Next Article in Journal
No Interaction Effect between Interleukin-6 Polymorphisms and Acid Ash Diet with Bone Resorption Marker in Postmenopausal Women
Next Article in Special Issue
Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbial Communities from Spontaneous Fermented Foods
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants of Residents’ Approach–Avoidance Responses to the Personal Carbon Trading Scheme: An Empirical Analysis of Urban Residents in Eastern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 Isolated from Contaminated Oil Sludge: Strategy and Effectiveness Study

1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
2
College of Civil Engineering, Kashgar University, Kashgar 844006, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, Beijing 102206, China
4
Anji Guoqian Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313000, China
5
Department of Environmental Engineering, Sunchon National University, 255 Jungang-ro, Suncheon, Jeonnam 57922, Korea
6
Division of Biotechnology, College of Environmental and Bioresource Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Iksan 570-752, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(2), 819; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18020819
Submission received: 30 November 2020 / Revised: 13 January 2021 / Accepted: 13 January 2021 / Published: 19 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Ecology for Environmental Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Biodegradation has been considered as an ideal technique for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) contamination, but its efficiency is limited by its application in the field. Herein, an original TPH-degrading strain, SCYY-5, was isolated from contaminated oil sludge and identified as Acinetobacter sp. by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. The biological function of the isolate was investigated by heavy metal tolerance, carbon, and nitrogen source and degradation tests. To enhance its biodegradation efficiency, the response surface methodology (RSM) based on a function model was adopted to investigate and optimize the strategy of microbial and environmental variables for TPH removal. Furthermore, the performance of the system increased to 79.94% with the further addition of extra nutrients, suggesting that the RSM and added nutrients increased the activity of bacteria to meet the needs of the co-metabolism matrix during growth or degradation. These results verified that it is feasible to adopt the optimal strategy of combining bioremediation with RSM to improve the biodegradation efficiency, for contaminated oil sludge.

1. Introduction

The oil industry inevitably produces a large amount of dense solid waste called oil sludge, which is produced during various production, transportation, and refining processes [1]. Oil sludge is exposed to biological and abiotic processes over time, such as limited microbial degradation, auto-oxidation, and volatilization, resulting in different degrees of pollution [2,3]. The pollutants in oil sludge are usually divided into inorganic pollutants such as copper, chromium and cadmium, and organic pollutants such as saturated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, asphaltenes, and so on [4]. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH), ranging from C15 to C36 or more, take a large fraction of the content of oil sludge [5]. Since the toxicity of oil sludge at high concentrations poses a potential risk to the environment and human health [6], it has already been listed in the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Various traditional treatment techniques for oil sludge have been proposed, like solvent extraction, chemical oxidation, landfill, natural attenuation, etc. Compared with these costly and time-consuming technologies, biodegradation is a reliable and relatively cost-effective technique to solve oil pollution [7,8]. Several studies have reported the ability of multiple organisms isolated from polluted environments, including molds, bacteria, fungi, and algae, to use petroleum hydrocarbons as their sole source of carbon and energy [9,10]. More than 70 genera and 200 species of microorganisms have been found to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons. The majority of petroleum hydrocarbon degraders are bacteria, such as Pseudomonas [11], Acinetobacter [12], Flavobacterium [13], and Corynebacterium [14], which can oxidize petroleum components through metabolic activities and be used for biological treatment of oil-contaminated areas. Many previous studies have focused on the infection and drug resistance of Acinetobacter, including studies on Acinetobacter degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. With the continuous occurrence of oil spills worldwide, its degradation efficiency needs to be improved. Hence, it is of great significance to study and optimize the biodegradation efficiency of Acinetobacter.
However, bioremediation is affected by multiple variables, and it is unreliable and time-consuming to analyze, compare, and optimize the process with classical methods. As a statistical analysis method, response surface methodology (RSM) is used to overcome these shortcomings. RSM is usually developed to analyze the relationship between one or more response variables to obtain the optimal response [15,16]. The Box–Behnken Design (BBD) is one of the experimental designs of RSM. As an independent three-level factor quadratic design, it requires fewer runs and is more efficient than other designs [17]. The advantage of BBD is that it can identify potential interactions between the variables, which help to avoid experiments under extreme conditions. Although RSM has been successfully applied in many fields, such as emulsion liquid membrane processes [18], fermentation conditions [19], milk processing wastewater [20], etc., there are few reports on the use of RSM to study and optimize the removal of TPH by microbial and environmental variables. Thus, using RSM to degrade TPH has become a hot topic.
The purpose of this study was to isolate and identify the petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in oil sludge and to solve the problem of limited efficiency of the biodegradation technique. Heavy metal tolerance, carbon, and nitrogen sources and degradation tests were used to evaluate the biological function of the isolates and their potential to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons. RSM was used to establish a quadratic equation model to optimize the isolated bacteria and environmental factors: temperature (A), pH (B), and NaCl concentration (C), and to select an optimum condition. The optimal condition and extra nutrients further promoted the bioremediation of TPH.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Media

Oil sludge samples, containing 38,236.62 mg kg−1 of n-alkanes, were kindly provided by the State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control of China. The oil sludge is in a viscous solid-state, which forms agglomerates at low temperatures, and precipitates black oil at high temperatures. The sludge was stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C before the biodegradability test. Clear-up oil sludge is performed by a microwave resolution method (CJ/T221-2005) and its heavy metal elements are detected by the ICP-MS method. The average concentrations of some heavy metals in oil sludge are shown in Table 1. The ingredients of minimal salt medium (MSM, analytical grade) were as follows: 0.67 g L−1 NH4Cl, 0.8 g L−1 K2HPO4, 0.4 g L−1 KH2PO4, 0.2 g L−1 NaCl, 0.05 g L−1 CaCl2, 0.05 g L−1 MgSO4, 0.05 g L−1 FeSO4•7H2O, 0.01 g L−1 MnSO4•H2O, and 0.01 g L−1 Na2MoO4•2H2O [21]. The lysogeny broth (LB) medium was composed of 3 g L−1 beef extract, 10 g L−1 peptone and 5 g L−1 NaCl. The nitrogen-free medium was composed of 3.84 g L−1 citrate, 0.8 g L−1 K2HPO4, 0.4 g L−1 KH2PO4, 0.2 g L−1 NaCl, 0.05 g L−1 CaCl2, 0.05 g L−1 MgSO4, 0.05 g L−1 FeSO4•7H2O, 0.01 g L−1 MnSO4•H2O, and 0.01 g L−1 Na2MoO4•2H2O. All media in this study were sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min before use. The pH of the diverse media utilized in this study was 7. The standard solution UST127-TPH Mix (17 n-alkanes, 2000 mg L−1) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The data in this study were averaged from triplicate experiments.

2.2. Enrichment and Isolation of the Strains

The strains from the source material, oil sludge, were enriched in a 250 mL conical flask containing 100 mL of MSM medium with 1 g of oil for seven days. The strains from the above-enriched solution were isolated, using a gradient dilution and spread plate technique. Then, different single colonies were selected and streaked on an LB plate. After multiple isolation and purification, the SCYY-5 with growth activity reaching the peak value at the soonest was screened based on the growth curve of the isolated strains.

2.3. TPH Biodegradation Ability of SCYY-5

To determine the degradation ability of the isolate to TPH, the isolate was cultured at 30 °C, and 150 rpm for 18 h (OD600:1) in the LB medium. Then, the bacterial solution was placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube at 2500× g for 10 min. The centrifuged cells were washed with MSM and centrifuged for 2 to 3 times to be reserved. About 20 mL of MSM was supplemented with 1% (w/v) oil sludge in a series of 50 mL conical flasks, which were employed for biodegradation tests. The inoculation amount of bacterial liquid was 10%. Then, they were cultured at 30 °C, and 150 rpm for 10 days. The concentration of TPH in oil sludge was determined by gas chromatography (GC 2060, Shanghai Acute Instrument Co., LTD., Shanghai, China) every two days, and the TPH biodegradation efficiency was calculated.
The standard solution UST127-TPH Mix (17 n-alkanes, 2000 mg L−1) was used to make the standard curve (10, 20, 50, 100, 200 mg L−1). GC was used to analyze the degradation of TPH by the isolate after dichloromethane extraction. About 2 μL of the organic phase was injected into the GC 2060 instrument equipped with an FID detector and HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The analysis conditions for GC were as follows: detector temperature, 310 °C; injector temperature, 280 °C; and carrier gas rate, 1.95 mL/min. The column temperature was kept at 50 °C for 1 min and was then ramped at 30 °C/min to 310 °C for 10 min in split mode (1:7).

2.4. Physiological Characterisation of the Isolated Strain

The metal salts used to prepare for Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, Zn2+ (4000 mg L−1, 100 mL) stock solutions were 1.5125 g Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (241.60 g mol−1), 1.11 g Cd(NO3)2·4H2O (308.41 g mol−1), 0.6396 g Pb(NO3)2 (331.20 g mol−1), 3.0769 g Cr(NO3)3·9H2O (400.00 g mol−1), and 1.8277 g Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (297.48 g mol−1) (analytical grade) [22]. Then, the stock solutions were diluted to 0, 4, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500 mg L−1 in the LB medium. The strain SCYY-5 was cultured in the LB medium with five different metal ions: Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, and Zn2+ at 30 °C, and 150 rpm to evaluate its tolerance to heavy metals. The colony numbers of bacteria were tested under the same concentration of different heavy metals by a plate counting method at log phase (18 h).
To investigate the effects of different carbon and nitrogen sources on the growth of strain, the carbon source studies were conducted using MSM as the essential medium with an equimolar concentration (20 mM) of fructose (3.60 g L−1), glucose (3.60 g L−1), sucrose (6.85 g L−1), lactose (6.85 g L−1), soluble starch (6.85 g L−1) and citrate (3.84 g L−1). The other ingredients remained unchanged [23]. They were cultured at 30 °C, and 150 rpm for nearly 40 h, and bacterial growth was monitored by turbidity measurements by measuring the absorbance of the bacterial solution at 600 nm [24,25]. The nitrogen source studies were carried out in a nitrogen-free medium, with the same equimolar concentration (20 mM) of the extra nitrogen source (2.80 g L−1 yeast extract, 2.94 g L−1 L-glutamic acid, 2.02 g L−1 potassium nitrate, 2.64 g L−1 ammonium sulfate, 1.07 g L−1 ammonium chloride).

2.5. Predictive Optimisation of TPH Degradation Based on RSM

The optimization procedure for TPH removal was conducted using BBD in Design-expert with physical-chemical parameters: temperature (A), pH (B), and NaCl concentration (C) as variables. Each aspect in the design has three different levels (−1, 0 and 1); Table 2 shows the list for each factor. A total of 17 experiments were performed in this design with TPH removal efficiency as the response. This includes 12 design diameters and 5 replication center point diameters, which were used to rule out experimental errors and fit the quadratic equation models. The statistical analysis (ANOVA) and plot response surfaces were performed using the Design-Expert 8.0 (Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) statistical software. Multiple regression and function models were used to evaluate the experimental data, and an F test was used to analyze the significance of the regression [17]. The following second-order polynomial equation was used to fit the experimental results and determine the relevant model terms.
Y = β 0 + β i X i + β i i X i 2 + β i j X i X j
where Y is the predicted response; β0, βi, βii, and βij are fixed regression coefficients of the model; and Xi and Xj represent independent variables.
Meanwhile, to further improve the biodegradation efficiency, carbon and nitrogen sources were added for the biodegradation tests under the optimal conditions of RSM. According to the above physiological characteristics, the carbon and nitrogen sources with the most significant influence on the growth rate of the bacteria were selected. No additional nutrients were added under optimal conditions in (1) the control group; and the other group was (2) optimum condition + C&N sources. The other experimental conditions were consistent with the above.

2.6. Identification of the SCYY-5 Strain

The bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using the AxyPrep DNA isolation kit. The universal bacterial 16S rDNA primers, 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-CTACGGCTACCTTGTTACGA-3′) were used to amplify bacterial 16S rDNA [26]. The PCR product of purified strains was subjected to DNA sequencing by the sequencer ABI3730-XL. The NCBI Blast program was used to compare the spliced sequence files with the data in the NCBI 16S database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The species information with the greatest similarity to the sequences to be tested was obtained, which was the identification result. Phylogenetic trees for 16S rDNA were built using MEGA 6.0 software (Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of the SCYY-5 Strain

The SCYY-5 strain with the highest growth activity was isolated from the oil sludge, which was selected from multiple isolates after multiple isolation and purification. The colonies cultured on the LB solid medium for two days were translucent, pale yellow, round, and moist with shiny edges. The isolate was identified by DNA sequencing. The sequence of the SCYY-5 strain was searched in an NCBI Blast, and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rDNA gene sequences indicated that the SCYY-5 strain belongs to the genus Acinetobacter sp., as shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Biodegradation Ability of TPH by the Isolated Strain

The concentration of 13 n-alkanes detected in the oil sludge was 38,236.62 mg kg−1. The degradation ability of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to n-alkanes was preliminarily determined after 10 days of culture. The degradation efficiency reached 69.17% on the tenth day. The content of 13 n-alkanes decreased from 38,236.62 mg kg−1 to 11,788.35 mg kg−1 after the treatment (Table S1). It was proven that this strain can degrade TPH, but further optimization and exploration were needed.
Figure 2 shows the GC profiles of TPH removal by Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5. It can be seen that C14 and C28 were degraded (Table S1), and the concentration of each component decreased to some extent. Those with a moderate length (C9–C16) were lessened by 82.00%, and the long-chain alkanes (C17–C34) were spoiled by 61.76%. Interestingly, some n-alkanes such as C30 have a higher concentration than the initial concentration on the 10th day of culture.

3.3. Physiological Characterization of the Isolated Strain

The tolerance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to Cr3+, Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ was slightly higher than that of Cd2+ (Figure 3). The growth of the strain was promoted when Cu2+ was less than 30 mg L−1, and the colony numbers further increased. Bacterial growth was also promoted when Cr3+ was less than 10 mg L−1. Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ had different degrees of inhibition on the isolate, and the cell survival in Cd2+ decreased to less than 10% at 60 mg L−1. The general order of resistance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to heavy metals was as follows: Cd2+ < Zn2+ < Pb2+ = Cr3+ < Cu2+. The maximal concentration tolerated was 100 mg L−1 for Cd2+, 250 mg L−1 for Zn2+, 300 mg L−1 for Pb2+ and Cr3+ and 400 mg L−1 for Cu2+. Although most heavy metals can damage the cell membrane and disrupt nutrient transport, Cu2+ was the most tolerated metal by the isolate and Cd2+ was the least tolerated.
The carbon sources, such as glucose, sucrose, fructose, lactose, soluble starch, and citrate, were used as nutrients for bacterial growth. As shown in Figure 4a, the strain grew very slowly in the MSM medium compared with other conditions containing carbon sources. It can be considered that the presence of extra carbon sources promoted the overall growth of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5. This indicates that the carbon sources were utilized during the growth of the strain. Compared with the blank control group, it shows that the preferred carbon sources by Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 can be arranged in a sequence, as follows: sucrose < lactose < fructose < glucose < soluble starch < citrate. The maximum cell growth (OD600) was 1.085 under the condition of citrate as a carbon source.
Similarly, the result in Figure 4b shows the preferred nitrogen sources of the isolate in the following order: ammonium chloride < ammonium sulfate < potassium nitrate < yeast extract < L-glutamic acid. The addition of inorganic nitrogen sources did not promote the growth of the strain. The utilization rate of organic nitrogen by the isolate was significantly higher than that of inorganic nitrogen, and the maximum cell growth (OD600) was 1.485, with L-glutamic acid as the nitrogen source.

3.4. Predictive Optimisation of TPH Degradation Based on RSM

The experimental data were fitted by multiple regression in Design-Expert 8.0. The response surface test designs with the actual and predicted values obtained are shown in Table 3. The quadratic polynomial regression model equation of variables and response values obtained from the analysis is as follows:
Y = 64.03 + 0.32A + 6.16B − 0.13C + 3.17AB − 0.28AC − 0.70BC − 14.40A2 − 5.36B2 − 11.19C2
where Y stands for TPH removal, A is the temperature, B is the pH and C is the NaCl concentration.
To verify the reliability of the function model based on the response surface, ANOVA was done to determine the influence of various factors on the system response and their interaction. The results are shown in Table 4, p = 0.0248 < 0.05 indicates that the model has statistical significance. Lack of fit (p = 0.3081 > 0.05) is not significant, and the residual caused by random error indicates that the model fits well. Figure S1 shows the different diagnostic plots to ensure that the residuals were plotted against the predicted value. As shown in Figure S1a, the reasonable match between the standardized residuals and normal probability percentage confirms that the statistical assumptions are suitable to analyze the data. Figure S1b presents no obvious pattern, as the observed runs are randomly distributed in the range of residuals (−3, 3), confirming the adequacy of the model. The F-value is 4.84, which shows that the system response can be explained by the regression equation [27]. The fact can prove that if R2 is closer to 1, the stronger the prediction ability of the model [28]. Hence, the correlation coefficient R2 is 0.8616, and the adjusted R2 is 0.7596, which proves that the model fits well with the actual situation [29].
The Design-Expert 8.0 software was used to draw the response surface curve and contour plots for the model. The three-dimensional (3D) response surface and two-dimensional (2D) contour plots reflect the influence and interaction between any two factors of temperature (A), pH (B), and NaCl concentration (C) on TPH removal, as shown in Figure 5. For instance, as shown in Figure 5a,b, when the initial pH (temperature) value is constant, the TPH removal increases initially and then decreases with the increase in temperature (pH). The purpose of 17 groups of experiments designed by RSM is to adjust the concentration of each factor to provide an effective limiting range for BBD. The experimental results are consistent with the significance of data analysis results in Table 4. Therefore, we consider it valid that the actual value of each factor is zero.
The optimal condition (temperature = 30.77 °C, pH = 8.20, NaCl = 10.12 g L−1) based on RSM was predicted. The predicted value of TPH removal under the optimal condition was 65.89%, the actual experimental value was 70.29% and the residual was 4.4%. It was found that TPH removal with carbon and nitrogen sources (citrate and L-glutamic acid) under the optimal condition could reach 79.94%. The degradation efficiency of hydrocarbons increased by 9.65%. Besides, compared with the degradation efficiency of other bacteria on hydrocarbons, the SCYY-5 strain in this study had a significantly stronger degradation ability in a short time (Table 5), which can be directly applied to the treatment of pollutants.

4. Discussion

There are reports that have proposed that using bioremediation to solve the pollution problem of oil sludge is feasible [33,34], while the biodegradation efficiency has limited its application in the field. Many factors such as temperature, pH, salinity, etc., will have a specific influence. Therefore, this study aimed to adopt the optimal strategy of combining bioremediation with RSM to solve the problem of biodegradation efficiency.
The pollutants in oil sludge are usually divided into inorganic pollutants (copper, chromium, cadmium, salts, etc.) and organic pollutants (TPHs, PAHs, etc.), which will greatly affect the growth and activity of microorganisms. Hence, we first discussed the isolation and identification of the strain and the effect of various heavy metals on its growth. In this study, the SCYY-5 strain isolated from oil sludge provided by the State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control was identified as Acinetobacter sp. Based on 16S rDNA gene sequences. According to the results of heavy metal tolerance experiments, the general order of resistance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to heavy metals is as follows: Cd2+ < Zn2+ < Pb2+ = Cr3+ < Cu2+. The tolerance of Acinetobacter sp. To metal ions has been reported. Cai et al. (2019) [35] isolated an Acinetobacter sp. Strain from an electroplating wastewater treatment, which was resistant to Cu2+ and Ni2+, while Zakaria et al. (2007) [23] isolated the Acinetobacter haemolyticus strain resistant to Zn2+ and Cr6+. Compared with these reported bacteria growing in other environments, the isolates may not have the highest tolerance to a single heavy metal, but shows good resistance to Cr3+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Zn2+ but not to Cd2+. This can be thought of as its solubility and affinity for potential complexing agents such as organic compounds [23], and the tolerance of the isolates to Cu2+ was higher than the strain of Cai et al. (2019) [35], with a cell survival rate of more than 40% at 200 mg L−1. We used a single growth medium and did not study the tolerance value of Acinetobacter sp. to heavy metals in other cultures. Therefore, it can be considered that the obtained tolerance value of heavy metals is not absolute [36].
In laboratory experiments, C/N sources were added to the culture medium to evaluate the effect of various nutrients on cell yield by a turbidity measurement, during the same culture time. The result showed that Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 could quickly utilize citrate and L-glutamic acid, and exhibit high metabolic activity. It is known that Acinetobacter sp. cannot use carbon sources extensively, while Acinetobacter sp. Y1 isolated by Liu et al. (2015) [37] used citrate and pyruvate during metabolic processes and Acinetobacter johnonii DBP-3 isolated by Li et al. (2013) [38] was also able to utilize carbon sources (sodium citrate > glucose). This is consistent with the preference of the isolates for citrate in this study. Moreover, the isolate showed significant differences in nitrogen source utilization. Compared with the control group, there was no good cellular activity during the 50 h of growth when the inorganic nitrogen source was added. L-glutamic acid, as an organic nitrogen source, provides a mixture of peptides, which can promote bacterial growth to 1.485 (OD600) in 24 h of growth.
The preliminary degradation study indicated that the oil usually forms a thin layer in the water system, and the degree of oil dispersion partially determined the surface area of the oil that Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 could contact [39]. The bacteria were mainly active in the oil–water interface, and the increase in the available boundary area would promote biodegradation [40,41]. For bioremediation of oil sludge pollution, some studies have evaluated the ability of bacteria to degrade hydrocarbons. However, most bacteria can only use limited hydrocarbon compounds. For instance, the Geobacillus jurassicus isolated by Nazina et al. (2005) [42] can only grow on C6–C16, and the Acinetobacter sp. BT1A isolated by Acer et al. (2016) [43] is capable of growing on C11–C34. While the Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 in this study showed a higher hydrocarbon degradation potential for C9–C34. The degradation efficiency of the isolate reached 69.17% on the 10th day of culture. Table 2 shows that it also has a good degradation effect on long-chain alkanes. It is generally believed that these strains can respond to petroleum hydrocarbon stress. Saturated hydrocarbons are degraded efficiently with the degradation of alkanes through terminal oxidation and Finnerty pathway [44]. Figure 6 shows two aerobic pathways of alkane degradation by Acinetobacter, especially for n-alkanes with more than one carbon atom, the most common degradation pathway is the terminal oxidation of alkanes. Microorganisms attack the terminal methyl groups of n-alkanes and generate primary alcohols under the action of oxygenases, which are further oxidized to aldehydes and fatty acids, and enter β oxidation [45]. Nonetheless, these biodegradation mechanisms need to be further studied and verified.
The combination of excessive biological stimuli, such as adding excessive nutrients to polluted environments or changing environmental variables, will also inhibit the growth activity of bacteria [46,47]. Therefore, replacing the traditional biodegradation technique with RSM can provide a more effective application to improve bioremediation. RSM used ANOVA to conduct statistical analysis of the model. It analyzed and optimized the relationship between bacteria and multiple environmental variables (pH, temperature, and NaCl) to obtain the best response. The results showed that the R2 value was 0.8616 and the adjusted R2 value was 0.7596. The high values of R2 and adjusted R2 reflected the success of the model prediction. The closeness of these two values indicated that the experimental results were compatible with the model [48,49]. In particular, under the optimal growth conditions (temperature = 30.77 °C, pH = 8.20 and NaCl = 10.12 g L−1), the degradation efficiency of TPH increased to 79.94% within 10 days with the addition of complex carbon and nitrogen sources. It is documented that bioremediation strategies with added nutrients often enhance oil degradation significantly [50]. The complex carbon and nitrogen sources could provide a more comprehensive nutritional requirement for bacteria to meet the needs of the co-metabolism matrix during growth or degradation.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the SCYY-5 strain that survived in the presence of high concentrations of TPH was isolated. It was identified as Acinetobacter sp. by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Through the 10-day degradation experiment, it was determined that the isolated bacteria had biodegradation ability in oil sludge. TPH removal reached 69.17% on the 10th day of culture, which was an effective bacterial degradation. The optimum degradation conditions (temperature = 30.77 °C, pH = 8.20 and NaCl = 10.12 g L−1) of TPH were predicted by RSM. Under the optimal conditions, with the addition of citrate and L-glutamic acid, the TPH biodegradation efficiency was improved to 79.94%. The results indicated that optimal strategy is suitable and is greatly significant to bioremediate oil sludge pollution.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/18/2/819/s1, Table S1. The content of the various hydrocarbons in oily sludge before and after the treatment; Figure S1. Diagnostic plots for TPHs removal (a) normal plot of residuals: standardized residuals versus normal probability percentage, and (b) standardized residuals plotted against predicted value.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.R. and R.W.; methodology: Y.C. and R.W.; data analysis: Y.C., L.H., and B.W.; writing—original draft preparation: Y.C.; writing—review and editing: Y.C., X.Z. and R.W.; supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration: P.R., L.Y., S.P., M.R. and R.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control (PPC2018017), CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Soil Collaborative Innovation Center in Shanghai University of Engineering Science.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest in this work. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Cameotra, S.S.; Singh, P. Bioremediation of oil sludge using crude biosurfactants. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 62, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Trindade, P.V.; Sobral, L.G.; Rizzo, A.C.; Leite, S.G.; Soriano, A.U. Bioremediation of a weathered and a recently oil-contaminated soils from Brazil: A comparison study. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Giles, W.R., Jr.; Kriel, K.D.; Stewart, J.R. Characterization and bioremediation of a weathered oil sludge. Environ. Geosci. 2001, 8, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, P.; Kan, L.B. Research on the Treatment of Oily Sludge. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 671–674, 2746–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.A.I.; Biswasa, B.; Smitha, E.; Naidub, R.; Megharaj, M. Toxicity assessment of fresh and weathered petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil- a review. Chemosphere 2018, 212, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, Y.; Lu, M. Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil: Comparison of different biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuiper, I.; Lagendijk, E.L.; Bloemberg, G.V.; Lugtenberg, B.J. Rhizoremediation A Beneficial Plant Microbe Interaction. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xu, J.; Xin, L.; Huang, T.; Chang, K. Enhanced bioremediation of oil contaminated soil by graded modified Fenton oxidation. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 1873–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohanty, G.; Mukherji, S. Biodegradation rate of diesel range n-alkanes by bacterial cultures Exiguobacterium aurantiacum and Burkholderia cepacia. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2008, 61, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biswal, B.K.; Tiwari, S.N.; Mukherji, S. Biodegradation of oil in oily sludges from steel mills. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1700–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Das, K.; Mukherjee, A.K. Crude petroleum-oil biodegradation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a petroleum-oil contaminated soil from North-East India. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Baumann, P.; Doudoroff, M.; Stanier, R.Y. A Study of the Moraxella Group II. Oxidative-negative Species (Genus Acinetobacter). J. Bacteriol. 1968, 95, 1520–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Essien, J.P.; Ebong, G.A.; Asuquo, J.E.; Olajire, A.A. Hydrocarbons contamination and microbial degradation in mangrove sediments of the Niger Delta region (Nigeria). Chem. Ecol. 2012, 28, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oyetibo, G.O.; Ilori, M.O.; Obayori, O.S.; Amund, O.O. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the presence of nickel and cobalt. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 53, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Elibol, M. Optimization of medium composition for actinorhodin production by Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) with response surface methodology. Process Biochem. 2004, 39, 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharma, S.; Malik, A.; Satya, S. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of nutrient supplementation for Cr (VI) removal by Aspergillus lentulus AML05. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bezerra, M.A.; Santelli, R.E.; Oliveira, E.P.; Villar, L.S.; Escaleira, L.A. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008, 76, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shokri, A.; Daraei, P.; Zereshki, S. Water decolorization using waste cooking oil: An optimized green emulsion liquid membrane by RSM. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rigas, F.; Dritsa, V.; Marchant, R.; Papadopoulou, K.; Avramides, E.J.; Hatzianestis, I. Biodegradation of lindane by Pleurotus ostreatus via central composite design. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdulgader, M.; Yu, Q.J.; Zinatizadeh, A.A.; Williams, P.; Rahimi, Z. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for process analysis and optimization of milk processing wastewater treatment using multistage flexible fiber biofilm reactor. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X. Co-biodegradation of pyrene and other PAHs by the bacterium Acinetobacter johnsonii. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Q.; Achal, V.; Xiang, W.N. Identification of Heavy Metal Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Yangtze River, China. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2014, 16, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zakaria, Z.A.; Zakaria, Z.; Surif, S.; Ahmad, W.A. Hexavalent chromium reduction by Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolated from heavy-metal contaminated wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Moreira, I.S.; Amorim, C.L.; Carvalho, M.F.; Castro, P.M. Degradation of difluorobenzenes by the wild strain Labrys portucalensis. Biodegradation 2012, 23, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiang, Y.; Qi, H.; Zhang, X.M. Co-biodegradation of anthracene and naphthalene by the bacterium Acinetobacter johnsonii. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Toxic Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2018, 53, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Onur, G.; Yilmaz, F.; Icgen, B. Diesel Oil Degradation Potential of a Bacterium Inhabiting Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Surface Waters and Characterization of Its Emulsification Ability. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2015, 18, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sanusi, S.N.A.; Halmi, M.I.E.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Hassan, H.A.; Hamzah, F.M.; Idris, M. Comparative process optimization of pilot-scale total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) degradation by Paspalum scrobiculatum L. Hack using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Ecol. Eng. 2016, 97, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prakash Maran, J.; Manikandan, S.; Thirugnanasambandham, K.; Vigna Nivetha, C.; Dinesh, R. Box-Behnken design based statistical modeling for ultrasound-assisted extraction of corn silk polysaccharide. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Baldawi, I.A.; Sheikh Abdullah, S.R.; Abu Hasan, H.; Suja, F.; Anuar, N.; Mushrifah, I. Optimized conditions for phytoremediation of diesel by Scirpus grossus in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSFCWs) using response surface methodology. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 140, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hassanshahian, M.; Emtiazi, G.; Cappello, S. Isolation and characterization of crude-oil-degrading bacteria from the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.; Lin, F.; Han, B.; He, C.; Li, Q.; Gao, X.; Cui, Z.; Sun, C.; Zheng, L. Study on immobilization of marine oil-degrading bacteria by carrier of algae materials. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, Y.; Li, C.; Zhou, Z.; Wen, J.; You, X.; Mao, Y.; Lu, C.; Huo, G.; Jia, X. Enhanced biodegradation of alkane hydrocarbons and crude oil by mixed strains and bacterial community analysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 3433–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, W.; Luo, Y.; Teng, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, L.Q. Bioremediation of oily sludge-contaminated soil by stimulating indigenous microbes. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sood, N.; Patle, S.; Lal, B. Bioremediation of acidic oily sludge-contaminated soil by the novel yeast strain Candida digboiensis TERI ASN6. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2010, 17, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cai, X.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, D.; Iqbal, W.; Liu, C.; Yang, B.; Zhao, X.; Lu, X.; Mao, Y. Microbial characterization of heavy metal resistant bacterial strains isolated from an electroplating wastewater treatment plant. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 181, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Thorneley, R.N.F. Metal ions and bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 1990, 8, 298–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Hu, T.; Song, Y.; Chen, H.; Lv, Y. Heterotrophic nitrogen removal by Acinetobacter sp. Y1 isolated from coke plant wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2015, 120, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, M.T.; Liu, J.H.; Zhao, S.J.; Wang, Z.X.; Hao, L.L. The characteristics of nitrate removal by the psychrotolerant denitrifying bacterium Acinetobacter johnonii DBP-3, isolated from a low-temperature eutrophic body of water. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2013, 48, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Overholt, W.A.; Marks, K.P.; Romero, I.C.; Hollander, D.J.; Snell, T.W.; Kostka, J.E. Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria Exhibit a Species-Specific Response to Dispersed Oil while Moderating Ecotoxicity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gatellier, C.R.; Oudin, J.L.; Fusey, P.; Lacaze, J.C.; Priou, M.L. Experimental Ecosystems to Measure Fate of Oil Spills Dispersed by Surface Active Products. Int. Oil Spill Conf. Proc. 1973, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gutnick, D.L.; Rosenberg, E. Oil tankers and pollution a microbiological approach. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1977, 31, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nazina, T.N.; Sokolova, D.; Grigoryan, A.A.; Shestakova, N.M.; Mikhailova, E.M.; Poltaraus, A.B.; Tourova, T.P.; Lysenko, A.M.; Osipov, G.A.; Belyaev, S.S. Geobacillus jurassicus sp. nov., a new thermophilic bacterium isolated from a high-temperature petroleum reservoir, and the validation of the Geobacillus species. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 28, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Acer, Ö.; Güven, K.; Bekler, F.M.; Gül-Güven, R. Isolation and characterization of long-chain alkane–degrading Acinetobacter sp. BT1A from oil-contaminated soil in Diyarbakır, in the Southeast of Turkey. Biorem. J. 2016, 20, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sakai, Y.; Maeng, J.H. A non-conventional dissimilation pathway for long chain n-alkanes in Acinetobacter sp. M-1 that starts with a dioxygenase reaction. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1996, 81, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Asperger, O.; Kleber, H.P. Metabolism of Alkanes by Acinetobacter. In The Biology of Acinetobacter; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 323–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Walworth, J.; Pond, A.; Snape, I.; Rayner, J.; Ferguson, S.; Harvey, P. Nitrogen requirements for maximizing petroleum bioremediation in a sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2007, 48, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Namkoonga, W.; Hwangb, E.Y.; Parka, J.S.; Choic, J.Y. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gunst, R.F. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Technometrics 1996, 38, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sabour, M.R.; Amiri, A. Comparative study of ANN and RSM for simultaneous optimization of multiple targets in Fenton treatment of landfill leachate. Waste Manag. 2017, 65, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, J.; Huang, P.T.; Zhang, K.Y.; Ding, F.R. Isolation of biosurfactant producers, optimization and properties of biosurfactant produced by Acinetobacter sp. from petroleum-contaminated soil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5. Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences (1241 bp) using the neighbor joining method. Phylogeny test used bootstrap method with 1000 replications.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5. Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences (1241 bp) using the neighbor joining method. Phylogeny test used bootstrap method with 1000 replications.
Ijerph 18 00819 g001
Figure 2. The comparison of GC profiles of TPH removal by Acinetobacter sp.: a control group and 10 days.
Figure 2. The comparison of GC profiles of TPH removal by Acinetobacter sp.: a control group and 10 days.
Ijerph 18 00819 g002
Figure 3. The tolerance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to 5 heavy metals: Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cr3+. The general order of resistance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to heavy metals is as follows: Cd2+ < Zn2+ < Pb2+ = Cr3+ < Cu2+.
Figure 3. The tolerance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to 5 heavy metals: Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cr3+. The general order of resistance of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 to heavy metals is as follows: Cd2+ < Zn2+ < Pb2+ = Cr3+ < Cu2+.
Ijerph 18 00819 g003
Figure 4. Growth profile of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 (a) carbon sources, (b) nitrogen sources.
Figure 4. Growth profile of Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 (a) carbon sources, (b) nitrogen sources.
Ijerph 18 00819 g004
Figure 5. RSM response surface and contour plots for TPH removal as a function of the variables: (a,b) Temperature (A) and pH (B), (c,d) Temperature (A) and NaCl (C), (e,f) pH (B) and NaCl (C).
Figure 5. RSM response surface and contour plots for TPH removal as a function of the variables: (a,b) Temperature (A) and pH (B), (c,d) Temperature (A) and NaCl (C), (e,f) pH (B) and NaCl (C).
Ijerph 18 00819 g005
Figure 6. Two aerobic pathways of alkane degradation by Acinetobacter: Terminal oxidation and Finnerty pathway.
Figure 6. Two aerobic pathways of alkane degradation by Acinetobacter: Terminal oxidation and Finnerty pathway.
Ijerph 18 00819 g006
Table 1. The average concentrations of some heavy metals in oily sludge.
Table 1. The average concentrations of some heavy metals in oily sludge.
Heavy MetalsConcentration (mg kg−1)
Cu2116.76 ± 9.52
Cd210.93 ± 2.37
Pb69.85 ± 2.25
Cr120.20 ± 5.04
Zn1672.44 ± 0.75
Table 2. Summary of experimental factors and design.
Table 2. Summary of experimental factors and design.
FactorUnit−101
(A) Temperature°C203040
(B) pH/579
(C) NaCl concentrationg L−101020
Table 3. Box–Behnken design scheme with the observed and predicted response for TPH removal.
Table 3. Box–Behnken design scheme with the observed and predicted response for TPH removal.
Run(A) Temperature (°C)(B) pH(C) NaCl (g L−1)TPH Removal (%)Predicted Value (%)
13071067.0764.03
2407042.2539.17
33071064.8764.03
43092060.9154.20
5207041.2337.98
6309053.4653.08
73071053.5164.03
83052040.1140.49
92072035.2038.27
102051044.4440.98
114091050.4653.93
12305035.4442.15
133071067.9764.03
142091043.3246.95
154072035.1138.35
163071066.7564.03
174051038.8835.26
Table 4. ANOVA analysis of the quadratic model.
Table 4. ANOVA analysis of the quadratic model.
ParameterSum of SquaresDegree of FreedomMean SquareF-Valuep > F
Model2017.669224.184.840.0248Significant
A0.7910.790.0170.8995
B303.641303.646.560.0375
C0.1410.140.0030.9578
AB40.32140.320.870.3818
AC0.3110.310.00660.9375
BC1.9311.930.0420.8439
A2872.661872.6618.850.0034
B2121.001121.002.610.1500
C2527.541527.5411.390.0118
Residual324.15746.31
Lack of Fit180.54360.181.680.3081Insignificant
Pure Error143.61435.90
Cor Total2341.8116
R2 = 0.8616Adj R2 = 0.7596
Table 5. Comparison of degradation period and degradation efficiency of hydrocarbons by different strains.
Table 5. Comparison of degradation period and degradation efficiency of hydrocarbons by different strains.
SpeciesDegradation Period (Day)Degradation Efficiency (%)References
Pseudomonas sp. CS-2741[30]
Rhodococcus sp. PG-39748[30]
Bacillus sp. E32163[31]
Acinetobacter sp. XM-021074.32[32]
Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-51079.94This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, Y.; Wang, R.; Rao, P.; Wu, B.; Yan, L.; Hu, L.; Park, S.; Ryu, M.; Zhou, X. Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 Isolated from Contaminated Oil Sludge: Strategy and Effectiveness Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18020819

AMA Style

Cai Y, Wang R, Rao P, Wu B, Yan L, Hu L, Park S, Ryu M, Zhou X. Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 Isolated from Contaminated Oil Sludge: Strategy and Effectiveness Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(2):819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18020819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Yiyun, Runkai Wang, Pinhua Rao, Baichun Wu, Lili Yan, Lijiang Hu, Sangsook Park, Moonhee Ryu, and Xiaoya Zhou. 2021. "Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons Using Acinetobacter sp. SCYY-5 Isolated from Contaminated Oil Sludge: Strategy and Effectiveness Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2: 819. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18020819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop