Next Article in Journal
Capillary Blood GSH Level Monitoring, Using an Electrochemical Method Adapted for Micro Volumes
Next Article in Special Issue
Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: Models for Evaluating Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity of Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil and Its Main Component Terpinen-4-ol
Previous Article in Journal
Representation of the QM Subsystem for Long-Range Electrostatic Interaction in Non-Periodic Ab Initio QM/MM Calculations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition of Essential Oil of Leaves from Lippia schaueriana Mart. Collected in the Caatinga Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Berries Essential Oils as Observed in a Collection of Genotypes

1
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Via Muroni 23/A, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council (CNR), Trav. La Crucca 3, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Via De Nicola 9, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 27 August 2018 / Revised: 27 September 2018 / Accepted: 27 September 2018 / Published: 29 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Recent Advances in Flavors and Fragrances)

Abstract

:
Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) is a shrub spontaneously growing in the Mediterranean area. The leaf and fruit content of essential oils and phenolic compounds justify the wide use of the plant as medicinal and aromatic. Because of overexploitation of wild plants, a domestication process is in progress in different regions and the influence of the genotype variability on the chemical composition of fruit essential oils may be useful to breeding programs. Consequently, the analysis performed on a selected group of candidate clones growing in the same field collection in Sardinia is the object of this report. Forty-seven selections provided fully ripe fruits for essential oil extraction by hydrodistillation and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Only five candidate clones showed white fruits. The highest yield of essential oil was observed in the LAC31 genotype with 0.55 g·kg−1, while the samples BOS1, MON5, RUM4, RUM10, V4 and V8 showed values above 0.20 g·kg−1 and most of the genotypes under 0.10 g·kg−1. Geranyl acetate was the compound with the highest relative abundance. The second compound for relative abundance was the 1,8-cineole. Other compounds with high relative abundance were α-terpinyl acetate, methyleugenol, linalool, α-terpineol, β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, Trans-caryophyllene oxide, and humulene epoxide II.

1. Introduction

Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) grows wild in the Mediterranean basin up to 800 m above sea level. Myrtle prospers in mild climates, fears frost but not drought, and prefers sandy, loose permeable soil with neutral or sub acid reaction. It is common in the Mediterranean maquis. In Sardinia and Corsica, it is a part of low Mediterranean maquis [1,2,3,4,5].
There are many scientific articles on the composition and biological activities of Myrtus communis; most studies on myrtle have focused on its volatile fraction. Due to its importance in the perfume and flavor industry, the chemical composition of myrtle essential oils was previously studied mainly in leaves from different geographic areas: Italy, Sardinia, Corsica, Tunisia, Algeria, Greece, Cyprus, Montenegro, Croatia, and Iran [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
The presence of essential oils in all tissues is of fundamental importance to determine the antioxidant, antibiotic and antimutagenic properties of the myrtle biomass [21,22,24,30]. Several studies have indicated the activities of Myrtus chemical components [31,32,33]. Less information is available on myrtle essential oil from flowers [13,17,23,34].
In addition, less investigation was performed on the essential oils of berries and few papers have been published on these topics [23,34,35,36,37].
Boelens et al. [34] analyzed the hydrodistilled oils coming from Spanish wild-growing unripe and ripe fruits. Eighty components have been identified and quantified. The yields of the hydrodistilled oils were obtained for unripe and ripe fruits: 0.5% and 0.02% respectively. They found that during ripening the concentration of the main constituents changed: e.g., 1,8-cineole increased from 19.5% to 61.5% while myrtenyl acetate decreased from 33.0% to 0.1%.
Jerkovic et al. [23] studied the Croatian myrtle fruit oils along the year and found that myrtenyl acetate (12.2–33.2%), 1,8-cineole + limonene (10.9–21.1%), α-pinene (4.0–15.3%), and linalool (4.7–7.7%) were the major constituents. Among them, linalool showed minimal quantitative changes. During the collecting period, high concentration of myrtenyl acetate was detected in September, while the concentrations of the four other quantitatively important compounds were highest in February, when the concentration of myrtenyl acetate was lowest. In this period, the fruit oil yields varied from 0.03 to 0.13%.
Pereira et al. [36] studied the composition of essential oil from Portuguese myrtle through the vegetative cycle. They found that Portuguese essential oils of myrtle berries are characterized by high content of limonene + 1,8-cineole (25.9%) and myrtenyl acetate (6.6%). α-pinene (9.7%) and linalool (36.5%) are also present at high level. These results indicate that Portuguese myrtle belongs to the group of myrtle genotypes, which characterized by the presence of myrtenyl acetate as one of the major components.
Messaoud et al. [37] report of some Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses of essential oils extracts from mature dark blue and white berries of Tunisian Myrtus communis samples growing at the same site, which allowed the identification of 33 chemical components. The oils from dark blue fruits showed high percentages of α-pinene (11.1%), linalool (11.6%), α-terpineol (15.7%), methyl eugenol (6.2%), and geraniol (3.7%). Myrtenyl acetate (20.3%) was found to be the major compound in the oils from white berries.
Brada et al. [38] studied the Algerian myrtle essential oil and the yield obtained from berries was 0.1%. Twenty-four constituents were identified, representing 89.5% of the berry oil analysis, the main components being: linalool (36.2%), followed by estragole (18.4%) and 1,8-cineole (11.4%). The oxygenated monoterpenes were the predominant chemical group (71.2%), followed by the sesquiterpenoids (16%). Monoterpenes (1.7%) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (0.4%) were very low. Berry oil is characterized by a great amount of linalool, estragole, 1,8 cineole and an appreciable amount of bergamotene and E-caryophyllene.
Kafkas et al. [39] studied the volatile compounds of white and black myrtle from Turkey. Seven samples (identified by numbers) were collected in two different stations and fruit volatiles were extracted by HS/SPME. Thirty-one volatile compounds were identified in fruits. The lowest hexanal percentage was detected in type 2, while the highest was detected in type 4. Four ester compounds were detected in white myrtle types, whereas no ester was identified in black myrtle types. Linanyl-butyrate and linanyl-acetate were detected with higher percentages. Alcohols were detected as major compounds except type 16, whereas, terpenes compounds were detected as major compounds in type 16.
Among the detected terpene compounds, α-pinene was the major compound. Limonene was detected in white myrtle types, whereas, this compound was not detected in black types. Eucalyptol was detected in higher percentages in black myrtle (types 4 and 5, respectively) compared to the white types (2, 3, 8, 16 and 1, respectively).
Mazza in 1983 [35] make the first GC-MS investigation on the volatile components of myrtle berries from Sardinian myrtle berries. He gave a detailed picture of the volatile components of myrtle berries analyzing the methanol extract of berries from Sardinia after centrifugation with water and extraction with pentane-methylene chloride that was used for GC-MS analyses. An alcoholic extract (60% ethanol) and commercial samples of liqueurs were also analyzed.
The extract obtained with solvent showed that α-pinene, limonene and 1,8-cineole represent 72% of the volatile fraction. Eleven hydrocarbons have been identified. Alcohols are 11% of volatile fraction and linalool and α-terpineol (being the most abundant) together reach 57% of total.
Tuberoso et al. [11] investigated the chemical composition of volatiles in Sardinian myrtle alcoholic extracts and essential oils. Although the content of monoterpenes represented 65.7–89.1% of the oil samples, some chemical constituents were remarkably different. For example, α-pinene ranged from 18.2% to 38.9%, δ-3-carene from 0.0 to 6.1%, p-cymene from 0.1% to 10.3%, limonene widely ranged from 3.7% to 44.5%, 1,8-cineole from 5.8% to 24.8%, γ-terpinene from 0.5% to 5.8%; terpinolene from 0.0% to 5.9%. Linalool widely ranged from 0.4% to 14.7%, terpenyl acetate from 0.1% to 5.4%, and geranyl acetate from 0.2% to 13.0%. The berries showed a moderate amount of sesquiterpenes representing 5.0% of the entire oil at the most.
Since ancient times, myrtle has been used as a medicinal plant. In Sardinia, it is very common the production of a myrtle liqueur [5]. Considering the high economic importance of myrtle industry in Sardinia the characterization of the genetic variability in wild and domesticated accessions may be a fundamental contribute to the breeding of the species [40,41,42].
Melito et al. in 2013 and in 2017 [40,41,42] studied genotypic variation and genetic diversity that were characterized using standard population genetics approaches. The level of genetic variability was high. The genetic data were compatible with the notion that myrtle has a mixed pollination system, including both out-pollination by insects and self-pollination. The candidate cultivars may represent an appropriate basis for directed breeding. All these selections are cultivated in Fenosu (Oristano) experimental field and represent a wide population usable to investigate chemical variations in these genotypes. In this field the production of different chemical profiles, in all parts of these plants, are regulated only by genetic differences because environmental condition is the same for all populations. In this view, considering the low level of information on the chemical composition of myrtle berries essential oils and the importance of these to determine the flavor of myrtle industry products, we investigated the chemical variation of berries essential oils with the aim to standardize the potential use of every clone selection.

2. Results and Discussion

In our studies, we consider 47 different candidate clones: only five of leucocarpa varietas and the most part of melanocarpa varietas. The yield of essential oil of the berries was highly variable (Figure 1). Six candidate clones did not have enough quantity of fruits to guarantee a correct random harvesting and oil yield. LAC10 and TEL2, do not seem to produce essential oils in appreciable amount, while CPT5, RUM15, RUM13 and 6/2 gave yields around 0.005g·kg−1, but the investigation has not resulted in a GC chromatogram associable to typical components of essential oils but only to hydrocarbons probably attributable to waxes. The highest yield of essential oil was observed in the LAC31 genotype with 0.55 g·kg−1, while the samples BOS1, MON5, RUM4, RUM10, V4 and V8 showed values above 0.20 g·kg−1 and most of the genotypes under 0.10 g·kg−1.
GC-MS analysis of essential oils resulted in the detection of 92 compounds that are showed in the Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. The main components were: geranyl acetate for 13 genotypes; 1,8-cineole for 7 genotypes; α-terpinyl-acetate for 4 genotypes; linalool, α-humulene, Trans-caryophyllene oxide and β-caryophyllene for 3 genotypes; limonene for 2 genotypes; α-terpineol, bornyl acetate and humulene epoxide II respectively for 1 genotype each. β-caryophyllene was the compound present in all the genotypes and methyl eugenol in 40 selections.
The compounds present only in one genotype with small quantities were the 2-methylbutanoic acid, 2 methylpropil ester, the p-mentha-1(7),8-diene, the linalyl acetate, the β-bisabolene, the ledol and the leptospermone iso.
Geranyl acetate was the compound with the highest relative abundance in all the population of candidate clones. It was present in 35 genotypes and the compound with the highest percentage in one essential oil, with the 50.95% in the candidate clone V5. The presence of geranyl acetate in the essential oils of the studied population gives a strong characterization to the same.
The second compound for relative abundance was the 1,8-cineole. It was present in 25 genotypes and the highest percentage was 43.26% in the candidate clone V4. Other compounds with high relative abundance were α-terpinyl acetate with the maximum of 23.56% in RUB95, methyleugenol with 19.66% in the sample LAC11, linalool with 35.10% in ISL3, α-terpineol with 23.21% in the RUM14 genotype, β-caryophyllene with 35.00% in MON5, α-humulene with 24.72% in LAC31, Trans-caryophyllene oxide with 25.69% in ORO2, and humulene epoxide II with 15.43% in ISL1.
The five genotypes with white berries showed limonene, 1,8-cineole, α-terpinyl acetate, and α-terpineol as main components but this chemotype was not exclusive of the candidate clones with white fruits.
The studied population of candidate clones had a high variability among genotypes and data on chemical composition of essential oils were quite different with respect to previously published data on samples from Sardinia and different other areas of Mediterranean region [25,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The recurrent association of main compounds was among α-terpinyl acetate, geranyl acetate, methyl eugenol and α-terpineol, as markedly evidenced in the candidate clones RUM6, BUB95, RUM20, CPT4, V9, V12, LAC1, ORS2, ORS3, SIN2, and PSF1 and only partially reported by other authors for Sardinia myrtle berry essential oils [11,35]. Other associations of main compounds were that of α-pinene, p-cymene, limonene, and 1,8-cineole, as reported for the selections RUB3, V8, RUM10, CPT6, V4, and BOS1; and that of limonene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, and geranyl acetate, characterizing RUM13, RUM14, and RUM4B. The association between linalool and geranyl acetate was also observed as characteristic of V17, V19, and V20.
Many of the most important components of these possible chemotypes have been previously reported as part of myrtle berries essential oils [11,23,34,35,36,37,38,39]. However, some aspects appeared as new and not previously reported. Firstly, the relative scarcity of α-pinene and linalool, always indicated by previous studies as two of the most abundant compounds. Furthermore, the absence or low content of myrtenyl acetate is a result that differentiates our study from all the previous findings [11,23,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Finally, we detected both the presence of previously described chemotypes or associations of main components and the original nature of some chemical profiles not previously reported for myrtle berries. This was the case of RUM12 with prevalence of metyleugenol, trans-caryophyllene oxide and dihydroeugenyl pentanoate, a recently described compound for the myrtle leaf and flower essential oils [13], and 38 other compounds in a very complex essential oil. Other genotypes showed chemical profiles of the essential oils absolutely originals: CPT3 with neryl acetate, α-humulene and α-selinene as main components; V7 with α-humulene, Trans-caryophyllene oxide and humulene epoxide II; and ORO2 with neryl acetate, Trans-caryophyllene oxide, and selinene-11-en-4-α-ol.
Application of multivariate analysis showed that the main components of the variance separate fairly genotypes in two groups based on essential oil chemical composition (Figure 2). We easily distinguish a chemotype that spreads in the South-East of the Sardinia and in all the localities above 300 m of altitude (white symbols) and another spreading all over the other localities where the genotypes were selected [41].

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Plant Materials and Essential Oils Distillation

The fruits have been harvested in the educational and experimental farm “Antonio Milella” located in San Quirico (Fenosu-Oristano, Central Wester Sardinia, Italy) in December 2015 when fully ripe. Among the 47 cultivars, only 5 are belonging to the variety leucocarpa DC, that means with white-yellow or withe-green fruits, the other 42 are belonging to the variety melanocarpa DC, that means with black-blue or purple fruits. The considered selections originate from different localities of Sardinia [5]. At least 15 plants represented every candidate clone. Mulas M. identified the analyzed plants. Voucher specimens have been deposited at the Herbarium SASSA (Sassari) of the Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari under a collective number 514.
To avoid a harvesting not representative we collected the fruits all at the same phenological stage (fully ripe) making sure to take plant material around all plants collecting material from the top, from the sides and from the base of threes. In the laboratory, the plant material was cleaned from other foreign parts (little branches, lives) and the samples were made as uniform as possible.
From every cultivar where collected about 2 kg of fruits and divided into three parts to replicate the analyses. After harvest, the clean fruits were kept in refrigerator at −20 °C until their extraction. Every sample of berries was chopped using a blender at low speed and the essential oil samples were obtained from the chopped berries by hydrodistillation for 4 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. For every selection three extractions were performed. The extraction yields calculated as g·kg−1 of fresh material are reported in Figure 1. The oils were stored in sealed vials, at −20 °C, ready for the chemical analysis.

3.2. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis

GC: Three replicates of each sample were analyzed by using a Hewlett-Packard Model 5890A GC, equipped with a flame ionization detector and fitted with a 60 m × 0.25 mm (I.D.), thickness 0.25 μm ZB-5 fused silica capillary column (Phenomenex, Torrance CA, USA). Injection port and detector temperatures were maintained at 280 °C.
The column temperature was programmed from 50 °C to 135 °C at 5 °C/min (1 min), 5 °C/min up 225°C (5 min), 5 °C/min up 260 °C and then held for 10 min.
Samples of 0.2 μL (volume injection) were analyzed, diluted in hexane using 2,6-dimethylphenol as internal standard. Injection was performed using a split/splitless automatic injector HP 7673 and helium as carrier gas. Several measurements of peak areas were performed with a HP workstation with a threshold set to 0 and peak width to 0.02. The quantization of each compound was expressed as absolute weight percentage using internal standard and response factors (RFs). The detector RFs were determined for key components relative to 2,6-dimethylphenol and assigned to other components based on functional group and/or structural similarity, since oxygenated compounds have lower detectability by FID (Flame Ionization Detector) than hydrocarbons. The standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka and Merck grade) were >95% also, and actual purity was checked by GC. Several response factor solutions were prepared that consisted of only four or five components (plus 2,6-dimethylphenol) to prevent interference from trace impurities. It is known that the oxygenated compounds have a lower sensitivity than the hydrocarbons to FID, we have calculated the response factor using a standard mixture of α-pinene, α-terpineol, neral, geranial, geranyl acetate and caryophyllene; in this mixture terpene accounted for 92% of the mixture, aldehydes 5% and alcohols, esters and sesquiterpenes 1% each. In our analyses we obtained that the RF of hydrocarbons was equal to 1 while for alcohols it was 0.80 and for esters 0.71. For this reason, we have multiplied the experimental data obtained for the following correction factors: hydrocarbons for 1, aldehydes and ketones for 1.24, alcohols for 1.28 and esters for 1.408.
GC/MS: MS analyses were carried out with an Agilent Technologies model 7820A connected with a MS detector 5977E MSD (Agilent), and using the same conditions and column described above. The column was connected to the ion source of the mass spectrometer. Mass units were monitored from 10 to 900 AMU at 70 eV. In the identification procedure we considered only the peaks from 40 to 900 AMU.
The identification of constituents was based on comparison of the Rt values and mass spectra with those obtained from authentic samples and/or the Nist and Wiley library spectra, or on the interpretation of the EI-fragmentation of the molecules [52,53].

3.3. Statistical Analysis

Oil yield data were processed for ANOVA by means of the software MSTAT-C and mean separation of was performed by application of the Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05 level of significance.
Data were submitted to multivariate statistical evaluation. Prior to chemometric analysis, setting the total integral areas to 100 normalized the data and the generated ASCII file was imported into Microsoft EXCEL for the addition of labels. The matrix was imported into SIMCA-P software version 12.0, (Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden) for statistical analysis.

4. Conclusions

The essential oil content of myrtle berries is quite low with respect to the yields that may be recovered by leaves or flowers of the same plant. Moreover, in six genotypes yields obtained with the hydrodistillation extraction system were insufficient for sample analysis. However, the importance of the essential oil composition for organoleptic properties of myrtle berries or of food and medicinal products obtained from their biomass is fundamental.
Among the main constituents of the myrtle essential oils geranyl acetate is a compound with a floral or fruity rose aroma. Geranyl acetate is soluble in alcohol and is used as a flavoring ingredient where a sweet fruity or citrus aroma is desired. Many uses are also reported for 1,8-cineole as fragrance and flavoring agent in foods, candies, cough drops, and personal care products [54,55]. This compound is the chief constituent of the oil of eucalyptus and was also found in essential oils of laurel, rosemary, and many other plants. α-terpinyl acetate and α-terpineol have pleasant odor similar to lilac and are common ingredients in perfumes, cosmetics, and flavors [56]. Linalool is a fragrant monoterpene alcohol found in the essential oils of numerous aromatic plants. Linalool is largely used as fragrance component in perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, and detergents but also as flavoring agent in foods. Methyl eugenol is mainly used as fragrance ingredient in perfumes, toiletries, detergents, and flavor ingredient in baked goods. This substance is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen [57]. β-caryophyllene and Trans-caryophyllene are natural bicyclic sesquiterpenes that are constituents of many essential oils. β-caryophyllene and Trans-caryophyllene are two of the chemical compounds that contributes to the spiciness of black pepper [58]. α-humulene and humulene epoxide II are components of the essential oil from the flowering cone of the hops plant (Humulus lupulus), from which derives they names.
Most value of the myrtle products is on their fragrance and permanence of the aromatic compounds of the berries in the processed foods, such as the typical myrtle liqueurs [5,11]. The research carried out provides new information on the recurrence of some aromatic profiles in the genotypes selected from the wild populations growing in Sardinia, and the directions for the possible replication in the cultivation of the candidate clones showing the most appreciable chemical composition of the berry essential oil. Considering the increasing development of the myrtle as a new crop, in the next future will be possible to increase the quality value of yielded biomasses also by combining the aromatic profiles of the cultivated clones, to obtain the most appreciated or beneficial results.

Author Contributions

M.U. and M.M. (Maurizio Mulas) conceived and designed the research; M.M. (Maurizio Mulas) provided the sample collection; M.U., M.M. (Mauro Marchetti) and N.C. performed the sample extraction, analysis and data processing; M.U., M.M. (Mauro Marchetti) and M.M. (Maurizio Mulas) wrote the paper.

Funding

The research has been supported by the Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (Special Grant L.R. 7/2007-2012: “The myrtle: genetics and metabolomics, an integrated approach for industry development”).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sumbul, S.; Ahmed, M.A.; Asif, M.; Akhtar, M. Myrtus communis Linn. A review. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour. 2011, 2, 395–402. [Google Scholar]
  2. Available online: http://www.tropicos.org/Name/22102175 (accessed on 23 January 2015).
  3. Nassar, M.I.; Aboutabl, E.A.; Ahmad, R.F.; El-Khrisy, E.-D.A.; Ibrahim, K.M.; Sleem, A.A. Secondary metabolites and bioactivities of Myrtus communis. Pharmacognosy Res. 2010, 2, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. The Plant List. 2013. Version 1.1. Published on the Internet. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 1 January 2013).
  5. Mulas, M. The myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) case, from a wild shrub to a new fruit crop. Acta Hortic. 2012, 948, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lawrence, B.M.; Terhune, S.J.; Hogg, J.W. Essential oil and their consituents. V. Oil of Myrtus communis. Amer. Perfum. 1970, 85, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence, B.M. Progress in essential oils. Perfum. Flav. 1996, 21, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I.; Maccioni, S.; Baldini, R. Phytochemical typologies in some populations of Myrtus communis L. on Capriome promontory (East Liguria, Italy). Food Chem. 2004, 85, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vidrich, V.; Franci, M.; Michelozzi, M.; Fusi, P. Variabilità della composizione di olii essenziali in diverse provenienze italiane di Myrtus communis L. Ital. J. For. Mt. Environ. 2006, 61, 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pirisino, G.; Mulè, A.; Moretti, M.D.L.; Satta, M. Studio della resa e della composizione chimica dell’olio essenziale di Myrtus communis L. spontaneo di Cuglieri (Sardegna). Rivista italiana EPPOS 1996, 19, 159–169. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Barra, A.; Angioni, A.; Sarritzu, E.; Pirisi, F.M. Chemical composition of volatiles in Sardinian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) alcoholic extracts and essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1420–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mulas, M.; Melis, R.A.M. Essential oil compositiom of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) leaves. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants. 2011, 17, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Usai, M.; Marchetti, M.; Mulas, M. Chemical composition of essential oils of leaves and flowers from five cultivars of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2015, 27, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bradesi, P.; Tomi, F.; Casanova, J.; Costa, J.; Bernardini, A.F. Chemical composition of myrtle leaf essential oil from Corsica (France). J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jamoussi, B.; Romdhane, M.; Abderraba, A.; Ben Hassine, B.; El Gadri, A. Effect of harvest time on the yield and composition of Tunisian myrtle oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Messaoud, C.; Zaouali, Y.; Salah, A.B.; Khoudja, M.L.; Boussaid, M. Myrtus communis in Tunisia: variability of the essential oil composition in natural populations. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wannes, W.A.; Mhamdi, B.; Marzouk, B. GC comparative analysis of leaf essential oils from two myrtle varieties at different phenological stages. Chromatographia 2009, 69, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moghrani, H.; Maachi, R. Valorization of Myrtus communis essential oil by steam driving distillation. Asian J. Sci. Res. 2008, 1, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bouzabata, A.; Castola, V.; Bighelli, A.; Abed, L.; Casanova, J.; Tomi, F. Chemical variability of Algerian Myrtus communis L. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gardeli, C.; Papageorgiou, V.; Mallouchos, A.; Theodosis, K.; Komaitis, M. Essential oil composition of Pistacia lentiscus L. and Myrtus communis L.: Evaluation of antioxidant capacity of methanolic extracts. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1120–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akin, M.; Aktumsek, A.; Nostro, A. Antibacterial activity and composition of the essential oils of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. and Myrtus communis L. growing in Northern Cyprus. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 531–535. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mimica-Dukić, N.; Bugarin, D.; Grbović, S.; Mitić-Ćulafić, D.; Vuković-Gačić, B.; Orčić, D.; Jovin, E.; Couladis, M. Essential oil of Myrtus communis as a potential antioxidant and antimutagenic agents. Molecules 2010, 15, 2759–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jerkovic, I.; Radonic, A.; Borcic, I. Comparative study of leaf, fruit and flower essential oils of Croatian Myrtus communis (L.) during a one-year vegetative cycle. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2002, 14, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yadegarina, D.; Gachkar, L.; Rezaei, M.B.; Taghizadeh, M.; Astaneh, S.A.; Rasooli, I. Biochemical activities of Iranian Mentha piperita L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1249–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Weyerstahl, P.; Marschall, H.; Rustaiyan, A. Constituents of the essential oil of Myrtus communis L. from Iran. Flavour Fragr. J. 1994, 9, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hashemi, P.; Abolghasemi, M.M.; Ahmadi, S.; Ghiasvant, A.R. Headspace-solvent microextraction for identification of volatile components of Myrtus communis L. Acta Chromatogr. 2009, 21, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moradi, M.; Kayhaii, M.; Ghiasvand, A.R.; Shadabi, S.; Salehinia, A. Composition of headspace solid-phase microextraction and hydrodistillationfor chemical screening of volatiles in Myrtus communis L. Phytochem. Anal. 2012, 23, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rahimmalek, M.; Mirzakhani, M.; Pirbalouti, A.G. Essential oil variation among 21 wild myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) populations collected from different geographical regions in Iran. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 51, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A.; Craker, L.E.J. Diversity in chemical compositions of essential oil of myrtle leaves from various natural habitats in south and southwest Iran. For. Res. 2015, 26, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zomorodian, K.; Morein, M.; Lori, Z.G.; Ghasemi, Y.; Rahimi, J.M.; Bandegani, A.; Pakshir, K.; Bazargani, A.; Mirzamohammadi, S.; Abbasi, N. Chemical composition and antimicrobical activities of the essential oil from Myrtus communis leaves. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Pl. 2013, 16, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alipour, G.; Dashti, S.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Review of pharmacological effects of Myrtus communis L. and its active constituents. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1125–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aleksic, V.; Knezevic, P. Antimicrobial and antioxidative activity of extracts and essential oils of Myrtus communis L. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fenu, G.; Foddai, M.; Carai, A.; Pirino, A.; Usai, M. Therapeuthic properties of myrtle oil: An in vitro study on human nasal mucosa cells. Int. J. Essen. Oil Ther. 2008, 2, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  34. Boelens, M.H.; Jimenez, R. The chemical composition of Spanish myrtle oil. Part II. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mazza, G. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric investigation of the volatile components of myrtle berries (Myrtus communis L.). J. Chromatogr. 1983, 264, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pereira, P.C.; Cebola, M.J.; Bernardo-Gil, M.G. Evolution of the yields and composition of essential oil from Portuguese Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) through the vegetative cycle. Molecules 2009, 14, 3094–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Messaoud, C.; Boussaid, M. Myrtus communis berry color morphs: a comparative analysis of essential oils, fatty acids, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activities. Chem. Biodiver. 2011, 8, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Brada, M.; Tabti, N.; Boutoumi, H.; Wathelet, J.P.; Lognay, G. Composition of the essential oil of leaves and berries of Algerian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.). J. Essent. Oil Res. 2012, 24, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kafkas, E.; Güney, M.; Sadighazadi, S.; Yıldırım, H.; Kefayati, S. Volatile compounds of selected white and black myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) types from Mediterranean region of Turkey. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 1244–1248. [Google Scholar]
  40. Melito, S.; Chessa, I.; Erre, P.; Podani, J.; Mulas, M. The genetic diversity of Sardinian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) populations. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Melito, S.; Fadda, A.; Rapposelli, E.; Mulas, M. Genetic diversity and population structure of Sardinian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) selections as obtained by AFLP markers. HortScience 2014, 49, 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  42. Melito, S.; Dessena, L.; Sale, L.; Mulas, M. Genetic diversity and population structure of wild Sardinian myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) genotypes from different microclimatic areas. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2017, 11, 1488–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mierendorff, H.G.; Stahl-Biskup, E.; Posthumus, M.A.; van Beek, T.A. Composition of commercial Cape chamomile oil (Eriocephalus punctulatus). Flavour Fragr. J. 2003, 18, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I.; Bader, A. Essential oils of the aerial parts of three Salvia species from Jordan: Salvia lanigera, S. spinosa and S. syriaca. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 732–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, F.; Liang, Y.; Cao, C.; Zhou, N. QSPR study of GC retention indices for saturated esters on seven stationary phases based on novel topological indices. Talanta 2007, 72, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ali, N.A.A.; Wurster, M.; Arnold, N.; Teichert, A.; Schmidt, J.; Lindequist, U.; Wessjohann, L. Chemical composition and biological activities of essential oils from the oleogum resins of three endemic soqotraen Boswellia species. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2008, 2, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mosayebi, M.; Amin, G.; Arzani, H.; Azarnivand, H.; Maleki, M.; Shafaghat, A. Effect of habitat on essential oil of Achillea filipendula L. in Iran. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2008, 7, 779–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Quijano, C.E.; Salamanca, G.; Pino, J.A. Aroma volatile constituents of Colombian varieties of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Batista-Pereira, L.G.; Fernandes, J.B.; Correa, A.G.; da Silva, M.F.G.F.; Vieira, P.C. Electrophysiological responses of eucalyptus brown looper Thyrinteina arnobia to essential oils of seven Eucalyptus species. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fakhari, A.R.; Sonboli, A.; Heydari, R. Composition of the essential oil of Rhabdosciadium strausii from Iran. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2005, 41, 413–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ramírez, J.; Gilardoni, G.; Ramón, E.; Tosi, S.; Picco, A.M.; Bicchi, C.; Vidari, G. Phytochemical study of the equadorian species Lepechinia mutica (Benth.). Epling and high antifungal activity of carnosol against Pyricularia oryzae. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. NIST2011. Library of Mass Spectra; Agilent Technologies Co.: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  53. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry, 3rd ed.; Allured Publ. Corp.: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  54. Opdyke, D.L.J. Monographs of fragrance raw materials: Eucalyptol. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1975, 13, 105–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. De Vincenzi, M.; Silano, M.; De Vincenzi, A.; Maialetti, F.; Scazzocchio, B. Costituents of aromatic plants: eucalyptol. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wagner, A. Manufacture of terpineol. Manuf. Chem. Aerosol News 1951, 22, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Smith, R.L.; Adams, T.B.; Doull, J.; Feron, V.J.; Goodman, J.I.; Marnett, L.J.; Portoghese, P.S.; Waddel, W.J.; Wagner, B.M.; Rogers, A.E.; et al. Safety assessment of allyalkoxybenzene derivatives used as flavouring substances -methyl eugenol and estragole. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002, 40, 851–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jirovetz, L.; Buchbauer, G.; Ngassoum, M.B.; Geissler, M. Aroma compound analysis of Piper nigrum and Piper guineense essential oils from Cameroon using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography, solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and olfactometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 976, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Yield of essential oils from 47 candidate clones of berries of M. communis L. The least significant difference value was 0.064 according to the application of Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 1. Yield of essential oils from 47 candidate clones of berries of M. communis L. The least significant difference value was 0.064 according to the application of Tukey’s test at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Molecules 23 02502 g001
Figure 2. Genotypes distribution according to the two main components of variance as obtained by statistical multivariate analysis.
Figure 2. Genotypes distribution according to the two main components of variance as obtained by statistical multivariate analysis.
Molecules 23 02502 g002
Table 1. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 1–10) myrtle genotypes.
Table 1. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 1–10) myrtle genotypes.
Genotype Number12345678910ID zRef.
SelectionRUM6RUM14RUB3RUB95V8RUM3RUM4RUM4BRUM10RUM12
RtKI Apolar Lit.KI apolarCompound%%%%%%%%%%
17.88939937α-pinene0.52 ± 0.02 11.88 ± 0.77 10.32 ± 0.26 2.90 ± 0.161.22 ± 0.028.54 ± 0.47 Std
21.40986985butanoic acid, 2-methyl-,2-methylpropyl ester 0.28 ± 0.03 MS-RI[43]
21.610021001α-phellandrene Std
21.9310021002δ-2-carene 1.56 ± 0.08 2.46 ± 0.41 0.57 ± 0.042.15 ± 0.090.05 ± 0.01Std
22.2510051004pseudolimonene MS-RI[44]
22.6610251021p-cymene2.80 ± 0.11 4.44 ± 0.051.23 ± 0.069.70 ± 0.131.75 ± 0.124.86 ± 0.282.77 ± 0.198.66 ± 0.430.02 ± 0.01Std
22.9010311029limonene3.04 ± 0.161.54 ± 0.087.34 ± 0.321.39 ± 0.0826.80 ± 1.241.19 ± 0.094.12 ± 0.2219.18 ± 0.9720.91 ± 1.04 Std
23.07103510311,8-cineole17.20 ± 0.475.34 ± 0.3936.41 ± 0.769.38 ± 0.4326.67 ± 1.3711.50 ± 0.7825.95 ± 0.898.49 ± 0.1722.69 ± 1.29 Std
24.4910601057γ-terpinene0.64 ± 0.03 1.92 ± 0.100.39 ± 0.030.95 ± 0.050.80 ± 0.031.82 ± 0.031.21 ± 0.060.86 ± 0.05 Std
26.0810891063α-terpinolene 0.94 ± 0.06 0.69 ± 0.02 Std
26.5510971094linalool2.32 ± 0.096.30 ± 0.462.03 ± 0.112.89 ± 0.156.39 ± 0.3914.93 ± 0.8613.23 ± 0.4511.48 ± 1.047.60 ± 0.14 Std
26.7511121108n-amyl isovalerate3.24 ± 0.181.83 ± 0.033.26 ± 0.173.41 ± 0.163.64 ± 0.263.83 ± 0.124.24 ± 0.091.38 ± 0.053.79 ± 0.17 MS-RI[45]
28.8111131115Trans-pinocarveol0.89 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.020.83 ± 0.09 0.35 ± 0.03 MS-RI
30.6211301133cosmene MS-RI[46]
30.6311681161Trans-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol0.53 ± 0.021.00 ± 0.040.30 ± 0.010.48 ± 0.03 MS-RI
30.7011771177terpinen-4-ol1.27 ± 0.061.87 ± 0.090.63 ± 0.031.09 ± 0.10 1.02 ± 0.07 1.23 ± 0.090.48 ± 0.06 Std
30.9811801180m-cymen-8-ol Std
31.1511831181p-cymen-8-ol 0.67 ± 0.07 0.41 ± 0.05 Std
31.3211891190α-terpineol11.22 ± 0.5123.21 ± 0.484.95 ± 0.549.76 ± 0.812.82 ± 0.1811.02 ± 0.657.90 ± 0.185.29 ± 0.223.05 ± 0.180.72 ± 0.03Std
31.6411921191estragole0.66 ± 0.030.85 ± 0.020.46 ± 0.060.97 ± 0.09 0.94 ± 0.09 MS-RI
32.6912171213Trans-carveol 0.04 ± 0.01MS-RI
33.0712301229nerol Std
33.2112451242(2-Z)-3-hexenyl isovalerate MS-RI
34.0112461248carvone MS-RI
34.2812531255geraniol 1.22 ± 0.03 0.61 ± 0.03Std
34.3212571256linalyl acetate Std
34.6712671257geranial1.12 ± 0.07 0.37 ± 0.040.83 ± 0.07 2.97 ± 0.125.45 ± 0.152.73 ± 0.13 Std
35.9212891290bornyl acetate Std
36.3712991312carvacrol Std
34.2513251322methyl geraniate 1.38 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.09 0.77 ± 0.090.07 ± 0.01Std
37.45132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.63 ± 0.02 0.88 ± 0.15 0.51 ± 0.080.03 ± 0.01MS
37.60132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.98 ± 0.11 MS
37.70132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y MS
37.7013321327myrtenyl acetate0.68 ± 0.041.40 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.01MS-RI
38.1413491351α-terpinyl acetate19.97 ± 0.32 8.57 ± 0.1723.56 ± 1.25 11.15 ± 0.237.76 ± 0.203.92 ± 0.28 0.05 ± 0.01MS-RI
38.4113621366neryl acetate 0.41 ± 0.02 1.38 ± 0.06 0.50 ± 0.08 0.06 ± 0.01Std
38.7913811379geranyl acetate12.30 ± 0.6617.67 ± 0.595.46 ± 0.1216.95 ± 1.030.99 ± 0.1616.81 ± 1.019.61 ± 0.2512.21 ± 0.941.00 ± 0.044.03 ± 0.08Std
39.6013881388β-cubebene 1.32 ± 0.11 0.01 ± 0.01Std
39.4613911395β-elemene 0.27 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.02Std
40.1014041401methyleugenol4.52 ± 0.274.52 ± 0.121.93 ± 0.095.03 ± 0.130.66 ± 0.127.29 ± 0.453.00 ± 0.124.02 ± 0.320.73 ± 0.036.74 ± 0.12MS-RI
40.25 unknown 1 0.32 ± 0.03
40.6914281430β-caryophyllene1.87 ± 0.015.55 ± 0.150.79 ± 0.072.13 ± 0.060.57 ± 0.113.99 ± 0.295.12 ± 0.425.97 ± 0.410.66 ± 0.050.96 ± 0.04Std
40.6914351439Trans-α-bergamotene MS-RI
41.1914371434γ-elemene Std
41.4714411443aromadendrene 0.16 ± 0.01Std
41.82 unknown 2 0.33 ± 0.06
42.2114551456α-humulene2.37 ± 0.037.03 ± 0.181.27 ± 0.052.95 ± 0.17 1.71 ± 0.092.28 ± 0.101.83 ± 0.090.18 ± 0.011.92 ± 0.14Std
42.4314571456(E)-β-farnesene MS-RI
42.5314571454α-patchoulene MS-RI
43.0414581458phenethyl pivalate MS-RI
43.12 unknown 3 0.24 ± 0.01
42.9314601460(Z)-methyl isoeugenol MS-RI
43.2214601458alloaromadendrene1.81 ± 0.140.84 ± 0.060.62 ± 0.032.25 ± 0.120.71 ± 0.04 1.06 ± 0.051.87 ± 0.11MS-RI
43.3314891490β-selinene Std
43.5114921492γ-selinene Std
43.5514981499α-selinene1.43 ± 0.070.59 ± 0.050.40 ± 0.031.94 ± 0.140.63 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.042.39 ± 0.15Std
43.6115001502bicyclogermacrene0.46 ± 0.021.02 ± 0.080.39 ± 0.020.65 ± 0.03 Std
43.6815061512β-bisabolene MS-RI
44.0615211520dihydroeugenyl butanoate 0.70 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.010.92 ± 0.080.11 ± 0.013.65 ± 0.20MS-RI[13]
44.2315231520δ-cadinene 1.43 ± 0.07 0.39 ± 0.02Std
44.7015301532zonarene 0.62 ± 0.03 MS-RI
44.8715461543α-calacorene 0.33 ± 0.01MS-RI
44.9215471546selina-3,7(11)-diene MS-RI
45.1215481548(Z)-nerolidol 0.49 ± 0.03 0.70 ± 0.02Std
45.3715501549elemol 1.36 ± 0.07 0.41 ± 0.01MS-RI
45.4115511553ledol MS-RI
45.8915781579spathulenol0.36 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.01 2.77 ± 0.19MS-RI
45.9715801581Cis-caryophyllene oxide MS-RI
45.9715831583Trans-caryophyllene oxide3.76 ± 0.035.63 ± 0.280.54 ± 0.042.72 ± 0.091.30 ± 0.073.03 ± 0.121.75 ± 0.034.75 ± 0.092.09 ± 0.1314.73 ± 0.25MS-RI
46.3015941595Cis-arteannuic alcohol MS-RI[47]
46.3115981596carotol MS-RI[44]
46.3216011600guaiol 0.59 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.02Std
46.1816031603α-dihydro (10,11)bi sabolol MS-RI
46.4816061608humulene epoxide II2.43 ± 0.154.46 ± 0.180.73 ± 0.043.01 ± 0.150.32 ± 0.021.40 ± 0.07 0.82 ± 0.040.78 ± 0.03 MS-RI[48]
46.8016131617isoleptospermone 2.36 ± 0.09MS-RI
46.8216201623leptospermone 3.78 ± 0.12MS-RI[49]
46.92 unknown 41.33 ± 0.082.14 ± 0.110.64 ± 0.031.78 ± 0.090.62 ± 0.04
46.9816311631dihydroeugenyl pentanoate 2.15 ± 0.100.97 ± 0.061.75 ± 0.081.26 ± 0.076.79 ± 0.18MS-RI[13]
47.06 unknown 5 0.37 ± 0.01
47.1516321634γ-eudesmol 0.63 ± 0.03 1.04 ± 0.05Std
47.23 Unknwon 60.65 ± 0.031.57 ± 0.070.21 ± 0.010.89 ± 0.04
47.3216411643alloaromadendrene epoxide 0.58 ± 0.06 0.38 ± 0.03 0.53 ± 0.022.74 ± 0.18MS-RI
47.42 unknown 7
47.43164116415, α caryophylla-4(14),8(15)-dien-5-ol 2.47 ± 0.17MS-RI
47.5516421642epi-α-muurolol 0.51 ± 0.02MS-RI
47.8316441644α-selinen-3,11-en-6-ol0.60 ± 0.04 0.71 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.02MS
47.8916601660α-selinen-11-en-4-ol 0.42 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0.033.23 ± 0.09MS
48.0516631661epi-globulol MS-RI
47.9716751670β-bisabolol 1.51 ± 0.05Std
48.3416821682ledene oxide II 0.46 ± 0.03MS-RI[50]
48.5617001713eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol 0.29 ± 0.01MS-RI[51]
49.22 unknown 8 0.63 ± 0.04
50.5917251738α-farnesol 0.20 ± 0.01Std
51.2919721978n-hexadecanoic acid MS-RI
54.2520001999eicosane MS-RI
Number of identified compounds26242529182117302940
z ID = Identification methods. MS: by comparison of the Mass spectrum with those of the computer mass libraries Adams, Nist 11 and by interpretation of the mass spectra fragmentations. RI: by comparison of retention index with those reported in literature [8,37]. Std: by comparison of the retention time and mass spectrum of available authentic standards. MS: identification of Mass spectrum. No-polar column ZB-5. Data are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. y Tentatively identified.
Table 2. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 11–20) myrtle genotypes.
Table 2. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 11–20) myrtle genotypes.
Genotype Number11121314151617181920ID zRef.
SelectionRUM20CPT3CPT4CPT6V4V5V7V9V11V12
RtKI apolar Lit.KI apolarCompound%%%%%%%%%%
17.88939937α-pinene 3.18 ± 0.067.02 ± 0.36 Std
21.40986985butanoic acid, 2-methyl-,2-methylpropyl ester MS-RI[43]
21.610021001α-phellandrene 0.33 ± 0.03 Std
21.9310021002δ-2-carene 4.53 ± 0.381.19 ± 0.06 Std
22.2510051004pseudolimonene 0.22 ± 0.02 MS-RI[44]
22.6610251021p-cymene 12.83 ± 0.683.31 ± 0.04 1.04 ± 0.09Std
22.9010311029limonene 10.22 ± 0.555.99 ± 0.18 4.58 ± 0.28Std
23.07103510311,8-cineole 18.72 ± 0.3743.26 ± 1.96 0.13 ± 0.01 3.79 ± 0.19Std
24.4910601057γ-terpinene 11.37 ± 0.261.78 ± 0.08 Std
26.0810891063α-terpinolene 5.69 ± 0.140.77 ± 0.05 Std
26.5510971094linalool1.01 ± 0.07 0.60 ± 0.039.94 ± 0.543.68 ± 0.171.61 ± 0.07 2.40 ± 0.192.77 ± 0.214.49 ± 0.21Std
26.7511121108n-amyl isovalerate 2.42 ± 0.083.07 ± 0.18 1.50 ± 0.12 2.07 ± 0.11MS-RI[45]
28.8111131115Trans-pinocarveol 0.25 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.03 0.42 ± 0.03MS-RI
30.6211301133cosmene 0.74 ± 0.090.47 ± 0.03MS-RI[46]
30.6311681161Trans-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol 0.87 ± 0.11 MS-RI
30.7011771177terpinen-4-ol0.69 ± 0.03 0.42 ± 0.022.46 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.09 1.38 ± 0.071.50 ± 0.04Std
30.9811801180m-cymen-8-ol Std
31.1511831181p-cymen-8-ol 0.72 ± 0.06 0.57 ± 0.0310.16 ± 0.510.39 ± 0.03Std
31.3211891190α-terpineol8.23 ± 0.431.81 ± 0.094.90 ± 0.246.12 ± 0.236.82 ± 0.87 9.15 ± 0.46 11.51 ± 0.69Std
31.6411921191estragole 0.77 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.030.66 ± 0.03MS-RI
32.6912171213Trans-carveol 0.42 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.02MS-RI
33.0712301229nerol Std
33.2112451242(2-Z)-3-hexenyl isovalerate 0.34 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.03 MS-RI
34.0112461248carvone MS-RI
34.2812531255geraniol 0.20 ± 0.01 Std
34.3212571256linalyl acetate Std
34.6712671257geranial 0.64 ± 0.032.48 ± 0.18 1.34 ± 0.044.68 ± 0.22 0.77 ± 0.061.44 ± 0.071.82 ± 0.08Std
35.9212891290bornyl acetate Std
36.3712991312carvacrol Std
34.2513251322methyl geraniate0.98 ± 0.06 0.45 ± 0.020.87 ± 0.060.50 ± 0.04Std
37.45132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.21 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.03MS
37.60132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y1.04 ± 0.08 0.57 ± 0.04 0.46 ± 0.02 0.63 ± 0.03 1.45 ± 0.09MS
37.70132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y MS
37.7013321327myrtenyl acetate1.11 ± 0.09 0.84 ± 0.05 0.81 ± 0.050.73 ± 0.05MS-RI
38.1413491351α-terpinyl acetate12.43 ± 0.736.70 ± 0.1320.24 ± 0.92 6.51 ± 0.3914.4 ± 1.04 7.9 ± 0.4318.56 ± 1.2613.3 ± 0.93MS-RI
38.4113621366neryl acetate 16.54 ± 0.711.21 ± 0.054.14 ± 0.11 2.84 ± 0.16 0.47 ± 0.020.58 ± 0.040.78 ± 0.06Std
38.7913811379geranyl acetate21.38 ± 1.66 43.27 ± 1.98 8.57 ± 0.4650.95 ± 2.58 27.78 ± 2.0116.79 ± 1.0421.61 ± 1.82Std
39.6013881388β-cubebene Std
39.4613911395β-elemene 1.34 ± 0.071.15 ± 0.05 Std
40.1014041401methyleugenol12.32 ± 0.801.49 ± 0.0812.16 ± 0.470.58 ± 0.022.68 ± 0.111.11 ± 0.05 12.34 ± 0.316.82 ± 0.387.28 ± 0.81MS-RI
40.25 unknown 1
40.6914281430β-caryophyllene Std
40.6914351439Trans-α-bergamotene MS-RI
41.1914371434γ-elemene Std
41.4714411443aromadendrene 1.37 ± 0.09 0.16 ± 0.01 Std
41.82 unknown 2 Std
42.2114551456α-humulene11.98 ± 0.7818.92 ± 1.090.93 ± 0.020.72 ± 0.031.6 ± 0.082.48 ± 0.1223.75 ± 1.873.11 ± 0.546.82 ± 0.413.14 ± 0.65Std
42.4314571456(E)-β-farnesene 0.99 ± 0.04 MS-RI
42.5314571454α-patchoulene 0.71 ± 0.03 MS-RI
43.0414581458phenethyl pivalate 0.34 ± 0.01 1.03 ± 0.05 MS-RI
43.12 unknown 3
42.9314601460(Z)-methyl isoeugenol 0.15 ± 0.01 MS-RI
43.2214601458alloaromadendrene 8.17 ± 0.111.46 ± 0.04 0.22 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.04 MS-RI
43.3314891490β-selinene Std
43.5114921492γ-selinene Std
43.5514981499α-selinene 8.94 ± 0.121.36 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.01 Std
43.6115001502bicyclogermacrene Std
43.6815061512β-bisabolene MS-RI
44.0615211520dihydroeugenyl butanoate1.33 ± 0.060.10 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0.037.82 ± 0.652.52 ± 0.150.85 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.08MS-RI[13]
44.2315231520δ-cadinene Std
44.7015301532zonarene 0.15 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.01 MS-RI
44.8715461543α-calacorene MS-RI
44.9215471546selina-3,7(11)-diene MS-RI
45.1215481548(Z)-nerolidol Std
45.3715501549elemol0.66 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.01 MS-RI
45.4115511553ledol MS-RI
45.8915781579spathulenol 1.05 ± 0.051.94 ± 0.05 0.26 ± 0.01 MS-RI
45.9715801581Cis-caryophyllene oxide MS-RI
45.9715831583Trans-caryophyllene oxide5.81 ± 0.386.39 ± 0.351.95 ± 0.041.10 ± 0.04 8.65 ± 0.6017.27 ± 0.915.52 ± 0.129.13 ± 0.263.94 ± 0.03MS-RI
46.3015941595Cis-arteannuic alcohol0.70 ± 0.05 MS-RI[47]
46.3115981596carotol 0.55 ± 0.04 MS-RI[44]
46.3216011600guaiol 0.34 ± 0.02 Std
46.1816031603α-dihydro (10,11)bi sabolol 0.44 ± 0.06 0.34 ± 0.021.09 ± 0.090.35 ± 0.02MS-RI
46.4816061608humulene epoxide II5.80 ± 0.395.59 ± 0.420.63 ± 0.030.41 ± 0.020.55 ± 0.022.25 ± 0.0813.68 ± 0.832.07 ± 0.049.62 ± 0.753.30 ± 0.47MS-RI[48]
46.8016131617isoleptospermone MS-RI
46.8216201623leptospermone 0.41 ± 0.02 MS-RI[49]
46.92 unknown 4
46.9816311631dihydroeugenyl pentanoate2.70 ± 0.27 0.10 ± 0.010.15 ± 0.010.40 ± 0.021.07 ± 0.0410.84 ± 0.582.52 ± 0.182.73 ± 0.193.46 ± 0.58MS-RI[13]
47.06 unknown 5
47.1516321634γ-eudesmol 0.35 ± 0.02 Std
47.23 Unknwon 6
47.3216411643alloaromadendrene epoxide1.54 ± 0.161.13 ± 0.06 0.47 ± 0.0210.79 ± 0.490.75 ± 0.031.72 ± 0.120.81 ± 0.05MS-RI
47.42 unknown 7
47.43164116415, α caryophylla-4(14),8(15)-dien-5-ol0.78 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.02 0.50 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.030.56 ± 0.040.41 ± 0.02MS-RI
47.5516421642epi-α-muurolol MS-RI
47.8316441644α-selinen-3,11-en-6-ol0.52 ± 0.030.49 ± 0.03 0.74 ± 0.06 MS
47.8916601660α-selinen-11-en-4 -ol 1.85 ± 0.111.75 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.02 MS
48.0516631661epi-globulol MS-RI
47.9716751670β-bisabolol 0.21 ± 0.01 Std
48.3416821682ledene oxide II MS-RI[50]
48.5617001713eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol MS-RI[51]
49.22 unknown 8
50.5917251738α-farnesol Std
51.2919721978n-hexadecanoic acid MS-RI
54.2520001999eicosane MS-RI
Number of identified compounds1921212718176352129
z ID = Identification methods. MS: by comparison of the Mass spectrum with those of the computer mass libraries Adams, Nist 11 and by interpretation of the mass spectra fragmentations. RI: by comparison of retention index with those reported in literature [8,37]. Std: by comparison of the retention time and mass spectrum of available authentic standards. MS: identification of Mass spectrum. No-polar column ZB-5. Data are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. y Tentatively identified.
Table 3. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 21–30) myrtle genotypes.
Table 3. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of ten (n. 21–30) myrtle genotypes.
Genotype Number21222324252627282930ID zRef.
SelectionV15V16V17V19V20LAC1LAC11LAC31BOS1BOS2
RtKI Apolar Lit.KI ApolarCompound%%%%%%%%%%
17.88939937α-pinene 0.35 ± 0.025.59 ± 0.21 Std
21.40986985butanoic acid, 2-methyl-,2-methylpropyl ester MS-RI[43]
21.610021001α-phellandrene 0.23 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.01 Std
21.9310021002δ-2-carene Std
22.2510051004pseudolimonene MS-RI[44]
22.6610251021p-cymene 2.91 ± 0.06 0.94 ± 0.05 0.66 ± 0.042.74 ± 0.13 Std
22.9010311029limonene 12.87 ± 0.981.21 ± 0.04 1.19 ± 0.07 0.38 ± 0.029.08 ± 0.45 Std
23.07103510311,8-cineole 14.01 ± 0.692.46 ± 0.09 2.22 ± 0.130.09 ± 0.01 2.65 ± 0.1441.18 ± 2.10 Std
24.4910601057γ-terpinene 2.70 ± 0.10 0.59 ± 0.04 5.27 ± 0.410.39 ± 0.031.97 ± 0.09 Std
26.0810891063α-terpinolene 0.95 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.041.00 ± 0.06 Std
26.5510971094linalool2.70 ± 0.057.83 ± 0.1928.71 ± 1.2410.86 ± 0.5934.04 ± 2.161.75 ± 0.01 10.63 ± 0.613.46 ± 0.141.90 ± 0.09Std
26.7511121108n-amyl isovalerate0.33 ± 0.023.18 ± 0.152.18 ± 0.090.50 ± 0.041.92 ± 0.160.09 ± 0.01 MS-RI[45]
28.8111131115Trans-pinocarveol0.36 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.01 MS-RI
30.6211301133cosmene 1.29 ± 0.070.94 ± 0.040.43 ± 0.030.61 ± 0.070.60 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.06 MS-RI[46]
30.6311681161Trans-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol MS-RI
30.7011771177terpinen-4-ol0.74 ± 0.042.00 ± 0.081.74 ± 0.070.55 ± 0.040.90 ± 0.060.84 ± 0.062.63 ± 0.101.56 ± 0.07 Std
30.9811801180m-cymen-8-ol Std
31.1511831181p-cymen-8-ol 0.60 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.040.47 ± 0.03 Std
31.3211891190α-terpineol5.14 ± 0.1212.50 ± 0.2411.87 ± 0.862.65 ± 0.105.80 ± 0.273.68 ± 0.1717.55 ± 0.845.73 ± 0.263.14 ± 0.194.68 ± 0.20Std
31.6411921191estragole0.30 ± 0.020.75 ± 0.040.77 ± 0.060.43 ± 0.030.35 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.020.65 ± 0.04 MS-RI
32.6912171213Trans-carveol 0.09 ± 0.01 MS-RI
33.0712301229nerol 0.16 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 Std
33.2112451242(2-Z)-3-hexenyl isovalerate0.25 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.01 MS-RI
34.0112461248carvone MS-RI
34.2812531255geraniol0.94 ± 0.06 0.52 ± 0.03 Std
34.3212571256linalyl acetate 4.94 ± 0.05 Std
34.6712671257geranial 2.72 ± 0.09 0.55 ± 0.041.36 ± 0.071.75 ± 0.067.63 ± 0.391.16 ± 0.061.58 ± 0.12Std
35.9212891290bornyl acetate 0.12 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.0124.29 ± 1.16 Std
36.3712991312carvacrol 0.10 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.01 Std
34.2513251322methyl geraniate1.01 ± 0.07 0.30 ± 0.020.49 ± 0.03 Std
37.45132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y0.41 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.02 MS
37.60132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y0.80 ± 0.051.06 ± 0.07 0.65 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.01 MS
37.70132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y1.08 ± 0.071.21 ± 0.06 0.33 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.01 MS
37.7013321327myrtenyl acetate 0.46 ± 0.030.10 ± 0.010.42 ± 0.03 0.20 ± 0.01 MS-RI
38.1413491351α-terpinyl acetate 7.36 ± 0.133.35 ± 0.16 8.45 ± 0.66 8.28 ± 0.454.21 ± 0.226.62 ± 0.33MS-RI
38.4113621366neryl acetate0.31 ± 0.02 1.17 ± 0.061.36 ± 0.07 0.41 ± 0.03 0.90 ± 0.05 15.94 ± 0.78Std
38.7913811379geranyl acetate12.56 ± 0.857.34 ± 0.1817.93 ± 0.6317.32 ± 0.966.88 ± 0.3715.15 ± 1.03 10.23 ± 0.528.31 ± 0.41 Std
39.6013881388β-cubebene 0.42 ± 0.030.37 ± 0.02 Std
39.4613911395β-elemene0.33 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.031.46 ± 0.07 1.54 ± 0.082.37 ± 0.11Std
40.1014041401methyleugenol11.14 ± 0.789.88 ± 0.529.20 ± 0.196.41 ± 0.185.79 ± 0.2610.03 ± 0.5519.66 ± 1.023.35 ± 0.173.65 ± 0.189.17 ± 0.56MS-RI
40.25 unknown 1
40.6914281430β-caryophyllene6.76 ± 0.148.37 ± 0.094.47 ± 0.082.71 ± 0.115.25 ± 0.290.25 ± 0.024.24 ± 0.2311.67 ± 0.565.31 ± 0.2523.02 ± 1.14Std
40.6914351439Trans-α-bergamotene 0.17 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.02 MS-RI
41.1914371434γ-elemene0.27 ± 0.02 Std
41.4714411443aromadendrene 0.17 ± 0.010.61 ± 0.05 1.70 ± 0.09Std
41.82 unknown 2 Std
42.2114551456α-humulene1.92 ± 0.132.23 ± 0.171.93 ± 0.056.27 ± 0.159.42 ± 0.480.28 ± 0.012.23 ± 0.1124.72 ± 1.651.39 ± 0.064.40 ± 0.24Std
42.4314571456(E)-β-farnesene MS-RI
42.5314571454α-patchoulene 0.13 ± 0.01 MS-RI
43.0414581458phenethyl pivalate2.56 ± 0.161.18 ± 0.06 0.17 ± 0.010.55 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.01 MS-RI
43.12 unknown 3
42.9314601460(Z)-methyl isoeugenol MS-RI
43.2214601458alloaromadendrene 0.19 ± 0.01 4.95 ± 0.24 2.60 ± 0.167.99 ± 0.49MS-RI
43.3314891490β-selinene 3.22 ± 0.16 Std
43.5114921492γ-selinene 3.31 ± 0.15 Std
43.5514981499α-selinene 0.30 ± 0.02 3.06 ± 0.19 Std
43.6115001502bicyclogermacrene 1.45 ± 0.06 1.08 ± 0.05 Std
43.6815061512β-bisabolene MS-RI
44.0615211520dihydroeugenyl butanoate1.39 ± 0.630.74 ± 0.081.07 ± 0.040.88 ± 0.041.62 ± 0.071.37 ± 0.050.10 ± 0.010.25 ± 0.02 MS-RI[13]
44.2315231520δ-cadinene 0.14 ± 0.01 Std
44.7015301532zonarene1.28 ± 0.71 1.04 ± 0.050.30 ± 0.020.28 ± 0.020.43 ± 0.030.75 ± 0.05 MS-RI
44.8715461543α-calacorene 0.15 ± 0.01 MS-RI
44.9215471546selina-3,7(11)-diene 0.31 ± 0.02 0.92 ± 0.03 MS-RI
45.1215481548(Z)-nerolidol 0.41 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.02 Std
45.3715501549elemol 0.28 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.01 2.29 ± 0.12 1.84 ± 0.13MS-RI
45.4115511553ledol MS-RI
45.8915781579spathulenol 0.16 ± 0.01 2.38 ± 0.131.53 ± 0.06 MS-RI
45.9715801581Cis-caryophyllene oxide MS-RI
45.9715831583Trans-caryophyllene oxide15.68 ± 0.983.83 ± 0.142.07 ± 0.064.37 ± 0.145.72 ± 0.2210.18 ± 0.642.13 ± 0.091.29 ± 0.10 0.97 ± 0.07MS-RI
46.3015941595Cis-arteannuic alcohol 2.88 ± 0.16MS-RI[47]
46.3115981596carotol MS-RI[44]
46.3216011600guaiol Std
46.1816031603α-dihydro (10,11)bi sabolol0.35 ± 0.02 0.87 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.02 MS-RI
46.4816061608humulene epoxide II2.86 ± 0.150.87 ± 0.040.83 ± 0.077.26 ± 0.686.01 ± 0.314.88 ± 0.250.62 ± 0.042.54 ± 0.11 MS-RI[48]
46.8016131617isoleptospermone MS-RI
46.8216201623leptospermone 1.17 ± 0.07 MS-RI[49]
46.92 unknown 4 0.36 ± 0.02
46.9816311631dihydroeugenyl pentanoate4.49 ± 0.361.06 ± 0.060.89 ± 0.052.21 ± 0.142.51 ± 0.09 MS-RI[13]
47.06 unknown 5 1.62 ± 0.10
47.1516321634γ-eudesmol Std
47.23 Unknwon 6 0.66 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.03
47.3216411643alloaromadendrene epoxide1.72 ± 0.12 2.01 ± 0.161.36 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.04 0.56 ± 0.04 MS-RI
47.42 unknown 7
47.43164116415, α caryophylla-4(14),8(15)-dien-5-ol1.55 ± 0.11 0.52 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.04 MS-RI
47.5516421642epi-α-muurolol MS-RI
47.8316441644α-selinen-3,11-en-6-ol0.23 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.022.51 ± 0.130.92 ± 0.05 MS
47.8916601660α-selinen-11-en-4 -ol0.64 ± 0.05 1.59 ± 0.070.31 ± 0.024.14 ± 0.21 MS
48.0516631661epi-globulol 0.39 ± 0.02 3.16 ± 0.19MS-RI
47.9716751670β-bisabolol0.78 ± 0.05 0.24 ± 0.020.89 ± 0.03 Std
48.3416821682ledene oxide II 0.12 ± 0.01 MS-RI[50]
48.5617001713eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol 0.06 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.02 MS-RI[51]
49.22 unknown 8
50.5917251738α-farnesol 0.29 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.02 Std
51.2919721978n-hexadecanoic acid0.35 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.01 MS-RI
54.2520001999eicosane0.66 ± 0.04 0.95 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.02 MS-RI
Number of identified compounds32232045315224301615
z ID = Identification methods. MS: by comparison of the Mass spectrum with those of the computer mass libraries Adams, Nist 11 and by interpretation of the mass spectra fragmentations. RI: by comparison of retention index with those reported in literature [8,37]. Std: by comparison of the retention time and mass spectrum of available authentic standards. MS: identification of Mass spectrum. No-polar column ZB-5. Data are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. y Tentatively identified.
Table 4. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of eleven (n. 31–41) myrtle genotypes.
Table 4. Chemical composition of berry essential oil of eleven (n. 31–41) myrtle genotypes.
Genotype Number3132333435363738394041ID zRef.
SelectionORS2ORS3ISL3BUD1CUG11ORO2ISL1SBDSIN2MON5PSF1
RtKI apolar Lit.KI apolarCompound
17.88939937α-pinene 0.36 ± 0.02Std
21.40986985butanoic acid, 2-methyl-,2-methylpropyl ester MS-RI[43]
21.610021001α-phellandrene Std
21.9310021002δ-2-carene Std
22.2510051004pseudolimonene MS-RI[44]
22.6610251021p-cymene 0.22 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.04 0.77 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.06Std
22.9010311029limonene 0.64 ± 0.05 0.62 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.05Std
23.07103510311,8-cineole 0.57 ± 0.046.79 ± 0.372.25 ± 0.12 3.12 ± 0.220.55 ± 0.03 7.75 ± 0.30Std
24.4910601057γ-terpinene 0.35 ± 0.02 1.41 ± 0.11 0.64 ± 0.05Std
26.0810891063α-terpinolene 0.56 ± 0.04 1.72 ± 0.12 0.92 ± 0.06Std
26.5510971094linalool 3.41 ± 0.1735.10 ± 2.362.02 ± 0.10 13.61 ± 0.8910.02 ± 0.511.43 ± 0.062.39 ± 0.11Std
26.7511121108n-amyl isovalerate 0.16 ± 0.013.10 ± 0.160.23 ± 0.01MS-RI[45]
28.8111131115Trans-pinocarveol 0.17 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.03 MS-RI
30.6211301133cosmene MS-RI[46]
30.6311681161Trans-p-mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol 5.80 ± 0.32 MS-RI
30.7011771177terpinen-4-ol 3.79 ± 0.13 1.30 ± 0.06 3.19 ± 0.194.14 ± 0.28 3.42 ± 0.19Std
30.9811801180m-cymen-8-ol 0.28 ± 0.02 0.38 ± 0.02Std
31.1511831181p-cymen-8-ol 0.95 ± 0.06 0.30 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.02Std
31.3211891190α-terpineol2.93 ± 0.186.90 ± 0.345.10 ± 0.243.94 ± 0.181.00 ± 0.06 0.12 ± 0.0113.93 ± 1.038.53 ± 0.422.78 ± 0.1410.04 ± 0.55Std
31.6411921191estragole 0.28 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.03MS-RI
32.6912171213Trans-carveol 0.10 ± 0.01 MS-RI
33.0712301229nerol 0.27 ± 0.02 Std
33.2112451242(2-Z)-3-hexenyl isovalerate 0.17 ± 0.01 MS-RI
34.0112461248carvone MS-RI
34.2812531255geraniol1.57 ± 0.08 0.16 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.031.29 ± 0.876.05 ± 0.341.27 ± 0.10 Std
34.3212571256linalyl acetate Std
34.6712671257geranial 1.80 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.05 2.32 ± 0.12Std
35.9212891290bornyl acetate 0.56 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.01 Std
36.3712991312carvacrol 0.28 ± 0.02 Std
34.2513251322methyl geraniate 0.09 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.04Std
37.45132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.19 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.02 MS
37.60132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.25 ± 0.01 0.80 ± 0.04 MS
37.70132613266-isoprenyl-3-methoxymethoxy-3-methyl-ciclohexene (isomer) y 0.24 ± 0.01 0.44 ± 0.03 0.27 ± 0.02 MS
37.7013321327myrtenyl acetate 0.51 ± 0.04 0.69 ± 0.05 MS-RI
38.1413491351α-terpinyl acetate21.10 ± 0.9612.68 ± 0.86 6.67 ± 0.363.90 ± 0.16 1.15 ± 0.06 17.70 ± 1.062.85 ± 0.1320.25 ± 1.03MS-RI
38.4113621366neryl acetate0.61 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.04 0.26 ± 0.020.18 ± 0.019.73 ± 0.810.57 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.02Std
38.7913811379geranyl acetate24.08 ± 1.2323.84 ± 1.458.62 ± 0.4610.46 ± 0.5114.31 ± 0.79 9.46 ± 0.5410.75 ± 0.6227.53 ± 1.8521.42 ± 1.0520.09 ± 0.96Std
39.6013881388β-cubebene 0.24 ± 0.02 1.59 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.01Std
39.4613911395β-elemene0.63 ± 0.050.29 ± 0.02 5.94 ± 0.30 1.37 ± 0.06 Std
40.1014041401methyleugenol16.49 ± 0.769.82 ± 0.562.94 ± 0.147.03 ± 0.418.34 ± 0.480.88 ± 0.066.37 ± 0.268.53 ± 0.466.72 ± 0.417.42 ± 0.367.97 ± 0.35MS-RI
40.25 unknown 1
40.6914281430β-caryophyllene8.36 ± 0.470.30 ± 0.028.81 ± 0.429.91 ± 0.586.12 ± 0.391.09 ± 0.070.14 ± 0.0122.26 ± 1.851.44 ± 0.0735.0 ± 2.047.44 ± 0.32Std
40.6914351439Trans-α-bergamotene 0.20 ± 0.01 MS-RI
41.1914371434γ-elemene 0.16 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.02 Std
41.4714411443aromadendrene0.84 ± 0.060.61 ± 0.04 0.41 ± 0.030.20 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.02 Std
41.82 unknown 2 Std
42.2114551456α-humulene1.64 ± 0.050.41 ± 0.0326.37 ± 1.325.09 ± 0.264.14 ± 0.28 1.35 ± 0.067.80 ± 0.340.91 ± 0.055.09 ± 0.251.86 ± 0.09Std
42.4314571456(E)-β-farnesene 0.46 ± 0.030.12 ± 0.010.99 ± 0.06 MS-RI
42.5314571454α-patchoulene0.53 ± 0.040.46 ± 0.03 1.72 ± 0.060.15 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.03 MS-RI
43.0414581458phenethyl pivalate0.45 ± 0.03 MS-RI
43.12 unknown 3
42.9314601460(Z)-methyl isoeugenol 0.15 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 MS-RI
43.2214601458alloaromadendrene3.32 ± 0.210.36 ± 0.02 9.82 ± 0.520.75 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.06 0.15 ± 0.01MS-RI
43.3314891490β-selinene 1.05 ± 0.06 Std
43.5114921492γ-selinene 0.28 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.02Std
43.5514981499α-selinene3.81 ± 0.240.37 ± 0.02 10.04 ± 0.531.11 ± 0.06 1.12 ± 0.08 Std
43.6115001502bicyclogermacrene 3.97 ± 0.190.14 ± 0.011.14 ± 0.07 Std
43.6815061512β-bisabolene 0.87 ± 0.04 MS-RI
44.0615211520dihydroeugenyl butanoate1.00 ± 0.060.88 ± 0.05 0.57 ± 0.042.17 ± 1.15 0.24 ± 0.011.27 ± 0.08 0.92 ± 0.07MS-RI[13]
44.2315231520δ-cadinene 0.92 ± 0.041.54 ± 0.07 Std
44.7015301532zonarene 0.73 ± 0.04 1.84 ± 0.092.60 ± 0.15 1.46 ± 0.09 0.74 ± 0.06MS-RI
44.8715461543α-calacorene 0.33 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.01 0.28 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.05MS-RI
44.9215471546selina-3,7(11)-diene 0.43 ± 0.031.29 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.05 MS-RI
45.1215481548(Z)-nerolidol 0.16 ± 0.01 1.85 ± 0.14 0.92 ± 0.07 Std
45.3715501549elemol 1.57 ± 0.062.11 ± 0.135.71 ± 0.280.38 ± 0.032.16 ± 0.12 3.42 ± 0.182.30 ± 0.12MS-RI
45.4115511553ledol 0.33 ± 0.02 MS-RI
45.8915781579spathulenol1.74 ± 0.073.40 ± 0.19 0.61 ± 0.051.21 ± 0.062.86 ± 0.167.84 ± 0.36 0.90 ± 0.05 0.29 ± 0.02MS-RI
45.9715801581Cis-caryophyllene oxide 0.95 ± 0.05 2.91 ± 0.161.11 ± 0.05 MS-RI
45.9715831583Trans-caryophyllene oxide5.84 ± 0.262.36 ± 0.15 2.55 ± 0.169.50 ± 0.4125.69 ± 1.039.20 ± 0.58 1.83 ± 0.10MS-RI
46.3015941595Cis-arteannuic alcohol 0.24 ± 0.01 MS-RI[47]
46.3115981596carotol 0.22 ± 0.01 0.62 ± 0.05 MS-RI[44]
46.3216011600guaiol 0.46 ± 0.03 0.28 ± 0.02 2.03 ± 0.10 0.15 ± 0.019.91 ± 0.55 Std
46.1816031603α-dihydro (10,11)bi sabolol 0.74 ± 0.06 2.14 ± 0.15 MS-RI
46.4816061608humulene epoxide II0.55 ± 0.040.97 ± 0.055.54 ± 0.220.81 ± 0.064.68 ± 0.214.94 ± 0.0815.43 ± 0.960.62 ± 0.050.43 ± 0.03 0.36 ± 0.02MS-RI[48]
46.8016131617isoleptospermone MS-RI
46.8216201623leptospermone 0.26 ± 0.01 MS-RI[49]
46.92 unknown 4 1.99 ± 0.12
46.9816311631dihydroeugenyl pentanoate 0.80 ± 0.053.48 ± 0.171.05 ± 0.040.55 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.01MS-RI[13]
47.06 unknown 5
47.1516321634γ-eudesmol 0.47 ± 0.03 2.21 ± 0.13 Std
47.23 Unknwon 6
47.3216411643alloaromadendrene epoxide0.61 ± 0.050.35 ± 0.02 1.68 ± 0.071.47 ± 0.064.44 ± 0.21 0.05 ± 0.01 MS-RI
47.42 unknown 7
47.43164116415, α caryophylla-4(14),8(15)-dien-5-ol 0.52 ± 0.042.19 ± 0.122.03 ± 0.132.41 ± 0.10 0.15 ± 0.01 0.33 ± 0.02MS-RI
47.5516421642epi-α-muurolol 0.83 ± 0.07 MS-RI
47.8316441644α-selinen-3,11-en-6-ol0.31 ± 0.020.77 ± 0.03 0.65 ± 0.053.06 ± 0.196.80 ± 0.371.80 ± 0.09 0.59 ± 0.04MS
47.8916601660α-selinen-11-en-4 -ol1.18 ± 0.060.20 ± 0.01 5.97 ± 0.291.53 ± 0.0712.26 ± 0.628.36 ± 0.27 0.81 ± 0.04 0.13 ± 0.01MS
48.0516631661epi-globulol 0.30 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.01 MS-RI
47.9716751670β-bisabolol 0.42 ± 0.031.35 ± 0.060.95 ± 0.040.89 ± 0.04 1.16 ± 0.07 Std
48.3416821682ledene oxide II 0.53 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.020.94 ± 0.050.65 ± 0.05 0.13 ± 0.01MS-RI[50]
48.5617001713eudesm-7(11)-en-4-ol 0.24 ± 0.01 0.62 ± 0.051.41 ± 0.060.22 ± 0.010.36 ± 0.02 MS-RI[51]
49.22 unknown 8
50.5917251738α-farnesol 1.30 ± 0.06 0.59 ± 0.041.59 ± 0.060.33 ± 0.02 Std
51.2919721978n-hexadecanoic acid 0.23 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01 MS-RI
54.2520001999eicosane 0.19 ± 0.01 0.85 ± 0.04 MS-RI
Number of identified compounds214783543203421391336
z ID = Identification methods. MS: by comparison of the Mass spectrum with those of the computer mass libraries Adams, Nist 11 and by interpretation of the mass spectra fragmentations. RI: by comparison of retention index with those reported in literature [8,37]. Std: by comparison of the retention time and mass spectrum of available authentic standards. MS: identification of Mass spectrum. No-polar column ZB-5. Data are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. y Tentatively identified.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Usai, M.; Marchetti, M.; Culeddu, N.; Mulas, M. Chemical Composition of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Berries Essential Oils as Observed in a Collection of Genotypes. Molecules 2018, 23, 2502. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23102502

AMA Style

Usai M, Marchetti M, Culeddu N, Mulas M. Chemical Composition of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Berries Essential Oils as Observed in a Collection of Genotypes. Molecules. 2018; 23(10):2502. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23102502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Usai, Marianna, Mauro Marchetti, Nicola Culeddu, and Maurizio Mulas. 2018. "Chemical Composition of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Berries Essential Oils as Observed in a Collection of Genotypes" Molecules 23, no. 10: 2502. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules23102502

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop