Next Article in Journal
Z-ajoene from Crushed Garlic Alleviates Cancer-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with the Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Food Group Intake, Cognition, and Academic Achievement in Elementary Schoolchildren
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Fenugreek on Milk Production in Rodent Models of Lactation Challenge
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/nu11112723
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Caesarean Section and its Impact on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

by
Zainab Taha
1,*,
Ahmed Ali Hassan
2,
Ludmilla Wikkeling-Scott
1 and
Dimitrios Papandreou
1
1
Department of Health Sciences, College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, P.O. Box 144534, UAE
2
Taami for Agricultural and Animal Production, Khartoum, Sudan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(11), 2723; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112723
Submission received: 18 October 2019 / Revised: 7 November 2019 / Accepted: 8 November 2019 / Published: 10 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breastfeeding: Short and Long-Term Benefits to Baby and Mother)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the early initiation of breastfeeding. Research shows that factors such as mode of delivery may interfere with the early initiation of breastfeeding. However, data in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on these findings is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of caesarean sections (CSs) and evaluate their effect on breastfeeding initiation among mothers of children under the age of two years in Abu Dhabi. Data were collected in clinical and non-clinical settings across various geographical areas in Abu Dhabi during 2017 using consent and structured questionnaires for interviews with mothers. Data analysis included both descriptive and inferential statistics. Among the 1624 participants, one-third (30.2%) reportedly delivered by CS, of which 71.1% were planned, while 28.9% were emergency CS. More than half of all mothers (62.5%) initiated early breastfeeding. Multivariable logistic regression indicated factors that were associated positively with CS included advanced maternal age, nationality, and obesity. However, gestational age (GA) was negatively associated with CS. This study shows that the prevalence of CS is high in Abu Dhabi, UAE. CS is associated with lower early initiation rates of breastfeeding. The early initiation rates of breastfeeding were 804 (79.2%) 95% confidence interval (CI) (76.4, 82.0), 162 (16.0%) 95% CI (10.4, 21.6), and 49 (4.8%) 95% CI (1.2, 10.8) among vaginal delivery, planned CS, and emergency CS, respectively. Regarding the mode of delivery, vaginal were 2.78 (Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR)): CI (95%), (2.17–3.56, p < 0.001) times more likely related to an early initiation of breastfeeding. CS in general, and emergency CS, was the main risk factor for the delayed initiation of breastfeeding. The study provides valuable information to develop appropriate strategies to reduce the CS rate in UAE. Maternal literacy on CS choices, the importance of breastfeeding for child health, and additional guidance for mothers and their families are necessary to achieve better breastfeeding outcomes.

1. Introduction

The rate of caesarean section (CS) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has increased from 10% in 1995 [1] to 24% in 2014 [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) [3] suggests a CS rate of 10%–15% of all live births, which is significantly lower than those reported in the UAE. Researchers suggest that the mode of delivery influences breastfeeding initiation and duration [4,5], and may influence subsequent breastfeeding and duration [6].
CS is well documented to be associated with suboptimal consequences related to both the mother and her infant’s health [7,8]. Among those consequences reported, endometritis, hemorrhage, cystitis, infant respiratory complications, and hypoglycemia [8,9] may have negative effects on breastfeeding. The effect of CS on the initiation of breastfeeding may be related to the adverse effects of anesthesia for both mothers and their newborns. Maternal distress, which often accompanies CS, may negatively affect the baby’s feeding behaviors and breastfeeding outcomes.
An abundance of studies have shown that mothers who give birth via CS delivery may be less likely to breastfeed, and or more likely to delay breastfeeding initiation [10,11,12]. An early initiation of breastfeeding, i.e., within the first hour after delivery, has been recommended by the WHO as an important factor to extend breastfeeding duration [13,14,15]. An important practice recommended by the WHO, as part of the 10 steps of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI), is skin-to-skin contact [16]. To ensure this practice, the mother and her newborn infant must be conscious and fully awake. Therefore, babies born by CS may not benefit from skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth, and may be more susceptible to delayed breastfeeding [16]. Previous studies have found that delaying breastfeeding initiation that co-occurs with CS delivery is associated with factors such as mother–baby separation, impaired suckling skills, and insufficient milk production. This will ultimately impact the continuation of breastfeeding [10,17,18].
The health benefits of breastfeeding for mother and child have been well documented. Mothers who breastfeed their babies have a reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as breast and ovarian cancers [19]. Moreover, breastfed babies are less likely to develop childhood illnesses and obesity, and have higher levels of intelligence as an adult [20,21].
Following the WHO recommendations [14], the UAE has incorporated the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding, and the Ministry of Health (MOH) has issued a national infant feeding policy [22]. This policy states that infants should be breast fed exclusively until six months of age and continue breastfeeding up to or beyond two years of age [22]. A previous study by Taha et al. revealed a breastfeeding initiation rate of 95.6% and early initiation of 62.5% [23]. However, only 7% of babies were still breastfeeding at six months of age, which prompted the authors to further investigate these findings.
Multiple studies from different countries on the effects of CS versus vaginal delivery on breastfeeding practices have shown contradicting results [24,25,26,27]. While some research has documented major barriers to breastfeeding after CS [28,29,30], other studies have indicated that CS had no effect on breastfeeding initiation [31,32] and duration [33]. Some studies reported that planned CS was associated with delayed breastfeeding [25,34] while others concluded the opposite [35].
Regardless of the discrepancies in previous results, CS will remain a significant and alarming concern, as it influences the initiation of breastfeeding. For a country such as the UAE, which follows the WHO recommendations of infants’ and young children’s feeding, but still encounters increased rates of CS deliveries, further investigation and more implementation is required to improve knowledge about predictive breastfeeding factors. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of CS and evaluate its effect on breastfeeding initiation among mothers of children under the age of two years in Abu Dhabi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Data Collection

The sample for this study is based on secondary data from an original sample of clinical and non-clinical data obtained from mothers with at least one infant under the age of two years. Participants for the original study included UAE nationals and non-nationals in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, which represents 87% of the geographical landmass of the UAE [36]. All data were collected between March and September 2017. The subjects were randomly selected from the community and seven out of a total of 11 maternal and child health centers serving children in Abu Dhabi Capital City (two rural, one suburban, four urban), which provided the possibility of data collection across various areas of Abu Dhabi. Among the 1578 mothers from the clinics who were invited to participate, 1555 mothers agreed and were included in the study. Another 267 mothers from the community also agreed to participate in the study, resulting in a total sample size of 1822 mothers. The geographical distribution of the sample was 54%, 10.8%, and 35.2% of mothers recruited from rural areas, suburban areas, and urban areas respectively.
Mothers with young children attending the centers were approached by the trained bilingual (Arabic and English) female research assistants, who provided oral and written information about the study. Consenting mothers who met the inclusion criteria of having at least one child under two years of age were interviewed by the research assistants using a structured questionnaire.

2.2. Study Instrument

A pre-tested questionnaire included family demographics (e.g., education, age, nationality, occupation), child’s information (e.g., birth weight and height, delivery mode), and infant feeding practices (e.g., initiation of breastfeeding, and rooming-in). Details of the methodology of the primary data have been previously described [23].

2.3. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

From the 1822 mother–child pairs, there were 1624 with complete data on all the variables of interest that were included in the analysis.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Science (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. T-tests and chi-square tests were applied to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively. Variables with significant p-value (<0.05) in univariate analysis were entered in multivariable logistic analysis with mode of delivery (vaginal delivery was coded as 0 and CS was coded as 1) as the dependent variable. In addition, body mass index (BMI) was categorized to underweight, normal, overweight, and obese in order to establish which category was associated with CS. Other variables such as sociodemographic characteristic (e.g., age, parent education, occupation, child gender, etc.) were considered as the independent variables. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a significance level of p-value < 0.05. Furthermore, multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the impact of each mode of delivery (vaginal delivery, planned and emergency CS) on the early initiation of breastfeeding.

2.5. Ethics

The original study from which this data was extracted was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Zayed University UAE (ZU17_006_F). Additional clearance was obtained from the Abu Dhabi Health Services Company. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to any data collection. Several measures were taken to ensure privacy and confidentiality throughout the study period by excluding personal identifiers during data collection.

2.6. Definitions

Early initiation of breastfeeding: when the infant initiated breastfeeding within one hour after birth [37].
Delayed initiation of breastfeeding: when the infant initiated breastfeeding within more than one hour after birth.
Rooming-in: the child stays with mother in the same room during hospital stay.
Exclusive breastfeeding: the infant being fed only breast milk without any other oral intake, except medications and vitamins, for the first six months of life; it was calculated based on the last 24 h.
Breastfeeding support: the support and encouragement from family (mother, husband, other relatives, and other non-relatives) on breastfeeding
Breastfeeding advice and or discussion: any received information, positive or negative things about breastfeeding before or after delivery
Gestational age: a measure of the age of a pregnancy that is taken from the beginning of the woman’s last menstrual period
Preterm birth: the birth of a baby at <37 weeks GA
Arab nationality: all Emirati mothers and other Arab ones
Non-Arab nationality: Asian mothers and other nationalities
Cesarean section: a surgical procedure in which incisions are made through a woman’s abdomen and uterus to deliver her baby

3. Results

Secondary data analysis included 1624 samples from the original study, of which 491 (30.2%) participants reportedly delivered by CS, of which 349 (71.1%) delivered by planned CS, and 142 (28.9%) delivered by emergency CS (Figure 1).
The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the mothers’ age and children’s age were 30.1 (5.2) years and 8.1 months (5.9), respectively. The mean (SD) gestational age at delivery was 39.1 (1.9) weeks, and 6.5% of infants were preterm (GA <37 weeks). More than half (62.5%) of the mothers initiated early breastfeeding. Bivariate analysis showed that child age, birth weight, pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal education, initiation of breastfeeding, and rooming-in were associated with the mode of delivery (Table 1). Exclusive breastfeeding among infants between 0–6 months was 46.5% (332/710).
By using logistic regression analysis, the different impacts of each mode of delivery (vaginal, planned CS, and emergency CS), and their impact on early initiation of breastfeeding, the study findings showed that vaginal delivery mothers were most likely to initiate early breastfeeding, followed by planned CS and emergency CS delivery (Table 3).

4. Discussion

One of the main findings was the high rate of CS (30.2%). This rate is more than double in comparison to the WHO set upper limit of 15% [3], and three times that of rates previously reported in the UAE (10% in 1995%) [1]. These data support the WHO reports that the rate of CS is increasing [2]. The results from this study exceed those for other Arab nations such as Saudi Arabia where a low rate of CS was reported (13.7%) [38] and Sudan (17.8%) [39]. Researchers attributed the varying trend of CS rate among nations to multiple factors including affluence [40], urbanization [40], and increases in preterm births [41]. For example, Boatin et al. [42] reported a low CS rate in South Sudan of 0.6% in comparison to the Dominican Republic, which reported 58.9%. CS rates also vary between public and private hospitals [43,44], which may be attributed to access to care.
This study indicated that non-Arab mothers were 1.3 times more likely to deliver by CS compared to Arab mothers. In multinational countries such as the UAE, the interpretation of such differences requires additional research. It should be noted that maternal age among non-Arab mothers was higher than Arab mothers, which may have contributed to the increased rates of CS in this group.
Advanced GA was found to be a protective factor for CS, (AOR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.86) i.e., full-term babies were less likely to have been delivered by CS in comparison to preterm babies, which is a finding that is supported by previous research [41,45]. In addition, advanced maternal age was found to be associated with preterm birth [46,47,48]. Thus, we can conclude that factors such as advanced maternal age, preterm birth, and nationality are correlated.
In contrast to our results, previous studies have found birth weight [43,49] and maternal education [40,49] to be associated with mode of delivery. Differences in the scope and approach to data collection may limit the ability to adequately compare current results with previous studies and warrant additional research.
As with previous findings [50,51,52], the current study found an increased risk of CS in obese women. However, overweight was not associated with CS, and the findings of the current study were confined to the obese mothers. Regardless of the association between obesity and CS, it is well documented that maternal obesity is associated with a decreased intention and initiation of breastfeeding, a shortened duration of breastfeeding, a less adequate milk supply, and a delayed onset of lactogenesis II, and can thus be considered as a risk factor for adverse breastfeeding outcomes [53,54,55].
In addition to the CS prevalence and its associated factors, including the breastfeeding ones, the study also documented the impact of each mode of delivery on breastfeeding initiation. In line with others, the present results documented CS as a key risk factor for the delayed initiation of breastfeeding [24,28,56,57]. The researchers attributed the delay to many reasons, including pain [28], delayed lactogenesis [56], and feeding the newborn with formula [28,57].
The current study found that women who had a vaginal delivery 4.57 (3.16, 6.61) versus planned CS delivery 1.64 (1.09, 2.46) were four times more likely to initiate breastfeeding early. This finding is in line with several studies that documented vaginal delivery to be associated with an early initiation of breastfeeding [26,28,29,30]. This finding supports previous research that suggests rooming-in as a factor for the early initiation of breastfeeding, and CS decreases that opportunity.
However, controversy exists between planned CS and emergency CS. Some researchers propose that planned CS is associated with a delayed initiation of breastfeeding [34] while others report that emergency CS is associated with a delayed initiation of breastfeeding [35], similar to our findings. The delayed initiation of breastfeeding after emergency CS could be attributed to the stress accompanying the labor and delivery, which is associated with a delayed onset of lactation [35].
Our study is the first of this kind in the UAE, using clinical and non-clinical data to describe CS and the initiation of breastfeeding. Several limitations should be noted. First, maternal indications and/or fetal indications of CS such as fetal distress, the type of anesthesia (general or regional) used during CS, and maternal and child condition such as morbidity and history of hospitalization after delivery by CS were not reported. These issues can affect the mode of delivery and its effect on breastfeeding practices. Future studies are needed to better describe the factors associated with CS in UAE populations.

5. Conclusions

This study suggests that the prevalence of CS is high in Abu Dhabi, UAE and that CS is associated with advanced maternal age, GA, nationality, and obesity. CS, and emergency CS in particular, was the main risk factor for a delayed initiation of breastfeeding. The study provides valuable information to aid with the development of appropriate strategies to reduce the CS rate in the UAE. Maternal literacy on CS choices, the importance of breastfeeding for child health, and additional guidance so that mothers and their families can achieve better breastfeeding outcomes are recommended to ensure successful breastfeeding practices.

Author Contributions

Z.T. designed the study and recruited the participants. Z.T. and A.A.H. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. L.S. and D.P. contributed to the design of the study, data collection, and manuscript writing. All contributing authors of this original manuscript authorized the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded (R17042) by the Research Office at Zayed University.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Abu Dhabi Health Services Company (SEHA) for granting access and approval to seven public ambulatory health care centers across the capital city of Abu Dhabi. We would like to express our gratitude to the mothers for their sincere cooperation and the provision of valuable information. Furthermore, we would like to thank the research assistants Amira Badr Eldin, Razan Abdelrahman, Nahed Yaghi, Nour Mohammed, Dhuha Abdulla Naser, Ayesha Rashed, and Jawaher Saeed for their time and commitment. We appreciate the work done by Teresa Arora on improving the English language. Special thanks go to Malin Garemo and Joy Nanda for their technical assistance in the study design.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2005 Statistical Annex; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. World health Statistics 2015; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith, L.J. Impact of birthing practices on the breastfeeding dyad. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2007, 52, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Procianoy, R.S.; Fernandes-Filho, P.H.; Lazaro, L.; Sartori, N.C. Factors affecting breastfeeding: The influence of caesarean section. J. Trop. Pediatr. 1984, 30, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jaafar, S.H.; Ho, J.J.; Lee, K.S. Rooming-in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, Cd006641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bodner, K.; Wierrani, F.; Grunberger, W.; Bodner-Adler, B. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2011, 283, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wax, J.R. Maternal request cesarean versus planned spontaneous vaginal delivery: Maternal morbidity and short term outcomes. Semin. Perinatol. 2006, 30, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karlstrom, A.; Lindgren, H.; Hildingsson, I. Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: Findings from a Swedish case-control study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 479–486; discussion 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rowe-Murray, H.J.; Fisher, J.R. Baby friendly hospital practices: Cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breastfeeding. Birth 2002, 29, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Watt, S.; Sword, W.; Sheehan, D.; Foster, G.; Thabane, L.; Krueger, P.; Landy, C.K. The effect of delivery method on breastfeeding initiation from the The Ontario Mother and Infant Study (TOMIS) III. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2012, 41, 728–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Esteves, T.M.; Daumas, R.P.; Oliveira, M.I.; Andrade, C.A.; Leite, I.C. Factors associated to breastfeeding in the first hour of life: Systematic review. Rev. Saude Publica 2014, 48, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Meedya, S.; Fahy, K.; Kable, A. Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: A literature review. Women Birth 2010, 23, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Revised, Updated and Expanded for Integrated Care; World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moore, E.R.; Bergman, N.; Anderson, G.C.; Medley, N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 11, Cd003519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patel, R.R.; Liebling, R.E.; Murphy, D.J. Effect of operative delivery in the second stage of labor on breastfeeding success. Birth 2003, 30, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zanardo, V.; Pigozzo, A.; Wainer, G.; Marchesoni, D.; Gasparoni, A.; Di Fabio, S.; Cavallin, F.; Giustardi, A.; Trevisanuto, D. Early lactation failure and formula adoption after elective caesarean delivery: Cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013, 98, F37–F41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ip, S.; Chung, M.; Raman, G.; Chew, P.; Magula, N.; DeVine, D.; Trikalinos, T.; Lau, J. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 2007, 153, 1–186. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yan, J.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, G.; Wang, P.P. The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Victora, C.G.; Horta, B.L.; Loret de Mola, C.; Quevedo, L.; Pinheiro, R.T.; Gigante, D.P.; Goncalves, H.; Barros, F.C. Association between breastfeeding and intelligence, educational attainment, and income at 30 years of age: A prospective birth cohort study from Brazil. Lancet Glob. Health 2015, 3, e199–e205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Taha, Z. Trends of breastfeeding in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Arab. J. Nutr. Exerc. 2017, 2, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Taha, Z.; Garemo, M.; Nanda, J. Patterns of breastfeeding practices among infants and young children in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Int Breastfeed. J. 2018, 13, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Perez-Rios, N.; Ramos-Valencia, G.; Ortiz, A.P. Cesarean delivery as a barrier for breastfeeding initiation: The Puerto Rican experience. J. Hum. Lact. 2008, 24, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prior, E.; Santhakumaran, S.; Gale, C.; Philipps, L.H.; Modi, N.; Hyde, M.J. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 1113–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Perez-Escamilla, R.; Maulen-Radovan, I.; Dewey, K.G. The association between cesarean delivery and breast-feeding outcomes among Mexican women. Am. J. Public Health 1996, 86, 832–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Brown, A.; Jordan, S. Impact of birth complications on breastfeeding duration: An internet survey. J. Adv. Nurs. 2013, 69, 828–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Albokhary, A.A.; James, J.P. Does cesarean section have an impact on the successful initiation of breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia? Saudi. Med. J. 2014, 35, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Badaya, N.; Jain, S.; Kumar, N. Time of initiation of breastfeeding in various modes of delivery and to observe the effect of low birth weight and period of gestation on initiation of breastfeeding. Int. J. Contemp. Pediatr. 2018, 5, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Regan, J.; Thompson, A.; DeFranco, E. The influence of mode of delivery on breastfeeding initiation in women with a prior cesarean delivery: A population-based study. Breastfeed. Med. 2013, 8, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kiani, S.N.; Rich, K.M.; Herkert, D.; Safon, C.; Perez-Escamilla, R. Delivery mode and breastfeeding outcomes among new mothers in Nicaragua. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2018, 14, e12474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hassan, A.A.; Taha, Z.; Ahmed, M.A.A.; Ali, A.A.A.; Adam, I. Assessment of initiation of breastfeeding practice in Kassala, Eastern Sudan: A community-based study. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2018, 13, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rabiepoor, S.; Sadeghi, E.; Hamidiazar, P. The relationship between type of delivery and successful breastfeeding. Int. J. Paediatr. 2017, 5, 4899–4907. [Google Scholar]
  34. Palla, H.; Kitsantas, P. Mode of delivery and breastfeeding practices. Int. J. Pregnancy Child Birth 2017, 2, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  35. Grajeda, R.; Perez-Escamilla, R. Stress during labor and delivery is associated with delayed onset of lactation among urban Guatemalan women. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3055–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abu Dhabi Government. Abu Dhabi Emirate: Facts and Figures; Abu Dhabi Government: Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2018.
  37. World Health Organization. Protecting, Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding in Facilities Providing Maternity and Newborn Services; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ghadeer, Z.; Abdullah, A.; Afnan, B.; Abdullah, A.; Abrar, H.; Hanoof, A.; Aeshah, A.; Fatimah, A.; Duaa, F.; Amair, A. Prevalence of caesarean section and its indicating factors among pregnant women attending delivery at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah city during 2016. EC Gynaecol. 2018, 7, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  39. Elmugabil, A.; Rayis, D.A.; Hassan, A.A.; Ali, A.A.A.; Adam, I. Epidemiology of cesarean delivery in Kassala, Eastern Sudan: A community-based study 2014–2015. Sudan JMS 2016, 11, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  40. Khan, M.N.; Islam, M.M.; Shariff, A.A.; Alam, M.M.; Rahman, M.M. Socio-demographic predictors and average annual rates of caesarean section in Bangladesh between 2004 and 2014. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Barros, F.C.; Rabello Neto, D.L.; Villar, J.; Kennedy, S.H.; Silveira, M.F.; Diaz-Rossello, J.L.; Victora, C.G. Caesarean sections and the prevalence of preterm and early-term births in Brazil: Secondary analyses of national birth registration. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e021538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boatin, A.A.; Schlotheuber, A.; Betran, A.P.; Moller, A.B.; Barros, A.J.D.; Boerma, T.; Torloni, M.R.; Victora, C.G.; Hosseinpoor, A.R. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: Observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ 2018, 360, k55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Al Rifai, R. Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: Analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012. Glob. Health Sci. Pract. 2014, 2, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Einarsdottir, K.; Haggar, F.; Pereira, G.; Leonard, H.; de Klerk, N.; Stanley, F.J.; Stock, S. Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: A cohort study. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e002789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Delnord, M.; Blondel, B.; Drewniak, N.; Klungsoyr, K.; Bolumar, F.; Mohangoo, A.; Gissler, M.; Szamotulska, K.; Lack, N.; Nijhuis, J.; et al. Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: An international comparison. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cavazos-Rehg, P.A.; Krauss, M.J.; Spitznagel, E.L.; Bommarito, K.; Madden, T.; Olsen, M.A.; Subramaniam, H.; Peipert, J.F.; Bierut, L.J. Maternal age and risk of labor and delivery complications. Matern. Child. Health J. 2015, 19, 1202–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fuchs, F.; Monet, B.; Ducruet, T.; Chaillet, N.; Audibert, F. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waldenstrom, U.; Cnattingius, S.; Vixner, L.; Norman, M. Advanced maternal age increases the risk of very preterm birth, irrespective of parity: A population-based register study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Apanga, P.A.; Awoonor-Williams, J.K. Predictors of caesarean section in northern Ghana: A case-control study. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2018, 29, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cresswell, J.A.; Campbell, O.M.; De Silva, M.J.; Slaymaker, E.; Filippi, V. Maternal obesity and Caesarean delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2016, 21, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ovesen, P.; Rasmussen, S.; Kesmodel, U. Effect of prepregnancy maternal overweight and obesity on pregnancy outcome. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 118, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tsvieli, O.; Sergienko, R.; Sheiner, E. Risk factors and perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated with cephalopelvic disproportion: A population-based study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012, 285, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Donath, S.M.; Amir, L.H. Maternal obesity and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: Data from the longitudinal study of Australian children. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2008, 4, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramji, N.; Quinlan, J.; Murphy, P.; Crane, J.M. The impact of maternal obesity on breastfeeding. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2016, 38, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Verret-Chalifour, J.; Giguere, Y.; Forest, J.-C.; Croteau, J.; Zhang, P.; Marc, I. Breastfeeding initiation: Impact of obesity in a large Canadian perinatal cohort study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Isik, Y.; Dag, Z.O.; Tulmac, O.B.; Pek, E. Early postpartum lactation effects of cesarean and vaginal birth. Ginekol. Pol. 2016, 87, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Chen, C.; Yan, Y.; Gao, X.; Xiang, S.; He, Q.; Zeng, G.; Liu, S.; Sha, T.; Li, L. Influences of Cesarean Delivery on Breastfeeding Practices and Duration: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Hum. Lact. 2018, 34, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 11 02723 g001 550
Figure 1. Study participants flow chart and main findings.
Figure 1. Study participants flow chart and main findings.
Nutrients 11 02723 g001
Table
Table 1. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with caesarean section among mothers with children two years old and younger in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Table 1. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with caesarean section among mothers with children two years old and younger in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Variables Mode of Delivery
Total
(n = 1624)		Vaginal
(n = 1133)		CS
(n = 491)
Mean
(SD), range		Mean
(SD)		Mean
(SD)		p-Value
Maternal age, years30.1(5.2)29.9(5.3)31.0(4.8)<0.001
Child age, months (median 6, interquartile range 9) 8.1(5.9)8.3(6.0)7.6(5.7)0.042
Gestational age, weeks39.1(1.9)39.4(1.7)38.6(2.1)<0.001
Birth weight, grams3079(518)3110(463)3008(621)<0.001
Mother pre-pregnancy BMI23.9(3.8), (15.2, 64.9)23.7(3.7)24.3(4.2)0.002
N%N%N%
Child Gender
 Male
 Female		79949.256049.423948.70.781
82550.857350.625251.3
Nationality by category
 Arab
 Non-Arab		105665.075766.729960.90.049
56835.037633.319239.1
Marital status
 Married
 Unmarried		160298.6111698.548699.00.440
221.4171.551.0
Initiation of breastfeeding
 Delayed initiated
 Early initiated		60937.532929.028057.0< 0.001
101562.580471.021143.0
Rooming-in
 Yes
 No		156296.2110197.246193.90.002
623.8322.8306.1
Mother’s education
 <Secondary level
 ≥secondary level		654.0534.7122.40.035
155996.0108095.347997.6
Father’s education
 <Secondary level
 ≥secondary level		311.9232.081.60.588
159398.1111098.048398.4
Mother occupation
 Housewives
 Employed		100862.169561.331363.70.533
61637.943838.717836.3
Child order
 1st order
 >1st order		103863.939935.218738.10.269
103863.930461.930461.9
Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that several factors were positively associated with caesarean section (CS). These included: advanced maternal age (Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02, 1.07), nationality (non-Arab) (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.65), and body mass index (BMI) status (obesity) (AOR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.15, 2.79). Gestational age (GA); however, (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.86) was found to be negatively associated with CS (Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Multivariable logistic regression analyses of factors associated with caesarean section among mothers with children two years old and younger in Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Table 2. Multivariable logistic regression analyses of factors associated with caesarean section among mothers with children two years old and younger in Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp-Value
Advanced maternal age, years 1.041.02, 1.07< 0.001
Gestational age, weeks 0.800.75, 0.86<0.001
Child’s birth weight, grams 1.001.00, 1.000.283
Nationality Non-Arab 1.361.08, 1.710.009
Arab Reference
Maternal education ≥Secondary 1.880.94, 3.750.072
<Secondary Reference
Mother pre-pregnancy BMIUnderweight (<18.5)1.120.56, 2.260.746
Normal (18.5–24.9)Reference
Overweight (25–29.9)1.100.85, 1.420.477
Obese (≥30)1.791.15, 2.790.010
From the total (1624), 1133 (69.8%), 349 (21.5%), and 142 (8.7%) delivered vaginally, by planned CS and by emergency CS, respectively. Among mothers who initiated breastfeeding early (1015), the rates of an early initiation of breastfeeding were 804 (79.2%) 95% CI (76.4, 82.0), 162 (16.0%) 95% CI (10.4, 21.6), and 49 (4.8%) 95% CI (1.2, 10.8) for vaginal deliveries, planned CS, and emergency CS, respectively.
Table
Table 3. Impact of mode of delivery (vaginal delivery, planned CS, and emergency CS) in comparison to each other on an early initiation of breastfeeding using logistic regression analysis.
Table 3. Impact of mode of delivery (vaginal delivery, planned CS, and emergency CS) in comparison to each other on an early initiation of breastfeeding using logistic regression analysis.
Mode of Delivery95% Confidence Interval (CI)p-ValueAOR 1
(95% CI)		p-ValueAOR
(95% CI)		p-Value
Vaginal delivery4.5
(3.16, 6.61)		< 0.0012.78 (2.17, 3.56)< 0.001Reference
Planned CS1.64
(1.09, 2.46)		0.017Reference0.36
(0.28, 046) 		< 0.001
Emergency CSReference0.61
(0.41, 0.91)		0.0170.22
(0.15, 0.32)		< 0.001
1 AOR: Adjusted for advance maternal age, gestational age, and mother’s BMI.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taha, Z.; Ali Hassan, A.; Wikkeling-Scott, L.; Papandreou, D. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Caesarean Section and its Impact on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2723. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu11112723

AMA Style

Taha Z, Ali Hassan A, Wikkeling-Scott L, Papandreou D. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Caesarean Section and its Impact on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Nutrients. 2019; 11(11):2723. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu11112723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taha, Zainab, Ahmed Ali Hassan, Ludmilla Wikkeling-Scott, and Dimitrios Papandreou. 2019. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Caesarean Section and its Impact on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates" Nutrients 11, no. 11: 2723. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu11112723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop