Next Article in Journal
Anti-Tubercular Activity of Substituted 7-Methyl and 7-Formylindolizines and In Silico Study for Prospective Molecular Target Identification
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Dosing Regimens of Daptomycin Based on the Susceptible Dose-Dependent Breakpoint against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/antibiotics8040246
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae

by
Xiao Ma
,
Wanliang Shi
and
Ying Zhang
*
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2019, 8(4), 246; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040246
Submission received: 11 November 2019 / Revised: 25 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published: 30 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Novel Antimicrobial Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bartonella henselae is a fastidious Gram-negative intracellular bacterium that can cause cat scratch disease, endocarditis in humans and animals, as well as other complications, leading to acute or chronic infections. The current treatment for Bartonella infections is not very effective presumably due to bacterial persistence. To develop better therapies for persistent and chronic Bartonella infections, in this study, with the help of SYBR Green I/PI viability assay, we performed a high-throughput screening of an essential oil library against the stationary phase B. henselae. We successfully identified 32 essential oils that had high activity, including four essential oils extracted from Citrus plants, three from Origanum, three from Cinnamomum, two from Pelargonium, and two from Melaleuca, as well as frankincense, ylang-ylang, fir needle, mountain savory (winter), citronella, spearmint, elemi, vetiver, clove bud, allspice, and cedarwood essential oils. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of these 32 top hits indicated they were not only active against stationary phase non-growing B. henselae but also had good activity against log-phase growing B. henselae. The time-kill assay showed 13 active hits, including essential oils of oregano, cinnamon bark, mountain savory (winter), cinnamon leaf, geranium, clove bud, allspice, geranium bourbon, ylang-ylang, citronella, elemi, and vetiver, could eradicate all stationary phase B. henselae cells within seven days at the concentration of 0.032% (v/v). Two active ingredients, carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde, of oregano and cinnamon bark essential oils, respectively, were shown to be very active against the stationary phase B. henselae such that they were able to eradicate all the bacterial cells even at the concentration ≤ 0.01% (v/v). More studies are needed to identify the active components of some potent essential oils, decode their antimicrobial mechanisms, and evaluate their activity against Bartonella infections in animal models.

1. Introduction

Bartonella species are fastidious, Gram-negative, facultative intracellular pathogens [1,2,3] that can be transmitted to humans or animals by several arthropod vectors including fleas, sheep keds, lice, sand flies, ticks, and potentially mites and spiders. Bartonella bacteria can infect healthy people while being considered especially important as opportunistic pathogens [4]. At least 13 Bartonella species are known to be able to infect humans, causing either acute or chronic infections which could lead to cat scratch disease, endocarditis, bacillary angiomatosis [3], bacteremia and central nervous system pathologies [5]. This pathogenicity is partly due to their unique infection cycle including the lymphatic stage [6] and intraerythrocytic stage [7,8]. It is laborious using classical bacteriological methods to isolate and culture Bartonella spp. in liquid media especially from clinical samples, which requires specific conditions and prolonged incubation periods [9,10]. Therefore, serology and real-time PCR are often used instead of culture to confirm the diagnosis for rapid Bartonella detection clinically [9,10]. The first-line antibiotics for treating bartonellosis include doxycycline, erythromycin, gentamicin, rifampicin, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin, as well as some drug combinations like doxycycline plus gentamicin, doxycycline plus rifampin [11,12]. However, a systematic review has revealed that the current clinical treatment of Bartonella infections relies mostly on personal experience, expert opinion, and microbiological susceptibility data. The treatment lacks evidence of randomized trials and the recommended antibiotic treatment for cat scratch disease, infectious endocarditis, and bacillary angiomatosis showed no improvement in cure rate or cure time [13]. In particular, there is no single treatment effective for systemic B. henselae infections, and antibiotic therapy exhibited poor activity against typical uncomplicated cat scratch disease [11,12]. Therefore, bartonellosis treatment remains a significant problem and without treatment, it could cause high mortality in some patients. The phenomenon of bacterial persistence may partly contribute to the difficulty to treat the disease because persister bacteria are hard to be eradicated and remain in the host which can revert to growing forms under appropriate conditions and lead to relapse or prolonged infections with symptoms [14]. Thus, identifying drugs that target Bartonella persister cells in the stationary phase could provide a promising strategy for developing a more effective treatment for bartonellosis. In our recent study, we have identified some promising drug candidates from the FDA drug library that are more active than the current drugs used to treat Bartonella infections. However, their utility remains to be further validated.
The essential oil, also known as volatile oil or ethereal oil, is a concentrated hydrophobic liquid containing volatile chemical compounds extracted from plants. It has many uses in aromatherapy [15], food processing [16], and also potentially in medical therapy [17] especially with recent concerns about antibiotic resistance. Previous in vitro studies have found certain essential oils had antibacterial activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates [18]. In fact, many essential oil compositions including carvacrol, thymol, cinnamic acid, trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, α-pinene, and γ-terpinene have been documented to have antimicrobial activities since decades ago, and some essential oil components could have a synergistic effect in combination with antibiotics [19]. We have previously used a rapid high-throughput drug screening method using SYBR Green I/PI viability assay [20] for the successful identification of many essential oils with high activity against stationary phase Borrelia burgdorferi [21,22] as a surrogate model of persister bacteria [23]. In this study, we adapted the same SYBR Green I/PI methodology to perform an efficient screen using our essential oil collection against stationary phase B. henselae and identified a significant number of essential oils that had good activity against non-growing B. henselae cells. The implication of the identified active hits for improved treatment of persistent Bartonella infections is discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Subsection Screening Essential Oil Collection to Identify Drugs Active against Non-Growing Stationary Phase B. henselae

Previously, we have developed an SYBR Green I/PI viability assay for the rapid viability assessment of B. henselae and have successfully used this assay for high-throughput drug screens against non-growing stationary phase B. henselae using the FDA drug library [24]. Here we adapted this SYBR Green I/PI viability assay for essential oil screens against B. henselae. As described in the previous study, a five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture was used to identify active essential oils against stationary phase B. henselae. All 149 essential oils were applied at two concentrations, 0.5% (v/v) and 0.25% (v/v), respectively, in the primary screens. Meanwhile, the currently known effective antibiotics used to treat bartonellosis such as doxycycline, azithromycin, gentamicin, rifampin, etc. were included as control drugs for comparison (Table 1). In addition, we included previously identified FDA-approved drugs that were effective against B. henselae such as daptomycin, methylene blue, miconazole and nitrofurantoin [24] as controls (Table 1). All these antibiotics were used at 20 μM. In the primary screens, 32 of the 149 essential oil collection were found to have good activity against stationary phase B. henselae both at the concentration of 0.5% and 0.25%, and thus were selected as top hits. The top 32 active hits were chosen based on their lower percentage of viable cells remaining after essential oil treatment than that for the current antibiotics used to treat Bartonella infections, including doxycycline, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and rifampin. According to our previous experience, some compounds in the essential oils can cause interference with the SYBR Green I/PI assay because of color and autofluorescence. Thus, we selected these 32 top hits for further validation by microscopic counting to confirm the SYBR Green I/PI plate reader results. The currently used antibiotics for bartonellosis treatment and the identified FDA-approved drugs effective against B. henselae were also included as controls for comparison at 20 μM. Doxycycline as a control drug showed mild activity against stationary phase B. henselae (residual viability above 26%) (Table 1). Antibiotics reported to have a clinical improvement for Bartonella infection including moxifloxacin, gentamicin, azithromycin, and rifampin [25,26] showed relatively better activity (residual viability between 9% and 25%) against stationary phase B. henselae than doxycycline. FDA-approved drugs that we identified as effective against stationary phase B. henselae (daptomycin, methylene blue, miconazole, and nitrofurantoin) had better activity (residual viability between 8% and 19%) than most of the five antibiotics mentioned above.
Among the 32 top hits that had better activity (residual viability between 5% and 21%) against stationary phase B. henselae than most control antibiotics, the most active essential oils were ylang-ylang, lemon, stress relief, health shield, Tic Tox aux huiles essentielles, geranium essential oil, clove bud, and cedarwood because of their remarkable activity at 0.25%, as shown by red (dead) cells in fluorescence microscope observation (Figure 1). Essential oils made from oregano (“oregano” and “oil of oregano”) and cinnamon (“cinnamon leaf” and “cinnamon bark”) were all shown to be active against stationary phase B. henselae, which have already been identified effective against stationary phase B. burgdorferi in our previous study [21]. Some essential oils extracted from plants of the same genus as oregano or cinnamon also exhibited good activity against stationary phase B. henselae. For example, ho wood, which was also extracted from Cinnamomum spp. as cinnamon essential oils were shown to be active. Marjoram (sweet), which was extracted from Origanum spp. as oregano essential oils were also active. In addition, essential oils extracted from Citrus spp. including tangerine, bergamot, lemon, and grapefruit all exhibited strong activity against stationary phase B. henselae, and the same for essential oils extracted from Pelargonium spp. (geranium bourbon and geranium essential oil) and Melaleuca spp. (cajeput and tea tree). Many synergy blend essential oils including “stress relief”, “bandit”, “health shield”, “Tic Tox”, “citrus blast”, and “deep forest” exhibited strong activity against stationary phase B. henselae because their effective ingredients were shown to be active by other single essential oils, such as clove, ylang-ylang, lemon, bergamot, grapefruit, cinnamon, oregano, and fir needle. Control drugs including doxycycline (DOX) and azithromycin (AZI) exhibited poor activity against stationary phase B. henselae as shown by green (live) cells in fluorescence microscope observation, other antibiotics including gentamicin (GEN), moxifloxacin (MXF), rifampin (RIF), daptomycin (DAP), methylene blue, nitrofurantoin (NIT), and miconazole showed better activity, while not as good as most of the 32 top hits (Figure 1).

2.2. MIC Determination of Active Hits

The essential oils listed above were active against the non-growing stationary phase B. henselae (Table 1 and Figure 1), and it was necessary to determine the MICs of these active drugs against log-phase growing B. henselae. The MICs of essential oils for B. henselae were determined by the standard microdilution method, as described in our previous study [27]. As shown in Table 2, cinnamon bark was the most active essential oil among these 32 hits, capable of inhibiting visible B. henselae proliferation at the lowest concentration of essential oils tested (0.008%). The health shield, a blend of many active compounds against non-growing B. henselae were also highly active against growing B. henselae, which could inhibit B. henselae proliferation at a concentration of 0.008–0.016%. And the growth of B. henselae was efficiently suppressed by bandit, elemi, mountain savory (winter), cedarwood and two oregano essential oils at 0.016–0.032%, and by ylang-ylang, citronella, clove bud, geranium bourbon, allspice, vetiver, cinnamon leaf and geranium essential oil at 0.032–0.063%. Other single essential oils including bergamot, cajeput, marjoram (sweet), fir needle, grapefruit as well as blend essential oils including stress relief, citrus blast, and deep forest were also active with MIC values of 0.063–0.125%. B. henselae growing cells were also susceptible to spearmint, tangerine, tea tree, lemon, ho wood, frankincense, and Tic Tox aux huiles essentielles at a concentration of 0.125–0.25%, though relatively higher than others.

2.3. Time-Kill Curves of Active Hits

Having obtained 32 top hits by primary screens, we performed a time-kill drug exposure assay against a five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture at a lower concentration of these active essential oils. Here we just selected single essential oil samples for drug exposure assay in order to better evaluate and compare the activity of antimicrobial components among different essential oils. All selected 25 essential oils were applied at 0.032% (v/v), respectively. Clinically used antibiotics and the previously identified effective FDA-approved drugs against B. henselae were used at their Cmax as controls. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2b,c, oregano, cinnamon bark, and mountain savory (winter) were the most active essential oils that rapidly killed B. henselae with no detectable CFU after one-day exposure. Other active hits, including clove bud 2, allspice, geranium, and cinnamon leaf could eradicate B. henselae cells without viable cells being recovered after a three-day drug exposure. Geranium bourbon and clove bud 1 also showed excellent activity which could kill all bacteria by day 5, followed by elemi, vetiver, citronella and ylang ylang that eradicated all B. henselae cells by day 7.
As shown in Table 3, grapefruit, tangerine, bergamot, fir needle, frankincense and ho wood were also quite active, reducing 5 log10 CFU/mL after a seven-day exposure. Lemon, as well as marjoram (sweet) also had the capability of killing stationary phase B. henselae and reduced the bacterial count by approximately 3 log10 CFU/mL in seven days. However, cajeput, tea tree, cedarwood, and spearmint showed poor activity. Compared with drug-free control, as shown in Figure 2a, some clinically used antibiotics for Bartonella treatment, such as azithromycin and doxycycline, had poor activity in killing B. henselae, achieving approximately 1 log10 CFU/mL decrease after the seven-day drug exposure. Gentamicin and rifampin showed better activity than azithromycin and doxycycline when used at their Cmax, which could eradicate all B. henselae cells respectively by day 3 and day 7. Other FDA-approved drugs effective against B. henselae including daptomycin and methylene blue had good activity that led to the eradication of B. henselae cells after a one-day or five-day exposure, respectively, while miconazole did not kill all B. henselae cells by day 7 when used at Cmax.

2.4. Carvacrol and Cinnamaldehyde as Highly Potent Active Ingredient of Essential Oils against Stationary Phase B. henselae

Our previous studies have identified two components, carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde, as highly potent active ingredients of oregano and cinnamon bark essential oils, respectively, which were effective against B. burgdorferi [21,22]. As shown above, oregano and cinnamon bark essential oils were also highly active to kill B. henselae, so we tested carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde, two major constituents of these two active essential oils, for their antimicrobial activity against B. henselae. Carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde were applied at two concentrations, 0.01% (v/v) and 0.005% (v/v), respectively, for the drug exposure assay against a five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture. Clinically used antibiotics and the previously identified effective FDA-approved drugs against B. henselae were used at their Cmax as controls. As shown in Figure 3, 0.01% carvacrol could eradicate B. henselae cells without viable cells being recovered after a five-day drug exposure. Additionally, 0.005% carvacrol led to 2 log10 CFU/mL reduction after a seven-day exposure. Cinnamaldehyde was especially active such that it rapidly killed all stationary phase B. henselae cells with no detectable CFU after one-day exposure when used at the concentration of 0.01%, and 0.005% cinnamaldehyde could also eradicate all B. henselae cells after a three-day exposure. According to the concentration of original stock, 0.005% carvacrol or cinnamaldehyde was approximately equal to 50 μg/mL. Thus, the antimicrobial activity of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde against B. henselae was comparable to that of effective FDA-approved antibiotics against stationary phase B. henselae, including gentamicin, rifampin, daptomycin, and methylene blue, which could eradicate all B. henselae cells within the seven-day drug exposure when used at their Cmax.

3. Discussion

In this study, we successfully applied the SYBR Green I/PI viability assay for the high-throughput screen of an essential oil collection for activity against stationary phase B. henselae as a model of persister drug screens. We identified 32 essential oils at 0.25% concentration which have good activity against stationary phase B. henselae. These include four essential oils extracted from plants of genus Citrus (tangerine, bergamot, lemon and grapefruit), three from Origanum (two oregano essential oils and marjoram), three from Cinnamomum (cinnamon bark, cinnamon leaf and ho wood), two from Pelargonium (geranium bourbon and geranium essential oil) and two from Melaleuca (cajeput and tea tree). Among these 32 top hits, thirteen single essential oils could effectively kill all stationary B. henselae cells without CFU detected within a seven-day drug exposure even at a low concentration of 0.032% (v/v), where the essential oils of oregano, cinnamon bark, and mountain savory (winter) were the most active ones that eradicated bacteria after a one-day exposure. Some essential oils that showed activity by primary screens exhibited poor activity in drug exposure assay, partly due to the volatility of essential oils during such a long incubation period. Carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde, two active ingredients of effective essential oils, oregano and cinnamon bark, respectively, were shown to be extremely active against stationary phase B. henselae that they could eradicate all bacterial cells within a seven-day drug exposure even at a very low concentration ≤ 0.01% (v/v). Additionally, the MIC determination showed the 32 active hits were not only active against stationary phase B. henselae but also effective in inhibiting the growth of log phase B. henselae, especially the essential oil of cinnamon bark.
The pattern that some different plant species of the same genus all possess the antimicrobial ability could serve as a guideline in our future study to obtain more active hits and decode the antimicrobial mechanism. Here, we identified Citrus, Cinnamomum, Origanum, Pelargonium and Melaleuca as potential genera that might include more plants active against B. henselae. Citrus plants constitute one of the most valuable and important sources of essential oil served in food processing and medical use. Citrus limonum essential oil was reported to have antimicrobial activities with preservative effect against Listeria monocytogenes inoculated in minced beef meat [28], and remarkable miticidal activity in vitro and in vivo applications against sarcoptic mange in rabbits [29]. Besides, the essential oil from Citrus limetta Risso peels could alleviate skin inflammation, both tested in vitro and in vivo [30], while the essential oil from Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl also had an anti-inflammatory effect [31]. Citrus leaf extract was reported to reduce blood pressure and vascular damage in repeatedly heated palm oil diet-induced hypertensive rats [32]. These studies indicated Citrus plants could serve in different health care treatments including antimicrobial function. Our study was the first to identify their activity against B. henselae.
Previous studies have shown that oregano oil has antibacterial activity against three Gram-positive and two Gram-negative bacteria of their growing log phase [33]. It was also reported to be highly effective against stationary phase B. burgdorferi [21]. Cinnamon, clove bud, and allspice were well-known as flavors for food processing, while they were both found to have excellent activity against B. burgdorferi stationary phase cells in vitro, even better than the persister drug daptomycin [21,22]. Allspice was also known to have antibacterial activities on many organisms [34]. Here, for the first time, we identified essential oils of oregano, cinnamon, clove bud and allspice as having highly potent activities against both the log phase and stationary phase B. henselae. It is interesting to note that the high activity of these common essential oils against both Borrelia and Bartonella, such as oregano, cinnamon bark, and clove bud, indicated that they had the potential to be active against both Borrelia and Bartonella persistent infections, which clinically may be present as coinfections [35]. However, it is also worth noting that some other essential oils including frankincense, ylang-ylang, fir needle, mountain savory (winter), elemi, and vetiver, are preferentially more active against B. henselae. This suggests preferential activity of some essential oils against different bacterial species that possess different cell surface structures, efflux, and physiology.
Other essential oils identified effective in our study have also been proved to have good biological activities by previous studies. It was reported that frankincense and geranium essential oils could suppress tumor progression through the regulation of the AMPK/mTOR pathway in breast cancer [36]. Geranium essential oil could eradicate enterococcal biofilm at a concentration of 150 mg/mL without bacteria developing resistance to it, thus could be a possible alternative to other antimicrobials during endodontic procedures [37]. Frankincense was reported to have anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects [38]. Mountain savory has been proved to be highly active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Salmonella typhimurium and L. monocytogenes [39,40,41]. According to previous studies, fir honeydew honey had strong antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, E. coli and kinds of fungi [42,43,44]. Ylang-ylang products have a wide variety of bioactivities including antimicrobial, antibiofilm, anti-inflammatory, anti-vector, insect-repellent and so on, demonstrating it to be a useful plant to agriculture and medicine [45]. Citronella was reported to have antifungal and antibiofilm activity as well as antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus [46,47]. Extracts from Canarium were proved to be active against MRSA and P. aeruginosa [48]. Essential oils of vetiver were active against S. aureus and showed good antifungal and cytotoxic activities [49,50]. Here, for the first time, we identified the remarkable activity of these essential oils active against both log phase and stationary phase B. henselae.
Although our study has identified many active hits from the essential oil collection, future studies are needed to identify the active ingredients of these active essential oils. Here we just tested two active ingredients, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde, which showed excellent ability to eradicate stationary phase B. henselae even at a much lower concentration than correlated essential oil samples used. Some previous studies have identified the main ingredients of some active essential oils such as mountain savory, thyme, lemongrass, limette, and cumin, including geranial, β-pinene, thymol, γ-terpinene, citronellal and so on [51]. The antimicrobial activity of these components should be studied thoroughly in the future in order to determine their utility.
It is worth noticing that clinically used drugs for bartonellosis treatment including doxycycline, azithromycin, rifampin, moxifloxacin, and gentamicin showed poor capability in eradicating stationary phase B. henselae cells (Table 1 and Figure 1), as they mainly target growing cells in log phase. The discrepant efficacies of antibiotics between in vitro MIC data and clinical data from patients with bartonellosis were also reported and the poor activities of current clinically used antibiotics against stationary phase B. henselae as shown in our study could partly explain for the treatment failure and persistence of infection [11]. The microscopic observation showed that stationary phase B. henselae cells tended to aggregate together (Figure 1), which might protect them from attack by antimicrobial agents. The bacterial cell membrane is a known target of some persister drugs, and it is interesting to note that essential oils are exactly agents targeting the membrane because of their lipophilicity. Due to this property, essential oils could exhibit much higher activity against stationary phase B. henselae in aggregated biofilm form than current clinically used antibiotics for Bartonella infections and could be considered promising candidates for further evaluation. However, it should also be noted that the high lipophilicity of essential oils might cause B. henselae cells or biofilm structures to be dissolved, leading to a reduction of the dead cell number and as a result, the residual viability percentage by the SYBR Green I/PI assay might be misinterpreted. It is also worth noting that as DMSO could permeabilize the bacterial membranes, it could increase the antibacterial effect of the essential oils by increasing the bacterial susceptibility to lipophilic compounds.
Another promising strategy for developing a more effective treatment for bartonellosis is the drug combination of active essential oils with antibiotics to avoid resistance development and improve the efficacy of the treatment. Future studies are needed to evaluate drug combinations of two or more newly identified essential oil candidates with current clinically used drugs in combination, in order to better target diverse bacterial populations of different phases or forms that can happen in the host as indicated by the Yin-Yang model [14]. There were some previous studies of evaluating the antimicrobial activity of combined essential oil samples against multidrug resistance (MDR) E. coli, K. pneumoniae, MRSA, S. epidermidis, Propionibacterium acnes, as well as airborne bacteria and fungi in hospital rooms, and some of the essential oil combinations did have better activity than used alone [52,53,54].
In this study, we identified a range of essential oils with high activity against stationary phase B. henselae in vitro. Because B. henselae can reside and propagate inside erythrocytes and/or endothelial cells in humans and animals [55,56], which could provide a shelter that protects them from the host immune responses and exposure to antibiotics, future studies are needed to evaluate the activities of selected essential oils against intracellular B. henselae. The active ingredients of many effective essential oils remain unknown, and it will take substantial effort to characterize and identify the active components, which is beyond the scope of the current study. These should be studied thoroughly in the future in order to identify the active components, decode the antimicrobial mechanism, and further evaluate their activity in vivo. We are fully aware that while the number of active components of essential oils may be subject to variations from different batches or sources, just like any natural products including essential oils, this should not change the overall findings or conclusions of the study. Further pharmacokinetic study is required to test whether it is possible to achieve effective concentrations in vivo. Further validation using appropriate animal models of bartonellosis is required to assess the safety and efficacy of identified essential oils in vivo. As far as we know, the effective concentration of two highly active ingredients, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde, was comparable to the Cmax of some antibiotics, which could serve as promising drug candidates that may achieve efficacy when used in vivo. Our study was performed with B. henselae and future studies are needed to test if the findings here apply to other B. henselae strains and also closely related pathogenic Bartonella species, such as B. quintana and B. bacilliformis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strain, Culture Media and Culture Conditions

The Bartonella henselae JK53 strain was obtained from BEI Resources (ATCC). Based on the culture medium developed in a previous study [57], B. henselae JK53 was cultured in Schneider’s Drosophila medium (Life Technologies Limited, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) and 5% sucrose (Fisher Scientific, New Jersey, USA) in microaerophilic incubator without shaking at 37℃, 5% CO2. As previously measured [24], B. henselae JK53 rapidly went into the logarithmic growth phase and reached a growth peak after two days under such culture conditions. The one-day-old and five-day-old culture were considered as log phase and stationary phase, respectively. The Columbia anaerobic sheep blood agar (HemoStat Laboratories, Dixon, CA, USA) was used to perform the drug exposure assay, which was also cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2.

4.2. Drugs, Essential Oils and their Active Ingredients

A panel of 149 essential oils was purchased from Plant Therapy (ID, USA), Natural Acres (MO, USA), or Plant Guru (NJ, USA). Detailed information, as well as some GC-MS reports of these essential oils, are available at the vendors’ websites. The main chemical compositions of active essential oils were summarized in Table S1 based on vendors’ GC-MS reports or previous studies. Carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). DMSO-soluble essential oils and carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 5% (v/v), followed by dilution at 1:10 into five-day-old stationary bacteria cultures to achieve 0.5% final concentration. To make further dilutions for evaluating anti-Bartonella activity, the 0.5% essential oil treatments were further diluted in the same stationary bacteria cultures to achieve desired concentrations. DMSO-insoluble essential oils were added directly to five-day-old stationary bacteria cultures to form emulsion by adequate vortexing, followed by immediate transfer of the emulsion into the same stationary cultures to make serial dilutions to achieve desired final concentrations. Antibiotics including azithromycin (AZI), daptomycin (DAP), doxycycline (DOX), gentamicin (GEN), methylene blue, miconazole, moxifloxacin (MXF), nitrofurantoin (NIT), rifampin (RIF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and were dissolved in appropriate solvents [58] to form 10mg/mL or 100mM stock solutions. All the antibiotic stocks were filter-sterilized by 0.2 μm filter except the DMSO stocks and then diluted and stored at −20 °C.

4.3. Microscopy Techniques

Drug-treated or control B. henselae JK53 cell suspensions were examined using BZ-X710 All-in-One fluorescence microscope (KEYENCE, Inc.), with SYBR Green I (100 × stock, Invitrogen) and propidium iodide (PI, 600 μM, Sigma) mixture used for staining. The SYBR Green I/PI dye was added to the sample at 1:10 dilution and mixed thoroughly to assess the bacterial viability by using the ratio of green/red fluorescence to determine the residual viability percentage, respectively, as described previously [20]. The residual bacteria viability was confirmed by analyzing three representative images of the same bacterial cell suspension using fluorescence microscopy. BZ-X Analyzer and Image Pro-Plus software were used to quantitatively determine the fluorescence intensity.

4.4. Screening of Essential Oil Library against Stationary Phase B. Henselae JK53

For the high-throughput essential oil screening, each essential oil was assayed in two concentrations, 0.5% (v/v) and 0.25% (v/v). Firstly, 20 μL 5% essential oil DMSO stocks or emulsion were added to the 96-well plate containing 180 μL of the five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae JK53 culture to obtain the desired concentration of 0.5%. Then, the 0.25% treatment concentration was obtained by mixing 100 μL 0.5% treatment with 100 μL five-day-old B. henselae JK53 culture. Antibiotics including AZI, DAP, DOX, GEN, methylene blue, miconazole, MXF, NIT, and RIF were used as control drugs at 20 μM. Plates were sealed and placed in a 37 °C incubator without shaking over a period of three days. SYBR Green I/ PI viability assay was used to assess the live and dead cells after drug exposure as described [20]. Briefly, the SYBR Green I/PI dye was added to the sample at 1:10 dilution and mixed thoroughly. The plates were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 15 min followed by plate reading using a microplate reader (HTS 7000 plus Bioassay Reader, PerkinElmer Inc., USA). The green/red (538 nm/650 nm) fluorescence ratio of each well was used for calculating the residual viability percentage. With the least-square fitting analysis, the regression equation and regression curve of the relationship between residual viability percentage and green/red fluorescence ratio was obtained, which was used in the calculation as described previously [24]. All tests were run in triplicate.

4.5. Drug Exposure Assay

Based on primary screening results, active hits were further confirmed by drug exposure assay. The 5-day-old B. henselae JK53 stationary phase culture was used for drug exposure experiments, which was treated with 0.032% (v/v) active essential oils respectively. Then two highly potent active ingredients, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde, of active essential oils oregano and cinnamon bark, respectively, were also tested by drug exposure assay at a very low concentration of 0.01% (v/v) and 0.005% (v/v). Control antibiotics were used at their Cmax. The drug exposure assay was carried out in 15 mL Eppendorf tubes over the course of seven days at 37 °C, 5% CO2 without shaking. At each time point we measured, the bacteria cells were collected by centrifugation and rinsed twice with fresh Schneider’s medium followed by resuspension in fresh Schneider’s medium. Then the cell suspension was serially diluted and each dilution was plated on Columbia blood agar plates for viable bacterial counts (colony forming unit, CFU). All tests were run in triplicate.

4.6. MIC Determination

The standard microdilution method was used to measure the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) needed to inhibit the visible growth of B. henselae JK53 after a five-day incubation period. The diluted one-day-old B. henselae JK53 logarithmic phase culture was used for MIC determination. 1×106 bacteria cells were inoculated into the well of the 96-well plate containing 180 μL fresh modified Schneider’s medium per well. Then 20 μL 5% essential oil stocks were added into each well respectively to achieve 0.5% final concentration. Other lower concentrations were obtained by mixing 0.5% treatment with diluted one-day-old B. henselae JK53 logarithmic phase culture. Plates were sealed and incubated at 37 °C without shaking for five days. Then the bacteria cell proliferation was assessed using the SYBR Green I/PI assay and the bacterial counting chamber after the incubation. All tests were run in triplicate.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this is the first study of a high throughput drug screen against stationary phase B. henselae using a collection of essential oils where we identified a range of highly active essential oils. Two active ingredients of these effective hits, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde were also identified to have strong antimicrobial activity against stationary phase B. henselae, while other ingredients still need to be identified and evaluated thoroughly for both efficacy and toxicity. Future studies are needed to determine if essential oil candidates are more effective against Bartonella persisters as well as biofilm bacteria in combination with antibiotics in vitro and in animal models of Bartonella infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2079-6382/8/4/246/s1, Table S1: Chemical compositions of top hit essential oils against B. henselae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; Data curation, X.M.; Formal analysis, W.S.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z.; Writing—original draft, X.M.; Writing—review & editing, Y.Z.

Funding

This research was funded by Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation, Global Lyme Alliance, LivLyme Foundation, NatCapLyme, and the Einstein-Sim Family Charitable Fund.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support by Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation, Global Lyme Alliance, LivLyme Foundation, NatCapLyme, and the Einstein-Sim Family Charitable Fund. We thank BEI Resources (ATCC) for providing Bartonella henselae strain JK53 used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brenner, D.J.; O’connor, S.P.; Winkler, H.H.; Steigerwalt, A.G. Proposals to unify the genera Bartonella and Rochalimaea, with descriptions of Bartonella quintana comb. nov., Bartonella vinsonii comb. nov., Bartonella henselae comb. nov., and Bartonella elizabethae comb. nov., and to remove the family Bartonellaceae from the order Rickettsiales. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1993, 43, 777–786. [Google Scholar]
  2. Peters, D.; Wigand, R. Bartonellaceae. Bacteriol. Rev. 1955, 19, 150–159. [Google Scholar]
  3. Okaro, U.; Addisu, A.; Casanas, B.; Anderson, B. Bartonella Species, an Emerging Cause of Blood-Culture-Negative Endocarditis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 709–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonellosis, One Health and all creatures great and small. Vet. Dermatol. 2017, 28, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mosepele, M.; Mazo, D.; Cohn, J. Bartonella infection in immunocompromised hosts: Immunology of vascular infection and vasoproliferation. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 612809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hong, J.; Li, Y.; Hua, X.; Bai, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, C.; Du, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, C. Lymphatic Circulation Disseminates Bartonella Infection into Bloodstream. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 303–311. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rolain, J.M.; La Scola, B.; Liang, Z.; Davoust, B.; Raoult, D. Immunofluorescent detection of intraerythrocytic Bartonella henselae in naturally infected cats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 2978–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jacomo, V.; Kelly, P.J.; Raoult, D. Natural history of Bartonella infections (an exception to Koch’s postulate). Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2002, 9, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chomel, B.B.; Boulouis, H.J.; Maruyama, S.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonella spp. in pets and effect on human health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gutierrez, R.; Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Buffet, J.P.; Harrus, S. Guidelines for the Isolation, Molecular Detection, and Characterization of Bartonella Species. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017, 17, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Angelakis, E.; Raoult, D. Pathogenicity and treatment of Bartonella infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Biswas, S.; Rolain, J.M. Bartonella infection: Treatment and drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 1719–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prutsky, G.; Domecq, J.P.; Mori, L.; Bebko, S.; Matzumura, M.; Sabouni, A.; Shahrour, A.; Erwin, P.J.; Boyce, T.G.; Montori, V.M.; et al. Treatment outcomes of human bartonellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y. Persisters, persistent infections and the Yin-Yang model. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2014, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, M.S.; Choi, J.; Posadzki, P.; Ernst, E. Aromatherapy for health care: An overview of systematic reviews. Maturitas 2012, 71, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential oils in food preservation: Mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, G.; Kapoor, I.P.; Pandey, S.K.; Singh, U.K.; Singh, R.K. Studies on essential oils: Part 10; antibacterial activity of volatile oils of some spices. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakkas, H.; Gousia, P.; Economou, V.; Sakkas, V.; Petsios, S.; Papadopoulou, C. In vitro antimicrobial activity of five essential oils on multidrug resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 5, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Langeveld, W.T.; Veldhuizen, E.J.A.; Burt, S.A. Synergy between essential oil components and antibiotics: A review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feng, J.; Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Shi, W.; Zhang, Y. An optimized SYBR Green I/PI assay for rapid viability assessment and antibiotic susceptibility testing for Borrelia burgdorferi. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, J.; Zhang, S.; Shi, W.; Zubcevik, N.; Miklossy, J.; Zhang, Y. Selective Essential Oils from Spice or Culinary Herbs Have High Activity against Stationary Phase and Biofilm Borrelia burgdorferi. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2017, 4, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, J.; Shi, W.; Miklossy, J.; Zhang, Y. Additional Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary Phase Borrelia burgdorferi. bioRxiv 2018, 260091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, J.; Shi, W.; Zhang, S.; Sullivan, D.; Auwaerter, P.G.; Zhang, Y. A Drug Combination Screen Identifies Drugs Active against Amoxicillin-Induced Round Bodies of In Vitro Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters from an FDA Drug Library. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, T.; Feng, J.; Xiao, S.; Shi, W.; Sullivan, D.; Zhang, Y. Identification of FDA-Approved Drugs with Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dörbecker, C.; Sander, A.; Oberle, K.; Schülin-Casonato, T. In vitro susceptibility of Bartonella species to 17 antimicrobial compounds: Comparison of Etest and agar dilution. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 784–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rolain, J.M.; Brouqui, P.; Koehler, J.E.; Maguina, C.; Dolan, M.J.; Raoult, D. Recommendations for treatment of human infections caused by Bartonella species. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2004, 48, 1921–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, J.; Wang, T.; Shi, W.; Zhang, S.; Sullivan, D.; Auwaerter, P.G.; Zhang, Y. Identification of novel activity against Borrelia burgdorferi persisters using an FDA approved drug library. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2014, 3, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ben Hsouna, A.; Ben Halima, N.; Smaoui, S.; Hamdi, N. Citrus lemon essential oil: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities with its preservative effect against Listeria monocytogenes inoculated in minced beef meat. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aboelhadid, S.M.; Mahrous, L.N.; Hashem, S.A.; Abdel-Kafy, E.M.; Miller, R.J. In vitro and in vivo effect of Citrus limon essential oil against sarcoptic mange in rabbits. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 3013–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maurya, A.K.; Mohanty, S.; Pal, A.; Chanotiya, C.S.; Bawankule, D.U. The essential oil from Citrus limetta Risso peels alleviates skin inflammation: In-vitro and in-vivo study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 212, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shen, C.Y.; Jiang, J.G.; Zhu, W.; Ou-Yang, Q. Anti-inflammatory Effect of Essential Oil from Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8586–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Siti, H.N.; Kamisah, Y.; Nur Iliyani, M.I.; Mohamed, S.; Jaarin, K. Citrus leaf extract reduces blood pressure and vascular damage in repeatedly heated palm oil diet-Induced hypertensive rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 87, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bejaoui, A.; Chaabane, H.; Jemli, M.; Boulila, A.; Boussaid, M. Essential oil composition and antibacterial activity of Origanum vulgare subsp. glandulosum Desf. at different phenological stages. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shelef, L.A.; Naglik, O.A.; Bogen, D.W. Sensitivity of some food-borne to the spices sage, rosemary and allspice. J. Food Sci. 1980, 45, M1042–M1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eskow, E.; Rao, R.V.; Mordechai, E. Concurrent infection of the central nervous system by Borrelia burgdorferi and Bartonella henselae: Evidence for a novel tick-borne disease complex. Arch. Neurol. 2001, 58, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ren, P.; Ren, X.; Cheng, L.; Xu, L. Frankincense, pine needle and geranium essential oils suppress tumor progression through the regulation of the AMPK/mTOR pathway in breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lysakowska, M.E.; Sienkiewicz, M.; Banaszek, K.; Sokolowski, J. The Sensitivity of Endodontic Enterococcus spp. Strains to Geranium Essential Oil. Molecules 2015, 20, 22881–22889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al-Yasiry, A.R.; Kiczorowska, B. Frankincense--therapeutic properties. Postep. Hig. Med. Dosw. (Online) 2016, 70, 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ndoti-Nembe, A.; Vu, K.D.; Han, J.; Doucet, N.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial Effects of Nisin, Essential Oil, and gamma-Irradiation Treatments against High Load of Salmonella typhimurium on Mini-carrots. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M1544–M1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sue, C.; Gary, Y.; Craig, O.; Karen, N. Inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 444–449. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ndoti-Nembe, A.; Vu, K.D.; Doucet, N.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial effects of essential oils, nisin, and irradiation treatments against Listeria monocytogenes on ready-to-eat carrots. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M795–M799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Broznic, D.; Ratkaj, I.; Malenica Staver, M.; Kraljevic Pavelic, S.; Zurga, P.; Bubalo, D.; Gobin, I. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Capacity, Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Potential of Fir (Abies alba Mill.) Honeydew Honey Collected from Gorski kotar (Croatia). Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 56, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gobin, I.; Crnkovic, G.; Magdalenic, M.; Begic, G.; Babic, A.; Lusic, D.; Vuckovic, D. Antibacterial potential of Croatian honey against antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria. Med. Glas. (Zenica) 2018, 15, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Whiley, H.; Gaskin, S.; Schroder, T.; Ross, K. Antifungal properties of essential oils for improvement of indoor air quality: A review. Rev. Environ. Health 2018, 33, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tan, L.T.; Lee, L.H.; Yin, W.F.; Chan, C.K.; Abdul Kadir, H.; Chan, K.G.; Goh, B.H. Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Bioactivities of Cananga odorata (Ylang-Ylang). Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 896314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Almeida Lde, F.; Paula, J.F.; Almeida, R.V.; Williams, D.W.; Hebling, J.; Cavalcanti, Y.W. Efficacy of citronella and cinnamon essential oils on Candida albicans biofilms. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2016, 74, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oliveira, J.B.; Teixeira, M.A.; Paiva, L.F.; Oliveira, R.F.; Mendonca, A.; Brito, M.J.A. In Vitro and In Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. Against Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Newborn Babies in an Intensive Care Unit. Microb. Drug. Resist. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mogana, R.; Teng-Jin, K.; Wiart, C. In Vitro Antimicrobial, Antioxidant Activities and Phytochemical Analysis of Canarium patentinervium Miq. from Malaysia. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2011, 2011, 768673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. David, A.; Wang, F.; Sun, X.; Li, H.; Lin, J.; Li, P.; Deng, G. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash Essential Oil Extracted by Carbon Dioxide Expanded Ethanol. Molecules 2019, 24, 1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Powers, C.N.; Osier, J.L.; Mcfeeters, R.L.; Brazell, C.B.; Olsen, E.L.; Moriarity, D.M.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. Antifungal and Cytotoxic Activities of Sixty Commercially-Available Essential Oils. Molecules 2018, 23, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zouhir, A.; Jridi, T.; Nefzi, A.; Ben Hamida, J.; Sebei, K. Inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and plant essential oils. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 3136–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gadisa, E.; Weldearegay, G.; Desta, K.; Tsegaye, G.; Hailu, S.; Jote, K.; Takele, A. Combined antibacterial effect of essential oils from three most commonly used Ethiopian traditional medicinal plants on multidrug resistant bacteria. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Orchard, A.; Van Vuuren, S.F.; Viljoen, A.M.; Kamatou, G. The in vitro antimicrobial evaluation of commercial essential oils and their combinations against acne. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2018, 40, 226–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lanzerstorfer, A.; Hackl, M.; Schlomer, M.; Rest, B.; Deutsch-Grasl, E.; Lanzerstorfer, C. The influence of air-dispersed essential oils from lemon (Citrus limon) and silver fir (Abies alba) on airborne bacteria and fungi in hospital rooms. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2019, 54, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Kordick, D.L. Bartonella infection in animals: Carriership, reservoir potential, pathogenicity, and zoonotic potential for human infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pulliainen, A.T.; Dehio, C. Persistence of Bartonella spp. stealth pathogens: From subclinical infections to vasoproliferative tumor formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 563–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Riess, T.; Dietrich, F.; Schmidt, K.V.; Kaiser, P.O.; Schwarz, H.; Schäfer, A.; Kempf, V.A. Analysis of a novel insect cell culture medium-based growth medium for Bartonella species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5224–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available online: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/ (accessed on 13 December 2018).
Antibiotics 08 00246 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of 32 top hits of essential oils against stationary phase B. henselae JK53 in comparison with control drugs. A five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae JK53 culture was treated with 0.25% (v/v) essential oils or control drugs (20 μM) for three days followed by SYBR Green I/PI viability assay and fluorescence microscopy.
Figure 1. Effect of 32 top hits of essential oils against stationary phase B. henselae JK53 in comparison with control drugs. A five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae JK53 culture was treated with 0.25% (v/v) essential oils or control drugs (20 μM) for three days followed by SYBR Green I/PI viability assay and fluorescence microscopy.
Antibiotics 08 00246 g001
Antibiotics 08 00246 g002 550
Figure 2. Time-kill curves for essential oils treatment of five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae in comparison with control drugs. (a) Time-kill curves for control antibiotic treatment. (b,c) Time-kill curves for essential oil treatment. Drug-free control, daptomycin, gentamicin, methylene blue, and rifampin treatment were the same among a, b, and c. The essential oils or control antibiotics were added to the stationary phase culture respectively at time point 0, and at different times of drug exposure (day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7), portions of bacteria were removed and washed and plated on Columbia blood agar for CFU counts. The essential oil concentration used in this experiment was 0.032% (v/v). Drug concentrations used in this experiment were based on their Cmax and were as follows: 2.4 μg/mL doxycycline, 0.2 μg/mL azithromycin, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, 7.8 μg/mL rifampin, 60 μg/mL daptomycin, 2.9 μg/mL methylene blue, and 6.3 μg/mL miconazole.
Figure 2. Time-kill curves for essential oils treatment of five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae in comparison with control drugs. (a) Time-kill curves for control antibiotic treatment. (b,c) Time-kill curves for essential oil treatment. Drug-free control, daptomycin, gentamicin, methylene blue, and rifampin treatment were the same among a, b, and c. The essential oils or control antibiotics were added to the stationary phase culture respectively at time point 0, and at different times of drug exposure (day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7), portions of bacteria were removed and washed and plated on Columbia blood agar for CFU counts. The essential oil concentration used in this experiment was 0.032% (v/v). Drug concentrations used in this experiment were based on their Cmax and were as follows: 2.4 μg/mL doxycycline, 0.2 μg/mL azithromycin, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, 7.8 μg/mL rifampin, 60 μg/mL daptomycin, 2.9 μg/mL methylene blue, and 6.3 μg/mL miconazole.
Antibiotics 08 00246 g002
Antibiotics 08 00246 g003 550
Figure 3. Time-kill curves for carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde treatment of five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae in comparison with control drugs. Carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde or control antibiotics were added to the stationary phase culture respectively at time point 0, and at different times of drug exposure (day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7), portions of bacteria were removed and washed and plated on Columbia blood agar for CFU counts. The concentrations of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde used were 0.01% (v/v) and 0.005% (v/v). Drug concentrations used in this experiment were based on their Cmax and were as follows: 2.4 μg/mL doxycycline, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, 7.8 μg/mL rifampin, 60 μg/mL daptomycin, 2.9 μg/mL methylene blue, and 6.3 μg/mL miconazole.
Figure 3. Time-kill curves for carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde treatment of five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae in comparison with control drugs. Carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde or control antibiotics were added to the stationary phase culture respectively at time point 0, and at different times of drug exposure (day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7), portions of bacteria were removed and washed and plated on Columbia blood agar for CFU counts. The concentrations of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde used were 0.01% (v/v) and 0.005% (v/v). Drug concentrations used in this experiment were based on their Cmax and were as follows: 2.4 μg/mL doxycycline, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, 7.8 μg/mL rifampin, 60 μg/mL daptomycin, 2.9 μg/mL methylene blue, and 6.3 μg/mL miconazole.
Antibiotics 08 00246 g003
Table
Table 1. Activity of top 32 active hits that had good activity against stationary phase B. henselae 1.
Table 1. Activity of top 32 active hits that had good activity against stationary phase B. henselae 1.
Essential Oils and Control DrugsPlant or Ingredients of Essential OilsResidual Viability (%) after 0.5% EO or 20 μM Antibiotic TreatmentResidual Viability (%) after 0.25% EO Treatment
Plate Reader 2Microscope 3Plate Reader 2Microscope 3
Drug free control 74%74%
Doxycycline 26%57%
Gentamicin 9%35%
Moxifloxacin 22%40%
Azithromycin 23%67%
Rifampin 25%44%
Daptomycin 8%18%
Methylene Blue 16%27%
Nitrofurantoin 18%50%
Miconazole 19%44%
Frankincense Boswellia serrata5%11%6%10%
Ylang ylangCananga odorata5%9%8%10%
TangerineCitrus reticulata6%6%5%12%
BergamotCitrus bergamia6%18%10%15%
Marjoram (sweet)Origanum majorana6%13%5%15%
CajeputMelaleuca cajeputi7%21%9%21%
LemonCitrus limonum7%10%4%11%
OreganoOriganum vulgarehirtum7%7%7%20%
Geranium bourbonPelargonium graveolens8%20%11%22%
Tea treeMelaleuca alternifolia8%12%5%25%
Fir needleAbies siberica8%25%10%26%
Stress relief synergy blend of essential oils of bergamot, patchouli, sweet orange, ylang ylang, pink grapefruit, gurjum8%15%6%12%
Mountain savory (winter)Satureja montana8%25%21%32%
Bandit synergy blend of essential oils of clove, cinnamon, lemon, rosemary, eucalyptus8%8%12%20%
Cinnamon leafCinnamomum zeylanicum8%35%10%25%
CitronellaCymbopogon winterianus8%15%12%23%
Health shieldblend of cinnamon, clove, eucalyptus, lemon and rosemary oils 9%18%17%20%
SpearmintMentha spicata9%9%4%20%
Ho woodCinnamomum camphora9%20%11%29%
Tic Tox aux huiles essentiellesblend of essential oils of savory, sage officinale, wild chamomile, clove, compact oregano, cinnamon and niaouli11%21%14%14%
Citrus blastsynergy blend of Citrus sinesis, Citrus limonum, Citrus reticulata blanco var tangerina, Citrus bergamia, Citrus reticulata, Citrus clementina, Vanilla planifolia11%13%11%30%
ElemiCanarium luzonicum12%25%14%32%
VetiverVetiveria zizanoides12%26%8%18%
Grapefruit Citrus paradisi12%35%11%36%
Clove bud 1Eugenia caryophyllata13%36%9%23%
Deep forestsynergy blend of Abies sibirica ledeb, Abies alba, Pinus sylvestris, Cupressus sempervirens, Cedrus deodora13%20%12%50%
GeraniumPelargonium asperum14%23%15%20%
Clove bud 2Syzygium aromaticum L15%15%14%18%
Oil of oreganoOriganum vulgarehirtum15%52%19%55%
AllspicePimenta officinalis16%35%6%30%
CedarwoodCedrus deodora17%53%10%23%
Cinnamon barkCinnamomum zeylanicum18%40%13%45%
1 A five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture was treated with essential oils (0.5%)(v/v) or control drugs (20 μM) for three days. 2 Residual viability was calculated according to the regression equation and the ratio of Green/Red fluorescence obtained by SYBR Green I/PI assay. 3 Residual viability was assayed by fluorescence microscope counting.
Table
Table 2. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of top hit essential oils against B. henselae 1.
Table 2. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of top hit essential oils against B. henselae 1.
Essential OilsPlant or Ingredients of Essential OilsMIC (v/v)
Cinnamon barkCinnamomum zeylanicum<0.008%
Health shieldblend of cinnamon, clove, eucalyptus, lemon and rosemary oils0.008–0.016%
Banditsynergy blend of essential oils of clove, cinnamon, lemon, rosemary, eucalyptus0.016–0.032%
OreganoOriganum vulgare hirtum0.016–0.032%
ElemiCanarium luzonicum0.016–0.032%
Oil of oreganoOriganum vulgare hirtum0.016–0.032%
Mountain savory (winter)Satureja montana0.016–0.032%
CedarwoodCedrus deodora0.016–0.032%
Ylang ylangCananga odorata0.032–0.063%
CitronellaCymbopogon winterianus0.032–0.063%
Clove bud 1Eugenia caryophyllata0.032–0.063%
Clove bud 2Syzygium aromaticum L0.032–0.063%
Geranium bourbonPelargonium graveolens0.032–0.063%
AllspicePimenta officinalis0.032–0.063%
VetiverVetiveria zizanoides0.032–0.063%
Cinnamon leafCinnamomum zeylanicum0.032–0.063%
GeraniumPelargonium asperum0.032–0.063%
Stress relief synergy blend of essential oils of bergamot, patchouli, sweet orange, ylang ylang, pink grapefruit, gurjum0.063–0.125%
BergamotCitrus bergamia0.063–0.125%
CajeputMelaleuca cajeputi0.063–0.125%
Marjoram (sweet)Origanum majorana0.063–0.125%
Citrus blastsynergy blend of essential oils of bergamot, patchouli, sweet orange, ylang ylang, pink grapefruit, gurjum0.063–0.125%
Deep forestsynergy blend of Abies sibirica ledeb, Abies alba, Pinus sylvestris, Cupressus sempervirens, Cedrus deodora0.063–0.125%
Fir needleAbies siberica0.063–0.125%
Grapefruit Citrus paradisi0.063–0.125%
SpearmintMentha spicata0.125–0.25%
TangerineCitrus reticulata0.125–0.25%
Tea treeMelaleuca alternifolia0.125–0.25%
LemonCitrus limonum0.125–0.25%
Ho woodCinnamomum camphora0.125–0.25%
FrankincenseBoswellia serrata0.125–0.25%
Tic Tox aux huiles essentiellesblend of essential oils of savory, sage officinale, wild chamomile, clove, compact oregano, cinnamon and niaouli0.125–0.25%
1 The MIC testing for B. henselae was set up as described in Methods.
Table
Table 3. Drug exposure assay of selected active essential oils against a five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture 1.
Table 3. Drug exposure assay of selected active essential oils against a five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture 1.
Essential Oils and Control Drugs 2CFU/mL after Drug Exposure
1 Day3 Day5 Day7 Day
Drug free control1.50 ± 0.53 × 1078.83 ± 0.29 × 1061.88 ± 0.40 × 1062.67 ± 0.29 × 106
Doxycycline4.17 ± 1.44 × 1075.07 ± 0.38 × 1062.30 ± 0.10 × 1068.33 ± 2.89 × 105
Azithromycin4.50 ± 2.00 × 1079.17 ± 0.29 × 1063.80 ± 0.72 × 1062.83 ± 1.04 × 105
Gentamicin9.83 ± 2.93 × 104000
Rifampin1.27 ± 0.15 × 1078.33 ± 0.76 × 1045.17 ± 0.29 × 1030
Daptomycin0000
Methylene blue1.35 ± 0.13 × 1063.17 ± 0.58 × 10300
Miconazole5.83 ± 1.53 × 1061.57 ± 0.28 × 1068.50 ± 1.32 × 1051.30 ± 0.10 × 104
Oregano0000
Cinnamon bark0000
Mountain savory (winter)0000
Clove bud 26.50 ± 3.46 × 102000
Allspice2.27 ± 0.33 × 103000
Geranium4.83 ± 0.76 × 103000
Cinnamon leaf1.33 ± 0.35 × 104000
Geranium bourbon5.50 ± 2.65 × 1035.00 ± 5.00 × 1000
Clove bud 15.00 ± 0.00 × 1048.33 ± 5.77 × 1000
Elemi1.38 ± 0.42 × 1035.00 ± 5.00 × 102.17 ± 1.04 × 1020
Vetiver2.00 ± 0.50 × 1051.18 ± 0.19 × 1045.17 ± 2.47 × 1020
Citronella1.13 ± 0.12 × 1047.33 ± 2.84 × 1034.50 ± 0.87 × 1030
Ylang ylang2.00 ± 0.87 × 1052.38 ± 0.19 × 1057.83 ± 3.01 × 1040
Grapefruit1.02 ± 0.19 × 1043.17 ± 1.89 × 1045.33 ± 1.26 × 1036.67 ± 5.77 × 10
Tangerine3.17 ± 0.29 × 1042.08 ± 0.58 × 1044.50 ± 2.29 × 1036.67 ± 5.77 × 10
Bergamot8.17 ± 2.25 × 1032.62 ± 0.35 × 1046.83 ± 0.76 × 1031.67 ± 0.58 × 102
Fir needle4.17 ± 1.61 × 1032.32 ± 0.41 × 1041.10 ± 0.13 × 1041.67 ± 0.58 × 102
Frankincense1.35 ± 0.22 × 1058.17 ± 1.53 × 1051.48 ± 0.29 × 1061.83 ± 0.76 × 102
Ho wood5.00 ± 0.50 × 1067.50 ± 2.65 × 1051.37 ± 0.28 × 1054.17 ± 1.44 × 102
Lemon3.17 ± 1.15 × 1041.03 ± 0.28 × 1058.67 ± 0.76 × 1044.33 ± 2.31 × 103
Marjoram (Sweet)2.17 ± 1.53 × 1052.13 ± 0.28 × 1062.22 ± 0.25 × 1067.50 ± 1.32 × 103
Cajeput2.50 ± 0.87 × 1069.43 ± 0.40 × 1063.20 ± 0.26 × 1061.62 ± 0.25 × 105
Tea tree8.00 ± 2.18 × 1059.33 ± 0.29 × 1063.97 ± 0.45 × 1063.17 ± 0.76 × 106
Cedarwood2.33 ± 2.31 × 1052.73 ± 0.33 × 1063.40 ± 0.36 × 1063.52 ± 0.18 × 106
Spearmint4.33 ± 1.26 × 1059.17 ± 0.29 × 1063.67 ± 0.58 × 1063.68 ± 0.38 × 106
1 A five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture was treated with essential oils or control drugs. The beginning CFU for the five-day-old stationary phase B. henselae culture was about 1 × 107 CFU/mL. At different times of drug exposure (day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7), portions of bacteria were removed, washed, and plated on Columbia blood agar for CFU counts. 2 The essential oil concentration used in this experiment was 0.032% (v/v). Drug concentrations used in this experiment were based on their Cmax and were as follows: 2.4 μg/mL doxycycline, 0.2 μg/mL azithromycin, 10 μg/mL gentamicin, 7.8 μg/mL rifampin, 60 μg/mL daptomycin, 2.9 μg/mL methylene blue, and 6.3 μg/mL miconazole.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, X.; Shi, W.; Zhang, Y. Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 246. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040246

AMA Style

Ma X, Shi W, Zhang Y. Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(4):246. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Xiao, Wanliang Shi, and Ying Zhang. 2019. "Essential Oils with High Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae" Antibiotics 8, no. 4: 246. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop