Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Monovalent and Divalent Ions Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Agricultural Waste Biochars Prepared at Different Temperatures—Experimental and Model Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanisms of Central Nervous System Axonal Regeneration and Remyelination: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Hypothermically Stored Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Alginate Bandages Facilitate Use of Paracrine Molecules for Corneal Wound Healing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calsequestrin Deletion Facilitates Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Spatial Learning in Post-Natal Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Gestational Factors throughout Fetal Neurodevelopment: The Serotonin Link

1
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1105 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3
College of Medical Laboratory, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
4
Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(16), 5850; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21165850
Submission received: 23 June 2020 / Revised: 24 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 August 2020 / Published: 14 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration)

Abstract

:
Serotonin (5-HT) is a critical player in brain development and neuropsychiatric disorders. Fetal 5-HT levels can be influenced by several gestational factors, such as maternal genotype, diet, stress, medication, and immune activation. In this review, addressing both human and animal studies, we discuss how these gestational factors affect placental and fetal brain 5-HT levels, leading to changes in brain structure and function and behavior. We conclude that gestational factors are able to interact and thereby amplify or counteract each other’s impact on the fetal 5-HT-ergic system. We, therefore, argue that beyond the understanding of how single gestational factors affect 5-HT-ergic brain development and behavior in offspring, it is critical to elucidate the consequences of interacting factors. Moreover, we describe how each gestational factor is able to alter the 5-HT-ergic influence on the thalamocortical- and prefrontal-limbic circuitry and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical-axis. These alterations have been associated with risks to develop attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, depression, and/or anxiety. Consequently, the manipulation of gestational factors may be used to combat pregnancy-related risks for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) plays a major role in neuropsychiatric disorders and is a key player in brain development [1,2]. In adulthood, 5-HT cannot cross the blood–brain barrier, while its precursors tryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) can (see review [3]). However, roughly during the first half of pregnancy, 5-HT can be transferred from the mother’s placenta, via the fetal periphery, to the fetal brain [4,5,6]. It is, therefore, likely that the maternal environment can greatly influence fetal brain development. This, in turn, may play a role in the onset of multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, as many of these disorders seem to have a developmental origin [7]. Further insight into how gestational factors can influence the fetal 5-HT system may advance our understanding of the aetiology underlying several neuropsychiatric disorders.

1.1. The 5-HT System and Its Embryonic Development

As illustrated in Figure 1, 5-HT signaling is tightly controlled by (1) tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-HT synthesis, and by (2) the 5-HT transporter (5-HTT), which is responsible for the high-affinity reuptake of 5-HT. Two TPH isoforms have been identified to synthesize 5-HT from tryptophan. TPH1 is responsible for 5-HT synthesis in the periphery and to a smaller extent also in the brain pineal gland. TPH2 is essential for 5-HT synthesis in the brain [8,9]. In addition, TPH2 is also important for 5-HT synthesis in the enteric nervous system and thereby the regulation of gastrointestinal motility [10]. In the brain, 5-HT is synthesized by 5-HT-ergic neurons located in the various nuclei of the raphe nuclei in the brainstem and is transported into synaptic vesicles by the vesicular monoamine transporter isoform 2. The exocytosis of these vesicles releases 5-HT into the synaptic cleft, where it binds to post-synaptic 5-HT receptors. Thus far, at least 14 different 5-HT receptor subtypes have been identified (5-HT1A/B/D/E/F, 5-HT2A/B/C, 5-HT3, 5-HT4, 5-HT5A/B, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7), which can trigger a variety of signaling cascades. All but the 5-HT3 receptor are metobotropic and belong to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. A complete overview of the receptor’s transduction mechanisms is beyond the scope of this review and has been discussed in detail previously [11,12]. Of note, at the cost of 5-HT, tryptophan can also serve as a precursor of kynurenine via the rate-limiting enzymes tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [13]. Kynurenine is further degraded into multiple neuroactive metabolites, including kynurenic acid and quinolinic acid. The kynurenine pathway plays a role in immune response and inflammation [14,15].
The various developmental stages of the fetal 5-HT system are largely comparable between humans and rodents. In humans, 5-HT-ergic neurons are first evident in the hindbrain at gestational week 5 [16] after which they project to the forebrain, reaching the cerebral cortex around gestational week 10 and the most rostral telencephalon around gestational week 13 [17]. At gestational week 15, during the second trimester of human pregnancy, the typical organization of clustered 5-HT cell bodies into the raphe nuclei is observed [18]. Similarly, in rodents, 5-HT-positive cells are observed in the raphe nuclei around embryonic day (E) 10–12, which corresponds to the second trimester of pregnancy in humans. One day after their appearance, these cells are able to synthesize 5-HT [2]. 5-HT-ergic axons reach the forebrain in mice around E16.5 and in rats around E17.5 [19,20]. Interestingly, 5-HT-ergic signaling molecules are already present in the forebrain before 5-HT-ergic axons reach it. Human data show the expression of 5-HTT in the brain around gestational week 8, i.e., the first trimester of pregnancy [21]. Similarly, in mice and rats, brain 5-HTT is detected around E8-9 in the forebrain [2,22,23,24]. This suggests that an exogenous source may provide the fetal forebrain with 5-HT before the actual 5-HT-ergic projections reach the forebrain.

1.2. Maternal and Placental Sources of 5-HT

Two exogenous sources have been reported to supply the fetus with 5-HT: the placenta and maternal platelets, i.e., 5-HT overflow from the gut. Although these two sources are clearly associated with the fetal 5-HT supply, it is still quite unclear what the varying degrees of supply from the placenta and maternal platelets are and whether they act in parallel [25]. Two studies reported that the placenta expresses both maternal and fetal isoforms of TPH1 and TPH2 (mouse placenta [19] and human placenta [26]), whereas another study was not able to detect placental TPH1 (mouse and human placentas [25]). It is, therefore, not fully clear as to whether the placenta has the necessary machinery to synthesize 5-HT from maternal tryptophan. Other literature suggests that maternal platelets serve as the exogenous source for the delivery of 5-HT to the fetus [5,25]. Maternal platelets degranulate in the intervillous space of the placenta, thereby releasing maternal 5-HT into the placenta. Subsequently, this maternal 5-HT is transferred through the placenta to the fetus. This transfer is facilitated by, among others, the fetal isoform of 5-HTT and organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3) [25]. However, Bonnin and colleagues could not find support for the hypothesis that maternal platelets serve as the exogenous source of 5-HT to the fetus. That is, 5-HT levels in the forebrain of 5-HTT heterozygotic embryos from 5-HTT knockout dams did not differ from those of 5-HTT heterozygotic embryos from 5-HTT wildtype dams [19]. It should be mentioned that the placenta does express monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), an enzyme responsible for 5-HT breakdown [27]. Hence, this enzyme may influence placental 5-HT levels and thus control the regulation of fetal 5-HT. Despite the unclarities, the placenta-derived 5-HT content (referring to both placenta and platelet 5-HT supply) is expected to play vital roles in the regulation of fetal processes. This exogeneous source is mainly provided to the fetus throughout the first half of the pregnancy, which is around the same time as 5-HT-regulated developmental events including corticogenesis and circuitry maturation occur [2]. For this reason, gestational factors affecting not only an offspring’s raphe-produced 5-HT content but also placenta-derived 5-HT content can have substantial effects on an offspring’s early brain development.

1.3. Aim of Review

We performed an extensive literature search up to February 2020 using the PubMed database. The key characteristics of referred human and animal studies are shown in Table S1 and S2, respectively. The objective of this review is to carry out a comprehensive approach towards gestational factors affecting the fetal 5-HT system and as a result may affect an offspring’s brain development and behavior regarding neuropsychiatric disorders. We first introduce this topic by providing background information concerning 5-HT-ergic neuromodulatory effects on brain development (Section 2). Thereafter, we highlight what is currently known about the effects of gestational factors on an offspring’s brain 5-HT system and neuropsychiatric disorders related to brain development and behavior (Section 3). Gestational factors include maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diet composition, stress, 5-HT-related medication, and immune activation. Finally, we discuss the (interactive) impact of the gestational factors on the placenta-derived and offspring’s raphe-produced 5-HT content, the related brain circuit development, and how these effects may provide risk of the onset of specific neuropsychiatric phenotypes later in life (Section 4). Noteworthy paternal and postnatal environmental factors, such as paternal genotype and maternal care, may influence an offspring’s 5-HT system and development as well. These factors have been discussed in detail previously (e.g., [28]) and are beyond the scope of this review.

2. Modulatory Effects of 5-HT on Brain Development

During development, 5-HT in the brain is involved in a variety of neurodevelopmental processes, such as neuronal proliferation and migration, as well as initial axon targeting and circuitry maturation [2]. Of note, 5-HTT and the vesicular monoamine transporter are transiently expressed on forebrain glutamatergic neurons [2,29]. This expression is observed before raphe nuclei-derived 5-HT-ergic projections are born until the second week of postnatal life [29]. Glutamatergic neurons in the forebrain are located in various cortical structures that play a role in complex behavior including the sensory cortex, prefrontal cortex (PFC), and hippocampus [2,30]. Furthermore, glutamatergic neurons project from the thalamus to the cortex (i.e., thalamocortical afferents). 5-HT accumulation in these glutamatergic neurons modulates responsiveness of neurons to guidance cues, and 5-HT may function itself as a guidance cue as well [31,32].
5-HT receptors within the brain are expressed on neurons as well as glial cells. As shown in Table 1, activation of neuronal 5-HT receptors is involved in the above-mentioned neurodevelopmental events (for more details see Section 2.1 and Section 2.2). Activation of astrocytic 5-HT receptors have been reported to play a role in neurogenesis and the release of the neurite-extending growth factor S100β (see review [11]). Interestingly, 5-HT regulates astrocytic activity, a cell type that has an important role in modulating synaptic function and network activity within a variety of brain areas including the PFC [33]. The microglial-expressed 5-HT2B receptor regulates 5-HT neurotransmission by releasing nitric oxide, cytokines, and glutamate, which, in turn, affect 5-HTT-mediated 5-HT clearance [34]. Moreover, microglia play an important role in brain maturation and inflammation. They are involved in cell positioning and survival and in synaptic patterning within various cortical structures including the sensory cortex, PFC, and hippocampus [35]. Regarding oligodendrocytes, elevated extracellular 5-HT levels negatively affect 5-HT2A-dependent oligodendrocytes’ survival (i.e., aberrant outgrowth, increased development-dependent cell death) leading to reduced myelination [36]. The recent investigations regarding the function of 5-HT and 5-HT receptors in the different glial cells are exciting and might result in refreshing new insights into the role of 5-HT in the development of these brain cells. Thus far, most studies have investigated the role of 5-HT on neuronal development.

2.1. Corticogenesis and Circuit Maturation

During embryonic development, 5-HT projections to the forebrain regulate certain aspects of corticogenesis, including neuronal migration and the proper positioning of pyramidal neurons and interneurons [2,37,38,39]. It has been shown that 5-HT-ergic fibers within cortical regions, including the medial PFC (mPFC), contact Cajal Retzius cells, and thereby possibly affect reelin release [40,41,42]. In turn, reelin affects the correct placement of pyramidal neurons in cortical layers [43]. How exactly 5-HT affects migration of pyramidal cells is still unclear. Another course of action via which the 5-HT system can influence neuronal migration involves the 5-HT receptors. The 5-HT6 receptor has been shown to mediate pyramidal neuron migration via controlling the activity of CDK5/p35, a master regulator of pyramidal neuron migration [44]. Interneuron migrational events are mediated through both the 5-HT6 and 5-HT3 receptors [39,44,45,46,47]. More specifically, activation of the 5-HT3 receptor increases calcium currents into the cell, thereby promoting the migratory speed of cortical interneurons during the invasion of the cortical plate. The modulation of calcium transients is speculated to be through the regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, also known as the NMDA receptors, and voltage-gated calcium channels [45,46].
5-HT also affects several other aspects of circuitry maturation, such as neurite outgrowth, pruning, and the remodeling of dendritic spines [48,49,50,51]. For example, activation of 5-HT receptors enhances neurite outgrowth and leads to neuronal survival [52,53]. The influence of 5-HT in neurite outgrowth is furthermore studied using a Pet-1 knockout animal model. Pet-1 is a key transcriptional regulator that controls 5-HT neuronal levels: depletion of this regulator results in a 70% reduction of raphe 5-HT neurons and an 80% reduction of forebrain 5-HT levels due to a diminished cortical innervation by 5-HT projections [54]. Such diminished 5-HT-ergic innervation leads to alterations in cortical interneuron activity as well as cortical neuron identity and placement and may result in an increase in cortical network excitability [55]. Pet-1 knockout mice also show elevated sensitivity to 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors, resulting in spontaneous synaptic activity [56].

2.2. Brain Circuits’ Structure and Function

Due to 5-HT’s role in neurodevelopmental events, changes in 5-HT levels can impact the maturation and the functioning of a variety of brain circuits, including thalamocortical and prefrontal-limbic circuits, as well as the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA)-axis. As described below, these circuits play an important role in the aetiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.
The thalamocortical projections mediate somatosensory (tactile) perceptions. Areas involved are the thalamus, the primary somatosensory barrel cortex, and the secondary somatosensory cortex. 5-HT accumulation in thalamocortical afferents plays a critical role in the formation of sensory cortices. Primary somatosensory barrel cortex development is greatly dependent on extracellular 5-HT concentrations regulated by the transient 5-HTT and 5-HT1B receptor expression on these thalamocortical afferents [32,57]. Activation of the 5-HT1B receptor has been shown to negatively regulate presynaptic glutamate release [58]. In turn, this negative regulation can instruct the clustering of postsynaptic excitatory synapses in the typical barrel formation [59]. Presynaptic 5-HT2A receptors, which are located at thalamocortical synapses throughout life, additionally control the NMDA-operated induction of thalamofrontal connectivity and the associated cognitive functions [60]. Moreover, somatosensory cortical inhibition, and, in turn, sensory processing, is affected by 5-HT-regulated astrocytic purinergic signaling [61]. Alterations in 5-HT levels can thus lead to structural and functional reorganization of thalamocortical afferents as well as intracortical microcircuitry. Altered development of sensory cortices will result in changes in the perception of sensory stimuli early in life. It has been shown that alterations in this circuitry can contribute to the development of pathologies, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and depression [62,63].
Another circuitry influenced by alterations in 5-HT levels is the prefrontal-limbic circuitry. This circuitry plays a crucial role in stress and emotional responses [64]. Areas include the mPFC, basal ganglia, amygdala, and hippocampus. 5-HT plays a prominent role in this circuitry as multiple receptors (e.g., 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A) are expressed in these areas [65]. In the mPFC, these receptors are mainly involved in modulating cortical activity. Whereas 5-HT1A receptors inhibit pyramidal neurons and interneurons via activation of GIRK channels, the 5-HT2A receptors excite these neurons via unknown mechanisms [66]. Indeed, drug-induced alterations in 5-HT2A receptor activity influence attention and impulsive behavior (see review [66]). This circuitry is often involved in the onset of various neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ASD, ADHD, anxiety, and depression [67,68].
The HPA-axis is yet another circuitry whose development can be influenced by alterations in 5-HT levels. It is a crucial neuroendocrine signaling system involved in physiological homeostasis and the adrenal glucocorticoid stress response [69]. The HPA-axis involves the hypothalamus where corticotrophin releasing factor is being produced, the pituitary that responds to corticotrophin releasing factor to produce the hormone adrenocorticotropin, and the adrenal cortex that responds to adrenocorticotropin to produce cortisol (in humans) or corticosterone (in rodents). Activation of this axis occurs via a discrete set of neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. These neurons are influenced by indirect input from limbic system-associated regions, including the mPFC, hippocampus, and amygdala. Accumulating data suggest a regulation of the corticotrophin releasing factor neuronal activity and thus activation of the HPA-axis via 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors at the hypothalamus and via 5-HT2C receptors at the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus [70,71]. A change in 5-HT levels results in altered 5-HT-ergic innervations in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and the hippocampus [72] and thereby can severely affect basal HPA-axis activity, predominantly at the level of the adrenal gland [73]. This, in turn, can lead to severe hormonal imbalances. Dysregulation of the HPA-axis is strongly implicated in the pathology of mood disorders, such as depression and anxiety disorders [74,75,76].

3. Gestational Factors Influence Fetal Development during the Embryonic Period and after Birth

3.1. 5-HT-ergic Maternal Genotype Influences the 5-HT System, Neurodevelopment, and Behavior in the Offspring

As proposed previously by Gleason and colleagues, maternal genetic variations affecting the 5-HT system (hereafter called maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype) are able to influence fetal development [77]. Changes in the 5-HT system can occur through alterations in placental and fetal 5-HT levels or through transmission of risk alleles. The effects of the transmission of risk alleles on an offspring’s brain development and behavior are discussed in other reviews (e.g., [21]). In short, maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype perturbs fetal 5-HT homeostasis by increasing or decreasing 5-HT supply. The animal studies addressed below suggest that the thalamocortical circuitry is particularly sensitive to maternal variance in 5-HT-ergic genotype.

3.1.1. Associations with Behavioral Changes in Offspring in Humans

A variety of human studies link maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype to differences in an offspring’s brain structure and function, as well as behavior. A well-known and common polymorphic variant is the 5-HT transporter-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR). This polymorphism consists of two variants, the short (S)-allelic and long (L)-allelic variant. The S-allelic variant confers reduced 5-HTT gene transcription, thereby reducing 5-HTT’s availability in cultured human lymphoblast cells and in the brain as measured via single photon emission computed tomography [78,79]. In one study, children heterozygous for 5-HTTLPR were divided into two groups depending on maternal 5-HTTLPR genotype, thus either S/S or L/L. Children from mothers homozygotic for the S allele were found to lift their pencils less often in a visuomotor performance task in comparison to children from mothers homozygotic for the L allele. This finding correlated with changes in their somatosensory cortex grey matter density. That is, children with denser grey matter lifted their pencils less often [80]. Interestingly, regarding associated neuropsychiatric disorders, children of 5-HTTLPR L-allele carrying mothers have a higher risk of ASD [81], while no association was found between 5-HTTLPR allelic variants and the occurrence of depression in mother–child groups [82]. Lower levels of maternal whole-blood 5-HT levels measured at mid-pregnancy were associated with the most severely affected ASD phenotypes [83]. The offspring of mothers carrying TPH1 loss-of-function mutations exhibited 1.5- to 2.5-times higher ADHD scores in comparison to controls and the offspring from fathers carrying such mutations [84]. Future studies with whole genome sequencing between mother and child and the neurobehavioral development of the child could potentially yield a guidance to whether which genotype combination exactly has an increased risk of the development of neuropsychiatric disorders.

3.1.2. 5-HT System Alterations in the Animal Offspring

To follow up on the human data, a variety of animal studies have linked maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype to structural and functional alterations in the offspring. For example, studies reported that maternal 5-HT1A receptor deficiency is associated with reduced juvenile ultrasonic vocalizations, adult anxiety-like traits in the offspring, increased stress responsiveness, and delayed development of the ventral dentate gyrus, independent of an offspring’s genotype [85,86]. Furthermore, mouse fetuses, capable of producing their own 5-HT but conceived by a TPH1 knockout mother (i.e., lacking 5-HT in the periphery), showed a reduced mitotic activity within the roof of the neocortex (future cerebral cortex) together with dramatic abnormalities in the shape of this region and of hindbrain regions [5]. In support, E18 TPH1 knockout embryos from TPH1 knockout dams showed also a decrease in proliferation rate in comparison to TPH1 wildtype embryos from TPH1 wildtype dams [87]. Another way to investigate maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype effects is the use of the 5-HTT Ala56 gain-of-function mutation mouse model [88]. In general, 5-HTT Ala56 mice display increased CNS 5-HT clearance, enhanced 5-HT receptor sensitivity, elevated peripheral blood 5-HT levels, and increased ASD-like behavior [89]. Offspring from Ala56 mothers displayed decreased placental and embryonic forebrain 5-HT levels and a broadening of 5-HT-sensitive somatosensory thalamocortical afferents at E14.5. The forebrain 5-HT homeostasis recovered at E18.5 [6], when 5-HT raphe fibers had reached the forebrain.

3.2. Maternal 5-HT-ergic-Related Diets Influence the Tryptophan Pathway, Neurodevelopment, and Behavior in the Offspring

Another route via which the mother can influence her offspring’s development involves her diet. Nutrients received from the mother via the placenta or during lactation are crucial for an offspring’s health and growth [90,91]. In the following sections, we describe the effects of maternal tryptophan-related diets, high-fat diets, and alcohol consumption on 5-HT-ergic brain development of the offspring. In short, depending on the composition of the diet, the mother can perturb fetal 5-HT homeostasis by increasing or decreasing fetal 5-HT availability and influencing the fetal 5-HT system in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, the raphe nuclei, and the mPFC.

3.2.1. Maternal Tryptophan-Related Diets Affect the Placental Tryptophan Pathway in Animals

The most obvious nutritional component that can affect 5-HT-ergic development in the offspring is tryptophan, the essential amino acid that serves as the precursor of 5-HT. Tryptophan is amongst others found in salmon, poultry, eggs, spinach, seeds, milk, soy products, and nuts. The greatest part of the consumed tryptophan is directly metabolized in the liver, the rest binds to albumin and circulates freely throughout the body [92]. Tryptophan supplements can be consumed to increase tryptophan availability and enhance 5-HT synthesis. Already in 1991, it was shown that oral administration of tryptophan during gestation in rodents increased fetal whole brain tryptophan and 5-HT levels [93]. A diet enriched with tryptophan (i.e., 50 g/kg) resulted in increased maternal, placental, and fetal tryptophan levels. As a result, both placental development and fetal growth were reduced, and pup death rate increased [94]. Less enriched tryptophan diets (i.e., ±10 g/kg) also resulted in peripheral hyperserotonemia and increased TPH activity in the gastrointestinal tract of dams and their pups [95,96,97]. However, opposed effects in the offspring’s brain (in contrast to the gastrointestinal tract) were reported due to low tryptophan enriched diets (i.e., ±10 g/kg). Namely, decreased frontal cortex 5-HT levels and TPH activity were found, probably caused by a delay in 5-HT axon outgrowth [96]. Remarkably, chronic deprivation of tryptophan (in contrast to enriched tryptophan diets) also resulted in decrements of dorsal raphe 5-HT-ergic neuron populations and neuronal migration disturbances, leading to an altered topography of the raphe nucleus (i.e., rostralization instead of caudalization of the dorsal raphe nucleus) [98]. Consequently, tryptophan-deprived diets resulted in decreased 5-HT levels in the PFC and decreased hippocampal but increased striatal 5-HT metabolism in adult offspring [99]. Such a diet deprived of tryptophan also resulted in a decrease in striatal brain derived neurotrofic factor (BDNF) levels and a reduction in hippocampal proliferation rate and in neuronal outgrowth, i.e., reduced dendritic spine density and abnormal dendrite swelling [99,100]. Notably, active maternal care seems to be reduced by a tryptophan-deprived diet and thus may aggravate the above described effects [99]. Depressive-like behavior in the offspring has also been reported upon neonatal tryptophan deprivation [99], which may be due to either a reduction in maternal care, disturbed brain maturation, or their interaction.
To ensure the transport of tryptophan from the mother to the fetus, a diet high in carbohydrates and low in proteins has been suggested [101]. Carbohydrates evoke insulin secretion. Insulin, in turn, reduces most large amino acids, with the exception of tryptophan [102]. In humans and rodents, the transfer of placental tryptophan from maternal blood into the fetal circulation is predominantly mediated by the so-called system A and system L transporters [103,104]. System A functions in a sodium-dependent manner to mediate the uptake of nonessential amino acids into the cell. In this way, a gradient is created that is used to drive the exchange for extracellular essential amino acids, such as tryptophan, via sodium-dependent system L [105]. Excessive amounts of nonessential amino acids in the maternal blood thus might increase the maternal-fetal transfer of essential amino acids, including tryptophan. Multiple animal studies investigated the effects of gestational low-protein diets on an offspring’s brain 5-HT system. Notably, some studies used isocaloric protein diets in which the low protein diets were adjusted with a higher content of carbohydrates, thereby creating low-protein high-carbohydrate diets. Such low-protein high-carbohydrate diets reduced maternal plasma tryptophan levels and increased maternal plasma 5-HT levels and the offspring’s brain 5-HT levels after birth [106,107]. It remains unclear whether the exposure to such diets decreases or increases placental and fetal 5-HT levels [106,107]. When using a low-protein high-carbohydrate diet supplemented with tryptophan, neither the maternal nor fetal 5-HT system is altered [108]. Importantly, when exposed to a prenatal carbohydrate-restricted diet consisting of similar protein levels, and thus tryptophan levels, as the control diet, fetal whole brain concentrations of tryptophan, 5-HT, 5-HIAA were reduced [109].
With regard to lasting effects within specific brain regions in the offspring, (isocaloric) maternal low-protein diets, irrespective of the gestational period, resulted in increased 5-HT levels in the mPFC, hypothalamus, and hippocampus throughout life [106,110,111,112]. However, a few studies were not able to replicate adult hypothalamic and hippocampal 5-HT increments [107,113,114,115]. Not only offspring’s 5-HT levels but also 5-HT-ergic receptors are influenced due to gestational exposure to low-protein diets. A prenatal isocaloric low-protein diet resulted in a reduced expression of the hypothalamic 5-HT2C receptor at birth and throughout life [107]. Similarly, a reduced hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor functionality has been reported [113,116]. Interestingly, Ye and colleagues recently reported that the reduced 5-HT1A receptor functionality was accompanied by an increased sensitivity to stress throughout life [116].

3.2.2. Maternal High-Fat Diet Reduces 5-HT Production in the Animal Offspring

Maternal high-fat diets throughout pregnancy result in an increased susceptibility to developing ASD, ADHD, anxiety, and depression. Potential mechanisms underlying offspring behavioral changes include maternal increases in nutrients (glucose and fatty acids) and hormones (insulin and leptin), maternal and placental increases in oxidative stress, and inflammatory cytokines. In turn, these maternal dysregulations increase the risk of placental dysfunction, as well as an increased inflammation in the fetal brain, alterations in the dopaminergic, and 5-HT-ergic systems in the fetal brain and perturbations in synaptic plasticity and the HPA-axis (see reviews [117,118,119,120]). Indeed, a perinatal high-fat diet in primates revealed an increase in fetal dorsal raphe nucleus TPH2 gene expression, and after birth, decrements in 5-HT levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, a reduction in TPH2 mRNA expression in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei, and an upregulation of the 5-HT1A receptor in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Interestingly, these effects were associated with increases in anxiety-like behavior in juvenile primates [121,122]. In rodents, similar findings were obtained, since pregestational together with perinatal high-fat diet resulted in an increase in dorsal hippocampal BDNF and ventral hippocampal 5-HT1A gene expression and in anxiety-like behavior in adult offspring. Although, the offspring conditioned fear response and exploratory behavior were not affected [123].

3.2.3. Maternal Alcohol Consumption Reduces Fetal 5-HT Production

Moderate to severe maternal alcohol consumption throughout pregnancy is associated with a disrupted brain development, attention deficits, hyperactivity, and impulsiveness in the offspring (see review [124]). Prenatal alcohol consumption is potentially linked to decreased 5-HT levels in maternal human serum and reduced 5-HTT binding in children’s medial frontal cortex [125,126]. Similarly, decreased rodent fetal whole brain 5-HT levels were reported, irrespective of the number of days exposed to alcohol [127,128,129]. The maternal alcohol-induced reduction in fetal 5-HT levels probably occurs due to reduced 5-HT-ergic neurons and TPH-positive cells within the raphe nuclei of the offspring [130,131,132,133,134]. These reductions have been linked to a lower expression of several pro-survival genes (i.e., the NF-κB-dependent anti-apoptotic genes: XIAP, cIAP1, cIAP2, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xl) and an increase in apoptotic cell death in the rat hindbrain [135,136]. Indeed, the migration and differentiation of 5-HT neurons towards their final position within the raphe nucleus was found to be diminished in the offspring by prenatal alcohol exposure [134]. Interestingly, such distortion in 5-HT-ergic neurons in the raphe nuclei could be prevented by maternal treatment with a 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist or a 5-HT1A receptor agonist [127,133,136,137]. More specifically, the 5-HT1A agonist, ipsapirone, which likely acts on somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors on both raphe neurons and astrocytes. Through agonistic activations of these cell types, ipsapirone prevented the reduction in expression of the pro-survival genes XIAP and Bcl-xl. Hence, these pro-survival genes might provide a mechanism into how ethanol-induced apoptosis can be protected via ipsapirone. [133,136]. Behaviorally, maternal alcohol-induced decrements in raphe 5-HT-ergic neurons resulted in a decreased susceptibility of and resistance to anxiety [131].
In rodents, maternal alcohol consumption not only results in alterations in 5-HT-ergic neurons, but also in 5-HT-ergic fibers from the raphe nuclei. More specifically, fewer 5-HT fibers were observed in E15- and E18-fetal’s brain in a variety of brain areas including the hypothalamus, hippocampus, and frontal and parietal cortices, and a reduction in the growth of the 5-HT-regulated somatosensory thalamocortical projections was observed [138]. Underdevelopment of the thalamocortical projections is thought to be the underlying cause of the volume reduction seen in the posterior medial barrel subfield (especially layer IV) and of the reduced numbers of neurons in this area. These alterations have been suggested to lead to compromised sensory modality [139]. Moreover, the 5-HTT gene expression and binding of the HPA-axis and prefrontal-limbic circuitry also seem to be sensitive to dysregulation evoked by prenatal alcohol exposure [140].

3.3. Maternal Stress Affects the 5-HT System, Neurodevelopment, and Behavior in the Offspring

Maternal stress (defined as physical and/or psychosocial stress during pregnancy) can negatively influence child health and a variety of pediatric aberrations have extensively been reported (for review [141]). The effects of maternal stress on the maternal HPA-axis resulting in excessive fetal cortisol levels has been most extensively described in literature. In recent reviews, the effects of maternal stress on the placental and fetal 5-HT systems is briefly discussed as potential underlying factor as well. These 5-HT alterations may affect fetal brain development and increase the risk of the onset of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as ASD, depression, and anxiety [141,142,143]. In the following sections, we will review human and animal studies describing the effects of maternal stress on 5-HT-related brain development and function in the offspring. In animals, stressors used include electric foot shocks, restraint under bright light, auditory stimuli, cold water immersion, forced swim, wet bedding, crowding, saline injection, and cage rotation. Some studies use one of these stressors to mimic maternal stress, while others make use of chronic unpredictable stress models whereby, in general, animals are exposed to up to two of these stressors daily. In short, maternal stress is associated with both increases and decreases in 5-HT levels in the offspring. Increases in 5-HT levels affect development of the thalamocortical circuitry, whereas decreases in 5-HT levels affect development of the prefrontal-limbic circuitry. The HPA-axis is affected in almost all maternal stress models, irrelevant of the offspring’s 5-HT level changes.

3.3.1. The Role of Prenatal Stress in Offspring Brain Development in Humans

Human studies clearly show that prenatal stress affects neurodevelopment including functional and structural brain connectivity alterations involving the amygdala and frontal cortex and changes in the HPA-axis functionality. In turn, these alterations induce long-lasting effects on children’s mental health (see review [144]). Studies concerning the role of maternal and fetal 5-HT levels in relation to stress, however, are scarce. Rotem-Kohavi and colleagues investigated neonatal brain function organization of children exposed to either maternal depression (indicative of maternal stress) only or selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and maternal depression. Neonates from the depressed-only group showed higher hub values (hubs are highly connected brain regions) in the left anterior cingulate, insula, caudate, and amygdala. Hub values of these regions in neonates of SSRI-depressed mothers did not differ from neonates of healthy mothers. These findings may suggest that SSRIs normalize the depression-induced alterations during brain development [145]. Consequently, both maternal depression and prenatal SSRI-exposure might have overlapping underlying mechanisms, which potentially involves the fetal 5-HT system. Indeed, high maternal anxiety, depression, and anger scores during and after pregnancy decreased neonatal peripheral 5-HT levels together with greater relative right frontal EEG activation, altered sleep patterns, and lower motor organization. However, no difference in maternal peripheral 5-HT levels were found during and after pregnancy [146].

3.3.2. Prenatal Stress Alters the 5-HT System in the Animal Offspring

During the embryonic period, maternal stress increases fetal brain 5-HT levels. An early study reported that chronic mild psychosocial prenatal stress increased maternal plasma tryptophan levels and increased levels of tryptophan, 5-HT, and 5-HIAA in fetal whole brain and neonatal cortex [147]. Maternal stress induced via either pregestational or prenatal chronic unpredictable stress led to increased forebrain, hippocampal, and hypothalamic 5-HT levels, decreased 5-HTT expression in both brain areas, and decreased hippocampal 5-HT1A receptor activity in the fetus [148,149]. However, animal studies have reported conflicting data regarding maternal stress-induced lasting effects on offspring’s 5-HT levels. Researchers found decreases in brain 5-HT levels of adolescent and adult offspring when using different maternal stress models. Upon maternal stress, hypothalamic, hippocampal, and mPFC 5-HT levels were reduced and PFC 5-HT metabolism was increased [150,151,152,153,154,155]. TPH2 gene and protein levels were decreased in the dorsal raphe nucleus, and the hippocampus and 5-HTT protein levels were increased in hippocampal and PFC brain regions [154,156]. Another group of researchers showed data in favor of maternal stress-induced increases in adult offspring 5-HT levels in similar brain regions and using similar maternal stress models. Maternal stress resulted in a decreased hippocampal 5-HTT and alterations in the dorsal raphe, i.e., increases in 5-HT levels and TPH2 gene expression and enhanced TPH2 immunoreactivities [157,158]. Of note, another study showed prenatal restraint stress-induced decreases in 5-HT-positive cell density and overall 5-HT immunoreactivity in the dorsal raphe nucleus of adult animals but increases in overall immunoreactivity in the mPFC and increased hippocampal TPH2 immunoreactivity. No difference was found in TPH2 immunoreactivity in either the dorsal raphe nucleus or the mPFC [159].

3.3.3. Prenatal Stress-Induced Alterations in Brain Circuits and Behavior in the Animal Offspring

The above-mentioned studies show not only alterations in offspring’s 5-HT levels in response to maternal stress but also imply neurodevelopmental changes. Prenatal chronic unpredictable stress not only increased embryonic forebrain 5-HT levels but also increased 5-HT+ fetal thalamic neurons and thalamocortical afferents [149]. Studies showing a decrease in an offspring’s 5-HT levels in response to maternal stress suggest alterations within the prefrontal limbic circuitry. Pregestational and prenatal stress reduced hippocampal neurogenesis and reduced synaptic plasticity (synaptophysin and PSD-95 densities) in the mPFC and hippocampus of adolescent rats [150,151,155,160]. Moreover, prenatal chronic unpredictable stress caused hippocampal structural modifications (decreases in ventral hippocampal sub-region volume together with a decrease in number of neurons; increases in dorsal hippocampal sub-region volume) [153]. Research supporting maternal stress-induced increases as well as decreases in an offspring’s brain 5-HT levels have suggested a maternal stress-induced over-activated HPA-axis in the offspring. Different maternal stress models increased fetal and adult offspring plasma and serum (baseline and stress-induced) corticosterone levels, corticotrophin releasing factor, and the hormone adrenocorticotropic and increased amygdala corticotrophin releasing factor gene expression [148,153,154,158,159]. Furthermore, diminished hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor levels and density were detected [158,160]. Of note, maternal stress-induced fetal changes in serum corticosterone and corticotrophin releasing factor have been suggested to cause the discussed 5-HT-ergic modifications. Whilst such changes in corticosterone in adulthood are proposedly caused by long-term changes in HPA function in response to the altered 5-HT-regulated cortical releasing factor neuronal activity [148].
Not only brain morphology but also behavior of the offspring is affected by maternal stress. Many studies show maternal stress-induced increases in offspring’s anxiety and depressive-like behavior, irrespective of the applied maternal stress model and 5-HT levels measured in the offspring [153,154,156,157,158,159,161,162,163]. Consistently, animals exposed to prenatal stress did not develop any form of stress adaptation [164]. However, in a few other studies prenatal stress did not affect or even decrease depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors [162,165]. Proposed mechanisms underlying these anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors are an increased HPA-axis reactivity, decreased transcriptional regulation factors CREB and BDNF in the prefrontal-limbic circuitry, and increases in placental inflammation and placental IGFBP-1 expression. Increases in this gene expression causes a decrease in available growth factors [153,154,158,161]. No clear association was found with hyperactivity or impulsivity, which are putative indicators for ADHD. Most studies did not find any effect, however one study reported hyperactive adult mice and two other studies reported hypo-locomotion [153,154,157,158,161,162,165]. Prenatal restraint stress and pregestational chronic unpredictable stress, respectively, decreasing and increasing offspring’s 5-HT metabolism, reduced social behavior in juvenile and adult offspring. Mechanisms underlying these behavior alterations probably include the above discussed reduced hippocampal plasticity and over-activated HPA-axis function [150,152,160]. Reduced social behavior has been suggested to be a potential indicative for the development of ASD-like behaviors [152].

3.4. Maternal Intake of 5-HT-ergic Medication Alters 5-HT Levels in Offspring and Affects Their Neurodevelopment and Behavior

Pregnant women suffering from depression, migraine, or schizophrenia are sometimes in need of medication during pregnancy. Medication is taken during 6% of all pregnancies [166]. Over the years, multiple reviews have been written trying to disentangle the effects attributable to prenatal SSRI exposure from the underlying maternal disorder and the maternal-child transmission of risk alleles to neuropsychiatric disorders. Due to inconsistent study results, review outcomes differ. There is a tendency, however, towards viewing SSRI exposure as a plasticity rather than a risk factor [167,168,169,170,171,172,173]. This means that SSRI exposure can positively or negatively influence offspring’s 5-HT system depending on other gestational factors. In the following sections, we describe the effects of maternal intake of 5-HT receptor (ant)agonists and SSRIs during pregnancy on offspring’s 5-HT-ergic brain development and neuropsychiatric disorders-related behaviors, referring to both human and animal studies. In short, there is quite some overlap between human and animal findings. Maternal SSRI intake alters fetal 5-HT levels; however, the direction remains unclear. Nevertheless, these fetal brain 5-HT alterations could explain the remarkable changes in fetal brain development related to the thalamocortical and prefrontal-limbic circuits, as well as the HPA-axis that we address in this review.

3.4.1. Maternal Intake of 5-HT Receptor (Ant)Agonist Might Affect the Unborn Child

Triptans are 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, which are often prescribed as medication against migraine and cluster headaches. Triptans cross the placenta [174] and, thus, may bind to these receptors in the fetal brain. Indeed, a clinical study showed an increased risk of attention problems in children prenatally exposed to triptans (particularly when exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy) [175]. Furthermore, antipsychotic medications, such as clozapine, have a high affinity as an antagonist/inverse agonist for (placental) 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors [176,177]. Therefore, clozapine might be able to influence the placental or fetal 5-HT system and thus fetal neurodevelopment.

3.4.2. Maternal SSRI Intake is Associated with Neural Changes and Behavior in Offspring in Humans

In many countries, provided guidelines prefer the use of psychotherapy and other non-pharmaceutical treatments as first-line treatments against mild to moderate depression during pregnancy. Antidepressants such as SSRIs are only preferred in severe cases of depression. However, current practice shows that most of the time antidepressants are still used as the primary treatment [178,179,180]. The effect of SSRIs during pregnancy on an offspring’s development has been examined frequently. Indications of a reduced brain maturation and neural development are the decrease in reelin and S100β found in infants of mothers exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy [181,182]. The programming of the HPA-axis seems to be altered as well, as reflected by increased serum corticosteroid binding globulin levels (even when controlling for maternal depression) and decreases in cortisol reactivity [183,184]. In support, Brennan et al. [184] suggested a moderate role for psychotropic medication (mainly SSRIs) in the relationship between maternal disorders during pregnancy and infant cortisol levels. Due to such changes, altered brain morphology is expected. Indeed, infants prenatally exposed to SSRIs have increased volumes of, and connectivity between, the amygdala and insular cortex [185]. Children prenatally exposed to SSRIs further displayed an increase in connectivity in the right medial frontal orbital gyrus [145]. Moreover, a recent study revealed that newborns prenatally exposed to SSRIs exhibited white matter changes in the basal ganglia and thalamus [186]. These white matter changes suggest that SSRI exposure affects axon myelination as well. As shown in Table 2, most human case-control and cohort studies have found an association between SSRI intake of the pregnant mother and risk of neuropsychiatric disorders (for more details see Table S1). In general, studies consider the maternal neuropsychiatric condition as an important confounding factor. Interestingly, even though the association with offspring depression decreased, the association stayed significant when comparing SSRI-depressed mothers with depressed-only mothers instead with healthy controls [187,188]. As to whether prenatal SSRI exposure evokes a risk of ASD development is unclear. Positive associations between prenatal SSRI exposure and ASD are mainly found in meta-analyses focusing on case-control studies and on early gestational exposure (pre-gestation and first trimester).

3.4.3. Maternal SSRI Intake Affects Animal Offspring 5-HT Signaling and Behavior

Numerous developmental consequences of gestational SSRI exposure (i.e., prenatal, neonatal, or perinatal) have also been reported in animal studies. These investigations mainly used healthy animals. To translate animal findings to the clinic, it is imperative to study gestational SSRI exposure not only in healthy animals but also in combination with maternal stress during pregnancy. As discussed below, gestational SSRI exposure seems to be able to mitigate some of the developmental effects of prenatal stress. It is, however, also able to alter developmental mechanisms and behaviors without counteracting prenatal stress; similar to the human study of Rotem-Kohave et al. [145]. That both gestational SSRI exposure and prenatal stress can influence brain development independent of each other is also highlighted in another review focusing specifically on hippocampal plasticity [203].
Animal models reported behavioral changes that partly correspond to those found in human studies (Table 3 & Table S2). Like in humans, rodents gestationally exposed to SSRIs do not seem to show increases in hyperactivity or impulsivity. As in human studies, several, but not all, studies do show an increase in anxiety- and depression-like behavior due to gestational SSRI exposure. There is no clear reason why studies using fluoxetine during a similar period and of similar concentrations evoke different depressive-like outcomes across studies. Different outcomes might be related to the specific SSRI, SSRI concentration, or behavioral test used. For instance, studies that tested citalopram or used the novelty suppressed feeding test (a test suggested to detect behaviors related to anxiety as well as depression [204]), mostly suggest an increased anxiety-like behavior. Studies using the highest fluoxetine concentrations resulted in decreased anxiety levels. Studies without significant differences mainly used the elevated plus maze as behavioral test (a test supposedly primarily detecting anxiety levels [204]) and low fluoxetine concentrations. Regarding ASD, rodent studies often investigate alterations in the sensory system, repetitive behavior, and social behavior (including social preference, social play, and social interaction). Gestational SSRI-exposed offspring mostly show an impaired social preference and social play behavior. Inconsistencies concerning social play and social interaction outcomes are probably due to environmental differences, i.e., semi-natural environment versus familiar versus unfamiliar playmates and juvenile versus adolescent versus adulthood. An earlier review of Gemmel et al. [151] suggested that the timing of gestational SSRI exposure might explain differences in social behavior. However, this is not visible when looking at the current available literature (Table 3). Nonetheless, overall, ASD-related behavior seems to be affected by SSRIs.
A few studies investigated the effects of gestational SSRI exposure on the 5-HT system of the offspring. Offspring of pregnant mice that were perinatally treated with fluoxetine and sertraline or prenatally with escitalopram exhibited whole brain decreases in MAOA expression and whole brain increases in cortical expression of TPH2, 5-HTT, and 5-HT1A/2A/C receptors [218,221,227]. These molecular changes likely lead to increased 5-HT signaling. However, other studies showed a reduction in brain 5-HT levels in the offspring. More specifically, perinatal fluoxetine resulted in decreased juvenile whole-brain 5-HT levels [165,220]. Neonatal escitalopram exposure led to decreased adult hippocampal 5-HT levels along with reduced 5-HTT binding in the median and dorsal raphe nucleus [212]. Notably, neonatal fluoxetine did not alter adult 5-HT levels in the mPFC, hippocampus, and somatosensory cortex [206,212]. Contradicting findings are also seen in studies investigating the effects of gestational SSRI exposure on prenatally stress exposed offspring. Prenatal citalopram exposure has been reported to normalize prenatal chronic unpredictable stress-induced increases in fetal forebrain 5-HT levels [149]. Neonatal fluoxetine exposure to prenatally restraint stressed offspring decreased hippocampal 5-HT levels [233]. Gestational SSRI intake also normalized maternal stress-induced decreases in an offspring’s 5-HT level. For instance, pre-adolescent offspring from dams pregestationally exposed to chronic unpredictable stress and perinatally treated with fluoxetine, reported that fluoxetine treatment normalized the diminished 5-HT levels and 5-HT metabolism in the PFC and the hippocampus [150,151].

3.4.4. Maternal SSRI Intake Affects Animal Offspring’s Brain Circuitry Development

Changes in offspring’s 5-HT system may result in altered functioning of specific brain circuits. One of the circuits that is mainly affected in the offspring from neonatal SSRI exposed healthy dams is the thalamocortical circuitry. Alterations within this circuitry are associated with the above discussed sensory abnormalities and decreased social behavior [206,225,229]. Fluoxetine exposure led to a reduction in the complexity of thalamocortical afferents projecting to layer four of the barrel cortex (i.e., fewer/shorter branches) [225]. Further, paroxetine exposure was associated with altered refinement, but not the formation, of dense clusters of these afferents (i.e., reduced barrel size and enlarged septa) [234]. Neonatal citalopram exposure suppressed the amplitude and prolonged the delay of sensory-evoked potentials, reduced the power and frequency of the early gamma oscillations, and suppressed sensory evoked and spontaneous neuronal firing in the barrel cortex of neonatal rats. These effects were absent during adolescence, indicating that the changes were transient [235]. Finally, retrograde tracer studies in neonatal fluoxetine exposed rats revealed a change in the morphology of oligodendrocytes in the corpus callosum. This change was associated with altered axon myelination in the corpus callosum and reduced connectivity between the primary somatosensory cortices across the hemispheres [229]. Interestingly, prenatal citalopram intake was found to decrease p11 expression in fetal thalamic neurons. The authors suggest that this decrease in p11 expression alters 5-HT signaling through regulating the translocation and signaling of 5-HT1B/D receptors, thereby potentially disturbing thalamocortical circuitry formation [236]. This might explain how prenatal citalopram exposure decreases and, therefore, normalizes the increased 5-HT-containing thalamocortical afferents evident in prenatal stressed fetus [149]. Thus, while neonatal SSRI exposure in healthy animals negatively influence thalamocortical circuitry development, these alterations seem to normalize the gestational stress-induced effects.
The HPA-axis is a brain circuitry, which is mainly affected by gestational SSRI intake studied in the offspring from stressed dams. Alterations have been related to the earlier discussed increases in anxiety-like behavior (probably via increased 5-HT2C receptor gene expression in the PFC and amygdala) and enhanced social preference [213,232]. While prenatal fluoxetine in healthy dams reduced stress-induced plasma corticosterone levels in adult male offspring, neonatal fluoxetine in healthy dams increased these levels in the serum of adult male offspring. In both studies, basal corticosterone levels were unaffected [213,222]. Consistently, when studying perinatal fluoxetine in prenatal restraint stressed offspring, fluoxetine normalized prenatal stress-induced increases in HPA-axis reactivity in adulthood. This time, however, perinatal fluoxetine also decreased baseline serum corticosterone levels [161]. Such a decrease in plasma basal corticosterone levels was also found in adolescent male rats after neonatal fluoxetine exposure. This time, however, prenatal restraint stress did not affect these levels [237]. That perinatal SSRI exposure, irrespective of prenatal stress, can impact the HPA-axis has been shown in other studies as well. Perinatal fluoxetine resulted in increased serum corticosteroid binding globulin, decreased hippocampal synaptic protein (PSD-95), reduced glucocorticoid receptor density in the hippocampus, and reduced glucocorticoid receptor density in the mPFC [150,160,203,237].
Another brain circuitry affected by gestational SSRI exposure in both healthy and prenatally stressed animal models is the prefrontal-limbic circuitry. A few studies suggest a link between presynaptic 5-HT1A activity and social interaction or depressive-like behavior and between hippocampal neurogenesis and anxiety-like behavior [210,213,218]. Other studies propose the decrease in mPFC dendritic complexity as one of the underlying mechanisms in decreased social recognition and increases in anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors [7,206,216,223]. Neonatal fluoxetine did not affect adult hippocampal neurogenesis but normalized decreased hippocampal neurogenesis evident in prenatally restraint-stress adolescent offspring [162,213]. Reduced adult hippocampal neurogenesis in males from pregestationally stressed dams was not normalized by perinatal fluoxetine. Moreover, females from this study showed no changes due to maternal stress but did show increased adult hippocampal neurogenesis as a consequence of the perinatal fluoxetine exposure [160]. Another study showed increases in prefrontal-striatal connectivity/synchronization after prenatal exposure to citalopram. Underlying mechanisms may include a decrease in the complexity of prefrontal neurons (i.e., fewer/shorter branches and reduce PSD-95), supposedly via 5-HT3-regulated increases in reelin [7,160,216,238]. Of note, other studies have reported an increased synaptic plasticity [150,206]. Another mechanism suggested is the disturbed mPFC excitation/inhibition as determined by a downregulation in NMDAR1 and CaMKIIα expression and an increase in GABAergic interneurons in the mPFC. The changes related to the mPFC excitation/inhibition might again be a compensation for the overall increased prefrontal excitation [223,238]. In support, prenatal fluoxetine exposure caused augmented spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission onto the layer 5 pyramidal neurons within the mPFC and led to an increase in the migratory speed of inhibitory cortical interneurons [239]. This is probably due to an upregulation in the 5-HT2A receptor signaling or may be related to a reduced expression of the transcription factor Npas4 [223,240]. Interestingly, alterations in the pyramidal neuron excitability seem to depend on the location. That is, an increased excitability was found in the prelimbic cortex, while in the infralimbic cortex a decreased excitability was found [7]. Adult male offspring neonatally exposed to fluoxetine showed an increase in the density of hippocampal immature neurons. In adult female offspring a decreased density was found [213]. Moreover, perinatal fluoxetine exposure resulted in decreased perineuronal net formation at postnatal day 17 (ongoing critical period [7]) and 24 (critical period closed [7]) in offspring’s hippocampus and basolateral amygdala [241]. Given that perineuronal nets increase with the maturation of neurons, the latter finding suggests that prenatal SSRI exposure delays the onset and the closure of a critical period in the development of the hippocampus and amygdala. Lastly, pregestational fluoxetine exposure affected 5-HT2C receptor gene expression and editing in neonatal amygdala and PFC. Maternal restraint stress prior to pregestational fluoxetine administration revealed that fluoxetine exposure can either reverse or enhance 5-HT2C receptor editing in the neonatal PFC [232].

3.5. Maternal Immune Activation Affects the Tryptophan Pathway and Neurodevelopment of Offspring

Recent reviews have proposed a role for maternal immune activation in the aetiology of ADHD, ASD, and depression and suggest a potential mediating role for the 5-HT system [242,243]. Immune activation during pregnancy occurs either upon a viral or a bacterial infection, or when there is a condition such as pre-eclampsia [244]. Pre-eclampsia is a complex multisystem disorder unique to the second half of pregnancy and marked by low platelet 5-HT levels [245]. Pre-eclampsia has been shown to play an important role in the development of neuropsychiatric disorders such as ASD [246,247,248]. In the following sections, we describe the effects of induced maternal immune activation on 5-HT-ergic brain development of the offspring of rodents. In short, maternal immune activation causes a decrease in an offspring’s brain 5-HT levels throughout life, independent of the method used and gestational period studied. During the embryonic period an acute increase in brain 5-HT levels may occur. The tryptophan and 5-HT-related brain areas that seem to be affected by maternal immune activation are located in the thalamocortical and the prefrontal-limbic circuits.

3.5.1. Activation of the Fetal Immune System Influences Animal Offspring

Experimentally, the consequences of maternal immune activation in fetal brain development are often studied in rodents using the immune stimulant polyriboinosinic–polyribocytidylic acid (Poly(I:C)), an endotoxin injection (Escherichia coli injection) or a flu exposure (influenza administration). Poly(I:C) affects maternal cytokine signaling, including interleukins (IL) such as IL-6. Since IL-6 seems to be able to pass the placenta, it might be able to affect fetal brain development [249,250]. It is noteworthy that not all studies found evidence of IL-6 placental–fetal transport [251]. IL-6 is able to trigger fetal inflammatory processes both directly via placental transfer and indirectly via placental inflammation [252]. This, in turn, can have widespread effects on brain development, including a decrease in the survival rate of fetal rostral raphe 5-HT neurons [253].

3.5.2. Changes in Placenta-Derived 5-HT Levels Influence the Animal Offspring

Besides cytokine-induced fetal 5-HT system alterations, maternal immune activation may also result in other 5-HT system alterations in either the mother or the placenta thereby affecting the offspring’s (neuro)development. A recent mouse study showed that even though Poly(I:C)-induced maternal immune activation was associated with a transient IL-6 increase in the maternal serum, there was no evidence of cytokine accumulation in the fetal brain [254]. Early-gestation poly(I:C) exposure evoked a transient increase in placental tryptophan levels and TPH1 gene expression and an increase in enzymatic activity. Placental MAOA gene expression was not affected [254]. Interestingly, when inducing maternal immune activation at mid- or late-gestation, the development of 5-HT-ergic neurons in the fetal hindbrain was not influenced [254,255]. This lack of effect is most likely because the hindbrain is not dependent anymore on placenta-derived 5-HT after E10.5. In contrast, E15–E17 endotoxin exposure did decrease dorsal raphe TPH2 neurons numbers and size when the offspring was investigated in adulthood [256].
A few studies investigated the effect of maternal immune activation on the fetal brain 5-HT system but obtained ambiguous results. Early-gestation-induced maternal immune activation increased 5-HT fetal forebrain levels, increased 5-HT-ergic neurons in the hindbrain, and changed forebrain circuitry formation (i.e., a reduction in 5-HT axon outgrowth into the forebrain) [254,257]. Late-gestation endotoxin injection in rats did not affect fetal cortical 5-HT levels but decreased fetal brain TPH1 gene expression [256]. Importantly, human intrauterine bacterial infection, as well as rodent-induced maternal immune activation, increased the placental kynurenine/tryptophan ratio [254,258,259]. In addition, the fetal rodent brain levels of kynurenine and its metabolites, quinolinic acid and kynurenine acid, were increased [254,258]. Thus, maternal inflammation may shunt placental tryptophan metabolism away from 5-HT to the kynurenine pathway.

3.5.3. Maternal Immune System Activation Influences Brain Circuits and Behavior in Animal Offspring

Multiple studies investigated the lasting effects of maternal immune activation on an offspring’s brain 5-HT system. Together, these studies show that, regardless of the gestational period, induction method, and animal’s age and species, maternal immune activation decreases 5-HT levels in the offspring (blood serum [260]; cerebellum [261,262]; frontal and parietal cortices, and the hippocampus [255,256,257,263]). This change was accompanied by a decrease in whole brain TPH2 and 5-HTT gene expression and an increase in the gene expression of TPH1 [256]. Early-gestation poly(I:C) did not affect 5-HT levels in the PFC, amygdala, ventral tegmental area, and the substantia nigra pars compacta [257,263]. Interestingly, while total striatal 5-HT levels were unaffected [257], subdividing the area showed a reduction in 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels in the nucleus accumbens but not in the caudate putamen [263]. On the contrary, poly(I:C) exposure at E15 decreased 5-HT and 5-HIAA levels in the caudate putamen but not in the nucleus accumbens of adolescent and adult offspring [264].
Beside the discussed decreases in an offspring’s brain 5-HT levels, these studies also reported changes in brain and behavior. Late-gestation maternal immune activation can lead to excitotoxic injury, such as increased apoptosis in the ventrobasal thalamus and a disrupted thalamocortical development in newborn pups (i.e., a decrease in 5-HT-mediated thalamocortical fibers and a decrease in 5-HTT expression in the somatosensory cortex) [255]. Early- to mid-gestation maternal immune activation-induced decreases in an offspring’s brain 5-HT levels were paralleled by sensory abnormalities and a reduced social contact [260,264]. Additionally, male offspring showed increased locomotor and stereotypic behaviors. As suggested by the author, these findings might be indicative of the development of ASD-like behaviors [260]. Both early- and late-gestational activation of the maternal immune system causes decreases in an offspring’s brain 5-HT levels and results in anxiety-like behavior [256,260]. Offspring gestationally exposed to poly(I:C) stimulation, specifically during mid-gestation, showed an increase in depressive-like behaviors together with increased hippocampal 5-HTT levels [265].

4. Discussion

4.1. Gestational Factors Influence Placenta-Derived and Raphe-Nuclei-Produced 5-HT Content

In the main body of this review, in Section 3, we described how five gestational factors affect the 5-HT system, the brain development, and the behavior in the offspring. In short, all reviewed gestational factors influence the 5-HT systems, by either increasing or decreasing 5-HT levels in the mother, the placenta and in the fetus, resulting in a risk of neuropsychiatric disorders in the offspring. In this Section, 4.1, we summarize the main findings related to the gestational factor influences on an offspring’s 5-HT system, and we discuss potential underlying mechanisms (Table 4). Subsequently, in Section 4.2, we discuss how the interaction between gestational factors might amplify or counteract each other’s impact on the fetal serotonergic system. Next, we summarize and discuss in Section 4.3 the main findings related to the gestational-factor-induced 5-HT-ergic alterations of the structure and function of the thalamocortical areas, the prefrontal-limbic areas, and the HPA axis. Lastly, in Section 4.4, we report the main findings related to the gestational-factor-induced risk of neuropsychiatric disorders, and we discuss the potency of 5-HT-ergic dependent alterations as underlying mechanisms within the mentioned circuits.
The influence of maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype depends on the gene investigated and whether the gene variance involves a loss- or gain-of-function mutation. Maternal genotype might influence the fetal 5-HT system through a variety of mechanisms altering the placenta-derived 5-HT content. The genotype of the mother may influence maternal gastrointestinal tract function [266] or its responsivity to gut bacteria (i.e., microbiome [267]). Importantly, the gastrointestinal tract and microbiome, in turn, influence maternal blood tryptophan and platelet 5-HT levels [267,268]. Consequently, changes in maternal tryptophan or 5-HT levels potentially alter 5-HT uptake into, and transfer through, the placenta. Maternal genotype may affect placental 5-HT synthesis (in cases of TPH1 and/or TPH2 polymorphisms) and placental immune- and metabolic-related activations (in case of maternal 5-HTT availability [6]). In turn, affecting placental 5-HT homeostasis. As maternal risk alleles can be transferred to the offspring, maternal genotype is also able to influence offspring’s 5-HT system directly (i.e., 5-HT production, availability, and receptor activity).
Regarding 5-HT-related maternal diet, tryptophan-deprived diets, high-fat diets, and alcohol consumption seem to mainly reduce an offspring’s 5-HT levels. Instead, high-tryptophan intake and protein-restricted carbohydrate-enhanced diets seem to be associated with increased 5-HT levels in offspring. Importantly, for some of the diets, the direction of change seems to differ depending on the time measured (embryonic vs. throughout life). Longitudinal studies are highly advised to investigate this research question. Potential mechanisms underlying maternal diets that are specific for tryptophan alterations and protein-restricted carbohydrate enhancements are changes in maternal tryptophan and 5-HT levels and their placental uptake and, consequently, the transfer to the fetus. The maternal alcohol consumption-induced reduction in fetal brain 5-HT levels might be a consequence of alterations within the intestinal microbiota composition and their function [269,270]. In turn, as shown for the maternal genotype, these alterations can influence maternal blood tryptophan and platelet 5-HT levels [267,268]. A similar mechanism can be suggested for the maternal high-fat diet-induced changes in offspring brain 5-HT levels [271,272].
Maternal stress increased fetal brain 5-HT levels in the few studies investigating the 5-HT levels during the embryonic period. After birth, both increased and decreased 5-HT levels have been reported after maternal stress. Although there are many differences between maternal stress models, even studies with similar models, time-windows gender, or ages find opposing effects of maternal stress on the offspring’s 5-HT system (e.g., regarding 5-HT levels and the expression of TPH2 and 5-HTT; Table S2). This suggest that these contradicting results in 5-HT levels after birth are due to complex underlying mechanisms. We would like to highlight the maternal stress-induced decrease in the expression of Lmx1b, a transcription factor essential for central 5-HT neurons differentiation and maintenance in the fetal hindbrain and adult raphe nuclei [164]. The decrease in this transcription factor could potentially lead to decrements in the raphe 5-HT system development and subsequently diminished brain 5-HT production. Increases in offspring’s brain 5-HT levels are hypothesized to be related to alterations in placenta-derived 5-HT. Increased maternal tryptophan might either be transported directly to the fetus or may increase maternal or placental 5-HT levels [142]. Alterations in the developing raphe nuclei system and the transient 5-HTT expression might be a compensatory mechanism of increased placenta-derived 5-HT content.
It is generally believed that maternal SSRI intake increases fetal 5-HT levels (see review [273]). Many of the behavioral and mechanistic neurodevelopmental effects of gestational SSRI exposure resemble those observed in rodents lacking the 5-HTT [29,239,240,274,275,276]. Since 5-HTT knockout in rodents is associated with increased extracellular levels of 5-HT [277], it can be speculated that gestational SSRI exposure also increases fetal 5-HT levels. However, the few studies that investigated the actual 5-HT levels of the offspring are inconsistent and cannot be explained by the use of different types of SSRIs nor by differences in exposure periods. Interestingly, studies investigating both gestational stress and SSRI exposure mainly show that SSRI exposure normalizes the prenatal stress-induced effects on offspring’s 5-HT levels, irrespective of whether prenatal stress increases or decreases 5-HT levels in the offspring (Table S2). Maternal 5-HT-ergic medication intake can influence the fetal 5-HT system through multiple mechanisms. First, medication decreases maternal platelet 5-HT levels [278,279], which potentially decrease 5-HT placental transfer. In addition, since maternal blood platelets and the placenta both express 5-HTT [280,281], medication such as SSRIs may affect placental function as well as 5-HT transfer. Moreover, most 5-HT-ergic medications are able to pass through the placenta, thereby creating the possibility to bind to the fetal 5-HTT and influence the offspring’s brain 5-HT receptor expression [282,283].
Maternal immune activation decreases the offspring 5-HT levels after birth, independent of the method used and gestational period induced. However, measurements during fetal development are ambiguous and may suggest a temporal increase in 5-HT levels. Placenta-derived cytokines are able to activate fetal inflammation, which might affect 5-HT-positive cell survival in the raphe nuclei. High maternal IL-6 has been suggested to increase placental A/L system amino acid transport [284] and, thus, potentially increases placental tryptophan transfer and thereby also fetal brain 5-HT levels. On the contrary, a decrease in placenta-derived 5-HT levels may be because pro-inflammatory cytokines in the maternal blood activate IDO and TDO, which in turn, trigger the production of kynurenine. In this way maternal inflammation may shunt placental tryptophan metabolism away from 5-HT to the kynurenine pathway. In support, maternal immune activation increased IDO expression in the placenta and in the fetal periventricular region together with an intense microglial activation within the fetal periventricular region [254,258].

4.2. Synergistic Impact on 5-HT-ergic Systems and Fetal Neurodevelopment

As shown in Figure 2, the discussed gestational factors do not only independently affect the 5-HT system, and thereby the brain development of the offspring, but also in interaction. As discussed in Section 3.2.2, high-fat diets leading to obesity during pregnancy increase the risk of maternal and placental immune activation through increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [117,120] but also the risk of pre-eclampsia via reduced placental vascularity and blood flow leading to a restriction in placental nutrient delivery [284,285]. Similarly, maternal stress provokes an increase in maternal immune activation, as shown by human plasma and mice placental IL-6 increments [286,287]. Thus, although some interactions between maternal factors might result in logical consequences on the developing 5-HT system, other effects of maternal factor interactions are not that natural and need more investigation in future studies.
As described in Section 3.3, Section 3.4 and Section 3.5, the three gestational factors of maternal depression, maternal SSRI intake, and pre-eclampsia can alter placental and fetal 5-HT levels and increase risk of ASD. These factors may interact, given that in humans prenatal antidepressant intake by depressed pregnant women increases the risk of pre-eclampsia [288,289,290]. Interestingly, this risk increases when SSRI treatment continue in the second trimester [288,291]. Of note, another study was unable to replicate these findings [292]. Importantly, a combined exposure of these three gestational factors may amplify their actions on the maternal and fetal 5-HT system and might increase the risk of the development of ASD in the offspring. The synergistic effect of prenatal SSRI intake and pre-eclampsia can be explained by SSRI-induced increases in placental 5-HT2A receptor activity [26]. As the 5-HT2A receptor is a key regulator of placentation (influencing placental growth and function), it is suggested to play a role in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia [293,294], thereby influencing the maternal immune system activity. However, the association between pre-eclampsia and 5-HT2A receptor function was not supported in another study [295]. Moreover, it is hypothesized that factors including maternal diet and genetics can influence the 5-HT2A receptor promoter [296]. Hence, maternal diet and genetics might influence the synergistic effect of prenatal antidepressant intake and pre-eclampsia.
Previous studies have demonstrated that SSRIs have reduced efficacy in humans with low 5-HTT expression due to an inherited 5-HTTLPR S-allele [297]. As such, carrying the 5-HTTLPR S-allelic variant could be a factor providing some protection against the unwanted effects of SSRIs on an offspring’s neurodevelopment. If so, the mother may simultaneously have less benefit from the treatment, increasing the impact of maternal stress and depression on the fetal development. The 5-HTTLPR has also been suggested to affect stress tolerance. Specifically, 5-HTTLPR-SS mothers of ASD children reported more stressors and an increased reactivity to these stressors in comparison to 5-HTTLPR-LL mothers. This suggests that this specific maternal genotype together with prenatal stress increases offspring’s risk of ASD [298]. In support, mouse studies showed that a combination of maternal stress and maternal 5-HTT genotype affects epigenetic mechanisms in the embryo resulting in social deficits but not anxiety-like behavior [299,300]. Moreover, maternal TPH2 functional haplotypes influence maternal depression during and after pregnancy [301].
Maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype can affect the amount of tryptophan and 5-HT that is released into the maternal and placental circulation (i.e., altered gastrointestinal tract function or responsivity to the gut microbiome). In this way, maternal genotype may influence the impact of the other gestational factors. The described examples of interactions between maternal factors might be altered by the potential of the maternal diet composition to impact a potential negative effect of other maternal factors. A protein-rich carbohydrate-low diet potentially decreases the transport of tryptophan, while a protein-low carbohydrate-high diet seems to increase this transport. As a result, a protein-restricted carbohydrate-enriched diet or tryptophan-high diet may increase the reduced brain 5-HT levels evident in offspring exposed to the maternal alcohol consumption (3.2.3) and maternal immune activation (3.5). Further exploration of this potential approach is needed. It is imperative to keep in mind that both too low and too high 5-HT levels negatively affect fetal neurodevelopment.

4.3. Gestational Factors Influence Offspring’s Brain Circuits

There seems to be a relationship between maternal, placental, and fetal 5-HT system changes during neurodevelopmental events and the formation and function of the three considered brain circuits we have discussed. The thalamocortical circuitry is commonly targeted by (1) the maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, (2) alcohol consumption, (3) stress resulting in increased offspring’s brain 5-HT levels, (4) SSRI intake, and 5) late-pregnancy immune activation. While a reduction in fetal 5-HT levels (maternal 5-HTT genotype, alcohol consumption, prenatal SSRI exposure, and immune activation) resulted in a loss or a broadening of thalamocortical afferents, an increase in 5-HT fetal levels (maternal stress & potentially neonatal SSRI intake in healthy dams) resulted in an increase in 5-HT-containing thalamocortical afferents or fewer branches. Interestingly, these findings may indicate that embryonic 5-HT alterations (prenatal SSRI exposure) result in opposing effects on thalamocortical development in comparison to the direct effects on an offspring’s 5-HT system seen after neonatal SSRI exposure.
The prefrontal-limbic circuitry contains brain functions, which are also often influenced by gestational factors. This circuitry is targeted by (1) stress models resulting in reduced offspring’s brain 5-HT levels, (2) SSRI intake, (3) immune activation, and (4) potentially by all discussed maternal diets. Maternal diets are associated with the offspring 5-HT system alterations in prefrontal-limbic subareas primarily. Focusing on hippocampal neurogenesis, it has been shown that maternal stress reduces this process while maternal SSRI exposure is often reported to increase hippocampal neurogenesis. Maternal SSRI exposure can, therefore, potentially adjust the maternal stress-evoked effects. However, SSRI-induced changes in hippocampal neurogenesis seem to differ depending on gender and age. Consequently, in some cases perinatal SSRI exposure alters hippocampal neurogenesis negatively. Furthermore, structural plasticity was reduced in offspring when exposed to either tryptophan-deprived diets, maternal stress, or SSRI intake by healthy dams. Interestingly, both tryptophan-deprived and maternal stress exposures were associated with decreased 5-HT levels in the offspring’s prefrontal-limbic areas.
The HPA-axis is affected by fetal 5-HT changes via influences from (1) maternal stress resulting in increased and decreased offspring’s brain 5-HT levels, (2) SSRI intake, and (3) potentially by maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, protein-restricted carbohydrate-enhanced diets, and alcohol consumption. Maternal genotype and diets may affect the HPA-axis via influencing 5-HT-ergic receptor expressions. Maternal stress and SSRI intake have a more widespread effect by altering not only receptor expression but also by altering the negative feedback loop through, amongst others, corticosterone/cortisol levels and glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus. Maternal stress, regardless of the direction of altered brain 5-HT levels, seems to cause a hyper-reactive HPA-axis. On the other hand, most studies concerning perinatal SSRI exposure (human, healthy, and perinatally stressed animal studies) indicate a decrease in HPA-axis reactivity, thereby normalizing the maternal stress evoked effects. Importantly, perinatal SSRI exposure also impacts the HPA-axis without normalizing maternal stress (e.g., reducing glucocorticoid receptor density in different brain areas).

4.4. Gestational Factors Can Influence the Risk to Develop Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Gestational-factor-evoked alterations in the offspring’s brain 5-HT system seem to correlate with an increased risk in the onset of certain neuropsychiatric disorders (Figure 3). For instance, maternal TPH1 loss-of-function mutations have been associated with an increased risk of developing ADHD. As maternal TPH1 mutations alter embryonic cell proliferation rate and cause abnormalities in the development of embryonic cortical regions, these alterations may underlie the increased risk of ADHD. It can be speculated that these effects are caused by diminished fetal brain 5-HT levels, as TPH1 mutations probably result in lower maternal platelet and placenta 5-HT levels and, thus, a diminished exogenous 5-HT content. Furthermore, attentional problems were seen when exposed to Triptans, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist. Indeed, genetic mutations within these receptors have been associated with the risk of ADHD [302,303].
Regarding ASD, an increased risk was reported in children of 5-HTTLPR-LL-carrying mothers and in animals exposed to maternal stress or maternal immune activation. Interestingly, enhanced 5-HTT expression seems to result in a decrease in fetal forebrain 5-HT levels and alterations within the thalamocortical circuitry (5-HTT gain-of-function mutation and prenatal SSRI exposure). These findings may suggest a potential mechanism through which maternal 5-HTT genotype influences the onset of ASD. A hyper-reactive HPA-axis and a reduced structural plasticity within the prefrontal-limbic circuit are suggested as underlying mechanisms after exposure to maternal stress and SSRI intake. Importantly, there are a few indicators suggesting that maternal SSRI intake after maternal stress restores the stress-induced changes in the HPA-axis. More elaborated studies are highly advised to investigate this potential further. Still, both human and animal work concerning SSRI exposure is very inconsistent but overall suggests a risk of ASD, irrespective of the effects of prenatal stress. This association, however, might change depending on the environment (e.g., maternal 5-HT-ergic genetic variance affects fetal 5-HT levels, maternal predisposition to neuropsychiatric disorders, and SSRI efficacy). It would be of importance to take such environments into consideration as potential interacting factors.
Increased anxiety-like behavior in the offspring is reported after gestational exposure to maternal genotype, high-fat diets, alcohol consumption, stress, SSRI intake, and immune activation. Research outcomes may imply that the SSRI-exposure-induced behavior is more related to depressive instead of anxiety-like behavior. Interestingly, high-fat diets, alcohol consumption as well as maternal immune activation are proposed to result in decreased 5-HT levels in offspring, which may imply a relationship between high anxiety levels and gestational-factor-induced decreases in an offspring’s 5-HT levels. Interestingly, these factors (including stress models resulting in reduced offspring’s brain 5-HT levels) are associated with a disrupted structure and function of the prefrontal-limbic circuitry. A hyper-reactive HPA-axis has been proposed as an underlying mechanism as well.
Maternal immune activation, stress as well as SSRI intake during pregnancy are associated with an increase in depressive-like behavior in the offspring. Interestingly, thus far only one animal study investigated prenatal SSRI exposure, rather than perinatal or neonatal exposure, and did not find any changes in depressive-like behavior [304]. This is consistent with findings from a human study showing that only late pregnancy SSRI exposure was associated with increased risk of depression [187]. These findings suggest that SSRI-induced effects on an offspring’s 5-HT-ergic system are more important than placental-derived 5-HT content.

5. Conclusions

Addressing both human and animal studies, we show that all gestational factors considered in the present review (maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diet composition, stress, 5-HT-related medication, and immune activation) affect both placenta-derived 5-HT and an offspring’s 5-HT production and availability. Due to these 5-HT changes, all discussed gestational factors are able to alter thalamocortical and/or prefrontal-limbic circuits and/or the HPA-axis and alter neuropsychiatry-related behaviors. Therefore, 5-HT changes induced by gestational factors may provide a risk of the onset of disorders like ASD, ADHD, anxiety, and depression. To date, research does not provide an answer to which extent placenta-derived 5-HT changes and direct changes to an offspring’s 5-HT system are causing the offspring’s brain and behavioral changes. Studies comparing first (placenta-derived 5-HT content) versus third trimester of pregnancy (offspring’s brain 5-HT production) can be helpful. SSRI-induced normalizations of abnormalities within the prefrontal-limbic and thalamocortical circuits evident in prenatally stressed offspring might be related to contrasting effects of SSRIs and prenatal stress on brain 5-HT levels in the offspring. Thereby, illustrating the potential of SSRIs to be a plasticity factor (suggested in the review [305]). Inconsistencies to whether gestational SSRI exposure influences ASD, anxiety, and depression still exist, which may imply the influence of other gestational factors. We argue that beyond the understanding of how a single gestational factor affects brain development and behavior in the offspring, it is also critical to elucidate the consequences of interacting factors. Hence, we want to advocate to take gestational factors into consideration when performing human cohort studies to reveal risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders. Concerning animal studies, we want to emphasize the importance to study the potential effect of combining different gestational factors. Indeed, there seems to be a shift towards research investigating maternal SSRI intake in combination with prenatal stress. Studying the combined effects of multiple factors creates the opportunity to examine, for example, whether protein-reduced carbohydrate-enriched maternal diets can reverse a reduced fetal brain 5-HT content due to a genetic mutation. Furthermore, developing and optimizing current methodologies, such as whole-genome mapping, may initiate opportunities to examine the contributions of maternal genotype effects beyond the transmission of risk alleles [306,307]. Such efforts can create the possibility to disentangle the underlying mechanisms of an increased risk of neuropsychiatric disorders in children who, for instance, had been exposed to SSRIs during their development. In conclusion, an enhanced understanding of the interacting gestational factors, and on which brain circuits they act, will increase our abilities to prevent pregnancies with disadvantageous consequences for the offspring.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1422-0067/21/16/5850/s1. Table S1: Characteristics human literature reviewed, Table S2: Characteristics animal literature reviewed.

Funding

CL and JRH were supported by the China Exchange Program of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (project 5305CDP09). LS received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 707404 (LEaDing Fellows). This work was also supported by the Era-Net NEURON grant “RESPOND”, awarded to JRH. Funding organizations had no further role in the writing process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

5-HTSerotonin
5-HTP5-hydroxytryptophan
5-HTTSerotonin transporter
5-HTTLPRSerotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region
ADHDAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder
ASDAutism spectrum disorders
BDNFBrain derived neurotrofic factor
EEmbryonic day
HPAhypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical
IDOIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase
ILInterleukins
L-allelicLong-allelic
MAOAMonoamine oxidase A
(m)PFC(Medial) Prefrontal cortex
OCT3Organic cation transporter 3
Poly(I:C)Polyriboinosinic–polyribocytidylic acid
S-allelicShort-allelic
SSRIsSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
TDOTryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase
TPHTryptophan hydroxylase

References

  1. Deneris, E.S.; Wyler, S.C. Serotonergic transcriptional networks and potential importance to mental health. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gaspar, P.; Cases, O.; Maroteaux, L. The developmental role of serotonin: News from mouse molecular genetics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4, 1002–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shaw, K.A.; Turner, J.; Del Mar, C. Tryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptophan for depression. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bonnin, A.; Levitt, P. Fetal, maternal, and placental sources of serotonin and new implications for developmental programming of the brain. Neuroscience 2011, 197, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cote, F.; Fligny, C.; Bayard, E.; Launay, J.M.; Gershon, M.D.; Mallet, J.; Vodjdani, G. Maternal serotonin is crucial for murine embryonic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Muller, C.L.; Anacker, A.M.; Rogers, T.D.; Goeden, N.; Keller, E.H.; Forsberg, C.G.; Kerr, T.M.; Wender, C.; Anderson, G.M.; Stanwood, G.D.; et al. Impact of maternal serotonin transporter genotype on placental serotonin, fetal forebrain serotonin, and neurodevelopment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rebello, T.J.; Yu, Q.; Goodfellow, N.M.; Caffrey Cagliostro, M.K.; Teissier, A.; Morelli, E.; Demireva, E.Y.; Chemiakine, A.; Rosoklija, G.B.; Dwork, A.J.; et al. Postnatal day 2 to 11 constitutes a 5-HT-sensitive period impacting adult mPFC function. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 12379–12393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walther, D.J.; Bader, M. A unique central tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 66, 1673–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Walther, D.J.; Peter, J.U.; Bashammakh, S.; Hortnagl, H.; Voits, M.; Fink, H.; Bader, M. Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science 2003, 299, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Chalazonitis, A.; Huang, Y.Y.; Mann, J.J.; Margolis, K.G.; Yang, Q.M.; Kim, D.O.; Cote, F.; Mallet, J.; Gershon, M.D. Essential roles of enteric neuronal serotonin in gastrointestinal motility and the development/survival of enteric dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 8998–9009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Millan, M.J.; Marin, P.; Bockaert, J.; Mannoury la Cour, C. Signaling at G-protein-coupled serotonin receptors: Recent advances and future research directions. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2008, 29, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sahu, A.; Gopalakrishnan, L.; Gaur, N.; Chatterjee, O.; Mol, P.; Modi, P.K.; Dagamajalu, S.; Advani, J.; Jain, S.; Keshava Prasad, T.S. The 5-Hydroxytryptamine signaling map: An overview of serotonin-serotonin receptor mediated signaling network. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018, 12, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Takikawa, O. Biochemical and medical aspects of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-initiated L-tryptophan metabolism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cervenka, I.; Agudelo, L.Z.; Ruas, J.L. Kynurenines: Tryptophan’s metabolites in exercise, inflammation, and mental health. Science 2017, 357, eaaf9794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Schwarcz, R.; Bruno, J.P.; Muchowski, P.J.; Wu, H.Q. Kynurenines in the mammalian brain: When physiology meets pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sundstrom, E.; Kolare, S.; Souverbie, F.; Samuelsson, E.B.; Pschera, H.; Lunell, N.O.; Seiger, A. Neurochemical differentiation of human bulbospinal monoaminergic neurons during the first trimester. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1993, 75, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verney, C.; Lebrand, C.; Gaspar, P. Changing distribution of monoaminergic markers in the developing human cerebral cortex with special emphasis on the serotonin transporter. Anat. Rec. 2002, 267, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takahashi, H.; Nakashima, S.; Ohama, E.; Takeda, S.; Ikuta, F. Distribution of serotonin-containing cell bodies in the brainstem of the human fetus determined with immunohistochemistry using antiserotonin serum. Brain Dev. 1986, 8, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bonnin, A.; Goeden, N.; Chen, K.; Wilson, M.L.; King, J.; Shih, J.C.; Blakely, R.D.; Deneris, E.S.; Levitt, P. A transient placental source of serotonin for the fetal forebrain. Nature 2011, 472, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhou, F.C.; Sari, Y.; Zhang, J.K. Expression of serotonin transporter protein in developing rat brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2000, 119, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Booij, L.; Tremblay, R.E.; Szyf, M.; Benkelfat, C. Genetic and early environmental influences on the serotonin system: Consequences for brain development and risk for psychopathology. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015, 40, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Buznikov, G.A.; Lambert, H.W.; Lauder, J.M. Serotonin and serotonin-like substances as regulators of early embryogenesis and morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2001, 305, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Choi, D.S.; Ward, S.J.; Messaddeq, N.; Launay, J.M.; Maroteaux, L. 5-HT2B receptor-mediated serotonin morphogenetic functions in mouse cranial neural crest and myocardiac cells. Development 1997, 124, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Fiorica-Howells, E.; Maroteaux, L.; Gershon, M.D. Serotonin and the 5-HT(2B) receptor in the development of enteric neurons. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kliman, H.J.; Quaratella, S.B.; Setaro, A.C.; Siegman, E.C.; Subha, Z.T.; Tal, R.; Milano, K.M.; Steck, T.L. Pathway of maternal serotonin to the human embryo and fetus. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1609–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hudon Thibeault, A.A.; Laurent, L.; Vo Duy, S.; Sauve, S.; Caron, P.; Guillemette, C.; Sanderson, J.T.; Vaillancourt, C. Fluoxetine and its active metabolite norfluoxetine disrupt estrogen synthesis in a co-culture model of the feto-placental unit. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 442, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Weyler, W.; Hsut, Y.P.; Breakefield, X.O. Biochemistry and genetics of monoamine oxidase. Pharmac. Ther. 1990, 47, 391–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Van Bodegom, M.; Homberg, J.R.; Henckens, M. Modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by early life stress exposure. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Homberg, J.R.; Schubert, D.; Gaspar, P. New perspectives on the neurodevelopmental effects of SSRIs. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 31, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lebrand, C.; Cases, O.; Wehrle, R.; Blakely, R.D.; Edwards, R.H.; Gaspar, P. Transient developmental expression of monoamine transporters in the rodent forebrain. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998, 401, 506–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bonnin, A.; Torii, M.; Wang, L.; Rakic, P.; Levitt, P. Serotonin modulates the response of embryonic thalamocortical axons to netrin-1. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, X.; Ye, R.; Gargus, J.J.; Blakely, R.D.; Dobrenis, K.; Sze, J.Y. Disruption of transient serotonin accumulation by non-serotonin-producing neurons impairs cortical map development. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 346–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Schipke, C.G.; Heuser, I.; Peters, O. Antidepressants act on glial cells: SSRIs and serotonin elicit astrocyte calcium signaling in the mouse prefrontal cortex. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2011, 45, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. D’Andrea, I.; Béchade, C.; Maroteaux, L. Serotonin and 5-HT2B receptors in microglia control of behavior. In Handbook of the Behavioural Neurobiology of Serotonin; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; pp. 589–599. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lenz, K.M.; Nelson, L.H. Microglia and beyond: Innate immune cells as regulators of brain development and behavioral function. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Fan, L.; Bhatt, A.; Tien, L.; Zheng, B.; Simpson, K.L.; Lin, R.C.S.; Cai, Z.; Kumar, P.; Pang, Y. Exposure to serotonin adversely affects oligodendrocyte development and myelination in vitro. J. Neurochem. 2015, 133, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Garcia-Gonzalez, D.; Khodosevich, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Rollenhagen, A.; Lubke, J.H.R.; Monyer, H. Serotonergic projections govern postnatal neuroblast migration. Neuron 2017, 94, 534–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kindt, K.S.; Tam, T.; Whiteman, S.; Schafer, W.R. Serotonin promotes G(o)-dependent neuronal migration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1738–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Riccio, O.; Jacobshagen, M.; Golding, B.; Vutskits, L.; Jabaudon, D.; Hornung, J.P.; Dayer, A.G. Excess of serotonin affects neocortical pyramidal neuron migration. Transl. Psychiatry 2011, 1, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garcia, L.P.; Witteveen, J.S.; Middelman, A.; van Hulten, J.A.; Martens, G.J.M.; Homberg, J.R.; Kolk, S.M. Perturbed developmental serotonin signaling affects prefrontal catecholaminergic innervation and cortical integrity. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 1405–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Janusonis, S.; Gluncic, V.; Rakic, P. Early serotonergic projections to Cajal-Retzius cells: Relevance for cortical development. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 1652–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Witteveen, J.S.; Middelman, A.; van Hulten, J.A.; Martens, G.J.; Homberg, J.R.; Kolk, S.M. Lack of serotonin reuptake during brain development alters rostral raphe-prefrontal network formation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Gil-Sanz, C.; Franco, S.J.; Martinez-Garay, I.; Espinosa, A.; Harkins-Perry, S.; Muller, U. Cajal-Retzius cells instruct neuronal migration by coincidence signaling between secreted and contact-dependent guidance cues. Neuron 2013, 79, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Jacobshagen, M.; Niquille, M.; Chaumont-Dubel, S.; Marin, P.; Dayer, A. The serotonin 6 receptor controls neuronal migration during corticogenesis via a ligand-independent Cdk5-dependent mechanism. Development 2014, 141, 3370–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Murthy, S.; Niquille, M.; Hurni, N.; Limoni, G.; Frazer, S.; Chameau, P.; van Hooft, J.A.; Vitalis, T.; Dayer, A. Serotonin receptor 3A controls interneuron migration into the neocortex. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vitalis, T.; Ansorge, M.S.; Dayer, A.G. Serotonin homeostasis and serotonin receptors as actors of cortical construction: Special attention to the 5-HT3A and 5-HT6 receptor subtypes. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Riccio, O.; Potter, G.; Walzer, C.; Vallet, P.; Szabo, G.; Vutskits, L.; Kiss, J.Z.; Dayer, A.G. Excess of serotonin affects embryonic interneuron migration through activation of the serotonin receptor 6. Mol. Psychiatry 2009, 14, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bijata, M.; Labus, J.; Guseva, D.; Stawarski, M.; Butzlaff, M.; Dzwonek, J.; Schneeberg, J.; Bohm, K.; Michaluk, P.; Rusakov, D.A.; et al. Synaptic remodeling depends on signaling between serotonin receptors and the extracellular matrix. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 1767–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Daubert, E.A.; Condron, B.G. Serotonin: A regulator of neuronal morphology and circuitry. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kobe, F.; Guseva, D.; Jensen, T.P.; Wirth, A.; Renner, U.; Hess, D.; Muller, M.; Medrihan, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, M.; et al. 5-HT7R/G12 signaling regulates neuronal morphology and function in an age-dependent manner. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 2915–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kvachnina, E.; Liu, G.; Dityatev, A.; Renner, U.; Dumuis, A.; Richter, D.W.; Dityateva, G.; Schachner, M.; Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T.A.; Ponimaskin, E.G. 5-HT7 receptor is coupled to G alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G12-protein to regulate gene transcription and neuronal morphology. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 7821–7830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fricker, A.D.; Rios, C.; Devi, L.A.; Gomes, I. Serotonin receptor activation leads to neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2005, 138, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lotto, B.; Upton, L.; Price, D.J.; Gaspar, P. Serotonin receptor activation enhances neurite outgrowth of thalamic neurones in rodents. Neurosci. Lett. 1999, 269, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hendricks, T.J.; Fyodorov, D.V.; Wegman, L.J.; Lelutiu, N.B.; Pehek, E.A.; Yamamoto, B.; Silver, J.; Weeber, E.J.; Sweatt, J.D.; Deneris, E.S. Pet-1 ETS gene plays a critical role in 5-HT neuron development and is required for normal anxiety-like and aggressive behavior. Neuron 2003, 37, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Puzerey, P.A.; Kodama, N.X.; Galan, R.F. Abnormal cell-intrinsic and network excitability in the neocortex of serotonin-deficient Pet-1 knockout mice. J. Neurophysiol. 2016, 115, 813–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Yadav, P.N.; Abbas, A.I.; Farrell, M.S.; Setola, V.; Sciaky, N.; Huang, X.P.; Kroeze, W.K.; Crawford, L.K.; Piel, D.A.; Keiser, M.J.; et al. The presynaptic component of the serotonergic system is required for clozapine’s efficacy. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 36, 638–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Leslie, M.J.; Bennett-Clarke, C.A.; Rhoades, R.W. Serotonin 1B receptors form a transient vibrissa-related pattern in the primary somatosensory cortex of the developing rat. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1992, 69, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Laurent, A.; Goaillard, J.M.; Cases, O.; Lebrand, C.; Gaspar, P.; Ropert, N. Activity-Dependent presynaptic effect of serotonin 1B receptors on the somatosensory thalamocortical transmission in neonatal mice. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 886–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Narboux-Neme, N.; Evrard, A.; Ferezou, I.; Erzurumlu, R.S.; Kaeser, P.S.; Laine, J.; Rossier, J.; Ropert, N.; Sudhof, T.C.; Gaspar, P. Neurotransmitter release at the thalamocortical synapse instructs barrel formation but not axon patterning in the somatosensory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 6183–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Barre, A.; Berthoux, C.; De, B.D.; Valjent, E.; Bockaert, J.; Marin, P.; Becamel, C. Presynaptic serotonin 2A receptors modulate thalamocortical plasticity and associative learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1382–E1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wotton, C.A.; Quon, E.F.; Palmer, A.C.; Bekar, L.K. Corticosterone and serotonin similarly influence GABAergic and purinergic pathways to affect cortical inhibitory networks. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 30, e12592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cascio, C.J. Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2010, 2, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Brown, E.C.; Clark, D.L.; Hassel, S.; MacQueen, G.; Ramasubbu, R. Intrinsic thalamocortical connectivity varies in the age of onset subtypes in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019, 15, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Cardinal, R.N.; Parkinson, J.A.; Hall, J.; Everitt, B.J. The contribution of the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, and prefrontal cortex to emotion and motivated behaviour. Int. Congr. Ser. 2003, 1250, 347–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pérez, S.P. Serotonin and emotional decision-making. In Serotonin; Qu, Y., Ed.; IntechOpen: Valencia, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. Puig, M.V.; Gulledge, A.T. Serotonin and prefrontal cortex function: Neurons, networks, and circuits. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 44, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gemmel, M.; Bogi, E.; Ragan, C.; Hazlett, M.; Dubovicky, M.; van den Hove, D.L.; Oberlander, T.F.; Charlier, T.D.; Pawluski, J.L. Perinatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medication (SSRI) effects on social behaviors, neurodevelopment and the epigenome. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 85, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kafetzopoulos, V.; Kokras, N.; Sotiropoulos, I.; Oliveira, J.F.; Leite-Almeida, H.; Vasalou, A.; Sardinha, V.M.; Papadopoulou-Daifoti, Z.; Almeida, O.F.X.; Antoniou, K.; et al. The nucleus reuniens: A key node in the neurocircuitry of stress and depression. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Herman, J.P.; McKlveen, J.M.; Ghosal, S.; Kopp, B.; Wulsin, A.; Makinson, R.; Scheimann, J.; Myers, B. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Heisler, L.K.; Pronchuk, N.; Nonogaki, K.; Zhou, L.; Raber, J.; Tung, L.; Yeo, G.S.; O’Rahilly, S.; Colmers, W.F.; Elmquist, J.K.; et al. Serotonin activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis via serotonin 2C receptor stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 6956–6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mikkelsen, J.D.; Hay-Schmidt, A.; Kiss, A. Serotonergic stimulation of the rat hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis: Interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1018, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Migliarini, S.; Pacini, G.; Pelosi, B.; Lunardi, G.; Pasqualetti, M. Lack of brain serotonin affects postnatal development and serotonergic neuronal circuitry formation. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Van der Doelen, R.H.; Deschamps, W.; D’Annibale, C.; Peeters, D.; Wevers, R.A.; Zelena, D.; Homberg, J.R.; Kozicz, T. Early life adversity and serotonin transporter gene variation interact at the level of the adrenal gland to affect the adult hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Transl. Psychiatry 2014, 4, e409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Du, X.; Pang, T.Y. Is dysregulation of the HPA-Axis a core pathophysiology mediating co-morbid depression in neurodegenerative diseases? Front. Psychiatry 2015, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Kinlein, S.A.; Wilson, C.D.; Karatsoreos, I.N. Dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function contributes to altered endocrine and neurobehavioral responses to acute stress. Front. Psychiatry 2015, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Speer, K.E.; Semple, S.; Naumovski, N.; D’Cunha, N.M.; McKune, A.J. HPA axis function and diurnal cortisol in post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. Neurobiol. Stress 2019, 11, 100180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gleason, G.; Zupan, B.; Toth, M. Maternal genetic mutations as gestational and early life influences in producing psychiatric disease-like phenotypes in mice. Front. Psychiatry 2011, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Bah, J.; Lindstrom, M.; Westberg, L.; Manneras, L.; Ryding, E.; Henningsson, S.; Melke, J.; Rosen, I.; Traskman-Bendz, L.; Eriksson, E. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms: Effect on serotonin transporter availability in the brain of suicide attempters. Psychiatry Res. 2008, 162, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lesch, K.P.; Bengel, D.; Heils, A.; Sabol, S.Z.; Greenberg, B.D.; Petri, S.; Benjamin, J.; Müller, C.R.; Hamer, D.H.; Murphy, D.L. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 1996, 274, 1527–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Van der Knaap, N.J.; El Marroun, H.; Klumpers, F.; Mous, S.E.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Hofman, A.; Homberg, J.R.; White, T.; Tiemeier, H.; Fernandez, G. Beyond classical inheritance: The influence of maternal genotype upon child’s brain morphology and behavior. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 9516–9521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kistner-Griffin, E.; Brune, C.W.; Davis, L.K.; Sutcliffe, J.S.; Cox, N.J.; Cook, E.H., Jr. Parent-of-Origin effects of the serotonin transporter gene associated with autism. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2011, 156, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mendonca, M.S.; Mangiavacchi, P.M.; De Sousa, P.F.; Crippa, J.A.S.; Mendes, A.V.; Loureiro, S.R.; Martin-Santos, R.; Quirino, C.R.; Kanashiro, M.M.; Rios, A.F.L. Epigenetic variation at the SLC6A4 gene promoter in mother-child pairs with major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 245, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Montgomery, A.K.; Shuffrey, L.C.; Guter, S.J.; Anderson, G.M.; Jacob, S.; Mosconi, M.W.; Sweeney, J.A.; Turner, J.B.; Sutcliffe, J.S.; Cook, E.H., Jr.; et al. Maternal Serotonin levels are associated with cognitive ability and core symptoms in autism spectrum disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 57, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Halmoy, A.; Johansson, S.; Winge, I.; McKinney, J.A.; Knappskog, P.M.; Haavik, J. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder symptoms in offspring of mothers with impaired serotonin production. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gleason, G.; Liu, B.; Bruening, S.; Zupan, B.; Auerbach, A.; Mark, W.; Oh, J.E.; Gal-Toth, J.; Lee, F.; Toth, M. The serotonin1A receptor gene as a genetic and prenatal maternal environmental factor in anxiety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 7592–7597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Van Velzen, A.; Toth, M. Role of maternal 5-HT(1A) receptor in programming offspring emotional and physical development. Genes Brain Behav. 2010, 9, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Hadden, C.; Fahmi, T.; Cooper, A.; Savenka, A.V.; Lupashin, V.V.; Roberts, D.J.; Maroteaux, L.; Hauguel-de Mouzon, S.; Kilic, F. Serotonin transporter protects the placental cells against apoptosis in caspase 3-independent pathway. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 3520–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sutcliffe, J.S.; Delahanty, R.J.; Prasad, H.C.; McCauley, J.L.; Han, Q.; Jiang, L.; Li, C.; Folstein, S.E.; Blakely, R.D. Allelic heterogeneity at the serotonin transporter locus (SLC6A4) confers susceptibility to autism and rigid-compulsive behaviors. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 77, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Veenstra-VanderWeele, J.; Muller, C.L.; Iwamoto, H.; Sauer, J.E.; Owens, W.A.; Shah, C.R.; Cohen, J.; Mannangatti, P.; Jessen, T.; Thompson, B.J.; et al. Autism gene variant causes hyperserotonemia, serotonin receptor hypersensitivity, social impairment and repetitive behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 5469–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Wu, G.; Bazer, F.W.; Cudd, T.A.; Meininger, C.J.; Spencer, T.E. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 2169–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Picciano, M.F. Pregnancy and lactation: Physiological adjustments, nutritional requirements and the role of dietary supplements. J. Nutr. 2002, 133, 1997–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yuwiler, A.; Oldendorf, W.H.; Geller, E.; Braun, L. Effect of albumin binding and amino acid competition on tryptophan uptake into brain. J. Neurochem. 1977, 28, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Arevalo, R.; Afonso, D.; Castro, R.; Rodriguez, M. Fetal brain serotonin synthesis and catabolism is under control by mother intake of tryptophan. Life Sci. 1991, 49, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tsuji, A.; Nakata, C.; Sano, M.; Fukuwatari, T.; Shibata, K. L-Tryptophan metabolism in pregnant mice fed a high L-tryptophan diet and the effect on maternal, placental, and fetal growth. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2013, 6, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Castrogiovanni, P.; Musumeci, G.; Trovato, F.M.; Avola, R.; Magro, G.; Imbesi, R. Effects of high-tryptophan diet on pre- and postnatal development in rats: A morphological study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2014, 53, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Huether, G.; Thomke, F.; Adler, L. Administration of tryptophan-enriched diets to pregnant rats retards the development of the serotonergic system in their offspring. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1992, 68, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Musumeci, G.; Loreto, C.; Trovato, F.M.; Giunta, S.; Imbesi, R.; Castrogiovanni, P. Serotonin (5HT) expression in rat pups treated with high-tryptophan diet during fetal and early postnatal development. Acta Histochem. 2014, 116, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Flores-Cruz, G.M.; Escobar, A. Reduction of serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe due to chronic prenatal administration of a tryptophan-free diet. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2012, 30, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zoratto, F.; Fiore, M.; Ali, S.F.; Laviola, G.; Macri, S. Neonatal tryptophan depletion and corticosterone supplementation modify emotional responses in adult male mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, L.; Guardarrama, L.; Corona-Morales, A.A.; Vega-Gonzalez, A.; Rocha, L.; Escobar, A. Rats subjected to extended L-tryptophan restriction during early postnatal stage exhibit anxious-depressive features and structural changes. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2006, 65, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Yokogoshi, H.; Wurtman, R.J. Meal composition and plasma amino acid ratios: Effect of various proteins or carbohydrates, and of various protein concentrations. Metabolism 1986, 35, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wurtman, R.J.; Fernstrom, J.D. Control of brain monoamine synthesis by diet and plasma amino acids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1975, 28, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kudo, Y.; Boyd, C.A. Characterisation of L-tryptophan transporters in human placenta: A comparison of brush border and basal membrane vesicles. J. Physiol. 2001, 531, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Winterhager, E.; Gellhaus, A. Transplacental nutrient transport mechanisms of intrauterine growth restriction in rodent models and humans. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Verrey, F.; Closs, E.I.; Wagner, C.A.; Palacin, M.; Endou, H.; Kanai, Y. CATs and HATs: The SLC7 family of amino acid transporters. Pflug. Arch. 2004, 447, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Honorio de Melo Martimiano, P.; de Sa Braga Oliveira, A.; Ferchaud-Roucher, V.; Croyal, M.; Aguesse, A.; Grit, I.; Ouguerram, K.; Lopes de Souza, S.; Kaeffer, B.; Bolanos-Jimenez, F. Maternal protein restriction during gestation and lactation in the rat results in increased brain levels of kynurenine and kynurenic acid in their adult offspring. J. Neurochem. 2017, 140, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Martin-Gronert, M.S.; Stocker, C.J.; Wargent, E.T.; Cripps, R.L.; Garfield, A.S.; Jovanovic, Z.; D’Agostino, G.; Yeo, G.S.; Cawthorne, M.A.; Arch, J.R.; et al. 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors as hypothalamic targets of developmental programming in male rats. Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Sano, M.; Ferchaud-Roucher, V.; Kaeffer, B.; Poupeau, G.; Castellano, B.; Darmaun, D. Maternal and fetal tryptophan metabolism in gestating rats: Effects of intrauterine growth restriction. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Koski, K.G.; Lanoue, L.; Young, S.N. Restriction of maternal dietary carbohydrate decreases fetal brain indoles and glycogen in rats. J. Nutr. 1993, 123, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kehoe, P.; Mallinson, K.; Bronzino, J.; McCormick, C.M. Effects of prenatal protein malnutrition and neonatal stress on CNS responsiveness. Dev. Brain Res. 2001, 132, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mokler, D.J.; McGaughy, J.A.; Bass, D.; Morgane, P.J.; Rosene, D.L.; Amaral, A.C.; Rushmore, R.J.; Galler, J.R. Prenatal protein malnutrition leads to hemispheric differences in the extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin in the medial prefrontal cortex of adult rats. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Resnick, O.; Morgane, P.J. Ontogeny of the levels of serotonin in various parts of the brain in severely protein malnourished rats. Brain Res. 1984, 303, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Blatt, G.J.; Jin-Chung, C.; Rosene, D.L.; Volicer, L.; Galler, J.R. Prenatal protein malnutrition effects on the serotonergic system in the hippocampal formation: An immunocytochemical, ligand binding, and neurochemical study. Brain Res. Bull. 1994, 34, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, J.C.; Tonkiss, J.; Galler, J.R.; Volicer, L. Prenatal protein malnutrition in rats enhances serotonin release from hippocampus. J. Nutr. 1992, 122, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Mokler, D.J.; Bronzino, J.D.; Galler, J.R.; Morgane, P.J. The effects of median raphe electrical stimulation on serotonin release in the dorsal hippocampal formation of prenatally protein malnourished rats. Brain Res. 1999, 838, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ye, W.; Pitlock, M.D.; Javors, M.A.; Thompson, B.J.; Lechleiter, J.D.; Hensler, J.G. The long-term effect of maternal dietary protein restriction on 5-HT1A receptor function and behavioral responses to stress in adulthood. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 349, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Edlow, A.G. Maternal obesity and neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in offspring. Prenat. Diagn. 2017, 37, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Sullivan, E.L.; Nousen, E.K.; Chamlou, K.A. Maternal high fat diet consumption during the perinatal period programs offspring behavior. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 123, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Sullivan, E.L.; Nousen, E.K.; Chamlou, K.A.; Grove, K.L. The impact of maternal high-fat diet consumption on neural development and behavior of offspring. Int. J. Obes. Suppl. 2012, 2, S7–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sullivan, E.L.; Riper, K.M.; Lockard, R.; Valleau, J.C. Maternal high-fat diet programming of the neuroendocrine system and behavior. Horm. Behav. 2015, 76, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Sullivan, E.L.; Grayson, B.; Takahashi, D.; Robertson, N.; Maier, A.; Bethea, C.L.; Smith, M.S.; Coleman, K.; Grove, K.L. Chronic consumption of a high-fat diet during pregnancy causes perturbations in the serotonergic system and increased anxiety-like behavior in nonhuman primate offspring. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 3826–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Thompson, J.R.; Valleau, J.C.; Barling, A.N.; Franco, J.G.; DeCapo, M.; Bagley, J.L.; Sullivan, E.L. Exposure to a high-fat diet during early development programs behavior and impairs the central serotonergic system in juvenile non-human primates. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2017, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Peleg-Raibstein, D.; Luca, E.; Wolfrum, C. Maternal high-fat diet in mice programs emotional behavior in adulthood. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 233, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Comasco, E.; Rangmar, J.; Eriksson, U.J.; Oreland, L. Neurological and neuropsychological effects of low and moderate prenatal alcohol exposure. Acta Physiol. (Oxford) 2018, 222, e12892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lehikoinen, A.I.; Karkkainen, O.K.; Lehtonen, M.A.S.; Auriola, S.O.K.; Hanhineva, K.J.; Heinonen, S.T. Alcohol and substance use are associated with altered metabolome in the first trimester serum samples of pregnant mothers. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 223, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Riikonen, R.S.; Nokelainen, P.; Valkonen, K.; Kolehmainen, A.I.; Kumpulainen, K.I.; Kononen, M.; Vanninen, R.L.; Kuikka, J.T. Deep serotonergic and dopaminergic structures in fetal alcoholic syndrome: A study with nor-beta-CIT-single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging volumetry. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Ishiguro, T.; Sakata-Haga, H.; Fukui, Y. A 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist, 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane, mitigates developmental neurotoxicity of ethanol to serotonergic neurons. Congenit. Anom. (Kyoto) 2016, 56, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Sari, Y.; Hammad, L.A.; Saleh, M.M.; Rebec, G.V.; Mechref, Y. Alteration of selective neurotransmitters in fetal brains of prenatally alcohol-treated C57BL/6 mice: Quantitative analysis using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2010, 28, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Maier, S.E.; Chen, W.J.A.; West, J.R. Prenatal binge-like alcohol exposure alters neurochemical profiles in fetal rat brain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1996, 55, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kim, E.K.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, H.; Sim, Y.J.; Shin, M.S.; Lee, S.J.; Yang, H.Y.; Chang, H.K.; Lee, T.H.; Jang, M.H.; et al. Maternal ethanol administration inhibits 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis and tryptophan hydroxylase expression in the dorsal raphe of rat offspring. Brain Dev. 2005, 27, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ohta, K.; Sakata-Haga, H.; Fukui, Y. Alteration in anxiety-related behaviors and reduction of serotonergic neurons in raphe nuclei in adult rats prenatally exposed to ethanol. Congenit. Anom. (Kyoto) 2010, 50, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sari, Y.; Zhou, F.C. Prenatal alcohol exposure causes long-term serotonin neuron deficit in mice. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2004, 28, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Tajuddin, N.F.; Druse, M.J. In utero ethanol exposure decreased the density of serotonin neurons. Maternal ipsapirone treatment exerted a protective effect. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1999, 117, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhou, F.C.; Sari, Y.; Zhang, J.K.; Goodlett, C.R.; Li, T.K. Prenatal alcohol exposure retards the migration and development of serotonin neurons in fetal C57BL mice. Dev. Brain Res. 2001, 126, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Druse, M.J.; Tajuddin, N.F.; Gillespie, R.A.; Dickson, E.; Atieh, M.; Pietrzak, C.A.; Le, P.T. The serotonin-1A agonist ipsapirone prevents ethanol-associated death of total rhombencephalic neurons and prevents the reduction of fetal serotonin neurons. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2004, 150, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Druse, M.J.; Tajuddin, N.F.; Gillespie, R.A.; Le, P. The effects of ethanol and the serotonin(1A) agonist ipsapirone on the expression of the serotonin(1A) receptor and several antiapoptotic proteins in fetal rhombencephalic neurons. Brain Res. 2006, 1092, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Tajuddin, N.F.; Druse, M.J. A persistent deficit of serotonin neurons in the offspring of ethanol-fed dams: Protective effects of maternal ipsapirone treatment. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2001, 129, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhou, F.C.; Sari, Y.; Powrozek, T.A. Fetal alcohol exposure reduces serotonin innervation and compromises development of the forebrain along the serotonergic pathway. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2005, 29, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Powrozek, T.A.; Zhou, F.C. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on the development of the vibrissal somatosensory cortical barrel network. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2005, 155, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zafar, H.; Shelat, S.G.; Redei, E.; Tejani-Butt, S. Fetal alcohol exposure alters serotonin transporter sites in the rat brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2000, 856, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Vehmeijer, F.O.L.; Guxens, M.; Duijts, L.; El Marroun, H. Maternal psychological distress during pregnancy and childhood health outcomes: A narrative review. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2019, 10, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Rakers, F.; Rupprecht, S.; Dreiling, M.; Bergmeier, C.; Witte, O.W.; Schwab, M. Transfer of maternal psychosocial stress to the fetus. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, S0149-7634(16)30719-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. St-Pierre, J.; Laurent, L.; King, S.; Vaillancourt, C. Effects of prenatal maternal stress on serotonin and fetal development. Placenta 2016, 48 (Suppl. 1), S66–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Van den Bergh, B.R.H.; van den Heuvel, M.I.; Lahti, M.; Braeken, M.; de Rooij, S.R.; Entringer, S.; Hoyer, D.; Roseboom, T.; Raikkonen, K.; King, S.; et al. Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: The influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, S0149-7634(16)30734-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Rotem-Kohavi, N.; Williams, L.J.; Muller, A.M.; Abdi, H.; Virji-Babul, N.; Bjornson, B.H.; Brain, U.; Werker, J.F.; Grunau, R.E.; Miller, S.P.; et al. Hub distribution of the brain functional networks of newborns prenatally exposed to maternal depression and SSRI antidepressants. Depress. Anxiety 2019, 36, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Field, T.; Diego, M.; Hernandez-Reif, M.; Schanberg, S.; Kuhn, C.; Yando, R.; Bendell, D. Pregnancy anxiety and comorbid depression and anger: Effects on the fetus and neonate. Depress. Anxiety 2003, 17, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Peters, D.A. Maternal stress increases fetal brain and neonatal cerebral cortex 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in rats: A possible mechanism by which stress influences brain development. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1990, 35, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Huang, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, H.; Yang, H.; Chen, Y.; Shi, X. Pre-Gestational stress reduces the ratio of 5-HIAA to 5-HT and the expression of 5-HT1A receptor and serotonin transporter in the brain of foetal rat. BMC Neurosci. 2012, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Velasquez, J.C.; Zhao, Q.; Chan, Y.; Galindo, L.C.M.; Simasotchi, C.; Wu, D.; Hou, Z.; Herod, S.M.; Oberlander, T.F.; Gil, S.; et al. In utero exposure to citalopram mitigates maternal stress effects on fetal brain development. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 3307–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gemmel, M.; Hazlett, M.; Bogi, E.; De Lacalle, S.; Hill, L.A.; Kokras, N.; Hammond, G.L.; Dalla, C.; Charlier, T.D.; Pawluski, J.L. Perinatal fluoxetine effects on social play, the HPA system, and hippocampal plasticity in pre-adolescent male and female rats: Interactions with pre-gestational maternal stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017, 84, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gemmel, M.; Kokras, N.; Dalla, C.; Pawluski, J.L. Perinatal fluoxetine prevents the effect of pre-gestational maternal stress on 5-HT in the PFC, but maternal stress has enduring effects on mPFC synaptic structure in offspring. Neuropharmacology 2018, 128, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gur, T.L.; Palkar, A.V.; Rajasekera, T.; Allen, J.; Niraula, A.; Godbout, J.; Bailey, M.T. Prenatal stress disrupts social behavior, cortical neurobiology and commensal microbes in adult male offspring. Behav. Brain Res. 2019, 359, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Soares-Cunha, C.; Coimbra, B.; Borges, S.; Domingues, A.V.; Silva, D.; Sousa, N.; Rodrigues, A.J. Mild prenatal stress causes emotional and brain structural modifications in rats of both sexes. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wei, S.; Li, Z.; Ren, M.; Wang, J.; Gao, J.; Guo, Y.; Xu, K.; Li, F.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, H.; et al. Social defeat stress before pregnancy induces depressive-like behaviours and cognitive deficits in adult male offspring: Correlation with neurobiological changes. BMC Neurosci. 2018, 19, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Hayashi, A.; Nagaoka, M.; Yamada, K.; Ichitani, Y.; Miake, Y.N.O. Maternal stress induces synaptic loss and developmental disabilities of offspring. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 1998, 16, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dang, S.; Lu, Y.; Su, Q.; Lin, T.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Z.; Li, H. H3K9 acetylation of Tph2 involved in depression-like behavior in male, but not female, juvenile offspring rat induced by prenatal stress. Neuroscience 2018, 381, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Miyagawa, K.; Tsuji, M.; Fujimori, K.; Saito, Y.; Takeda, H. Prenatal stress induces anxiety-like behavior together with the disruption of central serotonin neurons in mice. Neurosci. Res. 2011, 70, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Mueller, B.R.; Bale, T.L. Sex-Specific programming of offspring emotionality after stress early in pregnancy. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 9055–9065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Van den Hove, D.L.; Leibold, N.K.; Strackx, E.; Martinez-Claros, M.; Lesch, K.P.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Schruers, K.R.; Prickaerts, J. Prenatal stress and subsequent exposure to chronic mild stress in rats; interdependent effects on emotional behavior and the serotonergic system. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 24, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Gemmel, M.; De Lacalle, S.; Mort, S.C.; Hill, L.A.; Charlier, T.D.; Pawluski, J.L. Perinatal fluoxetine has enduring sexually differentiated effects on neurobehavioral outcomes related to social behaviors. Neuropharmacology 2019, 144, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Salari, A.A.; Fatehi-Gharehlar, L.; Motayagheni, N.; Homberg, J.R. Fluoxetine normalizes the effects of prenatal maternal stress on depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in mouse dams and male offspring. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 311, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Rayen, I.; van den Hove, D.L.; Prickaerts, J.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Pawluski, J.L. Fluoxetine during development reverses the effects of prenatal stress on depressive-like behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis in adolescence. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zohar, I.; Shoham, S.; Weinstock, M. Perinatal citalopram does not prevent the effect of prenatal stress on anxiety, depressive-like behaviour and serotonergic transmission in adult rat offspring. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2016, 43, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Miyagawa, K.; Tsuji, M.; Ishii, D.; Takeda, K.; Takeda, H. Prenatal stress induces vulnerability to stress together with the disruption of central serotonin neurons in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 277, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kiryanova, V.; Meunier, S.J.; Vecchiarelli, H.A.; Hill, M.N.; Dyck, R.H. Effects of maternal stress and perinatal fluoxetine exposure on behavioral outcomes of adult male offspring. Neuroscience 2016, 320, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ornoy, A.; Koren, G. SSRIs and SNRIs (SRI) in pregnancy: Effects on the course of pregnancy and the offspring: How far are we from having all the answers? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Kott, J.; Brummelte, S. Trick or treat? Evaluating contributing factors and sex-differences for developmental effects of maternal depression and its treatment. Horm. Behav. 2019, 111, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lusskin, S.I.; Khan, S.J.; Ernst, C.; Habib, S.; Fersh, M.E.; Albertini, E.S. Pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 61, 544–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Millard, S.J.; Weston-Green, K.; Newell, K.A. The effects of maternal antidepressant use on offspring behaviour and brain development: Implications for risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 80, 743–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Ornoy, A. Neurobehavioral risks of SSRIs in pregnancy: Comparing human and animal data. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017, 72, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Park, M.; Oberlander, T.F. In-Utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant exposure: Fetal programing and developmental interactions with context. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 104, 616–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Oberlander, T.F.; Zwaigenbaum, L. Disentangling maternal depression and antidepressant use during pregnancy as risks for autism in children. JAMA 2017, 317, 1533–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Rotem-Kohavi, N.; Oberlander, T.F. Variations in neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with prenatal SSRI antidepressant exposure. Birth Defects Res. 2017, 109, 909–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Schenker, S.; Yang, Y.; Perez, A.; Henderson, G.I.; Lee, M.P. Sumatriptan (Imitrex) transport by the human placenta. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1995, 210, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wood, M.E.; Lapane, K.; Frazier, J.A.; Ystrom, E.; Mick, E.O.; Nordeng, H. Prenatal triptan exposure and internalising and externalising behaviour problems in 3-year-old children: Results from the norwegian mother and child cohort study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2016, 30, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Meltzer, H.Y. Update on typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Annu. Rev. Med. 2013, 64, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Miyamoto, S.; Miyake, N.; Jarskog, L.F.; Fleischhacker, W.W.; Lieberman, J.A. Pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: A critical review of the pharmacology and clinical effects of current and future therapeutic agents. Mol. Psychiatry 2012, 17, 1206–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Molenaar, N.M.; Kamperman, A.M.; Boyce, P.; Bergink, V. Guidelines on treatment of perinatal depression with antidepressants: An international review. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2018, 52, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Wichman, C.L.; Stern, T.A. Diagnosing and treating depression during pregnancy. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Fischer Fumeaux, C.J.; Morisod Harari, M.; Weisskopf, E.; Eap, C.B.; Epiney, M.; Vial, Y.; Csajka, C.; Bickle Graz, M.; Panchaud, A. Risk-Benefit balance assessment of SSRI antidepressant use during pregnancy and lactation based on best available evidence—An update. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2019, 18, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Brummelte, S.; Galea, L.A.; Devlin, A.M.; Oberlander, T.F. Antidepressant use during pregnancy and serotonin transporter genotype (SLC6A4) affect newborn serum reelin levels. Dev. Psychobiol. 2013, 55, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Pawluski, J.L.; Galea, L.A.; Brain, U.; Papsdorf, M.; Oberlander, T.F. Neonatal S100B protein levels after prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e662–e670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Pawluski, J.L.; Brain, U.M.; Underhill, C.M.; Hammond, G.L.; Oberlander, T.F. Prenatal SSRI exposure alters neonatal corticosteroid binding globulin, infant cortisol levels, and emerging HPA function. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012, 37, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Brennan, P.A.; Pargas, R.; Walker, E.F.; Green, P.; Newport, D.J.; Stowe, Z. Maternal depression and infant cortisol: Influences of timing, comorbidity and treatment. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 2008, 49, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Lugo-Candelas, C.; Cha, J.; Hong, S.; Bastidas, V.; Weissman, M.; Fifer, W.P.; Myers, M.; Talati, A.; Bansal, R.; Peterson, B.S.; et al. Associations between brain structure and connectivity in infants and exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy. JAMA Pediatr. 2018, 172, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Podrebarac, S.K.; Duerden, E.G.; Chau, V.; Grunau, R.E.; Synnes, A.; Oberlander, T.F.; Miller, S.P. Antenatal exposure to antidepressants is associated with altered brain development in very preterm-born neonates. Neuroscience 2017, 342, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Lupattelli, A.; Wood, M.; Ystrom, E.; Skurtveit, S.; Handal, M.; Nordeng, H. Effect of time-dependent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants during pregnancy on behavioral, emotional, and social development in preschool-aged children. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 57, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Malm, H.; Brown, A.S.; Gissler, M.; Gyllenberg, D.; Hinkka-Yli-Salomaki, S.; McKeague, I.W.; Weissman, M.; Wickramaratne, P.; Artama, M.; Gingrich, J.A.; et al. Gestational exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and offspring psychiatric disorders: A national register-based study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2016, 55, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Man, K.K.C.; Chan, E.W.; Ip, P.; Coghill, D.; Simonoff, E.; Chan, P.K.L.; Lau, W.C.Y.; Schuemie, M.J.; Sturkenboom, M.; Wong, I.C.K. Prenatal antidepressant exposure and the risk of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 86, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. Sujan, A.C.; Rickert, M.E.; Oberg, A.S.; Quinn, P.D.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Almqvist, C.; Lichtenstein, P.; Larsson, H.; D’Onofrio, B.M. Associations of maternal antidepressant use during the first trimester of pregnancy with preterm birth, small for gestational age, autism spectrum disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring. JAMA 2017, 317, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Uguz, F. Maternal antidepressant use during pregnancy and the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children: A systematic review of the current literature. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2018, 38, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hermansen, T.K.; Roysamb, E.; Augusti, E.M.; Melinder, A. Behavior and inhibitory control in children with prenatal exposure to antidepressants and medically untreated depression. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2016, 233, 1523–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Andalib, S.; Emamhadi, M.R.; Yousefzadeh-Chabok, S.; Shakouri, S.K.; Hoilund-Carlsen, P.F.; Vafaee, M.S.; Michel, T.M. Maternal SSRI exposure increases the risk of autistic offspring: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur. Psychiatry 2017, 45, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Brown, H.K.; Hussain-Shamsy, N.; Lunsky, Y.; Dennis, C.E.; Vigod, S.N. The association between antenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, e48–e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Fatima, M.; Srivastav, S.; Mondal, A.C. Prenatal stress and depression associated neuronal development in neonates. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2017, 60, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Gentile, S. Prenatal antidepressant exposure and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in children. Are we looking at the fall of Gods? J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 182, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kaplan, Y.C.; Keskin-Arslan, E.; Acar, S.; Sozmen, K. Prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and the risk of autism spectrum disorder in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 66, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Man, K.K.; Tong, H.H.; Wong, L.Y.; Chan, E.W.; Simonoff, E.; Wong, I.C. Exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorder in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 49, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Mezzacappa, A.; Lasica, P.A.; Gianfagna, F.; Cazas, O.; Hardy, P.; Falissard, B.; Sutter-Dallay, A.L.; Gressier, F. Risk for autism spectrum disorders according to period of prenatal antidepressant exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Brown, H.K.; Ray, J.G.; Wilton, A.S.; Lunsky, Y.; Gomes, T.; Vigod, S.N. Association between serotonergic antidepressant use during pregnancy and autism spectrum disorder in children. JAMA 2017, 317, 1544–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Kaplan, Y.C.; Keskin-Arslan, E.; Acar, S.; Sozmen, K. Maternal SSRI discontinuation, use, psychiatric disorder and the risk of autism in children: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 2798–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Kobayashi, T.; Matsuyama, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Ito, S. Autism spectrum disorder and prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 65, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Pawluski, J.L.; Gemmel, M. Perinatal SSRI medications and offspring hippocampal plasticity: Interaction with maternal stress and sex. Hormones (Athens) 2018, 17, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Belovicova, K.; Bogi, E.; Csatlosova, K.; Dubovicky, M. Animal tests for anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in rats. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2017, 10, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Khatri, N.; Simpson, K.L.; Lin, R.C.; Paul, I.A. Lasting neurobehavioral abnormalities in rats after neonatal activation of serotonin 1A and 1B receptors: Possible mechanisms for serotonin dysfunction in autistic spectrum disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2014, 231, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Ko, M.C.; Lee, L.J.; Li, Y.; Lee, L.J. Long-Term consequences of neonatal fluoxetine exposure in adult rats. Dev. Neurobiol. 2014, 74, 1038–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Lisboa, S.F.; Oliveira, P.E.; Costa, L.C.; Venancio, E.J.; Moreira, E.G. Behavioral evaluation of male and female mice pups exposed to fluoxetine during pregnancy and lactation. Pharmacology 2007, 80, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. McAllister, B.B.; Kiryanova, V.; Dyck, R.H. Behavioural outcomes of perinatal maternal fluoxetine treatment. Neuroscience 2012, 226, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Olivier, J.D.; Valles, A.; van Heesch, F.; Afrasiab-Middelman, A.; Roelofs, J.J.; Jonkers, M.; Peeters, E.J.; Korte-Bouws, G.A.; Dederen, J.P.; Kiliaan, A.J.; et al. Fluoxetine administration to pregnant rats increases anxiety-related behavior in the offspring. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2011, 217, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Popa, D.; Lena, C.; Alexandre, C.; Adrien, J. Lasting syndrome of depression produced by reduction in serotonin uptake during postnatal development: Evidence from sleep, stress, and behavior. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 3546–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Sprowles, J.L.; Hufgard, J.R.; Gutierrez, A.; Bailey, R.A.; Jablonski, S.A.; Williams, M.T.; Vorhees, C.V. Perinatal exposure to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram alters spatial learning and memory, anxiety, depression, and startle in Sprague-Dawley rats. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2016, 54, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Altieri, S.C.; Yang, H.; O’Brien, H.J.; Redwine, H.M.; Senturk, D.; Hensler, J.G.; Andrews, A.M. Perinatal vs. genetic programming of serotonin states associated with anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015, 40, 1456–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Gobinath, A.R.; Workman, J.L.; Chow, C.; Lieblich, S.E.; Galea, L.A. Maternal postpartum corticosterone and fluoxetine differentially affect adult male and female offspring on anxiety-like behavior, stress reactivity, and hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuropharmacology 2016, 101, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Ansorge, M.S.; Zhou, M.; Lira, A.; Hen, R.; Gingrich, J.A. Early-Life blockade of the 5-HT transporter alters emotional behavior in adult mice. Science 2004, 306, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Ansorge, M.S.; Morelli, E.; Gingrich, J.A. Inhibition of serotonin but not norepinephrine transport during development produces delayed, persistent perturbations of emotional behaviors in mice. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Smit-Rigter, L.A.; Noorlander, C.W.; von Oerthel, L.; Chameau, P.; Smidt, M.P.; van Hooft, J.A. Prenatal fluoxetine exposure induces life-long serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor-dependent cortical abnormalities and anxiety-like behaviour. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Bairy, K.L.; Madhyastha, S.; Ashok, K.P.; Bairy, I.; Malini, S. Developmental and behavioral consequences of prenatal fluoxetine. Pharmacology 2007, 79, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ehrlich, D.E.; Neigh, G.N.; Bourke, C.H.; Nemeth, C.L.; Hazra, R.; Ryan, S.J.; Rowson, S.; Jairam, N.; Sholar, C.A.; Rainnie, D.G.; et al. Prenatal stress, regardless of concurrent escitalopram treatment, alters behavior and amygdala gene expression of adolescent female rats. Neuropharmacology 2015, 97, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Harris, S.S.; Maciag, D.; Simpson, K.L.; Lin, R.C.; Paul, I.A. Dose-Dependent effects of neonatal SSRI exposure on adult behavior in the rat. Brain Res. 2012, 1429, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  220. Kiryanova, V.; Dyck, R.H. Increased aggression, improved spatial memory, and reduced anxiety-like behaviour in adult male mice exposed to fluoxetine early in life. Dev. Neurosci. 2014, 36, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Meyer, L.R.; Dexter, B.; Lo, C.; Kenkel, E.; Hirai, T.; Roghair, R.D.; Haskell, S.E. Perinatal SSRI exposure permanently alters cerebral serotonin receptor mRNA in mice but does not impact adult behaviors. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Silva, A.S.; Toffoli, L.V.; Estrada, V.B.; Verissimo, L.F.; Francis-Oliveira, J.; Moreira, E.G.; Gomes, M.V.; Pelosi, G.G. Maternal exposure to fluoxetine during gestation and lactation induces long lasting changes in the DNA methylation profile of offspring’s brain and affects the social interaction of rat. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 142, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Yu, W.; Yen, Y.C.; Lee, Y.H.; Tan, S.; Xiao, Y.; Lokman, H.; Ting, A.K.T.; Ganegala, H.; Kwon, T.; Ho, W.K.; et al. Prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure induces working memory and social recognition deficits by disrupting inhibitory synaptic networks in male mice. Mol. Brain 2019, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Zimmerberg, B.; Germeyan, S.C. Effects of neonatal fluoxetine exposure on behavior across development in rats selectively bred for an infantile affective trait. Dev. Psychobiol. 2015, 57, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Lee, L.J. Neonatal fluoxetine exposure affects the neuronal structure in the somatosensory cortex and somatosensory-related behaviors in adolescent rats. Neurotox. Res. 2009, 15, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Maloney, S.E.; Akula, S.; Rieger, M.A.; McCullough, K.B.; Chandler, K.; Corbett, A.M.; McGowin, A.E.; Dougherty, J.D. Examining the reversibility of long-term behavioral disruptions in progeny of maternal SSRI exposure. eNeuro 2018, 5, ENEURO.0120-18.2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Bond, C.M.; Johnson, J.C.; Chaudhary, V.; McCarthy, E.M.; McWhorter, M.L.; Woehrle, N.S. Perinatal fluoxetine exposure results in social deficits and reduced monoamine oxidase gene expression in mice. Brain Res. 2020, 1727, 146282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Rodriguez-Porcel, F.; Green, D.; Khatri, N.; Harris, S.S.; May, W.L.; Lin, R.C.; Paul, I.A. Neonatal exposure of rats to antidepressants affects behavioral reactions to novelty and social interactions in a manner analogous to autistic spectrum disorders. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 2011, 294, 1726–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Simpson, K.L.; Weaver, K.J.; de Villers-Sidani, E.; Lu, J.Y.; Cai, Z.; Pang, Y.; Rodriguez-Porcel, F.; Paul, I.A.; Merzenich, M.; Lin, R.C. Perinatal antidepressant exposure alters cortical network function in rodents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18465–18470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Houwing, D.J.; Heijkoop, R.; Olivier, J.D.A.; Snoeren, E.M.S. Perinatal fluoxetine exposure changes social and stress-coping behavior in adult rats housed in a seminatural environment. Neuropharmacology 2019, 151, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Svirsky, N.; Levy, S.; Avitsur, R. Prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) increases aggression and modulates maternal behavior in offspring mice. Dev. Psychobiol. 2016, 58, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Zaidan, H.; Ramaswami, G.; Barak, M.; Li, J.B.; Gaisler-Salomon, I. Pre-Reproductive stress and fluoxetine treatment in rats affect offspring A-to-I RNA editing, gene expression and social behavior. Environ. Epigenet. 2018, 4, dvy021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Gemmel, M.; Rayen, I.; Lotus, T.; van Donkelaar, E.; Steinbusch, H.W.; De Lacalle, S.; Kokras, N.; Dalla, C.; Pawluski, J.L. Developmental fluoxetine and prenatal stress effects on serotonin, dopamine, and synaptophysin density in the PFC and hippocampus of offspring at weaning. Dev. Psychobiol. 2016, 58, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Xu, Y.; Sari, Y.; Zhou, F.C. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor disrupts organization of thalamocortical somatosensory barrels during development. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 2004, 150, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Akhmetshina, D.; Zakharov, A.; Vinokurova, D.; Nasretdinov, A.; Valeeva, G.; Khazipov, R. The serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram suppresses activity in the neonatal rat barrel cortex in vivo. Brain Res. Bull. 2016, 124, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. King, J.R.; Velasquez, J.C.; Torii, M.; Bonnin, A. Effect of maternal +/−citalopram exposure on P11 expression and neurogenesis in the mouse fetal brain. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Pawluski, J.L.; Rayen, I.; Niessen, N.A.; Kristensen, S.; van Donkelaar, E.L.; Balthazart, J.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Charlier, T.D. Developmental fluoxetine exposure differentially alters central and peripheral measures of the HPA system in adolescent male and female offspring. Neuroscience 2012, 220, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Jiang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zahra, A.; Long, C.; Yang, L. Exposure to prenatal antidepressant alters medial prefrontal-striatal synchronization in mice. Brain Res. 2019, 1717, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Frazer, S.; Otomo, K.; Dayer, A. Early-Life serotonin dysregulation affects the migration and positioning of cortical interneuron subtypes. Transl. Psychiatry 2015, 5, e644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Guidotti, G.; Calabrese, F.; Auletta, F.; Olivier, J.; Racagni, G.; Homberg, J.; Riva, M.A. Developmental influence of the serotonin transporter on the expression of npas4 and GABAergic markers: Modulation by antidepressant treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 746–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Umemori, J.; Winkel, F.; Castren, E.; Karpova, N.N. Distinct effects of perinatal exposure to fluoxetine or methylmercury on parvalbumin and perineuronal nets, the markers of critical periods in brain development. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2015, 44, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Al-Haddad, B.J.S.; Oler, E.; Armistead, B.; Elsayed, N.A.; Weinberger, D.R.; Bernier, R.; Burd, I.; Kapur, R.; Jacobsson, B.; Wang, C.; et al. The fetal origins of mental illness. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 221, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Dunn, G.A.; Nigg, J.T.; Sullivan, E.L. Neuroinflammation as a risk factor for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2019, 182, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Halmos, A.; Rigo, J., Jr.; Szijarto, J.; Fust, G.; Prohaszka, Z.; Molvarec, A. Circulating ficolin-2 and ficolin-3 in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2012, 169, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Nakashima, A.; Yamanaka-Tatematsu, M.; Fujita, N.; Koizumi, K.; Shima, T.; Yoshida, T.; Nikaido, T.; Okamoto, A.; Yoshimori, T.; Saito, S. Impaired autophagy by soluble endoglin, under physiological hypoxia in early pregnant period, is involved in poor placentation in preeclampsia. Autophagy 2013, 9, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Dachew, B.A.; Mamun, A.; Maravilla, J.C.; Alati, R. Pre-Eclampsia and the risk of autism-spectrum disorder in offspring: Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 2018, 212, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Mann, J.R.; McDermott, S.; Bao, H.; Hardin, J.; Gregg, A. Pre-Eclampsia, birth weight, and autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2010, 40, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Maher, G.M.; O’Keeffe, G.W.; Kearney, P.M.; Kenny, L.C.; Dinan, T.G.; Mattsson, M.; Khashan, A.S. Association of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2018, 75, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Possomato-Vieira, J.S.; Khalil, R.A. Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive pregnancy and preeclampsia. Adv. Pharmacol. 2016, 77, 361–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Smith, S.E.; Li, J.; Garbett, K.; Mirnics, K.; Patterson, P.H. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 10695–10702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Appel, S.; Turnwald, E.M.; Ankerne, J.; Wohlfarth, M.; Appel, J.; Rother, E.; Janoschek, R.; Alejandre Alcazar, M.A.; Schnare, M.; Meissner, U.; et al. Hypoxia-Mediated soluble fms-like tyrosine Kinase 1 increase is not attenuated in interleukin 6-deficient mice. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Wu, W.L.; Hsiao, E.Y.; Yan, Z.; Mazmanian, S.K.; Patterson, P.H. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 62, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Jarskog, L.F.; Xiao, H.; Wilkie, M.B.; Lauder, J.M.; Gilmore, J.H. Cytokine regulation of embryonic rat dopamine and serotonin neuronal survival in vitro. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 1997, 15, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Goeden, N.; Velasquez, J.; Arnold, K.A.; Chan, Y.; Lund, B.T.; Anderson, G.M.; Bonnin, A. Maternal inflammation disrupts fetal neurodevelopment via increased placental output of serotonin to the fetal brain. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 6041–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  255. Kannan, S.; Saadani-Makki, F.; Balakrishnan, B.; Dai, H.; Chakraborty, P.K.; Janisse, J.; Muzik, O.; Romero, R.; Chugani, D.C. Decreased cortical serotonin in neonatal rabbits exposed to endotoxin in utero. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Hsueh, P.T.; Wang, H.H.; Liu, C.L.; Ni, W.F.; Chen, Y.L.; Liu, J.K. Expression of cerebral serotonin related to anxiety-like behaviors in C57BL/6 offspring induced by repeated subcutaneous prenatal exposure to low-dose lipopolysaccharide. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Ohkawara, T.; Katsuyama, T.; Ida-Eto, M.; Narita, N.; Narita, M. Maternal viral infection during pregnancy impairs development of fetal serotonergic neurons. Brain Dev. 2015, 37, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Williams, M.; Zhang, Z.; Nance, E.; Drewes, J.L.; Lesniak, W.G.; Singh, S.; Chugani, D.C.; Rangaramanujam, K.; Graham, D.R.; Kannan, S. Maternal inflammation results in altered tryptophan metabolism in rabbit placenta and fetal brain. Dev. Neurosci. 2017, 39, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Manuelpillai, U.; Ligam, P.; Smythe, G.; Wallace, E.M.; Hirst, J.; Walker, D.W. Identification of kynurenine pathway enzyme mRNAs and metabolites in human placenta: Up-Regulation by inflammatory stimuli and with clinical infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Miller, V.M.; Zhu, Y.; Bucher, C.; McGinnis, W.; Ryan, L.K.; Siegel, A.; Zalcman, S. Gestational flu exposure induces changes in neurochemicals, affiliative hormones and brainstem inflammation, in addition to autism-like behaviors in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 33, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Fatemi, S.H.; Reutiman, T.J.; Folsom, T.D.; Huang, H.; Oishi, K.; Mori, S.; Smee, D.F.; Pearce, D.A.; Winter, C.; Sohr, R.; et al. Maternal infection leads to abnormal gene regulation and brain atrophy in mouse offspring: Implications for genesis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Schizophr. Res. 2008, 99, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Winter, C.; Reutiman, T.J.; Folsom, T.D.; Sohr, R.; Wolf, R.J.; Juckel, G.; Fatemi, S.H. Dopamine and serotonin levels following prenatal viral infection in mouse—Implications for psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and autism. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008, 18, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Winter, C.; Djodari-Irani, A.; Sohr, R.; Morgenstern, R.; Feldon, J.; Juckel, G.; Meyer, U. Prenatal immune activation leads to multiple changes in basal neurotransmitter levels in the adult brain: Implications for brain disorders of neurodevelopmental origin such as schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  264. Hadar, R.; Soto-Montenegro, M.L.; Gotz, T.; Wieske, F.; Sohr, R.; Desco, M.; Hamani, C.; Weiner, I.; Pascau, J.; Winter, C. Using a maternal immune stimulation model of schizophrenia to study behavioral and neurobiological alterations over the developmental course. Schizophr. Res. 2015, 166, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  265. Reisinger, S.N.; Kong, E.; Khan, D.; Schulz, S.; Ronovsky, M.; Berger, S.; Horvath, O.; Cabatic, M.; Berger, A.; Pollak, D.D. Maternal immune activation epigenetically regulates hippocampal serotonin transporter levels. Neurobiol. Stress 2016, 4, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  266. Gershon, M.D. Serotonin is a sword and a shield of the bowel: Serotonin plays offense and defense. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 2012, 123, 268–280. [Google Scholar]
  267. Yano, J.M.; Yu, K.; Donaldson, G.P.; Shastri, G.G.; Ann, P.; Ma, L.; Nagler, C.R.; Ismagilov, R.F.; Mazmanian, S.K.; Hsiao, E.Y. Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Cell 2015, 161, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Clarke, G.; Grenham, S.; Scully, P.; Fitzgerald, P.; Moloney, R.D.; Shanahan, F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Engen, P.A.; Green, S.J.; Voigt, R.M.; Forsyth, C.B.; Keshavarzian, A. The Gastrointestinal microbiome. alcohol effects on the composition of intestinal microbiota. Alcohol. Res. 2015, 37, 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  270. Bishehsari, F.; Magno, E.; Swanson, G.; Desai, V.; Volgt, R.M.; Forsyth, C.B.; Keshavarzian, A. Alcohol and gut-derived inflammation. Alcohol. Res. 2017, 38, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  271. Bibbo, S.; Ianiro, G.; Giorgio, V.; Scaldaferri, F.; Masucci, L.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G. The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 20, 4742–4749. [Google Scholar]
  272. Bisanz, J.E.; Upadhyay, V.; Turnbaugh, J.A.; Ly, K.; Turnbaugh, P.J. Meta-Analysis reveals reproducible gut microbiome alterations in response to a high-fat diet. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Shah, R.; Courtiol, E.; Castellanos, F.X.; Teixeira, C.M. Abnormal serotonin levels during perinatal development lead to behavioral deficits in adulthood. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  274. Kinast, K.; Peeters, D.; Kolk, S.M.; Schubert, D.; Homberg, J.R. Genetic and pharmacological manipulations of the serotonergic system in early life: Neurodevelopmental underpinnings of autism-related behavior. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  275. Kroeze, Y.; Dirven, B.; Janssen, S.; Krohnke, M.; Barte, R.M.; Middelman, A.; van Bokhoven, H.; Zhou, H.; Homberg, J.R. Perinatal reduction of functional serotonin transporters results in developmental delay. Neuropharmacology 2016, 109, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Miceli, S.; Nadif Kasri, N.; Joosten, J.; Huang, C.; Kepser, L.; Proville, R.; Selten, M.M.; van Eijs, F.; Azarfar, A.; Homberg, J.R.; et al. Reduced inhibition within Layer IV of sert knockout rat barrel cortex is associated with faster sensory integration. Cereb. Cortex 2017, 27, 933–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  277. Homberg, J.R.; Olivier, J.D.; Smits, B.M.; Mul, J.D.; Mudde, J.; Verheul, M.; Nieuwenhuizen, O.F.; Cools, A.R.; Ronken, E.; Cremers, T.; et al. Characterization of the serotonin transporter knockout rat: A selective change in the functioning of the serotonergic system. Neuroscience 2007, 146, 1662–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Hergovich, N.; Aigner, M.; Eichler, H.G.; Entlicher, J.; Drucker, C.; Jilma, B. Paroxetine decreases platelet serotonin storage and platelet function in human beings. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 68, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Maurer-Spurej, E.; Pittendreigh, C.; Solomons, K. The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on human platelet serotonin. Thromb. Haemost. 2004, 91, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Balkovetz, D.F.; Tiruppathi, C.; Leibach, F.H.; Mahesh, V.B.; Ganapathy, V. Evidence for an imipramine-sensitive serotonin transporter in human placental brush-border membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 263, 2195–2198. [Google Scholar]
  281. Lesch, K.; Wolozin, B.L.; Murphy, D.L.; Riederer, P. Primary structure of the human platelet serotonin uptake site: Identity with the brain serotonin transporter. J. Neurochem. 1993, 60, 2319–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Pei, S.; Liu, L.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, H.; Lin, S.; Shang, J. Risk of prenatal depression and stress treatment: Alteration on serotonin system of offspring through exposure to Fluoxetine. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Velasquez, J.C.; Goeden, N.; Herod, S.M.; Bonnin, A. Maternal pharmacokinetics and fetal disposition of (+/−)−citalopram during mouse pregnancy. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  284. Howell, K.R.; Powell, T.L. Effects of maternal obesity on placental function and fetal development. Reproduction 2017, 153, R97–R108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Hayes, E.K.; Lechowicz, A.; Petrik, J.J.; Storozhuk, Y.; Paez-Parent, S.; Dai, Q.; Samjoo, I.A.; Mansell, M.; Gruslin, A.; Holloway, A.C.; et al. Adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with a life-long high fat diet: Role of altered development of the placental vasculature. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Bronson, S.L.; Bale, T.L. Prenatal stress-induced increases in placental inflammation and offspring hyperactivity are male-specific and ameliorated by maternal antiinflammatory treatment. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 2635–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  287. Christian, L.M.; Glaser, R.; Porter, K.; Iams, J.D. Stress-induced inflammatory responses in women: Effects of race and pregnancy. Psychosom. Med. 2013, 75, 658–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Avalos, L.A.; Chen, H.; Li, D.K. Antidepressant medication use, depression, and the risk of preeclampsia. CNS Spectr. 2015, 20, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Guan, H.B.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.L.; Qiao, C.; Liu, C.X. Prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and associated risk for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Womens Health (Larchmont) 2018, 27, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Palmsten, K.; Setoguchi, S.; Margulis, A.V.; Patrick, A.R.; Hernandez-Diaz, S. Elevated risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women with depression: Depression or antidepressants? Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 175, 988–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  291. Toh, S.; Mitchell, A.A.; Louik, C.; Werler, M.M.; Chambers, C.D.; Hernandez-Diaz, S. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and risk of gestational hypertension. Am. J. Psychiatry 2009, 166, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  292. Lupattelli, A.; Wood, M.; Lapane, K.; Spigset, O.; Nordeng, H. Risk of preeclampsia after gestational exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: A study from the norwegian mother and child cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2017, 26, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Bolte, A.C.; Van Geijn, H.P.; Dekker, G.A. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia and the role of serotonin. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2001, 95, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Hudon Thibeault, A.A.; Lopez de Los Santos, Y.; Doucet, N.; Sanderson, J.T.; Vaillancourt, C. Serotonin and serotonin reuptake inhibitors alter placental aromatase. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 195, 105470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Sabolovic Rudman, S.; Mustapic, M.; Kosec, V.; Pivac, N.; Rudman, F.; Muck-Seler, D. Serotonin risk factors for the development of hypertension in pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015, 291, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Paquette, A.G.; Marsit, C.J. The developmental basis of epigenetic regulation of HTR2A and psychiatric outcomes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 115, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  297. Kroeze, Y.; Zhou, H.; Homberg, J.R. The genetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 136, 375–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Hecht, P.M.; Hudson, M.; Connors, S.L.; Tilley, M.R.; Liu, X.; Beversdorf, D.Q. Maternal serotonin transporter genotype affects risk for ASD with exposure to prenatal stress. Autism Res. 2016, 9, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Jones, K.L.; Smith, R.M.; Edwards, K.S.; Givens, B.; Tilley, M.R.; Beversdorf, D.Q. Combined effect of maternal serotonin transporter genotype and prenatal stress in modulating offspring social interaction in mice. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2010, 28, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  300. Sjaarda, C.P.; Hecht, P.; McNaughton, A.J.M.; Zhou, A.; Hudson, M.L.; Will, M.J.; Smith, G.; Ayub, M.; Liang, P.; Chen, N.; et al. Interplay between maternal Slc6a4 mutation and prenatal stress: A possible mechanism for autistic behavior development. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  301. Fasching, P.A.; Faschingbauer, F.; Goecke, T.W.; Engel, A.; Haberle, L.; Seifert, A.; Voigt, F.; Amann, M.; Rebhan, D.; Burger, P.; et al. Genetic variants in the tryptophan hydroxylase 2 gene (TPH2) and depression during and after pregnancy. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2012, 46, 1109–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Hou, Y.W.; Xiong, P.; Gu, X.; Huang, X.; Wang, M.; Wu, J. Association of serotonin receptors with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 538–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, B.; Faraone, S.V. The serotonin 5-HT1D receptor gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in Chinese Han subjects. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2006, 141B, 874–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Olivier, J.D.; Van Der Hart, M.G.; Van Swelm, R.P.; Dederen, P.J.; Homberg, J.R.; Cremers, T.; Deen, P.M.; Cuppen, E.; Cools, A.R.; Ellenbroek, B.A. A study in male and female 5-HT transporter knockout rats: An animal model for anxiety and depression disorders. Neuroscience 2008, 152, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Brummelte, S.; Mc Glanaghy, E.; Bonnin, A.; Oberlander, T.F. Developmental changes in serotonin signaling: Implications for early brain function, behavior and adaptation. Neuroscience 2017, 342, 212–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  306. Abbott, P.W.; Gumusoglu, S.B.; Bittle, J.; Beversdorf, D.Q.; Stevens, H.E. Prenatal stress and genetic risk: How prenatal stress interacts with genetics to alter risk for psychiatric illness. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2018, 90, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Evans, D.M.; Moen, G.H.; Hwang, L.D.; Lawlor, D.A.; Warrington, N.M. Elucidating the role of maternal environmental exposures on offspring health and disease using two-sample Mendelian randomization. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 861–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. An integrated view of 5-HT signaling within the brain. 5-HT in the brain is synthesized from tryptophan via the enzymes Tph2 and AADC. 5-HT is transported via VMAT into synaptic vesicles. Exocytosis of these vesicles releases 5-HT into the synaptic cleft. Here, it can bind to 5-HT receptors localized on pre- and postsynaptic neurons and/or on glial cells (microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes). 5-HT signaling can be terminated by the reuptake of 5-HT via the 5-HT transporter. 5-HT is again transported into synaptic vesicles or converted to 5-HIAA via the enzyme MAOA. Within neurons, microglia, and astrocytes, tryptophan can be converted into kynurenine via the enzymes IDO and TDO. 5-HIAA: 5-hydroxyindole amino acid; 5-HT: serotonin; AADC: aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase; IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; MAOA: monoamine oxidase A; TDO: tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase; TPH2: tryptophan hydroxylase 2; VMAT: vesicular monoamine transporter.
Figure 1. An integrated view of 5-HT signaling within the brain. 5-HT in the brain is synthesized from tryptophan via the enzymes Tph2 and AADC. 5-HT is transported via VMAT into synaptic vesicles. Exocytosis of these vesicles releases 5-HT into the synaptic cleft. Here, it can bind to 5-HT receptors localized on pre- and postsynaptic neurons and/or on glial cells (microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes). 5-HT signaling can be terminated by the reuptake of 5-HT via the 5-HT transporter. 5-HT is again transported into synaptic vesicles or converted to 5-HIAA via the enzyme MAOA. Within neurons, microglia, and astrocytes, tryptophan can be converted into kynurenine via the enzymes IDO and TDO. 5-HIAA: 5-hydroxyindole amino acid; 5-HT: serotonin; AADC: aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase; IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; MAOA: monoamine oxidase A; TDO: tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase; TPH2: tryptophan hydroxylase 2; VMAT: vesicular monoamine transporter.
Ijms 21 05850 g001
Figure 2. Schematic overview of the effects of (interacting) gestational factors on 5-HT levels during the embryonic period. Gestational factors (i.e., maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diets, stress exposure, 5-HT-ergic medication intake, and immune activation) decrease (top arrow blue, left) or increase (top arrow red, right) embryonic brain 5-HT levels. The gestational factors in the middle (purple) have been found to increase as well as decrease brain 5-HT levels in the embryo. Gestational factors do not only independently affect the embryonic brain 5-HT system but are also able to interact and thereby amplify or counteract each other’s impact on the embryonic brain 5-HT system. Maternal genotype is able to influence the effects of maternal diet composition, stress, and medication intake. The maternal immune system is activated by bacteria, viruses, and pre-eclampsia (blue dot) and is influenced by maternal stress and diet composition. Furthermore, the risk of pre-eclampsia is influenced by maternal medication intake and diet composition. Gestational factor influences on the embryonic brain 5-HT system are a consequence of changes in placenta-derived (maternal blood or placenta) and/or offspring’s raphe-produced (hindbrain) 5-HT content. Factors can influence maternal tryptophan levels, which influence tryptophan transfer to the embryo and placental 5-HT synthesis (green arrows). In turn, placental 5-HT synthesis alterations influence the transfer of 5-HT to the embryo (yellow arrows). Maternal 5-HT levels can influence placental 5-HT levels and transfer to the embryo as well (orange arrows). It should be mentioned that the placenta also express MAOA and the 5-HT2A receptor, which can breakdown the supplied/synthesized 5-HT and affect the placental structure and function, respectively. Gestational factors can influence the placental 5-HT system by targeting TPH1/2, MAOA, 5-HTT, and/or the 5-HT2A receptor. Some of these factors also influence the embryonic brain 5-HT system. These direct effects are evident in the fore- and hindbrain and include fetal 5-HT-ergic genotype, the placental transfer from 5-HT-ergic medications, activation of the embryonic immune system, and alterations in the raphe-produced 5-HT content due to maternal stress (placental CORT transfer) and maternal diet. These factors can influence the maternal and placental pathway at multiple levels: altering maternal tryptophan and 5-HT levels, placental 5-HT synthesis, or the placental transfer from tryptophan and 5-HT to the fetus.
Figure 2. Schematic overview of the effects of (interacting) gestational factors on 5-HT levels during the embryonic period. Gestational factors (i.e., maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diets, stress exposure, 5-HT-ergic medication intake, and immune activation) decrease (top arrow blue, left) or increase (top arrow red, right) embryonic brain 5-HT levels. The gestational factors in the middle (purple) have been found to increase as well as decrease brain 5-HT levels in the embryo. Gestational factors do not only independently affect the embryonic brain 5-HT system but are also able to interact and thereby amplify or counteract each other’s impact on the embryonic brain 5-HT system. Maternal genotype is able to influence the effects of maternal diet composition, stress, and medication intake. The maternal immune system is activated by bacteria, viruses, and pre-eclampsia (blue dot) and is influenced by maternal stress and diet composition. Furthermore, the risk of pre-eclampsia is influenced by maternal medication intake and diet composition. Gestational factor influences on the embryonic brain 5-HT system are a consequence of changes in placenta-derived (maternal blood or placenta) and/or offspring’s raphe-produced (hindbrain) 5-HT content. Factors can influence maternal tryptophan levels, which influence tryptophan transfer to the embryo and placental 5-HT synthesis (green arrows). In turn, placental 5-HT synthesis alterations influence the transfer of 5-HT to the embryo (yellow arrows). Maternal 5-HT levels can influence placental 5-HT levels and transfer to the embryo as well (orange arrows). It should be mentioned that the placenta also express MAOA and the 5-HT2A receptor, which can breakdown the supplied/synthesized 5-HT and affect the placental structure and function, respectively. Gestational factors can influence the placental 5-HT system by targeting TPH1/2, MAOA, 5-HTT, and/or the 5-HT2A receptor. Some of these factors also influence the embryonic brain 5-HT system. These direct effects are evident in the fore- and hindbrain and include fetal 5-HT-ergic genotype, the placental transfer from 5-HT-ergic medications, activation of the embryonic immune system, and alterations in the raphe-produced 5-HT content due to maternal stress (placental CORT transfer) and maternal diet. These factors can influence the maternal and placental pathway at multiple levels: altering maternal tryptophan and 5-HT levels, placental 5-HT synthesis, or the placental transfer from tryptophan and 5-HT to the fetus.
Ijms 21 05850 g002
Figure 3. Schematic overview of the effects of gestational factors on the offspring’s 5-HT-ergic influence on brain circuits maturation and the resulting aberrant behavior. Gestational factors (i.e., maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diets, stress exposure, 5-HT-related medication intake, and immune activation) decrease (arrow blue, left) or increase (arrow red, right) the offspring’s brain 5-HT levels. The gestational factors in the middle (purple) have been found to increase as well as decrease brain 5-HT levels in the offspring. Gestational-factor-induced alterations in the formation and function of the prefrontal-limbic circuitry, thalamocortical circuitry, and the HPA-axis are depicted via orange, blue, and green dots, respectively. We mention which gestational factor has been associated to the highlighted neuropsychiatric disorders of ASD, ADHD, depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, where possible, direct links have been depicted between gestational-factor-induced 5-HT-ergic-related changes within one of the three brain circuits and a neuropsychiatric disorder. 5-HT: serotonin; ASD: autism spectrum disorders; ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; HPA: hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical; SSRIs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Figure 3. Schematic overview of the effects of gestational factors on the offspring’s 5-HT-ergic influence on brain circuits maturation and the resulting aberrant behavior. Gestational factors (i.e., maternal 5-HT-ergic genotype, 5-HT-related diets, stress exposure, 5-HT-related medication intake, and immune activation) decrease (arrow blue, left) or increase (arrow red, right) the offspring’s brain 5-HT levels. The gestational factors in the middle (purple) have been found to increase as well as decrease brain 5-HT levels in the offspring. Gestational-factor-induced alterations in the formation and function of the prefrontal-limbic circuitry, thalamocortical circuitry, and the HPA-axis are depicted via orange, blue, and green dots, respectively. We mention which gestational factor has been associated to the highlighted neuropsychiatric disorders of ASD, ADHD, depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, where possible, direct links have been depicted between gestational-factor-induced 5-HT-ergic-related changes within one of the three brain circuits and a neuropsychiatric disorder. 5-HT: serotonin; ASD: autism spectrum disorders; ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; HPA: hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical; SSRIs: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Ijms 21 05850 g003
Table 1. 5-HT receptor involvement in neurodevelopmental events.
Table 1. 5-HT receptor involvement in neurodevelopmental events.
Neurodevelopmental Events5-HT Receptors Involved
Cell proliferation and survival/apoptosisPostsynaptic 5-HT1A/B/D & 2A & 6
Astrocytic 5-HT1-7
Microglial 5-HT2B/7
Neuronal migration/positioningPostsynaptic 5-HT1A/B/D & 3 & 6
Microglial 5-HT2B/7
Neuronal activityPostsynaptic 5-HT1A & 2A/C
Astrocytic 5-HT1-7
Neuronal outgrowth/dendrite formationPostsynaptic 5-HT1A & 2A & 3 & 4 & 6 & 7
Neuronal connectivityPresynaptic 5-HT2A
Oligodendrocyte 5-HT2A
Synaptic formation/functionAstrocytic 5-HT1-7
Synaptic clusteringPresynaptic 5-HT1B
Postsynaptic 5-HT1D
Synaptic patterningMicroglial 5-HT2B & 7
5-HT neurotransmission
(i.e., 5-HT clearance and release)
Presynaptic 5-HT1A/B & 5A
Microglial 5-HT2B & 7
HPA-axis activationPostsynaptic 5-HT1A & 2A/2C
5-HT: serotonin; HPA: hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical.
Table 2. Literature overview of associations between human maternal SSRI intake and child alterations. In depth information about the key characteristics of each article can be found in Table S1. We included meta-analyses but also case-control and cohort studies that were not included in one of the meta-analyses.
Table 2. Literature overview of associations between human maternal SSRI intake and child alterations. In depth information about the key characteristics of each article can be found in Table S1. We included meta-analyses but also case-control and cohort studies that were not included in one of the meta-analyses.
Increased Risk ofAssociation FoundAssociation Not Found or Mainly Caused by the Underlying Maternal Psychiatric Condition
ADHD-Man et al. [189] (meta-analysis)
Sujan et al. [190]
Uguz [191] (systematic review)
Anxiety/DepressionHermansen et al. [192]
Lupattelli et al. [187]
Malm et al. [188]
-
ASDAndalib et al. [193] (meta-analysis)
Brown et al. [194] (meta-analysis)
Fatima et al. [195] (review)
Gentile [196] (review)
Kaplan et al. [197] (meta-analysis)
Man et al. [198] (meta-analysis)
Mezzacappa et al. [199] (meta-analysis)
Brown et al. [200]
Kaplan et al. [201] (meta-analysis)
Kobayashi et al. [202] (meta-analysis)
Sujan et al. [190]
ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ASD: autism spectrum disorders.
Table 3. Literature overview of associations between perinatal SSRI exposure in rodents and behavioral changes in the offspring. In depth information about the key characteristics of each article can be found in Table S2. Specifications are added when the SSRI effects were studied in gestational stressed animals.
Table 3. Literature overview of associations between perinatal SSRI exposure in rodents and behavioral changes in the offspring. In depth information about the key characteristics of each article can be found in Table S2. Specifications are added when the SSRI effects were studied in gestational stressed animals.
AbnormalitiesAssociation FoundAssociation Not Found
Hyperactivity & impulsivity-Khatri et al. [205]
Ko et al. [206]
Lisboa et al. [207]
McAllister et al. [208]
Olivier et al. [209]
Increased depressive-like behaviorLisboa et al. [207]
Ko et al. [206]
Popa et al. [210]
Rayen et al. [162] (normalised stress effect)
Rebello et al. [7]
Sprowles et al. [211]
Zohar et al. [163] (irrespective of stress effect)
Altieri et al. [212]
Gobinath et al. [213]
McAllister et al. [208]
Olivier et al. [209]
Salari et al. [161] (normalised stress effect)
Increased anxiety-like behaviorAltieri et al. [212]
Ansorge et al. [214]
Ansorge et al. [215]
Gobinath et al. [213]
Khatri et al. [205]
Olivier et al. [209]
Rebello et al. [7]
Smit-Rigter et al. [216]
Sprowles et al. [211]
Zohar et al. [163] (irrespective of stress effect)
Altieri et al. [212]
Bairy et al. [217]
Ehrlich et al. [218]
Harris et al. [219]
Kiryanova et al. [165] (irrespective of stress effect)
Kiryanova & Dyck [220]
Ko et al. [206]
Lisboa et al. [207]
McAllister et al. [208]
Meyer et al. [221]
Popa et al. [210]
Salari et al. [161] (normalised stress effect)
Silva et al. [222]
Yu et al. [223]
Zimmerberg & Germeyan [224]
Repetitive behavior and sensory abnormalitiesLee [225]
Ko et al. [206]
Maloney et al. [226]
Sprowles et al. [211]
McAllister et al. [208]
Decreased social behaviorBond et al. [227]
Maloney et al. [226] (social preference)
Ehrlich et al. [218]
Khatri et al. [205]
Olivier et al. [209]
Rodriguez-Porcel et al. [228]
Simpson et al. [229]
Silva et al. [222]
Yu et al. [223]
Zimmerberg & Germeyan [224]
Houwing et al. [230]
Gemmel et al. [150] (normalised stress effect)
Gemmel et al. [160] (irrespective of stress effect)
Ko et al. [206]
Maloney et al. [226] (social interaction)
Meyer et al. [221]
Svirsky et al. [231]
Zaidan et al. [232]
Table 4. Gestational factors influence multiple 5-HT-ergic systems. When the association between the gestational factor and the 5-HT system is proven by scientific studies, we report ‘YES’. When the association is theorized but not yet proven, we report ‘?’. When the association is not investigated, we report ‘Not Determined’ (N.D.).
Table 4. Gestational factors influence multiple 5-HT-ergic systems. When the association between the gestational factor and the 5-HT system is proven by scientific studies, we report ‘YES’. When the association is theorized but not yet proven, we report ‘?’. When the association is not investigated, we report ‘Not Determined’ (N.D.).
Placenta-Derived 5-HT-Ergic SystemsOffspring’s 5-HT-Ergic Systems
Maternal Plasma Tryptophan and 5-HT LevelsPlacental 5-HT Synthesis (i.e., Changes in Placental 5-HT Levels)Maternal-Fetal Transport of Tryptophan and 5-HTBrain 5-HT Production and Survival5-HT Receptor or 5-HTT Activity/Gene Expression
Maternal 5-HT-ergic genotypeYESYES?YESYES
Maternal diet compositionYESYES?YESYES
Maternal stressYES?N.D.YESYES
Maternal 5-HT-ergic medication intakeYESN.D.?N.D.YES
Maternal immune activationN.D.YES?YESYES
5-HT: serotonin; 5-HTT: serotonin transporter.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hanswijk, S.I.; Spoelder, M.; Shan, L.; Verheij, M.M.M.; Muilwijk, O.G.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Kolk, S.M.; Homberg, J.R. Gestational Factors throughout Fetal Neurodevelopment: The Serotonin Link. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5850. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21165850

AMA Style

Hanswijk SI, Spoelder M, Shan L, Verheij MMM, Muilwijk OG, Li W, Liu C, Kolk SM, Homberg JR. Gestational Factors throughout Fetal Neurodevelopment: The Serotonin Link. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(16):5850. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21165850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hanswijk, Sabrina I., Marcia Spoelder, Ling Shan, Michel M. M. Verheij, Otto G. Muilwijk, Weizhuo Li, Chunqing Liu, Sharon M. Kolk, and Judith R. Homberg. 2020. "Gestational Factors throughout Fetal Neurodevelopment: The Serotonin Link" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 16: 5850. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21165850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop