Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Carbon Composites—Graphene-Oxide-Catalyzed Sugar Graphitization
Previous Article in Journal
Compositing Fullerene-Derived Porous Carbon Fibers with Reduced Graphene Oxide for Enhanced ORR Catalytic Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
C
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/c8010014
carbon-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers

by
Margarita Kozlova
1,2,
Sergey Butrim
1,2,
Maksim Solovyev
1,2,
Artem Pushkarev
1,2,
Irina Pushkareva
1,2,
Valery Kalinichenko
2,3,4,
Svetlana Akelkina
2 and
Sergey Grigoriev
1,2,5,6,*
1
National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”, 14, Krasnokazarmennaya St., 111250 Moscow, Russia
2
National Research Centre, “Kurchatov Institute”, 1, Akademika Kurchatova Sq., Moscow 123182, Russia
3
N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, Kosygina St., 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
N.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4, Kosygina St., 119991 Moscow, Russia
5
HySA Infrastructure Center of Competence, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa
6
A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 28, Vavilova St., 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
C 2022, 8(1), 14; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/c8010014
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 4 February 2022 / Published: 14 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Nanocarbon-Based Composites and Their Thermal, Electrical, and Mechanical Properties)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Graphene-like materials have attracted significant attention as alternative catalyst carriers due to the broad possibilities of changing their shape, composition, and properties. In this study we investigated the structural and electrochemical characteristics of platinum electrocatalysts supported on reduced graphene oxide (rGO), including those modified with amine functionalities, nitrogen heteroatoms (rGO-Am), and oxygen enriched (rGO-O). Synthesis of Pt nanoparticles (20 wt.%) on the graphene-like nanomaterials surface was carried out using a modified polyol procedure. The Pt20/rGO-Am showed a lower Pt nanoparticles size together with high Pt utilization and EASA values compared to rGO-supported catalysts and the Pt/C reference sample due to the uniform distribution of nucleation centers on the surface of graphene nanoparticles, and the greater ability of these centers to electrically bond with platinum.

1. Introduction

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) are being developed as power sources for transport, stationary and portable systems as an alternative to conventional internal combustion engines, secondary batteries, and other conventional power sources [1]. The catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) (usually carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles [2]) is the main component of the membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) of PEMFC, which determines its performance, efficiency and durability [3]. The high specific surface area of catalysts based on Pt nanoparticles is achieved by using carbon carries [4]. Carbon carries must have such properties as: a high specific surface area, high electrical conductivity, developed pore structure and corrosion resistance [5]. In particular, in order to ensure the transport of reagents/reaction products to/from the active centers, the carbon supports must have a large number of mesopores and macropores, and an appropriate morphology [6]. The most commonly used carbon supports are carbon blacks (for example, Vulcan XC-72), which do not completely fulfil catalyst support requirements, especially on the corrosion resistance [7,8]. The disadvantage of carbon black consists of its microporous structure. The metal particles may sink inside micropores, decreasing the electrochemically active surface area (EASA). This leads to the development of mesoporous carbons with high mesopores (2 < pore sizes < 50 nm) degree. These materials have attracted a lot of attention due to their regular structure, high surface area, large pore volume and a narrow pore size distribution [9].
The challenging task is the development of alternative supports for Pt nanoparticles that increase the activity and stability of the catalyst, reduce the noble metal loading, and provide optimal properties of the active layer (hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, porous structure, etc.) that allow the mass transfer facilitation [10,11]. Therefore, graphene-like materials and their derivatives are considered as promising catalyst supports.
Graphene first obtained by mechanical exfoliation [12] is significantly exploited for energy storage systems because of its excellent physical-chemical properties: high specific surface area (up to 2600 m2 g−1), high thermal and electrical conductivity, corrosion resistance and mechanical strength (up to 130 GPa) [13]. In graphene, each carbon atom is covalently bonded with neighboring carbon atoms by three in-plane σ-bonds (from sp2 orbitals) and one π-bond (from the remaining 2p orbital) perpendicular to the basal plane comprising the electron delocalization network [14,15]. For many electrochemical systems, including PEMFC, dispersed derivatives of graphene, such as three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are of practical interest [16,17]. Due to the sp2-hybridized carbon atoms the chemical and electrochemical stability of graphene-like materials are quite high [18,19], and these materials are considered as promising supports of Pt nanoparticles. However, the graphene basal plane is inert and does not have enough defects that could act as the active centers of electrochemical reactions or nucleation of nanoparticles [20]. Carbon materials modified with heteroatoms (B, N, S or P) allow for breaking the surface electroneutrality and redistributing the electronic density, providing the appearance of active centers for the deposition of Pt nanoparticles, as well as controlling their properties [21]. This allows for achieving higher activity and stability of electrocatalysts in ORR and other reactions compared with counterparts based on carbon black or graphene-like materials without doping [22]. In particular, aminated graphene exhibits complicated morphology with a tendency to form a wrinkled and corrugated structure, which facilitates the formation of porous films and aerogels, making it promising for catalyst and sensing applications [23].
The proposed study is focused on the structural, morphological and electrochemical properties of electrocatalysts supported on rGO modified with amine functionalities and nitrogen heteroatoms (rGO-Am), and an oxygen enriched one (rGO-O) obtained by ozone treatment. The synthesized catalysts (with 20 wt.% of Pt) were characterized using different techniques, including X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and cyclic voltammetry.

2. Materials and Methods

Graphene oxide (GO) was obtained by modified Hummers’ method, as described in [24,25].
The rGO-O was obtained by ozone–oxygen mixture treatment which was performed at 20 °C by barrier discharge in the ozone generator “MEDOZONE” UOTA-60-01. The ozone concentration was 30–50 mg L−1, and the processing was carried out for 40–50 min until the ozone absorption stopped [26].
The rGO-Am was synthesized via the following three-stage approach. At the first stage, GO was treated with hydrobromic acid. At the second stage the brominated graphene oxide was subjected to ammonolysis with alcoholic ammonia solution. At the third stage the aminated graphene oxide was reduced with hydrazine.
Synthesis of rGO-supported Pt nanoparticles (20 wt.%) was carried out by a modified polyol reduction approach [27]. Briefly, 11.2 mL H2PtCl6 × 2H2O was used as the platinum precursor, and 180 mL of ethylene glycol was used as the reducing agent. The synthesis was carried out in a Drexel flask with argon flowing in the flask, which was kept at 75 °C for 2 h, and then heated to a reduction temperature of 180 °C, and kept for 1 h. Washing was performed by decantation six times. Pt supported on Vulcan XC-72 (Pt/C) was used as the reference catalyst (Prometheus R&D Ltd., Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
XRD (SmartLab SE X-ray Diffractometer, Rigaku SmartLab, Tokyo, Japan) was carried out using CuKα radiation. The diffraction data for Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am catalyst were recorded for 2θ angles between 5° and 120°. The crystallite size of Pt nanoparticles (d) was determined by Debye–Scherrer’s equation:
d = K λ β c o s θ
where K is the Scherrer constant (for spherical particles with cubic symmetry is equal to 0.94), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray used (0.15406 nm), β is the full width of the diffraction peak at half maximum in radians (FWHM), and θ is the Bragg angle.
The morphological features of the catalysts were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a TitanTM 80–300 S/TEM (“FEI”) (80–300 kV, space resolution by points is equal to 0.07–0.08 nm).
The XPS studies were performed using a PHOIBOS 150 (SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) hemispherical analyzer and monochromatic Al Kα radiation (Kurchatov Complex of Synchrotron and Neutron Investigation, NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia). Obtained spectrums (C 1s, O 1s, Pt 4f) were measured and processed according to the approach described in [28,29].
Electrochemical studies were performed using a potentiostat Solartron 1285 (AMETEK Inc., Berwyn, PA, USA) in a three-electrode cell using Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl solution reference electrode (Ag/AgCl), polished glassy carbon working electrode, and Pt wire counter electrode [27,28]. Cyclic voltammograms were measured using Ar-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 solution in the potential range of –0.15 to 1.2 V at the sweep rate of 20 mV s−1.
Electrocatalytic ink consisting of 16 mg of catalyst and 8 mL of water was prepared by ultrasonic treatment using a probe ultrasonic homogenizer (Cole Parmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) for 20 s with the following treatment in an ultrasonic bath for 40 min. Then, a 10 μL inks aliquot was dropped onto the working electrode surface. The pretreatment of the working electrode was performed via cyclic voltammetry at 100 mV s−1 until the stable curve was obtained.
Electrochemical surface area was calculated from cyclic voltammetry analysis by using the following equation:
E A S A = ( Q Q H ∗ L p t ) ∗ 10 − 1
where Q is the charge associated with the adsorption/desorption of hydrogen monolayers (average value between anodic and cathodic sweep was taken) (μC cm−2), LPt is the Pt loading on the working electrode (mg cm−2), and QH is the charge required to oxidize the monolayer of hydrogen on a Pt surface (μC cm−2) [30].
The total Pt surface area was calculated using the equation below, considering particles have spherical shape [28]:
S p t = 6000 p ∗ d
where Spt—the total surface area of Pt particles (m2 g−1), d—the Pt particle diameter (nm) taken as the mean value between dXRD and dTEM, a p—the density of Pt (21.4 g m−3).
The accessibility of the Pt nanoparticles and the catalytic layer connectivity could be analyzed using the Pt utilization. Pt utilization of 100% means that all Pt nanoparticles are integrated into the entire electron conductivity network and are fully accessible by the electrolyte. The Pt utilization was calculated using the equation below:
U p t = ( E A S A S p t ) ∗ 100
where Upt is the Pt utilization of the catalyst (%) [28,31].

3. Results and Discussion

TEM-micrographs of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am catalysts are shown on Figure 1. All catalysts exhibit a layered structure which is characterized by some extent of Pt nanoparticles agglomeration. Using well-known ImageJ software [32], an analysis of the size distribution of Pt nanoparticles were performed (no less than 100 particles for each catalyst have been taken into account). Pt nanoparticles are well-dispersed with a narrow size distribution in the range of 2–3 nm with an average size of 2.8, 2.5 and 2.4 nm for Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am, respectively. However, rGO-supported Pt nanoparticles are characterized by agglomeration, which leads to a decrease in catalysts EASA [28,33]. Pt20/rGO-Am has the smallest average nanoparticle size because the nitrogen doping of rGO allows for the formation of additional defects on the rGO basal surface, which provides additional active centers for stabilizing Pt nanoparticles during their deposition. This contributes to a more uniform distribution of smaller Pt nanoparticles [34,35]. It should be noted that the average sizes of Pt nanoparticles in all obtained rGO-based catalysts were lower compared to the commercial catalyst Pt20/C (average size of 3.1 nm) which is taken as a well-known reference catalyst [36].
In addition, the XRD investigations were performed to confirm the crystalline structures of the Pt on different supports (Figure 2). The characteristic peaks at 2θ ≈ 23.3° with respect to the carbon (002) plane are detected for all studied catalysts. The diffraction peaks at 2θ of 39°, 46°, 67°, 81° and 85° correspond to the (111), (200), (220), (311) and (222) planes of the face-centered cubic structure of Pt crystallites, respectively [37]. The average crystallite size was calculated for the XRD peak assigned to Pt(220), as this is far from the background signal of carbon support [38]. The Pt crystallite size of Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am was found to be ca. 2.83, 2.70, 2.85 and 2.69 nm, respectively. The obtained average crystallite sizes are given in Table 1 together with the particle sizes obtained by TEM. The mean Pt(220) crystallite size values are in a narrow range of 2.69–2.85 nm, which generally correlates well with the Pt nanoparticles mean size values (2.4–3.1 nm).
The elemental composition of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am catalysts was studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. According to the C 1s spectra (Figure 3A,C,E), rGO-supported catalysts primarily consist of sp2–carbon (~284.4 eV). The sp2/sp3 ratios of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am are 38.69, 23.4 and 1.23.
According to the C 1s spectra, Pt20/rGO and Pt20/rGO-O are rather similar to each other and differ mainly in the relative intensity ratios of O=C-OH, C=O, C–O, C-OH and quinone groups [29]. The existence of C–N bonds (286.07 eV) [39], as well as relatively high sp3 carbon atoms ratios, should be noticed in Pt20/rGO-Am.
The O 1s spectra of catalysts are characterized by several peaks and allow for a somewhat more detailed assessment of the oxygen-containing groups. In particular, quinone (~530.3–530.5 eV), carboxyl (~531.1 eV), carbonyl (~532.1 eV), C–O (~532.7–533.0 eV), and hydroxyl (~533.7 eV) functional groups [29,40] are detected. Lower binding energy peaks in the O 1s spectra could be ascribed to the quinone [41] or Me-O. The existence of oxygen functional groups in rGO is due to the incomplete thermal reduction of graphene oxide at temperatures below 2000 °C [42]. The C/O value of each catalyst shows oxygen content and equals to 15.57, 9.35 and 8.87 at.% for Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am, respectively. As such, the ozone treatment allows for significantly increasing the concentration of oxygen functional groups in comparison with the bare rGO, which is in good agreement with the literature. Ozone treatment of carbon black at 140 °C was responsible for a C/O decrease from 22.4 to 18.4 and increase in the oxygen functionalities content, especially in the carboxyl groups [43].
It is worth noting that the N 1s peak in Pt20/rGO-Am confirms the presence of N in the rGO structure, according to XPS spectrum fitting the nitrogen content in rGO is ca. 1.41 at.% (Table 2). Thus, the peaks observed in Pt20/rGO-Am spectra (Figure 3G) show the presence of amino groups (399.83 eV) [23], and demonstrate that the significant part of the N atoms being embedded in the rGO structure in the form of quaternary N (401.78 eV) and pyridine N (398.4 eV) [29,44]. It is important to note that the amine functionality with its peak area percentage of ca. 60% appears to be a dominant type of nitrogen species. The dominancy of amine functionality was reported for bare aminated rGO as well [23]. It is well known that amino, carbonyl and carboxyl groups can replace chlorine in the coordination sphere of hexachloroplatinates [45,46,47]. The introduction of functional groups into the rGO allows for the immobilization of platinum precursor molecules (H2PtCl6) on the support surface. The features of these groups determine the Pt nanoparticles morphology. Moreover, the nitrogen heteroatoms presumably contribute to better Pt nanoparticles distribution, as described recently [48,49,50].
Metallic Pt (0) duplet peaks were detected at 71.20/74.55 eV, 71.22/74.57 eV and 71.39/74.72 eV for Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am (Figure 4). The Pt (0) content of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am is ca. 46.18, 52.77 and 55.4%, respectively. The observed binding energy shift (ca. 0.2 eV) of the Pt/rGO-Am catalyst Pt(0) peak toward higher values is associated with a change in the electronic structure of the support (downshifting of the d-band center position), which may decrease the specific interaction between the Pt surface and strongly adsorbed intermediates (e.g., OHads) [51]. Moreover, the decrease in these adsorbed OHads–Pt interactions could enhance the catalytic activity of Pt towards ORR [52,53]. This is consistent with the apparent absence of Pt (IV) in the Pt 4f spectrum (Figure 4C) [54].
The cyclic voltammograms of catalysts of Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O, Pt20/rGO-Am are shown in Figure 5. Well-defined peaks, observed in the potential range from −0.15 to 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode correspond to the desorption/adsorption of the hydrogen monolayer on the surface of Pt nanoparticles [28]. The EASA value for Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am is ca. 70.5, 67.1, 40.6 and 87.5 m2 g−1, respectively. The EASA value for Pt20/rGO is in good agreement with the data reported in the literature [55] for the rGO-supported catalyst (52.1 m2 g−1) with a similar platinum content and rather close mean Pt nanoparticle size. Pt20/rGO-O has low EASA, presumably due to a high degree of particle agglomeration during synthesis. These areas are unevenly distributed over the rGO surface, and tend to appear near the graphene sheet edges. Therefore, Pt nanoparticles in Pt20/rGO-O tend to be closely formed on the same areas, allowing their aggregation [26]. This could be responsible for lower catalyst EASA and Pt utilization, as discussed below.
The purpose of studying the Pt utilization in the electrocatalyst is to evaluate the electronic bonding of the carbon support with Pt nanoparticles [56]. According to our results, the obtained EASA values are lower than the values of the total Pt surface area calculated from Equation (3), even using a low-loaded thin catalytic film on the working electrode surface. Pt utilization of the various rGO-supported catalyst could vary from 28% to 93% [57,58] depending on synthesis approach and conditions. The obtained results (Table 1) show that the nitrogen doping of rGO allows for increasing the catalyst EASA, reducing the Pt nanoparticles agglomeration degree, and increasing the Pt utilization. This observation is in good agreement with the literature; the interaction between Pt nanoparticles and the N-doped support enhance adhesion of the Pt nanoparticles to the support [35] which could alleviate the aggregation of the nanoparticles. Moreover, first-principles study revealed that Pt nucleation is favorable on pyridinic and pyrrolic N, and the center of the d-band can be shifted downward by the nitrogen species [52]. The EASA of Pt20/rGO and Pt20/rGO-O catalysts calculated by CVs exhibited low values compared to Pt20/C, which is probably due to the blocking on the surface of the Pt particles and to the inaccessibility of the catalyst deep inside the micropores of the carbon support [59].

4. Conclusions

In this study, variously modified rGO-based catalytic materials were synthesized and characterized, and their performances were compared with those for a reference Pt/C catalyst. The aminated rGO synthesized in this study could be suggested as a promising PEMFC catalyst support due to the uniform distribution of Pt nanoparticles provided by amino functionalities and embedded nitrogen (pyridine and quaternary) heteroatoms. Amination provides additional sites for Pt nanoparticles nucleation and prevents their further growth during synthesis. The low nanoparticles agglomeration degree ensures a high Pt utilization value, which is higher than the one for the bare rGO-supported catalyst and comparable with those for Pt/C. Pt20/rGO-Am catalyst showed the highest % ECSA among the other catalysts. Ozone treatment of rGO is still a questionable approach, as the Pt nanoparticles morphology is not appropriate for further use as PEMFC catalyst, because of the high degree of catalyst particles agglomeration, which deteriorates the catalyst layer microstructure, thus reducing the MEA performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., A.P. and I.P.; methodology, I.P., S.B. and M.S.; validation, M.K., A.P. and S.A.; investigation, M.K. and V.K.; resources, S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, I.P. and S.G.; visualization, M.K. and I.P.; supervision, S.G.; project administration, S.G. and I.P.; funding acquisition, S.G. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been performed within the framework of the project “Modified carbon nanomaterials for electrodes of fuel cells with solid polymer electrolyte”, with the support of a grant from the National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” for the implementation of scientific research programs “Energy”, “Electronics, Radio Engineering and IT”, and “Industry 4.0 Technologies for Industry and Robotics in 2020–2022”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to E.V. Kukueva for capturing the TEM images, to R.G. Chumakov for capturing and processing of the XPS spectrums, and to V.V. Podmasterijev for RGO ozone processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Abdelkareem, M.A.; Elsaid, K.; Wilberforce, T.; Kamil, M.; Sayed, E.T.; Olabi, A. Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 752, 141803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Ruiz Diaz, D.F.; Chen, K.S.; Wang, Z.; Adroher, X.C. Materials, technological status, and fundamentals of PEM fuel cells—A review. Mater. Today 2020, 32, 178–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, J.; Yang, M.; Ke, C.; Wei, G.; Priest, C.; Qiao, Z.; Wu, G.; Zhang, J. Platinum-group-metal catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: From catalyst design to electrode structure optimization. EnergyChem 2020, 2, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Du, L.; Shao, Y.; Sun, J.; Yin, G.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. Advanced catalyst supports for PEM fuel cell cathodes. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lee, J.-H.; Park, S.-J. Recent advances in preparations and applications of carbon aerogels: A review. Carbon 2020, 163, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grigoriev, S.A.; Millet, P.; Fateev, V.N. Evaluation of carbon-supported Pt and Pd nanoparticles for the hydrogen evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysers. J. Power Source 2008, 177, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, S.; Yuan, X.-Z.; Hin, J.N.C.; Wang, H.; Friedrich, K.A.; Schulze, M. A review of platinum-based catalyst layer degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Source 2009, 194, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bharti, A.; Cheruvally, G. Influence of various carbon nano-forms as supports for Pt catalyst on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. J. Power Source 2017, 360, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Messias, S.; Nunes da Ponte, M.S.; Reis-Machado, A. Carbon Materials as Cathode Constituents for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction—A Review. C—J. Carbon Res. 2019, 5, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pak Hoe, L.; Boaventura, M.; Lagarteira, T.; Kee Shyuan, L.; Mendes, A. Polyol synthesis of reduced graphene oxide supported platinum electrocatalysts for fuel cells: Effect of Pt precursor, support oxidation level and pH. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 16998–17011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baranov, I.E.; Grigoriev, S.A.; Ylitalo, D.; Fateev, V.N.; Nikolaev, I.I. Transfer processes in PEM fuel cell: Influence of electrode structure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nanosci. Technol. 2009, 6, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jamil, M.F.; Biçer, E.; Yarar Kaplan, B.; Alkan Gürsel, S. One-step fabrication of new generation graphene-based electrodes for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells by a novel electrophoretic deposition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 5653–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bera, M.; Maji, P.K. Effect of structural disparity of graphene-based materials on thermo-mechanical and surface properties of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer 2017, 119, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Armano, A.; Agnello, S. Two-Dimensional Carbon: A Review of Synthesis Methods, and Electronic, Optical, and Vibrational Properties of Single-Layer Graphene. C—J. Carbon Res. 2019, 5, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Alekseeva, O.K.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Fateev, V.N. Graphene and Graphene-Like Materials for Hydrogen Energy. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2020, 15, 273–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tkachev, S.V.; Buslaeva, E.Y.; Naumkin, A.V.; Kotova, S.L.; Laure, I.V.; Gubin, S.P. Reduced graphene oxide. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Erickson, K.; Erni, R.; Lee, Z.; Alem, N.; Gannett, W.; Zettl, A. Determination of the Local Chemical Structure of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4467–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mamat, M.; Grigoriev, S.; Dzhus, K.; Grant, D.; Walker, G. The performance and degradation of Pt electrocatalysts on novel carbon carriers for PEMFC applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 7580–7587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, H.; Hu, Y.H. Recent advances in graphene-based materials for fuel cell applications. Energy Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 958–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, X.; Bai, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, C. Untangling the respective effects of heteroatom-doped carbon materials in batteries, supercapacitors and the ORR to design high performance materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2036–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shahgaldi, S.; Hamelin, J. Improved carbon nanostructures as a novel catalyst support in the cathode side of PEMFC: A critical review. Carbon 2015, 94, 705–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rabchinskii, M.K.; Ryzhkov, S.A.; Kirilenko, D.A.; Ulin, N.V.; Baidakova, M.V.; Shnitov, V.V.; Pavlov, S.I.; Chumakov, R.G.; Stolyarova, D.Y.; Besedina, N.A.; et al. From graphene oxide towards aminated graphene: Facile synthesis, its structure and electronic properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pushkarev, A.S.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Grigoriev, S.A.; Kalinichenko, V.N.; Presniakov, M.Y.; Fateev, V.N. Electrocatalytic layers modified by reduced graphene oxide for PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 14492–14497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grigor’ev, S.A.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Kalinichenko, V.N.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Presnyakov, M.Y.; Fateev, V.N. Electrocatalytic layers based on reduced graphene oxide for fabrication of low-temperature fuel cells. Kinet. Catal. 2015, 56, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grigoriev, S.A.; Fateev, V.N.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Ivanova, N.A.; Kalinichenko, V.N.; Presnyakov, M.Y.; Wei, X. Reduced Graphene Oxide and Its Modifications as Catalyst Supports and Catalyst Layer Modifiers for PEMFC. Materials 2018, 11, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pushkarev, A.S.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Ivanova, N.A.; du Preez, S.; Bessarabov, D.G.; Chumakov, R.G.; Stankevich, V.G.; Fateev, V.N.; Evdokimov, A.A.; Grigoriev, S.A. Pt/C and Pt/SnOx/C Catalysts for Ethanol Electrooxidation: Rotating Disk Electrode Study. Catalysts 2019, 9, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pushkareva, I.V.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Kalinichenko, V.N.; Chumakov, R.G.; Soloviev, M.A.; Liang, Y.; Millet, P.; Grigoriev, S.A. Reduced Graphene Oxide-Supported Pt-Based Catalysts for PEM Fuel Cells with Enhanced Activity and Stability. Catalysts 2021, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pushkarev, A.S.; Alekseeva, O.K.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Shapir, B.L.; Chumakov, R.G.; Tishkin, V.V.; Kozlova, M.V.; Kalinichenko, V.N.; Fateev, V.N. Plasma doping of nanostructed reduced graphene oxide. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2020, 15, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pozio, A.; Francesco, M.; De Cemmi, A.; Cardellini, F.; Giorgi, L.; De Francesco, M.; Cemmi, A.; Cardellini, F.; Giorgi, L. Comparison of high surface Pt/C catalysts by cyclic voltammetry. J. Power Source 2002, 105, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Avcioglu, G.S.; Ficicilar, B.; Bayrakceken, A.; Eroglu, I. High performance PEM fuel cell catalyst layers with hydrophobic channels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 7720–7731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Spasov, D.D.; Ivanova, N.A.; Pushkarev, A.S.; Pushkareva, I.V.; Presnyakova, N.N.; Chumakov, R.G.; Presnyakov, M.Y.; Grigoriev, S.A.; Fateev, V.N. On the Influence of Composition and Structure of Carbon-Supported Pt-SnO2 Hetero-Clusters onto Their Electrocatalytic Activity and Durability in PEMFC. Catalysts 2019, 9, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Puthusseri, D.; Ramaprabhu, S. Oxygen reduction reaction activity of platinum nanoparticles decorated nitrogen doped carbon in proton exchange membrane fuel cell under real operating conditions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 13163–13170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Melke, J.; Peter, B.; Habereder, A.; Ziegler, J.; Fasel, C.; Nefedov, A.; Sezen, H.; Wöll, C.; Ehrenberg, H.; Roth, C. Metal–Support Interactions of Platinum Nanoparticles Decorated N-Doped Carbon Nanofibers for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nefedkin, S.I.; Guterman, V.E.; Alekseenko, A.A.; Belenov, S.V.; Ivanenko, A.V.; Klimova, M.A.; Pavlov, V.I.; Panov, S.V.; Paperzh, K.O.; Shubenkov, S.V. Russian Technologies and Nanostructural Materials in High Specific Power Systems Based on Hydrogen–Air Fuel Cells with an Open Cathode. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2020, 15, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carrera-Cerritos, R.; Baglio, V.; Aricò, A.S.; Ledesma-García, J.; Sgroi, M.F.; Pullini, D.; Pruna, A.J.; Mataix, D.B.; Fuentes-Ramírez, R.; Arriaga, L.G. Improved Pd electro-catalysis for oxygen reduction reaction in direct methanol fuel cell by reduced graphene oxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hyun, K.; Lee, J.H.; Yoon, C.W.; Kwon, Y. The Effect of Platinum Based Bimetallic Electrocatalysts on Oxygen Reduction Reaction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 11752–11767. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma, J.; Habrioux, A.; Luo, Y.; Ramos-Sanchez, G.; Calvillo, L.; Granozzi, G.; Balbuena, P.B.; Alonso-Vante, N. Electronic interaction between platinum nanoparticles and nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide: Effect on the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11891–11904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stobinski, L.; Lesiak, B.; Malolepszy, A.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Mierzwa, B.; Zemek, J.; Jiricek, P.; Bieloshapka, I. Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenom. 2014, 195, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oh, Y.J.; Yoo, J.; Kim, Y.I.; Yoon, J.K.; Na Yoon, H.; Kim, J.-H.; Bin Park, S. Oxygen functional groups and electrochemical capacitive behavior of incompletely reduced graphene oxides as a thin-film electrode of supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 116, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Botas, C.; Álvarez, P.; Blanco, C.; Santamaría, R.; Granda, M.; Gutiérrez, M.D.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.; Menéndez, R. Critical temperatures in the synthesis of graphene-like materials by thermal exfoliation–reduction of graphite oxide. Carbon 2013, 52, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chang, X.; Dong, F.; Yang, S.; Tang, Z.; Zha, F. Well dispersed Pt nanoparticles on commercial carbon black oxidized by ozone possess significantly high electro-catalytic activity for methanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 21559–21568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Deng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Zou, K.; Ji, X. Review on recent advances in nitrogen-doped carbons: Preparations and applications in supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1144–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zou, M.; Du, M.; Zhang, M.; Yang, T.; Zhu, H.; Wang, P.; Bao, S. Synthesis and deposition of ultrafine noble metallic nanoparticles on amino-functionalized halloysite nanotubes and their catalytic application. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 61, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Golovizin, V.S.; Levchenko, L.M. Recovery of Platinum Complexes from Chloride Solutions Using Oxidized Carbon Sorbents. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 19, 537–540. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim, K.T.; Kim, Y.G.; Chung, J.S. Adsorption of cationic platinum complex onto carbon support. Carbon 1993, 31, 1289–1296. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, Z.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Tian, W.; Tan, Y.; Qian, W.; Liu, Z. Low content Pt nanoparticles anchored on N-doped reduced graphene oxide with high and stable electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mao, S.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y. The chemical nature of N doping on N doped carbon supported noble metal catalysts. J. Catal. 2019, 375, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, L.; Sui, X.-L.; Li, J.-L.; Zhang, J.-J.; Zhang, L.-M.; Wang, Z.-B. Ultra-fine Pt nanoparticles supported on 3D porous N-doped graphene aerogel as a promising electro-catalyst for methanol electrooxidation. Catal. Commun. 2016, 86, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhu, J.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, X.; Liu, C.; Ge, J.; Xing, W. Strongly coupled Pt nanotubes/N-doped graphene as highly active and durable electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 2015, 13, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tachibana, N.; Yukawa, Y.; Morikawa, K.; Kawaguchi, M.; Shimanoe, K. Pt nanoparticles supported on nitrogen-doped porous carbon as efficient oxygen reduction catalysts synthesized via a simple alcohol reduction method. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nie, Y.; Wei, Z. Surface-confined Pt-based catalysts for strengthening oxygen reduction performance. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2020, 30, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yarar Kaplan, B.; Haghmoradi, N.; Biçer, E.; Merino, C.; Alkan Gürsel, S. High performance electrocatalysts supported on graphene based hybrids for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 23221–23230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Antony, R.P.; Preethi, L.K.; Gupta, B.; Mathews, T.; Dash, S.; Tyagi, A.K. Efficient electrocatalytic performance of thermally exfoliated reduced graphene oxide-Pt hybrid. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 70, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Avcioglu, G.S.; Ficicilar, B.; Eroglu, I. Improved PEM fuel cell performance with hydrophobic catalyst layers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 18632–18641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Eris, S.; Daşdelen, Z.; Yıldız, Y.; Sen, F. Nanostructured Polyaniline-rGO decorated platinum catalyst with enhanced activity and durability for Methanol oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Şanlı, L.I.; Bayram, V.; Yarar, B.; Ghobadi, S.; Gürsel, S.A. Development of graphene supported platinum nanoparticles for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Effect of support type and impregnation–reduction methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 3414–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Joo, S.H.; Pak, C.; You, D.J.; Lee, S.-A.; Lee, H.I.; Kim, J.M.; Chang, H.; Seung, D. Ordered mesoporous carbons (OMC) as supports of electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC): Effect of carbon precursors of OMC on DMFC performances. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 52, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Carbon 08 00014 g001a 550Carbon 08 00014 g001b 550
Figure 1. TEM images of Pt20/rGO (A,B), Pt20/rGO-O (D,E) and Pt20/rGO-Am (G,H), the corresponding Pt nanoparticles size distribution (C,F,I).
Figure 1. TEM images of Pt20/rGO (A,B), Pt20/rGO-O (D,E) and Pt20/rGO-Am (G,H), the corresponding Pt nanoparticles size distribution (C,F,I).
Carbon 08 00014 g001aCarbon 08 00014 g001b
Carbon 08 00014 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns for Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns for Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am.
Carbon 08 00014 g002
Carbon 08 00014 g003a 550Carbon 08 00014 g003b 550
Figure 3. C 1s (A,C,E), O 1s (B,D,F) and N 1s (G) spectrums of catalysts: Pt20/rGO (A,B), Pt20/rGO-O (C,D) and Pt20/rGO-Am (E,F,G).
Figure 3. C 1s (A,C,E), O 1s (B,D,F) and N 1s (G) spectrums of catalysts: Pt20/rGO (A,B), Pt20/rGO-O (C,D) and Pt20/rGO-Am (E,F,G).
Carbon 08 00014 g003aCarbon 08 00014 g003b
Carbon 08 00014 g004 550
Figure 4. Spectra Pt 4f of Pt20/rGO (A), Pt20/rGO-O (B) and Pt20/rGO-Am (C) catalysts obtained by the XPS method.
Figure 4. Spectra Pt 4f of Pt20/rGO (A), Pt20/rGO-O (B) and Pt20/rGO-Am (C) catalysts obtained by the XPS method.
Carbon 08 00014 g004
Carbon 08 00014 g005 550
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am measured in an Ar-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 20 mV s−1.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of Pt20/C, Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am measured in an Ar-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at 20 mV s−1.
Carbon 08 00014 g005
Table
Table 1. Comparative parameters of the obtained catalysts.
Table 1. Comparative parameters of the obtained catalysts.
SampledTEM, nmdXRD, nmEASA, m2 g−1SPt, m2 g−1UPt, %
Pt20/C3.12.8370.594.777.4
Pt20/rGO2.82.7067.1101.965.8
Pt20/rGO-O2.52.8540.6105.025.8
Pt20/rGO-Am2.42.6987.5110.379.3
Table
Table 2. Some results of XPS spectrums fitting of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am.
Table 2. Some results of XPS spectrums fitting of Pt20/rGO, Pt20/rGO-O and Pt20/rGO-Am.
SampleC/OC sp2, %N, at.%NH2–, %Npyrr, %Nquat, %
Pt20/rGO15.5776.2––––
Pt20/rGO-O9.3571.1––––
Pt20/rGO-Am8.8737.01.4159.5721.9818.43
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kozlova, M.; Butrim, S.; Solovyev, M.; Pushkarev, A.; Pushkareva, I.; Kalinichenko, V.; Akelkina, S.; Grigoriev, S. Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers. C 2022, 8, 14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/c8010014

AMA Style

Kozlova M, Butrim S, Solovyev M, Pushkarev A, Pushkareva I, Kalinichenko V, Akelkina S, Grigoriev S. Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers. C. 2022; 8(1):14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/c8010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kozlova, Margarita, Sergey Butrim, Maksim Solovyev, Artem Pushkarev, Irina Pushkareva, Valery Kalinichenko, Svetlana Akelkina, and Sergey Grigoriev. 2022. "Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers" C 8, no. 1: 14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/c8010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop