Next Article in Journal
Kalkitoxin Reduces Osteoclast Formation and Resorption and Protects against Inflammatory Bone Loss
Next Article in Special Issue
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Type 4 (S1P4) Is Differentially Regulated in Peritoneal B1 B Cells upon TLR4 Stimulation and Facilitates the Egress of Peritoneal B1a B Cells and Subsequent Accumulation of Splenic IRA B Cells under Inflammatory Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Chemokines Up-Regulated in Epithelial Cells Control Senescence-Associated T Cell Accumulation in Salivary Glands of Aged and Sjögren’s Syndrome Model Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trogocytosis between Non-Immune Cells for Cell Clearance, and among Immune-Related Cells for Modulating Immune Responses and Autoimmunity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Opportunities and Challenges in Tunneling Nanotubes Research: How Far from Clinical Application?

Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2306; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052306
Submission received: 30 January 2021 / Revised: 21 February 2021 / Accepted: 21 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021

Abstract

:
Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) are recognized long membrane nanotubes connecting distance cells. In the last decade, growing evidence has shown that these subcellular structures mediate the specific transfer of cellular materials, pathogens, and electrical signals between cells. As intercellular bridges, they play a unique role in embryonic development, collective cell migration, injured cell recovery, cancer treatment resistance, and pathogen propagation. Although TNTs have been considered as potential drug targets for treatment, there is still a long way to go to translate the research findings into clinical practice. Herein, we emphasize the heterogeneous nature of TNTs by systemically summarizing the current knowledge on their morphology, structure, and biogenesis in different types of cells. Furthermore, we address the communication efficiency and biological outcomes of TNT-dependent transport related to diseases. Finally, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of TNTs as an exciting therapeutic approach by focusing on the development of efficient and safe drugs targeting TNTs.

1. Introduction

Multicellular organisms coordinate cell behavior, regulate morphogenesis, and maintain tissue homeostasis by secreting chemical molecules, releasing exosomes, and establishing direct connections such as neuronal synapses and gap junctions [1]. In 2004, the group of Gerdes reported for the first time a new way of long-distance cell–cell communication, tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) [2]. TNTs are tubular membrane structures with diameters of several hundred nanometers, which contain F-actin and, usually, adhesion proteins at one end (Figure 1) [3,4]. Hovering above the substrate, they directly connect adjacent cells up to hundreds of micrometers apart. These unique morphological features make them different from other cellular protrusions, such as filopodia and cytoneme. Numerous studies over the past ten years have shown that TNTs are widely present in various cell types [5,6]. More importantly, TNTs enable the transfer of small molecules, proteins, vesicles, and organelles between cells [2,7,8,9,10,11]. In 2010, we discovered that TNTs mediated depolarization coupling in non-neuronal cells, indicating that TNTs facilitate electrical signal transduction in addition to material transport [12]. Indeed, due to the characteristics of long-distance, high specificity, and multilevel transportation, TNT communication was dubbed the Internet of cells [13].
Subsequent studies have demonstrated the existence of TNT-like structures in tissues, such as mouse corneal stroma, non-neural ectoderms, and zebrafish embryos, suggesting the involvement of TNTs in embryonic development [14,15,16]. A recent work by Alarcon-Martinez and colleagues provided impressive evidence of the presence of TNTs in the retina of living mice and their physiological role in synchronizing the blood flow and neural activity [4]. In pathological conditions, TNTs may provide a new recovery mechanism for injured cells that have a limited ability of proliferation and regeneration [17,18,19]. On the other side, TNTs may transfer survival signals to tumor cells from neighboring cells, which was shown by Osswald et al., that malignant brain tumor cells acquired radiotherapy resistance by establishing a TNT network [20]. Moreover, several pathogens were found to stimulate TNT formation and use them as bridges to propagate between cells [21,22,23]. Thus, it has become a consensus to explore TNTs as therapeutic potential targets [6,24]. However, such an endeavor could take a long way towards future clinical application due to our limited knowledge about these heterogenetic structures. In this review, we will address the opportunities and challenges of TNTs as therapeutics. It begins with an overview of the diversity of structures and biogenesis of TNTs. Then, their versatile functions are introduced, followed by highlighting the communication efficiency of TNTs and the outcomes of TNT-dependent communication. Finally, TNTs as a potential therapeutic target are discussed by focusing on the challenges in the development of TNT-interfering drugs.

2. TNTs Are Heterogeneous Structures

2.1. Difference in Morphology

TNTs exhibit high variability in their morphology in terms of length and thickness [5,25]. Though the length of TNTs usually changes with the cell spacing caused by cell movement, it ranges from 10 to 100 µm in most types of cells. In a few cases, TNTs have been described as long cytoplasmic extensions up to 300 µm in length [6]. However, these fragile structures may break during prolongation if the pulling force by the cells exceeds the mechanical strength of TNTs [2,26]. In any event, the maximum length of a TNT is crucial since it determines the communication distance between cells. By analyzing the electron microscope images, the diameter of the TNTs was measured from hundreds of nanometers to a microscale [27]. One explanation for such a variation is that TNTs containing microtubules display thicker morphology [19,28,29]. Using cryo-electron microscopy, Sartori-Rupp and his colleagues recently revealed that TNTs were composed of a bunch of ultrathin tubes in mouse catecholaminergic CAD cells and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, which are hardly distinguished by conventional confocal microscopy [3]. According to this study, the diameter of a TNT lacking microtubules may be determined by the number of ultrathin tubes. Since the identification of TNTs is still based on their morphological characteristics, the morphological diversity of TNTs has brought confusion to the nomenclature and the literature review on TNT research. The establishment of criteria for the classification of TNTs will be of great significance in this field.
The characterization of TNTs in vitro indicated that TNTs are uniformly F-actin-positive [30], which separates them from other cellular protrusions such as tethers and nanopodia [5]. Surprisingly, F-actin may not be simply arranged in TNTs, as we thought until Anna Sartori-Rupp et al. demonstrated highly organized parallel actin bundles within TNTs [3]. Such a bundle organization could enhance the mechanical stability of these tiny, long structures. As another major type of cytoskeleton, microtubules were also found in TNTs in specific cell types, such as human macrophages, leukemia cells, immature neurons, and apoptotic pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells [19,31,32,33]. Although the molecular mechanism of microtubule-containing TNT (MT-TNTs) formation is still unknown, our study provided evidence that end-binding protein 3 (EB3), a microtubule plus-end tracking protein, moved in MT-TNTs in PC12 cells [19]. Moreover, MT-TNTs were only present in cells at a very early apoptotic stage, suggesting that the formation of MT-TNTs may not be cell-specific [19]. A later study reported that MT-TNTs could establish kinesin/dynein-dependent transfers of mitochondria between cells [18]. Obviously, the difference in the cytoskeleton composition of TNTs not only indicates the existence of different formation mechanisms but also leads to its functional diversity.

2.2. Different Mechanisms of TNTs Formation

The importance of F-actin in TNT formation was first proved by our early study showing that a low dose of cytochalasin B, an actin inhibitor, could reduce the number of TNTs in PC12 cells [34]. Even in the MT-TNTs, F-actin plays a dominant role as well, because the treatment of microtubule inhibitors did not significantly disrupt the TNT structures [19,35]. Due to this line of thought, researchers considered that actin regulators and motor proteins were implicated in the formation of TNTs. Many laboratories successively identified several key proteins and signal pathways regulating TNT formation in different types of cells, such as M-sec/ERp29 [36,37,38], p53/Akt/PI3K/mTOR [39,40,41], Myosin10 [42,43], CDC42/IRSp53/VASP [44], and Rab11a/Rab8a [45,46]. Paradoxically, TNTs were also observed in M-sec or p53-deficient cells [42,47]. Such inconsistent results imply that the biogenesis of TNTs may not have a universal molecular regulation mechanism, probably due to their heterogeneity [30].
On the cellular level, two models of TNT formation based on cell–cell interactions in different cell types have long been recognized [48]: (i) the cell dislodgement model, proposing that two adjacent cells retain thin membrane tubes when they move apart [49,50], and (ii) the filopodia interplay model, meaning that TNTs are generated from active cellular protrusions that make direct contact with neighboring cells [30,34,51,52]. Since mechanical forces are required in both models to pull out the tube structure after membrane binding, adequate cell–cell contact is a prerequisite for the generation of TNTs. For example, T cells only formed TNTs after at least four minutes of direct contact [21]. During this “kiss and run” process, cell–cell adhesion proteins provide a sufficient binding force for maintaining the connection at the tips of TNTs [3,53]. In addition, the elongation of TNTs needs to overcome the constraints of the actomyosin cortex on the inner side of the cell membrane, as well as the membrane tension. It should be noted that artificial membrane nanotubes could be pulled out from the cell membrane by magnetic tweezers or atomic force microscopy [54,55]. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that some TNTs are generated passively during cell dislodgment. Such passive TNT formation has been observed recently by Staufer et al. showing the formation of membrane tubes during protease-mediated dense cell singularization [56]. In short, the formation of TNTs is regulated not only by actin-relevant molecules but also the mechanical force exerted by cells, which is influenced by the actin skeleton rearrangement, adhesion protein binding, and cell migration.

2.3. Where and When Do TNTs Form?

Although the evolutionary significance of TNTs biogenesis is completely unknown, cells under specific physiological circumstances may need these unique structures to establish communication that could not be accomplished by other types of intercellular connections: (i) distant cells connection [4,57,58], (ii) cells migration or invasion [20,59,60], and (iii) heterogeneous cells interaction [17,61,62,63]. Interestingly, the discovery of TNT-like structures between bacteria may provide clues in the study of the putative evolution of TNTs from bacteria to mammals [64]. Whether there are extracellular signals that trigger the formation and directionality of TNTs is still an exciting question. At least, quite a lot of studies have described that the number of TNT-like structures increased in inflammatory and stress conditions, such as pathogen infections [21,31,65], oxidative stress [66], high intracellular calcium concentrations [36], inflammatory signals [67,68], misfolded proteins, and pathogenic amyloid aggregates [8,42,69,70]. Moreover, the tumor microenvironment (hypoxia, acidic pH, hyperglycemia, and serum deprivation), as well as chemo- and radiotherapy-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, leads to more TNTs in tumor cells [39,66,71,72,73,74,75,76]. Additionally, exosomes derived from malignant cells or vesicle recycling induce an increased rate in the formation of TNTs [46,77]. Under these circumstances, cells may respond to the stresses or stimulations by activating signaling pathways that initiate cytoskeleton rearrangement and cell movement, which consequently promote the formation of TNTs.

3. Versatile Functions of TNTs

3.1. Two Types of Transport Activity via TNTs

TNTs act as intercellular conduits for the exchange of organelles of different sizes, including, but not limited to, mitochondria [4,19], Golgi vesicles [71], and lysosomes [31,78]. These transports are hardly carried out by other types of cell-to-cell interactions and display features of active transportation: (i) requirement of a motor protein in an ATP-dependent manner [17,31], (ii) one-way transportation because of the polarity of motor proteins on F-actin [18,60], and (iii) higher transfer velocity than passive diffusion [22,79]. Moreover, the cargos in TNTs may show controlled movement behaviors, such as stop-and-go and to-and-fro [19,80]. Since our understanding of TNT-dependent active transports remains at a very preliminary stage, many questions need further investigation. For example, how are the cargos recruited towards the openings of TNTs? Is the transport organelle-specific? How do organelles cross the membrane interface between the TNT and connected cell?
TNT-dependent passive transfer mainly occurs to ions, small molecular, and nuclear acid [81]. As a universal second messenger that is easily measured, the intercellular Ca2+ flux via TNTs has been widely studied [4,20,54,82,83]. Further work identified that gap junctions were the key proteins which allow the transfer of small molecular or electrical coupling through the border of TNTs [12,20,84,85]. The movement of exogenous materials (e.g., viruses [23,65], bacteria [31], and membrane markers [10,49]) along TNTs could be considered as a special situation of transports. When they bind on the outer surface of TNTs, the transfer was probably accomplished together with the establishment and prolongation of TNTs. On the other hand, virus particles could be carried within vesicles that were driven through TNTs by an active mechanism based on motor proteins [53,86].

3.2. Communication Efficiency of TNTs

The amount of data being transfer is determined by the data rate, carrier frequency, and bandwidth [87], which here represent the speed and frequency of transport carried out by a certain number of TNTs. The speed of TNT-dependent communication is mainly dependent on the types of transport. For active transport inside TNTs, the velocity varies from 0.1 to 8 µm/s [11,54,79,88], which is faster than passive diffusion along the membrane tube [89]. An exception is the transduction of electrical signals via TNTs that happen in milliseconds, providing a new concept in the fast communication between distant cells [12,33]. Due to the extremely high length-to-diameter ratio, a TNT is more like a one-lane road for both types of transport. Thus, the frequency of organelles transport driven by the motor proteins is restricted. As for passive transport, in theory, the amount of molecules that diffuse through these submicron tubes is limited. For instance, we did not detect the diffusion of Cascade Blue, a small molecular dye, between TNT-connected normal rat kidney (NRK) cells even after 20 min of dye injection [12]. Moreover, the gap junctions present in TNTs may play a gating role in such communications [6]. Fortunately, a higher bandwidth could be provided by parallel TNTs between a pair of cells that have been shown in our study that recorded a higher amplitude signal through double TNTs [12].
When the communication efficiency of TNTs is examined in the perspective of group cell behavior, it is highly determined by the abundance of TNTs, i.e., the formation frequency and the lifetime of TNTs. The number of TNTs per hundred cells is normally less than 30% in many cell types [10,73,76,90,91]. Most of them are transient structures with an average survival time ranging from a few to tens of minutes [21,34]. Considering the low transportation rate within a single TNT and limited distribution of TNTs among cells, we believe that TNTs are not an efficient route for cell–cell communication. Nevertheless, cells may utilize TNTs for special communication purposes by adopting several strategies. (i) Signaling cascade amplification: a little amount of transferred signaling molecules via TNTs may be amplified by the downstream cascade in receipt cells. Different signaling pathways could be triggered in the receiving cells, such as IP3-induced calcium release [54], depolarization-induced voltage-gated calcium channels opening [12], and Fas signal-induced cell death [92]. (ii) Establishing a network of cells: a group of cells may be connected to each other through TNTs to share signals. Such a phenomenon has been observed in tumor cells that utilize the TNT network to maintain their homogeneous state and enhance their therapy resistance ability [20]. (iii) Multilevel communication: one TNT may facilitate different types of transfers. For instance, organelle exchanges and the diffusion of calcium ions through TNTs may occur in the retinal pigment epithelial cell line and pericytes in the mouse retina [4,82]. In light of the above, the communication efficiency of TNTs should not be neglected when exploring the outcomes of TNT-dependent communication.

3.3. Outcomes of TNT-Dependent Communication

Although diverse signals and materials can be transported through TNTs, the subsequent biological events are not fully revealed yet. So far, the most reported is the protective effect on stressed cells, which usually involves the mitochondria, an important organelle associated with apoptosis. Mitochondria were delivered from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to injured cells in acute lung injury, allergic airway inflammation, blood vessels experiencing chemotherapy stress, or dysfunctional pancreatic islet [17,18,93,94]. Injured cells could also be rescued by obtaining mitochondria from neighboring healthy cells via TNTs [19]. Besides, the delivery of functional lysosomes from macrophages to cystinosin-deficient cells displayed a rescue effect by correcting a genetic lysosomal defect [95]. Moreover, brain tumor cells under treatment may utilize a TNT network to propagate intercellular calcium waves and reduce the harmful level of Ca2+, thereby obtaining higher resistance to irradiation [20].
Interestingly, proapoptotic proteins transferred via TNTs could induce receipt cell death [92]. Our recent study revealed that prophagocytic membrane markers were delivered from apoptotic cells to healthy cells and induced the phagocytosis of health cells by macrophages [10]. Nevertheless, the currently observed anti- or proapoptotic events induced by TNT-dependent communication are mostly due to the experimental feasibility in detecting cell viability. Undoubtedly, the versatile functions of TNTs result in other cellular consequences as well. It was shown by Connor et al. that cancer cell-endothelial intercellular transport altered the endogenous microRNA (miRNA) profile and phenotype of the recipient endothelial [96]. Therefore, using single-cell profiling, the TNT-dependent transfer-induced alteration in the receiving cells will be revealed at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels, which finally provides clues for medical research and applications [11].
Another outcome induced by TNT-dependent communication is the spread of infectious and neurodegenerative substances [23,27,97]. The first evidence provided by the group of Davis showed that membrane nanotubes physically connecting T cells acted as a novel route for HIV-1 transmission [21]. In recent years, viruses of many different families, including retroviruses, herpesviruses, and orthomyxoviruses, have been reported to spread via TNTs [23,98,99]. Besides viruses, mycoplasma, bacteria, and malaria parasites were also found to propagate through TNTs [31,100,101]. Importantly, some pathogens are prone to stimulate the formation of TNTs in infected cells [23]. It raises the question whether pathogens have adaptively evolved a spread model by promoting TNT formation. In a series of studies of degenerative diseases, Zurzolo and her colleagues proposed that prion-like proteins (alpha-synuclein, PolyQ Huntingtin, and fibrillar tau) could effectively propagate between neurons by using TNTs as the predominant mechanism of dissemination [8,22,44,69]. Whereas most of these studies were carried out in vitro, a difficult challenge is how to explore TNT-mediated infections in tissues derived from infected animals and individuals.
In addition to the above cellular events triggered via TNT-mediated transport, the physical connection of TNT itself may participate in cell–cell interactions as well. An interesting study showed that human natural killer cells generated TNTs that contained an immune synapse at the junction point with target cells. The nanotubes could specifically drive the movement of target cells and, finally, lysis them [102]. In another study, airway epithelial cells were demonstrated to directly move along the structure of TNTs, suggesting TNTs may provide spatial information to guide cell migration [59]. By using the microfluidic technique, Marki et al. found that neutrophils rolling on a P-selectin-coated substrate generated nanotubes with one end binding on the substrate. These load-bearing nanotubes aligned along the streamlines of flow stress, implying immune cells may form TNTs as mooring ropes for docking on the endothelial cells in blood vessels [103]. Overall, the current discovery may be seen as only the tip of the iceberg. Further investigation of the roles of TNTs connection together with their interactions with the microenvironment is required for a better understanding of their clinical implications.

4. TNTs as Potential Therapeutic Targets

4.1. Opportunities Lie Ahead

During the past few years, various studies have suggested TNTs as a potential target for the treatment of tissue injury, tumor drug resistance, and infection (Table 1). As discussed earlier, stressed tumor cells adaptively respond to the tumor microenvironment or therapeutic stress by forming more TNTs [28,72,104,105]. Oncogenes including K-RAS and P53 participate in the activation of proteins regulating the actin cytoskeleton [39,73]. Meanwhile, TNT-based intercellular communication enhances the antiapoptosis ability of tumor cells by delivering mitochondria or dispersing and reducing the cytotoxic factors [106]. As for infections, some viruses can stimulate the formation of TNT to promote spreading between cells [67,107,108]. Therefore, studies have begun to explore the feasibility of disease treatments by blocking TNT formation. The preliminary results have revealed that the inhibition of the TNT-dependent transfer of the mitochondria leads to an increase in chemotherapy-induced cell death or animal survival [74,109]. Additionally, the propagation of HIV viral particles or neurodegenerative alpha-syn fibrils could be impaired when TNT formation is inhibited [67,110]. Thus, it appears that blocking TNT-like connectivity could be a promising strategy for treatment.
Conversely, we need to protect or promote TNT formation in case TNT-based communication allows the delivery of “defensive tools” to repair injured normal cells [128] (Table 1). The ability of cells to exploit TNTs as a bridge to help other cells in pathological conditions might be a natural mechanism for tissue self-repairing. When mesenchymal stem cells were introduced into damaged cultures or tissues, the transfer of the mitochondria from these stem cells was shown to save the recipient cells by recovering their cellular metabolism [17,94], rescuing aerobic respiration [61], or establishing angiogenic capacity [93]. Alternatively, TNT-like structures could remove damaged organelles or autophagosomes to rescue cystinosin-deficient fibroblasts or prematurely senescent endothelial cells [95,129]. In such cases, improving the efficiency of TNT communication will undoubtedly promote the recovery of injured cells.
Another potential clinical application of TNTs is acting as a route for intercellular drug delivery (Table 2). The effective delivery of drugs to target cells is critical for treatment. However, the delivery of biomacromolecular drugs (polypeptides, proteins, antibodies, glycans, nucleic acids, etc.) and drug carriers in tissues mainly relies on slow diffusion and hardly reaches the target cells [130]. Benefiting the ability to transfer macromolecules and vesicles, TNTs could be a novel way for drug delivery within the last few microns in a highly specific manner. Indeed, the transfer of the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin via TNTs has been observed in pancreatic, ovarian, and lung cancer cells [29,60,131]. Furthermore, the TNT network may be employed as an efficient way for the redistribution of antitumor drugs among connected tumor cells [131,132]. Nevertheless, extensive investigations are required to elucidate the mechanism of exogenous material transport through TNTs from binding and movement to the final destination in the receipt cells, as well as the overall delivery efficiency. According to the studies showing the quantum dot (QDs) transfer via TNTs [88,133], QDs may be a suitable tool to track drug delivery from donor to recipient cells through TNTs in vitro and even in vivo.

4.2. Challenges in TNTs as Therapeutic Targets

Although the clinical benefits of TNT-mediated intercellular communication have reached a consensus in the field of TNT research [6], there is still a long way to go due to the challenges in developing effective and safe TNT-interfering drugs. To date, very few drugs (e.g., arachidonic acid and doxorubicin) have been proven to enhance the formation of TNTs in microvascular endothelial cells or pancreatic cancer cells [29,131,142]. Comparing the efforts that promote TNT formation, the development of TNT inhibitors seems more feasible. Actin inhibitors (e.g., cytochalasin, latrunculin, and tolytoxin) have been widely used in in vitro studies [10,34,82,143]. However, these compounds cannot be applied as medicine due to their cytotoxic effect on the cellular cytoskeleton in tissues [144,145]. Since the safety of TNT-interfering drugs should be a priority consideration, the discovery of low-toxicity drugs will be the first step towards clinical application. To solve this issue, a high-throughput screening system is required to identify drug candidates based on the assessment of both the cell viability and TNT number after the drug treatment. A pioneer work was performed by Hashimoto et al. to search TNT inhibitors using commercially available instruments, which combined a cell culture array on a multi-position scanner, a drug loading system with chemical compounds databases, and imaging software for the quantitative identification of TNTs [37].
Drugs specifically targeting the proteins that regulate TNT formation may belong to those with less cytotoxicity. In a few studies, the number of TNTs could be reduced by the shRNA (short hairpin RNA) -mediated knockdown of CD38 in human multiple myeloma cells [74], impairing the IL-10 (Interleukin-10)/STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) signaling pathway in human macrophages [67] or blocking beta-CaMKII (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases II) in the neuronal cell line [110]. However, it is difficult to find a broad-spectrum inhibitor because of the heterogeneous mechanisms of TNT formation. An alternative strategy is to abolish TNT connections by blocking cell adhesion proteins (e.g., cadherin) [53]. Therefore, it is worth testing the effect of cadherin antagonists such as synthetic linear peptides, synthetic cyclic peptides, and non-peptidyl peptidomimetics [146] on the number of TNTs in various cell types. Moreover, several studies have reported on the formation and function of TNTs that appear to be highly related to the expression of connexin 43 [12,20]. In this regard, conventional gap junction blockers may play a novel role in TNT expressing connexins. Finally, as mentioned earlier, TNTs are very sensitive to mechanical forces [2,26]. Therefore, mechanical shock, such as directional ultrasound or low-frequency oscillation, may be a feasible and safe way to eliminate TNTs in tissues. Nevertheless, we are still facing a challenge on how to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment in removing TNTs in vivo due to the lack of identification markers for TNTs [3,5]. Using laser capture microdissection and microproteomics technology, Gousset et al. recently carried out a mass spectrometry analysis of specific proteins in TNTs isolated from catecholaminergic cells. Their path-breaking study demonstrated that glycolysis and ubiquitin-labeling proteins were enriched on TNTs, which were different from other subtypes of cellular protrusions [147]. In this way, TNT-specific protein markers may be found in the near future. By combining with advanced imaging technology, it is possible to develop a standardized approach to assess the effects of drugs on TNTs in tissues.

5. Conclusions

Over the past decade, there has been significant progress in the investigation aiming to understand the biology of TNTs. Numerous studies of different cell systems revealed the heterogeneous nature of TNTs that involve different mechanisms of formation and diverse functions. Although the outcomes of such heterogeneity are still not fully clear, the roles of TNTs in tissue repair, cancer, and infectious and neurodegenerative diseases indicate a wide range of implications of TNTs in the field of biomedical research. Thus, how to use TNTs as a therapeutic target in clinical applications has gradually become the main focus of this field. To close the gap between our current knowledge and clinical applications, we need a deeper understanding of TNT-dependent communication by elucidating (i) specific molecular events occurring in TNTs, (ii) global cellular responses to TNT-mediated transportation, (iii) dynamic interactions of TNT-connected cells with their microenvironment beyond chemical signals, and (iv) the communication efficiency of TNTs from a macroscopic perspective. Moreover, we are still facing challenges in developing efficient and safe drugs targeting TNTs. Nonetheless, the recent advances in using advanced technology to identify biomarkers of TNTs and screen TNT inhibitors may open up a new era for TNT research and translational medicine.

Author Contributions

X.W. had the idea for the review. Data analysis, literature search, manuscript writing, table designs, and construction were done by X.H. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31972922) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191452).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van Niel, G.; D’Angelo, G.; Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rustom, A.; Saffrich, R.; Markovic, I.; Walther, P.; Gerdes, H.H. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 2004, 303, 1007–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sartori-Rupp, A.; Cordero Cervantes, D.; Pepe, A.; Gousset, K.; Delage, E.; Corroyer-Dulmont, S.; Schmitt, C.; Krijnse-Locker, J.; Zurzolo, C. Correlative cryo-electron microscopy reveals the structure of TNTs in neuronal cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Alarcon-Martinez, L.; Villafranca-Baughman, D.; Quintero, H.; Kacerovsky, J.B.; Dotigny, F.; Murai, K.K.; Prat, A.; Drapeau, P.; Di Polo, A. Interpericyte tunnelling nanotubes regulate neurovascular coupling. Nature 2020, 585, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Austefjord, M.W.; Gerdes, H.H.; Wang, X. Tunneling nanotubes: Diversity in morphology and structure. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2014, 7, e27934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ariazi, J.; Benowitz, A.; De Biasi, V.; Den Boer, M.L.; Cherqui, S.; Cui, H.; Douillet, N.; Eugenin, E.A.; Favre, D.; Goodman, S.; et al. Tunneling Nanotubes and Gap Junctions-Their Role in Long-Range Intercellular Communication during Development, Health, and Disease Conditions. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gurke, S.; Barroso, J.F.V.; Hodneland, E.; Bukoreshtliev, N.V.; Schlicker, O.; Gerdes, H.-H. Tunneling nanotube (TNT)-like structures facilitate a constitutive, actomyosin-dependent exchange of endocytic organelles between normal rat kidney cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 3669–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Costanzo, M.; Abounit, S.; Marzo, L.; Danckaert, A.; Chamoun, Z.; Roux, P.; Zurzolo, C. Transfer of polyglutamine aggregates in neuronal cells occurs in tunneling nanotubes. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126 Pt 16, 3678–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Haimovich, G.; Ecker, C.M.; Dunagin, M.C.; Eggan, E.; Raj, A.; Gerst, J.E.; Singer, R.H. Intercellular mRNA trafficking via membrane nanotube-like extensions in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E9873–E9882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bittins, M.; Wang, X. TNT-Induced Phagocytosis: Tunneling Nanotubes Mediate the Transfer of Pro-Phagocytic Signals from Apoptotic to Viable Cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2017, 232, 2271–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kolba, M.D.; Dudka, W.; Zareba-Koziol, M.; Kominek, A.; Ronchi, P.; Turos, L.; Chroscicki, P.; Wlodarczyk, J.; Schwab, Y.; Klejman, A.; et al. Tunneling nanotube-mediated intercellular vesicle and protein transfer in the stroma-provided imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, X.; Veruki, M.L.; Bukoreshtliev, N.V.; Hartveit, E.; Gerdes, H.H. Animal cells connected by nanotubes can be electrically coupled through interposed gap-junction channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17194–17199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Baker, M. How the Internet of cells has biologists buzzing. Nature 2017, 549, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pyrgaki, C.; Trainor, P.; Hadjantonakis, A.-K.; Niswander, L. Dynamic imaging of mammalian neural tube closure. Dev. Biol. 2010, 344, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Caneparo, L.; Pantazis, P.; Dempsey, W.; Fraser, S.E. Intercellular Bridges in Vertebrate Gastrulation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Seyed-Razavi, Y.; Hickey, M.J.; Kuffova, L.; McMenamin, P.G.; Chinnery, H.R. Membrane nanotubes in myeloid cells in the adult mouse cornea represent a novel mode of immune cell interaction. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2013, 91, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Islam, M.N.; Das, S.R.; Emin, M.T.; Wei, M.; Sun, L.; Westphalen, K.; Rowlands, D.J.; Quadri, S.K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Bhattacharya, J. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ahmad, T.; Mukherjee, S.; Pattnaik, B.; Kumar, M.; Singh, S.; Kumar, M.; Rehman, R.; Tiwari, B.K.; Jha, K.A.; Barhanpurkar, A.P.; et al. Miro1 regulates intercellular mitochondrial transport & enhances mesenchymal stem cell rescue efficacy. EMBO J. 2014, 33, 994–1010. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, X.; Gerdes, H.H. Transfer of mitochondria via tunneling nanotubes rescues apoptotic PC12 cells. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Osswald, M.; Jung, E.; Sahm, F.; Solecki, G.; Venkataramani, V.; Blaes, J.; Weil, S.; Horstmann, H.; Wiestler, B.; Syed, M.; et al. Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network. Nature 2015, 528, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sowinski, S.; Jolly, C.; Berninghausen, O.; Purbhoo, M.A.; Chauveau, A.; Kohler, K.; Oddos, S.; Eissmann, P.; Brodsky, F.M.; Hopkins, C.; et al. Membrane nanotubes physically connect T cells over long distances presenting a novel route for HIV-1 transmission. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gousset, K.; Schiff, E.; Langevin, C.; Marijanovic, Z.; Caputo, A.; Browman, D.T.; Chenouard, N.; de Chaumont, F.; Martino, A.; Enninga, J.; et al. Prions hijack tunnelling nanotubes for intercellular spread. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jansens, R.J.J.; Tishchenko, A.; Favoreel, H.W. Bridging the Gap: Virus Long-Distance Spread via Tunneling Nanotubes. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Walsh, D.M.; Selkoe, D.J. A critical appraisal of the pathogenic protein spread hypothesis of neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mittal, R.; Karhu, E.; Wang, J.S.; Delgado, S.; Zukerman, R.; Mittal, J.; Jhaveri, V.M. Cell communication by tunneling nanotubes: Implications in disease and therapeutic applications. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 1130–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pontes, B.; Viana, N.B.; Campanati, L.; Farina, M.; Neto, V.M.; Nussenzveig, H.M. Structure and elastic properties of tunneling nanotubes. Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 2008, 37, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pinto, G.; Brou, C.; Zurzolo, C. Tunneling Nanotubes: The Fuel of Tumor Progression? Trends Cancer 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weil, S.; Osswald, M.; Solecki, G.; Grosch, J.; Jung, E.; Lemke, D.; Ratliff, M.; Hanggi, D.; Wick, W.; Winkler, F. Tumor microtubes convey resistance to surgical lesions and chemotherapy in gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2017, 19, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Guo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, R.; Wang, C.; Feng, M. Lipopolysaccharide-anchored macrophages hijack tumor microtube networks for selective drug transport and augmentation of antitumor effects in orthotopic lung cancer. Theranostics 2019, 9, 6936–6948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ljubojevic, N.; Henderson, J.M.; Zurzolo, C. The Ways of Actin: Why Tunneling Nanotubes Are Unique Cell Protrusions. Trends Cell Biol. 2021, 31, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Onfelt, B.; Nedvetzki, S.; Benninger, R.K.P.; Purbhoo, M.A.; Sowinski, S.; Hume, A.N.; Seabra, M.C.; Neil, M.A.A.; French, P.M.W.; Davis, D.M. Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8476–8483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mineo, M.; Garfield, S.H.; Taverna, S.; Flugy, A.; De Leo, G.; Alessandro, R.; Kohn, E.C. Exosomes released by K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells promote angiogenesis in a src-dependent fashion. Angiogenesis 2012, 15, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, X.; Bukoreshtliev, N.V.; Gerdes, H.H. Developing neurons form transient nanotubes facilitating electrical coupling and calcium signaling with distant astrocytes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bukoreshtliev, N.V.; Wang, X.; Hodneland, E.; Gurke, S.; Barroso, J.F.V.; Gerdes, H.-H. Selective block of tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation inhibits intercellular organelle transfer between PC12 cells. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hanna, S.J.; McCoy-Simandle, K.; Miskolci, V.; Guo, P.; Cammer, M.; Hodgson, L.; Cox, D. The Role of Rho-GTPases and actin polymerization during Macrophage Tunneling Nanotube Biogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hase, K.; Kimura, S.; Takatsu, H.; Ohmae, M.; Kawano, S.; Kitamura, H.; Ito, M.; Watarai, H.; Hazelett, C.C.; Yeaman, C.; et al. M-Sec promotes membrane nanotube formation by interacting with Ral and the exocyst complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1427–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hashimoto, M.; Bhuyan, F.; Hiyoshi, M.; Noyori, O.; Nasser, H.; Miyazaki, M.; Saito, T.; Kondoh, Y.; Osada, H.; Kimura, S.; et al. Potential Role of the Formation of Tunneling Nanotubes in HIV-1 Spread in Macrophages. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pergu, R.; Dagar, S.; Kumar, H.; Kumar, R.; Bhattacharya, J.; Mylavarapu, S.V.S. The chaperone ERp29 is required for tunneling nanotube formation by stabilizing MSec. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 7177–7193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Y.; Cui, J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y. Tunneling-nanotube development in astrocytes depends on p53 activation. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 732–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lu, J.J.; Yang, W.M.; Li, F.; Zhu, W.; Chen, Z. Tunneling Nanotubes Mediated microRNA-155 Intercellular Transportation Promotes Bladder Cancer Cells’ Invasive and Proliferative Capacity. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 9731–9743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Sharma, M.; Subramaniam, S. Rhes travels from cell to cell and transports Huntington disease protein via TNT-like protrusion. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 1972–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gousset, K.; Marzo, L.; Commere, P.H.; Zurzolo, C. Myo10 is a key regulator of TNT formation in neuronal cells. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126 Pt 19, 4424–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Uhl, J.; Gujarathi, S.; Waheed, A.A.; Gordon, A.; Freed, E.O.; Gousset, K. Myosin-X is essential to the intercellular spread of HIV-1 Nef through tunneling nanotubes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 13, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Delage, E.; Cervantes, D.C.; Penard, E.; Schmitt, C.; Syan, S.; Disanza, A.; Scita, G.; Zurzolo, C. Differential identity of Filopodia and Tunneling Nanotubes revealed by the opposite functions of actin regulatory complexes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhu, H.; Xue, C.; Xu, X.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Lu, J.; Ju, S.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Z.; Gu, X. Rab8a/Rab11a regulate intercellular communications between neural cells via tunneling nanotubes. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhu, S.; Bhat, S.; Syan, S.; Kuchitsu, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Zurzolo, C. Rab11a-Rab8a cascade regulates the formation of tunneling nanotubes through vesicle recycling. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Andresen, V.; Wang, X.; Ghimire, S.; Omsland, M.; Gjertsen, B.T.; Gerdes, H.H. Tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation is independent of p53 expression. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, X.; Gerdes, H.H. Long-distance electrical coupling via tunneling nanotubes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 2082–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Reichert, D.; Scheinpflug, J.; Karbanova, J.; Freund, D.; Bornhaeuser, M.; Corbeil, D. Tunneling nanotubes mediate the transfer of stem cell marker CD133 between hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 2016, 44, 1092–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dieriks, B.V.; Park, T.I.; Fourie, C.; Faull, R.L.; Dragunow, M.; Curtis, M.A. α-synuclein transfer through tunneling nanotubes occurs in SH-SY5Y cells and primary brain pericytes from Parkinson’s disease patients. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Castro, M.A.A.; Grieneisen, V.A.; de Almeida, R.M.C. Disruption and de novo formation of nanotubular membrane extensions in SW620 colon carcinoma cell line during cell division. Cell Biol. Int. 2005, 29, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gerdes, H.H.; Rustom, A.; Wang, X. Tunneling nanotubes, an emerging intercellular communication route in development. Mech. Dev. 2013, 130, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jansens, R.J.J.; Van den Broeck, W.; De Pelsmaeker, S.; Lamote, J.A.S.; Van Waesberghe, C.; Couck, L.; Favoreel, H.W. Pseudorabies Virus US3-Induced Tunneling Nanotubes Contain Stabilized Microtubules, Interact with Neighboring Cells via Cadherins, and Allow Intercellular Molecular Communication. J. Virol. 2017, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Smith, I.F.; Shuai, J.; Parker, I. Active generation and propagation of Ca2+ signals within tunneling membrane nanotubes. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, L37–L39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gabella, C.; Bertseva, E.; Bottier, C.; Piacentini, N.; Bornert, A.; Jeney, S.; Forró, L.; Sbalzarini, I.F.; Meister, J.J.; Verkhovsky, A.B. Contact angle at the leading edge controls cell protrusion rate. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Staufer, O.; Hernandez, J.E.B.; Rustom, A. Protease-resistant cell meshworks: An indication of membrane nanotube-based syncytia formation. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 372, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. McKinney, M.C.; Stark, D.A.; Teddy, J.; Kulesa, P.M. Neural Crest Cell Communication Involves an Exchange of Cytoplasmic Material Through Cellular Bridges Revealed by Photoconversion of KikGR. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 240, 1391–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Miyazawa, K.; Emmerling, K.; Manuelidis, L. Proliferative Arrest of Neural Cells Induces Prion Protein Synthesis, Nanotube Formation, and Cell-to-Cell Contacts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 111, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zani, B.G.; Laura, I.; Edelman, E.R.; Edward, M.R. Tubular Bridges for Bronchial Epithelial Cell Migration and Communication. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Guo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Peng, H.; Wei, R.; Wang, C.; Feng, M. Tunneling Nanotubular Expressways for Ultrafast and Accurate M1 Macrophage Delivery of Anticancer Drugs to Metastatic Ovarian Carcinoma. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1078–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Spees, J.L.; Olson, S.D.; Whitney, M.J.; Prockop, D.J. Mitochondrial transfer between cells can rescue aerobic respiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1283–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Han, H.; Hu, J.; Yan, Q.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, R. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured H9c2 cells via transferring intact mitochondria through tunneling nanotubes in an in vitro simulated ischemia/reperfusion model. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Vallabhaneni, K.C.; Haller, H.; Dumler, I. Vascular smooth muscle cells initiate proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21, 3104–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Dubey, G.P.; Ben-Yehuda, S. Intercellular nanotubes mediate bacterial communication. Cell 2011, 144, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Eugenin, E.A.; Gaskill, P.J.; Berman, J.W. Tunneling nanotubes (TNT) are induced by HIV-infection of macrophages: A potential mechanism for intercellular HIV trafficking. Cell. Immunol. 2009, 254, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Zhu, D.; Tan, K.S.; Zhang, X.; Sun, A.Y.; Sun, G.Y.; Lee, J.C. Hydrogen peroxide alters membrane and cytoskeleton properties and increases intercellular connections in astrocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118 Pt 16, 3695–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Souriant, S.; Balboa, L.; Dupont, M.; Pingris, K.; Kviatcovsky, D.; Cougoule, C.; Lastrucci, C.; Bah, A.; Gasser, R.; Poincloux, R.; et al. Tuberculosis Exacerbates HIV-1 Infection through IL-10/STAT3-Dependent Tunneling Nanotube Formation in Macrophages. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 3586–3599.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Filippova, N.; Nabors, L.B. ELAVL1 Role in Cell Fusion and Tunneling Membrane Nanotube Formations with Implication to Treat Glioma Heterogeneity. Cancers 2020, 12, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abounit, S.; Bousset, L.; Loria, F.; Zhu, S.; de Chaumont, F.; Pieri, L.; Olivo-Marin, J.C.; Melki, R.; Zurzolo, C. Tunneling nanotubes spread fibrillar alpha-synuclein by intercellular trafficking of lysosomes. EMBO J. 2016, 35, 2120–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abounit, S.; Wu, J.W.; Duff, K.; Victoria, G.S.; Zurzolo, C. Tunneling nanotubes: A possible highway in the spreading of tau and other prion-like proteins in neurodegenerative diseases. Prion 2016, 10, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lou, E.; Fujisawa, S.; Morozov, A.; Barlas, A.; Romin, Y.; Dogan, Y.; Gholami, S.; Moreira, A.L.; Manova-Todorova, K.; Moore, M.A. Tunneling nanotubes provide a unique conduit for intercellular transfer of cellular contents in human malignant pleural mesothelioma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Matejka, N.; Reindl, J. Perspectives of cellular communication through tunneling nanotubes in cancer cells and the connection to radiation effects. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 14, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Desir, S.; Wong, P.; Turbyville, T.; Chen, D.; Shetty, M.; Clark, C.; Zhai, E.; Romin, Y.; Manova-Todorova, K.; Starr, T.K.; et al. Intercellular Transfer of Oncogenic KRAS via Tunneling Nanotubes Introduces Intracellular Mutational Heterogeneity in Colon Cancer Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Marlein, C.R.; Piddock, R.E.; Mistry, J.J.; Zaitseva, L.; Hellmich, C.; Horton, R.H.; Zhou, Z.; Auger, M.J.; Bowles, K.M.; Rushworth, S.A. CD38-Driven Mitochondrial Trafficking Promotes Bioenergetic Plasticity in Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 2285–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Asencio-Barría, C.; Defamie, N.; Sáez, J.C.; Mesnil, M.; Godoy, A.S. Direct Intercellular Communications and Cancer: A Snapshot of the Biological Roles of Connexins in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Kretschmer, A.; Zhang, F.; Somasekharan, S.P.; Tse, C.; Leachman, L.; Gleave, A.; Li, B.; Asmaro, I.; Huang, T.; Kotula, L.; et al. Stress-induced tunneling nanotubes support treatment adaptation in prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Thayanithy, V.; Babatunde, V.; Dickson, E.L.; Wong, P.; Oh, S.; Ke, X.; Barlas, A.; Fujisawa, S.; Romin, Y.; Moreira, A.L.; et al. Tumor exosomes induce tunneling nanotubes in lipid raft-enriched regions of human mesothelioma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 323, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Saenz-de-Santa-Maria, I.; Bernardo-Castineira, C.; Enciso, E.; Garcia-Moreno, I.; Chiara, J.L.; Suarez, C.; Chiara, M.D. Control of long-distance cell-to-cell communication and autophagosome transfer in squamous cell carcinoma via tunneling nanotubes. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20939–20960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. He, K.; Shi, X.; Zhang, X.; Dang, S.; Ma, X.; Liu, F.; Xu, M.; Lv, Z.; Han, D.; Fang, X.; et al. Long-distance intercellular connectivity between cardiomyocytes and cardiofibroblasts mediated by membrane nanotubes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 92, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Epperla, C.P.; Mohan, N.; Chang, C.-W.; Chen, C.-C.; Chang, H.-C. Nanodiamond-Mediated Intercellular Transport of Proteins through Membrane Tunneling Nanotubes. Small 2015, 11, 6097–6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rustom, A. The missing link: Does tunnelling nanotube-based supercellularity provide a new understanding of chronic and lifestyle diseases? Open Biol. 2016, 6, 160057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Wittig, D.; Wang, X.; Walter, C.; Gerdes, H.H.; Funk, R.H.; Roehlecke, C. Multi-level communication of human retinal pigment epithelial cells via tunneling nanotubes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Abounit, S.; Zurzolo, C. Wiring through tunneling nanotubes—From electrical signals to organelle transfer. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Lock, J.T.; Parker, I.; Smith, I.F. Communication of Ca2+ signals via tunneling membrane nanotubes is mediated by transmission of inositol trisphosphate through gap junctions. Cell Calcium 2016, 60, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Ribeiro-Rodrigues, T.M.; Martins-Marques, T.; Morel, S.; Kwak, B.R.; Girao, H. Role of connexin 43 in different forms of intercellular communication—Gap junctions, extracellular vesicles and tunnelling nanotubes. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 3619–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Kadiu, I.; Gendelman, H.E. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 endocytic trafficking through macrophage bridging conduits facilitates spread of infection. J. Neuroimmune. Pharm. 2011, 6, 658–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Palus, M. Coupling in complex systems as information transfer across time scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 377, 20190094. [Google Scholar]
  88. He, K.; Luo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Liu, D.; Xu, L.; Qin, L.; Xiong, C.; Lu, Z.; Fang, X.; et al. Intercellular Transportation of Quantum Dots Mediated by Membrane Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3015–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Daniels, D.R. Transport of solid bodies along tubular membrane tethers. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, L.; Xin, Y.; Liu, S.; Cui, W. Differential roles of microtubules in the two formation stages of membrane nanotubes between human mesenchymal stem cells and neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 512, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Omsland, M.; Andresen, V.; Gullaksen, S.-E.; Ayuda-Duran, P.; Popa, M.; Hovland, R.; Brendehaug, A.; Enserink, J.; McCormack, E.; Gjertsen, B.T. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and interferon-alpha increase tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation and cell adhesion in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell lines. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 3773–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Arkwright, P.D.; Luchetti, F.; Tour, J.; Roberts, C.; Ayub, R.; Morales, A.P.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Gilmore, A.; Canonico, B.; Papa, S.; et al. Fas stimulation of T lymphocytes promotes rapid intercellular exchange of death signals via membrane nanotubes. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 72–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Feng, Y.; Zhu, R.; Shen, J.; Wu, J.; Lu, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, K. Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Rescue Endothelial Cells Experiencing Chemotherapy Stress by Mitochondrial Transfer Via Tunneling Nanotubes. Stem Cells Dev. 2019, 28, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rackham, C.L.; Hubber, E.L.; Czajka, A.; Malik, A.N.; King, A.J.F.; Jones, P.M. Optimizing beta cell function through mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated mitochondria transfer. Stem Cells 2020, 38, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Naphade, S.; Sharma, J.; Gaide Chevronnay, H.P.; Shook, M.A.; Yeagy, B.A.; Rocca, C.J.; Ur, S.N.; Lau, A.J.; Courtoy, P.J.; Cherqui, S. Brief reports: Lysosomal cross-correction by hematopoietic stem cell-derived macrophages via tunneling nanotubes. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Connor, Y.; Tekleab, S.; Nandakumar, S.; Walls, C.; Tekleab, Y.; Husain, A.; Gadish, O.; Sabbisetti, V.; Kaushik, S.; Sehrawat, S.; et al. Physical nanoscale conduit-mediated communication between tumour cells and the endothelium modulates endothelial phenotype. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Subramaniam, S. Rhes Tunnels: A Radical New Way of Communication in the Brain’s Striatum? Bioessays 2020, 42, 1900231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kumar, A.; Kim, J.H.; Ranjan, P.; Metcalfe, M.G.; Cao, W.; Mishina, M.; Gangappa, S.; Guo, Z.; Boyden, E.S.; Zaki, S.; et al. Influenza virus exploits tunneling nanotubes for cell-to-cell spread. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Panasiuk, M.; Rychlowski, M.; Derewonko, N.; Bienkowska-Szewczyk, K. Tunneling Nanotubes as a Novel Route of Cell-to-Cell Spread of Herpesviruses. J. Virol. 2018, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Rupp, I.; Sologub, L.; Williamson, K.C.; Scheuermayer, M.; Reininger, L.; Doerig, C.; Eksi, S.; Kombila, D.U.; Frank, M.; Pradel, G. Malaria parasites form filamentous cell-to-cell connections during reproduction in the mosquito midgut. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Kim, B.-W.; Lee, J.-S.; Ko, Y.-G. Mycoplasma exploits mammalian tunneling nanotubes for cell-to-cell dissemination. BMB Rep. 2019, 52, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Chauveau, A.; Aucher, A.; Eissmann, P.; Vivier, E.; Davis, D.M. Membrane nanotubes facilitate long-distance interactions between natural killer cells and target cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5545–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Marki, A.; Gutierrez, E.; Mikulski, Z.; Groisman, A.; Ley, K. Microfluidics-based side view flow chamber reveals tether-to-sling transition in rolling neutrophils. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Winkler, F.; Wick, W. Harmful networks in the brain and beyond. Science 2018, 359, 1100–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Roehlecke, C.; Schmidt, M.H.H. Tunneling Nanotubes and Tumor Microtubes in Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Hekmatshoar, Y.; Nakhle, J.; Galloni, M.; Vignais, M.L. The role of metabolism and tunneling nanotube-mediated intercellular mitochondria exchange in cancer drug resistance. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 2305–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xiao, M.; Xu, N.; Wang, C.; Pang, D.W.; Zhang, Z.L. Dynamic monitoring of membrane nanotubes formation induced by vaccinia virus on a high throughput microfluidic chip. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Furnon, W.; Fender, P.; Confort, M.P.; Desloire, S.; Nangola, S.; Kitidee, K.; Leroux, C.; Ratinier, M.; Arnaud, F.; Lecollinet, S.; et al. Remodeling of the Actin Network Associated with the Non-Structural Protein 1 (NS1) of West Nile Virus and Formation of NS1-Containing Tunneling Nanotubes. Viruses 2019, 11, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Qiu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Cai, J.; Wang, B.; Wei, X.; Ke, Q.; Sui, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Cell adhesion-mediated mitochondria transfer contributes to mesenchymal stem cell-induced chemoresistance on T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Vargas, J.Y.; Loria, F.; Wu, Y.J.; Cordova, G.; Nonaka, T.; Bellow, S.; Syan, S.; Hasegawa, M.; van Woerden, G.M.; Trollet, C.; et al. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway is involved in interneuronal communication mediated by tunneling nanotubes. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Polak, R.; de Rooij, B.; Pieters, R.; den Boer, M.L. B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells use tunneling nanotubes to orchestrate their microenvironment. Blood 2015, 126, 2404–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Matejka, N.; Reindl, J. Influence of α-Particle Radiation on Intercellular Communication Networks of Tunneling Nanotubes in U87 Glioblastoma Cells. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Civita, P.; Leite, D.M.; Pilkington, G.J. Pre-Clinical Drug Testing in 2D and 3D Human in Vitro Models of Glioblastoma Incorporating Non-Neoplastic Astrocytes: Tunneling Nano Tubules and Mitochondrial Transfer Modulates Cell Behavior and Therapeutic Respons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Hanna, S.J.; McCoy-Simandle, K.; Leung, E.; Genna, A.; Condeelis, J.; Cox, D. Tunneling nanotubes, a novel mode of tumor cell-macrophage communication in tumor cell invasion. J. Cell Sci. 2019, 132, jcs223321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Zoetemelk, M.; Ramzy, G.M.; Rausch, M.; Koessler, T.; van Beijnum, J.R.; Weiss, A.; Mieville, V.; Piersma, S.R.; de Haas, R.R.; Delucinge-Vivier, C.; et al. Optimized low-dose combinatorial drug treatment boosts selectivity and efficacy of colorectal carcinoma treatment. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 2894–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ippolito, L.; Morandi, A.; Taddei, M.L.; Parri, M.; Comito, G.; Iscaro, A.; Raspollini, M.R.; Magherini, F.; Rapizzi, E.; Masquelier, J.; et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote prostate cancer malignancy via metabolic rewiring and mitochondrial transfer. Oncogene 2019, 38, 5339–5355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Chastagner, P.; Loria, F.; Vargas, J.Y.; Tois, J.; Diamond, M.; Okafo, G.; Brou, C.; Zurzolo, C. Fate and propagation of endogenously formed Tau aggregates in neuronal cells. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e12025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tardivel, M.; Bégard, S.; Bousset, L.; Dujardin, S.; Coens, A.; Melki, R.; Buée, L.; Colin, M. Tunneling nanotube (TNT)-mediated neuron-to neuron transfer of pathological Tau protein assemblies. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016, 4, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Bera, H.; Ippagunta, S.R.; Kumar, S.; Vangala, P. Core-shell alginate-ghatti gum modified montmorillonite composite matrices for stomach-specific flurbiprofen delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 76, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Faust, J.J.; Balabiyev, A.; Heddleston, J.M.; Podolnikova, N.P.; Page-Baluch, D.; Chew, T.-L.; Ugarova, T.P. An actin-based protrusion originating from a podosome-enriched region initiates macrophage fusion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2019, 30, 2254–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Liu, K.; Ji, K.; Guo, L.; Wu, W.; Lu, H.; Shan, P.; Yan, C. Mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured endothelial cells in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model via tunneling nanotube like structure-mediated mitochondrial transfer. Microvasc. Res. 2014, 92, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, X.; Yu, X.; Xie, C.; Tan, Z.; Tian, Q.; Zhu, D.; Liu, M.; Guan, Y. Rescue of Brain Function Using Tunneling Nanotubes Between Neural Stem Cells and Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 2480–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zou, X.; Hou, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhong, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, G.; Sun, J. Mitochondria transfer via tunneling nanotubes is an important mechanism by which CD133+scattered tubular cells eliminate hypoxic tubular cell injury. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Jhala, D.; Rather, H.A.; Vasita, R. Extracellular matrix mimicking polycaprolactone-chitosan nanofibers promote stemness maintenance of mesenchymal stem cells via spheroid formation. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 15, 035011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Hsu, M.-J.; Karkossa, I.; Schaefer, I.; Christ, M.; Kuehne, H.; Schubert, K.; Rolle-Kampczyk, U.E.; Kalkhof, S.; Nickel, S.; Seibel, P.; et al. Mitochondrial Transfer by Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Ameliorates Hepatocyte Lipid Load in a Mouse Model of NASH. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Goodman, S.; Naphade, S.; Khan, M.; Sharma, J.; Cherqui, S. Macrophage polarization impacts tunneling nanotube formation and intercellular organelle trafficking. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Boukelmoune, N.; Chiu, G.S.; Kavelaars, A.; Heijnen, C.J. Mitochondrial transfer from mesenchymal stem cells to neural stem cells protects against the neurotoxic effects of cisplatin. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Vignais, M.L.; Caicedo, A.; Brondello, J.M.; Jorgensen, C. Cell Connections by Tunneling Nanotubes: Effects of Mitochondrial Trafficking on Target Cell Metabolism, Homeostasis, and Response to Therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 6917941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Yasuda, K.; Khandare, A.; Burianovskyy, L.; Maruyama, S.; Zhang, F.; Nasjletti, A.; Goligorsky, M.S. Tunneling nanotubes mediate rescue of prematurely senescent endothelial cells by endothelial progenitors: Exchange of lysosomal pool. Aging 2011, 3, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Dewhirst, M.W.; Secomb, T.W. Transport of drugs from blood vessels to tumour tissue. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Desir, S.; O’Hare, P.; Vogel, R.I.; Sperduto, W.; Sarkari, A.; Dickson, E.L.; Wong, P.; Nelson, A.C.; Fong, Y.; Steer, C.J.; et al. Chemotherapy-Induced Tunneling Nanotubes Mediate Intercellular Drug Efflux in Pancreatic Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Omsland, M.; Bruserud, O.; Gjertsen, B.T.; Andresen, V. Tunneling nanotube (TNT) formation is downregulated by cytarabine and NF-kappa B inhibition in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Oncotarget 2017, 8, 7946–7963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Rehberg, M.; Nekolla, K.; Sellner, S.; Praetner, M.; Mildner, K.; Zeuschner, D.; Krombach, F. Intercellular Transport of Nanomaterials is Mediated by Membrane Nanotubes in Vivo. Small 2016, 12, 1882–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Aswathy, J.; Jahnavi, S.; Krishna, R.; Manzoor, K.; Nair, S.; Menon, D. Targeted Labeling of Cancer Cells Using Biotin Tagged Avidin Functionalized Biocompatible Fluorescent Nanocrystals. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11, 7611–7620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Li, H.; Ye, S.; Guo, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, W.; Song, J.; Qu, J. Biocompatible carbon dots with low-saturation-intensity and high-photobleaching-resistance for STED nanoscopy imaging of the nucleolus and tunneling nanotubes in living cells. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 3075–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Domhan, S.; Ma, L.; Tai, A.; Anaya, Z.; Beheshti, A.; Zeier, M.; Hlatky, L.; Abdollahi, A. Intercellular communication by exchange of cytoplasmic material via tunneling nano-tube like structures in primary human renal epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Ferrati, S.; Shamsudeen, S.; Summers, H.D.; Rees, P.; Abbey, J.V.A.; Schmulen, J.; Liu, X.; Wong, S.T.C.; Bean, A.J.; Ferrari, M.; et al. Inter-endothelial Transport of Microvectors using Cellular Shuttles and Tunneling Nanotubes. Small 2012, 8, 3151–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ingle, N.P.; Hexum, J.K.; Reineke, T.M. Polyplexes Are Endocytosed by and Trafficked within Filopodia. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 1379–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Gu, Y.; Bi, X.; Ye, J. Gap-enhanced resonance Raman tags for live-cell imaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 6944–6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Deng, G.; Wu, Z.; Zhou, F.; Dai, C.; Zhao, J.; Kang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q. Exchangeability of FITC-SiO2 Nanoparticles Between Cancer Cells Increases the Range of Drug Delivery. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2018, 14, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Formicola, B.; D’Aloia, A.; Dal Magro, R.; Stucchi, S.; Rigolio, R.; Ceriani, M.; Re, F. Differential Exchange of Multifunctional Liposomes Between Glioblastoma Cells and Healthy Astrocytes via Tunneling Nanotubes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Astanina, K.; Koch, M.; Jungst, C.; Zumbusch, A.; Kiemer, A.K. Lipid droplets as a novel cargo of tunnelling nanotubes in endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Dilsizoglu Senol, A.; Pepe, A.; Grudina, C.; Sassoon, N.; Reiko, U.; Bousset, L.; Melki, R.; Piel, J.; Gugger, M.; Zurzolo, C. Effect of tolytoxin on tunneling nanotube formation and function. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Fortemaison, N.; Blancquaert, S.; Dumont, J.E.; Maenhaut, C.; Aktories, K.; Roger, P.P.; Dremier, S. Differential involvement of the actin cytoskeleton in differentiation and mitogenesis of thyroid cells: Inactivation of rho proteins contributes to cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent gene expression but prevents mitogenesis. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 5485–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Susanto, O.; Stewart, S.E.; Voskoboinik, I.; Brasacchio, D.; Hagn, M.; Ellis, S.; Asquith, S.; Sedelies, K.A.; Bird, P.I.; Waterhouse, N.J.; et al. Mouse granzyme A induces a novel death with writhing morphology that is mechanistically distinct from granzyme B-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 1183–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Yu, W.; Yang, L.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y. Cadherin Signaling in Cancer: Its Functions and Role as a Therapeutic Target. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gousset, K.; Gordon, A.; Kannan, S.K.; Tovar, J. A novel Microproteomic Approach Using Laser Capture Microdissection to Study Cellular Protrusions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The schematic representation illustrates the structure and general composition of tunneling nanotubes (TNTs).
Figure 1. The schematic representation illustrates the structure and general composition of tunneling nanotubes (TNTs).
Ijms 22 02306 g001
Table 1. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) as potential targets in disease treatment.
Table 1. Tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) as potential targets in disease treatment.
TreatmentRole of TNTsReferences
Inhibit TNT formationCancersTNTs drive tumor cell invasion, proliferation, and intercellular connection to protect cell death from radiotherapy in astrocytic tumor.[20]
TNTs in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) promote leukemogenic processes, the proliferation of ALLs, and increase chemotherapeutic resistance.[111]
Cancer cell transfer microRNAs via TNTs to endothelium to promote metastasis.[96]
Mitochondrial transfer through TNTs from neighboring nonmalignant bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) to multiple myeloma cells increase their oxidative phosphorylation.[74]
Mutant KRAS promote TNT formation in colorectal cancer cells, inducing intratumoral heterogeneity and invasiveness.[73]
Cell fusions via TNTs lead to glioma tumor heterogeneity and promote tumor cell survival against treatment.[68]
Therapy against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) increase TNT formation in bone marrow-derived malignancies.[91]
Irradiation in glioblastoma cells promotes TNT formation and cell survival.[112]
Astrocytes establish TNT connections with glioblastoma (GBM) cells, thus promote tumor growth and migration.[113]
Bladder cancer cells form TNTs to connect others, transferring miR-155 and acquiring a higher proliferative rate.[40]
TNTs between macrophages and tumor cells promote tumor invasion.[114]
Vemurafenib against colorectal cancer (CRC) enhances TNT formation in CRC cells with increasing therapy resistance.[115]
Mitochondria transferred from stromal cell cancer-associated fibroblasts to prostate cancer cells enhance their migration and metastatic ability.[116]
Stress promotes TNT formation between prostate cancer cells to resistant treatment.[76]
Neurodegenerative diseasesPrion trafficking through TNTs in neurons.[22]
Transfer of polyglutamine aggregates in neuronal cells.[7]
Misfolded α-synuclein transfer through TNTs inside lysosomal vesicles in neuronal cells.[69,110]
Tau transferred inside TNTs connecting neuronal cells.[117,118]
Transfer of Huntington disease protein, mHTT, in neurons.[41]
InfectionsIntercellular transmission of malaria parasites in the mosquito midgut.[100]
Transfer of bacillus between Human Macrophages.[31]
Transfer of tuberculosis bacillus (TB) and HIV-1 virus in human M (IL-10) macrophages.[67]
Transmission of HIV-1 within T cells.[21]
Nef HIV-1 increases TNTs and transfer via TNTs from macrophages to T cells.[43]
Transfer of influenza virus between lung epithelial cells.[119]
Transfer of bovine herpesvirus 1 between bovine primary fibroblasts and oropharynx cells.[99]
Transfer of Mycoplasma hyorhinis between NIH3T3 cells.[101]
Macrophages initiate fusion via TNT-associated cell connection, resulting in multinucleated giant cells in chronic inflammatory disease.[120]
Promote TNT formationBone marrow-derived stromal cells (BMSCs) protect alveolar epithelia in mice through TNTs against acute lung injury.[17,18]
MSCs protect endothelial cells from apoptosis via TNT-mediate mitochondrial transfer.[121]
Neural stem cells rescue brain function by formatting TNTs with brain microvascular endothelial cells.[122]
Renal CD133+ scattered tubular cells (STCs) protect injured tubular cells (TECs) in rat kidney.[123]
TNTs among MSCs help to maintain their stemness and differentiation potential.[124]
MSCs improved non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) lipid metabolism and tissue homeostasis via TNTs in mouse livers.[125]
Interpericyte TNTs coupled changes in microvasculature to neuronal activity through the bi-directional transfer of Ca2+ in mouse retina.[4]
Macrophages deliver lysosomes to cystinosin-deficient cells, leading to tissue preservation.[126]
MSCs transfer healthy mitochondria to damaged neural stem cells via TNTs.[127]
Table 2. Transfer of nanoparticles and drugs via TNTs.
Table 2. Transfer of nanoparticles and drugs via TNTs.
CargoesCellsReferences
NanocrystalsHuman hepatocellular carcinoma cells, HepG2 cells[134]
Quantum dots (QDs)Rat cardiac myoblast cells, H9c2 cells[88]
Fluorescence carbon dots4T1 cells[135]
QDsHuman proximal tubular epithelial cells (RPTEC)[136]
Carboxyl-QDsPerivascular macrophages[133]
Silicon microparticlesHuman microvascular (HMVEC) and umbilical vein
(HUVEC) endothelial cells
[137]
Polymer-based nanoparticleHela cells[138]
NanotagsHela cells[139]
FITC-SiO2 nanoparticlesHela cells[140]
liposomes carrying mApoE and chlorotoxinGlioblastoma (GBM) cell line U87-MG cells and normal human astrocytes (NHA)[141]
DoxorubicinHuman pancreatic cancer cells: MIA PaCa-2, S2013, CAPAN-1, and CAPAN -2[131]
DoxorubicinMacrophage cells RAW264.7 and human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells [29]
DoxorubicinFrom macrophages to ovarian carcinoma cells[60]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, X.; Wang, X. Opportunities and Challenges in Tunneling Nanotubes Research: How Far from Clinical Application? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052306

AMA Style

Han X, Wang X. Opportunities and Challenges in Tunneling Nanotubes Research: How Far from Clinical Application? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(5):2306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Xiaoning, and Xiang Wang. 2021. "Opportunities and Challenges in Tunneling Nanotubes Research: How Far from Clinical Application?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5: 2306. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22052306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop