Next Article in Journal
Suppression of an Effect of Terrain Unevenness on Accuracy of Height Measurement in UAV with Integrated Ultrasound Altimeter during Landing
Previous Article in Journal
A Workflow for Affective Computing and Stress Recognition from Biosignals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A New Readout Method for a High Sensitivity Capacitance Sensor Based on Weakly Coupled Resonators †

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liege, 4000 Liège, Belgium
Presented at the 7th Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications, 15–30 November 2020; Available online: https://ecsa-7.sciforum.net/.
Published: 14 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 7th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a new readout method for a sensor to detect minute variations in the capacitance. A sensor is based on the weakly coupled electrical resonators that use an amplitude ratio (AR) as an output signal. A new readout scheme with a relatively higher output sensitivity is proposed to measure the relative changes in the input capacitor. A mathematical model is derived to express the readout output as a function of change in the capacitance. To validate the theoretical model, a system is modelled and designed using an industry-standard electronic circuit design environment. SPICE simulation results are presented for a wide range of design parameters, such as varying coupling factors between the two electrical resonators. Sensitivity comparison between the existing and the proposed AR readout is presented to show the effectiveness of the method of detection proposed in this work.

1. Introduction

In today’s world, intelligent electronic circuits [1,2,3] to detect/measure minute capacitance change form an integral part of many micromachined/MEMS sensors [4,5,6]. Often, the key design requirements of such capacitive readouts are high sensitivity, ultra-high resolution (low noise floor), low power consumption, etc. However, designing and implementing a high-performance capacitive readout to precisely measure the minute variations in to the input capacitance pose various challenges. These include intrinsic and extrinsic noise sources, and board-level parasitics, etc. Recently, a capacitance readout method based on the two weakly coupled resonators (WCR) has been used to measure minute variations in a capacitance [2,7]. This research was done in the context of proposing a readout method for capacitance sensors. Our work presents an innovative, and new readout method to measure small capacitance changes in the micromachined/MEMS transducers. A readout method reflects in the higher changes in the output voltage (relatively higher sensitivity) for small incremental changes in the perturbation (capacitance). A readout circuit is called as capacitance-to-amplitude/ amplitude ratio (AR) converter.

2. Mathematical Model

Consider an RLC circuit, shown in Figure 1. This circuit is used to form two electrically coupled resonators (CR) to measure changes to the input capacitance. In this circuit, the following assumptions are valid: L1 = L2 = L, C1 = C2 = C and R1 = R2 = R. This establishes a symmetry in a circuit. A coupling factor between the two individual RLC circuits is modelled as κ = C/Cc. A change in the input capacitance is ∆C. The normalized value of the capacitance change (in the form of a perturbation) is expressed as δ = ∆C/C. Condition for a coupling is given as Cc >> C, indicating two resonant modes can be reasonably distinguished in the output frequency response. The quantities V1(t) and V2(t) are input voltages, and quantities I1(t) and I1(t) are the output loop currents.
Assuming no damping in the system—i.e., R = 0—a set of governing differential equations are represented as
L q ¨ 1 ( t ) + 1 C q 1 ( t ) + 1 C c [ q 1 ( t ) q 2 ( t ) ] = V 1 ( t )
L q ¨ 2 ( t ) + 1 C ± Δ C q 2 ( t ) + 1 C c [ q 2 ( t ) q 1 ( t ) ] = V 2 ( t )
It is assumed that the system is driven with only one voltage source—i.e., V1(s) ≠ 0, and V2(s) = 0. Applying Laplace Transform to Equations (1) and (2) yields the following:
( L s 2 + 1 C + 1 C c ) Q 1 ( s ) 1 C c Q 2 ( s ) = V 1 ( s )
( L s 2 + 1 C ± Δ C + 1 C c ) Q 2 ( s ) 1 C c Q 1 ( s ) = 0
Solving further, one can obtain the transfer functions as
H 1 ( j ω ) = Q 1 ( j ω ) V 1 ( j ω ) = L ω 2 + 1 C ± Δ C + 1 C L 2 ω 4 ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) ω 2 + α
H 2 ( j ω ) = Q 2 ( j ω ) V 1 ( j ω ) = 1 C c L 2 ω 4 ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) ω 2 + α
Here, α = ( 1 C 2 + C C c + 1 C C c + C c Δ C + 1 C C c ) .
The denominator in (5) and (6) is the characteristic equation which provide the roots. In other words, the roots or eigen-frequencies, ω i 2 (i = 1, 2) as a function of ∆C are obtained as follows:
ω i 2 = ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) ± ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) 2 4 L 2 α 2 L 2
Using (7) in (5) and (6), and taking the ratio of H 1 ( j ω ) and H 2 ( j ω ) —i.e., Q 1 ( j ω i ) Q 2 ( j ω i ) —provides the charge output amplitude ratio (AR). The amplitude ratio, A R i (i = 1, 2), as a function of ∆C, is then obtained as
Q 1 ( j ω i ) Q 2 ( j ω i ) = L ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) ± ( L C + 2 L C c + L C ± Δ C ) 2 4 L 2 α 2 L 2 + 1 C ± Δ C + 1 C 1 C c

3. SPICE Modeling and Results

Figure 2a shows a resulting plot of the output loop currents of a RLC readout circuit model seen in Figure 1. A fixed value of the coupling capacitor Cc is used for the simulation. Note that equal output amplitudes of the loop currents represent the initial symmetry of the system. Figure 2b presents similar plots of the output loop currents for varying values of the coupling capacitor Cc. Higher effective values of Cc leads to the lower effective value of a coupling between the two resonant circuits. A relatively weaker coupling is reflected by the closed-spacing of the mode-frequencies, as seen from the plots.
Figure 3 presents a frequency response of a coupled RLC for a fixed value of a coupling and variants of a perturbations used. As can be observed, upon applying a minute changes (∆C) in the input capacitor, C2 (refer to Figure 1), variations in both the resonant mode frequencies and mode amplitudes of each resonators are observed.

4. A New Readout Method (Measure at ω0 Instead of ωi)

A conventional method of sensing the capacitance perturbation is existent in the literature [2]. Such method relies on the fact that mode-frequencies and amplitude ratio vary as a function of ∆C (Equations (7) and (8)).
AR method of sensing is being pursued owing to the relatively higher sensitivity to the input perturbations in the weakly coupled resonant system. In our work, we propose a new method of sensing in which amplitude/s and/or AR of the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) at the ith mode (i = 1, 2) is recorded at the initial resonant mode-frequency, ω0 (instead of ωi) when perturbation is applied in the system. This can be illustrated from Figure 4 that presents a frequency response of the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) at the first resonant mode. As seen, an arrow indicates an amplitude change in the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) when ∆C is applied in the system and this is the conventional output of a readout. We instead propose to sense the amplitude shifts at the resonance for each applied value of ∆C. This is indicated by dots forming a downward line in Figure 4. A similar readout approach can be utilized with a frequency response of the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) at the second resonant mode.
Figure 5a shows output amplitude response of a RLC coupled resonators. It shows how amplitudes of the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) varies as a function of % variation in δ. In the same plot, it also shows how amplitudes of the jth resonator (j = 1, 2) varies as a function of % variation in the δ if the proposed method of readout is used. Clearly, a linear (up to certain range) and higher output is available with the new method of readout. Figure 5b provides a final readout in terms of AR of the system. Two AR readout methods are seen in the plot. A proposed AR readout method shows higher changes in the output for small incremental changes in the capacitance.

5. Conclusions

A new readout method using an electrically coupled resonator circuits is proposed. Such readout circuit when interfaced with the micromachined transducer can be effective for the enhanced sensitivity output. The same concept of the readout can be extended to the MEMS resonators and other inertial sensors, where overall system can benefit from the high quality factor of the MEMS transducers/sensors. Extended work should involve improving the linearity in the output of the proposed readout method.
Findings: This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pérez Sanjurjo, J.; Prefasi, E.; Buffa, C.; Gaggl, R. A Capacitance-To-Digital Converter for MEMS Sensors for Smart Applications. Sensors 2017, 17, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hafizi-Moori, S.; Cretu, E. Weakly-coupled resonators in capacitive readout circuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2015, 62, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, Z.; Boom, B.A.; Annema, A.J.; Wiegerink, R.J.; Nauta, B. On frequency-based interface circuits for capacitive MEMS accelerometers. Micromachines 2018, 9, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Utz, A.; Walk, C.; Stanitzki, A.; Mokhtari, M.; Kraft, M.; Kokozinski, R. A High-Precision and High-Bandwidth MEMS-Based Capacitive Accelerometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 6533–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kose, T.; Terzioglu, Y.; Azgin, K.; Akin, T. A single-mass self-resonating closed-loop capacitive MEMS accelerometer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Orlando, FL, USA, 30 October–3 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nazemi, H.; Balasingam, J.A.; Swaminathan, S.; Ambrose, K.; Nathani, M.U.; Ahmadi, T. Mass sensors based on capacitive and piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers—CMUT and PMUT. Sensors 2020, 20, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hafizi-Moori, S.; Cretu, E. Reducing measurement error in capacitive readout circuits based on weakly coupled resonators. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A circuit level schematic representation of a RLC readout.
Figure 1. A circuit level schematic representation of a RLC readout.
Engproc 02 00086 g001
Figure 2. (a) Frequency response of a coupled RLC system for a fixed value of a coupling, magnitude (left) and phase (right); (b) frequency response of a coupled RLC system for variants of effective coupling. Lower coupling leads to closely-spaced mode frequencies.
Figure 2. (a) Frequency response of a coupled RLC system for a fixed value of a coupling, magnitude (left) and phase (right); (b) frequency response of a coupled RLC system for variants of effective coupling. Lower coupling leads to closely-spaced mode frequencies.
Engproc 02 00086 g002
Figure 3. Frequency response of a coupled RLC capacitance sensor system. Top plot shows response of resonator 1 and bottom plot shows response of resonator 2. Direction of arrow indicates a variation trend of the resonant peak of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the ith (i = 1, 2) mode of the frequency response.
Figure 3. Frequency response of a coupled RLC capacitance sensor system. Top plot shows response of resonator 1 and bottom plot shows response of resonator 2. Direction of arrow indicates a variation trend of the resonant peak of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the ith (i = 1, 2) mode of the frequency response.
Engproc 02 00086 g003
Figure 4. Frequency response of a coupled RLC capacitance readout system. Response of resonator 1 (top) and response of resonator 2 (bottom). Direction of dotted line indicates measuring a proposed variation trend of the resonant peak of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the ith (i = 1, 2) mode of the frequency response. Shown here is the output response of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the first mode of a coupled RLC resonant capacitance readout.
Figure 4. Frequency response of a coupled RLC capacitance readout system. Response of resonator 1 (top) and response of resonator 2 (bottom). Direction of dotted line indicates measuring a proposed variation trend of the resonant peak of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the ith (i = 1, 2) mode of the frequency response. Shown here is the output response of the jth (j = 1, 2) resonator at the first mode of a coupled RLC resonant capacitance readout.
Engproc 02 00086 g004
Figure 5. Output response of a coupled RLC capacitance readout circuit. (a) Output current amplitude vs. ∆C or δ. Lable a11 is amplitude of resonator 1 at mode 1, a22 is amplitude of resonator 2 at mode 1 (b) Amplitude ratio (AR) readout of RLC coupled resonator circuit. ω0 is the initial readout resonant frequency at mode 1.
Figure 5. Output response of a coupled RLC capacitance readout circuit. (a) Output current amplitude vs. ∆C or δ. Lable a11 is amplitude of resonator 1 at mode 1, a22 is amplitude of resonator 2 at mode 1 (b) Amplitude ratio (AR) readout of RLC coupled resonator circuit. ω0 is the initial readout resonant frequency at mode 1.
Engproc 02 00086 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pachkawade, V. A New Readout Method for a High Sensitivity Capacitance Sensor Based on Weakly Coupled Resonators. Eng. Proc. 2020, 2, 86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ecsa-7-08230

AMA Style

Pachkawade V. A New Readout Method for a High Sensitivity Capacitance Sensor Based on Weakly Coupled Resonators. Engineering Proceedings. 2020; 2(1):86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ecsa-7-08230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pachkawade, Vinayak. 2020. "A New Readout Method for a High Sensitivity Capacitance Sensor Based on Weakly Coupled Resonators" Engineering Proceedings 2, no. 1: 86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ecsa-7-08230

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop