Next Article in Journal
Combining Patulin with Cadmium Induces Enhanced Hepatotoxicity and Nephrotoxicity In Vitro and In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of the Nephrotoxin Ochratoxin A on Human Renal Cells Studied by a Novel Co-Culture Model Is Influenced by the Presence of Fibroblasts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Toxicity of Crude Toxins Produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Aphis craccivora (Koch)

1
Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Independent Science Advisor, York YO10 5AQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 5 March 2021 / Accepted: 15 March 2021 / Published: 18 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)

Abstract

:
Cordyceps fumosorosea, an insect pathogenic fungus, produces different toxins/secondary metabolites which can act as pest control agents. This study reports the extraction and characterization of crude mycelial extracts of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 along with their bio-efficacy against Bemisia tabaci and Aphis craccivora. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometery and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 extracts showed the presence of five major compounds—Trichodermin, 5-Methylmellein, Brevianamide F, Enniatin and Beauvericin—which all may potentially be involved in insecticidal activity. The HPLC analysis of C. fumosorosea mycelial extracts and Beauvericin standard showed similar chromatographic peaks, with the content of Beauvericin in the crude toxin being calculated as 0.66 mg/ml. The median lethal concentrations of C. fumosorosea mycelial extracts towards first, second, third and fourth instar nymphs of A. craccivora were 46.35, 54.55, 68.94, and 81.92 µg/mL, respectively. The median lethal concentrations of C. fumosorosea mycelial extracts towards first, second, third and fourth instar nymphs of B. tabaci were 62.67, 72.84, 77.40, and 94.40 µg/mL, respectively. Our results demonstrate that bioactive compounds produced by C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 have insecticidal properties and could, therefore, be developed into biopesticides for the management of B. tabaci and A. craccivora.
Key Contribution: This study reports the extraction and characterisation of crude mycelial extracts of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 along with their bio-efficacy against Bemisia tabaci and Aphis craccivora.

1. Introduction

Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a species complex containing 36 or more cryptic species, continues to be a major threat to field crop production across the globe [1,2]. Population levels and infestation by B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) (previously known as “Biotype B”) is by far the most common. It is the most notoriously invasive species of the Bemisia species complex, having increased greatly during the last twenty years [3,4]. Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 damages plants directly through feeding on cell sap, and indirectly by honey dew secretion which leads to sooty mould growth on plant surfaces [5]. In addition, B. tabaci MEAM1 is also a vector of over 150 viral crop diseases [6].
Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae), also known as cowpea aphid, is a major pest of cowpea and other crops in different regions of the world [7]. Both nymphs and adults can damage the crops. Aphis craccivora causes economic damage either by directly sucking the sap from aerial plant parts or by releasing honeydew on plant leaves which leads to sooty mould production [8]. The severe damage of A. craccivora can cause delayed flowering and yield a loss of more than 50% [9]. In addition, they are also a vector of many viral plant diseases [10].
Insect pest management has generally been achieved using synthetic agro-chemicals. However, their overuse has resulted in the development of insecticide resistance by many insect pests [11,12]. In addition, the negative impacts of synthetic insecticides on beneficial insects [13,14] and humans have forced the agricultural industry to seek the development of bio-rational and natural/indigenous methods to control insect pests [15]. Therefore, the development and application of biochemicals/biopesticides originating from naturally occurring insect pathogenic fungi can potentially provide an alternative to synthetic insecticides [16].
Entomopathogenic fungi have been suggested as potential agents for the biological control of different insects for over a century. Diversified species range, complex metabolic types, and appropriate safety levels for humans and other non-target organisms of entomopathogenic fungi makes them more attractive than other pest control tactics [15]. Cordyceps fumosorosea (previously known as Isaria fumosorosea) is a well-documented entomopathogen used for insect pest management [17]. Different isolates of C. fumosorosea have been effective against aphids, scales, whiteflies and other insect pests across the globe [17,18,19,20,21]. Cordyceps fumosorosea produces different secondary compounds/toxins such as Beauvericin, Beauverolides and 2,6-pyridindicarboxylic acid (also known as dipicolinic acid; DPA) [22,23,24,25] which may be effective in the control of insect pests.
The aims of the current study were to (i) extract and characterise the mycelial extracts/secondary chemicals of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 which has shown considerable pathogenicity against B. tabaci in our previous studies [26]; (ii) undertake toxicity assays of mycelial extracts/secondary chemicals against nymphal instars of B. tabaci and A. craccivora.

2. Results

2.1. Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR analysis was performed to find the functional groups of the active compounds based on the peak value in the infrared region (Figure 1 and Table 1). FTIR analysis showed the presence of prominent bands due to the O-H stretch alcohols or phenols (3458.89 cm−1), N-H alkane (Methyl) (2970.68 cm−1), C-H alkane (Methylene) (2928.95 cm−1), C≡C stretch nitrile (2015.74 cm−1), C=O carboxylic acid (1729.67 cm−1), C=C stretch alkane (1516.99 cm−1), C=O trans-alkenes (1454.26 cm−1), C=C trans-alkenes (1373.96 cm−1), C=C trans-alkenes (1344.48 cm−1), C=C ester carbonyl group (1295.41 cm−1), C=C ether/alcohol (1104.42 cm−1), C-O trans-alkenes (1013.50 cm−1), C=C vinyl-alkenes (928.39 cm−1), C=C aromatics (866.68; 744.30 cm−1), and aromatics (Ring) (525.81 cm−1).

2.2. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Cordyceps fumosorosea

The LC-MS results obtained from the ethyl acetate extract of SP502 indicated the presence of five main fractions: Trichodermin (C17H24O4; retention time: 0.340), 5-Methylmellein (C11H13O3; retention time: 0.344), Brevianamide F (C16H17N3O2; retention time: 2.0621), Enniatin (C32H55N3 O9; retention time: 2.565) and Beauvericin (C45H57N3 O9; retention time: 9.615) which may potentially be involved in insecticidal activity (Figure 2 and Table 2).

2.3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

The 1H NMR analysis of metabolic compounds produced by C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 shows a high resonance band in aliphatic (0.9–1.4 ppm), allylic, pyrrolidine ring and NeCH (2.0–2.6 ppm and 2.1–3.5 ppm), an ether linkage (3.5–4.3 ppm), and amide proton (7.3–7.8 ppm) regions. These findings further confirm the production of metabolic compounds detected through LC-MS analysis (Figure 3).

2.4. HPLC Analysis

The HPLC analysis of C. fumosorosea mycelial extracts and Beauvericin standard showed a similar chromatographic peak (at retention time 14.572 and 14.592 min). The content of Beauvericin in crude toxin was calculated to be 0.66 mg/mL (Figure 4).

2.5. Toxicity of C. fumosorosea Secondary Metabolites Against Immature Instars of B. tabaci and A. craccivora

The insecticidal activity of ethyl acetate mycelial extracts from C. fumosorosea was tested against different nymphal instar stages of B. tabaci and A. craccivora under laboratory conditions. The mycelial extracts were toxic against first to fourth instar nymphs of A. craccivora after 3 days of exposure with LC50 values of 46.35, 54.55, 68.94, and 81.92 µg/mL against first, second, third and fourth instar nymphs, respectively (Table 3).
The bioactive compounds produced by C. fumosorosea were also toxic against first to fourth instar nymphs of B. tabaci after 3 days of exposure with LC50 values of 62.67, 72.84, 77.40, and 94.40 µg/mL against first, second, third and fourth instar nymphs, respectively (Table 4).

3. Discussion

Cordyceps fumosorosea (previously Isaria fumosorosea) is a well-documented entomopathogenic fungus that has been widely commercialised for whitefly control [17]. This fungal species is also known to produce different insecticidal mycotoxins [25,27]. This study reports the characterization of mycelial extracts produced by C. fumosorosea-SP502 and their toxicity against nymphal instars of B. tabaci and A. craccivora.
FTIR analysis of the ethyl acetate mycelium extract showed the presence of prominent bands due to the O-H stretch alcohols or phenols, N-H alkane (Methyl), C-H alkane (Methylene), C≡C stretch nitrile, C=O carboxylic acid, C=C stretch alkane, C=O trans-alkenes, C=C trans- alkenes, C=C trans-alkenes, C=C ester carbonyl group, C=C ether/alcohol, C-O trans-alkenes, C=C vinyl-alkenes, C=C aromatics, and aromatics (Ring). Similar functional types have also been observed by Ragavendran et al. [28] and Vivekanandhan et al. [29] in the FTIR profiles of the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. The LC-MS analysis results revealed the presence of five major compounds responsible for the toxic activity of mycelial extracts, namely Trichodermin, 5-Methylmellein, Brevianamide F, Enniatin and Beauvericin. Previously, Qasim et al. [25] reported the production of 17 different mycotoxins, including Beauvericin by C. fumosorosea isolate FAFU-1. Supothina et al. [30] also showed Beauvericin production by Cordyceps tenuipes. The 1H NMR analysis of metabolic compounds produced by C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 shows a high resonance band at the region for aliphatic, allylic, pyrrolidine ring and NeCH, an ether linkage, and amide proton. These results are similar to the 1H NMR spectra of C. tenuipes [30] and Metarhizium anisopliae [31]. The HPLC analysis of mycelial extracts was compared with the Beauvercin standard and they showed similar chromatographic peaks. These results are in agreement with Supothina et al. [30], who also observed Beauvericin in mycelial extracts of Cordyceps tenuipes.
In the present study, mycelial extracts of C. fumosorosea-SP502 were found to be toxic against different nymphal stages of both B. tabaci and A. craccivora. The results clearly suggested that mycelial extracts of C. fumosorosea-SP502 had a broad spectrum of nymphal mortality against B. tabaci and A. craccivora. These metabolites cause infection by destroying the insect cuticle layer, which can lead to their death [28]. Similar studies have also been conducted by Wang et al. [32] using mycelial extracts of another Hypocereales fungus, Akanthomyces muscarium (previously Lecanicillium muscarium), as an insecticidal agent against B. tabaci. They reported LC50 values of 111 and 216 mg/L for mycelial extracts of Akanthomyces muscarium V3450 and Akanthomyces muscarium Vp28, respectively against third instar nymphs of B. tabaci.

4. Conclusions

Our findings reveal promising results regarding the insecticidal potential of toxic compounds produced by C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 against B. tabaci and A. craccivora. The mycelial extracts of C. fumosorosea-SP502 had a broad spectrum of nymphal mortality against both pest species. The characterisation of extracts demonstrated that Beauvericin was one of the main constituents of the mycelial extracts, since it hadinsecticidal properties. These metabolites have potential to be further developed as biopesticides formulations to control whitefly and aphid pests.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Insect Cultures

Bemisia tabaci was reared on Solanum melongena as outlined by Wang et al. [15]. Briefly, a stock culture of whiteflies was obtained from the Engineering Research Centre of Biological Control, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), Guangzhou, China. Whiteflies were maintained on eggplants (cultured in 18.0 cm pots and kept in cages to avoid any premature infestation from whiteflies or other insects until use) placed in cages at 26 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% R.H., and a photoperiod of 12 h of light: 12 h of darkness.
Stock cultures of A. craccivora were collected from the experimental research fields of SCAU. Following collection, the insects were reared on Vigna unguiculata seedlings (6 weeks old) for five generations prior to the experiments, following the method of Ekesi et al. [33] at 26 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% R.H., and a photoperiod of 12 h of light: 12 h of darkness.

5.2. Fungal Inoculum and Culture Conditions

Cordyceps fumosorosea strain SP502 isolated from soil was used during this study. The fungal strain was cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates following the method of Ali et al. [34]. The basal fungal suspension used during the current experiments was prepared by harvesting from PDA plates (10 days old culture) with ddH2O containing 0.03% Tween-80 and sieving them using filter paper (Whatman no. 2; Science Kit and Boreal Laboratories, New York, NY, USA) into sterile vials. Conidia were counted using a compound microscope and a hemocytometer (0.0625 m2; Fuchs-Rosenthal Merck Euro Lab, Darmstadt, Germany) at 40× magnification under a phase contrast microscope in order to calibrate a suspension of 1 × 107 conidia/mL.
Erlenmeyer flasks (500 mL) containing 150 mL of sterilised culture medium (per litre) consisting of 30 g of glucose, 3 g of yeast extract, 0.39 g of KH2PO4, 1.42 g of Na2HPO4·12H2O, 0.60 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.70 g of NH4NO3 and 1.00 g of KCl were inoculated with 5 mL of conidial suspension (1 × 107 conidia/mL) followed by incubation at 150 rpm and 27 °C for 5 days.

5.3. Secondary Metabolite Extraction from Cordyceps fumosorosea

Fungal cultures (following 5 days growth) were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, 4 °C for 10 min by using an Eppendorf 5804R centrifuge (Eppendorf, Germany) to remove the mycelium. The supernatant was further filtered through nylon filters (pore size 0.45 µm). The bio-active compounds were extracted using 1:1 ratio of ethyl acetate as solvent by sonication at room temperature for 10 min followed by incubation at 4 ℃ for 24 h. The organic phase (pale yellow colour) was separated from the fermentation liquid and then the ethyl acetate was separated from the extracts by rotary vacuum evaporation at 45 °C. The dried extracts appearing as a brownish paste were used for further analytical studies.

5.4. Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrophotometry (LC-MS) Analysis

The LC-MS analysis was performed by using an LC-MS/MS system, consisting of a LC Agilent 1200 using a binary pump and an automatic injector, and coupled with a 3200 QTRAP® AB SCIEX equipped with a Turbo-V™ source (electrospray ionisation) interface. The chromatographic separation of the compounds was conducted at 24 ± 1 °C on a reverse-phase analytical column C18 (3 μm, 150 × 2 mm ID) and a guard-column C18 (4 × 2 mm, ID; 3 μm). Mobile phases were as follows: methanol (0.1% acetic acid and 5 mM ammonium acetate) as Phase A and water (0.1% acetic acid and 5 mM ammonium acetate) as Phase B. The following gradient was used: equilibration at 90% B for 2 min, from 80% to 20% B in 3 min, 20% B for 1 min, from 20% to 10% B in 2 min, 10% B for 6 min, from 10% to 0% B in 3 min, 100% A for 1 min, from 100% to 50% A in 3 min, return to initial conditions in 2 min, and maintain at initial conditions for 2 min. The flow rate was 0.25 mL min−1 in all steps. Total run time was 21 min. The injection volume was 20 µL. In regard to mycotoxin analysis, the QTRAP System was used as selected reaction monitoring (SRM). The Turbo-V™ source was used in positive mode with the following settings for source/gas parameters: curtain gas (CUR) 20, ion spray voltage (IS) 5500, source temperature (TEM) 450 °C, ion source gas 1 (GS1), and ion source gas 2 (GS2) 50. The entrance potential (EP) was the same for all analytes, i.e., 10 V. Acquisition and processing data were performed using Analyst® software, version 1.5.2 (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, Canada).

5.5. Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy analysis was performed by using an MIR8035 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Darmstadt, Germany). All measurements were made at a resolution of 4 cm-1 over a frequency range of 400 to 4000 cm−1. The liquid sample was loaded directly, and the spectra were recorded at room temperature.

5.6. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was performed using a Bruker advance III-HD 600 NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) by following the method of Wang et al. [32].

5.7. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

The crude extracts and pure Beauvericin were diluted in isopropanol and subjected to high performance liquid chromatography by using a LC-20AD HPLC system (Shimadzu Chromatographic Instruments, Kyoto, Japan) and an Ultimate XB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, and 5 μm) at 35 °C. Acetonitrile was employed as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 5 µL. The compound peaks were detected at 220 nm wavelength. Beauvericin was used as the standard. The amount of specific compound that resembles the standard was expressed as mg/mL.

5.8. Toxicity of C. fumosorosea Secondary Metabolites against Immature Instars of B. tabaci and A. craccivora

Different concentrations of fungal extracts (500, 200, 100, 50, 20 and 10 µg/mL) were prepared by adding the extracts to ethyl acetate. Eggplant leaves infested with individual B. tabaci nymphal instar stages (first, second, third or fourth instar) were dipped in each concentration for 30 s following the methods of Cuthbertson et al. [35,36], respectively. The leaves were then air dried and placed in Petri dishes (ø 9 cm) with moist filter paper for moisture maintenance. Bemisia tabaci nymphs dipped in Matrine (15 mg/L) acted as positive control while whitefly nymphs dipped in ddH2O served as negative control. Four eggplant leaves with 100 B. tabaci nymphs of each instar stage/leaf were used in each treatment. The whole experimental setup was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C and 80 ± 5% R.H and 16:8 h (Light/Dark photoperiod). The whole experiment was performed three times (with a fresh batch of insects each time). Insect mortality was observed on a daily basis until 3 days post treatment.
Following the same method from Cuthbertson et al. [36], cowpea (V. unguiculata) leaves were dipped in different concentrations of fungal extracts (500, 200, 100, 50, 20 and 10 µg/mL) for 30 s. Cowpea leaves dipped in Matrine (15 mg/L) acted as a positive control while leaves dipped in ddH2O served as a negative control. The leaves were air dried and placed in Petri dishes (ø 9 cm) with a moist filter paper for moisture maintenance. Fifty newly moulted bean aphids up to 12 h old (first instar) were released on the treated and control leaf respectively in a Petri dish. The whole experimental setup was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C and 80 ± 5% R.H and 16:8 h (Light/Dark photoperiod). The whole experiment was performed three times (with a fresh batch of insects each time).

5.9. Data Analysis

Mortality (%) was calculated and corrected with control mortality using Abbott’s formula [37]. LC50 and LC90 values were calculated by probit analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 8.01 [38].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and S.A.; methodology, S.A.; formal analysis, J.X.; investigation, J.X. and B.Y.; resources, J.W.; data curation, J.X. and B.Y.; writing—original draft S.A.; writing—review and editing, A.G.S.C.; supervision, S.A.; funding acquisition, J.W. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from The Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B020205003) and The Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, P.R. China (201807010019,201804020070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion will be made available by the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank the handling editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hu, J.; De Barro, P.; Zhao, H.; Wang, J.; Nardi, F.; Liu, S.S. An extensive field survey combined with a phylogenetic analysis reveals rapid and widespread invasion of two alien whiteflies in China. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6, e16061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Firdaus, S.; Vosman, B.; Hidayati, N.; Supena, E.; Darmo, J.; Visser, R.G.F.; van Heusden, A.W. The Bemisia tabaci species complex: Additions from different parts of the world. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Vänninen, I. The importance of maintaining protected zone status against Bemisia tabaci. Insects 2015, 6, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, C.; Ali, S.; Musa, P.D.; Wang, X.M.; Qiu, B.L. Evaluation of the pathogenecity of Aschersonia aleyrodis on Bemisia tabaci in the laboratory and greenhouse. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perring, T.M. The Bemisia tabaci species complex. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 725–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stansly, P.A.; Naranjo, S.E. Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Obopile, M.; Ositile, B. Life table and population parameters of cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) on five cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L. Walp.) varieties. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tang, L.D.; Wu, J.H.; Ali, S.; Ren, S.X. The influence of different aphid prey species on biology and life table parameters of Propylea japonica. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2013, 23, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Obopile, M. Economic threshold and injury levels for control of cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Linnaeus (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cowpea. Afr. Plant Prot. 2006, 12, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ofuya, T.I. Control of the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae) in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 1997, 2, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Murchie, A.K. European red spider mite—An environmental consequence of persistent chemical pesticide application. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 2, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, S.; Wu, X.Y.; Zheng, J.Z.; Han, Z.Q.; Zhao, C.X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, C.; Han, J. A study of control effect of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on greenhouse tomatoes using parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan. J. Anhui Agri. Sci. 2013, 41, 6244–6248. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Cuthbertson, A.G.S. Unnecessary pesticide applications in Northern Ireland apple orchards due to mis-identification of a beneficial mite species. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2004, 8, 77–78. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Murchie, A.K. The environmental impact of an orchard winter wash and early season pesticide applications on both a beneficial and a pest mite species in Bramley apple orchards. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 3, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, X.S.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.M.; Qiu, B.L.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Du, C.L.; Wu, J.H.; Ali, S. Isaria fumosorosea-based-zero-valent iron nanoparticles affect the growth and survival of sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2174–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Du, C.L.; Yang, B.; Wu, J.H.; Ali, S. Identification and virulence characterization of two Akanthomyces attenuatus isolates against Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Insects 2019, 10, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Du, C.L.; Wu, J.H.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Bashir, M.H.; Sun, T.F.; Ali, S. Morphological, molecular and virulence characterisation of six Cordyceps spp. isolates infecting the diamondback moth, Pluttela xylostella. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ali, S.; Huang, Z.; Ren, S.X. Production of cuticle degrading enzymes by Isaria fumosorosea and their evaluation as a biocontrol agent against diamondback moth. J. Pest. Sci. 2010, 83, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Z.; Ali, S.; Ren, S.X.; Wu, J.H. The effect of Isaria fumosorosea on mortality and fecundity of Bemisia tabaci and Plutella xylostella. Insect Sci. 2010, 17, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pick, D.A.; Avery, P.B.; Hunter, W.B.; Powell, C.A.; Arthurs, S.P. Effect of Isaria fumosorosea (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) and Lysiphlebus testaceipes, (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the brown citrus aphid: Preliminary assessment of a compatibility study. Fla. Entomol. 2012, 95, 764–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Audsley, N. Further screening of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes as control agents for Drosophila suzukii. Insects 2016, 24, 7020024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bernardini, M.; Carilli, A.; Pacioini, G.; Santurbano, B. Isolation of beauvericin from Paecilomyces fumosoroseus. Phytochem. Rep. 1975, 14, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grove, J.F.; Pople, M. The insecticidal activity of beauvericin and the enniatin complex. Mycopathologia 1980, 70, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Weng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Hu, Q. Secondary metabolites and the risks of Isaria fumosorosea and Isaria farinosa. Molecules 2019, 24, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Qasim, M.; Islam, S.U.; Islam, W.; Noman, A.; Khan, K.A.; Hafeez, M.; Hussain, D.; Das, C.K.; Bamisisle, B.S.; Akutse, K.S.; et al. Characterization of mycotoxins from entomopathogenic fungi (Cordyceps fumosorosea) and their toxic effects to the development of asian citrus psyllid reared on healthy and diseased citrus plants. Toxicon 2020, 188, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, J. Studies on the Extraction, Characterization and Toxicity of Toxins Produced by Different Isolates of Entomopathogenic Fungus Isaria fumosorosea. Master’s Thesis, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gupta, S.; Montllor, C.; Hwang, Y.S. Isolation of novel beauvericin analogues from the fungus Beauveria bassiana. J. Natl. Prod. 1995, 58, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ragavendran, C.; Dubey, N.K.; Natarajan, D. Beauveria bassina (Clavicipitaceae): A potent fungal agent for controlling mosquito vectors of Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 3838–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vivekanandhan, P.; Kavitha, T.; Karthi, S.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Shivakumar, M.S. Toxicity of Beauveria bassiana-28 mycelial extracts on larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Supothina, S.; Srisanoh, U.; Nithithanaslip, S.; Tasanathai, K.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Li, C.R.; Isaka, M. Beauvericin production by the lepidoptera pathogenic fungus Isaria tenuipes: Analysis of natural specimens, synnemata from cultivation, and mycelia from liquid-media fermentation. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2011, 1, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ravindran, K.; Akutse, K.S.; Sivaramakrishnan, S.; Wang, L. Determination and characterization of destruxin production in Metarhizium anisopliae Tk6 and formulations for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes control at the field level. Toxicon 2016, 120, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, L.; Huang, J.; You, M.S.; Guan, X.; Liu, B. Toxicity and feeding deterrence of crude toxin extracts of Lecanicillium (Verticillium) lecanii (Hyphomycetes) against sweet potato whitefly. Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 63, 381–387. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ekesi, S.; Akpa, A.D.; Onu, I.; Ogunlana, M.O. Entomopathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae to the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2000, 33, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ali, S.; Huang, Z.; Ren, S.X. Media composition influences on growth, enzyme activity and virulence of the entomopathogen hyphomycete Isaria fumosorosea. Entomol. Experiment. Appl. 2009, 131, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Walters, K.F.A.; Northing, P. Susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci immature stages to the entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium muscarium on tomato and verbena foliage. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Blackburn, L.F.; Northing, P.; Luo, W.; Cannon, R.J.C.; Walters, K.F.A. Leaf dipping as an environmental screening measure to test chemical efficacy against Bemisia tabaci on poinsettia plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1987, 3, 302–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. SAS Institute. SAS User’s Guide; Statistics SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. FTIR analysis of the ethyl acetate mycelia extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Figure 1. FTIR analysis of the ethyl acetate mycelia extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Toxins 13 00220 g001
Figure 2. LC-Ms analysis of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502. (A) LC-MS profile; (B) Trichodermin; (C) 5-Methylmellein; (D) Brevianamide F; (E) Enniatin; (F) Beauvericin.
Figure 2. LC-Ms analysis of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502. (A) LC-MS profile; (B) Trichodermin; (C) 5-Methylmellein; (D) Brevianamide F; (E) Enniatin; (F) Beauvericin.
Toxins 13 00220 g002
Figure 3. The 1H NMR analysis of bio-active compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502.
Figure 3. The 1H NMR analysis of bio-active compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502.
Toxins 13 00220 g003
Figure 4. (A) The HPLC chromatogram of Beauvericin standard and (B) the HPLC chromatogram of mycelial extracts obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Figure 4. (A) The HPLC chromatogram of Beauvericin standard and (B) the HPLC chromatogram of mycelial extracts obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Toxins 13 00220 g004
Table 1. FTIR spectrum of ethyl acetate extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Table 1. FTIR spectrum of ethyl acetate extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Observed Wave Numbers (cm−1)Functional GroupBonding Pattern
3458.89O-H stretch alcohols or phenolsStrong, broad
2970.68N-H alkane (Methyl)Sharp
2928.95C-H alkane (Methylene)Strong, medium
2015.74C≡C stretch nitrileWeak
1729.67C=O carboxylic acidStrong, sharp
1516.99C=C stretch alkaneWeak, sharp
1454.26C=O trans alkenesStrong, sharp
1373.96C=C trans alkenesStrong, sharp
1344.48C=C trans alkenesWeak, sharp
1295.41C=C ester carbonyl groupWeak, medium
1104.42C=C ether/alcoholStrong, medium
1013.50C-O trans-alkenesStrong, sharp
928.39C=C vinyl-alkenesStrong, sharp
866.68C=C aromaticsStrong, medium
744.30C=C aromatics (Ring)Weak, sharp
525.81C=C Aromatics (Ring)Weak, sharp
Table 2. LC-MS spectrum of ethyl acetate extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Table 2. LC-MS spectrum of ethyl acetate extract obtained from Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Sr#Compound NameRtMolecular FormulaBiological Activity
1Trichodermin0.340C17H24O4Fungicide; Pesticide
25-Methylmellein0.344C11H13O3Antimicrobial activity
3Brevianamide F2.062C16H17N3 O2Antioxidant activity, mycotoxin
4Enniatin2.565C32H55N3 O9Antimicrobial activity
5Beauvericin9.615C45H57N3 O9Mycotoxin
Table 3. Insecticidal activity of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502 against Aphis craccivora nymphs.
Table 3. Insecticidal activity of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502 against Aphis craccivora nymphs.
Nymphal InstarConcentration
(mg/L)
Mortality (%)LC50 (LCL–UCL)
(mg/L)
LC90 (LCL–UCL)
(mg/L)
χ2 (df)4
1st instarddH2O3.2746.35
(30.89–66.65)
346.83
(203.44–865.38)
24.29
Ethyl acetate3.67
Matrine51.16
1014.29
2036.67
5051.67
10062.97
20078.99
50097.84
2nd instarddH2O2.3454.55
(42.11–69.94)
419.39
(280.43–747.78)
11.28
Ethyl acetate3.33
Matrine52.34
1012.91
2031.06
5048.21
10060.37
20077.04
50094.67
3rd instarddH2O2.3368.94
(56.14–84.77)
539.42
(377.61–873.66)
7.55
Ethyl acetate3.19
Matrine48.67
1010.97
2024.67
5041.87
10058.09
20070.33
50092.33
4th instarddH2O2.1181.92
(73.47–91.52)
714.74
(575.59–921.65)
3.46
Ethyl acetate3.56
Matrine47.92
1010.02
2023.17
5037.92
10054.08
20068.23
50087.67
Table 4. Insecticidal activity of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502 against Bemisia tabaci nymphs.
Table 4. Insecticidal activity of bioactive compounds produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolate SP502 against Bemisia tabaci nymphs.
Nymphal InstarConcentration
(mg/L)
Mortality (%)LC50 (LCL–UCL)
(mg/L)
LC90 (LCL–UCL)
(mg/L)
χ2 (df)4
1st instarddH2O2.0162.67
(39.26–100.48)
339.31
(185.15–1129.67)
9.26
Ethyl acetate3.16
Matrine54.23
1013.06
2021.23
5038.54
10053.67
20082.33
500100
2nd instarddH2O1.0672.84
(58.88–90.51)
442.00
(311.92–712.57)
4.06
Ethyl acetate2.14
Matrine53.18
1012.18
2019.36
5035.87
10051.67
20078.23
50095.08
3rd instarddH2O1.3777.40
(61.89–97.56)
535.70
(365.12–913.75)
4.52
Ethyl acetate2.23
Matrine46.72
1011.5
2018.29
5033.33
10051.33
20075.67
50094.33
4th instarddH2O1.2494.40
(75.48–119.81)
653.27
(439.06–1139.34)
2.31
Ethyl acetate2.87
Matrine45.91
1010.6
2015.06
5029.33
10048.16
20072.34
50089.17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, J.; Yang, B.; Xu, J.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Ali, S. Characterization and Toxicity of Crude Toxins Produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Aphis craccivora (Koch). Toxins 2021, 13, 220. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13030220

AMA Style

Wu J, Yang B, Xu J, Cuthbertson AGS, Ali S. Characterization and Toxicity of Crude Toxins Produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Aphis craccivora (Koch). Toxins. 2021; 13(3):220. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13030220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Jianhui, Bo Yang, Jing Xu, Andrew G. S. Cuthbertson, and Shaukat Ali. 2021. "Characterization and Toxicity of Crude Toxins Produced by Cordyceps fumosorosea against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Aphis craccivora (Koch)" Toxins 13, no. 3: 220. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13030220

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop