Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Probing the Effect of Six-Membered N-Heterocyclic Carbene—6-Mes—on the Synthesis, Structure and Reactivity of Me2MOR(NHC) (M = Ga, In) Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
Future Directions for Transuranic Single Molecule Magnets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sterically Bulky NHC Adducts of GaMe3 and InMe3 for H2 Activation and Lactide Polymerization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cationic Protic Imidazolylidene NHC Complexes of Cp*IrCl+ and Cp*RhCl+ with a Pyridyl Tether Formed at Ambient Temperature

1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-1030, USA
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0385, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 16 January 2018 / Revised: 6 February 2018 / Accepted: 7 February 2018 / Published: 14 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue N-Heterocyclic Carbene Metal Complexes: From Design to Applications)

Abstract

:
Protic NHC (PNHC) complexes with N1H, N2-alkyl/aryl imidazolylidene ligands are relatively rare, and routes for their synthesis differ from what is used to make non-protic analogs. Prior work from our group and others showed that in the presence of a tethering ligand (phosphine or in one case, pyridine), CpM and Cp*M (M = Ir, Ru) PNHC complexes could be made by heating. Here, we find that the use of ionizing agents to activate [Cp*MIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (M = Ir, Rh) allows for what we believe is unprecedented ambient temperature formation of PNHC complexes from neutral imidazoles; the product complexes are able to perform transfer hydrogenation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The last 25 years have seen the establishment of N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) as essential tools for creation of powerful metal-containing catalysts and organocatalysts. The predominant parent heterocycle that has been used is imidazole. The overwhelming majority of imidazolidene and imidazolylidene NHC ligands bear two non-hydrogen substituents on the ring nitrogens. By contrast, NH derivatives may be described as protic NHCs (PNHC) [1,2], Whereas thousands of literature references describe NHCs, less than one hundred describe PNHCs, yet for PNHCs, there is the additional possibility of bifunctional chemistry and catalysis enabled by the protic functionality.
Synthetic routes to PNHC complexes must differ from those used to make NHC complexes. For example, in some syntheses of NHC complexes, free NHCs are made by deprotonating imidazolium salts; this route is precluded in making PNHCs, because the most acidic proton on the imidazolium salt precursor would be that on one of the nitrogens. Some PNHC complexes are made by coordination of a 1-alkylimidazole to a metal fragment, followed by deprotonation with the appropriate base at C-2, migration of the metal fragment to C-2, followed by protonation with the appropriate acid [3,4,5]. A variant on this scheme starts with C-2 deprotonation, installation of the metal at C-2, and protonation [6,7,8]. Occasionally, a suitable N-protecting group has been used [9]. All three of these routes involve three synthetic steps. Another route starts with a heterocycle functionalized at C2 with a halide; oxidative addition, followed by protonation afford PHNC complexes [10,11,12]. There is still a need for development of PNHC synthetic routes that are short and as general as possible.
To this end, our group and others have focused on developing reactions of 1-alkyl or 1-arylimidazole derivatives with a metal complex to form a N1H, N2-alkyl/aryl PNHC complex in a single synthetic step, that most certainly happens by more than one mechanistic step in the same flask. In 2008 and 2011, we reported the use of a 2-diphenylphosphinoethyl group as a tether to enable direct metalation by [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 or CpRuIICl(COD) to form 1 and 2, respectively (Scheme 1) [13,14], and in these and other papers [15,16], we showed some of the unusual chemistry enabled by the protic functionality, and the use of 15N NMR chemical shifts in studying structure. Subsequent work by Hahn and Cossairt groups using 2-phosphinoethyl tethers has appeared; in particular, proligands 3 and 4 lead to bis- and tris-PNHC species [17]. In 2008, the Ikariya group reported conversion of N-(pyrid-2-yl)benzimidazole to PNHC species 5 using tetramer (Cp*RuCl)4 in refluxing THF [18]. In 2010, Song et al. managed to form a pyridylene PNHC complex 7 at ambient temperature, but needed the special rigidity of proligand 6, the ability of Ir(I) for metalation, and the stabilizing influence of NH–Cl hydrogen bonding to isolate solely the PNHC [19].
Here, we extend this one-pot metalation chemistry to a homologous pair of pyrid-2-yl and even more conformationally flexible pyrid-2-ylmethyl 4-tert-butylimidazoles 3a and 3b, using both Cp*Ir and Cp*Rh fragments using [Cp*MIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 and ionizing agents to make complexes of form 4. Notably, the use of one equiv. of AgPF6 per Cp*MCl2 unit allowed room temperature reaction conditions to succeed for all four ligand–metal combinations, suggesting general applicability or importance of ionization as a means of promoting PNHC formation from precursors with M–halide bonds.

2. Results

2.1. Syntheses and Characterization by NMR and X-ray Diffraction

Proligand 8a was reported in 2010, made for another purpose, but only in 36% yield [20]. Our first attempt to improve the yield avoided the use of Cu(I) catalysis: a solution of tert-butylimidazole in N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP) was treated with NaH to make the conjugate base sodium salt, and then 2-bromopyridine was added and the mixture heated. The likely mechanism for substitution involves rate-determining addition of imidazolate N to pyridine C2, disrupting aromaticity, followed by facile loss of bromide. Once the reaction was completed by heating to 100 °C for 17 h, removal of the NMP by vacuum distillation into a liquid nitrogen trap, followed by silica column chromatography of the residue, gave 8a in improved but still moderate 59% yield.
We returned to Cu(I) catalysis, used DMF as lower-boiling solvent than NMP, and used a different base and higher reaction temperature and longer time (120 °C, 82 h). After reaction completion, workup as above and silica column chromatography yielded the product in a better yield of 70%.
Our first attempt to make novel 8b proligand started with NaH in NMP used to generate tert-butylimidazolate sodium salt. The requisite (chloromethyl)pyridine was then added and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature, in which tert-butylimidazole anion presumably performed an SN2 displacement on the (chloromethyl)pyridine electrophile. This reaction, unlike that for 8a, occurred readily at room temperature. Removal of NMP was accomplished via vacuum distillation into a nitrogen trap, and silica column chromatography gave 8b in a modest 48% yield.
An alternative method avoided the use of strong base and NMP. These adjustments made both the reaction preparation and purification 8b more facile. Following a preparation seen in literature, for analogs lacking the tert-butyl group [21], tert-butylimidazole, potassium hydroxide, (chloromethyl)pyridine hydrochloride, and tetrahydrofuran were added to a round bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser, and subsequently refluxed at 70 °C for 2–3 days. The higher temperature of the reaction allows for the usage of a weaker base for deprotonation and subsequent nucleophillic attack via a one-pot synthesis. Extraction of the products from the reaction mixture with dichloromethane and subsequent recrystallization of the solids obtained gave 86% yield.
Attempts to find a straightforward synthetic method for complexing 8a and 8b ligands proved to be more difficult than anticipated. Initially, [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 and 8b were dissolved in 0.5 to 1 molar ratio in NMP and heated to 60 °C for 11 days, but no product was observed. In an attempt to lower the reaction temperature, KPF6 was added to the reaction mixture to ionize chlorides and aid in the complexation of the ligands to the metal. The addition of KPF6 led to complete complexation within 3 to 5 days but, in the case of forming 9b-Ir, two products in a ratio of 9:1 were observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The peaks for the major product were shadowed by smaller minor product peaks. Specifically, mutually coupled doublets for the diastereotopic methylene spacer protons of the major product appeared near 5.6 and 5.0 ppm, whereas the minor product peaks were seen at 5.8 and 4.9 ppm. The N–H peaks for the major and minor product occur were seen at 11.6 and 11.8 ppm respectively. Adding KPF6 alleviated the need for high temperatures, but the difficulty of completely removing NMP spawned the continued search for better reaction conditions.
The use of KPF6 in THF at 60 °C was carried out with both ligand precursors 8a and 8b, and with rhodium and iridium precursors, yielding 9a-Ir, 9b-Ir, 9a-Rh and 9b-Rh. All of the reactions required several days of heating at 60 °C in the low boiling solvent tetrahydrofuran. Only the iridium reaction with 8b showed a second minor product, whereas the other three reactions appeared to contain only one product by NMR spectroscopic analysis. Early attempts used excesses of KPF6, leading to crystallized products containing an extra hexafluorophosphate anion and potassium cation, as seen from a representative structure in Figure 1. By contrast, use of little more than one equivalent of KPF6 per Ir or Rh allowed for isolation of bulk material with correct CHN analyses.
The final optimized procedure for synthesizing complexes 9a-Ir, 9b-Ir, 9a-Rh and 9b-Rh used silver hexafluorophosphate with the anticipation that the silver(I) cation would more efficiently ionize the chlorides and allow for easier binding of the proligand to the metal center (Scheme 2). To our delight, both ionization and subsequent formation of PNHC complexes occurred at room temperature. In addition, the crystallized products contained neither excess silver nor hexafluorophosphate as demonstrated by elemental analysis.
Unfortunately, the many attempts to form crystals of complexes derived from 8a were unsuccessful. Fortunately, X-ray quality crystals for 9b-Ir and 9b-Rh were obtained and led to the structures seen below in Figure 2 and Figure 3 respectively. CCDC 1814025-1814027 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper (Supplementary Materials). These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-mail: [email protected]).
The bond angles and distances for the cations of complexes 9b-Ir and 9b-Rh are similar in both the iridium and rhodium analogues, as seen in Table 1. In fact, bond distances are essentially identical within experimental uncertainty. Both structures are octahedral, with Cp* occupying three facial sites. The Cl1–M1–C1 bond angles for both the iridium and rhodium analogues are around 90°, and in both cases, the NH is pointed away from the chloride.
The Ir–carbene and Ir–pyridine distances, and carbene–Ir–pyridine angle are also almost identical to those reported by Xiao et al. [22] for the cation of N-methylated analog of 9b-Ir, NHC complex 10b (Scheme 3). Those literature data are Ir–C 2.022(14) and Ir–N 2.097(10) Å, and angle 85.4(5)°.
By analogy, we suggest that the angles and bond distances of the 4a-Ir and 4a-Rh are very similar to one another, and also very similar to those reported for the N-methylated analog 10a.
To help assess the role of the NH group, we prepared standard NHC complex 10b-PF6 (X = PF6) (Scheme 3). The imidazolium salt 11 was converted to 12, followed by transmetallation using [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 in the presence of KPF6.

2.2. Catalysis

We compared our catalysts in transfer hydrogenation reactions following protocols found in literature [23,24]. We focused on the reduction of acetophenone to 1-phenylethanol using potassium hydroxide (0.1 equiv.) as base and 1 mol % catalyst loadings, as seen in Scheme 4. Because this process generates a chiral compound, and the Cp*M-containing catalysts are all chiral (but made here in racemic form), eventually, in future work, one might envision making enantiopure versions of the catalysts and studying enantioselective reductions.
Reactions were carried out air-free in dried 20 mL scintillation vials, and in the glovebox. Aliquots from each reaction were removed at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 20 h, 2 days, and 3 days time intervals. In cases where catalysis was complete in less than one hour, aliquots were taken every 5 min. All yields are calculated via 1H NMR integrations of the peaks for the product and remaining reactants using an inert internal standard (1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene), which has been used elsewhere [23]. The molar ratio of isopropanol (reductant) to acetophenone (substrate) was 20 to 1. We searched for a literature determination of Keq for the reaction in Scheme 4, but were surprised not to find a value. Assuming Keq is 1, the maximum yield of reduction product expected would be 95%. The percent yields in Table 2 and Table 3 are given to the nearest 0.1, but the estimated uncertainty of NMR integrations is in the order of 1–2%; because one compares integrals of standard and analyte, the uncertainties in the yields reported are conservatively estimated as about 3%.
As seen in the results found in Table 2, the methylene spacer-containing complex 9b-Ir is three times faster than its homolog 9a-Ir lacking the spacer. Although exact bond distances and angles cannot be directly compared due to the lack of crystal structure for 9a-Ir, one can extrapolate based on the data from the literature NHC complexes 10a and 10b. If Scheme 5 applies, the methylene spacer may serve to decrease the distance between the ketone substrate and the N–H, leading to faster reduction. Also Scheme 5 may explain why N-methylated complex 10b-PF6 is approximately 10 times slower than the PNHC analog 4b-Ir. See Discussion for more details.
[Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 was also used as catalyst, and in fact, was initially faster than 9a-Ir and 9b-Ir. A number of [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2-derived catalysts contain NHC or phosphine ligands, and in some cases, the simple parent complex [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 is indeed superior. Unfortunately, not all publications bother to include control experiments with [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2, as we have done here.
As for the Ir complexes, 9b-Rh with methylene spacer was faster than 9a-Rh: 9b-Rh was 6 times faster than 9a-Rh, as defined by comparing the times needed for 50% conversion of product (Table 3, ca. 60 min versus 10 min). Also of interest is the fact that the rhodium PNHC complexes were much faster than their iridum counterparts (Table 2 vs. Table 3). Given the estimated 3% uncertainty in yield values discussed above, we could say that 9b-Rh achieves theoretical ca. 95% yield at 30–45 min, whereas 9a-Rh requires almost 6 times longer (3 h), and the Ir complexes do not achieve theoretical yields under the conditions we have examined.

3. Discussion

In forming PNHC complexes from proligands 8a and 8b, the pyridyl and pyridylmethyl tethers were successfully used in conjunction with a tert-butyl group that effectively blocks coordination of the metal to the imidazole nitrogen. Use of KPF6 as ionizing agent speeds up metalations considerably, but heating at 60 °C for some days was still required, whether the solvent used was THF for the syntheses reported, or the more polar NMP. More dramatic was the ability to use ambient temperatures for metalation in less than 24 h, when AgPF6 was employed. These results may inform future work on forming PNHC complexes from neutral imidazole or pyridine precursors by one-pot direct functionalization of a CH bond.
Turning to catalysis by Ir complexes, N–CH3 species 10b-PF6 was about 10× slower than its PNHC counterpart, 9b-Ir, consistent with Scheme 5. Also consistent with Scheme 5 is the fact that in both the Ir and Rh series, the methylene spacer led to faster reactions (ca. 3× for Ir, 6× for Rh). The distance between NH and MH would be less in the complexes with methylene spacers, allowing better interaction with the C=O of substrate. An indication can be had by looking at published crystal structures of complexes 10a-Cl and 10b-(Cp*IrCl3) [22]. The distance between the carbon of the N–CH3 and the chlorine of the M–Cl units is 4.32 Å for 10a-Cl and 3.48 Å for 10b-(Cp*IrCl3). The more rigid ligand in 9a and 10a holds the NH quite far from the secondary sphere of the metal. Further significant effort will be needed to study the mechanism in detail.
Of all the catalysts examined, 9b-Rh was the fastest, being about 6 times faster than either its Ir congener or the Rh homolog 9a-Rh.
The rates of catalysis by the CpIr* species here are in the range of rates reported for a variety of Cp*Ir complexes, where temperatures of about 80 °C are used, often with co-catalytic base (recent examples: [25,26]). As a side note, to achieve faster rates, e.g., activity at ambient temperature, it would appear that a mono-dentate NHC is needed on Cp*Ir [27]. For a particularly thorough comparison paper, see work of Hintermair et al. [24]; first, they actually include [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2, which is a rather good catalyst (60% in their work and 66% in ours, under identical conditions). Hintermair et al. tested 14 different molecular catalysts, but only two of the species achieved >95% yield after 3 h. To our knowledge, a similarly thorough comparison of Cp*Rh species has not appeared. Notable in our work is the 9b-Rh obtained at 95% yield in less than an hour. The faster catalysis by the Rh species may be a result of the trend that second row transition metals typically form weaker metal ligand bonds than third row metals, leading to more facile turnover during catalysis.
The ability of XH/MH systems (X = O or N) to facilitate a variety of reactions remains a very active area of research (examples: [28,29]), and further exploration of systems like the one here is definitely warranted.

4. Materials and Methods

For general experimental conditions, see other articles from our lab, for example [16,30,31].

4.1. Synthesis of 8a Using NaH

In the glovebox, sodium hydride (60% in mineral oil) (0.6470 g, 0.01617 mol) was added to an oven-dried 50 mL Schlenk flask, and washed with hexane (2 × 5 mL). Each time the mixture was stirred, and then allowed to settle, followed by removal of the solvent wash via pipet. The washed sodium hydride was placed under Teflon pump vacuum until dry, and then suspended in N-methylpyrrolidinone (3 mL). tert-Butylimidazole (2.0055 g, 0.01617 mol) in N-methylpyrrolidinone (7 mL) was added dropwise to the Schlenk flask and allowed to stir, and vented while bubbling occurred. After the reaction mixture stopped bubbling and cleared, it was placed under nitrogen outside the glovebox and the flask placed in an ice bath. Using a syringe, 2-chloropyridine (1.517 mL, 0.01616 mol) was added to the cooled Schlenk flask. The reaction mixture turned orange, and the flask was allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was then placed in a 100 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 17 h. Reaction completion was monitored by the analysis of an aliquot by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). After the removing the reaction from the oil bath, deionized water (5 mL) was added to the mixture. The N-methylpyrrolidinone and water were removed via vacuum distillation with heating by a heat gun and trapping of the solvent in a liquid nitrogen cold trap, leaving behind a red solid. The red solid was mixed with water (70 mL), and product was extracted with (6 × 50 mL) dichloromethane. The organic layers were combined and dried with sodium sulfate. The dried organic layers were filtered through a coarse fritted funnel and concentrated via rotary evaporation. The yellow oil was then dried to completion on a Schlenk vacuum line. The identity of the resulting yellow oil (1.9289 g, 59% yield) was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR (chloroform-d1, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ 8.46 (ddd, J = 0.8, 1.9, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.32 (s, 1 H), 7.94 (ddd, J = 1.3, 6.9, 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.67 (td, J = 0.9, 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.54 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (ddd, J = 0.9, 4.9, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.30 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (chloroform-d1, 100 MHz, 30 °C) δ 154.6, 150.5, 149.9, 140.2, 134.5, 122.5, 113.0, 110.4, 30.4, 30.7. Anal. Calcd. for C12H15N (201.13): C, 71.61; H, 7.51; N, 20.88. Found C, 71.33; H, 7.90; N, 20.67.

4.2. Synthesis of 8a [2-(4-tert-butyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)pyridine] Using CuI

In the glovebox, dimethylformamide (2 mL) was added to a 50 mL oven-dried Schlenk flask containing copper (I) iodide (0.0401 g, 0.211 mmol), tert-butylimidazole (0.1239 g, 0.998 mmol), and Cs2CO3 (0.06938 g, 0.2129 mmol). The reaction flask was removed from the glovebox and the contents put under an N2 atmosphere. A syringe was used to add 2-bromopyridine (0.1000 mL, 1.025 mmol) to the Schlenk flask, and the reaction mixture and was allowed to stir at ambient temperature for 45 min. The reaction mixture was then placed in a 120 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 82 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, ethyl acetate (10 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The resulting reddish solution was loaded onto a silica plug and product was eluted with ethyl acetate (2 × 100 mL). The cloudy eluant was filtered through Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated by rotary evaporation, and the residue stored under oil pump vacuum. The resulting reddish oil was loaded onto a silica column and eluted with ethyl acetate. The product containing fractions were combined, dried with magnesium sulfate, filtered, and the filtrate concentrated by rotary evaporation. The identity and purity of the yellow oil (0.1406 g, 70% yield) was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR.

4.3. Synthesis of 9a-Ir with the Aid of KPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (4 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8a (0.1531 g, 0.7606 mmol, 2.077 equiv.), [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.2917 g, 0.3661 mmol), and KPF6 (0.1445 g, 0.7850 mmol, 2.14 equiv.). The vial containing the orange heterogenous reaction was then placed in a 60 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 44 h. The yellow reaction mixture was concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum. The remaining yellow solid was resuspended in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL) and filtered through a Celite plug to remove KCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid and then concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting yellow solid (0.4645 g, 86.1% yield) was confirmed as 9a-Ir by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 600 MHz, 30 °C) δ 12.18 (bs, 1 H), 8.80 (ddd, J = 0.8, 1.4, 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 8.28 (dt, J = 1.8, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.20 (ddd, J = 0.8, 1.3, 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.60 (dt, J = 1.3, 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.86 (s, 15 H), 1.43 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 600 MHz, 30 °C) δ 167.82, 153.40, 152.55, 147.12, 143.01, 124.91, 113.01, 111.63, 93.43, 31.92, 28.27, 8.23. Anal. Calcd. for C22H30ClF6N3PIr (709.13): C, 37.26; H, 4.20; N, 5.93. Found: C, 37.73; H, 4.53; N, 6.11.

4.4. Synthesis of 9a-Ir with the Aid of AgPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (4.5 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8a (0.0317 g, 0.157 mmol, 1.98 equiv.), [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0631 g, 0.0792 mmol), and AgPF6 (0.0474 g, 0.187 mmol). The reaction vial containing the orange heterogenous solution was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to stir for 22 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture solution was filtered through a Celite plug to remove AgCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated THF (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 5 mL) was added to the solid, and then concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting yellow solid (0.0927 g, 83% yield) was confirmed by by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy.

4.5. Synthesis of 9a-Rh with the Aid of KPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (1.5 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8a (0.0750 g, 0.372 mmol, 2.07 equiv.), [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.1106 g, 0.1789 mmol), and KPF6 (0.0696 g, 0.378 mmol, 2.11 equiv.). The red/brown heterogenous reaction was then placed in a 60 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 10 d. The orange reaction mixture was concentrated on Teflon pump vacuum. The remaining yellow solid was resuspended in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL), and filtered through a Celite plug to remove KCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid and then concentrated with a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting orange solid (0.1849 g, 80% yield) was confirmed as product by 1H, 31P, and 13C NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ 12.75 (bs, 1 H), 8.82 (td, J = 0.7, 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 8.29 (dt, J = 1.6, 68.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.05 (s, 1 H), 7.65 (dt, J = 1.3, 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.83 (s, 15 H), 1.44 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, 100MHz, 30 °C) δ 180.49 (d, 51.6 Hz), 151.38, 151.313, 146.92, 141.88, 123.76, 112.47, 111.09, 99.22 (d, 6.7 Hz), 30.98, 28.34, 8.52. 31P NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −144.260 (septet, J = 707.2 Hz). 19F NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −75.66 (d, J = 713.1 Hz) Anal. Calcd. for C22H30ClF6N3PRh (619.82): C, 42.63; H, 4.88; N, 6.78. Found: C, 43.10; H, 4.61; N, 7.15.

4.6. Synthesis of 9a-Rh with the Aid of AgPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (4.5 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8a (0.0307 g, 0.153 mmol), [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0488 g, 0.0789 mmol), and AgPF6 (0.0402 g, 0.1590 mmol). The reaction vial containing the reddish heterogenous solution was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to stir for 40 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture solution was filtered through a Celite plug to remove AgCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated THF (3 × 3 mL) and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated with the Teflon high vacuum. The obtained solid was rinsed with pentane (2 × 5 mL), and solvent was removed by a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting yellow solid (0.0927 g, 83% yield) was confirmed to be product by 1H, 31P, and 13C NMR spectroscopy.

4.7. Synthesis of 9b-Ir with the Aid of KPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (0.5 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8b (0.0304 g, 0.141 mmol, 2.07 equiv.), [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0543 g, 0.0681 mmol), and KPF6 (0.0272 g, 0.147 mmol). The orange heterogeneous reaction was then placed in a 60 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 5 d. The bright yellow reaction mixture was concentrated on a Teflon vacuum pump. The remaining orange solid was resuspended in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL) and filtered through a Celite plug to remove KCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL) and the filtrates were collected in a tared vial and concentrated with the Teflon vacuum pump. The resulting yellow solid 9b-Ir (0.0884 g, 86% yield) was confirmed by by 1H, 13C, 31P, and 19F NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ 11.67 (s, 1 H), 8.96 (dd, J =1.2, 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 8.11 (dt, J = 1.5, 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.23 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.74 (s, 15 H), 1.33 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (chloroform-d1, 100 MHz, 30 °C) δ 157.36, 140.22, 126.59, 125.32, 115.82, 53.76, 28.50, 8.26. 31P NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −144.22 (septet, J = 707.4 Hz). 19F NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −72.4 (d, J = 707.4 Hz). X-ray crystals were obtained by evaporative recrystallization from THF. Anal. Calcd. For C23H32ClF6N3PIr (723.15): C, 38.20; H, 4.46; N, 5.81. Found: C, 38.93; H, 4.02; N, 5.55.

4.8. Synthesis of 9b-Ir with the Aid of AgPF6

In the glovebox, dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (1.5 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8b (0.0107 g, 0.0497 mmol, 1.98 equiv.), [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0200 g, 0.251 mmol), and AgPF6 (0.0127 g, 0.0464 mmol). The reaction vial was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to stir for 17 h at room temperature. The bright yellow reaction mixture was concentrated using a Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid and then concentrated with a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The remaining yellow solid was resuspended in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL) and filtered through a Celite plug to remove AgCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrates were collected in a tared vial and concentrated under vacuum. The obtained solid was rinsed with pentane (2 × 20 mL), and solvent was removed under a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. Yellow solid 9b-Ir (0.0254 g, 70% yield) was obtained.

4.9. Synthesis of 9b-Rh with the Aid of KPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (1 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8b (0.0313 g, 0.145 mmol, 2.16 equiv.), [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0418 g, 0.0676 mmol), and KPF6 (0.0274 g, 0.148 mmol). The red/brown heterogeneous reaction was then placed in a 60 °C oil bath and allowed to stir for 4 days. The orange reaction mixture was concentrated on Teflon high vacuum. The remaining orange solid was redissolved in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL) and filtered through a Celite plug to remove KCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated with the Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid and then concentrated with a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting orange solid (0.0874 g, 95% yield) was confirmed as product by 1H, 31P, and 13C NMR spectroscopy. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ 11.77 (s, 1 H), 8.99 (dd, J = 1.3, 5.7 Hz, 1 H), 8.11 (dt, J = 1.5, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.78 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.62 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.64 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.15 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.72 (s, 15 H), 1.29 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (chloroform-d1, 100 MHz, 30 °C) δ 170.72 (d, JCRh = 50.4 Hz), 156.51 (d, 2J = 1.3 Hz), 155.55, 144.76, 139.98, 125.89, 125.52, 117.02, 98.13 (d, 1JCRh = 6.4 Hz), 30.61, 28.46, 8.59. 31P NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −144.22 (septet, J = 696.7 Hz). 19F NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ −72.47 (d, J = 707.5 Hz). X-ray crystals were obtained by vapor diffusion of acetone and pentane. Anal. Calcd. for C23H32ClF6N3PRh (633.84): C, 43.58; H, 5.09; N, 6.63. Found: C, 43.93; H, 4.71; N, 6.38.

4.10. Synthesis of 9b-Rh with the Aid of AgPF6

Dry, deoxygenated tetrahydrofuran (3 mL) was added to a 20 mL scintillation vial containing 8b (0.0309 g, 0.143 mmol, 2.09 equiv.), [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (0.0423 g, 0.0684 mmol), and AgPF6 (0.0367 g, 0.145 mmol). The reaction vial was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to stir for 34 h at room temperature. The orange reaction mixture was concentrated using a Teflon high vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid, and then concentrated with a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The remaining yellow solid was resuspended in deoxygenated acetone (2 mL), and filtered through a Celite plug to remove AgCl precipitate. The Celite plug was washed with deoxygenated acetone (3 × 3 mL), and the filtrate was collected in a tared vial and concentrated under Teflon pump vacuum. Pentane (2 × 20 mL) was added to the solid and then concentrated with a Teflon pump vacuum after each addition of pentane. The resulting orange solid (0.0741 g, 81% yield) was confirmed as product by 1H, 31P, and 13C NMR spectroscopy.

4.11. Synthesis of 10b-PF6

In the glovebox, a vial was charged with solids [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (51.9 mg, 0.0651 mmol), silver carbene complex 12 (41.4 mg, 0.0652 mmol), and KPF6 (23.9 mg, 0.1298 mmol). CH2Cl2 (3 mL) was added and the vial was capped, wrapped in foil, and the contents stirred for 3 days. The mixture was filtered through Celite and the filtrate evaporated. The crude product was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and pentane vapor was allowed to diffuse. The crystals were harvested, rinsed with CHCl3, and then dissolved in CH2Cl2 (ca. 10 mL) and the resulting solution passed through a small plug of silica, eluting with CH2Cl2/acetone. The product so obtained (62.2 mg) was dissolved in acetone (5 mL) and ether vapor was allowed to diffuse. Yellow crystals (52.6 mg, 59%) of product were obtained. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C) δ 8.98 (dd, J = ~1, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (dt, J = ~1, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (dt, J = ~1, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 2.0, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 1.6, 1H), 5.72 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 1.78 ppm (s, 15H). Anal. Calcd. for C20H26ClF6IrN3P (681.11): C, 35.27; H, 3.85; N, 6.17. Found: C, 35.35; H, 3.67; N, 6.49.

4.12. General Catalytic Procedures for the Reduction of Acetophenone to 1-Phenylethanol

A stock reactant solution was made by mixing acetophenone (4.66 mL), isopropanol (60 mL), and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (402.8 mg) as internal standard.
In the glovebox, finely ground potassium hydroxide (11.3 mg, 0.201 mmol) and 9b-Rh (13.1 mg, 0.0206 mmol) were weighed into an oven-dried 20 mL scintillation vial. To the reaction flask was added the acetophenone/isopropanol (0.616 M) solution (3.25 mL, 2.00 mmol) containing trimethoxybenzene. The reaction vial was removed from the glovebox and placed in an 82 °C oil bath. The reaction flask was removed from the oil bath during specific time increments for removal of aliquots for analysis. Before aliquot removal, the reaction flask was cooled for 30 s in an ice bath, followed by being brought into the glovebox for removal of 0.2 mL of the reaction mixture. The aliquot was placed in an NMR tube. The aliquot was diluted with 0.5–1.0 mL of deuterated dichloromethane, and kept on ice until analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
9a-Rh (12.0 mg, 0.214 mmol), KOH (12.4 mg, 0.200 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.25 mL).
[Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (6.1 mg, 0.0091 mmol), KOH (11.2 mg, 0.200 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.25 mL).
9b-Ir (15.5 mg, 0.0214 mmol), KOH (13.9 mg, 0.248 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.41 mL).
9a-Ir (14.9 mg, 0.0210 mmol), KOH (13.5 mg, 0.241 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.48 mL).
[Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 (8.0 mg, 0.011 mmol), KOH (11.2 mg, 0.200 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.25 mL).
10b-PF6 (13.6 mg, 0.0199 mmol), KOH (11.9 mg, 0.212 mmol), acetophenone/isopropanol solution (3.25 mL).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2304-6740/6/1/27/s1, cif and checkcif files for the structures (9b-Ir)KPF6·1.5THF, 9b-Ir and 9b-Rh.
Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

We thank LeRoy Lafferty, former head of the SDSU NMR Facility, for all of his help, and gratefully acknowledge partial financial support from the US National Science Foundation.

Author Contributions

Douglas B. Grotjahn and Jessica K. Martin conceived and designed the experiments and analyzed all but the X-ray diffraction data, Jessica K. Martin did most of the experiments, Taylon N. Tom made 10b-PF6 and performed some catalysis experiments, Arnold L. Rheingold obtained and analyzed X-ray diffraction data, Jessica K. Martin wrote her thesis on her part of the work, Douglas B. Grotjahn wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jahnke, M.C.; Hahn, F.E. Complexes with protic (NH,NH and NH,NR) N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 293–294, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuwata, S.; Ikariya, T. Metal-ligand bifunctional reactivity and catalysis of protic N-heterocyclic carbene and pyrazole complexes featuring β-NH units. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 14290–14300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huertos, M.A.; Perez, J.; Riera, L.; Menendez-Velazquez, A. From N-alkylimidazole ligands at a rhenium center: Ring opening or formation of NHC complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13530–13531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huertos, M.A.; Perez, J.; Riera, L.; Diaz, J.; Lopez, R. From bis(N-alkylimidazole) to bis(NH-NHC) in rhenium carbonyl complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6409–6412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ruiz, J.; Perandones, B.F. Base-promoted tautomerization of imidazole ligands to N-heterocyclic carbenes and subsequent transmetalation reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9298–9299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bonati, F.; Burini, A.; Pietroni, B.R.; Bovio, B. Reactions of C-imidazolyllithium derivatives with group Ib compounds: Tris[μ-(1-alkylimidazolato-N3,C2)]trigold(I) and -silver(I). Crystal structure of bis(1-benzylimidazolin-2-ylidene)gold(I) chloride. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 375, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raubenheimer, H.G.; Cronje, S. Carbene complexes derived from lithiated heterocycles, mainly azoles, by transmetalation. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617–618, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meier, N.; Hahn, F.E.; Pape, T.; Siering, C.; Waldvogel, S.R. Molecular recognition utilizing complexes with NH,NH-stabilized carbene ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 1210–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dobereiner, G.E.; Chamberlin, C.A.; Schley, N.D.; Crabtree, R.H. Acyl protection strategy for synthesis of a protic NHC complex via N-acyl methanolysis. Organometallics 2010, 29, 5728–5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Isobe, K.; Kai, E.; Nakamura, Y.; Nishimoto, K.; Miwa, T.; Kawaguchi, S.; Kinoshita, K.; Nakatsu, K. Trans-bromo(2-, 3-, and 4-pyridyl)bis(triethylphosphine)palladium(II) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2475–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Isobe, K.; Kawaguchi, S. Organopalladium(II) complexes containing carbon-bonded pyridine and picoline as a ligand: Preparation, structures, and reactions. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar]
  12. Crociani, B.; Di Bianca, F.; Giovenco, A.; Scrivanti, A. Protonation and methylation reactions of 2-pyridyl-palladium(II) and platinumu(II) complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 251, 393–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Miranda-Soto, V.; Grotjahn, D.B.; DiPasquale, A.G.; Rheingold, A.L. Imidazol-2-yl complexes of Cp*Ir as bifunctional ambident reactants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13200–13201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miranda-Soto, V.; Grotjahn, D.B.; Cooksy, A.L.; Golen, J.A.; Moore, C.E.; Rheingold, A.L. A labile and catalytically active imidazol-2-yl fragment system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marelius, D.C.; Moore, C.E.; Rheingold, A.L.; Grotjahn, D.B. Reactivity studies of pincer bis-protic N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of platinum and palladium under basic conditions. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1334–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marelius, D.C.; Darrow, E.H.; Moore, C.E.; Rheingold, A.L.; Grotjahn, D.B. Hydrogen-bonding pincers with two protic N-heterocyclic carbenes from direct metalation of a 1,8-bis(imidazol-1-yl)carbazole by platinum, palladium, as well as nickel. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 10988–10992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Flowers, S.E.; Cossairt, B.M. Mono- and dimetalation of a tridentate bisimidazole-phosphine ligand. Organometallics 2014, 33, 4341–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Araki, K.; Kuwata, S.; Ikariya, T. Isolation and interconversion of protic N-heterocyclic carbene and imidazolyl complexes: Application to catalytic dehydrative condensation of N-(2-pyridyl)benzimidazole and allyl alcohol. Organometallics 2008, 27, 2176–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, G.; Su, Y.; Periana, R.A.; Crabtree, R.H.; Han, K.; Zhang, H.; Li, X. Anion-exchange-triggered 1,3-shift of an NH proton to iridium in protic N-heterocyclic carbenes: Hydrogen-bonding and ion-pairing effects. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Peters, M.; Breinbauer, R. A simple synthesis of functionalized 3-methyl-1-pyridinyl-1H-imidazolium salts as bidentate N-heterocyclic-carbene precursors and their application in ir-catalyzed arene borylation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6622–6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chiu, P.L.; Lai, C.-L.; Chang, C.-F.; Hu, C.-H.; Lee, H.M. Synthesis, structural characterization, computational study, and catalytic activity of metal complexes based on tetradentate pyridine/N-heterocyclic carbene ligand. Organometallics 2005, 24, 6169–6178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, X.-Q.; Jin, G.-X. Functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene iridium complexes: Synthesis, structure and addition polymerization of norbornene. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 3363–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gnanamgari, D.; Sauer, E.L.O.; Schley, N.D.; Butler, C.; Incarvito, C.D.; Crabtree, R.H. Iridium and ruthenium complexes with chelating N-heterocyclic carbenes: Efficient catalysts for transfer hydrogenation, β-alkylation of alcohols, and N-alkylation of amines. Organometallics 2009, 28, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hintermair, U.; Campos, J.; Brewster, T.P.; Pratt, L.M.; Schley, N.D.; Crabtree, R.H. Hydrogen-transfer catalysis with Cp*IrIII complexes: The influence of the ancillary ligands. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Navarro, M.; Smith, C.A.; Albrecht, M. Enhanced catalytic activity of iridium(III) complexes by facile modification of C,N-bidentate chelating pyridylideneamide ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 11688–11701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mazloomi, Z.; Pretorius, R.; Pamies, O.; Albrecht, M.; Dieguez, M. Triazolylidene iridium complexes for highly efficient and versatile transfer hydrogenation of C=O, C=N, and C=C bonds and for acceptorless alcohol oxidation. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 11282–11298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Corberán, R.; Peris, E. An unusual example of base-free catalyzed reduction of C=O and C=NR bonds by transfer hydrogenation and some useful implications. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1954–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moore, C.M.; Szymczak, N.K. 6,6’-dihydroxy terpyridine: A proton-responsive bifunctional ligand and its application in catalytic transfer hydrogenation of ketones. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nieto, I.; Livings, M.S.; Sacci, J.B.; Reuther, L.E.; Zeller, M.; Papish, E.T. Transfer hydrogenation in water via a ruthenium catalyst with OH groups near the metal center on a bipy scaffold. Organometallics 2011, 30, 6339–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Larsen, C.R.; Erdogan, G.; Grotjahn, D.B. General catalyst control of the monoisomerization of 1-alkenes to trans-2-alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1226–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Grotjahn, D.B.; Kraus, J.E.; Amouri, H.; Rager, M.-N.; Cortes-Llamas, S.A.; Mallari, A.A.; DiPasquale, A.G.; Liable-Sands, L.M.; Golen, J.A.; Zakharov, L.N.; et al. Multimodal study of secondary interactions in Cp*Ir complexes of imidazolylphosphines bearing an NH group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7919–7934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Examples of prior tethered protic NHC (PNHC) and proligands, and the present work on 8 and 9.
Scheme 1. Examples of prior tethered protic NHC (PNHC) and proligands, and the present work on 8 and 9.
Inorganics 06 00027 sch001
Figure 1. Crystal structure of (9b-Ir)KPF6·1.5THF isolated using KPF6 as described in the text. One THF molecule is excluded for clarity. The graphic shows bonds between K+ and three PF6 ions but the structure should be regarded as ionic.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of (9b-Ir)KPF6·1.5THF isolated using KPF6 as described in the text. One THF molecule is excluded for clarity. The graphic shows bonds between K+ and three PF6 ions but the structure should be regarded as ionic.
Inorganics 06 00027 g001
Scheme 2. Optimized room temperature formation of PNHC complexes of form 9 from 8a and 8b, using AgPF6.
Scheme 2. Optimized room temperature formation of PNHC complexes of form 9 from 8a and 8b, using AgPF6.
Inorganics 06 00027 sch002
Figure 2. Crystal structure of the cation of 9b-Ir; PF6 anion and two THF molecules are excluded for clarity.
Figure 2. Crystal structure of the cation of 9b-Ir; PF6 anion and two THF molecules are excluded for clarity.
Inorganics 06 00027 g002
Figure 3. Crystal structure of the cation of 9b-Rh; PF6 anion and two THF molecules are excluded for clarity.
Figure 3. Crystal structure of the cation of 9b-Rh; PF6 anion and two THF molecules are excluded for clarity.
Inorganics 06 00027 g003
Scheme 3. Related NHC complexes with N-methyl group. In this work, 10b-PF6 (X = PF6) was made by the route shown; previously, Xiao et al. had made 10a-Cl and 10b-Cl and 10b-(Cp*IrCl3).
Scheme 3. Related NHC complexes with N-methyl group. In this work, 10b-PF6 (X = PF6) was made by the route shown; previously, Xiao et al. had made 10a-Cl and 10b-Cl and 10b-(Cp*IrCl3).
Inorganics 06 00027 sch003
Scheme 4. Transfer hydrogenation used to evaluate catalysts in this work.
Scheme 4. Transfer hydrogenation used to evaluate catalysts in this work.
Inorganics 06 00027 sch004
Scheme 5. Suggested mechanism of transfer hydrogenation reactions involving PNHC complexes.
Scheme 5. Suggested mechanism of transfer hydrogenation reactions involving PNHC complexes.
Inorganics 06 00027 sch005
Table 1. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) in the cations of 9b-Ir and 9b-Rh.
Table 1. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) in the cations of 9b-Ir and 9b-Rh.
Bond9b-Ir9b-RhAngles9b-Ir9b-Rh
M1–C12.017(3)2.020(4)Cl1–M1–C189.33(11)90.66(12)
H1N–Cl13.4363.432Cl1–M1–N386.46(9)88.08(11)
M1–N32.108(2)2.111(4)C1–Ir1–N385.01(12)85.49(16)
C11–M12.4154(8)2.407(1)---
Table 2. Yields (%) of product over time (h) using 9a-Ir, 9b-Ir, 10b-PF6, or [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 [a].
Table 2. Yields (%) of product over time (h) using 9a-Ir, 9b-Ir, 10b-PF6, or [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 [a].
Time (h)[Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]29a-Ir9b-Ir10b-PF6
00000
158.711.036.92.7
366.234.975.47.6
666.6 15.7
2091.2 36.1
4880.8 54.2
7280.7 61.3
[a] Using 1 mol % catalyst (0.5 mol % of dimer [Cp*IrIIICl(μ-Cl)]2), 0.1 equiv. KOH, i-PrOH solvent, 82 °C.
Table 3. Yields (%) of product over time (min) using 9a-Rh, 9b-Rh, or [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 [a].
Table 3. Yields (%) of product over time (min) using 9a-Rh, 9b-Rh, or [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2 [a].
Time (min)9a-Rh9b-Rh[Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2
0000
513.919.82.5
10-54.84.0
1518.473.83.8
20-84.54.1
2522.992.04.2
30-92.74.5
3524.795.44.3
40-92.15.1
4532.494.55.5
50-91.65.8
55-97.05.0
6049.196.35.7
18099.794.89.5
[a] Using 1 mol % catalyst (0.5 mol % of dimer [Cp*RhIIICl(μ-Cl)]2), 0.1 equiv. KOH, i-PrOH solvent, 82 °C.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grotjahn, D.B.; Martin, J.K.; Tom, T.N.; Rheingold, A.L. Cationic Protic Imidazolylidene NHC Complexes of Cp*IrCl+ and Cp*RhCl+ with a Pyridyl Tether Formed at Ambient Temperature. Inorganics 2018, 6, 27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics6010027

AMA Style

Grotjahn DB, Martin JK, Tom TN, Rheingold AL. Cationic Protic Imidazolylidene NHC Complexes of Cp*IrCl+ and Cp*RhCl+ with a Pyridyl Tether Formed at Ambient Temperature. Inorganics. 2018; 6(1):27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics6010027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grotjahn, Douglas B., Jessica K. Martin, Taylon N. Tom, and Arnold L. Rheingold. 2018. "Cationic Protic Imidazolylidene NHC Complexes of Cp*IrCl+ and Cp*RhCl+ with a Pyridyl Tether Formed at Ambient Temperature" Inorganics 6, no. 1: 27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics6010027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop