Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) and Green Consumption Intention
2.2. Green Supply Chain Management and Hotel’s Green Image
2.3. Strategic Green Marketing Orientation and Green Consumption Intention
2.4. Strategic Green Marketing Orientation and Hotel’s Green Image
2.5. Hotel’s Green Image and Green Consumption Intention
2.6. Hotel’s Green Image as Mediator
2.7. HotelBrand’s Social Responsibility as a Moderator
2.8. Signaling Theory
3. Methodology
4. Results Analysis
4.1. Demographic Characteristics
4.2. Measurement Model
4.3. Structural Model
4.4. Mediation Analysis (Indirect Model)
4.5. Moderation Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. Managerial Implications
5.2. Limitations of the Study and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mohanty, M.K.; Gahan, P. Buyer supplier relationship in manufacturing industry—Findings from Indian manufacturing sector. Bus. Intell. J. 2012, 5, 319–333. [Google Scholar]
- World Economic Forum, 2020. This Is How Coronavirus Could Affect the Travel and Tourism Industry. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/world-travel-coronavirus-covid19-jobs-pandemic-tourism-aviation/ (accessed on 30 June 2021).
- Eichenbaum, M.S.; Rebelo, S.; Trabandt, M. The Macroeconomics of Epidemics, 2020; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Raid, A.; Matloub, H. An assessment of green practices in a hotel supply chain: A study of UAE hotels. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2017, 32, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
- Wisner, J.D.; Tan, K.-C.; Leong, G.K. Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach, 3rd ed.; South-Western Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Beamon, B.M. Designing the green supply chain. Logist. Inf. Manag. 1999, 12, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ali, A.; Ahmad, I. Environment friendly products: Factors that influence the green purchase intentions of Pakistani consumers. Pak. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2012, 2, 84–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, P.; Chuang, S.; Yang, C. Key success factors when implementing a green-manufacturing system. Prod. Plan. Control. 2013, 25, 923–937. [Google Scholar]
- Dehghanan, H.; Bakhshandeh, G. The impact of green perceived value and green perceived risk on green purchase behavior of Iranian consumers. Int. J. Manag. Humanit. Sci. 2014, 3, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar]
- Pappu, R.; Quester, P.G. How does brand innovativeness affect brand loyalty? Eur. J. Mark. 2016, 20, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mavlanova, T.; Benbunan-Fich, R.; Lang, G.I. The role of external and internal signals in ecommerce. Decis. Support Syst. 2016, 87, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiliç, S.; Özdemir, E. Green Marketing Strategies and Marketing Performance: The Case of Turkey. Driving Green Consumerism through Strategic Sustainability Marketing; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–316. [Google Scholar]
- Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q. Environmental sustainability and production: Taking the road less travelled. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 743–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimal, B.; Zhang, L.; Stork, N.; Sloan, S.; Rijal, S. Urban expansion occurred at the expense of agricultural lands in the tarai region of Nepal from 1989 to 2016. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sanidewi, H.; Paramita, E.L. The role of perceived green marketing and brand equity on green purchasing decision. DiponegoroInt. J. Bus. 2018, 1, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugandini, D.; Muafi, M.; Susilowati, C.; Siswanti, Y.; Syafri, W. Green supply management and green marketing strategy on green purchase intention: SMEs cases. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2020, 13, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, M. Green marketing—A changing concept in changing time. BVIMR Manag. Edge 2010, 4, 82–92. [Google Scholar]
- Papadas, K.K.; Avlonitis, G.J.; Carrigan, M. Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 80, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labafi, S.; Salamzadeh, Y.; Jalalpoor, M. Green supply-chain management and green purchase intention: The role of green brand equity. Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2019, 6, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
- Gayialis, S.P.; Konstantakopoulos, G.D.; Papadopoulos, G.A.; Kechagias, E.; Ponis, S.T. Developing an advanced cloud-based vehicle routing and scheduling system for urban freight transportation. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Seoul, Korea, 26–30 August 2018; pp. 190–197. [Google Scholar]
- Kechagias, E.P.; Gayialis, S.P.; Konstantakopoulos, G.D.; Papadopoulos, G.A. An application of an urban freight transportation system for reduced environmental emissions. Systems 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.; Tomas, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Zhuo, Z.; Siyal, Z.A.; Shaikh, G.M.; Shah SA, A.; Solangi, Y.A. An integrated multi-criteria decision support framework for the selection of suppliers in small and medium enterprises based on green innovation ability. Processes 2020, 8, 418. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, Y. Supplier selection for the adoption of green innovation in sustainable supply chain management practices: A case of the Chinese textile manufacturing industry. Processes 2020, 8, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touboulic, A.; McCarthy, L.; Matthews, L. Re-imagining supply chain challenges through critical engaged research. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 56, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Maestra, S.; D’Agostini, F.; Sanguineti, E.; Yus González, A.; Annis, S.; Militello, G.M.; Parisi, G.; Scuderi, A.; Gaggero, L. Dispersion of natural airborne TiO2 fibres in excavation activity as a potential environmental and human health risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hategan, V.-P. Eco trends, counseling and applied ecology in community using Sophia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flammer, G. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Manag. J. 2013, 56, 758–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tanner, C.; Kast, S. Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol. Mark. 2003, 20, 883–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Xie, H. Toward green IT: Modeling sustainable production characteristics for Chinese electronic information industry, 1980–2012. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 96, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veleva, V.; Ellenbecker, M. Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 2001, 9, 519–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chekima, B.; Wafa, S.A.W.S.K.; Igau, O.A.; Chekima, S.; Sondoh, S.L., Jr. Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does Premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3436–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, R.; Bhatt, K. Analyzing psychographic factors affecting green purchase intention. J. Contemp. Res. Manag. 2015, 10, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
- Mohd Suki, N. Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. Br. Food J. 2016, 118, 2893–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Lobo, A.; Greenland, S. Energy efficient household appliances in emerging markets: The influence of consumers’ values and knowledge on their attitudes and purchase behavior. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2017, 41, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goriparthi, R.K.; Tallapally, M. Consumers’ attitude in green purchasing. FIIB Bus. Rev. 2017, 6, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, T.A.; Zacher, H.; Parker, S.L.; Ashkanasy, N.M. Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. J. Organ. Behav. 2017, 38, 996–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Z.; Xie, Y.; Aguilar, F.X. Eco-label credibility and retailer effects on green product purchasing intentions. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreen, N.; Purbey, S.; Sadarangani, P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum.Serv. 2018, 41, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, S.J. Moderating effects of consumer empowerment on the relationship between involvement in eco-friendly food and eco-friendly food behaviour. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2020, 44, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Luo, B.; Wang, S.; Fang, W. What you see is meaningful: Does green advertising change the intentions of consumers to purchase eco-labeled products? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Tonder, E.; Fullerton, S.; de Beer, L.T. Cognitive and emotional factors contributing to green customer citizenship behaviors: A Moderated mediation model. J. Consum. Mark. 2020, 37, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matharu, M.; Jain, R.; Kamboj, S. Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: A sharing economy perspective. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2020, 32, 20–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinho, G.; Pires, A.; Portela, G.; Fonseca, M. Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 103, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, J.; Ribeiro, A.I.; Aznar, S.; Pizarro, A.; Santos, M.P. Urban green spaces, greenness exposure and species richness in residential environments and relations with physical activity and BMI in Portuguese adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felix, R.; Braunsberger, K. I believe therefore I care: The relationship between religiosity, environmental attitudes, and green product purchase in Mexico. Int. Mark. Rev. 2016, 33, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.F.; Xu, X.; Adams, J.; Brannon, J.; Li, F.; Walzem, A. When east meets west: Understanding residents’ home energy management system adoption intention and willingness to pay in Japan and the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 69, 101616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göçer, A.; SevilOflaç, B. Understanding young consumers’ tendencies regarding eco-labelled products. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2017, 29, 80–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.H.; Chang, C.W. Tie strength, green expertise, and interpersonal influences on the purchase of organic food in an emerging market. Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 284–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Lobo, A.; Greenland, S. The influence of cultural values on green purchase behavior. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2017, 35, 377–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, C.S.; Sharma, N. Relationship between consumers’ spirituality and green purchasing intentions: The mediation effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. IIM Kozhikode Soc. Manag. Rev. 2017, 6, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siyavooshi, M.; Foroozanfar, A.; Sharifi, Y. Effect of Islamic values on green purchasing behavior. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arli, D.; Tan, L.P.; Tjiptono, F.; Yang, L. Exploring consumers’ purchase intention towards green products in an emerging market: The role of consumers’ perceived readiness. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedard, S.A.N.; Tolmie, C.R. Millennials’ green consumption behavior: Exploring the role of social media. Corp. Soc. Responsib.Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1388–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghazali, E.M.; Mutum, D.S.; Ariswibowo, N. Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 639–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stadelmann, M.; Schubert, R. How do different designs of energy labels influence purchases of household appliances? A field study in Switzerland. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 144, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schill, M.; Godefroit-Winkel, D.; Diallo, M.F.; Barbarossa, C. Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter? Ecol. Econ. 2019, 161, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hojnik, J.; Ruzzier, M.; Manolova, T.S. Sustainable development: Predictors of green consumerism in Slovenia. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 1695–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niedermeier, A.; Emberger-Klein, A.; Menrad, K. Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast-moving consumer goods in Germany? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 1823–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soomro, R.B.; Mirani, I.A.; Sajid Ali, M.; Marvi, S. Exploring the green purchasing behavior of young generation in Pakistan: Opportunities for green entrepreneurship. Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep. 2020, 14, 289–302. [Google Scholar]
- Konuk, F.A.; Rahman, S.U.; Salo, J. Antecedents of green behavioral intentions: A cross-country study of Turkey, Finland and Pakistan. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 39, 586–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahi, P.; Searcy, C. A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 52, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Alcaraz, J.L.; Sosa, L.A.; Reza, J.R.D. Effect of green attributes in obtaining benefits in the manufacturing and marketing process. In Handbook of Research on Industrial Applications for Improved Supply Chain Performance; IGI Global: Hershey, Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 46–72. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.-Y.; Klassen, R.D. Drivers and enablers that Foster environmental management capabilities in small-and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2008, 17, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.W.; Hu, A.H. Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H.H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micheli, G.J.L.; Cagno, E.; Mustillo, G.; Trianni, A. Green supply chain management drivers, practices and performance: A comprehensive study on the moderators. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 80, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klassen, R.D.; Vachon, S. Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: The impact on plant-level environmental investment. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2003, 12, 336–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morali, O.; Searcy, C. Are views of sustainable supply chain management practices in Canada. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 117, 635–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igarashi, M.; DeBoer, L.; Fet, A.M. What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2013, 19, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, S.; Lasch, R. Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation—Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2017, 60, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthra, S.; Govindan, K.; Kannan, D.; Mangla, S.K.; Garg, C.P. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1686–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuter, C.; Goebel, P.; Foerstl, K. The impact of stakeholder orientation on sustainability and cost prevalence in supplier selection decisions. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2012, 18, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, S.H.; Karimi, A.; Tavana, M. An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 159, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendixen, M.; Abratt, R. Corporate identity, ethics and reputation in supplier buyer relationships. J. Bus. Ethics 2007, 76, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Money, K.; Hillenbrand, C.; Day, M.; Magnan, G.M. Exploring reputation of B2B partnerships: Extending the study of reputation from the perception of single firms to the perception of inter-firm partnerships. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2010, 39, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porteous, A.H.; Rammohan, S.V.; Lee, H.L. Carrots or sticks? Improving social and environmental compliance at suppliers through incentives and penalties. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2015, 24, 1402–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Cantor, D.E.; Grimm, C.M. The impact of a supplier’s environmental management concerns on a buyer’s environmental reputation: The moderating role of relationship criticality and firm size. Transp. Res. Part ELogist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 122, 448–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, X.; Dang, W.V.T.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q. Environmental orientation, green supply chain management, and firm performance: Empirical evidence from chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, C.W.Y.; Lai, K.H.; Shang, K.C.; Lu, C.S.; Leung, T.K.P. Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lienland, B.; Baumgartner, A.; Knubben, E. The under valuation of corporate reputation as a supplier selection factor: An analysis of ingredient branding of complex products in the manufacturing industry. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2013, 19, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.; Huo, B. The impact of green supply chain integration on sustainable performance. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, 120, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M.M.H.; Waseem, M.; Khurram, M. Impact of green supply chain management practices on corporate image: Mediating role of green communications. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2019, 13, 581–598. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, V.; Sabri, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Nadeem, S.P.; Kumari, A.; Akkaranggoon, S. The challenges of GSCM implementation in the UK manufacturing environmental legitimacy on HEI-wide innovativeness and applications for admission: From natural resource-based view. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 168, 105. [Google Scholar]
- Testa, F.; Iraldo, F. Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): Determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bansal, P. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg. Manag. J. 2005, 26, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Hsu, L.T.; Lee, J.S. Empirical investigation of the roles of attitudes toward green behaviors, overall image, gender and age in hotel customers’ eco-friendly decision- making process. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2009, 28, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.S.; Hsu, L.T.; Han, H.; Kim, Y. Understanding how consumers view green hotels: How a hotel’s green image can influence behavioral intentions. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 901–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.B.; Chai, L.T. Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
- Parguel, B.; Benoît-Moreau, F.; Larceneux, F. How sustainability ratings might deter ‘green washing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, E.; Jang, S.S.; Day, J.; Ha, S. The impact of eco-friendly practices on green image and customer attitudes: An investigation in a café setting. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 41, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, H.H.R.; Chen, J.S.; Chen, P.C. Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4997–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mathivathanan, D.; Kannan, D.; Haq, A.N. Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 128, 284–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Akter, T.; Ma, Y. Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) performance implemented by the textile industry of Gazipur District, Dhaka. Logistics 2018, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maheshwari, S.P. Influence on buying behavior of consumers: Special reference to Madhya Pradesh, India. AIMA J. Manag. Res. 2014, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Polonsky, M.J. A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 1995, 10, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aragón-Correa, J.A. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Acad. Manag. J. 1998, 41, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charter, M.; Polonsky, M.J. Green Marketing: A Global Perspective on Green Marketing Practices; Greenleaf Publication: Sheffield, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee, S.B. Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. J. Bus. Res. 2002, 55, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, F.S.; Olson, E.M.; Hult, G.T.M. The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strateg. Manag. J. 2006, 27, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avci, U.; Madanoglu, M.; Okumus, F. Strategic orientation and performance of tourism organizations: Evidence from a developing country. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, C.M.; Bruton, G.D. Strategic orientations and strategies of high technology ventures in two transition economies. J. World Bus. 2011, 46, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguinis, H. Organizational responsibility: Doing good and doing well. In APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 855–879. [Google Scholar]
- Stoeckl, V.E.; Luedicke, M.K. Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 2452–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Manag. 2004, 22, 265–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmas, M.A.; Montiel, I. The adoption of ISO 14001 within the supply chain: When are customer pressures affective? Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Oyewole, P. Social costs of environmental justice associated with the practice of green marketing. J. Bus. Ethics 2001, 29, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menguc, B.; Auh, S.; Ozanne, L. The interactive effect of internal and externalfactors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 94, 279–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonidou, C.N.; Katsikeas, C.S.; Morgan, N.A. “Greening” the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off? J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2013, 41, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diamantopoulos, A.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Sinkovics, R.R.; Bohlen, G.M. Cansocio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res. 2003, 56, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lai, K.H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 130, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, S.W. Gap analysis of green hotel marketing. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 25, 1017–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagiaslis, A.; Krontalis, A.K. Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.; Jang, J.; Kandampully, J. Application of the extended VBN theory to understand consumers’ decisions about green hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 51, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maniatis, P. Investigating factors influencing consumer decision-making while choosing green products. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 132, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tung, T.; Koenig, H.F.; Chen, H.L. Effects of green self-identity and cognitive and affective involvement on patronage intention in eco-friendly apparel consumption: A gender comparison. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cerri, J.; Testa, F.; Rizzi, F. The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers’ attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, S. Extending the theory of planned behavior to explain the effects of cognitive factors across different kinds of green products. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghali-Zinoubi, Z.; Toukabri, M. The antecedents of the consumer purchase intention: Sensitivity to price and involvement in organic product: Moderating role of product regional identity. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, M.P.; Cremasco, C.P.; Almeida Gabriel Filho, L.R.; BragaJunior, S.S.; Bednaski, A.V.; Quevedo-Silva, F.; Correa, C.M.; da Silva, D.; Moura-Leite Padgett, R.C. Fuzzy. inference system to study the behavior of the green consumer facing the perception of green washing. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 116064–116086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Hua, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, G. Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 156, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attaran, S.; Celik, B.G. Students’ environmental responsibility and their willingness to pay for green buildings. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2015, 16, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Yang, Z. The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018, 59, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuang, S.P.; Huang, S.J. The effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on environmental performance and business competitiveness: The mediation of green information technology capital. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 150, 991–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.C.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y.C. Effects of green brand on green purchase intention. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2014, 32, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S. Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 21, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, P. Customer loyalty: Exploring its antecedents from a green marketing perspective. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 27, 896–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, C.H.; Wang, Y.S.; Yieh, K. Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maignan, I.; Ferrell, O.C. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, A.B. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2016, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kotler, P.; Lee, N. Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing” leads the pack. Soc. Mark. Q. 2005, 11, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, G.F.; Jung, J.C. Managing responsibly in tough economic times: Strategic and tactical CSR during the 2008–2009 global recessions. Long Range Plan. 2015, 48, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
- Eshra, N.; Beshir, N. Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer buying behavior in Egypt. World Rev. Bus. Res. 2017, 7, 32–44. [Google Scholar]
- Chapple, W.; Moon, J. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus. Soc. 2005, 44, 415–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burke, L.; Logsdon, J.M. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Plan. 1996, 29, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Little, A.D. The innovation high ground: Winning tomorrow’s customers using sustainability–driven innovation. Strateg. Dir. 2006, 22, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
- Fatma, M.; Rahman, Z. The CSR’s influence on customer responses in Indian banking sector. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 29, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stigler, G.J. The economics of information. J. Political Econ. 1961, 69, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, CA, USA, 2006; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Çankaya, S.Y.; Sezen, B. Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 98–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-S. The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 93, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, G.; Xie, F.; Gong, S.; Pan, H. The role of cultural values in green purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from Chinese consumers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019, 43, 315–326. [Google Scholar]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.R.A. Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. J. Ext. 1999, 37, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Berger, J. Are luxury brand labels and ‘green’ labels costly signals of social status? An extended replication. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Demographic Characteristics | Frequency | (%) | Valid | Cumulative (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | 196 | 61.8 | 61.8 | 61.8 |
Female | 121 | 38.2 | 38.2 | 100.0 |
Age | ||||
20–30 years | 139 | 43.8 | 43.8 | 43.8 |
31–40 years | 150 | 47.3 | 47.3 | 91.2 |
41–50 years | 20 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 97.5 |
51–60 above | 08 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
Education | ||||
High School/College | 129 | 40.7 | 40.7 | 40.7 |
Undergraduate | 118 | 37.2 | 37.2 | 77.9 |
Postgraduate | 70 | 22.1 | 22.1 | 100.0 |
Income | ||||
Below PKR 50,000 | 168 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 53.0 |
PKR 50,000 to 100,000 | 94 | 29.7 | 29.7 | 82.6 |
PKR 100,000 to 200,000 | 34 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 93.4 |
Above PKR 200,000 | 21 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 100.0 |
Total | 317 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Constructs | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statistic | Statistic | Statistic | Statistic | Std. Error | Statistic | Std. Error | |
SGMO | 317 | 3.1951 | 0.67223 | −0.463 | 0.137 | −0.402 | 0.273 |
GSCM | 317 | 3.4830 | 0.42069 | −0.240 | 0.137 | −0.435 | 0.273 |
GI | 317 | 3.5902 | 0.84107 | 0.232 | 0.137 | −0.174 | 0.273 |
BSR | 317 | 3.2438 | 0.67895 | −0.403 | 0.137 | −0.284 | 0.273 |
GCI | 317 | 3.2248 | 0.69707 | −0.447 | 0.137 | −0.871 | 0.273 |
Valid N (listwise) | 317 |
ITEMS | FL | CA | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|
SGMO | 0.793 | 0.795 | 0.562 | |
SGMO1 | 0.651 | |||
SGMO2 | 0.726 | |||
SGMO3 | 0.587 | |||
SGMO4 | 0.614 | |||
SGMO5 | 0.792 | |||
SGMO6 | 0.773 | |||
GSCM | 0.721 | 0.726 | 0.659 | |
GSCM1 | 0.615 | |||
GSCM2 | 0.721 | |||
GSCM3 | 0.768 | |||
GSCM4 | 0.643 | |||
GSCM5 | 0.804 | |||
GSCM6 | 0.691 | |||
GSCM7 | 0.561 | |||
GSCM8 | 0.595 | |||
GI | 0.868 | 0.905 | 0.712 | |
GI1 | 0.836 | |||
GI2 | 0.866 | |||
GI3 | 0.868 | |||
GI4 | 0.844 | |||
GI5 | 0.618 | |||
BSR | 0.820 | 0.868 | 0.614 | |
BSR1 | 0.918 | |||
BSR2 | 0.797 | |||
BSR3 | 0.743 | |||
BSR4 | 0.724 | |||
BSR5 | 0.753 | |||
BSR6 | 0.668 | |||
BSR7 | 0.691 | |||
GCI | 0.713 | 0.821 | 0.746 | |
GCI1 | 0.787 | |||
GCI2 | 0.826 | |||
GCI3 | 0.796 | |||
GCI4 | 0.690 |
Variables | BSR | GCI | GI | GSCM | SGMO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSR | 0.706 | ||||
GCI | 0.396 | 0.737 | |||
GI | 0.579 | 0.46 | 0.812 | ||
GSCM | 0.465 | 0.288 | 0.314 | 0.807 | |
SGMO | 0.456 | 0.305 | 0.551 | 0.258 | 0.635 |
Hypothesis/Path | Original Sample (O) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | t-Statistics (O/STDEV) | p-Values | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 SGMO -> GCI | 0.199 | 0.073 | 2.739 | 0.006 | Accepted |
H2 SGMO -> GI | 0.315 | 0.115 | 2.742 | 0.006 | Accepted |
H3 GSCM -> GCI | 0.410 | 0.052 | 7.961 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H4 GSCM -> GI | 0.502 | 0.072 | 6.967 | 0.000 | Accepted |
H5 GI -> GCI | 0.173 | 0.061 | 2.858 | 0.004 | Accepted |
Hypothesis/Path | Original Sample (O) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | t-Statistics (O/STDEV) | p-Values | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H6 SGMO -> GI -> GCI | 0.054 | 0.023 | 2.342 | 0.020 | Accepted |
H7 GSCM -> GI -> GCI | 0.032 | 0.018 | 2.717 | 0.007 | Accepted |
Hypothesis/Path | Original Sample (O) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | t-Statistics (O/STDEV) | p-Values | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H8 BSR * GI -> GCI | 0.061 | 0.039 | 1.566 | 0.118 | Rejected |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khan, M.I.; Khalid, S.; Zaman, U.; José, A.E.; Ferreira, P. Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18189626
Khan MI, Khalid S, Zaman U, José AE, Ferreira P. Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(18):9626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18189626
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhan, Muhammad Ishfaq, Shahbaz Khalid, Umer Zaman, Ana Ercília José, and Paulo Ferreira. 2021. "Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 18: 9626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18189626