Next Article in Journal
Increase of Antimicrobial Consumption in a Tertiary Care Hospital during the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
D-Mannoside FimH Inhibitors as Non-Antibiotic Alternatives for Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Journal
Plasmid-Mediated Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli in Sarawak Rivers and Aquaculture Farms, Northwest of Borneo
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/antibiotics10070777
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Epidemiology of Fosfomycin Resistant E. coli from a Pigeon Farm in China

by
Lu Han
1,2,†,
Xiao-Qing Lu
1,2,†,
Xu-Wei Liu
1,2,
Mei-Na Liao
1,2,
Ruan-Yang Sun
1,2,
Yao Xie
1,2,
Xiao-Ping Liao
1,2,3,
Ya-Hong Liu
1,2,3,
Jian Sun
1,2,3 and
Rong-Min Zhang
1,2,3,*
1
National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(7), 777; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070777
Submission received: 22 May 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 23 June 2021 / Published: 25 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in Plant and Soil Microbiome)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We determined the prevalence and molecular characteristics of fosfomycin-resistant Escherichia coli from a domestic pigeon farm. A total of 79 samples collected from pigeons and their surrounding environments were screened for the presence of fosfomycin resistant isolates and these included 49 E. coli isolates that displayed high-level resistance (MIC ≥ 256 mg L−1) and carried the fosA3 gene on plasmids with sizes ranging from 80 to 370 kb. MLST analysis of these fosA3-positive E. coli isolates indicated the presence of nine sequence types (ST6856, ST8804, ST457, ST746, ST533, ST165, ST2614, ST362 and ST8805) of which ST6856 was the most prevalent (24.5%, 12/49). PFGE combined with genomic context comparative analyses indicated that the fosA3 gene was spread by horizontal transfer as well as via clonal transmission between E. coli in the pigeon farm, and IS26 played an important role in fosA3 transmission. The high prevalence of fosA3 in the pigeon farm and the high similarity of the fosA3 genomic environment between E. coli isolates from humans and pigeons indicated that the pigeon farm served as a potential reservoir for human infections. The pigeon farm was found to be an important reservoir for the fosA3 gene and this should be further monitored.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of bacterial resistance to multiple antibiotics has resulted in fewer treatment options for clinicians. Fosfomycin has emerged as a candidate antibiotic to treat infections caused by carbapenem-, tigecycline-, and polymyxin-resistant bacteria [1]. Resistance to fosfomycin is mediated by FosA enzymes in Gram-negative bacteria and there are more than 10 fos types, of which fosA and fosC2 are the primary ones found in the Enterobacteriaceae [2]. The fosA3 gene has also been co-localized via IS26 with blaCTX-M on epidemic plasmids frequently detected in E. coli that spread among humans, pets, and food animals [3,4]. However, fosfomycin is not approved for use in animals in China, although the fosA3 gene has been detected in food animals as well as humans [5].
Pigeon breeding is popular and common in China, especially in Guangdong province, and domestic pigeons are found in all urban areas, with a population size estimated at several hundred million [6]. Moreover, the number of pigeons consumed in China has grown to three times as many as one decade ago [7]. Importantly, clinically healthy homing pigeons have served as an unnoticed reservoir for zoonotic bacteria that are spread by faeces [8]. Furthermore, the close relationships between humans and birds have contributed to the spread of infectious agents, including antibiotic-resistant bacteria [9], and are an epidemiological link to wild birds [8]. The global and clonal multidrug-resistant carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) carried by pigeons therefore may be established in ecological niches that include humans, livestock, wildlife, pets, and insects [10].
The goal of the present work was to reveal the distribution and prevalence of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolates in domestic pigeons. Our results indicated that pigeons carrying fosA3-positive Escherichia coli were prevalent in pigeon farms and that E. coli of human origin are a potential reservoir for the fosA3 gene.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolation, Fosfomycin-Resistant Gene Identification, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

A total of 79 samples including pigeon faeces (n = 34), pigeon ceca (n = 12), pigeon pericardial fluid (n = 6), sewage (n = 18), dust (n = 3), and flies (n = 6) were collected from a pigeon farm in South China, Foshan City, Guangdong province, in 2016. Briefly, flies, sewage, and dust were collected as reported previously [11]. Samples were incubated in Luria–Bertani (LB) liquid medium overnight and the fosfomycin-resistant isolates were selected on MacConkey agar containing 256 mg/L fosfomycin. All colonies were selected and identified using Gram staining and sequence analysis of the 16S rDNA gene using previously described primers [12]. Species identification of Gram-negative bacteria was further conducted by MALDI-TOF MS [13]. Fosfomycin resistance genes, including fosA, fosA3, fosC2, and blaCTX-M, were screened using PCR and sequencing [14]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for E. coli was based on seven housekeeping genes, as reported previously [15]. PCR amplification and sequencing were performed following the protocols suggested on the website [16].

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of a range of antibiotics against the fosfomycin-resistant isolates were determined using the agar dilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M100-S28 [17], and the breakpoints of colistin and tigecycline for Enterobacteriaceae were interpreted according to EUCAST criteria (Version 7.0) [18]. The E. coli isolate ATCC 25922 was used for quality control.

2.3. Molecular Analysis of Fosfomycin-Resistant E. coli

The fosfomycin-resistant E. coli were investigated by XbaI pulsed field electrophoresis (PFGE) and the locations of the fosfomycin resistance genes in the original isolates were determined by S1-PFGE mapping and Southern blot analysis, as described previously [19]. The PFGE patterns were analysed using a dendrogram of per cent similarity calculated with Dice coefficients using a cut-off of 80% [20]. The transferability of fosfomycin resistance genes was determined by the filter mating method using streptomycin-resistant E. coli C600 as a recipient strain, in accordance with a previous study [19].

2.4. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of fosA3-Positive Isolates

Total DNA was extracted using a DNA Extraction Kit (TianGen, Beijing, China) and subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The library was constructed using the NEXT Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, UK) and an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (Novogene, Guangzhou, China), which produced 250 bp paired-end reads. A draft assembly of the sequences was generated using CLC Genomics Workbench 5 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark). All contigs were searched for fosA3 genes using standalone BLAST analysis [21].
To explore the molecular relationships among the isolates in the current study and other resources, WGS information for 130 E. coli isolates was downloaded from GenBank as of 7 November 2020. (Table S1). The 130 representative isolates were selected according to the following standard. Briefly, the WGS of a total of 774,435 isolates were downloaded from GenBank and the fosA3-positive E. coli were screened using stand-alone BLAST analysis, resulting in a total of 915 fosA3-positive E. coli. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the isolates from the current study and the public repository. Since the phylogenetic software could only process 500 isolates at a time, these 915 fosA3-positive E. coli strains were randomly divided into two groups and each group was employed to construct a phylogenetic tree with the 14 isolates in the current study, respectively. Then, the 130 representative strains were selected according to their distribution in the phylogenetic tree, sources, and sampling locations (Figure S2). MLST results were analysed using MLST Version 2 [22].
The downloaded genomic sequences, along with time and geospatial information, were applied to construct phylogenetic trees with the E. coli isolates using Parsnp in Harvest package 5 [23]. SNP assignments were determined using Snippy v4.4.5 [24] and Snippy-core was used to determine the core SNPs. For the phylogenetic tree, a reference genome was randomly selected using the ”-r!” switch. The E. coli population structure was estimated with the hierBAPS module from the software BAPS v6.0 [25], which fits lineage to genome data using nested clustering. Annotations for each isolate and tree embellishment were visualized using iTOL [26].

2.5. Data Availability

Genome assemblies of 14 strains co-harbouring fosA3 were deposited in GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA728561.

2.6. Ethical Statement

This research was conducted in accordance with the regulations of the ethical guidelines of South China Agricultural University. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of pigeons.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of fos Genes in Samples

We identified a total of 69 E. coli isolates in our 79 samples collected on the pigeon farm that were resistant to fosfomycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg L−1), and these included isolates from faeces (n = 34), ceca (n = 12), liquor pericardii (n = 5), sewage (n = 14), dust (n = 1) and flies (n = 3). These isolates were further identified by 16S rDNA gene sequencing combined with MALDI-TOF MS as E. coli (n = 52), Proteus mirabilis (n = 15) and Citrobacter freundii (n = 2). PCR results indicated that the prevalence of fosA3 in the E. coli was 94.2% (49/52) and fosA and fosC variants were not detected. MLST analysis of these fosA3-positive E. coli indicated nine types and ST6856 was the most prevalent sequence type (ST) (24.5%, 12/49), followed by ST8804 (18.4%, 9/49), ST457 (16.3%, 8/49), ST746 (12.2%, 6/49), ST533 (10.2%, 5/49), ST165 (8.2%, 4/49), ST2614 (4.1%, 2/49), ST362 (4.1%, 2/49) and ST8805 (2.0%, 1/49).
The 49 fosA3-positive E. coli isolates were resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime, fosfomycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (100%, 49/49), colistin (95.9%, 47/49), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (73.47%, 36/49), florfenicol (34.69%, 17/49), gentamicin (18.37%, 9/49) and amikacin (2.04%, 1/49). All E. coli isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, meropenem and tigecycline and the fosfomycin-resistant E. coli remained highly susceptible to meropenem and tigecycline.
Conjugation experiments were performed on 49 fosA3-positive E. coli isolates and generated 31 transconjugants (63.27%, 31/49). For the 49 fosA3-positive E. coli isolates, PFGE was successfully performed and generated 13 pulsotypes designated as pulsotypes A–M. Pulsotype C, which was derived from faeces and sewage, as well as pulsotype I, from faeces, sewage and ceca, were the most prevalent clonal isolates and accounted for 18.4% of the total. Identical PFGE patterns were found between pericardial effusion and flies for pulsotype B as well as from faeces and sewage in pulsotypes E, G, I and K. Pulsotypes K–M were identified as ST457 and pulsotypes H–J as ST6856, whereas each PFGE pattern in the remaining pulsotypes was identified as one type of ST (Figure 1). Among these 49 isolates, S1-nuclease PFGE mapping and Southern blot analysis were performed successfully in 31 (63.2%, 31/49) of them and revealed that the fosA3 gene was present on differently sized plasmids, including 150 kb (n = 10), 80 kb (n = 5), 210 kb (n = 7), 240 kb (n = 1), 310 kb (n = 5), 340 kb (n = 1) and 370 kb (n = 2) (Figure S1).

3.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of fosA3-Positive E. coli Isolates

We performed WGS on two isolates each for pulsotypes C and I, which possessed the largest numbers of isolates, and for single representatives from each of the remaining pulsotypes; only one failed to be sequenced. A total of 130 representative strains with time and geospatial information were then combined with these 14 isolates and a phylogenetic tree was constructed [27]. These 144 isolates were primarily distributed in China (n = 126), followed by South America (n = 7) and other counties (n = 11), and were derived from animals (n = 57), humans (n = 71) and environmental sources (n = 16) (Figure 2). These isolates were further clustered into eight groups sharing a total 163,219 SNPs. MLST analysis revealed that fosA3 was distributed across a diverse range of STs (n = 71). Cluster 2 contained only a single isolate (ST245) and cluster 6 possessed five isolates (all ST457). However, all other clusters contained >2 STs, such as cluster 1 which was dominated by ST167 (14/144), while ST167 (6/144) and ST156 (14/144) were prevalent in cluster 8. Additionally, the strain E7-1 from pigeon faeces shared only 2 SNPs with the strain W1-1 from a sewage isolate in cluster 8 and the strain GZEC065 from human blood shared only 18 SNPs with the strain WFA04 from pig lungs. A strain from a chicken cecum shared only one SNP with strain 648 from a dog anal swab sample (Figure 2).
We identified the presence of 40 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) which mediated resistance to 11 types of antibiotics that co-existed with fosA3 in these 144 E. coli isolates. These included resistance genes to fosfomycin, β-lactams, colistin, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, quinolones, macrolides, sulphonamides, trimethoprim, and rifampicin (antibiotic resistance gene class is represented with the line colours at the bottom of Figure 2). The β-lactamase genes displayed the greatest diversity and blaCTX-M (91%, 131/144) and mdfA (98.6%, 142/144) were most prevalent. The genes blaNDM, mcr and tet(X4), which mediate carbapenem, colistin, and tigecycline resistance, were present among these fosA3-carrying E. coli at 38.9, 77.8 and 0.69%, respectively.

3.3. Genetic Environments

A comparative genomic analysis indicated that fosA3 was present in three genomic contexts including types Ⅰ, Ⅲ and Ⅴ, with Ⅰ being the most prevalent, which originated from faeces, ceca and sewage. The entries from the fosA3-positive E. coli from the public repository indicated that three genomic environments flanking fosA3 in E. coli of human origin resembled those found in current study (types Ⅱ, Ⅳ and Ⅵ). Type III of pigeon origin and type IV of human origin shared the greatest similarities in the backbones and differed only by one IS26 element, which was complete in type IV but truncated in type III. In the remaining four genomic contexts, IS26 was present both upstream and downstream of the fosA3 gene. In addition, the extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) gene blaCTX-M was frequently located upstream of the fosA3 gene in these six genomic contexts (Figure 3). In addition, combining the NCBI database information (998 fosA3-positive E. coli isolates downloaded on 7 November 2020) with the WGS (14 fosA3-positive E. coli isolates) analysis of this study, we found that blaCTX-M was present in 92.59% (937/1012) of the isolates. The prevalence of blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-55 and blaCTX-M-65 was 27.17, 4.94, 36.67 and 17.292%, respectively.

4. Discussion

E. coli resistant to fosfomycin have become a serious global health problem [28,29]. The high level (71%, 49/69) of fosA3-positive E. coli detected from pigeons in the current study was significantly higher than that found for pets (10.34%, 3/29) and food animals (1.1%, 10/892) in previous studies for Guangzhou, China [30,31,32]. PFGE patterns combined with the genomic contexts of regions flanking fosA3 indicated that fosA3 could spread by horizontal transfer as well as via clonal dissemination between E. coli on the pigeon farm, and this most likely led to its high prevalence.
Our isolates also frequently contained IS26 both upstream and downstream of fosA3 and this has been previously reported [33]. This is further evidence that IS26 plays a role in the dissemination of fosA3 in E. coli. IS26 also facilitated ARG diversity in our isolates, including aphA1, tet(C), tet(D), catA2 and cfr [34]. The fosA3 gene was generally found co-localized with blaCTX-M [34] and this most likely was the result of the combined administration of fosfomycin and β-lactam antibiotics that promoted their co-transfer between Gram-negative bacteria.
The use of fosfomycin in food-producing animals has not been approved in China. Nevertheless, we found a high prevalence of fosA3 in food-producing animals and in E. coli, P. mirabilis, E. fergusonii and C. freundii isolates from pets, and pet owners [4]. The isolates sharing <35 SNPs were classified as clonally spread according to criteria defined in a previous study [35,36]. The phylogeny for a strain from human blood (accession: SAMN13875146) that shared only 18 SNPs with strain WFA04 from a pig suggested that the fosA3-carrying E. coli were likely spread between humans and food animals via clonal propagation. In addition, we found that the genomic contexts that flanked fosA3 in the current study closely resembled those from human isolates, suggesting that the pigeon farm served as a potential reservoir for human infections.

5. Conclusions

In current study, we detected a high prevalence of fosA3 in pigeon farm samples and found that fosA3 could spread by both horizontal and clonal transfer. The high similarity of the fosA3 genomic environment between E. coli isolates from humans and pigeons indicated that the pigeon farm served as a reservoir for these strains. The presence of fosA3 on the pigeon farm poses a threat to public health and should be regularly monitored.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/antibiotics10070777/s1, Figure S1: S1-nuclease PFGE mapping and Southern blot analysis of fosA3-carrying plasmids on different sizes. Figure S2: Phylogenetic analysis of the fosA3 positive E. coli from public repository and current study Table S1: Sample collection, strain identification and MIC results.

Author Contributions

Data curation, L.H. and Y.X.; Formal analysis, L.H. and Y.X.; Funding acquisition, X.-P.L., Y.-H.L. and J.S.; Investigation, L.H., X.-Q.L., X.-W.L. and R.-Y.S.; Methodology, R.-M.Z.; Project administration, Y.-H.L. and J.S.; Resources, L.H.; Software, L.H., M.-N.L. and R.-Y.S.; Writing—original draft, L.H.; Writing—review & editing, R.-M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Program for Innovative Research Team of the University of the Ministry of Education of China (grant IRT_17R39), the Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (grant 2019BT02N054) and the 111 Project (grant D20008).

Data Availability Statement

The data for this manuscript is available from correspondence author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lletí, J.R.R. Fosfomycin in infections caused by multidrugresistant Gram-negative pathogens. Soc. Esp. Quimioter. 2019, 32, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang, T.Y.; Lu, P.L.; Tseng, S.P. Update on fosfomycin-modified genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 52, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, D.; Liu, L.; Guo, B.; Wu, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, J. Chromosomal location of the fosA3 and blaCTX-M genes in Proteus mirabilis and clonal spread of Escherichia coli ST117 carrying fosA3-positive IncHI2/ST3 or F2: A-: B-plasmids in a chicken farm. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 49, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yao, H.; Wu, D.; Lei, L.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liao, K. The detection of fosfomycin resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae from pets and their owners. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 193, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, L.; Gu, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Lu, Y.; Fang, L.; Jiang, H. Characterization of a fosA3 carrying IncC–IncN plasmid from a multidrug-resistant ST17 Salmonella Indiana isolate. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haag-Wackernagel, D. Die taube-eine erfolgsgeschichte. vom liebling der götter zur eroberung der städte. Biol. Unserer Zeit 2011, 41, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ye, M.; Xu, M.; Chen, C.; He, Y.; Ding, M.; Ding, X.; Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, B. Expression analyses of candidate genes related to meat quality traits in squabs from two breeds of meat-type pigeon. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 102, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Teske, L.; Ryll, M.; Rubbenstroth, D.; Hänel, I.; Hartmann, M.; Kreienbrock, L.; Rautenschlein, S. Epidemiological investigations on the possible risk of distribution of zoonotic bacteria through apparently healthy homing pigeons. Avian Pathol. 2013, 42, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Mukerji, S.; Gunasekera, S.; Dunlop, J.N.; Stegger, M.; Jordan, D.; Laird, T.; Abraham, R.J.; Barton, M.; O’Dea, M.; Abraham, S. Implications of foraging and interspecies interactions of birds for carriage of escherichia coli strains resistant to critically important antimicrobials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01610–e01620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, R.-M.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.-L.; Fang, L.-X.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Liao, X.-P. Distribution patterns of antibiotic resistance genes and their bacterial hosts in pig farm wastewater treatment systems and soil fertilized with pig manure. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 758, 143654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Yin, W.; Schwarz, S.; Tyrrell, J.M.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Shen, Z.; et al. Comprehensive resistome analysis reveals the prevalence of NDM and MCR-1 in Chinese poultry production. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 16260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Walsh, F.; Duffy, B. The culturable soil antibiotic resistome: A community of multi-drug resistant bacteria. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Seng, P.; Drancourt, M.; Gouriet, F.; La Scola, B.; Fournier, P.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: Routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sato, N.; Kawamura, K.; Nakane, K.; Wachino, J.; Arakawa, Y. First detection of fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli isolates from healthy individuals in Japan. Microb. Drug Resist. 2013, 19, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wirth, T.; Falush, D.; Lan, R.; Colles, F.; Mensa, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H.; Reeves, P.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Ochman, H.; et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: An evolutionary perspective. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Escherichia coli Sequence Typing. Available online: https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/ecoli/ecoli.htm (accessed on 27 August 2016).
  17. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Twenty-Eighth Edition; CLSI: Annapolis Junction, MD, USA, 2018; p. M100. [Google Scholar]
  18. EUCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 7.0; EUCAST: Växjö, Sweden, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, R.; Wan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Yin, W.; Lei, L.; Wu, C.; Shen, J. Characterization of NDM-1-producing carbapenemase in Acinetobacter spp. and E. coli isolates from diseased pigs. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2015, 2, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, M.; Zhang, R.; Wang, L.; Sun, R.; Bai, S.; Han, L.; Fang, L.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Liao, X. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli from duck farms in south-east coastal China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 76, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Madden, T. The BLAST Sequence Analysis Tool. 2013. Available online: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 15 March 2013).
  22. Inouye, M.; Harriet Dashnow, L.A.R.; Schultz, M.B.; Pope, B.J.; Tpmita, T.; Zobel, J.; Holt, K.E. SRST2: Rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med. 2014, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Treangen, T.J.; Ondov, B.D.; Koren, S.; Phillippy, A.M. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tseemann. Snippy (Version 4.4.5). Available online: https://github.com/tseemann/snippy (accessed on 4 January 2020).
  25. Cheng, L.; Connor, T.R.; Sirén, J.; Aanensen, D.M.; Corander, J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1224–12248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sanaa, A.A.; Lo, C.-C.; Li, P.-E.; Davenport, K.D.; Chain, P.S.G. Chain. From raw reads to trees: Whole genome SNP phylogenetics across the tree of life. bioRxiv 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lei, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-A.; Kang, Z.H.; Kong, L.I.; Wang, H.-O. Characterization of a Novel SXT/R391 integrative and conjugative element carrying cfr, blaCTX-M-65, fosA3, and aac(6′)-Ib-cr in Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00849-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cyoia, C.P.S.; Koga, V.L.; Nishio, E.K.; Houle, S.; Dozois, C.M.; de Brito, K.C.T.; de Brito, B.G.; Nakazato, G.; Kobayashi, R.K.T. Distribution of ExPEC virulence factors, blaCTX-M, fosA3, and mcr-1 in Escherichia coli isolated from commercialized chicken carcasses. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hou, J.; Huang, X.; Deng, Y.; He, L.; Yang, T.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J. Dissemination of the fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 with CTX-M β-lactamase genes and rmtB carried on IncFII Plasmids among Escherichia coli isolates from pets in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 56, 2135–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hou, J. Detection of the plasmid-encoded fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in Escherichia coli of food-animal origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 68, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ho, P.L.; Chan, J.; Lo, W.U.; Law, P.Y.; Li, Z.; Lai, E.L.; Chow, K.H. Dissemination of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance fosA3 among multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from livestock and other animals. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Cheng, K.; Fang, L.; Ge, Q.; Wang, D.; He, B.; Lu, J.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, X.; Yu, Y.; Lian, X.; et al. Emergence of fosA3 and bla CTX-M-14 in multidrug-resistant citrobacter freundii isolates from flowers and the retail environment in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 586504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. David, S.; Reuter, S.; Harris, S.R.; Glasner, C.; Feltwell, T.; Argimon, S.; Abudahab, K.; Goater, R.; Giani, T.; Errico, G.; et al. Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1919–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chew, K.L.; Octavia, S.; Ng, O.T.; Marimuthu, K.; Venkatachalam, I.; Cheng, B.; Lin, R.T.P.; Teo, J.W.P. Challenge of drug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Clonal spread of NDM-1-positive ST-308 within a tertiary hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2220–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 10 00777 g001 550
Figure 1. PFGE typing of 49 strains of fosA3-positive E. coli. Strains, sources and PFGE types are indicated, including 13 pulsotypes (A–M) that had similarities >80%.
Figure 1. PFGE typing of 49 strains of fosA3-positive E. coli. Strains, sources and PFGE types are indicated, including 13 pulsotypes (A–M) that had similarities >80%.
Antibiotics 10 00777 g001
Antibiotics 10 00777 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree along with ARGs present in the E. coli isolates. The phylogenetic tree is composed of 144 fosA3-positive E. coli divided into eight clusters as indicted. The strains are marked with an orange dashed line in this study.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree along with ARGs present in the E. coli isolates. The phylogenetic tree is composed of 144 fosA3-positive E. coli divided into eight clusters as indicted. The strains are marked with an orange dashed line in this study.
Antibiotics 10 00777 g002
Antibiotics 10 00777 g003 550
Figure 3. Genetic environment of fosA3 in 14 E. coli isolates. Arrows indicate the directions of transcription of the genes, and different genes are shown in different colours. Regions of >99.0% nucleotide sequence identity are shaded in grey. The delta (Δ) symbol indicates a truncated gene.
Figure 3. Genetic environment of fosA3 in 14 E. coli isolates. Arrows indicate the directions of transcription of the genes, and different genes are shown in different colours. Regions of >99.0% nucleotide sequence identity are shaded in grey. The delta (Δ) symbol indicates a truncated gene.
Antibiotics 10 00777 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, L.; Lu, X.-Q.; Liu, X.-W.; Liao, M.-N.; Sun, R.-Y.; Xie, Y.; Liao, X.-P.; Liu, Y.-H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, R.-M. Molecular Epidemiology of Fosfomycin Resistant E. coli from a Pigeon Farm in China. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 777. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070777

AMA Style

Han L, Lu X-Q, Liu X-W, Liao M-N, Sun R-Y, Xie Y, Liao X-P, Liu Y-H, Sun J, Zhang R-M. Molecular Epidemiology of Fosfomycin Resistant E. coli from a Pigeon Farm in China. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(7):777. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Lu, Xiao-Qing Lu, Xu-Wei Liu, Mei-Na Liao, Ruan-Yang Sun, Yao Xie, Xiao-Ping Liao, Ya-Hong Liu, Jian Sun, and Rong-Min Zhang. 2021. "Molecular Epidemiology of Fosfomycin Resistant E. coli from a Pigeon Farm in China" Antibiotics 10, no. 7: 777. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop