Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Reliance on Herbicide-Resistant Crops
3. Herbicide Resistance
4. New Herbicide Trait Technologies and Developing Environmental Issues
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Beckie, H.J. Herbicide-resistant weeds: Management tactics and practices. Weed Technol. 2006, 20, 793–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duke, S.O.; Powles, S.B. Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: Now and in the future. AgBioForum 2009, 12, 346–357. [Google Scholar]
- Heap, I. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available online: http://weedscience.org/summary/ResistByActive.aspx (accessed on 23 May 2019).
- Behrens, M.R.; Mutlu, N.; Chakraborty, S.; Dumitru, R.; Jiang, W.Z.; LaVallee, B.J.; Herman, P.L.; Clemente, T.E.; Weeks, D.P. Dicamba resistance: Enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies. Science 2007, 316, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Green, J.M.; Owen, M.D. Herbicide-resistant crops: Utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 59, 5819–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egan, J.F.; Barlow, K.M.; Mortensen, D.A. A meta-analysis on the effects of 2, 4-D and dicamba drift on soybean and cotton. Weed Sci. 2014, 62, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, R.H.; Mangan, M.R. Surface Temperature Inversions and Risk of Off-Target Herbicide Damage in the Soybean-and Cotton-Growing Regions of the US. Crop Forage Turfgrass Manag. 2019, 5, 180078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Havens, P.L.; Hillger, D.E.; Hewitt, A.J.; Kruger, G.R.; Marchi-Werle, L.; Czaczyk, Z. Field Measurements of Drift of Conventional and Drift Control Formulations of 2, 4-D Plus Glyphosate. Weed Technol. 2018, 32, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortensen, D.A.; Egan, J.F.; Maxwell, B.D.; Ryan, M.R.; Smith, R.G. Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 2012, 62, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, B.G. Changes in Herbicide Use Patterns and Production Practices Resulting from Glyphosate-Resistant Crops. Weed Technol. 2006, 20, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISAAA. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. GM Crop Events Approved in United States. Available online: https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/approvedeventsin/default.asp?CountryID=US&Country=United%20States (accessed on 23 May 2019).
- Anonymous. Liberty 280 SL Herbicide Product Label. EPA Reg. No. 264–829. Available online: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.agrian.com/pdfs/Liberty_280_SL_Herbicide_Label1r.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2019).
- Anonymous. Roundup PowerMAX Herbicide Product Label. EPA Reg. No. 524–549. Available online: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.agrian.com/pdfs/Roundup_PowerMAX1e_Herbicide_Label.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2019).
- Young, B.G.; Hart, S.E. Control of Volunteer Sethoxydim-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) in Soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 1997, 11, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.; Evans, R.R.; Dahmer, M.L.; Singh, B.K.; Shaner, D.L. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: History, current status and future. Pest Manag. Sci. 2005, 61, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, C.R.; Dille, J.A.; Peterson, D.E. Weed Competition and Management in Sorghum. In Sorghum: State of the Art and Future Perspectives; Ciampitti, I., Prasad, V., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Gressel, J.; Gassmann, A.J.; Owen, M.D. How well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance? Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schroeder, J.; Barrett, M.; Shaw, D.R.; Asmus, A.B.; Coble, H.; Ervin, D.; Jussaume, R.A.; Owen, M.D.; Burke, I.; Creech, C.F. Managing wicked herbicide-resistance: Lessons from the field. Weed Technol. 2018, 32, 475–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swanton, C.J.; Weise, S.F. Integrated weed management: The rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 1991, 5, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norsworthy, J.K.; Ward, S.M.; Shaw, D.R.; Llewellyn, R.S.; Nichols, R.L.; Webster, T.M.; Bradley, K.W.; Frisvold, G.; Powles, S.B.; Burgos, N.R.; et al. Reducing the Risks of Herbicide Resistance: Best Management Practices and Recommendations. Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 31–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moss, S. Integrated weed management (IWM): Why are farmers reluctant to adopt non-chemical alternatives to herbicides? Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beckie, H.J.; Ashworth, M.B.; Flower, K.C. Herbicide Resistance Management: Recent Developments and Trends. Plants 2019, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peterson, M.A.; Collavo, A.; Ovejero, R.; Shivrain, V.; Walsh, M.J. The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: A current summary. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2246–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Somerville, G.J.; Powles, S.B.; Walsh, M.J.; Renton, M. Why was resistance to shorter-acting pre-emergence herbicides slower to evolve? Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busi, R.; Powles, S.B.; Beckie, H.J.; Renton, M. Rotations and mixtures of soil-applied herbicides delay resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuerffel, R.J.; Young, J.M.; Tranel, P.J.; Young, B.G. Soil-Residual Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase–Inhibiting Herbicides Influence the Frequency of Associated Resistance in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci. 2017, 63, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaner, D.L. Lessons Learned From the History of Herbicide Resistance. Weed Sci. 2017, 62, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbrook, C.M. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S.—The first sixteen years. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2012, 24, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gressel, J. Fewer constraints than proclaimed to the evolution of glyphosate-resistant weeds. No. REP-12306. Resist. Pest Manag. 1996, 8, 2–5. [Google Scholar]
- Heap, I.M. The occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide. Pestic. Sci. 1997, 51, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerdeira, A.L.; Duke, S.O. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 1633–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blewett, T.C. Comments on Behalf of Dow AgroSciences LLC on Supplemental Information for Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Herbicide Resistant DAS-40278–9 Corn. Economic and Agronomic Impacts of the Introduction of DAS-40278–9 Corn on Glyphosate Resistant Weeds in the U.S. Cropping System; Dow AgroSciences LLC: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2011; pp. 1–202. [Google Scholar]
- Manalil, S.; Busi, R.; Renton, M.; Powles, S.B. Rapid Evolution of Herbicide Resistance by Low Herbicide Dosages. Weed Sci. 2017, 59, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, C.J.; Norsworthy, J.K.; Young, B.G.; Steckel, L.E.; Bradley, K.W.; Johnson, W.G.; Loux, M.M.; Davis, V.M.; Kruger, G.R.; Bararpour, M.T. Herbicide program approaches for managing glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus rudis) in future soybean-trait technologies. Weed Technol. 2015, 29, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neve, P.; Norsworthy, J.; Smith, K.; Zelaya, I. Modelling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Res. 2011, 51, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westwood, J.H.; Charudattan, R.; Duke, S.O.; Fennimore, S.A.; Marrone, P.; Slaughter, D.C.; Swanton, C.; Zollinger, R. Weed Management in 2050: Perspectives on the Future of Weed Science. Weed Sci. 2018, 66, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duke, S.O. Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakka, S.; Godar, A.S.; Wani, P.S.; Thompson, C.R.; Peterson, D.E.; Roelofs, J.; Jugulam, M. Physiological and molecular characterization of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibitor resistance in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Figueiredo, M.R.; Leibhart, L.J.; Reicher, Z.J.; Tranel, P.J.; Nissen, S.J.; Westra, P.; Bernards, M.L.; Kruger, G.R.; Gaines, T.A.; Jugulam, M. Metabolism of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid contributes to resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2356–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, Q.; Powles, S. Metabolism-based herbicide resistance and cross-resistance in crop weeds: A threat to herbicide sustainability and global crop production. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beckie, H.J.; Reboud, X. Selecting for weed resistance: herbicide rotation and mixture. Weed Technol. 2009, 23, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaines, T.A. Webinar: Metabolic Resistance to Herbicides: What We Know and Why It Matters; AGRO Webinar Series, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA; Available online: https://www.agrodiv.org/webinars/metabolic-resistance-to-herbicides-what-we-know-and-why-it-matters/ (accessed on 10 April 2019).
- Frisvold, G.B.; Hurley, T.M.; Mitchell, P.D. Adoption of best management practices to control weed resistance by corn, cotton, and soybean growers. AgBioForum 2009, 12, 370–381. [Google Scholar]
- Barber, L.; Smith, K.; Scott, R.; Norsworthy, J.; Vangilder, A. Zero Tolerance: A Community-Based Program for Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth Management; University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin FSA2177: Fayetteville, AR, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Bagavathiannan, M.V.; Graham, S.; Ma, Z.; Barney, J.N.; Coutts, S.R.; Caicedo, A.L.; De Clerck-Floate, R.; West, N.M.; Blank, L.; Metcalf, A.L. Considering weed management as a social dilemma bridges individual and collective interests. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Acker, R.C.; Swanton, C.J.; Stephan, F.W. The Critical Period of Weed Control in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Weed Sci. 1993, 41, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menalled, F.D.; Peterson, R.K.D.; Smith, R.G.; Curran, W.S.; Páez, D.J.; Maxwell, B.D. The Eco-Evolutionary Imperative: Revisiting Weed Management in the Midst of an Herbicide Resistance Crisis. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, T.R.; Shan, G.; Walsh, T.A.; Lira, J.M.; Cui, C.; Song, P.; Zhuang, M.; Arnold, N.L.; Lin, G.; Yau, K. Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20240–20245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Everitt, J.D.; Keeling, J.W. Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2, 4-D and dicamba drift. Weed Technol. 2009, 23, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osipitan, O.A.; Scott, J.E.; Knezevic, S.Z. Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Response to Micro-Rates of Three Dicamba-Based Herbicides. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ. 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knezevic, S.Z.; Osipitan, O.A.; Scott, J.E. Sensitivity of grape and tomato to micro-rates of dicamba-based herbicides. J. Hortic. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiedau, K.N.; Krausz, R.F.; Walters, S.A.; Matthews, J.L.; Gage, K.L. Evaluating risks of plant growth regulator–resistant soybean technologies to horseradish production. Weed Technol. 2019, 33, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sciumbato, A.S.; Chandler, J.M.; Senseman, S.A.; Bovey, R.W.; Smith, K.L. Determining exposure to auxin-like herbicides. I. Quantifying injury to cotton and soybean. Weed Technol. 2004, 18, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kniss, A.R. Soybean Response to Dicamba: A Meta-Analysis. Weed Technol. 2018, 32, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streibig, J.C.; Green, J.M. Dose, Drift, and Non-Target Organisms. In Pesticide Dose: Effects on the Environment and Target and Non-Target Organisms; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume 1249, pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar]
- Van Rensburg, E.; Breeze, V. Uptake and development of phytotoxicity following exposure to vapour of the herbicide 14C 2, 4-D butyl by tomato and lettuce plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1990, 30, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittmar, P.J.; Ferrell, J.A.; Fernandez, J.V.; Smith, H. Effect of glyphosate and dicamba drift timing and rates in bell pepper and yellow squash. Weed Technol. 2016, 30, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USEPA. Dicamba, 1918-00-9, DTXSID4024018. Available online: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?search=DTXSID4024018#properties (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- USEPA. Dicamba-Dimethylammonium, 2300-66-5, DTXSID9034369. Available online: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?search=DTXSID9034369#properties (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- Oseland, E.G.; Bish, M.; Bradley, K.W. Investigations of the effects of soil pH on the volatility of dicamba formulations. In Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America, New Orleans, LA, USA, 11–14 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
- USEPA. 2,4-D Dimethylamine Salt, 2008-39-1, DTXSID0024896. Available online: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?search=DTXSID0024896#properties (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- USEPA. 2,4-D Ethyl Ester, 533-23-3, DTXSID1041346. Available online: https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/dsstoxdb/results?search=DTXSID1041346#properties (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- Ellis, J.M.; Griffin, J.L. Soybean (Glycine max) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol. 2002, 16, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlsen, S.C.K.; Spliid, N.H.; Svensmark, B. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift). Chemosphere 2006, 64, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrens, R.; Lueschen, W.E. Dicamba Volatility. Weed Sci. 1979, 27, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, R. A Method for Determining the Volatility of Herbicides. Weed Sci. 2017, 23, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khatib, K.; Parker, R.; Fuerst, E.P. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) response to simulated herbicide spray drift. Weed Technol. 1992, 6, 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USEPA. Registration Decision for the Continuation of Uses of Dicamba on Dicamba Tolerant Cotton and Soybean; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
- Bradley, K.W. A Final Report on Dicamba-Injured Soybean Acres. Available online: https://ipm.missouri.edu/IPCM/2017/10/final_report_dicamba_injured_soybean/ (accessed on 30 May 2019).
- Charles, D. Damage from Wayward Weedkiller Keeps Growing; National Public Radio: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Charles, D. The EPA Says Farmers Can Keep Using Weedkiller Blamed for Vast Crop Damage; National Public Radio: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Flitter, E. Scant Oversight, Corporate Secrecy Preceded US Weed Killer Crisis; Reuters: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- McCune, M. A Pesticide, a Pigwed and a Farmer’s Murder; National Public Radio: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hakim, D. Monsanto’s Weedkiller, Dicamba, Divides Farmers; The New York Times: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ahl, J. Experts: Dicamba will come for trees, specialty crops in 2019; Harvest Public Media: Kansas City, MO, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Benbrook, C.M. How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides? Environ. Sci. Eur. 2019, 31, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, J.P.; Antoniou, M.N.; Blumberg, B.; Carroll, L.; Colborn, T.; Everett, L.G.; Hansen, M.; Landrigan, P.J.; Lanphear, B.P.; Mesnage, R. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: A consensus statement. Environ. Health 2016, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schütte, G.; Eckerstorfer, M.; Rastelli, V.; Reichenbecher, W.; Restrepo-Vassalli, S.; Ruohonen-Lehto, M.; Saucy, A.-G.W.; Mertens, M. Herbicide resistance and biodiversity: Agronomic and environmental aspects of genetically modified herbicide-resistant plants. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2017, 29, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, V.M.; Gibson, K.D.; Bauman, T.T.; Weller, S.C.; Johnson, W.G. Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) population dynamics and crop yield-years III and IV. Weed Sci. 2009, 57, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culpepper, A.S.; Sosnoskie, L.M.; Kichler, J.; Steckel, L.E. Impact of cover crop residue and tillage on control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth. In Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America, Portland, OR, USA, 7–10 February 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, J.A.; Tranel, P.J.; Hager, A.G.; Schutte, B.; Wu, C.; Chatham, L.A.; Davis, A.S. Managing the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagavathiannan, M.V.; Davis, A.S. An ecological perspective on managing weeds during the great selection for herbicide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 2277–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gage, K.L.; Krausz, R.F.; Walters, S.A. Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Agriculture 2019, 9, 180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture9080180
Gage KL, Krausz RF, Walters SA. Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Agriculture. 2019; 9(8):180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture9080180
Chicago/Turabian StyleGage, Karla L., Ronald F. Krausz, and S. Alan Walters. 2019. "Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops" Agriculture 9, no. 8: 180. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture9080180