Next Article in Journal
Tumour Size and T-Stage in Pancreatic Cancer Resection Specimens Depend on the Pathology Examination Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Artificial Intelligence for Thyroid Nodule Characterization: Where Are We Standing?
Previous Article in Journal
Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Working Space Creation in Transoral Thyroidectomy: Pearls and Pitfalls
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/cancers14102472
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk of Complications in Patients Undergoing Completion Thyroidectomy after Hemithyroidectomy for Thyroid Nodule with Indeterminate Cytology: An Italian Multicentre Retrospective Study

by
Gian Luigi Canu
1,*,
Fabio Medas
1,
Federico Cappellacci
1,
Alessio Biagio Filippo Giordano
2,
Angela Gurrado
3,
Claudio Gambardella
4,
Giovanni Docimo
4,
Francesco Feroci
2,
Giovanni Conzo
5,
Mario Testini
3 and
Pietro Giorgio Calò
1
1
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, CA, Italy
2
Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Santo Stefano Hospital, 59100 Prato, PO, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, BA, Italy
4
Department of Medical and Advanced Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy
5
Department of Traslational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, NA, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(10), 2472; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102472
Submission received: 28 April 2022 / Revised: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 14 May 2022 / Published: 17 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates in Thyroid Cancer Surgery)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The increasing use of high-quality imaging techniques together with improved access to healthcare has led to an increase in the detection of thyroid nodules. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is currently considered the most accurate examination for the assessment of thyroid nodular disease. However, in about 25% of cases, FNAC leads to the diagnosis of an indeterminate thyroid nodule, which represents a problem because malignancy, although relatively low (up to 30%), cannot be excluded with certainty. According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines, patients with thyroid nodular disease with an indeterminate cytology can undergo, based on established factors, a total thyroidectomy or a hemithyroidectomy. However, if an intermediate or high-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma is detected after the hemithyroidectomy, through histological examination, the above-mentioned guidelines recommend performing a completion thyroidectomy. The main aim of this study was to assess the rate of complications in patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with an indeterminate cytology.

Abstract

There is still controversy as to whether patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with an indeterminate cytology have a comparable, increased or decreased risk of complications compared to those submitted to primary thyroid surgery. The main aim of this study was to investigate this topic. Patients undergoing a thyroidectomy for thyroid nodular disease with an indeterminate cytology in four high-volume thyroid surgery centres in Italy, between January 2017 and December 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Based on the surgical procedure performed, four groups were identified: the TT Group (total thyroidectomy), HT Group (hemithyroidectomy), CT Group (completion thyroidectomy) and HT + CT Group (hemithyroidectomy with subsequent completion thyroidectomy). A total of 751 patients were included. As for the initial surgery, 506 (67.38%) patients underwent a total thyroidectomy and 245 (32.62%) a hemithyroidectomy. Among all patients submitted to a hemithyroidectomy, 66 (26.94%) were subsequently submitted to a completion thyroidectomy. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of complications comparing both the TT Group with the HT + CT Group and the HT Group with the CT Group. The risk of complications in patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with an indeterminate cytology was comparable to that of patients submitted to primary thyroid surgery (both a total thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy).

1. Introduction

The increasing use of high-quality imaging techniques together with improved access to healthcare has led to an increase in the detection of thyroid nodules, which have thus become a common clinical problem. At the same time, there has been an increase in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma, which has increased by 300% worldwide over the last three decades. The increase in the incidence rate of thyroid cancer is almost entirely due to the increase in the diagnosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), whose mortality has however remained relatively low and stable [1,2,3,4].
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is currently considered the most accurate examination for the assessment of thyroid nodular disease, given its high specificity (92%) and sensitivity (83%). However, in about 25% of cases, the FNAC leads to the diagnosis of an indeterminate thyroid nodule, which represents a problem because malignancy, although relatively low (up to 30%), cannot be excluded with certainty. In patients with this diagnosis, based on the risk of malignancy established through preoperative investigations, surgery or surveillance may be indicated. As regards surgery, in these patients, it has a diagnostic rather than therapeutic purpose, with almost 80% of surgical procedures unnecessary [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, patients with thyroid nodular disease with an indeterminate cytology can undergo a total thyroidectomy or a hemithyroidectomy. The choice between these two surgical procedures is influenced by several factors, including: a nodule size greater than 4 cm, a familial history of DTC, previous radiation exposure, highly suspicious ultrasound features and positivity for known mutations specific for DTC. In addition, all these factors must be further associated with the presence of bilateral nodular disease, the possible coexistence of hyperthyroidism, the patient’s medical comorbidities and patient preference. However, if an intermediate or high-risk DTC is detected after a hemithyroidectomy, through final histological examination, the above-mentioned guidelines recommend performing a completion thyroidectomy, as a hemithyroidectomy is considered oncologically inadequate in these cases [15].
There is still controversy as to whether patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy for this reason have a comparable, increased or decreased risk of complications compared to those submitted to primary thyroid surgery [16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
The main aim of this study was to assess the rate of complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, cervical haematoma and wound infection) in patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with an indeterminate cytology.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational study on patients who underwent thyroidectomy for thyroid nodular disease with indeterminate cytology between January 2017 and December 2020.
Data were collected from four high-volume thyroid surgery centres in Italy:
-
Multi-specialty General Surgery Unit, Cagliari University Hospital, Monserrato (CA);
-
General, Oncologic, Mininvasive and Bariatric Surgery Unit, University Hospital “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples (NA);
-
Academic General Surgery Unit “V. Bonomo”, Bari University Hospital, Bari (BA);
-
General Surgery Unit, Prato Hospital “Santo Stefano”, Prato (PO).
All participating centres used the same dedicated Microsoft Office Excel database (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for data collection.
Only patients undergoing conventional open thyroidectomy were included in this study. Patients simultaneously submitted to parathyroidectomy, those with preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastasis, those with suspected medullary thyroid carcinoma (due to elevated preoperative calcitonin levels) and those with incomplete data were excluded.
Demographic and preoperative data, information about the surgical procedure, postoperative stay, histological findings and complications were assessed.
Based on the surgical procedure performed, four groups were identified:
-
TT Group: total thyroidectomy;
-
HT Group: hemithyroidectomy (including all hemithyroidectomies performed as initial surgery);
-
CT Group: completion thyroidectomy;
-
HT + CT Group: hemithyroidectomy with subsequent completion thyroidectomy (considered as single bilateral surgical procedure).
The primary endpoint was to assess the occurrence of complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, cervical haematoma and wound infection) in patients undergoing completion thyroidectomy.
For this purpose, we compared:
-
TT Group with HT + CT Group (evaluated as bilateral surgical procedures);
-
HT Group with CT Group (evaluated as unilateral surgical procedures).
The secondary endpoint was to compare HT Group with CT Group in terms of operative time.
In all enrolled patients, preoperative evaluation included: medical history, physical examination, blood tests to assess thyroid function, high-resolution ultrasound (US) of the neck and fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Hyperthyroidism status was defined in the case of low serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (<0.4 mIU/L) and use of thyrostatic drugs.
High-resolution US of the neck was always performed before surgery by an experienced surgeon, with careful evaluation of the thyroid gland and cervical lymph nodes.
The results of fine-needle aspiration cytology were classified according to the 2014 Italian consensus of the Italian Thyroid Association (AIT), the Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) and the Italian Society for Anatomic Pathology and Cytology joint with the Italian Division of the International Academy of Pathology (SIAPEC-IAP) for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology [23].
Moreover, all patients underwent preoperative fibrolaryngoscopy to assess vocal cord mobility.
The indication and type of initial surgery (total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy) were established according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines. After final histological examination, completion thyroidectomy, with or without central neck dissection, was performed in accordance with the same guidelines [15].
Recurrent laryngeal nerves and parathyroid glands were systematically searched and identified.
Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM), energy-based device and drain were used according to the preference of the operating surgeon.
The duration of the surgical procedure was estimated, in minutes, from skin incision to skin closure.
Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism was defined as iPTH < 10 pg/mL following the operation (normal range = 10–65 pg/mL). Permanent hypoparathyroidism was defined as iPTH levels below the normal range for more than 12 months.
Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was diagnosed through postoperative fibrolaryngoscopy. After surgery, fibrolaryngoscopy was performed in the case of suspected recurrent laryngeal nerve injury for loss of signal at IONM or hoarseness. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was defined as permanent in the case of vocal cord paralysis, identified through fibrolaryngoscopy, persisting for more than 12 months.
Statistical analyses were performed with MedCalc® 20.106. Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test were used for categorical variables and t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 751 patients met the established inclusion criteria: 242 (32.22%) males and 509 (67.78%) females, with a mean age of 51.74 ± 14.15 years.
As for the initial surgery, 506 (67.38%) underwent a total thyroidectomy (TT Group) and 245 (32.62%) a hemithyroidectomy (HT Group). Detailed data regarding features of the whole sample and of these two groups are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.
Among all patients submitted to a hemithyroidectomy, 66 (26.94%) subsequently underwent a completion thyroidectomy. In patients undergoing a hemithyroidectomy with a subsequent histological finding of malignancy, a completion thyroidectomy was performed in 56.90% of the cases. One (1.52%) patient underwent a two-stage thyroidectomy for a loss of signal at intraoperative nerve monitoring. A central neck dissection was performed in 13 (19.70%) patients. The average interval between an HT and a CT was 2.12 ± 1.20 months. Malignancy in the contralateral lobe was found in 16 (24.24%) patients, while lymph node metastasis was found in 9 (13.64%).
These results are shown in Table 3.

3.1. Complications in TT Group and HT + CT Group

In the TT Group, there were 141 (27.87%) cases of transient hypoparathyroidism, 12 (2.37%) cases of permanent hypoparathyroidism, 4 (0.79%) cervical haematomas, 17 (3.36%) unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, 13 (2.57%) transient recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, 4 (0.79%) permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions and 1 (0.20%) wound infection. No bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was observed.
In the HT + CT Group, there were 14 (21.21%) cases of transient hypoparathyroidism, 2 (3.03%) cases of permanent hypoparathyroidism, 4 (6.06%) unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, 3 (4.55%) transient recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions and 1 (1.52%) permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion. No bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, cervical haematoma or wound infection was observed.
No statistically significant difference was found in terms of the occurrence of hypoparathyroidism, cervical haematoma, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and wound infection between the two groups.
These data are reported in Table 4.

3.2. Comparison between HT Group and CT Group

In the HT Group, the median operative time was 50 min (IQR, 42–65 min). Intraoperative nerve monitoring, an energy-based device and a drain were used in 140 (57.14%), 245 (100%) and 73 (29.80%) patients, respectively. The average postoperative stay was 1.72 ± 0.76 days. About complications, there was one (0.41%) cervical haematoma, seven (2.86%) unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, five (2.04%) transient recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions and two (0.82%) permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions. No wound infection was observed.
In the CT Group, the median operative time was 50 min (IQR, 40–60 min). Intraoperative nerve monitoring, an energy-based device and a drain were used in 33 (50%), 64 (96.97%) and 19 (28.79%) patients, respectively. The average postoperative stay was 1.77 ± 0.46 days. About complications, there were two (3.03%) unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions, one (1.52%) transient recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion and one (1.52%) permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion. No cervical haematoma or wound infection was observed.
No statistically significant difference was found in terms of the operative time, the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring, the use of drain, postoperative stay and complications between the two groups.
On the contrary, the use of the energy-based device was significantly greater in the HT Group than in the CT Group (p = 0.045).
These data are shown in Table 5.

4. Discussion

The thyroidectomy, in particular, the total thyroidectomy, is the most performed surgical procedure in endocrine surgery, for the treatment of both benign and malignant diseases [1,3,7].
Although the mortality rate due to this operation is very low, complications may occur in a considerable number of patients, even in the most experienced hands and in high-volume centres. Morbidity is mainly represented by hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, cervical haematoma and wound infection. These complications lead to a reduction in the quality of life of the patients and increased costs for healthcare systems [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
Reoperative thyroid surgery is traditionally considered to have a higher risk of complications due to the development after the primary operation, depending on the time interval between the two procedures, of tissue inflammation, oedema, adhesions and scar tissue, which make dissection difficult and result in a distortion of the normal neck anatomy causing the loss of landmarks [34,35].
Indications for a completion thyroidectomy are mainly three: a residual or recurrent thyroid carcinoma, a residual or recurrent benign thyroid disease and the detection at the histological examination of the intermediate or high-risk DTC after a hemithyroidectomy [14,15,34,35].
In the first two categories, it is generally accepted that a completion thyroidectomy entails a higher risk of complications. Differently, as regards the third category, there is still controversy about this topic [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,34,35].
Moreover, there is still uncertainty as to whether the timing of a completion thyroidectomy in patients with detection at the final histological examination of the intermediate or high-risk DTC after a hemithyroidectomy may influence the risk of complications. Some authors recommend performing completion surgery either within the first 10 days or after 3 months, reporting increased complication rates in a completion thyroidectomy performed in the intermediate postoperative period (between 10 days and 3 months). However, other studies concluded that timing has no influence on morbidity [36,37].
The main aim of this study was to assess the complication rate in this category of patients, particularly in those undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with indeterminate cytology.
Data for this analysis were collected from four high-volume thyroid surgery centres in Italy, with consequent high experience in this field of surgery.
In order to eliminate the bias related to different surgical techniques, only patients undergoing a conventional open thyroidectomy were included, while patients submitted to a minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) were excluded. Moreover, in order to more accurately assess postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, patients simultaneously submitted to a parathyroidectomy were also not included.
In our analysis, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the occurrence of hypoparathyroidism, cervical haematoma, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and wound infection comparing both the TT Group with the HT + CT Group (evaluated as bilateral surgical procedures) and the HT Group with the CT Group (evaluated as unilateral surgical procedures).
Moreover, with regard to the secondary endpoint, which was the comparison of the HT Group with the CT Group in terms of operative time, no statistically significant difference was found. In this regard, it is important to underline that operative times were comparable even though the use of the energy-based device, which was well described in the literature as leading to a reduction in operative times, was slightly greater, but with a statistically significant difference, in the HT Group [38,39].
Regarding our results on complications and operative times, we believe they are justified by the fact that, in these patients, a completion thyroidectomy is performed on a “virgin” surgical field, free of anatomical distortions resulting from a previous operation, which does not entail any particular technical difficulty for the surgeon. Actually, it is important to note that, in addition to the completion thyroidectomy, a central neck dissection was performed in 19.70% of the patients, making it necessary to return to the side of the first surgery. However, despite this, the complication rate in patients who underwent a completion thyroidectomy was comparable to that of patients submitted to primary thyroid surgery (both a total thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy).
Finally, about the timing of the completion thyroidectomy, the complication rate was comparable even though the completion surgery was, on average, performed 2.12 ± 1.20 months after the first operation, thus in the so-called “intermediate” postoperative period. For this reason, as claimed by other authors, we do not believe that the timing between the two surgical procedures has an influence on the development of complications [36].
As regards the rate of the completion thyroidectomy among patients undergoing a hemithyroidectomy, it was only 26.94%. Moreover, the completion surgery was not necessary in all patients submitted to a hemithyroidectomy with a subsequent histological finding of malignancy, but it was in 56.90%. Thus, following the ATA guidelines, unnecessary overtreatment, represented by total thyroidectomy, was avoided in a high percentage of patients. In this regard, it is also important to underline that a total thyroidectomy is burdened by a higher overall risk of complications, with specific reference to hypoparathyroidism and bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, which cannot occur in patients submitted to a hemithyroidectomy. Furthermore, as is well known and described by our data (reported in detail in Table 2), in patients undergoing a total thyroidectomy, the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring (useful for avoiding bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury), the use of a drain, the operative time and the postoperative stay are greater. These elements together with the higher complication rate make the overall costs (both direct and indirect) of a total thyroidectomy higher than those of a hemithyroidectomy [7,12].
The main limitation of our study is that it is based on a retrospective analysis, and thus at risk of bias.

5. Conclusions

The risk of complications in patients undergoing a completion thyroidectomy after a hemithyroidectomy for a thyroid nodule with an indeterminate cytology was comparable to that of patients submitted to primary thyroid surgery (both a total thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy). Furthermore, also the result on operative times, obtained from the comparison between unilateral procedures (a hemithyroidectomy and a completion thyroidectomy), suggests that, in these patients, completion surgery does not entail any particular technical difficulty for the surgeon.
Based on our findings, we believe that, when possible, in accordance with the American Thyroid Association guidelines, in patients with thyroid nodular disease with an indeterminate cytology, a hemithyroidectomy should always be performed as the initial surgery. This surgical strategy allows to avoid unnecessary overtreatment and the complications and overall costs associated with a total thyroidectomy, without an increased risk of complications in the case of a need for a completion thyroidectomy.
Given the main limitation of our study, further prospective studies are needed to better investigate this topic.

Author Contributions

G.L.C.: conception and design of the study, literature search, involved in drafting the manuscript; F.M.: conception and design of the study, involved in drafting the manuscript; F.C., A.B.F.G., A.G. and C.G.: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, literature search; G.D., F.F., G.C., M.T. and P.G.C.: conception and design of the study, critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (Independent Ethics Committee, A.O.U. Cagliari; protocol code: NP/2020/4411, date of approval: 28 October 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seib, C.D.; Sosa, J.A. Evolving Understanding of the Epidemiology of Thyroid Cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 48, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Prinzi, N.; Sorrenti, S.; Baldini, E.; De Vito, C.; Tuccilli, C.; Catania, A.; Coccaro, C.; Bianchini, M.; Nesca, A.; Grani, G.; et al. Association of thyroid diseases with primary extra-thyroidal malignancies in women: Results of a cross-sectional study of 6386 patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, M.; Dal Maso, L.; Vaccarella, S. Global trends in thyroid cancer incidence and the impact of overdiagnosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baldini, E.; Tuccilli, C.; Prinzi, N.; Sorrenti, S.; Falvo, L.; De Vito, C.; Catania, A.; Tartaglia, F.; Mocini, R.; Coccaro, C.; et al. Deregulated expression of Aurora kinases is not a prognostic biomarker in papillary thyroid cancer patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nambron, R.; Rosenthal, R.; Bahl, D. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules-the Clinician’s Perspective. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 58, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tartaglia, F.; Giuliani, A.; Tromba, L.; Carbotta, S.; Karpathiotakis, M.; Tortorelli, G.; Pelle, F.; Merola, R.; Donello, C.; Carbotta, G.; et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of 650 thyroid nodules operated for multinodular goiter: A cyto-histological correlation based on the new Italian cytological classification (siapec 2014). J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2016, 30, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosato, L.; De Crea, C.; Bellantone, R.; Brandi, M.L.; De Toma, G.; Filetti, S.; Miccoli, P.; Pacini, F.; Pelizzo, M.R.; Pontecorvi, A.; et al. Diagnostic, therapeutic and health-care management protocol in thyroid surgery: A position statement of the Italian Association of Endocrine Surgery Units (U.E.C. CLUB). J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2016, 39, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Papale, F.; Cafiero, G.; Grimaldi, A.; Marino, G.; Rosso, F.; Mian, C.; Barollo, S.; Pennelli, G.; Sorrenti, S.; De Antoni, E.; et al. Galectin-3 expression in thyroid fine needle cytology (t-FNAC) uncertain cases: Validation of molecular markers and technology innovation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cozzani, F.; Bettini, D.; Rossini, M.; Bonati, E.; Nuzzo, S.; Loderer, T.; Pedrazzi, G.; Zaccaroni, A.; Del Rio, P. Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: Association between nodule size, histopathological characteristics and clinical outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas—A multicenter retrospective cohort study on 761 patients. Updates Surg. 2021, 73, 1923–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Medas, F.; Erdas, E.; Gordini, L.; Conzo, G.; Gambardella, C.; Canu, G.L.; Pisano, G.; Nicolosi, A.; Calò, P.G. Risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules classified as TIR-3A: What therapy? Int. J. Surg. 2017, 41 (Suppl. 1), S60–S64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fresilli, D.; David, E.; Pacini, P.; Del Gaudio, G.; Dolcetti, V.; Lucarelli, G.T.; Di Leo, N.; Bellini, M.I.; D’Andrea, V.; Sorrenti, S.; et al. Thyroid Nodule Characterization: How to Assess the Malignancy Risk. Update of the Literature. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dobrinja, C.; Samardzic, N.; Giudici, F.; Raffaelli, M.; De Crea, C.; Sessa, L.; Docimo, G.; Ansaldo, G.L.; Minuto, M.; Varaldo, E.; et al. Hemithyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy in the intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: The Italian Societies of Endocrine Surgeons and Surgical Oncology Multicentric Study. Updates Surg. 2021, 73, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Conzo, G.; Avenia, N.; Ansaldo, G.L.; Calò, P.; De Palma, M.; Dobrinja, C.; Docimo, G.; Gambardella, C.; Grasso, M.; Lombardi, C.P.; et al. Surgical treatment of thyroid follicular neoplasms: Results of a retrospective analysis of a large clinical series. Endocrine 2017, 55, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pacini, F.; Basolo, F.; Bellantone, R.; Boni, G.; Cannizzaro, M.A.; De Palma, M.; Durante, C.; Elisei, R.; Fadda, G.; Frasoldati, A.; et al. Italian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer: Joint statements of six Italian societies. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2018, 41, 849–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sena, G.; Gallo, G.; Innaro, N.; Laquatra, N.; Tolone, M.; Sacco, R.; Sammarco, G. Total thyroidectomy vs completion thyroidectomy for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology/follicular proliferation: A single-centre experience. BMC Surg. 2019, 19, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Giordano, D.; Botti, C.; Piana, S.; Zini, M.; Frasoldati, A.; Lusetti, F.; Cavuto, S.; Savoldi, L.; Pernice, C.; Ghidini, A. Postoperative hypoparathyroidism after completion thyroidectomy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 185, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dedhia, P.H.; Stoeckl, E.M.; McDow, A.D.; Pitt, S.C.; Schneider, D.F.; Sippel, R.S.; Long, K.L. Outcomes after completion thyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer: A single-center experience. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 122, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brauer, P.R.; Reddy, C.A.; Burkey, B.B.; Lamarre, E.D. A National Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Completion Thyroidectomy and Total Thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 164, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nicholson, K.J.; Teng, C.Y.; McCoy, K.L.; Carty, S.E.; Yip, L. Completion thyroidectomy: A risky undertaking? Am. J. Surg. 2019, 218, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, Y.M.; Kim, J.R.; Oh, K.H.; Cho, J.G.; Baek, S.K.; Kwon, S.Y.; Jung, K.Y.; Woo, J.S. Comparison of functional outcomes after total thyroidectomy and completion thyroidectomy: Hypoparathyroidism and postoperative complications. Auris Nasus Larynx 2019, 46, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sawant, R.; Hulse, K.; Sohrabi, S.; Yeo, J.C.L.; Pal, K.; Gibb, F.W.; Adamson, R.; Nixon, I.J. The impact of completion thyroidectomy. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 45, 1171–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nardi, F.; Basolo, F.; Crescenzi, A.; Fadda, G.; Frasoldati, A.; Orlandi, F.; Palombini, L.; Papini, E.; Zini, M.; Pontecorvi, A.; et al. Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2014, 37, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Del Rio, P.; Carcoforo, P.; Medas, F.; Bonati, E.; Loderer, T.; Koleva Radica, M.; Calò, P. Adverse events in thyroid surgery: Observational study in three surgical units with high volume/year. BMC Surg. 2021, 21, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lukinović, J.; Bilić, M. Overview of Thyroid Surgery Complications. Acta Clin. Croat. 2020, 59 (Suppl. 1), 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sitges-Serra, A.; Gómez, J.; Barczynski, M.; Lorente-Poch, L.; Iacobone, M.; Sancho, J. A nomogram to predict the likelihood of permanent hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy based on delayed serum calcium and iPTH measurements. Gland Surg. 2017, 6 (Suppl. 1), S11–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sessa, L.; De Crea, C.; Zotta, F.; Pia Cerviere, M.; Gallucci, P.; Pennestri’, F.; Princi, P.; Revelli, L.; Arcuri, G.; Bellantone, R.; et al. Post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia: Is a routine preferable over a selective supplementation? Am. J. Surg. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Calò, P.G.; Medas, F.; Conzo, G.; Podda, F.; Canu, G.L.; Gambardella, C.; Pisano, G.; Erdas, E.; Nicolosi, A. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery: Is the two-staged thyroidectomy justified? Int. J. Surg. 2017, 41 (Suppl. 1), S13–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prete, F.P.; Sgaramella, L.I.; Di Meo, G.; Pasculli, A.; Calculli, G.; Protopapa, G.; Gurrado, A.; Testini, M. Introducing routine intraoperative nerve monitoring in a high-volume endocrine surgery centre: A health technology assessment. Updates Surg. 2021, 73, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Materazzi, G.; Ambrosini, C.E.; Fregoli, L.; De Napoli, L.; Frustaci, G.; Matteucci, V.; Papini, P.; Bakkar, S.; Miccoli, P. Prevention and management of bleeding in thyroid surgery. Gland Surg. 2017, 6, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Doran, H.E.; Wiseman, S.M.; Palazzo, F.F.; Chadwick, D.; Aspinall, S. Post-thyroidectomy bleeding: Analysis of risk factors from a national registry. Br. J. Surg. 2021, 108, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Medas, F.; Canu, G.L.; Cappellacci, F.; Romano, G.; Amato, G.; Erdas, E.; Calò, P.G. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 164, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Polistena, A.; Prete, F.P.; Avenia, S.; Cavallaro, G.; Di Meo, G.; Pasculli, A.; Rondelli, F.; Sanguinetti, A.; Sgaramella, L.I.; Avenia, N.; et al. Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infection in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cappellani, A.; Zanghì, A.; Cardì, F.; Cavallaro, A.; Piccolo, G.; Palmucci, S.; Fuccio Sanzà, G.; Di Vita, M. Total Thyroidectomy: The first, the best. The recurrent goiter issue. Clin. Ter. 2017, 168, e194–e198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Medas, F.; Tuveri, M.; Canu, G.L.; Erdas, E.; Calò, P.G. Complications after reoperative thyroid surgery: Retrospective evaluation of 152 consecutive cases. Updates Surg. 2019, 71, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bin Saleem, R.; Bin Saleem, M.; Bin Saleem, N. Impact of completion thyroidectomy timing on post-operative complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2018, 7, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Park, J.J.; Frank, E.; Simental, A.A.; Park, J.S.; Kim, S.; Imperio-Lagabon, K.; Van der Werf, O. Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Completion Thyroidectomy for Malignancy. Am. Surg. 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Canu, G.L.; Medas, F.; Podda, F.; Tatti, A.; Pisano, G.; Erdas, E.; Calò, P.G. Thyroidectomy with energy-based devices: Surgical outcomes and complications-comparison between Harmonic Focus, LigaSure Small Jaw and Thunderbeat Open Fine Jaw. Gland Surg. 2020, 9, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bakkar, S.; Papavramidis, T.S.; Aljarrah, Q.; Materazzi, G.; Miccoli, P. Energy-based devices in thyroid surgery—An overview. Gland Surg. 2020, 9 (Suppl. 1), S14–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Demographic and preoperative data regarding the whole sample, TT Group and HT Group.
Table 1. Demographic and preoperative data regarding the whole sample, TT Group and HT Group.
TotalTT GroupHT Groupp Value
(n = 751)(n = 506)(n = 245)
Sex
 - Male242 (32.22%)147 (29.05%)95 (38.78%)0.008
 - Female509 (67.78%)359 (70.95%)150 (61.22%)
Age (years, mean ± SD)51.74 ± 14.1552.74 ± 13.7249.67 ± 14.820.005
Familial history of DTC73 (9.72%)50 (9.88%)23 (9.39%)0.830
Hyperthyroidism84 (11.19%)67 (13.24%)17 (6.94%)0.010
US findings
 - Nodule size (mm, mean ± SD)25.08 ± 13.2125.10 ± 13.4125.04 ± 12.820.957
 - Bilateral nodules334 (44.47%)333 (65.81%)1 (0.41%)<0.001
Cytological category
 - TIR3A262 (34.89%)162 (32.02%)100 (40.82%)
 - TIR3B489 (65.11%)344 (67.98%)145 (59.18%)0.018
SD: standard deviation; DTC: differentiated thyroid carcinoma; US: ultrasound.
Table
Table 2. Information about surgical procedure, postoperative stay, complications and histological findings regarding the whole sample, TT Group and HT Group.
Table 2. Information about surgical procedure, postoperative stay, complications and histological findings regarding the whole sample, TT Group and HT Group.
TotalTT GroupHT Groupp Value
(n = 751)(n = 506)(n = 245)
Operative time (minutes, mean ± SD)78.40 ± 33.9489.26 ± 34.2155.96 ± 19.16<0.001
Use of IONM487 (64.85%)347 (68.58%)140 (57.14%)0.002
Use of EBD751 (100%)506 (100%)245 (100%)-
Use of drain491 (65.38%)418 (82.61%)73 (29.80%)<0.001
Postoperative stay (days, mean ± SD)2.19 ± 1.032.42 ± 1.061.72 ± 0.76<0.001
Hypoparathyroidism
 - Transient141 (18.77%)141 (27.87%)0<0.001
 - Permanent12 (1.60%)12 (2.37%)00.011
Cervical haematoma5 (0.67%)4 (0.79%)1 (0.41%)1.000
RLN injury
 - Unilateral24 (3.20%)17 (3.36%)7 (2.86%)0.714
 - Bilateral000-
 - Transient18 (2.40%)13 (2.57%)5 (2.04%)0.657
 - Permanent6 (0.80%)4 (0.79%)2 (0.82%)1.000
Wound infection1 (0.13%)1 (0.20%)01.000
Histological findings
 - Benign disease390261 (51.58%)129 (52.65%)0.783
 - DTC361245 (48.42%)116 (47.35%)
 - Microcarcinoma133102 (20.16%)31 (12.65%)0.012
 - LN metastasis2011 (2.17%)9 (3.67%)0.231
SD: standard deviation; IONM: intraoperative nerve monitoring; EBD: energy-based device; RLN: recurrent laryngeal nerve; DTC: differentiated thyroid carcinoma; LN: lymph node.
Table
Table 3. General information about CT Group.
Table 3. General information about CT Group.
CT Group
(n = 66)
% CT/HT26.94%
% CT/HT with a histological finding of malignancy56.90%
Two-stage thyroidectomy for LOS at IONM1 (1.52%)
CND13 (19.70%)
Interval between HT and CT (months, mean ± SD)2.12 ± 1.20
Malignancy in the contralateral lobe16 (24.24%)
LN metastasis9 (13.64%)
CT: completion thyroidectomy; HT: hemithyroidectomy; LOS: loss of signal; IONM: intraoperative nerve monitoring; CND: central neck dissection; SD: standard deviation; LN: lymph node.
Table
Table 4. Complications in TT Group and HT + CT Group.
Table 4. Complications in TT Group and HT + CT Group.
TT GroupHT + CT Groupp Value
(n = 506)(n = 66)
Hypoparathyroidism
 - Transient141 (27.87%)14 (21.21%)0.253
 - Permanent12 (2.37%)2 (3.03%)0.670
Cervical haematoma4 (0.79%)01.000
RLN injury
 - Unilateral17 (3.36%)4 (6.06%)0.288
 - Bilateral00-
 - Transient13 (2.57%)3 (4.55%)0.414
 - Permanent4 (0.79%)1 (1.52%)0.460
Wound infection1 (0.20%)01.000
RLN: recurrent laryngeal nerve.
Table
Table 5. Data about surgical procedure, postoperative stay and complications in HT Group and CT Group.
Table 5. Data about surgical procedure, postoperative stay and complications in HT Group and CT Group.
HT GroupCT Groupp Value
(n = 245)(n = 66)
Operative time (minutes, median and IQR)50 (42–65)50 (40–60)0.757
Use of IONM140 (57.14%)33 (50%)0.300
Use of EBD245 (100%)64 (96.97%)0.045
Use of drain73 (29.80%)19 (28.79%)0.873
Postoperative stay (days, mean ± SD)1.72 ± 0.761.77 ± 0.460.606
Cervical haematoma1 (0.41%)01.000
RLN injury
 - Unilateral7 (2.86%)2 (3.03%)1.000
 - Transient5 (2.04%)1 (1.52%)1.000
 - Permanent2 (0.82%)1 (1.52%)0.512
Wound infection00-
IQR: interquartile range; IONM: intraoperative nerve monitoring; EBD: energy-based device; SD: standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Canu, G.L.; Medas, F.; Cappellacci, F.; Giordano, A.B.F.; Gurrado, A.; Gambardella, C.; Docimo, G.; Feroci, F.; Conzo, G.; Testini, M.; et al. Risk of Complications in Patients Undergoing Completion Thyroidectomy after Hemithyroidectomy for Thyroid Nodule with Indeterminate Cytology: An Italian Multicentre Retrospective Study. Cancers 2022, 14, 2472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102472

AMA Style

Canu GL, Medas F, Cappellacci F, Giordano ABF, Gurrado A, Gambardella C, Docimo G, Feroci F, Conzo G, Testini M, et al. Risk of Complications in Patients Undergoing Completion Thyroidectomy after Hemithyroidectomy for Thyroid Nodule with Indeterminate Cytology: An Italian Multicentre Retrospective Study. Cancers. 2022; 14(10):2472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Canu, Gian Luigi, Fabio Medas, Federico Cappellacci, Alessio Biagio Filippo Giordano, Angela Gurrado, Claudio Gambardella, Giovanni Docimo, Francesco Feroci, Giovanni Conzo, Mario Testini, and et al. 2022. "Risk of Complications in Patients Undergoing Completion Thyroidectomy after Hemithyroidectomy for Thyroid Nodule with Indeterminate Cytology: An Italian Multicentre Retrospective Study" Cancers 14, no. 10: 2472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14102472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop