Next Article in Journal
Data Journalism Practices Globally: Skills, Education, Opportunities, and Values
Previous Article in Journal
Transitions in Journalism—Toward a Semantic-Oriented Technological Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reading about Gastronomy—An approach to Food Contents in New York City’s Newspapers

by
Francesc Fusté-Forné
1,2
1
Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations, Ramon Llull University, 08001 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
2
Department of Business, University of Girona, 17004 Girona, Catalonia, Spain
Submission received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 9 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 11 September 2020

Abstract

:
Food and gastronomy are significant ingredients of everyday leisure and lifestyle practices. Food is part of culture and culture is part of the media. The current research analyzes the mediatization of food in legacy media. Drawing from a quantitative approach, the paper reviews food-based contents in New York City’s newspapers. In particular, AM New York, El Diario, Metro, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal are studied over a period of 50 days. As a result, a total of 287 articles are analyzed. This research highlights the features of food and gastronomy contents and describes the differences and similarities between traditional newspapers and free dailies. Furthermore, the referent role of The New York Times in communicating food is confirmed.

1. Introduction

Food is a meaningful cultural asset. Both food and gastronomy are a vital part of cultural and leisure daily practices. In this sense, the discovery of food and gastronomy is a pleasurable and valorized lifestyle experience (Jones and Taylor 2013), which is increasingly mediatized (English and Fleischman 2017; Fusté-Forné 2017; Hughes 2010; Kristensen and From 2012; Naulin 2012; Voss 2012). Food is gathering a growing interest as part of the current media landscape which is manifested in a special interest form of journalism: food journalism. In this context, this paper aims to analyze media representations of food. To achieve it, a comparative case study of New York City’s newspapers is used. New York is a cosmopolitan city where people can taste a different food culture every day (Goossens et al. 2013), which awards the city a paramount role in gastronomy. The research analyzes food-based contents of five of New York City’s based newspapers (AM New York, El Diario, Metro, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal) over a period of 50 days. The study period runs from 14 November 2016 to 2 January 2017. Results show the characteristics of food-based contents in newspapers drawing on a range of issues such as page placement, journalism genres and topics developed by legacy media in their narratives of food and gastronomy.

2. Food in Lifestyle: An Approach to Food Journalism

Food and gastronomy are meaningful expressions of culture and lifestyle. Food and gastronomy are significant cultural identity markers (Sims 2009), and they reflect a diverse landscape of communities and lifestyles worldwide (Sutton 2001). Gastronomy has acquired a social dimension and it holds a powerful capacity to express identity (Duffy and Ashley 2012; Sanjuán Ballano 2007) and it is increasingly regarded as a tool for communication and cultural transmission. According to Fusté-Forné and Masip, “gastronomy is a driving force capable of setting social trends and ways of life. Thus, media in general and newspapers in particular offer a pathway for the transfer of gastronomic knowledge to society, and fulfil a key role as agents of democratization and popularization of food” (Fusté-Forné and Masip 2019, p. 136).
The origins of food journalism are directly connected with the “gastronome” (Jones and Taylor 2013), a food writer who contributed to the concept of eating as a social activity (Mennell 1996) and appeared at the beginning of the nineteenth century in parallel with restaurants (Ferguson 1998; Naulin 2012). While food journalism was “a primarily aesthetic or philosophical field, rather than one closely linked to professional cookery or domestic practice” (Jones and Taylor 2013, p. 98), Bell and Valentine (1997) reported that food primarily appeared in the women’s page of newspapers (David 1986). Voss explains it: “the newspaper few options for women before the 1970s were pages for women. These sections were known by the four F’s [English] family, fashion, food, and furniture” (Voss 2012, p. 67).
Nowadays, food and gastronomy have emerged as a crucial topic of cultural reporting, and they have reached unprecedented media coverage (see, for example, Fusté-Forné 2017). According to Brown, “the transformation of food journalism from five things to do with cream of mushroom soup to the subject of an entire issue of The New Yorker, longtime food writers say, has a lot to do with changing attitudes about food across the country” (Brown 2004, p. 51). Previous studies have showcased how food journalism has dealt with new significant content such as products, food events and food tourism destinations, together with the leading role carried out by celebrity chefs (Fusté-Forné and Masip 2019). In particular, chefs have largely enhanced the involvement of people on the discovery of culinary and gastronomic aspects of food.
Within the framework of lifestyle studies, lifestyle journalism is focused on a wide range of topics, where food takes a relevant portion. Media outlets are paying a growing attention to the development of areas that play a significant role in public life such as food and drink (Cole 2005; Craig 2016; Fürsich 2012; Hanusch 2012). These areas are heavily linked to how people spend their free time (Hanusch 2012) which is, in turn, associated with culture and leisure consumption. In this sense, food journalism contents are conceptualized as “soft news”. According to Hanusch, “recent decades have seen an apparently rapid rise in media content that falls outside what many have traditionally regarded as ‘good’ journalism. Increasingly, it seems, newspapers, magazines, radio, television and the Internet are preoccupied with what is generally referred to as ‘soft news’” (Hanusch 2012, p. 2). While “soft news” contributes to “extend the reach of media, who teach audiences the pleasures of staying tuned, who popularize knowledge” (Hartley 2000, p. 40), it is less dominant in the hierarchy of news values (Harcup and O’Neill 2017).
Kristensen and From (2012) highlight that in contemporary media “the coverage of food includes good advice, recipes, reviews and expressions of taste and lifestyle, and the subject is therefore approached not only as guidance to cultural and/or gastronomic products or experiences (e.g., restaurant reviews) but also, like fashion, as a representation of ways of life and a symbolic marker of taste and lifestyle” (p. 34). As a consequence, according to Germann Molz (2007), “it is clear that food is seen as symbolic of particular places and as a way of getting close to or consuming the essence of those places” (p. 88).
In the framework of agenda setting theory (McCombs 2004; McCombs and Shaw 1972), media are not only a source of influence, but also of inspiration and motivation for people (see Månsson 2011; McLennan et al. 2017). A special interest journalism—such as lifestyle journalism (Hanusch 2012), food journalism (Fusté-Forné and Masip 2019; Hughes 2010; Jones and Taylor 2001, 2013; Naulin 2012) and, to a broader extent, also travel journalism (Pirolli 2019)—drives audiences to processes of knowledge gathering on food through media. These forms of journalism allow audiences to symbolically taste food without physical mobility (Damkjær and Waade 2014). This means that reading a newspaper article or watching a documentary are also examples of food cultural and leisure practices. This paper contributes to the understanding of media food landscapes from a legacy media perspective.

3. Methods

The objective of this study is to analyze how legacy media communicates food. Previous researchers have studied the representations of food in press (see, for example, Aguirregoitia Martínez and Fernández Poyatos 2015; Fusté-Forné 2017; Fusté-Forné and Masip 2018, 2019; Hughes 2010; Jones and Taylor 2001; Naulin 2014; Voss 2012). This study adds texture to this conversation. In particular, it analyzes the food-based contents of five New York-based newspapers over a period of 50 days (N = 287), from 14 November 2016 to 2 January 2017. Media analyzed include AM New York, El Diario, Metro, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. These newspapers were selected according to the 2019 edition of the Alliance for Audited Media database: The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal are the two largest daily newspapers in terms of circulation, and AM New York and Metro are the two largest free daily newspapers. From its side, El Diario is the largest Spanish-language daily in New York.
All the newspapers were analyzed manually through their printed editions by using the hard copies of the newspapers daily available at The New York Public Library, New York. Food-based articles were manually coded following a codebook tested and used in previous research (see Fusté-Forné and Masip 2018). The codebook has two different sections: general features and thematic categories. The first section includes general data in order to identify each article: title, author, date, newspaper, genre, section and length. The second section refers to the thematic categories. These topics were divided into eleven sub-categories: “products”, “dishes”, “chefs”, “restaurants”, “food selling points”, “events”, “gastronomy and arts”, “gastronomy as social fact”, “alimentation and nutrition”, “gastronomy and media” and “food and tourism”. Drawing from a quantitative analysis of food-based contents, results are discussed from a comparative approach.

4. Results

In order to describe the characteristics of food-based contents in New York City’s newspapers, 287 articles were analyzed. They represent all the pieces with food content found in five New York City’s newspapers (AM, El Diario, Metro, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal) during the period running from the 14 November 2016 to 2 January 2017.
The total amount of food-based articles found in each newspaper (Table 1) showcase a first result: the leading role of The New York Times in communicating food. Almost half of the articles are published by this newspaper.
First, in focusing on the articles that have appeared on the front pages (Table 2), both The Wall Street Journal (27%) and The New York Times (9%) showcased the highest results. In particular, the analysis of the free dailies and El Diario revealed an extremely low presence of food on the front pages. Overall, only one out of ten pieces were found in the first page of the newspapers. The vast majority of the contents found on the cover pages of both The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times only anticipated content under specific Food sections.
Data collected also focused on the importance of food contents in relation to the articles that open section and page (those found in the top left-hand of the page). Results are observed in Table 3. 35% of the pieces are part of the opening page and almost 60% of them are found to open section. In comparison to the feature above, this issue shows a different trend: both free dailies and El Diario count on more than half of the articles that open section and page. Given its high amount of food-based contents, only 22% of the articles published by The New York Times are part of section opening while 57% are found in the top left hand of a page. Finally, The Wall Street Journal showcases lower percentages (22% section opening and 30% page opening).
Following, the study analyses the space that food contents occupy in the newspaper layout. Table 4 shows that articles with four or more columns account for almost 80% of the sample, which confirms the importance that all newspapers give to food contents.
Similar results are observed with regards to the space per page, and Table 5 displays that the weight of short articles is extremely few. In relation to the articles with a larger extension, 65% of them take at least half a page, and nearly 90% of the pieces at least a quarter of page. Again, this shows the huge importance given to food content by all the newspapers.
In focusing on the journalism genres (Table 6), news (information and news report) is of the greatest importance throughout the sample, and it represents an aggregate of two-thirds of all food-based contents, which is because the overall evolution that food-based news has experienced in recent decades, from opinion to information articles. However, The New York Times communicates food from an opinion perspective. As a result, food is released through food columns, critics and recipes which are only relevant in this newspaper since it defines the trends developed in food journalism.
Finally, Table 7 shows the topics developed. Although products are the category with the highest weight (24%), it is observed that three other categories represent over 10% of the sample each: restaurants (17%), dishes (16%) and food selling points (13%). Overall, these four top-ranked topics mean 70% of the articles. Themes such as alimentation and nutrition, arts or tourism have a very limited presence. The presence of these topics demonstrates the significance of “what” is offered, that is, products and dishes, and “how” it is delivered. Restaurants and other food selling points represent the places where production and consumption experiences are possible through the valorization of local and international culinary identities.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

The study of the mediatization of food contents is a pathway to understanding cultural, leisure and lifestyle contexts. The current paper has approached the importance of food journalism in legacy media from a quantitative perspective. This is the main implication of the research, which expands the field of food journalism by describing the features of food-based news as an example of “soft news” in print media. This also contributes to the understanding of food news values and provides an avenue towards the development of impactful and relevant food-based journalism. As early as in the fifties of the twentieth century, food was a significant attribute of American journalism: “in US dailies, few staffers exert more direct influence on readers than the food editor; only the front page and the comics have a bigger readership” (Time 1953).
As a result of the study of food-based contents in five newspapers based in New York City, the first outcome confirms the importance of The New York Times, where food is a salient ingredient. The embedded supplement Food (and also its online version) has become a worldwide referent for food and gastronomy-based communication. Furthermore, results have showcased that newspapers, except The New York Times, provide a similar presence of food and gastronomy contents. Added to the observed differences between free and non-free daily newspapers—for example, regarding the percentage of articles that open section or page, The New York Times owns a powerful role in terms of relevance, size and news content about food. Every day, 2.76 articles deal with food issues appear in the printed edition of The New York Times.
This paper contributes to further understanding both the dynamics and presence of food-based content in newspapers (Fusté-Forné and Masip 2018). A significant issue refers to the themes developed. The most important content (products, dishes, restaurants and food selling points) is heavily attached to production and consumption dimensions of food, and closely relies on the understanding of food as a cultural, leisure and lifestyle practice which may be later transferred to tourism (see, for example, Fusté-Forné and Masip 2020). From a theoretical point of view, this paper contributes to the current literature on the relationships between food and journalism studies (Voss 2020) and informs about the role that food plays in legacy media as an example of special interest journalism (see Turner and Orange 2012) and of a slow journalism practice (Vodanovic 2020). In terms of practical implications, the study’s findings could be used by the newspaper industry to explore their processes of mediatization of food which may lead to changes in the way they communicate food and gastronomy issues.
Limitations of this research are specifically based on three issues. First, its quantitative nature. Second, the limited study period, and third, the study of newspapers in a single city, where results described in relation to New York City’s newspapers need to be compared with other cities in the United States in order to confirm or not if similar outputs are obtained. While New York is a significant food city (Davis 2009), its unique profile it is not generalizable to other American cities. As a consequence, the study opens further opportunities for upcoming research. A discourse analysis with a robust qualitative approach would certainly provide a more impactful contribution and would lead to more conclusive results in terms of how topics are covered. Furthermore, the use of a larger sample would allow one to draw on food contents’ evolution. Finally, the method applied to this research may serve to elaborate studies in different geographical contexts that would lead to cross-cultural comparative media scenarios.

Funding

This research was made possible thanks to the financial support of Aristos Campus Mundus 2015 (ACM 2015)—Campus of International Excellence, which allowed the author to carry out a research stay at Fordham University.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the feedback provided by Pere Masip on a previous version of this manuscript and the availability, professionality and support of staff at The New York Public Library.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguirregoitia Martínez, Ainhoa, and María Dolores Fernández Poyatos. 2015. La gastronomía en la prensa española del siglo XIX. Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 21: 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bell, David, and Gill Valentine. 1997. Consuming Geographies. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Doug. 2004. Haute cuisine: Food journalism, once a throwaway compendium of recipes and ‘what’s hot’ articles, has gone upscale. American Journalism Review 26: 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole, Peter. 2005. The Structure of the Print Industry. In Print Journalism: A Critical Introduction. Edited by Richard Keeble. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  5. Craig, Geoffrey. 2016. Political Participation and Pleasure in Green Lifestyle Journalism. Environmental Communication 10: 122–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Damkjær, Maja Sonne, and Anne Marit Waade. 2014. Armchair Tourism: The Travel Series as a Hybrid Genre. In Travel Journalism: Exploring Production, Impact and Culture. Edited by Folker Hanusch and Elfriede Fürsich. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39–59. [Google Scholar]
  7. David, Elizabeth. 1986. An Omelette and a Glass of Wine. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis, Mitchell. 2009. A Taste for New York: Restaurant Reviews, Food Discourse, and the Field of Gastronomy in America. New York: New York University. [Google Scholar]
  9. Duffy, Andrew, and Yang Yuhong Ashley. 2012. Bread and Circuses: Food meets politics in the Singapore media. Journalism Practice 6: 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. English, Peter, and David Fleischman. 2017. Food for Thought in Restaurant Reviews. Journalism Practice 13: 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferguson, Priscilla Parkhurst. 1998. A cultural field in the making: Gastronomy in 19th-century France. American Journal of Sociology 104: 597–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fürsich, Elfriede. 2012. Lifestyle Journalism as Popular Journalism. Journalism Practice 6: 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fusté-Forné, Francesc. 2017. Food Journalism: Building the Discourse on the Popularization of Gastronomy in the Twenty-First Century. Barcelona: Universitat Ramon Llull. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fusté-Forné, Francesc, and Pere Masip. 2018. Food in journalistic narratives: A methodological design for the study of food-based contents in daily newspapers. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 14: 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fusté-Forné, Francesc, and Pere Masip. 2019. Food and journalism: Storytelling about gastronomy in newspapers from the U.S., and Spain. In Lifestyle Journalism: Social Media, Consumption and Experience. Edited by Lucia Vodanovic. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 129–40. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fusté-Forné, Francesc, and Pere Masip. 2020. Representation of food and tourism in legacy media: Rediscovering the roots. In The Routledge Companion to Media and Tourism. Edited by Maria Månsson, Annæ Buchmann, Cecilia Cassinger and Lena Eskilsson. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 142–52. [Google Scholar]
  17. Germann Molz, Jennie. 2007. The Cosmopolitan Mobilities of Culinary Tourism. Space and Culture 10: 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goossens, Jacqueline, Tim Vandenberghe, and Luk Thys. 2013. New York Street Food. Tielt: Lannoo. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanusch, Folker. 2012. Broadening the Focus. Journalism Practice 6: 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Harcup, Tony, and Deirdre O’Neill. 2017. What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies 18: 1470–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hartley, John. 2000. Communicative Democracy in a Redactional Society: The future of journalism studies. Journalism 1: 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hughes, Kathryn. 2010. Food Writing Moves from Kitchen to Bookshelf. Guardian Review, June 19, 2–4. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, Steve, and Ben Taylor. 2001. Food Writing and Food Cultures: The case of Elizabeth David and Jane Grigson. European Journal of Cultural Studies 4: 171–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jones, Steve, and Ben Taylor. 2013. Food journalism. In Specialist journalism. Edited by Barry Turner and Richard Orange. New York: Routledge, pp. 96–106. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kristensen, Nete Nørgaard, and Unni From. 2012. Lifestyle Journalism: Blurring boundaries. Journalism Practice 6: 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Månsson, Maria. 2011. Mediatized Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 38: 1634–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McCombs, Maxwell. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McLennan, Char-Iee. J., Susanne Becken, and Brent D. Moyle. 2017. Framing in a contested space: Media reporting on tourism and mining in Australia. Current Issues in Tourism 20: 960–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mennell, Stephen. 1996. All Manners of Food: Eating and Taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the Present. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Naulin, Sidonie. 2012. Le journalisme Gastronomique. Sociologie d’un Dispositif de Médiation Marchande. Paris: Paris 4. [Google Scholar]
  32. Naulin, Sidonie. 2014. Le plaisir affranchi de la nécessité? la représentation de l’alimentation dans le magazine Cuisine et Vins de France (1947–2010). Sociologie et Sociétés 46: 109–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pirolli, Bryan. 2019. Travel Journalism: Informing Tourists in the Digital Age. Abingdon: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sanjuán Ballano, Beatriz. 2007. Información=Cultura. Mapas patrimoniales para ir de los medios a las mediaciones. PH Cuadernos Patrimonio Cultural y Medios de Comunicación 21: 30–43. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sims, Rebecca. 2009. Food, place and authenticity: Local food and the sustainable tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17: 321–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sutton, David E. 2001. Remembrance of Repasts: An Anthropology of Food and Memory. Oxford: Berg. [Google Scholar]
  37. Time. 1953. The Press: The Kitchen Department. Time, October 19. [Google Scholar]
  38. Turner, Barry, and Richard Orange. 2012. Specialist Journalism. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vodanovic, Lucia. 2020. Aesthetic Experience, News Content, and Critique in Live Journalism Events. Journalism Practice, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Voss, Kimberly Wilmot. 2012. Food Journalism or Culinary Anthropology? Re-evaluating Soft News and the Influence of Jeanne Voltz’s Food Section in the Los Angeles Times. American Journalism 29: 66–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Voss, Kimberly Wilmot. 2020. A Food Journalism Pioneer: The Story behind the First New York Times Food Writer Jane Nickerson and Her Food Section, 1942–57. Journalism History, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Distribution of food-based articles found in each newspaper.
Table 1. Distribution of food-based articles found in each newspaper.
NewspaperN%
AM (AM)4114.3%
El Diario (ED)3010.5%
Metro (M)4114.3%
The New York Times (NYT)13848.1%
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ)3712.9%
Total287100.0%
Table 2. Analysis of food articles found on the front page.
Table 2. Analysis of food articles found on the front page.
Front pageAMEDMNYTWSJN
N/front page39293812527258
Front page213131029
Total41304113837287
Table 3. Analysis of the food articles that open section and page.
Table 3. Analysis of the food articles that open section and page.
OpeningAMEDMNYTWSJN
Section opening231723308101
N/page opening18131810829186
Total41304113837287
Page opening2724297911170
N/page opening146125926117
Total41304113837287
Table 4. Analysis of the columns of the food articles.
Table 4. Analysis of the columns of the food articles.
ColumnsAMEDMNYTWSJN
15206215
23527320
38195528
4737251254
554161475
6131522341195
Total41304113837287
Table 5. Analysis of space per page of food articles.
Table 5. Analysis of space per page of food articles.
Space per PageAMEDMNYTWSJN
1. Article ≥75%9211024064
2. Article 74–50%153177910124
3. Article 49–25%9211261563
4. Article 24–10%54391132
5. Short article300014
Total41304113837287
Table 6. Analysis of the genre of the food articles.
Table 6. Analysis of the genre of the food articles.
GenresAMEDMNYTWSJN
1. Information1010174227104
2. News report18111726879
3. Interview213006
4. Food column90418132
5. Opinion column210216
6. Food critic01015016
7. Recipe06035041
Total41304113837287
Table 7. Analysis of the main topic developed in food articles.
Table 7. Analysis of the main topic developed in food articles.
TopicsAMEDMNYTWSJN
1. Products578291968
2. Dishes17235045
3. Chefs1242312
4. Restaurants122527248
5. Food selling points81713837
6. Events33610224
7. Gastronomy and arts102508
8. Gastronomy as social fact36210223
9. Alimentation and nutrition120205
10. Gastronomy and media3033110
11. Food and tourism302207
Total41304113837287

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fusté-Forné, F. Reading about Gastronomy—An approach to Food Contents in New York City’s Newspapers. Journal. Media 2020, 1, 18-25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/journalmedia1010002

AMA Style

Fusté-Forné F. Reading about Gastronomy—An approach to Food Contents in New York City’s Newspapers. Journalism and Media. 2020; 1(1):18-25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/journalmedia1010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fusté-Forné, Francesc. 2020. "Reading about Gastronomy—An approach to Food Contents in New York City’s Newspapers" Journalism and Media 1, no. 1: 18-25. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/journalmedia1010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop