Next Article in Journal
Modeling Viral Infectious Diseases and Development of Antiviral Therapies Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Systems
Previous Article in Journal
The Apis mellifera Filamentous Virus Genome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 7
Issue 7
10.3390/v7072799
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Characterization of Cucumis metuliferus Proteinase Inhibitor Gene (CmSPI) in Potyviruses Resistance

by
Chia-Wei Lin
,
Mei-Hsiu Su
,
Yu-Tsung Lin
,
Chien-Hung Chung
and
Hsin-Mei Ku
*
Agronomy Department National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo Kuang Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2015, 7(7), 3816-3834; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7072799
Submission received: 27 April 2015 / Revised: 2 July 2015 / Accepted: 3 July 2015 / Published: 9 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Viruses of Plants, Fungi and Protozoa)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Proteinase inhibitors are ubiquitous proteins that block the active center or interact allosterically with proteinases and are involved in plant physiological processes and defense responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. The CmSPI gene identified from Cucumis metuliferus encodes a serine type PI (8 kDa) that belongs to potato I type family. To evaluate the effect of silencing CmSPI gene on Papaya ringspot virus resistance, RNA interference (RNAi) with an inter-space hairpin RNA (ihpRNA) construct was introduced into a PRSV-resistant C. metuliferus line. CmSPI was down-regulated in CmSPI RNAi transgenic lines in which synchronously PRSV symptoms were evident at 21 day post inoculation. Alternatively, heterogeneous expression of CmSPI in Nicotiana benthamiana was also conducted and showed that CmSPI can provide resistance to Potato virus Y, another member of Potyvirus, in transgenic N. benthamiana lines. This study demonstrated that CmSPI plays an important role in resistant function against potyviruses in C. metuliferus and N. benthamiana.

1. Introduction

Proteinase inhibitors (PIs) are commonly found in the plant kingdom and have been identified mainly in plant shoots and storage tissues [1]. At least 74 PI families have been reported based on structural homology, topological relationships, and relative site [2,3,4]. Plant PIs (PPIs) are involved in flowering, seed germination, protein storage, and programmed cell death. PPIs are also induced in plants in responses to wounding and pathogen infections [5]. Several studies have showed that PPIs are effective against predators or pathogens such as insects, nematodes, fungal, and viruses [6,7]. For example, introduction and expression of soybean Kuntiz trypsin inhibitor and Bowman-Birk inhibitor in sugarcane can confer resistance to sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis [8]. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of rice cysteine PI or cowpea serine PI can reduce Rotylenchulus reniformis female fecundity and density [9]. Constitutive expression of rice cysteine proteinase oryzacystatin I was effective against Tobacco etch virus (TEV) and Potato virus Y (PVY) in transgenic N. benthamiana plants [10].
Cucumis metuliferus (horned melon) is native to South Africa, is a highly nutritious source and is also reported to have resistance against many pathogens [11]. C. metuliferus line PI 292190 is immune to Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), a member of the genus Potyvirus of the family Potyviridae, but C. metuliferus line Acc. 2459 is susceptible [12]. C. metuliferus line PI 292190 has a single dominant resistant gene, Wmv, against PRSV and has been used for selecting attenuated strains of PRSV [13]. This has made C. metuliferus an ideal model in studying plant-virus interaction and pathogenicity of PRSV in plants. In a previous study, we identified several transcript derived fragments (TDFs) from PI 292190 using cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (cDNA-AFLP) [14]. One of these TDFs showed sequence similarity to serine proteinase inhibitor genes. This TDF was induced at 48 hour post inoculation in PRSV-resistant line PI 292190 but much later in PRSV-susceptible line Acc. 2459 (21 dpi) after PRSV infection. To test the function of C. metuliferus serine proteinase inhibitor (CmSPI), RNAi (RNA interference) was conducted in this study. RNAi initiated by double stranded RNA (dsRNA) modulates gene expression in eukaryotes via small interference RNA (siRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) [15,16]. RNAi is a powerful tool to study gene expression and analyze gene function [17]. The dsRNA can be formed in vivo by transforming plants with a construct that encodes hairpin RNA (hpRNA). Hairpin RNAi (hpRNAi) approach can lead to off target effects such as down-regulation of endogenous genes sharing sequence similarity with the hpRNAi construct. Moreover, an intron or inter-space contained self-complementary hpRNA (ihpRNA) construct could be more effective in its silencing ability [18].
This study has successfully obtained CmSPI RNAi transgenic lines in the PI 292190 genetic background, which showed a down regulation of CmSPI and suppression of the anti-PRSV resistance in C. metuliferus line PI 292190. However, transformation on the PRSV-susceptible C. metuliferus line Acc. 2459 was shown to be difficult. Therefore a full length genomic CmSPI fragment was cloned and used to transform N. benthamiana. Since PRSV could not infect N. benthamiana, the testing for resistance in transgenic N. benthamiana plants was conducted using a related potyvirus, potato virus Y (PVY), which is capable of infecting N. benthamiana. Two of the N. benthamiana transgenic lines were shown to be resistant to PVY infection. This study has provided evidence that the function of C. metuliferus CmSPI, a serine proteinase inhibitor gene, plays an important role in potyvirus resistance in both C. metuliferus and N. benthamiana.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cloning CmSPI Gene cDNA and Full Length Genomic Fragment of Cucumis metuliferus

The C. metuliferus (PI 292190) cDNA fragment was identified using CapFishing Full-length cDNA Premix Kit (Seegene, Inc., Seoul, Korea) and the full length genomic fragment was identified by cassette ligation-mediated PCR genome walking [19]. In order to synthesize CmSPI cDNA, total RNA was isolated using previously described methods [20]. Three micrograms of RNA extracted from C. metuliferus line PI 292190 at 48 h post PRSV inoculation (hpi) were used for first strand cDNA synthesis, and the complementary strand was produced using the oligo-dT adaptor primer and the 5′ end of cDNA was ligated with CapFishing adaptor using reverse transcriptase. The mixture was then used for 3′ and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE) PCR reaction using specific primers HMK2007-14 and HMK2007-15 (Table 1). The PCR products were ligated into the cloning vector yT & A (Yeastern Biotech Co., Taipei, Taiwan) for sequencing. To identify full length CmSPI genomic fragment, 5 μg of DNA extracted from C. metuliferus line PI 292190 were digested with restriction enzymes (BamHI, PstI, EcoRI, EcoRV, HpaI, NcoI, BstXI, HindIII, KpaI, SalI, and XbaI) and then ligated with adaptors HMK2010-35 and HMK2010-36. PCR primers (HMK2010-37, HMK2010-38, HMK2011-118, HMK2011-119, HMK2011-127, and HMK2011-128) were used for genome walking (shown in Table 1) and the PCR products were then ligated into cloning vector yT & A for sequencing.
Table
Table 1. Specific primers used in this study.
Table 1. Specific primers used in this study.
Primer NameOligonucleotides
5′ and 3′ RACE reaction
HMK2007-145′-AAT TCC AAC ACA AAT CAT CAT CTT-3′
HMK2007-155′-TAA CAA ACA ACC AAA CTC GAT CAC-3′
Full length genome walking
HMK2010-355′-CTA ATA CgA CTC ACT ATA ggg CTC gAg Cgg CCg CCC ggg CAg gT-3′
HMK2010-365′-ACC TgC CC-3′
HMK2010-375′-ggA TCC TAA TAC gAC TCA CTA TAg ggC-3′
HMK2010-385′-ACT CAC TAT Agg gCT CgA gCg ggC-3′
HMK2011-1185′-TAT TCC AAC AAG TTC CGG CCA CTG-3′
HMK2011-1195′-GAA AGT TGT TGA AAT TCC GAA GGT TG-3′
HMK2011-1275′-gct gga act gga acc act aaa ga-3′
HMK2011-1285′-cca taa atg gaa aca tac cag gag-3′
CmSPI RNAi construction
HMK2007-935′-ggA TCC CCA Tgg CCC ggg CgA ATT CCA AgC TT-3′
HMK2007-945′-TgT ACA CTC gAg TAg Agg ggA TCC AgA TCT-3′
Full length genomic CmSPI construction
HMK2012-65′-CAA ATA GGA GAA GAT GTT CTC G-3′
HMK2012-235′-CAG GTG ACA CAT GCG TAT AAC-3′
Genomic PCR and probe synthesis
HMK2011-1025′-gaa ctt tct gga tct act tta ttt g-3′
HMK2011-1035′-aca caa act tca tct aac ctt aaa c-3′
RT-PCR and probe synthesis
HMK2013-605′-acg cGA ATT CGT CGA CCT CGA GAA CCT TCG GAA TTT CAA CAA C-3′
HMK2013-615′-acg cGG ATC CGA GCT CAA GCT TAT GGC TGA TAT TTG TCC TCC T-3′

2.2. Sequence Analysis and Construction of Phylogenetic Tree

CmSPI sequence and the reactive sites were analyzed in the plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements database [21]. The CmSPI ORF (KR012492) was translated into an amino acid sequence and used in phylogenetic analysis. The sequences of fifteen other serine proteinase inhibitor proteins were obtained including Solanum tuberosum (CAA78259, AAZ08247, ACZ04396), Solanum lycopersicum (AAA34198, AAA60745), Nicotiana tabacum (CAA78269), Nicotiana sylvestris (AAA34067), Arabidopsis lyrata (EFH39906), Vitis cinerea (ADD51184), Ricinus communis (EEF41422), Jatropha curcas (ADB85100), Salvia miltiorrhiza (ABP01767), Medicago truncatula (AES61046), and Populus trichocarpa (EEF01895) by BLASTP algorithm in the NCBI GenBank. These sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W software (EMBL Data Library, Heidelberg, Germany), and a dendrogram was constructed with MAGA2 [22] using the neighbor-joining method [23] with the HKY85 [24] genetic distance. Data were resampled 100 times for bootstrap analyses.

2.3. Construction of Binary Vector and Bacterial Strain

The cDNA fragment of CmSPI gene for the RNAi construct was amplified by PCR with the primers, HMK2007-93 and HMK2007-94 (Table 1), and ligated into the yT & A vector. Sense and antisense CmSPI sequences were digested with BamH I–Nco I and BsrG I–Xho I individually and ligated into the pEPJ86i plasmid vector [25], in which the sense and antisense fragments were located in tandem with an inter-space sequence between them, and this ihpRNA construct was placed behind the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The entire RNAi construct was then subcloned into the binary vector pGA482G and introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in C. metuliferus.
The full length genomic sequence of CmSPI gene was amplified from C. metuliferus resistant line PI 292190 with the primers, HMK2012-6 and HMK2012-23 (Table 1). The PCR reaction was conducted using the proof-reading DNA polymerase, Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen™, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The resulting PCR product was digested with Kpn I and Hpa I and ligated into the binary vector pGA482G and introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation into N. benthamiana plants.

2.4. Plant Material and Transformation

Transformation of C. metuliferus resistant line PI 292190 was conducted according to a previously described protocol [26]. In brief, cotyledon explants of the resistant line PI 292190 were infected with A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring the CmSPI RNAi binary vector construct. The resulting calli were screened for kanamycin resistance and the regenerated T0 plants were grown in soil-vermiculite mixture in pots. These T0 transgenic plants were tested by Southern hybridization and then self-pollinated to harvest T1 seed for RNA and protein analysis and virus inoculation test.
The transformation protocol for N. benthamiana was performed as previously described [27] with minor modifications. Young leaves harvested from two-month-old N. benthamiana plants were infected with A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 carrying the full length genomic CmSPI binary vector construct. The resulting calli were screened for kanamycin resistance and regenerated T0 plants were grown in soil-vermiculite mixture in pots to harvest T1 and T2 seed. The T1 and T2 transgenic N. benthamiana lines were used for the virus inoculation test.

2.5. Inoculation of Plant Viruses

PRSV was obtained from C. metuliferus susceptible line Acc. 2459 leaves after virus inoculated. PVY obtained from infected N. benthamiana leaves was inoculated to transgenic N. benthamiana lines. Virus inoculation was conducted using a 1:50 (w/v) dilution of the homogenized leaves infected with the virus in 10 mM phosphate buffer (0.033 M K2H2PO4, 0.067 M K2HPO4 at pH 7.0).

2.6. Gene Expression Detection

2.6.1. Genomic PCR

Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of the transgenic C. metuliferus and N. benthamiana plants by cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method as previously described [28]. The presence of the transgene was detected by PCR with primer set HMK2011-102/HMK2011-103 for the intron sequence and HMK2013-60/HMK2013-61 primers for the CmSPI gene. PCR analysis was performed in a reaction mixture containing 10 μM specific primer pairs, 1× Taq DNA polymerase reaction buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1.75 mM MgCl2), 1U Taq DNA polymerase and 2.5 mM dNTP in a final volume of 20 μL.

2.6.2. Southern Hybridization

Ten micrograms of genomic DNA from transgenic plants were digested with Nco I to completion, subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Perkin Elmer Life Science, Waltham, MA, USA). To detect the CmSPI RNAi construct in transgenic C. metuliferus, the membrane was hybridized with α32P-labeled intron sequence probe (generated by PCR with primer set HMK2011-102/HMK2011-103), and for detection of the full length genomic CmSPI construct in transgenic N. benthamiana, the membrane was hybridized with α32P-labeled CmSPI gene probe (generated by PCR with primer set HMK2013-60/HMK2013-61).

2.6.3. RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription PCR)

The reverse transcription reaction was used Superscript III (InvitrogenTM) with HMK2013-61 as a primer for cDNA synthesis. The PCR using the specific primer set HMK2013-60/HMK2013-61was used for CmSPI gene expression detection.

2.6.4. Northern Hybridization

Ten micrograms of total RNA from C. metuliferus line PI 292190 infected with PRSV at 48 hpi were subjected to denaturing electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel containing 5% MOPS and then transferred onto a nylon membrane. The membrane was hybridized with α32P-labeled CmSPI gene probe (generated by PCR with primer set HMK2013-60/HMK2013-61 for CmSPI gene expression detection.

2.6.5. Western Hybridization

Total protein was extracted from transgenic plants subjected to 16% poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred onto PVDF blotting membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). Immunostaining used anti-CmSPI polyclonal antibodies (CmSPI anti rabbit) and the one-step BCIP/NBT detection system (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

2.6.6. Detection of Small Interfering RNA

Ten micrograms of total RNA extracted from PRSV-infected C. metuliferus line PI 292190 at 48 hpi were subjected to 15% poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred onto a nylon membrane. The membrane was hybridized with α32P-labeled CmSPI gene probe (generated by PCR with primer set HMK2013-60/HMK2013-61) to detect CmSPI gene expression.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning and Functional Characterization of C. metuliferus CmSPI Gene

To identify full length cDNA and genomic fragments of CmSPI, RACE and genome walking were conducted. The ORF of CmSPI (KR012492) was identified as 219 bp in length, and the coding region of genomic fragment including 5′ and 3′ UTR was identified as 888 bp, containing two exons and one intron as shown in Figure 1. CmSPI sequence was analyzed in plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements database, and the predicted reactive site of CmSPI was located at Lys48 (K48) and Asp49 (D49).
In addition, several conserved sequences of cis elements were identified in CmSPI promoter or upstream region. The “ACGT” sequence, a core abscisic acid response element [29], was found at −917 bp on the promoter region. The T/GBOXATPIN2 element “AACGTG” (identified in Arabidopis thaliana [30]) was present at −89 to −94 of CmSPI. Another element “CCATAA” (−42 to −47), a wound response element, is present on the nopaline synthae promoter [31] (Figure 1).
Phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequence data from plant serine type PIs was conducted by neighbor-joining methods with the HKY85 genetic distance model as shown in Figure 2. Two distinct subtypes, potato I type and potato II type, were identified and CmSPI was grouped into potato I type which is a small size protein (8 kDa) containing two reactive sites.
Viruses 07 02799 g001 1024
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence of CmSPI. The nucleotide sequence of C. metuliferus CmSPI gene, including the 5′-flanking region and 3′-UTR, is shown. The transcription start site is labeled +1, and the TATA box is shown in boldface. The core abscisic acid response element, T/GBOXATPIN2 element, and wound response element are boxed. Asterisk marks indicate the predicted reactive sites, K48 and D49. Flanking region sequences are shown in italic letters. Exon and intron predicted sequences are shown in upper and lower case letters, respectively.
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence of CmSPI. The nucleotide sequence of C. metuliferus CmSPI gene, including the 5′-flanking region and 3′-UTR, is shown. The transcription start site is labeled +1, and the TATA box is shown in boldface. The core abscisic acid response element, T/GBOXATPIN2 element, and wound response element are boxed. Asterisk marks indicate the predicted reactive sites, K48 and D49. Flanking region sequences are shown in italic letters. Exon and intron predicted sequences are shown in upper and lower case letters, respectively.
Viruses 07 02799 g001
Viruses 07 02799 g002 1024
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships among plant serine proteinases inhibitors. Bootstrap values for nodes supported in >70% of 100 bootstrap replicates are shown above the branches. The scale bar shows the ratio of amino acid substitutions for a given horizontal branch length. The following reference sequences were included: Solanum tuberosum (CAA78259, AAZ08247, ACZ04396), Solanum lycopersicum (AAA34198, AAA60745), Nicotiana tabacum (CAA78269), Nicotiana sylvestris (AAA34067), Arabidopsis lyrata (EFH39906), Vitis cinerea (ADD51184), Ricinus communis (EEF41422), Jatropha curcas (ADB85100), Salvia miltiorrhiza (ABP01767), Medicago truncatula (AES61046), and Populus trichocarpa (EEF01895).
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships among plant serine proteinases inhibitors. Bootstrap values for nodes supported in >70% of 100 bootstrap replicates are shown above the branches. The scale bar shows the ratio of amino acid substitutions for a given horizontal branch length. The following reference sequences were included: Solanum tuberosum (CAA78259, AAZ08247, ACZ04396), Solanum lycopersicum (AAA34198, AAA60745), Nicotiana tabacum (CAA78269), Nicotiana sylvestris (AAA34067), Arabidopsis lyrata (EFH39906), Vitis cinerea (ADD51184), Ricinus communis (EEF41422), Jatropha curcas (ADB85100), Salvia miltiorrhiza (ABP01767), Medicago truncatula (AES61046), and Populus trichocarpa (EEF01895).
Viruses 07 02799 g002

3.2. Generation of CmSPI RNAi Transgenic Plant

To study CmSPI gene function by reverse genetics, an RNAi construct was generated for ihpRNA, constitutively expressing an inverted repeat of 203 bp CmSPI fragment (from +46 to +682 nt except intron sequence) under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. C. metuliferus PRSV-resistant line PI292190 was transformed by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with the CmSPI ihpRNA construct (Figure 3). Southern hybridization (Figure 4A) confirmed that eight out of ten kanamcyin resistant plants (T0 generation) included the transgene and harbored the same size, indicating that these transgenic plants might be generated from the same calli. Two of these transgenic plants, T0H-1 and T0H-3, were self-pollinated to generate T1 seeds and the T1 progeny were then screened by genomic PCR (Figure 4B). Both T1H-1 line (47 plants, χ2 = 0.211, p = 0.487) and T1H-3 line (48 plants, χ2 = 1.778, p value = 0.317) showed goodness of fit to a 3:1 ratio, a segregation pattern indicative of a single dominant transgene inheritance in both cases. The resistant control line PI292190, susceptible control line Acc. 2459, and two T1 transgenic lines (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1) were then analyzed by RT-PCR, Northern hybridization for detecting high molecular weight or low molecular weight (small) RNAs, and Western hybridization. A decreased expression of CmSPI transcripts relative to the PRSV-resistant line PI292190 was evident (Figure 4C,D). For small interfering RNA (siRNA) analysis, the abundant accumulation of low molecular weight siRNA in the transgenic lines, a hallmark of RNA silencing, was detected (Figure 4E). To examine protein level in the RNAi transgenic lines, Western hybridization was conducted with a polyclonal antibody against CmSPI. A clear band (8 kDa) was detected in individual wild type controls (PRSV-resistant line PI 292190 and PRSV-susceptible line Acc. 2459) but a very faint band was shown in each individual transgenic lines (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1) (Figure 4F). In summary, both RNA and protein levels of CmSPI expression were down regulated greatly by the silencing effect of CmSPI ihpRNA construct.
Viruses 07 02799 g003 1024
Figure 3. Constructs used for C. metuliferus and N. benthamiana transformation. (A) Construct for C. metuliferus CmSPI RNAi transformation. Partial sequence of CmSPI (203bp; from +46 to +692 nucleotide without intron sequences) was constructed into an invert-repeat form; (B) The construct for the transformation of full length genomic CmSPI into N. benthamiana plants. Arrows indicate the location of the primers used in the construction. RB, right border; Nos pro, nopaline synthase promoter; NPT II, neomycin phosphotransferase II; NOS ter, nopaline synthase terminator; CaMV 35S enh, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S enhancer; CaMV 35S pro, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; CaMV 35S ter, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S terminator; LB, left border.
Figure 3. Constructs used for C. metuliferus and N. benthamiana transformation. (A) Construct for C. metuliferus CmSPI RNAi transformation. Partial sequence of CmSPI (203bp; from +46 to +692 nucleotide without intron sequences) was constructed into an invert-repeat form; (B) The construct for the transformation of full length genomic CmSPI into N. benthamiana plants. Arrows indicate the location of the primers used in the construction. RB, right border; Nos pro, nopaline synthase promoter; NPT II, neomycin phosphotransferase II; NOS ter, nopaline synthase terminator; CaMV 35S enh, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S enhancer; CaMV 35S pro, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; CaMV 35S ter, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S terminator; LB, left border.
Viruses 07 02799 g003
Viruses 07 02799 g004 1024
Figure 4. Generation of CmSPI RNAi trangsenic C. metuliferus. (A) Southern hybridization analysis of DNA isolated from RNAi T0 transgenic lines (T0H-1 to T0H-10) with α32P-labeled intron fragment probe. C. metuliferus line PI 292190 was used as a negative control; (B) PCR analysis of two RNAi transgenic T1 lines (T1H-1 and T1H-3 lines) with intron specific primers. +, transgenic plants; –, non-transgenic plants; (C) Transcript levels of CmSPI in C. metuliferus lines (PRSV-resistant line PI 292190 and PRSV-susceptible line Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic lines (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi was analyzed by RT-PCR. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (D) Northern hybridization analysis of CmSPI in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA isolated from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and detected with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (E) Detection of short interfering RNAs in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA isolated from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and detected with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (F) CmSPI protein expression level in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and transgenic CmSPI RNAi plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1) by Western hybridization. Total soluble extracts from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and immunostaining with an anti-CmSPI polyclonal antibodies (CmSPI anti rabbit). The commassie blue-stained Rubisco is shown as a loading control.
Figure 4. Generation of CmSPI RNAi trangsenic C. metuliferus. (A) Southern hybridization analysis of DNA isolated from RNAi T0 transgenic lines (T0H-1 to T0H-10) with α32P-labeled intron fragment probe. C. metuliferus line PI 292190 was used as a negative control; (B) PCR analysis of two RNAi transgenic T1 lines (T1H-1 and T1H-3 lines) with intron specific primers. +, transgenic plants; –, non-transgenic plants; (C) Transcript levels of CmSPI in C. metuliferus lines (PRSV-resistant line PI 292190 and PRSV-susceptible line Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic lines (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi was analyzed by RT-PCR. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (D) Northern hybridization analysis of CmSPI in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA isolated from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and detected with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (E) Detection of short interfering RNAs in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and two T1 transgenic plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1). Total RNA isolated from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and detected with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control; (F) CmSPI protein expression level in C. metuliferus lines (PI 292190 and Acc. 2459) and transgenic CmSPI RNAi plants (T1H-1-2 and T1H-3-1) by Western hybridization. Total soluble extracts from PRSV inoculated plants at 48 hpi and immunostaining with an anti-CmSPI polyclonal antibodies (CmSPI anti rabbit). The commassie blue-stained Rubisco is shown as a loading control.
Viruses 07 02799 g004

3.3. Alteration of Virus Resistance in CmSPI RNAi Transgenic C. metuliferus

To examine the effect of silencing CmSPI in PRSV-resistance C. metuliferus, a total of 95 T1 transgenic plants (47 T1H-1 and 48 T1H-3 plants) along with three C. metuliferus resistant control plants (PI292190), and three C. metuliferus susceptible control plants (Acc. 2459) were inoculated with PRSV. The susceptible control Acc. 2459 showed typical symptoms of PRSV infection at 7 day post inoculation (dpi), the development of prominent mosaicism and chlorosis of leaves, water soaked streaking on the petiole and upper stem, and the distortion of young leaves (Figure 5A,C). The resistant control PI292190 showed immunity against PRSV and no symptoms were detected (Figure 5A,B). After silencing CmSPI on the resistant line PI292190, CmSPI RNAi T1 transgenic plants were losing immunity to PRSV and showed PRSV infection symptoms on the topmost leaves after PRSV inoculation at 21 dpi (Figure 5D,E). This indicated that silencing of CmSPI gene could break down the resistance to PRSV in these RNAi transgenic lines.
Viruses 07 02799 g005 1024
Figure 5. Effect of CmSPI gene silencing on PRSV inoculated C. metuliferus plants. (A) PRSV symptoms on the whole plant are shown for C. metuliferus reistance line PI 292190, susceptible line Acc. 2459, CmSPI RNAi transgenic line T1H-1-2, and CmSPI RNAi transgenic line T1H-3-1 (from left to right); PRSV symptoms on leaves for (B) PI 292190; (C) Acc. 2459; (D) transgenic line T1H-1-2; and (E) transgenic line T1H-3-1.
Figure 5. Effect of CmSPI gene silencing on PRSV inoculated C. metuliferus plants. (A) PRSV symptoms on the whole plant are shown for C. metuliferus reistance line PI 292190, susceptible line Acc. 2459, CmSPI RNAi transgenic line T1H-1-2, and CmSPI RNAi transgenic line T1H-3-1 (from left to right); PRSV symptoms on leaves for (B) PI 292190; (C) Acc. 2459; (D) transgenic line T1H-1-2; and (E) transgenic line T1H-3-1.
Viruses 07 02799 g005

3.4. Resistance to Virus in Transgenic N. benthamiana

To confirm the function of CmSPI in potyviruses resistance, the full length CmSPI genomic fragment with size 2858 bp (from −1457 to +1411 nt) was cloned and transformed into N. benthamiana by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. All transgenic plants showed no obvious morphological alterations as compared to wild type N. benthamiana. Eleven T0 transgenic plants were tested by PCR analysis and nine of them showed CmSPI gene positive signal (data not shown). The T0 lines with transgenes were selected and self-pollinated to harvest seeds. T1 plants derived from individual T0 transgenic lines along with wild type N. benthamiana control plants were inoculated with PVY. As shown in Table 2, two of these transgenic lines, T1F-21 and T1F-51, showed some degree of PVY resistance. The symptoms of PVY infection were observed on those non-transformed N. benthamiana plants at 7 dpi. Compared to wild type N. benthamiana control plants, these two lines showed no symptoms at 14 dpi (Figure 6). Two lines (T1F-21-2 and T1F-51-10) selected from the T1 population were then self-pollinated to generated T2 plants. Using Southern blot, two T2 lines, T2F-21-2-5 and T2F-51-10-8, showed one copy of the CmSPI insertion (Figure 7A). In RNA level, CmSPI gene expression was observed after virus inoculation at 2 dpi in T2 transgenic plants in which RNA expression levels were lower than those in C. metuliferus control PI 29219 (Figure 7B). Furthermore, T2 plants generated from independent T1 lines (T1F-21-2 and T1F-51-10) and three wild type N. benthamiana control plants were inoculated with the sap obtained from wild type N. benthamiana plants infected with PVY. Different levels of viral resistance were observed in these two lines. A total of two out of 44 plants of T2F-51-10 line showed PVY infected symptoms, but 33/44 of T2F-21-2 plants showed PVY infected symptoms at 21 dpi (Table 3). This result indicated the resistant function of CmSPI expression against PVY was identified in N. benthamiana transgenic plants.
Table
Table 2. Infectivity assays of T1 transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with PVY.
Table 2. Infectivity assays of T1 transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with PVY.
Transgenic LinesSymptomatic Plants/Total of Inoculated Plants
T1F-328/28
T1F-525/25
T1F-1421/22
T1F-2118/30
T1F-5117/30
T1F-5227/30
T1F-5329/29
T1F-5430/30
T1F-5527/28
Non-transformed control27/27
The values indicate the number of plants with symptoms of disease (left of slash) and total number of inoculated plants (right of slash). Plants were observed for up to 21 days post-inoculation.
Viruses 07 02799 g006 1024
Figure 6. PVY resistance of CmSPI T1 transgenic N. benthamiana plants at 14 dpi. (A) Wild type N. benthamiana-mock; (B) Wild type N. benthamiana-PVY inoculated; (C) T1F-21-2- PVY inoculated; (D) T1F-51-10- PVY inoculated. Arrow indicates the symptoms of PVY on N. benthamiana.
Figure 6. PVY resistance of CmSPI T1 transgenic N. benthamiana plants at 14 dpi. (A) Wild type N. benthamiana-mock; (B) Wild type N. benthamiana-PVY inoculated; (C) T1F-21-2- PVY inoculated; (D) T1F-51-10- PVY inoculated. Arrow indicates the symptoms of PVY on N. benthamiana.
Viruses 07 02799 g006
Viruses 07 02799 g007 1024
Figure 7. Southern hybridization and RT-PCR analysis of CmSPI T2 transgenic N. benthamiana lines. (A) Southern hybridization analysis of DNA isolated from wild type N. benthamiana control (WT), CmSPI T2 transgenic lines, T2F-21-2-5 and T2F-51-10-8, with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. CmSPI transformation plasmid DNA was used as a postive control; (B) Transcript levels of CmSPI in postive control (C. metuliferus resistance line PI 292190), negative control WT (wild type N. benthamiana plant), and CmSPI T2 transgenic lines (T2F-21-2-5 and T2F-51-10-8). Total RNA from PVY inoculated plants at 2 dpi was analyzed by RT-PCR. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control.
Figure 7. Southern hybridization and RT-PCR analysis of CmSPI T2 transgenic N. benthamiana lines. (A) Southern hybridization analysis of DNA isolated from wild type N. benthamiana control (WT), CmSPI T2 transgenic lines, T2F-21-2-5 and T2F-51-10-8, with α32P-labeled CmSPI probe. CmSPI transformation plasmid DNA was used as a postive control; (B) Transcript levels of CmSPI in postive control (C. metuliferus resistance line PI 292190), negative control WT (wild type N. benthamiana plant), and CmSPI T2 transgenic lines (T2F-21-2-5 and T2F-51-10-8). Total RNA from PVY inoculated plants at 2 dpi was analyzed by RT-PCR. The ethidum bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control.
Viruses 07 02799 g007
Table
Table 3. Infectivity assays of T2 transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with PVY.
Table 3. Infectivity assays of T2 transgenic N. benthamiana plants inoculated with PVY.
Transgenic LinesSymptomatic Plants/Total of Inoculated Plants
T2F-21-233/44
T2F-51-102/44
Non-transformed control15/15
The values indicate the number of plants with symptoms of disease (left of slash) and total number of inoculated plants (right of slash). Plants were observed for up to 21 days post-inoculation.

4. Discussion

4.1. CmSPI Is Involved in Plant Physiological Responses and Plant Defense

In our previous study, TDFs isolated from C. metuliferus were shown to be related to PRSV resistance using cDNA-AFLP analysis, and one of the candidate genes, CmSPI, was strongly induced after PRSV inoculation at 48 hpi [14]. In this study, we cloned and identified the full length sequence of the CmSPI gene from PRSV resistant line PI 292190. The ORF of CmSPI was identified as 219 bp in length and codes for a small protein (8 kDa) classified as a serine type proteinase inhibitor belonging to the serpin (serine PI) family, the largest and most widespread superfamily of PIs [32]. Plant PIs are active against different classes of proteinases and have been classified into different families [6]. They have been reported to interact with a variety of factors involving developmental and protein storage signals, wounding responses, and abiotic and biotic stress responses [33,34,35,36,37]. For example, peanut Bowman-Birk inhibitor genes, AhBBI, encode serine protease inhibitors that respond to drought stress, exogenous jasmonic acid (JA), and abscisic acid (ABA) [38]. The expression of soybean cysteine PI genes, R1 and N2, was induced by wounding and methyl jasmonate treatments, indicating a role for RI and N2 in plant defense [39]. The present study also detected several cis elements in the promoter region of the C. metuliferus CmSPI including a core abscisic acid response element [29], a T/GBOXATPIN2 element [30], and a wound response element indicating the CmSPI gene is involved in the responses to ABA, JA, and wounding [31].

4.2. Silencing of CmSPI Alters PRSV Resistance in C. metuliferus

To confirm the antiviral function of CmSPI in PRSV resistance, RNAi was performed using an inter-space or intron contained self-complementary hpRNA construct to enhance the silencing efficiency. In the present study, the immune response against PRSV in C. metuliferus resistant line PI 292190 was broken down after silencing CmSPI transgene expression in CmSPI RNAi transgenic plants. However, the mosaic symptoms on the upper leaves of transgenic lines were observed in a delayed fashion, after 21 dpi, compared to the severe symptoms at 7 dpi in PRSV susceptible control Acc. 2459. This could be explained by the fact that the expression of CmSPI was knocked down instead of completely knocked out. This virus has to replicate and accumulate enough to overcome the threshold of basic defense to display symptoms in CmSPI RNAi transgenic lines. Alternatively, P1/Hc-Pro of PRSV is a strong virus silencing suppressor by binding to CmSPI-derived siRNAs [40], which might reduce the RNAi efficiency of CmSPI RNAi transgenic plants.

4.3. Expression of CmSPI in N. benthamiana Plants Can Supply Resistance for PVY

Plant viruses such as potyviruses, tymoviruses, nepoviruses, comoviruses, and closteroviruses would require proteinases to process their own proteins for replication and propagation [41]. Hence plant PIs might play a role in limiting proteinase function in these viruses. In a previous report, constitutive expression of rice cysteine PIs (oryzacytatin I) in transgenic N. benthamiana lines induced resistance against both Tobacco etch virus (TEV) and PVY infections [10]. Interestingly, a serine PI instead of cysteine PIs, CmSPI, identified in this study, was also shown to provide resistance function in N. benthamiana against PVY, a member of the potyvirus group. Potyviruses contains three proteinases (P1, HC-Pro, and NIa ) which have been reported in regulation of viral gene expression, replication and infection cycle [42,43]. It has been reported that a serine proteinase encoded by P1 gene can self-cleave at its C terminus for its function and the reactive sites of P1 proteinase included Asp233, Gly-Ser-Ser256-Gly [43]. In this study, CmSPI is a serine type PI and its reactive site was located at the 48th (K48) and 49th (D49) amino acid residues which might obstruct the function of P1 serine proteinase of potyviruses. This suggests that plant PIs both cysteine or serine type potentially have a role in defending against different viruses. Interestingly, the T2 plants derived from two resistant T1 transgenic N. benthamiana lines showed variations (42/44 in T2F-51-10 and 11/44 in T2F-21-2) with regard to their resistance to PVY. It is not uncommon that variations in resistance occur among different generations of transgenic lines. For example, a previous study reported that R1 plants expressing N gene segments of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) showed variations in their resistance to viruses [44]. However, further experiments would be required to understand the association between the inheritance of the transgene to its target traits.

5. Conclusions

We have demonstrated that the C. metuliferus CmSPI gene encodes a serine proteinase inhibitor. Knocking down CmSPI gene expression in the PRSV-resistant C. metuliferus line PI 292190 broke down its resistance against PRSV. Furthermore, heterologous expression of the C. metuliferus CmSPI gene in N. benthamiana provided resistance to PVY, another Potyvirus, and indicated its important role in the mechanism of potyviruses resistance.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Amy Frary, a native English speaker, for critically reviewing and editing the manuscript. We also thank Fuh-Jyh Jan’s suggestions about this manuscript and his help for the technique instructions related to potyviruses. This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Council in Taiwan (NSC102-2313-B-005-032-MY3).

Author Contributions

C-W.L. was responsible for data analysis, manuscript writing and also preparing plant samples, virus inoculation, construction and transformation into N. benthamiana and C. metuliferus, detection and phenotyping the transgenic plants and their progeny. M-H.S., Y-T.L. and C-H.C. performed cloning and prepared plant samples, virus inoculation, and transgenic progeny identification and phenotyping. H-M.K. is the corresponding author and the project supervisor; she was responsible for conducting this project and for the manuscript writing and submission. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Leo, F.; Volpicella, M.; Licciulli, F.; Liuni, S.; Gallerani, R.; Ceci, L.R. Plant-PIs: A database for plant protease inhibitors and their genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 347–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rawlings, N.D.; Barrett, A.J. Evolutionary families of peptidases. Biochem. J. 1993, 299, 205–218. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rawlings, N.D.; Tolle, D.P.; Barrett, A.J. MEROPS: The peptidase database. Nucleic Acid Res. 2004, 32, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kidric, M.; Kos, J.; Sabotic, J. Protease and their endogenous inhibitors in the plant response to abiotic stress. Botanica Serbica 2014, 38, 139–158. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ryan, C.A. Proteinase inhibitors in plants: Genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1990, 28, 425–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Habib, H.; Fazili, K.M. Plant protease inhibitors: A defense strategy in plants. Biltechnol. Mol. Biol. 2007, 2, 68–85. [Google Scholar]
  7. Haq, S.K.; Atif, S.M.; Khan, R.H. Protein proteinase inhibitor genes in combat against insects, pests, and pathogens: Natural and engineered phytoprotection. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 43, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Falco, M.C.; Silva-Filho, M.C. Expression of soybean proteinases inhibitor in transgenic sugarcane plants: Effects on natural defense against Diatraea saccharalis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urwin, P.E.; Levesley, A.; McPherson, M.J.; Atkinson, H.J. Transgenic resistance to the nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis conferred by Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing proteinase inhibitors. Mol. Breed. 2000, 6, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gutierrez-Campos, R.; Torres-Acosta, J.A.; Saucedo-Arias, L.J.; Gomez-Lim, M.A. The use of cysteine proteinase inhibitors to engineer resistance against potyviruses in transgenic tobacco plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 1223–1226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Provvidenti, R.; Robinson, R.W. Inheritance of resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus 1 in Cucumis metulifetrus (Naud.) May. J. Hered. 1977, 68, 56–57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Provvidenti, R.; Gonsalves, D. Resistance to Papaya ringspot virus in Cucumis metuliferus and its relationship to resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus 1. J. Hered. 1982, 73, 239–240. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yeh, S.D.; Chen, Y.H. Use of resistant Cucumis metuliferus for selection of nitrous-acid induced attenuated strains of papaya ringspot virus. Phytophathology 1989, 79, 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lin, Y.T.; Jan, F.J.; Lin, C.W.; Chung, C.H.; Chen, J.C.; Yeh, S.D.; Ku, H.M. Differential gene expression in response to Papaya ringspot virus infection in Cucumis metuliferus using cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Axtell, M.J. Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 137–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Waterhouse, P.M.; Helliwell, C.A. Exploring plant genomes by RNA-induced gene silencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wesley, S.V.; Helliwell, C.A.; Smith, N.A.; Wang, M.B.; Rouse, D.T.; Liu, Q.; Gooding, P.S.; Singh, S.P.; Abbott, D.; Stoutjesdijk, P.A.; et al. Construct design for efficient, effective and highthroughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 2001, 27, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sibert, P.D.; Chenchik, A.; Kellogg, D.E.; Lukyanov, K.A.; Lukyanov, S.A. An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 1087–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Napoli, C.; Lemieux, C.; Jorgensen, R. Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kumar, S.; Tamura, K.; Jakobsen, I.B.; Nei, M. MEGA2: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 1244–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Hasegawa, M.; Kishino, H.; Yano, T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985, 22, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jan, F.J. Roles of nontarget DNA and viral gene length in influencing multi-virus resistance through homology-dependent gene silencing. Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, Y.T.; Lin, C.W.; Chung, C.H.; Su, M.H.; Ho, H.Y.; Yeh, S.D.; Jan, F.J.; Ku, H.M. In Vitro Regeneration and genetic transformation of Cucumis metuliferus through cotyledon organogenesis. HortScience 2011, 46, 616–621. [Google Scholar]
  27. Horsch, R.B.; Fry, J.E.; Hoffmann, N.L.; Eichholtz, D.; Rogers, S.G.; Fraley, R.T. A simple method for transferring genes into plants. Science 1985, 227, 1229–1231. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fulton, T.M.; Chunwongse, J.; Tanksley, S.D. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1995, 13, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hattori, T.; Totsuka, M.; Hobo, T.; Kagaya, Y.; Yamamoto-Toyoda, A. Experimentally determined sequence requirement of ACGT-containing abscisic acid response element. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ma, S.; Bohnert, H.J. Integration of Arabidopsis thaliana stress-related transcript profiles, promoter structures, and cell-specific expression. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, eR49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. An, G.; Costa, M.A.; Ha, S.B. Nopaline synthase promoter is wound inducible and auxin lnducible. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Birk, Y. Protein proteinase inhibitors in legume seeds-overview. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 1996, 44, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sugawara, H.; Shibuya, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Hashiba, T.; Satoh, S. Is a cysteine proteinase inhibitor involved in the regulation of petal wilting in senescing carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) flowers? J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mosolov, V.V.; Valueva, T.A. Proteinase inhibitors and their function in plants: A review. Prikl. Biokhimiia Mikrobiol. 2005, 41, 261–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, Y.; Xiao, B.; Xiong, L. Characterization of a stress responsive proteinase inhibitor gene with positive effect in improving drought resistance in rice. Planta 2007, 226, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sin, S.F.; Chye, M.L. Expression of proteinase inhibitor II proteins during floral development in Solanum americanum. Planta 2004, 219, 1010–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sin, S.F.; Yeung, E.C.; Chye, M.L. Downregulation of Solanum americanum genes encoding proteinase inhibitor II causes defective seed development. Plant J. 2006, 45, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Drame, K.N.; Passaquet, C.; Repellin, A.; Zuily-Fodil, Y. Cloning, characterization and differential expression of a Bowman-Birk inhibitor during progressive water deficit and subsequent recovery in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Botella, M.A.; Xu, Y.; Prabha, T.N.; Zhao, Y.; Narasimhan, M.L.; Wilson, K.A.; Nielsen, S.S.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M. Differential expression of soybean cysteine proteinase inhibitor genes during development and in response to wounding and methyl jasmonate. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kasschau, K.D.; Xie, Z.; Allen, E.; Llave, C.; Chapman, E.J.; Krizan, K.A.; Carrington, J.C. P1/HC-Pro, a Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing, Interferes with Arabidopsis development and miRNA function. Dev. Cell 2003, 4, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dasgupta, I.; Malathi, V.G.; Mukherjee, S.K. Genetic engineering for virus resistance. Curr. Sci. 2003, 84, 341–354. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yeh, S.D.; Jan, F.J.; Chiang, C.H.; Doong, T.J.; Chen, M.C.; Chung, P.H.; Bau, H.J. Complete nucleotide sequence and genetic organization of Papaya ringspot virus RNA. J. Gen. Virol. 1992, 73, 2531–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Verchot, J.; Koonon, E.V.; Carrington, J.C. The 35S-kDa protein from the N-terminus of the potyviral polyprotein functions as a third virus-encoded proteinase. Virology 1991, 185, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jan, F.J.; Fagoaga, C.; Pang, S.Z.; Gonsalves, D. A single chimeric transgene derived from two distinct viruses confers multi-virus resistance in transgenic plants through homology-dependent gene silencing. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81, 2103–2109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, C.-W.; Su, M.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Chung, C.-H.; Ku, H.-M. Functional Characterization of Cucumis metuliferus Proteinase Inhibitor Gene (CmSPI) in Potyviruses Resistance. Viruses 2015, 7, 3816-3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7072799

AMA Style

Lin C-W, Su M-H, Lin Y-T, Chung C-H, Ku H-M. Functional Characterization of Cucumis metuliferus Proteinase Inhibitor Gene (CmSPI) in Potyviruses Resistance. Viruses. 2015; 7(7):3816-3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7072799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Chia-Wei, Mei-Hsiu Su, Yu-Tsung Lin, Chien-Hung Chung, and Hsin-Mei Ku. 2015. "Functional Characterization of Cucumis metuliferus Proteinase Inhibitor Gene (CmSPI) in Potyviruses Resistance" Viruses 7, no. 7: 3816-3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7072799

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop