Next Article in Journal
Integration of Electrodeposited Ni-Fe in MEMS with Low-Temperature Deposition and Etch Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Development of AlN and TiB2 Composites with Nb2O5, Y2O3 and ZrO2 as Sintering Aids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels during Conversion of Waste to Biofuel

1
Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Bergamo, Dalmine (BG) 24044, Italy
2
Consorzio INSTM, Via G. Giusti 9, Firenze 50121, Italy
3
Eni SpA, Renewable Energy & Environmental Laboratories Istituto Donegani, Via G. Fauser 4, Novara (NO) 28100, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 February 2017 / Revised: 14 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published: 22 March 2017

Abstract

:
The paper deals with the corrosion behavior of stainless steels as candidate materials for biofuel production plants by liquefaction process of the sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Corrosion tests were carried out on AISI 316L and AISI 304L stainless steels at 250 °C in a batch reactor during conversion of raw material to bio-oil (biofuel precursor), by exposing specimens either to water/oil phase or humid gas phase. General corrosion rate was measured by weight loss tests. The susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking was evaluated by means of U-bend specimens and slow stress rate tests at 10−6 or 10−5 s−1 strain rate. After tests, scanning electron microscope analysis was carried out to detect cracks and localized attacks. The results are discussed in relation with exposure conditions. They show very low corrosion rates strictly dependent upon time and temperature. No stress corrosion cracking was observed on U-bend specimens, under constant loading. Small cracks confined in the necking cone of specimens prove that stress corrosion cracking only occurred during slow strain rate tests at stresses exceeding the yield strength.

1. Introduction

The development of the green economy is based on an industrial model in discontinuity with the past and the idea that the entire production chain must be sustainable and integrated into the local urban fabric. According to this approach, the use of organic waste as a renewable energy source is surely a topical issue. In Italy, municipal solid waste (MSW) and green crops in 2012 stood at 4.8 million tons. In the regions where recycling is effectively applied, the collection of bio-waste reaches 45–60 kg/inhabitant/year.
Biofuels coming from waste feature a double benefit, being the result of a process of waste recovery, which is preferable to disposal according to the management hierarchy prescribed by the regulations, and it is not in competition with the food industry, as in the case of the first generation biofuels.
The thermochemical conversion of organic waste into biofuel by a liquefaction process has been developed by Renewable Energy and Environmental R&D Center (ENI-Donegani) in Novara. The results of this research project led to the realization of batch laboratory equipment and a pilot scale prototype for continuous operation [1,2,3,4].
The corrosion risk assessment of the materials and equipment operating in contact with such an environment represents a crucial step. Bio-oils and processing fluids can contain significant concentrations of aggressive substances derived from organic waste conversion, but there is currently a lack of data. Few works have been published on the evaluation of the corrosion resistance of traditional steels in contact with bio-oils produced from biomass; moreover, none of them refers to the specific operating conditions of the liquefaction processes considered in this paper.
According to Keiser et al. [5], carbon steels or low alloyed steels containing chromium and molybdenum show corrosion rates ranging from less than 1 mm/year up to 4 mm/year in bio-oil at 50 °C, depending upon Total Acid Number (TAN). They report corrosion rates between 0.1 and 0.8 mm/year on an AISI 409 ferritic stainless steel—containing about 11.5% of chromium—and negligible corrosion rates on austenitic stainless steels with 18% chromium without molybdenum (AISI 304) and with molybdenum (AISI 316).
Aubin and Roy [6] outlined the increase of bio-oils corrosivity with temperature, strictly dependent upon oil on water ratio. The presence of formic and acetic acids causes a decrease in pH of bio-oils produced by pyrolysis to values in the range of 2–3 [7]. The aggressiveness increases particularly for carbon steels and aluminum alloys rather than for stainless steels.
Hu et al. [8] carried out tests in bio-oil obtained by pyrolysis containing 30% of water, at temperatures between 25 and 50 °C. The pH was in the range 3–3.5 due to the presence of organic acids. They observed high corrosion rates on lead and iron, slightly lower on AISI 1045 carbon steel, whist copper did not show general corrosion [8,9]. In a previous work, Darmstadt et al. [9] report on bio-oils from vacuum pyrolysis of bark residues at 80 °C. They outline that the significant amount of acidic water in the bio-oils caused severe corrosion of aluminum, to a less extent of copper, while the corrosion of AISI 316 stainless steel was substantially nil.
In the temperature range of interest for liquefaction process—between 240 and 310 °C—there is a lack of data on the behavior of austenitic stainless steels in bio-oils with high TAN, since pyrolysis bio-oils tend to decompose and polymerize. Most of the available information regarding the corrosivity induced by organic acids at high temperatures comes from the experience of the refineries. According to Nagi-Hanspal et al. [10], oils with TAN higher than 0.5 mg KOH/g bio-oil or distilled fractions with TAN greater than 1.5 are potentially corrosive at temperatures between 230 and 400 °C. In the refinery practice, despite the value of the TAN including all acids in crude oil, TAN is typically associated with the content of naphthenic acids, since they are primarily responsible for high temperature corrosion. Corrosion by naphthenic acid is controlled by using stainless steels containing molybdenum, mainly AISI 316L, AISI316Nb, and AISI 317.
Keiser et al. [11] report that pyrolysis oil causes cracking in carbon and low alloy steels. They investigated the risk of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) by exposing U-bend specimens in pyrolysis oil at 50 °C. Cracks were found on carbon and low alloy steels after 250-h exposure. Shallow cracks were also found on stainless steels after 500 and 750 h exposures. Furthermore, micro-cracks were observed on austenitic stainless steel and nickel alloys exposed directly in the pyrolysis plant at the output of the fluids, at a temperature of 550 °C. The presence of chloride induced SCC was also demonstrated by failure analysis of components exposed to contact with corrosive bio-oils [5,12,13].
The liquefaction process involves the thermochemical conversion of sorted organic fraction of MSW in bio-oil. Before feeding in the reactor, the raw material is crushed until a particle size less than 2 mm is attained and then it is homogenized. In the reactor, the charge undergoes a heat treatment at temperatures between 240 and 310 °C, for durations ranging from 0.5 up to 4 h and pressures from 40 up to 110 bar, due to liquid vapor pressure and the formation of non-condensable gases.
The conversion takes place with a multi-phase process for the simultaneous formation of a gaseous phase, rich in acid gases (mainly CO2, H2S), an aqueous phase containing inorganic compounds—such as chlorides and sulfates—and organic compounds, an oil phase—that is the bio-oil—and a solid phase constituted by carbonaceous and inorganic residues.
The oil phase is a mixture of fatty acids and their amides, aromatics, paraffins and olefins, ketones, alkyl cycloalkanes or cycloalkenes, alkylated pyrrolidones, methyl or ethyl esters of fatty acids, alkylated furans, steroids, etc. More detailed description was published in previous papers by Leonardis et al. and Chiaberge et al. [14,15]. During the reaction, homogeneous system that separates during the cooling forms. The oil (after reparation of the solid phase with the aid of a solvent—ethylacetate) contains a total amount of water lower than 0.1% with dissolved inorganic compounds, which are mainly constituted of sodium salts. The TAN is influenced by the characteristics of the charge and by the operating conditions of liquefaction. Chiaberge et al. [16] measured on bio-oils derived from waste food typical TAN values between 20 and 150. After cooling, the pH of aqueous phase is between 6 and 8.5. Its composition is complex. The analysis indicates the presence of organic acids (i.e., formic, acetic, propionic, butyric, levulinic acids), sugars, and alcohols as well as inorganic salts. Inorganic anions includes chlorides (about 4000–5000 ppm), sulphur ions, and phosphorus ions. Among cations, sodium, potassium, iron, calcium, and magnesium were mainly detected. Inorganic carbon is also found in many different chemical combinations, including hydrated carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, and carbonate, depending on pH.
The solid residue consists of inorganic elements, in which Ca and P prevail, probably due the precipitation of insoluble salts (i.e., phosphates and mixed carbonates of Ca and Mg) derived from bones present in the feed. Furthermore, organic fraction is still present in the solid residue, as demonstrated by not negligible calorific value. More details on the chemical-physical characterization of the phases produced by liquefaction on organic fraction of MSW are reported elsewhere [17].
The aim of the work is the study of the corrosion and stress corrosion cracking behavior of traditional AISI 316L and 304L austenitic stainless steels exposed to the environmental conditions occurring during liquefaction process of organic sorted fraction of municipal solid waste.

2. Results

Figure 1 shows the corrosion rates estimated by weight loss measurements on U-bend specimens after tests performed during the SMSW liquefaction process at different temperatures, for durations ranging from 55 to 264 h. The corrosion rate is calculated as mean values on exposed surface. The general attack is low, with rates in the humid gas phase that remains constant over the testing time at about 10 μm/year. At 300 °C, the values slightly rise. In the oil/water phase, the corrosion rate shows values comparable to that in gas phase, but the rate tends to decrease with time approaching at about 5 μm/year. The tests on AISI 304L steel were only executed at 250 °C. AISI 316L and AISI 304L steels showed similar corrosion rates (Figure 1), but shallow and widened sporadic pits were observed on the surface of AISI 304L stainless steel (Figure 2).
After testing, all U-bend specimens showed a dyed layer of oxide below a carbonaceous scale, with colours varying from metallic grey to black-brown, passing through bronze, gold, red, purple, blue, and green. The change of colour denotes an increase in film thickness, considering the interference nature of film colours on stainless steel. The Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis showed superficial depletion of iron and an increase in chromium and oxygen, indicating that the oxide layer was mainly constituted of chromium oxide (Figure 3).
Visual examinations of exposed surfaces were performed and metallografic sections of U-bend specimens were carried out in order to assess stress corrosion cracking. The specimens did not show any cracking. Only micro-defects were observed on slip bands with depth limited to 20 μm (Figure 4).
Figure 5 compares the stress/strain curve collected during SSR tests in the batch reactor to the corresponding curve in air at 10−5 s−1 strain rate. The tests in the batch reactor were performed during the liquefaction reaction. Not relevant differences can be underlined. Nevertheless, the specimens exposed during liquefaction reaction show numerous shallow cracks. The fracture originates from the coalescence of these cracks on the surface of the specimen, producing an appreciable decrease of ductile parameters, mainly the reduction of area. The cracks have a brittle growth featuring the typical morphology of chloride SCC (Figure 6). Their growth on the fracture surface is limited to less than 150 μm. Secondary cracks were also present on the surface of the necking cone, with similar morphology. Some micro-cracks have also been found far from the necking due to work hardening induced by the machining of specimens.
At 250 °C, the stress/strain curves showed a noticeable reduction of strength—both tensile yield stress and ultimate tensile stress—compared with the behaviour at room temperature (Figure 7). Furthermore, the ductility also decreases with a significant reduction of elongation to fracture, but with a less extensive variation of the reduction of area. Byun et al. [18] reports on temperature dependence of strain hardening of austenitic stainless steels and plastic instability occurrence. Strain hardening of austenitic stainless steels at high temperature promotes the early insurgence of necking, thus limiting the extension of the uniform plastic deformation. Actually, the fracture surface of the specimens tested in air is fully ductile in any case. At 25 °C, the fracture surface has typical ductile morphology with small dimples. At 250 °C, the dimples appear larger and transversal ductile separations are visible.
In order to assess the extent of SCC phenomena during SSR tests, embrittlement indexes were calculated by using elongation at break (IA%) and reduction of area (IZ%). The ratio between the value of the parameter in environment and the corresponding value in air was determined according to the following relationships:
IA %   = ( 1 A %   e n v i r o n m e n t A %   a i r ) × 100
IZ %   = ( 1 Z %   e n v i r o n m e n t Z %   a i r ) × 100
The evaluation of the SCC indexes is based on the increase of the value above zero.
Table 1 summarizes the results of SSR tests. They indicate a general low susceptibility to SCC for the AISI 316L stainless steel, being in the range of 10%–27%. Minor differences can be noticed between different testing conditions. According to the fracture analysis of the specimens, the authors decided to use the IZ% index rather than IA% to discuss the effect of environmental conditions on SCC. The test performed on AISI 304 steel confirms slightly worse behaviour compared to AISI 316 steel.

3. Discussion

The results confirm that the two austenitic stainless steels are substantially resistant to corrosion (both localized corrosion and SCC) under the environmental conditions of batch liquefaction process The very low corrosion rates measured during tests should be considered negligible in any case. Actually, traditional austenitic stainless steels as AISI 316L and AISI 304L steels have high general corrosion resistance due to the formation of passive film made of chromium-rich oxide. The protective film is stable in a wide range of pH values of the liquid phase.
Despite the high chloride concentration of the water phase, in the range between 4000–5000 mg/L, and high temperature (240–300 °C), pitting corrosion was not clearly noticeable. The initiation of pitting was only sporadic, and limited to AISI 304L steels, without any significant propagation. Pitting generally occurs in the presence of oxidant, under conditions that promote corrosion potentials sufficiently noble to overcome the pitting potential. The corrosion potential of passive stainless steel mainly depends on the oxidizing power of the environment. It is considerably lower in reducing conditions than in oxidizing ones. Otherwise, the pitting potential depends on chlorides concentration, pH, and temperature of solution.
The batch process produces low corrosivity due to its short duration and modifications of environmental parameter during the early period of liquefaction reactions. In the early stages of the batch process of liquefaction, the presence of dissolved oxygen in the charge produces an oxidizing environment favourable to pit initiation. However, at sufficiently high temperatures reducing conditions develop that lower the corrosion potential, reducing the risk of localized corrosion. Thus, the most critical conditions are primarily present in the initial transient stage. Then the oxygen depletion also reduces the propagation of shallow pits initiated during early period. It is quite difficult to measure the dissolved concentration of O2 in batch liquefaction, due to the high level of temperature and pressure.
During thermal treatment, different reactions take place, mainly depolymerisation and condensation, with a variety of side reactions. Light hydrocarbons like CH4, ethane, and propane, and permanent gases like H2, CO, and CO2 were found in the effluent of reaction. The mentioned products give evidence of the presence of reactions involving radicals formation (cracking reactions). Such reactions are activated as the temperature reaches 220–240 °C. Moreover, oxygen is a promoting agent for radical reactions and its complete scavenging is a consequence of the occurrence of such reactions [19].
The behaviour greatly depends on the intrinsic resistance of the alloy to this form of corrosion. The pitting potential increases with the pitting resistance equivalent index (PRE) of alloys, depending on composition of the stainless steel (mainly chromium and molybdenum). The resistance of AISI 304L steel—having PRE 18—is not enough to prevent the initiation of the attack. Data indicate a certain risk of corrosion in presence of oxygen for a prolonged period. Thus, it appears more conservative to select stainless steel grades with suitable molybdenum content.
Furthermore, the pitting potential also depends on the properties of the protective film. The weight loss measured during tests can be related to colour variations of the specimens after exposure, which is strictly related to the thickness and protectiveness of the passive film. Eish et al. [20] reported that the semi-transparent oxide films become coloured after thermal oxidation at temperatures higher than 200 °C. At temperatures lower than 400 °C, the films are generally too thin for permitting an evaluation of differences in the elements concentration using XPS technique. Trasatti et al. [21] reported that thermal oxidation in the range 150 to 300 °C in air substantially modifies the nature of the passive film of AISI 304L, thus creating conditions that favour nucleation and development of localized corrosion. However, during batch liquefaction, the film develops by chemical oxidation under complex and humid exposure, either on the part placed in the gas phase or immersed. The tests on U-bend specimens didn’t show the clear presence of SCC, but only some micro-defects originated in hardened zones.
After SSR tests, all the specimens showed the presence of cracking that reduced the ductility parameters (see Table 1), but no significant changes of the stress/strain curves were noticed in both the elastic and plastic fields. The cracking was limited to the necking cone in the zone where the material undergoes considerable plastic deformations. Therefore, the phenomena of SCC observed is rather mild, despite the chemical analysis of the aqueous phase indicating a remarkable concentration of chlorides.
The SCC of austenitic stainless steels has been well known since 1930s [22]. Extensive testing has been performed in diluted neutral chloride solutions showing the effect of the critical environmental parameter. Since 1980, Gordon [23] and Speidel [24] showed a quite extensive compilation of SCC data for austenitic stainless steels, including Type 304L and 316L, in term of critical domain of chloride and oxygen concentrations. The importance of oxygen concentration and, hence, potential on the SCC susceptibility was clearly stated. Thus, it can be assumed that at temperatures in the range of 250 to 350 °C and oxygen concentration of 1 ppm, chloride concentrations of 10 ppm can even induce SCC on highly stressed elements.
The absence of clear evidence of SCC can be attributed to some features of batch process. As already observed for the risk of localized corrosion, the duration of the batch conversion process could be too short to promote SCC onset. Furthermore, as previously observed, the oxygen depletion occurs at an early time, modifying corrosion potential. Such a variation can bring the potential to much less critical ranges than in aerated water, reducing the risk of SCC.
Plastic straining at very low strain rates generally enhances environmentally assisted cracking phenomena [25,26,27,28]. The SCC indexes mark the effects of the strain rate, the exposure time, and the position of the specimen in the autoclave (Figure 8). The embrittlement index decreases as the specimen is placed in the bottom of the autoclave, and the strain rate decreases from 10−5 s−1 to 10−6 s−1. This seems to be in contradiction with the principles of chloride SCC of austenitic stainless steels, which state higher susceptibilities at 10−6 s−1 strain rate compared to 10−5 s−1. The effect of the strain rate is hindered by the primary effect of the extent of liquefaction reaction. In the test at 10−5 s−1 strain rate performed 55 h after reaching the temperature of 250 °C, the embrittlement index falls to 10. This effect can be attributed to the decrease in the oxygen content, but it should also be noted that an organic deposit forms during prolonged exposure. Therefore, the risk of SCC tends to decrease over time during the bio-oil production process. Actually, the role of organic substances that constitute the bio-oil has to be further demonstrated, but the results of SSR tests carried out at 10−6 s−1 evidenced higher indexes in the upper part (20) rather than in the lower part (12), meaning that a certain shielding effect can also be hypothesized (Figure 8). The presence of such organic deposits was also evidenced on the surface of U-bend specimens. The EDS analysis before pickling identified a large number of elements, mainly Cl, Si, Al, Na, K, and Ca. Sulphur was not clearly identified because of overlapping with the peak of the molybdenum in base metal. Sporadic presence was determined for deposits of sodium chloride, potassium, and calcium phosphate. Relevant concentrations of amides in bio-oil was evidenced by means of gascromatographic analysis with mass detection (GC-MS), as reported elsewhere by Chiaberge et al. [15]. Amides were also measured in ethyl acetate solvent used for washing the specimens. The adsorption of such organic substances on the metallic surface could play a crucial role in terms of corrosion mitigation, having inhibiting properties as from previous woks by Di Iorio et al. [29], Fang [30], Ghareba and Omanovic [31], and Yu [32].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The corrosion tests were performed on AISI 316L and 304L stainless steels, purchased in the form of a 1000 × 2000 mm2 sheet with 2.5 mm thickness or 6 mm diameter bar. Table 2 shows the alloy compositions.
The steel microstructure was verified by oxalic acid etching, according to Practice A of ASTM A262 standard for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack. Both steels show a “step” microstructure without carbide precipitation at grain boundary.

4.2. Environment

The corrosion tests were carried out during the liquefaction of a Simulated Organic fraction of MSW (SMSW). The same SMSW composition was used for all the tests. The charge was prepared by cutting and mixing different foods in order to reproduce the same average content of protein, salts, carbohydrates, lipids, water, etc., of a typical organic fraction of MSW. It was packaged and frozen at −20 °C in different amounts and thawed just before use. Table 3 shows the elementary composition of the dry matter of the charge, the dry matter is 30% of the total weight, being the complement to 100% water.
The liquefaction reaction was performed in batch reactors at the temperatures of 240–250 °C or 300 °C, from 55 up to 264 h. Pressure ranges between 40 and 100 bar. As mentioned in the introduction, the bio-oil TAN is influenced by the operating conditions of liquefaction and characteristics of the charge. The TAN number is statistically proportional to the lipid fraction of the charge and with a same charge, composition tends to slightly decrease with higher temperatures and contact time. In the temperature range investigated from 240 to 310 °C, with a charge containing 29% of lipid content, the conversion of the SMSW produces bio-oils with TAN of about 85 mg KOH/g.

4.3. Corrosion Tests and Stress Corrosion Cracking Tests

U-bend specimens were prepared according to type A of ASTM G30-97 (Figure 9). They were polished with emery papers up to 1200 grit, degreased in acetone, dried, and weighed with an analytical scale with accuracy of 0.1 mg. Afterward, they were pre-formed to a U-shape by 10 mm diameter mandrel and loaded by bolt.
The sample holder consists of a lower plate with three threaded columns with a diameter of 8 mm, made of the same type of stainless steel of specimens in order to avoid any galvanic coupling. The specimens were tightened on two of these columns on different levels in order to expose the material to different zones of the reactor. PTFE sheaths were mounted in order to achieve electrical insulation between the specimens and the autoclave. Other PTFE spacers were mounted on the plate and on the upper end for regulating the system centring (Figure 10). Before the tests, the electrical insulation between holder and test vessel was checked.
The reactor (autoclave in Hastelloy C276) had a volume of 680 mL and was filled with about 300 g of SMSW, in order to occupy 2/3 of the total volume. During tests, the specimens at the top of the holder were in contact with the gas phase, while the others were immersed in the oil/water phase.
After testing, the autoclave was cooled to 40 °C and then it was opened in order to extract the specimens. The specimens were firstly cleaned with ethyl acetate, then ultrasonically cleaned in acetone before the observation of surfaces by means of optical and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Later, the specimens were further cleaned in hot sodium hydroxide and nitric acid (50%) at a temperature of 60 °C in order to dissolve carbonaceous residues. Afterward, the specimens were dried and weighed to evaluate the weight loss. In order to estimate the weight loss due to the cleaning procedure, some untested specimens were pickled by using the same cleaning procedure. The weight loss of these specimens was negligible.
The SSR tests were performed according to ASTM G129-00 and EN ISO 7539-7, on cylindrical specimens machined from stainless steel bars (Table 2, Chemical composition (wt %) of steels) with an asymmetric geometry (Figure 11), in order to expose the gauge length in the upper or lower position of the autoclave.
The specimens were loaded under constant elongation rate until break, at initial strain rates of 10−5 and 10−6 s−1 referred to gauge length. The insurgence of SCC was evaluated by comparing the results of test performed into the aggressive environment to the result in air.
The tests were performed in an autoclave made of Hastelloy C and featuring an inner volume of about 0.5 L during the liquid phase test. The specimen was positioned with the gauge length in the lower region of the reactor, immersed in about 430 g of SMSW. During testing in the gas phase, the gauge length was in the upper zone of the reactor and the SMSW volume was limited to 300 g.
The loading was applied after the charge inside the autoclave reached the target testing temperature during the early stage of SMSW conversion. The test then continued until specimens break occurred, typically for about five hours at 10−5 s−1 strain rate and 55 h at 10−6 s−1 strain rate. Tests at 10−5 s−1 were also performed after the charge conversion process in order to evidence the effect of the modification of the environment on the function of the extent of the conversion reaction.
After the rupture of the specimen, the autoclave was cooled down to about 60 °C before discharging the residual pressure. The gases coming out were treated through an abatement solution of sodium hypochlorite. Then the autoclave was purged with nitrogen and the specimens were taken out. The specimens were cleaned in ethyl acetate and they were measured in order to estimate the total elongation and reduction of area. Finally, the fracture surface was observed by means of optical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM).

5. Conclusions

The paper investigates the corrosion and stress corrosion cracking behaviour of AISI 316L and AISI 304L stainless steels in environments typical of the sub-critical liquefaction processes for bio-oil production from the organic fraction of MSW. Very low corrosion rates strictly dependent upon time and temperature were noticed due to the formation of passive film of chromium-rich oxide. This protective film is stable in a wide range of pH. Despite the high chloride concentration of the water phase and high temperature, pitting corrosion was not clearly noticeable, and the initiation of pitting was only observed on AISI 304L steels, without any significant propagation. The low pitting susceptibility can be mainly ascribed to the nature of batch process, which promotes the formation of reducing conditions. However, critical conditions during process transients can occur.
SCC was not observed on U-bend specimens under constant loading. Small cracks confined in the necking cone of specimens were noticed after SSR tests, meaning that SCC phenomena take place only under dynamic loading in the plastic field. The micro-cracks depth was less than 150 μm. Despite the high content of chlorides in the aqueous phase (close to 5000 mg/L), the oxygen depletion and the formation of a deposit of organic products reduce the risk of SCC during the liquefaction process. The embrittlement indexes calculated after SSR tests confirmed a slightly better resistance to SCC of AISI 316L steel compared to AISI 304L.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by ENI—Renewable Energy and Environmental R&D Center.

Author Contributions

Marina Cabrini, Sergio Lorenzi, and Tommaso Pastore conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and contributed materials and scanning electron/EDX analysis. Simone Pellegrini performed slow strain rate tests and data analysis. Mauro Burattini and Roberta Miglio performed the constant loading and weight loss experiments. Each author contributed to paper writing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bosetti, A.; Bianchi, D.; Franzosi, G.; Ricci, M. Process for the Production of Bio-Oil from Solid Urban Waste. U.S. Patent WO 2011/030196 A1, 17 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosetti, A.; Bianchi, D.; Franzosi, G. Integrated Process for the Production of Bio-Oil from Sludge Coming from a Wastewater Purification Plant. U.S. Patent WO 2012/117319 A1, 7 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosetti, A.; Bianchi, D.; Moscotti, D.; Pollesel, P. Integrated Process for the Production of Biofuels from Solid Urban Waste. U.S. Patent EP 2749626 A1, 2 February 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. Caretta, A.; Riccò, M.; Bosetti, A.; Burattini, M.; Carnelli, L.; Miglio, R.; Volpato, C. Waste to fuel—Conversion of waste into energy. In Proceedings of the 9th European Congress of Chemical Engineering, The Hague, The Netherlands, 21–24 April 2013. poster.
  5. Keiser, J.R.; Howel, M.; Lewis, S.A.; Connatser, R. Corrosion Studies of Raw and Treated Biomass-Derived Pyrolysis Oils. In NACE Corrosion 2012; NACE International: Houston, TX, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aubin, H.; Roy, C. Study on the corrosiveness of wood pyrolysis oils. Fuel Sci. Technol. Int. 1990, 8, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Czernik, S.; Bridgwater, A.V. Overview of application of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuel 2004, 18, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, X.G.; Zhou, L.L.; Wang, Q.J.; Xu, Y.F.; Zhu, X.F. On corrosion behaviour of metal in biomass oil. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Darmstadt, H.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Adnot, A.; Chaala, A.; Kretschmer, D.; Roy, C. Corrosion of Metals by Bio-Oil Obtained by Vacuum Pyrolysis of Softwood Bark Residues. An X-ray Photolectron Spectroscopy and Auger Electron Spectroscopy Study. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nagi-Hanspal, I.; Subramanjyam, M.; Shah, P. Corrosion control with acid crude. Digit. Refin. 2013, 7, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  11. Keiser, J.R.; Brady, M.P.; Connatser, R.M.; Lewis, S.A. Degradation of Structural Alloys in Biomass Derived Pyrolysis Oil. J. Sci. Technol. For. Prod. Process. 2013, 3, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  12. Keiser, J.R.; Brady, M.P.; Thomson, J.K.; Connatser, R.M.; Leonard, D.N. Bio-Oil Properties and Effects on Containment Materials. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2014 Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 9–13 March 2014. Paper 4423.
  13. Brady, M.; Keiser, J.; Leonard, D.; Whitmer, L.; Thomson, J. Corrosion considerations for the thermochemical biomass liquefaction process system in biofuel production. JOM 2014, 66, 2583–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leonardis, I.; Chiaberge, S.; Fiorani, T.; Spera, S.; Battistel, E.; Bosetti, A.; Cesti, P.; Reale, S.; De Angelis, F. Characterization of Bio-oil from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Organic Waste by NMR Spectroscopy and FTICR Mass Spectrometry. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chiaberge, S.; Leonardis, I.; Fiorani, T.; Cesti, P.; Reale, S.; De Angelis, F. Bio-Oil from Waste: A Comprehensive Analytical Study by Soft-Ionization FTICR Mass Spectrometry. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 2019–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chiaberge, S.; Pietropaolo, E.; Perucchini, S.; Congiu, A. Bio-oil from organic waste: Acidity vs. molecular level composition assessment through FTICR MS and potentiometric titration. In Proceedings of the EUROANALYSIS 2015—15th European Conference of Analytical Chemistry, Bordeaux, France, 6–10 September 2015.
  17. Odoardi, V. Liquefazione Termochimica di Biomasse: Ricostruzione Meccanismi di Reazione, Modello Cinetico Lumped e Studio di Differenti Tipologie reatToristiche. Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi dell’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Byun, T.; Hashimoto, N.; Farrell, K. Temperature dependence of strain hardening and plastic instability behaviors in austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 3889–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y. Hydrothermal Liquefaction to Convert Biomass into Crude Oil. In Biofuels from Agricultural Wastes and Byproducts; Blaschek, H.P., Ezeji, C.T., Scheffran, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Esih, I.; Alar, V.; Juraga, I. Influence of thermal oxides on pitting corrosion of stainless steel in chloride solutions. Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Trasatti, S.; Camona, E.; Mazza, F.; Sivieri, E. Influence of the exposure of AISI 304L stainless steel at moderately high temperature on the susceptibility to crevice corrosion. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1998, 28, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gragnolino, G.; Sridhar, N. A review of stress corrosion cracking of high-level nuclear waste container materials—I. In CNWRA 92-021; Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses: San Antonio, TX, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gordon, B. The effect of chloride and oxygen on tie stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels: Review of the literature. Mater. Perform. 1980, 19, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  24. Speidel, M. Stress corrosion cracking of stainless steels in NaCl Solutions. Metall. Trans. A 1981, 12, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brass, A.; Chêne, J. Hydrogen uptake in 316L stainless steel: Consequences on the tensile properties. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48, 3222–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. San Marchi, C.; Somerday, B.; Tang, X.; Schiroky, G. Effects of alloy composition and strain hardening on tensile fracture of hydrogen-precharged type 316 stainless steels. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cabrini, M.; Lorenzi, S.; Marcassoli, P.; Pastore, T. Hydrogen embrittlement behavior of HSLA line pipe steel under cathodic protection. Corros. Rev. 2011, 29, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cabrini, M.; Lorenzi, S.; Pellegrini, S.; Pastore, T. Environmentally assisted cracking and hydrogen diffusion in traditional and high-strength pipeline steels. Corros. Rev. 2015, 33, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Iorio, C.; Cheldi, T.; Correra, S.; LoPiccolo, E.; Mortali, G. Evaluation of environmentally friendly corrosion inhibitors vs. traditional corrosion inhibitors in oil and gas industry. In Proceedings of the Eurocorr 2014—European Corrosion Congress, Pisa, Italy, 8–12 September 2014.
  30. Fang, J.; Li, J. Quantum chemistry study on the relationship between molecular structure and corrosion inhibition efficiency of amides. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 2002, 593, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ghareba, S.; Omanovic, S. Interaction of 12-aminododecanoic acid with a carbon steel surface: Towards the development of “green” corrosion inhibitors. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52, 2104–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuznetsov, Y.I.; Thomas, J.G.N. Organic Inhibitors of Corrosion of Metals; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Weight loss measurements to evaluate the effect of time on the corrosion rate of AISI 316L steel during SMSW liquefaction at 250 °C. (a) In humid phase; (b) in oil/water phase.
Figure 1. Weight loss measurements to evaluate the effect of time on the corrosion rate of AISI 316L steel during SMSW liquefaction at 250 °C. (a) In humid phase; (b) in oil/water phase.
Materials 10 00325 g001
Figure 2. Shallow pit on AISI 304L steel after SMSW liquefaction at 250 °C for 264 h.
Figure 2. Shallow pit on AISI 304L steel after SMSW liquefaction at 250 °C for 264 h.
Materials 10 00325 g002
Figure 3. EDS analysis of the oxide film formed on AISI 316L U-Bend specimens (a) and base material composition as reference (b).
Figure 3. EDS analysis of the oxide film formed on AISI 316L U-Bend specimens (a) and base material composition as reference (b).
Materials 10 00325 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of micro-defect on AISI 316L U-bend specimens after test at 250 °C for 55 h: external surface (a); metallographic section (b).
Figure 4. SEM image of micro-defect on AISI 316L U-bend specimens after test at 250 °C for 55 h: external surface (a); metallographic section (b).
Materials 10 00325 g004
Figure 5. Stress vs. strain curves of AISI 316L in air and in autoclave during bio-oil conversion.
Figure 5. Stress vs. strain curves of AISI 316L in air and in autoclave during bio-oil conversion.
Materials 10 00325 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of fracture morphology of AISI 316L steel after SSR tests in autoclave, during bio-oil conversion at 250 °C at 10−6 s−1.
Figure 6. SEM images of fracture morphology of AISI 316L steel after SSR tests in autoclave, during bio-oil conversion at 250 °C at 10−6 s−1.
Materials 10 00325 g006
Figure 7. Effect of temperature on the stress vs. strain curves of AISI 316L in air.
Figure 7. Effect of temperature on the stress vs. strain curves of AISI 316L in air.
Materials 10 00325 g007
Figure 8. Embrittlement index from reduction of area as a function of strain rate.
Figure 8. Embrittlement index from reduction of area as a function of strain rate.
Materials 10 00325 g008
Figure 9. U-bend specimens for corrosion and constant-load stress corrosion cracking tests (all measurements are in millimeters).
Figure 9. U-bend specimens for corrosion and constant-load stress corrosion cracking tests (all measurements are in millimeters).
Materials 10 00325 g009
Figure 10. U-bend specimens after the test at 250 °C after 55 hours exposure.
Figure 10. U-bend specimens after the test at 250 °C after 55 hours exposure.
Materials 10 00325 g010
Figure 11. Geometry of SSR specimen (all measurements are in millimeters).
Figure 11. Geometry of SSR specimen (all measurements are in millimeters).
Materials 10 00325 g011
Table 1. Values of SCC indexes calculated after SSR tests at 250 °C during liquefaction of SMSW.
Table 1. Values of SCC indexes calculated after SSR tests at 250 °C during liquefaction of SMSW.
MaterialStrain Rate (s−1)Position Specimen’s Gauge LengthWaiting Time (h) *IA%IZ%
AISI 316L10−5Liquid phase0426
552110
Gas phase02527
10−6Liquid phase02112
Gas phase02120
AISI 304L10−5Liquid phase03837
* Specimen immersed into the testing environment before loading application.
Table 2. Chemical composition (wt %) of steels.
Table 2. Chemical composition (wt %) of steels.
SteelsFormCMnSiPSCrNiMoNCuYS * (MPa)UTS ** (MPa)
AISI 316Lsheet0.0260.90.320.030.00116.7510.302.090.0480.39268583
bar0.031.450.340.0290.0316.610.52,010.050.32609735
AISI 304Lsheet0.0261.770.330.0260.001188.070.190.060.18265612
bar0.0441.360.340.0320.02218.38.10.240.080.33611843
* YS = Yield Strength; ** UTS = Ultimate Tensile Strength.
Table 3. Average composition of the SMSW.
Table 3. Average composition of the SMSW.
ChargeNCHSOAsh
OS-MSW typical composition (wt %)2–440–607–100.1–0.223–352–7
SMSW—present study composition (wt %) 4.150.67.90.230.15.7

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabrini, M.; Lorenzi, S.; Pastore, T.; Pellegrini, S.; Burattini, M.; Miglio, R. Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels during Conversion of Waste to Biofuel. Materials 2017, 10, 325. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma10030325

AMA Style

Cabrini M, Lorenzi S, Pastore T, Pellegrini S, Burattini M, Miglio R. Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels during Conversion of Waste to Biofuel. Materials. 2017; 10(3):325. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma10030325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cabrini, Marina, Sergio Lorenzi, Tommaso Pastore, Simone Pellegrini, Mauro Burattini, and Roberta Miglio. 2017. "Study of the Corrosion Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels during Conversion of Waste to Biofuel" Materials 10, no. 3: 325. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma10030325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop