Next Article in Journal
The Inc FII Plasmid and its Contribution in the Transmission of blaNDM-1 and blaKPC-2 in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Egypt
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Dietary Chicory (Chicorium intybus L.) and Probiotic Blend as Natural Feed Additives on Performance Traits, Blood Biochemistry, and Gut Microbiota of Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing the Onset of Intra- and Post- Operative Complications Following Tooth Exodontia: Retrospective Survey on 1701 Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation on Soft Contact Lenses by Allium sativum Fermented Extract (BGE) and Cannabinol Oil Extract (CBD)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/antibiotics8040265
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonella enterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression

by
Alexandre Lamas
*,
Patricia Regal
,
Beatriz Vázquez
,
Alberto Cepeda
and
Carlos Manuel Franco
Laboratorio de Higiene Inspección y Control de Alimentos, Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición y Bromatología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2019, 8(4), 265; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040265
Submission received: 14 November 2019 / Revised: 9 December 2019 / Accepted: 12 December 2019 / Published: 13 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are commonly produced by healthy gut microbiota and they have a protective role against enteric pathogens. SCFAs also have direct antimicrobial activity against bacterial pathogens by diffusion across the bacterial membrane and reduction of intracellular pH. Due to this antimicrobial activity, SCFAs have promising applications in human health and food safety. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of four SCFAs (acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, and valeric acid) in Salmonella strains isolated from poultry were determined. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs in Salmonella biofilm formation, motility, and gene expression was also evaluated. Butyric acid, propionic acid, and valeric acid showed a MIC of 3750 µg/mL in all strains tested, while the MIC of acetic acid was between 1875 and 3750 µg/mL. Subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the motility of all Salmonella strains, especially in the presence of acetic acid. Biofilm formation was also significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the presence of SCFAs in some of the Salmonella strains. Salmonella strain. Salmonella Typhimurium T7 showed significant (p < 0.05) upregulation of important virulence genes, such as invA and hilA, especially in the presence of butyric acid. Therefore, SCFAs are promising substances for the inhibition of the growth of foodborne pathogens. However, it is important to avoid the use of subinhibitory concentrations that could increase the virulence of foodborne pathogen Salmonella.

1. Introduction

Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are end metabolites produced by microbial fermentation of undigested carbohydrates and dietary fibers. Butyrate, acetate, and propionate are the main SCFAs, but others, such as lactate and valerate, are also produced by microbiota [1,2,3]. SCFAs have important roles in human gut homeostasis by exerting several effects on the host and its own microbiota. SCFAs are used as a source of energy by intestinal epithelial cells. They also modulate the absorption of electrolytes and increase the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. SCFAs also reduce the production of molecules that act as pro-inflammatory substances, such as nitrous oxide, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor. SCFAs also have a protective effect against bacterial pathogens by maintaining the integrity of the epithelial barrier [4,5]. In addition, it has been observed that SCFAs induce the production of antimicrobial peptides by enterocytes [6]. In the same way, it has been observed that macrophages that differentiate in the presence of butyrate show increased antimicrobial activity even in the absence of an increased inflammatory cytokine response [6].
In adequate concentrations, SCFAs also have direct antimicrobial activity against pathogenic bacteria. SCFAs can reduce microbial growth by modifying the intracellular pH and the metabolism. At lower pH, SCFAs are commonly present in nonionized forms that can diffuse across the bacterial membrane into the bacterial cytoplasm. Once in the cytoplasm, SCFAs dissociate, increasing the anion and proton concentrations and lowering the intracellular pH [7,8,9].
The production of adequate and balanced SCFAs by a healthy gut microbiota is an important factor that prevents infection by common foodborne pathogens [10]. It was found that Bacteriodes spp. mediates resistance to Salmonella colonization by producing propionate [9]. Diverse studies have observed total SFCAs concentrations ranging between 60 and 85 mM with levels of acetate between 40 and 50 mM, propionate around 15 mM, and butyrate around 10 mM [11,12]. A dysregulation of SCFAs levels can facilitate the colonization of intestine by pathogens. In this sense, decreased concentrations of butyrate cause upregulation of virulence genes in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), and different spatial gradients of SCFAs regulate the expression of virulence and commensal genes in Campylobacter jejuni [13,14]. Propionate decreases the expression of Salmonella genes located in Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI-1) [15]. In addition, pre-incubation of Salmonella enteritidis with propionate and butyrate results in a reduction in host cell invasion [16]. It is noteworthy that SCFA concentrations similar to those found in the distal ileum cause upregulation of Salmonella virulence genes, while concentrations similar to those found in the colon have the opposite effect [17]. Therefore, the protective and antimicrobial effects of SCFAs are concentration dependent.
Understanding the inhibitory effects of SCFAs on enteric pathogens is not only important from a gut health point-of-view, but this knowledge can also be important from a food safety point-of-view. In the last years, different researchers have been evaluating alternatives to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens in the food industry as antimicrobial peptides [18,19]. In the same way, SCFAs can be added to food and feed as preservatives, avoiding the growth of bacterial pathogens. The SCFAs ingested through can also have positive effects in gut balance with inhibitory effects in enteric pathogens. For this purpose, the aim of this study was to determine the minimum inhibitory and biocidal concentrations of four SCFAs (acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, and valeric acid) in Salmonella and to determine the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of these SCFAs in biofilm formation, motility, and gene expression. As poultry products are mainly responsible of human salmonellosis [20], the authors decided to use a total of 12 Salmonella strains isolated from poultry. These Salmonella strains also belonged to seven different serotypes and two Salmonella subspecies in order to observe if they have a similar response to the presence of SCFAs.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Antimicrobial Activity of Short Chain Fatty Acids

Until now, there have been limited studies evaluating the MIC and minimum biocidal concentration (MBC) values of SCFAs in food-borne pathogens [21]. In this study, the MICs of the four SCFAs were determined. Butyric acid, propionic acid, and valeric acid had the same MIC value (3750 µg/mL) in all Salmonella strains tested in this study. In addition, all strains showed the same MBC (3750 µg/mL) with all the SFCAs tested. However, in the case of acetic acid, five of the twelve strains had a MIC value of 1875 µg/mL, while the other strains had the same MIC as those with the others SCFAs (3750 µg/mL). The results observed with acetic acid were similar to those observed in previous work where the MIC50 was 1650 µg/mL and the MIC90 was 3280 µg/mL in 88 multidrug resistant Salmonella isolates [22]. In the same way, another study that evaluated the antimicrobial activity of acetic acid in different pathogens, such as E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, or Acinetobacter baumannii, found that the MIC values were between 0.16% and 0.31% [23]. However, another study that determined the antimicrobial activity of acetic acid in E. coli and Salmonella sp. strains found MIC values of 1.5% and 1%, respectively [24]. Campylobacter coli strains isolated from pigs had MIC values of 2048 µg/mL in most of the strains tested in the presence of butyric acid and propionic acid [25], lower than the MIC values observed in this study. Conversely, in others works with Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 or Vibrio harveyi, the inhibition values and propionic acid of butyric acid, respectively, were between 500 and 100 µg/mL [26,27]. The antimicrobial activity of SCFAs is due to their diffusion across the bacterial membrane into the bacterial cytoplasm, modifying the intracellular pH and the metabolism [7,8].

2.2. Effect of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Salmonella enterica Motility

Once the MICs were calculated, the effect of SCFAs on Salmonella motility was determined. For this purpose, the highest subinhibitory concentrations of the SCFAs were used. The motility was significantly reduced in the presence of SCFAs in comparison to the control semisolid agar in all strains tested in this study (Table 1). There were also significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different SCFAs included in the study. The higher reduction in motility was observed in the presence of acetic acid, while valeric acid caused a lower reduction in motility in comparison to the control agar. In accordance with this study, a previous study also observed that organic acids, including acetic acid, decreased the motility of E. coli and Salmonella strains isolated from fresh fruit and vegetables [24]. It was observed that Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14,028 motility decreased as the subinhibitory concentrations of propionic acid increased [27]. Deepening in these effects, it has been observed that the fermentation products of Clostridium ramosum and SCFAs reduce the motility in enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), disturb the flagellar rotation, and the flagella length is lower in comparison to control conditions [28]. However, the decrease in intracellular pH could be responsible for the slow flagella motor rotation and the reduced motility [29].

2.3. Effect of Short Chain Fatty Acids on Biofilm Formation

The presence of subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs influence biofilm formation in some of the Salmonella strains included in this study (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in the reduction of biofilm formation between the different SCFAs tested in eight of the nine strains. However, in Salmonella Typhimurium T23, the reduction in biofilm formation caused by propionic acid was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the reduction caused by acetic acid and butyric acid. It is also worth noting that the strains in which biofilm formation was not influenced by the SFCAs were Salmonella strains with a low ability to produce a biofilm at 37 °C.
Consistent with the above-mentioned, previous studies have also observed a reduction in biofilm formation by Salmonella strains under the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of acetic acid [23,24,27]. The presence of acetic acid causes inhibition of extracellular polysaccharides production in foodborne pathogens such as E. coli or S. Typhimurium, although to a lesser extent in the latter [24]. Acetic acid also showed anti-quorum sensing activity in E. coli and S. Typhimurium [24]. Quorum sensing is a cell-to-cell communication mechanism that has great importance in biofilm formation, and inhibition of this mechanism can result in lower biofilm formation [30]. Flagella also have important roles in the initial adhesion of bacterial cells to a surface in biofilm formation [31]. In this sense, it has been observed that propionic acid causes changes in type 1 fimbriae, with a brittle and broken appearance [27]. The authors hypothesize that these effects of SCFAs, in combination with the short flagella that can be synthetized in the presence of intracellular acid [29], could be responsible for the lower biofilm formation observed. The results of this study should be considered as preliminary and only exploratory in nature and might not have external validity. There are some biofilm formation assays that are more labor-intensive and more accurate than using 96-well microplates in recovering the sessile cells using sonication or the beads/vortex method [32,33]. Therefore, the preliminary results of this study should be confirmed in the future by using more accurate assays and including different surfaces of great importance in the food industry, such as stainless steel.

2.4. Effect of Short Chain Fatty Acids on Salmonella enterica Gene Expression

The results of this and previous studies have demonstrated that SCFAs are able to inhibit the growth of foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella [9,22,24,27]. However, previous studies also observed that subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs can induce the expression of virulence genes in E. coli [14], Salmonella [17], and C. jejuni [13]. In this study, the expression of 14 genes related to virulence, stress response, and carbon storage was determined in two Salmonella strains (S. Typhimurium T7 and S. Infantis I4).
The expression profiles of the two strains were different. Salmonella Typhimurium T7 showed overexpression of all genes tested in this study in presence of SCFAs (Figure 2), especially acetic acid and butyric acid, in comparison to control growth media. Butyric acid caused significant upregulation of all genes evaluated in this study in comparison to propionic acid and valeric acid. For gene invA, the upregulation in the presence of butyric acid was also significantly higher than in the presence of the other three SCFAs. Only the transcription of rpoS was not influenced by SCFAs. Salmonella Infantis I4 (Figure 3) showed different expression profiles according to the gene and the SFCAs. It is remarkable that nine genes showed no significant differences in their regulation between the different SCFAs and in comparison to the control sample. While gene fliC was significantly upregulated in the presence of valeric acid, gene invA was significantly downregulated in comparison to the other SCFAs. The expression of hilA and spiA was also significantly upregulated in the presence of acetic acid and butyric acid.
Previous studies have shown that acetate can be used by Salmonella as a signal for invasion gene expression by upregulation of genes such as hilA and sirA [17]. On the other side, it has been observed that propionate downregulates invasion genes located in SPI-1 [15]. The results of this study showed that upregulation of hilA or spiA genes caused by propionate was lower in the presence of propionic acid than in the presence of other SCFAs, such as acetic acid or butyric acid. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that most of the genes tested in this study were significantly upregulated in S. Typhimurium T7 in the presence of acetic acid and especially butyric acid (Figure 2). In concordance with these results, it was observed that enterohemorrhagic E. coli increased the expression of virulence genes in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of SFCAs and especially in the presence of butyric acid [14]. Consequently, subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs can produce an overexpression of virulence genes in common enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella and E. coli, resulting in increased virulence of these pathogens.
In previous work, organic acids, such as acetic acid, showed anti-quorum sensing activity in Salmonella and E. coli [24]. Quorum sensing is an important mechanism that regulates the expression of virulence determinants to effectively colonize the host [34]. In this study, the expression of luxS, which codifies the Autoinducer-2 (AI-2), was significantly upregulated in S. Typhimurium T7 in the presence of SCFAs. The authors consider that SCFAs can inhibit the quorum sensing mechanism by blocking AI-2 instead of downregulating the genes implicated in the production of the signal molecule. Finally, it is necessary to re-emphasize the different transcriptional profiles observed in S. Typhimurium T7 and S. Infantis I4. This is due to the strain variability in the behavior of foodborne pathogens [35]. It is important to consider that S. Typhimurium is one of the most pathogenic serotypes of S. enterica [36]. As a consequence, strains of this serotype could have an enhanced virulence response in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Salmonella enterica Strains and Short Chain Fatty Acids

A total of twelve Salmonella strains belonging to seven different serotypes and two Salmonella subspecies were included in this study (Table 2). All the strains were previously isolated from poultry houses and chicken meat in our laboratory according to ISO 6579:2003 [37]. The strains were kept at −20 °C in tryptic soy broth (TSB, Oxoid, UK) supplemented with 20% glycerol until use. Salmonella strains were previously grown in nutrient agar (Applichem Panreac, Barcelona, Spain) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C before use. The following four different SCFAs were tested in this study: acetic acid (≥99%, Sigma Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), butyric acid (≥99%, Alfa Aesar, ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, Waltham, MA, USA), propionic acid (≥99%, Sigma Aldrich), and valeric acid (≥99%, Sigma Aldrich).

3.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Biocidal Concentration of Short Chain Fatty Acids

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of SCFAs were determined according to the microdilution broth method described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. An initial concentration of SCFAs at 20% in Mueller–Hinton broth was used to perform serial dilutions of the tested SCFAs. Salmonella strains were initially grown in nutrient agar for 24 h at 37 °C, and isolated colonies were used to prepare a saline suspension with a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Two serial dilutions of the initial inoculum in Mueller–Hinton broth were performed to obtain a final concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL. In a 96-well microtiter plate, 100 µL of each dilution was mixed with 100 µL of the final inoculum, and microplates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration in which no visual bacterial growth was observed. The liquid of wells with no visual bacterial growth observed was transferred to nutrient agar plates to determine the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C.

3.3. Motility Assays

Motility assays were carried out in nutrient semisolid agar plates composed of 8 g/L of nutrient broth (AppliChem, Panreac, Barcelona, Spain), 4 g/L of agar (Liofilchem, Abruzzi TE, Italy), and 0.05 g/L of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (Sigma Aldrich). Five different types of agar were used: a control agar and four semisolid agars, each supplemented with one SCFA at the highest subinhibitory concentration observed in this study. A saline suspension with a turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was prepared for each strain from the isolated colonies of nutrient agar plates incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. An inoculating loop was immersed in the Salmonella saline suspension, and then the strains were inoculated in the semisolid agar plates by stabbing. Motility agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, the ratio between the stabbing point and the end of the growth circle was measured. The experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.4. Biofilm Formation on Polystyrene

The effect of SCFAs on the ability to produce a biofilm in polystyrene of Salmonella strains included in this study was evaluated according to the method described by Stepanović et al. [38]. Five different growth media were used: control TSB media and four growth media, each supplemented with one of the SCFAs tested in this study to a final concentration of the highest subinhibitory concentration observed the MICs evaluation. Polystyrene, 96-well microplates were filled with 200 µL of the corresponding growth media and then inoculated with 20 µL of saline solution with a Salmonella concentration of 104 CFU/mL. Microplates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and then washed three times with 250 µL of distilled water. Salmonella cells that were adhered to the surface of the wells were fixed with 250 µL of methanol for 15 min. Then, wells were emptied, air dried, and filled with 250 µL of 0.1% crystal violet solution (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain) for 5 min. Excess crystal violet was removed under tap water, and the crystal violet that was adhered to the wells was resolubilized with 250 µL of 33% acetic acid solution. The absorbance of the microplates was read at 630 nm using a plate reader (das, Palombara Sabina, Italy). The experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.5. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR

The transcription of 14 Salmonella genes (Table 3) in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs was evaluated in two Salmonella strains (S. Typhimurium T7 and S. Infantis I4). A total of five growth media were used: TSB media that was used as control media and four growth media, each supplemented with the highest subinhibitory concentrations of one of the SFCAs tested in this study. Fifteen-milliliter plastic tubes were filled with 10 mL of the corresponding growth media and 100 µL of a saline solution with a concentration of 104 CFU/mL of the corresponding Salmonella strains. The tubes were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C and then centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of NZYol (nzytech, Lisboa, Portugal), and the RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Immediately, RNA was quantified using a fluorometer (Qubit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Thermofisher Scientific) and reversed transcribed using the NZY First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (nzytech) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNA was stored at −20 °C until use.
The 10 µL RT-qPCR reactions, composed of 5 µL of NZYSpeedy qPCR green master mix 2× ROX (nzytech), 0.4 µL of each primer, 1 µL of the sample, and 3.2 µL of RNase-free water, were carried out in a QuantStudio 12 k Flex real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific, Foster, CA, USA). The conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 s, annealing at 60 °C for 20 s, and a final melting curve program of 15 s at 95 °C, 60 s at 60 °C, and followed by a dissociation step for 15 s at 95 °C. The expression of target genes in comparison to the control gene 16 s rRNA was evaluated using the 2ΔΔCt method, where ΔΔCt = (Cttarget genes − Ct16s rRNA)treatment − (Cttarget genes − Ct16s rRNA)control.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad, CA, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. Analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05) were used to determine the influence of SCFAs on Salmonella motility, biofilm formation, and transcription profiles.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study showed that SCFAs are promising antimicrobial substances that can be potentially used for human health and food safety purposes. A SCFA concentration of 3750 µg/mL is enough to inhibit the growth of Salmonella strains. In addition, subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs caused a reduction in motility and biofilm formation in Salmonella strains. This study demonstrated that subinhibitory concentrations of SCFAs can enhance the expression of virulence genes in Salmonella strains, resulting in a higher virulence of strains. Thus, for future applications in human health and food safety, it is important to assess the appropriate concentrations of the SCFAs used.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L. and C.M.F.; methodology, A.L.; software, A.L., B.V. and P.R.; formal analysis, A.L. and P.R.; investigation, A.L.; data curation, A.L., P.R. and C.M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—A.C., B.V., P.R. and C.M.F.; supervision, A.C. and C.M.F.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. LeBlanc, J.G.; Chain, F.; Martín, R.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Courau, S.; Langella, P. Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microb. Cell Factories 2017, 16, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Macfarlane, S.; Macfarlane, G.T. Session: Short-chain fatty acids. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McDonald, J.A.K.; Mullish, B.H.; Pechlivanis, A.; Liu, Z.; Brignardello, J.; Kao, D.; Holmes, E.; Li, J.V.; Clarke, T.B.; Thursz, M.R.; et al. Inhibiting Growth of Clostridioides difficile by Restoring Valerate, Produced by the Intestinal Microbiota. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1495–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Honda, K.; Littman, D.R. The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 30, 759–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ashida, H.; Ogawa, M.; Kim, M.; Mimuro, H.; Sasakawa, C. Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schulthess, J.; Pandey, S.; Capitani, M.; Rue-Albrecht, K.C.; Arnold, I.; Franchini, F.; Chomka, A.; Ilott, N.E.; Johnston, D.G.W.; Pires, E.; et al. The Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate Imprints an Antimicrobial Program in Macrophages. Immunity 2019, 50, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cummings, J.H.; Pomare, E.W.; Branch, H.W.J.; Naylor, C.P.E.; MacFarlane, G.T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut 1987, 28, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Repaske, D.R.; Adler, J. Change in intracellular pH of Escherichia coli mediates the chemotactic response to certain attractants and repellents. J. Bacteriol. 1981, 145, 1196–1208. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobson, A.; Lam, L.; Rajendram, M.; Tamburini, F.; Honeycutt, J.; Pham, T.; Van Treuren, W.; Pruss, K.; Stabler, S.R.; Lugo, K.; et al. A Gut Commensal-Produced Metabolite Mediates Colonization Resistance to Salmonella Infection. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Round, J.L.; Mazmanian, S.K. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodríguez-Carrio, J.; Salazar, N.; Margolles, A.; González, S.; Gueimonde, M.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Suárez, A. Free fatty acids profiles are related to gut microbiota signatures and short-chain fatty acids. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, K.N.; Yao, Y.; Ju, S.Y. Short chain fatty acids and fecal microbiota abundance in humans with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Luethy, P.M.; Huynh, S.; Ribardo, D.A.; Winter, S.E.; Parker, C.T.; Hendrixson, D.R. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids modulate expression of Campylobacter jejuni determinants required for commensalism and virulence. MBio 2017, 8, 00407-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nakanishi, N.; Tashiro, K.; Kuhara, S.; Hayashi, T.; Sugimoto, N.; Tobe, T. Regulation of virulence by butyrate sensing in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Microbiology 2009, 155, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hung, C.-C.; Garner, C.D.; Slauch, J.M.; Dwyer, Z.W.; Lawhon, S.D.; Frye, J.G.; Mcclelland, M.; Ahmer, B.M.M.; Altier, C. The intestinal fatty acid propionate inhibits Salmonella invasion through the post-translational control of HilD. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 87, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Van Immerseel, F.; De Buck, J.; Pasmans, F.; Velge, P.; Bottreau, E.; Fievez, V.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. Invasion of Salmonella enteritidis in avian intestinal epithelial cells in vitro is influenced by short-chain fatty acids. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 85, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lawhon, S.D.; Maurer, R.; Suyemoto, M.; Altier, C. Intestinal short-chain fatty acids alter Salmonella typhimurium invasion gene expression and virulence through BarA/SirA. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 1451–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Palmieri, G.; Balestrieri, M.; Capuano, F.; Proroga, Y.T.R.; Pomilio, F.; Centorame, P.; Riccio, A.; Marrone, R.; Anastasio, A. Bactericidal and antibiofilm activity of bactenecin-derivative peptides against the food-pathogen Listeria monocytogenes: New perspectives for food processing industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 279, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agrillo, B.; Balestrieri, M.; Gogliettino, M.; Palmieri, G.; Moretta, R.; Proroga, Y.T.R.; Rea, I.; Cornacchia, A.; Capuano, F.; Smaldone, G.; et al. Functionalized polymeric materials with bio-derived antimicrobial peptides for “active” packaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA, and ECDC). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05500. [Google Scholar]
  21. Peng, M.; Biswas, D. Short chain and polyunsaturated fatty acids in host gut health and foodborne bacterial pathogen inhibition. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3987–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Humayoun, S.B.; Hiott, L.M.; Gupta, S.K.; Barrett, J.B.; Woodley, T.A.; Johnston, J.J.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G. An assay for determining the susceptibility of Salmonella isolates to commercial and household biocides. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Halstead, F.D.; Rauf, M.; Moiemen, N.S.; Bamford, A.; Wearn, C.M.; Fraise, A.P.; Lund, P.A.; Oppenheim, B.A.; Webber, M.A. The antibacterial activity of acetic acid against biofilm-producing pathogens of relevance to burns patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Amrutha, B.; Sundar, K.; Shetty, P.H. Effect of organic acids on biofilm formation and quorum signaling of pathogens from fresh fruits and vegetables. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 111, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Beier, R.C.; Harvey, R.B.; Hernandez, C.A.; Hume, M.E.; Andrews, K.; Droleskey, R.E.; Davidson, M.K.; Bodeis-Jones, S.; Young, S.; Duke, S.E.; et al. Interactions of organic acids with campylobacter coli from swine. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mine, S.; Boopathy, R. Effect of organic acids on shrimp pathogen, Vibrio harveyi. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 63, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Burt, S.A.; Adolfse, S.J.M.; Ahad, D.S.A.; Tersteeg-Zijderveld, M.H.G.; Jongerius-Gortemaker, B.G.M.; Post, J.A.; Brüggemann, H.; Santos, R.R. Cinnamaldehyde, Carvacrol and Organic Acids Affect Gene Expression of Selected Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Markers in IPEC-J2 Cells Exposed to Salmonella typhimurium. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1988–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, J.; Koyanagi, Y.; Isogai, E.; Nakamura, S. Effects of fermentation products of the commensal bacterium Clostridium ramosum on motility, intracellular pH, and flagellar synthesis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakamura, S.; Kami-ike, N.; Yokota, J.-P.; Kudo, S.; Minamino, T.; Namba, K. Effect of Intracellular pH on the Torque-Speed Relationship of Bacterial Proton-Driven Flagellar Motor. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lamas, A.; Regal, P.; Vázquez, B.; Miranda, J.M.; Cepeda, A.; Franco, C.M. Salmonella and Campylobacter biofilm formation: A comparative assessment from farm to fork. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 4014–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Steenackers, H.; Hermans, K.; Vanderleyden, J.; De Keersmaecker, S.C. Salmonella biofilms: An overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 502–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blana, V.; Georgomanou, A.; Giaouris, E. Assessing biofilm formation by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on abiotic substrata in the presence of quorum sensing signals produced by Hafnia alvei. Food Control 2017, 80, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gkana, E.; Giaouris, E.; Doulgeraki, A.; Kathariou, S.; Nychas, G.E. Biofilm formation by Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel under either mono- or dual-species multi-strain conditions and resistance of sessile communities to sub-lethal chemical disinfection. Food Control 2017, 73, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Banerjee, G.; Ray, A.K. The talking language in some major Gram-negative bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2016, 198, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lianou, A.; Koutsoumanis, K.P. Strain variability of the behavior of foodborne bacterial pathogens: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 167, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fàbrega, A.; Vila, J. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium skills to succeed in the host: Virulence and regulation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 308–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. International Standarization Organization. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp. (ISO 6579:2002); International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  38. Stepanovic, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Ranin, L.; Švabic-Vlahovic, M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, S.H.; Jung, B.Y.; Rayamahji, N.; Lee, H.S.; Jeon, W.J.; Choi, K.S.; Kweon, C.H.; Yoo, H.S. A multiplex real-time PCR for differential detection and quantification of Salmonella spp., Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Enteritidis in meats. J. Vet. Sci. 2009, 10, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Karavolos, M.H.; Bulmer, D.M.; Winzer, K.; Wilson, M.; Mastroeni, P.; Williams, P.; Khan, C.M.A. LuxS affects flagellar phase variation independently of quorum sensing in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 769–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Salaheen, S.; Jaiswal, E.; Joo, J.; Peng, M.; Ho, R.; OConnor, D.; Adlerz, K.; Aranda Espinoza, J.; Biswas, D. Bioactive extracts from berry byproducts on the pathogenicity of Salmonella Typhimurium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 237, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, Z.; Jiang, X. Thermal resistance and gene expression of both desiccation-adapted and rehydrated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium cells in aged broiler litter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00367-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, H.; Dong, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G. Effect of growth media on gene expression levels in Salmonella Typhimurium biofilm formed on stainless steel surface. Food Control 2016, 59, 546–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aurass, P.; Düvel, J.; Karste, S.; Nübel, U.; Rabsch, W.; Flieger, A. glnA truncation in Salmonella enterica results in a small colony variant phenotype, attenuated host cell entry, and reduced expression of flagellin and SPI-1- associated effector genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01838-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Qian, W.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G. Behavior variability of Salmonella enterica isolates from meat-related sources. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, J.; Zhai, L.; Lu, W.; Lu, Z.; Bie, X. Amino acid decarboxylase-dependent acid tolerance, selected phenotypic, and virulence gene expression responses of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg. Food Res. Int. 2017, 92, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 08 00265 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of the four short chain fatty acids tested in this study (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid) in the biofilm formation of Salmonella strains at 37 °C expressed as optical density. Results are expressed as the mean of three different experiments (n = 3) and error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters in the same Salmonella strain represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different growth media.
Figure 1. Influence of the four short chain fatty acids tested in this study (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid) in the biofilm formation of Salmonella strains at 37 °C expressed as optical density. Results are expressed as the mean of three different experiments (n = 3) and error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters in the same Salmonella strain represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different growth media.
Antibiotics 08 00265 g001
Antibiotics 08 00265 g002 550
Figure 2. Fold change normalized to control gene 16s rRNA in the transcription of genes related to virulence and stress in the presence of short chain fatty acids in comparison to control TSB growth media in Salmonella Typhimurium T7. Only target genes with different letters between the different growth media present statistically significant differences after analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Fold change normalized to control gene 16s rRNA in the transcription of genes related to virulence and stress in the presence of short chain fatty acids in comparison to control TSB growth media in Salmonella Typhimurium T7. Only target genes with different letters between the different growth media present statistically significant differences after analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Antibiotics 08 00265 g002
Antibiotics 08 00265 g003 550
Figure 3. Fold change normalized to control gene 16s rRNA in the transcription of genes related to virulence and stress in presence of short chain fatty acids in comparison to control TSB growth media in Salmonella Infantis I4. Only target genes with different letters between the different growth media present statistically significant differences after analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Fold change normalized to control gene 16s rRNA in the transcription of genes related to virulence and stress in presence of short chain fatty acids in comparison to control TSB growth media in Salmonella Infantis I4. Only target genes with different letters between the different growth media present statistically significant differences after analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05).
Antibiotics 08 00265 g003
Table
Table 1. Influence of the four short chain fatty acids tested in this study (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid) in the motility of Salmonella strains at 37 °C expressed in millimeters. Different letters in the same row represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different agar media.
Table 1. Influence of the four short chain fatty acids tested in this study (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid) in the motility of Salmonella strains at 37 °C expressed in millimeters. Different letters in the same row represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different agar media.
Motility (mm)
StrainCodeControl
(n = 3) Mean ± SD		Acetic Acid (n = 3) Mean ± SDButyric Acid (n = 3) Mean ± SDPropionic Acid (n = 3) Mean ± SDValeric Acid (n = 3) Mean ± SD
S. enterica subsp. arizonaeAZ316.00 ± 1.73 a2.33 ± 1.53 c6.00 ± 1.73 b,c5.00 ± 1.00 b,c8.67 ± 1.15 b
S. enterica subsp. arizonaeAZ2617.00 ± 2.00 a2.00 ± 1.00 c5.33 ± 1.53 b,c5.67 ± 2.10 b,c8.00 ± 2.00 b
S. BredeneyBR115.33 ± 1.15 a2.00 ± 1.73 c4.67 ± 1.15 c3.00 ± 1.00 c8.33 ± 1.53 b
S. InfantisI1815.33 ± 2.31 a1.67 ± 1.15 c3.67 ± 1.15 c3.67 ± 0.57 c8.67 ± 1.15 b
S. InfantisI415.33 ± 1.53 a3.00 ± 1.73 c5.67 ± 1.15 b,c2.67 ± 1.53 c7.33 ± 2.08 b
S. IsangiIG115.67 ± 2.08 a1.67 ± 0.58 c4.00 ± 1.00 c4.67 ± 1.15 c9.00 ± 1.73 b
S. MontevideoM120.00 ± 2.00 a1.33 ± 0.58 c6.33 ± 2.08 b5.33 ± 0.58 b8.33 ± 0.58 b
S. NewportN618.33 ± 1.53 a2.67 ± 1.53 d7.00 ± 1.73 b,c4.00 ± 2.00 c,d10.00 ± 2.00 b
S. TyphimuriumT120.00 ± 1.00 a3.67 ± 1.15 c4.67 ± 1.53 c6.00 ± 1.73 c10.00 ± 1.00 b
S. TyphimuriumT317.77 ± 2.52 a2.67 ± 0.58 c4.33 ± 1.53 b,c4.00 ± 2.65 b,c8.00 ± 1.00 b
S. TyphimuriumT719.33 ± 2.08 a3.33 ± 1.15 c5.33 ± 1.53 c3.33 ± 1.15 c10.67 ± 1.53 b
S. TyphimuriumT2319.67 ± 2.10 a2.33 ± 2.31 c6.00 ± 1.00 b,c3.67 ± 2.10 c9.33 ± 2.52 b
Total-17.36 ± 2.41 a2.43 ± 1.36 d4.12 ± 1.60 c4.24 ± 1.69 c8.45 ± 1.92 b
Table
Table 2. List of Salmonella strains included in this study and its source.
Table 2. List of Salmonella strains included in this study and its source.
StrainCodeSource
S. enterica subsp. arizonaeAZ3Poultry farm
S. enterica subsp. arizonaeAZ26Poultry farm
S. BredeneyBR1Poultry farm
S. InfantisI18Poultry farm
S. InfantisI4Poultry farm
S. IsangiIG1Poultry farm
S. MontevideoM1Poultry farm
S. NewportN6Poultry farm
S. TyphimuriumT1Chicken meat
S. TyphimuriumT3Chicken meat
S. TyphimuriumT7Poultry farm
S. TyphimuriumT23Poultry farm
Table
Table 3. Primers sequences of genes tested in this study.
Table 3. Primers sequences of genes tested in this study.
Target GenesSequence (5′–3′)Reference
16s rRNAF: AGGCCTTCGGGTTGTAAAGT
R: GTTAGCCGGTGCTTCTTCTG		[39]
luxSF: ATGCCATTATTAGATAGCTT
R: GAGATGGTCGCGCATAAAGCCAGC		[40]
hilAF: AATGGTCACAGGCTGAGGTG
R: ACATCGTCGCGACTTGTGAA		[41]
invAF: CGCGCTTGATGAGCTTTACC
R: CTCGTAATTCGCCGCCATTG		[41]
rpoSF: CAAGGGGAAATCCGTAAACCC
R: GCCAATGGTGCCGAGTATC		[42]
csrAF: CTGGACTGCTGGGATTTTTC
R: CATGATTGGCGATGAGGTC 		[43]
fliCF: CTCGGCTACTGGTCTTGGTG
R: CCGTAACGGTAACTTTGGCG		[44]
ssrAF: CGGCTGGTATTCTTGTAAGGGT
R: AAGCAGACACAAATTCGCAAG		[45]
stnF: CAACCAGATAGTAAAGACCG
R: ATTAGCGTAGAGGCAAAAGA		[46]
fadAF: ATCTCTCCGCCCACTTAATGCGTA
R: AGCCTTGCTCCAGCGTTTGTTGTA		[42]
sirAF: CCAGCTACTTTCGCAGCAA
R: AACACGTTGTAACGCGGTTG		[41]
spiAF: AGGCGCTTGATATGTGC
R: GCAGGCTCCGGAATTTTAGG		[46]
cpxF: CATTTAACGACCGCGAGCTG
R: ACCCGGATTAAGGCTTAGCG		[44]
rpoEF: CACCTTACGGGAGCTGGATG
R: GAAGATACGTGAACGCACCG		[44]
flijBF: ATGGTACTACACTGGATGTATCG
R: GTAAAGCCACCAATAGTAAC		[44]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lamas, A.; Regal, P.; Vázquez, B.; Cepeda, A.; Franco, C.M. Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonella enterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 265. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040265

AMA Style

Lamas A, Regal P, Vázquez B, Cepeda A, Franco CM. Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonella enterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(4):265. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lamas, Alexandre, Patricia Regal, Beatriz Vázquez, Alberto Cepeda, and Carlos Manuel Franco. 2019. "Short Chain Fatty Acids Commonly Produced by Gut Microbiota Influence Salmonella enterica Motility, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression" Antibiotics 8, no. 4: 265. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics8040265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop