Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Nano Silver Paste and Applications in Transparent Electrodes via Electric-Field Driven Micro-Scale 3D Printing
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Compressive Prestrain on the Anti-Pressure and Anti-Wear Performance of Monolayer MoS2: A Molecular Dynamics Study
Previous Article in Journal
Chloramine-T/N-Bromosuccinimide/FeCl3/KIO3 Decorated Graphene Oxide Nanosheets and Their Antibacterial Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Efficiency Production of Large-Size Few-Layer Graphene Platelets via Pulsed Discharge of Graphite Strips
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanotip Contacts for Electric Transport and Field Emission Characterization of Ultrathin MoS2 Flakes

by
Laura Iemmo
1,2,
Francesca Urban
1,2,
Filippo Giubileo
2,
Maurizio Passacantando
3 and
Antonio Di Bartolomeo
1,2,*
1
Department of Physics ‘E.R.Caianello’, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
2
CNR-SPIN Institute, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
3
Department of Physical and Chemical Science, University of L’Aquila, via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 16 December 2019 / Revised: 31 December 2019 / Accepted: 2 January 2020 / Published: 4 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D Materials and Their Heterostructures and Superlattices)

Abstract

:
We report a facile approach based on piezoelectric-driven nanotips inside a scanning electron microscope to contact and electrically characterize ultrathin MoS2 (molybdenum disulfide) flakes on a SiO2/Si (silicon dioxide/silicon) substrate. We apply such a method to analyze the electric transport and field emission properties of chemical vapor deposition-synthesized monolayer MoS2, used as the channel of back-gate field effect transistors. We study the effects of the gate-voltage range and sweeping time on the channel current and on its hysteretic behavior. We observe that the conduction of the MoS2 channel is affected by trap states. Moreover, we report a gate-controlled field emission current from the edge part of the MoS2 flake, evidencing a field enhancement factor of approximately 200 and a turn-on field of approximately   40   V / μ m at a cathode–anode separation distance of 900   nm .

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is one of the most studied members of the transition metal dichalcogenide family [1,2] as an alternative to graphene [3,4] for new-generation electronic devices and sensors based on atomically thin 2D materials. It has been extensively used to develop field effect transistors (FETs) [5,6], photodetectors [7], photovoltaic cells [8], light emitters [9], integrated circuits [10], field emission devices [11,12], and chemical [13] or biological [14] sensors.
Mono- and few-layer MoS2 flakes can be produced either by mechanical exfoliation (from bulk material) [15], or can be synthesized by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [16]. At present, for larger scale production, high-quality MoS2 flakes are preferably produced by CVD.
The MoS2 bulk form consists of a layered structure held by van der Waals interactions [17]. Three atomic layers with the molybdenum plane in between two sulfur planes constitute each monolayer. Bulk MoS2 presents an indirect bandgap ( 1.2   eV ), which becomes direct and larger, up to 1.9   eV , for monolayers [18,19,20]. The high direct bandgap makes this material suitable for FET applications with an on/off ratio exceeding 10 8 [21] and for selective light absorption in optoelectronic devices with high photoresponsivity [7]. Unfortunately, the carrier mobility for these devices is limited to a few tens of cm 2 V 1 s 1 [22] due to short- and long-range scattering caused by the presence of structural defects, such as S (sulfur) vacancies, or Coulomb traps and surface corrugations related to the substrate [23,24,25].
Due to its sharp edges and high aspect ratio, few-layers MoS2 is also considered suitable for field emission (FE). Several technological applications require the controlled propagation of electrons in a vacuum, such as flat-panel displays, microwave amplifiers, electron microscopy, and X-ray sources. Field emission is a quantum mechanical tunneling process by which the electrons are extracted from a surface (metallic or semiconducting) by the application of an external electric field so the electrons can flow in a vacuum from a cathode to an anode. For a flat cathode, FE is enabled by a strong electric field (several kV / μ m ), while if the cathode surface has sharp edges or protrusions, electrons may be extracted by a considerably lower applied electric field, since the physical geometry provides a field enhancement near the emitting surface. To date, several nanostructures have been investigated as possible field emitters, like metallic nanowires and nanoparticles [26,27,28], semiconducting nanowires and nanoparticles [29,30,31,32,33], nanodiamonds [34], carbon nanostructures [35], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [36,37,38,39,40,41], and graphene [33,42,43,44]. Instead, few studies have investigated FE from MoS2 structures, such as sheets and nanosheets [45,46], nanotubes and nanoflowers [47,48], nanostructures [49], thin films [50], and bilayers [12].
The deposition of metal electrodes on 2D materials by standard electron-beam lithography (EBL) and lift-off processes is an expensive step, in economic and time terms, during the device’s fabrication. In this work, we propose a facile method to easily realize metal contacts on MoS2 flakes that can be used for a first assessment of their suitability for FETs and FE devices. Such a method is based on the use of piezoelectric-driven W (tungsten) tips inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM) chamber, connected to external source-meter units, which are gently approached onto the flake under the combined control of SEM imaging and electrical current monitoring. Moreover, the method can provide a reliable electrical characterization without exposing the flake to process-related damage.
With such an approach, we analyze the electrical transport properties of CVD-synthesized n-type monolayer MoS2 FETs in a back-gate configuration and their modifications due to gate voltage sweeping range, sweeping time, and electron-beam irradiation. We investigate the effects of the trap centers on the gate hysteresis and we observe that the hysteresis width increases linearly with the gate voltage range and exponentially with the sweeping time. Furthermore, we demonstrate that after exposure to electron-beam irradiation, the n-doping of the channel increases. Considering the n-type doping, we can study the local FE properties from the edge part of the flake. We demonstrate that the gate voltage can modulate the FE current. At the cathode–anode distance of 900   nm , we find a maximum value of the field enhancement factor of 200 and a turn-on field of approximately   40   V / μ m at the gate voltage of 40   V . This study demonstrates that it is possible to extensively and reliably characterize 2D material-based devices even without complex nanofabrication by EBL, metal sputtering/evaporation, and lift-off techniques. The proposed method enables a quick selection of flakes before engaging in the laborious production of field effect or field emission devices or the characterization of devices unaffected by process-related damages.
We note that a similar lithography-free method to perform electrical measurements of 2D materials, using a manually actuated microprobe station with carbon fiber microprobes for the direct electrical contact, has previously been proposed [51]. However, the method here demonstrated utilizes thinner probes (approximately   100   nm ), fine-controlled by piezo-driven arms, which can be reliably placed with a separation less than 1   μ m , thus enabling measurements even on very small flakes. Furthermore, the SEM imaging instead of the optical one allows higher-resolution monitoring of the contact regions.

2. Materials and Methods

MoS2 flakes were synthesized by CVD at a temperature of 750   K , using S powder and a saturated ammonium heptamolybdate solution as precursors, on a SiO2/Si substrate. To evaluate the number of MoS2 layers, we performed micro-Raman spectroscopy measurements (using a 532   nm laser source). In Figure 1a, we report the Raman spectrum, evidencing the standard (in-plane) E 2 g 1 and (out-of-plane) A 1 g vibration modes. The frequency separation of the two peaks of approximately 20   cm 1 indicates a monolayer flake [52,53]. The inset in Figure 1a shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the flake and of the two sharp piezoelectric-driven tungsten tips (curvature radius approximately   100   nm ) used as electrical contacts.
Electrical measurements were performed inside a SEM chamber (LEO 1530, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at room temperature and high vacuum ( 10 6   Torr ), using metallic tips mounted on piezoelectric-driven nanoprobes. Probes were electrically connected to a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keithley 4200-SCS, semiconductor characterization system, Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA), with a current sensitivity of 10 13 A . The piezoelectric control of the probes allows the fine tuning of the movements with a spatial resolution of about 5   nm and enables a gentle and non-destructive approach on the flakes. The approach is performed with the following procedure. Using SEM imaging, the tips can be positioned above the flake with an incertitude of 50–100 nm. After that, one of the two tips is harshly pushed against the flake (by selecting an edge or a location of no interest) until a movement or a scratch is observed on it. After that, we gradually move the second tip in 5 nm steps and simultaneously monitor the current between the two tips. We systematically observe a sudden rise of the current from the noise floor of 10 13 A without any apparent damage of the approach point on the flake. Finally, we detach the first tip and repeat the gentle approach of it to a desired location.
The schematic layout of the device and the experimental setup is reported in Figure 1b. The silicon substrate was used as the back gate and metallic tips as the drain and the source electrodes for the FET characterization. For the field emission measurements, we exploited the same setup, using a tip as the cathode and retracting the other tip (anode) from the MoS2 flake at a controlled cathode–anode separation distance.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Transistor Characterization

The electrical characterization by the tip-contact method of a selected MoS2 flake, used as the channel of a back-gated FET, is reported in Figure 2. The source-drain I d s V d s output characteristics as a function of the gate voltage V g s , shown in Figure 2a, reveal a rectifying behavior, which can be attributed to the formation of asymmetric Schottky barriers between the channel and the contacts, as often occurs when contacting MoS2 [54,55]. Figure 2b shows the I d s V g s transfer characteristics at the drain bias V d s = 5   V , on a linear (black curve) and logarithmic scale (red curve). The FET reveals n-type behavior with a threshold voltage of V T   10.5   V ( V g s corresponding to a I d s =   1   nA ), indicating a n-doped channel, as reported in several studies due to the chemisorption of oxygen on MoS2 surface defects and sulfur vacancies [56,57,58].
The I d s current on the logarithmic scale of Figure 2b shows an on/off ratio greater than 10 5 and a subthreshold swing of S S = d V g s d L o g ( I d s )   ~   4   V decade , i.e., the gate-voltage variation due to the one-decade increase of the FET current. From the slope of the transfer characteristics on the linear scale of Figure 2b, we evaluated the mobility μ = L W 1 C S i O 2 1 V d s d I d s d V g s   ~   1   cm 2 V 1 s 1 , where L and W are the channel length and width, respectively, and C S i O 2 = 11   nF   cm 2 is the capacitance per unit area of the SiO2 with a thickness of 300   nm . We assumed the distance between the tips ( 13   μ m ) and their diameter ( 200   nm ) as the length and width of the transistor channel, respectively. The obtained mobility is within the range ( 0.05 70   cm 2   V 1 s 1 ) commonly reported in FETs with a MoS2 channel on SiO2 [22,59,60,61]. Its relatively low value can be caused partially by the high contact resistance but is mainly an indication of a high density of scattering centers, such as intrinsic defects in the crystal structure of MoS2, extrinsic traps at the MoS2/SiO2 interface or into the SiO2 dielectric layer, and charged impurities such as adsorbates on the MoS2 surface [6].
In Figure 3a, we report the transfer characteristics measured for a gate-voltage sweep between   60   V and 60   V (forth and back), which induces Joule heating on the device that has been in high vacuum (at 10 6   Torr ) for a long time. The combined effect of Joule heating and low pressure reduces/removes adsorbates and makes it possible to analyze the effect of intrinsic defects and traps only. The complete sweeping shows a right shift of the transfer curve, creating a hysteresis that can be explained in terms of negative charge trapping [25,56,62]. Hysteretic behavior can be analyzed by the hysteresis width H W (i.e., the difference of the gate voltage values corresponding to a channel current I d s =   0.1   nA ). Figure 3b,c shows two features of the gate-induced hysteresis as a function of the gate voltage range and the sweeping time, respectively. We observe that H W linearly increases with the V g s sweeping range while it has exponential dependence on the V g s sweeping time (see inset of Figure 3b,c). The linear behavior of H W with the sweeping range indicates a trapping process that is proportional to gate voltage and loads the capacitor formed by the MoS2 channel and the Si substrate. The exponential dependence of H W on the sweeping time [63], (time constant approximately 9   min ), reveals a prevalent role of slow trap states related to either MoS2 or SiO2 defects compared to the contribution of MoS2 defects or MoS2/SiO2 interface (fast) traps [64,65]. These results are in agreement with previous experiments on similar devices contacted by Ti/Au (titanium/gold) metal contacts [6,66].
We remark that the backward sweeps of Figure 3b, which are unaffected by the gate-voltage range, well overlap each other, indicating that the proposed contacting method enables highly reproducible measurements. The repeatability of the measurements is further demonstrated by the inset of Figure 3a, which shows two transfer curves measured before and after the two tips were detached and reconnected.
Considering the expression of the S S in terms of the trap ( C T ) and channel depletion layer ( C D L ) capacitances per unit area:
S S l n ( 10 ) k T q ( 1 + C T + C D L C S i O 2 ) ,
(where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, and q is the electron charge) and assuming C D L is negligible with respect to C T (because of the low flake thickness), we estimated a trap state density of D T = C T q 2 4.5 × 10 12 eV 1 cm 2 , a value consistent with existing data [6,67].
We also analyzed the effects on the transfer characteristics of electron-beam irradiation. The irradiation was performed at the electron-beam energy of 10   keV (energy typically used for SEM imaging) for an exposure time of 51   s and with a constant beam current of 0.2   nA . In Figure 3d, we report the forward and backward transfer characteristics before and after the irradiation. After the irradiation, the curve shows a left shift, which reveals an increased n-type doping of the MoS2. Such doping is due to positive charge accumulation from beam-induced electron-hole pair generation in SiO2 [66,67].
In order to study the properties of the MoS2/W-tip interface and estimate the contact resistance, we varied the distance between the two tips to apply the Transfer Length Method (TLM) [68]. In Figure 4a, we show the I d s V d s characteristics at the floating back gate as a function of the channel length. Since the characteristics have non-linear behavior, we estimated the total dynamic resistance from the linear fit of the curves in a small range of V d s around the value 5 V . The total resistance for the two-probe configuration can be written as the sum of the channel resistance and the contact resistances, which we assumed for a rough estimation to have the same value for the two tips, i.e., R t o t =   2 R c + R c h . Writing R c h as R s W d , where d is the contacts separation, the previous becomes [69,70]:
R t o t   =   2 R c + R s W d ,
where R s is the MoS2 sheet resistance and W the tips diameter ( 200   nm ).
From the linear fit of R t o t   vs .   d (see Figure 4b), we extracted the specific area contact resistivity ρ c 4   × 10 2   Ω cm 2   from the intercept with y-axis and R s 10 8   Ω / from the slope. The obtained ρ c value is comparable to that achieved with Au contacts [71], revealing that the W-tips can form good contacts with the MoS2 flake. Instead, the R s value is about four orders of magnitude higher than the values achieved in other works [69], likely caused by a possible oxidation of the flake for a long exposure to air or by the low quality of the MoS2/SiO2 interface, which can be further optimized.

3.2. Field Emission Characterization

The n-type doping and the geometrical shape of the MoS2 flake [72] are excellent prerequisites for FE experiments. The FE measurements were implemented with a W-tip (anode) on the top of the MoS2 flake (cathode) in non-physical contact at a distance of 900   nm and we varied the gate voltage to observe a possible modulation of the FE current. In Figure 5a, we report FE characteristics (current−voltage), on a semi-logarithmic scale, in the voltage bias range from 5 to 120   V at given V g s values. Over the setup sensitivity limit of 10 13   A , we observed an exponential increase of the current up to seven orders of magnitude as the applied voltage increased. The fluctuations and drops of the FE current can be attributed to the atomic modification of the flake edge, such as oxide or adsorbates removal by joule heating. For this reason, the initial sweep has an electrical conditioning effect and the following sweep results are smoother [39,73].
Remarkably, the FE current measured at V g s = 40   V is significantly higher than the one at V g s = 10   V . An increased gate voltage enhances the n-doping of the flake and favors field emission, similarly to what has been reported in WSe2 vertical field emission transistors [73].
The FE current can be analyzed using the traditional Fowler–Nordheim (FN) theory [74] based on the following equation:
I d s = a E S 2 Φ S · e x p ( b Φ 3 2 E s ) ,
where Φ is the work function of the emitter, S is the emitting surface, E S is the local electric field, and a and b are constants. The local electric field is E s = β   V d s / d , where V d s is the applied potential, d is the cathode–anode separation distance, and β is the so-called field enhancement factor. When Φ is expressed in eV , S in cm 2 , and E s in V / cm , the constants a and b are 1.54   ×   10 6   AV 2 eV and 6.83   ×   10 7   Vcm 1 eV 3 / 2 , respectively. According to FN theory, l n ( I d s / V   d s 2 ) vs. 1 / V ds is a straight line (known as the FN plot), whose slope can be used to estimate β . Figure 5b shows the corresponding FN plots to the curves in Figure 5a and their linearity confirms that the measured currents are governed by FN tunneling. At the back-gate voltage V g s = 40   V , we estimated a value of the turn-on field (here defined as the applied field necessary to extract a current of 10   pA ) of E o n = 40   V μ m 1 , and, assuming a MoS2 work function of Φ = 5.15   eV [75], from the linear fitting we can estimate a maximum value of β 200 , consistent with existing data at similar cathode–anode distances [67]. The obtained E o n value can be considered a good result compared to what has been obtained with similar measurement setups on other layered materials [12,42,67].
We note that it has been recently suggested that the FN equation should be modified to account for the 2D nature of the emitting material [73,76,77]. A new model with I d s e x p ( c Φ 3 2 E s ) , where c is a constant, here referred to as the 2D FN model, has been proposed [77]. The fit of the 2D FN model, shown in Figure 5c, yields a slightly better adjusted R-squared. However, the difference from the Equation (3) model is not significant and, based on the present measurements, we cannot make any sound conclusions in favor of this new model.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we proposed an easy and fast method to contact 2D flakes by the gentle touch of piezoelectric-driven tungsten tips inside a SEM chamber. We applied this method to a MoS2 monolayer flake that we fully characterized with measurements of parameters such as mobility, hysteresis, electron-beam effect, field emission, and so on.
Despite the facile contacting, we obtained good specific area contact resistivity ρ c 4   × 10 2   Ω cm 2 , similar to the case of MoS2 devices with metal contacts deposited using EBL techniques. We also demonstrated that the direct contacting by metallic nanoprobes allows the complete electrical characterization of the transport properties of 2D FETs. In particular, we reported a complete study of the hysteresis observed in the transfer characteristics. We demonstrated that the hysteresis width has a linear dependence on the gate voltage range and an exponential dependence (with a characteristic time of 9 min) on the sweeping time. Moreover we achieved a significant gate-controlled field emission current from the edge part of the MoS2 flake under the application of a moderate turn-on field of approximately   40   V / μ m with a field enhancement factor of approximately   200 .
We have so proved that the use of tips directly on the flake, instead of metal leads, equally allows a rapid as well as a deep and complete investigation of the physical properties of the devices, avoiding an expensive and delicate EBL or optical lithography/lift-off processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.B. and F.G.; methodology, A.D.B., F.G., and M.P.; software, F.U.; validation, F.G., L.I., and F.U.; formal analysis, L.I. and F.U.; investigation, A.D.B., F.G., F.U., and M.P.; resources, A.D.B. and M.P.; data curation, L.I., F.U., and F.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.I.; writing—review and editing, A.D.B.; supervision, A.D.B.; project administration, A.D.B.; funding acquisition, A.D.B. and M.P. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project Pico & Pro, MIUR Project ARS01_01061, 2018–2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, Z.; McCreary, A.; Briggs, N.; Subramanian, S.; Zhang, K.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Borys, N.J.; Yuan, H.; Fullerton-Shirey, S.K.; et al. 2D materials advances: From large scale synthesis and controlled heterostructures to improved characterization techniques, defects and applications. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Urban, F.; Martucciello, N.; Peters, L.; McEvoy, N.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Environmental Effects on the Electrical Characteristics of Back-Gated WSe2 Field-Effect Transistors. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, H.-Q.; Linghu, C.-Y.; Lu, H.-M.; Qian, H. Graphene applications in electronic and optoelectronic devices and circuits. Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 098106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Di Bartolomeo, A. Graphene Schottky diodes: An experimental review of the rectifying graphene/semiconductor heterojunction. Phys. Rep. 2016, 606, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tong, X.; Ashalley, E.; Lin, F.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.M. Advances in MoS2-Based Field Effect Transistors (FETs). Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Urban, F.; Giubileo, F.; Grillo, A.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Passacantando, M.; Foller, T.; Madauß, L.; Pollmann, E.; Geller, M.P.; et al. Gas dependent hysteresis in MoS2 field effect transistors. 2D Mater. 2019, 6, 045049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Lembke, D.; Kayci, M.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hao, L.; Liu, Y.; Gao, W.; Han, Z.; Xue, Q.; Zeng, H.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, W. Electrical and photovoltaic characteristics of MoS2 /Si p-n junctions. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 114502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Alarcon Llado, E.; Koman, V.; Fontcuberta i Morral, A.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Light Generation and Harvesting in a van der Waals Heterostructure. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3042–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Su, Y.; Kshirsagar, C.U.; Robbins, M.C.; Haratipour, N.; Koester, S.J. Symmetric complementary logic inverter using integrated black phosphorus and MoS2 transistors. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 011006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, H.; Yu, K.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Guo, B.; Tan, Y.; Song, C.; Zhu, Z. Enhanced field emission and photocatalytic performance of MoS2 titania nanoheterojunctions via two synthetic approaches. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 1664–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Urban, F.; Passacantando, M.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Transport and Field Emission Properties of MoS2 Bilayers. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Li, P.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Y.; Chang, H.; Liu, J.; Yin, N. Towards intrinsic MoS2 devices for high performance arsenite sensing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 063110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yan, L.; Shi, H.; Sui, X.; Deng, Z.; Gao, L. MoS2 -DNA and MoS2 based sensors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 23573–23582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Coleman, J.N.; Lotya, M.; O’Neill, A.; Bergin, S.D.; King, P.J.; Khan, U.; Young, K.; Gaucher, A.; De, S.; Smith, R.J.; et al. Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials. Science 2011, 331, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, X.; Zhu, H. Two-dimensional MoS2: Properties, preparation, and applications. J. Mater. 2015, 1, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, H.S.; Min, S.-W.; Chang, Y.-G.; Park, M.K.; Nam, T.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.H.; Ryu, S.; Im, S. MoS2 Nanosheet Phototransistors with Thickness-Modulated Optical Energy Gap. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3695–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mak, K.F.; Lee, C.; Hone, J.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T.F. Atomically Thin MoS 2 : A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ellis, J.K.; Lucero, M.J.; Scuseria, G.E. The indirect to direct band gap transition in multilayered MoS2 as predicted by screened hybrid density functional theory. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 261908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, C.; Wang, X.; Raju, S.; Lin, Z.; Villaroman, D.; Huang, B.; Chan, H.L.-W.; Chan, M.; Chai, Y. Low voltage and high ON/OFF ratio field-effect transistors based on CVD MoS2 and ultra high-k gate dielectric PZT. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8695–8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, M.-W.; Liu, L.; Lan, Q.; Tan, X.; Dhindsa, K.S.; Zeng, P.; Naik, V.M.; Cheng, M.M.-C.; Zhou, Z. Mobility enhancement and highly efficient gating of monolayer MoS2 transistors with polymer electrolyte. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 345102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ong, Z.-Y.; Xu, T.; Xin, R.; Pan, L.; Wang, B.; Sun, L.; et al. Towards intrinsic charge transport in monolayer molybdenum disulfide by defect and interface engineering. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qiu, H.; Xu, T.; Wang, Z.; Ren, W.; Nan, H.; Ni, Z.; Chen, Q.; Yuan, S.; Miao, F.; Song, F.; et al. Hopping transport through defect-induced localized states in molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Yang, Y.; Rinzan, M.B.M.; Boyd, A.K.; Barbara, P. Record Endurance for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube–Based Memory Cell. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1852–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Geng-Min, Z.; Roy, E.; Hong-Wen, L.; Wei-Min, L.; Shi-Min, H.; Yu-Zhang, K.; Zeng-Quan, X. Field Emission from an Array of Free-standing Metallic Nanowires. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2002, 19, 1016–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xavier, S.; Mátéfi-Tempfli, S.; Ferain, E.; Purcell, S.; Enouz-Védrenne, S.; Gangloff, L.; Minoux, E.; Hudanski, L.; Vincent, P.; Schnell, J.-P.; et al. Stable field emission from arrays of vertically aligned free-standing metallic nanowires. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 215601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Passacantando, M.; Niu, G.; Schlykow, V.; Lupina, G.; Giubileo, F.; Schroeder, T. Observation of field emission from GeSn nanoparticles epitaxially grown on silicon nanopillar arrays. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 485707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Choueib, M.; Martel, R.; Cojocaru, C.S.; Ayari, A.; Vincent, P.; Purcell, S.T. Current Saturation in Field Emission from H-Passivated Si Nanowires. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7463–7471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, F.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Q. Enhanced field emission properties from AlN nanowires synthesized on conductive graphite substrate. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 646, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, L.; Fang, X.; Chew, H.G.; Zheng, F.; Liew, T.H.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, S.; Li, G.; Zhang, L. Crystallinity-Controlled Germanium Nanowire Arrays: Potential Field Emitters. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giubileo, F.; Di Bartolomeo, A.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Passacantando, M.; Koivusalo, E.; Hakkarainen, T.; Guina, M. Field Emission from Self-Catalyzed GaAs Nanowires. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Iemmo, L.; Di Bartolomeo, A.; Giubileo, F.; Luongo, G.; Passacantando, M.; Niu, G.; Hatami, F.; Skibitzki, O.; Schroeder, T. Graphene enhanced field emission from InP nanocrystals. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 495705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Terranova, M.L.; Orlanducci, S.; Rossi, M.; Tamburri, E. Nanodiamonds for field emission: State of the art. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 5094–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Giubileo, F.; Di Bartolomeo, A.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Urban, F. Field Emission from Carbon Nanostructures. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Scarfato, A.; Giubileo, F.; Bobba, F.; Biasiucci, M.; Cucolo, A.M.; Santucci, S.; Passacantando, M. A local field emission study of partially aligned carbon-nanotubes by atomic force microscope probe. Carbon 2007, 45, 2957–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Smith, R.C.; Carey, J.D.; Cox, D.C.; Silva, S.R.P. In situ electrode manipulation for three terminal field emission characterization of individual carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 063111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Passacantando, M.; Bussolotti, F.; Santucci, S.; Di Bartolomeo, A.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Cucolo, A.M. Field emission from a selected multiwall carbon nanotube. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 395701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Giubileo, F.; Bartolomeo, A.D.; Scarfato, A.; Iemmo, L.; Bobba, F.; Passacantando, M.; Santucci, S.; Cucolo, A.M. Local probing of the field emission stability of vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2009, 47, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bonard, J.-M.; Dean, K.A.; Coll, B.F.; Klinke, C. Field Emission of Individual Carbon Nanotubes in the Scanning Electron Microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 197602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Martucciello, N.; Raimondo, M.; Guadagno, L.; Passacantando, M.; Lafdi, K.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Transport and field emission properties of buckypapers obtained from aligned carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 6459–6468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santandrea, S.; Giubileo, F.; Grossi, V.; Santucci, S.; Passacantando, M.; Schroeder, T.; Lupina, G.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Field emission from single and few-layer graphene flakes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 163109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, S.; Duesberg, G.S.; Pratap, R.; Raghavan, S. Graphene field emission devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 103107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Romeo, F.; Russo, S.; Unal, S.; Passacantando, M.; Grossi, V.; Cucolo, A.M. Leakage and field emission in side-gate graphene field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 023510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kashid, R.V.; Late, D.J.; Chou, S.S.; Huang, Y.-K.; De, M.; Joag, D.S.; More, M.A.; Dravid, V.P. Enhanced Field-Emission Behavior of Layered MoS2 Sheets. Small 2013, 9, 2730–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, H.; Wu, H.; Wang, B.; Qian, H. Field Emission Properties of Vertically Aligned MoS2 Nanosheets. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits (EDSSC), Singapore, 1–4 June 2015; pp. 431–434. [Google Scholar]
  47. Deepak, F.L.; Mayoral, A.; Yacaman, M.J. Faceted MoS2 nanotubes and nanoflowers. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 118, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Y.B.; Bando, Y.; Golberg, D. MoS2 nanoflowers and their field-emission properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 1962–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grillo, A.; Barrat, J.; Galazka, Z.; Passacantando, M.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Urban, F.; Dubourdieu, C.; Di Bartolomeo, A. High field-emission current density from β-Ga 2 O 3 nanopillars. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 193101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Late, D.J.; Shaikh, P.A.; Khare, R.; Kashid, R.V.; Chaudhary, M.; More, M.A.; Ogale, S.B. Pulsed Laser-Deposited MoS2 Thin Films on W and Si: Field Emission and Photoresponse Studies. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 15881–15888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gant, P.; Niu, Y.; Svatek, S.A.; Agraït, N.; Munuera, C.; García-Hernández, M.; Frisenda, R.; de Lara, D.P.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Lithography-free electrical transport measurements on 2D materials by direct microprobing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 11252–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yap, C.C.R.; Tay, B.K.; Edwin, T.H.T.; Olivier, A.; Baillargeat, D. From Bulk to Monolayer MoS2: Evolution of Raman Scattering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boukhicha, M.; Calandra, M.; Measson, M.-A.; Lancry, O.; Shukla, A. Anharmonic phonons in few-layer MoS 2 : Raman spectroscopy of ultralow energy compression and shear modes. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 195316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ghatak, S.; Ghosh, A. Observation of trap-assisted space charge limited conductivity in short channel MoS2 transistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 122103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Grillo, A.; Urban, F.; Iemmo, L.; Giubileo, F.; Luongo, G.; Amato, G.; Croin, L.; Sun, L.; Liang, S.-J.; et al. Asymmetric Schottky Contacts in Bilayer MoS2 Field Effect Transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Genovese, L.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Foller, T.; Schleberger, M. Hysteresis in the transfer characteristics of MoS2 transistors. 2D Mater. 2017, 5, 015014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Qi, L.; Wang, Y.; Shen, L.; Wu, Y. Chemisorption-induced n -doping of MoS2 by oxygen. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 063103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cho, K.; Kim, T.-Y.; Park, W.; Park, J.; Kim, D.; Jang, J.; Jeong, H.; Hong, S.; Lee, T. Gate-bias stress-dependent photoconductive characteristics of multi-layer MoS2 field-effect transistors. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 155201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bao, W.; Cai, X.; Kim, D.; Sridhara, K.; Fuhrer, M.S. High mobility ambipolar MoS2 field-effect transistors: Substrate and dielectric effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Amani, M.; Chin, M.L.; Birdwell, A.G.; O’Regan, T.P.; Najmaei, S.; Liu, Z.; Ajayan, P.M.; Lou, J.; Dubey, M. Electrical performance of monolayer MoS2 field-effect transistors prepared by chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 193107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Radisavljevic, B.; Kis, A. Mobility engineering and a metal–insulator transition in monolayer MoS2. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Rücker, H.; Schley, P.; Fox, A.; Lischke, S.; Na, K.-Y. A single-poly EEPROM cell for embedded memory applications. Solid-State Electron. 2009, 53, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cho, K.; Park, W.; Park, J.; Jeong, H.; Jang, J.; Kim, T.-Y.; Hong, W.-K.; Hong, S.; Lee, T. Electric Stress-Induced Threshold Voltage Instability of Multilayer MoS2 Field Effect Transistors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7751–7758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Late, D.J.; Liu, B.; Matte, H.S.S.R.; Dravid, V.P.; Rao, C.N.R. Hysteresis in Single-Layer MoS2 Field Effect Transistors. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5635–5641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lee, Y.G.; Kang, C.G.; Jung, U.J.; Kim, J.J.; Hwang, H.J.; Chung, H.-J.; Seo, S.; Choi, R.; Lee, B.H. Fast transient charging at the graphene/SiO2 interface causing hysteretic device characteristics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 183508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Pelella, A.; Liu, X.; Miao, F.; Passacantando, M.; Giubileo, F.; Grillo, A.; Iemmo, L.; Urban, F.; Liang, S. Pressure-Tunable Ambipolar Conduction and Hysteresis in Thin Palladium Diselenide Field Effect Transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Passacantando, M.; Urban, F.; Luongo, G.; Sun, L.; Amato, G.; Enrico, E.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Effect of Electron Irradiation on the Transport and Field Emission Properties of Few-Layer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 1454–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Urban, F.; Lupina, G.; Grillo, A.; Martucciello, N.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Temperature and gate effects on contact resistance and mobility in graphene transistors by TLM and Y-function methods. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1912.04623 [physics]. [Google Scholar]
  69. Du, Y.; Liu, H.; Neal, A.T.; Si, M.; Ye, P.D. Molecular Doping of Multilayer ${\rm MoS} {2}$ Field-Effect Transistors: Reduction in Sheet and Contact Resistances. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 1328–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Giubileo, F.; Di Bartolomeo, A. The role of contact resistance in graphene field-effect devices. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2017, 92, 143–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, S.-L.; Komatsu, K.; Nakaharai, S.; Lin, Y.-F.; Yamamoto, M.; Duan, X.; Tsukagoshi, K. Thickness Scaling Effect on Interfacial Barrier and Electrical Contact to Two-Dimensional MoS2 Layers. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 12836–12842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Zhong, H.; Quhe, R.; Wang, Y.; Ni, Z.; Ye, M.; Song, Z.; Pan, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, L.; Lei, M.; et al. Interfacial Properties of Monolayer and Bilayer MoS2 Contacts with Metals: Beyond the Energy Band Calculations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 201786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Di Bartolomeo, A.; Urban, F.; Passacantando, M.; McEvoy, N.; Peters, L.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Romeo, F.; Giubileo, F. A WSe 2 vertical field emission transistor. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 1538–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Fowler, R.H.; Nordheim, L. Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1928, 119, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Choi, S.; Shaolin, Z.; Yang, W. Layer-number-dependent work function of MoS2 nanoflakes. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2014, 64, 1550–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Urban, F.; Passacantando, M.; Giubileo, F.; Iemmo, L.; Luongo, G.; Grillo, A.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Two-dimensional effects in Fowler-Nordheim field emission from transition metal dichalcogenides. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1226, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ang, Y.S.; Zubair, M.; Ooi, K.J.A.; Ang, L.K. Generalized Fowler-Nordheim field-induced vertical electron emission model for two-dimensional materials. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1711.05898 [cond-mat, physics:physics]. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Raman spectrum of the monolayer MoS2 flake. The inset displays a SEM image of the MoS2 flake and the two W-tips used as electrical contacts. (b) Schematic of the device and the measurement setup.
Figure 1. (a) Raman spectrum of the monolayer MoS2 flake. The inset displays a SEM image of the MoS2 flake and the two W-tips used as electrical contacts. (b) Schematic of the device and the measurement setup.
Nanomaterials 10 00106 g001
Figure 2. (a) I d s     V d s output characteristics of the MoS2 back-gated FET at different gate voltages V g s , in steps of 10 V, with source-drain current on logarithmic scale. (b) I d s V g s transfer characteristics at V d s = 5   V with source-drain current on logarithmic and linear scales, and linear fitting curves (dashed lines).
Figure 2. (a) I d s     V d s output characteristics of the MoS2 back-gated FET at different gate voltages V g s , in steps of 10 V, with source-drain current on logarithmic scale. (b) I d s V g s transfer characteristics at V d s = 5   V with source-drain current on logarithmic and linear scales, and linear fitting curves (dashed lines).
Nanomaterials 10 00106 g002
Figure 3. (a) Forward and backward transfer characteristics. The inset shows two transfer curves obtained before (sweep 1) and after (sweep 2) the two tips were detached and re-connected to check the reproducibility of the measurements. (b) Transfer characteristics (complete sweep loop) plotted as a function of the gate voltage range and (c) the sweeping time. The insets show the linear and the exponential dependence of the hysteresis width as a function of the gate voltage range and the sweeping time, respectively. (d) Transfer characteristics before and after electron-beam irradiation. All transfer characteristics were measured at V ds = 5   V   and at   10 6   Torr   pressure.
Figure 3. (a) Forward and backward transfer characteristics. The inset shows two transfer curves obtained before (sweep 1) and after (sweep 2) the two tips were detached and re-connected to check the reproducibility of the measurements. (b) Transfer characteristics (complete sweep loop) plotted as a function of the gate voltage range and (c) the sweeping time. The insets show the linear and the exponential dependence of the hysteresis width as a function of the gate voltage range and the sweeping time, respectively. (d) Transfer characteristics before and after electron-beam irradiation. All transfer characteristics were measured at V ds = 5   V   and at   10 6   Torr   pressure.
Nanomaterials 10 00106 g003
Figure 4. (a) I d s     V d s characteristics at the floating back gate as a function of the channel length. (b) TLM plot of R t o t   vs .   d . The red line represents the linear fit of experimental data.
Figure 4. (a) I d s     V d s characteristics at the floating back gate as a function of the channel length. (b) TLM plot of R t o t   vs .   d . The red line represents the linear fit of experimental data.
Nanomaterials 10 00106 g004
Figure 5. (a) FE current measured with the W-tip at a distance of d 900   nm from the MoS2 flake and at a given back-gate voltage on a semi-logarithmic scale. (b) Experimental data plotted with the Fowler–Nordheim model and their linear fitting (dash lines). (c) Experimental data plotted with the 2D Fowler–Nordheim model [77] and their linear fitting (dash lines).
Figure 5. (a) FE current measured with the W-tip at a distance of d 900   nm from the MoS2 flake and at a given back-gate voltage on a semi-logarithmic scale. (b) Experimental data plotted with the Fowler–Nordheim model and their linear fitting (dash lines). (c) Experimental data plotted with the 2D Fowler–Nordheim model [77] and their linear fitting (dash lines).
Nanomaterials 10 00106 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iemmo, L.; Urban, F.; Giubileo, F.; Passacantando, M.; Di Bartolomeo, A. Nanotip Contacts for Electric Transport and Field Emission Characterization of Ultrathin MoS2 Flakes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10010106

AMA Style

Iemmo L, Urban F, Giubileo F, Passacantando M, Di Bartolomeo A. Nanotip Contacts for Electric Transport and Field Emission Characterization of Ultrathin MoS2 Flakes. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(1):106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10010106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iemmo, Laura, Francesca Urban, Filippo Giubileo, Maurizio Passacantando, and Antonio Di Bartolomeo. 2020. "Nanotip Contacts for Electric Transport and Field Emission Characterization of Ultrathin MoS2 Flakes" Nanomaterials 10, no. 1: 106. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10010106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop