Next Article in Journal
Editorial Materials: Special Issue on Advances in Luminescent Engineered Nanomaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
Deterioration and Protection of Concrete Elements Embedded in Contaminated Soil: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Strengthening of Continuous Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Large Openings Using CFRP Strips
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Characteristics of Ferritic Steel Determined during the Uniaxial Tensile Test
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Confining Conditions on the Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Lime Blended Semiarid Soil

by
Abdullah Ali Shaker
1,
Mosleh Ali Al-Shamrani
1,*,
Arif Ali Baig Moghal
2,* and
Kopparthi Venkata Vydehi
2
1
Bugshan Research Chair in Expansive Soils, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Warangal 506004, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 April 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 6 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Testing of Materials and Elements in Civil Engineering (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
The hydraulic properties of expansive soils are affected due to the formation of visible cracks in the dry state. Chemical stabilization coupled with fiber reinforcement is often considered an effective strategy to improve the geotechnical performance of such soils. In this study, hydraulic conductivity tests have been conducted on expansive clay using two different types of fibers (fiber cast (FC) and fiber mesh (FM)) exhibiting different surface morphological properties. The fiber parameters include their dosage (added at 0.2% to 0.6% by dry weight of soil) and length (6 and 12 mm). Commercially available lime is added to ensure proper bonding between clay particles and fiber materials, and its dosage was fixed at 6% (by dry weight of the soil). Saturated hydraulic conductivity tests were conducted relying on a flexible wall permeameter on lime-treated fiber-blended soil specimens cured for 7 and 28 days. The confining pressures were varied from 50 to 400 kPa, and the saturated hydraulic conductivity values (ksat) were determined. For FC fibers, an increase in fiber dosage caused ksat values to increase by 9.5% and 94.3% for the 6 and 12 mm lengths, respectively, at all confining pressures and curing periods. For FM fibers, ksat values for samples mixed with 6 mm fiber increased by 12 and 99.2% for 6 and 12 mm lengths, respectively for all confining pressures at the end of the 28-day curing period. The results obtained from a flexible wall permeameter (FWP) were compared with those of a rigid wall permeameter (RWP) available in the literature, and the fundamental mechanism responsible for such variations is explained.

1. Introduction

Desiccation heave and shrinkage characteristics of expansive soils have limited their application as a subbase for roadway pavements material in arid and semiarid climates. Randomly oriented fibers are often used to reduce the problems associated with clayey soils. The cost-effectiveness and chemical inertness of the fibers makes them useful as a soil additive [1,2]. To develop the bonding between soil grains, researchers used chemical stabilizers such as lime, cement, EICP, MICP, biopolymer, etc., in combination with fiber to improve the geotechnical properties [3,4,5,6]. The addition of fiber to the soil increases shear strength [7], reduces swelling [8,9], reduces desiccation cracking [10], and increases hydraulic conductivity (k) values [11,12]. Although fiber inclusion reduces the desiccation cracking, an increase in k values of soil limited its application in the subbase for the construction of pavements. However, the resultant properties of fiber-reinforced soil depend on the fiber type, dosage, and aspect ratio [13]. Experimental investigations on medium plasticity clay with polypropylene fiber (at 2%) inclusion results in an increase in k values by 10−3 cm/s compared to untreated clay. The fiber dosage up to 0.5% resulted in acceptable hydraulic conductivity values [12]. On the contrary, k values of lime-amended high-plastic clay reduced by 10−2 cm/s with a fiber dosage of 0.2% and length of 6 mm at the end of a 28-day curing period compared to specimens without curing [14]. To meet the requirements of hydraulic conductivity values for lime-stabilized high-plastic clay reinforced with fiber, an optimum length of 10.5 mm with 0.5% dosage for a 15-day curing period is proposed using the response surface method [15]. On the other hand, few researchers have studied the effect of lime on the hydraulic conductivity of soils. The results showed an increase in the hydraulic conductivity with lime [16,17,18]. In addition, the k value of lime-treated soil increased at initial curing periods and then decreased at higher curing periods [19,20]. Earlier research concentrated on evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of fiber-reinforced soil using a conventional rigid wall permeameter (RWP).
However, for a compacted clay as a subgrade layer, the surcharge load coming on it plays a major role in controlling the hydraulic conductivity values. According to Daniel et al. [21], complete control over imposed stress on the soil is not possible, resulting in the inability of RWP to measure vertical and horizontal deformations. To overcome these limitations, a flexible wall permeameter (FWP) was introduced, in which back pressure saturation and the minimization of sidewall leakages facilitate in determining the accurate value of saturated hydraulic conductivity values (ksat) [22]. Therefore, to simulate the real field conditions, researchers proposed using FWP to evaluate ksat values. Experimental investigations on sand–Alqatif clay mixture revealed that ksat values reduced with an increase in confining pressure [23]. The generalized mechanism proposed for the reduction of ksat values using FWP is that an increase in confining pressure reduces the effective pore spaces, and an increase in unit weight leads to a reduction of effective flow paths.
There are limited studies on the evaluation of ksat values for fiber-reinforced soil using FWP. In lieu of this, the present research evaluates the ksat values of a lime-stabilized Al-Ghat soil with fiber inclusion using FWP. The effect of dosage, length of the fiber, and curing period are considered in evaluating the ksat values. Then, the values obtained from the study are compared with the values in the literature [13] to evaluate the effectiveness of FWP in the accurate measurement of ksat values.

2. Materials

2.1. Soil

Locally available natural soil sourced from Al Ghat (26°1′36″ N, 44°57′39″ E) town, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia, was selected for the present study. Disturbed samples were obtained from open test pits excavated to a depth of 1.5–3.0 m below the ground surface. The physical characterization of soil (carried out in accordance with relevant ASTM standards) seen from Table 1 reveals that the selected soil is a high plastic clay (CH) as per the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), and it is expansive in nature [13].

2.2. Fiber

Two types of fibers FM 300 and FC 500 supplied by Propex operating company (Chattanooga, TN, USA) were used for the present study. The physicochemical properties of two fibers are provided in Table 2. The length of fiber adopted for the experimental work is 6 mm and 12 mm for both FM and FC (Figure 1); the dosage of each fiber is fixed at 0.2% and 0.6% by weight of dry soil mass.

2.3. Lime

Locally available commercial-grade hydrated lime is used as a soil stabilizer. The percentage of lime was standardized at 6% for all tests by dry weight of the soil. This optimum quantity of lime was fixed relying on the soil–pH response upon the addition of lime [14,24].

3. Experimental Program

3.1. Sample Preparation

The expansive soil obtained from the field was air-dried, pulverized, and sieved using sieve No. 20. The soil fraction is mixed with optimum lime content (i.e., 6% of lime added to the soil by dry weight) and fiber (FC and FM) at selected dosages of 0.2% and 0.6%. The lengths of fibers were kept at 6 mm and 12 mm, resulting in 17 mix combinations in triplicates (including untreated soil) for the entire experimental work. A total of 51 specimens (including triplicates) were tested in FWP. Previous studies on the compaction properties of fiber-reinforced soil have revealed that the fiber inclusion had little or no effect on variations in maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) of various mix proportions [12,25,26]. Based on this, all the specimens in the present study were molded at fixed MDD (16.08 kN/m3) and corresponding OMC (25%). Soil, lime, and fibers at various proportions were mixed in dry condition; then, the target moisture content was added and mixed thoroughly to obtain a homogenous mixture. Statically compacted specimens of 70 mm diameter and 35 mm height were kept in a desiccator at a relative humidity > 95% and cured for a period of 7 and 28 days.

3.2. Testing Procedure

The evaluation of saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) was performed in accordance with ASTM D5084—Method A [27], using a flexible wall constant head permeameter. A schematic diagram of the test setup used in the present study is shown in Figure 2. At the end of each curing period, the prepared specimens were transferred to the cell. Porous stone and filter paper were kept on the top and bottom end of the specimen. A rubber membrane was used to confine the specimen; two O-rings placed at both ends provide a complete seal against any water leakage. The cell was filled with distilled water, and the drainage line at the bottom and top of the cell was flushed until no more air bubbles were observed inside the cell. The various stages involved in the testing phase are described below.
I. Back-Pressure Saturation:
This stage involved a simultaneous increase of both the cell pressure (CP) and the back pressure (BP) to reduce air bubbles or voids within the test sample. In this study, the effective confining pressure (defined as cell pressure minus back pressure, CP-BP) was kept at approximately 10 kPa throughout the saturation process for all specimens. This effective confining pressure was selected to maintain sample stability without significantly affecting the stress history of the specimen. The (CP-BP) was maintained for one day. Specimen saturation was verified by measuring the B coefficient (defined as the difference in pore-water pressure (Δu), divided by the difference in pressure of the cells (ΔCP) of the porous material). A saturation check involved increasing the pressure of the cell on the specimen and monitoring the pore pressure response using a pore pressure transducer connected at the top and bottom of the specimen. The theoretical B value for a fully saturated specimen reaches 1. However, in fluid flow experiments, specimens were considered saturated with the assurance of B values ≥ 0.95. If the B value is less than 0.95, the above procedure of increasing CP and BP and B value checking was repeated until the B value is >0.95.
II. Consolidation:
The specimens were consolidated under effective confining pressure (CP-BP) of 50, 100, 200, and 400 kPa. Effective confining pressure was applied by increasing the cell pressure to the level necessary to develop the desired effective confining pressure while maintaining a constant back pressure. Drainage was allowed from the base of the specimen. The outflow volumes were recorded to confirm that primary consolidation has been completed before the initiation of the next stage.
III. Permeation:
This stage involved inducing flow-through test specimens by applying a differential pressure between the top and bottom of the specimens. The differential pressure was applied by reducing the top pressure and increasing the bottom pressure such that the difference was equal to the pressure head corresponding to the desired hydraulic gradient. To speed up the test, the hydraulic gradient was fixed at 30 [27]. The water inflow and outflow were continuously monitored until a steady-state condition was established as defined by the inflow rate being equal to the outflow rate.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Effect of Confining Pressure

Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the variation in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) values for lime-treated (at 6%) expansive soil with fiber inclusion (0.2% and 0.6%) at various effective confining pressures at the end of each curing period.
In general, the ksat values reduced with an increase in confining pressure for all the tested specimens irrespective of fiber type, dosage, and curing period. A noticeable reduction in ksat values is observed when the confining pressure is increased from 50 to 200 kPa. The flow of water through the compacted specimen depends on the availability and connectivity of inter and intra-aggregate flow channels, and the k value is directly related with inter-aggregate flow paths [28,29]. Increased confining pressure contributes to a significant reduction in inter-aggregate flow paths compared to intra-aggregate flow paths. Due to this, with the increase in pressure from 50 to 200 kPa, a significant reduction in inter-aggregate flow channels causes a decrease in ksat values. A further increment in confining pressure from 200 to 400 kPa has less effect in reducing these flow paths and leads to a marginal reduction in ksat values for all the tested specimens.
For any type of soil, the higher the confining pressure, the lower the ksat values, irrespective of the permeating liquid [23]. Increased confinement causes a reduction in pore spaces and increases the unit weight, thus reducing the hydraulic conductivity [30]. Similar results were reported by de Brito Galvão et al. [31] and Shaker and Elkady [32].
The boundary condition adopted in the present study is highly correlated with the field conditions for the case of a subbase for pavements material in which the subbase material will be subjected to surcharge load coming on it.

4.2. Effect of Lime

Figure 7 shows the variations in (ksat) values with and without lime treatment for fiber-reinforced clay (FC and FM) without any curing. The addition of 6% lime causes an increase in ksat values in the order of 10−1 cm/s for fiber-reinforced clay compared to that of an untreated case. The addition of lime leads to the aggregation of soil grains by Ca2+ ions, resulting in the formation of a flocculated structure [33,34]. The increased porosity of soil improves the connectivity of inter-aggregate pores and leads to an increase in ksat values [31]. A similar trend is observed for all the tested specimens; however, the rate of increase in ksat values is a function of fiber type, dosage, and length.

4.3. Effect of Curing Time

The effect of the curing period on the ksat values of all samples with lime-treated expansive clay under different confining pressures is illustrated in Figure 8. Lime-treated soil reinforced with 0.2% FC (both 6 mm and 12 mm) exhibited a reduction in ksat values with an increase in curing period, as seen from Figure 8a. This is attributed to the fact that the cementitious compounds formed at a higher curing period fill the void spaces within the clay and the soil becomes less conductive [13]. At 0.6% FC, for 6 mm length of fibers, ksat values reduced marginally at a lower confining pressure (at 50 kPa), and a significant reduction is observed at higher confining pressure (at 400 kPa). Whereas, an increase in fiber length to 12 mm leads to an increase in ksat values up to 7 days of curing and thereafter reduced at the end of a 28-day curing period (Figure 8b). This might be due to an increase in the length of fiber creating more drainage paths during the first 7 days of curing. However, after a 28-day curing period, this effect is dominated by the formation of cementitious compounds, which reduces the ksat values with 12 mm fiber length.
Figure 8c,d depict the variations in ksat values with FM addition at various curing periods. The ksat values increased at the end of the 28-day curing period with a marginal reduction at 7 days compared with specimens without curing. Irrespective of the dosage and length of FM, the ksat values increased at all confining pressures.

4.4. Effect of Fiber

The results of permeability tests indicate that the ksat is a function of fiber type, dosage, and length (Figure 8). With an increase in dosage from 0.2 to 0.6%, the ksat values increased irrespective of the type of fiber for all specimens and are attributed to the randomly distributed fibers increasing the flow paths and causing free movement of the permeating liquid. In addition, an increase in fiber length from 6 to 12 mm results in an increase in ksat values. However, this effect is not significant at higher curing periods. Relatively, the inclusion of FM results in increased ksat values compared to the inclusion of FC, especially at 0.6% dosage. This behavior is attributed to the fact that the FM has a rough surface with protrusions (Table 2) compared to FC, which facilitates in creating more drainage paths and leading to an increase in the resultant ksat values; whereas FC having a relatively smooth texture offers fewer drainage paths and leads to a reduction in ksat values at higher curing periods. Similar observations were reported by Abdi et al. [10] and Maher and Ho [11].

4.5. Comparison between Flexible Wall Permeameter and Rigid Wall Permeameter

A comparison of the ksat values obtained from the present study (using FWP at 50 kPa) and Moghal et al. [13] (using RWP) is presented in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 for the same materials under the same testing conditions. From Figure 9 and Figure 10, the ksat values obtained from FWP are lower than the ksat values obtained from RWP tests for the fiber-reinforced lime-treated soil specimens up to a 7-day curing period irrespective of fiber type. A notable variation in ksat values (in the order of 10−1) is observed for specimens with 0.6% dosage and 12 mm length of fiber (FC and FM) compared to other combinations. Since complete control over the confining pressure and back saturation of a specimen prior to testing is possible in FWP, it leads to an accurate measurement of vertical and horizontal deformations and thus ksat values [21]. From the comparison, it is understood that FWP gives reliable results simulating the prevailing conditions in the field. For specimens cured for 28 days, the values of ksat obtained using FWP are higher than those obtained from RWP (Figure 11). Experimental results on RWP have revealed that at higher curing periods (28 days), the leakage of liquid through the sidewalls of RWP due to loss of soil contact may significantly influence the ksat values.

5. Conclusions

The present study evaluated the effect of fiber inclusion (FC and FM) on saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) of lime-treated expansive clay. The constant head method using FWP at various confining pressures is adopted for experimental work. The ksat values were evaluated at various dosages (0.2% and 0.6%), fiber lengths (6 and 12 mm), and curing periods (7 and 28 days). The following conclusions are drawn:
  • The addition of lime significantly increased the ksat values compared to untreated specimens.
  • At lower confining pressures (50 to 200 kPa), the reduction in ksat values is attributed to a decrease in inter-aggregate flow paths. This effect is not significant at higher confining pressure (400 kPa).
  • An increase in the dosage and lengths of fiber leads to an increase in ksat values irrespective of the fiber type.
  • For FC at 0.2%, the ksat values reduced at the end of the 28-day curing period irrespective of the length of fiber used. At 0.6% dosage, the values marginally increased for the 12 mm fiber length due to increased drainage paths.
  • For FM, the ksat values increased at the end of 28 days irrespective of dosage and fiber length at all confining pressures.
  • ksat values are directly dependent on the nature and type of fiber used, of which FM fibers with extended protrusions enable higher friction levels. For FC fibers, increased fiber dosage from 0.2 to 0.6% has caused an increase in ksat values by 9.5% and 94.3% for the 6 and 12 mm lengths, respectively, at all confining pressures. In contrast, for a similar change in fiber amount for FM fibers, the ksat values for samples mixed with 6 mm fiber increased by 12 and 99.2% for 6 and 12 mm lengths, respectively for all confining pressures.

Author Contributions

A.A.S.: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing Original Draft; M.A.A.-S.: Supervision, Funding Acquisition, Review and Editing; A.A.B.M.: Conceptualization, Writing Original Draft, Review and Editing, Moral Support; K.V.V.: Writing Original Draft and Final Version, Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The content presented here was sourced from existing published literature, hence, this clause is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University for funding this study through Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chairs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following symbols are used in this paper:
BCoefficient of Saturation
BPBack Pressure
CPCell Pressure
FCFiber Cast
FMFiber Mesh
FWPFlexible Wall Permeameter
ksatSaturated hydraulic conductivity
RWPRigid Wall Permeameter
ΔCPThe difference in cell pressure
ΔuThe difference in pore-water pressure

References

  1. Puppala, A.J.; Musenda, C. Effects of fiber reinforcement on strength and volume change in expansive soils. Transp. Res. Rec. 2000, C, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yetimoglu, T.; Salbas, O. A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers. Geotext. Geomembr. 2003, 21, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moghal, A.A.B.; Bhaskar, C.S.C.; Basha, B.M. Effect of fibre reinforcement on CBR behaviour of lime-blended expansive soils: Reliability approach. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2017, 19, 690–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moghal, A.A.B.; Lateef, M.A.; Mohammed, S.A.S.; Ahmad, M.; Usman, A.R.A.; Almajed, A. Heavy Metal Immobilization Studies and Enhancement in Geotechnical Properties of Cohesive Soils by EICP Technique. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Almajed, A.; Lateef, M.A.; Moghal, A.A.B.; Lemboye, K.K. State-of-the-Art Review of the Applicability and Challenges of Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-Induced Calcite Precipitation (EICP) Techniques for Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moghal, A.A.B.; Vydehi, K.V. State-of-the-art review on efficacy of xanthan gum and guar gum inclusion on the engineering behavior of soils. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2021, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khattak, M.J.; Alrashidi, M. Durability and mechanistic characteristics of fiber reinforced soil-cement mixtures. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2006, 7, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Viswanadham, B.V.S.; Phanikumar, B.R.; Mukherjee, R.V. Swelling behaviour of a geofiber-reinforced expansive soil. Geotext. Geomembr. 2009, 27, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moghal, A.A.B.; Bhaskar, C.S.C.; Basha, B.M.; Al-Mahbashi, A.M. Effect of polypropylene fibre reinforcement on the consolidation, swell and shrinkage behaviour of lime-blended expansive soil. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 2018, 12, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdi, M.R.; Parsapajouh, A.; Arjomand, M.A. Effects of Random Fiber Inclusion on Consolidation, Hydraulic Conductivity, Swelling, Shrinkage Limit and Desiccation Cracking of Clays. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 2008, 6, 284–292. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maher, M.; HO, Y. Mechanical properties of kaolinite/fiber soil composite. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 1994, 120, 1381–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miller, C.J.; Rifai, S. Fiber Reinforcement for Waste Containment Soil Liners. J. Environ. Eng. 2004, 130, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moghal, A.A.B.; Basha, B.M.; Ashfaq, M. Probabilistic Study on the Geotechnical Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Soil; Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN 9789811358715. [Google Scholar]
  14. Moghal, A.A.B.; Basha, B.M.; Chittoori, B.; Al-Shamrani, M.A. Effect of fiber reinforcement on the hydraulic conductivity behavior of lime-treated expansive soil—Reliability-based optimization perspective. ASCE Geotech Spec. Publ. No 2016, 263, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Almajed, A.; Dinesh, S.; Moghal, A.A.B. Response Surface Method Analysis of Chemically Stabilized Fiber-Reinforced Soil. Materials 2021, 14, 1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shaker, A.A.; Elkady, T.Y. Investigation of the hydraulic efficiency of sand-natural expansive clay mixtures. Int. J. Geomate 2016, 11, 2410–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nalbantoglu, Z.; Tuncer, E.R. Compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of a chemically treated expansive clay. Can. Geotech. J. 2001, 38, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Locat, J.; Trembaly, H.; Leroueil, S. Mechanical and hydraulic behaviour of a soft inorganic clay treated with lime. Can. Geotech. J. 1996, 33, 654–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Metelková, Z.; Bohác, J.; Sedlárová, I.; Prikryl, R. Changes of pore size and of hydraulic conductivity by adding lime in compacting clay liners. In Geotechnical Engineering: New Horizons, Proceedings of the 21st European Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference Rotterdam 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4–7 September 2011; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 2011, pp. 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tran, T.D.; Cui, Y.J.; Tang, A.M.; Audiguier, M.; Cojean, R. Effects of lime treatment on the microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of Héricourt clay. J. Rock Mech Geotech. 2014, 6, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daniel, D.E.; Anderson, D.C.; Boynton, S.S. Fixed-wall versus flexible-wall permeameters. In Hydraulic Barriers in Soil and Rock; ASTM STP, 874; Johnson, A.I., Frobel, R.K., Cavalli, N.J., Pettersson, C.B., Eds.; ASTM: West Conshohoken, PA, USA, 1985; pp. 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kang, J.; Shackelford, C.D. Clay membrane testing using a flexible-wall cell under closed-system boundary conditions. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 44, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dafalla, M.; Shaker, A.A.; Elkady, T.; Al-Shamrani, M.; Dhowian, A. Effects of confining pressure and effective stress on hydraulic conductivity of sand-clay mixtures. Arab. J. Geosci. 2015, 8, 9993–10001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eades, J.L.; Grim, R.E. A Quick Test to Determine Lime Requirements For Lime Stabilization. Highw. Res. Rec. 1966, 5, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nataraj, M.S.; McManis, K.L. Strength and deformation properties of soils reinforced with fibrillated fibers. Geosynth. Int. 1997, 4, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Soganci, A.S. The Effect of Polypropylene Fiber in the Stabilization of Expansive Soils. Int. J. Environ. Chem. Ecol. Geophys. Eng. 2015, 9, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM International. ASTM D5084-03: Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Olsen, H.W. Hydraulic flow through saturated clays. In Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals, Lafayette, IN, USA, 5–8 October 1960; pp. 131–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scholes, O.N.; Clayton, S.A.; Hoadley, A.F.A.; Tiu, C. Permeability anisotropy due to consolidation of compressible porous media. Transp Porous Media. 2007, 68, 365–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elkady, T.Y.; Shaker, A.; Al-Shamrani, M. Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Lime-Treated Expansive Soils. In Proceedings of the Fourth Geo-China International Conference, Geo-China 2016, Shandong, China, 25–27 July 2016; ASCE: Shandong, China, 2016; pp. 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. de Brito Galvão, T.C.; Elsharief, A.; Simões, G.F. Effects of Lime on Permeability and Compressibility of Two Tropical Residual Soils. J. Environ. Eng. 2004, 130, 881–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shaker, A.A.; Elkady, T.Y. Hydraulic performance of sand–clay mixtures: Soil fabric perspective. Géotechnique Lett. 2015, 5, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bell, F.G. Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng. Geol. 1996, 42, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moghal, A.A.B.; Rehman, A.U.; Vydehi, K.V.; Umer, U. Sustainable Perspective of Low-Lime Stabilized Fly Ashes for Geotechnical Applications: PROMETHEE-Based Optimization Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fibers used in the study.
Figure 1. Fibers used in the study.
Materials 14 03120 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a flexible wall constant head permeameter.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a flexible wall constant head permeameter.
Materials 14 03120 g002
Figure 3. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM without lime treatment (without curing).
Figure 3. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM without lime treatment (without curing).
Materials 14 03120 g003
Figure 4. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (without curing).
Figure 4. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (without curing).
Materials 14 03120 g004
Figure 5. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (after 7-day curing period).
Figure 5. Variations in saturated hydraulic conductivity (ksat) with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (after 7-day curing period).
Materials 14 03120 g005
Figure 6. Variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (after 28-day curing period).
Figure 6. Variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with confining pressure (a) FC (b) FM with lime treatment (after 28-day curing period).
Materials 14 03120 g006
Figure 7. Variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with lime content and confining pressure (a) 0.2%, 6mm; (b) 0.2%, 12mm; (c) 0.6%, 6mm; (d) 0.6%, 12mm.
Figure 7. Variation of saturated hydraulic conductivity with lime content and confining pressure (a) 0.2%, 6mm; (b) 0.2%, 12mm; (c) 0.6%, 6mm; (d) 0.6%, 12mm.
Materials 14 03120 g007aMaterials 14 03120 g007b
Figure 8. Variation of ksat values with curing period and confining pressure (a) FC_0.2% (b) FC_0.6% (c) FM_0.2% (d) FM_0.6%.
Figure 8. Variation of ksat values with curing period and confining pressure (a) FC_0.2% (b) FC_0.6% (c) FM_0.2% (d) FM_0.6%.
Materials 14 03120 g008aMaterials 14 03120 g008b
Figure 9. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (0-day curing period).
Figure 9. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (0-day curing period).
Materials 14 03120 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (7-day curing period).
Figure 10. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (7-day curing period).
Materials 14 03120 g010
Figure 11. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (28-day curing period).
Figure 11. Comparison of hydraulic conductivity values from FWP and RWP (28-day curing period).
Materials 14 03120 g011
Table 1. Physical properties of studied soil.
Table 1. Physical properties of studied soil.
Physical PropertyValue
Liquid Limit (%)66
Plastic Limit (%)32
Plasticity Index (%)34
Shrinkage Limit (%)15
Linear Shrinkage (%)31
% Finer No.200 sieve87
Natural Moisture Content (%)3.2
Maximum Dry Density (kN/m3)16.08
Optimum Water Content (%)25
Specific Gravity2.85
Specific Surface Area (BET Method) (m2/g)27.08
USCS ClassificationCH
Colorlight brown
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of fibers.
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of fibers.
PropertyFiber Cast 500 (FC)Fiber Mesh 300 (FM)
Tensile Strength440 N/mm2330 N/mm2
Specific Gravity0.910.91
Electrical ConductivityLowLow
Acid and Salt ResistanceHighHigh
Melt Point324 °F (162 °C)324 °F (162 °C)
Ignition Point1100 °F (593 °C)1100 °F (593 °C)
Thermal ConductivityLowLow
Water AbsorptionNilNil
Alkali ResistanceAlkali ProofAlkali Proof
Surface TextureRelatively SmoothRough with Protrusions
ShapeFibrillatedMonofilament
Aspect Ratio (L/D)42.8 and 120193.5 and 387
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaker, A.A.; Al-Shamrani, M.A.; Moghal, A.A.B.; Vydehi, K.V. Effect of Confining Conditions on the Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Lime Blended Semiarid Soil. Materials 2021, 14, 3120. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113120

AMA Style

Shaker AA, Al-Shamrani MA, Moghal AAB, Vydehi KV. Effect of Confining Conditions on the Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Lime Blended Semiarid Soil. Materials. 2021; 14(11):3120. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaker, Abdullah Ali, Mosleh Ali Al-Shamrani, Arif Ali Baig Moghal, and Kopparthi Venkata Vydehi. 2021. "Effect of Confining Conditions on the Hydraulic Conductivity Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Lime Blended Semiarid Soil" Materials 14, no. 11: 3120. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14113120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop