Next Article in Journal
Immunotoxicity of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Insights into Short-Chain PFAS Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Prenatal Exposure to Chemical Mixtures and Inhibition among Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Protein Adduction in Toxic Neuropathies of Exogenous and Endogenous Origin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organophosphate Pesticide Exposures in Early and Late Pregnancy Influence Different Aspects of Infant Developmental Performance

by
Boonsita Suwannakul
1,
Ratana Sapbamrer
1,2,*,
Natrujee Wiwattanadittakul
3 and
Surat Hongsibsong
2,4
1
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthavaroros, Sri Phum Subdistrict, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Non Communicable Diseases Center of Excellence, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthavaroros Road, Sriphum Subdistrict, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthavaroros, Sri Phum Subdistrict, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
School of Health Science Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthavaroros, Sri Phum Subdistrict, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 2 March 2021 / Revised: 24 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prenatal Exposures and Children’s Health)

Abstract

:
Organophosphate (OP) pesticides can transfer from mother to fetus via the placenta and amniotic fluid and may affect the development of infants. This study aims to evaluate the associations between maternal OP concentrations collected in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and the infant developmental performance. The Screening Test of the Bayley Scales of Infants and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID–III screening test) was used to assess development performance at 2 and 6 months of age. Multiple regression analysis showed a negative correlation between cognitive performance at 2 months and maternal diethylthiophosphate (DETP) levels in the 1st–2nd trimester (β ± SE = −0.012 ± 0.004, p < 0.05). We also found that expressive communication and fine motor performance at 6 months were negatively associated with maternal diethyldithiophosphate (DEDTP) levels in the 3rd trimester (β ± SE = −0.047 ± 0.016, p < 0.05, and β ± SE = −0.044 ± 0.017, p < 0.05, respectively). These results suggest that maternal ethylated OP concentrations at different timing of exposure during pregnancy may influence different aspects of infant developmental performance.

1. Introduction

Organophosphate (OP) pesticides are a class of insecticide commonly used for agricultural purposes to control pests. Chronic low-dose exposure to OP pesticides such as occupational exposure could induce long-term adverse health effects through a non-cholinergic process. Some of these effects could include cytotoxicity, cytoarchitectural abnormalities, neuroinflammation, abnormal energy homeostasis and neurotransmission, and blood–brain barrier impairment [1]. Prenatal exposure to OP pesticides is potentially deleterious to the fetus since these chemicals can be passed to the fetus via the placenta and amniotic fluid [2]. Fetuses and young children are more susceptible to the neurotoxic effects of OP than adults as the human central nervous system, especially the brain, is undergoing rapid growth and development during the fetal period [3]. Fetuses and young children also have lower levels of detoxifying enzymes making the deactivation of OP less effective [4]. It has been shown that accumulation of OP in the placenta may disrupt fetal development. A recent study reported that maternal urinary OP concentrations collected during early and mid–pregnancy were inversely associated with fetal length and weight in mid–pregnancy [5]. Prenatal OP exposure had also been shown to have impact on birth outcomes and child neurodevelopment. Several previous studies described the relationships between maternal urinary OP metabolites and adverse birth outcomes including shortened gestation age, low birth weight, and smaller head circumference [6,7,8,9].
Repeated low-level exposure to OP pesticides during the fetal period induced long term consequences for the lifetime neurodevelopment of the offspring. These consequences included abnormal primitive reflexes in newborns and mental and motor delays among preschoolers [10,11,12,13]. However, the findings of these prior epidemiologic studies are contradictory, perhaps due to the timing of exposures. The majority of previous studies had examined the association between child neurodevelopment with only one OP exposure biomarker sample detected from maternal spot urine collected in the second or third trimester of pregnancy [14,15] or from umbilical cord blood, collected at delivery [13,16]. For example, a study by Engel et al. (2011) found that maternal total dialkylphosphate (DAP) concentrations in mid–pregnancy were negatively associated with cognitive development [14] while another study found that higher OP metabolite concentrations in a mother in late pregnancy were significantly associated with reduced motor and cognitive composite scores [15]. Some prior studies also indicated the average OP concentration from two maternal spot urine samples collected in the same or different trimesters of pregnancy were related to infant developmental performance [17,18]. A study by Eskenazi et al. (2007) found a significant negative association between the average prenatal total DAP levels collected in the 2nd trimester and Mental Development Index (MDI) scores at 24 months of age [17]. These results were inconsistent with those reported in a study by Donauer et al. (2016) which found no significant associations between average prenatal OP metabolites collected in the 2nd and 3rd trimester and cognition at 1–5 years of age [18]. One study used two maternal spot urine samples collected at the different time points of pregnancy [19]. However, these authors found no significant relationship between prenatal urinary metabolite level of OP insecticides in both 2nd and 3rd trimesters and child neurodevelopment [19].
Despite the inconsistent findings of the previous studies there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the timing of exposure to OP played a critical role in overall fetal development and neurodevelopment of infants and young children. We hypothesized that exposure to OP pesticides at different stages of pregnancy may exert different impacts on infant developmental performance. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between prenatal exposure to OP pesticides at two distinct time points and infant developmental performance among pregnant women living in an agricultural community in Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. Measurements included six DAP metabolite concentrations collected once in the 1st–2nd trimester and again in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, with infants developmental performance being analysed at 2 and 6 months of age.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This birth cohort study was conducted from September 2019 to December 2020. Ninety pregnant women aged 18–35 years old and their infants were recruited. All participants lived in agricultural areas which included Galyani Vadhana, Samoeng, and Chiang Dao Districts, Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. Inclusion criteria were gestation less than 28 weeks, healthy and had no major adverse health conditions which would affect child outcomes or neurodevelopment (such as thalassemia, diabetes, and hypertension), and spoke Thai as their primary language. After selection, the objectives and protocols of the study were explained to the pregnant women. All of the pregnant women had volunteered to participate and provided written informed consent before participation in the study.

2.2. Data Collection

The pregnant women were interviewed twice. The questionnaires were administered in Thai. In the first interview (at the first visit), following information was collected: (1) demographic data of pregnant women (age, gestation age, weight, height, education level, and family income); (2) health condition (underlying disease, medication, drugs/ alcohol use during pregnancy, utero smoke exposure); (3) source of pesticide exposure (household insecticide use, fresh fruit/ vegetable consumption, and distance from residence to farm); and (4) agricultural work characteristics (agricultural work during pregnancy and frequency of agricultural work during pregnancy). At the second interview (at 2 months after delivery), data was collected regarding the birth history (gestation age at birth, delivery procedure, complications, and serious medical condition). Birth outcome data including body weight, body length, and head circumference were extracted from medical records.
Pregnant women collected 50 mL of two spot urine samples, one at the first visit (the 1st–2nd trimester of pregnancy or gestation age < 28 weeks) and another at the second visit (the 3rd trimester of pregnancy or gestation age > 28 weeks). The urine samples were collected in polypropylene containers and stored at 2–3 °C in cooler boxes until shipment to the laboratory of the Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University on the day of collection. Urine specimens were aliquoted into 12 mL portions and stored at −20 °C until analysis.

2.3. Measurement of Urinary OP Metabolites

The gas chromatography–flame photometric detection (GC–FPD) method was used for analyzing the six nonspecific dialkylphosphate (DAP) metabolites of OP pesticides [20]. The six DAP metabolites were diethylphosphate (DEP), diethylthiophosphate (DETP), diethyldithiophosphate (DEDTP), dimethylphosphate (DMP), dimethylthiophosphate (DMTP), and dimethyldithiophosphate (DMDTP). The sum of all metabolites represented total DAP. The concentrations of all metabolites were adjusted against creatinine levels and presented in nanomoles per gram of creatinine (nmole/g creatinine). The levels of creatinine in urine samples were determined based on the Jaffe reaction [21]. The limitation of detection (LOD) ranged from 0.1 µg/L for DETP to 2.5 µg/L for DMP and the limitation of quantification (LOQ) ranged from 0.5 µg/L for DETP to 12.5 µg/L for DMP. The metabolite levels below LOD were reported as a value of LOD divided by the square root of two [22].

2.4. Developmental Performance Assessment

The Screening Test of the Bayley Scales of Infants and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID–III screening test) was used to assess infant’s developmental performance at 2 and 6 months of age. Testing was carried out by a physical therapist who had been trained in administration and scoring by an experienced pediatric physical therapist. The BSID–III screening test items included subtests of the cognition, language, and motor items of the Bayley Scales of Infants and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID–III). This screening test consists of five subtests: (1) cognitive subtests (33 items) that assess attention, novelty preference and habituation, problem–solving, exploration and manipulation, play, object relatedness, and concept formation; (2) receptive communication subtests (24 items) that assess auditory acuity, vocabulary development, and vocabulary related to morphological development; (3) expressive communication subtests (24 items) that assess preverbal communication, vocabulary development, and morpho–syntactic development; (4) fine motor subtests (27 items) that assess prehension, perceptual–motor integration, and functional hand skills; and (5) gross motor subtests (28 items) that assess static positioning, dynamic movement, balance, and motor planning. The number of test–items depends on the child’s age. The child’s score on the BSID–III screening test enables the practitioner to identify whether or not the child is at risk of developmental delay and further evaluation is needed. The summary score for each subtest was determined using the BSID–III subtest cut scores regarding the child’s age and classified into ‘competent’, ‘emerging’, and ‘at risk’ categories. If the child scores in the ‘competent’ category, the child is considered to be at low risk of developmental delay and in most cases does not need further evaluation. If the child scores in the ‘emerging’ category, it means that the child is considered to be at some risk of developmental delay; however, the need for further evaluation should be made in light of all information collected about the child. If the child scores in the ‘at risk’ category, it is most likely that the child needs further evaluation using an appropriate comprehensive evaluation tool such as the full BSID–III [23,24].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics version 22.0. Descriptive statistics have been used to present the demographic data of pregnant women and their infants, and BSID–III screening test scores of infants at 2 and 6 months of age. Paired sample t-tests (or Wilcoxon test for the non–parametric test) were used to compare the differences between the urinary OP metabolites in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. The BSID–III screening test scores were examined for the normality distribution by using histograms and we found that each subtest scores had a normal distribution. The potential demographic covariates of BSID–III screening test scores that were examined for association, and included in the multiple regression analysis if p < 0.2, were: maternal age, gestation age, body mass index, parity, maternal education, occupation, family income, alcohol use during pregnancy, utero smoke exposure, household insecticide use, fresh fruit/vegetable consumption, distance from residence to farm, agricultural work during pregnancy, frequency of agricultural work during pregnancy, and infant gender. A multiple linear regression model was then built to examine the association between maternal urinary OP metabolites (DEP, DETP, DEDTP, DMP, DMTP, DMDTP, and total DAP) in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and infant developmental screening scores of BSID–III screening test (cognitive, receptive communication, expressive communication, fine motor, and gross motor scores) at 2 and 6 months of age, after controlling for the identified potential demographic covariates including maternal age, parity, maternal education, utero smoke exposure, and fresh fruit/vegetable consumption. The OP metabolites were investigated individually in each multiple linear regression model. The Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was applied for adjusting the false discovery rate (FDR) [25]. Multiple testing raw p-values and FDR adjusted p-values were reported for each association. Findings were considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05.

2.6. Ethical Approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Ethical Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (protocol code 221/2562 and date of approval 26 July 2019), before data collection began.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Mothers and Infants in the Agricultural Community

We included 90 healthy pregnant women in the study. Two participants were excluded from analysis due to threatened miscarriage before the second visit (in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy for collected the second spot urine sample) therefore 88 infants underwent developmental performance testing. The demographics data are reported in Table 1. Almost all participants (80.7%) were agricultural workers and most reported working in the fields during pregnancy (70.5%). 70.5% worked during the 1st trimester, 60.23% worked during the 2nd trimester, and 30.68% worked during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Most participants (73.9%) lived near the farmland.
The results indicated that the mean values of all birth outcomes were within the normal range of national growth reference values for Thai children [26]. However, we found that 9.1% of newborns were premature with a gestation age at birth of less than 37 weeks, 4.6% of newborns had low birth weight (<2500 g), 8.0% of newborns had low birth height (<48 cm), and 18.2% of newborns had a head circumference less than the reference range (<32 cm).

3.2. Urinary OP Metabolites Levels in Pregnant Women in the Agricultural Community

All urinary OP metabolite concentrations were examined for the normality distribution by using histograms and we found that each metabolite concentrations had not normally distributed. A paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare urinary OP metabolite concentrations across the two time points. We found that the number of samples with detectable levels of DMDTP was 0%. Therefore, we removed DMDTP from the analysis. The results indicated that all of the urinary OP metabolite levels in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy were significantly higher than the urinary OP metabolite levels in the 1st–2nd trimester of pregnancy (Table 2). The correlation coefficients for the different OP metabolites were evaluated by using Pearson correlation test. In the 1st–2nd trimester, the correlations between DEP and DMP (r = 0.633, p = 0.000), DETP and DEDTP (r = 0.352, p = 0.001), DEDTP and DMTP (r = 0.491, p = 0.000), and DMP and DMTP (r = 0.317, p = 0.003) were found. We also found the correlations between DEP and DETP (r = 0.663, p = 0.000), DEP and DEDTP (r = 0.317, p = 0.003), DETP and DEDTP (r = 0.305, p = 0.004), and DMP and DMTP (r = 0.335, p = 0.001) in the 3rd trimester (Table 3).

3.3. BSID–III Screening Test Scores of Infants at 2 and 6 Months of Age

The BSID–III screening test scores of the 88 infants at 2 and 6 months of age are shown in Table 4. When determining the infant’s performance summary score of each subtest at 2 months of age using the BSID–III subtest cut scores, we found that 27.3% of them were classified as ‘competent’ in the cognitive subtest, 67% in the receptive communication subtest, 44.3% in the expressive communication subtest, 13.6% in a fine motor subtest, and 43.2% in a gross motor subtest, while 72.7%, 33%, 55.7%, 86.4%, and 56.8% of infants respectively were categorized as at ‘emerging’ risk in the above subtest sequences. At 6 months of age, 33% of them were classified as ‘competent’ in a cognitive subtest, 60.2% in receptive communication subtest, 46.6% in expressive communication subtest, 19.3% in a fine motor subtest, and 51.1% in a gross motor subtest, while 53.4%, 35.2%, 43.2%, 70.5%, and 30.7% of infants respectively were categorized as at ‘emerging’ risk in the above subtest sequences. Lastly, 5–20% of 6 months old infants were determined to be ‘at risk’ to developmental delay in cognitive subtest (13.6%), receptive communication subtest (4.5%), expressive communication subtest (10.2%), fine motor subtest (10.2%), and gross motor subtest (18.2%).

3.4. Association between Maternal Urinary OP Metabolites in the 1st–2nd Trimester and the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy and Infant Developmental Screening Scores at 2 and 6 Months of Age

Multiple linear regression analysis of the association between each maternal urinary OP metabolites (DEP, DETP, DEDTP, DMP, DMTP, and total DAP) and each infant developmental screening scores of BSID–III screening test (cognitive, receptive communication, expressive communication, fine motor, and gross motor scores) were performed with adjustment for the identified potential covariates. The potential covariates included maternal age, parity, maternal education, utero smoke exposure, and fresh fruit/vegetable consumption. The results indicated that cognitive performance at 2 months was negatively associated with maternal DETP levels in the 1st–2nd trimester of pregnancy (β ± SE = −0.012 ± 0.004, p < 0.05) (Table 5). We also found that expressive communication and fine motor performance at 6 months were negatively associated with maternal DEDTP levels in the 3rd trimester (β ± SE = −0.047 ± 0.016, p < 0.05, and β ± SE = −0.044 ± 0.017, p < 0.05, respectively) (Table 6). However, we found no significant relationships between methylated OP metabolites (DMP and DMTP) and total DAP concentrations and infant developmental screening scores of BSID–III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age.

4. Discussion

In this study, we reported the levels of urinary OP metabolites in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy among 88 pregnant women living in the agricultural community. We also identified the associations between prenatal OP metabolite levels in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and infant developmental screening scores of BSID–III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age. We found that maternal DEP is the most common metabolite detected in the urine at both periods of detection. The ethylated OP metabolites have parent compounds such as chlorpyrifos, parathion, diazinon, phorate, and ethion. In Thailand, OP is the most frequently imported insecticide and is widely used in farm tasks [27]. In addition, chlorpyrifos was the most commonly found and was also the one detected at the highest level in vegetables in Thailand [28]. In the present study, most of the pregnant women reported that they had carried out agricultural work during pregnancy and lived near farmland. Therefore, the high level of urinary DEP detectable in these pregnant women might be caused by exposure to OP pesticides from the environment, fresh fruit or vegetable consumption, and/ or farm task behaviors. Also, our results indicated that maternal urinary total DAP metabolite levels in the 3rd trimester were significantly higher than in the 1st–2nd trimester (120.43 and 61.52 nmole/g creatinine, respectively). These results were inconsistent with a previous study which reported lower urinary total DAP concentration in the 3rd trimester than in the 1st–2nd trimester (14.7 and 21.5 µmol/mol creatinine, respectively) among fifty–nine pregnant farmworkers [6]. Our results had revealed a higher percentage (30.68%) women carrying out of agricultural work during the 3rd trimester than the previous study (17.3%) [6] which might result in higher exposure to OP pesticides among the participants in our study, hence the higher levels.
The results of the infant neurodevelopment assessment using the BSID–III screening test indicated that more than half of 2–month–old infants were classified as ‘emerging’ in cognitive, expressive communication, fine motor, and gross motor subtest. In addition, we found that about 5–20% of 6–month–old infants were determined to be ‘at risk’ to developmental delay in cognitive, receptive communication, expressive communication, fine motor, and gross motor domains. The proportion of developmental delay found in this study was higher than the data reported by Angsupisal et al. (2018) who assessed development using the BSID–III screening test in 64 children aged below 42 months old in an urban community of central Thailand [29]. They found only about 3–7% of the children were categorized as ‘at risk’ of developmental delays, while 70–95% of these children were generally at the lowest risk for developmental delays. It is widely recognized that OP can transfer from mother to child through the placenta and breast milk, resulting in adverse effects on the growth and development of children [2,30]. We therefore postulated that the infants in our study whose mothers lived in an agricultural community were more vulnerable to OP toxicity than the children in the urban community, resulting in a higher proportion of developmental delays.
Exposure to OP pesticides at different critical windows may have different impacts on overall fetal development including neurodevelopment in early childhood. In the present study, we found the significant associations between maternal ethylated OP concentrations at different timing of exposure during pregnancy and infant developmental performance. However, we found no significant relationships between DMP, DMTP, and total DAP and infant developmental screening scores of BSID–III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age. Our results indicated a significant negative association between prenatal DETP levels in the 1st–2nd trimester and cognitive performance at 2 months of age (p < 0.05). Our results were consistent with a previous study which discovered a significant negative association between the prenatal total DAP collected at the end of the 2nd trimester (26–28 weeks gestation) and cognitive development assessed with BSID–II at 12 months of age [14]. A study by Eskenazi et al. (2007) also found a significant negative association between the average prenatal total DAP levels collected in the 2nd trimester (at 14 and 27 weeks gestation) and MDI scores (cognitive composite) assessed with BSID–II at 24 months of age [17]. However, they found no significant relationships between prenatal total DAP levels and scores on MDI or PDI (motor composite) at 6 and 12 months of age. Prenatal exposure to OP insecticides in early to mid–pregnancy is potentially likely to affect the cognitive performance in the early months of life through to early childhood. However, a previous study found no significant associations between prenatal OP exposed in mid pregnancy and cognition at 1–5 years of age [18]. These authors assumed that the exposure in their cohort was too low to detect an association with the outcomes. The median of total DAP concentrations in the null study referenced here were lower than concentrations in the current study (23.7 and 54.9 nmol/g creatinine, respectively). They concluded that the level of exposure to the parent compound was not a significant risk. OP inhibit acetylcholiesterase enzyme (AChE) at nerve ending. Loss of AChE function allows accumulation of acetylcholine at synaptic cleft in brain and muscular junction, resulting in an overstimulation on muscarinic and nicotinic receptor of central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system [31,32]. To date, there is little evidence to clarify the mechanisms involved following prenatal OP exposure with regard to neurotoxic effects on the developing human brain. The human brain and nervous system begin to develop at about three weeks gestation with the closing of the neuron tube. At four weeks, the brain divided into four regions including the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and optic vesicles. The rapid growth of the brain during the second trimester is followed by neuronal migration, differentiation, proliferation, and pruning throughout early childhood [33,34]. Prenatal OP exposure in these critical periods may affect the process of brain development. A previous study had investigated associations between exposure to the OP insecticide chlorpyrifos and brain morphology using magnetic resonance imaging in 40 children, aged 6–11 years and found that higher–exposure to chlorpyrifos induced brain enlargement and reduced cortical thickness in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions, resulted in cognitive functional impairment [7]. These authors suggested that prenatal OP exposure induced permanent abnormal brain morphology and function. [7]. Also, a study by Sagiv et al. (2019) indicated a negative association between total OP pesticide use within 1 km of maternal residence during pregnancy and the brain activation in the prefrontal cortex during a cognitive flexibility task of 95 adolescents [35]. The results of these studies illustrate that prenatal OP exposure affects the brain in both morphological and functional ways. However, these authors did not specify the exact critical windows of OP exposure during the pregnancy.
Our results also indicated a significant negative association between prenatal DEDTP levels in the 3rd trimester and expressive communication and fine motor performance at 6 months of age (p < 0.05). These results were consistent with the findings reported in a study by Kongtip et al. (2017) which found that higher total DEP and total DAP levels from mothers in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy were significantly associated with reduced motor composite scores and they also found a negative association between total DEP and cognitive composite scores of BSID–III at 5 months of age [15]. A study by Silver et al. (2017) also found that prenatal presence of naled and chlorpyrifos detected from umbilical cord blood at delivery were associated with a decrease in 9–month fine and gross motor function evaluated via the Peabody Development Motor Scale 2nd edition (PDMS−2) [13]. These results were consistent with the findings reported in a study by Rauh et al. (2006) which found a negative association between prenatal chlorpyrifos levels in umbilical cord plasma and Bayley’s psychomotor and mental development index at 3 years of age [16]. However, our results are in contrast with those reported in a study by Fluegge et al. (2016) which found no significant relationship between prenatal urinary metabolite level of OP insecticides in both 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy and child neurodevelopment assessed by BSID–II at 3 months after birth [19]. These authors surmised that the impact only in a few children who experienced clinically significant development delays might limit the clinical significance of the results. In the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, rapid myelination begins. The oligodendrocytes wrap the axons of neurons with myelin. If this process is interrupted, the myelin sheaths might not develop normally, resulting in ineffective communication between the neurons [36,37]. The child could have problems in focusing and learning abilities such as motor skills learning. Exposure to OP pesticides in late pregnancy potentially disrupted this brain development process and fetal development in this period. However, there are insufficient available published data to make a firm conclusion with regard to these associations.
The main strength of our study is that we assessed maternal OP levels in two urine samples collected from different trimesters. This enabled us to investigate time–specific associations with infant development performance and evaluate critical windows of susceptibility during the pregnancy. However, this study also has some limitations. First, the sample size was small. Our small sample size limited the statistical power of the study. We could not rule out the possibility that some of the findings may be due to chance. Second, maternal OP levels in the 1st and 2nd were considered together due to subject recruitment limitation. In the 1st trimester of pregnancy, most pregnant women in our agricultural study site did not notice that they got pregnant and had no initiate antenatal care in the hospitals. In addition, many pregnant women had a spontaneous miscarriage in this period. Therefore, we needed to recruit the pregnant women during the 1st–2nd trimester who initiated antenatal care in the hospitals to this study for the first urine sample collection. Third, DAP metabolites have a short halt–life (24–48 h.), so the urinary concentrations reflect only recent exposure [38,39]. Finally, we evaluated the infant developmental performance using the BSID–III screening test, which could identify only ‘risk’ or ‘no risk’ in developmental delay. Thus, the child who scored in the ‘at risk’ category needs further evaluation using an appropriate comprehensive evaluation tool such as the full BSID–III for specific diagnosis. All limitations should be considered to improve a future study.

5. Conclusions

The data from this study suggest that maternal ethylated OP concentrations at different timing of exposure during pregnancy may influence different aspects of infant developmental performance. Prenatal OP exposure in the 1st–2nd trimester of pregnancy was inversely associated with cognitive performance at both 2 and 6 months of age. In addition, prenatal OP exposure in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy was inversely associated with communication and motor performance at 6 months of age. However, the underlying mechanisms behind these correlations are not fully understood and future research needs to focus more on the damaging processes behind these findings. Intervention and prevention strategies regarding prenatal pesticide exposure in the agricultural community are necessary to prevent long-term adverse health effects in children.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S., R.S., N.W. and S.H.; methodology, B.S., R.S., N.W. and S.H.; formal analysis and investigation, B.S. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S.; writing—review and editing, R.S.; funding acquisition, B.S. and R.S.; resources, R.S., N.W. and S.H.; supervision, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, grant number 029/2563, and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Non Communicable Diseases Center of Excellence, Chiang Mai University Research Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Human Ethical Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (protocol code 221/2562 and date of approval 26 July 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, grant number 029/2563, and Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and Non Communicable Diseases Center of Excellence, Chiang Mai University Research Fund. We would like to thank all participants who volunteered to participate in this study. We also express our thanks to the Research Administration Section, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for their assistance with the English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Voorhees, J.R.; Rohlman, D.S.; Lein, P.J.; Pieper, A.A. Neurotoxicity in preclinical models of occupational exposure to organophosphorus compounds. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bradman, A.; Barr, D.B.; Claus Henn, B.G.; Drumheller, T.; Curry, C.; Eskenazi, B. Measurement of pesticides and other toxicants in amniotic fluid as a potential biomarker of prenatal exposure: A validation study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1779–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rice, D.; Barone, S. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: Evidence from humans and animal models. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 511–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Furlong, C.E.; Holland, N.; Richter, R.J.; Bradman, A.; Ho, A.; Eskenazi, B. PON1 status of farmworker mothers and children as a predictor of organophosphate sensitivity. Pharm. Genom. 2006, 16, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ferguson, K.K.; Dries, M.A.; Gaillard, R.; Pronk, A.; Spaan, S.; Tiemeier, H.; Jaddoe, V.W.V. Organophosphate pesticide exposure in pregnancy in association with ultrasound and delivery measures of fetal growth. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 087005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Naksen, W.; Prapamontol, T.; Mangklabruks, M.; Chantara, S.; Thavornyutikarn, P.; Srinual, N.; Panuwet, P.; Ryan, P.B.; Riederer, A.M.; Barr, D.B. Associations of maternal organophosphate pesticide exposure and PON1 activity with birth outcomes in SAWASDEE birth cohort, Thailand. Environ. Res. 2015, 142, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rauch, V.A.; Braun, J.M.; Barr, D.B.; Calafat, A.M.; Khoury, J.; Montesano, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B.P. Associations of prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticide metabolites with gestational age and birth weight. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, P.; Tian, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Gao, Y.; Shi, R.; Wang, G.Q.; Hu, G.H.; Shen, X.M. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and perinatal outcomes in Shanghai, China. Environ. Int. 2012, 42, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harley, K.G.; Huen, K.; Schall, R.A.; Holland, N.T.; Bradman, A.; Barr, D.B.; Eskenazi, B. Association of Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Paraoxonase with Birth Outcome in Mexican-American Women. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sapbamrer, R.; Hongsibsong, S. Effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides on child neurodevelopment in different age groups: A systematic review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Rec. 2019, 26, 18267–18290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Sass, J.B.; Engel, S.; Bennett, D.H.; Bradman, A.; Eskenazi, B.; Lanphear, B.; Whyatt, R. Organophosphate exposures during pregnancy and child neurodevelopment: Recommendations for essential policy reforms. PLoS Med. 2018, 15, e1002671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Woskie, S.; Kongtip, P.; Thanasanpaiboon, W.; Kiatdamrong, N.; Charoonrungsirikul, N.; Nankongnab, N.; Surach, A.; Phamonphon, A. A pilot study of maternal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and newborn neurodevelopment in Thailand. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2017, 23, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Silver, M.K.; Shao, J.; Zhu, B.; Chen, M.; Xia, Y.; Kaciroti, N.; Lozoff, B.; Meeker, J.D. Prenatal naled and chlorpyrifos exposure is associated with deficits in infant motor function in a cohort of Chinese infants. Environ. Int. 2017, 106, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Engel, S.M.; Wetmur, J.; Chen, J.; Zhu, C.; Barr, D.B.; Canfield, R.L.; Wolff, M.S. Prenatal exposure to organophosphates, paraoxonase 1, and cognitive development in childhood. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 19, 1182–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kongtip, P.; Techasaensiri, B.; Nankongnab, N.; Adams, J.; Phamonphon, A.; Surach, A.; Sangprasert, S.; Thongsuksai, A.; Srikumpol, P.; Susan Woskie, S. The impact of prenatal organophosphate pesticide exposures on Thai infant neurodevelopment. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rauch, V.A.; Garfinkel, R.; Perera, F.P.; Andrews, H.F.; Hoepner, L.; Barr, D.B.; Whitehead, R.; Tang, D.; Whyatt, R.W. Impact of prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children. Pediatrics 2006, 118, e1845–e1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Eskenazi, B.; Marks, A.R.; Bradman, A.; Harley, K.; Barr, D.B.; Johnson, C.; Morga, N.; Jewell, N.P. Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Neurodevelopment in Young Mexican-American Children. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Donauer, S.; Altaye, M.; Xu, Y.; Sucharew, H.; Succop, P.; Calafat, A.M.; Khoury, J.C.; Lanphear, B.; Yolton, K. An observational study to evaluate associations between low-level gestational exposure to organophosphate pesticides and cognition during early childhood. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 184, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Fluegge, K.R.; Nishioka, M.; Wilkins, J.R. Effects of simultaneous prenatal exposures to organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides on infant neurodevelopment at three months of age. J. Environ. Toxicol. Public Health 2016, 1, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prapamontol, T.; Sutan, K.; Laoyang, S.; Hongsibsong, S.; Lee, G.; Yano, Y.; Hunter, R.E.; Ryan, P.B.; Barr, D.B.; Panuwet, P. Cross validation of gas chromatography-flame photometric detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for measuring dialkylphosphate metabolites of organophosphate pesticides in human urine. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2014, 217, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Butler, A.R. The Jaffé reaction Part II: A kinetic study of the Janovsky complexes formed from creatinine (2-imino-1-methylimazolidin-4-one) and acetone. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1975, 2, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hornung, R.W.; Reed, L.D. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1990, 5, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bayley, N. Bayley Scales Infant Toddler Development, 3rd ed.; NCS Pearson, Inc.: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2006; pp. 9–45. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bayley, N. Bayley Scales Infant Toddler Development Screening Test, 3rd ed.; Harcourt Assessment, Inc.: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2006; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  25. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wattananon, Y. The important role of nurses in labour room: Health assessment of the newborn. Thai J. Nurs. Counc. 2012, 15, 51–65. Available online: https://he02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/2316 (accessed on 29 November 2020). (In Thai).
  27. Bureau of Agricultural Regulation, Department of Agriculture, Thailand. Agricultural Hazardous Substances Import in Thailand 2016 Report. Available online: www.thaipan.org/stat/408 (accessed on 17 December 2020).
  28. Sapbamrer, R.; Hongsibsong, S. Organophosphorus pesticide residues in vegetables from farms, markets, and a supermarket around Kwan Phayao Lake of Northern Thailand. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 67, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Angsupaisal, M.; Thawinchai, N.; Prathep, W. Developmental performance of young children aged 1–42 months in Mueang Pitsanulok, Thailand: The Bayley-III screening survey. Int. J. Child Dev. Ment. Health 2018, 6, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eskenazi, B.; Bradman, A.; Castorina, R. Exposures of children to organophosphate pesticides and their potential adverse health effects. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gupta, R.C. Brain Regional Heterogeneity and Toxicological Mechanisms of Organophosphates and Carbamates. Toxicol. Mech. Method 2004, 14, 103–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Naughton, S.X.; Terry, A.V. Neurotoxicity in acute and repeated organophosphate exposure. Toxicology 2018, 1, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lanphear, B.P. The impact of toxins on the developing brain. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2015, 36, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Stiles, J.; Jernigen, T.L. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2010, 20, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sagiv, S.K.; Bruno, J.L.; Joseph, M.; Baker, J.M.; Palzes, V.; Kogut, K.; Rauch, S.; Gunier, R.; Mora, A.N.; Reiss, A.L.; et al. Prenatal exposure to organophosphate pesticides and functional neuroimaging in adolescents living in proximity to pesticide application. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 18347–18356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Linderkamp, O.; Janus, L.; Linder, R.; Skoruppa, D.B. Time table of normal foetal brain development. Int. J. Prenat. Perinat. Psychol. Med. 2009, 21, 4–16. [Google Scholar]
  37. Newville, J.; Ortega, M.; Maxwell, J. Babies born early can have brain injury. Front. Young Minds 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wessels, D.; Barr, D.B.; Mendola, P. Use of biomarkers to indicate exposure of children to organophosphate pesticides: Implications for a longitudinal study of children’s environmental health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1939–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Barr, D.B.; Barr, J.R.; Driskell, W.J.; Hill, R.H., Jr.; Ashley, D.L.; Needham, L.L.; Head, S.L.; Sampson, E.J. Strategies for biological monitoring of exposure for contemporary-use pesticides. Toxicol. Ind. Health 1999, 15, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic data of the mothers and infants in the agricultural community (n = 88).
Table 1. Demographic data of the mothers and infants in the agricultural community (n = 88).
Parameters n (%) or Mean ± SD
Maternal characteristics
Age (years), mean ± SD 24.32 ± 4.90
Gestation age (weeks), mean ± SD1st–2nd trimester
3rd trimester
19.33 ± 6.65
31.26 ± 2.11
Body mass index (kg/m2), n (%)<18.5
18.5–24.9
25–29.9
≥30
3 (3.4)
51 (58.0)
26 (29.5)
8 (9.1)
Parity, n (%)1st child
2nd child
3rd child
26 (29.5)
40 (45.5)
22 (25.0)
Education, n (%)Junior high school or less Senior high school or higher57 (64.8)
31 (35.2)
Occupation, n (%)Agricultural workers
Other
71 (80.7)
17 (19.3)
Family income (Baht/month), n (%)<4500
4500–9000
>9000
44 (50.0)
35 (39.8)
9 (10.2)
Alcohol use during pregnancy, n (%) 1 (1.1)
Drugs use during pregnancy, n (%) 0 (0)
Utero smoke exposure, n (%)Yes
No
38 (43.2)
50 (56.8)
Household insecticide use, n (%) 46 (43.4)
Fresh fruit/ vegetable consumption (days/week), n (%) 7
4–6
1–3
50 (47.2)
12 (11.3)
26 (24.5)
Distance from residence to farm (km), n (%) 0–5
>5
65 (73.9)
23 (26.1)
Agricultural work during pregnancy, n (%)Yes
No
62 (70.5)
26 (29.5)
Frequency of agricultural work during pregnancy (days/week), n (%) 5–7
4 or less
53 (60.2)
35 (39.8)
Infant characteristics
Delivery procedure, n (%)Normal labor
Cesarean section
74 (84.1)
14 (15.9)
Infant gender, n (%) Male
Female
35 (39.8)
53 (60.2)
Gestation duration (weeks), mean ± SD 38.28 ± 1.72
Birth weight (g), mean ± SD 3087.76 ± 435.25
Birth height (cm), mean ± SD 51.45 ± 2.96
Head circumference (cm), mean ± SD 32.72 ± 1.67
Table 2. Urinary OP metabolites (nmol/g creatinine) in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy in pregnant women (n = 88) in the agricultural community.
Table 2. Urinary OP metabolites (nmol/g creatinine) in the 1st–2nd trimester and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy in pregnant women (n = 88) in the agricultural community.
OP Metabolites1st–2nd Trimester3rd Trimesterp-Value
% Samples DetectableGMMedianMin–Max% Samples DetectableGMMedianMin–Max
DEP64.776.896.82<LOD-807.1467.0515.0411.82<LOD-314.170.000 **
DETP51.142.471.59<LOD-167.3365.917.526.20<LOD-411.320.000 **
DEDTP3.411.681.63<LOD-19.2711.363.102.44<LOD-62.840.000 **
DMP6.8233.2531.12<LOD-1086.814.5547.3940.65<LOD-971.380.007 *
DMTP5.684.254.25<LOD-20.4521.598.237.34<LOD-1358.410.000 **
Total DAP70.4561.5254.92<LOD-1817.1275.00120.43103.52<LOD-2040.160.000 **
Note: GM, geometric mean; Min, minimum; Max, maximum; LOD, limit of detection; DEP, diethylphosphate; DETP, diethylthiophosphate; DEDTP, diethyldithiophosphate; DMP, dimethylphosphate; DMTP, dimethylthiophosphate; DMDTP, dimethyldithiophosphate; * p < 0.01; ** p < 0.001. Total DAP = DEP ± DETP ± DEDTP ± DMP ± DMTP.
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficient of DAP metabolites.
Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficient of DAP metabolites.
DAP MetabolitesDEPDETPDEDTPDMPDMTP
Rp-Valuerp-ValueRp-ValueRp-ValueRp-Value
1st–2nd trimester
DEP0.0440.6810.0540.6170.6330.000 **0.1510.161
DETP0.3520.001 **−0.0310.773−0.0180.865
DEDTP0.1250.2450.4910.000 **
DMP0.3170.003 **
DMTP
3rd trimester
DEP0.6630.000 **0.3170.003 **−0.0010.9960.0540.615
DETP0.3050.004 **−0.0060.9540.1480.169
DEDTP0.0580.590−0.0110.922
DMP0.3350.001 **
DMTP
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2–tailed).
Table 4. The BSID–III screening test scores of infants at 2 and 6 months of age (n = 88).
Table 4. The BSID–III screening test scores of infants at 2 and 6 months of age (n = 88).
Subtest2 Months of Age6 Months of Age
MeanMedianSDRangeMeanMedianSDRange
Cognitive1.9021.290–55.4461.882–10
Receptive communication3.1131.190–55.8661.662–10
Expressive communication1.8011.290–64.1441.530–8
Fine motor1.7220.800–45.0651.532–8
Gross motor1.9421.370–46.356.52.181–11
Table 5. Association between maternal urinary OP metabolites in the 1st–2nd trimester and infant developmental screening scores using the BSID–III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age.
Table 5. Association between maternal urinary OP metabolites in the 1st–2nd trimester and infant developmental screening scores using the BSID–III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age.
OP MetabolitesCognitiveReceptive CommunicationExpressive CommunicationFine MotorGross Motor
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
2 months of age
DEP0.000 ± 0.0020.9680.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.5460.063−0.002 ± 0.0020.1870.0630.001 ± 0.0010.6250.063−0.000 ± 0.0020.9930.063
DETP−0.012 ± 0.0040.0050.030 *0.004 ± 0.0040.3500.0630.006 ± 0.0050.2180.0630.002 ± 0.0030.4510.063−0.002 ± 0.0050.7270.063
DEDTP0.040 ± 0.0500.4320.063−0.004 ± 0.0470.9260.063−0.01 ± 0.05208500.063−0.006 ± 0.0340.8710.063−0.002 ± 0.0560.9680.063
DMP0.000 ± 0.0010.9000.0630.000 ± 0.0010.9650.0630.00 ± 0.0010.1410.0630.000 ± 0.0010.4960.0630.001 ± 0.0010.5860.063
DMTP−0.018 ± 0.0340.5990.0630.007 ± 0.0310.8280.063−0.048 ± 0.0330.1530.0630.005 ± 0.0220.0820.0630.061 ± 0.0360.0990.063
6 months of age
DEP−0.002 ± 0.0020.2850.0630.003 ± 0.0020.0840.0630.002 ± 0.0020.1960.0630.003 ± 0.0020.0880.0630.001 ± 0.0030.6600.063
DETP0.000 ± 0.0080.8590.0630.001 ± 0.0060.8590.063−0.00 ± 0.0060.4860.063−0.001 ± 0.0060.8730.063−0.008 ± 0.0080.3340.063
DEDTP0.070 ± 0.0750.3530.063−0.013 ± 0.0660.8470.063−0.00 ± 0.0610.9520.0630.009 ± 0.0630.8840.0630.00 ± 0.0870.9980.063
DMP0.001 ± 0.0010.3520.0630.002 ± 0.0010.1030.0630.001 ± 0.0010.3570.0630.002 ± 0.0010.0630.0630.001 ± 0.0010.6740.063
DMTP0.032 ± 0.0490.5190.063−0.025 ± 0.0430.5690.063−0.060 ± 0.0390.1280.0630.016 ± 0.0410.6990.0630.022 ± 0.0570.7010.063
Note: adjusted with maternal age, parity, education, utero smoke exposure, and fresh fruit/vegetable consumption; β beta; SE standard error; * p < 0.05.
Table 6. Association between maternal urinary OP metabolites in the 3rd trimester and infant developmental screening scores using the Bayley III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age.
Table 6. Association between maternal urinary OP metabolites in the 3rd trimester and infant developmental screening scores using the Bayley III screening test at 2 and 6 months of age.
OP MetabolitesCognitiveReceptive CommunicationExpressive CommunicationFine MotorGross Motor
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDRAdjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
β ± SERaw
p-Value
FDR Adjusted
p-Value
2 months of age
DEP−0.006 ± 0.0020.0530.063−0.00 ± 0.0020.5760.0630.000 ± 0.0020.8310.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.2790.063−0.001 ± 0.0020.7570.063
DETP−0.003 ± 0.0020.0650.063−0.001 ± 0.0020.5760.063−0.001 ± 0.0020.5550.0630.001 ± 0.0010.5460.063−0.001 ± 0.0020.7260.063
DEDTP−0.021 ± 0.0180.0970.063−0.008 ± 0.0130.5130.063−0.020 ± 0.0140.1360.063−0.013 ± 0.0090.1730.0630.006 ± 0.0160.6920.063
DMP0.000 ± 0.0010.8650.063−0.002 ± 0.0010.0880.0630.000 ± 0.0010.6380.0630.000 ± 0.0010.8920.0630.000 ± 0.0010.8020.063
DMTP−0.001 ± 0.0010.2780.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.3460.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.3330.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.4040.0630.001 ± 0.0010.6230.063
6 months of age
DEP0.000 ± 0.0030.9420.063−0.001 ± 0.0030.7590.0630.002 ± 0.0030.4190.0630.001 ± 0.0030.6660.0630.000 ± 0.0040.8610.063
DETP0.002 ± 0.0030.3890.0630.000 ± 0.0020.8650.063−0.001 ± 0.0020.7310.0630.003 ± 0.0030.3360.0630.001 ± 0.0030.6910.063
DEDTP−0.020 ± 0.0210.6350.063−0.038 ± 0.0180.1030.063−0.047 ± 0.0160.0070.042 *−0.044 ± 0.0170.0080.04 *−0.025 ± 0.0240.3030.063
DMP0.001 ± 0.0020.5630.0630.001 ± 0.0010.3440.0630.000 ± 0.0010.7220.0630.001 ± 0.0010.1370.0630.001 ± 0.0020.4430.063
DMTP0.001 ± 0.0010.4400.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.4950.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.4580.063−0.001 ± 0.0010.5210.0630.000 ± 0.0020.8640.063
Note: adjusted with maternal age, parity, education, utero smoke exposure, and fresh fruit/vegetable consumption; β beta; SE standard error; * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suwannakul, B.; Sapbamrer, R.; Wiwattanadittakul, N.; Hongsibsong, S. Organophosphate Pesticide Exposures in Early and Late Pregnancy Influence Different Aspects of Infant Developmental Performance. Toxics 2021, 9, 99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9050099

AMA Style

Suwannakul B, Sapbamrer R, Wiwattanadittakul N, Hongsibsong S. Organophosphate Pesticide Exposures in Early and Late Pregnancy Influence Different Aspects of Infant Developmental Performance. Toxics. 2021; 9(5):99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9050099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suwannakul, Boonsita, Ratana Sapbamrer, Natrujee Wiwattanadittakul, and Surat Hongsibsong. 2021. "Organophosphate Pesticide Exposures in Early and Late Pregnancy Influence Different Aspects of Infant Developmental Performance" Toxics 9, no. 5: 99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9050099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop