Next Article in Journal
Moraxella nonliquefaciens and M. osloensis Are Important Moraxella Species That Cause Ocular Infections
Next Article in Special Issue
Viability and Composition Validation of Commercial Probiotic Products by Selective Culturing Combined with Next-Generation Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
A New Genome-to-Genome Comparison Approach for Large-Scale Revisiting of Current Microbial Taxonomy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Production, Oxidative Stress Prevention, and Probiotic Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from the Human Vagina and Fermented Food
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short-Term Probiotic Administration Increases Fecal-Anti Candida Activity in Healthy Subjects

1
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome-Sapienza, Rome 00185, Italy
2
Department of Experimental Medicine- Virology section, University of Rome-Sapienza, Rome 00185, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 7 April 2019 / Revised: 20 May 2019 / Accepted: 27 May 2019 / Published: 3 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probiotics: From Quality Assessment to Microbial Ecology)

Abstract

:
Background: Candida albicans’ ability to evade host immune responses represents a serious threat for vulnerable patients. Objectives: To investigate if (1) feces from healthy subjects exert anti-Candida activity; (2) fecal anti-Candida activity is modified by probiotic administration and (3) different probiotic differently modulate anti-Candida activity. Patients and methods: Feces from healthy donors were analyzed before and after seven days of dietary supplementation with two different probiotic formulations (VSL#3®; Vivomixx®). Candida albicans was cultured with decreasing concentrations of diluted feces, obtained before and after the treatment period. The relationship between anti-Candida activity of feces, interferon-α, anti-interferon-α antibodies and the expression of MxA, ISG15 and IFNAR1 was also evaluated. Results: Feces obtained prior to probiotic intake and feces collected after supplementation with VSL#3® did not affect Candida albicans growth. On the contrary, a 3log10 inhibition of Candida development was observed after Vivomixx® intake. Interferon-α played a role in the inhibition of Candida growth. Conclusion: Fecal anti-Candida activity was not observed prior to probiotic supplementation. Seven days of administration of Vivomixx® increased fecal anti-Candida activity, the same effect was not observed after intake of VSL#3®. The probiotic-induced anti-Candida activity seems to be related to an increased local production and release of interferon-α. Clinical trials are needed to determine if a short pretreatment with specific probiotic formulations may increase anti-Candida defenses in patients at risk.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Candida albicans (C. albicans) is a natural inhabitant of the gut and at the same time may behave as an aggressive pathogen causing life-threatening disease [1]. The human immune system has developed multiple strategies to fight fungal infections, but at the same time Candida spp. has developed various survival mechanisms, such as the ability to evade recognition by host immune cells [2]. The host anti-Candida defense system is also reinforced by some gut-resident bacteria, which are capable of restraining the growth of the fungus [3]. Nevertheless, under certain circumstances the equilibrium between host activities, bacterial activities, and fungal activities may be disrupted and turn into a pathological state [4,5]. For example, studies conducted on patients with chronic intestinal inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have shown a link between inflammation and overgrowth of C. albicans [5]. In addition, patients with cirrhosis may develop spontaneous C. albicans peritonitis, and in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) associated with visceral hypersensitivity an intestinal fungal dysbiosis has been reported [6].
It is a common practice to use lactic acid bacteria (principally Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera) with antifungal properties for biopreservation of food [7] and it is well known that a healthy vaginal microbiota is generally dominated by Lactobacillus spp. The protection provided by the lactobacilli has been generally attributed to pH control, the release of metabolites with antifungal activity (particularly fermentative metabolites such as lactic acid, acetic acid and succinic acid) [7,8], or even to an interference with the fungus cell cycle [9]. Despite that those protective mechanisms remain poorly understood, recent evidences showed that the type I IFN pathway plays a central role in the immune responses to C. albicans in humans and that components of the gut microbiota can have distal effects on responses to a number of infections through the modulation of type I IFN [10,11].
Accordingly, the primary scope of our research was to test the hypothesis that upon ingestion, probiotic formulations without any demonstrated anti-Candida activity in vitro may nevertheless increase the anti-Candida activity of the feces by changing the equilibrium among the species present in the gut and/or induce the host to produce and release molecules with anti-Candida activity. The secondary endpoint were (I) to assess whether this effect was influenced by differences in the probiotics used and (II) to evaluate if anti-Candida activity was linked with the modulation of type I IFN.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Participants.

The present study was a cross-over, pilot study and included 10 healthy individuals divided in 2 groups (group 1 and 2). All subjects were enrolled at the Clinic of the Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases of University of Rome “Sapienza”. The study protocol was approved by the internal committee of the Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases of “Sapienza” University of Rome and by the Ethics Committee of Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome (Rif. C.E. 2970). All participants agreed by signing a written informed consent form to be treated for a week with a probiotic, then to observe a period of eight weeks of wash out, and then to be treated again with a formulation different from the one they were treated previously. We collected 40 samples of feces and for each subject four samples, two before and two after the treatments (Figure 1).
All study participants were healthy Caucasian men (health donors—HD) with a median age of 35 years [Interquartile Range (IQR) 22–53 years]. Exclusion criteria were patients with (1) a known allergy or intolerance to the product, (2) diarrhea, (3) a history of or current inflammatory diseases of the small or large intestine, (4) any past or current systemic malignancy, (5) previous or a current drug addiction and (6) past Candida spp. infections. All subjects enrolled in the study showed a negative microscopic examination of the stool, a negative bacterial stool culture and a negative result for the research of pathogenic viruses in the stool.
Group 1 started with a 7 days course of the probiotic A manufactured in the USA (trade name: Vivomixx® in EU, Visbiome® in USA, DeSimone Formulation® in Korea) and containing Lactobacillus plantarum DSM24730, Streptococcus thermophilus DSM24731, Bifidobacterium breve DSM24732, Lactobacillus paracasei DSM24733, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus± DSM24734, Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 24735, Bifidobacterium longum* DSM24736 and Bifidobacterium infantis* DSM24737 (±: recently reclassified as Bifidobacterium lactis; *: recently reclassified as Lactobacillus helveticus). After the washout period (60 days) start a second 7 days course of the probiotic B, manufactured in Italy (trade name: VSL#3®), containing Streptococcus thermophilus BT01, Bifidobacterium breve BB02, Bifidobacterium longum* BL03, Bifidobacterium infantis* BI04, Lactobacillus acidophilus BA05, Lactobacillus plantarum BP06, Lactobacillus paracasei BP07 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus± BD08 (±: recently reclassified as Bifidobacterium lactis; *: recently reclassified as Lactobacillus helveticus). Group B started with a 7 days course of the probiotic B and after the washout period (60 days) start a second 7 days course of the probiotic A.
For all donors the supplementation dose was three sachets/day for a total of 1350 billion bacteria day for seven days. This dosage was in the range of the daily amount recommended by the marketers and previously reported in the literature.
Enrollment, fecal sample collection and additional tests were all conducted during the same time period for both HD receiving Vivomixx® and HD receiving VSL#3®.

2.2. Microbiological Analyses

For the microbiological analyses, the C. albicans reference strain (ATCC 14053) was used [12]. The strain was stored on a cryovial bead preservation system (Microbank; Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada) at −80 °C. A C. albicans inoculum was prepared by spreading one cryovial bead on a blood agar plate and Sabouraud dextrose agar (Liofilchem S.r.l. Via Scozia, Zona Industriale 64026, Roseto degli Abruzzi (TE)) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. One colony was re-suspended in a 5 mL Sabouraud dextrose broth and incubated at 37 °C without shaking. Overnight cultures were then adjusted to a turbidity of 2 McFarland, corresponding to ≈1 × 108 CFU/mL. The anti-Candida activity was evaluated by using the macrobroth dilution in a final volume of 1 mL.

2.3. Anti-Candida Activity of Probiotic Formulations

Probiotic formulations were dissolved in 20 mL of NaCl 0.9% solution. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, the solution was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min and 450 µL of the collected surnatant were added to 450 µL of Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB). A final C. albicans inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL was added to tubes containing two-fold serial dilutions of MHB plus probiotic surnatant and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Minimal inhibitory dilution (MID) and minimal bactericidal dilution (MBD) were defined as the lowest dilution that completely inhibited visible growth and ≥99.9% (i.e., ≥3log10 CFU/mL) reduction of the initial C. albicans count after 24 h of incubation, respectively [13].

2.4. Anti-Candida Activity of Fecal Water

Stools (200 mg) collected at time 0 and time 1 (before and at the end of 7-day probiotic supplementation, respectively) were dissolved in 2 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS), with a final concentration of 100 mg/mL, vortexed and then assayed for anti-Candida activity (fecal water). A final C. albicans inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL was added to tubes containing two-fold serial dilutions of the Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) plus fecal water at the final concentration of 50 mg/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A total of 20 μL was then plated on the Sabouraud agar and colonies were counted after an additional 24 h of incubation. Minimal fungicidal dilution (MFD), together with the correspondent concentration of fecal water (mg/mL), was defined as the fecal water dilution obtaining ≥99.9% (i.e., ≥3log10 CFU/mL) reduction of the initial fungal count after 24 h of incubation. The limit of detection was 50 CFU/mL. Each experiment was run in duplicate.

2.5. Anti-Candida Activity of IFN-a

To assess the potential role of IFN-a against C. albicans, two-fold serial dilutions of IFN-a (starting from 1000 IU/mL) plus MHB containing a final 5 × 105 CFU/mL of fungal inoculum were tested, as described above. In a subsequent experiment, antibodies against IFN-a (50 μL) were added to fecal water (50 μL, with a final concentration of 25 mg/mL) collected at T1 from HD receiving Vivomixx® and MHB (100 μL). After 24 h incubation with 5 × 105 CFU/mL of C. albicans, MFD was calculated as previously described.
Quantitative real-time PCR for MxA, ISG15 and IFNAR1 was carried out with the LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Briefly, the total RNA was extracted from A549 cells using the RNeasy Plus Universal Tissue Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Primers and probes for each gene were added to the Probes Master Mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 500 nM and 250 nM, respectively, in a final volume of 20 μL. The housekeeping gene β-glucuronidase was used as an internal control. Gene expression values were calculated by the comparative Ct method using the equation 2-ΔΔCt (ΔΔCt method) [14]. The list of primers and probes is as follows: ISG15 (Forward: 5′-TGGCGGGCAACGAATT-3′, Reverse: 5′-GGGTGATCTGCGCCTTCA-3′, Probe: 5′-[6 carboxyfluorescein(6FAM)]TGAGCAGCTCCATGTC [tetramethylrhodamine(TAM)]-3′); MxA: (Forward: 5′-CTGCCTGGC AGAAAACTTACC-3′; Reverse: 5′-CTCTGTTATTCT CTGGTGAGTCTCCTT-3′; Probe: 5′-[6FAM]CATCAC ACATATCTGTAAATCTCTGCCCCTGTTAGA[TAM]-3′) and β-glucuronidase: (Forward: 5′-TCTGTCAAGGGCAGTAACCTG-3′, Reverse: 5′-GCCCACGACTTTGTTTTCTG-3′, Probe: 5′-(6FAM)TATGTCTTTCGATATGCAGCCAAGTTTTACCG3′(TAM)-3′). Primers and probe sequences used for IFNR1 (Hs. PT.58.25402720.g) were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), Iowa, USA. Each experiment was run in triplicate.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (min–max), as appropriate. Continuous data (i.e., log10 CFU/mL) were analyzed with the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. ANOVA test was used to compare the means of more than two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 9 software (STATA corp. LP, College Station, TX, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 7 for Windows (GraphPad Software San Diego, CA 92108, USA), as appropriate. All statistic tests were two-tailed and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

All the subjects tolerated the probiotic treatment without any adverse effects, with the exception of one patient who exhibited labialis H. Simplex on the third day of treatment with VSL#3®. The fecal samples of this individual were not evaluated.
After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, the morphological state of C. albicans culture was checked: In the cultures performed, C. albicans did not undergo yeast-to-hyphae transition, as in previous studies [15]. As for the antimicrobial activity of probiotic formulation (surnatant), no inhibition of C. albicans was observed, with fungal growth (>108 CFU/mL) observed at the lowest dilution (1:2).
At time 0, the fecal water samples (total number 20) of all volunteers did not inhibit Candida growth in Petri plates (6.070 ± 0.267 and 6.046 ± 0.263 log10 CFU/mL for subjects receiving VSL#3® and, Vivomixx®, respectively). Conversely, at time 1 (total number 19 samples), the fecal water samples (n = 10) from HDs receiving Vivomixx® showed markedly reduced Candida growth compared to the starting inoculum (log10 CFU/mL 5.732; log10 CFU/mL 3.312 ± 1.345, 3.439 ± 1.253, 3.589 ± 1.183, at 1:2 (50 mg/mL), 1:4 (25 mg/mL), and 1:8 (12.5mg/mL) dilutions, respectively) while the anti-Candida activity of fecal water samples (n = 9) from HDs receiving VSL#3® was barely detectable (log10 CFU/mL 4.687 ± 1.99, 5.621 ± 0.929, 5.822 ± 0.390 at 1:2 (50 mg/mL), 1:4 (25 mg/mL), and 1:8 (12.5 mg/mL) dilutions, respectively; Figure 2).
When IFN-a was added to the fecal water samples previously devoid of anti-Candida activity (HDs receiving VSL#3®), the growth of Candida spp. was inhibited up to a 1:32 dilution. The addition of IFN-a to the fecal water of HDs receiving Vivomixx® did not further increase anti-Candida inhibitory potential while the addition of IFN-a antibodies to these samples resulted in a high fungal growth at all tested dilutions, confirming a relationship between fecal anti-Candida activity and the presence of IFN-a. No modification was observed when IFN-a antibodies were added to HDs receiving VSL#3®.
Moreover, a strong induction of human MxA protein, interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), and interferon-α/β receptor α chain gene (IFNAR1) was detected when the A549 cells, usually employed in viral research and associated protein expression changes, were incubated with fecal water from HD1 (Figure 3).
As a whole, these results suggest that the presence of IFN-a in fecal water is a determinant for C. albicans inhibition and that one formulation, i.e., Vivomixx® is much more effective in inducing a protective IFN-a-mediated local immune response. The complete characterization of the fecal samples, including measurement of IFN-a as well as the levels of the fecal volatile fatty acids and the metabolomics is in progress.

4. Discussion

Our approach obviously did not reflect how effective the anti-Candida defense system is as a whole, but only that portion related to the excreted fecal mass. The fact that the subjects enrolled in our study were all healthy and did not develop any Candida infection during the following four months proves that their anti-Candida defenses were efficient at the moment of enrollment. However, we have shown that the administration for just one week of a specific probiotic product that is per se unable to inhibit in vitro Candida growth was able to modify the capability of the gut flora to inhibit the growth of Candida. This increased anti-Candida activity can be considered irrelevant in healthy subjects where the immune system and other components function efficiently, but may be relevant in other clinical situations. For example, if we accept the hypothesis that recurrences of Crohn’s disease are somehow related to an overgrowth of Candida, then a proper probiotic treatment could be a contributing factor to the maintenance of clinical remission [16]. Another situation, still in the research phase, is schizophrenia, where a relationship between the severity of the disease and antibody response to Candida has been observed.
Since Candida is a frequent colonizer our data may have the potential to impact many people. Chronic administration of anti-fungals is not a feasible option and therefore any “safe” alternative to prevent Candida spp. infections, such as probiotics, should be taken in due consideration. It is possible to hypothesize a short pre-treatment with probiotics to increase the anti-Candida defenses in patients who will undergo immunodepression due to the evolution of their disease, such as cirrhosis, or induced by drugs or irradiation, such as leukemia [17,18,19].
At the same time, we also demonstrated that not all probiotic preparations are suitable in inducing an anti-Candida activity in the feces. The subjects who ingested VSL#3® did not show any significant variation in anti-Candida fecal activity, contrary to subjects who were treated with Vivomixx®. Notably, this finding was reconfirmed when subjects were shifted to the other product, since our study was a cross-over study. We used two products that are apparently similar in composition but different in manufacturing process [20]. Moreover, we do not know if the two products tested by us have the same bacterial composition. The product labels show a similarity in terms of bacterial species, but according to supplementary Table 3 of a recent publication of Douillard et al. [21], VSL#3® seems to contain seven strains. Vivomixx® contains eight strains and it is possible that its capability to induce anti-Candida activity depends on the presence of a different number of strains in different proportions [22].
To summarize, three observations are relevant. The first one is the fact that the induction of anti-Candida activity is rather quick, after just one week or even less of probiotic supplementation. This suggests that the observed anti-Candida activity in fecal water is a consequence of a probiotic-induced shift of the equilibrium among the different bacterial populations present in the gut in favor of the species with anti-Candida activity. This short timeframe for induction also confirms the feasibility of our approach in many clinical situations in order to prevent Candida spp. infection in patients at risk. Previously, other works have already shown that short periods of high dose probiotic administration are able to induce adequate intestinal colonization and clinical effects [23,24].
The second relevant observation is that VSL#3® was ineffective compared to Vivomixx®, which reconfirms that if the probiotic formulations are produced by different producers that use different strains, methods and media to ferment the bacteria, they will have a different clinical efficacy, as recently suggested [25]. Unfortunately, very few people pay due attention to what is reported on the product label since they are not aware that the probiotic market is still poorly regulated and what may look similar is quite different in reality.
The third observation is related to a different induction of the host cytokines by the two formulations. Our preliminary results showed that the reduction of almost 3log10 CFU/mL in the growth of Candida in the fecal water of subjects who took Vivomixx® was associated with an increased release of IFN-a at T1, and that this inhibitory action was lost after the addition of anti-IFN-a antibodies. On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that specific components and/or metabolites of the gut microbiota of subjects treated Vivomixx® contribute to the increase the anti-Candida activity of the feces by enhancing IFN signaling.
Previously, it has been shown that Lactobacillus reuterii changes its metabolism in response to Candida spp. overgrowth in the gut, ceasing to use sugar and starting to consume amino acids to produce an inducer of Interleukin 22, a substance, which controls the proliferation of Candida spp. and protects the gut wall from inflammation [26,27,28]. Since a modulation of the tryptophan/serotonin pathway associated with a modification of the immune response has already been shown in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients treated with Vivomixx®, we cannot exclude the involvement of this pathway in the healthy volunteers treated with Vivomixx® [29].
The major limitation of this study was the small sample size and larger studies should be performed to confirm and extend these findings. Nevertheless, it is the first time that a cross-over study in healthy subjects evidenced that administering a short course of a high concentration multistrain probiotic formulation had the potential to modify the resident gut flora to increase anti-Candida activity.
In conclusion a number of preliminary clinical studies suggested that probiotics might play a role in the reduction of Candida colonization on human mucosal surfaces, potentially reducing the risk of not only oral, vaginal and intestinal colonization, but also the incidence of invasive fungal infections [30]. Our data not only confirmed this suggestion providing a basis for a larger study, but also clarified that not all probiotic formulations are suitable in situations where Candida spp. may play a pathogenic role.

Author Contributions

M.D.A. provided study concept and design, as well as data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; C.S., A.O., G.C., L.C., L.S., G.P.I. and E.N.C. provided data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; V.V. provided drafting of the manuscript; G.d.E., G.C. provided drafting of the manuscript and critical~revision. Software, C.B.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Znaidi, S.; van Wijlick, L. Systematic gene overexpression in Candida albicans identifies a regulator of early adaptation to the mammalian gut. Cell Microbiol. 2018, 20, e12890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Campos, C.F.; van de Veerdonk, F.L. Host Genetic Signatures of Susceptibility to Fungal Disease. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shibata, N.; Kunisawa, J. Dietary and Microbial Metabolites in the Regulation of Host Immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. García, C.; Tebbji, F. The Human Gut Microbial Metabolome Modulates Fungal Growth via the TOR Signaling Pathway. mSphere 2017, 2, e00555-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Botschuijver, S.; Roeselers, G. Intestinal Fungal Dysbiosis Is Associated with Visceral Hypersensitivity in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Rats. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 1026–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Krohn, S.; Zeller, K. Molecular quantification and differentiation of Candida species in biological specimens of patients with liver cirrhosis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leyva Salas, M.; Mounier, J. Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation—A Review. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ilavenil, S.; Park, H.S. Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus Strains with Antifungal Activity Isolated from Animal Manure. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 802570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, C.H.; Kim, Y. In vitro probiotic properties of vaginal Lactobacillus fermentum MG901 and Lactobacillus plantarum MG989 against Candida albicans. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 228, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Steed, A.L.; Christophi, G.P. The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon. Science 2017, 357, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Smeekens, S.P.; Ng, A. Functional genomics identifies type I interferon pathway as central for host defense against Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oliva, A.; Costantini, S. High Potency of Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil against Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2018, 23, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. D’Ettorre, G.; Oliva, A. RE: Ectopic Colonization of Oral Bacteria In The Intestine Drives Th1 Cell Induction And Inflammation. Science E-letter. 28 November 2017. Available online: https://science.sciencemag (accessed on 15 May 2019).
  14. Pinacchio, C.; Scheri, G.C. Type I/II Interferon in HIV-1-Infected Patients: Expression in Gut Mucosa and in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Its Modification upon Probiotic Supplementation. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 1738676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rossoni, R.D.; de Barros, P.P. Antifungal activity of clinical Lactobacillus strains against Candida albicans biofilms: Identification of potential probiotic candidates to prevent oral candidiasis. Biofouling 2018, 34, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Luca, A.; Montagnoli, C. Functional yet balanced reactivity to Candida albicans requires TRIF, MyD88, and IDO-dependent inhibition of Rorc. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5999–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Severance, E.G.; Gressitt, K.L. Probiotic normalization of Candida albicans in schizophrenia: A randomized, placebo-controlled, longitudinal pilot study. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 62, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Midkiff, J.; Borochoff-Porte, N. Small molecule inhibitors of the Candida albicans budded-to-hyphal transition act through multiple signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Severance, E.G.; Gressitt, K.L. Candida albicans exposures, sex specificity and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. NPJ Schizophr. 2016, 2, 16018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Biagioli, M.; Capobianco, D. Divergent Effectiveness of Multispecies Probiotic Preparations on Intestinal Microbiota Structure Depends on Metabolic Properties. Nutrients 2019, 2, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Douillard, F.P.; Mora, D. Comparative genomic analysis of the multispecies probiotic-marketed product VSL#3. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Biagioli, M.; Laghi, L. Metabolic Variability of a Multispecies Probiotic Preparation Impacts on the Anti-inflammatory Activity. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Venturi, A.; Gionchetti, P. Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: Preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 13, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dubey, A.P.; Rajeshwari, K. Use of VSL#3 in the treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in children: Preliminary results. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008, 42, S126–S129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sanders, M.E.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Effects of genetic, processing, or product formulation changes on efficacy and safety of probiotics. Ann. N. Y. Acad Sci. 2014, 1309, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zelante, T.; Iannitti, R.G. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity 2013, 39, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jørgensen, M.R.; Kragelund, C. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri has antifungal effects on oral Candida species in vitro. J. Oral Microbiol. 2017, 9, 1274582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jiang, Q.; Stamatova, I. Inhibitory activity in vitro of probiotic lactobacilli against oral Candida under different fermentation conditions. Benef. Microbes. 2015, 6, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Scheri, G.C.; Fard, S.N. Modulation of Tryptophan/Serotonin Pathway by Probiotic Supplementation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients: Preliminary Results of a New Study Approach. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2017, 10, 1178646917710668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Matsubara, V.H.; Bandara, H.M. Probiotics as Antifungals in Mucosal Candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, 1143–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Protocol flow-chat.
Figure 1. Protocol flow-chat.
Microorganisms 07 00162 g001
Figure 2. Candia albicans growth inhibition effect observed at different dilutions of fecal water in Vivomixx and VSL#3 supplemented participants.
Figure 2. Candia albicans growth inhibition effect observed at different dilutions of fecal water in Vivomixx and VSL#3 supplemented participants.
Microorganisms 07 00162 g002
Figure 3. Human mycovirus resistance protein 1 (MxA), Interferon-α/β receptor α chain gene (IFNAE) 1 and interferon stimulated gene 1 (ISG15) production from A549 cells after incubation with HD1 fecal water.
Figure 3. Human mycovirus resistance protein 1 (MxA), Interferon-α/β receptor α chain gene (IFNAE) 1 and interferon stimulated gene 1 (ISG15) production from A549 cells after incubation with HD1 fecal water.
Microorganisms 07 00162 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Angelis, M.; Scagnolari, C.; Oliva, A.; Cavallari, E.N.; Celani, L.; Santinelli, L.; Innocenti, G.P.; Borrazzo, C.; Ceccarelli, G.; Vullo, V.; et al. Short-Term Probiotic Administration Increases Fecal-Anti Candida Activity in Healthy Subjects. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 162. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms7060162

AMA Style

De Angelis M, Scagnolari C, Oliva A, Cavallari EN, Celani L, Santinelli L, Innocenti GP, Borrazzo C, Ceccarelli G, Vullo V, et al. Short-Term Probiotic Administration Increases Fecal-Anti Candida Activity in Healthy Subjects. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(6):162. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms7060162

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Angelis, Massimiliano, Carolina Scagnolari, Alessandra Oliva, Eugenio Nelson Cavallari, Luigi Celani, Letizia Santinelli, Giuseppe Pietro Innocenti, Cristian Borrazzo, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Vincenzo Vullo, and et al. 2019. "Short-Term Probiotic Administration Increases Fecal-Anti Candida Activity in Healthy Subjects" Microorganisms 7, no. 6: 162. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms7060162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop