Next Article in Journal
Biomechanical Analysis of Serious Neck Injuries Resulting from Judo
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Factors Affecting Early Quality of Life of Patients after Breast Cancer Surgery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Treatment in Patients with Complications of Kidney and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in Indonesia

1
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Bhakti Kencana, Bandung 40164, Indonesia
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
4
Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
5
Center for Health Technology Assessment, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 December 2020 / Revised: 12 February 2021 / Accepted: 13 February 2021 / Published: 16 February 2021

Abstract

:
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease with high-cost treatment. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of T2DM treatment in hospitalized patients with complications of kidney and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in Indonesia by focusing on patients of Health Social Security Agency (BPJS Kesehatan). An observational study was applied by collecting data retrospectively from patients’ medical record at the biggest public hospital in West Java Province, Indonesia. Two perspectives of payer and healthcare provider were applied to estimate the treatment cost. We considered following inclusion criteria: (i) Hospitalized T2DM patients without complication, with complications of kidney and PVD during 2014–2017; (ii) member of BPJS Kesehatan; (iii) >18 years old patients; and (iv) patients with complete medical record data. The results showed that the majority patients were female (56.72%), 45–64 years old (69.40%), and had a length of stay at 4–10 days (54.48%). The greatest contributions in the total treatment cost were found to be hospital room, medical services and medicines for the treatment of T2DM without complications, with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. From the perspective of payer, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of T2DM treatment with complications of kidney and PVD would be IDR 215,723 and IDR 234,591 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction, respectively. From the perspective of healthcare provider, the ICERs of T2DM treatment with complications of kidney and PVD would be IDR 166,289 and IDR 681,853 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction in both perspectives (1 US$ = IDR 13,451). In a comparison with T2DM without complication, reducing 1 mg/dL blood glucose in T2DM treatment with complication of PVD would require higher cost than in T2DM treatment with complication of kidney from both perspectives.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in Indonesia was estimated to be 8.6% of the total population, which placed this country in the fourth rank after India, China and America [1,2,3]. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) has predicted the number of DM patients in Indonesia would increase from 9.1 million in 2014 to 14.1 million in 2030, which is linear with the result of Indonesia Basic Health Research in 2013 that confirmed the number of DM patients (>15 years old) in Indonesia at 12.2 million [4,5]. In general, there are two types of DM: Type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM). In T1DM, β-pancreatic cells fail to secrete insulin that may lead the production of insulin to be very low [6,7,8,9,10]. While, T2DM is characterized by several disorders, such as impaired insulin secretion, insulin resistance (e.g., in muscles, liver, and adipose), and excessive secretion of glucagon-like-peptide-1 [11,12]. In a comparison with healthy people, T2DM patients are risky to have kidney failure (17 times higher) and diabetic ulcers (50 times higher) [13,14]. In Indonesia, the annual incidence of kidney failure was reported to be 200–250 cases in 1 million population [15,16,17]. Another most frequent case of T2DM complication is diabetic ulcer [18], which can cause up to 50% of non-pneumatic lower limb amputations [18,19]. The mortality and amputation rates in Indonesia were estimated to be 16% and 25%, respectively. In addition, approximately 14.3% and 37% of patients would die after one-year and three-year amputation, respectively [20].
Since T2DM is a lifetime and high-cost disease, its economic burden is evident. The economic burden of DM in Indonesia was estimated to be $1.27 billion in 2020 [21]. This burden was predicted to be much higher in the next decade since the number of DM patients in the world would increase from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030 [22]. In developing countries, the number of DM patients was estimated to increase 246% from 115 million to 284 million patients [23]. In Indonesia, this economic burden would be worsened by the limited access to healthcare centers [24]. A previous study also highlighted that complications have a significant impact on the costs of managing T2DM in Indonesia and confirmed that a comprehensive strategy could potentially reduce national healthcare expenditure [25].
Since the implementation of national health insurance system in 2014, the Indonesian National Healthcare Insurance (BPJS Kesehatan) has launched a chronic disease management program (Prolanis), which provides a comprehensive treatment for patients, including T2DM patients, to improve their quality of life [26]. To evaluate the effectiveness of T2DM treatment in Indonesia, it is necessary to conduct an economic evaluation by considering clinical and cost parameters. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of T2DM treatment in patients with complications of kidney and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in Indonesia by focusing on Health Social Security Agency (BPJS Kesehatan) patients and taking two different cost perspectives into account. This type of analysis can be used to assess whether the additional benefits of the treatment are commensurate with its additional costs [27,28,29].

2. Methods

An observational study was applied by collecting data retrospectively from patients’ medical record at the biggest public hospital in West Java Province, as the most populous province in Indonesia (total population: 49,316,712; working age group: 45%; sex: 51% of male and 49% of female) with the highest prevalence of T2DM (8%) [30,31]. As the implementation of Indonesian constitutional duty to provide social security for all citizens, the government of Indonesia initiated the national health insurance program in 2014, which was operated by BPJS Kesehatan. In this study, we considered following inclusion criteria: (i) Hospitalized T2DM patients with no complications, complications of kidney and PVD in a period of 2014–2017; (ii) member of BPJS Kesehatan; (iii) patients in the age group of >18 years old; and (iv) patients with complete medical record data. We excluded patients who died and had no clinical improvement.
In a period of 2014–2017, we found 501 hospitalized T2DM patients with no complications, complications of kidney, and PVD. In this stage, we excluded 206 patients since they were not BPJS Kesehatan members and had other complication diseases. From 295 patients, we further excluded 161 patients who had incomplete medical record, died, and had no clinical improvement. We considered only 134 patients who met inclusion criteria, which consisted of 8, 104, and 22 patients without complications, with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively (see Figure 1).
In a comparison with T2DM treatment without complications, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of T2DM treatment with complications of kidney and PVD by considering parameters of cost and clinical effectiveness. We calculated ICER by dividing the difference in total cost by the difference in total effectiveness.
ICER   =   Cos t with   complication   -   Cos t without   complication Effectiveness with   complication   -   Effectiveness without   complication
For hospitalizations due to T2DM complications, the following outcome measures were considered: Blood glucose reduction that was measured during hospitalization, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. In particular, total hospitalization costs in this study were considered in two perspectives: Healthcare provider and payer. In the perspective of healthcare provider, we only considered direct medical costs, such as hospital room, doctors’ fee, medicines, laboratory tests, blood transfusion, and other medical services. All costs of hospitalized T2DM patients in this perspective were derived from medical record data. In the perspective of payer, we considered all costs covered by BPJS Kesehatan, as the third-party payer. All costs of hospitalized T2DM patients in this perspective were derived from the tariffs of Indonesia case-based groups (INA-CBGs). Descriptive statistics were applied to describe baseline characteristics of selected patients and all monetary values were reported in Indonesian Rupiah (IDR). To calculate the total cost, a discount rate of 3% was applied.

3. Results

From 134 patients who met inclusion criteria, we found that the majority gender and age group of patients are female (n = 76 and 45–64 years old (n = 93), respectively. In particular, the majority of patients had a length of stay at 4–10 days (n = 73) and kidney disease complications (n = 104). Information about patients’ characteristics can be seen in Table 1. The average total costs per patient in a period of 2014–2017 were estimated to be IDR 8,629,930; IDR 10,874,833; and 31,472,019 for the treatment of T2DM without complication, T2DM with complications of kidney, and PVD, respectively (see Table 2). In a comparison with other components in direct medical costs, the results showed that the greatest contributions in the total treatment cost were found to be hospital room (50.11%), medical services (28.18%), and medicines (29.07%) for the treatment of T2DM without complications, T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively (see Table 3).
In a comparison with T2DM treatment without complication, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the perspective of payer would be IDR 215,723 and IDR 234,591 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction for the treatment of T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. In general, there were significant differences (p-value < 0.05) in total treatment cost between T2DM without complication, with complications of kidney and PVD during 2014–2017 (see Table 4).
From the perspective of healthcare provider, we estimated the ICERs would be IDR 166,289 and IDR 681,853 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction for the treatment of T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. In particular, there were significant differences (p-value < 0.05) in total treatment cost between T2DM without complication, with complications of kidney and PVD during 2016–2017 (see Table 5).

4. Discussion

The results showed that the majority patients were female (56.72%) and 45–64 years old. These results of this study are similar with the results of previous studies, which confirmed that population over 45 years old have a higher risk of T2DM since increasing of age will decrease physical activity, cause the glucose metabolism abnormal, increase glucose induction in insulin secretion, and insulin resistance [32,33]. A study by Chia et al. also mentioned that the presence of DM doubled the risk for CVD in men and tripled it in women, according to the Framingham and the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention studies [33]. In particular, the majority of patients had a length of stay (LoS) at 4–10 days (54.48%). It has been known that LoS is an important indicator to determine the effectiveness of T2DM treatment and it is related to the cost of care. The less LoS is associated with the more effective and efficient hospital services. In T2DM treatment, it has correlations with the knowledge of patients to deal with their lifetime disease [34,35]. The results of this study also showed that the majority of T2DM patients had kidney disease complications (77.61%), which is in line with a previous study in 2007 that showed the high prevalence (32%) of T2DM patients in Japan with microalbuminuria [36]. Another previous study in 2006 also confirmed that about 36% and 28% of T2DM patients in the US suffered from albuminuria and had kidney problems, respectively [37].
Our study gives some useful insight into the cost-effectiveness analysis of T2DM treatment in Indonesia by taking two different perspectives into account, but we should highlight several limitations of this study. Firstly, we obtained data from administrative database in the healthcare provider, which relied on its accuracy and its completeness of the patients’ records. Secondly, we did not consider the cost of side-effects in all treatments. In a lot of cases, side-effects due to treatment of T2DM-related complications are evident. Thirdly, unlike cost, a discount rate of health outcome was not applied in this study since we assumed that health outcome in our study would be less desirable with time.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the cost-effectiveness of T2DM treatment in patients with complications of kidney and PVD in Indonesia. Hence, it has several novel findings. The average total costs per patient for the treatment of T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD were reported to be 126.01% and 364.68% higher than T2DM without complications, respectively. The greatest contributions in the total treatment cost were found to be hospital room (50.11%), medical services (28.18%), and medicines (29.07%) for the treatment of T2DM without complications, with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. These results strengthen the result of a study on assessing the impact of complications on the direct medical costs of T2DM in Indonesia, which confirmed that 84.35% T2DM outpatient patients had at least one complication of disease with an average treatment cost of $774.37 per patient for a six-month treatment [25]. The more complications will be linear with the higher treatment cost [38]. In addition, these particular costs of T2DM treatment with complications were associated with pharmacological treatment, diagnostic, and therapeutic procedures [25,38].
In a comparison with T2DM treatment without complications, we estimated the ICERs of T2DM treatment from the perspective of payer would be IDR 215,723 and IDR 234,591 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction for the treatment of T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. From the perspective of healthcare provider, the ICERs of T2DM treatment would be IDR 166,289 and IDR 681,853 per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction for the treatment of T2DM with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. The results showed that reducing 1 mg/dL blood glucose in T2DM treatment with complication of PVD required higher cost than in T2DM treatment with complication of kidney from both perspectives. The ICERs in this cost-effectiveness analysis can be interpreted to find out the additional costs in one unit of effectiveness and to provide several alternative interventions by considering funding availability, specifically from the perspective of payer [30,39,40]. To gain more cost-effective T2DM treatment with complications, it is necessary for the government of Indonesia to intensify prevention strategies. A systematic review study by Siegel et al. on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage DM highlighted that there were several interventions with strong evidence to prevent T2DM complications, such as through screening for undiagnosed T2DM, managing risk factors, and early treatment interventions [41]. Screening for T2DM has been proven to be a cost-effective intervention. A systematic review study by Najafi et al. on the cost-effectiveness of T2DM screening concluded that screening is cost-effective to prevent T2DM with the ICER in a range from $516 to $126,238 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Siegel et al. also mentioned that screening every three years for the US population without DM had strong evidence of being very cost-effective at $7898/QALY, compared with no screening [42]. We also found strong evidence that managing DM risk factors through diabetes self-management education (DSME) for individuals with diabetes, compared with usual care, was very cost-effective. A randomized-controlled trial study on the cost-effectiveness of DSME highlighted that DSME was a promising investment and had a potential to be a cost-saving intervention [43]. Regarding early treatment interventions, we found strong evidence that early T2DM treatment with the use of telemedicine could be cost-effective [41,44]. Learning from the experience of other countries on managing risk factors to prevent T2DM complications, these interventions are promising to be included in the benefit package of social insurance in Indonesia.

5. Conclusions

The majority of patients in this study had a LoS at 4–10 days. Since LoS is closely related to the total treatment cost of T2DM, we investigated the greatest contributions in the total cost, which were found to be hospital room, medical services and medicines for the treatment of T2DM without complications, with complications of kidney and PVD, respectively. Despite the fact that the cost-effectiveness values of T2DM treatment with complications of kidney and PVD varied in different perspectives, reducing 1 mg/dL blood glucose in T2DM treatment with complication of PVD would require higher cost than in T2DM treatment with complication of kidney from the perspective of healthcare provider and payer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. and H.P.; methodology, A.P. and A.A.S.; software, A.P. and R.K.S.; validation, H.P. and A.A.S.; formal analysis, A.P. and A.M.; investigation, A.P. and S.A.S.; resources, H.P. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P. and R.K.S.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and A.A.S.; supervision, S.A.S. and A.A.S.; project administration, R.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of UNIVERSITAS PADJADJARAN (protocol code: 496/UN6.KEP/EC/2-18 and date of approval: 11 May 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Soelistijo, S.A.; Novida, H.; Rudijanto, A.; Soewondo, P.; Suastika, K.; Manaf, A. Management and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Indonesia 2015; PB Perkeni: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sinuraya, R.K.; Oktrina, A.; Handayani, N.K.; Destiani, D.P.; Puspitasari, I.M. Clinical Pharmacy Services Improve Blood Sugar Control of Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Indones. J. Clin. Pharm. 2019, 8, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IDF. IDF Diabetes Atlas Ninth Edition (9th) 2019. Available online: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/2019/IDF_Atlas_9th_Edition_2019.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2020).
  5. Basic Health Research. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; Basic Health Research: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2015 abridged for primary care providers. Clin. Diabetes 2015, 33, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. ADA. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010, 33 (Suppl. 1), S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. ADA. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013, 36 (Suppl. 1), S67–S74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. ADA. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013, 36 (Suppl. 1), S8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Flint, A.; Arslanian, S. Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Youth. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, S177–S183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Inzucchi, S.E.; Bergenstal, R.M.; Buse, J.B.; Diamant, M.; Ferrannini, E.; Nauck, M.; Peters, A.L.; Tsapas, A.; Wender, R.; Matthews, D.R. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Approach: Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 1364–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roden, M.; Shulman, G.I. The integrative biology of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 576, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Casqueiro, J.; Casqueiro, J.; Alves, C. Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus: A review of pathogenesis. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 16 (Suppl. 1), S27–S36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pecoits-Filho, R.; Abensur, H.; Betônico, C.C.R.; Machado, A.D.; Parente, E.B.; Queiroz, M.; Salles, J.E.N.; Titan, S.; Vencio, S. Interactions between kidney disease and diabetes: Dangerous liaisons. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2016, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vallon, V.; Komers, R. Pathophysiology of the Diabetic Kidney. Compr. Physiol. 2011, 1, 1175–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pourghasem, M.; Shafi, H.; Babazadeh, Z. Histological changes of kidney in diabetic nephropathy. Casp. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 6, 120–127. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hidayati, T.; Adiningrat, A.; Akrom, A. Clinical conditions and history of illness among terminal chronic kidney disease patients. Int. J. Public Health Sci. 2019, 8, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yazdanpanah, L.; Shahbazian, H.; Nazari, I.; Arti, H.R.; Ahmadi, F.; Mohammadianinejad, S.E.; Cheraghian, B.; Hesam, S. Incidence and Risk Factors of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Population-Based Diabetic Foot Cohort (ADFC Study)—Two-Year Follow-Up Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Boulton, A.J.M.; Kirsner, R.S.; Vileikyte, L. Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pemayun, T.G.D.; Naibaho, R.M. Clinical profile and outcome of diabetic foot ulcer, a view from tertiary care hospital in Semarang, Indonesia. Diabet. Foot Ankle 2017, 8, 1312974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Finkelstein, E.A.; Chay, J.; Bajpai, S. The Economic Burden of Self-Reported and Undiagnosed Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes on Indonesian Households. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Padmawati, R.S.; Ng, N.; Prabandari, Y.S.; Nichter, M. Smoking among diabetes patients in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Cessation efforts are urgently needed. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2009, 14, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wild, S.; Roglic, G.; Green, A.; Sicree, R.; King, H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ligita, T.; Wicking, K.; Francis, K.; Harvey, N.; Nurjannah, I. How people living with diabetes in Indonesia learn about their disease: A grounded theory study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Reynolds, R.; Dennis, S.; Hasan, I.; Slewa, J.; Chen, W.; Tian, D.; Bobba, S.; Zwar, N. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam. Pr. 2018, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Holdford, D.A. Pharmacoeconomics: From Theory to Practice. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2010, 74, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bodrogi, J.; Kaló, Z. Principles of pharmacoeconomics and their impact on strategic imperatives of pharmaceutical research and development. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 159, 1367–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. A Suwantika, A.; Postma, M.J. Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Statistics of West Java Province, Indonesia. Total Population in West Java Province, Indonesia. Available online: https://jabar.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2020/02/11/212/-jumlah-penduduk-dan-jenis-kelamin-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-barat-2019.html (accessed on 15 January 2020).
  30. West Java Province. In 2040, Approximately 642 Million People in the World Will Suffer Diabetes. Available online: https://jabarprov.go.id/index.php/news/26203/2040_Sebanyak_642_Juta_Penduduk_Dunia_Akan_Mengalami_Diabetes (accessed on 15 January 2020).
  31. Kalyani, R.R.; Egan, J.M. Diabetes and Altered Glucose Metabolism with Aging. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 42, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Chia Chee, W.; Egan Josephine, M.; Ferrucci, L. Age-Related Changes in Glucose Metabolism, Hyperglycemia, and Cardiovascular Risk. Circ. Res. 2018, 123, 886–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Comino, E.J.; Harris, M.F.; Islam, M.D.F.; Tran, D.T.; Jalaludin, B.; Jorm, L.; Flack, J.; Haas, M. Impact of diabetes on hospital admission and length of stay among a general population aged 45 year or more: A record linkage study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Allende-Vigo, M.Z.; González-Rosario, R.A.; González, L.; Sánchez, V.; Vega, M.A.; Alvarado, M.; Ramón, R.O. Inpatient Management of Diabets Mellitus among Noncritically Ill Patients at the University Hospital of Puerto Rico. Endocr. Pr. 2014, 20, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yokoyama, H.; Kawai, K.; Kobayashi, M.; on behalf of the Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management Study Group. Microalbuminuria Is Common in Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A nationwide survey from the Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management Study Group (JDDM 10). Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 989–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Retnakaran, R.; Cull, C.A.; Thorne, K.I.; Adler, A.I.; Holman, R.R.; for the UKPDS Study Group. Risk Factors for Renal Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 74. Diabetes 2006, 55, 1832–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Andayani, T.M.; Ibrahim, M.I.M.; Asdie, A.H. Assessing the Impact of Complications on the Direct Medical Costs of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Outpatients. Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  38. Soewondo, P.; Ferrario, A.; Tahapary, D.L. Challenges in diabetes management in Indonesia: A literature review. Glob. Health 2013, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Suwantika, A.A.; Zakiyah, N.; Lestari, K.; Postma, M.J. Accelerating the introduction of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2014, 13, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gonçalves, A.C.O.; Cazarim, M.D.S.; Sanches, C.; Pereira, L.R.L.; Camargos, A.M.T.; Aquino, J.A.; Baldoni, A.O. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2019, 7, e000647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Siegel, K.R.; Ali, M.K.; Zhou, X.; Ng, B.P.; Jawanda, S.; Proia, K.; Zhang, X.; Gregg, E.W.; Albright, A.L.; Zhang, P. Cost-effectiveness of Interventions to Manage Diabetes: Has the Evidence Changed Since 2008? Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1557–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Najafi, B.; Farzadfar, F.; Ghaderi, H.; Hadian, M. Cost effectiveness of type 2 diabetes screening: A systematic review. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran 2016, 30, 326. [Google Scholar]
  43. Piatt, G.; Ye, W.; Kuo, S.; Sinco, B.R.; Herman, W.H.; Spencer, M.S.; Palmisano, G.; Heisler, M.; Kieffer, E.C. Cost-Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in the Community—Projections from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes 2018, 67, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wu, S.C.; Driver, V.R.; Wrobel, J.S.; Armstrong, D.G. Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2007, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection.
Figure 1. Flowchart of patient selection.
Healthcare 09 00211 g001
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics.
CategorySub-CategoryTotal%
GenderMale5843.28%
Female7656.72%
Ages (years)18–44107.46%
45–649369.40%
≥653123.14%
Length of stay (days)1–31410.45%
4–107354.48%
>104735.07%
Types of T2DM complicationsWithout complication85.97%
Kidney disease10477.61%
PVD2216.42%
Table 2. Direct medical costs of T2DM treatment in Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) (1 US$ = IDR 13,451).
Table 2. Direct medical costs of T2DM treatment in Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) (1 US$ = IDR 13,451).
Types of T2DM ComplicationYearCost *
Hospital RoomDoctors’ FeeMedicinesLaboratory TestsBlood TransfusionMedical ServicesTotal Cost
Without complication20142,647,000500,0002,456,5001,439,500-345,9407,388,940
20152,864,887486,812547,225880,825-1,315,6896,095,439
20164,825,000800,000843,000680,376-1,983,5009,131,876
20177,711,5481,076,3581,192,141754,391297,056871,97211,903,465
Average4,512,109715,7921,258,716938,77374,2641,129,2758,629,930
Complication of kidney disease20141,606,250237,8131,657,3311,634,793223,7502,577,7217,937,657
20151,948,082288,4362,047,1651,834,698151,3642,277,2018,546,946
20162,424,766509,5712,716,5322,651,687856,3253,364,89312,523,774
20174,048,111451,0433,106,7262,556,657455,0573,873,36114,490,955
Average2,506,802371,7162,381,9392,169,459421,6243,023,29410,874,833
Complication of PVD20147,055,2001,427,50010,563,5153,629,325618,3009,194,60032,488,440
20159,746,2971,888,83011,592,9043,214,7021,301,08610,942,23138,686,049
20164,576,995792,4285,751,7493,781,058407,4437,439,60222,749,276
20175,180,618878,94713,208,7753,846,8041,148,7427,700,42431,964,311
Average6,639,7781,246,92610,279,2363,617,972868,8938,819,21431,472,019
* Discounted.
Table 3. Direct medical costs of T2DM treatment in percentage.
Table 3. Direct medical costs of T2DM treatment in percentage.
Types of T2DM ComplicationYearCost *
Hospital RoomDoctors’ FeeMedicinesLaboratory TestsBlood TransfusionMedical ServicesTotal Cost
Without complication201435.82%6.77%33.25%19.48%0.00%4.68%100.00%
201547.00%7.99%8.98%14.45%0.00%21.58%100.00%
201652.84%8.76%9.23%7.45%0.00%21.72%100.00%
201764.78%9.04%10.02%6.34%2.50%7.33%100.00%
Average50.11%8.14%15.37%11.93%0.62%13.83%100.00%
Complication of kidney disease201420.24%3.00%20.88%20.60%2.82%32.47%100.00%
201522.79%3.37%23.95%21.47%1.77%26.64%100.00%
201619.36%4.07%21.69%21.17%6.84%26.87%100.00%
201727.94%3.11%21.44%17.64%3.14%26.73%100.00%
Average22.58%3.39%21.99%20.22%3.64%28.18%100.00%
Complication of PVD201421.72%4.39%32.51%11.17%1.90%28.30%100.00%
201525.19%4.88%29.97%8.31%3.36%28.28%100.00%
201620.12%3.48%25.28%16.62%1.79%32.70%100.00%
201716.21%2.75%41.32%12.03%3.59%24.09%100.00%
Average20.81%3.88%32.27%12.03%2.66%28.34%100.00%
* Discounted.
Table 4. Cost-effectiveness value from the perspective of payer.
Table 4. Cost-effectiveness value from the perspective of payer.
YearTypes of T2DM ComplicationTotal Cost (IDR)Blood Glucose Reduction (mg/dL)p-Value
2014Without complication11,330,400950.01639 *
Complication of kidney disease15,064,23898
Complication of PVD21,475,94065
2015Without complication11,031,5451210.01747 *
Complication of kidney disease14,813,90984
Complication of PVD21,377,659169
2016Without complication6,094,319540.02735 *
Complication of kidney disease9,663,89893
Complication of PVD14,614,06287
2017Without complication9,832,741150.00227 *
Complication of kidney disease10,396,00864
Complication of PVD12,256,47398
AverageWithout complication9,572,251710.01453 *
Complication of kidney disease12,484,51385
Complication of PVD17,431,034105
ICER **Complication of kidney diseaseIDR 215,723
per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction
Complication of PVDIDR 234,591
per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction
* Significant difference (p-value < 0.05); ** In a comparison with T2DM treatment without complication.
Table 5. Cost-effectiveness value from the perspective of healthcare provider.
Table 5. Cost-effectiveness value from the perspective of healthcare provider.
YearTypes of T2DM ComplicationTotal Cost (IDR)Blood Glucose Reduction (mg/dL)p-Value
2014Without complication7,388,940950.097
Complication of kidney disease7,937,65798
Complication of PVD32,488,44065
2015Without complication6,095,4391210.11595
Complication of kidney disease8,546,94684
Complication of PVD38,686,049169
2016Without complication9,131,875540.03434 *
Complication of kidney disease12,523,77493
Complication of PVD22,749,27687
2017Without complication11,903,465150.04541 *
Complication of kidney disease14,490,95564
Complication of PVD31,964,31198
AverageWithout complication8,629,930710.07219
Complication of kidney disease10,874,83385
Complication of PVD31,472,019105
ICER **Complication of kidney diseaseIDR 166,289
per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction
Complication of PVDIDR 681,853
per 1 mg/dL blood glucose reduction
* Significant difference (p-value < 0.05); ** In a comparison with T2DM treatment without complication.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Priyadi, A.; Permana, H.; Muhtadi, A.; Sumiwi, S.A.; Sinuraya, R.K.; Suwantika, A.A. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Treatment in Patients with Complications of Kidney and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in Indonesia. Healthcare 2021, 9, 211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9020211

AMA Style

Priyadi A, Permana H, Muhtadi A, Sumiwi SA, Sinuraya RK, Suwantika AA. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Treatment in Patients with Complications of Kidney and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in Indonesia. Healthcare. 2021; 9(2):211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9020211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Priyadi, Akhmad, Hikmat Permana, Ahmad Muhtadi, Sri A. Sumiwi, Rano K. Sinuraya, and Auliya A. Suwantika. 2021. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Treatment in Patients with Complications of Kidney and Peripheral Vascular Diseases in Indonesia" Healthcare 9, no. 2: 211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/healthcare9020211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop