Next Article in Journal
Physiological and Proteomic Dissection of the Responses of Two Contrasting Wheat Genotypes to Nitrogen Deficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential Use of Extracellular Vesicles Generated by Microbubble-Assisted Ultrasound as Drug Nanocarriers for Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in DNA Methylation in Response to 6-Benzylaminopurine Affect Allele-Specific Gene Expression in Populus Tomentosa
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms21062118
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy

by
Tomasz Lorenc
1,*,
Katarzyna Klimczyk
2,3,
Izabela Michalczewska
2,3,
Monika Słomka
2,3,
Grażyna Kubiak-Tomaszewska
2,3 and
Wioletta Olejarz
2,3
1
1st Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
3
Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(6), 2118; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21062118
Submission received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 13 March 2020 / Accepted: 17 March 2020 / Published: 19 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extracellular Vesicles: Biology and Potentials in Cancer Therapeutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality among men in the developed world. Conventional anti-PCa therapies are not effective for patients with advanced and/or metastatic disease. In most cases, cancer therapies fail due to an incomplete depletion of tumor cells, resulting in tumor relapse. Exosomes are involved in tumor progression, promoting the angiogenesis and migration of tumor cells during metastasis. These structures contribute to the dissemination of pathogenic agents through interaction with recipient cells. Exosomes may deliver molecules that are able to induce the transdifferentiation process, known as “epithelial to mesenchymal transition”. The composition of exosomes and the associated possibilities of interacting with cells make exosomes multifaceted regulators of cancer development. Extracellular vesicles have biophysical properties, such as stability, biocompatibility, permeability, low toxicity and low immunogenicity, which are key for the successful development of an innovative drug delivery system. They have an enhanced circulation stability and bio-barrier permeation ability, and they can therefore be used as effective chemotherapeutic carriers to improve the regulation of target tissues and organs. Exosomes have the capacity to deliver different types of cargo and to target specific cells. Chemotherapeutics, natural products and RNA have been encapsulated for the treatment of prostate cancers.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid malignancy, with a high mortality in men [1]. In many cases, successful treatment of prostate cancer is difficult due to the late detection and rate of metastasis [2]. Importantly, the tumors of many patients with prostate cancer become refractory to androgen therapy and progress to metastatic castration-resistant disease [3]. An effective treatment course of prostate cancer patients requires predictive biomarkers in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that support individual therapy [4]. Liquid biopsies, circulating tumor cells, exosomes and circulating nucleic acids have been developed as minimally invasive assays to monitor PCa patients [5]. Exosomes are extracellular vesicles (EVs), which may serve as novel tools for various therapeutic approaches, including drug delivery [6], anti-tumor therapy, pathogen vaccination, immune-modulatory and regenerative therapies. They are secreted by cells and detected in various biological fluids, and they can serve as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and therapy [7]. The presence of EVs in urine was discovered in 2004 [8]. It is believed that urinary EVs originate from epithelial cells of the urogenital system, which includes the organs involved in reproduction and urine excretion. Urine has additional advantages relating to cancers of the urogenital system, since the composition of urine directly reflects changes in the function of associated organs. Blood-specific prostate antigen (PSA) remains the most widely used biomarker in the detection of early prostate cancer, but new biomarkers, like exosomal miRNAs, have been proposed to increase specificity and distinguish aggressive from non-aggressive PCas [9]. It has been shown that urinary markers can aid in the decision-making process regarding whether to carry out a prostate biopsy and in the design of a therapeutic strategy [10]. Urinary exosomes and their cargo, especially miR-21 and miR-375, have become an emerging source of biomarkers in the detection and prognosis of PCa [11]. Moreover, the expression of serum exosomal miRNAs induced by radiotherapy may have potential value as prognostic and predictive biomarkers PCa [12]. Exosomes are also promising carriers of drugs and other therapeutic molecules targeting prostate cancer, but there are still several challenges relating to their use as drug carriers [13].

2. Structure and Function of Exosomes

Exosomes are small (from 30 to 120 nm in diameter) extracellular vesicles (EVs) (Figure 1). Their lipid bilayer membrane, with a width of 5 nm, protects them from the negative action of RNases and proteases. Exosomes have a longer retention in circulation in comparison to polymersomes or liposomes [14]. This characteristic originates from transmembrane protein (CD47-SIRPα), which prevents exosomes from being phagocytosed [15]. Moreover, the double membrane structures contain various cargo, such as miRNAs, proteins (e.g., tetraspanin CD63, CD81, CD82, CD53 and CD37, as well as cystolic proteins), lipids (e.g., sphingomyelin, cholesterol and generally saturated fats) and viral particles [16], and their presence depends on the origin cells and organism’s health conditions. The proteins in exosomes include endosomal, plasma and nuclear proteins [17]. Therefore, in comparison to cellular proteins in prostate cancer, those in exosomes have a higher level of glycosylation [18]. Moreover, proteins enriched in exosomes include those relevant for individual exosomal biogenesis pathways and for exosome secretion. The Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 highlights three categories of markers that must be found in isolated extracellular exosomes. They include at least one transmembrane/lipidbound protein or cytosolic protein and one negative protein marker [19]. The cargo present in extracellular vesicles can be transferred and alter signaling pathways in recipient cells [13]. For example, exosomes from metastatic prostate cancer cells showed high contents of miR-21 and miR-141, which are responsible for the regulation of osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis. Cancer-derived exosomes can promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) via miRNAs. They play an important role in the conversion from benign to malignant cancers [13] and in the regulation of the response to docetaxel, such as miR-34 in prostate cancer cells and cell-derived exosomes targeting Bcl-2. This shows the great influence of extracellular vesicles on the drug resistance of prostate cancer cells.
Exosomes are released by the exocytosis of multivesicular bodies (MVBs), developed from early and then late endosomes [20]. Those naturally occurring membrane particles mediate intercellular communication by delivering molecular information between cancer and stromal cells, especially cancer-associated fibroblast (CAFs) [14]. Cancer cell-derived EVs cause very diverse effects and may depend on their target cells, which appear to take them up in several ways, such as receptor/lipid raft endocytosis, phagocytosis, micropinocytosis or fusion with the plasma membrane [17]. Some exosomes can reduce the anti-cancer immune response, interact with specific membrane receptors [9] and promote a suitable microenvironment, while others may cause drug resistance and the failure of antibody therapy involving RNA species and protein delivery [21]. Recent studies point out that exosomes released from the tumor microenvironment can regulate (also by tethering TGFβ) a proliferation, a reduction of apoptosis, a promotion of angiogenesis and, finally, an evasion of immune surveillance (Figure 2). Moreover, exosomes can provide candidate biomarkers for prostate cancer, contribute to tumor progression and, after a loss of environment homeostasis, promote tumor metastasis [18].

3. Tumor-Derived Exosomes in Cancer Progression

3.1. Tumorigenesis

Tumorigenesis or carcinogenesis is the process of an uncontrolled multiplication of cells or deregulated apoptotic cell death, which leads to the formation of cancer. Exosomes derived from prostate cancer cells, which have become the common object of scientists’ interest, are implicated in creating a premetastatic niche [13]. It is a microenvironment that is especially favorable to cancer cells composed of different cell types, like fibroblasts, lymphocytes, epithelial cells, matrix molecules, factors, such as growth factors, and cytokines [22]. Exosomes influence the immune system in a premetastatic niche through various mechanisms. Prostate cells are involved in producing tumor-derived secreted factors (TDSFs), including VEGF, TNF-α and interleukins in response to the local inflammatory niche. First, TDSFs stimulate the recruitment of myeloid cells and immune cells to the pre-metastatic niche. Furthermore, the expression of inflammatory factors is upregulated by stromal cells under the influence of TDSFs. Moreover, tumor-derived exosome content enhances the pre-metastatic niche [23]. Tumor exosomes possess the capacity to support the migration of immune cells, like neutrophils, macrophages and regulatory T to secondary sites, thereby reducing immune response against tumors and inhibiting antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. These nanoparticles could impair the function of T-cells and NK-cells via the blocking, proliferation, activation and provision of apoptosis [23,24].

3.2. Tumor Progression

Recent research suggests that exosomes isolated from the prostate cancer microenvironment are an important factor in the progression of this type of cancer. The increase in the mass of prostate tumors may be the result of tumor stem cell proliferation, which possess a self-renewing ability [13,25]. Prostate cancer exosomes, as the carriers of many lipids, proteins and RNAs, can affect the proliferation, angiogenesis and survival of cancer cells, as well as their ability to avoid immune surveillance [26]. Exosomes, which form in the tumor microenvironment, transport, among other things, miRNAs (miRs, short noncoding RNAs that are responsible for the regulation of gene expression). miR-20a, miR-21 and miR-125b cause the inhibition of apoptosis and survival, promoting the effects of cancer cells. miRNA-221 and miR-222 are responsible for cancer growth. miR-92a and miR-17-92 are involved in the promotion of angiogenesis, as a result of an increased proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. It has been shown that miR-210 is responsible for the induction of metastasis by EMT promotion. miR-21, miR-100 and miR-139 induce fibroblast migration by increasing the expression of MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-13 and RANKL. miR-21, miR375 and miR-141 overcome low androgen conditions during distant metastasis. miR-1290 and miR-375 are connected with a poor patient prognosis. miR-409 downregulates tumor suppressors, like RSU1 and STAG2, and promotes cancer cell tumorigenesis. The ANXA6/LRP1/TSP1 complex causes tumor growth induction. miR-126 and miR-146a are involved in tumor suppression [27,28,29,30]. Moreover, exosomes, with a structure rich in lipids, especially cholesterol and sphingomyelin, can modulate the lipid composition of the target cells, disturbing their homeostasis. A study on prostate cancer has shown that the accumulation of cholesterol esters in prostate cancer cells is associated with tumor progression and metastasis. This was confirmed by studies, using synthetic exosomes carried out by the Lombardo Group, which showed that exosomal lipids can increase the tumor aggressiveness, metastatic progression and drug resistance of pancreatic cancer cells [31].
It is well known that exosomes secreted by prostate cancer cells under hypoxic conditions increase the invasiveness, mobility and EMT in native PC cells and promote the transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. Moreover, under these conditions, lipid accumulation (triglycerides, bis-monoacylglycerolphosphate, ceramides, cholesterol, etc.) increase in PCs, which leads to increased exosome secretion by hypoxic tumor cells [32].
Exosomes also participate in the regulation of the progression of prostatic tumors, as the carriers of numerous proteins. These vesicular structures, as carriers of TGF-β, can induce the above-mentioned transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts (CAFs) by the activation of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling or independent SMAD signaling pathways and promote neoangiogenesis. Webber found that exosomal TGFβ1 induces a highly aggressive myofibroblast phenotype, with a high proangiogenic activity [13,33]. ITGA3, ITGB1, ITGB4 and ITGB3 are exosomal proteins involved in the progression of prostate cancers. These integrins are responsible for the promotion of the migration and invasion of epithelial cells by the activation of Src phosphorylation in recipient cells. The matrix metalloproteinases MMP-9 and MMP-14 promote cancer cell protection from apoptosis and intensify their mobility through the stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Subsequently, they prepare the metastatic site [26,27]. The next group, ligands for the NKG2D and Fas receptors, causes tumor immune evasion by receptor downregulation and silences the cytotoxic activity of NK cells and CD8+ cells. Caveolin-1 increases the survival of cancer cells and their independence from androgens, and they also promote distant metastasis by the positive regulation of fatty acid synthase activity. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) promotes the initiation and progression of metastasis by promoting the loss of E-cadherin. The tetraspanin–integrin complex increases the adhesion of exosomes to the right cells. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) induces tumor angiogenesis by the activation of the autocrine VEGF/VEGFR-2 pathway in endothelial cells. Tyrosine-protein kinase Met induces metastasis and promotes a phenotype resistant to castration therapy. Other exosomal proteins, c-Src tyrosine kinase, IGF-1R and FAK, induce angiogenesis by the stimulation of the VEGF transcription within the tumor microenvironment [34,35,36,37,38,39].
It has also been shown that tumor-derived exosomes enhance interleukin-6 production in myeloid-derived suppressor cells through the activation of Toll-like receptor 2 via the membrane-linked heat shock protein, which promotes the autocrine phosphorylation of Stat3 and enhances the effect of the immunosuppression of the immune system and the promotion of prostate cancer [40].
Exosomes secreted by prostate cancer cells are also involved in tumor metastasis in bone, which is common in patients with this type of cancer. Recent studies have shown that prostate cancer cell-derived exosomes mediate cell–cell communication in osteoblastic metastasis. On the other hand, osteoblast-derived exosomes may regulate prostate cancer cell proliferation at the original site of tumor development [41].
Exosomes secreted by tumor cells affect the stromal cells by stimulating the formation of pro-proliferative and proangiogenic phenotypes in these cells. It has been shown that exosomes secreted by cancer-associated fibroblasts increase the ability of prostate cancer cells to proliferate and survive in low-oxygen and low-nutrient environments by inhibiting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and increasing anaerobic glycolysis [33,42].

3.3. Angiogenesis

Exosomes obtained from prostate cancer stem cells support tumorigenesis by promoting angiogenesis, which, as a process of developing a new vasculature, is crucial for tumor growth and migrations and is the main cause of metastasis and malignancy. A recent report has shown that some conditions, like hypoxia or acidosis, enhance secreting exosomes in bodily fluids, and these exosomes cause angiogenesis more frequently [30]. Studies have also reported that the expression of E-cadherin and carbonic anhydrase 9 in exosomes could contribute to the angiogenesis process [43]. In the case of prostate cancer, the process of vascularization is supported by the transfer of sphingomyelin and CD147 via exosomes into endothelial cells [44]. Newly formed blood vessels are created to facilitate tumor growth by transporting TDSFs and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) into secondary tissues, thereby beginning vascular leakage [23]. Prostate cancer cell-derived exosomes, via the activation of TGF-β\SMAD3 signaling, lead to the transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, referred to as CAFs. The exosomes derived from these special kinds of cells are able to cause an explosive growth of prostate cancer cells by transferring the miRNAs (miR-21 and miR-409) into neighboring epithelia. miR-21 suppresses the expression of APAF1 (apoptotic peptidase activating factor 1) and PDCD4 (programmed cell death 4) to inhibit apoptosis and make cancer cells resistant to chemotherapeutics [13]. Increased angiogenesis and vascular permeability promote metastasis.

3.4. Metastasis

Tumor metastasis is a complicated process, including vascular leakiness and an alteration of the microenvironment, in which exosomes are also involved. Initially, exosomes begin an epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) via miRNAs by losing their junction and adhesion ability. Thus, epithelial tumor cells obtain mesenchymal cell properties and are responsive to malignancy [45]. Exosomes support the formation of a pre-metastatic niche, and cells could then be found at the vascularized organs, but metastasis cannot be developed randomly, but rather only in preferential sites under the direction of exosomes. In the process of this expansion, the special kind of CTCs (metastases-initiating cells (MICs)) are involved [46]. MICs can act on other cells by secreting exosomes that reprogram adjacent stromal cells to create a more favorable tumor microenvironment in order to support cancer growth and progression. As mentioned above, cancer-derived exosomes determine organotropism. Prostate cancer possesses an affinity with bone. Exosomes obtained from prostate cancer cells by osteoclast fusion and differentiation support transmission to this destination [47]. Furthermore, exosomes derived therefrom, through the activation of RANKL, FOXM1 and c-Myc, support EMT [46]. As described previously, cancer cell-derived exosomes transfer various substances, including integrins, which are responsible for organotropism. Integrin σ3 and β1 lead to the migration and dissemination of epithelial cells. In addition, integrin avb6, expressed on the surface, is responsible for the metastatic phenotype [48]. The tumor microenvironment contributes to the regulation of prostate cancer progression through proliferation, angiogenesis and metastasis, and it also regulates immunity.

3.5. Tumor Immune Escape

The immune system is able to recognize transformed cells and eliminate them. Thus, tumors use diverse mechanisms to escape from immune-mediated surveillance. Exosomes derived from prostate cancer cells impair the cytotoxic function of lymphocytes and induce the apoptosis of CD8+ T cells [23]. In the first step, exosomes activate the T cell receptor, and the expression of Fas on the T cell is then upregulated. Subsequently, FasL induces apoptosis directly via receptor CD 95/APO1 or indirectly using dendritic cells [49]. Fas-mediated apoptosis, as an immune-evasive mechanism, may lead to tumorigenesis, but it may also be responsible for drug resistance [49]. Some other mechanisms and molecules may also contribute to T cell apoptosis. Among the substances carried by exosomes is the programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1). Exosomal PDL-1 plays the same role as tumor PDL-1. PDL-1 binds to its receptor, PD-1, expressed on the surface of activated T and B cells or macrophages, and enables T cell apoptosis [50]. On the other hand, cancer-derived exosomes can not only cause the dysfunction of T and NK cells by blocking the activation and proliferation or induction of apoptosis, but also inhibit antigen-presenting cells and antitumor immune response [23]. While exosomes are characterized by heterogeneity and a risk of developing metastasis, those nanoparticles could be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for various cancers and as promising drug carriers.

4. The Potential of Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Monitoring

EVs may be key biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer and in a personalized approach to treatment and to future patients’ prognosis [26]. EVs in the blood and urine of prostate cancer patients contain unique prostate-cancer-specific contents, which are biomarkers of prostate cancer and cancer metastasis [51,52]. Exosomes present many different proteins on their surface. These proteins can act as epitopes, which are recognized using different mono- or polyclonal antibodies. A dedicated assay has been established to determine if the exosomes in blood plasma can serve as markers for prostate cancer [51]. Additionally, several EV-derived proteins have been investigated as potential cancer biomarkers in clinical settings [53]. Several urinary exosome proteins showed a high sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer as individual biomarkers, and combining them in a multi-panel test has the potential for a full differentiation of prostate cancer from non-disease controls [52]. Liu et al. showed that exosomes from prostate cancer are highly enriched with PSA, representing characteristics of the original PCa cells [54]. Current evidence indicates that the strongest candidates for intercellular communications in PCa are exosomal RNAs [55]. The EV-derived RNAs have also been assessed in terms of their potential as cancer biomarkers in clinical samples. Yang et al. confirmed, through meta-analysis, that plasma exosomal miRNAs have a high diagnostic value for prostate cancer patients [56]. Hessvik et al. identified 36 exosomal miRNAs as biomarker candidates for PCa in clinical studies [57]. In prostate cancer, plasma vesicles, isolated using the precipitation-based ExoQuick method, identified miR-1290 and miR-375 as potential prognostic biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), since their level correlates with a poorer overall survival (p < 0.004) [58,59]. Joncas et al. demonstrated that the exosomal androgen receptor splice variant (AR-V7) is correlated with lower sex steroid levels and with a poor prognosis in CRPC patients [60]. For prostate cancer, the expression of the AR-V7 RNA in CTCs was identified as a predictive marker for response to enzalutamide (anti-androgen) and abiraterone (anti-androgen and CYP17 inhibitor) [61]. Whether the AR-V7 transcript can also be measured in plasma EVs and serve as a biomarker was investigated by Del Re et al. [62]. Using the exoRNeasy purification method, EV-RNA was extracted, and the AR-V7 transcript was detected, preferentially in patients resistant to enzalutamide or abiraterone treatment. This study, as well as other studies, shows the biomarker potential of plasma-derived EV-RNA and the advantages with respect to the cost, ease of workflow and likelihood that all (heterogeneous) tumors are represented by a specific EV population. Communication between a tumor and its environment in PCa via extracellular vesicle (EV) RNAs is a potential mechanism of bone metastasis [63]. It has been shown that exosomal miR-375 significantly promoted osteoblast activity [64]. Krishn et al. proved that prostate cancer sheds the αvβ3 integrin in vivo through exosomes. The exosomal αvβ3 integrin has been shown to promote aggressive phenotypes in many types of cancers and may be clinically useful as a non-invasive biomarker to follow prostate cancer progression [65]. Another paper has reported survivin as a plasma-derived EV biomarker through the isolation of total EVs by the ultracentrifugation-based method for prostate cancer [66]. It has been shown that exosomes released by irradiated prostate cancer cells are enriched in B7-H3 protein (CD276), which has been identified as a diagnostic marker [67]. Furthermore, the serum exosomes of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy had increased levels of HSP72, which plays a key role in the stimulation of pro-inflammatory immune responses [68]. Additionally, urinary exosomes are a promising non-invasive biomarker, with a potential use in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of prostate cancer [69].

5. The Potential of Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Therapy

5.1. Exosomes as Drug Carriers for Prostate Cancer Therapy

Extracellular vesicles have biophysical properties, such as stability, biocompatibility, permeability, low toxicity and low immunogenicity, which are key to successful drug delivery systems [70]. They have an enhanced circulation stability and bio-barrier permeation ability, and they can therefore be used as effective chemotherapeutics carriers to improve the regulation of target tissues and organs [71]. Chemotherapeutics, natural products and RNA were combined for the treatment of prostate, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers, as well as glioblastoma [14]. Exosomes have the capacity to deliver different types of cargo and to target specific cells (Figure 3). They have been tested for the delivery of different therapeutic agents in in vitro and in vivo experiments [72]. EVs can be used as carriers to deliver therapeutic agents to tumor cells, leading to an effective tumor cell killing, while minimizing the side effects of the drugs [73]. It has been shown that mesenchymal stromal cells are able to package and deliver active drugs through their membrane microvesicles (MVs) [74]. Additionally, Tian et al. demonstrated that exosomes modified by targeting ligands can be used therapeutically for the delivery of doxorubicin to tumors [75]. Additionally, Qi et al. confirmed that drug-loaded exosomes enhanced cancer cell targeting under an external magnetic field and suppressed tumor growth [76]. Saari et al. confirmed that cancer cell-derived EVs can be used as effective carriers of Paclitaxel to autologous prostate cancer cells by increasing its cytotoxicity [21]. The simultaneous application of either radiation technology or nuclear medicine with exosomes are promising tools for the realization of the enhancement of targeting strategies using radiation technology [77].

5.2. Precision Therapy

Exosomes have been shown to be crucial for the development of drug resistance in patients with prostate tumor. In 2017, Del Re et al. assessed AR-V7 as a predictor of resistance to hormonal therapy by highly sensitive digital droplet polymerase chain reaction in plasma-derived exosomal RNA. They found that both the median progression-free survival (20 vs. 3 months; p < 0.001) and overall survival (8 months vs. not reached; p < 0.001) were significantly longer in AR-V7-negative vs. AR-V7-positive patients [62]. Exosome-derived microRNAs also contribute to PCa chemoresistance [78] and can act as surrogate biomarkers of tumor response to taxanes [79]. It has been observed that the transfer of exosomes (in particular, MDR-1/P-gp) from docetaxel-resistant cell lines to the DU145, 22Rv1, and LNCap PCa cell lines induces an acquired resistance to this drug [80]. In the same view, Kawakami et al. reported that β4 (ITGB4) and VCL in exosomes could be useful markers of PCa progression, which is correlated with taxane resistance [81]. Interestingly, high serum exosomal P-glycoprotein levels are associated with resistance to docetaxel, but not to cabazitaxel, thus representing a potential biomarker for guiding the decision-making process of PCa patients [82].
There is currently also a list of challenges that remain in the era of individualized or person-specific targeting of cancer. EVs are being pursued as intercellular vectors for RNA-based therapy (both miRNAs and siRNAs), with a documented efficacy in animal models of disease. For example, the in vivo suppression of prostate cancer has been achieved through the exosome delivery of the tumor suppressor miRNA, miR-143, in mice [83].

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

Increasingly, studies confirm the potential of exosomes as therapeutic vehicles for cancer treatment. Exosomes can transfer cargos with both an immunoregulatory potential and genetic information. They can decrease tumor cell invasion, migration and proliferation by enhancing immune response, cell death and sensitivity to chemotherapy. Exosomes have a high potential for both as diagnostic and therapeutic agents in immune therapy, vaccination trials and regenerative medicine. The native structure and unique cellular functions of exosomes give them a great potential as natural drug/gene delivery vehicles, but developing efficient and reliable isolation methods is necessary to fully utilize their potential [84]. The use of exosomes in clinical applications must be further investigated in order to establish standards for exosome characterization and manipulation [85]. The most important thing is to choose optimal methods for engineering exosomes and ensuring the safety of engineered exosomes in clinical trials [86]. Furthermore, the translation of EVs into clinical therapies requires their categorization as active drug components or drug delivery vehicles [6]. It is also necessary to clarify the composition and action mechanism of the various substances in exosomes and determine how to obtain highly purified exosomes and the right dosage for their clinical use [15]. Another important therapeutic use of EVs could be cancer vaccination [87]. In brief, exosomes are very promising tools for the future theranostics of prostate cancer, but their use first requires solutions for the many challenging issues remaining.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

APAF1apoptotic peptidase-activating factor 1
AR-V7androgen receptor variant 7
CAFscancer-associated fibroblast
CRPCcastrate-resistant prostate cancer
CTCscirculating tumor cells
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
EMTepithelial–mesenchymal transition
EVextracellular vesicles
FASLligand Fas
HIF-1αhypoxia-inducible factor 1α
HSPheat shock proteins
ITGB4integrin β4
MICsmetastases-initiating cells
miRmicro RNA
MMPmatrix metalloproteinase
MVBsmultivesicular bodies
PCaprostate cancer
PDCD4programmed cell death 4
PDL-1programmed death ligand 1
PSAprostate specific antigen
RANKLreceptor activator for nuclear factor κB ligand
RSU1Ras suppressor protein 1
siRNAsmall interfering RNA
STAG2cohesin subunit SA-2
TDSFstumor-derived secreted factors
TGFβtransforming growth factor β
VCLvinculin

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, S.J.; Kim, S.I. Current treatment strategies for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Korean J. Urol. 2011, 52, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ingrosso, G.; Detti, B.; Scartoni, D.; Lancia, A.; Giacomelli, I.; Baki, M.; Carta, G.; Livi, L.; Santoni, R. Current therapeutic options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2018, 45, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Kretschmer, A.; Tilki, D. Biomarkers in prostate cancer—Current clinical utility and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017, 120, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lu, Y.T.; Delijani, K.; Mecum, A.; Goldkorn, A. Current status of liquid biopsies for the detection and management of prostate cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 5271–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lener, T.; Gimona, M.; Aigner, L.; Borger, V.; Buzas, E.; Camussi, G.; Chaput, N.; Chatterjee, D.; Court, F.A.; Del Portillo, H.A.; et al. Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials—An ISEV position paper. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 30087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, L.; Gu, Y.; Du, Y.; Liu, J. Exosomes: Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Delivery Vehicles for Cancer. Mol. Pharm. 2019, 16, 3333–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pisitkun, T.; Shen, R.F.; Knepper, M.A. Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13368–13373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Filella, X.; Foj, L. Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis: From Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) to Exosomal Biomarkers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fujita, K.; Nonomura, N. Urinary biomarkers of prostate cancer. Int. J. Urol. 2018, 25, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Foj, L.; Ferrer, F.; Serra, M.; Arevalo, A.; Gavagnach, M.; Gimenez, N.; Filella, X. Exosomal and Non-Exosomal Urinary miRNAs in Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis. Prostate 2017, 77, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Malla, B.; Aebersold, D.M.; Pra, A.D. Protocol for serum exosomal miRNAs analysis in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pan, J.; Ding, M.; Xu, K.; Yang, C.; Mao, L.J. Exosomes in diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 97693–97700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Pullan, J.E.; Confeld, M.I.; Osborn, J.K.; Kim, J.; Sarkar, K.; Mallik, S. Exosomes as Drug Carriers for Cancer Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2019, 16, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Di, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, Y.; Gan, L.; Zhou, R.; Sun, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; et al. Exosomes as drug carriers for clinical application. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, S564–S570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qin, J.; Xu, A.Q. Functions and application of exosomes. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2014, 71, 537–543. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, N.; Shao, F.; Wang, C.; Wang, P.; Yang, Z.; Li, R.; He, J. Exosomes: New players in cancer (Review). Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, C.M.; Hsieh, C.L.; Shen, C.N.; Lin, C.C.; Shigemura, K.; Sung, S.Y. Exosomes from the tumor microenvironment as reciprocal regulators that enhance prostate cancer progression. Int. J. Urol. 2016, 23, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thery, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Panigrahi, G.K.; Deep, G. Exosomes-based biomarker discovery for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Front. Biosci. 2017, 22, 1682–1696. [Google Scholar]
  21. Saari, H.; Lazaro-Ibanez, E.; Viitala, T.; Vuorimaa-Laukkanen, E.; Siljander, P.; Yliperttula, M. Microvesicle- and exosome-mediated drug delivery enhances the cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel in autologous prostate cancer cells. J. Control. Release 2015, 220, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Egeblad, M.; Nakasone, E.S.; Werb, Z. Tumors as organs: Complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Dev. Cell 2010, 18, 884–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Guo, Y.; Ji, X.; Liu, J.; Fan, D.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Yuan, W.; et al. Effects of exosomes on pre-metastatic niche formation in tumors. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, Y.; Xiang, X.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Cheng, Z.; Michalek, S.; Grizzle, W.; Zhang, H.G. Contribution of MyD88 to the tumor exosome-mediated induction of myeloid derived suppressor cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2490–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alzahrani, F.A.; El-Magd, M.A.; Abdelfattah-Hassan, A.; Saleh, A.A.; Saadeldin, I.M.; El-Shetry, E.S.; Badawy, A.A.; Alkarim, S. Potential Effect of Exosomes Derived from Cancer Stem Cells and MSCs on Progression of DEN-Induced HCC in Rats. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 8058979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Vlaeminck-Guillem, V. Extracellular Vesicles in Prostate Cancer Carcinogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giusti, I.; Dolo, V. Extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer: New future clinical strategies? Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 561571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Umezu, T.; Ohyashiki, K.; Kuroda, M.; Ohyashiki, J.H. Leukemia cell to endothelial cell communication via exosomal miRNAs. Oncogene 2013, 32, 2747–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, Z.; Tan, Y.; Yu, W.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, S.; Sun, L.; Ding, K. Small role with big impact: miRNAs as communicators in the cross-talk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 13, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mashouri, L.; Yousefi, H.; Aref, A.R.; Ahadi, A.M.; Molaei, F.; Alahari, S.K. Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis, and mechanisms in cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Brzozowski, J.S.; Jankowski, H.; Bond, D.R.; McCague, S.B.; Munro, B.R.; Predebon, M.J.; Scarlett, C.J.; Skelding, K.A. Lipidomic profiling of extracellular vesicles derived from prostate and prostate cancer cell lines. Lipids Health Dis. 2018, 17, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Deep, G.; Schlaepfer, I.R. Aberrant Lipid Metabolism Promotes Prostate Cancer: Role in Cell Survival under Hypoxia and Extracellular Vesicles Biogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Webber, J.P.; Spary, L.K.; Sanders, A.J.; Chowdhury, R.; Jiang, W.G.; Steadman, R.; Wymant, J.; Jones, A.T.; Kynaston, H.; Mason, M.D.; et al. Differentiation of tumour-promoting stromal myofibroblasts by cancer exosomes. Oncogene 2015, 34, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bellezza, I.; Aisa, M.C.; Palazzo, R.; Costanzi, E.; Mearini, E.; Minelli, A. Extracellular matrix degrading enzymes at the prostasome surface. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005, 8, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Di Vizio, D.; Sotgia, F.; Williams, T.M.; Hassan, G.S.; Capozza, F.; Frank, P.G.; Pestell, R.G.; Loda, M.; Freeman, M.R.; Lisanti, M.P. Caveolin-1 is required for the upregulation of fatty acid synthase (FASN), a tumor promoter, during prostate cancer progression. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007, 6, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wu, M.; Wang, G.; Hu, W.; Yao, Y.; Yu, X.F. Emerging roles and therapeutic value of exosomes in cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Conigliaro, A.; Cicchini, C. Exosome-Mediated Signaling in Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Tumor Progression. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tian, W.; Liu, S.; Li, B. Potential Role of Exosomes in Cancer Metastasis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 4649705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lopez, T.; Hanahan, D. Elevated levels of IGF-1 receptor convey invasive and metastatic capability in a mouse model of pancreatic islet tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2002, 1, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Chalmin, F.; Ladoire, S.; Mignot, G.; Vincent, J.; Bruchard, M.; Remy-Martin, J.P.; Boireau, W.; Rouleau, A.; Simon, B.; Lanneau, D.; et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, F.X.; Liu, J.J.; Xu, F.; Lin, X.; Zhong, J.Y.; Wu, F.; Yuan, L.Q. Role of tumor-derived exosomes in bone metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 3935–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vander Heiden, M.G.; Cantley, L.C.; Thompson, C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009, 324, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Tang, M.K.S.; Yue, P.Y.K.; Ip, P.P.; Huang, R.L.; Lai, H.C.; Cheung, A.N.Y.; Tse, K.Y.; Ngan, H.Y.S.; Wong, A.S.T. Soluble E-cadherin promotes tumor angiogenesis and localizes to exosome surface. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Naito, Y.; Yoshioka, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ochiya, T. How cancer cells dictate their microenvironment: Present roles of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Roma-Rodrigues, C.; Mendes, R.; Baptista, P.; Fernandes, A. Targeting Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shiao, S.L.; Chu, G.C.; Chung, L.W. Regulation of prostate cancer progression by the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 2016, 380, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Karlsson, T.; Lundholm, M.; Widmark, A.; Persson, E. Tumor Cell-Derived Exosomes from the Prostate Cancer Cell Line TRAMP-C1 Impair Osteoclast Formation and Differentiation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bijnsdorp, I.V.; Geldof, A.A.; Lavaei, M.; Piersma, S.R.; van Moorselaar, R.J.; Jimenez, C.R. Exosomal ITGA3 interferes with non-cancerous prostate cell functions and is increased in urine exosomes of metastatic prostate cancer patients. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2013, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ichim, T.E.; Zhong, Z.; Kaushal, S.; Zheng, X.; Ren, X.; Hao, X.; Joyce, J.A.; Hanley, H.H.; Riordan, N.H.; Koropatnick, J.; et al. Exosomes as a tumor immune escape mechanism: Possible therapeutic implications. J. Transl. Med. 2008, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, G.; Huang, A.C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, G.; Wu, M.; Xu, W.; Yu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, B.; Sun, H.; et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 2018, 560, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tavoosidana, G.; Ronquist, G.; Darmanis, S.; Yan, J.; Carlsson, L.; Wu, D.; Conze, T.; Ek, P.; Semjonow, A.; Eltze, E.; et al. Multiple recognition assay reveals prostasomes as promising plasma biomarkers for prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8809–8814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Overbye, A.; Skotland, T.; Koehler, C.J.; Thiede, B.; Seierstad, T.; Berge, V.; Sandvig, K.; Llorente, A. Identification of prostate cancer biomarkers in urinary exosomes. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 30357–30376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Soekmadji, C.; Corcoran, N.M.; Oleinikova, I.; Jovanovic, L. Extracellular vesicles for personalized therapy decision support in advanced metastatic cancers and its potential impact for prostate cancer. Prostate 2017, 77, 1416–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, T.; Mendes, D.E.; Berkman, C.E. Functional prostate-specific membrane antigen is enriched in exosomes from prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Soekmadji, C.; Russell, P.J.; Nelson, C.C. Exosomes in prostate cancer: Putting together the pieces of a puzzle. Cancers 2013, 5, 1522–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yang, B.; Xiong, W.Y.; Hou, H.J.; Xu, Q.; Cai, X.L.; Zeng, T.X.; Ha, X.Q. Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Clin. Lab. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hessvik, N.P.; Sandvig, K.; Llorente, A. Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Huang, X.; Yuan, T.; Tschannen, M.; Sun, Z.; Jacob, H.; Du, M.; Liang, M.; Dittmar, R.L.; Liu, Y.; Liang, M.; et al. Characterization of human plasma-derived exosomal RNAs by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Huang, X.; Yuan, T.; Liang, M.; Du, M.; Xia, S.; Dittmar, R.; Wang, D.; See, W.; Costello, B.A.; Quevedo, F.; et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2015, 67, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Joncas, F.H.; Lucien, F.; Rouleau, M.; Morin, F.; Leong, H.S.; Pouliot, F.; Fradet, Y.; Gilbert, C.; Toren, P. Plasma extracellular vesicles as phenotypic biomarkers in prostate cancer patients. Prostate 2019, 79, 1767–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Antonarakis, E.S.; Lu, C.; Wang, H.; Luber, B.; Nakazawa, M.; Roeser, J.C.; Chen, Y.; Mohammad, T.A.; Chen, Y.; Fedor, H.L.; et al. AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Del Re, M.; Biasco, E.; Crucitta, S.; Derosa, L.; Rofi, E.; Orlandini, C.; Miccoli, M.; Galli, L.; Falcone, A.; Jenster, G.W.; et al. The Detection of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in Plasma-derived Exosomal RNA Strongly Predicts Resistance to Hormonal Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur. Urol. 2017, 71, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Probert, C.; Dottorini, T.; Speakman, A.; Hunt, S.; Nafee, T.; Fazeli, A.; Wood, S.; Brown, J.E.; James, V. Communication of prostate cancer cells with bone cells via extracellular vesicle RNA; a potential mechanism of metastasis. Oncogene 2019, 38, 1751–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, S.L.; An, N.; Liu, B.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, J.J.; Ye, Y. Exosomes from LNCaP cells promote osteoblast activity through miR-375 transfer. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 4463–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Krishn, S.R.; Singh, A.; Bowler, N.; Duffy, A.N.; Friedman, A.; Fedele, C.; Kurtoglu, S.; Tripathi, S.K.; Wang, K.; Hawkins, A.; et al. Prostate cancer sheds the alphavbeta3 integrin in vivo through exosomes. Matrix Biol. 2019, 77, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khan, S.; Jutzy, J.M.; Valenzuela, M.M.; Turay, D.; Aspe, J.R.; Ashok, A.; Mirshahidi, S.; Mercola, D.; Lilly, M.B.; Wall, N.R. Plasma-derived exosomal survivin, a plausible biomarker for early detection of prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Lehmann, B.D.; Paine, M.S.; Brooks, A.M.; McCubrey, J.A.; Renegar, R.H.; Wang, R.; Terrian, D.M. Senescence-associated exosome release from human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 7864–7871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hurwitz, M.D.; Kaur, P.; Nagaraja, G.M.; Bausero, M.A.; Manola, J.; Asea, A. Radiation therapy induces circulating serum Hsp72 in patients with prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2010, 95, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Erozenci, L.A.; Bottger, F.; Bijnsdorp, I.V.; Jimenez, C.R. Urinary exosomal proteins as (pan-)cancer biomarkers: Insights from the proteome. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 1580–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kim, S.M.; Kim, H.S. Engineering of extracellular vesicles as drug delivery vehicles. Stem Cell Investig. 2017, 4, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lin, Y.; Lu, Y.; Li, X. Biological characteristics of exosomes and genetically engineered exosomes for the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. J. Drug Target. 2019, 28, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Johnsen, K.B.; Gudbergsson, J.M.; Skov, M.N.; Pilgaard, L.; Moos, T.; Duroux, M. A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles—Endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1846, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, P.; Liu, J.; Ma, J.; Lv, M.; Li, D.; Katirai, F.; Shen, G.X.; et al. Delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumour cell-derived microparticles. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Pascucci, L.; Cocce, V.; Bonomi, A.; Ami, D.; Ceccarelli, P.; Ciusani, E.; Vigano, L.; Locatelli, A.; Sisto, F.; Doglia, S.M.; et al. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: A new approach for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2014, 192, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tian, Y.; Li, S.; Song, J.; Ji, T.; Zhu, M.; Anderson, G.J.; Wei, J.; Nie, G. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 2383–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Qi, H.; Liu, C.; Long, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chang, X.; Qian, X.; Jia, H.; Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; et al. Blood Exosomes Endowed with Magnetic and Targeting Properties for Cancer Therapy. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3323–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bakht, M.K.; Oh, S.W.; Hwang, D.W.; Lee, Y.S.; Youn, H.; Porter, L.A.; Cheon, G.J.; Kwak, C.; Lee, D.S.; Kang, K.W. The Potential Roles of Radionanomedicine and Radioexosomics in Prostate Cancer Research and Treatment. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 2976–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, J.; Yang, X.; Guan, H.; Mizokami, A.; Keller, E.T.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Tan, J.; Hu, L.; Lu, Y.; et al. Exosome-derived microRNAs contribute to prostate cancer chemoresistance. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 49, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kharaziha, P.; Chioureas, D.; Rutishauser, D.; Baltatzis, G.; Lennartsson, L.; Fonseca, P.; Azimi, A.; Hultenby, K.; Zubarev, R.; Ullen, A.; et al. Molecular profiling of prostate cancer derived exosomes may reveal a predictive signature for response to docetaxel. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 21740–21754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Corcoran, C.; Rani, S.; O’Brien, K.; O’Neill, A.; Prencipe, M.; Sheikh, R.; Webb, G.; McDermott, R.; Watson, W.; Crown, J.; et al. Docetaxel-resistance in prostate cancer: Evaluating associated phenotypic changes and potential for resistance transfer via exosomes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kawakami, K.; Fujita, Y.; Kato, T.; Mizutani, K.; Kameyama, K.; Tsumoto, H.; Miura, Y.; Deguchi, T.; Ito, M. Integrin beta4 and vinculin contained in exosomes are potential markers for progression of prostate cancer associated with taxane-resistance. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 47, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Kato, T.; Mizutani, K.; Kameyama, K.; Kawakami, K.; Fujita, Y.; Nakane, K.; Kanimoto, Y.; Ehara, H.; Ito, H.; Seishima, M.; et al. Serum exosomal P-glycoprotein is a potential marker to diagnose docetaxel resistance and select a taxoid for patients with prostate cancer. Urol. Oncol. 2015, 33, 385.e15–385.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kosaka, N.; Iguchi, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Hagiwara, K.; Takeshita, F.; Ochiya, T. Competitive interactions of cancer cells and normal cells via secretory microRNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Li, X.; Corbett, A.L.; Taatizadeh, E.; Tasnim, N.; Little, J.P.; Garnis, C.; Daugaard, M.; Guns, E.; Hoorfar, M.; Li, I.T.S. Challenges and opportunities in exosome research-Perspectives from biology, engineering, and cancer therapy. APL Bioeng. 2019, 3, 011503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Gilligan, K.E.; Dwyer, R.M. Engineering Exosomes for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Rahbarghazi, R.; Jabbari, N.; Sani, N.A.; Asghari, R.; Salimi, L.; Kalashani, S.A.; Feghhi, M.; Etemadi, T.; Akbariazar, E.; Mahmoudi, M.; et al. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles: Reliable tools for Cancer diagnosis and clinical applications. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Giulietti, M.; Santoni, M.; Cimadamore, A.; Carrozza, F.; Piva, F.; Cheng, L.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; Scarpelli, M.; Battelli, N.; Montironi, R. Exploring Small Extracellular Vesicles for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 02118 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an exosome.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an exosome.
Ijms 21 02118 g001
Ijms 21 02118 g002 550
Figure 2. Role of prostate cell-derived exosomes in cancer progression. Exosomes regulate stromal cells, impair immune cells and alter the microenvironment, which could lead to tumor growth and metastasis. Exosomes are also responsible for drug resistance.
Figure 2. Role of prostate cell-derived exosomes in cancer progression. Exosomes regulate stromal cells, impair immune cells and alter the microenvironment, which could lead to tumor growth and metastasis. Exosomes are also responsible for drug resistance.
Ijms 21 02118 g002
Ijms 21 02118 g003 550
Figure 3. Exosomes are promising drug carriers in prostate cancer therapy.
Figure 3. Exosomes are promising drug carriers in prostate cancer therapy.
Ijms 21 02118 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lorenc, T.; Klimczyk, K.; Michalczewska, I.; Słomka, M.; Kubiak-Tomaszewska, G.; Olejarz, W. Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21062118

AMA Style

Lorenc T, Klimczyk K, Michalczewska I, Słomka M, Kubiak-Tomaszewska G, Olejarz W. Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(6):2118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21062118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorenc, Tomasz, Katarzyna Klimczyk, Izabela Michalczewska, Monika Słomka, Grażyna Kubiak-Tomaszewska, and Wioletta Olejarz. 2020. "Exosomes in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 6: 2118. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21062118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop