Next Article in Journal
Eurasian Avian-like M1 Plays More Important Role than M2 in Pathogenicity of 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
ATM-Dependent Phosphorylation of Hepatitis B Core Protein in Response to Genotoxic Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of African Swine Fever Virus Transcription within Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Acutely Infected Pigs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyses of Leishmania-LRV Co-Phylogenetic Patterns and Evolutionary Variability of Viral Proteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

History of Arbovirus Research in the Czech Republic

Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic
Submission received: 12 October 2021 / Revised: 11 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021

Abstract

:
The aim of this review is to follow the history of studies on endemiv arboviruses and the diseases they cause which were detected in the Czech lands (Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia (i.e., the Czech Republic)). The viruses involve tick-borne encephalitis, West Nile and Usutu flaviviruses; the Sindbis alphavirus; Ťahyňa, Batai, Lednice and Sedlec bunyaviruses; the Uukuniemi phlebovirus; and the Tribeč orbivirus. Arboviruses temporarily imported from abroad to the Czech Republic have been omitted. This brief historical review includes a bibliography of all relevant papers.

1. Introduction

The investigation of arboviruses and arboviral diseases has a long history in the Czech lands. It started in 1948, and the first papers were published in 1949 [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Basic research of arthropod-borne viruses (with the acronym “arboviruses”) has been mainly organized at three institutes in the Czech lands: the Institute of Parasitology (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague and České Budějovice), the National Institute of Public Health (Prague) and the Institute of Vertebrate Biology (Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno). However, a number of other laboratories (e.g., the Regional Hygiene Station in Ostrava and some other district public health stations) and researchers also contributed significantly to the study of arboviruses in the Czech Republic. The following description of arbovirus studies covers the papers published between 1948 and 2021. The papers have been included in this review if they investigated arboviruses occurring in the Czech lands or they described laboratory studies carried out by Czech virologists focusing on such arboviruses. Arbovirus infections temporarily imported from abroad have not been included, nor have the field studies of Czech arbovirologists abroad.
Arboviruses belong to an ecological group of viruses characterized by their specific biological transmission via competent hematophagous arthropods (e.g., ticks, mosquitoes and others) to homeotherm (warm-blooded) vertebrates. Competent vectors are those arthropods that are able to imbibe the virus in the course of blood-feeding on an infected donor vertebrate host to support the multiplication of the virus in their organism and to deliver a sufficiently large inoculum to the recipient (i.e., the uninfected vertebrate host). Usually, a certain minimum level of viremia (i.e., the “infection threshold”) in a donor vertebrate host is necessary for efficient infection of particular arthropod vectors. Therefore, only those vertebrate species that produce at least moderate viremia have been regarded as competent, “true” or “amplifying” hosts of particular arboviruses [7]. However, co-feeding of the ixodid ticks on a viremia-free host can sometimes also contribute to the infection of noninfected ticks. Some arboviruses are transmitted from larvae to the nymphs and imagoes of arthropods during metamorphosis (i.e., transstadial transmission (TST)), from infected females to the offspring (i.e., transovarial transmission (TOT)) and from males to females during copulation (i.e., venereal or horizontal transmission). These transmission modes are important ecologically. For example, under the conditions of TOT, the vector also plays the role of a long-term reservoir of the virus in nature.
In addition to a few severe, occasionally re-emerging viral diseases transmitted by ixodid ticks or mosquitoes in Czech lands (tick-borne encephalitis and West Nile fever), there are a number of other usually neglected arbovirus infections of vertebrates which are infrequent, likely underdiagnosed and non-pathogenic for humans.
Several monographs about multiple arboviruses in Czechoslovakia were published [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Particular arboviruses are treated separately in the following text.

2. Family: FLAVIVIRIDAE

2.1. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV; Genus: Flavivirus)

The history of TBE in Czech lands and research on TBE is a long-lasting story that is very rich and dramatic. The first cases of TBE were diagnosed in several districts (Beroun, Strakonice, Nový Bydžov and Vyškov) in the summer of 1948 [1,2,4]. For instance, 56 TBE patients were found in the Vyškov district in 1948 and 22 patients in 1949 [15]. TBEV was isolated from the blood and CSF of several patients from the districts of Beroun [1], Strakonice [2,3], and Vyškov in the summer of 1948 [4,5]. The original virus isolate (strain “Stillerová”) was found [16] to be closely related to the louping ill virus (LIV) and Russian spring-summer encephalitis virus (RSSEV) by cross-VNT, cross-CFT and cross-protection, although it is more pathogenic for laboratory mice than LIV.
The characteristics (e.g., passage history, disease in mice and guinea pigs, neutralization assays and ultrafiltration) of the isolated TBEV strains were described in detail [1,17]. Krejčí [4] recorded that 74% of his patients in the Vyškov area were attacked by Ixodes ricinus ticks (e.g., during mushroom collections) in local forests. Inspired by this notice, the successful isolation of TBEV from ixodid ticks was then reported in the Beroun [6] and Vyškov areas in 1949 [18]. TBE cases also occurred in the Vyškov and Strakonice areas in the following years [15,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], as well as in the lower Sázava river valley [27] and Brno region [28,29]. Additional TBEV strains were isolated from patients and ixodid ticks in Bohemia [30,31] and in the Brno region, including the prototype TBE strain “Hypr” [31,32].
Some physicians [33,34] drew attention to certain non-diagnosed cases of aseptic meningoencephalitis in the Czech Republic before the Second World War, being convinced that some of them were, in fact (according to the described clinical symptoms), most probably TBE, such as those reported in 1924–1932. Retrospectively, TBE has been detected by serology in forest workers in the Brno region since 1939 [35].
The Czech TBEV strains have thus been regarded as closely related to LIV and RSSEV [16]. The close relationships of the Czech TBEV, Russian TBEV (RSSEV) and LIV were confirmed [36,37], and the first electron microscopy pictures of the Czech TBE were published [38]. Much later, it was reported [39] that Central European TBEV strains are antigenically very homogeneous and closer to LIV than to RSSEV. Because the Russian strains are now regarded as a variant of the TBEV species, LIV should be considered as a variant within the same TBEV species. Subtyping of the TBEV isolates using multiplex RT-PCR was suggested [40].
The principal arthropod vectors are ticks of the genus Ixodes: for TBEV I. ricinus in central Europe (TST and TOT confirmed [41,42]), and the prevalence rate of TBEV in I. ricinus populations may reach 0.5–3% in the valent natural foci [43,44]. Occasional vectors are other tick species such as I. hexagonus [45] and possibly I. arboricola. The TOT of TBEV in ticks [46,47] is epidemiologically very important in that it makes possible the long-term persistence of the virus in a natural focus. Mosquitoes and fleas are not vectors of TBEV, as was proven experimentally [48,49,50].
In experiments, the relative humidity affected the infection rate of TBEV in I. ricnus ticks, but the temperature did not [51,52]. The interaction of a temperature-sensitive mutant with a virulent TBEV strain was observed in the experimental dual infection of I. ricinus ticks [53], where the mutant partially inhibited the replication of the virulent strain.
TBEV multiplied in all the tested cell lines derived from diverse ixodid ticks, but CPE was not observed [54]. However, in cell lines derived from the vector tick species (I. ricinus), there was a 100–1000-fold higher virus yield than in the cell lines derived from non-vector ixodid ticks (I. scapularis, Boophilus mocrolus, Hyalomma anatolicum, etc.). The differences between the TBEV grown in mammalian and tick cell lines were studied [55,56]. Mapping of the envelope protein of TBEV grown in parallel in human and tick cells also revealed some differences between the two lines [57]. The question of whether two different cell lines (from I. scapularis and I. ricinus ticks) responded to infection with TBEV in the same way was investigated by transcriptomic and proteomic analysis [58]. Several molecules were identified that may be involved in the tick cells’ innate immune response against flaviviruses.
The competent vertebrate hosts of TBEV are certain mammals, especially rodents and insectivores such as Apodemus flavicollis, A. sylvaticus, Myodes glareolus, Microtus agrestis, Sciurus vulgaris [59], Talpa europaea [60,61], Sorex araneus and Erinaceus concolor, as well as goats [62], sheep and rarely cattle. However, the so-called non-viremic transmission of TBEV by co-feeding of non-infected and infected ticks on incompetent vertebrate hosts could also be important in natural foci [63,64,65]. TBEV was isolated from the brain of A. sylvaticus and M. glareolus in the North Moravian region in 1956–1959 but not from rodents of the other seven rodent spp. and S. araneus [66]. However, Kožuch et al. [67] isolated TBEV from S. araneus in the same region. The TBEV seropositivity in four spp. of bats in Czech lands was reported [68,69], though the ecological interpretation of this finding is difficult. Experimental infection of several Myotis myotis bats with TBEV [70] resulted in viremia (up to 12 DPI), and the virus was isolated from the visceral organs and brain at up to 12 DPI. Some bats showed paresis or even quadriplegia. High titers of antibodies to TBEV were detected by CFT in forest rodents, deer (Cervus elaphus and Capreolus capreolus), hares and wild rabbits, Sciurus vulgaris and Meles meles in the natural focus near Beroun [31,59]. Laboratory mice and rats, including adult ones, are very susceptible to TBEV and die within few days after i.c., s.c., i.p. or i.n. inoculation with the virus [1,4,5,17,18,42,71,72,73,74]. The interaction of TBEV with mouse peritoneal macrophages was described and modified by antibodies and lectin [75]. Experimental s.c. infection with TBEV in wild bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and laboratory mice [76] resulted in survival of the voles (contrary to white mice), and they had higher viral titers in the regional lymph nodes but much lower viral load in the brain. In addition, the TBEV infectivity for M. glareolus and A. flavicollis from two habitats was tested [77]. TBEV infection was compared in laboratory mice and wild Apodemus field mice, in which the latter survived and had no virus present in the brain, higher NK cell activity, no multiplication of TBEV in the peritoneal macrophages and higher titers of VN antibodies. Both species revealed viremia and viral presence in the spleen [78]. In one M. glareolus examined from a military area in central Bohemia, TBEV RNA was detected in the visceral organs [79]. Experimental TBEV viremia was demonstrated in many mammalian, avian, amphibian and reptilian species, such as in bats [70], Talpa europaea [60,61,80], Microtus subterraneus [81], Micromys minutus [82,83] and some other vertebrate species. The monkeys Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis (=M. cynomolgus) were killed by TBEV [84,85], except when inoculated by the respiratory route [86]. However, no clinical signs in rhesus monkeys were observed when inoculated s.c. with high doses of TBEV, but viremia (3–11 DPI) and antibodies (VN and CF after 2–3 weeks) were present [86,87].
Kolman and Husová [88] examined small mammals (136 Apodemus flavicollis, 111 Myodes glareolus and 127 Microtus arvalis) in a natural focus at Unhošť in central Bohemia via the HIT. Antibodies to TBEV were present in the three species at rates of 0.7%, 1.8% and 4.5%, respectively. The seropositivity rate (HIT) in 84 examined forest rodents (Myodes glareolus and Apodemus spp.) in the Bohemian Krušné hory mountains was 9.5% [89], and seropositivity was found in the wildlife and small wild mammals in south Moravia via the HIT [90].
The role of birds as hosts of TBEV has not yet been fully elucidated, as the virus has been occasionally isolated from some passeriform and other birds. For instance, 809 wild birds were shot in southern Bohemia and examined. One strain of TBEV was isolated from Fulica atra coot, and VN antibodies to TBEV were detected in one each of the stork Ciconia ciconia and pheasant Phasianus colchicus. Only 1.7% of the birds were parasitized by ixodid ticks [91,92]. In 13% of 338 wild birds (mostly passerines) shot in central and eastern Bohemia, antibodies to TBEV were detected [93]. However, heart extracts collected from the shot birds could contain non-specific virus-inhibiting compounds (e.g., traces of bile). One teal (Anas crecca) of the 84 examined wild ducks and geese (6 spp.) in the Czech lands was seropositive for TBEV by VNT but at a very low titer of 1:8 [94]. Juřicová et al. [95] tested via the HIT 295 passeriform birds caught in south Moravia, and TBEV antibodies were present in 7.1% of them. Four of 82 passerine birds (14 spp.) in the Krkonoše mountains netted during the autumn migration contained HI antibodies to TBEV [96]. In 273 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) caught in northern Moravia and tested for their HI TBEV antibodies were found in 1.8% of them [97]. The chick embryos were killed by inoculation of TBEV [98,99,100,101,102,103,104].
TBE in domestic animals has not been fully investigated [105]. TBEV infection is usually subclinical in adult ruminants, and pigs, goats, sheep and cows excrete the virus in their milk. In dogs, several cases of TBE were described, including three dogs which had meningoencephalitis [106].
Humans acquire TBEV infection through the bite of an infectious tick or by consumption of infected raw (unpasteurized) goat or sheep (less often cow) milk or dairy products [107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114]. Tick-transmitted cases tend to be sporadic, while milk-borne infections usually affect whole families or population groups in outbreaks. For instance, one very large milk-borne TBE epidemic occurred in Rožňava, East Slovakia in 1951, when 660 persons were infected and 274 of them were hospitalized. In addition, many laboratory infections (usually occurring due to infectious aerosols) have been reported in unvaccinated personnel [1]. TBE could present an occupational risk in foresters or farmers, since these persons have a greater risk of exposure to ticks [115,116].
Hanzal and Henner [117,118] differentiated four clinical forms of TBE in humans: abortive, meningeal, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis. The clinical forms of TBE were described by many other authors in the Czech lands, as well as the neurologic sequelae [4,15,21,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154]. The pathogenesis of TBE was studied by a number of Czech authors [155], and the histopathological changes in the mouse brain, typical for encephalitis, were reported [156,157,158]. Jandásek [159,160] observed the blood–brain barrier crossing of TBEV in a mouse model. Kašová-Odrážková [161] detected antibodies in the CSF of TBE human patients. Málková et al. [162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174] and Málková and Filip [175] confirmed that the lymphatic system is an important route for TBEV dissemination in the bodies of experimental animals. The histopathological changes in monkeys infected by TBEV were studied, and the changes were similar to those in humans [176]. Several authors [177,178] observed modulation of the changes of infected dendritic cells caused by tick saliva. Cultured mouse dendritic cells were infected with two TBEV virus strains of different virulences in the presence of I. ricinus tick saliva. Tick saliva treatment increased the proportion of virus-infected cells, leading to a decrease in virus-induced TNF-alpha and IL-6 production and to reduced virus-induced apoptosis, which may have positive consequences for TBEV replication and transmission. The effect of TBEV on the morphology human neural cells was also studied in detail. Three human neural cell lines (neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma and glioblastoma) were infected with TBEV, and the neural cells produced roughly from 100- to 10,000-fold more virus titers than the conventional cell lines of extraneural origin, indicating the highly susceptible nature of neural cells to TBEV infection. The infection of medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells was associated with a number of major morphological changes, including proliferation of the membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum and extensive rearrangement of cytoskeletal structures. Cells were dying preferentially by necrotic mechanisms rather than apoptosis [179,180,181,182]. In another study, the host cell receptor for TBEV was identified by a complex procedure. Anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibodies (anti-ID MAbs) were formed against two mouse MAbs that neutralized the infectivity of TBEV. Three of the anti-ID MAbs inhibited the binding of the respective idiotypic MAb to the TBEV antigen and bound to the surfaces of virus-susceptible (but not non-susceptible) cells. They recognized a 35-kD protein in the immunoblotting analysis [183]. The growth of TBEV in cultured mouse macrophages was tested, and the virus replication process differed from that in other mammalian cell lines, since the smooth membrane structures, which are thought to be the sites for flavivirus replication, were not observed. Moreover, different TBEV strains exhibited different interactions with the host macrophages [184]. Palus et al. [185,186] demonstrated injury to human astrocytes by TBEV and novel inflammatory markers in TBE pathogenesis. CD8+ T-cells have been shown to mediate immunopathology in TBE, as demonstrated by the prolonged survival of SCID or CD8(-/-) mice following infection when compared with immunocompetent mice or mice with adoptively transferred CD8(+) T-cells. The results imply that the inflammatory reaction significantly contributes to the fatal outcome of TBE [187]. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and inflammation in the CNS of TBEV-infected animals were studied by several authors [188,189,190]. For instance, primary human microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) were infected with TBEV to study their interactions with the BBB. The infection was persistent, with high TBEV yields. Infection did not induce any significant changes in the expression of key tight junction proteins and did not alter the highly organized intercellular junctions between HBMECs. In this in vitro model, the virus crossed the BBB via a transcellular pathway without compromising the integrity of the cell’s monolayer. The results indicate that HBMECs may support TBEV entry into the brain without altering the BBB integrity. The authors also followed serum metalloproteinases in 147 TBE patients. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) play important roles in the function of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and they were measured by ELISA in serum from patients with an acute phase of TBE. The MMP-9 levels and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios of the TBE patients were significantly higher than those of the controls. The results suggest that the increased serum level of MMP-9 and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio is associated with the pathogenesis of TBE. Serum MMP-9 can serve as an indicator of breakdown of the BBB and inflammatory brain damage during TBE [191]. A novel locus on mouse chromosome 7 affects the survival of the host infected with TBEV [192]. Changes in the cytokine and chemokine profiles in the mouse serum and brains of infected mice were investigated [193]. TBEV-infected mice exhibited increases in serum and brain tissue concentrations of multiple cytokines and chemokines (mainly CXCL10/IP-10, as well as CXCL1, G-CSF, IL-6 and others). TBEV-infected SK-N-SH cells exhibited increased production of IL-8 and downregulated MCP-1 and HGF. TBEV infection of HBCA cells activated the production of a broad spectrum of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and growth factors (mainly IL-6, IL-8, CXCL10 and G-CSF) and downregulated the expression of VEGF. Treatment of SK-N-SH cells with supernatants from infected HBCA-induced expression of a variety of chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines reduced the SK-N-SH mortality after TBEV infection and decreased virus growth in these cells. Treatment of HBCA with supernatants from infected SK-N-SH cells had little effect on cytokine, chemokine or growth factor expression but reduced TBEV growth in these cells after infection. The results indicated that both neurons and astrocytes are potential sources of pro-inflammatory cytokines in TBEV-infected brain tissue. Infected or activated astrocytes produce cytokines or chemokines that stimulate the innate neuronal immune response, limiting virus replication and increasing the survival of infected neurons.
When TBEV was passaged serially in either mice or PS (pig kidney) cells at 40 °C, the authors obtained a new variant strain with increased plaque size, invasiveness and temperature resistance and with two unique amino acid substitutions. They explained this as a process of selection of pre-existing virulent variants in the TBEV gene pool and not as the appearance of a new mutant [194]. The effect of passaging TBEV in different host cell systems was also observed by other investigators [195]. A highly virulent strain (Hypr) of TBEV was serially subcultured in the mammalian porcine kidney stable (PS) and I. ricinus tick (IRE/CTVM19) cell lines, producing three viral variants. These variants exhibited distinct plaque sizes and virulence in a mouse model. When comparing the full-genome sequences of all variants, several nucleotide changes were identified in different genomic regions. Furthermore, different sequential variants were revealed to coexist within one sample as quasispecies. These observations further imply that TBEV exists as a heterogeneous population that contains virus variants pre-adapted to reproduction in different environments (ticks and mammals).
Human incidence of TBE in particular areas of the Czech lands was reported in a number of papers [196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213]. The incidence rate is relatively high in the Czech lands compared with other European countries. On average, 368 cases (140–744 in individual years) per year were reported in the Czech Republic between 1970 and 1999 with a morbidity rate of 4.2 (1.4–7.4) per 100,000 inhabitants, and it peaked at 1029 patients with a morbidity rate of 10.0 per 100,000 inhabitants in the year 2006 [214,215]. In the years 2004–2007, only Slovenia and the Baltic republics (Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia) had higher morbidity rates of TBE than the Czech Republic (5–10), while the TBE incidence was as low as 0.6–1.2 in neighboring Austria due to a much higher vaccination frequency in that country. Vaccination rates against TBE in the human population in the Czech lands are roughly 15% [205].
The natural foci of TBE are classified according to the hosts of the principal vector as “theriodic” (i.e., situated in deciduous and mixed forest ecosystems with wildlife, often in game preserves), “boskematic” (i.e., pastoral, with pastured domestic mammals), mixed “theriodic-boskematic” or “mountain” [216]. The periurban foci of TBE have also been described [217,218,219]. The foci were analyzed for their original plant (forest) communities in different areas of the Czech lands [220,221,222] and in the vertebrate fauna [223,224]. The use of satellite data (remote sensing) may be helpful for the risk assessment of areas with high populations of ixodid ticks, which are vectors of TBEV [225,226,227]. The natural foci of TBE have been studied in different parts of Bohemia [31,88,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239] and Moravia [67,235,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252].
During the last three decades, a significant increase in the incidence of human TBE has followed a shift of I. ricinus ticks to higher altitudes (above 700 m a.s.l.) in the Bohemian and Moravian mountains (Šumava, Krkonoše, Jeseníky and Czech-Moravian Highland), likely in response to climate warming [253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264]. The effect of the weather and climate on the TBE incidence has been demonstrated [211,214,215,257,259,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273]. Positive correlation between the daily mean air temperature and lagged (by 3–11 days) human TBE incidence (a total of 4613 cases recorded) in the Czech Republic was found for the years 1994–2001 [264,267]. The authors explained this phenomenon with the increased host-seeking activity of I. ricinus tick vectors and human behavior, in that TBE in the Czech Republic is largely a recreation-based disease connected with human outdoor activities [274]. No correlation was found for precipitation. Significant correlation between the enhanced rodent population size and increased human TBE incidence in a following (lagged) calendar year was found by several authors [275,276,277,278,279].
TBEV strains in central Europe are regarded as antigenically stable and genetically homogeneous [39]. The isolation of four temperature-sensitive (ts) small plaque mutant TBEV strains from I. ricinus collected in the natural foci of south Bohemia is of special interest, because these mutants are markedly less pathogenic for s.c. inoculation into adult mice than typical TBEV strains. These mutants caused complete protection against challenges with “normal” TBEV strains such as Hypr. Moreover, the ts mutant also interfered with the Hypr strain and blocked its replication in female I. ricinus ticks in experiments [280].
TBEV has been studied in cell cultures in vitro [281]. CPE and distinct plaques of TBEV are produced in porcine embryonal kidney cell lines PK, PS and SPEV [282,283,284] and in CV-1 monkey cells [285,286,287], which are highly applicable for VNT and PRNT.
Many Czech virologists contributed to the serological diagnosis of TBE [288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295]. Acute TBE can be diagnosed through the detection of IgM antibodies using indirect IFA [296,297,298]. The preparation of hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids and IFA were described as a useful tool for the identification and serodiagnostics of TBEV [299,300]. For rapid serodiagnosis, ELISA with purified TBEV antigen from infected mouse brains can be used [301,302]. Monoclonal antibodies to TBEV were prepared for the identification and antigenic differentiation of TBE complex viruses [303,304,305,306]. The monoclonals were also used for the analysis and localization of TBEV antigens, especially glycoprotein E and non-structural protein NS3 [305]. The cryo-EM structures of native TBE virions and their neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (its complex with Fab fragments of the antibody) was visualized [306].
Heinz et al. [307] compared the sensitivity of chick embryo cells and young mice for the isolation of TBEV, and the mice were more susceptible. Different methods for the detection of TBEV or its RNA in various specimens were reviewed [308,309]. Genome sequencing of TBEV isolates from patients was proposed as epidemiologically helpful [310].
The prevention and control of TBE include mapping and surveillance of their natural foci [221,222,225,226,265,269,311] and immunization of humans. Vaccines against TBEV consist of a purified, inactivated virus grown in chicken embryo cells produced by methods largely based on the original studies of several Czech virologists [312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323]. In the Czech Republic, two vaccines against TBE are presently registered: FSME IMMUN (Baxter) and ENCEPUR (Behringwerke). These vaccines were tested for immunogenicity, tolerance and antibody persistence in this country [324,325,326,327,328,329]. A TBE vaccine has also been developed for domestic animals [330,331].
For therapy of TBE, cortisone and corticoids could be helpful [150,332,333]. Specific immunglobulin or human antiserum to TBEV can neutralize the infecting virus if applied in the early acute phase of the disease [101,334,335,336]. Several antiviral agents were also tested in cell cultures or mice infected with TBEV [337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348], and some of them seem promising (e.g., arbidol).

2.2. West Nile Virus (WNV; Genus: Flavivirus; Japanese Encephalitis Group)

Two strains of this mosquito-borne virus were isolated in Moravia from Cx. pipiens mosquitoes caught opposite to the Austrian village of Rabensburg in 1997 and 1999 [349,350]. The first isolate (97–103) was later sequenced and found to represent a new third genomic lineage of WNV [351]. Previously, only lineage WNV-1 was known in Europe before 1997. Another strain of WNV-3 was isolated later from Ae. rossicus in the same locality [352]. WNV-3 is less virulent than WNV-1, and it does not kill adult mice. The much more virulent lineage-2 WNV strains were recently recovered from Cx. modestus in south Moravia [353,354,355] and also in south Bohemia [356]. WNV could possibly persist in overwintering mosquitoes [357].
The vertebrate hosts are largely wild birds, and migratory birds play a role in the widespread geographic distribution of WNV [358]. VN antibodies to WNV were detected in the sera of 4 (out of 10 examined) wild geese (A. anser) in south Moravia [359,360]. Juřicová et al. [98,361] found HI antibodies to WNV in 9.7% of 295 passeriform birds caught in south Moravia. They also found WNV antibodies in 4 out of 82 passerine birds (14 spp.) in the Krkonoše mountains during the autumn migration [96] and in 5.5% of 273 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) caught in northern Moravia [97]. In south Moravia, 4.3% of the mostly wetland birds had antibodies to WNV [362]. This survey provided evidence of the local circulation of WNV in the littoral of the Nesyt fishpond near Mikulov, where many young wetland birds caught in July 1985 (hatched in that year locally) were seropositive without cross-reacting with TBEV. The possible local vector mosquito species were Cx. modestus or Cx. pipiens, which occur abundantly in the reed beds. The local WNV circulation was documented later when 11.3% of 574 domestic ducks living on the fishponds were seropositive for WNV in south Moravia [363]. Out of 31 cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) in south Moravia, 9.7% had antibodies to WNV [364]. In southern Moravia, 5.9% of 391 wild birds representing 28 species had PRN antibodies against WNV [365], including Fulica atra, Alcedo atthis, Acrocephalus scirpaceus, A. schoenobaenus, A. palustris, L. luscinioides, Emberiza schoeniclus, Sylvia atricapilla, Remiz pendulinus, Parus caeruleus and Sturnus vulgaris. The common coot (F. atra) has been suggested as a useful serological sentinel species for indicating the presence of WNV in the Czech Republic instead of chickens [366].
Many cases of free-living raptors and those in falconries (mainly goshawks) with lethal neuroinfections caused by the WNV-2 lineage were detected in Czech lands recently [367,368].
Of 93 wild boars in south Moravia, 6.5% were positive for WNV (PRN) antibodies [369]. The PRNT serosurvey was repeated in southern Moravia about 10 years later, with additional wild artiodactyl species being examined (105 Capreolus capreolus, 148 Cervus elaphus, 287 Dama dama, 71 Ovis musimon and 412 Sus scrofa). The overall seropositivity was 5.9%, with a range in individual species from 4.1% to 9.9% [370].
A serological survey (PRNT) for WNV in 163 horses in Czech lands was negative, but in neighboring Slovakia, 8.3% of 229 nonvaccinated horses were seropositive [371]. Later (2011–2013), a large serosurvey of 2349 horses found a specific WNV seropositivity of 0.7% among nonvaccinated equids in the Czech lands [372].
A serosurvey of the human population (n = 316) in three southern Moravían districts for WNV revealed only 0.6% positivity, but the sera were sampled in 1988–1999, which was prior the introduction of WNV in Moravia [373]. Sporadic human cases of WN disease have been diagnosed in south Moravia, with the first cases documented after the flood in 1997, which was followed by an enormous mosquito population [374,375]. WNV cases are still being reported in the Czech Republic [376,377].
Several contributions from Czech virologists to WNV diagnostics have been presented. CV-1 monkey cells and low-viscosity methylcellulose as an overlay were described for the plaquing and PRNT of WNV on plastic panels [285,286,287]. The preparation of hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids and indirect IFA were described as useful tools for the identification and serodiagnostics of WNV [299,300].
Certain antiviral agents were tested on cell lines or mice infected with WNV [341,342,343,344].

2.3. Usutu Virus (USUV; Genus: Flavivirus; Japanese Encephalitis Group)

The vector of this African virus is mosquitoes (Culex spp., Coquillettidia aurites, Mansonia africana). In Czech lands, USUV was first isolated from birds [378] and then from Cx. pipiens and Cx. modestus mosquitoes [354,379].
The vertebrate hosts are birds, and the common coot (Fulica atra) has been suggested as a useful serological sentinel species for the indication of the presence of USUV in the area [370].
USUV is very pathogenic for certain passeriform birds (especially for the blackbird Turdus merula in Europe) and raptors [378,379].
Little is known about the medical importance of USUV. Rare human cases (usually in immunocompromised persons) have been reported in Europe, including in the Czech Republic [377].

3. Family: TOGAVIRIDAE

Sindbis Virus (SINV; Genus: Alphavirus)

In the Czech Republic, antibodies to SINV have been found infrequently in south Moravia and south Bohemia [12,380,381,382,383,384,385].
The vectors of SINV are ornithophilic mosquitoes. The natural foci of SINV infections occur mainly in wetland ecosystems of diverse biomes (principally in an avian–mosquito cycle).
Vertebrate hosts are largely wild passeriform birds and occasionally rodents and amphibians.
Migratory birds play an important role in the wide geographic distribution of the virus. In south Moravia, 14.2% of 106 wild geese (Anser anser) were positive for SINV antibodies [360]. Juřicová et al. [361] found that 6.4% of 295 passeriform birds caught in south Moravia had SINV antibodies. Later, in the same area, only 0.7% of 178 passerine birds were seropositive for SINV [386]. SINV antibodies were found in 2.9% of birds in the family Hirundinidae (n = 183) [387]. Out of 31 cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) in south Moravia, 9.7% revealed antibodies to SINV [364]. Juřicová [96] examined 82 passerine birds of 14 spp. in the Krkonoše mountains during autumn migration and found antibodies to SINV in one robin (Erithacus rubecula). She also tested 273 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) caught in northern Moravia. SINV antibodies were present in 2.2% of them [97].
SINV antibodies have only been detected once in wild boars in south Moravia [369]. Kolman [380] found no seropositivity to SINV in domestic mammals including horses, cows and pigs living in south Moravia (district: Břeclav). However, the SINV antibodies were present in 1.0% of 104 hens and 8.5% of 47 ducks. Of 574 domestic ducks kept on 5 fishponds in south Moravia, only 0.3% were seropositive for SINV [363].
Recently, RNA of the Kyzylagach variant of SINV was detected by PCR in 4 of 221 pools prepared from 10,784 female Culex modestus mosquitoes collected at a fishpond in south Moravia [388].
Sluka [389] mentioned a febrile patient in Valtice who seroconverted against the Semliki Forest virus antigen (HI titer rose from negativity to 1:80). It is possible that the etiologic agent in this case was SINV due to the cross-HI reaction of SINV with the Semliki Forest virus.
CV-1 monkey cells and low-viscosity methylcellulose as an overlay were described for the plaquing and PRNT of SINV on plastic panels [285,286,287]. The preparation of hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids and the immunofluorescence assay were described as useful for the serodiagnostics of SINV [299,300].

4. Family: BUNYAVIRIDAE

4.1. Ťahyňa Virus (TAHV; Genus: Orthobunyavirus; California Group)

TAHV was originally isolated (prototype strain Ť-92) from Aedes vexans and Ochlerotatus caspius mosquitoes in the village of Ťahyňa (eastern Slovakia) in 1958 [390]. This is the very first mosquito-borne virus that was isolated in Europe. In the Czech Republic, TAHV was first recovered from Ae. vexans in southern Moravia during 1962 [391]. A cross-neutralization study among the main viruses of the California group was carried out, showing a close relationship between TAHV and three North American agents: California encephalitis virus, LaCrosse virus and Snowshoe Hare virus [392].
The arthropod vectors of TAHV are mosquitoes. In the Czech lands (predominantly in southern Moravia), the virus was isolated from Ae. vexans, Ae. cantans, Ae. caspius, Ae. sticticus, Ae. cinereus, Ae. dorsalis, Culex modestus, Culiseta annulata and Anopheles hyrcanus [392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,403,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414]. These species of mosquitoes can be competent vectors, possibly also Ae. excrucians, Ae. flavescens and Ae. communis [398,411]. Rare TAHV isolations from mosquitoes are from northern Bohemia [414]. The dissemination of TAHV to various organs and body parts (legs) of Ae. vexans was followed experimentally [396,397,415]. Transovarial transmission of TAHV was documented in Ae. vexans [416] and Cs. annulata [417,418] as well as its overwintering in female Cs. annulata [419,420,421]. The seasonal occurrence of TAHV infections thus depends upon the seasonal activity of competent mosquito vectors [400,407]. One exception was the isolation of two strains of TAHV from ceratopogonid flies (Culicoides) in Moravia [422].
TAHV multiplies in mosquito cell lines (e.g., from Aedes albopictus) but without producing CPE [411,423,424]. Danielová [425] tested TAHV replication in the Ae. albopictus cell line at different temperatures. The virus grew in the range of 6–28 °C, more slowly at the lower temperatures, and it survived at 10 °C and 15 °C for more than 300 days.
The vertebrate hosts of TAHV in the Czech lands are mainly lagomorphs, hedgehogs and rodents. Antibodies or (experimental) viremia were demonstrated in rabbits and hares (Lepus europaeus and Oryctolagus cuniculus), hedgehog Erinaceus concolor, rodents (Citellus citellus, Glis glis and Sciurus vulgaris) and other mammals, including Sus scrofa, Capreolus capreolus, Cervus elaphus, Martes foina, Putorius eversmanni, Vulpes vulpes and Myotis myotis [411,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433,434,435,436]. Hedgehogs inoculated with TAHV in winter (January) during the hibernation period showed viremia, and the virus could be isolated from organs up to 14 DPI [431]. For wild boars in south Moravia, 19.4% were positive for TAHV antibodies [369]. Serosurveys of game animals in south Moravia revealed seropositivity in a number of wild mammals [90,437].
Antibodies to TAHV were detected in 73.3% of domestic pigs in south Moravia in the Břeclav district [429]. Kolman [380] found high seropositivity to TAHV in domestic mammals living in that district, including 34.4% of 61 horses, 55.0% of 109 pigs and 5.6% of 305 cattle (but 49% of 346 local cattle were seropositive when tested in 1974 [411]). Antibodies for TAHV in domestic fowl were negligible at 1 of 104 hens and 0 of 47 ducks. Wild pheasants (Phasianus colchicus, 58 individuals) were seronegative [429], and when the pheasants were inoculated with TAHV, they did not reveal signs, viremia or antibodies [438]. In south Moravia, 106 wild geese (Anser anser) were examined for VN antibodies to TAHV, and 5.7% were positive [360]. However, no HI antibodies to TAHV were detected via the HIT in 280 wild birds of the 29 spp. living in the area [384]. Of 574 domestic ducks kept on 5 fishponds in south Moravia, 8.0% were seropositive in the HIT [365]. Juřicová et al. [361] tested via the HIT 295 passeriform birds caught in south Moravia, and TAHV antibodies were present in 16.3% of them. In the same area, 178 passerines were tested later, and 14.0% were seropositive [386]. Juřicová [96] examined 82 wild passerine birds (14 spp.) in the Krkonoše mountains during the autumn migration and found antibodies to TAHV in 9.8% of the birds. Out of 31 cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from south Moravia, 22.6% revealed HI antibodies to TAHV [364]. Juřicová et al. [97] later tested 273 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) caught in northern Moravia, and TAHV antibodies were present in 14.7% of them. Additionally, in 4.4% of the birds of the family Hirundinidae, antibodies to TAHV were detected [387].
The formation of VN antibodies in mice infected with TAHV was influenced by the sex and inoculum dose [439]. The open-field activity of mice inoculated with TAHV changed, although obvious clinical signs were not observed [440]. Host immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide reverted the asymptomatic TAHV infection of mice into a lethal disease [441].
The effects of serial passaging of TAHV in Syrian hamsters and suckling mice and the cell cultures on the properties of the virus were studied [442]. Researchers found the appearance of small-plaque variants on GMK cells and virulence modifications (index of invasivity and average survival time in suckling mice). A similar study with 10 TAHV strains showed that after three passages in suckling mice, the virus titer increased, and the plaque size formation on GMK cells was reduced [443]. Málková [444,445,446,447] studied TAHV thermosensitivity and the effect of a higher temperature (39.2 °C) on TAHV in chick embryo cells. CPE started later and was less intense than that at 36.5 °C. CV-1 monkey cells and low-viscosity methylcellulose as an overlay were described for the TAHV plaquing and PRNT on plastic panels [285,286,287]. Málková [448] observed that carboxymethycellulose in the overlay increased the TAHV plaque number in GMK cells. Málková and Marhoul [449] tested the plaquing of several TAHV strains in GMK cells and found two TAHV variants with different plaque size virulence and thermostability values [450]. This was confirmed later when it was shown that specific strains of TAHV can differ in plaque size on vertebrate cell cultures and their antigenic properties, and their virulence can be affected by the number of passages in vitro [451]. The nucleotide variability of different strains of TAHV was documented, and the S segment was highly conservative in all analyzed TAHV strains. Within the M segment, the highest variability was observed in the G(C) gene encoding viral envelope protein and, to a lesser extent, in the NS gene as well [452,453].
The preparation of hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids and indirect IFA were described as useful tools for the identification and serodiagnostics of TAHV [299,300]. For the HIT, stabilization of goose erythrocytes by formaldehyde and preparation of a high-titer hemagglutinin were suggested [454,455,456]. A modified plaque assay of TAHV in the GMK cells was reported [457]. A useful VNT on micropanels for the detection of TAHV antibodies was also described [458]. A nonspecific inhibitor of hemagglutination of TAHV in acetone-extracted mouse sera was detected, and its removal by acetone and heat was performed [459]. When the sensitivity of the PS cells, XTC-2 cells and suckling mice for the detection and isolation of California group bunyaviruses was compared, the mice were found to be the most sensitive [460].
The natural foci of TAHV disease occur in water-inundated lowland habitats (floodplain forest ecosystem) of the Czech lands, mainly situated in south Moravia [407,408,411,429,461,462,463]. High frequencies (up to 60–80%) of TAHV seroprevalence rates have been reported regularly in adult human populations in endemic south Moravian foci [251,375,429,464,465,466,467,468,469]. In the other parts of the Czech Republic, the TAHV seroprevalence rates in humans have been much lower, usually being below 10% [203,251,381,382,383,385,461,465,470,471].
Human disease caused by TAHV, called “Valtice fever” starting in 1960, is an influenza-like febrile illness occurring in the summer and early autumn mainly in children, with a sudden onset of fever (lasting 3–5 days), headache, dizziness, malaise, conjunctivitis, pharyngitis, myalgia, nausea, gastrointestinal disorders, loss of appetite, anorexia, occasional arthralgia, stiff neck or other signs of the CNS involvement (meningitis) and sometimes bronchopneumonia [8,457,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479]. No lethal cases have been described for TAHV, contrary to the closely related North American La Crosse virus. At least 50 documented cases of Valtice fever in Moravia have been published since 1963 [461,466,472,473,474,475,476,477,478,479,480,481,482,483], but many cases have remained undiagnosed or unreported, since this is not a notifiable infectious disease in Europe. TAHV has been isolated from the blood of patients with Valtice fever several times [475,477,480,481].
Experimental infections of primates with TAHV yielded interesting results. Eighteen rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) exposed to infectious aerosols did not develop a fever, other clinical signs (except for one animal), viremia or VN antibodies 28 DPI. When five chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) were inoculated with TAHV s.c., they developed a fever for 3–4 days and an enhanced erythrocyte sedimentation rate and decreased mobility. Viremia lasted 3–8 DPI, and antibodies (HI, CF and VN) were formed 14 DPI [484,485,486]. Five chimpanzees were exposed to TAHV-infected Cs. annulata mosquitoes [487]. Fever and other symptoms were similar to those in the previous experiment.

4.2. Batai Virus (BATV; Genus: Orthobunyavirus; Bunyamwera Group; Synonym Čalovo Virus)

BATV was originally isolated from Culex gelidus collected in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) in 1955 [13]. The antigenically identical “Čalovo” virus (strain 184) was isolated from Anopheles maculipennis s.l. mosquitoes collected in a stable at Čalovo (village of Trstená in south Slovakia) in 1960 [488]. BATV was then also isolated from anopheline mosquitoes in the district of Břeclav in southern Moravia [406,489]. The genome of BATV strains was analyzed lately and revealed that Eurasian and African strains of BATV are phylogenetically different and form two distinct lineages [490].
The principal vectors of BATV in Europe are zoophilic mosquitoes. In south Moravia, BATV was isolated only from An. maculipennis s.l. collected in stables, and two strains from 10,901 anophelids were recovered [405,491].
The vertebrate hosts are horses, cattle and domestic pigs [8,380]. Antibodies to BATV were detected repeatedly in domestic animals in south Moravia. A high seropositivity to BATV was found in domestic mammals living in the district of Břeclav (27.9% of 61 horses, 25.2% of 305 cows (maintained in stables) and 17.4% of 109 pigs, but only 1.0% of 104 hens and 0.0% of 47 ducks [380]. Out of 574 domestic ducks kept on 5 fishponds in south Moravia, only 2.1% were seropositive for BATV [363]. Additionally, 106 wild geese (Anser anser) in south Moravia were examined, and 4.7% were seropositive [360]. Juřicová et al. [97] found BATV antibodies in 2.2% of 273 house sparrows (Passer domesticus) caught in northern Moravia. In south Moravia, 12.1% of 295 passeriform birds had BATV antibodies [95]. In the same area at a later date, 6.8% of 178 passerines were seropositive [286]. Juřicová [96] also examined 82 passerine birds of 14 spp. caught in the Krkonoše mountains during autumn migration and found antibodies to BATV in 3 birds.
The natural foci of BATV infection occur in agroecosystems (i.e., in and around villages and farms), and principally, virus circulation is based on the “domestic animal–zoophilic mosquito” cycle.
BATV reproduces (with the formation of CPE) in CEC, BHK-21 and PS cells [423]. It also multiplies (without CPE) in Anopheles stephensi and Aedes albopictus mosquito cells, but it does not multiply in cell line Mos 55 from An. gambiae [424,490].
The virus is pathogenic for suckling and juvenile mice (after i.c. and s.c. inoculation) and chick embryos but not for adult rats, guinea pigs and chickens [8,12].
BATV could be pathogenic for other mammals. In humans, seroconversion data have indicated an association of BATV with influenza-like illness accompanied by malaise, myalgia and anorexia in south Moravia [389,474,492,493]. Further research on the pathogenic role of BATV in humans is necessary.

4.3. Lednice Virus (LEDV; Orthobunyavirus; Turlock Group)

The prototype strain 6118 of LEDV was isolated from Cx. modestus mosquitoes collected in the reedbeds of fishponds at Lednice in south Moravia (Czech Republic) in 1963 [405] and identified later [494]. Six additional isolations were made at the same locality in 1972 [409]. The virus was originally classified as the Yaba-1 (=M’Poko) virus of the Turlock antigenic group [495], which is known to occur in Africa. The LEDV genome was later sequenced, and it was found that the virus is related to but different from the Umbre, Turlock and Kedah viruses of the Turlock group [496].
Some physical and chemical properties of the virus (e.g., the effect of pH, temperature, HA formation and morphology) were described [497,498], as well as biological properties such as the pathogenicity (mice, rats, golden hamsters, guinea pigs and chickens are all refractory) [499] in LEDV replicates in chick embryo [500] and chick embryo cells [501].
The only known competent vector is Cx. modestus [12,502]. The virus does not replicate in cell line Mos-55 from An. gambiae [424].
The vertebrate hosts are wetland birds, largely of the order Anseriformes. In 1975–1977, antibodies were detected in south Moravian fishponds [12,384,503] in Cygnus olor (2/4 seropositive), Anser anser (14/95 seropositive) and Anas platyrhynchos (22/69 seropositive). LEDV antibodies were also detected in domestic fowl bred at fishponds in the endemic area in 1972 [381] and in 1975–1977 [384] in geese (7/185 and 10/436) and ducks (25/141 and 21/295), but in hens the rates were 0/100 and 1/208, respectively. Kolman et al. [384] examined 280 wild birds of 29 spp. living in the endemic area and detected antibodies to LEDV in anseriform birds living on the fishponds with reed beds (i.e., the habitat of vector Cx. modestus), namely A. platyrhynchos (22/69), A. anser (11/64) and C. olor (1/3), while no specimens were seropositive of the 65 passeriform birds caught in the same ecosystem (Acrocephalus and Locustella spp. and Emberiza schoeniclus). The experimental viremia in several local wild bird species, including Phasianus colchicus, Larus ridibundus and Fulica atra, was generally low and of a short duration [12,504,505]. Domestic chickens, ducklings and goslings inoculated s.c. with LEDV did not develop signs of illness, and the viremia was short and of a low level. VN antibodies appeared after 2–3 weeks post-inoculation [506,507]. LEDV multiplies in chick embryos and causes histological lesions in the brain, striated muscles and heart and vascular endothelium [12,499,500,508].
No disease signs, viremia or antibodies have been detected in local mammals (e.g., rodents, insectivores or deer) or in s.c. inoculated Macaca mulatta monkeys [509]. LEDV is fatal to suckling mice (inoculated i.c. and i.n. but not i.p. and s.c.) and partially pathogenic to adult mice (i.c. and i.n.) and nonpathogenic to suckling and adult rats, guinea pigs, golden hamsters, rabbits, ferrets and chickens [12,510]. A serosurvey of local domestic mammals (461 cows, 181 pigs, 91 horses, 6 goats and 50 sheep) resulted in a single positive cattle, but the HI titer was low (1:20) [511]. Forty-four local wild rodents (Micromys minutus, Apodemus sylvaticus, Myodes glareolus and Microtus arvalis) were all seronegative [12,510].
LEDV produces CPE in chick (duck and goose) embryo cells but not in mammalian cell lines (e.g., PS, Vero or CV-1) [12,499,501] or in mosquito cell lines from Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Anopheles stephensi or An. gambiae [423,424,490].
A good HA antigen of LEDV was prepared using ultrasonic waves [512]. Málková et al. [513] proposed radial hemolysis in gel as a useful serological test for LEDV.
Disease in vertebrates is unknown but quite improbable in mammals including humans, as no antibodies were detected in 581 inhabitants of the endemic area [464,511].

4.4. Sedlec Virus (SEDV; Genus: Orthobunyavirus; Simbu Group)

The prototype strain AV172 of the virus was isolated from the blood of a reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) caught on the Nesyt fishpond near the village of Sedlec (close to Mikulov) in south Moravia on 30 July 1984 [362,514]. SEDV was identified as a member of the Simbu group of bunyaviruses [515,516].
The virus causes no symptoms in suckling or adult mice when given s.c., but for i.c. inoculation the virus kills them. Adult rabbits are not susceptible to SEDV and do not produce VN antibodies after i.v. inoculation. CPE is formed in CV-1 monkey cells (but not in Vero cells) and in SPEV pig cells, but only at an elevated temperature of 40–41 °C (i.e., at the avian body temperature).
Among 109 birds of 6 species caught on the Nesyt fishpond wetland in 1988, 25 (i.e., 22.9%) had VN antibodies against SEDV (titer of 1:10 or higher) when tested on CV-1 cells, namely the reed warbler A. scirpaceus (19/89), sedge warbler A. schoenobaenus (3/12), Savi’s warbler Locustella luscinioides (2/2), and reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus (1/3) [514]. All these species live in reed beds of fishponds.
Arthropod vectors are still unknown, but possible vectors can be ornithophilic ceratopogonids.
Disease in humans or animals has not been described; serosurveys of humans and other mammals have not been carried out.

4.5. Uukuniemi Virus (UUKV; Genus: Phlebovirus)

UUKV was originally isolated from I. ricinus ticks collected from cattle near the village of Uukuniemi in southeast Finland in 1959. In 1963, an agent named the “Poteplí” virus was isolated from I. ricinus in Central Bohemia [517] and at an MIR of 3.95, while the MIR of TBEV in the I. ricinus population was only 1.91 in this locality [233]. This virus was later found to be antigenically identical with the Finnish UUKV. The biological and physico-chemical properties of the virus were studied [518,519]. UUKV is not pathogenic for adult mice when given s.c. or i.p.
In addition to the Poteplí locality, UUKV was isolated from I. ricinus ticks in northern Moravia [520,521], urban parks in Prague [217,219,233] and southern Moravia [248].
The arthropod vectors are ixodid ticks, and TST of UUKV occurs in I. ricinus [522].
The vertebrate hosts are forest rodents (Myodes glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis) and birds, largely ground-feeding passerines. Kolman and Husová [88] examined via CFT small mammals (288 A. flavicollis, 161 M. glareolus and 101 Microtus arvalis) in a natural focus of TBE at Unhošť in central Bohemia, and antibodies to UUKV were present in the three species (3.7%, 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively).
Fatal meningoencephalitis with myositis occurs in suckling mice, but no symptoms have been observed in adult mice via any route of inoculation or in adult rats (i.c.). UUKV is also pathogenic to suckling but not adult M. arvalis, A. flavicollis or M. glareolus (i.c., but usually not i.p.) or suckling rats (i.c., but not i.p.). UUKV is non-pathogenic for rhesus monkeys (i.p.).
Only partial CPE (or no CPE) is formed by UUKV in several primary mammalian cells (e.g., kidney cells from susliks, dormice and martens) [523], but CPE is produced in BSC-1, BHK-21 and PS cells. UUKV replication does not occur in Aedes egypti, Ae. albopictus or Ae. stephensi mosquito cells [423,424,490].
Animal and human disease caused by UUKV has never been reported. Antibodies were detected in less than 5% of the persons examined in a few areas [524,525]. For serological diagnosis, CFT, HIT, IFA or VNT can be used [12].

5. Family: REOVIRIDAE

Tribeč Virus (TRBV; Genus: Orbivirus; Kemerovo Group)

The prototype strain is Tribeč (Ixodes ricinus, west Slovakia, 1963). Its synonymous strains are Lipovník (I. ricinus, east Slovakia, 1963) and Cvilín (I. ricinus, north Moravia).
TRBV is closely related to the Siberian Kemerovo virus by CFT but is distinguishable by VNT. The gene pools of the Kemerovo group and other orbiviruses have great reassortment potential (because of the segmented dsRNA genome) and resulting biological variability.
The principal vector for TRBV is the I. ricinus tick. In the Czech lands, TRBV or its variants were isolated from I. ricinus in Cvilín (district of Bruntál) in 1975 [526], Tetčiněves (district of Litoměřice) in 1976, Sychrov (district of Liberec) in 1976, Chuchelná (district of Opava) in 1978 and Černá Voda (district of Šumperk) in 1978 [527].
The vertebrate hosts of TRBV are rodents, hares and goats. Antibodies are often present in the grazed ruminants in endemic areas. Animal disease is unknown (inapparent infections); however, TRBV is fatal to suckling mice (also when inoculated s.c., showing meningoencephalitis with perivascular infiltration, progressive neuronal and glial damage). TRBV is fatal in suckling rats and suckling Syrian hamsters (i.c., but not s.c.). Meningitis with survival or no symptoms at all occur in adult mice under i.c. inoculation (but with local necrotizing encephalitis demonstrated histologically), while no symptoms are present in adult mice given s.c., i.n. or p.o. inoculation. Adult rats (i.c.), rabbits (i.c.) and peripherally inoculated calves or foals are also asymptomatic. Fever and meningitis are present in rhesus monkeys under i.c. inoculation. The CPE or plaques are produced in Hep-2, L (mouse) and RU-1 cells.
The virus occasionally causes febrile illness or aseptic meningitis in humans. A study reported at least 15 patients with the CNS infection (meningitis) and seroconversion against TRBV in the Czech lands. Seven of 154 patients hospitalized with meningoencephalitis (all negative for TBE) in central Bohemia presented IF antibodies to TRBV. Five of these sera were examined in PRNT, and although the titers were low, one serum reacted at titers of 1:16–1:32 against TRBV, suggesting seroconversion [525,528,529]. In northern Moravia, out of 49 patients with TBE-like symptoms, 16% revealed seroconversion or a significant increase in the PRN antibody titer to TRBV, and 7–8% of the healthy forest workers had antibodies to TRBV [527], while 9% of the 103 healthy adult residents in that region had TRBV antibodies as detected by PRNT [530]. A total of 4.9% of 408 persons with neuropathies in Central Bohemia had IF antibodies to TRBV, and 6 patients with meningoencephalitis seroconverted against TRBV [12]. In addition, Fraňková et al. [528] observed a meningoencephalitis case in central Bohemia caused by an orbivirus that was likely TRBV. In the Znojmo district hospital (southern Moravia), 19% of 75 febrile patients were seropositive to TRBV by PRNT. One patient out of 6 with meningoencephalitis and 10 out of 32 patients with meningitis had TRBV infections. In the same study of 28 forest workers in the same district, 22 had antibodies to TRBV by PRNT [531]. Additionally, in West Bohemia, antibodies to TRBV were detected in humans [203].
Interestingly, antibodies to TRBV were detected at a higher frequency among patients with multiple sclerosis [530]. However, additional studies are necessary to assess the public health importance of TRBV.
The HIT cannot be used in diagnostic serology, as TRBV does not produce hemagglutinin [12,528].

6. Conclusions

Czech researchers and medical doctors (clinicians and epidemiologists) have contributed significantly to the study of these arboviruses and the diseases they cause since the year 1948.
Three tick-borne viruses (“tiboviruses”) have occurred in the Czech lands since the 20th century: TBEV, UUKV and TRBV. Their recognized vertebrate hosts are rodents, insectivores and certain other mammals. The most important tibovirus, TBEV, causes serious human disease, usually biphasic fever with a rapid onset, sweating, headache, nausea, weakness, myalgia and arthralgia. Frequently, there are CNS affections, including meningitis, meningoencephalitis or encephalomyelitis with paresis, paralysis and other neurological sequelae. TRBV might play a role in human or animal pathology, though the disease is usually either less serious or infrequently reported. UUKV is an “orphan” virus without proven medical or veterinary significance. However, certain arboviral diseases of vertebrates may often pass unnoticed or be misdiagnosed, and they might potentially appear to be emerging diseases.
Seven mosquito-borne viruses (“moboviruses”) have occurred in the Czech Republic since the 20th century: WNV, USUV, SINV, TAHV, BATV, LEDV and SEDV (however, the last virus is probably transmitted by biting midges). The recognized or potential vertebrate hosts of these moboviruses are insectivores (TAHV), bats (SINV, WNV and TAHV), rodents (SINV, WNV, BATV and TAHV), lagomorphs (TAHV), carnivores (BATV and TAHV), equids (WNV (BATV)), artiodactyls (WNV and BATV (TAHV)), primates (SINV, WNV, BATV and TAHV), birds (SINV, WNV, USUV, BATV, LEDV and SEDV) and amphibians (SINV and WNV). Out of these moboviruses reported in the Czech lands to date, five can cause human disease (WNV, USUV, SINV, TAHV and BATV), and two are associated with birds and are probably not pathogenic to humans (LEDV and SEDV). Two groups of mobovirus diseases can be recognized according to the main clinical symptoms produced: (1) febrile illness with sweating, headache, nausea, weakness, myalgia, arthralgia and rash and (2) CNS affection with meningitis, meningoencephalitis or encephalomyelitis with paresis, paralysis and other neurological sequelae. Mobovirus outbreaks are strictly determined by the presence or import of particular competent vectors of the disease. Ecological variables (including weather and climate conditions) affect moboviruses considerably. The main factors are an abundance of mosquito vectors and their vertebrate hosts, intense summer precipitations, floods, higher summer temperatures and drought and the presence of appropriate habitats.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CF(T): complement fixation (test); CPE: cytopathic effect; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; DPI: days post inoculation; HA: hemagglutinin; HI(T): hemagglutination inhibition (test); i.c.: intracerebral; IF(A): immunofluorescence (assay); i.m.: intramuscular; i.n.: intranasal; i.p.: intraperitoneal; i.v.: intravenous; MIR: minimum infection rate (per 1000 examined individual mosquitoes or ticks); p.o.: peroral; PRNT: plaque reduction neutralization test; s.c.: subcutaneous; TBE: tick-borne encephalitis; TOT: transovarial transmission (in arthropods); TST: transstadial transmission (in arthropods); VN(T): virus neutralization (test).

References

  1. Gallia, F.; Rampas, J.; Hollender, L. Laboratory infection with encephalitis virus. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1949, 88, 224–226. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  2. Hloucal, L. Abortive virus meningoencephalitides. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1949, 48, 1390–1394. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  3. Hloucal, L.; Gallia, F. An epidemic of neurotropic virus disease in the Strakonice district. Sbor. Lék. (Praha) 1949, 51, 352–376. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  4. Krejčí, J. An epidemic of viral meningoencephalitis in the Vyškov area (Moravia). Lék. Listy 1949, 4, 73–75. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  5. Krejčí, J. Isolement dun virus nouveau en course d’une epidémie de meningoencephalite dans la region de Vyškov (Moravie). Presse Méd. 1949, 74, 1084. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rampas, J.; Gallia, F. Isolation of encephalitis virus from Ixodes ricinus ticks. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1949, 88, 1179–1180. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bárdoš, V.; Rosický, B. A proposal for the evaluation of vertebrates as to their role in the circulation of arboviruses. Folia Parasitol. 1979, 26, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bárdoš, V. On the Ecology of Arbovíruses in Czechoslovakia; Vydav. SAV: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1965; pp. 1–198. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  9. Grešíková, M.; Nosek, J. Arboviruses in Czechoslovakia; Veda: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1981; pp. 1–132. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  10. Grešíková, M.; Nosek, J. Arboviruses isolated from ticks in Central Europe. Biológia 1982, 37, 755–763. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grešíková, M. Studies on tick-borne arboviruses isolated in Central Europe. Biol. Práce 1972, 18, 3–111. [Google Scholar]
  12. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Holubová, J.; Marhoul, Z. Less known arboviruses of Central Europe. Rozpravy ČSAV Řada Matem. Přír. Věd. 1986, 96, 1–75. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubálek, Z. Mosquito-borne viruses in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I. Tick-borne viruses in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 9–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Krejčí, J. Tick-Borne Virus Meningo-Encephalitis in Vyškov in 1949. Čas. Lék. Česk. 1952, 91, 358–363. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  16. Edward, D.G. The relationship of a newly isolated human encephalitis virus to louping-ill virus. Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 1950, 31, 515–522. [Google Scholar]
  17. Krejčí, J. Properties of the virus isolated by author from the blood and cerebrospinal fluid during an outbreak of meningoencephalitis in the Vyškov area; 1948. Lék. Listy 1950, 5, 373–381. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  18. Krejčí, J. Isolation of human meningoencephalitis virus from ticks. Lék. Listy 1950, 5, 406–409. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Krejčí, J. Viral meningoencephalitides in the Vyškov area; 1950. Lék. Listy 1954, 9, 358–361. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  20. Krejčí, J. A new wave of meningoencephalitis and encephalomyelitis cases in the Vyškov area. Vnitř. Lék. 1955, 1, 113–124. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  21. Krejčí, J. Viral meningoencephalitides in the light of topical diagnostics. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1956, 96, 225–230. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  22. Hloucal, L. Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1952, 91, 990–991. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  23. Hloucal, L. Zeckenenzephalitis in Böhmen und Mähren. Schweiz. Med. Wschr. 1953, 83, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Hloucal, L. Tick-borne encephalitis as observed in Czechoslovakia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1960, 63, 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hloucal, L.; Rampas, J. Tick-borne neuroinfections in Strakonice area. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1953, 18, 495–500. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  26. Rádl, V. Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis in 1953. Prakt. Lék. 1954, 34, 279–280. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Šerý, V.; Vaněčková, N.; Izbický, A.; Absolonová, O. Tick-borne encephalitis in some holiday areas of the Prague region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 79–81. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  28. Pospíšil, L.; Jandásek, L.; Pešek, J. Isolation of new strains of meningoencephalitis virus in the Brno region during the summer of 1953. Lék. Listy 1954, 9, 3–5. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  29. Pešek, J.; Pospíšil, L.; Jandásek, L. Third report on serological examinations with the newly isolated tick-borne encephalitis virus. Lék. Listy 1954, 9, 417–418. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Strauss, J.; Kolman, J. Isolation and serological identification of 16 strains of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 67–74. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  31. Kolman, J.M.; Havlík, O. The investigation of vectors and reservoirs in a natural focus of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 74–78. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  32. Jandásek, L.; Pešek, J.; Pospíšil, L. Isolation of new strains of meningoencephalitis virus in the Brno region. II. Pathogenicity for laboratory animals. Lék. Listy 1954, 9, 388–389. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Pavlák, R.; Snítilová, R.; Dědková, A. Analysis of the history of seasonal tick-borne encephalitis in Czechoslovakia from the standpoint of natural focality of diseases. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 50–55. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  34. Šerý, V.; Strauss, J.; Izbický, A. A contribution to elucidation of occurrence of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis before 1953. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1957, 96, 230–235. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  35. Pospíšilová, V.; Snítilová, R.; Dědková, A. Survey of tick-borne encephalitis prevalence in forest workers since 1939. Scr. Med. 1954, 27, 153–158. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  36. Slonim, D. Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis virus. Antigenic relation to louping-ill virus and to Russian spring-summer encephalitis of the eastern type. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1955, 4, 407–417. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  37. Slonim, D. Beitrag zur Frage der antigenen Verwandschaft des Virus der Tschechoslowakischen Zeckenenzephalitis zu dem Louping-ill Virus und dem Virus der russischen Frühlimg-Sommer Enzephalitis des östlichen Typus. Zentralbl Bakt. I Orig. 1956, 167, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  38. Slonim, D.; Štěpánek, J. Electron microscopy of virus purificates of Czechoslovak tick encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 172–177. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  39. Hubálek, Z.; Pow, I.; Reid, H.W.; Hussain, M.H. Antigenic similarity of Central European encephalitis and louping-ill viruses. Acta Virol. 1995, 39, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Růžek, D.; Šťastná, H.; Kopecký, J.; Golovljova, I.; Grubhoffer, L. Rapid subtyping of tick-borne encephalitis virus isolates using multiplex RT-PCR. J. Virol. Methods 2007, 144, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Benda, R. The common tick Ixodes ricinus L. as a reservoir and vector of tick-borne encephalitis. I. Survival of the virus (strain B3) during the development of the tick under laboratory conditions. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1958, 2, 314–330. [Google Scholar]
  42. Benda, R. The common tick Ixodes ricinus L. as a reservoir and vector of tick-borne encephalitis. II. Experimental transmission of encephalitis to laboratory animals by ticks at various stages of development. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1958, 2, 331–344. [Google Scholar]
  43. Danielová, V. Natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis and prerequisites for their existence. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 291, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Danielová, V.; Holubová, J.; Daniel, M. Tick-borne encephalitis virus prevalence in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in high risk habitats of the South-Bohemian region of the Czech Republic. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2002, 26, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Křivanec, K.; Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E.; Grubhoffer, L. Isolation of TBE virus from the tick Ixodes hexagonus. Folia Parasitol. 1988, 35, 273–276. [Google Scholar]
  46. Danielová, V.; Holubová, J. Transovarial transmission rate of tick-borne encephalitis virus in Ixodes ricinus ticks. In Modern Acarology; Dusbábek, F., Bukva, V., Eds.; Academia Prague–SPB Academic: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1991; Volume 2, pp. 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  47. Danielová, V.; Holubová, J.; Pejčoch, M.; Daniel, M. Potential significance of transovarial transmission in the circulation of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Folia Parasitol. 2002, 49, 323–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kramář, J.; Slonim, D. An attempt at detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in a natural focus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 185–189. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  49. Slonim, D.; Kramář, J. An attempt at transmission of the virus of Czechoslovak tick encephalitis by mosquitoes occurring in Czechoslovakia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1955, 4, 176–180. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  50. Smetana, A. On the transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus by fleas. Acta Virol. 1965, 9, 375–378. [Google Scholar]
  51. Danielová, V.; Daniel, M.; Holubová, J.; Hájková, Z.; Albrecht, V.; Marhoul, Z.; Simonová, V. Influence of microclimatic factors on the development and virus infection rate of ticks Ixodes ricinus (L.) under experimental condoitions. Folia Parasitol. 1983, 30, 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  52. Danielová, V. Experimental infection of ticks Ixodes ricinus with tick-borne encephalitis virus under different microclimatic conditions. Folia Parasitol. 1990, 37, 279–282. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kopecký, J.; Stanková, I. Interaction of virulent and attenuated tick-borne encephalitis virus strains in ticks and a tick cell line. Folia Parasitol. 1998, 45, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  54. Růžek, D.; Bell-Sakyi, L.; Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L. Growth of tick-borne encephalitis virus (European subtype) in cell lines from vector and non-vector ticks. Virus. Res. 2008, 137, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Šenigl, F.; Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L. Distribution of E and NS1 proteins of TBE virus in mammalian and tick cells. Folia Microbiol. 2004, 49, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Šenigl, F.; Grubhoffer, L.; Kopecký, J. Differences in maturation of tick-borne encephalitis virus in mammalian and tick cell line. Intervirology 2006, 49, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lattová, E.; Straková, P.; Pokorná-Formanová, P.; Grubhoffer, L.; Bell-Sakyi, L.; Zdráhal, Z.; Palus, M.; Růžek, D. Comprehensive N-glycosylation mapping of envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus grown in human and tick cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, e13204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Weisheit, S.; Villar, M.; Tykalová, H.; Popara, M.; Loecherbach, J.; Watson, M.; Růžek, D.; Grubhoffer, L.; de la Fuente, J.; Fazakerley, J.K.; et al. Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus tick cell lines respond to infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus: Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Kolman, J.M. Isolation of the tick-borne encephalitis virus from the squirrel. Sciurus Vulgaris. Folia Parasitol. 1969, 19, 80. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kožuch, O.; Grulich, I.; Nosek, J. Experimental infection of the mole with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1965, 9, 287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Kožuch, O.; Grulich, I.; Nosek, J. Serological survey and isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from the blood of the mole (Talpa europaea) in a natural focus. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 557–560. [Google Scholar]
  62. Benda, R. Experimental transmission of Czech tick-borne encephalitis to goats by infected Ixodes ricinus female ticks. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1958, 7, 1–5. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  63. Labuda, M.; Danielová, V.; Jones, L.D.; Nuttall, P.A. Amplification of tick-borne encephalitis virus infection during co-feeding of ticks. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1993, 4, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Labuda, M.; Jones, L.D.; Williams, T.; Danielová, V.; Nuttall, P.A. Efficient transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus between cofeeding ticks. J. Med. Entomol. 1993, 30, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Danielová, V. A new look at transmission and circulation of tick encephalitis virus in nature. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1994, 43, 127–129. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  66. Ašmera, J.; Šeděnka, B.; Nedvídek, J. Results of parasitological investigation of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the former Ostrava region. Česk. Parasitol. 1962, 9, 5–14. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  67. Kožuch, O.; Lichard, M.; Nosek, J.; Chmela, J. Isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from the blood of Sorex aranaeus in a natural focus. Acta Virol. 1967, 11, 563. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Havlík, O.; Kolman, J.M. Detection of antibodies against tick-borne encephalitis virus in some species of bats in Czechoslovakia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1957, 6, 241–244. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  69. Havlík, O.; Kolman, J.M. The demonstration of antibodies against the virus of tick-borne encephalitis in certain bats. J. Hyg. Epidem. 1957, 1, 231–233. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kolman, J.M.; Fischer, J.; Havlík, O. Experimental infection of Myotis myotis Borkhausen bats with the Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Univ. Carol. Med. 1960, 2, 147–180. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  71. Pešek, J. Experimental pathogenicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus for suckling white rat. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 178–184. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  72. Šimon, J.; Slonim, D.; Závadová, H. Experimentelle Untersuchungen von klinischen und subklinischen Formen der Zeckenenzephalitis an unterschiedlich empfänglichen Wirten: Mäusen; Hamstern und Affen. I. Weisse Maus. II. Hamster. Acta Neuropathol. 1966, 7, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Slonim, D.; Závadová, H.; Šimon, J. Pathogenicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus. V. Relation between infective and pathogenic activity for white mice. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Daneš, L.; Libich, J.; Benda, R. Experimental air-borne infection of mice with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1962, 6, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L.; Tomková, E. Interaction of tick-borne encephalitis virus with mouse peritoneal macrophages. The effect of antiviral antibody and lectin. Acta Virol. 1991, 35, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Málková, D.; Smetana, A.; Fischer, J.; Marhoul, Z. Course of infection of Clethrionomys glareolus and white mice with tick-borne encephalitis virus freshly isolated from Ixodes ricinus ticks. Acta Virol. 1965, 9, 367–374. [Google Scholar]
  77. Smetana, A.; Málková, D. The relation of the Bank Vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and the Yellow-necked Mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) to tick-borne encephalitis virus in two different habitats (in Czech). Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1966, 15, 229–233. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E.; Vlček, M. Immune response of the long-tailed field mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) to tick-borne encephalitis virus infection. Folia Parasitol. 1991, 38, 275–282. [Google Scholar]
  79. Weidmann, M.; Schmidt, P.; Hufert, F.T.; Krivanec, K.; Meyer, H. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in Clethrionomys glareolus in the Czech Republic. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2006, 6, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kožuch, O.; Nosek, J.; Lichard, M.; Grulich, I. Transmission of tick-borne encephalitis virus by nymphs of Ixodes ricinus to the European Mole (Talpa europaea). Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 83. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kožuch, O.; Nosek, J.; Lichard, M.; Chmela, J.; Ernek, E. Experimental infection of Pitymys subterraneus with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1967, 11, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Mornsteinová, D.; Albrecht, P. Experimental infection of the Harvest Mouse; Micromys minutus; with the Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1957, 6, 157–161. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  83. Málková, D. Experimentelle Infektion der Mäuseart Micromys minutus mit dem Virus Zeckenenzephalitis. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1961; pp. 108–109. [Google Scholar]
  84. Benda, R.; Daneš, L.; Fuchsová, M. Susceptibility of Macacus cynomolgus and Macacus rhesus to tick-borne encephalitis virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1960, 9, 1–11. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  85. Slonim, D.; Šimon, J.; Závadová, H. Pathogenicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus. VII. Relation between infective and pathogenic activity for rhesus monkeys. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 412–419. [Google Scholar]
  86. Benda, R.; Fuchsová, M.; Daneš, L. Experimental air-borne infection of monkeys with tick-borne encephalitis. Acta Virol. 1962, 6, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  87. Slonim, D.; Závadová, H. Viremia and serum antibodies in Macacus rhesus monkey after inapparent infection with European tick-borne encephalitis virus. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1977, 21, 460–474. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kolman, J.M.; Husová, M. Antibodies against the tick-borne encephalitis and the Uukuniemi viruses in small mammmals in a mixed natural focus of diseases. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  89. Juřicová, Z. Antibodies to arboviruses in small mammals caught in the area of Krušné hory mountains. Biológia (Bratisl) 1991, 46, 265–269. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  90. Juřicová, Z. Antibodies to arboviruses in wildlife from South Moravia. Vet. Med. 1992, 37, 633–636. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  91. Soběslavský, O.; Rehn, F.; Fischer, J. Isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from the coot. Fulica atra. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1960, 9, 256–261. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  92. Rehn, F.; Soběslavský, O.; Mráz, J.; Formánek, J. A complex investigation of free-living birds. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1967, 16, 58–64. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  93. Havlík, O.; Kolman, J.M.; Lím, J. The incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in wild birds. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1957, 1, 367–376. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ernek, E.; Kožuch, O.; Hudec, K.; Urbán, S. Occurrence of tick-borne encephalitis virus neutralizing antibodies in aquatic birds in Central Europe. Acta Virol. 1967, 11, 562. [Google Scholar]
  95. Juřicová, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Hubálek, Z. Serological examinations of birds for arboviruses in South Moravia. Biológia 1987, 42, 1097–1101. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  96. Juřicová, Z. Antibodies to arboviruses in wild birds caught in the Krkonoše mountains. Biológia 1988, 43, 259–263. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  97. Juřicová, Z.; Literák, I.; Pinowski, J. Antibodies to arboviruses in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in the Czech Republic. Acta Vet. Brno 2000, 69, 213–215. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jandásek, L.; Dluhoš, M. Biology of the Czechoslovak encephalitis virus in the fertile hen’s egg. Scr. Med. 1954, 27, 159–170. [Google Scholar]
  99. Bednář, B.; Slonim, D. Histopathological changes in chick embryo produced by the virus of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. III. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 63–67. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  100. Bednář, B.; Slonim, D. Histopathologische Veränderungen im Hühnerembryo hervorgerufen durch das Virus der Tschechoslowakischen Zeckenenzephalitis. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. 1957, 169, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  101. Slonim, D. Qualitative study of protein fractions of the human convalescent serum after tick-borne encephalitis with regard to a possible specific prophylaxis of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Hyg. Epidem. Mikrobiol. 1955, 4, 40–41. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  102. Slonim, D. Virus of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis in chick embryo (in Czech). Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1956, 5, 3–13. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  103. Slonim, D. Das Virus der Tchechoslowakischen Zeckenencephalitis in Hühnerembryo. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. 1957, 168, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  104. Slonim, D.; Röslerová, V. Pathogenicity of tick-borne encephalitis virus for the chicken embryo. I.; II.; III.; IV. Acta Virol. 1965, 9, 475–480. [Google Scholar]
  105. Salát, J.; Růžek, D. Tick-borne encephalitis in domestic animals. Acta Virol. 2020, 64, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Klimeš, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Literák, I.; Schánilec, P.; Trachta e Silva, E. Prevalence of antibodies to tick-borne encephalitis and West Nile flaviviruses and the clinical signs of tick-borne encephalitis in dogs in the Czech Republic. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kolář, O. Unusual clinical picture of infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Vnitř. Lék. 1995, 1, 755–760. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  108. Raška, K. Epidemologie der Zeckenenzephalitis in der Tschechoslowakei. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Publ House Czech Acad Sci: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1961; pp. 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  109. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Gawlas, W.; Piňosová, M.; Šeděnka, B. Mass occurrence of alimentary tick-borne encephalitis in the North-Moravian region. Zprávy Epidem. Mikrobiol. 1968, 10, 5. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  110. Novák, M. Familiar occurrence of tick-borne encephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1973, 53, 741–742. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  111. Czimová, M.; Raszka, J.; Januška, J.; Heinz, F.; Odehnal, P.; Fantová, Z. Familial incidence of tick-borne encephalitis with alimentary transmission. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1981, 30, 334–339. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  112. Pazdiora, P.; Morávková, I.; Bruj, J. A familiar alimentary transmission of tick-borne encephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1994, 74, 209–210. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  113. Zeman, P.; Januska, J.; Orolinova, M.; Stuen, S.; Struhar, V.; Jebavy, L. High seroprevalence of granulocytic ehrlichiosis distinguishes sheep that were the source of an alimentary epidemic of tick-borne emcephalitis. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2004, 116, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kříž, B.; Beneš, Č.; Daniel, M. Alimentary transmission of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic (1997–2008). Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2009, 58, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
  115. Ašmera, J.; Eisler, L.; Heinz, F.; Herzig, P. Tick-borne encephalitis as a risk factor in professional environment. Prac. Lék. 1968, 20, 137–142. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  116. Ašmera, J.; Heinz, F. Tick-borne encephalitis as a hazard factor in working environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Acarology; Prague, Czech Republic, 31 August–6 September 1971, Daniel, M., Rosický, B., Eds.; Academia: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1973; pp. 563–567. [Google Scholar]
  117. Hanzal, F.; Henner, K. Czechoslovak encephalitis; its clinical and morphological picture; diagnosis and treatment. In Českovenská Klíšťová Encefalitis; Raška, K., Ed.; Stát Zdrav Naklad: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1954; pp. 3–22. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  118. Hanzal, F.; Henner, K. Klinik der Tschechoslowakischen Zeckenenzephalitis. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1961; pp. 174–177. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hanzal, F. Czechoslovak encephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1953, 31, 397–399. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  120. Hanzal, F. Neurologic analysis of the Czechoslovak encephalitis with a special regard on differential diagnosis Cas. Lek. Cesk. 1955, 94, 128–132. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  121. Hanzal, F. Further clinical experience with Czechoslovak encephalitis. Česk. Neurol. 1956, 19, 29–34. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Hloucal, L.; Slonim, D. Neue Erfahrungen über die Tschechoslowakische Zeckenenzephalitis. Schweiz. Med. Wschr. 1954, 84, 1085–1088. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  123. Málková, N.; Kroó, H.; Žáček, K. Occurrence of abortive and inapparent human cases in a natural focus of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 31, 110–113. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  124. Bednář, B. Postmortem diagnosis of acute encephalitis with special reference to tick-borne encephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1955, 94, 133–137. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  125. Kroó, H.; Málková, N.; Adamová, V.; Adam, E. Limb pareses in Czechoslovak tick-borne meningoencephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1954, 35, 51–54. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  126. Kroó, H.; Mágrová, J.; Baráková-Švehlová, J.; Vojíř, R. Sequelae after tick-borne encephalitis in children. Česk. Pediat. 1956, 11, 694–698. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  127. Rudlová, B. Report on an unusual picture of Czechoslovak tick encephalitis in a 6-year old girl. Neurol. Psychiatr. Česk. 1955, 18, 77–80. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  128. Šimon, J.; Šimonová, D. Chronaxy in paretic forms of Czechoslovak tick encephalitis. Čas. Lek. Čes. 1955, 94, 397–401. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  129. Šimon, J.; Šimonová, D. Paretic forms of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalomyelitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1955, 94, 754–761. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  130. Procházka, J.; Kroó, H.; Málková, N. Analysis of the biphasic pattern of Czechoslovak tick-borne meningoencephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1956, 95, 397–400. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  131. Procházka, J.; Kroó, H.; Mágrová, J.; Vojíř, T. Psychoneurotic disorders in tick-borne meningoencephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1957, 96, 240–242. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  132. Henner, K.; Hanzal, F. Encéphalite Tchécoslovaque à tiques: Tableau cliniques; diagnostique et traitement. Rev. Neurol. 1957, 96, 384–408. [Google Scholar]
  133. Henner, K.; Hanzal, F. Tschechoslowakische Zeckenenzephalitis und die sogennante Rožňava-Enzephalitis. Psychiat. Neurol. 1960, 12, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
  134. Henner, K.; Hanzal, F. Les encéphalites européenes à tiques. Rev. Neurol. 1963, 108, 697–752. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Nedvídek, J.; Boschetty, V.; Harudová, L. Epidemiology and symptomatology of tick-borne encephalitis in a natural focus of the Ostrava region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1958, 7, 9–14. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  136. Kolář, O. Practical questions of subacute and chronical forms of Central-European tick-borne encephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1960, 40, 531–534. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  137. Kroó, H.; Grantová, H. Effect of tick-borne encephalitis acquired during pregnancy on the course of gravidity and the foetal development. Česk. Pediat. 1960, 15, 920–921. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  138. Černáček, J.; Balek, F. Folgezustände; chronische und periphere Formen der Zeckenenenzephalitids in der Tschechoslowakei. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Czechoslovakia, 1961; pp. 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  139. Jaroš, O. Late sequelae of encephalitides acquired on the Hradec Králové region; 1953. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1961, 30, 35–37. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  140. Král, L.; Pecháček, M.; Nádvorník, P.; Vondráčková, A. Results of long-term follow-up of patients after tick-borne encephalitis. Sbor. Věd. Prací. Lék. Fak. Karl. Univ. V Hradci. Králové 1965, 8, 545–553. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  141. Ježek, P. Tick-borne encephalitis at Brno town (Moravia). I. Some epidemogical data. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1966, 15, 247–252. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  142. Ježek, P. Tick-borne encephalitis. II. Symptomatology of patients hospitalized in the infectious ward in Brno; 1960–1965. Vnitř. Lék. 1967, 13, 453–459. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  143. Novák, M.; Doutlík, S.; Kulková, H. Unusual symptomatology in the course of arbovirus infection. Česk. Neurol. 1973, 36, 394–398. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Novák, M. Pareses as a consequence of tick-borne encephalitis during the epidemic in 1970. Prakt. Lék. 1974, 54, 489–491. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  145. Novák, M.; Doutlík, S.; Kulková, H.; Mertenová, J. Symptomatologic plurality of tick-borne encephalitis. Prakt. Lék. 1976, 56, 747–749. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  146. Novák, M.; Mertenová, J.; Kulková, H.; Doutlík, S. Bell’s palsy in viral infections. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1978, 117, 460–462. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  147. Doutlík, S.; Vacek, Z.; Novák, M.; Lobovská, A.; Vepřeková, A. Autoimmune mechanisms in tick-borne encephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1976, 115, 1360–1362. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  148. Duniewicz, M. Klinisches Bild der Zentraleuropäisc hen Zeckenenzephalitis. Münch. Med. Wschr. 1976, 118, 1609–1613. [Google Scholar]
  149. Duniewicz, M.; Mertenová, J.; Moravcová, E.; Jelínková, E.; Holý, M.; Kulková, H.; Doutlík, S. Mitteleuropäische Zeckenenzephalitis in den Jahren 1969–1972 im Kreis Mittelböhmen. Infection 1975, 3, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Duniewicz, M.; Mertenová, J.; Moravcová, E.; Kulková, H. Corticoids in the therapy of tick-borne encephalitis and other viral encephalitiden. In Tick-Borne Encephalitis; Kunz, C., Ed.; Facultas-Verlag: Wien, Austria, 1981; pp. 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  151. Štruncová, V.; Sedláček, D.; Bárta, R. Tick-borne encephalitis in children. Česk. Pediatr. 1997, 52, 683–685. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  152. Štruncová, V.; Sedláček, D.; Pizingerová, K.; Amblerová, V.; Kastner, J.; Švecová, M. Lethal tick-borne encephalitis in a 15-year-old adolescent. Prakt. Lék. 2005, 85, 635–637. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  153. Chmelík, V.; Trnovcová, R.; Bouzková, M.; Slámová, I.; Houserová, L.; Chrdle, A.; Cihlová, V.; Jabali, Y.; Bečvářová, J. Clinical picture of tick-borne encephalitis: A retrospective study of 493 cases. Zentralbl. Bakt. 1999, 289, 583–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chmelík, V. Clinical picture of tick-borne encephalitis. In Tick-borne Encephalitis; Růžek, D., Ed.; Grada: Praha, Czech Republic, 2015; pp. 105–126. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  155. Růžek, D. Tick-borne encephalitis-pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2015, 64, 204–209. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  156. Fischer, J.; Rampas, J. Kinetics of histopathological changes caused by experimentally induced viral encephalitis: Czechoslovak strain and louping ill. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1952, 1, 49–56. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  157. Fischer, J.; Bárdoš, V. Effect of tick-borne encephalitis virus concentration on the dynamics of inflammatory histopathological changes in the central nervous system of mice. Acta Univ. Carolinae Med. 1959, 7, 451–458. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  158. Rampas, J.; Fischer, J. Relationship of viraemia to the phasic course of histopathologic changes of viral encephalitis in mice. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 43–47. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  159. Jandásek, L. Pathogenesis of experimental tick-borne encephalitis in white mouse. I. Viremia and penetration of the virus into the brain. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1957, 6, 1–8. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  160. Jandásek, L. Die Bluthirnschranke bei der experimentellen Zeckenenzephalitis der Maus. Z. Immunitätforsch. 1958, 115, 30–37. [Google Scholar]
  161. Kašová-Odrážková, V. Occurrence of antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1957, 6, 245–249. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  162. Málková, D.; Fraňková, V. The lymphatic system in the development of experimentalstudy with tick-borne encephalitis in mice. Acta Virol. 1959, 3, 210–214. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  163. Málková, D. The role of the lymphatic system in experimental infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus. I. The tick-borne encephalitis virus in the lymph and blood of experimentally infected sheep. II. Neutralizing antibodies in the lymph and blood plasma of experimentally infected sheep. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 233–240; 283–289. [Google Scholar]
  164. Málková, D. Participation of the lymphatic and blood circulation in the dissemination of the tick-borne encephalitis virus to the organs of experimentally infected mice. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 290–295. [Google Scholar]
  165. Málková, D. Virus and antibodies in the lymph and blood of sheep infected experimentally with the virus of tick-borne encephalitis. Nature 1960, 187, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Málková, D. Role of lymphatic and blood circulation in the distributioin of tick-borne encephalitis virus in the organism of a susceptible and non-susceptible animal. In Biology of Viruses of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex; Libíková, H., Ed.; Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1962; pp. 271–274. [Google Scholar]
  167. Málková, D. Penetration of tick-borne encephalitis virus into the thymus of mice. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  168. Málková, D. Role of free cells in the lymph and blood vessels during viraemia in animals experimentally infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus. I. Virus bound in vivo to free lymph node cells in mice. II. Virus bound in vivo to the cellular blood component in mice. Acta Virol. 1967, 11, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  169. Málková, D. The significance of the skin and the regional lymph nodes in the penetration and multiplication of tick-borne encephalitis virus after subcutaneous infection of mice. Acta Virol. 1968, 12, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  170. Málková, D. The lymphatic system in viral infection. An experimental study with tick-borne encephalitis virus in animals. Rozpr. Česk. Akad. Věd. 1969, 79, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  171. Málková, D.; Pala, F.; Šidák, Z. Cellular changes in the white cell count; regional lymph node and spleen during infection with the tick-borne encephalitis virus in mice. Acta Virol. 1961, 5, 101–111. [Google Scholar]
  172. Málková, D.; Kolman, J.M. Role of the regional lymphatic system of the immunized mouse in penetration of tick-borne encephalitis virus into the blood stream. Acta Virol. 1964, 8, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Málková, D.; Kolman, J.M. The role of bone marrow in the multiplication of tick-borne encephalitis virus in the early viraemic phase in experimentally infected mice. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 131–134. [Google Scholar]
  174. Málková, D.; Smetana, A. The role of lymphatic system after direct admiistration of tick-borne encephalitis virus into the blood stream of susceptible white mice. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  175. Málková, D.; Filip, O. Histological picture in the place of inoculation and in lymph nodes of mice after subcutaneous infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1968, 12, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  176. Šimon, J.; Slonim, D.; Závadová, H. Experimentelle Untersuchungen von klinischen und subklinischen Formen der Zeckenenzephalitis an unterschiedlich empfänglichen Wirten: Mäusen; Hamstern und Affen. III. Das histologische Bild der Zecken-Encephalitis bei Affen. Acta Neuropathol. 1967, 8, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Fialová, A.; Cimburek, Z.; Iezzi, G.; Kopecký, J. Ixodes ricinus tick saliva modulates tick-borne encephalitis virus infection of dendritic cells. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Lieskovská, J.; Páleníková, J.; Langhansová, H.; Chmelař, J.; Kopecký, J. Saliva of Ixodes ricinus enhances TBE virus replication in dendritic cells by modulation of pro-survival Akt pathway. Virology 2018, 514, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Růžek, D.; Vancová, M.; Tesařová, M.; Ahantarig, A.; Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L. Morphological changes in human neural cells following tick-borne encephalitis virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Bílý, T.; Palus, M.; Eyer, L.; Elsterová, J.; Vancová, M.; Růžek, D. Electron tomography analysis of tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in human neurons. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Selinger, M.; Wilkie, G.S.; Tong, L.; Gu, Q.; Schnettler, E.; Grubhoffer, L.; Kohl, A. Analysis of tick-borne encephalitis virus-induced host responses in human cells of neuronal origin and interferon-mediated protection. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Selinger, M.; Tykalová, H.; Štěrba, J.; Věchtová, P.; Vavrušková, Z.; Lieskovská, J.; Kohl, A.; Schnettler, E.; Grubhoffer, L. Tick-borne encephalitis virus inhibits rRNA synthesis and host protein production in human cells of neural origin. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L.; Kovár, V.; Jindrák, L.; Vokurková, D. A putative host cell receptor for tick-borne encephalitis virus identified by anti-idiotypic antibodies and virus affinoblotting. Intervirology 1999, 42, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Ahantarig, A.; Růžek, D.; Vancová, M.; Janowitz, A.; Št’astná, H.; Tesařová, M.; Grubhoffer, L. Tick-borne encephalitis virus infection of cultured mouse macrophages. Intervirology 2009, 52, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Palus, M.; Bílý, T.; Elsterová, J.; Langhansová, H.; Salát, K.; Vancová, M.; Růžek, D. Infection and injury of human astrocytes by tick-borne encephalitis virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2411–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Palus, M.; Formanová, P.; Salát, J.; Žampachová, E.; Elsterová, J.; Růžek, D. Analysis of serum levels of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and monoamine neurotransmitters in patients with tick-borne encephalitis: Identification of novel inflammatory markers with implications for pathogenesis. J. Med. Virol. 2015, 87, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Růžek, D.; Salát, J.; Palus, M.; Gritsun, T.S.; Gould, E.A.; Dyková, I.; Skallová, A.; Jelínek, J.; Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L. CD8+ T-cells mediate immunopathology in tick-borne encephalitis. Virology 2009, 384, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Palus, M.; Vojtíšková, J.; Salát, J.; Kopecký, J.; Grubhoffer, L.; Lipoldová, M.; Demant, P.; Růžek, D. Mice with different susceptibility to tick-borne encephalitis virus infection show selective neutralizing antibody response and inflammatory reaction in the central nervous system. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Palus, M.; Vancova, M.; Širmarova, J.; Elsterova, J.; Perner, J.; Ruzek, D. Tick-borne encephalitis virus infects human brain microvascular endothelial cells without compromising blood-brain barrier integrity. Virology 2017, 507, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Růžek, D.; Salát, J.; Singh, S.K.; Kopecký, J. Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier during tick-borne encephalitis in mice is not dependent on CD8+ T-cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  191. Palus, M.; Žampachová, E.; Elsterová, J.; Růžek, D. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 levels in patients with tick-borne encephalitis. J. Infect. 2014, 68, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Palus, M.; Sohrabi, Y.; Broman, K.W.; Strnad, H.; Šíma, M.; Růžek, D.; Volková, V.; Slapničková, M.; Vojtíšková, J.; Mrázková, L.; et al. A novel locus on mouse chromosome 7 that influences survival after infection with tick-borne encephalitis virus. BMC Neurosci 2018, 19, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Pokorná-Formanová, P.; Palus, M.; Salát, J.; Hönig, V.; Štefanik, M.; Svoboda, P.; Růžek, D. Changes in cytokine and chemokine profiles in mouse serum and brain; and in human neural cells; upon tick-borne encephalitis virus infection. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Růžek, D.; Gritsun, T.S.; Forrester, N.L.; Gould, E.A.; Kopecký, J.; Golovchenko, M.; Rudenko, N.; Grubhoffer, L. Mutations in the NS2 and NS3 genes affect mouse neuroinvasiveness of a western field strain of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Virology 2008, 374, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Helmová, R.; Hönig, V.; Tykalová, H.; Palus, M.; Bell-Sakyi, L.; Grubhoffer, L. Tick-borne encephalitis virus adaptation in different host environments and existence of quasispecies. Viruses 2020, 12, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hendrich, P.; Sedlák, J.; Skalník, L.; Tůma, M. The occurrence of Czechoslovak tick-borne encepalitis in the Českomoravská Highlands. Vnitř. Lék. 1955, 1, 124–127. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  197. Ondráček, J.; Král, L.; Palisa, J. Epidemic of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis in the region of Hradec Králové; 1953. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1955, 24, 32–35. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  198. Rejlek, J. Outbreak of poliomyelitis and tick-borne encephalitis in the district of Jičín in the summer of 1953. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1955, 24, 17–21. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  199. Havlík, J.; Marsa, J.; Potužník, V. Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis in the region of České Budějovice. Prakt. Lék. 1956, 36, 271–273. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  200. Nedvídek, J.; Ašmera, J.; Šeděnka, B. Results of the investigation on the tick-borne encephalitis prevalence in the Ostrava region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1962, 11, 62–64. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  201. Kopecký, K.; Pešek, J.; Šerý, V.; Ježek, Z.; Truksová, S. Nachweise hämagglutinations-hemmender Antikörper gegen das Virus der Zeckenenzephalitis in der Bevölkerung eines Kreises in Zentralbnöhmen; Tschechoslowakei. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1972, 16, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  202. Farník, J.; Bruj, J.; Maliňáková, J.; Štruncová, V.; Hronovský, V. Occurrence of some zoonoses with natural focality in the West Bohemia region. I. Tick-borne encephalitis-basic epidemiological characteristics. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1990, 39, 113–119. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  203. Januška, J.; Bruj, J.; Farník, J. The occurrence of some zoonoses in West-Bohemian region. II. Antibodies to viruses of tick-borne encephalitis; Ťahyňa and Tribeč among inhabitants of the region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1990, 39, 134–138. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  204. Pazdiora, P.; Benešová, J.; Böhmová, Z.; Králíková, J.; Kubátová, A.; Menclová, I.; Morávková, I.; Morávková, I.; Průchová, J.; Přechová, M.; et al. The prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis in the region of West Bohemia (Czech Republic) between 1960–2005. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2008, 158, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Pazdiora, P.; Benešová, J.; Brejcha, O.; Holeček, J.; Hrubá, P.; Kubátová, A.; Morávková, I.; Ouřadová, H.; Spáčilová, M.; Turková, D.; et al. Incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in the West Bohemian region in 1960–1999-evaluation of vaccination. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2000, 49, 148–152. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  206. Pazdiora, P.; Bruj, J.; Štruncová, V. Tick-borne encephalitis in the West Bohemian region 1960–1991. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1993, 132, 494–497. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  207. Pazdiora, P.; Štruncová, V.; Švecová, M. Tick-borne encephalitis in children and adolescents in the Czech Republic between 1960 and 2007. World J. Pediatr. 2012, 8, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Kříž, B.; Malý, M.; Beneš, Č.; Daniel, M. Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic 1970–2008. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2012, 12, 994–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Kříž, B.; Beneš, Č.; Daniel, M.; Malý, M. Incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic in 2001-2011 in different administrative regions and municipalities. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2013, 62, 9–18. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  210. Křiž, B.; Hubalek, Z.; Maly, M.; Daniel, M.; Strakova, P.; Betasova, L. Results of the screening of tick-borne encephalitis virus antibodies in human sera from eight districts collected two decades apart. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2015, 15, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Kříž, B.; Kott, I.; Daniel, M.; Vráblík, T.; Beneš, Č. Impact of climate changes on the incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic; 1982–2011. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2015, 64, 24–32. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  212. Kříž, B.; Fialová, A.; Šebestová, H.; Daniel, M.; Malý, M. Comparison of the epidemiological patterns of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic in 2007–2016. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2018, 67, 134–140. [Google Scholar]
  213. Zeman, P. Cyclic patterns in the central European tick-borne encephalitis incidence series. Epidem. Infect. 2017, 145, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Daniel, M.; Kříž, B.; Danielová, V.; Valter, J.; Kott, I. Correlation between meteorological factors and tick-borne encephalitis incidence in the Czech Republic. Parasit. Res. 2008, 103, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Daniel, M.; Kříž, B.; Valter, B.; Kott, J.; Danielová, V. The influence of meteorological conditions of the preceding winter on the incidences of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Rosický, B. Notes on the classification of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in central and south-east Europe. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1959, 3, 431–443. [Google Scholar]
  217. Danielová, V.; Málková, D. Tick-borne arboviruses in recreation areas. In New Aspects in Ecology of Arboviruses; Labuda, M., Calisher, C.H., Eds.; (Proc Internat Symp; Smolenice; June 1979); Inst Virol SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1980; pp. 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  218. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Dusbábek, F.; Holubová, J.; Honzáková, F. Tick-borne encephalitis in recreation areas of Prague. In Tick-Borne. Encephalitis; Kunz, C., Ed.; Facultas Verlag: Wien, Austria, 1981; pp. 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  219. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Holubová, J.; Marhoul, Z.; Bouchalová, J. Isolation of viruses of tick-borne encephalitis and Uukuniemi from ticks collected in Prague parks. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1983, 32, 138–142. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  220. Rosický, B.; Hejný, S. Structure of elementary foci of tick-borne encephalitis and the possibilities of their indication by certain phytocenoses. In Biology of Viruses of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex; Libíková, H., Ed.; Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1962; pp. 420–422. [Google Scholar]
  221. Minář, J. Natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in Central Europe and the relationship of the incidence of Ixodes ricinus to original ecosystems. Cent. Eur. J. Public. Health 1995, 3, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  222. Minář, J. Relation of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis to original plant communities in the Czech Republic. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1995, 41, 307–313. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  223. Grulich, I. Some principles affording the existence of natural focuses of the tick-borne encephalitis in Czechoslovakia. Zool. Listy 1963, 12, 273–292. [Google Scholar]
  224. Kříž, B.; Daniel, M.; Beneš, Č.; Malý, M. The role of game (wild boar and roe deer) in the spread of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2014, 14, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Daniel, M.; Kolář, J.; Zeman, P.; Pavelka, K.; Sádlo, J. Predictive map of Ixodes ricinus high-incidence habitats and a tick-borne encephalitis risk assessment using satellite data. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1998, 22, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Daniel, M.; Kolář, J.; Zeman, P.; Pavelka, K.; Sádlo, J. Prediction of sites with an increased risk of infestation with Ixodes ricinus and tick-borne encephalitis infection in the Central Bohemia Region based on satellite data. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1998, 47, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  227. Daniel, M.; Kolář, J.; Zeman, P.; Pavelka, K.; Sádlo, J. Tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis: Comparison of habitat risk assessments using satellite data (an experience from the Central Bohemian region of the Czech Republic). Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 1999, 7, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  228. Rosický, B.; Havlík, O. Natural focality of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. In Československá Klíšťová Encefalitis; Raška, K., Ed.; Stát Zdrav Vydav: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1954; pp. 23–29. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  229. Radvan, R.; Benda, R.; Daneš, L. Investigation of a natural focus of tick-borne encephalitis. In Prírodné Ohniská Nákaz; Blaškovič, D., Ed.; Vydav SAV: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1956; pp. 125–133. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  230. Radvan, R.; Hanzák, J.; Hejný, S.; Rehn, F.; Rosický, B. Demonstration of elementary foci of tick-borne infections on the basis of microbiological; parasitological and biocenological investigations. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1960, 4, 81–93. [Google Scholar]
  231. Strauss, J.; Šerý, V.; Izbický, A.; Langová, S. Epidemiological and serological research in a natural focus of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1957, 96, 235–240. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  232. Kadlčík, K.; Vošta, J.; Poledníková, L.; Vychodil, J. Results of the investigation in a natural focus of tick-borne encephalitis and leptospirosis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1968, 17, 244–248. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  233. Kolman, J.M.; Husová, M. Virus-carrying ticks Ixodes ricinus in the mixed natural focus of the Central-European tick-borne encephalitis virus and Uukuniemi virus. Folia Parasitol. 1971, 18, 327–335. [Google Scholar]
  234. Uvízl, M.; Chmela, J.; Nosek, J.; Kožuch, O.; Ernek, E.; Lichard, M. Natural foci of tick-orne encephalitis in the Olomouc region. Zprávy Vlastivěd. Muzea Olomouc. 1972, 155, 30–36. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  235. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Januška, J. Present activity in natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the CSSR. In Tick-Borne Encephalitis; Kunz, C., Ed.; Facultas-Verlag: Wien, Austria, 1981; pp. 279–281. [Google Scholar]
  236. Zeman, P.; Vítková, V.; Markvart, K. Simultaneous occurrence of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in the Central Bohemian Region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1990, 39, 95–105. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  237. Křivanec, K.; Vlček, M. A microstructure of forest natural foci of in southern Bohemia. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1994, 63, 145–149. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  238. Hönig, V.; Švec, P.; Halas, P.; Vavručkova, Z.; Tykalova, H.; Kilian, P.; Vetiskova, V.; Dornakova, V.; Štěrbova, J.; Simonova, Z.; et al. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens in South Bohemia (Czech Republic)—Spatial variability in Ixodes ricinus abundance; Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis virus prevalence. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2015, 6, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Hönig, V.; Švec, P.; Marek, L.; Mrkvička, T.; Dana, Z.; Wittmann, M.V.; Masař, O.; Szturcová, D.; Růžek, D.; Pfister, K.; et al. Model of risk of exposure to Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis virus-infected ticks in the border area of the Czech Republic (South Bohemia) and Germany (Lower Bavaria and Upper Palatinate). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Kožuch, O.; Nosek, J.; Chmela, J.; Ernek, E.; Uvízl, M.; Bolek, S. Ecology of tick-borne encephalitis virus in natural foci of Olomouc district. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1976, 25, 88–96. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  241. Ašmera, J.; Heinz, F.; Hadamová, Z. Results of the investigation of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the North-Moravian region. Přírod. Sbor. Ostrava 1968, 171–178. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  242. Ašmera, J.; Heinz, F.; Mlýnková, H.; Opravil, E.; Šeděnka, B.; Kupec, V. Results of investigation of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the North Moravian region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1969, 18, 205–217. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  243. Ašmera, J.; Heinz, F. Delimitation of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in north-eastern Moravia. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 263–271. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  244. Kožuch, O.; Nosek, J.; Lichard, M.; Chmela, J. Isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Ixodes ricinus L. ticks in a natural focus in the surroundings of Bouzov (in Slovak). Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1966, 15, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  245. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Mlýnková, H.; Opravil, E.; Šeděnka, B.; Kupec, V. Present results of surveillance of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the North-Moravian region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1969, 18, 205–217. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  246. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Januška, J.; Červenka, P.; Černý, J.; Klimeš, A.; Těmín, K. Isolation of arboviruses from Ixodes ricinus ticks in Bohemia and Moravia. In New Aspects in Ecology of Arboviruses; Labuda, M., Calisher, C.H., Eds.; Inst Virol SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1980; pp. 279–285. [Google Scholar]
  247. Nosek, J.; Kožuch, O.; Grulich, I. The structure of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) foci in Central Europe. Oecologia 1970, 5, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Hubálek, Z.; Ryba, J.; Bárdoš, V.; Juřicová, Z. Isolation of viruses of tick-borne encephalitis virus and Uukuniemi from ixodid ticks in the area of Vranov water reservoir. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1978, 27, 321–326. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  249. Kožuch, O.; Chmela, J. A longitudinal monitoring of natural foci of tick-borne encephalitis in the Olomouc region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1993, 42, 179–183. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  250. Klimeš, A.; Černý, J.; Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Januška, J.; Kupec, V. Delimitation of a hitherto unknown natural focus of tick-borne encephalitis in the district Litoměřice. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1981, 30, 191–198. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  251. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Havelka, I.; Syka, M.; Pelantová, L.; Minář, J. Serological examination of human population in the recreation area Vranov water dam (southern Moravia) for antibodies to to some arboviruses of the families Togaviridae and Bunyaviridae. Acta Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. 1981, 11, 15–23. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  252. Zeman, P.; Januška, J. Epizootiologic background of dissimilar distribution of human cases of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis in a joint endemic area. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999, 22, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Jirsa, A.; Nožička, J. Shift of the tick Ixodes ricinus and tick-borne encephalitis to higher altitudes in central Europe. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2003, 22, 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Kott, I. An attempt to elucidate the increased incidence of tick-borne encephalitis and its spread to higher altitudes in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 37, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Zeman, P.; Beneš, Č. A tick-borne encephalitis ceiling in Central Europe has moved upwards during the last 30 years: Possible impact of global warming? Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 293, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Daniel, M.; Kříž, B.; Danielová, V.; Materna, J.; Rudenko, N.; Holubová, J.; Schwarzová, L.; Golovchenko, M. Occurrence of ticks infected by tickborne encephalitis virus and Borrelia genospecies in mountains of the Czech Republic. Eurosurveillance 2005, 10, e050331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Danielová, V.; Rudenko, N.; Daniel, M.; Holubová, J.; Materna, J.; Golovchenko, M.; Schwarzová, L. Extension of Ixodes ricinus ticks and agents of tick-borne diseases to mountain areas in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Danielová, V.; Schwarzová, L.; Materna, J.; Daniel, M.; Metelka, L.; Holubová, J.; Kříž, B. Tick-borne encephalitis virus expansion to higher altitudes with climate warming. Internat. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Danielová, V.; Kliegrová, S.; Daniel, M.; Beneš, Č. Influence of climate warming on tick-borne encephalitis expansion to higher altitudes over the last decade (1997–2006) in the Highland Region (Czech Republic). Centr. Eur. J. Public. Health 2008, 16, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Daniel, M.; Materna, H.; Hönig, V.; Metelka, I.; Danielová, V.; Harcařík, J.; Kliegrová, S.; Grubhoffer, L. Vertical distribution of the tick Ixodes ricinus and tick-borne pathogens in the northern Moravian mountains correlated with climate warming (Jeseníky Mts.; Czech Republic). Centr. Eur. J. Public. Health 2009, 17, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  261. Danielová, V.; Daniel, M.; Schwarzová, L.; Materna, J.; Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Holubová, J.; Grubhoffer, L.; Kilián, P. Integration of a tick-borne encephalitis virus and Borrelia. burgdorferi sensu lato into mountain ecosystems; following a shift in the altitudinal limit of distribution of their vector; Ixodes ricinus (Krkonoše mountains; Czech Republic). Vector Borne Zoonot Dis. 2010, 10, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Růžek, D.; Fialová, A.; Malý, M.; Materna, J.; Pejčoch, M.; Erhart, J. The occurrence of Ixodes ricinus ticks and important tick-borne pathogens in areas with high tick-borne encephalitis prevalence in different altitudinal levels of the Czech Republic Part, I. Ixodes ricinus ticks and tick-borne encephalitis virus. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2016, 65, 118–128. [Google Scholar]
  263. Danielová, V.; Beneš, Č. Possible role of rainfall in the epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 1997, 5, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  264. Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Daniel, M.; Beneš, Č.; Valter, J.; Kott, I. Effects of climate change on the incidence of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic in the past two decades. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2004, 53, 174–181. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  265. Daniel, M.; Kolář, J.; Zeman, P. Analysing and predicting the occurrence of ticks and and tick-borne diseases using GIS. In Ticks: Biology, Diseases and Control; Bowman, A.S., Nuttall, P., Eds.; Cambridge Univ Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; pp. 377–407. [Google Scholar]
  266. Daniel, M.; Kříž, B.; Danielová, V.; Beneš, Č. Sudden increase in tick-borne encephalitis cases in the Czech Republic, 2006. Intern. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Daniel, M.; Kříž, B.; Danielová, V.; Valter, J.; Beneš, Č. Changes of meteorological factors and tick-borne encephaliis incidence in the Czech Republic. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2009, 58, 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  268. Zeman, P.; Pazdiora, P.; Beneš, Č. Spatio-temporal variation of tick-borne encephalitis incidence in the Czech Republic: Is the current explanation of the disease rise satisfactory? Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis. 2010, 1, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Daniel, M.; Beneš, Č.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B. Sixty years of research of tick-borne encephalitis—A basis of the current knowledge of the epidemiological situation in Central Europe. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2011, 60, 135–155. [Google Scholar]
  270. Zeman, P. Predictability of tick-borne encephalitis fluctuations. Epidem. Infect. 2017, 145, 2781–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  271. Daniel, M.; Danielová, V.; Fialová, A.; Malý, M.; Kříž, B.; Nuttall, P.A. Increased relative risk of tick-borne encephalitis in warmer weather. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  272. Zeman, P. Prolongation of tick-borne encephalitis cycles in warmer climatic conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  273. Daniel, M.; Zítek, K.; Danielová, V.; Kříž, B.; Valter, J.; Kott, I. Risk assessment and prediction of Ixodes ricinus tick questing activity and human tick-borne encephalitis infection in space and time in the Czech Republic. Internat. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Kříž, B.; Beneš, Č.; Danielová, V.; Daniel, M. Socio-economic conditions and other anthropogenic factors influencing tick-borne encephalitis incidence in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 293, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Havlík, O. The significance of rodent gradations for the epidemiology of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 300–330. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  276. Havlík, O.; Černý, V.; Rosický, B. Probability of occurrence of tick-borne meningoencephalitis in the year 1960. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1960, 9, 217–222. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  277. Kolman, J.M. Contribution to the possible forecast of an epidemic of tick-borne encephalitis. In Theoretical Questions of Natural Foci of Diseases; Rosický, B., Heyberger, K., Eds.; (Proc Symp Prague, Nov 1963); Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1965; pp. 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  278. Tkadlec, E.; Václavík, T.; Široký, P. Rodent host abundance and climate vadiability as predictors of tickborne disease risk 1 year in advance. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 26, 1735–1741. [Google Scholar]
  279. Hubálek, Z. Effect of environmental variables on the incidence of tick-borne encephalitis, leptospirosis and tularaemia. Cent. Eur J. Publ Health 2021, 29, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Kopecký, J.; Křivanec, K.; Tomková, E. Attenuated temperature-sensitive muants of tick-borne encephalitis virus isolated from natural focus. In Modern Acarology; Dusbábek, F., Bukva, V., Eds.; Academia: Prague, Czech Republic; SPB Academic Publ: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1991; Volume 2, pp. 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  281. Daneš, L. Some properties of tick-borne encephalitis virus cultivated in vitro. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1957, 2, 350–356. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  282. Korych, B. Cultivation of tick-borne encephalitis virus with cytopathic changes in stable-line pig kidney epithelium cells. J. Hyg. Epidem. 1960, 4, 333–340. [Google Scholar]
  283. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. A neutralization test with tick-borne encephalitis virus in pig kidney cells. Acta Virol. 1962, 6, 374. [Google Scholar]
  284. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z.; Fraňková, V.; Černý, M. Cytopathic effect of tick-borne encephalitis virus in pig kidney cells and its application in the neutralization test. In Biology of Viruses of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex; Libíková, H., Ed.; Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1962; pp. 205–207. [Google Scholar]
  285. Hronovský, V.; Plaisner, V.; Benda, R. CV-1 monkey kidney cell line-a highly susceptible substrate for diagnosis and study of arboviruses. Acta Virol. 1978, 22, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  286. Hronovský, V.; Benda, R.; Plaisner, V. A modified plaque method for arboviruses on plastic panels. Acta Virol. 1978, 19, 150–154. [Google Scholar]
  287. Hronovský, V.; Propper, P.; Kopecký, J.; Benda, R. (1977) Experience with the use of a low-viscosity methylcellulose in plaquing of some arboviruses. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1977, 26, 83–88. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  288. Jandásek, L.; Pešek, J.; Pospíšil, L. Immunization and hyperimmunization of laboratory animals against the Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis virus and related neurotropic viruses. Scripta Med. 1954, 27, 171–176. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  289. Jandásek, L.; Pešek, J. A contribution to the serology of tick-encephalitis. Z. Immunitätforsch. 1956, 113, 261–270. [Google Scholar]
  290. Žáček, K. Viral meningoencephalitides. II. Diagnosis of Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis by means of complement-fixation test with extracted antigens. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 98–104. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  291. Slonim, D.; Štejfa, R.; Zedníková, A. A contribution to serological diagnosis of some viral neuroinfections in Czechoslovakia; II.; Czechoslovak tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1954, 3, 35–41. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  292. Slonim, D.; Hloucal, L. Bildung und Überdauern der komplementbindenden und virusneutralisierenden Antikörper bei der Zeckenencephalitis. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. 1959, 175, 344–355. [Google Scholar]
  293. Heinz, F.; Herzig, P.; Ašmera, J.; Benda, R. Comparison of sensitivity of complement-fixation; virus neutralization and indirect immunofluorescence tests in serological diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1969, 18, 193–198. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  294. Korych, B. Serodiagnosis of arbovirus infections. I. The use of immunofluorescence for a quantitative asay of neutralizimg antibodies. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1971, 20, 281–287. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  295. Lobkowicz, F.; Kulková, H.; Korych, B. Comparison of a sensitive neutralization test for the diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis with standard serological reactions. Folia Mcrobiol. 1973, 18, 184–185. [Google Scholar]
  296. Moravová, I.; Benda, R.; Fraňková, V.; Heinz, F.; Kulková, H. Experience with application of indirect immunofluorescence method in detection of antibodies against tick-borne encephalitis virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1970, 19, 185–190. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  297. Fraňková, V.; Chýle, M.; Duniewicz, M.; Marhoul, Z.; Kolman, J.M.; Mančal, P. Rapid diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis by immunofluorescence assay of specific serum IgM antibodies. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1978, 22, 502–504. [Google Scholar]
  298. Hronovský, V.; Bruj, J.; Maliňáková, J. Experience with the demonstration of early antibodies of IgM class in tick-borne encephalitis. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1983, 32, 320–356. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  299. Hronovský, V. Preparation of murine hyperimmune ascitic fluids for serodiagnosis and immunofluorescent detection of arboviruses. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1978, 27, 129–136. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  300. Hronovský, V.; Benda, R. Use of hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluids for arbovirus differentiation by indirect immunofluorescence and conventional serology. Acta Virol. 1981, 25, 295–303. [Google Scholar]
  301. Grubhoffer, L.; Křivanec, K.; Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E. Rapid serological diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis by means of enzyme immunoassay. Folia Parasitol. 1988, 35, 181–187. [Google Scholar]
  302. Grubhoffer, L.; Křivanec, K.; Tomková, E.; Kopecký, J. Antigen for the diagnosis of tick-borne encephalitis using the ELISA technique. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1991, 40, 209–220. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  303. Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E.; Grubhoffer, L.; Melnikova, Y.E. Monoclonal antibodies to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus: Their use for differentiation of the TBE complex viruses. Acta Virol. 1991, 35, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  304. Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E.; Křivanec, K. Identification of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus using monoclonal antibodies and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In Modern Acarology; Dusbábek, F., Bukva, V., Eds.; Academia: Prague, Czech Republic; SPB Academic Publ: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1991; Volume 2, pp. 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  305. Grubhoffer, L.; Kopecký, J.; Tomková, E. Analysis of tick-borne encephalitis virus antigens by monoclonal antibodies. Microbios 1992, 69, 205–213. [Google Scholar]
  306. Fúzik, T.; Formanová, P.; Růžek, D.; Yoshii, K.; Niedrig, M.; Plevka, P. Structure of tick-borne encephalitis virus and its neutralization by a monoclonal antibody. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  307. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Žídková, Y.; Šeděnka, B.; Kupec, V. Comparison of sensitivity of chuck embryomic cells and young mice for the isolation of tick-borne encephalitis virus from unengorged Ixodes ricinus ticks. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1968, 17, 297–303. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  308. Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Cihlárova, V.; Grubhoffer, L. Tick-borne encephalitis virus-specific RT-PCR—A rapid test for detection of the pathogen without viral RNA purification. Acta Virol. 2004, 48, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  309. Ergunay, K.; Tkachev, S.; Kozlova, I.; Růžek, D. A review of methods for detecting tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in tick; animal; and human specimens. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2016, 16, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Formanová, P.; Černý, J.; Bolfíková, B.Č.; Valdés, J.J.; Kozlova, I.; Dzhioev, Y.; Růžek, D. Full genome sequences and molecular characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus strains isolated from human patients. Ticks. Tick-Borne Dis. 2015, 6, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Zeman, P. Objective assessment of risk maps of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis based on spatial patterns of located cases. Internat. J. Epidem. 1997, 26, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  312. Málková, D. Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1958, 27, 401–405. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  313. Daneš, L.; Benda, R. Study of the possibility of preparing a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis; using tissue culture methods. I. Propagation of tick-borne encephalitis virus in tissue cultures for vaccine preparation. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  314. Daneš, L.; Benda, R. Study of the possibility of preparation a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis; using tissue culture methods. II. The inactivation by formaldehyde of the tickborne encephalitis virus in liquids prepared from tissue cultures. Immunogenic properties. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 82–93. [Google Scholar]
  315. Benda, R.; Daneš, L. Study of the possibility of preparing a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis; using tissue culture methods. III. Experimental principles for safety tests of virus inactivation in formolized liquids. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  316. Daneš, L.; Benda, R. Study of the possibility of preparing a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis; using tissue culture methods. IV. Immunisation of humans with test samples of inactivated vaccine. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  317. Benda, R.; Daneš, L. Study of the possibility of preparing a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis; using tissue culture methods. V.; Experimental data for the evaluation of the efficiency of formol treated vaccines in laboratory animals. Acta Virol. 1961, 5, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  318. Slonim, D. Probleme der Schutzimpfung gegen die Zeckenenzephalitis. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1961; pp. 154–162. [Google Scholar]
  319. Daneš, L. Concerning the preparation of a vaccine against tick-borne encephalitis using tissue culture methods. In Biology of Viruses of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex; Libíková, H., Ed.; Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1962; pp. 233–235. [Google Scholar]
  320. Benda, R.; Daneš, L. Evaluation of the immunogenic efficiency of tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine. In Biology of Viruses of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Complex; Libíková, H., Ed.; Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1962; pp. 354–357. [Google Scholar]
  321. Málková, D.; Ráthová, V. Auswahl der Virusstämme zur Herstellung der Vaccine gegen die Zeckenenzephalitis. In Zeckenenzephalitis in Europa; Libíková, H., Ed.; Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1961; pp. 162–165. [Google Scholar]
  322. Málková, D.; Ráthová, V. Selection of tick-borne encephalitis virus strains for the preparation of vaccine. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1958, 7, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  323. Plesník, V.; Januška, J.; Matuška, J. Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis with the Soviet inactivated virus vaccine. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1984, 13, 338–345. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  324. Markvart, K.; Ostrovská, A.; Vlašimská, H.; Duniewicz, M.; Kulková, H.; Heinz, F. Experience with an inactivated tick-borne encephalitis vaccine. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1982, 31, 321–328. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  325. Duniewicz, M.; Markvart, K.; Vlašimská, H.; Heinz, F.; Kulková, H. Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis with an inactivated vaccine. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1983, 122, 1000–1002. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  326. Klockmann, U.; Bock, H.L.; Kwasny, H.; Praus, M.; Cihlová, V.; Tomková, E.; Křivanec, K. Humoral immunity against tick-borne encephalitis virus following manifest disease and active immunization. Vaccine 1991, 9, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Klockmann, U.; Křivanec, K.; Stephenson, J.R.; Hilfenhaus, J. Protection against European isolates of tick-borne encephalitis virus after vaccination with a new tick-borne encephalitis vaccine. Vaccine 1960, 9, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Křivanec, K.; Tomková, E.; Hedenström, M. Tolerance and immunogenicity of a new vaccine ENCEPUR (Behringswerke) against tick-borne encephalitis and the dynamics of the antibody formation within five years after vaccination. Voj. Zdrav. Listy 1994, 63, 153–156. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  329. Prymula, R. Possibilities of prevention and vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. In Tick-Borne Encephalitis; Růžek, D., Ed.; Grada: Praha, Czech Republic, 2015; pp. 155–172. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  330. Salát, J.; Formanová, P.; Huňady, M.; Eyer, L.; Palus, M.; Růžek, D. Development and testing of a new tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine candidate for veterinary use. Vaccine 2018, 36, 7257–7261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Salát, J.; Mikulášek, K.; Larralde, O.; Pokorná-Formanová, P.; Chrdle, A.; Haviernik, J.; Elsterová, J.; Teislerová, D.; Palus, M.; Eyer, L.; et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines contain non-structural protein 1 antigen and may elicit NS1-specific antibody responses in vaccinated individuals. Vaccines 2020, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  332. Benda, R.; Daneš, L.; Fuchsová, M. The effect of cortisone on the course of tick-borne encephalitis infection in cynomolgus monkeys. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  333. Kašová, V. Course of tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in cortisone treated white mice. Acta Virol. 1962, 6, 186. [Google Scholar]
  334. Hanzal, F. Hyperimmune gamma globulin in the propylaxis and treatment of tick-borne encephalitis. Rev. Czech. Med. 1959, 5, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
  335. Elsterová, J.; Palus, M.; Sirmarová, J.; Kopecký, J.; Niller, H.H.; Růžek, D. Tick-borne encephalitis virus neutralization by high dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 8, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Růžek, D.; Dobler, G.; Niller, H.H. May early intervention with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin pose a potentially successful treatment for severe cases of tick-borne encephalitis? BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  337. Grešíková, M.; Rada, B.; Holý, A. Studies on the effect of 9-(R;S)-(2;3-dihydroxypropyl) adenine on tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1982, 26, 521–523. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  338. Růžek, D.; Danielová, V.; Daniel, M.; Chmelík, V.; Chrdle, A.; Pazdiora, P.; Prymula, R.; Salát, J.; Sýkora, J.; Žampachová, E. Tick-Borne Encephalitis; Grada Publishing: Praha, Czech Republic, 2015; p. 196. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  339. Eyer, L.; Valdés, J.J.; Gil, V.A.; Nencka, R.; Hřebabecký, H.; Šála, M.; Salát, J.; Černý, J.; Palus, M.; De Clercq, E.; et al. Nucleoside inhibitors of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5483–5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  340. Eyer, L.; Šmídková, M.; Nencka, R.; Neča, J.; Kastl, T.; Palus, M.; De Clercq, E.; Růžek, D. Structure-activity relationships of nucleoside analogues for inhibition of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Antiviral. Res. 2016, 133, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  341. Eyer, L.; Zouharová, D.; Širmarová, J.; Fojtíková, M.; Štefánik, M.; Haviernik, J.; Nencka, R.; de Clercq, E.; Růžek, D. Antiviral activity of the adenosine analogue BCX4430 against West Nile virus and tick-borne flaviviruses. Antiviral. Res. 2017, 142, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Eyer, L.; Nencka, R.; de Clercq, E.; Seley-Radtke, K.; Růžek, D. Nucleoside analogs as a rich source of antiviral agents active against arthropod-borne flaviviruses. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2018, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Haviernik, J.; Štefánik, M.; Fojtíková, M.; Kali, S.; Tordo, N.; Rudolf, I.; Hubálek, Z.; Eyer, L.; Ruzek, D. Arbidol (Umifenovir): A broad-spectrum antiviral drug that inhibits medically important arthropod-borne flaviviruses. Viruses 2018, 10, e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  344. Eyer, L.; Fojtíková, M.; Nencka, R.; Rudolf, I.; Hubálek, Z.; Růžek, D. Viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor 7-deaza-2′-C-methyladenosine prevents death in a mouse model of West Nile virus infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02093-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  345. Eyer, L.; Nougairède, A.; Uhlířová, M.; Driouich, J.S.; Zouharová, D.; Valdés, J.J.; Haviernik, J.; Gould, E.A.; De Clercq, E.; de Lamballerie, X.; et al. An E460D substitution in the NS5 protein of tick-borne encephalitis virus confers resistance to the inhibitor galidesivir (BCX4430) and also attenuates the virus for mice. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00367-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  346. Krol, E.; Wandzik, I.; Brzuska, G.; Eyer, L.; Růžek, D.; Szewczyk, B. Antiviral activity of uridine derivatives of 2-deoxy sugars against tick-borne encephalitis virus. Molecules 2019, 24, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  347. Růžek, D.; Avsič-Županc, T.; Borde, J.; Chrdle, A.; Eyer, L.; Karganova, G.; Kholodilov, I.; Knap, N.; Kozlovskaya, L.; Matveev, A.; et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and Russia: Review of pathogenesis; clinical features; therapy; and vaccines. Antiviral. Res. 2019, 164, 23–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Gejji, V.; Svoboda, P.; Stefanik, M.; Wang, H.; Salat, J.; Eyer, L.; Ruzek, D.; Fernando, S. An RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor for tick-borne encephalitis virus. Virology 2020, 546, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Šebesta, O. First isolation of mosquito-borne West-Nile virus in the Czech Republic. Acta Virol. 1998, 42, 119–120. [Google Scholar]
  350. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Příkazský, Z.; Žáková, J.; Šebesta, O. Surveillance of mosquito-borne viruses in Břeclav district in the flood year 1997. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1999, 48, 91–96. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  351. Bakonyi, T.; Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Nowotny, N. Novel flavivirus or new lineage of West Nile virus; Central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015, 11, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Bakonyi, T.; Kazdová, K.; Halouzka, J.; Šebesta, O.; Šikutová, S.; Juřicová, Z.; Nowotny, N. Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) surveillance for arboviruses in an area endemic for West Nile (lineage Rabensburg) and Ťahyňa viruses in Central Europe. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Rudolf, I.; Bakonyi, T.; Sebesta, O.; Mendel, J.; Peško, J.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Venclíková, K.; Straková, P.; Nowotny, N.; et al. West Nile virus lineage 2 isolated from Culex modestus mosquitoes in the Czech Republic; 2013: Expansion of the European WNV endemic area to the North? Eurosurveillance 2014, 19, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  354. Rudolf, I.; Bakonyi, T.; Šebesta, O.; Mendel, J.; Peško, J.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Venclíková, K.; Straková, P.; Nowotny, N.; et al. Co-circulation of Usutu virus and West Nile virus in a reed bed ecosystem. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  355. Rudolf, I.; Blažejová, H.; Šebesta, O.; Mendel, J.; Peško, J.; Betášová, L.; Straková, P.; Šikutová, S.; Hubálek, Z. West Nile virus (lineage 2) in mosquitoes in southern Moravia—Awaiting the first autochthonous human cases. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2018, 67, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  356. Rudolf, I.; Rettich, F.; Betášová, L.; Imrichová, K.; Mendel, J.; Hubálek, Z.; Šikutová, S. West Nile virus (lineage 2) detected for the first time in mosquitoes in Southern Bohemia: New WNV endemic area? Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2019, 68, 150–153. [Google Scholar]
  357. Rudolf, I.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Venclíková, K.; Straková, P.; Šebesta, O.; Mendel, J.; Bakonyi, T.; Schaffner, F.; Nowotny, N.; et al. West Nile virus in overwintering mosquitoes; Czech Republic. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  358. Rappole, J.H.; Hubálek, Z. Migratory birds and West Nile virus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  359. Ernek, E.; Kožuch, O.; Sekeyová, M.; Hudec, K.; Folk, Č. Antibodies to arboviruses in birds in Czechoslovakia. Acta Virol. 1971, 15, 335. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  360. Ernek, E.; Kožuch, O.; Nosek, J.; Hudec, K.; Folk, Č. Virus neutralizing antibodies to arboviruses in birds of the order Anseriformes in Czechoslovakia. Acta Virol. 1975, 19, 349–353. [Google Scholar]
  361. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Pellantová, J.; Chytil, J. Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies against arboviruses of the families Togaviridae and Bunyaviridae in birds caught in southern Moravia; Czechoslovakia. Folia Parasitol. 1987, 34, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  362. Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Pellantová, J.; Hudec, K. Arboviruses associated with birds in southern Moravia; Czechoslovakia. Acta Sc. Nat. Brno 1989, 23, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  363. Juřicová, Z.; Halouzka, J. Serological examination of domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos f. domestica) in southern Moravia for antibodies against arboviruses of the groups A.; B; California and Bunyamwera. Biológia (Bratisl.) 1993, 48, 481–484. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  364. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Macháček, P. Virological examination of cormorants for arboviruses. Vet. Med. 1993, 38, 375–379. [Google Scholar]
  365. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Šikutová, S.; Rudolf, I.; Honza, M.; Janková, J.; Chytil, J.; Marec, F.; Sitko, J. Serologic survey of birds for West Nile flavivirus in southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2008, 8, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Straková, P.; Šikutová, S.; Jedličková, P.; Sitko, J.; Rudolf, I.; Hubálek, Z. The common coot as sentinel species for the presence of West Nile and Usutu flaviviruses in Central Europe. Res. Vet. Sci 2015, 102, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Hubálek, Z.; Kosina, M.; Rudolf, I.; Mendel, J.; Straková, P.; Tomešek, M. Mortality of goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) due to West Nile virus lineage 2. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2018, 18, 624–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Hubálek, Z.; Tomešek, M.; Kosina, M.; Šikutová, S.; Straková, P.; Rudolf, I. West Nile virus outbreak in captive and wild raptors; Czech Republic; 2018. Zoonos Public Health 2019, 66, 978–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Janková, J.; Hubálek, Z. Serologic survey of wild boars for mosquito-borne viruses in South Moravia (Czech Republic). Vet. Med. 2008, 53, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  370. Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z.; Straková, P.; Blažejová, H.; Betášová, L.; Rudolf, I. Serological survey for West Nile virus in wild artiodactyls; southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2017, 17, 654–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Hubálek, Z.; Ludvíková, E.; Jahn, P.; Treml, F.; Rudolf, I.; Svobodová, P.; Šikutová, S.; Betášová, L.; Bíreš, J.; Mojžíš, M.; et al. West Nile virus equine serosurvey in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2013, 13, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  372. Sedlák, K.; Zelená, H.; Křivda, V.; Šatrán, P. Surveillance of West Nile fever in horses in the Czech Republic from 2011 to 2013. Epid. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2014, 63, 307–311. [Google Scholar]
  373. Hubálek, Z.; Kříž, B.; Halouzka, J. Serologic survey of humans for Flavivirus West Nile in southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2011, 19, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z. West Nile fever in Czechland. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999, 5, 594–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Hubálek, Z.; Savage, H.M.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Sanogo, Y.O.; Lusk, S. West Nile virus investigations in South Moravia; Czechland. Viral. Immunol. 2000, 13, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  376. Ciupek, R.; Juráš, P.; Šebesta, O.; Rudolf, I.; Šikutová, S.; Zelená, H. West Nile fever—Autochthonous human cases in South Moravia in 2018 from the epidemiological perspective. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2019, 68, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  377. Zelená, H.; Kleinerová, J.; Šikutová, S.; Straková, P.; Kocourková, H.; Stebel, R.; Husa, P.; Husa, P., Jr.; Tesařová, E.; Lejdarová, H.; et al. First autochthonous West Nile lineage 2 and Usutu virus infections in humans; July to October 2018; Czech Republic. Pathogens 2021, 10, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Čapek, M.; Bakonyi, T.; Betášová, L.; Nowotny, N. Usutu virus in blackbirds (Turdus merula); Czech Republic; 2011–2012. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2014, 61, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Hönig, V.; Palus, M.; Kaspar, T.; Zemanova, M.; Majerova, K.; Hofmannova, L.; Papezik, P.; Sikutova, S.; Rettich, F.; Hubalek, Z.; et al. Multiple lineages of Usutu virus (Flaviviridae; Flavivirus) in blackbirds (Turdus merula) and mosquitoes (Culex pipiens; Cx. modestus) in the Czech Republic (2016–2019). Microorganisms 2019, 7, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  380. Kolman, J.M. Serologic examination of some domestic animals from South Moravia on the presence of antibodies to selected arboviruses of the A.; B; California and Bunyamwera groups. Folia Parasitol. 1973, 20, 353–360. [Google Scholar]
  381. Kolman, J.M.; Minář, J.; Horák, I. Serologic examination of birds from area of southern Moravia for presence of antibodies against arboviruses of groups alfa; flavo; Bunyamwera supergroup; and virus Yaba 1-Lednice 110. I. Domestic fowls. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. A 1975, 233, 279–287. [Google Scholar]
  382. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Minář, J.; Hausenblasová, M. Incidence of antibodies against Ťahyňa; Čalovo and tick-borne encephalitis viruses in population of Bohemia. I. The Elbe basin. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1972, 21, 79–85. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  383. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Minář, J.; Tupý, I. Serological examination of human population in Bohemia for antibodies to Ťahyňa; Čalovo; Sindbis and tick-borne encephalitis viruses. I.; II.; III. Acta Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. 1975, 5, 116–129. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  384. Kolman, J.M.; Folk, Č.; Hudec, K.; Reddy, G.N. Serologic examination of birds from the area of southern Moravia for the presence of antibodies against arboviruses of the group Alfa; Flavo; Uukuniemi; Turlock and Bynyamwere supergroup. II. Wild living birds. Folia Parasitol. 1976, 23, 251–255. [Google Scholar]
  385. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Minář, J.; Augustin, J.; Kramář, J. Serological examination of human population in Bohemia for antibodies to Ťahyňa; Čalovo; Sindbis; West Nile and tick-borne encephalitis viruses. V. Acta Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. 1977, 7, 128–133. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  386. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Šikutová, S. Serological examination of songbirds (Passeriformes) for mosquito-borne viruses Sindbis; Ťahyňa; and Batai in a south Moravian wetland (Czech Republic). Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 2009, 9, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  387. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Hudec, K.; Pellantová, J. Results of arbovirological examination of birds of the family Hirundinidae in Czechoslovakia. Folia Parasitol. 1989, 36, 379–383. [Google Scholar]
  388. Šikutová, S.; Dočkal, P.; Straková, P.; Mendel, J.; Šebesta, O.; Betášová, L.; Blažejová, H.; Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I. First record of mosquito-borne Kyzylagach virus in Central Europe. Viruses 2020, 12, e1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  389. Sluka, F. A clinical method for the discovery of new natural disease foci. In Theoretical Questions of Natural Foci of Diseases; Rosický, B., Heyberger, K., Eds.; (Proc. Symp. Prague; Nov 1963); Academia Publishing House of The Czech Academy of Sciences: Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1965; pp. 423–425. [Google Scholar]
  390. Bárdoš, V.; Danielová, V. The Ťahyňa virus—A virus isolated from mosquitoes in Czechoslovakia. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1959, 3, 264–276. [Google Scholar]
  391. Bárdoš, V.; Danielová, V. A study of the relation between Ťahyňa virus and Aedes vexans in natural conditions (in Slovak). Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1961, 10, 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  392. Kolman, J.M.; Málková, D.; Nemec, A.; Smetana, A.; Hájková, Z.; Minář, J. The isolation of the Ťahyňa virus from the mosquito Aedes vexans in southern Moravia. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1964, 8, 380–386. [Google Scholar]
  393. Hubálek, Z.; Chanas, A.C.; Johnson, B.K.; Simpson, D.I.H. Cross-neutralization study of seven California group (Bunyaviridae) strains in homoiothermous (PS) and poikilothermous (XTC-2) vertebrate cells. J. Gen. Virol. 1979, 42, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  394. Šimková, A.; Danielová, V.; Bárdoš, V. Experimental transmission of the Ťahyňa virus by Aedes vexans mosquitoes. Acta Virol. 1960, 4, 341–357. [Google Scholar]
  395. Danielová, V. Experimental studies on the relation of Ťahyňa virus to some species of mosquitoes. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1962, 11, 171–174. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  396. Danielová, V. Multiplication dynamics of Ťahyňa virus in different body parts of Aëdes vexans mosquito. Acta Virol. 1962, 6, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  397. Danielová, V. Quantitative relationships of Ťahyňa virus and the mosquito Aëdes vexans. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  398. Danielová, V. The relation of the virus Ťahyňa to some species of mosquitoes of the genera Aedes; Culex and Anopheles. Folia Parasitol. 1966, 13, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
  399. Danielová, V. Experimental sttudy on the relationship of Ťahyňa virus and Aedes vexans mosquito. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 151–154. [Google Scholar]
  400. Danielová, V. To the seasonal occurrence of the virus Ťahyňa. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 189–192. [Google Scholar]
  401. Danielová, V. The vector efficiency of Culiseta annulata mosquito in relation to Ťahyňa virus. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 259–262. [Google Scholar]
  402. Danielová, V. Importance of mosquitoes as vectors of arboviruses in Czechoslovakia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1978, 27, 218–222. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  403. Danielová, V. Circulation of arboviruses transmitted by mosquitoes in Czechoslovakia and the epidemiological consequences. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1990, 39, 354–359. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  404. Danielová, V. Relationships of mosquitoes to Ťahyňa virus as determinant factors of its circulation in nature. Studie ČSAV 1992, 3, 1–102. [Google Scholar]
  405. Danielová, V.; Hájková, Z.; Kolman, J.M.; Minář, J.; Smetana, A. Results of virological examination of mosquitoes in southern Moravia; 1962–1964. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1966, 15, 178–184. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  406. Danielová, V.; Minář, J.; Ryba, J. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from mosquitoes Culiseta annulata (Schrk. 1776). Folia Parasitol. 1970, 17, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  407. Danielová, V.; Hájková, Z.; Minář, J.; Ryba, J. Virological investigation of mosquitoes in different seasons of the year at the natural focus of the Ťahyňa virus in southern Moravia. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  408. Danielová, V.; Málková, D.; Minář, J.; Ryba, J. Dynamics of the natural focus of Ťahyňa virus in southern Moravia and species succession of its vectors; the mosquitoes of the genus Aedes. Folia Parasitol. 1976, 23, 243–249. [Google Scholar]
  409. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Minář, J.; Ryba, J. Virological investigations of mosquitoes in some biotopes of southern Moravia in summer season 1972. Folia Parasitol. 1974, 21, 363–372. [Google Scholar]
  410. Danielová, V.; Holubová, J. Two more mosquito species proved as vectors of Ťahyňa virus in Czechoslovakia. Folia Parasitol. 1977, 24, 187–189. [Google Scholar]
  411. Rosický, B.; Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Hájková, Z.; Holubová, J.; Kolman, J.; Marhoul, Z.; Minář, J.; Šimková, A. Ťahyňa virus natural focus in southern Moravia. Rozpravy ČSAV Mat. Přír. Vědy. 1980, 90, 1–107. [Google Scholar]
  412. Hubalek, Z.; Sebesta, O.; Pesko, J.; Betasova, L.; Blazejova, H.; Venclikova, K.; Rudolf, I. Isolation of Tahyna virus (California encephalitis group) from Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera; Culicidae); a mosquito species new to; and expanding in; Central Europe. J. Med. Entomol. 2014, 51, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  413. Kazdová, K.; Hubálek, Z. Examination of mosquitoes collected in southern Moravia in 2006-2008 for arboviruses. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2010, 59, 107–111. (In Czech) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  414. Málková, D.; Holubová, J.; Marhoul, Z.; Černý, V.; Hájková, Z.; Rödl, P. Investigation of arboviruses in the Most area; 1981–1982. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1984, 33, 88–96. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  415. Danielová, V. Penetration of the Ťahyňa virus to various organs of the Aedes vexans mosquito. Folia Parsitol. 1968, 15, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  416. Danielová, V.; Ryba, J. Laboratory demonstration of transovarial transmission of Ťahyňa virus in Aedes vexans and the role of this mechanism in overwintering of this arbovirus. Folia Parasitol. 1979, 26, 361–368. [Google Scholar]
  417. Bárdoš, V.; Ryba, J.; Hubálek, Z. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from field-collected Culiseta annulata (Schrk.) larvae. Acta Virol. 1975, 19, 446. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  418. Bárdoš, V.; Ryba, J.; Hubálek, Z.; Olejníček, J. Virological examination of mosquito larvae from southern Moravia. Folia Parasitol. 1978, 25, 75–78. [Google Scholar]
  419. Danielová, V.; Minář, J.; Rosický, B. Experimental survival of the virus Ťahyňa in hibernating mosquitoes Theobaldia annulata (Schrk.). Folia Parasitol. 1968, 15, 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  420. Danielová, V.; Minář, J. Experimental overwintering of the virus Ťahyňa in mosquitoes Culiseta annulata (Schrk.) (Diptera; Culicidae). Folia Parasitol. 1969, 16, 285–287. [Google Scholar]
  421. Danielová, V. Overwintering of mosquito-borne viruses. Med. Biol. 1975, 53, 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  422. Halouzka, J.; Pejčoch, M.; Hubálek, Z.; Knoz, J. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from biting midges (Diptera; Ceratopogonidae) in Czecho-Slovakia. Acta Virol. 1991, 35, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  423. Marhoul, Z. Multiplication of Ťahyňa; Čalovo and Uukuniemi (strain Poteplí) viruses in mosquito cell lines of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi. In Proceedings of the 3rd Internat Colloq Invertebr Tissue Culture; Řeháček, J., Ed.; Publ House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1973; pp. 275–290. [Google Scholar]
  424. Marhoul, Z. Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae mosquito cell line (Mos 55) to some arboviruses. Acta Virol. 1973, 17, 507–509. [Google Scholar]
  425. Danielová, V. Growth of Ťahyňa virus at low temperatures. Acta Virol. 1975, 19, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  426. Kolman, J.M.; Danielová, V.; Málková, D.; Smetana, A. The laboratory rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.; var. domesticus) as an indicator of the Ťahyňa virus in nature. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1966, 19, 240–252. [Google Scholar]
  427. Kolman, J.M.; Marhoul, Z.; Málková, D. Experimental infection of the bat Myotis myotis Borkhausen with the Ťahyňa virus. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1967, 11, 125–126. [Google Scholar]
  428. Smetana, A.; Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Ťahyňa virus in squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris L.). J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1966, 10, 523–524. [Google Scholar]
  429. Danielová, V.; Marhoul, Z. Antibodies against some arboviruses in humans; domestic and wild animals living in the natural focus of Ťahyňa virus in South Moravia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1968, 17, 155–161. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  430. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Viremia and antibody formation in rabbits; experimentally infected with Ťahyňa virus. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1969; pp. 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  431. Málková, D.; Hodková, Z.; Chaturvedi, R. Overwintering of the virus Ťahyňa in hedgehogs kept under natural conditions. Folia Parasitol. 1969, 16, 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  432. Bárdoš, V. The role of mammals in the circulation of Ťahyňa virus. Folia Parasitol. 1975, 22, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  433. Rödl, P.; Bárdoš, V.; Hubálek, Z. Experimental infection of Putorius eversmanni pole-cats and Martes foina martens with Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1978, 22, 502–505. [Google Scholar]
  434. Rödl, P.; Bárdoš, V.; Hubálek, Z. Experimental infection of the squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) and the muskrat (Ondatra zibethica) with Ťahyňa virus (California group; Bunyaviridae). Folia Parasitol. 1987, 34, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  435. Rödl, P.; Bárdoš, V.; Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z. Experimental infection of foxes with Ťahyňa virus. Folia Parasitol. 1977, 24, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  436. Rödl, P.; Bárdoš, V.; Ryba, J. Experimental transmission of Ťahyňa virus (California group) to wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) by mosquitoes. Folia Parasitol. 1979, 26, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  437. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z. Serological surveys for arboviruses in the game animals of southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Folia Zool. 1999, 48, 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  438. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Attempts at experimental infection of pheasants with Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 375. [Google Scholar]
  439. Hubálek, Z. Effects of sex and dose of inoculum on the antibody response of mice to Ťahyňa virus (Bunyaviridae). Acta Virol. 1980, 24, 358–362. [Google Scholar]
  440. Hubálek, Z.; Rödl, P. Assessment of the mouse open-field activity after infection with Ťahyňa virus (California serogroup; Bunyaviridae). Lab. Anim. Sci. 1994, 44, 186–188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  441. Hubálek, Z.; Bárdoš, V. Effect of cyclophosphamide on the infection of mice with Ťahyňa virus. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. A 1981, 251, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Danielová, V. The property changes of two Ťahyňa virus strains by influence of serial passages in various environments. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Hyg. I Orig. A 1974, 229, 323–333. [Google Scholar]
  443. Málková, D.; Reddy, N.G. Influence of early passages on the character of freshly isolated strains of Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1975, 19, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  444. Málková, D. Thermosensitivity of Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1971, 15, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  445. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Influence of temperature corresponding to that of the host animals on Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1976, 20, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  446. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Influence of temperature corresponding to that of the vector on Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1976, 20, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  447. Málková, D. Virulence of Ťahyňa virus in mice and its relation to thermosensitivity and character of plaque population markers. Acta Virol. 1971, 15, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  448. Málková, D. Effects of some overlay components on plaque number and plaque size of Ťahyňa virus in GMK cells. Acta Virol. 1971, 15, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  449. Málková, D.; Marhoul, Z. Plaquing of different strains of Ťahyňa virus in GMK cells. Acta Virol. 1971, 15, 227–262. [Google Scholar]
  450. Málková, D. Comparative study of two variants of Ťahyňa virus. Acta Virol. 1974, 18, 407–415. [Google Scholar]
  451. Bárdoš, V.; Peško, J. Biological and antigenic variants among Ťahyňa virus strains isolated in Czechoslovakia. Arch. Virol. 1981, 68, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  452. Kilian, P.; Růžek, D.; Danielová, V.; Hypša, V.; Grubhoffer, L. Nucleotide variability of Tahyna virus (Bunyaviridae; Orthobunyavirus) small (S) and medium (M) genomic segments in field strains differing in biological properties. Virus. Res. 2010, 149, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Kilian, P.; Valdes, J.J.; Lecina-Casas, D.; Chrudimský, T.; Růžek, D. The variability of the large genomic segment of Ťahyňa orthobunyavirus and an all-atom exploration of its anti-viral drug resistance. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 20, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  454. Juřicová, Z. The use of formaldehyde-stabilized gander erythrocytes in haemagglutination-inhibition test in the diagnosis of infections caused by the Ťahyňa virus. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1982, 31, 208–213. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  455. Juřicová, Z. Preparation of the specific Ťahyňa virus antigen with a high titre od haemagglutinin. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1987, 36, 287–291. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  456. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z. Use of goose ertythrocytes in haemaglutinatin titration with Ťahyňa virus. Biológia 1982, 37, 701–705. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  457. Málková, D.; Macháčková, I. Simplified plaque assay of Ťahyňa virus on GMK cells. Acta Virol. 1972, 16, 92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  458. Zelená, H.; Januška, J.; Raszka, J. Micromodification of virus-neutralisation assay with vital staining in 96-well plate and its use in diagnostics of Ťahyňa virus infections. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2008, 57, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
  459. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Příkazský, Z. A nonspecific inhibitor of haemagglutination by Ťahyňa virus in acetone-extracted mouse sera and its removal. Zentralbl. Bakt. I Orig. A 1983, 254, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  460. Hubálek, Z.; Chanas, A.C.; Johnson, B.K.; Simpson, D.I.H. Comparative susceptibility of PS cells; XTC-2 cells and suckling mice to infection with California group arboviruses (Bunyaviridae). Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1979, 73, 586–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  461. Heinz, F.; Herzig, P.; Ašmera, J.; Gawlas, W.; Šedĕnka, B. Epidemiological and clinical importance of Ťahyňa virus in the North Moravian Region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1972, 21, 149–158. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  462. Minář, J. Investigation of haematophagous diptera with special emphasis on mosquitoes as vectors of arboviruses in Czechoslovakia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1976, 25, 313–329. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  463. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Kolman, J.; Minář, J.; Smetana, A. Natural focus of Ťahyňa virus in South Moravia. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1965, 9, 434–440. [Google Scholar]
  464. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Rác, O. Serologic examination of human population in South Moravia (Czechoslovakia) on the presence of antibodies to arboviruses of the Alfavirus; Flavivirus; Turlock groups and Bunyamwera supergroup. Folia Parasitol. 1979, 26, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  465. Hubálek, Z.; Zeman, P.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Šťovíčková, E.; Bálková, H.; Šikutová, S.; Rudolf, I. Mosquitoborne viruses; Czech Republic; 2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 116–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  466. Bárdoš, V. Recent state of knowledge of Ťahyňa virus infections. Folia Parasitol. 1974, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  467. Hubálek, Z.; Bárdoš, V.; Medek, M.; Kania, V.; Kychler, L.; Jelínek, E. Ťahyňa virus-neutralizing antibodies in patients in southern Moravia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1979, 28, 87–96. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  468. Juřicová, Z.; Bárdoš, V.; Medek, M.; Kychler, L.; Kania, V. Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies against the Ťahyňa virus in patients in South Moravia. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1983, 32, 349–354. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  469. Juřicová, Z.; Hubálek, Z.; Chalupský, V. An arbovirus study of pregnant women in Southern Moravia. Čes. Gynekol. 1989, 54, 91–95. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  470. Hubálek, Z.; Zeman, P.; Halouzka, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Šťovíčková, E.; Bálková, H.; Šikutová, S.; Rudolf, I. Antibodies to mosquito-borne viruses in human population affected by the flood; Central Bohemia 2002. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 2004, 53, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  471. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J. Presence of virus-neutralizing antibodies to the Ťahyňa virus in the inhabitants of North Moravia. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  472. Bárdoš, V.; Sluka, F. Acute human infections caused by Ťahyňa virus (in Slovak). Čas. Lék. Čes. 1963, 52, 394–402. [Google Scholar]
  473. Sluka, F. The clinical picture of the Ťahyňa virus infection. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 311–314. [Google Scholar]
  474. Bardos, V.; Cupkova, E.; Sefcovicova, L.; Sluka, F. Serological study on the medical importance of the Czechoslovak mosquito-borne viruses Tahyna and Calovo. In Proceedings of the Atti del XIII Congresso Nazionale di Mikrobiologia, Parma-Salsomaggiore, Italy, May 1965; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  475. Bárdoš, V.; Medek, M.; Kania, V.; Hubálek, Z. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from the blood of sick children. Acta Virol. 1975, 19, 447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  476. Bárdoš, V.; Medek, M.; Kania, V.; Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z. Das klinische Bild der Ťahyňa-Virus (California Gruppe)-Infektionen bei Kindern. Pädiat. Grenzgeb. 1980, 19, 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  477. Medek, M.; Bárdoš, V.; Hubálek, Z.; Kania, V. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from the blood of clinically ill children. Česk. Pediat. 1976, 31, 617–619. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  478. Šimková, A.; Sluka, F. The etiopathogenetic importance of Ťahyňa virus for man. Lek. Obzor. 1977, 26, 341–348. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  479. Sluka, F. Zur Erkenntnis der klinischen Formen des Valtice-Fiebers; einer neuen Arbovirose. Wien. Med. Wschr. 1969, 119, 765–769. [Google Scholar]
  480. Sluka, F.; Šimková, A. Demonstration of human infection in the natural focus of the Valtice fever. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 358. [Google Scholar]
  481. Šimková, A.; Sluka, F. Isolation of Ťahyňa virus from the blood of a case of influenza-like disease. Acta Virol. 1973, 17, 94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  482. Bárdoš, V. Zur Ökologie und medizinischer Bedeutung des Ťahyňa-Virus. Münch Med. Wochenschr. 1976, 118, 1617–1620. [Google Scholar]
  483. Bárdoš, V. Acute infections caused by Ťahyňa virus—Evaluation for the period 1959–1976. Čas. Lék. Čes. 1977, 116, 995–998. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  484. Bárdoš, V.; Daneš, L.; Šimková, A.; Libich, J.; Blažek, K.; Čupková, E. Virological and clinico-pathological observations on rhesus monkeys exposed to Ťahyňa virus aerosol. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czšechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 275–277. [Google Scholar]
  485. Šimková, A.; Daneš, L. Virological and clinical observations on chimpanzees exposed to Ťahyňa virus aerosol. Acta Virol. 1968, 12, 474. [Google Scholar]
  486. Šimková, A.; Bárdoš, V. Experimental Ťahyňa virus infection in primates. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 269–274. [Google Scholar]
  487. Šimková, A.; Danielová, V. Experimental infection of chimpanzees with Ťahyňa virus by Culiseta annulata mosquitoes. Folia Parasitol. 1969, 16, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  488. Bárdoš, V.; Čupková, E. The Čalovo virus—The second virus isolated from mosquitoes in Czechoslovakia. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1962, 6, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  489. Dufková, L.; Pachler, K.; Kilian, P.; Chrudimský, T.; Danielová, V.; Růžek, D.; Nowotny, N. Full-length genome analysis of Čalovo strains of Batai orthobunyavirus (Bunyamwera serogroup): Implications to taxonomy. Infect. Genet. Evol 2014, 27, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  490. Danielová, V. Susceptibility of Aedes albopictus mosquito cell line to some arboviruses. Acta Virol. 1973, 17, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  491. Smetana, A.; Danielová, V.; Kolman, J.M.; Málková, D.; Minář, J. The isolation of the Čalovo virus from the mosquitoes of the group Anopheles maculipennis in southern Moravia. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1967, 11, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  492. Bárdoš, V.; Sluka, F.; Čupková, E. Serological study on the medical importance of Čalovo virus. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 333–336. [Google Scholar]
  493. Sluka, F. The clinical picture of the Čalovo virus infection. In Arboviruses of the California Complex and the Bunyamwera Group; Bárdoš, V., Ed.; Public House SAS: Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, 1969; pp. 337–339. [Google Scholar]
  494. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Minář, J.; Rosický, B.; Casals, J. Isolation of Yaba 1 arbovirus in Czechoslovakia. Acta Virol. 1972, 16, 93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  495. Calisher, C.G.; Lazuick, J.S.; Wolff, K.L.; Muth, D.J. Antigenic relationships among Turlock serogroup bunyaviruses as determined by neutralization tests. Acta Virol. 1984, 28, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  496. Berčič, R.L.; Bányai, K.; Růžek, D.; Fehér, E.; Domán, M.; Danielová, V.; Bakonyi, T.; Nowotny, N. Phylogenetic analysis of Lednice Orthobunyavirus. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  497. Málková, D. Yaba 1 virus in Czechoslovakia. I. Some physical and chemical properties of Yaba 1 (Lednice 110) virus. Acta Virol. 1972, 16, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  498. Jelínková, A.; Málková, D.; Holubová, J.; Novák, M. Electron microscopy of Lednice vírus in chick embryo cells. Acta Virol. 1980, 24, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  499. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Marhoul, Z.; Blažek, K. Yaba 1 virus in Czechoslovakia. II. Some biological properties of Yaba 1-Lednice 110 virus. Acta Virol. 1973, 17, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  500. Málková, D.; Kolman, J.M. Multiplication of Yaba 1-Lednice 110 virus in chick embryo. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1975, 24, 225–230. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  501. Marhoul, Z.; Danielová, V.; Holubová-Krobová, J.; Málková, D. Cultivation of Lednice (Yaba 1) virus in goose; duck; and chick embryo cells. Acta Virol. 1976, 20, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  502. Danielová, V. To the problem of the vector of Lednice virus. Folia Parasitol. 1984, 31, 379–382. [Google Scholar]
  503. Kolman, J.M.; Folk, Č.; Hudec, K.; Minář, J. Serologic survey of a selected sample of the human population and of domestic and wild animals for haemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies to Lednice–Yaba 1 virus in an endemic region of this virus in South Moravia. Folia Microbiol. 1976, 21, 245–246. [Google Scholar]
  504. Málková, D.; Danielová, V. Experimental infection of pheasants with Lednice (Yaba 1) virus. Folia Parasitol. 1977, 24, 382–384. [Google Scholar]
  505. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Lím, D. Experimental infection of black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus L.) and coots (Fulica atra L.) with Lednice (M’Poko) virus. Folia Parasitol. 1979, 26, 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  506. Danielová, V.; Málková, D. Study on viremia and antibody formation in ducklings and goslings after experimental infection with Lednice (Yaba 1) virus. Folia Parasitol. 1976, 23, 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  507. Málková, D.; Danielová, V. Experimental infection of chickens with Lednice (Yaba 1) virus. Folia Parasitol. 1978, 25, 255–256. [Google Scholar]
  508. Krobová, J.; Málková, D.; Kolman, J.M.; Rajčáni, J. Propagation and distribution of Lednice virus in the chick embryo. Folia Microbiol. 1976, 21, 244–245. [Google Scholar]
  509. Málková, D.; Danielová, V.; Viktora, L.; Holubová-Krobová, J. Experimental infection of Macaca mulatta monkeys with Lednice (Yaba 1) virus. Acta Virol. 1976, 20, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  510. Málková, D.; Kolman, J.M.; Hodková, Z. Relationships of Lednice (Yaba 1) arbovirus in some small mammals. Folia Parasitol. 1978, 25, 113–114. [Google Scholar]
  511. Kolman, J.M. Serological examination of a sample of human population and some animal species for the presence of antibodies to Yaba 1 virus. Folia Parasitol. 1974, 21, 160. [Google Scholar]
  512. Kolman, J.M.; Meergansová, J. Haemagglutinatíng antigen prepared from YABA-1 virus (strain Lednice-110) by ultrasonic disintegration. J. Hyg. Epidem. Microbiol. Immunol. 1973, 17, 503–504. [Google Scholar]
  513. Málková, D.; Krpešová, N.; Holubová, J.; Kolman, J.M. Radial haemolysis in gel for detection of antibodies to bunyavirus Lednice (Turlock group). Acta Virol. 1983, 27, 439–441. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  514. Hubálek, Z.; Juřicová, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Butenko, A.M.; Kondrašina, N.G.; Guščina, E.A.; Morozova, T.N. Isolation and characterization of Sedlec virus; a new bunyavirus from birds. Acta Virol. 1990, 34, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  515. Bakonyi, T.; Kolodziejek, J.; Rudolf, I.; Berčič, R.; Nowotny, N.; Hubálek, Z. Partial genetic characterization of Sedlec virus (Orthobunyavirus; Bunyaviridae). Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 19, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  516. Kapuscinski, M.L.; Bergren, N.A.; Russell, B.J.; Lee, J.S.; Borland, E.M.; Hartman, D.A.; King, D.C.; Hughes, H.R.; Burkhalter, K.L.; Kading, R.C.; et al. Genomic characterization of 99 viruses from the bunyavirus families Nairoviridae; Peribunyaviridae; and Phenuiviridae; including 35 previously unsequenced viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  517. Kolman, J.M.; Málková, D.; Smetana, K. Isolation of a presumably new virus from unengorged Ixodes ricinus ticks. Acta Virol. 1966, 10, 171–172. [Google Scholar]
  518. Kolman, J.M. Some biological properties of Uukuniemi virus; strain Poteplí-63. Acta Virol. 1970, 14, 151–158. [Google Scholar]
  519. Kolman, J.M. Some physical and chemical properties of Uukuniemi virus; strain Poteplí-63. Acta Virol. 1970, 14, 159–162. [Google Scholar]
  520. Kožuch, O.; Grešíková, M.; Nosek, J.; Chmela, J. Uukuniemi virus in western Slovakia and northern Moravia. Folia Parasitol. 1970, 17, 337–340. [Google Scholar]
  521. Papa, A.; Zelená, H.; Papadopoulou, E.; Mrázek, J. Uukuniemi virus; Czech Republic. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  522. Kolman, J.M.; Meergansová, J. Transfer of the virus Uukuniemi among the developmental stages of Ixodes ricinus under laboratory conditions. Folia Parasitol. 1972, 19, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  523. Marhoul, Z. The use of cell cultures for some diagnostic methods with Uukuniemi virus. Acta Virol. 1970, 14, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  524. Kolman, J.M.; Kopecký, K.; Wokounová, D. Serological examination of human population from an endemic area of tick-borne encephalitis and Uukuniemi viruses. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1973, 22, 153–159. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  525. Málková, D.; Holubová, J.; Kolman, J.M.; Marhoul, Z.; Hanzal, F.; Kulková, H.; Markvart, K.; Šimková, L. Antibodies against some arboviruses in persons with various neuropathies. Acta Virol. 1980, 24, 298. [Google Scholar]
  526. Libíková, H.; Ašmera, J.; Heinz, F. Isolation of a Kemerovo complex orbivirus (strain Cvilín) from ixodid ticks in the North Moravian region. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1977, 26, 135–138. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  527. Heinz, F.; Ašmera, J.; Januška, J.; Červenka, P.; Černý, J.; Klimeš, A.; Těmín, K.; Kupec, V. Isolation of orbiviruses of the Kemerovo complex from Ixodes ricinus ticks in the Czech Socialist Republic. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Inunol. 1981, 30, 129–134. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  528. Fraňková, V. Meningoencephalitis caused by arbovirus of the genus Orbivirus in the Czechoslovakia. Sbornik. Lék. 1981, 83, 181–186. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  529. Fraňková, V.; Marhoul, Z.; Duniewicz, M.; Pruklová, A. Meningoencephalitis cases associated with orbivirus infections. Sborník. Lék. 1982, 83, 181–186. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  530. Libíková, H.; Heinz, F.; Ujházyová, D.; Stünzner, D. Orbiviruses of the Kemerovo complex and neurological diseases. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 1978, 166, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  531. Hubálek, Z.; Havelka, I.; Bárdoš, V.; Halouzka, J.; Peško, J.; Juřicová, Z.; Kofroň, F. Arbovirus infections in the Znojmo district. Česk. Epidem. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1987, 36, 337–344. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hubálek, Z. History of Arbovirus Research in the Czech Republic. Viruses 2021, 13, 2334. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13112334

AMA Style

Hubálek Z. History of Arbovirus Research in the Czech Republic. Viruses. 2021; 13(11):2334. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13112334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hubálek, Zdenek. 2021. "History of Arbovirus Research in the Czech Republic" Viruses 13, no. 11: 2334. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13112334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop