Next Article in Journal
Evolution of Some Fruit Quality Parameters during Development and Ripening of Three Apricot Cultivars and Effect of Harvest Maturity on Postharvest Maturation
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Rocket Seed Oil, Wheat Germ Oil, and Their Mixture on Growth Performance, Feed Utilization, Digestibility, Redox Status, and Meat Fatty Acid Profile of Growing Rabbits
Previous Article in Journal
Managing Crop Load in European Pear (Pyrus communis L.)—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Supplementation of Some Antioxidants as Attenuators of Heat Stress on Chicken Meat Characteristics

by
Mihaela Saracila
1,2,*,
Tatiana Dumitra Panaite
1,
Silvia Mironeasa
3 and
Arabela Elena Untea
1
1
Department of Chemistry and Animal Nutrition Physiology, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Ilfov, Romania
2
Faculty of Animal Production Engineering and Management, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59 Marasti Blvd, District 1, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
3
Faculty of Food Engineering, Ştefan cel Mare University, 720229 Suceava, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 May 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 July 2021 / Published: 8 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety and Efficacy of Feed Additives in Animal Production)

Abstract

:
The study evaluated the effect of dietary chromium and vitamin C, Zinc, and sorrel wood powder supplements on chicken health and the nutritional, textural, and sensorial quality of chicken meat. A total of 120 Cobb 500 chickens (heat stress, 32 °C) were assigned into four treatments: control diet (C) and three test diets including 200 µg/kg diet chromium picolinate and supplemented with: 0.25 g vitamin C(VC)/kg diet (E1), 0.025 g Zn/kg diet (E2), and 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet (E3). Crude protein concentration increased in the breast meat from the E3 group; crude fat decreased in E1 and E3 compared to those fed the C diet. Dietary combinations of CrPic with VC, Zn, and CWS increased redness and decreased the luminosity parameter of breast meat compared with the C group. Dietary combinations of CrPic with VC and CWS lowered the hardness of breast meat. Significant positive correlation was found between hardness–gumminess (r = 0.891), gumminess–cohesiveness (r = 0.771), cohesiveness–resilience-EE (r = 0.861; r = 0.585), ash-L* (r = 0.426), and a negative one between ash–a* (r = 0.446). In conclusion, a dietary combination of CrPic with VC, Zn, and CWS as antioxidant sources could have a beneficial effect on quality without affecting sensory attributes.

1. Introduction

Chicken meat is the most accessible protein source for humans in most countries. However, the poultry sector may be limited by a series of problems, including high or low environmental temperature, high stocking density, etc. Heat stress is one of the main problems encountered within the poultry sector [1,2]. Heat stress affects nutritional quality, resulting in a lower protein content and higher fat deposition, etc. [3], and sensorial quality such as low water-holding capacity, higher brightness, and lower redness of meat, etc. [4]. In recent years, much attention has been paid to the inclusion of phytochemicals (vitamins, minerals, phytogenic feed additives) with antioxidant properties in the feed mixture, which would overcome the effects of heat stress on poultry health and on the quality of the meat they produce [5]. Some authors have stated that dietary Cr supplementation had a positive effect on meat quality by decreasing the fat content of the carcass, [6] and on carcass traits of broiler chicks in natural [7,8] or heat stress conditions [9]. Moreover, it has been suggested that combinations between Cr and other antioxidants (Zn, vitamin C) might have a synergistic action [2,10].
Vitamin C is a renowned water-soluble vitamin, with undeniable antioxidant activity. In heat-stressed broilers, dietary vitamin C supplementations have improved performance and humoral immunity [11].
Zinc is one of the most important components of the poultry diet, being a cofactor for enzymes with implication in the antioxidant defense system [12]. It was reported that dietary Zn supplementation in broiler chickens improved broiler carcass quality by reducing the percentage of abdominal fat, suppressing lipid peroxidation of chicken meat [13].
Creeping wood sorrel (Oxalis corniculata) is a little-known plant, which contains an important amount of vitamin C [14] and phenolic compounds with strong free radical scavenging activity [15]. Previous studies demonstrated that including creeping wood sorrel in chicken diet (1%) and Cr picolinate (0.2 mg/kg diet) could counteract the effects of heat stress, resulting in unaffecting growth performance, improving lactobacilli populations and reducing pathogenic bacteria [14].
However, dietary supplementation with Cr together with other minerals such as Zn, vitamins (C, E), or phytogenic feed additives may potentate the antioxidant effect. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effect of dietary inclusion of chromium and vitamin C, Zinc, and sorrel wood powder supplements on chicken health and nutritional, textural, and sensorial quality of chicken meat.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Birds, Diets, and Treatments

A 6 week feeding trial (0–42 d) was conducted on 120 unsexed Cobb 500 chickens (1 day of age), weighed and randomly divided into four homogenous groups (C, E1, E2, and E3) with 30 chickens/group. Each group consisted of 6 replicates, with 5 chickens per replicate (1 replicate/chickens/cage). The feeding trial was conducted in an experimental hall of the National Institute for Animal Nutrition (Ilfov, Romania) according to experimental protocol approved (case no. 4775/02.08.2019) by the Ethics Commission of the Institute (Ethical Committee no. 52/30.07.2014). The chicks were housed in three-tiered digestibility cages (cage dimensions 65 × 75 × 45 cm, one cage per replicate) During the experimental period, the chickens were reared under controlled environmental conditions and monitored by a Viper Touch computer (temperature 32 ± 0.5 °C, humidity 36 ± 1.4%, with 0.38 ± 0.01% ventilation/broiler, and 899 ± 0.2 ppm CO2 emission). The light regimen was 23 h light/1 h darkness. Compared with the control diet (C group), the experimental diets (E1, E2, and E3 group) included 200 µg/kg diet chromium picolinate, CrPic (Table 1). Additionally, the experimental diets contained 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet (E1), 0.025 g Zn/kg diet (E2), and 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet (E3). The chickens had free access to feed and water. Creeping wood sorrel was analyzed, and the data was published previously by Saracila et al. [14]. The analysis revealed a concentration of 15.44% CP, 2.83% EE, 4.96 mg/g GAE total polyphenols, 31.60 mmol ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity and 11.77 mg/100 g vitamin C.

2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis

At the end of experiment (42 days), from each group with homogenous weights, 6 chickens/group were randomly selected (1 chicken/replicate). From each group selected, blood samples were collected aseptically from the sub-axial region into heparinized test tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged (775× g for 25 min at 4 °C), and the serum obtained was analyzed using an automatic BS-130 chemistry analyzer (Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) in order to determine the biochemical parameters (serum glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, phosphorus, calcium, iron, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase).

2.3. Sampling

After collecting blood samples, according to the approved working protocol, the chicks (6 chicks/group) were electrically stunned and subsequently slaughtered by cervical dislocation. After bleeding and evisceration, thigh and breast meat samples were collected (6 breast and 6 thigh meat samples per group). From each of the samples collected, samples were taken to determine the proximate composition (dry matter—DM, crude protein—CP, ether extractives—EE, ash) and to determine the color, texture, and pH parameters. Until analysis, the samples were stored in plastic bags at −20 °C.

2.4. Analysis

The proximate composition of the thigh and breast was determined according to the chemical methods specified by AOAC [16]. Dry matter (ISO 6496/2001) and Ash (ISO 2171/2010) were determined by gravimetric method, crude protein (ISO 5983-2/2009) was analyzed by Kjeldahl method, and ether extractives were performed by extraction in organic solvents (SR ISO 6492/2001).
Chicken thigh and breast color analyses were performed using a Konica Minolta CR-400 (Tokyo, Japan) colorimeter and the CIELAB trichromatic system, which determines lightness (L*), saturation index in green/red (a*), and saturation index in blue/yellow (b*) values. The analyses were performed according to the method described by Panaite [17] and Vlaicu et al. [18]. Each analysis was performed in triplicate to obtain an average colorimetric value.
Firmness was determined by a Warner–Bratzler shear test using a Perten TVT 6700 texturometer (Perten Instruments, Hägersten, Sweden). The principle of this test is the measurement of the force expressed in Newtons (N) necessary to shear a piece of meat. Sample cuts (three rectangular slices/group with 2.0 cm long × 1.0 cm wide × 1.0 cm high) were made parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers. Firmness was calculated from the maximum point of the curve obtained from the test.
The texture profile analyses (TPA) were performed by a double cycle compression using a Perten TVT 6700 texturometer (Perten Instruments, Hägersten, Sweden), equipped with a Compression Platen cell. Four portions of cylindrical form (15 mm high and 20 mm wide) were cut out from each meat sample. The double compression cycle test was applied using an aluminum cylinder probe of 20 mm diameter and was performed up to 50% compression of the original portion height previously prepared. The variables analyzed were: hardness, which is the maximum force needed to compress the sample; springiness, which represents the ability of a sample to recover to its original form after removal of the compressing force; resilience, which is the ratio of the negative force input to positive force input during the first compression; cohesiveness, which is a ratio between the total energy required for the first and second compression; and gumminess, which is defined as the product of springiness, hardness, cohesiveness. Each analysis was carried out in triplicate.
The pH values of the thigh and breast samples were measured 24 h postmortem according to SR ISO 2917: 2007 using a Hach HQ30d pH-meter (Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA). An aqueous homogenate (meat: distillated water, 1:1) was prepared and filtered according to the method described by Turcu et al. [19]. The measurements were performed in triplicate.
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with the proximate compositions and color and textural parameters of meat using Graph-Pad Prism v. 9.02 (San Diego, CA, USA) software package for Windows. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to assess the relationships between meat characteristics. The similarities and differences between measured variables can be seen in the loading plot. Close variables suggest direct correlations, whereas the opposed variables indicate indirect relationships between them.

2.5. Sensory Analysis of Meat

Consumer acceptance tests were performed at the Faculty of Food Engineering, “Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava. An acceptance test with hedonic scale was used for the sensorial evaluation, using a 5-point scale (5 = extremely like and 1 = extremely dislike). The raw breast and thigh meat (n = 6 samples/group) were rated for sensory attributes by a semi-trained panel of 13 members selected from the University community. The study was conducted at room temperature of 22 °C under normal daylight. The samples were evaluated for muscle fiber appearance, appearance and characteristics of fat, flavor, firmness, juiciness, and tenderness.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were compared applying Tukey’s multiple range test using StatView program for Windows. The following statistical model was used:
Yi = Ti + ei
where Yi was the dependent variable, Ti is the treatment and ei is the error.
Significance was set at p < 0.05. The graphs highlighting the sensory attributes of chicken meat (breast and thigh) were plotted using the same statistical model with Graph-Pad Prism v. 9.02 (San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Biochemical Measurements

At the beginning of the trial, the mortality rate was 2.5% (starter phase), while at the end of the experiment no mortality was recorded (0%). Table 2 revealed the biochemical measurements performed on serum samples. Serum glucose was significantly lower (by 19.72%) in E2 group compared to E1 and insignificant (p > 0.05) compared to the other groups (C, E3). Diets did not affect (p > 0.05) the other parameters such as cholesterol, triglyceride, phosphorus, calcium, iron, AST, ALT, gamma GT.

3.2. Proximate Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Chicken Meat

Data on proximate composition of breast and thigh samples collected at the end of the experiment are presented in Table 3.
In thigh meat, the concentrations of DM, CP and Ash did not differ (p > 0.05) between control group and experimental groups (E1, E2 and E3). However, the concentration of EE recorded significant differences (p < 0.05), being higher in E2 (CrPic + Zn) compared to C group.
In the analyzed chicken breast meat, there were significant increases (p < 0.05) in terms of CP and Ash and decreases in the EE. Thus, the dietary supplementation with CrPic + CWS determined the increase in crude protein concentration in breast meat compared to the C group; otherwise, the other groups had a statistically similar protein with group C. Additionally interesting is that CrPic + VC and CrPic + CWS caused a significant reduction in the concentration of crude fat in chicken breast compared to group C. The breast from E2 group had a significantly higher concentration of crude fat than E1 and E3, but similar to group C. Ash concentration was higher (p < 0.05) in groups E1 and E3 than in C. The group E2 had a significantly lower Ash content than in E1 and E3, but at a comparable level to C.

3.3. Color Parameters of Chicken Samples (Thigh and Breast Meat)

Table 4 shows the effects of diets on the color of thigh and breast muscle (pectoralis major). Supplementation of chicken diets with CrPic + VC (E1), CrPic + Zn (E2) and CrPic + CWS (E3) did not influence the value of the L* parameter of thigh meat. In contrast, the value of a* was significantly lower in the thigh collected from E1 than from E3 group. Yellowness parameter (b*) was also lower in the thigh samples from C group than in those from E1 group, while no difference was recorded in the E2 and E3 groups.
Regarding the chicken breast, the L* parameter was significantly lower in the groups that included CrPic + VC, Cr + Zn, Cr + CWS in the diet than in the C group. Moreover, the values of a* parameter were higher in E1, E2 and E3 groups compared with the C group. The breast of chickens fed E1, E3 diets had a significant lower yellowness (b*) (p < 0.05) than those fed C diet. Notably is that the lowest value of b* parameter was recorded in the breast samples collected from E3 diet.

3.4. Meat Texture Parameters Determined by Shear with a Single Cycle and Double Cycle Compression

The chicken thigh meat recorded significant differences in the shear force parameter (p < 0.05) between experimental groups (E1, E2, and E3) and C group (Table 5). The thigh meat collected from E1 was firmer compared to those collected from E2 and E3. The combined effect of chromium and vitamin C led to an increase in the firmness of the meat, the cutting force registering the lowest value (30.88 N). The thigh meat of chicken from group E3 was firmer compared to meat from group E2, but the differences were not statistically significant.
The analysis of the texture profile (TPA) of thigh samples resulting from the application of the double compression test shows that the parameters of hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and gumminess did not register significant (p > 0.05) differences between groups. Cohesiveness shows how well the sample retains its structure after compression and includes adhesive and cohesive forces as well as viscosity and elasticity. Gumminess, a secondary parameter in the analysis of the texture profile, is determined as a product between firmness and cohesiveness. The resilience of chicken thigh was significantly lower in the group that included CrPic + Zn (E2), CrPic + CWS (E3) in the diet compared to group C and E1. The lowest resilience value was obtained in group E2 (diet supplemented with CrPic + Zn). The pH values were lower (p < 0.05) in E2 and E3 compared to C group. The dietary inclusion of CrPic+ VC did not have a significant effect on the pH of the thigh meat.
The shear force showed inconsistent patterns concerning the supplemented diets (Table 6). It is observed that the breast meat obtained from groups E2 and E3 was characterized by a lower hardness (p < 0.05) compared to that from groups C and E1. The springiness of chicken breast collected from E2 and E3 groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) from that obtained for group C. Statistically significant differences were obtained between C and E1, the breast meat in group E1 showing a significantly lower elasticity (99.42%) compared to that of group C (99.74%). The resilience of chicken breast meat in groups E2 and E3 differs significantly (p < 0.05) from the values obtained in group E1. There were no differences between group C and the other groups. However, the lowest resilience value of breast meat (2.16 adm) was recorded in E2 group, which included CrPic + Zn in the diet. The cohesiveness and gumminess attributes of the chicken breast did not differ between groups. The inclusion of CrPic + VC in the chicken diet led to an increase in the pH of breast meat compared to C group. There were no significant differences in pH between C and E2 and E3. Diet supplementation with CrPic + Zn, and CrPic+ CWS respectively led to a significant decrease in pH value, compared to that of samples from E1.

3.5. Relationship between Meat Characteristics

Figure 1 shows the PCA plot for chemical characteristics, L*, a*, b* color parameters, textural parameters, and some sensorial characteristics.
The first two PCs explain 50.81% of the total variance (PC1 = 32.30%, PC2 = 18.51%) for the evaluated characteristics. Some sensory characteristics such as muscle fiber appearance, appearance and fat characteristics, and smell were eliminated from the PCA because they have a low adequacy for PCs. The first principal component, PC1 was associated with chemical composition (CP, EE, and Ash) and L*, a*, b* color parameters. The second component, PC 2 was characterized by dry matter (DM), textural parameters (hardness and gumminess), and sensory characteristics (consistency, juiciness, and tenderness). Meat tenderness shows a weak negative correlation with EE (r = −0.342), which may be related to the intramuscular fat content that affects tenderness. Significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation was found between hardness and gumminess (r = 0.891), gumminess and cohesiveness (r = 0.771), between cohesiveness and resilience (r = 0.861), and EE (r = 0.585). A positive correlation was also found between Ash and L* (r = 0.426), and a negative one between Ash and a* (r = 0.446).
As Figure 2 and Figure 3 show, the panelists indicated similar sensory attributes for chicken breast and thigh among groups. Thus, the dietary supplementation had not changed the consumer acceptance criteria.

4. Discussion

The implication of Cr in reducing glucose levels in heat-stressed broilers was well documented [20,21,22]. However, the literature is limited in studies regarding the effect of combinations of Cr with other antioxidant compounds. In this study, dietary supplementation with CrPic + Zn had a lowering effect in glucose level compared with CrPic + vitamin C. Nevertheless, there is evidence confirming that dietary Zn can decrease glucose level in heat-stressed broilers [23]. Contradictory results were reported by Abuajamieh et al. [24], showing that dietary organic zinc supplementation (50% and 100% of the Zn level from basal diet) in HS chicks increased blood glucose and additionally decreased blood calcium. Conversely, Saleh et al. [25] showed that Zn methionine supplementation (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg) in heat-stressed broiler diet significantly decreased plasma triacylglycerol, total cholesterol concentrations as compared to the control group. AST and glucose parameters did not record any difference. In this study, dietary supplementation with CrPic + VC or CrPic + CWS did not have any effect on serum biochemical parameters tested. In contrast, some researchers reported that combination of Cr with vitamin C has synergistic action and decreased glucose and cholesterol [10], while data using CrPic + CWS were not found. Perai et al. [26] showed that under stressful condition caused by transport, broiler chickens fed diet enriched in Cr + vit. C had a lower triglyceride level and a higher glucose level than before transport.
The dietary supplementation with CrPic + CWS determined an increase in crude protein concentration in breast meat compared to those fed C diet; otherwise, the other groups had a similar protein content with group C. Untea et al. [27] observed the positive influence of dietary chromium supplements (200, 400 µg/kg) on crude protein concentrations of breast meat in a study on broiler chickens raised under normal temperature conditions. Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that CrPic + VC and CrPic + CWS caused a significant reduction in the concentration of crude fat in chicken breast compared to group C. This reduction in crude fat is a good achievement because a high content of fat led to lipid oxidation, a key factor that negatively affects meat color and texture. Additionally, some researchers [28,29] have reported higher protein and lower fat content in breast meat, when chickens fed diets supplemented with 200 and 400 ppb Cr3+. The probable explanation for fat reducing effect could be the inhibitory potential on lipogenic activity in chick adipose tissue. Toghyani et al. [30] showed that under heat stress, broilers fed a diet enriched in Cr (500, 1000, 1500 ppb Cr nicotinate) recorded increases in crude protein of breast meat.
In this study, it was observed that the use of dietary VC, Zn, and creeping wood sorrel changed the meat color. The redness value (a*) of the thigh collected from E1 group was significantly lower than from E3 group. Therefore, the combination of CrPic + CWS had a favorable effect on thigh meat color compared to that of CrPic + VC. Nevertheless, the redness parameter was higher in E1, E2, and E3 groups compared to the C group. Definitely, those results showed that CrPic in combination with VC, Zn, and CWS improved the meat color. Moreover, the breast from E3 group had the highest concentration of crude protein and the highest redness. Myoglobin is the main heme protein in muscle tissue; perhaps an increase in myoglobin concentration has led to an increase in the redness of chicken breast color. According to Sałek et al. [31], Zn binds myoglobin and increase its oxygenation, which maintain the meat color. Consumers associate the increase in the redness parameter with a better quality of the meat [32]. Meat color is influenced by animal diet [33], its heme components concentration consisting of myoglobin, haemoglobin, cytochrome C [34,35], their oxidation-reduction state, chemical reactions, etc. [36]. The explanation of increasing the meat redness might be the antioxidant activity of supplements, being well-known that vit. C and Zn are involved in the redox reactions, delaying the meat oxidations processes. On the other hand, creeping wood sorrel contain phenols, but also large amounts of vitamin C, which could contribute to maintain the pigment stability of the meat. The luminosity parameter was significantly lower in the breast meat collected from groups that included CrPic + VC, CrPic + Zn, CrPic + CWS in the diet than in the C group. The lightness of the breast ranged from 46.93–51.38; redness from 0.61–1.49 and yellowness from 12.13–14.40. The breast meat of chickens fed E1, E3 diets recorded a significant decrease in the yellowness parameter than those fed the C diet. Notably, the lowest value of b* parameter was recorded in the breast samples collected from E3 diet. Similar results were reported by Huang et al. [9] who studied the effect of three sources of Cr added in the diet of broiler chickens (Cr propionate, CrPro; Cr picolinate, CrPic; Cr chloride, CrCl3) and two concentrations of added Cr (0.4, or 2.0 mg of Cr/kg) on meat quality of broilers raised under heat stress. The authors reported that broilers supplemented Cr had decreased b* values of meat color in breast muscle. Peña et al. [37] showed no differences on breast color when included ascorbic acid (250, 500, and 1000 g/ton) + citric flavonoids in the diet of heat-stressed chickens.
Results from our study revealed that the dietary supplementation with combinations of CrPic with VC, Zn, and CWS had a beneficial effect on the mechanical strength of the muscle fiber. From a textural point of view, Tudoreanu [38] has found that meat firmness depends mainly on the structure of myofibrin and connective tissue, while Astruc [39] has shown that it depends on the amount of fat and collagen. The texture profile analysis (TPA) of thigh samples resulting from the application of the double compression test shows that the parameters of hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and gumminess did not register significant (p > 0.05) differences between groups. The resilience of chicken thigh was significantly lower in the group that included CrPic+ Zn (E2), CrPic + CWS (E3) in the diet compared to group C and E1. The lowest resilience value was obtained in group E2 diet was supplemented with CrPic + Zn. This observation could be related with the increase in EE in E2 than in C. The pH values of thigh meat were lower in E2 and E3 compared to C group. Normally, postmortem, the muscle undergoes various reactions, through which it is transformed into meat. For example, muscle glycogen is denatured by glycolysis, forming lactic acid. This reaction results in an increase in the acidity of meat. Heat stress can affect the pH of meat, increasing it, as a consequence of glycogen consumption in reserves and thus the production of lactic acid is reduced [40]. According to Listrat et al. [33], in poultry, the texture is strongly affected by the postmortem acidification kinetics of muscle.
The breast meat obtained from groups fed combination of CrPic + Zn and CrPic + CWS had a lower hardness (p < 0.05) compared to that from groups C and E1. This indicates that the caused an increase in the tenderness of the chicken breast compared to the control diet and the combination of CrPic + VC. Chromium, in combination with Zn or CWS may lead to a decrease in the mechanical strength of muscle fiber, having an effect of increasing its firmness. The breast meat in group E1 had a significantly lower elasticity (99.42%) compared to that of group C (99.74%). This result suggests that dietary supplementation with CrPic + VC leads to a significant decrease in the ability of the chicken breast meat to return to its original shape after compression. Nevertheless, the lowest resilience value of breast meat (2.16 adm) was recorded in E2 group, which included CrPic + Zn in the diet. This achievement could be correlated with the low hardness of the chicken breast meat in E2. The inclusion of CrPic + VC in the chicken diet led to an increase in the pH of breast meat compared to C group. pH is considered one of the crucial variables determining meat quality [41]. According to Berri et al. [42] the normal pH values of chicken meat at 15 min postmortem are around 6.2 to 6.5, whereas normal ultimate pH values are around 5.8 [43].
The results of PCA revealed that the assessed meat characteristics were clustered in function of similarity. The first component, PC1 underline a close association between EE, cohesiveness and a* parameters, variables which are negatively correlated with CP, Ash, L* and b*. The second component, PC2 distinguished between DM and a* parameters and between textural parameters, hardness and springiness, this fact being expectable. Additionally, an opposite relation can be observed between cohesiveness and springiness, meat springiness showing a direct relation with sensorial parameters, consistency, juiciness, and tenderness.
Sensory attributes of meat such as tenderness, juiciness, muscle appearance, are among the most critical attributes in consumer preferences [44]. In this regard, several studies conducted on consumers have shown that these attributes could be influenced by supplementation of broiler diets. For example, Velasco and Williams [45] showed that chicken meat quality could be improved by adding natural antioxidants. Some selected panelists have indicated an improvement in the flavor of thigh meat, reduced the metallic taste and the overall aftertaste as consequence of supplementing chicken diets with faba bean compared to a soy-based diet [46]. However, Suliman et al. [47] evaluated the sensory attributes of meat obtained from broilers fed diet supplemented with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6% clove seeds. The authors showed that the sensory attributes were not significantly different between the treatment groups except tenderness. However, in our study, according to panelists, the experimental diets had no influence on sensory attributes tested compared to the conventional diet.
Taken together, the achievement such as improvement of meat color could be probably attributed to the antioxidant potential of the tested supplements being involved in the redox reactions. However, the improvement of breast meat tenderness observed in this study as consequence of supplementing the broiler chicken diet with antioxidants is an important result as it strongly influences consumer satisfaction. Nevertheless, the influence of dietary antioxidants on the regulatory mechanisms that define metabolic and physiological changes in muscle tissue is complex, poorly understood, and further studies are needed to investigate it.

5. Conclusions

The dietary supplementation with CrPic + creeping wood sorrel determined an increase of crude protein concentration in breast meat, and CrPic + vitamin C and CrPic + creeping wood sorrel reduced the concentration of crude fat compared to those fed the C diet. Dietary supplementation with combinations of CrPic with vitamin C, Zn, and creeping wood sorrel improved the breast meat color, increasing the redness parameter and decreasing the luminosity parameter. Conversely, dietary supplementation with combinations of CrPic with vitamin C and creeping wood sorrel had a beneficial effect on textural parameters of chicken breast meat, increasing the tenderness. Furthermore, there was a clear relationship among proximate composition, color, and texture attributes of chicken meat. Taken together, this study revealed that a dietary combination of CrPic with vitamin C, Zn, creeping wood sorrel, respectively, as sources of antioxidants could attenuate the negative effects of heat stress on nutritional quality and texture without affecting the sensorial parameters of chicken meat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and T.D.P.; methodology, M.S. and T.D.P.; software, M.S. and S.M.; validation, T.D.P. and A.E.U.; formal analysis, S.M.; investigation, M.S.; data curation, M.S. and S.M.; Writing—Original draft preparation, M.S.; Writing—Review and editing, M.S. and A.E.U.; project administration, T.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Romanian Ministry of Research and Digitalization, grant number PN 19 09 0102.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures were approved (case no. 4775/02.08.2019) by the Ethics Commission of the National Research and Development Institute for Animal Biology and Nutrition (Ethical Committee no. 52/30.07.2014). The experiment followed the rules of the Romanian Law 43/2014 for the handling and protection of animals used for experimental purposes and Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Data Availability Statement

All data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Meremikwu, V.; Ibekwe, H.; Essien, A. Improving broiler performance in the tropics using quantitative nutrition. World Poult. Sci. J. 2013, 69, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shakeri, M.; Oskoueian, E.; Le, H.H.; Shakeri, M. Strategies to combat heat stress in broiler chickens: Unveiling the roles of selenium, vitamin E and vitamin C. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zaboli, G.; Huang, X.; Feng, X.; Ahn, D.U. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality?—A review. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeferino, C.P.; Komiyama, C.M.; Pelícia, V.C.; Fascina, V.B.; Aoyagi, M.M.; Coutinho, L.L.; Sartori, J.R.; Moura, A.S. Carcass and meat quality traits of chickens fed diets concurrently supplemented with vitamins C and E under constant heat stress. Animal 2016, 10, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Saracila, M.; Panaite, T.D.; Papuc, C.P.; Criste, R.D. Heat stress in broiler chickens and the effect of dietary polyphenols, with special reference to willow (Salix spp.) bark supplements—A Review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Samanta, S.; Haldar, S.; Bahadur, V.; Ghosh, T.K. Chromium picolinate can ameliorate the negative effects of heat stress and enhance performance, carcass and meat traits in broiler chickens by reducing the circulatory cortisol level. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tolmir, N.; Pavlovski, Z.; Koljajic, V.; Mitrovic, S.; Anokic, N. The effect of different sources and chromium level in ration on broiler breast musculature. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2005, 21, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Toghyani, M.; Shivazad, M.; Gheisari, A.A.; Zarkesh, S.H. Performance, carcass traits and hematological parameters of heat stressed broiler chicks in response to dietary levels of chromium picolinate. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 5, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Xiao, F.; Lloyd, K.; Lin, X. Effects of supplemental chromium source and concentration on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of broilers under heat stress conditions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 170, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haq, Z.; Jain, R.K.; Khan, N.; Dar, M.Y.; Ali, S.; Gupta, M.; Varun, T.K. Recent advances in role of chromium and its antioxidant combinations in poultry nutrition: A review. Vet. World 2016, 9, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mirfendereski, E.; Jahanian, R. Effects of dietary organic chromium and vitamin C supplementation on performance, immune responses, blood metabolites, and stress status of laying hens subjected to high stocking density. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sahin, K.; Sahin, N.; Kucuk, O.; Hayirli, A.; Prasad, A.S. Role of dietary zinc in heat-stressed poultry: A review. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2176–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hidayat, C.; Sumiati, J.A.; Wina, E. Effect of zinc addition on the immune response and production performance of broilers: A meta-analysis. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 33, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saracila, M.; Panaite, T.; Tabuc, C.; Șoica, C.; Untea, A.; Varzaru, I.; Wojdyło, A.; Criste, R. Maintaining intestinal microflora balance in heat-stressed broilers using dietary creeping wood sorrel (Oxalis corniculata) powder and chromium (chromium picolinate). Span. J. Agric. Res. 2020, 18, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khyade, V.B.; Jagtap, S.G. Sprouting exert significant influence on the antioxidant activity in selected pulses (black gram, cowpea, desi chickpea and yellow mustard). World Sci. News 2016, 35, 73. [Google Scholar]
  16. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Panaite, T.D.; Mironeasa, S.; Iuga, M.; Vlaicu, P.A. Liquid egg products characterization during storage as a response of novel phyto-additives added in hens diet. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2019, 31, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vlaicu, P.A.; Turcu, R.P.; Mironeasa, S.; Panaite, T.D. Meat quality of breast from broilers fed a diet supplemented with orange and red grapefruit dried peel. Sci. Papers. Ser. D Anim. Sci. 2020, LXIII, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
  19. Turcu, R.P.; Panaite, T.D.; Untea, A.E.; Șoica, C.; Iuga, M.; Mironeasa, S. Effects of supplementing grape pomace to broilers fed polyunsaturated fatty acids enriched diets on meat quality. Animals 2020, 10, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sahin, N.; Hayirli, A.; Orhan, C.; Tuzcu, M.; Akdemir, F.A.T.İ.H.; Komorowski, J.R.; Sahin, K. Effects of the supplemental chromium form on performance and oxidative stress in broilers exposed to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 4317–4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dalólio, F.; Albino, L.; Silva, J.; Campos, P.; Lima, H.; Moreira, J.; Ribeiro Junior, V. Dietary chromium supplementation for heat-stressed broilers. World Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arif, M.; Hussain, I.; Mahmood, M.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Swelum, A.A.; Alagawany, M.; Mahmoud, A.H.; Ebaid, H.; Komany, A. Effect of varying levels of chromium propionate on growth performance and blood biochemistry of broilers. Animals 2019, 9, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kucuk, O.; Sahin, N.; Sahin, K. Supplemental zinc and vitamin A can alleviate negative effects of heat stress in broiler chickens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2003, 94, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abuajamieh, M.; Abdelqader, A.; Irshaid, R.; Hayajneh, F.M.; Al-Khaza’leh, J.F.M.; Al-Fataftah, A.R. Effects of organic zinc on the performance and gut integrity of broilers under heat stress conditions. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2020, 63, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saleh, A.A.; Ragab, M.M.; Ahmed, E.A.; Abudabos, A.M.; Ebeid, T.A. Effect of dietary zinc-methionine supplementation on growth performance, nutrient utilization, antioxidative properties and immune response in broiler chickens under high ambient temperature. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018, 46, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Perai, A.H.; Kermanshahi, H.; Moghaddam, H.N.; Zarban, A. Effects of chromium and chromium+ vitamin C combination on metabolic, oxidative, and fear responses of broilers transported under summer conditions. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2015, 59, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Untea, A.E.; Panaite, T.D.; Dragomir, C.; Ropota, M.; Olteanu, M.; Varzaru, I. Effect of dietary chromium supplementation on meat nutritional quality and antioxidant status from broilers fed with Camelina-meal-supplemented diets. Animal 2019, 13, 2939–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, Y.H.; Han, I.K.; Choi, Y.J.; Shin, I.S.; Chae, B.J.; Kang, T.H. Effects of dietary levels of chromium picolinate on growth performance carcass quality and serum traits in broiler chicks. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 9, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suksombat, W.; Kanchanatwee, S. Effect of various sources and levels of chromium on performance of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Toghyani, M.; Shivazad, M.; Gheisari, A.A.; Khodami, A. Improving the breast meat quality and carcass characteristics of heat-stressed broilers by feeding chromium supplementation. In World Poultry Science Association, Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Strasbourg, France, 26–30 August 2007; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 735–738. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sałek, P.; Przybylski, W.; Jaworska, D.; Adamczak, L.; Zielińska, D.; Głuchowski, A. The effects on the quality of poultry meat of supplementing feed with zinc-methionine complex. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2020, 19, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  32. López-Pedrouso, M.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, R.; Purriños, L.; Oliván, M.; García-Torres, S.; Sentandreu, M.Á.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Zapata, C.; Franco, D. Sensory and physicochemical analysis of meat from bovine breeds in different livestock production systems, pre-slaughter handling conditions, and ageing time. Foods 2020, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Listrat, A.; Lebret, B.; Louveau, I.; Astruc, T.; Bonnet, M.; Lefaucheur, L.; Picard, B.; Bugeon, J. How muscle structure and composition influence meat and flesh quality. Sci. World J. 2016, 2016, 3182746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mancini, R.A.; Hunt, M. Current research in meat color. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 100–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hoffman, L.C.; Mostert, A.C.; Kidd, M.; Laubscher, L.L. Meat quality of kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) and impala (Aepyceros melampus): Carcass yield, physical quality and chemical composition of kudu and impala Longissimus dorsi muscle as affected by gender and age. Meat Sci. 2009, 83, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brewer, S. Irradiation effects on meat color—A review. Meat Sci. 2004, 68, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peña, J.E.M.; Vieira, S.L.; López, J.; Reis, R.N.; Barros, R.; Furtado, F.V.F.; Silva, P.X. Ascorbic acid and citric flavonoids for broilers under heat stress: Effects on performance and meat quality. Braz. J. Poult. Sci 2008, 10, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tudoreanu, L. Reologia Produselor Alimentare si Analiza Texturala; Printech: Timisoara, Romania, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Astruc, T. Connective tissue: Structure, function and influence on meat quality. In Encyclopedia of Meat Science, 2nd ed.; Dikeman, C.D.M., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dai, S.F.; Gao, F.; Xu, X.L.; Zhang, W.H.; Song, S.X.; Zhou, G.H. Effects of dietary glutamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid on meat colour, pH, composition, and water-holding characteristic in broilers under cyclic heat stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012, 53, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thanatsang, K.V.; Malila, Y.; Arayamethakorn, S.; Srimarut, Y.; Tatiyaborworntham, N.; Uengwetwanit, T.; Panya, A.; Rungrassamee, W.; Visessanguan, W. Nutritional properties and oxidative indices of broiler breast meat affected by wooden breast abnormality. Animals 2020, 10, 2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Berri, C.; Debut, M.; Santé-Lhoutellier, C.; Arnould, B.; Boutten, B.; Sellier, N.; Baéza, E.; Jehl, N.; Jégo, Y.; Duclos, M.J.; et al. Variations in chicken breast meat quality: A strong implication of struggle and muscle glycogen level at death. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Van Laack, R.L.J.M.; Liu, C.H.; Smith, M.O.; Loveday, H.D. Characteristics of pale, soft, exudative broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Font-i-Furnols, M.; Guerrero, L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Velasco, V.; Williams, P. Improving meat quality through natural antioxidants. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 71, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. del Bosque, C.I.E.; Altmann, B.A.; Ciulu, M.; Hallem, I.; Jansen, S.; Nolte, T.; Weigend, S.; Mörlein, D. Meat quality parameters and sensory properties of one high-performing and two local chicken breeds fed with Vicia faba. Foods 2020, 9, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Suliman, G.M.; Alowaimer, A.N.; Al-Mufarrej, S.I.; Hussein, E.O.S.; Fazea, E.H.; Naiel, M.A.E.; Alhotan, R.A.; Swelum, A.A. The effects of clove seed (Syzygium aromaticum) dietary administration on carcass characteristics, meat quality, and sensory attributes of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 100904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Principal component loading based on the chemical composition, L*, a*, b* color parameters, textural parameters, and sensory characteristics. L*: luminosity parameter; a*: redness; b*: yellowness; DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extractives.
Figure 1. Principal component loading based on the chemical composition, L*, a*, b* color parameters, textural parameters, and sensory characteristics. L*: luminosity parameter; a*: redness; b*: yellowness; DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extractives.
Agriculture 11 00638 g001
Figure 2. Sensory characteristics of chicken’s breast (mean of points). Main effects of diets are presented in each graph (Prism Graph 9.02). Data are presented as mean ±SEM (n = 6 samples/group). No superscript denotes any statistical significance (p > 0.1234). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Figure 2. Sensory characteristics of chicken’s breast (mean of points). Main effects of diets are presented in each graph (Prism Graph 9.02). Data are presented as mean ±SEM (n = 6 samples/group). No superscript denotes any statistical significance (p > 0.1234). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Agriculture 11 00638 g002
Figure 3. Sensory characteristics of chicken’s thigh (mean of points) Main effects of diets are presented in each graph (Prism Graph 9.02). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of points (n = 6 samples/group). No superscript denotes any statistical significance (p > 0.1234). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Figure 3. Sensory characteristics of chicken’s thigh (mean of points) Main effects of diets are presented in each graph (Prism Graph 9.02). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of points (n = 6 samples/group). No superscript denotes any statistical significance (p > 0.1234). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Agriculture 11 00638 g003
Table 1. Nutrient composition of experimental basal diets (%).
Table 1. Nutrient composition of experimental basal diets (%).
IngredientStarter (0–14 d)Grower(14–28 d)Finisher (28–42 d)
CE1E2E3 1CE1E2E3 1CE1E2E3 1
Corn32.7332.7332.7331.7336.6336.6336.6335.6340.6440.6440.6439.64
Wheat20.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00
Corn gluten2.002.002.002.004.004.004.004.006.006.006.006.00
Soybean meal36.1736.1736.1736.1730.230.230.230.223.9523.9523.9523.95
Creeping wood sorrel (CWS)---1.00---1.00---1.00
Oil3.853.853.853.854.34.34.34.34.724.724.724.72
Monocalcium phosphate1.681.681.681.681.521.521.521.521.431.431.431.43
Calcium carbonate1.501.501.501.501.381.381.381.381.311.311.311.31
Salt0.390.390.390.390.380.380.380.380.330.330.330.33
Methionine0.330.330.330.330.250.250.250.250.210.210.210.21
Lysine0.30.30.30.30.290.290.290.290.360.360.360.36
Choline0.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.05
A1 Premix1.001.00 21.00 31.00 41.001.00 21.00 31.00 41.001.00 21.00 31.00 4
Total100100100100100100100100100100100100
Chemical analysis—theoretical
ME, Kcal/kg3039.793128.993217.72
CP, %23.0021.5020.00
EE, %5.486.016.49
CF, %3.773.573.36
Ca., %0.960.870.81
P, %0.770.700.65
P. available, %0.480.430.41
Lysine, %1.441.290.16
Methionin, %0.690.610.32
Tryptophan, %0.250.221.19
1 kg of A1 premix contains 1,100,000 IU/kg vitamin A; 200,000 IU/kg vitamin D3; 2700 IU/kg vitamin E; 300 mg/kg vitamin K; 200 mg/kg Vit. B1; 400 mg/kg vitamin B2; 1485 mg/kg pantothenic acid; 2700 mg/kg nicotinic acid; 300 mg/kg vitamin B6; 4 mg/kg Vit. B7; 100 mg/kg vitamin B9; 1.8 mg/kg vitamin B12; 2000 mg/kg vitamin C; 8000 mg/kg manganese; 8000 mg/kg iron; 500 mg/kg copper; 6000 mg/kg zinc; 37 mg/kg cobalt; 152 mg/kg iodine; 18 mg/kg selenium. C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic +0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic +10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet. 1 Diet structure published previously by Saracila et al. [14]. 2 A1 premix + 20 mg CrPic/kg premix + 25 g vit. C/kg premix; 3 A1 premix + 20 mg CrPic/kg premix + 2.5 g Zn/kg premix; 4 A1 premix + 20 mg CrPic/kg premix + 1% creeping wood sorrel powder.
Table 2. Biochemical parameters determined in blood serum samples.
Table 2. Biochemical parameters determined in blood serum samples.
VariableUMCE1E2E3SEMp-Value
Energy profile
Glucosemg/dL247.1 ab265.6 a213.2 b246.2 ab8.0760.0452
Cholesterolmg/dL144.8139.6132.9146.43.7830.6604
Triglyceridemg/dL37.1040.8942.6551.872.6940.3277
Mineral profile
Phosphorusmg/dL5.75.15.65.30.1340.4812
Calciummg/dL8.38.78.58.80.1190.4164
Ironug/dL80.887.177.376.62.6640.585
Enzyme profile
ALTU/L3.44.53.64.80.3000.3276
ASTU/L453.0399.5309.2300.431.4100.9381
Gama GTU/L15.219.916.420.31.2640.4135
a,b Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet; ALT—Alanine aminotransferase; AST—Aspartate aminotransferase.
Table 3. Proximate composition of thigh and breast meat samples.
Table 3. Proximate composition of thigh and breast meat samples.
VariableCE1E2E3SEMp-Value
Thigh meat
DM (%)26.1726.36 26.9727.220.5960.9879
CP (%)18.6118.5118.4119.120.4440.9516
EE (%)6.47 a6.52 ab7.43 b6.83 ab0.1710.0228
Ash (%)1.081.081.071.100.0250.9888
Breast meat
DM (%)25.50 25.6125.7625.860.2070.9409
CP (%)22.21 a22.68 ab22.44 ab23.42 b0.2040.0335
EE (%)2.40 a2.18 b2.57 a1.65 b0.0190.0100
Ash (%)1.21 a1.32 b1.28 a1.37 b0.0190.0100
a,b Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). Where: C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet; DM = dry matter; CP = crude protein; EE—ether extractives; Ash.
Table 4. Color parameters of the chicken meat.
Table 4. Color parameters of the chicken meat.
VariableCE1E2E3SEMp-Value
Thigh meat
L*49.0449.8750.2650.070.2360.2771
a*1.90 ab1.45 a1.97 ab2.52 b0.1940.032
b*12.51 a13.39 b13.19 ab13.02 ab0.1630.015
Breast meat
L*54.03 c50.81 b51.38 b46.93 a0.330<0.0001
a*−1.26 a0.80 b0.62 b1.49 b0.169<0.0001
b*15.15 c13.61 b14.40 bc12.13 a0.182<0.0001
a–c Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet; L*: luminosity parameter; a*: redness; b*: yellowness.
Table 5. Texture parameters of thigh meat.
Table 5. Texture parameters of thigh meat.
VariableCE1E2E3SEMp-Value
Shear with a single cycle
Firmness (N)47.46 a30.88 b37.01 c35.88 c0.938<0.0001
Double cycle compression
Hardness (N)27.2326.3623.2725.250.8740.4070
Springiness (%)99.4699.5499.6299.620.0540.6681
Resilience (adm)3.63 a3.52 a2.87 b2.93 b0.1020.056
Cohesiveness (adm)0.470.510.480.470.0150.0158
Gumminess (N)13.5014.8215.2413.280.5800.0086
pH6.57 a6.53 a6.40 b6.36 b0.014<0.0001
a–c Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Table 6. Texture parameters of breast meat.
Table 6. Texture parameters of breast meat.
VariableCE1E2E3SEMp-Value
Shear with a single cycle
Firmness (N)25.8323.7123.5623.840.5330.4033
Double cycle compression
Hardness (N)22.24 a18.99 a11.43 b12.76 b0.985<0.0001
Springiness (%)99.74 a99.42 b99.63 a99.63 a0.0340.0052
Resilience (adm)2.48 ab2.96 a2.16 b2.21 b0.0960.0158
Cohesiveness (adm)0.380.420.370.390.0100.4132
Gumminess (N)8.198.368.006.300.5240.5484
pH6.37 b6.53 a6.40 b6.36 b0.0190.0041
a,b Means within a column with no common superscript differ (p < 0.05). C: control diet; E1: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.25 g vitamin C (VC)/kg diet; E2: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 0.025 g Zn/kg diet; E3: experimental diet supplemented with 200 µg/kg diet CrPic + 10 g creeping wood sorrel powder (CWS)/kg diet.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saracila, M.; Panaite, T.D.; Mironeasa, S.; Untea, A.E. Dietary Supplementation of Some Antioxidants as Attenuators of Heat Stress on Chicken Meat Characteristics. Agriculture 2021, 11, 638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture11070638

AMA Style

Saracila M, Panaite TD, Mironeasa S, Untea AE. Dietary Supplementation of Some Antioxidants as Attenuators of Heat Stress on Chicken Meat Characteristics. Agriculture. 2021; 11(7):638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture11070638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saracila, Mihaela, Tatiana Dumitra Panaite, Silvia Mironeasa, and Arabela Elena Untea. 2021. "Dietary Supplementation of Some Antioxidants as Attenuators of Heat Stress on Chicken Meat Characteristics" Agriculture 11, no. 7: 638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture11070638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop