Next Article in Journal
Biomimetic Transparent Eye Protection Inspired by the Carapace of an Ostracod (Crustacea)
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Mass Loading Hierarchically Porous Activated Carbon Electrode for Pouch-Type Supercapacitors with Propylene Carbonate-Based Electrolyte
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Nanotechnology for Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oxygen Reduction Reaction in the Field of Water Environment for Application of Nanomaterials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/nano11030662
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Defect-Rich Heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS Nanocomposite for Efficient pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution

by
Guangsheng Liu
,
Kunyapat Thummavichai
,
Xuefeng Lv
,
Wenting Chen
,
Tingjun Lin
,
Shipeng Tan
,
Minli Zeng
,
Yu Chen
,
Nannan Wang
* and
Yanqiu Zhu
Guangxi Institute Fullerene Technology (GIFT), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-Ferrous Metals and Featured Materials, School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(3), 662; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030662
Submission received: 7 February 2021 / Revised: 28 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 March 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanocomposites for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Supercapacitor Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has been universally demonstrated to be an effective electrocatalytic catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). However, the low conductivity, few active sites and poor stability of MoS2-based electrocatalysts hinder its hydrogen evolution performance in a wide pH range. The introduction of other metal phases and carbon materials can create rich interfaces and defects to enhance the activity and stability of the catalyst. Herein, a new defect-rich heterogeneous ternary nanocomposite consisted of MoS2, NiS and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are synthesized using ultrathin αNi(OH)2 nanowires as the nickel source. The MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 of optimal formulation in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS only requires 152, 169 and 209 mV of overpotential to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2 (denoted as η10), respectively. The excellent HER performance of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 electrocatalyst can be ascribed to the synergistic effect of abundant heterogeneous interfaces in MoS2/rGO/NiS, expanded interlayer spacings, and the addition of high conductivity graphene oxide. The method reported here can provide a new idea for catalyst with Ni-Mo heterojunction, pH-universal and inexpensive hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalyst.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen energy is expected to be an ideal energy source in the future due to its high energy density and zero pollution [1,2]. Electrolytic water is a simple and effective method to produce high purity hydrogen. High efficiency of hydrogen evolution reaction can be achieved by efficient electrocatalysts such as Pt, which can decrease the activated barrier and accelerate the reaction rate. However, noble electrocatalysts cannot be widely used in industrial hydrogen production because of their high price and scarcity. In view of the above, the development of high efficiency non-noble metal electrocatalysts is of great significance to boost the development of hydrogen energy resources.
Two-dimensional transition metal sulfides (TMDs), such as MoS2, WS2, NiS2 and CoS2, have been widely investigated due to their excellent electrocatalytic properties [3,4,5,6]. Among the materials, MoS2 shows superior catalytic activity and is considered as a promising catalyst due to its low adsorption energy between unsaturated sulfur atoms and hydrogen atoms [7]. Unfortunately, few active sites, intrinsic low conductivity and insufficient stability hinder the HER activity of MoS2 [8]. To solve these problems, various effective methods such as defect and interfaces engineering, structural design and elements doping technique have been introduced for improving electrocatalytic activity of MoS2. Considering that the active site was derived from the Mo-S of edge of MoS2 catalysis, surface defects or interfaces are essential to improve the electrocatalytic activity of catalysts [9,10,11]. Various defect-rich MoS2 electrocatalysts has been previously reported, including doping heteroatom to form various M-Mo-S (M = Co, Ni) structure [12,13,14], interlayer-expanded MoS2 nanosheets [15], N-doped MoS2 nanosheet [16] and addition of excessive sulfur sources [17]. These modified MoS2 structures with poor crystallinity are easily dissolved in acidic solution, resulting in poor electrochemical stability. In addition, due to slow HER kinetics and poor stability in alkaline medium, it is still remaining a big challenge to produce MoS2-based catalysts to meet the industrial requirements.
The kinetics of HER in acidic solution is 2–3 times faster than in alkaline solution due to the large adsorption energy of OH− on the surface of catalyst in alkaline medium and high dissociation energy barrier between MoS2 and water [18,19]. Modifying the MoS2 structure helps to reduce its binding energy to hydroxyl, resulting in the improvement of catalyst HER performance in alkaline medium. Previous studies have demonstrated that NiSx has excellent stability under alkaline conditions, and can form a heterostructure with MoS2 nanosheets to achieve both high catalytic performance and play a protective role for MoS2 [20].
Apart from HER performance, the charge conductivity of MoS2-based catalyst is also another key performance for electrocatalytic materials. Nickel and copper foam materials have been used as conductive substrates and supporting materials, then in situ growth MoS2 nanosheets on their surfaces [21,22,23,24]. This strategy has shown excellent performance in HER and OER processes. Unfortunately, the metal foam in these self-supporting catalysts could be dissolved by acid, which severely limits their widespread use. Carbon materials have excellent electrical conductivity and stability in a wide pH range, such as reduced graphene oxide (rGO), carbon fiber paper and carbon cloth. The reported CoS2@MoS2/rGO [19], MoS2/rGO [25] and Mn/MoS2/rGO [26] catalysts have good catalytic stability and electrocatalytic activity, which owes to the synergetic effect of rGO intrinsic high charge conduction characteristics [23]. Therefore, it is an effective strategy to grow MoS2 on rGO using rGO as conductive substrate.
Herein, defect-rich multiphase MoS2/rGO/NiS nanocomposite catalyst was successfully synthesized using αNi(OH)2 nanowires with excellent catalytic performance and stability over a wide range of pH. The existence of abundant defects and heterogeneous interfaces was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), Raman spectrum and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Furthermore, the optimal MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite exhibited very low overpotential and good stability in 0.5 M H2SO4 (η10 = 152 mV), 1.0 M KOH (η10 = 169 mV) and 1.0 M PBS (η10 = 209 mV), respectively.

2. Results and Discussion

The MoS2/rGO/NiS nanocomposite with rich defects and heterogeneous interfaces was synthesized by two-step hydrothermal method, which is shown in Figure 1. (The detailed synthesized steps were in supporting information). L-cysteine hydrochloride (L-ch, HSCH2CHNH2COOH·HCl·H2O) can conjugate well with graphene oxide (GO) due to its multifunctional groups (-SH, -NH2, -COO). When heated, L-ch can not only be acted as a reductant to reduce Mo6+ to Mo4+, but also expand the interlayer spacing of MoS2 by releasing NH4+ and in situ intercalating into the interlayer of MoS2. The αNi(OH)2 adsorbed on the GO was sandwiched between the GO and the MoS2 nanosheets and was vulcanized into NiS, while the GO was also in situ reduced to reduced graphene oxide (rGO) during the hydrothermal process. Furthermore, the weakly acidic conditions formed by the dissolution of L-ch can dissolve a small amount of αNi(OH)2 and reduce the dissolved Ni2+ to Ni0 and then dope it into MoS2.
The crystal phases change of MoS2 based samples before and after doping GO and αNi(OH)2 are shown in Figure 2a. The diffraction peaks at 33.76°, 35.12° and 57.76°, correspond to (101), (102) and (110) plane of 2H-MoS2 (JPCDS no. 37-1492), respectively. These peaks are broad, indicative of the poorly crystallization of the samples. The standard (002) peak of pristine 2H-MoS2 at 14.4° are not observed in our as-prepared MoS2 samples. Instead, a peak at 9.41° is obtained, which can be ascribed to the insertion of NH4+ into MoS2 structure, suggesting an enlarged d value [27]. According to Bragg’s Law (nλ = 2dsinθ), the spacing between two adjacent S-Mo-S layers are calculated to be about 0.94 nm [28,29]. The (002) diffraction peak of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 shifts toward the lower 2-theta position at 8.5° compare with as-prepared MoS2. The d value is also calculated to be 1.06 nm, in accordance well with the results of TEM (Figure 3e). The reason of (002) peak shift is that graphene oxide may inhibit the growth of MoS2 crystal in the mixed catalyst. The diffraction pattern of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 catalyst also matched well with NiS standard pattern (JCPDS no. 02-1280), suggesting αNi(OH)2 was transformed into NiS. Four broad peaks of NiS located at 30.37°, 34.65°, 45.70° and 53.93° were attributed to (100), (101), (102) and (110) planes, respectively. The XRD spectrum of αNi(OH)2 nanowires is shown in Figure S1a.
Furthermore, the structural characteristics of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 can be obtained from the Raman spectrum in Figure 2. The main peaks at ~402, ~371 and ~296 cm−1 are attributed to A1g, E12g and E1g mode of 2H MoS2, respectively, whereas the peak located at ~345 cm−1 belong to the modes of Ni-S [30,31]. More importantly, three sharp peaks in the range of 800–1000 cm−1 originate from the molecular structure of Mo3S13 located at edge of MoS2. It can be proven that there are abundant unsaturated Mo-S edge sites in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 [19,30]. There are two characteristic peaks at ~1437 and ~1580 cm−1, which are G and D-band of GO, respectively. The degree of graphitization can be expressed by the strength ratio of D and G bands. As shown in Figure 2b, the ID/IG of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 (value of 1.11) is higher than that of GO (value of 0.83), indicating that the defects of GO increase with the reduction of oxygen-containing functional groups and GO is transformed into rGO [4,32].
Large specific surface area is a critical factor to determine the performance of the electrocatalyst of the electrode materials for the HER. The N2 isothermal adsorption desorption curve of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 shows type-IV isotherm (Figure S2), suggesting the existence of both micro-pores and meso-pores [33]. This specific surface area was 20.7 m2 g−1, which benefits from the abundant MoS2 nanosheets wrinkles and small particle size. The morphology of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 was shown in Figure 3 and Figure S3. A large number of as-prepared αNi(OH)2 nanowires are anchored uniformly on the GO substrate (Figure S1d). It is observed that the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 has a 3D crimp structure, which is attributed to the GO curling during hydrothermal process [34]. A large number of ultra-thin MoS2 nanosheets suspended on rGO are presented in Figure 3a–c and Figure S3a,b. Such microstructure is conducive to exposing more marginal catalytic active sites. Further, the TEM images in Figure S3c prove that the microstructure of the nanowires is maintained after the αNi(OH)2 nanowires are vulcanized to NiS. Moreover, the hybrid catalyst has a three-dimensional structure consisting of three layers of rGO, NiS and MoS2. The HRTEM image exhibited lattice fringe with spacing of 1.06 and 0.95 nm, which belonged to the (002) plane of MoS2 (Figure 3e,i). The lattice fringe of ~0.25 nm is indexed to the (101) plane of NiS (Figure 3f,h). Heterogeneous interface between MoS2 and NiS are observed (Figure 3d,g), resulting in rich-defects and disordered structure of our samples. Furthermore, the element mapping of the MoS2/rGO/rGO/NiS-5 hybrid sample is also carried out, which proves that Mo, Ni and S elements are uniformly distributed on rGO nanosheets (Figure 3j). The elemental composition ratio and spectral pattern of the hybrid catalyst are presented in Figure S3.
The chemical states of elements in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite were investigated by XPS. The survey XPS spectrum shows that the samples contain Mo, S, Ni, C, O, and N elements in Figure S4a, which is verified by the results of EDS. From the percentage of atomic orbital, it can be known that 27.39% S 2p bonding with 13.85% Mo 3d and 3.36% Ni 2p orbitals (Figure S4), which indicates the existence of Mo-S defects. Comparing C 1s spectrum in GO sheets and MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite, the two peaks in GO at 286.7 eV and 287.5 eV are ascribed to graphitic sp2 carbon atom and C=O (Figure S4b) [4,35,36]. However, these two peaks disappeared after hydrothermal treatment, which suggests that some of the oxygen-containing functional groups were reduced (Figure 4a). A new peak of C=N in C 1s spectrum of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 appeared at 285.8 eV, which could be due to the part of NH4+ released by L-ch doping for rGO [37,38]. Two main Mo 3d peaks at 228.9 eV and 232.1 eV correspond to 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 of Mo4+, respectively, affirming the dominance of Mo4+ in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite (Figure 4b). Another doublet peak is detected at 233.0 and 235.63 eV, which ascribe to the oxidation state of Mo4+. The peak of S 2s at 226.2 eV indicates the formation of Mo-S and Ni-S bonds [33,39]. For S 2p spectrum (Figure 4c), two types of distinct doublets (2P3/2, 2P1/2) were examined: (1) the peaks at 161.8 eV and 163.4 eV are divided and fitted to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively. (2) Another doublet at 162.9 and 164.5 eV are attributed to the bridging S22− ligands and the apical S2− ligand of the [Mo3S13]2−, in agreement with the result of Raman spectrum [26,37,40]. Two resolved doublets (with a spin-orbits splitting of ~17.3 eV between 2p3/2 and 2p1/2) and two satellites are observed in the spectrum of Ni 2p (Figure 4d). The peaks located at 853.6 eV and 870.9 eV correspond to metallic Ni0 species in the sample; hence, the existence of Ni0 could be due to the reducibility of L-ch. The other two peaks at 856.0 and 873.7 eV in the spectrum are attributed to the presence of Ni2+ component [41,42].
The HER activity of the hybrid catalysts was investigated in different pH electrolyte solutions including 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS. Commercial 20% Pt/C was also examined in different electrolyte solutions. In acidic medium, the electrode coated with pristine MoS2 showed the worst catalytic activity, as shown in Figure 5a. Both MoS2/NiS-5 and MoS2/rGO/NiS-0 samples were exhibited higher catalytic activity and lower overpotential than the pristine MoS2. Hence, the trend of catalytic currents for these doped catalysts is MoS2/rGO/NiS-0 > MoS2/NiS-5 > MoS2. After adding different amounts of αNi(OH)2 into the MoS2/rGO, the activity increased with the increase of αNi(OH)2, whereas the activity decreased when the addition amount of αNi(OH)2 reached 7 mL. The optimal MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 exhibits excellent catalytic performance (η10 = 152 mV) and requires only 212 mV overpotential to achieve a current density of 100 mA cm−2 (denoted as η100) in acidic medium. Interestingly, when the current density is smaller than 40 mA cm−1, the polarization curves of MoS2/rGO/NiS-0 and MoS2/rGO/NiS-3 almost coincide. However, when the current density is more than 40 mA cm−2, the overpotential of MoS2/rGO/NiS-0 is larger than that of MoS2/rGO/NiS-3, which is probably because formed NiS improves the stability of MoS2. The overpotential of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-7 (η10 = 241 mV) is larger than other doped catalysts, which may be due to the fact that the large amount of NiS covers the active site of MoS2.
The MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 exhibits the best HER catalyst activity under alkaline condition, and the overpotential are 169 and 301 mV at current density of 10 and 100 mA cm−2, respectively (Figure 5d). Different from acid medium, the overpotential MoS2/rGO/NiS-7 exhibits the second lowest overpotential in alkaline media (η10 = 357 mV), which is related to the heterogeneous interface between NiS and MoS2 that facilitates the dissociation of water molecules. In neutral condition, the overpotential of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 showed modest overpotential at 10 mA cm−2 (η10 = 209 mV) (Figure 5g).
The Tafel slope was fitted from the LSV curve to evaluate the HER kinetics of as-prepared samples. In 0.5 M H2SO4 (Figure 5b), MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 showed a very small Tafel slope of 54.3 mV/dec, which is close to 32.2 mV/dec of Pt/C. The small Tafel slope indicating that the HER first occur a very fast Volmer step (H3O+ + e− → Hads + H2O), followed by a slow electrochemical desorption Heyrovsky step (Hads + H3O+ + e− → H2 + H2O), and the desorption reaction of hydrogen was the rate limiting step of HER [38,43,44]. Moreover, the Tafel slopes for MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) and Pt/C were 190.4, 186.4, 91.6, 150.1 and 58.3 mV/dec in 1.0 M KOH solution, respectively (Figure 5e). The lower Tafel slope of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 indicates the Volmer-Heyrovsky recombination mechanism of HER and the Volmer step of water splitting into protons and hydroxyls is the main step determining the reaction rate [45]. In 1.0 M PBS, the Tafel slopes of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X and Pt/C were 354.8, 215.7, 141.9, 216.3 and 69.7 mV/dec, respectively (Figure 5h). The results revealed that the rate limiting step of HER for as-prepared samples is slow Volmer step in a neutral medium [44].
The MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite suggests excellent stability in acidic, alkaline and neutral medium, as the polarization curve after 1000 cycles (Figure 5c,f,i), in which the overpotential has only increased by 17, 27 and 23 mV, respectively. Furthermore, chronopotentiometry of catalyst in different media were performed under 10 mA cm−2 current density of for 10 h (as shown in the insets image of Figure 5c,f,i). After ten hours, the overpotential increased by 14.4% (from 163 to 186 mV), 20.8% (from 226 to 273 mV) and 37.9% (from 208 to 287 mV) in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively. These results indicate that the as-prepared MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 has a good stability, and it is more stable under acidic conditions than in alkaline and neutral conditions. Compared with other MoS2-based electrocatalysts reported recently, the MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 has superior performance in acidic and alkaline media (Table 1).
The electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) of as-synthesized catalysts was measured to evaluate the electrochemical active surface areas (ECSA). Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) with various scan rates from 40–200 mV s−1 (Figures S5–S7) were recorded to calculate Cdl. The capacitance current (Δj = ja − jc) and the scanning rates are fitted into a straight line, and the slope of the line is twice the value of Cdl. The slope of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) are 7.1, 9.01, 11.9 and 4.58 mF cm−2 in 0.5 M H2SO4, respectively (Figure 6a). Notably, MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 with the highest Cdl (5.95 mF cm−2) has the largest ECSA compared to other samples, which further demonstrates its excellent HER performance in acidic medium. The MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 (Cdl = 2.76 mF cm−2) exhibits better HER performance than MoS2/rGO/NiS-7 (Cdl = 2.46 mF cm−2) despite that they have similar ECSA in the alkaline medium (Figure 6c), indicating that the catalytic activity is determined by the coordination of hydrogen adsorption and the active sites of water adsorption/dissociation [46]. Similarly, MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 still has the largest Cdl value (1.66 mF cm−2) in neutral media (Figure 6e).
Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) was measured to further investigate the charge-transfer kinetics between electrocatalysts and electrolyte interface (Figure 6b,d,f). The EIS data are fitted to acquire the equivalent circuit patterns (insets in Figure 6b,d,f), where Rs is the solution resistance, the Rc at the high frequency region is related to the pores on the material surface and does not change with the change of overpotential, and the Rct at the low frequency region represents the charge transfer impedance [43]. The results of the fitting data are shown in Tables S1–S3. Evidently, MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 shows the lowest charge transfer resistance value of 19.75, 14.3 and 105.1 ohm in acidic, alkaline and neutral electrolytes, which demonstrate it’s the high electrochemical conductivity. Simultaneously, it can be clearly seen that the Rct of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X in acid solution is much smaller than that of MoS2/NiS-5 (515.2 ohm), which is because the addition of rGO enhances the rate of electrons transfer between the electrode and catalytic active site. Furthermore, experiments show that 5 mL of αNi(OH)2 is the best addition to reduce the impedance of the catalyst. Importantly, the results of EIS studies are in agreement with above results of electrochemical performances studies. These results also confirmed that the abundant heterogeneous interface between NiS and MoS2 allow not only to expose dense catalytic sites but also improves the electron transfer ability of catalytic materials, which further enhance the catalytic activity of electrocatalyst.

3. Conclusions

In this paper, defect-rich heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS nanocomposite for HER has been successfully synthesized using αNi(OH)2 nanowires with excellent catalytic performance and stability over a wide range of pH. The effect of different amounts of NiS on the HER activity of MoS2/rGO were investigated. The results confirmed that defect-rich heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS can be used as an efficient and stable HER catalyst under a universal range of pH electrolyte condition. The optimal MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 electrocatalysts exhibited good stability as well as very low overpotential in 0.5 M H2SO4 (η10 = 152 mV), 1.0 M KOH (η10 = 169 mV) and 1.0 M PBS (η10 = 209 mV), respectively. The outstanding HER performance of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 catalyst can be ascribed mainly to the following three points: (1) the abundant heterogeneous interface between NiS and MoS2 can expose dense catalytic sites and accelerate electron transfer, which synergistically promotes electrocatalytic activity in a wide pH range; (2) the enlarged interlayer spacing of MoS2 exposes more marginal active edge sites; (3) the high intrinsic conductivity of rGO facilitates the rate of charges transfer between electrode and active catalytic site. This work can provide a new idea for designing Ni-Mo heterojunction materials as an efficient and low-cost pH-universal HER electrocatalyst.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2079-4991/11/3/662/s1, Figure S1: (a) XRD spectrum, (b) TEM images and (c) SEM images of αNi(OH)2 nanowires; (d) SEM image of αNi(OH)2 adsorbed on GO, Figure S2: N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size-distribution profiles of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5, Figure S3: (a–c) Low magnification TEM images and (d) TEM-EDS pattern of MoS2/rGO/Ni-5, Figure S4: (a) The survey XPS spectrum of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5; (b) XPS spectrum of C 1s of GO, Figure S5: (a–d) Cyclic voltammograms curves of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) in 0.5 M H2SO4 under 0.36–0.46 V vs. RHE, Figure S6: (a–d) Cyclic voltammetry curves of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) in 1 M KOH under 0.6–0.7 V vs. RHE, Figure S7: Cyclic voltammetry curves of the MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) in 1 M PBS under 0.7–0.8 V vs. RHE. Table S1: The electrochemical impedance fitting results of as-prepared samples in 0.5 M H2SO4, Table S2: The electrochemical impedance fitting results of as-prepared samples in 1 M KOH, Table S3: The electrochemical impedance fitting results of the prepared samples in 1 M PBS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L., K.T., and X.L.; writing-original draft preparation, G.L., W.C., T.L., and Y.C.; experiment, S.T. and M.Z.; funding acquisition, N.W., Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation, grant number 51972068.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (grant NO: 51972068) and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-Ferrous Metals and Featured Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, G.; Jiang, K.; Lin, H.; Ade, H.; Ma, W.; Yan, H. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, X.; Aoki, T.; Pattengale, B.; Huang, J.; He, X.; Bian, W.; Younan, S.; Williams, N. Atomically engineering activation sites onto metallic 1T-MoS2 catalysts for enhanced electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Niu, H.; Zou, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, K.; Ye, K.; Wang, G.; Cao, D.; Yan, J. Structurally stable ultrathin 1T-2H MoS2 heterostructures coaxially aligned on carbon nanofibers toward superhigh-energy-density supercapacitor and enhanced electrocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Guo, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, R.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, T. One-step microwave-hydrothermal preparation of NiS/rGO hybrid for high-performance symmetric solid-state supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 514, 146080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, L.; Huang, W.; Gong, Q.; Liu, C.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Dai, H. Ultrathin WS2 nanoflakes as a high-performance electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7860–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhuo, S.; Shi, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, R.; Shi, L.; Anjum, D.H.; Han, Y.; Wang, P. Dual-template engineering of triple-layered nanoarray electrode of metal chalcogenides sandwiched with hydrogen-substituted graphdiyne. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hinnemann, B.; Moses, P.G.; Bonde, J.; Jorgensen, K.P.; Nielsen, J.H.; Horch, S.; Chorkendorff, I.; Nørskov, J.K. Biomimetic hydrogen evolution:  MoS2 nanoparticles as catalyst for hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5308–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, X.Y.; Lou, X.W. Mixed metal sSulfides for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Winchester, A.; Ghosh, S.; Feng, S.; Elias, A.L.; Mallouk, T.E.; Terrones, M.; Talapatra, S. Electrochemical characterization of liquid phase exfoliated two-dimensional layers of molybdenum disulfide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yu, Y.; Nam, G.H.; He, Q.; Wu, X.J.; Zhang, H. High phase-purity 1T′-MoS2 and 1T′-MoSe2-layered crystals. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, Y.; Han, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, P.; Yuan, Q.; Samad, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Contributions of phase, sulfur vacancies, and edges to the hydrogen evolution reaction catalytic activity of porous molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7965–7972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, X.Y.; Feng, Y.; Jeon, Y.; Guan, B.; Lou, X.W.D.; Paik, U. Formation of Ni-Co-MoS2 nanoboxes with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9006–9011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, L.; Xia, B.Y.; Wang, X.; Lou, X.W. General formation of M-MoS3 (M = Co, Ni) hollow structures with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ming, J.; Yun, K.; Wang, H.; Sun, X. Amorphous Co–Mo–S ultrathin films with low-temperature sulfurization as high-performance electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13731–13735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, M.R.; Chan, M.K.Y.; Sun, Y. Edge-terminated molybdenum disulfide with a 9.4-Å interlayer spacing for electrochemical hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xiao, W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Song, W.; Feng, Y.P.; Gao, D.; Ding, J. Dual-functional N dopants in edges and basal plane of MoS2 nanosheets toward efficient and durable hydrogen evolution. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xie, J.F.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Wang, R.X.; Sun, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, J.; Lou, X.W. Ultrathin nanosheets with additional active edge sites for enhanced electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5807–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, P.; Liu, S.; Dong, R.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, M.; Feng, X. Engineering water dissociation sites in MoS2 nanosheets for accelerated electrocatalytic hydrogen production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2789–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Staszak-Jirkovsky, J.; Malliakas, C.D.; Lopes, P.P.; Danilovic, N.; Kota, S.S.; Chang, K.C.; Genorio, B.; Strmcnik, D.; Stamenkovic, V.R.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Design of active and stable Co-Mo-Sx chalcogels as pH-universal catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lin, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Si, X.; Qi, J.; Cao, J.; Zhong, Z.; Fei, W. Defect-rich heterogeneous MoS2/NiS2 nanosheets electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, B.; Yun, W.; Peng, H.Q.; Yang, R.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, X.; Chun-Sing, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, W. Iron vacancies induced bifunctionality in ultrathin feroxyhyte nanosheets for overall water splitting. Adv. Mater. 2018, 1803144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Pohl, D.; Rellinghaus, B.; Dong, R.; Liu, S.; Zhuang, X.; Feng, X. Interface engineering of MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructures for highly enhanced electrochemical overall-water-splitting activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 6702–6707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. An, T.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Wei, W.; Cui, X.; Alenizi, A.M.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, G. Interlaced NiS2–MoS2 nanoflake-nanowires as efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts in basic solutions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13439–13443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, K.; Lan, Y. In situ growth of a POMOF-derived nitride based composite on Cu foam to produce hydrogen with enhanced water dissociation kinetics. J. Mater. Chem. 2019, 7, 13559–13566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, J.E.; Jung, J.; Ko, T.Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.I.; Nah, J.; Ryu, S.; Nam, K.T.; Lee, M.H. Catalytic synergy effect of MoS2/reduced graphene oxide hybrids for a highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 5480–5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wu, L.; Xu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Sun, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, W.; Du, Y. Mn doped MoS2/reduced graphene oxide hybrid for enhanced hydrogen evolution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 425, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.S. Interlayer nanoarchitectonics of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides nanosheets for energy storage and conversion applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sun, K.; Zeng, L.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Cao, D.; Hou, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Design of basal plane active MoS2 through one-step nitrogen and phosphorus co-doping as an efficient pH universal electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Nano Energy 2019, 58, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miao, J.; Xiao, F.X.; Hong, B.Y.; Si, Y.K.; Liu, B. Hierarchical Ni-Mo-S nanosheets on carbon fiber cloth: A flexible electrode for efficient hydrogen generation in neutral electrolyte. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kibsgaard, J.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Besenbacher, F. Building an appropriate active-site motif into a hydrogen-evolution catalyst with thiomolybdate [Mo3S13]2− clusters. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Strmcnik, D.; Lopes, P.P.; Genorio, B.; Stamenkovic, V.R.; Markovic, N.M. Design principles for hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst materials. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Abdelhamid, A.A.; Yang, X.; Yang, J.; Chen, X.; Ying, J.Y. Graphene-wrapped nickel sulfide nanoprisms with improved performance for Li-ion battery anodes and supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kong, D.; Wang, Y.; von Lim, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.; Chen, T.; Yang, H.Y. 3D hierarchical defect-rich NiMo3S4 nanosheet arrays grown on carbon textiles for high-performance sodium-ion batteries and hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 2018, 26, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, K.; Chen, W. L-cysteine assisted synthesis of layered MoS2/graphene composites with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, D.; Lin, Z.; Sartin, M.M.; Huang, T.X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Li, J.F.; Tian, Z.Q.; Zhan, D. Photosynergetic electrochemical synthesis of graphene oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6516–6520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, J.; Yu, C.; Hu, C.; Wang, M.; Li, S.; Huang, H.; Bustillo, K.; Han, X.; Zhao, C.; Guo, W.; et al. Surface-confined fabrication of ultrathin nickel cobalt-layered double hydroxide nanosheets for high-performance supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ye, J.; Yu, Z.; Chen, W.; Chen, Q.; Ma, L. Ionic-liquid mediated synthesis of molybdenum disulfide/graphene composites: An enhanced electrochemical hydrogen evolution catalyst. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 12049–12061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tong, J.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; Wang, W.; Ma, W.; Su, B.; Bo, L. MoS2 thin sheet growing on nitrogen self-doped mesoporous graphic carbon derived from ZIF-8 with highly electrocatalytic performance on hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 10240–10247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, H.; Zhang, J.; Yanzhang, R.; Du, M.; Wang, Q.; Gao, G.; Wu, J.; Wu, G.; Zhang, M.; Liu, B.; et al. When cubic cobalt sulfide meets layered molybdenum disulfide: A core-shell system toward synergetic electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4752–4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhaojun, L.; Jing, Q.; Moxuan, L.; Shumeng, Z.; Qikui, F.; Hongpo, L.; Kai, L.; Haoquan, Z.; Yadong, Y.; Chuanbo, G. Aqueous synthesis of ultrathin platinum/non-noble metal alloy nanowires for enhanced hydrogen evolution activity. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 11678–11682. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Q.; Shang, L.; Shi, R.; Zhang, X.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Wu, L.-Z.; Tung, C.-H.; Zhang, T. 3D carbon nanoframe scaffold-immobilized Ni3FeN nanoparticle electrocatalysts for rechargeable zinc-air batteries’ cathodes. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tu, Y.; Ren, P.; Deng, D.; Bao, X. Structural and electronic optimization of graphene encapsulating binary metal for highly efficient water oxidation. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anjum, M.A.R.; Jeong, H.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Shin, H.S.; Lee, J.S. Efficient hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis in alkaline media by all-in-one MoS2 with multifunctional active sites. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Solomon, G.; Mazzaro, R.; You, S.; Natile, M.M.; Morandi, V.; Concina, I.; Vomiero, A. Ag2S/MoS2 nanocomposites anchored on reduced graphene oxide: Fast interfacial charge transfer for hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 22380–22389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, G.; Lin, Y.; Rui, K.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, Y.; Dou, S.X.; Sun, W. Epitaxial growth of Ni(OH)2 nanoclusters on MoS2 nanosheets for enhanced alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19074–19081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ojha, K.; Saha, S.; Banerjee, S.; Ganguli, A.K. Efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution from MoS2-functionalized Mo2N nanostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 19455–19461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhu, Y.; Song, L.; Song, N.; Li, M.; Wang, C.; Lu, X. Bifunctional and efficient CoS2–C@MoS2 core–shell nanofiber electrocatalyst for water splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 2899–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ibupoto, Z.H.; Tahira, A.; Tang, P.; Liu, X.; Morante, J.R.; Fahlman, M.; Arbiol, J.; Vagin, M.; Vomiero, A. MoSx@NiO composite nanostructures: An advanced nonprecious catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Huang, H.; Song, J.; Yu, D.; Hao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, S. Few-layer FePS3 decorated with thin MoS2 nanosheets for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline and acidic media. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 525, 146623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Diao, L.; Zhang, B.; Sun, Q.; Wang, N.; Zhao, N.; Shi, C.; Liu, E.; He, C. An in-plane Co9S8@MoS2 heterostructure for the hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 21479–21486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, H.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, L. Hierarchical CoS/MoS2 and Co3S4/MoS2/Ni2P nanotubes for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution in alkaline media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25410–25419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lin, C.; Gao, Z.; Jin, J. Boosting alkaline hydrogen evolution activity with Ni-Doped MoS2/reduced graphene oxide hybrid aerogel. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of synthesized process and structural of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (where X is the volume of αNi(OH)2 added, X = 0, 3, 5, 7).
Figure 1. Schematic of synthesized process and structural of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (where X is the volume of αNi(OH)2 added, X = 0, 3, 5, 7).
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g001
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) nanocomposite and pure MoS2 (b) Raman spectrum of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite and GO.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of MoS2/rGO/NiS-X (X = 0, 3, 5, 7) nanocomposite and pure MoS2 (b) Raman spectrum of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite and GO.
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g002
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g003 550
Figure 3. (a–c) SEM images of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite. (d–i) HRTEM images of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite. (j) HAADF-STEM and corresponding element mapping images in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite.
Figure 3. (a–c) SEM images of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite. (d–i) HRTEM images of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite. (j) HAADF-STEM and corresponding element mapping images in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g003
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) C 1s, (b) Mo 3d, (c) S 2p, and (d) Ni 2p in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of (a) C 1s, (b) Mo 3d, (c) S 2p, and (d) Ni 2p in MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g004
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g005 550
Figure 5. HER catalytic activities of the as-prepared samples. (a,d,g) Polarization curves in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively. (b,e,h) Tafel plots under 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively. (c,f,i) The polarization curves of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 before and after 1000 cycles of voltammetry in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS were compared, respectively. Their insets were chronopotentiometric curves under 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively.
Figure 5. HER catalytic activities of the as-prepared samples. (a,d,g) Polarization curves in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively. (b,e,h) Tafel plots under 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively. (c,f,i) The polarization curves of MoS2/rGO/NiS-5 before and after 1000 cycles of voltammetry in 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS were compared, respectively. Their insets were chronopotentiometric curves under 0.5 M H2SO4, 1.0 M KOH and 1.0 M PBS, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g005
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g006 550
Figure 6. Calculated double-layer capacitance for the samples in (a) 0.5 M H2SO4, (c) 1.0 M KOH and (e) 1.0 M PBS. The Nyquist plots (solid lines), fitting data (dot) and equivalent circuit (inset) of the samples in (b) 0.5 M H2SO4, (d) 1.0 M KOH and (f) 1.0 M PBS.
Figure 6. Calculated double-layer capacitance for the samples in (a) 0.5 M H2SO4, (c) 1.0 M KOH and (e) 1.0 M PBS. The Nyquist plots (solid lines), fitting data (dot) and equivalent circuit (inset) of the samples in (b) 0.5 M H2SO4, (d) 1.0 M KOH and (f) 1.0 M PBS.
Nanomaterials 11 00662 g006
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the MoS2-based catalyst in acidic and alkaline electrolytes.
Table 1. Comparison of the MoS2-based catalyst in acidic and alkaline electrolytes.
CatalystsMediumη(mV) aTafel Slope
(mV/dec)		Loading
(mg/cm−2)		SubstrateRef.
MoS2/rGO/NiS0.5 M H2SO415254.30.353GCthis work
Ag2S/MoS2/rGO0.5 M H2SO419056.00.250GC[44]
MoN-MoS20.5 M H2SO4190590.250GC[46]
CoS2-C@MoS20.5 M H2SO4173610.250GC[47]
Ag2S/MoS20.5 M H2SO4220420.570GC[25]
N-C/MoS20.5 M H2SO4185570.105GC[38]
MoS2/rGO/NiS1 M KOH16991.60.353GCthis work
MoSx@NiO1 M KOH406430.706GC[48]
MoS2@FePS31 M KOH1751272.000NF b[49]
Co9S8@MoS21 M KOH17783.6———GC[50]
Co3S4/MoS2/Ni2P1 M KOH178980.510GC[51]
MoS2/rGO1 M KOH16883.90.566GC[52]
a Overpotential at a current density of 10 mA/cm2. b Nickel foam.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.; Thummavichai, K.; Lv, X.; Chen, W.; Lin, T.; Tan, S.; Zeng, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, N.; Zhu, Y. Defect-Rich Heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS Nanocomposite for Efficient pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 662. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030662

AMA Style

Liu G, Thummavichai K, Lv X, Chen W, Lin T, Tan S, Zeng M, Chen Y, Wang N, Zhu Y. Defect-Rich Heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS Nanocomposite for Efficient pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(3):662. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Guangsheng, Kunyapat Thummavichai, Xuefeng Lv, Wenting Chen, Tingjun Lin, Shipeng Tan, Minli Zeng, Yu Chen, Nannan Wang, and Yanqiu Zhu. 2021. "Defect-Rich Heterogeneous MoS2/rGO/NiS Nanocomposite for Efficient pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution" Nanomaterials 11, no. 3: 662. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop