Next Article in Journal
Diet Breadth Mediates the Prey Specificity of Venom Potency in Snakes
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic and Metabolomic Analyses of Natural Products in Nodularia spumigena Isolated from a Shrimp Culture Pond
Previous Article in Journal
Reply to Comment on Re-Visiting Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment. Toxins 2019, 11, 491
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation and Characterization of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii Strains from Finished Drinking Water
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/toxins12020073
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioprospecting Sponge-Associated Marine Cyanobacteria to Produce Bioactive Compounds

by
Despoina Konstantinou
1,
Eleni Mavrogonatou
1,2,
Sevasti-Kiriaki Zervou
1,3,
Panagiotis Giannogonas
1,2 and
Spyros Gkelis
1,*
1
Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Ageing, Institute of Biosciences & Applications, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Patriarchou Grigoriou & Neapoleos, Agia Paraskevi, 15341 Athens, Greece
3
Laboratory of Photo-Catalytic Processes and Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Patriarchou Grigoriou & Neapoleos, Agia Paraskevi, 15341 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(2), 73; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020073
Submission received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 23 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Toxic Cyanobacteria)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Marine cyanobacteria are considered a prolific source of bioactive natural products with a range of biotechnological and pharmacological applications. However, data on the production of natural compounds from sponge-associated cyanobacteria are scarce. This study aimed to assess the potential of sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains representing different taxonomic groups for the production of bioactive compounds and the biological activity of their extracts. Phylogenetic analysis of sponge-associated cyanobacteria and screening for the presence of genes encoding non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) and polyketide synthases (PKSs) were performed. Methanol extracts of the sponge-associated strains were analyzed for cyanotoxin production and tested for antioxidant activity and cytotoxic activity against several human cancer cell lines and pathogenic bacteria. PKS were detected in all sponge-associated strains examined, indicating the metabolic potential of the isolates. PKS genes were more ubiquitous than NRPS genes. Cyanotoxins (i.e., cylindrospermopsin, anatoxin-a, nodularin, and microcystins) were not detected in any of the sponge-associated cyanobacterial strains. Strains belonging to Leptothoe, Pseudanabaena, and Synechococcus were found to have activity mainly against Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, sponge-associated Leptothoe strains (TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215) were found to be highly cytotoxic and in most cases more effective against human cancer cell lines than against normal cells. Extracts with the most promising bioactivity deserve further investigation in order to isolate and identify the bioactive molecule(s).
Keywords:
NRPSs; PKSs; antibacterial; human cancer cell lines; cytotoxicity; Leptothoe
Key Contribution: Sponge-associated strains belonging to the novel genus Leptothoe exhibit potent cytotoxic activities against human cancer cell lines.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes with long evolutionary history, which is reflected in their worldwide distribution to a wide range of habitats including the extreme ones and in their high morphological, physiological, and metabolic diversity. They have gathered considerable attention for the production of toxins, as they form toxic blooms in freshwater bodies around the world, posing health risks to humans and animals [1]. However, cyanobacteria can also produce secondary metabolites with therapeutic properties and have emerged as a promising resource for the discovery of new drugs with potential pharmacological applications [2,3].
Marine cyanobacteria, in particular, are significant sources of structurally diverse marine secondary metabolites and are also among the few bacteria groups known to be chemically rich in providing new classes of compounds [2,4,5]. In fact, in the last decade, a plethora of natural compounds has been isolated and identified from marine cyanobacteria (more than 400 new natural compounds), mainly from filamentous stains [2,4,6]. These compounds include linear and cyclic peptides, linear lipopeptides, depsipeptides, fatty acid amides, swinholides, glicomacrolides, and macrolactones and show a broad spectrum of activities, such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, cytotoxic, and anticancer activities [3,4,7].
Among potential bioactivities, anticancer effects have mostly attracted scientific interest, as cancer is the major cause of mortality worldwide. Nearly 100 compounds deriving from marine cyanobacteria have been found to induce cytotoxicity in several cancer cell lines [6,8], and currently 17 compounds are in different phases of clinical trials for cancer treatment. Some examples of potent anticancer compounds isolated from marine cyanobacteria, with known cytotoxic mechanisms, are dolastatins, cryptophycins, apratoxins, and aurilides [8]. The most famous example is brentuximab vedotin, a synthetic analog of dolastatin 10, which targets CD30 and microtubules, and is used for the treatment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma after approval by the Federal Drug Agency [9].
Cyanobacteria, in the marine environment, have been reported to live in association with a remarkable variety of hosts (e.g., fungi, ascidians, corals, and protists) [10], while the association formed with sponges has significantly attracted research interest from a biotechnological perspective (among others) in the last decades. Sponges are considered a rich source of bioactive natural products with potential biotechnological applications, namely in the pharmacological field, contributing to nearly 30% (more than 4850 compounds) of all marine natural products discovered [11]. Sponges are renowned for establishing symbiotic relationships with complex communities of microorganisms [12], in which symbiotic microorganisms have often been proposed to be the producers of the bioactive compounds [13,14]. Cyanobacteria have been recognized as a major group of sponge-associated microbes contributing to the production of pharmacologically relevant secondary metabolites [13].
According to the most recent review, cyanobacterial diversity reported from sponges is still underestimated; their taxonomy below the phylum level has received little attention while only few cyanobacteria strains isolated from sponge species are presently known [15]. Our recent research on sponge-associated cyanobacteria in the North Aegean Sea [15] resulted in the isolation of 15 cyanobacteria strains [15,16] and showed novel cyanobacteria diversity. Indeed, the investigation of five Leptolyngbya-like sponge-associated isolates based on a polyphasic approach (evaluation of molecular, chemical, and morphological data) revealed a novel marine genus, Leptothoe gen. nov., in which three new species of sponge-associated cyanobacteria, i.e., Le. sithoniana, Le. kymatousa, and Le. spongobia, were described. In the present study, we aimed to assess: (i) the production of bioactive compounds by sponge-associated cyanobacteria isolates representing different taxonomic groups; (ii) the biological activity of their extracts; and (iii) if closely affiliated strains could possess the same bioactivity.

2. Results

2.1. Molecular Characterization of Sponge-Associated Cyanobacteria Strains

Phylogenetic relationships of the 15 sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains (coccoid and filamentous) based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that 13 strains belong to different lineages of the Synechococcales order and two strains to one lineage within Pleurocapsales (Figure 1). Two coccoid strains, namely TAU-MAC 0615 and 1915, assigned to Xenococcus, formed a distinct subclade, and clustered together with the reference strain of the same genus (Xenococcus sp. PCC 7305) within the Pleurocapsales order. Filamentous Synechococcales strains TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, 1215, and 1615 belonging to Leptothoe were affiliated to the strains Schizotrichaceae sp. TAU-MAC 1315, Leptolyngbya sp. TAU-MAC 1715, Leptolyngbya sp. TAU-MAC 1815, and Pseudanabaena cf. persicina 1415 strains were distributed in three distinct clades (Clades I–III) in the phylogenetic reconstruction shown in Figure 1. Inside Clades I–III, our strains clustered together with other strains of uncertain taxonomic status. The three sponge-associated Synechococcus strains (TAU-MAC 0715, 0815, and 2015) were placed in one subclade and together with the strain Synechococcus PCC 7376 were clustered in a well-supported clade (Figure 1). This clade was placed outside of other clades formed by marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus. Strain Pseudanabaena sp. TAU-MAC 1515 was placed in the same clade with other strains of the same genus of marine origin (Figure 1).

2.2. PCR Screening for PKS and NRPS Encoding Genes

To evaluate the potential of these cyanobacterial isolates to produce secondary metabolites, a PCR screening was performed for type I polyketide synthase (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) genes. PKS encoding genes were detected in all sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains, while NRPS encoding genes were detected only in two strains of the species Leptothoe spongobia (TAU-MAC 1115) and Le. sithoniana (TAU-MAC 0915) (Figure 1).

2.3. Cyanotoxins

LC-MS/MS analysis results indicate that none of the targeted cyanotoxins, i.e., cylindrospermopsin (CYN), anatoxin-a (ATX-a), nodularin (NOD), microcystins (MCs), [D-Asp3]MC-RR, MC-RR, MC-YR, MC-HtyR, [D-Asp3]MC-LR, MC-LR, MC-HilR, MC-WR, MC-LA, MC-LY, MC-LW, and MC-LF, were present in detectable concentrations in the examined material of cyanobacterial strains associated with sponges.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity

Five sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains belonging to Leptothoe, Pseudanabaena, and Synechococcus genera inhibited the growth of three out of four heterotrophic bacteria tested (i.e., Escherichia coli 8879, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12469, and Staphylococcus aureus 9518) (Table 1). The largest inhibition zone (10 mm) was observed in the cyanobacterial extract of Pseudanabaena cf. persicina TAU-MAC 1415 against S. aureus 9518. Inhibition zones in the rest of the heterotrophic bacteria were 5–8 mm.

2.5. Effects on Cell Lines

As shown in Figure 2, the majority of extracts were either non cytotoxic (i.e., extract TAU-MAC 1815), cytotoxic only at very high concentrations [i.e., extracts TAU-MAC 1515 and 1715 with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) that exceeded 100 or even 200 μg·mL−1], or non-selectively cytotoxic for cancer cells (i.e., extracts TAU-MAC 0615, 0715, 0815, 1315, 1415, 1615, 1915, and 2015). Four extracts however were found to be highly cytotoxic (i.e., extracts TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215). Among these, extracts TAU-MAC 1015 and 1115 were the most potent and selective for cancer cell lines, as presented in Table 2. Interestingly, all strains that showed high cytotoxicity belong to the genus Leptothoe.
For the assessment of the antioxidant potential, each extract was used at the highest concentration that—according to the MTT assay—had no severe impact on the viability of normal human skin fibroblasts. In contrast to the known antioxidants NAC and Trolox that were able to reduce intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels early on, no extract tested had an early or a late antioxidant effect on skin fibroblasts (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

Phylogenetic analysis performed in the present study corroborates our previous research [15]; the diversity of our sponge-associated isolates could be characterized as quite unique and their taxonomic status requires further investigation. The majority of the strains belong to distinct and well supported clades of Synechococcales (13/15) and Pleurocapsales (2/15), while in related studies sponge-associated cyanobacteria isolates have been found to belong exclusively to Synechococcales [17,18]. The Leptolyngbya-like strains TAU-MAC 1715 and 1815 as well as the strains Schizotrichaceae sp. TAU-MAC 1315 and Pseudanabaena cf. persicina [15] showed less than 94% similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequences with the related filamentous genera Leptothoe [16], Nodosilinea [19], and Haloleptolyngbya [20]. The polyphyletic status of genus Leptolyngbya is well established, and, as has been underlined, there is still undiscovered diversity in Leptolyngbya-like cyanobacteria [16,19,20].
Our phylogenetic analysis was motivated by the aim of testing if closely affiliated strains could possess the same bioactivity. Interestingly, all cyanobacterial extracts (TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215) that were more cytotoxic belong to the newly described Leptothoe genus and to the three novel sponge-associated species Le. sithoniana, Le. spongobia and Le. kymatousa [16]. Previously, the strain Phormidium ectocarpi SAG 60.90 that also falls into the Leptothoe clade (Figure 1) has been found to produce hierridin B [21], a compound that was recently shown to have cytotoxic effects on human cancer cell lines [22]. The PKS clusters in all Leptothoe strains (TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, 1215, and 1615) of this study have also been previously detected in the other two strains belonging to the Leptothoe clade, Phormidium ectocarpi SAG 60.90 and Leptolyngbya ectocarpi PCC 7375 [23,24]. NRPS encoding genes were detected only in Le. sithoniana TAU-MAC 0915 and Le. spongobia TAU-MAC 1115, as PKS genes seem to be more ubiquitous than NRPS genes in marine cyanobacteria [25]. It should be noted that Le. sithoniana TAU-MAC 0915 and Le. spongobia TAU-MAC 1115 are the only strains containing both NRPS and PKS genes and showing both antibacterial and cytotoxic activities. By contrast, the rest of sponge-associated strains that showed either cytotoxic or antibacterial activity contained only PKS genes. PKS and NRPS gene clusters have been linked with the production of bioactive molecules [2,5] and, further, advances in bioinformatics have revealed that there are still cryptic biosynthetic gene clusters related to the production of novel natural products [5]. It is interesting that two strains belonging to the species Le. spongobia have differences since one has NRPS genes (TAU-MAC 1115) and the other (TAU-MAC 1015) does not. This is not surprising as infraspecific and/or intra-strain variation in the content of biosynthetic genes as well as in the production of secondary metabolites is well documented in cyanobacteria [1]. Previous studies detecting the presence of PKS and NRPS encoding genes in cyanobacteria reported more often the presence of these genes in filamentous than coccoid strains [24,25,26], but no difference was observed in our sponge-associated strains, at least for the PKS cluster; both coccoid and filamentous strains were found to possess these genes. It is worth mentioning that our coccoid strains (Synechococcus TAU-MAC 0715, 0815, and 2015 and Xenococcus TAU-MAC 0615 and 1915) were grouped into distinct clades with strains of the Pasteur Culture Collection (Synechococcus PCC 7336 and Xenococcus PCC 7305, respectively), in which the presence of PKS and NRPS encoding genes has been previously detected [26]. A great fraction of the biosynthetic gene clusters (NRPS and PKS) in cyanobacteria and other prokaryotes remains unknown, similar to other complex marine organisms such as dinoflagellates [27].
Regarding cyanotoxin production, free-living cyanobacteria strains isolated from Greek freshwater ecosystems are well documented to produce mainly microcystins (e.g., [28,29]), while the presence of cyanotoxins (i.e., CYN, ANA, NOD, and MCs) was not detected in our sponge-associated cyanobacteria isolated from the Aegean Sea. However, in the strain Leptothoe spongobia TAU-MAC 1115, isolated in January 2015 and first analyzed for the synthesis of microcystin in June 2016, the presence of MC-RR (0.14 μg·g−1 dw) was identified by the LC-MS/MS analysis [16]. In a recent study, an example of a cyanobacterial strain which lost the ability to produce microcystin under laboratory conditions was shown [30]. Since the LC-MS/MS analytical method [31] used herein is able to unequivocally identify several cyanotoxins (i.e., CYN, ANA, NOD, and MCs), most of them known for their cytotoxic effects [32], the negative results obtained for the tested strains indicate that the observed bioactivities may be caused from other compounds (unknown or not identified).
The potential of sponge-associated cyanobacteria isolates to show antibacterial activities was evaluated for the first time herein, and strains belonging to Leptothoe, Pseudanabaena, and Synechococcus genera were mainly inhibitory for the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. Antibacterial activities against S. aureus were also observed in a recent study of our group testing the extracts of freshwater cyanobacteria [28]. Antimicrobial activities of cyanobacteria have been mostly reported from marine filamentous strains (e.g., [33,34]), while Martins et al. [35] suggested that marine Synechocystis and Synechococcus genera are a source of antibiotic compounds. Swain et al. [36] described 121 compounds with antimicrobial activity among cyanobacteria, but few cyanobacterial compounds and derivatives have gone up into clinical trials and no cyanoderivative has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA), yet. Bacteria become drug resistant, thus novel compounds from cyanobacteria could suitably be exploited in drug development.
The high proportion of marine cyanobacterial compounds revealed as cytotoxic has fueled the research effort for screening more and more marine cyanobacteria strains aiming to reveal new cytotoxic compounds. To date, marine cyanobacteria that have shown strong cytotoxicity effects against human cancer cell lines belong to the following genera: Lyngbya and the recently separated Moorea and Okeania (previously identified as Lyngbya) [33,37,38], Symploca [39,40] and the recently separated Caldora (previously identified as Symploca) [41], Geitlerinema [42], Phormidium [43], Oscillatoria [44], Leptolyngbya [45], Nodosilinea [46], Pseudanabaena [46], Cyanobium [23], Synechocystis [46], and Synechococcus [46]. In the present study, we add another genus showing a cytotoxic effect against human cancer cell lines, the novel genus Leptothoe [16]. In fact, our sponge-associated Leptothoe strains (TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215) were found to be highly cytotoxic, and the newly described sponge-associated species Le. spongobia [16] seems to be the most promising since the extracts of both Le. spongobia strains (TAU-MAC 1015 and 1115) were the most potent. As it comes out, these sponge-associated strains seem to produce cytotoxic compounds and deserve further research. Some examples of potent anticancer compounds isolated from cyanobacteria, with known cytotoxicity mechanisms, are dolastatins, cryptophycins, apratoxins, and aurilides [2,8]. On the other hand, a significant number of anticancer compounds deriving from cyanobacteria with unknown mode of cytotoxic action exists, including dragonamides, minutissamides, and almiramides [8].
Thus far, the most recent approaches to explore the bioactivity of marine cyanobacteria have mainly addressed free-living forms, due to the limitation posed by the inability to isolate and culture symbiotic microorganisms. Therefore, few studies assessing the biotechnological potential of sponge-associated cyanobacteria exist. Previously, three Leptolyngbya and Synechococcus strains isolated from the Mediterranean sponge Petrosia ficiformis were investigated for their bioactive properties, based on bioassays with human erythrocytes, Artemia salina nauplii, and Paracentrotus lividus gametes and showed cytotoxic activity [18]. The same bioassays were performed in 12 recently isolated cyanobacteria from sponges of the Portuguese coast and eight extracts showed a promising potential [47]. Herein, sponge-associated cyanobacterial strains were tested for the first time against pathogenic bacteria species and human cancer cell lines, and some of them seem to be promising.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, we performed an assessment on the potential of sponge-associated cyanobacteria isolates, representing different taxa of Synechococcales and Pleurocapsales orders, to produce bioactive compounds and the biological activity of their extracts. PKS genes were detected in all sponge-associated strains examined, indicating the metabolic potential of the isolates, whereas they were more ubiquitous than NRPS genes. Sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains belonging to Leptothoe, Pseudanabaena, and Synechococcus were found to have activity mainly against Staphylococcus aureus; Pseudanabaena cf. persicina TAU-MAC 1415 showed the strongest inhibitory effect. Moreover, four out of five sponge-associated Leptothoe strains were found to be cytotoxic. Taking into account previous works that screened strains corresponding to the Leptothoe clade for cytotoxicity and are discussed herein, we could hypothesize that this lineage is enriched with core gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of cytotoxic compounds. Although these findings should be regarded as indicative, they highlight the metabolic potential of these sponge-associated cyanobacterial isolates to produce natural products and allow the selection of the most promising strains for further studies to isolate and identify the bioactive molecule(s).

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Cyanobacterial Isolates and Culture Conditions

Fifteen strains of sponge-associated cyanobacteria of the Thessaloniki Aristotle University Microalgae and Cyanobacteria (TAU-MAC) culture collection [48] were used in this study. Among these, ten sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains have been previously isolated from sponges and identified as members of the taxa Synechococcus, Xenococcus, Pseudanabaena, Schizotrichaceae, and the newly described genus Leptothoe [15,16], while five strains were characterized in the present study (Table 3). The cultures were grown in MN medium with the addition of inorganic nitrogen [49]. Cultures were maintained under white fluorescent light (20 μmol·photons·m−2·s−1) with a 12:12 h light: dark cycle at 20 ± 1.0 °C.

5.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Cultured sponge-associated cyanobacteria cells (1.5 mL) were harvested during exponential growth phase by centrifugation. The cells were resuspended in 800 μL of lysis buffer [2% (w/v) Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB), 100 mM Tris⎯HCl, 1.4 M NaCl, 1% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and 20 mM disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid] [50] and incubated at 65 °C for 1 h (gently shacked every 10 min). The sample of lysed cells was extracted with chloroform–isoamyl alcohol using the protocol described by Atashpaz et al. (2010) [50]. Partial 16S rRNA gene was amplified from strains TAU-MAC 1515, 1715, 1815, 1915, and 2015 using CYA106F and 23S30R primers [51,52], as described by Konstantinou et al. [15]. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed according to the methods described previously [15,16]. PCR amplifications of PKS and NRPS gene clusters from all 15 cyanobacteria strains were performed using the degenerate oligonucleotide primer pairs DKF/DKR [53] and MTF2/MTR [54], respectively. PCR reactions were carried out using an Eppendorf MasterCycler Pro (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and were prepared in a volume of 25 μL containing 5× PCR buffer, 200 μM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 0.5 μΜ of each of the primers, 0.8 U of taq DNA polymerase, and 30–80 ng of genomic DNA, determined with the Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C (DKF/DKR) or 48 °C (MTF2/MTR) for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were separated on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel by electrophoresis, visualized with Μidory Green (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH, Düren, Germany), and photographed under UV transillumination.
PCR products of the 16S rRNA gene were purified using the Nucleospin Gel and PCR clean up (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) kit. The purified products were sequenced using the same primer pairs as in the PCR amplifications with ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer. Partial 16S rRNA sequence data were obtained from TAU-MAC 1515, 1715, 1815, 1915, and 2015 and processed with BioEdit (Ibis Biosciences 1997–2015) software. Chimera check was performed for sequences using Pintail [55]. Sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MN833625–MN833629.

5.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of all 15 sponge-associated cyanobacteria strains and sequences that showed >97% sequence similarity via BLAST searches (at least 1065 nucleotides) were included in the analysis along with representative sequences of taxa of four major cyanobacteria orders (Synechococcales, Pleurocapsales, Oscillatoriales, and Nostocales). Two sequences of the unicellular Gloeobacter violaceus (GenBank acc. No. AF132790 and AF132790) were used as outgroup, because genus Gloeobacter is distantly related to all cyanobacteria taxa [56]. Multiple sequence alignments were performed in MEGA v. 7.0 [57] using ClustalW [58]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). The GTR+I+G model was determined in jModelTest 0.1.1 [59] as the most appropriate, based on both the Bayesian and Akaike information criterion, and was used for ML and BI analyses. The ML analysis was performed in MEGA v. 7.0 [57]. Bootstrap resampling was performed on 1000 replicates. Bayesian analysis was conducted using MrBayes 3.2.6 [60]. Four Metropolis-coupled MCMC chains (three heated chains and one cold) were run for 10,000,000 generations, the first 2,500,000 generations were discarded as burn-in, and the following datasets were sampled every 1000th generation. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using the FigTree (V1.4.3) software.

5.4. Cyanotoxin Analysis Using LC-MS/MS

Lyophilized cyanobacterial cells were extracted for the analysis of cylindrospermopsin (CYN), anatoxin-a (ATX-a), nodularin (NOD), and 12 microcystins (MCs), as described in detail by Christophoridis et al. [61]. Briefly, 10 mg dry weight (dw) of culture material were suspended in 1.5 mL 75% (v/v) aqueous methanol, sonicated for 15 min in a sonication bath, centrifuged for 10 min at 4000 rpm, and the supernatant was collected. The pellet was re-extracted twice, with 1.5 mL 75% (v/v) aqueous methanol and 1.5 mL n-butanol. Then, 1.5 mL of the pooled supernatants were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen stream. The residue was dissolved in 0.5 mL of 5% (v/v) aqueous methanol and sonicated for 5 min.
LC-MS/MS analysis of CYN, ATX-a, NOD, and 12 MCs ([D-Asp3]MC-RR, MC-RR, MC-YR, MC-HtyR, [D-Asp3]MC-LR, MC-LR, MC-HilR, MC-WR, MC-LA, MC-LY, MC-LW, and MC-LF) was performed on a Finnigan Surveyor LC system, equipped with a Finnigan Surveyor AS autosampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific), coupled with Finnigan TSQ Quantum Discovery Max triple-stage quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using positive electrospray ionization (ESI) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Xcalibur software 2.1 SP 1160 was used to control the system and for data acquisition. The determination of 15 cyanotoxins was carried out according to the LC-MS/MS method described by Zervou et al. [31]. Detection limits (LODs) of the applied method were 0.1 μg·g−1 dw for CYN, 0.3 μg·g−1 dw for ATX-a, 0.2 μg·g−1 dw for NOD, and varied from 0.1 to 0.7 μg·g−1 dw for MCs.

5.5. Extract Preparation for Assays

Sponge-associated cyanobacteria cells were harvested at the exponential growth phase (between 25 and 35 days of growth) by centrifugation and were freeze-dried. Extract preparation for antimicrobial assays was done as follows: lyophilized culture material (~30 mg dry weight) was dissolved in 8 mL of 75% (v/v) aqueous methanol and sonicated for 15 min. Further, the extraction procedure was performed according to the protocols described by Gkelis et al. [28,62].
Extract preparation for the cytotoxicity assay and for the estimation of the antioxidant potential was done as follows: lyophilized culture material (~50 mg dw) was extracted with 20 mL 90% (v/v) aqueous methanol. The mixture was vortexed for 3 min, sonicated for cell lysis in a sonication bath for 15 min, and vortexed again for 15 min. Supernatant was collected in a round-bottom flask, after centrifugation for 5 min at 4000 rpm. The pellet was further extracted with 20 mL methanol, vortexed for 15 min, and centrifuged for 5 min at 4000 rpm. Supernatants were pooled in the same round-bottom flask and concentrated under vacuum using a rotary evaporator (35–40 °C). Residue was transferred assisted by small portions of methanol in a pre-weighted vial and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen steam. Dry weight of final extract was measured in order to evaluate the bioactivity.

5.6. Agar Disc Diffusion Assay

Four heterotrophic bacteria strains, Escherichia coli 8879, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12469, Bacillus subtilis 3610, and Staphylococcus aureus 9518, were used for antibacterial assays. Cultures were grown in Mueller Hinton Broth (MH, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Sterilized Whatman® filter paper discs (6 mm diameter) (Merck) were impregnated with the cyanobacterial extract and placed on MH II Agar (Merck) plates seeded with a lawn of the tested microorganism. Double-distilled water (ddH2O) was used as a negative control. After 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, the plates were analyzed for inhibition zones, which were measured for every cyanobacterial extract.

5.7. Human Cell Lines and Cell Culture Conditions

Normal human skin fibroblasts (AG01523) used in this work were obtained from the Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ, USA). Human breast cancer epithelial cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, human skin cancer epithelial cells A-431 and human colon cancer epithelial cells HT-29 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Skin fibroblasts and cancer cells were routinely cultured in DMEM containing penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg·mL−1), and 15% or 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), respectively (all from Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cultures were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and cells were subcultured when necessary using a trypsin/citrate (0.25%/0.30%, w/v) solution.

5.8. Cytotoxicity Assay

Obtained extracts were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a final concentration of 20 mg·mL−1 and their effect on cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay, as previously reported [63]. In brief, cells were plated in 96-well plates before the addition of two-fold serial dilutions of the extracts to achieve final concentrations ranging from 0 to 250 μg·mL−1. The same concentrations of DMSO alone were also tested to rule out the possibility of a cytotoxic effect caused by the solvent itself. Cells were incubated with DMSO or the extracts at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 72 h. Optical density was measured at 550 nm and cell viability was presented as percent ratio of the samples not treated with the extracts. IC50 values were calculated for the four most potent extracts.

5.9. Estimation of the Antioxidant Potential

Extracts’ putative antioxidant potential was estimated with the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay, as reported previously [63,64,65] with slight modifications. In detail, human skin fibroblasts were plated in 96-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 15% (v/v) FBS and were grown until they reached confluence. Cells were then deprived of serum by medium change to DMEM containing 0.1% (v/v) FBS for 24 h, before the addition of 10 μM of DCFH-DA in each well for 1.5 h. Then, cells were incubated with selected non-cytotoxic concentrations of the extracts or DMSO alone, as well as with the known antioxidants N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, Merck) and 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox, Merck) that served as positive controls. Fluorescence intensity (excitation wavelength: 485 nm, emission wavelength: 520 nm) was measured by an Infinite 200 Tecan microtiter-plate photometer (Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland) and alterations in intracellular ROS levels were expressed as a percent ratio of the samples not treated with the extracts.

5.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Statgraphics Centurion software (Manugistics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). IC50 values of selected extracts were compared using the ANOVA test and Fisher’s LSD post hoc analysis (p < 0.05). Means not sharing common letters are significantly different from each other.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; study design, all authors; formal analysis, D.K., E.M., S.-K.Z. and P.G.; phylogenetic analysis, D.K.; cyanotoxin analysis and preparation of extracts for assays, S.-K.Z.; cytotoxic and anti-oxidant activities, E.M. and P.G.; antibacterial assays D.K.; validation, S.G., D.K., E.M., S.-K.Z. and P.G.; data curation, S.G. and D.K; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, S.G., D.K., E.M., S.-K.Z. and P.G.; visualization, D.K., E.M., S.-K.Z. and P.G.; supervision, S.G.; project administration, S.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is implemented by the Operational Program "Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning" and is co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund) and Greek national funds (MIS 5004698).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Drs. Anastasia Hiskia and Dimitris Kletsas for their invaluable contribution to cyanotoxin analysis and cytotoxic/antioxidant assays, respectively, carried out in their laboratories.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dittmann, E.; Fewer, D.P.; Neilan, B.A. Cyanobacterial toxins: Biosynthetic routes and evolutionary roots. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nunnery, J.K.; Mevers, E.; Gerwick, W.H. Biologically active secondary metabolites from marine cyanobacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Singh, R.; Parihar, P.; Singh, M.; Bajguz, A.; Kumar, J.; Singh, S.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Uncovering Potential Applications of Cyanobacteria and Algal Metabolites in Biology, Agriculture and Medicine: Current Status and Future Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tan, L.T. Pharmaceutical agents from filamentous marine cyanobacteria. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dittmann, E.; Gugger, M.; Sivonen, K.; Fewer, D.P. Natural Product Biosynthetic Diversity and Comparative Genomics of the Cyanobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mi, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, S.; Yan, X. New peptides isolated from marine cyanobacteria, an overview over the past decade. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Costa, M.; Costa-Rodrigues, J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Barros, P.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Marine cyanobacteria compounds with anticancer properties: A review on the implication of apoptosis. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2181–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Martins, M.D.R.; Costa, M. Marine cyanobacteria compounds with anticancer properties: Implication of apoptosis. In Handbook of Anticancer Drugs from Marine Origin; Kim, S.-K., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 621–647. ISBN 9783319071442. [Google Scholar]
  9. Deng, C.; Pan, B.; O’Connor, O.A. Brentuximab Vedotin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Adams, D.G.; Duggan, P.S.; Jackson, O. Cyanobacterial symbioses. In Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time; Whitton, B.A., Ed.; Springer: Dordrech, Germany, 2012; pp. 593–636. ISBN 0306468557. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mehbub, M.; Lei, J.; Franco, C.; Zhang, W. Marine Sponge Derived Natural Products between 2001 and 2010: Trends and Opportunities for Discovery of Bioactives. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 4539–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Thomas, T.; Moitinho-Silva, L.; Lurgi, M.; Björk, J.R.; Easson, C.; Astudillo-García, C.; Olson, J.B.; Erwin, P.M.; López-Legentil, S.; Luter, H.; et al. Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Thomas, T.; Rusch, D.; DeMaere, M.Z.; Yung, P.Y.; Lewis, M.; Halpern, A.; Heidelberg, K.B.; Egan, S.; Steinberg, P.D.; Kjelleberg, S. Functional genomic signatures of sponge bacteria reveal unique and shared features of symbiosis. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hentschel, U.; Piel, J.; Degnan, S.M.; Taylor, M.W. Genomic insights into the marine sponge microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Konstantinou, D.; Gerovasileiou, V.; Voultsiadou, E.; Gkelis, S. Sponges-cyanobacteria associations: Global diversity overview and new data from the Eastern Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Konstantinou, D.; Voultsiadou, E.; Panteris, E.; Zervou, S.K.; Hiskia, A.; Gkelis, S. Leptothoe, a new genus of marine cyanobacteria (Synechococcales) and three new species associated with sponges from the Aegean Sea. J. Phycol. 2019, 55, 882–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Regueiras, A.; Alex, A.; Pereira, S.; Costa, M.S.; Antunes, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Cyanobacterial diversity in the marine sponge Hymeniacidon perlevis from a temperate region (Portuguese coast, Northeast Atlantic). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 79, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pagliara, P.; Caroppo, C. Cytotoxic and antimitotic activities in aqueous extracts of eight cyanobacterial strains isolated from the marine sponge Petrosia ficiformis. Toxicon 2011, 57, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perkerson, R.B.; Johansen, J.R.; Kovácik, L.; Brand, J.; Kaštovský, J.; Casamatta, D.A. A unique pseudanabaenalean (cyanobacteria) genus Nodosilinea gen. nov. based on morphological and molecular data. J. Phycol. 2011, 47, 1397–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dadheech, P.K.; Mahmoud, H.; Kotut, K.; Krienitz, L. Haloleptolyngbya alcalis gen. et sp. nov., a new filamentous cyanobacterium from the soda lake Nakuru, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 2012, 691, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Papendorf, O.; Konig, G.M.; Wright, A.D. Hierridin B and 2,4-dimethoxy-6-heptadecyl-phenol, secondary metabolites from the cyanobacterium Phormidium ectocarpi with antiplasmodial activity. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 2383–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Freitas, S.; Martins, R.; Costa, M.; Leão, P.N.; Vitorino, R.; Vasconcelos, V.; Urbatzka, R. Hierridin B Isolated from a Marine Cyanobacterium Alters VDAC1, Mitochondrial Activity, and Cell Cycle Genes on HT-29 Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Leão, P.N.; Costa, M.; Ramos, V.; Pereira, A.R.; Fernandes, V.C.; Domingues, V.F.; Gerwick, W.H.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Martins, R. Antitumor Activity of Hierridin B, a Cyanobacterial Secondary Metabolite Found in both Filamentous and Unicellular Marine Strains. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Calteau, A.; Fewer, D.P.; Latifi, A.; Coursin, T.; Laurent, T.; Jokela, J.; Kerfeld, C.A.; Sivonen, K.; Piel, J.; Gugger, M. Phylum-wide comparative genomics unravel the diversity of secondary metabolism in Cyanobacteria. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Brito, Â.; Gaifem, J.; Ramos, V.; Glukhov, E.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Gerwick, W.H.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Mendes, M.V.; Tamagnini, P. Bioprospecting Portuguese Atlantic coast cyanobacteria for bioactive secondary metabolites reveals untapped chemodiversity. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shih, P.M.; Wu, D.; Latifi, A.; Axen, S.D.; Fewer, D.P.; Talla, E.; Calteau, A.; Cai, F.; Tandeau de Marsac, N.; Rippka, R.; et al. Improving the coverage of the cyanobacterial phylum using diversity-driven genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Verma, A.; Barua, A.; Ruvindy, R.; Savela, H.; Ajani, P.A.; Murray, S.A. The genetic basis of toxin biosynthesis in dinoflagellates. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gkelis, S.; Panou, M.; Konstantinou, D.; Apostolidis, P.; Kasampali, A.; Papadimitriou, S.; Kati, D.; Di Lorenzo, G.M.; Ioakeim, S.; Zervou, S.K.; et al. Diversity, cyanotoxin production, and bioactivities of cyanobacteria isolated from freshwaters of greece. Toxins 2019, 11, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gkelis, S.; Fernández Tussy, P.; Zaoutsos, N. Isolation and preliminary characterization of cyanobacteria strains from freshwaters of Greece. Open Life Sci. 2015, 10, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shishido, T.K.; Jokela, J.; Humisto, A.; Suurnäkki, S.; Wahlsten, M.; Alvarenga, D.O.; Sivonen, K.; Fewer, D.P. The biosynthesis of rare homo-amino acid containing variants of microcystin by a benthic cyanobacterium. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zervou, S.K.; Christophoridis, C.; Kaloudis, T.; Triantis, T.M.; Hiskia, A. New SPE-LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of multi-class cyanobacterial and algal toxins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 323, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meriluoto, J.; Spoof, L.; Codd, G.A. Handbook of Cyanobacterial Monitoring and Cyanotoxin Analysis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; ISBN 1119068681. [Google Scholar]
  33. Choi, H.; Engene, N.; Smith, J.E.; Preskitt, L.B.; Gerwick, W.H. Crossbyanols A–D, toxic brominated polyphenyl ethers from the hawai’ian bloom-forming cyanobacterium leptolyngbya crossbyana. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zainuddin, E.N.; Jansen, R.; Nimtz, M.; Wray, V.; Preisitsch, M.; Lalk, M.; Mundt, S. Lyngbyazothrins A–D, antimicrobial cyclic undecapeptides from the cultured cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Martins, R.F.; Ramos, M.F.; Herfindal, L.; Sousa, J.A.; Skærven, K.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic assessment of marine cyanobacteria—Synechocystis and Synechococcus. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Swain, S.S.; Paidesetty, S.K.; Padhy, R.N. Antibacterial, antifungal and antimycobacterial compounds from cyanobacteria. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 90, 760–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Engene, N.; Rottacker, E.C.; Kaštovský, J.; Byrum, T.; Choi, H.; Ellisman, M.H.; Komárek, J.; Gerwick, W.H. Moorea producens gen. nov., sp. nov. and Moorea bouillonii comb. nov., tropical marine cyanobacteria rich in bioactive secondary metabolites. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Engene, N.; Paul, V.J.; Byrum, T.; Gerwick, W.H.; Thor, A.; Ellisman, M.H. Five chemically rich species of tropical marine cyanobacteria of the genus Okeania gen. nov. (Oscillatoriales, Cyanoprokaryota). J. Phycol. 2013, 49, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taori, K.; Paul, V.J.; Luesch, H. Structure and activity of largazole, a potent anti-proliferative agent from the Floridian marine cyanobacterium Symploca sp. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1806–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salvador-Reyes, L.A.; Luesch, H. Biological targets and mechanisms of action of natural products from marine cyanobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 478–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Engene, N.; Tronholm, A.; Salvador-Reyes, L.A.; Luesch, H.; Paul, V.J. Caldora penicillata gen. nov., comb. nov. (Cyanobacteria), a pantropical marine species with biomedical relevance. J. Phycol. 2015, 51, 670–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Andrianasolo, E.H.; Gross, H.; Goeger, D.; Musafija-Girt, M.; McPhail, K.; Leal, R.M.; Mooberry, S.L.; Gerwick, W.H. Isolation of swinholide A and related glycosylated derivatives from two field collections of marine cyanobacteria. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1375–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Salvador, L.A.; Paul, V.J.; Luesch, H. Caylobolide B, a macrolactone from symplostatin 1-producing marine cyanobacteria Phormidium spp. from Florida. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1606–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Plaza, A.; Bewley, C.A. Largamides A-H, unusual cyclic peptides from the marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria sp. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6898–6907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Thornburg, C.C.; Thimmaiah, M.; Shaala, L.A.; Hau, A.M.; Malmo, J.M.; Ishmael, J.E.; Youssef, D.T.A.; McPhail, K.L. Cyclic depsipeptides, grassypeptolides D and e and Ibu-epidemethoxylyngbyastatin 3, from a Red Sea Leptolyngbya cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1677–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Costa, M.; Garcia, M.; Costa-Rodrigues, J.; Costa, M.S.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Barros, P.; Barreiro, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Exploring bioactive properties of marine cyanobacteria isolated from the Portuguese coast: High potential as a source of anticancer compounds. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Regueiras, A.; Pereira, S.; Costa, M.S.; Vasconcelos, V. Differential toxicity of cyanobacteria isolated from marine sponges towards echinoderms and crustaceans. Toxins 2018, 10, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gkelis, S.; Panou, M. Capturing biodiversity: Linking a cyanobacteria culture collection to the “scratchpads” virtual research environment enhances biodiversity knowledge. Biodivers. Data J. 2016, 4, e7965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Rippka, R. Isolation and Purification of Cyanobacteria. Methods Enzymol. 1988, 167, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Atashpaz, S.; Khani, S.; Barzegari, A.; Barar, J.; Vahed, S.Z.; Azarbaijani, R.; Omidi, Y. A robust universal method for extraction of genomic DNA from bacterial species. Microbiology 2010, 79, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nübel, U.; Garcia-Pichel, F.; Muyzer, G. PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 3327–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Taton, A.; Grubisic, S.; Brambilla, E.; De Wit, R.; Wilmotte, A. Cyanobacterial diversity in natural and artificial microbial mats of Lake Fryxell (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica): A morphological and molecular approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5157–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Moffitt, M.C.; Neilan, B.A. On the presence of peptide synthetase and polyketide synthase genes in the cyanobacterial genus Nodularia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 196, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Neilan, B.A.; Dittmann, E.; Rouhiainen, L.; Bass, R.A.; Schaub, V.; Sivonen, K.; Börner, T. Nonribosomal peptide synthesis and toxigenicity of cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4089–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ashelford, K.E.; Chuzhanova, N.A.; Fry, J.C.; Jones, A.J.; Weightman, A.J. Media release • communique aux medias • medienmitteilung. World 2005, 71, 7724–7736. [Google Scholar]
  56. Komárek, J.; Kaštovský, J.; Mareš, J.; Johansen, J.R. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014, 86, 295–335. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; Mcgettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Christophoridis, C.; Zervou, S.-K.; Manolidi, K.; Katsiapi, M.; Moustaka-Gouni, M.; Kaloudis, T.; Triantis, T.M.; Hiskia, A. Occurrence and diversity of cyanotoxins in Greek lakes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gkelis, S.; Panou, M.; Chronis, I.; Zervou, S.K.; Christophoridis, C.; Manolidi, K.; Ntislidou, C.; Triantis, T.M.; Kaloudis, T.; Hiskia, A.; et al. Monitoring a newly re-born patient: Water quality and cyanotoxin occurrence in a reconstructed shallow mediterranean lake. Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 2017, 8, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Mavrogonatou, E.; Angelopoulou, M.T.; Kletsas, D. The catabolic effect of TNFa on bovine nucleus pulposus intervertebral disc cells and the restraining role of glucosamine sulfate in the TNFa-mediated up-regulation of MMP-3. J. Orthop. Res. 2014, 32, 1701–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dimozi, A.; Mavrogonatou, E.; Sklirou, A.; Kletsas, D. Oxidative stress inhibits the proliferation, induces premature senescence and promotes a catabolic phenotype in human nucleus pulposus intervertebral disc cells. Eur. Cells Mater. 2015, 30, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mavrogonatou, E.; Konstantinou, A.; Kletsas, D. Long-term exposure to TNF-α leads human skin fibroblasts to a p38 MAPK- and ROS-mediated premature senescence. Biogerontology 2018, 19, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins 12 00073 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of the studied sponge-associated strains based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence (1056 bp), in relationship to representative strains of four cyanobacteria orders (Synechococcales, Pleurocapsales, Oscillatoriales and Nostocales), with Gloeobacter violaceus as outgroup. The tree was constructed with the Bayesian Inference (ΒΙ) method and the maximum-likelihood (ML) method; BI topology is demonstrated. Support values are indicated as posterior probability for Bayesian inference and bootstrap support for Maximum Likelihood analysis. Strains of the present study are indicated in bold, while GenBank accession numbers are indicated in brackets. Blue dots represent the detection of PKS encoding genes and pink triangles represent the detection of NRPS encoding genes. The bar represents 0.040 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of the studied sponge-associated strains based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence (1056 bp), in relationship to representative strains of four cyanobacteria orders (Synechococcales, Pleurocapsales, Oscillatoriales and Nostocales), with Gloeobacter violaceus as outgroup. The tree was constructed with the Bayesian Inference (ΒΙ) method and the maximum-likelihood (ML) method; BI topology is demonstrated. Support values are indicated as posterior probability for Bayesian inference and bootstrap support for Maximum Likelihood analysis. Strains of the present study are indicated in bold, while GenBank accession numbers are indicated in brackets. Blue dots represent the detection of PKS encoding genes and pink triangles represent the detection of NRPS encoding genes. The bar represents 0.040 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Toxins 12 00073 g001
Toxins 12 00073 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts (TAU-MAC Culture Collection) on normal human skin fibroblasts’ and human cancer cells’ viability, as estimated by the MTT assay. Cells were plated in 96-well plates before the addition of each extract or DMSO alone at concentrations from 0 to 250 μg·mL−1 for 72 h. Optical density was measured at 550 nm and cell viability was calculated as a percent ratio of the samples solely treated with the respective DMSO concentration. Data presented are mean values ± standard deviations. At least two independent experiments were conducted in triplicates with similar results. One representative experiment is depicted here.
Figure 2. Effect of sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts (TAU-MAC Culture Collection) on normal human skin fibroblasts’ and human cancer cells’ viability, as estimated by the MTT assay. Cells were plated in 96-well plates before the addition of each extract or DMSO alone at concentrations from 0 to 250 μg·mL−1 for 72 h. Optical density was measured at 550 nm and cell viability was calculated as a percent ratio of the samples solely treated with the respective DMSO concentration. Data presented are mean values ± standard deviations. At least two independent experiments were conducted in triplicates with similar results. One representative experiment is depicted here.
Toxins 12 00073 g002
Toxins 12 00073 g003 550
Figure 3. Estimation of intracellular ROS levels in normal human skin fibroblasts treated with the studied sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts. Cells were plated in 96-well plates until they reached confluence. After a 24-h serum deprivation, cells were pre-incubated with 10 μΜ DCFH-DA and then exposed to the extracts at the following concentrations: 1015 and 1115 at 7.5 μg·mL−1; 0615, 0715, 0915, 1215, and 1315 at 15 μg·mL−1; 0815 and 1615 at 30 μg·mL−1; 1415, 1915, and 2015 at 50 μg·mL−1; 1515 and 1715 at 100 μg·mL−1; and 1815 at 200 μg·mL−1 or to the known antioxidants NAC (2 mM) and Trolox (20 μΜ). Fluorescence intensity was measured at the designated time points up to 72 h. Intracellular ROS levels were estimated as a percent ratio of the control. Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations.
Figure 3. Estimation of intracellular ROS levels in normal human skin fibroblasts treated with the studied sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts. Cells were plated in 96-well plates until they reached confluence. After a 24-h serum deprivation, cells were pre-incubated with 10 μΜ DCFH-DA and then exposed to the extracts at the following concentrations: 1015 and 1115 at 7.5 μg·mL−1; 0615, 0715, 0915, 1215, and 1315 at 15 μg·mL−1; 0815 and 1615 at 30 μg·mL−1; 1415, 1915, and 2015 at 50 μg·mL−1; 1515 and 1715 at 100 μg·mL−1; and 1815 at 200 μg·mL−1 or to the known antioxidants NAC (2 mM) and Trolox (20 μΜ). Fluorescence intensity was measured at the designated time points up to 72 h. Intracellular ROS levels were estimated as a percent ratio of the control. Results are expressed as mean values ± standard deviations.
Toxins 12 00073 g003
Table
Table 1. Effect of crude cyanobacterial extracts on the growth of bacteria. Inhibition zones were measured in mm diameter including the diameter of the paper disk (− no inhibitory effect; + <10 mm; ++ 10 mm).
Table 1. Effect of crude cyanobacterial extracts on the growth of bacteria. Inhibition zones were measured in mm diameter including the diameter of the paper disk (− no inhibitory effect; + <10 mm; ++ 10 mm).
Cyanobacteria Strain (TAU-MAC)Bacteria
Gram+Gram-
Staphylococcus aureus 9518Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12469Escherichia coli 8879 Bacillus subtilis 3610
Xenococcus sp. 0615−−−−
Synechococcus sp. 0715−−−−
Synechococcus sp. 0815+−−−
Leptothoe sithoniana 0915+−−−
Leptothoe spongobia 1015−−−−
Leptothoe spongobia 1115+−−−
Leptothoe kymatousa 1215−−−−
Schizotrichaceae sp. 1315−−−−
Pseudanabaena cf. persicina 1415++++−
Pseudanabaena sp. 1515−−−−
Leptothoe kymatousa 1615+−−−
Leptolyngbya sp. 1715−−−−
Leptolyngbya sp. 1815−−−−
Xenococcus sp. 1915−−−−
Synechococcus sp. 2015−−−−
Table
Table 2. IC50 values (means ± standard deviations in μg·mL−1) of sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215. Values not sharing a common letter among cell lines tested after ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD analysis (p < 0.05) are significantly different.
Table 2. IC50 values (means ± standard deviations in μg·mL−1) of sponge-associated cyanobacterial extracts TAU-MAC 0915, 1015, 1115, and 1215. Values not sharing a common letter among cell lines tested after ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD analysis (p < 0.05) are significantly different.
IC50 (μg·mL−1)p Value (ANOVA test)Fisher’s LSD
TAU-MAC 0915
Skin fibroblasts28.76 ± 18.790.0149ab
MDA-MB-23144.58 ± 2.99b
MCF-79.68 ± 0.58c
A-43129.12 ± 1.37ab
HT-2926.45 ± 8.39ac
TAU-MAC 1015
Skin fibroblasts45.74 ± 18.400.0439a
MDA-MB-23126.17 ± 7.41b
MCF-720.53 ± 9.68b
A-43114.03 ± 1.48b
HT-2917.56 ± 0.69b
TAU-MAC 1115
Skin fibroblasts45.25 ± 3.760.0000a
MDA-MB-23137.26 ± 1.44b
MCF-714.88 ±4.55c
A-43115.86 ± 0.73c
HT-2918.39 ± 1.37c
TAU-MAC 1215
Skin fibroblasts112.58 ± 7.860.0102a
MDA-MB-23165.64 ± 2.43b
MCF-734.95 ± 8.71b
A-43142.66 ± 31.55b
HT-2955.38 ± 17.51b
Table
Table 3. Cyanobacteria strains isolated from different sponge-hosts and habitat types from the North Aegean Sea, Greece (39.951° N, 23.685° E).
Table 3. Cyanobacteria strains isolated from different sponge-hosts and habitat types from the North Aegean Sea, Greece (39.951° N, 23.685° E).
Strain (TAU-MAC)TaxonomySponge-HostHabitat-TypeReference
0615Xenococcus sp.Ircinia variabilisoverhang[15]
0715Synechococcus sp.Axinella cannabinaoverhang[15]
0815Synechococcus sp.Axinella damicornisoverhang[15]
0915Leptothoe sithonianaPetrosia (Petrosia) ficiformisrocky reef[16]
1015Leptothoe spongobiaDysidea avararocky reef[16]
1115Leptothoe spongobiaAcanthella acutaoverhang[16]
1215Leptothoe kymatousaChondrilla nucularocky reef[16]
1315Schizotricaceae sp.Aplysina aerophobarocky reef[15]
1415Pseudanabaena cf. persicinaAxinella damicornisoverhang[15]
1515Pseudanabaena sp.Spirastrella cunctatrixrocky reefThis study
1615Leptothoe kymatousaChondrilla nucularocky reef[15]
1715Leptolyngbya sp.Hexadella racovitzaioverhangThis study
1815Leptolyngbya sp.Agelas oroidesrocky reefThis study
1915Xenococcus sp.Haliclona (Halichoclona) fulvaoverhangThis study
2015Synechococcus sp.Stryphnus ponderosusrocky reefThis study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Konstantinou, D.; Mavrogonatou, E.; Zervou, S.-K.; Giannogonas, P.; Gkelis, S. Bioprospecting Sponge-Associated Marine Cyanobacteria to Produce Bioactive Compounds. Toxins 2020, 12, 73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020073

AMA Style

Konstantinou D, Mavrogonatou E, Zervou S-K, Giannogonas P, Gkelis S. Bioprospecting Sponge-Associated Marine Cyanobacteria to Produce Bioactive Compounds. Toxins. 2020; 12(2):73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Konstantinou, Despoina, Eleni Mavrogonatou, Sevasti-Kiriaki Zervou, Panagiotis Giannogonas, and Spyros Gkelis. 2020. "Bioprospecting Sponge-Associated Marine Cyanobacteria to Produce Bioactive Compounds" Toxins 12, no. 2: 73. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins12020073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop