Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Cell Fate Decisions During Breast Cancer Development
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Hermes (Rbpms) is a Critical Component of RNP Complexes that Sequester Germline RNAs during Oogenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JDB
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/jdb4010003
jdb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Notochord Cells in Intervertebral Disc Development and Degeneration

by
Matthew R. McCann
1,2 and
Cheryle A. Séguin
1,2,*
1
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
2
Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4(1), 3; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jdb4010003
Submission received: 13 November 2015 / Revised: 7 January 2016 / Accepted: 13 January 2016 / Published: 21 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Fate Decisions in Development and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The intervertebral disc is a complex structure responsible for flexibility, multi-axial motion, and load transmission throughout the spine. Importantly, degeneration of the intervertebral disc is thought to be an initiating factor for back pain. Due to a lack of understanding of the pathways that govern disc degeneration, there are currently no disease-modifying treatments to delay or prevent degenerative disc disease. This review presents an overview of our current understanding of the developmental processes that regulate intervertebral disc formation, with particular emphasis on the role of the notochord and notochord-derived cells in disc homeostasis and how their loss can result in degeneration. We then describe the role of small animal models in understanding the development of the disc and their use to interrogate disc degeneration and associated pathologies. Finally, we highlight essential development pathways that are associated with disc degeneration and/or implicated in the reparative response of the tissue that might serve as targets for future therapeutic approaches.

1. Introduction

“Know from whence you came. If you know whence you came, there are absolutely no limitations to where you can go.”
—James Baldwin
In trying to understand the cellular and molecular basis of tissue degeneration, it is important to consider the dynamic interplay involving cell-cell communication, gene regulation, and growth factor and cytokine secretion required to form a healthy, functional tissue during normal development. Once we have identified pathways that serve to regulate tissue formation, we can start to investigate alterations in these signals during normal aging, disease, and tissue repair.
Low back pain has become one of the most common causes of disability, affecting overall well-being and work performance, with recent reports indicating a lifetime prevalence as high as 85% in industrialized countries [1]. In fact, according to the recent Global Burden of Disease study, low back pain is the most common musculoskeletal disorder and the leading cause of years lived with disability in all developed countries [2]. The prevalence of chronic low back pain has increased remarkably over the last decade for all ages and genders; increases have been reported to be as high as 162% between 1992 and 2006 in middle-aged individuals in the US [3]. Alarmingly, there are no disease-modifying therapies for low back pain and current treatment options do not adequately provide improved outcomes [4]. While several risk factors for back pain have been identified such as, obesity [5], psychological factors [6], age and sex [7], and genetic variants [8], the molecular cause(s) of back pain remain elusive.
Although the etiology of low back pain is unknown, it is often associated with degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD). The current lack of disease-modifying therapeutics for disc degeneration is linked to a poor understanding of the biological mechanisms that regulate IVD development, health and degeneration. This review provides an overview of IVD biology, with a specific emphasis on the development of the nucleus pulposus (NP) and how the embryonic notochord plays an essential role in adult IVD homeostasis. Furthermore, we explore the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of animal models to study the IVD.

2. Functions and Structure of the Intervertebral Disc

IVDs are complex connective tissue structures that serve to anchor adjacent vertebral bodies along the spinal column, essential for mechanical stabilization of the spine and load bearing during axial compression [9]. The cartilaginous joints formed by IVDs also provide flexibility and movement to the spinal column. The IVD consists of three distinct, yet interdependent specialized tissues: the central viscous NP, the outer fibrillar annulus fibrosus (AF), and the cartilage end-plates (CEP) that anchor the disc to the adjacent vertebral bones. The diversity in the structure of these tissues is related to the specific organization of their extracellular matrix (ECM), which is produced and maintained by distinct cell populations.
The NP is composed primarily of large aggregating proteoglycans held together loosely by an irregular network of type-II collagen and elastin fibers. The aggrecan monomers are highly sulphated by covalently bound glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (chondroitin sulfate, keratin sulfate) and cross-linked to hyaluronic acid via cartilage link protein [10]. The GAGs confer a net negative charge to the aggrecan molecules, attracting large numbers of counter ions and therefore water molecules [11,12]. The influx of water to the NP is created by osmotic pressure [13], and the water molecules are retained in the matrix in part by the irregular meshwork of type II collagen [14]. The osmotic pressure provides the stiffness required for the NP to maintain height and turgor against compressive loads. With sustained loading, such as human daily activity, roughly 20%–25% of the water slowly diffuses out of the disc into the paravertebral muscles, resulting in a decrease in disc height [15,16]. Upon removal of the compressive load (i.e., nightly rest), water is reabsorbed into the NP matrix, resulting in a re-expansion of the tissue and recovery of disc height [17,18,19].
The AF is a fibrocartilagenous structure formed by distinct lamellae composed of bundles of type I collagen fibers oriented at oblique angles, that alternate within each consecutive lamella to form an angle-ply structure (25 lamellae in the AF of a human disc) [20]. This arrangement provides mechanical support to resist the turgor pressure that is applied by the NP. The outer AF contains elastic fibers (elastin, elaunin and oxytalan proteins) that directly associate with the adjacent vertebra and extend into the bone as Sharpey’s fibers to anchor the IVD into bone [21]. The inner AF forms a transition zone between the fibrous outer AF and the gelatinous NP, containing higher levels of glycosaminoglycans and type-II collagen in the interlamellar matrix when compared to the outer AF [22].
The disc is anchored superiorly and inferiorly to the adjacent vertebral bodies through the CEPs, thin layers of hyaline cartilage that interface with the inner AF and NP. In humans, the adult NP is the largest avascular tissue in the body and therefore depends on nutrient, metabolic by-products and O2 gas exchange through the CEPs via passive diffusion from the highly vascularized vertebral bone [23]. The CEP is formed by chondrocytes similar to those found in articular cartilage, which secrete a type II collagen- and proteoglycan-rich extracellular matrix.

3. Intervertebral Disc Development

3.1. Early Embryo and Node Development

Much of our knowledge of mammalian notochord development is derived from experiments using mouse models due to their short gestation period, large litter sizes and ease of genetic manipulation. As such, the data presented below apply to the murine model and developmental stages, unless otherwise indicated.
During gastrulation the primitive streak is formed along the longitudinal axis of the embryo, establishing longitudinal (anterior/posterior) and bilateral (left/right) symmetry. In the mouse, a cluster of cells located near the anterior end of the primitive streak ingress to form the node (Figure 1). The node is a transient, pit-shaped structure located at the distal tip the early embryo, responsible for establishing the left asymmetry of the body plan. Monocilia localized to the apical surface of node cells beat in a clockwise rotation (when viewed from the ventral side) to drive a leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid containing morphogens, such as Nodal and the Nodal antagonist Cerl-2, secreted by the columnar epithelial cells of ventral node [24,25,26,27]. This fluid flow promotes left side specification via two possible mechanisms: either through direct morphogen-induced differentiation on the left side of the embryo, or by inducing a mechanosensitive calcium signalling response to the nodal flow in the perinodal crown cells that promotes cell specification. While the underlying mechanisms remain to be established, the node and resultant nodal flow are necessary for asymmetric differentiation of the left axis of the embryo [28,29,30].
Jdb 04 00003 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic representation of key events in the transition from notochord to nucleus pulposus development in the murine model. Notochord cells within the mouse embryonic node at embryonic day 7.5 play a fundamental role in left/right patterning of the early embryo by secreting Nodal and Cerl-2. Notochord cells proliferate and migrate to form the embryonic notochord (surrounded by the notochord sheath) between embryonic day 9–11 where they provide instructive cues that pattern the neural tube and sclerotome through secretion of sonic hedgehog. Notochord cells then go on to form the mature nucleus pulposus (NP) in the post-natal intervertebral disc (IVD) (shown here in the sagittal plane), where they continue to secrete inductive factors, including sonic hedgehog and Wnt, which serve to regulate intervertebral disc homeostasis.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of key events in the transition from notochord to nucleus pulposus development in the murine model. Notochord cells within the mouse embryonic node at embryonic day 7.5 play a fundamental role in left/right patterning of the early embryo by secreting Nodal and Cerl-2. Notochord cells proliferate and migrate to form the embryonic notochord (surrounded by the notochord sheath) between embryonic day 9–11 where they provide instructive cues that pattern the neural tube and sclerotome through secretion of sonic hedgehog. Notochord cells then go on to form the mature nucleus pulposus (NP) in the post-natal intervertebral disc (IVD) (shown here in the sagittal plane), where they continue to secrete inductive factors, including sonic hedgehog and Wnt, which serve to regulate intervertebral disc homeostasis.
Jdb 04 00003 g001

3.2. Notochord Development

In the mouse, the first stages of notochord development originate at the notochordal plate between E8.0–E8.5. This plate-like structure lays in the ventral midline of the embryo and is continuous with the dorsal gut endoderm. At E9.0, the notochord plate folds off the gut endoderm to form the anterior notochord, where it rests in a central position in the embryo, flanked by the dorsal ridge of the neural tube (the floor plate) and ventrally by the gut endoderm (the endoderm plate). Laterally, the notochord is flanked by the paraxial mesoderm, which will go on to form the somites and subsequently the AF and vertebrae.
Anatomically, the notochord is a continuous rod-like structure that forms the primitive anterior/posterior axis of the embryo. The notochord is able to resist compressive loads along the axis of the embryo yet is sufficiently flexible to resist buckling [31]. The unique structural and cellular features of the notochord achieve this rigidity. In mammals the notochord is surrounded by an acellular sheath composed of collagens, laminins and proteoglycans [32,33], while in zebrafish the sheath is made up of an epidermal cell layer; both serving to encapsulate the notochord [34]. In zebrafish, alterations in the composition of the notochord sheath, such as loss of col15a1 or emilin3, result in specific phenotypes associated with notochord malformations [35,36,37,38]. Furthermore, disruptions in the structural integrity of the sheath result in loss of the embryonic axis and perturbations in spinal column development [33]. In mammals, the cell type responsible for secretion of the notochord sheath has yet to be established, with the extracellular matrix proteins produced by notochord cells, the surrounding mesenchyme cells or a combination thereof. Notochord cells also directly contribute to the mechanical properties of the notochord due to the presence of large intracellular vacuoles that increase cell size and occupy ~80% of the cell volume [39]. The presence of these vacuoles have been described in numerous species including amphibians [40], birds [41], mammals [42] and humans [43]. While conserved across species, their classification has been long debated. Recent work by Ellis et al. demonstrated that in zebrafish, notochord cell vacuoles are lysosome related organelles that require late endosomal trafficking and H+-ATPase-dependent acidification [44]. In contrast to typical lysosomes that have a low pH [45], V-ATPase in notochord vacuoles generates a proton rich gradient that allows water to flow into the vacuole through osmosis [46]. Work from our lab has shown that H+-ATPases are enriched in the mouse IVD [47], and others have indicated their importance in bovine [48] and canine [39] NP cells suggesting that the processes governing notochord vacuole formation maybe be conserved. The expansion of intracellular vacuoles contributes to longitudinal elongation of the embryonic axis; disruption of vacuolated cell differentiation or integrity in the zebrafish was shown to alter notochord and spine morphogenesis [44]. In mammals, the notochord remains in place until the development of the permanent axial skeleton (e.g., vertebrae, IVDs).

3.3. Notochord Signalling

During early development, the notochord is generally considered a signalling centre, secreting growth factors and morphogens responsible for patterning of surrounding tissues, including the neural tube [49], sclerotome [50], pancreas [51] and aorta [52]. The best characterized is its ability to direct neural tube neurogenesis during dorsal-ventral patterning. Mutations that disrupt notochord formation result in altered floor-plate induction [53]. Conversely, grafting experiments that placed an ectopic notochord adjacent to the neural tube established a secondary floor plate [49,54]. This process is thought to be mediated by notochord-derived SHH and chordin, as transplantation of microcarrier beads likewise resulted in the formation of a secondary floor plate [55].
The notochord also influences mesodermal muscle determination in the sclerotome; experiments have shown that mutations that prevent notochord development disrupt sclerotome formation [56]. In zebrafish, mutation of the floating head (flh) gene that disrupts notochord formation results in ectopic midline muscle development [57], suggesting that notochord-derived signals inhibit muscle development. This interaction appears to be mediated by pair-box transcription factors, specifically Pax1 induction and Pax-3 and Pax-7 repression [56,58]. Finally, the notochord is also known to contribute to endoderm patterning [59], where notochord-derived activin-βB and FGF2 have been shown to repress SHH in the endoderm thereby promoting pancreas development [60].
While the importance of the notochord in early embryonic development is well established, the postnatal role of notochord cells has been a source of ongoing controversy. Work from our lab and others have shown that in the mouse the notochord disappears in areas where the vertebral bodies form but expands within the perichordal disc, to form the central NP [61,62]. Interestingly, the mechanisms by which the notochord undergoes regression in the presumptive vertebrae are unknown [63,64]. The absence of detectable notochord cell apoptosis in this region or proliferation in the future NP [65] has led to the hypothesis that notochord cells either succumb to pressure from the developing bone mesenchyme and are forced into the future NP, or undergo directed migration to sites of the future NP [64]. Within the newly formed NP, notochord cells produce a glycosaminoglycan-rich extracellular matrix, which separates the original cell mass into a network of cell clusters.

3.4. Role of the Mesenchyme in Intervertebral Disc Development

Development of the axial skeleton is a multi-step process, beginning with notochord formation and requiring fine-tuned coordination and pre-patterning of individual skeletal segments. In the mouse, the paraxial mesoderm undergoes segmentation between E7.5–E11.5 to form the somites, which are metameric structures that exist transiently during vertebrate development [66]. The somites lie adjacent to the neural tube and the notochord. In response to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wnt signals from the ectoderm and Shh signaling from the notochord and neural tube floorplate, the dorsal aspect of the somites differentiate to form the dermomyotome, which gives rise to the dermis. At E12.5, the ventral portion of the somites differentiates to form the sclerotome that will give rise to the ribs, vertebral bodies and CEP and AF of the IVD [67]. The sclerotome cells migrate and aggregate around the notochord to form a continuous perichordal tube [68]. At E15.5, these mesenchymal cells acquire a metameric pattern of condensed and non-condensed segments along the anterior/posterior axis. This process is regulated by Notch and Wnt signalling to maintain somite polarity [69,70]. The notochord secretes Shh thereby regulating differentiation of the sclerotome in the formation of the axial skeleton. Notably, the vertebral column is not formed in mice lacking Shh [71]; however, targeted deletion of Shh in the floorplate does not alter IVD development, and deletion of Shh in both the floorplate and notochord results in the loss of IVD and vertebral body structures [72]. Lineage tracing using both the Gdf5-Cre [73] and Tbx18-Cre [74] demonstrated the mesenchymal origin of the AF. The condensed segments will later contribute to the mesenchyme-derived AF, whereas the less-condensed segments form the templates of the future vertebral bones.

3.5. Notochord Cell Contribution to the Nucleus Pulposus

Unlike the cells of the AF and CEP that remain relatively stable throughout life, the cells of the NP undergo drastic changes within the first decade of life in humans. In most vertebrates, including humans and mice, there is a progressive loss of large vacuolated notochord cells immediately after birth and the NP becomes populated by small cartilage-like nucleus pulposus cells [75,76]. Interestingly, the loss of the large vacuolated notochord cells from the NP is associated with the onset of disc degeneration, suggesting that these cells contribute to maintenance of the NP [75,77,78]. Despite this correlation, only recently has there been insight into the underlying biological mechanisms.
There have historically been two conflicting hypotheses regarding the origin of the cartilage-like cells of the NP. It was originally suggested that these cells were of mesenchymal origin, resulting from migration of cells to the NP from either the surrounding CEP [79] or the perichondrium at the periphery of the IVD [80]. During IVD formation, notochord cells were believed to direct mesenchymal cell migration, stimulate matrix synthesis, and then undergo apoptosis or necrosis [81,82]. More recent studies have suggested an alternate model in which notochord cells serve as NP progenitors and undergo terminal differentiation to give rise to the cartilage-like nucleus pulposus cells [77,83,84]. Our group and others conducted lineage-tracing studies in mice that established that during normal development and aging all cells of the NP are notochord-derived (from E15.5 until 21 months of age) [61,62]. To investigate the cellular composition of the NP during IVD degeneration, a mechanically-induced model of disc degeneration was used in mice where bone marrow-derived cells were labeled with GFP. These studies demonstrated an increased number of GFP+ BMSCs in the vertebral bone marrow, vascular canals of the CEP and the site of injury in the outer AF; however, BMSC-derived cells were not detected in the NP [85]. While other genetic approaches and in vivo models of disc degeneration or other spine-related pathologies should be used to examine the cellular composition of the IVD in various disease states, the data to date supports the notochord cell maturation model. In fact, recent publications in the field have suggested that mature cells within the NP should instead be referred to as “nucleus pulpocytes” to underscore their distinct developmental origin and function [86].

4. Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

The most common cause of back pain is disc degeneration, the etiology of which is poorly understood. Consequently, there are no specific criteria to distinguish degeneration from the physiological processes of growth, aging or adaptive remodeling [18]. Disc degeneration has perhaps been best defined as a cell-mediated response to progressive structural failure [18]. This process is thought to initiate with changes to the cellular microenvironment within the disc and progress over decades, resulting in structural breakdown and functional deficiency [87,88]. Degeneration of the IVD is associated with increased extracellular matrix breakdown [89], abnormal (fibrotic) matrix synthesis [90], inflammation [91], and in-growth of nociceptive nerves and blood vessels into a typically aneural and avascular tissue [92] (Figure 2).
Jdb 04 00003 g002 1024
Figure 2. Schematic representation highlighting the hallmarks of human disc degeneration. Compared to healthy intervertebral disc, the degenerative disc has increased inflammation, blood vessel and neuronal ingrowth, loss of the boundary between the NP and annulus fibrosus (AF), and widening of the interlamellar space between collagen bundles in the AF that often results in disc bulging. In advanced degeneration the cartilage endplate calcifies and osteophytes form on the adjacent vertebral bones.
Figure 2. Schematic representation highlighting the hallmarks of human disc degeneration. Compared to healthy intervertebral disc, the degenerative disc has increased inflammation, blood vessel and neuronal ingrowth, loss of the boundary between the NP and annulus fibrosus (AF), and widening of the interlamellar space between collagen bundles in the AF that often results in disc bulging. In advanced degeneration the cartilage endplate calcifies and osteophytes form on the adjacent vertebral bones.
Jdb 04 00003 g002
Initiation of the degenerative process is thought to originate specifically in the NP [93,94]. The deterioration of the major structural proteoglycan aggrecan [95,96], along with decreased production of other ECM components in the NP, lead to reduced hydration [97], loss of disc height, and an overall inability to absorb compressive load [98,99]. Compressive forces are therefore distributed to the surrounding AF, which results in altered mechanical properties and structural deterioration including radial and circumferential tears in the AF [100,101]. These tears often precede radial bulges or herniations of the NP substance into the adjacent spinal cord, resulting in pain [88,102]. Currently, there are symptomatic treatments for late stages of degenerative disc disease but no disease-modifying therapeutics [103].

Notochord Cells and Intervertebral Disc Homeostasis

Within the postnatal IVD notochord cells are thought to maintain their role as important signaling effectors regulating IVD cell function. This function was first suggested by co-culture experiments that demonstrated the ability of notochord cells to increase proteoglycan synthesis in mature NP cells [78]. This effect was shown to be independent of direct cell contact, as notochord-condition media could recapitulate the anabolic effects of notochord cells on NP cells [104,105] as well as AF cells [106]. Notochord secreted factors, including the matricellular protein CCN2, directly regulate NP cell function by upregulating anabolic gene expression and downregulating catabolic gene expression [107,108,109]. Notochord secreted factors have also been shown to inhibit cell death and apoptosis of NP cells and protect NP cells from the degradative effects of cytokine exposure [110].
Since disc degeneration and LBP are associated with nerve and blood vessel in-growth to the IVD [92], studies have investigated the ability of notochord-secreted molecules to prevent axons and/or blood vessels from entering inappropriate territories. During mouse development, secretion of semaphorin 3E from the notochord and lateral plate mesoderm has been shown to regulate dorsal aorta formation [52]. In the IVD, notochord cells have been shown to inhibit angiogenesis by suppressing Vegf expression in endothelial cells [111]. With regards to neuronal patterning, studies of early chick development established that the notochord and dermamyotomes regulate axonal guidance [112]. These studies also identified semaphorin 3A as a notochord-derived axon repellent [113]. Interestingly, the outer AF of degenerative human discs shows reduced expression of semaphorin 3A compared to healthy IVDs, suggesting that IVD-associated nerve repellent pathways maybe be conserved across species [114]. In keeping with the correlation between the loss of notochord cells and neural in-growth to the IVD, expression of Nrp-1, another inhibitor of anxonal growth expressed in the NP, is decreased in degenerative human discs [114] and in aged rat NP [115].
The microenvironment of the NP may also contribute to repelling innervation. The ECM of the notochord differs from that of cartilage tissues in that it lacks keratin sulfate and has high levels of chondroitin sulfate [116]. In zebrafish, chondroitin sulfate has been shown to guide the development of the nervous system by inhibiting the formation of segmental motor neurons [117]. Co-culture studies demonstrated that chondroitin sulfate derived from the notochord or notochord sheath directly induced dorsal root ganglia cone collapse and increased axonal repulsion [118]. The role of notochord-derived chondroitin sulphate in restricting neural in-growth appears to be maintained in the adult IVD; recent studies report that soluble factors derived from porcine notochord cell conditioned media inhibit in vitro neurite outgrowth and that this affect was ablated with chondroitin sulfate digestion [119]. Interestingly, a genome-wide association study identified CHST3 as a susceptibility gene for lumbar disc degeneration [120], and loss-of-function mutation in CHST3 results in chondrodysplasia with major involvement of the spine [121]. CHST3 is the gene encoding chondroitin 6-O-sulfotransferase, an enzyme required for proper chondroitin sulfate synthesis that is required for proper cartilage formation [122]. While chondroitin 6-O-sulfotransferase activity is required for water retention with the IVD [120], it may serve a dual purpose of also inhibiting neural in-growth [123,124]. Conversely, NP tissue is able to cause nerve tissue injury in the absence of mechanical compression [125], indicating that it is most likely chemical in nature.

5. Small Animal Models to Study Intervertebral Disc Development and Degeneration

5.1. Notochord Cells in Animal Models

Due to the difficulties associated with obtaining “healthy” intact human IVD tissue and cells or biological material from the early stages of disease onset, animal models have become invaluable to study the IVD biology [126]. Animal models have been incorporated into studies aimed at characterizing disc development, disease progression and to develop therapeutic interventions. In all mammals, development of the IVD involves common pathways associated with node formation, notochord elongation and aggregation of the mesenchyme around the central notochord (as described above). Although the overall process is similar, one important difference between species is the postnatal persistence of notochord cells in the NP—an important factor to consider when studying NP aging or degeneration. Unlike humans, species such as the rat, pig, cat, and rabbit, retain notochord cells throughout their life [16]. Large animals such as bovine and sheep better resemble humans in that the notochord cells present at birth rapidly decline in number early in life [126].
The use of canine models has revealed insights into the importance of notochord cells in IVD health [127,128]. While there is a large genetic variability in canine breeds, they can be classified as either chondrodystrophic or non-chondrodystrophic. Chondrodystrophia is altered development in the cartilage of the long bones, especially those involved the region of the epiphysial plates, resulting in arrested growth of the long bones [129]. Chondrodystrophic dogs (dachshund, bulldog, and beagle) have a higher prevalence and earlier age of onset of disc degeneration, while non-chondrodystrophic dogs are relatively resistant to disc degeneration in the earlier years of life [130,131]. Strikingly, in chondrodystrophic breeds, notochord cells in the NP are replaced by small nucleus pulposus cells in the first year of life and IVD degeneration proceeds rapidly thereafter [132]. Conversely, in non-chondrodystrophic dogs notochord cells persist in the IVD throughout life [133,134], and while these breeds experience some degree of disc degeneration, it occurs at a much slower rate.
Mouse models are also commonly used to study human disease due to the ease of their genetic manipulation, highly conserved genome, comparable physiology, short gestation period and low housing costs [135,136]. The murine NP is predominantly composed of notochord cells until skeletal maturity, and like humans, there is a progressive decline in notochord cells and a concomitant increase in nucleus pulposus cells with age [137]. An important tool in mouse genetics is Cre/loxP-based conditional mutagenesis. In this system, expression of Cre recombinase can be regulated by tissue-specific and/or temporally-regulated promoters, leading to excision of loxP-flanked (“floxed”) genes via intra-chromosomal recombination leading to gain or loss of gene expression. This strategy confers the ability to track specific cell types over time, or assess the function of a specific gene within a given cell type based on the specificity of Cre recombinase expression [138].

5.2. Notochord Associated Cre Mouse Strains

Several genes or gene loci have been targeted to generate Cre expressing mouse strains that demonstrate Cre expression in the notochord, including the T-box transcription factor brachyury, T-Cre [139], flat-top (Cfap126), a cilia and flagella associated protein, FltpT2AiCre [140], and type-II collagen Col2a1-Cre [141,142,143,144]. However, in these strains Cre expression is not notochord-specific, and is detected in the lateral mesoderm, the neural tube floorplate, head mesenchyme and cartilaginous tissues, respectively. Consequently, novel notochord-specific Cre strains were required to trace the developmental lineage of NP cells. The first reported and most commonly used notochord-Cre mouse is the Shh-Cre strain [145], which when crossed with a conditional lacZ reporter marked cells throughout the notochord at E10.5, notochord cells during segmentation at E12.5, and the presumptive NP at E16.5 [61]. Importantly, no β-galactosidase-positive cells were detected in the surrounding AF or CEPs. To ensure that detection of Cre expression in the postnatal NP was not associated with the induction of Shh expression in mature NP cells, a tamoxifen-inducible Shh-CreERT2 [145] was used to transiently induce Cre expression in the notochord between E8.5–E12.5. This experiment conclusively demonstrated that all the cells the mature NP (in mice ≥19 months of age) were derived from the Shh expressing cells of the node and notochord [61].
The sickle tail (Skt) gene has been reported to play a role in the development of the notochord and IVD. The Skt protein is localized to the cytoplasm where it is thought to act as a structural element or a scaffolding protein. Skt was an interesting target for the development of a notochord-specific Cre strain since in gene-trapping experiments, intense β-galactosidase expression was detected in the notochord and at birth the mice had kinky tails, compressed IVDs, and disorganized NP tissues [146]. Skt-Cre mice were subsequently generated and when crossed to a conditional LacZ reporter, β-galactosidase expression was detected in the notochord at E9.5 and E12.5. At E15.5 β-galactosidase expression was predominantly detected in the NP however, small cell populations were also detected in the primitive AF. In adult mice, β-galactosidase expression was detected in the NP but large populations of AF were also LacZ positive [147], making the Skt-Cre mouse not suitable for NP-specific genetic experiments.
Forkhead box protein A2 (FoxA2), also known as hepatocyte nuclear factor 3-β, is a transcription factor necessary for the formation and maintenance of the definitive endoderm [148] and required for node and notochord formation [149]. Both a FoxA2-Cre strain [150,151] and an inducible FoxA2mcm Cre strain [150] have been generated, and when crossed to a conditional Rosa26-LacZ reporter mouse, β-galactosidase expression was detected in the endoderm but also in the node, floorplate, and notochord [150]. FoxA2-Cre has been used to knockout hypoxia inducing factor-1α, which demonstrated a NP phenotype [152].
Lastly, work form our group targeted the Noto locus that encodes a homeobox transcription factor that is transiently but specifically expressed in the node and the posterior notochord between E7.5–E12.5. Noto has been shown to regulate morphogenesis, node ciliogenesis and left-right embryo patterning [153]. Characterization of Cre specificity in this mouse showed specific localization to the node, notochord and NP during development and in adult mice [62], and this mouse strain has subsequently been used to study the role of notochord-derived factors in NP biology [108].

6. IVD Disease and Repair: A Mirror of Development?

Basic research and the use of animal models have demonstrated the role of the notochord as a regulator of disc development, enabling investigations into the ability of notochord-associated signals to modulate disc degeneration. One example is the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway which is critical for embryonic notochord patterning [154], IVD development, and is also reactivated during disc degeneration in rabbits [155] and rodents [156] localized to the NP and CEP [157]. Consequently, BMPs have been evaluated as potential therapeutic targets to treat disc degeneration, owing to their ability to promote ECM gene expression [158] and their anti-apoptoic effects [159]. However, the use of recombinant BMPs to treat disc degeneration has been called into question due their potent ability to induce osteogenesis leading to spinal fusion [160], and associated complications including swelling in the cervical spine [161]. It remains unclear whether the increased BMP signaling detected within the degenerate IVD is a result of the degenerative cascade or an indication of a reparative tissue response; further studies are required to elucidate the role of BMP in disc degeneration.
The Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been shown to maintain notochord progenitor cell fate during early notochord formation and is required for posterior extension of the notochord [162]. β-catenin is also critical in IVD development. Targeted ablation of β-catenin in type II collagen expressing cells lead to CEP calcification; conversely, ectopic activation of β-catenin in the AF and vertebral growth plate resulted in severe deterioration of both structures [163]. This may be a direct effect of Wnt/β-catenin activation or an indirect effect mediated by altered SHH signaling, given the feedback between these two pathways in the NP [164,165]. Interestingly, in the adult NP expression of both SHH and Wnt/β-catenin are downregulated, as are Wnt targets in the whole IVD [164]. The down-regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the aged disc has been shown to be reversible and that re-activation of this pathway can induce molecular markers of the IVD that was lost in degeneration [164]. Interestingly, canonical Wnt signalling has also been shown to be upregulated in the NP during early disc degeneration in chondrodystophic dogs [166]. Taken together, these findings suggest a dual role for Wnt/β-catenin in the IVD and its potential as a therapeutic intervention for degenerative disc disease.
Brachyury is a highly conserved transcription factor that is expressed in the developing notochord, required during embryogenesis for proper development of the primitive streak, axial and posterior mesoderm [167]. Brachury is expressed in notochord cells of the NP but not in the nucleus pulposus cells of mature rat discs [115]. Interestingly, increased expression of brachyury, resulting from either gene mutation [168] or gene duplication [169], has been associated with the notochord-derived tumour termed chordoma. Chordoma is a rare invasive cancer responsible for 20% of primary spine tumours, located at clavius of the skull (32%) and sacrococcygeal region (29%), and less frequently in cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae [170,171]. Chordomas are morphologically similar to notochord cells, formed by physaliferous cells that co-express notochord cell genes including cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19 and brachyury [79]. Fate mapping of the notochord demonstrated that during disc formation, not all notochord cells are incorporated in the IVD; some persist in the vertebral bone [61,62]. In humans, notochord cell remnants have been detected in 20% of adult vertebrae but do not develop into neoplasms [172]. The current hypothesis is the chordoma formation results from the activation and proliferation of notochord remnants; while the pathways regulating this process have yet to be elucidated; it is intriguing that malignant transformation is associated with the activation of developmental notochord factors such as brachyury.

7. Conclusions

The IVD is a highly specialized tissue that requires complex developmental patterning to form a complex joint. The notochord and notochord-derived cells play an integral role in the development of the embryo and continue to be important in maintaining IVD homeostasis. Studies to date suggest that as the IVD undergoes degeneration, reactivation of these pathways may not contribute to tissue breakdown but instead reflect the cellular attempt to activate a program of tissue repair. Future studies are needed to understand these processes and exploit them as potential therapeutics for disc degeneration.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (371546) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-115718 and 115068 to C.A.S.). M.R.M. was supported by a CIHR Doctoral Award and the Joint Motion Program—A CIHR Training Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research and Leadership. C.A.S. is the recipient of a Scholar Award from The Arthritis Society/Canadian Arthritis Network, a CIHR New Investigator Award and an Early Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.

Author Contributions

M.R.M and C.A.S. were both involved in drafting the article and revising it for intellectual content, and approved the final version to be published.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Balague, F.; Mannion, A.F.; Pellise, F.; Cedraschi, C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012, 379, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vos, T.; Flaxman, A.D.; Naghavi, M.; Lozano, R.; Michaud, C.; Ezzati, M.; Shibuya, K.; Salomon, J.A.; Abdalla, S.; Aboyans, V.; et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 2163–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Manchikanti, L.; Singh, V.; Falco, F.J.; Benyamin, R.M.; Hirsch, J.A. Epidemiology of low back pain in adults. Neuromodulation 2014, 17 (Suppl. 2), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Friedman, B.W.; O’Mahony, S.; Mulvey, L.; Davitt, M.; Choi, H.; Xia, S.; Esses, D.; Bijur, P.E.; Gallagher, E.J. One-week and 3-month outcomes after an emergency department visit for undifferentiated musculoskeletal low back pain. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2012, 59, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shiri, R.; Karppinen, J.; Leino-Arjas, P.; Solovieva, S.; Viikari-Juntura, E. The association between obesity and low back pain: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 171, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Andersson, G.B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999, 354, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hoy, D.; Bain, C.; Williams, G.; March, L.; Brooks, P.; Blyth, F.; Woolf, A.; Vos, T.; Buchbinder, R. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 2028–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mayer, J.E.; Iatridis, J.C.; Chan, D.; Qureshi, S.A.; Gottesman, O.; Hecht, A.C. Genetic polymorphisms associated with intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine J. 2013, 13, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Inoue, N.; Espinoza Orias, A.A. Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 42, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Moreland, L.W. Intra-articular hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid) and hylans for the treatment of osteoarthritis: Mechanisms of action. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2003, 5, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chandran, P.L.; Horkay, F. Aggrecan, an unusual polyelectrolyte: Review of solution behavior and physiological implications. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nap, R.J.; Szleifer, I. Structure and interactions of aggrecans: Statistical thermodynamic approach. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 4570–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kraemer, J.; Kolditz, D.; Gowin, R. Water and electrolyte content of human intervertebral discs under variable load. Spine 1985, 10, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mwale, F. Collagen and other proteins of the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and cartilage end plates. In The Intervertebral Disc; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumura, Y.; Kasai, Y.; Obata, H.; Matsushima, S.; Inaba, T.; Uchida, A. Changes in water content of intervertebral discs and paravertebral muscles before and after bed rest. J. Orthop. Sci. 2009, 14, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Urban, J.P.G.; Roberts, S.; Ralphs, J.R. The nucleus of the intervertebral disc from development to degeneration. Am. Zool. 2000, 40, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Setton, L.A.; Chen, J. Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc and relevance to disc degeneration. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006, 88 (Suppl. 2), 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adams, M.A.; Roughley, P.J. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 2006, 31, 2151–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Watanabe, H.; Yamada, Y.; Kimata, K. Roles of aggrecan, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in cartilage structure and function. J. Biochem. 1998, 124, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cassidy, J.J.; Hiltner, A.; Baer, E. Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect. Tissue Res. 1989, 23, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Smith, L.J.; Fazzalari, N.L. The elastic fibre network of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus: Architecture, mechanical function and potential role in the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur. Spine J. 2009, 18, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, J.; Liu, C.; Guo, Q.; Yang, H.; Li, B. Regional variations in the cellular, biochemical, and biomechanical characteristics of rabbit annulus fibrosus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Urban, J.P.; Smith, S.; Fairbank, J.C. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine 2004, 29, 2700–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Davidson, B.P.; Tam, P.P. The node of the mouse embryo. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, R617–R619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hirokawa, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Okada, Y.; Takeda, S. Nodal flow and the generation of left-right asymmetry. Cell 2006, 125, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brennan, J.; Norris, D.P.; Robertson, E.J. Nodal activity in the node governs left-right asymmetry. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2339–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Marques, S.; Borges, A.C.; Silva, A.C.; Freitas, S.; Cordenonsi, M.; Belo, J.A. The activity of the Nodal antagonist Cerl-2 in the mouse node is required for correct L/R body axis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2342–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Babu, D.; Roy, S. Left-right asymmetry: Cilia stir up new surprises in the node. Open Biol. 2013, 3, 130052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tanaka, Y.; Okada, Y.; Hirokawa, N. FGF-induced vesicular release of sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid in leftward nodal flow is critical for left-right determination. Nature 2005, 435, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nonaka, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Okada, Y.; Takeda, S.; Harada, A.; Kanai, Y.; Kido, M.; Hirokawa, N. Randomization of left-right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid in mice lacking KIF3B motor protein. Cell 1998, 95, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adams, D.S.; Keller, R.; Koehl, M.A. The mechanics of notochord elongation, straightening and stiffening in the embryo of xenopus laevis. Development 1990, 110, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Stemple, D.L. Structure and function of the notochord: An essential organ for chordate development. Development 2005, 132, 2503–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Choi, K.S.; Harfe, B.D. Hedgehog signaling is required for formation of the notochord sheath and patterning of nuclei pulposi within the intervertebral discs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9484–9489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gray, R.S.; Wilm, T.P.; Smith, J.; Bagnat, M.; Dale, R.M.; Topczewski, J.; Johnson, S.L.; Solnica-Krezel, L. Loss of col8a1a function during zebrafish embryogenesis results in congenital vertebral malformations. Dev. Biol. 2014, 386, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gotz, W.; Osmers, R.; Herken, R. Localisation of extracellular matrix components in the embryonic human notochord and axial mesenchyme. J. Anat. 1995, 186 Pt 1, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Corallo, D.; Schiavinato, A.; Trapani, V.; Moro, E.; Argenton, F.; Bonaldo, P. Emilin3 is required for notochord sheath integrity and interacts with Scube2 to regulate notochord-derived hedgehog signals. Development 2013, 140, 4594–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pagnon-Minot, A.; Malbouyres, M.; Haftek-Terreau, Z.; Kim, H.R.; Sasaki, T.; Thisse, C.; Thisse, B.; Ingham, P.W.; Ruggiero, F.; le Guellec, D. Collagen XV, a novel factor in zebrafish notochord differentiation and muscle development. Dev. Biol. 2008, 316, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mangos, S.; Lam, P.Y.; Zhao, A.; Liu, Y.; Mudumana, S.; Vasilyev, A.; Liu, A.; Drummond, I.A. The ADPKD genes pkd1a/b and pkd2 regulate extracellular matrix formation. Dis. Model. Mech. 2010, 3, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hunter, C.J.; Bianchi, S.; Cheng, P.; Muldrew, K. Osmoregulatory function of large vacuoles found in notochordal cells of the intervertebral disc running title: An osmoregulatory vacuole. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 2007, 4, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Waddington, C.; Perry, M.M. The ultrastructure of the developing urodele notochord. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1962, 156, 459–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bancroft, M.; Bellairs, R. The development of the notochord in the chick embryo, studied by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1976, 35, 383–401. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Leeson, T.S.; Leeson, C.R. Observations on the histochemistry and fine structure of the notochord in rabbit embryos. J. Anat. 1958, 92, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Babic, M.S. Development of the notochord in normal and malformed human embryos and fetuses. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1991, 35, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Ellis, K.; Bagwell, J.; Bagnat, M. Notochord vacuoles are lysosome-related organelles that function in axis and spine morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Luzio, J.P.; Pryor, P.R.; Bright, N.A. Lysosomes: Fusion and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Allen, R.D.; Naitoh, Y. Osmoregulation and contractile vacuoles of protozoa. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2002, 215, 351–394. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. McCann, M.R.; Patel, P.; Frimpong, A.; Xiao, Y.; Siqueira, W.L.; Seguin, C.A. Proteomic signature of the murine intervertebral disc. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117807. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mavrogonatou, E.; Papadimitriou, K.; Urban, J.P.; Papadopoulos, V.; Kletsas, D. Deficiency in the α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase enhances the anti-proliferative effect of high osmolality in nucleus pulposus intervertebral disc cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 3037–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yamada, T.; Placzek, M.; Tanaka, H.; Dodd, J.; Jessell, T.M. Control of cell pattern in the developing nervous system: Polarizing activity of the floor plate and notochord. Cell 1991, 64, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fan, C.M.; Tessier-Lavigne, M. Patterning of mammalian somites by surface ectoderm and notochord: Evidence for sclerotome induction by a hedgehog homolog. Cell 1994, 79, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, S.K.; Hebrok, M.; Melton, D.A. Notochord to endoderm signaling is required for pancreas development. Development 1997, 124, 4243–4252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Meadows, S.M.; Fletcher, P.J.; Moran, C.; Xu, K.; Neufeld, G.; Chauvet, S.; Mann, F.; Krieg, P.A.; Cleaver, O. Integration of repulsive guidance cues generates avascular zones that shape mammalian blood vessels. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Clarke, J.D.; Holder, N.; Soffe, S.R.; Storm-Mathisen, J. Neuroanatomical and functional analysis of neural tube formation in notochordless xenopus embryos; laterality of the ventral spinal cord is lost. Development 1991, 112, 499–516. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Basler, K.; Edlund, T.; Jessell, T.M.; Yamada, T. Control of cell pattern in the neural tube: Regulation of cell differentiation by dorsalin-1, a novel TGF beta family member. Cell 1993, 73, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Patten, I.; Placzek, M. Opponent activities of Shh and BMP signaling during floor plate induction in vivo. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Goulding, M.; Lumsden, A.; Paquette, A.J. Regulation of Pax-3 expression in the dermomyotome and its role in muscle development. Development 1994, 120, 957–971. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Amacher, S.L.; Kimmel, C.B. Promoting notochord fate and repressing muscle development in zebrafish axial mesoderm. Development 1998, 125, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Brand-Saberi, B.; Ebensperger, C.; Wilting, J.; Balling, R.; Christ, B. The ventralizing effect of the notochord on somite differentiation in chick embryos. Anat. Embryol. 1993, 188, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cleaver, O.; Krieg, P.A. Notochord patterning of the endoderm. Dev. Biol. 2001, 234, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hebrok, M.; Kim, S.K.; Melton, D.A. Notochord repression of endodermal sonic hedgehog permits pancreas development. Genes Dev. 1998, 12, 1705–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Choi, K.S.; Cohn, M.J.; Harfe, B.D. Identification of nucleus pulposus precursor cells and notochordal remnants in the mouse: Implications for disk degeneration and chordoma formation. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237, 3953–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. McCann, M.R.; Tamplin, O.J.; Rossant, J.; Seguin, C.A. Tracing notochord-derived cells using a Noto-cre mouse: Implications for intervertebral disc development. Dis. Model. Mech. 2012, 5, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sivakamasundari, V.; Lufkin, T. Bridging the gap: Understanding embryonic intervertebral disc development. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 1, 103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Lawson, L.; Harfe, B.D. Notochord to nucleus pulposus transition. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2015, 13, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Aszodi, A.; Chan, D.; Hunziker, E.; Bateman, J.F.; Fassler, R. Collagen II is essential for the removal of the notochord and the formation of intervertebral discs. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143, 1399–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Forsberg, H.; Crozet, F.; Brown, N.A. Waves of mouse lunatic fringe expression, in four-hour cycles at two-hour intervals, precede somite boundary formation. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 1027–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brent, A.E.; Tabin, C.J. Developmental regulation of somite derivatives: Muscle, cartilage and tendon. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2002, 12, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Christ, B.; Wilting, J. From somites to vertebral column. Ann. Anat. 1992, 174, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, N.; Gridley, T. Defects in somite formation in lunatic fringe-deficient mice. Nature 1998, 394, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Barrantes, I.B.; Elia, A.J.; Wunsch, K.; Hrabe de Angelis, M.H.; Mak, T.W.; Rossant, J.; Conlon, R.A.; Gossler, A.; de la Pompa, J.L. Interaction between notch signalling and lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chiang, C.; Litingtung, Y.; Lee, E.; Young, K.E.; Corden, J.L.; Westphal, H.; Beachy, P.A. Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 1996, 383, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Choi, K.S.; Lee, C.; Harfe, B.D. Sonic hedgehog in the notochord is sufficient for patterning of the intervertebral discs. Mech. Dev. 2012, 129, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mundy, C.; Yasuda, T.; Kinumatsu, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Enomoto-Iwamoto, M.; Koyama, E.; Pacifici, M. Synovial joint formation requires local ext1 expression and heparan sulfate production in developing mouse embryo limbs and spine. Dev. Biol. 2011, 351, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bruggeman, B.J.; Maier, J.A.; Mohiuddin, Y.S.; Powers, R.; Lo, Y.; Guimaraes-Camboa, N.; Evans, S.M.; Harfe, B.D. Avian intervertebral disc arises from rostral sclerotome and lacks a nucleus pulposus: Implications for evolution of the vertebrate disc. Dev. Dyn. 2012, 241, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hunter, C.J.; Matyas, J.R.; Duncan, N.A. The notochordal cell in the nucleus pulposus: A review in the context of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2003, 9, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Roberts, S. Disc morphology in health and disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2002, 30, 864–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Boos, N.; Weissbach, S.; Rohrbach, H.; Weiler, C.; Spratt, K.F.; Nerlich, A.G. Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 2002, 27, 2631–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aguiar, D.J.; Johnson, S.L.; Oegema, T.R. Notochordal cells interact with nucleus pulposus cells: Regulation of proteoglycan synthesis. Exp. Cell Res. 1999, 246, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Vujovic, S.; Henderson, S.; Presneau, N.; Odell, E.; Jacques, T.S.; Tirabosco, R.; Boshoff, C.; Flanagan, A.M. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J. Pathol. 2006, 209, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Henriksson, H.; Thornemo, M.; Karlsson, C.; Hagg, O.; Junevik, K.; Lindahl, A.; Brisby, H. Identification of cell proliferation zones, progenitor cells and a potential stem cell niche in the intervertebral disc region: A study in four species. Spine 2009, 34, 2278–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kim, K.W.; Lim, T.H.; Kim, J.G.; Jeong, S.T.; Masuda, K.; An, H.S. The origin of chondrocytes in the nucleus pulposus and histologic findings associated with the transition of a notochordal nucleus pulposus to a fibrocartilaginous nucleus pulposus in intact rabbit intervertebral discs. Spine 2003, 28, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Trout, J.J.; Buckwalter, J.A.; Moore, K.C. Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc: II. Cells of the nucleus pulposus. Anat. Rec. 1982, 204, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pazzaglia, U.E.; Salisbury, J.R.; Byers, P.D. Development and involution of the notochord in the human spine. J. R. Soc. Med. 1989, 82, 413–415. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Liebscher, T.; Haefeli, M.; Wuertz, K.; Nerlich, A.G.; Boos, N. Age-related variation in cell density of human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 2010, 36, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sakai, D.; Nishimura, K.; Tanaka, M.; Nakajima, D.; Grad, S.; Alini, M.; Kawada, H.; Ando, K.; Mochida, J. Migration of bone marrow-derived cells for endogenous repair in a new tail-looping disc degeneration model in the mouse: A pilot study. Spine J. 2015, 15, 1356–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Colombier, P.; Camus, A.; Lescaudron, L.; Clouet, J.; Guicheux, J. Intervertebral disc regeneration: A great challenge for tissue engineers. Trends Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 433–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mwale, F.; Roughley, P.; Antoniou, J. Distinction between the extracellular matrix of the nucleus pulposus and hyaline cartilage: A requisite for tissue engineering of intervertebral disc. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2004, 8, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Smith, L.J.; Nerurkar, N.L.; Choi, K.S.; Harfe, B.D.; Elliott, D.M. Degeneration and regeneration of the intervertebral disc: Lessons from development. Dis. Model. Mech. 2011, 4, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Freemont, A.J. The cellular pathobiology of the degenerate intervertebral disc and discogenic back pain. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Peng, Y.; Lv, F.J. Fibrosis in intervertebral disc degeneration: Knowledge and gaps. Austin J. Orthop. Rheumatol. 2014, 1, 3. [Google Scholar]
  91. Risbud, M.V.; Shapiro, I.M. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: Pain and disc content. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Freemont, A.J.; Peacock, T.E.; Goupille, P.; Hoyland, J.A.; O’Brien, J.; Jayson, M.I. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet 1997, 350, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pearce, R.H.; Grimmer, B.J.; Adams, M.E. Degeneration and the chemical composition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc. J. Orthop. Res. 1987, 5, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Sobajima, S.; Kim, J.S.; Gilbertson, L.G.; Kang, J.D. Gene therapy for degenerative disc disease. Gene Ther. 2004, 11, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Roughley, P.J. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: Involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine 2004, 29, 2691–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Boxberger, J.I.; Sen, S.; Yerramalli, C.S.; Elliott, D.M. Nucleus pulposus glycosaminoglycan content is correlated with axial mechanics in rat lumbar motion segments. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Buckwalter, J.A. Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1995, 20, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Barbir, A.; Godburn, K.E.; Michalek, A.J.; Lai, A.; Monsey, R.D.; Iatridis, J.C. Effects of torsion on intervertebral disc gene expression and biomechanics, using a rat tail model. Spine 2011, 36, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. O’Connell, G.D.; Guerin, H.L.; Elliott, D.M. Theoretical and uniaxial experimental evaluation of human annulus fibrosus degeneration. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131, 111007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Natarajan, R.N.; Williams, J.R.; Andersson, G.B. Modeling changes in intervertebral disc mechanics with degeneration. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006, 88 (Suppl. 2), 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Haefeli, M.; Kalberer, F.; Saegesser, D.; Nerlich, A.G.; Boos, N.; Paesold, G. The course of macroscopic degeneration in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 2006, 31, 1522–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nilsson, E.; Nakamae, T.; Olmarker, K. Pain behavior changes following disc puncture relate to nucleus pulposus rather than to the disc injury per se: An experimental study in rats. Open Orthop. J. 2011, 5, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Risbud, M.V.; Schaer, T.P.; Shapiro, I.M. Toward an understanding of the role of notochordal cells in the adult intervertebral disc: From discord to accord. Dev. Dyn. 2011, 239, 2141–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Korecki, C.L.; MacLean, J.J.; Iatridis, J.C. Dynamic compression effects on intervertebral disc mechanics and biology. Spine 2008, 33, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gantenbein, B.; Calandriello, E.; Wuertz-Kozak, K.; Benneker, L.M.; Keel, M.J.; Chan, S.C. Activation of intervertebral disc cells by co-culture with notochordal cells, conditioned medium and hypoxia. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2014, 15, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Boyd, L.M.; Chen, J.; Kraus, V.B.; Setton, L.A. Conditioned medium differentially regulates matrix protein gene expression in cells of the intervertebral disc. Spine 2004, 29, 2217–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Erwin, W.M.; Ashman, K.; O’Donnel, P.; Inman, R.D. Nucleus pulposus notochord cells secrete connective tissue growth factor and up-regulate proteoglycan expression by intervertebral disc chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 3859–3867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bedore, J.; Sha, W.; McCann, M.R.; Liu, S.; Leask, A.; Seguin, C.A. Impaired intervertebral disc development and premature disc degeneration in mice with notochord-specific deletion of CCN2. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 2634–2644. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  109. Bedore, J.; Leask, A.; Seguin, C.A. Targeting the extracellular matrix: Matricellular proteins regulate cell-extracellular matrix communication within distinct niches of the intervertebral disc. Matrix Biol. 2014, 37, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Erwin, W.M.; Islam, D.; Inman, R.D.; Fehlings, M.G.; Tsui, F.W. Notochordal cells protect nucleus pulposus cells from degradation and apoptosis: Implications for the mechanisms of intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, R215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cornejo, M.C.; Cho, S.K.; Giannarelli, C.; Iatridis, J.C.; Purmessur, D. Soluble factors from the notochordal-rich intervertebral disc inhibit endothelial cell invasion and vessel formation in the presence and absence of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015, 23, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Davies, J.A.; Cook, G.M.; Stern, C.D.; Keynes, R.J. Isolation from chick somites of a glycoprotein fraction that causes collapse of dorsal root ganglion growth cones. Neuron 1990, 4, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Anderson, C.N.; Ohta, K.; Quick, M.M.; Fleming, A.; Keynes, R.; Tannahill, D. Molecular analysis of axon repulsion by the notochord. Development 2003, 130, 1123–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Tolofari, S.K.; Richardson, S.M.; Freemont, A.J.; Hoyland, J.A. Expression of semaphorin 3a and its receptors in the human intervertebral disc: Potential role in regulating neural ingrowth in the degenerate intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Tang, X.; Jing, L.; Chen, J. Changes in the molecular phenotype of nucleus pulposus cells with intervertebral disc aging. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mathews, M.B. Comparative biochemistry of chondroitin sulphate-proteins of cartilage and notochord. Biochem. J. 1971, 125, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Bernhardt, R.R.; Schachner, M. Chondroitin sulfates affect the formation of the segmental motor nerves in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Biol. 2000, 221, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Masuda, T.; Fukamauchi, F.; Takeda, Y.; Fujisawa, H.; Watanabe, K.; Okado, N.; Shiga, T. Developmental regulation of notochord-derived repulsion for dorsal root ganglion axons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2004, 25, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Purmessur, D.; Cornejo, M.C.; Cho, S.K.; Roughley, P.J.; Linhardt, R.J.; Hecht, A.C.; Iatridis, J.C. Intact glycosaminoglycans from intervertebral disc-derived notochordal cell-conditioned media inhibit neurite growth while maintaining neuronal cell viability. Spine J. 2015, 15, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Song, Y.Q.; Karasugi, T.; Cheung, K.M.; Chiba, K.; Ho, D.W.; Miyake, A.; Kao, P.Y.; Sze, K.L.; Yee, A.; Takahashi, A.; et al. Lumbar disc degeneration is linked to a carbohydrate sulfotransferase 3 variant. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 4909–4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Thiele, H.; Sakano, M.; Kitagawa, H.; Sugahara, K.; Rajab, A.; Hohne, W.; Ritter, H.; Leschik, G.; Nurnberg, P.; Mundlos, S. Loss of chondroitin 6-O-sulfotransferase-1 function results in severe human chondrodysplasia with progressive spinal involvement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10155–10160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Hermanns, P.; Unger, S.; Rossi, A.; Perez-Aytes, A.; Cortina, H.; Bonafe, L.; Boccone, L.; Setzu, V.; Dutoit, M.; Sangiorgi, L.; et al. Congenital joint dislocations caused by carbohydrate sulfotransferase 3 deficiency in recessive larsen syndrome and humero-spinal dysostosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Yin, J.; Sakamoto, K.; Zhang, H.; Ito, Z.; Imagama, S.; Kishida, S.; Natori, T.; Sawada, M.; Matsuyama, Y.; Kadomatsu, K. Transforming growth factor-beta1 upregulates keratan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate biosynthesis in microglias after brain injury. Brain Res. 2009, 1263, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Johnson, W.E.; Caterson, B.; Eisenstein, S.M.; Hynds, D.L.; Snow, D.M.; Roberts, S. Human intervertebral disc aggrecan inhibits nerve growth in vitro. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46, 2658–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Olmarker, K.; Rydevik, B.; Nordborg, C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine 1993, 18, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Alini, M.; Eisenstein, S.M.; Ito, K.; Little, C.; Kettler, A.A.; Masuda, K.; Melrose, J.; Ralphs, J.; Stokes, I.; Wilke, H.J. Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration? Eur. Spine J. 2008, 17, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hunter, C.J.; Matyas, J.R.; Duncan, N.A. The three-dimensional architecture of the notochordal nucleus pulposus: Novel observations on cell structures in the canine intervertebral disc. J. Anat. 2003, 202, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Hunter, C.J.; Matyas, J.R.; Duncan, N.A. The functional significance of cell clusters in the notochordal nucleus pulposus: Survival and signaling in the canine intervertebral disc. Spine 2004, 29, 1099–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Beachley, M.C.; Graham, F.H., Jr. Hypochondroplastic dwarfism (enchondral chondrodystrophy) in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1973, 163, 283–284. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  130. Hansen, H.J. Some animal bone and joint diseases of comparative interest. Calcif. Tissue Res. 1968, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Smolders, L.A.; Bergknut, N.; Grinwis, G.C.; Hagman, R.; Lagerstedt, A.S.; Hazewinkel, H.A.; Tryfonidou, M.A.; Meij, B.P. Intervertebral disc degeneration in the dog. Part 2: Chondrodystrophic and non-chondrodystrophic breeds. Vet. J. 2013, 195, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Olby, N.; Harris, T.; Burr, J.; Munana, K.; Sharp, N.; Keene, B. Recovery of pelvic limb function in dogs following acute intervertebral disc herniations. J. Neurotrauma 2004, 21, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Cappello, R.; Bird, J.L.; Pfeiffer, D.; Bayliss, M.T.; Dudhia, J. Notochordal cell produce and assemble extracellular matrix in a distinct manner, which may be responsible for the maintenance of healthy nucleus pulposus. Spine 2006, 31, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Klauser, M.; Forterre, F.; Doherr, M.; Zurbriggen, A.; Spreng, D.; Forterre, S. Evaluation of apoptotic cell death in normal and chondrodystrophic canine intervertebral discs. Vet. Sci. Dev. 2012, 2, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rosenthal, N.; Brown, S. The mouse ascending: Perspectives for human-disease models. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Nguyen, D.; Xu, T. The expanding role of mouse genetics for understanding human biology and disease. Dis. Model. Mech. 2008, 1, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Hunter, C.J.; Matyas, J.R.; Duncan, N.A. Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: A species comparison. J. Anat. 2004, 205, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Nagy, A. Cre recombinase: The universal reagent for genome tailoring. Genesis 2000, 26, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Perantoni, A.O.; Timofeeva, O.; Naillat, F.; Richman, C.; Pajni-Underwood, S.; Wilson, C.; Vainio, S.; Dove, L.F.; Lewandoski, M. Inactivation of FGF8 in early mesoderm reveals an essential role in kidney development. Development 2005, 132, 3859–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Lange, A.; Gegg, M.; Burtscher, I.; Bengel, D.; Kremmer, E.; Lickert, H. Fltp(T2AiCre): A new knock-in mouse line for conditional gene targeting in distinct mono- and multiciliated tissues. Differentiation 2012, 83, S105–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ovchinnikov, D.A.; Deng, J.M.; Ogunrinu, G.; Behringer, R.R. Col2a1-directed expression of Cre recombinase in differentiating chondrocytes in transgenic mice. Genesis 2000, 26, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Schipani, E.; Ryan, H.E.; Didrickson, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Knight, M.; Johnson, R.S. Hypoxia in cartilage: HIF-1alpha is essential for chondrocyte growth arrest and survival. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2865–2876. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Sakai, K.; Hiripi, L.; Glumoff, V.; Brandau, O.; Eerola, R.; Vuorio, E.; Bosze, Z.; Fassler, R.; Aszodi, A. Stage-and tissue-specific expression of a Col2a1-Cre fusion gene in transgenic mice. Matrix Biol. 2001, 19, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Terpstra, L.; Prud’homme, J.; Arabian, A.; Takeda, S.; Karsenty, G.; Dedhar, S.; St-Arnaud, R. Reduced chondrocyte proliferation and chondrodysplasia in mice lacking the integrin-linked kinase in chondrocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 162, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Harfe, B.D.; Scherz, P.J.; Nissim, S.; Tian, H.; McMahon, A.P.; Tabin, C.J. Evidence for an expansion-based temporal shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell 2004, 118, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Semba, K.; Araki, K.; Li, Z.; Matsumoto, K.; Suzuki, M.; Nakagata, N.; Takagi, K.; Takeya, M.; Yoshinobu, K.; Araki, M.; et al. A novel murine gene, sickle tail, linked to the danforth’s short tail locus, is required for normal development of the intervertebral disc. Genetics 2006, 172, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Abe, K.; Araki, K.; Tanigawa, M.; Semba, K.; Ando, T.; Sato, M.; Sakai, D.; Hiyama, A.; Mochida, J.; Yamamura, K. A Cre knock-in mouse line on the sickle tail locus induces recombination in the notochord and intervertebral disks. Genesis 2012, 50, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ang, S.L.; Wierda, A.; Wong, D.; Stevens, K.A.; Cascio, S.; Rossant, J.; Zaret, K.S. The formation and maintenance of the definitive endoderm lineage in the mouse: Involvement of HNF3/forkhead proteins. Development 1993, 119, 1301–1315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  149. Ang, S.L.; Rossant, J. HNF-3 beta is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. Cell 1994, 78, 561–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Park, E.J.; Sun, X.; Nichol, P.; Saijoh, Y.; Martin, J.F.; Moon, A.M. System for tamoxifen-inducible expression of Cre-recombinase from the Foxa2 locus in mice. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Uetzmann, L.; Burtscher, I.; Lickert, H. A mouse line expressing Foxa2-driven Cre recombinase in node, notochord, floorplate, and endoderm. Genesis 2008, 46, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Merceron, C.; Mangiavini, L.; Robling, A.; Wilson, T.L.; Giaccia, A.J.; Shapiro, I.M.; Schipani, E.; Risbud, M.V. Loss of HIF-1alpha in the notochord results in cell death and complete disappearance of the nucleus pulposus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Beckers, A.; Alten, L.; Viebahn, C.; Andre, P.; Gossler, A. The mouse homeobox gene noto regulates node morphogenesis, notochordal ciliogenesis, and left right patterning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15765–15770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Darras, S.; Nishida, H. The BMP signaling pathway is required together with the FGF pathway for notochord induction in the ascidian embryo. Development 2001, 128, 2629–2638. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Sobajima, S.; Shimer, A.L.; Chadderdon, R.C.; Kompel, J.F.; Kim, J.S.; Gilbertson, L.G.; Kang, J.D. Quantitative analysis of gene expression in a rabbit model of intervertebral disc degeneration by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Spine J. 2005, 5, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Takae, R.; Matsunaga, S.; Origuchi, N.; Yamamoto, T.; Morimoto, N.; Suzuki, S.; Sakou, T. Immunolocalization of bone morphogenetic protein and its receptors in degeneration of intervertebral disc. Spine 1999, 24, 1397–1401. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  157. Kim, H.; Lee, J.U.; Moon, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Kwon, U.H.; Seol, N.H.; Kim, H.J.; Park, J.O.; Chun, H.J.; Kwon, I.K.; et al. Zonal responsiveness of the human intervertebral disc to bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 2009, 34, 1834–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Than, K.D.; Rahman, S.U.; Vanaman, M.J.; Wang, A.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Zhang, H.; la Marca, F.; Park, P. Bone morphogenetic proteins and degenerative disk disease. Neurosurgery 2012, 70, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Wei, A.; Brisby, H.; Chung, S.A.; Diwan, A.D. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 protects human intervertebral disc cells in vitro from apoptosis. Spine J. 2008, 8, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Carragee, E.J.; Hurwitz, E.L.; Weiner, B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: Emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011, 11, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Smucker, J.D.; Rhee, J.M.; Singh, K.; Yoon, S.T.; Heller, J.G. Increased swelling complications associated with off-label usage of rhBMP-2 in the anterior cervical spine. Spine 2006, 31, 2813–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Ukita, K.; Hirahara, S.; Oshima, N.; Imuta, Y.; Yoshimoto, A.; Jang, C.W.; Oginuma, M.; Saga, Y.; Behringer, R.R.; Kondoh, H.; et al. Wnt signaling maintains the notochord fate for progenitor cells and supports the posterior extension of the notochord. Mech. Dev. 2009, 126, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Kondo, N.; Yuasa, T.; Shimono, K.; Tung, W.; Okabe, T.; Yasuhara, R.; Pacifici, M.; Zhang, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Enomoto-Iwamoto, M. Intervertebral disc development is regulated by Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Spine 2011, 36, E513–E518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Winkler, T.; Mahoney, E.J.; Sinner, D.; Wylie, C.C.; Dahia, C.L. Wnt signaling activates Shh signaling in early postnatal intervertebral discs, and re-activates Shh signaling in old discs in the mouse. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Dahia, C.L.; Mahoney, E.; Wylie, C. Shh signaling from the nucleus pulposus is required for the postnatal growth and differentiation of the mouse intervertebral disc. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Smolders, L.A.; Meij, B.P.; Riemers, F.M.; Licht, R.; Wubbolts, R.; Heuvel, D.; Grinwis, G.C.; Vernooij, H.C.; Hazewinkel, H.A.; Penning, L.C.; et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in the notochordal cell is upregulated in early intervertebral disk degeneration. J. Orthop. Res. 2012, 30, 950–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Showell, C.; Binder, O.; Conlon, F.L. T-box genes in early embryogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 229, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Pillay, N.; Plagnol, V.; Tarpey, P.S.; Lobo, S.B.; Presneau, N.; Szuhai, K.; Halai, D.; Berisha, F.; Cannon, S.R.; Mead, S.; et al. A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1185–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Yang, X.R.; Ng, D.; Alcorta, D.A.; Liebsch, N.J.; Sheridan, E.; Li, S.; Goldstein, A.M.; Parry, D.M.; Kelley, M.J. T (brachyury) gene duplication confers major susceptibility to familial chordoma. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 1176–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. McMaster, M.L.; Goldstein, A.M.; Bromley, C.M.; Ishibe, N.; Parry, D.M. Chordoma: Incidence and survival patterns in the united states, 1973–1995. Cancer Causes Control 2001, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Chambers, K.J.; Lin, D.T.; Meier, J.; Remenschneider, A.; Herr, M.; Gray, S.T. Incidence and survival patterns of cranial chordoma in the united states. Laryngoscope 2014, 124, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Yamaguchi, T.; Suzuki, S.; Ishiiwa, H.; Ueda, Y. Intraosseous benign notochordal cell tumours: Overlooked precursors of classic chordomas? Histopathology 2004, 44, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McCann, M.R.; Séguin, C.A. Notochord Cells in Intervertebral Disc Development and Degeneration. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jdb4010003

AMA Style

McCann MR, Séguin CA. Notochord Cells in Intervertebral Disc Development and Degeneration. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2016; 4(1):3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jdb4010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

McCann, Matthew R., and Cheryle A. Séguin. 2016. "Notochord Cells in Intervertebral Disc Development and Degeneration" Journal of Developmental Biology 4, no. 1: 3. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jdb4010003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop