Next Article in Journal
De Novo Structural Determination of the Oligosaccharide Structure of Hemocyanins from Molluscs
Next Article in Special Issue
Protective Effects of Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) on Endometrial, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Previous Article in Journal
Citrus sudachi Peel Extract Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Promotes the Differentiation of Keratinocytes through Inhibition of the EGFR–ERK Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Targeting the Id1-Kif11 Axis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Combination Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Curcumin’s Beneficial Effects on Neuroblastoma: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Potential Solutions

1
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha 24144, Qatar
2
Musculoskeletal Research Group and Tumor Biology, Chair of Vegetative Anatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
3
Department of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 2 October 2020 / Revised: 17 October 2020 / Accepted: 19 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomolecules and Cancer Prevention)

Abstract

:
Curcumin, a natural polyphenolic compound derived from the South Asian turmeric plant (Curcuma longa), has well-characterized antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-protein-aggregate, and anticancer properties. Neuroblastoma (NB) is a cancer of the nervous system that arises primarily in pediatric patients. In order to reduce the multiple disadvantages and side effects of conventional oncologic modalities and to potentially overcome cancer drug resistance, natural substances such as curcumin are examined as complementary and supportive therapies against NB. In NB cell lines, curcumin by itself promotes apoptosis and cell cycle arrest through the suppression of serine–threonine kinase Akt and nuclear factor kappa of activated B-cells (NF-κB) signaling, induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, and upregulation of p53 and caspase signaling. While curcumin demonstrates anti-NB efficacy in vitro, cross-validation between NB cell types is currently lacking for many of its specific mechanistic activities. Furthermore, curcumin’s low bioavailability by oral administration, poor absorption, and relative insolubility in water pose challenges to its clinical introduction. Numerous curcumin formulations, including nanoparticles, nanocarriers, and microemulsions, have been developed, with these having some success in the treatment of NB. In the future, standardization and further basic and preclinical trials will be required to ensure the safety of curcumin formulations. While the administration of curcumin is clinically safe even at high doses, clinical trials are necessary to substantiate the practical efficacy of curcumin in the prevention and treatment of NB.

1. Natural Substances in the Prevention and Treatment of Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a solid pediatric tumor of the nervous system that arises from neural progenitor cells. Neuroblastoma occurs mostly in the abdominal region, especially in and around the adrenal gland. Tumors may also form in the central nervous system (CNS) and the thoracic and pelvic regions [1]. The annual epidemiological occurrence of NB varies regionally, with approximately 13 cases per million children in Germany and 8.3 cases per million children in Argentina [2,3]. Five-year survival rates also vary, with 47% survival among 971 patients in Argentina, 48% among 1094 patients in Europe, and 57% among 265 patients in the United States [3,4].
Notably, the risk posed by NB depends on numerous factors, including patient age, inflammation, protein aggregation, tumor localization or metastasis, and genetic disposition. To take these factors into account, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System establishes four stages of NB progression (L1, L2, M, and MS) and four risk levels (very low, low, intermediate, and high) [5,6]. One of the major risk factors in NB is the amplification of the N-myc proto-oncogene protein (MYCN), which promotes NB tumorigenesis. Other risk factors include patient age and the deletion of a portion of chromosome 11 (11q aberration). Both MYCN amplification and 11q aberration are markers of poor clinical prognosis [7].
A variety of human and rodent cell lines are utilized to account for NB risk factors and other genetic variables within in vitro studies. These include the MYCN-amplified human cell lines IMR-32, Kelly, LAN5, SK-N-Be(2), SMS-KAN, and NUB-7. Among these lines, IMR-32, Kelly, SK-N-Be(2), and SMS-KAN exhibit 11q aberrations. In contrast, non-MYCN-amplified human cell lines include L-AN-6, SH-SY5Y, SK-N-AS, and SK-N-SH; of these, L-AN-6, SH-SY5Y, and SK-N-AS cells exhibit 11q aberrations [8]. Finally, rodent cell lines include the murine Neuro2a line and the rat B50 line.
Conventional treatments for NB include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical tumor resection, and combinations thereof. Surgery alone may sufficiently ablate low-risk NB; supporting chemotherapy with carboplatin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin may occur in some cases [9]. Reduced-dose chemotherapy with the drugs mentioned above can similarly control intermediate-risk NB [10]. In contrast, a treatment regimen for high-risk NB could include the following: (1) induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, carboplatin, etoposide, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide; (2) surgical removal of the primary tumor, with or without additional topotecan, vincristine, and doxorubicin therapy; (3) consolidation chemotherapy utilizing busulfan and melphalan, or carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan; (4) stem cell rescue; (5) radiation therapy; and (6) maintenance chemotherapy, with or without immunotherapy [11]. These often complex and multifaceted conventional treatment regimens are clinically trialed and effective. However, they also involve some significant disadvantages. Chemotherapy, for instance, can induce potentially harmful side effects, including toxicity and myelosuppression [10]. Surgical interventions, on the other hand, are invasive and can lead to incomplete tumor resection, requiring further chemo- and radiotherapy and possibly stem cell transplantation [12].
In attempting to address the disadvantages posed by conventional oncologic therapies, the anticancer properties of natural substances have been widely investigated. Natural substances are naturally occurring chemical compounds, many of which are dietary. Some of these compounds can support cancer prevention and therapy or overcome cancer drug resistance with few or no side effects. Flavonoids, for example, suppress cancer through modulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, inhibition of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and inhibition of cancer cell metabolism [13,14]. Plant phenolic acids and lichens upregulate apoptosis, inhibit proliferation and metastasis, and induce cell cycle arrest, while vanilloids such as capsaicin exert anticancer effects through the modulation of intracellular calcium signaling [15,16,17]. Significantly, several natural substances are effective against NB cells in vitro. Isoliquiritigenin, a flavonoid, induces necrotic cell death and cell cycle arrest and downregulates intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in SH-SY5Y cells [18]. Another flavonoid, rutin, downregulates the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and MYCN, upregulates tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in LAN-5 cells [19]. Juniper berry extract, which also includes flavonoids, upregulates p53 and induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells [20]. Furthermore, resveratrol, a natural polyphenol found in berries, grapes, and nuts, demonstrates several anticarcinogenic effects on NB cells—it increases cytotoxicity, inhibits the cell cycle, induces apoptosis, and reduces the overall growth rate. Initiator and effector caspase activation, inhibition of Bcl-2, and downregulation of p21 are known mechanisms [21,22]. Finally, curcumin, a plant-derived non-flavonoid substance, exhibits a wide range of anticancer properties toward NB cell lines, which will be investigated in this review.
In evaluating the potential of curcumin in preventing and treating NB, it should be emphasized that in contrast to most known tumors, the tumor suppressor protein p53 occurs as a wild type in almost all NB tumors [23]. Initially, p53 is primarily localized to the cytosol, where it is irregularly stabilized, accumulated, and overexpressed [24,25]. This is a typical mechanism for the functional inactivation of p53 in NB [24,25,26]. However, the p53 signaling pathway can be activated in several NB cell lines despite its cytoplasmic localization and nuclear exclusion [26,27,28]. In addition, the expression of p53 in malignant NB cells, as opposed to non-malignant NB cells, is significantly downregulated at the physiological level [24,25,29]. This underscores the possibility that these cells can undergo apoptosis [30,31]. Interestingly, the p53 transformation process in NB cells is reversible, suggesting that it could represent a therapeutic target. Malignant NB cells are often resistant to typical radiation and chemotherapy treatments. The upregulation of transcription factors such as NF-κB and activator protein 1 (AP-1) in tumors is partly responsible for this increased resistance [32,33]. Curcumin, a strong and natural NF-κB inhibitor [34,35,36,37,38,39,40], significantly reduces cell survival and modulates the expression of apoptosis-related genes in human NB cells in combination with radiation therapy [32]. Notably, p53-dependent cell death in various tumor cells can be specifically and effectively activated by treatment with the naturally occurring polyphenol curcumin [41].

2. Structure and Biological Properties of Curcumin

Curcumin ((1E,6E)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene-3,5-dione) is derived from the rhizome of the turmeric plant (Curcuma longa). Turmeric is native to South Asia (e.g., India, China, and Indonesia) and is cultivated for its traditional medicinal properties [42].
Curcumin exists as a yellow-orange solid, with a molecular weight of 368 g/mol and a melting point of 183 °C. Chemically, it is a polyphenolic compound with two aromatic rings, each with one hydroxy and one methoxy substituent (Figure 1). A seven-carbon chain with two α-β unsaturated carbonyl groups (which are subject to tautomerization) links the rings [43].
Commercially available curcumin contains three primary components, namely diferuloylmethane (the most abundant and active component of turmeric, at 82%) and its derivatives demethoxycurcumin (15%) and bisdemethoxycurcumin (3%); these are collectively referred to as “curcuminoids” [44,45]. Curcuminoids have the potential to treat various diseases through the modulation of molecular signaling targets, including transcription factors (e.g., NF-κB, AP-1, ß-catenin, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor), enzymes (e.g., COX-2, 5-LOX, and iNOS), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6) [44,46,47,48,49,50,51].
The biological and physiological properties of curcumin have been extensively examined and reviewed in the context of neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Curcumin exhibits notable antioxidant activities through iron chelation, inhibition of lipid peroxidation, and scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [52]. The compound also has anti-inflammatory properties in acute and chronic inflammation [53]. Beyond these functions, curcumin is widely examined as an anticancer agent. Orally administered curcumin—alone and in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics—has been clinically trialed in pancreatic, breast, and prostate cancer patients [54,55,56,57]. Curcumin also demonstrates oncologic effects by itself on murine glioblastoma xenografts and in combination with the chemotherapeutic 5-fluorouracil on colorectal cancer cells [49,58,59,60].
Although curcumin has many positive effects on health, it is sometimes criticized for its low bioavailability—a result of its low absorption and rapid metabolism by the body. However, its bioavailability can be enhanced through combination with adjuvants. Indeed, piperine, a component of black pepper, is suitable for this purpose [61,62,63]. Notably, while curcumin’s anticancer properties are frequently reported, its membrane transport mechanisms remain mostly uncharacterized. Molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance experiments indicate that curcumin can insert itself into plasma membranes [64,65]. However, specific transport mechanisms for the nervous system and NB cells are unclear at this time.
Despite these shortcomings, curcumin is a major component of numerous spices and foods, and is well tolerated in relatively high concentrations as part of daily diets without side effects. As such, it has high potential as a putative chemopreventive or therapeutic agent [66].

3. Description of the Study

3.1. Rationale and Aims of the Study

A vast body of preclinical literature is available on the anticancer properties of curcumin. Promising results have arisen from pancreatic and colon cancer cells, and within the CNS in glioblastoma and brain tumor cells [67]. Within the previous decade, clinical trials have substantiated the potential oncologic applications of curcumin for several common cancer types (pancreatic, prostate, and breast cancers). Moreover, clinical trials have also tested the anticancer properties of curcumin in the nervous system. Its effects on glioblastoma cell lines have been widely documented and extensively reviewed. However, the literature relating curcumin and NB, a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, remains comparatively sparse.
As such, this review explores curcumin’s viability as a natural supportive therapy for the prevention and treatment of NB. It first summarizes existing preclinical trials of curcumin on NB cell lines and presents overarching pathways through which curcumin may exert oncologic effects. This study then notes the synergistic and combinatorial effects of curcumin with other natural substances, chemotherapeutics, and radiotherapy on NB. Moreover, the differential effects of curcumin on various NB cell lines and types are explored. Finally, this review discusses the current challenges involved in curcumin delivery and presents some potential solutions and improvements.

3.2. Study Methodology

Core literature for this review was obtained from PubMed and Google Scholar, using the keywords “curcumin,” “neuroblastoma,” and “apoptosis.” A PubMed search with these keywords yielded 42 literature results. Approximately 20 of these studies were utilized for this review. Studies including both curcumin and NB but concerning subjects other than oncology (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, or neurodegeneration) were excluded. Further literature (approximately 10 recent studies) on the bioavailability and absorption of curcumin was obtained using the keywords “curcumin”, “bioavailability”, “nervous system”, or “brain delivery”.

4. Curcumin as an Anticancer Agent in NB

Preclinical trials demonstrate that curcumin exerts a range of oncologic effects on NB cell lines. These include the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, downregulation of proliferative signaling pathways, inhibition of cell migration, and disruption of cellular glucose metabolism (Table 1).

4.1. Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest

In cancerous cells, proliferative and pro-survival effectors such as the serine–threonine kinase Akt, nuclear factor kappa light-chain enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB), Bcl-2, and Survivin are active, while apoptotic effectors such as cytochrome c, p53, and caspases are suppressed. Curcumin shifts the intracellular signaling mechanisms in NB to upregulate apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [41]. Mechanistically, curcumin promotes apoptosis through the downregulation of Akt and NF-κB signaling, induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, upregulation of p53, and activation of caspases (Figure 2).
Upon its in vitro application to NB cells, curcumin firstly modulates phosphatase and tension homolog (PTEN)–Akt signaling. Curcumin upregulates PTEN, which downregulates Akt and reduces Akt translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus [68]. Downregulation of Akt, in turn, leads to (1) downregulation of NF-κB; (2) upregulation of the pro-apoptotic mitochondrial protein Bad and induction of its translocation from the cytosol to the mitochondria; and (3) upregulation of the forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) protein and induction of its nuclear translocation from the cytosol [68,69,70]. FOXO3a consequently upregulates the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim), as well as the Fas ligand (Fas-L). Elevated levels of Fas-L induce the Fas pathway, in which Fas-L and Fas activate caspase 8, a proteolytic enzyme that cleaves the BH3-interacting domain death agonist (Bid) protein into its active form [68,71] (see Figure 2).
In inducing mitochondrial dysfunction, curcumin depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), leading to the downregulation of Bcl-2 [72]. The upregulation of Bim and downregulation of NF-κB, as previously discussed, also contribute to the downregulation of Bcl-2 [69,73]. In turn, the downregulation of Bcl-2 causes the upregulation of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) [72]. Together, the upregulation of Bax, Fas-L, Bid, and Bad; the depolarization of the MMP; as well as the downregulation of Bcl-2 all contribute to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol [70,71,72,74]. Additionally, curcumin downregulates the mitochondrial heat shock protein Hsp60 [68].
Concurrently with the modulation of PTEN–Akt signaling and induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, curcumin highly regulates pro-apoptotic p53 signaling in NB cells. The increase of intracellular ROS levels by curcumin leads to the downregulation of the proliferative extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERK) 1/2 and the upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) [72,75]. HIF-1α and downregulated ERK 1/2 consequently upregulate nuclear p53 (p53n) [75,76]. In turn, p53n further upregulates Bax and induces the pro-apoptotic brain-expressed X-linked (Bex) genes [75,77]. Moreover, downregulation of mitochondrial Hsp60 allows for the upregulation of cytosolic p53 (p53c), which in turn downregulates the pro-survival protein Survivin [78].
At the end of the pro-apoptotic axis, cytochrome c release, Bex genes, and p53n activate caspase 9 [71,75]. Caspase 9 activates caspase 3; Survivin, which ordinarily inhibits apoptosis by downregulating caspase 3, is itself downregulated and does not perform this function [79]. Finally, caspase 3 cleaves poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), leading to apoptosis.
In addition to apoptosis, curcumin also promotes cell cycle arrest in various NB cell lines. FOXO3a upregulates the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27, while p53 upregulates the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 [68,80]. Together, p21 and p27 induce cell cycle arrest [68,77].
Interestingly, curcumin activates the degradation of amyloidogenic proteins, including the amyloid β precursor protein and α-synuclein, via translocation of the transcription factor EB–autophagy signaling pathway. This activity is regulated by the inhibition of GSK-3β signaling, which thereby increases antioxidant gene expression in human NB cells [81]. Bavisotto and co-workers demonstrated that curcumin decreases heat shock protein (Hsp60) levels and upregulates Hsp60 mRNA expression, and thereby causes apoptosis. Curcumin downregulates the ubiquitination and nitration of Hsp60 and increases chaperonin levels, indicating that it may disrupt NB progression through a protective pathway involving chaperonin [82].

4.2. Effects on NB Cell Migration and Glucose Metabolism

Beyond the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, curcumin modulates NB cell migration and glucose metabolism. Curcumin upregulates TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (TIMP-1), which downregulates ECM matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), and thereby inhibits cell migration [80]. In fact, D’Aguanno and colleagues demonstrated that cell organization and assembly are inhibited because curcumin downregulates necessary proteins [83]. Additionally, curcumin downregulates the glucose-metabolism-related proteins lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aldolase (ALDOA), triosephosphate isomerase (TPI1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and enolase (ENO1) [83]. As such, curcumin inhibits the following conversions: pyruvate to lactate by LDH; fructose 1,6-biphosphate (FBP) to dihydroxyacetone (DHAP) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (G3P) by ALDOA; DHAP to G3P by TPI1; G3P to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3-BPG) by GAPDH; and 2-phosphoglycerate (2-PG) to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) by ENO1. Since evidence of the Warburg effect has been found in NB, the associated mechanisms could represent a further point of targeting by curcumin. Curcumin can suppress the Warburg effect in other cancer cell lines, and thus influence their glucose metabolism [84,85].
Table 1. Anticancer effects of pure curcumin on NB cell lines. Curcumin modulates genes and proteins that regulate proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, cell motility, and intracellular glucose metabolism. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold.
Table 1. Anticancer effects of pure curcumin on NB cell lines. Curcumin modulates genes and proteins that regulate proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, cell motility, and intracellular glucose metabolism. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold.
EffectCell LineEffective
Concentration/Dosage
Source
Decreases proliferationNeuro2a10, 25, 50 µM[75]
SH-SY5Y [74]
SK-NBE2c [74]
LAN5 [74]
HTLA-230 [74]
GI-LI-N [74]
IMR-32 [74]
Decreases clonal growth/colony formationGI-LI-N20 µM[74]
Increases cell death/decreases viabilityNeuro2a10, 25, 50 µM[75]
LAN515, 20 µM[68]
LAN50.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µM[86]
LAN53.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 µM[82]
LAN510, 20, 40, 80 µM[77]
SK-N-SH0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µM[86]
SK-N-SH1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500 µM[87]
Kelly0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 µM[86]
IMR-32100 µM[72]
IMR-3210, 25, 50, 100 µM[77]
IMR-3210, 100 µg/mL[88]
SMS-KAN100 µM[72]
SK-N-AS100 µM[72]
SK-N-AS10, 25, 50, 75, 100 µM[69]
LA-N-6100 µM[72]
SH-SY5Y5, 10, 20, 50 µM[80]
SH-SY5Y (WT)10, 20, 40, 80 µM[83]
SH-SY5Y (DDP)10, 20, 40, 80 µM[83]
NUB-75, 10, 20, 40, 80 µM[77]
SK-N-Be(2)10, 25, 50, 100 µM[77]
SK-N-Be(2)25, 50, 75, 100 µM[69]
SK-N-MC [89]
SK-N-FI5, 10, 50, 100, 500 µM[87]
Increases apoptosisNeuro2a50 µM[75]
LAN515, 20 µM[68]
LAN512.5, 25 µM[82]
Kelly10, 100 µM[86]
IMR-32100 µM[72]
SMS-KAN100 µM[72]
LA-N-6100 µM[72]
SH-SY5Y20, 50 µM[80]
GI-LI-N10 µM[74]
NUB-710, 25, 50, 100 µM[77]
SK-N-AS25, 50 µM[69]
Causes DNA fragmentationNeuro2a50 µM[75]
Causes membrane blebbingNeuro2a50 µM[75]
Causes nuclear condensationNeuro2a50 µM[75]
Downregulates ERK 1/2 (protein)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
Upregulates caspase 9 (protein)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
Upregulates caspase 3 (protein)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
GI-LI-N10 µM[74]
Inactivates/cleaves PARP-1 (protein)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
SK-N-AS25, 50 µM[69]
Upregulates Bex1 (mRNA)Neuro2a10, 25 µM[75]
Upregulates Bex3 (mRNA)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
Upregulates Bex4 (mRNA)Neuro2a10, 25, 50 µM[75]
Upregulates Bex6 (mRNA)Neuro2a10, 25, 50 µM[75]
Upregulates p53 (mRNA)SH-SY5Y5, 10, 20, 50 µM[80]
Activates/phosphorylates p53 (protein)Neuro2a25 µM[75]
Upregulates p53 (protein)NUB-725 µM[77]
Upregulates p53 nuclear translocationNUB-725 µM[77]
Upregulates p21 (mRNA)SH-SY5Y20, 50 µM[80]
Upregulates p21 (protein)NUB-725 µM[77]
Upregulates ROSiLAN510, 15 µM[68]
SK-N-AS [72]
IMR-32 [72]
Decreases MMPLAN510, 15 µM[68]
IMR-3210 µM[74]
Downregulates Hsp60 (mRNA)LAN512.5 µM[82]
Upregulates Hsp60 (mRNA)LAN525 µM[82]
Downregulates Hsp60 (protein)LAN510, 15 µM[68]
LAN525 µM[82]
Downregulates Hsp60 ubiquitinationLAN525 µM[82]
Downregulates Hsp60 S-nitrosylationLAN525 µM[82]
Downregulates HKII (protein)LAN510, 15 µM[68]
Upregulates Bad (protein)LAN515 µM[68]
Upregulates PTEN (protein)LAN55, 10, 15 µM[68]
Downregulates Akt (protein)LAN510, 15 µM[68]
SK-N-AS25, 50 µM[69]
Downregulates Akt nuclear translocationLAN510, 15 µM[68]
Upregulates FOXO3a (mRNA)LAN5 [68]
Upregulates FOXO3a (protein)LAN510, 15 µM[68]
Upregulates FOXO3a nuclear translocationLAN510, 15 µM[68]
Upregulates Fas-L (mRNA)LAN5 [68]
Upregulates Bim (mRNA)LAN5 [68]
Upregulates p27 (mRNA)LAN5 [68]
Downregulates NF-κB (protein)Kelly 100 µM[86]
Inhibits NF-κB DNA bindingSK-N-MC50, 100 nM[32]
SK-N-AS25 µM[69]
Reduces cell migration/motilitySH-SY5Y10, 20 µM[80]
Upregulates TIMP-1 (mRNA)SH-SY5Y10, 20 µM[80]
Downregulates MMP-2 (mRNA)SH-SY5Y20 µM[80]
Upregulates Bax (protein)NUB-725 µM[77]
Downregulates Bcl-2 (mRNA)SK-N-AS25, 50 µM[69]
Downregulates Bcl-2 (protein)SK-N-AS25, 50 µM[69]
Downregulates LDH (protein)SH-SY5Y (WT)40 µM[83]
SH-SY5Y (DDP)40 µM[83]
Downregulates TPI1 (protein)SH-SY5Y (WT)40 µM[83]
SH-SY5Y (DDP)40 µM[83]
Downregulates GAPDH (protein)SH-SY5Y (WT)40 µM[83]
SH-SY5Y (DDP)40 µM[83]
Downregulates ENO1SH-SY5Y (WT)40 µM[83]
Downregulates ALDOASH-SY5Y (WT)40 µM[83]

5. Synergistic and Combinatorial Effects of Curcumin with Natural and Conventional Therapies for the Treatment of NB

5.1. Curcumin Applied Simultaneously with Other Natural Substances

While curcumin is independently effective in suppressing NB, it also exhibits synergistic effects in conjunction with several conventional and natural therapies (Table 2). Compared to other natural substances, curcumin and berberine (BBR) together demonstrate more significant cytotoxic effects on NB cells than either substance alone [90]. BBR, a plant-derived alkaloid, is a common dietary supplement. However, some clinical trials reported adverse reactions or toxicity at high doses, with 14.3% incidence of adverse effects at dosages of 0.9 to 1.5 g/day and 10.6% incidence at 1.5 g/day [91]. Therefore, while the application of 100 µM BBR is possible in vitro, clinical attainment of such a high concentration may induce potentially dangerous side effects.
In another study, SH-SY5Y cells were treated with a combination of curcumin and piperine. Cytotoxicity analysis demonstrated that increasing concentrations of curcumin- and piperine-loaded zein–chitosan nanoparticles (CPZChN; 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL) decreased the viability of the NB cells from 115 to 99, 30, 8, and finally 3%. CPZChN, with a mean particle size of approximately 500 nm and high encapsulation efficiencies for curcumin (89%) and piperine (87%), constitutes a promising experimental approach [92].

5.2. Curcumin Applied Simultaneously with Conventional Chemotherapeutics

Another potential application of curcumin in NB therapy is in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. These drugs, particularly cisplatin (a platinum compound) and doxorubicin (an anthracycline), share several anti-NB pathways with curcumin (Figure 3). Similarly to curcumin, cisplatin downregulates Bcl-2 (in SH-SY5Y cells) and upregulates Bax (in B50 cells), thereby inducing mitochondrial dysfunction [93,94]. Moreover, both curcumin and doxorubicin upregulate components of the Fas signaling pathway. Curcumin upregulates Fas-L and induces the Fas signaling pathway in LAN5 cells [68]. Doxorubicin, in contrast, upregulates Fas but not Fas-L in SH-EP-1 and SK-N-AS cells [95]. Therefore, an interesting contrast emerges, as while curcumin enhances mitochondrial dysfunction via the Fas pathway, doxorubicin does not because said pathway does not proceed without the ligand (Fas-L). Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to the release of cytochrome c, as observed in SK-N-SH cells treated with doxorubicin and B50 cells treated with cisplatin [94,96]. Furthermore, in another pathway shared with curcumin, cisplatin upregulates p53 in SH-SY5Y cells [93]. Finally, curcumin, cisplatin, and doxorubicin all induce the activation of caspases 9 and 3, leading to apoptosis.
Synergistically, curcumin potentiates the cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects of doxorubicin in SH-SY5Y and SK-N-AS cells [69,80]. This effect may be of clinical relevance, since it occurred at relatively low doses (0.05 µg/mL; 0.5–1.5 µM) of doxorubicin, which may feasibly be obtained in physiological environments. Moreover, Fonseka et al. (2020) evaluated a combination treatment of curcumin with doxorubicin in in vitro and in vivo NB models. The in vitro and consequent in vivo results demonstrate the oncostatic efficacy of this drug combination. Notably, curcumin and doxorubicin increased the survival and reduced the tumor volume of mice implanted with SK-N-Be(2) cells [97]. Curcumin also enhances the cytotoxic effects of 15, 30, and 45 µM cisplatin [69]. Similar drug concentrations are physiologically achievable via cisplatin infusion; as such, curcumin–cisplatin therapy has potential clinical applicability [98].

5.3. Curcumin in Conjunction with Radiation Therapy

Finally, curcumin also enhances the cytotoxic, apoptotic, and anticolonigenic effects of radiation therapy on NB in vitro. Potential side effects of radiation therapy include the induction of antiapoptotic genes such as Bcl-2 and the suppression of pro-apoptotic effectors such as caspases 3 and 7. However, curcumin can effectively attenuate these negative effects. Importantly, inflammation plays a central role not only in tumor resistance, but also in the incidence of side effects following radiotherapy [99]. Curcumin is not only a radiosensitizer for various malignancies, but also a radioprotector for normal tissues. As such, it exerts protective effects against the following radiotherapy toxicities: dermatitis, pneumonitis, cataractogenesis, neurocognition, myelosuppression, secondary malignancies, and mucositis or enteritis [100]. Moreover, curcumin modulates and downregulates the radiation-activated genes of the TNF superfamily, as well as the expression of NF-κB- and NF-κB-mediated pro-survival signaling in NB cells [32]. Overall, the synergistic potential of curcumin for treating NB is promising based on the results of primary studies, but is not yet supported by clinical trials.
Once sufficient basic and preclinical studies have been conducted, clinical trials will be necessary to substantiate both the isolated and synergistic effects of curcumin on NB. The combination of curcumin with radiation therapy is a promising avenue of investigation, as a low dose of 100 nM curcumin promotes apoptosis and reverses the detrimental side effects of radiation [32]. Significantly, curcumin-mediated radiosensitization and downregulation of radiation-induced antiapoptotic effectors have already been demonstrated in prostate and colorectal cancers [37,101]. Curcumin notably exerts protective effects against radiation-induced inflammation and consequent lung damage [102]. In fact, curcumin was clinically investigated for its anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, and free radical scavenging properties [44].
Table 2. Synergistic anticancer effects of curcumin and other natural substances, conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, or radiation therapy on NB cell lines. While solid lipid curcumin particles (SLCP) were trialed with BBR and CPZChN with piperine, pure (or “standard”) curcumin was trialed with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and radiation therapy. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold. “Curc.” refers to “Curcumin”, “Conc.” refers to “Concentration”, and “Subs.” refers to “Substance”.
Table 2. Synergistic anticancer effects of curcumin and other natural substances, conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, or radiation therapy on NB cell lines. While solid lipid curcumin particles (SLCP) were trialed with BBR and CPZChN with piperine, pure (or “standard”) curcumin was trialed with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and radiation therapy. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold. “Curc.” refers to “Curcumin”, “Conc.” refers to “Concentration”, and “Subs.” refers to “Substance”.
EffectCell LineCurc. TypeCurc. Conc.Subs. 2Subs. 2 Conc.Source
Increases cell death/decreases viabilitySH-SY5YSLCP20 µMBBR100 µM[90]
SH-SY5YCPZChN25, 50, 100 µg/mLPiperine25, 50, 100 µg/mL [92]
SH-SY5YStandard5, 10, 20 µMDoxorubicin0.05 µg/mL[80]
SH-SY5YStandard10, 20 µMDoxorubicin5 µg/mL[80]
SH-SY5YStandard10 µMDoxorubicin1 µM[97]
SK-N-MCStandard100 nMRadiation2 Gy[32]
SK-N-ASStandard12.5, 25 µMDoxorubicin0.5, 1, 1.5 µM[69]
SK-N-ASStandard12.5, 25 µMCisplatin15, 30, 45 µM[69]
SK-N-ASStandard10 µMDoxorubicin1 µM[97]
SK-N-Be(2)Standard10 µMDoxorubicin1 µM[97]
IMR-32Standard10 µMDoxorubicin1 µM[97]
Increases apoptosisSH-SY5YStandard5, 10, 20 µMDoxorubicin5 µg/mL[80]
SK-N-MCStandard100 nMRadiation2 Gy[32]
Decreases clonal growth/colony formationSK-N-MCStandard100 nMRadiation2 Gy[32]
Reduces cell migration/motilitySH-SY5Y spheroidStandard2, 5, 10, 20 µMDoxorubicin5 µg/mL[80]
Reduces tumor volumeSK-N-Be(2) xenografts, nude miceStandard40 mg/kgDoxorubicin5 mg/kg[97]

6. Challenges in the Use of Curcumin in the Prevention and Treatment of NB

The application of curcumin as a preventive and therapeutic agent in NB is contingent upon its clinical delivery in sufficient doses. While a 2008 study demonstrated statistically significant decreases in the viability of SK-N-SH, Kelly, and LAN-5 NB cells treated with 0.001 µM curcumin, contemporary studies continue to utilize much higher concentrations [86]. As such, many recent studies report anticancer effects in NB cells after exposure to around 10–100 µM pure curcumin (Table 1). While such concentrations are attainable in vitro, numerous physiological challenges may hamper their clinical feasibility.
A major disadvantage of pure curcumin is its low water solubility. Organic solvents may overcome this problem; however, these solvents are rarely appropriate (or safe) for clinical use. Therefore, numerous synthetic curcumin formulations, including curcumin–alginate conjugated micelles and whey protein nanofibril carriers, have been developed to enhance the compound’s solubility [103,104].
Beyond its low water solubility, the poor oral bioavailability and rapid metabolism and elimination of curcumin have been extensively characterized and reviewed [105]. The data in Table 3 indicate that curcumin has low oral bioavailability in humans, which is improved in murine and rat models. In Wistar rats (WR), peak curcumin concentrations after oral administration are reached slowly (6 h after ingestion) in the liver and kidney, even after relatively high doses. In contrast, intravenous (IV) injection substantially decreases the time to peak concentration in the same organs. Finally, maximal curcumin concentrations in the nervous system (brain and spinal cord) are attainable relatively quickly (sometimes in a matter of minutes) after oral, IV, or intranasal administration in WR, Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) mice (ICRM), and Sprague–Dawley rats (SDR). The rapid delivery of curcumin to nervous system organs underscores the compound’s potential value as an anticancer agent in NB. In considering clinical administration, it is essential to note that curcumin lacks adverse side effects at dosages of up to 8000 mg/day [106].

7. Potential Solutions for the Use of Curcumin in the Nervous System and Against NB

7.1. Novel Curcumin Encapsulation and Delivery Modalities

As categorized in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, numerous experimental curcumin formulations have been developed to improve its delivery, oral bioavailability, and in vivo absorption. These formulations are diverse and include curcumin–protein complexes, nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, and microemulsions.

7.1.1. Curcumin–Protein Complexes

Curcumin–protein complexes leverage the properties of certain biomacromolecules to stabilize curcumin and optimize their delivery. Mirzaee et al. developed complexes of curcumin with bovine serum albumin (BSA), casein, and beta-lactoglobulin (β-lg). In particular, native BSA and a modified form of β-lg significantly attenuated water-mediated degradation of curcumin [89]. These curcumin-protein systems could improve the half-life of curcumin under physiological conditions, and thereby enhance its bioavailability and absorption.

7.1.2. Curcumin Microemulsions

In contrast with curcumin–protein complexes, microemulsions combine curcumin with oil and water. Within these microemulsions, curcumin can be combined with Capmul mono-diglyceride of medium-chain fatty acids (MCM) only (CUR Capmul ME), or both docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-rich oil and Capmul MCM (CUR DHA ME). The injection or intranasal delivery of either microemulsion in SDR improves brain and plasma concentrations relative to standard curcumin at 1 mg/kg [111]. DHA is an essential native component of the CNS, and as such can substantially enhance the brain uptake of curcumin.

7.1.3. Curcumin Nanosuspensions

Nanosuspensions, which stabilize nanoscale droplets of curcumin with biopolymers or surfactants, constitute a further delivery modality. Examples of these formulations include D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate-coated curcumin nanosuspension (TPGS-NS) and Tween-80-coated curcumin nanosuspension (Tween-NS). TPGS-NS and Tween-NS exhibit rapid and complete dissolution in phosphate-buffered saline, compared to the slower and incomplete dissolution of pure curcumin. Moreover, the IV administration of these nanosuspensions increases curcumin concentrations in the plasma, brain, heart, and digestive system in comparison to standard curcumin at 10 mg/kg [112].

7.1.4. Curcumin Nanoparticles

Finally, nanoparticles comprise a widely investigated category of curcumin formulations. These encapsulate curcumin or other hydrophobic substances in solid nanostructures and may be conjugated with proteins to facilitate cell uptake. Examples include cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNP-Cur), which are pH-sensitive, and therefore selectively induce apoptosis in cancerous cells with minimal disruption to healthy cells, even at high concentrations. Application of a dextran coating to CNPs (Dex-CNP-Cur) enhances their biocompatibility and controls the release of curcumin over time [72]. Similarly to CNPs, silk fibroin nanoparticles (Curc-SFN) target cancer cells without harming healthy cells. Moreover, Montalban et al. synthesized SFNs using physical adsorption and coprecipitation—methods that could feasibly be scaled-up [113].
A further curcumin formulation utilizes polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles. In ICRM, these nanoparticles substantially increase curcumin concentrations in the brain, spinal cord, and plasma after oral ingestion as compared to pure curcumin at the same dosage of 20 mg/kg [109]. Additional modalities of curcumin delivery utilize lipid nanostructures, including solid lipid nanoparticles (C-SLN), stearic acid nanoparticles (C-SALN), and nanostructured lipid carriers (C-NLC) [88,110]. C-SLN and C-NLC improve brain concentrations compared to standard curcumin at 4 mg/kg in SDR, with a better brain absorption of C-NLC than C-SLN [110].

7.2. Cell Uptake and Anti-NB Efficacy of Curcumin Formulations

Protein-conjugated curcumin nanoparticles may leverage specific cellular uptake mechanisms for enhanced delivery; cellular uptake data for some formulations are detailed in Table 4. Unfortunately, only limited data specific to NB are available. Transferrin (Tf)-conjugated solid lipid nanoparticles (Tf-C-SLN) leverage Tf-receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter SH-SY5Y cells; these nanoparticles are of particular relevance, as SH-SY5Y cells overexpress the Tf receptor. Tf-C-SLN achieves a higher cellular uptake than non-Tf-conjugated curcumin SLN (C-SLN) and curcumin-solubilized surfactant solution (CSSS) [114]. Similarly, apolipoprotein-E3 curcumin-loaded poly(butyl)cyanoacrylate (ApoE3-C-PBCA) nanoparticles enter SH-SY5Y cells via endocytosis, mediated by the overexpressed low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R). As such, ApoE3-C-PBCA nanoparticles achieve higher cellular uptake than non-ApoE3-conjugated curcumin PBCA nanoparticles (C-PBCA) and CSSS [115]. Finally, in the human NB cell line SH-SY5Y695 APP, a novel curcumin formulation exhibits significantly better quality and cytotoxic efficacy due to its improved cellular uptake. This formulation is well tolerated and without side effects when administered orally [116].
Table 4. Cellular uptake of several curcumin formulations, including suspension, nanoparticles, and protein-conjugated nanoparticles. The protein-conjugated nanoparticles (ApoE3-C-PBCA and Tf-C-SLN) utilize receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter NB cells and exhibit greater uptake over time than curcumin-solubilized surfactant solution (CSSS) and the corresponding non-protein-conjugated nanoparticles.
Table 4. Cellular uptake of several curcumin formulations, including suspension, nanoparticles, and protein-conjugated nanoparticles. The protein-conjugated nanoparticles (ApoE3-C-PBCA and Tf-C-SLN) utilize receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter NB cells and exhibit greater uptake over time than curcumin-solubilized surfactant solution (CSSS) and the corresponding non-protein-conjugated nanoparticles.
Curcumin TypeAdministered DoseCell LineConcentrationTimeSource
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.85 ± 0.21 µg/105 cells12 h[114]
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.65 ± 0.11 µg/105 cells24 h[114]
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.53 ± 0.06 µg/105 cells48 h[114]
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.8 ± 0.1 µg/106 cells12 h[115]
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.57 ± 0.11 µg/106 cells24 h[115]
CSSS10 µMSH-SY5Y0.5 ± 0.06 µg/106 cells48 h[115]
C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y1.4 ± 0.14 µg/105 cells12 h[114]
C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y1.52 ± 0.2 µg/105 cells24 h[114]
C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y1.59 ± 0.1 µg/105 cells48 h[114]
Tf-C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y2.35 ± 0.11 µg/105 cells12 h[114]
Tf-C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y2.4 ± 0.1 µg/105 cells24 h[114]
Tf-C-SLN10 µMSH-SY5Y2.42 ± 0.12 µg/105 cells48 h[114]
C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y1.45 ± 0.1 µg/106 cells12 h[115]
C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y1.52 ± 0.27 µg/106 cells24 h[115]
C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y1.58 ± 0.22 µg/106 cells48 h[115]
ApoE3-C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y2.4 ± 0.15 µg/106 cells12 h[115]
ApoE3-C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y2.6 ± 0.21 µg/106 cells24 h[115]
ApoE3-C-PBCA10 µMSH-SY5Y2.55 ± 0.24 µg/106 cells48 h[115]
The anti-NB efficacy of several curcumin formulations is demonstrable in primary experiments (Table 5). Some of these formulations, including C-SLN, Tf-C-SLN, C-PBCA, and ApoE3-C-PBCA, exhibit statistically significant oncologic effects at low concentrations (0.5, 1, 2, 4 µM), indicating their potential clinical viability. Interestingly, other formulations, such as cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNP-Cur) and dextran-CNP-Cur (Dex-CNP-Cur), have only been tested or demonstrate significant effects at higher (and possibly clinically inviable) concentrations of 100 and 250 µM. Finally, the ability of some formulations, including CNP-Cur and Curc-SFN, to target NB cells with minimal collateral damage will be valuable. In the meantime, clinically relevant studies continue.
Table 5. Anticancer effects of various curcumin formulations, including protein-conjugated nanoparticles and curcumin-protein complexes, on NB cell lines. While a variety of novel curcumin formulations successfully induce NB cell death, their specific mechanistic actions remain unclear. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold.
Table 5. Anticancer effects of various curcumin formulations, including protein-conjugated nanoparticles and curcumin-protein complexes, on NB cell lines. While a variety of novel curcumin formulations successfully induce NB cell death, their specific mechanistic actions remain unclear. Downregulations, decreases, and inhibitions are in bold.
EffectCell LineDelivery MechanismEffective
Concentration/Dosage
Source
Increases cell death/decreases viabilityIMR-32CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
IMR-32Dex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
IMR-32C-SALN10, 100 µg/mL[88]
SMS-KANCNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SMS-KANDex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SK-N-ASCNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SK-N-ASDex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
LA-N-6CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
LA-N-6Dex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SH-SY5YCSSS [114]
SH-SY5YC-SLN4, 16, 32, 64 µM[114]
SH-SY5YTf-C-SLN4, 8, 16, 32, 64 µM[114]
SH-SY5YCSSS [115]
SH-SY5YC-PBCA4, 32, 64 µM[115]
SH-SY5YApoE3-C-PBCA0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 µM[115]
SK-N-MCCurcumin-BSA [89]
SK-N-MCCurcumin-Casein [89]
SK-N-MCCurcumin-β-lg [89]
KellyCurc-SFN 1 [113]
KellyCurc-SFN 2 [113]
Increases apoptosisIMR-32CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
IMR-32Dex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SMS-KANCNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SMS-KANDex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SK-N-ASCNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SK-N-ASDex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
LA-N-6CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
LA-N-6Dex-CNP-Cur100 µM[72]
SH-SY5YCSSS2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YC-SLN2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YTf-C-SLN2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YCSSS2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YC-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YApoE3-C-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]
Upregulates ROSiSK-N-ASDex-CNP-Cur [72]
IMR-32Dex-CNP-Cur [72]
SH-SY5YCSSS [114]
SH-SY5YC-SLN4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YTf-C-SLN4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YCSSS [115]
SH-SY5YC-PBCA2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 µM[115]
SH-SY5YApoE3-C-PBCA2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 µM[115]
Decreases MMPSH-SY5YCSSS2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YC-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YApoE3-C-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]
Decreases Bcl-2/Bax (mRNA) ratioIMR-32CNP-Cur250 µM[72]
IMR-32Dex-CNP-Cur250 µM[72]
Upregulates caspase 3 (protein)SH-SY5YCSSS2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YC-SLN2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YTf-C-SLN2, 4 µM[114]
SH-SY5YCSSS2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YC-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]
SH-SY5YApoE3-C-PBCA2, 4 µM[115]

8. Differential Effects of Curcumin and Curcumin Formulations on NB Cell Lines

8.1. Patterns in NB Cell Line Usage in Curcumin Studies

Recent preclinical studies examined the effects of curcumin on diverse human and murine NB cell lines. As enumerated in Table 1, studies utilizing pure curcumin were conducted with a wide range of cell lines, some of which exhibit MYCN amplification or 11q aberration. A similar breadth can be observed for the reviewed synergistic experiments (Table 2). However, all cell uptake data arise from a single cell line, SH-SY5Y (Table 4). Finally, the data in Table 5 indicate that studies with curcumin formulations were performed with both MYCN-amplified and non-MYCN-amplified cell lines.

8.2. Curcumin’s Effects on Specific NB Cell Lines

8.2.1. Apoptotic Mechanisms

Curcumin exhibits a wide variety of apoptotic effects when applied to NB cell lines; however, many of the compound’s individual mechanistic effects are only documented in a few cell lines (Table 1). For example, the modulation of several mitochondrial proteins (Hsp60, Bad, and Bim), the downregulation of HKII, and the upregulation of PTEN, FOXO3a, Fas-L, and p27 are reported only in the MYCN-amplified LAN5 cell line. Induction of the Bex genes and downregulation of proliferative ERK 1/2 signaling are demonstrated only in murine Neuro2a cells. The activation of caspases 9 and 3 is an essential downstream apoptotic mechanism; however, caspase 3 activation is reported in only three NB cell lines (Neuro2a, SH-SY5Y, and GL-LI-N), and caspase 9 activation in only Neuro2a cells. Finally, reductions in cell viability and upregulation of apoptosis are broadly documented.

8.2.2. Synergistic Effects

The synergistic effects of curcumin with natural substances, anticancer drugs, and radiation therapy are documented in only five NB cell lines (Table 2). At present, the synergistic efficacy of curcumin–cisplatin is confirmed only in SK-N-AS cells, while the synergy of curcumin–BBR and curcumin–piperine is limited to SH-SY5Y cells. Moreover, curcumin was trialed with radiation therapy only in SK-N-MC cells. Curcumin–doxorubicin treatment has a greater breadth of efficacy, with demonstrable effects in the MYCN-amplified and 11q-abberated SK-N-Be(2) and IMR-32 cell lines, as well as in the non-MYCN-amplified SK-N-AS and SH-SY5Y lines.

8.2.3. Curcumin Formulations

Broadly, novel curcumin formulations demonstrate efficacy against a wide variety of NB types and cell lines. The breadth of cell uptake studies with these formulations is highly limited—many formulations have not yet been evaluated, while the two reviewed studies utilized SH-SY5Y cells exclusively (Table 4). Moreover, preclinical oncologic studies with these formulations yielded promising general outcomes, but few specific details and limited mechanistic insights. A large proportion of the mentioned formulations exhibit confirmed efficacy in only one NB cell line or one type of NB cell line. Curc-SFNs, for example, were only trialed in MYCN-amplified and 11q-aberrated Kelly cells, and the curcumin-protein complexes curcumin–BSA, curcumin–casein, and curcumin–β-lg were trialed exclusively in SK-N-MC cells. Moreover, the demonstrated efficacy of CSSS, C-SLN, Tf-C-SLN, C-PBCA, and ApoE3-C-PBCA is limited to SH-SY5Y cells.
In contrast, Kalashnikova et al. trialed CNP-Cur and Dex-CNP-Cur against both MYCN-amplified (IMR-32, SMS-KAN) and non-MYCN-amplified (LAN-6, SK-N-AS) cell lines, reporting that the nanoparticles exhibit greater effects on the MYCN-amplified cell lines than the non-MYCN-amplified ones [72]. These results are of particular interest, as MYCN amplification typically enhances NB tumorigenesis but does not independently lead to drug resistance [117].

9. Proposed Areas for Further Consideration

9.1. Repetition of Mechanistic Trials and Synergistic Studies Across NB Cell Lines

Specific insights on curcumin’s isolated and synergistic anti-NB activities remain relatively sparse. In particular, important apoptotic mechanisms such as PTEN, FOXO3a, and Fas-L upregulation; ERK 1/2 downregulation; Bex gene induction; several components of mitochondrial dysfunction; and caspase 9 activation have each only been reported in a single NB cell line. Among these, confirmation of Bex gene induction and ERK 1/2 downregulation is limited to murine Neuro2a cells. Similarly, synergy between curcumin and BBR, piperine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy are also each limited to one cell line. As such, cross-validation of curcumin’s effects between different types of NB cell lines (e.g., murine, human, (non-)MYCN-amplified, (non-)11q aberrated, etc.) is significantly lacking. Further experiments are therefore necessary to evaluate the generalizability of curcumin’s apoptotic pathways across NB cell lines.

9.2. Further Testing and Standardization of Curcumin Formulations

While curcumin formulations are promising, their safety and efficacy, as well as the generalizability of their effects across NB cell lines, merit special consideration. As discussed in Section 9.1 above, curcumin formulations should be tested on a variety of NB cell lines and types. Moreover, each research group or organization currently synthesizes formulations according to its own internal procedures. As such, these formulations may vary substantially between laboratories and even between different batches from the same laboratory. While curcumin should be further investigated as an anticancer agent in NB, it is important to achieve an agreement on one or several standardized curcumin formulations before the commencement of clinical trials.

9.3. Investigation of the Effects of Curcumin on NB Cell Metabolism

Given recent developments in curcumin delivery systems and their efficacy against NB cell lines in primary studies, curcumin is a promising candidate for the clinical treatment of NB. However, many more experiments are needed before the introduction of curcumin for clinical trials. In particular, the effects of curcumin on NB cell glucose metabolism merit further investigation. Cancerous cells notably exhibit altered metabolic processes, which favor aerobic glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation; this is known as the Warburg effect and has been demonstrated in NB [84]. Curcumin suppresses the Warburg effect in lung, breast, cervical, and prostate cancer cell lines, but this has not been demonstrated in NB [85]. The literature on curcumin and glucose metabolism in NB is sparse. D’Aguanno and colleagues reported that curcumin downregulates biosynthesis, glucose uptake, glycolysis, and metabolic enzymes specific to glycolysis, such as LDH, ALDOA, GAPDH, TPI1, and ENO1 [83]. Notably, epigenetic modifications that occur during tumor progression are potentially reversible, with consequent diminishment of the Warburg effect [118,119]. These results suggest that the Warburg effect, in which decreased vascularization, nutrient deprivation, and hypoxia lead to a tumor microenvironment with low pH, is a reversible process that may be targeted by curcumin. These observations could potentially also explain the anabolic and catabolic actions of phytochemicals in healthy and tumor cells, respectively. Overall, additional studies are necessary to fully elucidate the interactions between curcumin and the Warburg effect in NB.

9.4. Investigation of the Effects of Curcumin on NB Drug Resistance

Cancer drug resistance is a major detrimental side effect of conventional chemotherapeutic regimens. A wide variety of cellular factors, including microRNAs, regulate NB resistance to cisplatin and doxorubicin [120,121]. Correspondingly, NB drug resistance tends to increase with the strength of chemotherapeutic regimens [117]. In this light, supplementation of such regimens with curcumin, a complementary and supportive agent, could theoretically reduce the necessary dosage(s) of anticancer drug(s), and thereby decrease cancer drug resistance. However, further combinatory trials of curcumin with anticancer drugs are necessary to characterize curcumin’s potential impact on drug resistance.

9.5. Clinical Trials of Curcumin in NB

Curcumin has been clinically trialed in combination with chemotherapy against several cancer types, such as breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and chronic myeloid leukemia [122]. Although the concept is promising, no clinical trials for curcumin–chemotherapy in NB are available at this time. Moreover, in situ factors, including a tumor’s specific location within the body, the tumor microenvironment, and tumor homogeneity or heterogeneity, are not easily investigated in vitro. However, they could significantly influence curcumin’s clinical efficacy.
As an independent agent or in conjunction with radiation or chemotherapy, curcumin can theoretically be administered in very high doses. Nevertheless, patient convenience and preference could be a limiting factor in oral administration, as the safe dosage of 8000 mg per day would necessitate the swallowing of sixteen 500 mg capsules per day or an equivalent dose. Despite curcumin’s safety and lack of side effects, patients may not be comfortable ingesting such large amounts.

10. Conclusions and Outlook

Curcumin, a naturally occurring chemical constituent of turmeric, is a promising chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent for a wide variety of cancers, including NB. In physiological systems, curcumin achieves its anticancer effects through the downregulation of proliferative Akt and NF-κB signaling, induction of mitochondrial dysfunction and cytochrome c release, upregulation of p53, and caspase activation, all of which lead to apoptosis. Curcumin also demonstrates synergistic effects with other natural substances, conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, and radiation therapy against NB cells.
Clearly, curcumin, as a multitargeting agent, exhibits strong activity against established tumors, with negligible toxicity to normal cells. It, therefore, has a high potential for clinical applications. Notable shortcomings, such as single-targeting and adverse toxicity, exist for current chemo- and radiotherapy treatments for NB. As such, NB treatment should be combined with more effective or safer compounds. Current evidence indicates that multitargeted curcumin may be a safe and highly effective supplement in clinical tumor control. In combination with curcumin, lower doses of chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation could achieve high antitumor efficacy, as well as low toxicity and drug resistance. In addition, curcumin has potential as an agent for safe and effective cancer prevention, treatment, and prophylaxis after chemotherapy and radiation. As such, the compound may be relevant in preventing tumor recurrence and metastasis.
Despite curcumin’s anti-NB efficacy, many of its mechanistic and synergistic activities are only demonstrated in one or several cell lines at present. As such, further testing and cross-validation with various types of NB cell lines is necessary to elucidate the impact of risk factors such as MYCN amplification on the efficacy of curcumin treatment.
Moreover, while curcumin has the potential to attenuate NB progression and counter cancer drug resistance, its clinical viability is limited by its poor oral bioavailability, low water solubility, and rapid metabolism. Numerous novel curcumin formulations—including nanoparticles, lipid carriers, nanosuspensions, and microemulsions—have been proposed to overcome these challenges. While pure curcumin is clinically safe and has minimal side effects, further basic and preclinical trials are necessary to ensure the safety of novel curcumin formulations. Ultimately, clinical trials could support or refute the viability of curcumin as an anticancer agent in NB treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.Z. and D.B.; literature review and resources, K.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Z.; writing—review and editing, K.Z., A.B., M.S., P.K., and D.B.; figure preparation and editing, K.Z. and D.B.; visualization, K.Z. and D.B.; supervision, D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

D.B. was supported by the NPRP11S-1214-170101 grant (June 2019–current) by the Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF), Doha, Qatar. The publication costs of this article were covered by the Division of Student Affairs at Weill Cornell Medicine—Qatar.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

1,3-BPG1,3-Bisphosphoglycerate
2-PG2-Phosphoglyceric Acid
5-LOX5-Lipoxygenase
Akt (PKB)Akt Serine–Threonine Kinase (Protein Kinase B)
ALDOAAldolase
AP-1Activator Protein 1
ApoE3-C-PBCAApolipoprotein-E3 Curcumin-Loaded Poly(Butyl)Cyanoacrylate (nanoparticles)
ATPAdenosine Triphosphate
β-lgβeta-Lactoglobulin
BadBcl-2-Associated Agonist of Cell Death
BaxBcl-2-Associated X Protein
BBRBerberine
Bcl-2B-cell Lymphoma 2
Bex1Brain-Expressed X-linked (gene) 1
Bex2Brain-Expressed X-linked (gene) 2
Bex3Brain-Expressed X-linked (gene) 3
Bex4Brain-Expressed X-linked (gene) 4
Bex6Brain-Expressed X-linked (gene) 6
BidBH3-Interacting Domain Death Agonist
BimBcl-2-Interacting Mediator of Cell Death
BSABovine Serum Albumin
C-NLCCurcumin-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers
C-PBCACurcumin-Loaded Poly(Butyl)Cyanoacrylate (nanoparticles)
C-SALNCurcumin-Loaded Stearic Acid Lipid Nanoparticles
C-SLNCurcumin-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
CNP-CurCerium Oxide Nanoparticles–Curcumin
CNSCentral Nervous System
COX-2Cyclo-Oxygenase 2
CPZChNCurcumin- and Piperine-Loaded Zein Chitosan Nanoparticles
CSSSCurcumin-Solubilized Surfactant Solution
CUR Capmul MECurcumin Capmul MCM Microemulsions
CUR DHA MECurcumin Docosahexaenoic Acid-Rich Microemulsions
Curc-SFN 1Curcumin-Loaded Silk Fibroin Nanoparticle Preparation 1 (physical adsorption)
Curc-SFN 2Curcumin-Loaded Silk Fibroin Nanoparticle Preparation 2 (coprecipitation)
DDPCisplatin-resistant
Dex-CNP-CurDextran–Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles–Curcumin
DHAPDihydroxyacetone Phosphate
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
ECMExtracellular Matrix
EMTEpithelial–Mesenchymal Transition
ENO1Enolase 1
ERKExtracellular-Signal-Regulated Kinase
Fas (CD95)Fas Cell Surface Death Receptor (Cluster of Differentiation 95)
Fas-LFas Ligand
FBPFructose 1,6-BiPhosphate
FLIPFLICE Inhibitory Protein
FOXO3aForkhead Box O3a
G3PGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate
GAPDHGlycerAldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase
GyGray
HIF-1αHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 αlpha
HKII (HK2)Hexokinase II (Hexokinase 2)
Hsp60Heat Shock Protein 60
ICRInstitute for Cancer Research
ICRMICR Mice
IL-1Interleukin 1
IL-6Interleukin 6
iNOSInducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
LDHLactate Dehydrogenase
LDL-RLow-Density Lipoprotein Receptor
MMPMitochondrial Membrane Potential
mRNAMessenger Ribonucleic Acid
MYCNN-myc Proto-oncogene
NBNeuroblastoma
NF-κBNuclear Factor κappa Light-Chain Enhancer of Activated B-cells
p21 (CDKN1A)(Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1A)
p27 (CDKN1B)(Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1B)
p53Tumor Protein p53
PARP-1Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1
PEPPhosphoenolpyruvate
PLGAPolylactic-co-Glycolic Acid (nanoparticles)
PTENPhosphatase and Tension Homolog
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SDRSprague–Dawley Rats
SLCPSolid Lipid Curcumin Particle
TfTransferrin
Tf-C-SLNTransferrin-Conjugated, Curcumin-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor αlpha
TPI1Triosephosphate Isomerase 1
Tween-NSTween 80-Coated (Curcumin) Nanosuspension
WRWistar Rats
WTWild-Type

References

  1. Park, J.R.; Eggert, A.; Caron, H. Neuroblastoma: Biology, prognosis, and treatment. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 55, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Berthold, F.; Spix, C.; Kaatsch, P.; Lampert, F. Incidence, Survival, and Treatment of Localized and Metastatic Neuroblastoma in Germany 1979–2015. Paediatr. Drugs 2017, 19, 577–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Moreno, F.; Lopez Marti, J.; Palladino, M.; Lobos, P.; Gualtieri, A.; Cacciavillano, W. Childhood Neuroblastoma: Incidence and Survival in Argentina. Report from the National Pediatric Cancer Registry, ROHA Network 2000–2012. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2016, 63, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gatta, G.; Capocaccia, R.; Coleman, M.P.; Ries, L.A.; Berrino, F. Childhood cancer survival in Europe and the United States. Cancer 2002, 95, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monclair, T.; Brodeur, G.M.; Ambros, P.F.; Brisse, H.J.; Cecchetto, G.; Holmes, K.; Kaneko, M.; London, W.B.; Matthay, K.K.; Nuchtern, J.G.; et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: An INRG Task Force report. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cohn, S.L.; Pearson, A.D.; London, W.B.; Monclair, T.; Ambros, P.F.; Brodeur, G.M.; Faldum, A.; Hero, B.; Iehara, T.; Machin, D.; et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: An INRG Task Force report. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Caren, H.; Kryh, H.; Nethander, M.; Sjoberg, R.M.; Trager, C.; Nilsson, S.; Abrahamsson, J.; Kogner, P.; Martinsson, T. High-risk neuroblastoma tumors with 11q-deletion display a poor prognostic, chromosome instability phenotype with later onset. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4323–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Harenza, J.L.; Diamond, M.A.; Adams, R.N.; Song, M.M.; Davidson, H.L.; Hart, L.S.; Dent, M.H.; Fortina, P.; Reynolds, C.P.; Maris, J.M. Transcriptomic profiling of 39 commonly-used neuroblastoma cell lines. Sci. Data 2017, 4, 170033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Strother, D.R.; London, W.B.; Schmidt, M.L.; Brodeur, G.M.; Shimada, H.; Thorner, P.; Collins, M.H.; Tagge, E.; Adkins, S.; Reynolds, C.P.; et al. Outcome after surgery alone or with restricted use of chemotherapy for patients with low-risk neuroblastoma: Results of Children’s Oncology Group study P9641. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baker, D.L.; Schmidt, M.L.; Cohn, S.L.; Maris, J.M.; London, W.B.; Buxton, A.; Stram, D.; Castleberry, R.P.; Shimada, H.; Sandler, A.; et al. Outcome after reduced chemotherapy for intermediate-risk neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ladenstein, R.; Pötschger, U.; Pearson, A.D.J.; Brock, P.; Luksch, R.; Castel, V.; Yaniv, I.; Papadakis, V.; Laureys, G.; Malis, J.; et al. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): An international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 500–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moon, S.B.; Park, K.W.; Jung, S.E.; Youn, W.J. Neuroblastoma: Treatment outcome after incomplete resection of primary tumors. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2009, 25, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Samec, M.; Liskova, A.; Koklesova, L.; Samuel, S.M.; Zhai, K.; Buhrmann, C.; Varghese, E.; Abotaleb, M.; Qaradakhi, T.; Zulli, A.; et al. Flavonoids against the Warburg phenotype—Concepts of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine to cut the Gordian knot of cancer cell metabolism. EPMA J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liskova, A.; Koklesova, L.; Samec, M.; Smejkal, K.; Samuel, S.M.; Varghese, E.; Abotaleb, M.; Biringer, K.; Kudela, E.; Danko, J.; et al. Flavonoids in Cancer Metastasis. Cancers 2020, 12, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abotaleb, M.; Liskova, A.; Kubatka, P.; Busselberg, D. Therapeutic Potential of Plant Phenolic Acids in the Treatment of Cancer. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Solarova, Z.; Liskova, A.; Samec, M.; Kubatka, P.; Busselberg, D.; Solar, P. Anticancer Potential of Lichens’ Secondary Metabolites. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhai, K.; Liskova, A.; Kubatka, P.; Busselberg, D. Calcium Entry through TRPV1: A Potential Target for the Regulation of Proliferation and Apoptosis in Cancerous and Healthy Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Escobar, S.J.M.; Fong, G.M.; Winnischofer, S.M.B.; Simone, M.; Munoz, L.; Dennis, J.M.; Rocha, M.E.M.; Witting, P.K. Anti-proliferative and cytotoxic activities of the flavonoid isoliquiritigenin in the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 299, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Miao, Q.; Geng, M.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.; Tian, L.; Pan, J.; Yang, Y. Anti-tumor effect of rutin on human neuroblastoma cell lines through inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and promoting apoptosis. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 269165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lantto, T.A.; Laakso, I.; Dorman, H.J.; Mauriala, T.; Hiltunen, R.; Koks, S.; Raasmaja, A. Cellular Stress and p53-Associated Apoptosis by Juniperus communis L. Berry Extract Treatment in the Human SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, Y.; Tseng, S.H.; Lai, H.S.; Chen, W.J. Resveratrol-induced cellular apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in neuroblastoma cells and antitumor effects on neuroblastoma in mice. Surgery 2004, 136, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rahman, M.A.; Kim, N.H.; Kim, S.H.; Oh, S.M.; Huh, S.O. Antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects of resveratrol in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in rat b103 neuroblastoma cells. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. Off. J. Korean Physiol. Soc. Korean Soc. Pharmacol. 2012, 16, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Komuro, H.; Hayashi, Y.; Kawamura, M.; Hayashi, K.; Kaneko, Y.; Kamoshita, S.; Hanada, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Hongo, T.; Yamada, M.; et al. Mutations of the p53 gene are involved in Ewing’s sarcomas but not in neuroblastomas. Cancer Res. 1993, 53, 5284–5288. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Moll, U.M.; LaQuaglia, M.; Bénard, J.; Riou, G. Wild-type p53 protein undergoes cytoplasmic sequestration in undifferentiated neuroblastomas but not in differentiated tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4407–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Davidoff, A.M.; Pence, J.C.; Shorter, N.A.; Iglehart, J.D.; Marks, J.R. Expression of p53 in human neuroblastoma- and neuroepithelioma-derived cell lines. Oncogene 1992, 7, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  26. Isaacs, J.S.; Hardman, R.; Carman, T.A.; Barrett, J.C.; Weissman, B.E. Differential subcellular p53 localization and function in N- and S-type neuroblastoma cell lines. Cell Growth Differ. Mol. Biol. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1998, 9, 545–555. [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldman, S.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Lansing, T.J.; Gilmer, T.M.; Kastan, M.B. The p53 signal transduction pathway is intact in human neuroblastoma despite cytoplasmic localization. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 148, 1381–1385. [Google Scholar]
  28. McKenzie, P.P.; Guichard, S.M.; Middlemas, D.S.; Ashmun, R.A.; Danks, M.K.; Harris, L.C. Wild-type p53 can induce p21 and apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells but the DNA damage-induced G1 checkpoint function is attenuated. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 4199–4207. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sidell, N.; Koeffler, H.P. Modulation of Mr 53,000 protein with induction of differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 2226–2230. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kruman, I.I.; Kostenko, M.A.; Gordon, R.; Popov, V.I.; Umansky, S.R. Differentiation and apoptosis of murine neuroblastoma cells N1E115. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 191, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lane, D.P. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature 1992, 358, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aravindan, N.; Madhusoodhanan, R.; Ahmad, S.; Johnson, D.; Herman, T.S. Curcumin inhibits NFkappaB mediated radioprotection and modulate apoptosis related genes in human neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2008, 7, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Smith, S.M.; Lyu, Y.L.; Cai, L. NF-κB affects proliferation and invasiveness of breast cancer cells by regulating CD44 expression. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gupta, S.C.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Aggarwal, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Inflammation, a Double-Edge Sword for Cancer and Other Age-Related Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, J.H.; Gupta, S.C.; Park, B.; Yadav, V.R.; Aggarwal, B.B. Turmeric (Curcuma longa) inhibits inflammatory nuclear factor (NF)-κB and NF-κB-regulated gene products and induces death receptors leading to suppressed proliferation, induced chemosensitization, and suppressed osteoclastogenesis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Diagaradjane, P.; Anand, P.; Harikumar, K.B.; Deorukhkar, A.; Gelovani, J.; Guha, S.; Krishnan, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin sensitizes human colorectal cancer to capecitabine by modulation of cyclin D1, COX-2, MMP-9, VEGF and CXCR4 expression in an orthotopic mouse model. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 2187–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Diagaradjane, P.; Guha, S.; Deorukhkar, A.; Shentu, S.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Krishnan, S. Curcumin sensitizes human colorectal cancer xenografts in nude mice to gamma-radiation by targeting nuclear factor-kappaB-regulated gene products. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 2128–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sandur, S.K.; Deorukhkar, A.; Pandey, M.K.; Pabón, A.M.; Shentu, S.; Guha, S.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Krishnan, S. Curcumin modulates the radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by suppressing constitutive and inducible NF-kappaB activity. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 75, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sung, B.; Prasad, S.; Yadav, V.R.; Aggarwal, B.B. Cancer cell signaling pathways targeted by spice-derived nutraceuticals. Nutr. Cancer 2012, 64, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhang, C.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Hazarika, P.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Duvic, M. Curcumin selectively induces apoptosis in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cell lines and patients’ PBMCs: Potential role for STAT-3 and NF-kappaB signaling. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 2110–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jee, S.H.; Shen, S.C.; Tseng, C.R.; Chiu, H.C.; Kuo, M.L. Curcumin induces a p53-dependent apoptosis in human basal cell carcinoma cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1998, 111, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Govindarajan, V.S. Turmeric--chemistry, technology, and quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1980, 12, 199–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Salem, M.; Rohani, S.; Gillies, E.R. Curcumin, a promising anti-cancer therapeutic: A review of its chemical properties, bioactivity and approaches to cancer cell delivery. RSC Adv. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bharti, A.C.; Donato, N.; Singh, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) down-regulates the constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and IkappaBalpha kinase in human multiple myeloma cells, leading to suppression of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Blood 2003, 101, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aggarwal, B.B.; Kumar, A.; Bharti, A.C. Anticancer potential of curcumin: Preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23, 363–398. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bharti, A.C.; Aggarwal, B.B. Chemopreventive agents induce suppression of nuclear factor-kappaB leading to chemosensitization. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 973, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mukhopadhyay, A.; Bueso-Ramos, C.; Chatterjee, D.; Pantazis, P.; Aggarwal, B.B. Curcumin downregulates cell survival mechanisms in human prostate cancer cell lines. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7597–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shakibaei, M.; John, T.; Schulze-Tanzil, G.; Lehmann, I.; Mobasheri, A. Suppression of NF-kappaB activation by curcumin leads to inhibition of expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in human articular chondrocytes: Implications for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 73, 1434–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shakibaei, M.; Kraehe, P.; Popper, B.; Shayan, P.; Goel, A.; Buhrmann, C. Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil in a 3D alginate tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Buhrmann, C.; Kraehe, P.; Lueders, C.; Shayan, P.; Goel, A.; Shakibaei, M. Curcumin suppresses crosstalk between colon cancer stem cells and stromal fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment: Potential role of EMT. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Buhrmann, C.; Shayan, P.; Banik, K.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Kubatka, P.; Koklesova, L.; Shakibaei, M. Targeting NF-κB Signaling by Calebin A, a Compound of Turmeric, in Multicellular Tumor Microenvironment: Potential Role of Apoptosis Induction in CRC Cells. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ak, T.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of curcumin. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2008, 174, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Srimal, R.C.; Dhawan, B.N. Pharmacology of diferuloyl methane (curcumin), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. J. Pharm. Pharm. 1973, 25, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dhillon, N.; Aggarwal, B.B.; Newman, R.A.; Wolff, R.A.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Abbruzzese, J.L.; Ng, C.S.; Badmaev, V.; Kurzrock, R. Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4491–4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Bayet-Robert, M.; Kwiatkowski, F.; Leheurteur, M.; Gachon, F.; Planchat, E.; Abrial, C.; Mouret-Reynier, M.A.; Durando, X.; Barthomeuf, C.; Chollet, P. Phase I dose escalation trial of docetaxel plus curcumin in patients with advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Biol. 2010, 9, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Mahammedi, H.; Planchat, E.; Pouget, M.; Durando, X.; Cure, H.; Guy, L.; Van-Praagh, I.; Savareux, L.; Atger, M.; Bayet-Robert, M.; et al. The New Combination Docetaxel, Prednisone and Curcumin in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Phase II Study. Oncology 2016, 90, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Varghese, E.; Samuel, S.M.; Abotaleb, M.; Cheema, S.; Mamtani, R.; Busselberg, D. The “Yin and Yang” of Natural Compounds in Anticancer Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Cancers 2018, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Perry, M.C.; Demeule, M.; Regina, A.; Moumdjian, R.; Beliveau, R. Curcumin inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in glioblastoma xenografts. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1192–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shakibaei, M.; Mobasheri, A.; Lueders, C.; Busch, F.; Shayan, P.; Goel, A. Curcumin enhances the effect of chemotherapy against colorectal cancer cells by inhibition of NF-kappaB and Src protein kinase signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shakibaei, M.; Buhrmann, C.; Kraehe, P.; Shayan, P.; Lueders, C.; Goel, A. Curcumin chemosensitizes 5-fluorouracil resistant MMR-deficient human colon cancer cells in high density cultures. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hewlings, S.J.; Kalman, D.S. Curcumin: A Review of Its Effects on Human Health. Foods 2017, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kaur, H.; He, B.; Zhang, C.; Rodriguez, E.; Hage, D.S.; Moreau, R. Piperine potentiates curcumin-mediated repression of mTORC1 signaling in human intestinal epithelial cells: Implications for the inhibition of protein synthesis and TNFα signaling. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 57, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Patel, S.S.; Acharya, A.; Ray, R.S.; Agrawal, R.; Raghuwanshi, R.; Jain, P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of curcumin in prevention and treatment of disease. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 887–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Barry, J.; Fritz, M.; Brender, J.R.; Smith, P.E.; Lee, D.K.; Ramamoorthy, A. Determining the effects of lipophilic drugs on membrane structure by solid-state NMR spectroscopy: The case of the antioxidant curcumin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4490–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lyu, Y.; Xiang, N.; Mondal, J.; Zhu, X.; Narsimhan, G. Characterization of Interactions between Curcumin and Different Types of Lipid Bilayers by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 2341–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vareed, S.K.; Kakarala, M.; Ruffin, M.T.; Crowell, J.A.; Normolle, D.P.; Djuric, Z.; Brenner, D.E. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin conjugate metabolites in healthy human subjects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. Publ. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Cosponsored Am. Soc. Prev. Oncol. 2008, 17, 1411–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Tomeh, M.A.; Hadianamrei, R.; Zhao, X. A Review of Curcumin and Its Derivatives as Anticancer Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Picone, P.; Nuzzo, D.; Caruana, L.; Messina, E.; Scafidi, V.; Di Carlo, M. Curcumin induces apoptosis in human neuroblastoma cells via inhibition of AKT and Foxo3a nuclear translocation. Free Radic. Res. 2014, 48, 1397–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sukumari-Ramesh, S.; Bentley, J.N.; Laird, M.D.; Singh, N.; Vender, J.R.; Dhandapani, K.M. Dietary phytochemicals induce p53- and caspase-independent cell death in human neuroblastoma cells. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2011, 29, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Liang, C.J.; Li, J.H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.Y.; Liu, S.Q.; Yang, J. Suppression of MIF-induced neuronal apoptosis may underlie the therapeutic effects of effective components of Fufang Danshen in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2018, 39, 1421–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Poulaki, V.; Mitsiades, N.; Romero, M.E.; Tsokos, M. Fas-mediated Apoptosis in Neuroblastoma Requires Mitochondrial Activation and Is Inhibited by FLICE Inhibitor Protein and bcl-2. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4864–4872. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Kalashnikova, I.; Mazar, J.; Neal, C.J.; Rosado, A.L.; Das, S.; Westmoreland, T.J.; Seal, S. Nanoparticle delivery of curcumin induces cellular hypoxia and ROS-mediated apoptosis via modulation of Bcl-2/Bax in human neuroblastoma. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 10375–10387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Guo, F.; Zhao, W.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. Truncated apolipoprotein C-I induces apoptosis in neuroblastoma by activating caspases in the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 1797–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Pisano, M.; Pagnan, G.; Dettori, M.A.; Cossu, S.; Caffa, I.; Sassu, I.; Emionite, L.; Fabbri, D.; Cilli, M.; Pastorino, F.; et al. Enhanced anti-tumor activity of a new curcumin-related compound against melanoma and neuroblastoma cells. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sidhar, H.; Giri, R.K. Induction of Bex genes by curcumin is associated with apoptosis and activation of p53 in N2a neuroblastoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Parandavar, E.; Yazdanparast, R. Differential impact of various reactive oxygen species (ROS) on HIF-1alpha/p53 direct interaction in SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells. Cell Biosci. 2017, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liontas, A.; Yeger, H. Curcumin and resveratrol induce apoptosis and nuclear translocation and activation of p53 in human neuroblastoma. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24, 987–998. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kim, W.; Ryu, J.; Kim, J.E. CCAR2/DBC1 and Hsp60 Positively Regulate Expression of Survivin in Neuroblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wang, J.; Zheng, S. Caspase-3 and survivin expression in pediatric neuroblastoma and their roles in apoptosis. Chin. Med. J. 2004, 117, 1821–1824. [Google Scholar]
  80. Namkaew, J.; Jaroonwitchawan, T.; Rujanapun, N.; Saelee, J.; Noisa, P. Combined effects of curcumin and doxorubicin on cell death and cell migration of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2018, 54, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Song, H.C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Park, J.; Zheng, M.; Surh, Y.J.; Kim, U.H.; Park, J.W.; Yu, R.; Chung, H.T.; et al. GSK-3β inhibition by curcumin mitigates amyloidogenesis via TFEB activation and anti-oxidative activity in human neuroblastoma cells. Free Radic. Res. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Caruso Bavisotto, C.; Marino Gammazza, A.; Lo Cascio, F.; Mocciaro, E.; Vitale, A.M.; Vergilio, G.; Pace, A.; Cappello, F.; Campanella, C.; Palumbo Piccionello, A. Curcumin Affects HSP60 Folding Activity and Levels in Neuroblastoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. D’Aguanno, S.; D’Agnano, I.; De Canio, M.; Rossi, C.; Bernardini, S.; Federici, G.; Urbani, A. Shotgun proteomics and network analysis of neuroblastoma cell lines treated with curcumin. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Aminzadeh, S.; Vidali, S.; Sperl, W.; Kofler, B.; Feichtinger, R.G. Energy metabolism in neuroblastoma and Wilms tumor. Transl. Pediatr. 2015, 4, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Siddiqui, F.A.; Prakasam, G.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Rehman, A.U.; Padder, R.A.; Ansari, M.A.; Irshad, R.; Mangalhara, K.; Bamezai, R.N.K.; Husain, M.; et al. Curcumin decreases Warburg effect in cancer cells by down-regulating pyruvate kinase M2 via mTOR-HIF1α inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Christian Freudlsperger, J.G.; Schumacher, U. Curcumin Induces Apoptosis in Human Neuroblastoma Cells via Inhibition of NFÎB. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28, 209–214. [Google Scholar]
  87. Campos, C.A.; Gianino, J.B.; Bailey, B.J.; Baluyut, M.E.; Wiek, C.; Hanenberg, H.; Shannon, H.E.; Pollok, K.E.; Ashfeld, B.L. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of curcumin-derived arylheptanoids for glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cytotoxicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 6874–6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Rahman, M.H.; Ramanathan, M.; Sankar, V. Preparation, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity assay of curcumin loaded solid lipid nanoparticle in IMR32 neuroblastoma cell line. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 27, 1281–1285. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mirzaee, F.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Ashrafi-Kooshk, M.R.; Esmaeili, S.; Ghobadi, S.; Farzaei, M.H.; Zad-Bari, M.R.; Khodarahmi, R. Diverse Effects of Different “Protein-Based” Vehicles on the Stability and Bioavailability of Curcumin: Spectroscopic Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicity In Vitro. Protein Pept. Lett. 2019, 26, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Maiti, P.; Plemmons, A.; Dunbar, G.L. Combination treatment of berberine and solid lipid curcumin particles increased cell death and inhibited PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway of human cultured glioblastoma cells more effectively than did individual treatments. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lan, J.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, F.; Yan, Z.; Zheng, W.; Fan, J.; Sun, G. Meta-analysis of the effect and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipemia and hypertension. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 161, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Baspinar, Y.; Ustundas, M.; Bayraktar, O.; Sezgin, C. Curcumin and piperine loaded zein-chitosan nanoparticles: Development and in-vitro characterisation. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Donzelli, E.; Carfi, M.; Miloso, M.; Strada, A.; Galbiati, S.; Bayssas, M.; Griffon-Etienne, G.; Cavaletti, G.; Petruccioli, M.G.; Tredici, G. Neurotoxicity of platinum compounds: Comparison of the effects of cisplatin and oxaliplatin on the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. J. Neurooncol. 2004, 67, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Santin, G.; Piccolini, V.M.; Barni, S.; Veneroni, P.; Giansanti, V.; Dal Bo, V.; Bernocchi, G.; Bottone, M.G. Mitochondrial fusion: A mechanism of cisplatin-induced resistance in neuroblastoma cells? Neurotoxicology 2013, 34, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bian, X.; Giordano, T.D.; Lin, H.J.; Solomon, G.; Castle, V.P.; Opipari, A.W., Jr. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis of S-type neuroblastoma cells requires caspase-9 and is augmented by CD95/Fas stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 4663–4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Rebbaa, A.; Chou, P.M.; Emran, M.; Mirkin, B.L. Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in caspase-8-deficient neuroblastoma cells is mediated through direct action on mitochondria. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 2001, 48, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Fonseka, P.; Gangoda, L.; Pathan, M.; Angela, D.G.; Mathivanan, S. Combinatorial treatment of curcumin or silibinin with doxorubicin sensitises high-risk neuroblastoma. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rajkumar, P.; Mathew, B.S.; Das, S.; Isaiah, R.; John, S.; Prabha, R.; Fleming, D.H. Cisplatin Concentrations in Long and Short Duration Infusion: Implications for the Optimal Time of Radiation Delivery. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, XC01–XC04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Farhood, B.; Mortezaee, K.; Goradel, N.H.; Khanlarkhani, N.; Salehi, E.; Nashtaei, M.S.; Najafi, M.; Sahebkar, A. Curcumin as an anti-inflammatory agent: Implications to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 5728–5740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Verma, V. Relationship and interactions of curcumin with radiation therapy. World J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 7, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chendil, D.; Ranga, R.S.; Meigooni, D.; Sathishkumar, S.; Ahmed, M.M. Curcumin confers radiosensitizing effect in prostate cancer cell line PC-3. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Cho, Y.J.; Yi, C.O.; Jeon, B.T.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Kang, G.M.; Lee, J.E.; Roh, G.S.; Lee, J.D. Curcumin attenuates radiation-induced inflammation and fibrosis in rat lungs. Korean J. Physiol. Pharm. 2013, 17, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Dey, S.; Sreenivasan, K. Conjugation of curcumin onto alginate enhances aqueous solubility and stability of curcumin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mohammadian, M.; Salami, M.; Momen, S.; Alavi, F.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. Enhancing the aqueous solubility of curcumin at acidic condition through the complexation with whey protein nanofibrils. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Anand, P.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Newman, R.A.; Aggarwal, B.B. Bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and promises. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Cheng, A.L.; Hsu, C.H.; Lin, J.K.; Hsu, M.M.; Ho, Y.F.; Shen, T.S.; Ko, J.Y.; Lin, J.T.; Lin, B.R.; Ming-Shiang, W.; et al. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant lesions. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 2895–2900. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Jager, R.; Lowery, R.P.; Calvanese, A.V.; Joy, J.M.; Purpura, M.; Wilson, J.M. Comparative absorption of curcumin formulations. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Suresh, D.; Srinivasan, K. Tissue distribution & elimination of capsaicin, piperine & curcumin following oral intake in rats. Indian J. Med. Res. 2010, 131, 682–691. [Google Scholar]
  109. Szymusiak, M.; Hu, X.; Leon Plata, P.A.; Ciupinski, P.; Wang, Z.J.; Liu, Y. Bioavailability of curcumin and curcumin glucuronide in the central nervous system of mice after oral delivery of nano-curcumin. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 511, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Sadegh Malvajerd, S.; Azadi, A.; Izadi, Z.; Kurd, M.; Dara, T.; Dibaei, M.; Sharif Zadeh, M.; Akbari Javar, H.; Hamidi, M. Brain Delivery of Curcumin Using Solid Lipid Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers: Preparation, Optimization, and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shinde, R.L.; Devarajan, P.V. Docosahexaenoic acid-mediated, targeted and sustained brain delivery of curcumin microemulsion. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Dibaei, M.; Rouini, M.R.; Sheikholeslami, B.; Gholami, M.; Dinarvand, R. The effect of surface treatment on the brain delivery of curcumin nanosuspension: In vitro and in vivo studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5477–5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Montalban, M.G.; Coburn, J.M.; Lozano-Perez, A.A.; Cenis, J.L.; Villora, G.; Kaplan, D.L. Production of Curcumin-Loaded Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Mulik, R.S.; Monkkonen, J.; Juvonen, R.O.; Mahadik, K.R.; Paradkar, A.R. Apoptosis-induced anticancer effect of transferrin-conjugated solid lipid nanoparticles of curcumin. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Mulik, R.S.; Monkkonen, J.; Juvonen, R.O.; Mahadik, K.R.; Paradkar, A.R. ApoE3 mediated polymeric nanoparticles containing curcumin: Apoptosis induced in vitro anticancer activity against neuroblastoma cells. Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 437, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Parikh, A.; Kathawala, K.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Shan, Z.; Cao, X.; Zhou, X.F.; Garg, S. Curcumin-loaded self-nanomicellizing solid dispersion system: Part II: In vivo safety and efficacy assessment against behavior deficit in Alzheimer disease. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2018, 8, 1406–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Keshelava, N.; Seeger, R.C.; Groshen, S.; Reynolds, C.P. Drug Resistance Patterns of Human Neuroblastoma Cell Lines Derived from Patients at Different Phases of Therapy. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5396–5405. [Google Scholar]
  118. Karpf, A.R.; Jones, D.A. Reactivating the expression of methylation silenced genes in human cancer. Oncogene 2002, 21, 5496–5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Shukla, S.; Meeran, S.M. Epigenetics of cancer stem cells: Pathways and therapeutics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 3494–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Takwi, A.A.; Wang, Y.M.; Wu, J.; Michaelis, M.; Cinatl, J.; Chen, T. miR-137 regulates the constitutive androstane receptor and modulates doxorubicin sensitivity in parental and doxorubicin-resistant neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene 2014, 33, 3717–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Chen, Y.; Tsai, Y.H.; Fang, Y.; Tseng, S.H. Micro-RNA-21 regulates the sensitivity to cisplatin in human neuroblastoma cells. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012, 47, 1797–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tan, B.L.; Norhaizan, M.E. Curcumin Combination Chemotherapy: The Implication and Efficacy in Cancer. Molecules 2019, 24, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of curcumin, a polyphenolic chemical constituent of turmeric with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects. Curcumin is a beta-diketone compound containing two substituted aromatic rings linked by a seven-carbon chain. Each aromatic ring has one hydroxy and one methoxy group.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of curcumin, a polyphenolic chemical constituent of turmeric with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects. Curcumin is a beta-diketone compound containing two substituted aromatic rings linked by a seven-carbon chain. Each aromatic ring has one hydroxy and one methoxy group.
Biomolecules 10 01469 g001
Figure 2. Curcumin, as a multitarget compound, induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in neuroblastoma (NB) cells through the modulation of PTEN–Akt, NF-κB, and p53 signaling; mitochondrial dysfunction; and caspase activation. (A) Intracellular signaling mechanisms within NB cells favor proliferation. The proliferative Akt, NF-κB, and ERK 1/2 pathways, as well as the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Survivin proteins, are active and upregulated. Apoptotic signals via mitochondrial dysfunction, cytochrome c release, p53, and caspases are downregulated. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p21 and p27) are inactive, allowing for cell cycle progression. (B) Curcumin modulates intracellular signaling in NB cells in favor of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Curcumin upregulates PTEN, which in turn downregulates Akt and NF-κB and upregulates FOXO3a and Fas pathway signaling. Moreover, curcumin-induced ROS generation elevates intracellular ROS levels and supports both FOXO3a and p53n signaling. Together, p53n, Fas pathway, and Akt signaling, along with mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) depolarization, promote the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol, where it supports caspase activation. Mitochondrial dysfunction also involves the downregulation of Hsp60, which ultimately leads to the downregulation of Survivin—a protein that ordinarily inhibits caspase activity. Caspase 3 cleaves PARP-1, causing apoptosis, while FOXO3a and p53 activate cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, which induce cell cycle arrest.
Figure 2. Curcumin, as a multitarget compound, induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in neuroblastoma (NB) cells through the modulation of PTEN–Akt, NF-κB, and p53 signaling; mitochondrial dysfunction; and caspase activation. (A) Intracellular signaling mechanisms within NB cells favor proliferation. The proliferative Akt, NF-κB, and ERK 1/2 pathways, as well as the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Survivin proteins, are active and upregulated. Apoptotic signals via mitochondrial dysfunction, cytochrome c release, p53, and caspases are downregulated. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p21 and p27) are inactive, allowing for cell cycle progression. (B) Curcumin modulates intracellular signaling in NB cells in favor of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Curcumin upregulates PTEN, which in turn downregulates Akt and NF-κB and upregulates FOXO3a and Fas pathway signaling. Moreover, curcumin-induced ROS generation elevates intracellular ROS levels and supports both FOXO3a and p53n signaling. Together, p53n, Fas pathway, and Akt signaling, along with mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) depolarization, promote the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol, where it supports caspase activation. Mitochondrial dysfunction also involves the downregulation of Hsp60, which ultimately leads to the downregulation of Survivin—a protein that ordinarily inhibits caspase activity. Caspase 3 cleaves PARP-1, causing apoptosis, while FOXO3a and p53 activate cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, which induce cell cycle arrest.
Biomolecules 10 01469 g002
Figure 3. Oncologic signaling pathways are shared by curcumin and the anti-NB cancer drugs doxorubicin and cisplatin. Curcumin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin induce mitochondrial dysfunction through the upregulation of Bax and downregulation of Bcl-2. While curcumin also induces the Fas signaling pathway, doxorubicin does not, since it does not upregulate the ligand needed by the signaling pathway to proceed (Fas-L). Ultimately, the pathways lead to the activation of caspases and apoptosis.
Figure 3. Oncologic signaling pathways are shared by curcumin and the anti-NB cancer drugs doxorubicin and cisplatin. Curcumin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin induce mitochondrial dysfunction through the upregulation of Bax and downregulation of Bcl-2. While curcumin also induces the Fas signaling pathway, doxorubicin does not, since it does not upregulate the ligand needed by the signaling pathway to proceed (Fas-L). Ultimately, the pathways lead to the activation of caspases and apoptosis.
Biomolecules 10 01469 g003
Table 3. Bioavailability of pure curcumin and various curcumin formulations after oral, intravenous, and intranasal delivery in humans, mice, and rats. Within the sample column, “H” refers to “humans”, “WR” to “Wistar rats”, “ICRM” to “ICR mice”, and “SDR” to “Sprague–Dawley rats”.
Table 3. Bioavailability of pure curcumin and various curcumin formulations after oral, intravenous, and intranasal delivery in humans, mice, and rats. Within the sample column, “H” refers to “humans”, “WR” to “Wistar rats”, “ICRM” to “ICR mice”, and “SDR” to “Sprague–Dawley rats”.
Administration RouteAdministered DosageMax. ConcentrationMax. TimeSampleSource
Oral1800 mg2.3 ± 0.3 ng/mL7.4 ± 1.0 hBlood Plasma, H[107]
Oral500 mg/kg83.80 ± 5.46 µg/mL6 hSerum, WR[108]
Oral500 mg/kg490.3 ± 32.0 µg6 hTotal Blood, WR[108]
Oral500 mg/kg135.2 ± 5.26 µg6 hLiver, WR[108]
Oral500 mg/kg9.03 ± 1.11 µg6 hKidney, WR[108]
Oral500 mg/kg36.19 ± 3.10 µg1 hIntestine, WR[108]
Oral20 mg/kg2.03 ± 0.69 ng/g15 minBrain, ICRM[109]
Oral20 mg/kg23.49 ± 11.57 ng/g7.5 minSpinal Cord, ICRM[109]
Oral20 mg/kg0.60 ± 0.44 ng/mL15 minPlasma, ICRM[109]
Oral400 mg/kg30.32 ± 3.10 ng/g5 minBrain, ICRM[109]
Oral400 mg/kg129.16 ± 63.12 ng/g5 minSpinal Cord, ICRM[109]
Oral400 mg/kg79.82 ± 49.00 ng/mL3 minPlasma, ICRM[109]
Oral/PLGA-Curcumin20 mg/kg12.71 ± 6.63 ng/g3 minBrain, ICRM[109]
Oral/PLGA-Curcumin20 mg/kg85.88 ± 54.27 ng/g7.5 minSpinal Cord, ICRM[109]
Oral/PLGA-Curcumin20 mg/kg41.33 ± 16.03 ng/mL3 minPlasma, ICRM[109]
Injection4 mg/kg0.00 ± 0.00 ng/g-Brain, SDR[110]
Injection/C-SLN4 mg/kg114.22 ± 58.21 ng/g0.5 ± 0.28 hBrain, SDR[110]
Injection/C-NLC4 mg/kg390.30 ± 35.93 ng/g1 ± 0.28 hBrain, SDR[110]
Injection1 mg/kg968.11 ± 67.1 ng/mL0.0833 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Injection1 mg/kg90 ± 6.82 ng/mL1 hBrain, SDR[111]
Injection/CUR Capmul ME1 mg/kg1875.45 ± 91.6 ng/mL0.0833 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Injection/CUR Capmul ME1 mg/kg120 ± 8.61 ng/mL1 hBrain, SDR[111]
Injection/CUR DHA ME1 mg/kg2059.8 ± 103.6 ng/mL0.0833 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Injection/CUR DHA ME1 mg/kg253 ± 18.74 ng/mL1 hBrain, SDR[111]
Intranasal1 mg/kg31.25 ± 2.8 ng/mL0.5 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Intranasal1 mg/kg122 ± 7.89 ng/mL0.5 hBrain, SDR[111]
Intranasal/CUR Capmul ME1 mg/kg39.62 ± 2.3 ng/mL0.5 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Intranasal/CUR Capmul ME1 mg/kg324 ± 22.43 ng/mL0.5 hBrain, SDR[111]
Intranasal/CUR DHA ME1 mg/kg48.75 ± 3.1 ng/mL0.5 hPlasma, SDR[111]
Intranasal/CUR DHA ME1 mg/kg523 ± 30.95 ng/mL0.5 hBrain, SDR[111]
Injection10 mg/kg661.66 ± 48.604 ng/mL-Plasma, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg6.6 ng/g0.25 hBrain, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg50.0 ng/g0.25 hLiver, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg51.6 ng/g0.50 hLung, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg24.1 ng/g0.25 hHeart, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg25.7 ng/g0.25 hKidney, WR[112]
Injection10 mg/kg24.0 ng/g1.00 hSpleen, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg1311.62 ± 172.294 ng/mL-Plasma, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg66.7 ng/g0.75 hBrain, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg94.5 ng/g0.50 hLiver, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg282.1 ng/g0.50 hLung, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg275.5 ng/g0.25 hHeart, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg86.5 ng/g0.50 hKidney, WR[112]
Injection/Tween-NS10 mg/kg79.4 ng/g3.00 hSpleen, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg1121.28 ± 46.259 ng/mL-Plasma, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg17.7 ng/g0.50 hBrain, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg169.8 ng/g0.25 hLiver, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg253.4 ng/g2.00 hLung, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg38.7 ng/g0.25 hHeart, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg70.1 ng/g0.50 hKidney, WR[112]
Injection/TPGS-NS10 mg/kg333.0 ng/g1.00 hSpleen, WR[112]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhai, K.; Brockmüller, A.; Kubatka, P.; Shakibaei, M.; Büsselberg, D. Curcumin’s Beneficial Effects on Neuroblastoma: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Potential Solutions. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1469. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10111469

AMA Style

Zhai K, Brockmüller A, Kubatka P, Shakibaei M, Büsselberg D. Curcumin’s Beneficial Effects on Neuroblastoma: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Potential Solutions. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(11):1469. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10111469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhai, Kevin, Aranka Brockmüller, Peter Kubatka, Mehdi Shakibaei, and Dietrich Büsselberg. 2020. "Curcumin’s Beneficial Effects on Neuroblastoma: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Potential Solutions" Biomolecules 10, no. 11: 1469. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10111469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop