Wang MC, Yang YM, Li XH, Dong F, Li Y. Maspin expression and its clinicopathological significance in tumorigenesis and progression of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(5): 634-637 [PMID: 14991928 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.634]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Meng-Chun Wang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. mengchunwang@hotmail.com
Article-Type of This Article
Gastric Cancer
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Meng-Chun Wang, Yan-Min Yang, Yan Li, Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
Xiao-Han Li, Fang Dong, Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
ORCID number: $[AuthorORCIDs]
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Meng-Chun Wang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. mengchunwang@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-24-83956947
Received: June 16, 2003 Revised: August 18, 2003 Accepted: August 25, 2003 Published online: March 1, 2004
Abstract
AIM: To investigate maspin expression in tumorigenesis and progression of gastric cancer and to explore its relevant molecular mechanisms.
METHODS: Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues from normal mucosa (n = 182), dysplasia (n = 69), cancer (n = 113) of the stomach were studied for maspin expression by immunohistochemistry. Microvessel density (MVD) in gastric cancer was labeled using anti-CD34 antibody. Maspin expression was compared with clinical parameters and MVD of tumors. Caspase-3 expression was also detected in gastric carcinoma by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between Caspase-3 and maspin expression was concerned as well.
RESULTS: The positive rates of maspin expression were 79.8% (145/182), 75.4% (52/69) and 50.4% (57/113) in normal mucosa, dysplasia and cancer of the stomach, respectively. Cancer less frequently expressed maspin than normal mucosa and dysplasia (P < 0.05). Maspin expression showed a significantly negative association with invasive depth, metastasis, Lauren’s and Nakamura’s classification (P < 0.05), but not with tumor size, Borrmann’s classification, growth pattern or TNM staging (P > 0.05). The positive rate of Caspase-3 was significantly lower in gastric cancer than in normal gastric mucosa (P < 0.05,32.7% vs 50.4%). It was noteworthy that maspin expression was negatively correlated with MVD, but positively correlated with expression of Caspase-3 in gastric cancer (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Down-regulated maspin expression is a late molecular event in gastric carcinogenesis. Reduced expression of maspin contributes to progression of gastric cancer probably by inhibiting cell adhesion, enhancing cell mobility, decreasing cell apoptosis and facilitating angiogenesis. Additionally altered expression of maspin underlies the molecular mechanism of differentiation of gastric cancer and supports the different histogenetic pathways of intestinal and diffuse gastric cancers. Maspin expression can be considered as an effective and objective marker to reveal biological behaviors of gastric cancer.
Key Words: $[Keywords]
Citation: Wang MC, Yang YM, Li XH, Dong F, Li Y. Maspin expression and its clinicopathological significance in tumorigenesis and progression of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(5): 634-637
Mammary serine protease inhibitor (maspin) was identified by subtractive hybridization as a candidate tumor suppressor protein in normal mammary epithelial cells[1]. Maspin gene maps to human chromosome 18q21.3-q23, whose cDNA consists of 2584 nucleotides encoding for a 42 ku peptide[2]. A number of findings support its inhibitory effects on tumors. Levels of maspin expression showed an inverse correlation with progression of malignancies. Mammary carcinoma cells transfected with maspin showed a reduction of tumor growth and metastasis in nude mice, the addition of recombinant maspin decreased the migration potential of breast and prostate cancer cells across a reconstituted basement membrane. More recently, maspin has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis by blocking in vitro migration of vascular endothelial cells and by in vivo inhibition of rat cornea neovascularization[1-8]. It has been documented that maspin transgene expression in mouse mammary gland inhibited Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T-antigen induced breast carcinogenesis and was correlated with increased apoptosis of mammary gland cells[9].
Gastric cancer is one of the commonest malignancies in China, and even in the world. However, the molecular aspects of carcinogenesis and progression of gastric cancer remain elusive[10-19]. The purposes of this study were to examine maspin expression in normal gastric mucosa, gastric dysplasia, gastric cancer, and to compare its expression with clinicopathological features of gastric cancer, and to analyze the correlation of maspin expression with Caspase-3 expression and MVD in gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and samples
Normal mucosa (n = 182), dysplasia (n = 69), cancer (n = 113) of the stomach were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between Sept. 1996 and Feb. 2002. All tissues were fixed in 40 g/L formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and incised into 4 μm sections. These sections were stained by hematoxylin-and-eosin method to confirm their histological diagnosis and other microscopic characteristics. All patients did not undergo chemotherapy and radiotherapy before operation.
Evaluation of clinicopathological parameters of gastric cancer
Clinicopathological staging for each gastric carcinoma was evaluated according to the TNM system. Gross appearance of the tumors was described according to Borrmann’s classification. Histomorphological architecture of the tumor samples was expressed according to Lauren’s and Nakamura’s classifications. Growth patterns of gastric cancer were classified into mass-,nest-, or diffuse- type. Furthermore, tumor diameter, invasive depth and metastasis were determined.
Immunohistochemistry
Representative and consecutive sections were studied with streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase immunohistochemistry (SABC kit from Boster Biotech.). Anti-maspin, anti-Caspase-3 and anti-CD34 antibodies were purchased from Novocastra, Zhongshan (China) and DAKO respectively. All procedures were implemented according to the instructions of the product. For negative controls, sections were processed as above but treated with PBS (0.01 mol/L, pH7.4) instead of primary antibodies.
Evaluation of maspin and Caspase-3 immunostaining
The immunoreactivity to maspin and Caspase-3 was localized in cytoplasms. One hundred cells were selected and counted from 5 representative fields of each section by two independent observers. The positive percentage of counted cells was graded semi-quantitatively into one of the four-tier scoring system: negative (-), 5%; weakly positive (+), 5% - 25%; moderately positive (++), 25% - 50%; and strongly positive (+++), 50%.
Microvessel density counting
CD34 antibodies were distributed in cell membranes and cytoplasms of vascular endothelial cells. Modified Weidner’s method was used to calculate the microvessel density, which was described as follows. Microvessels in tumor were considered as hot points in vessel counts. Any brown staining endothelial cell or endothelial cell cluster was regarded as a single, countable microvessel. Observers selected such five areas and counted individual microvessels at 400× magnification (i.e. 40× objective lens and 10× ocular lens, 0.1885 mm2 per field).
Statistical analysis
Statistical evaluation was performed using chi-square test to differentiate the rates between different groups, using Spearman correlation test to analyze the rank data, and using one-way ANOVA to differentiate means of different groups. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. SPSS 10.0 software was employed to analyze all data.
RESULTS
Maspin expression in normal mucosa, dysplasia, and cancer of the stomach
Figures 1A-D show the positive immunoreactivity to maspin in cytoplasms of epithelial, dysplasia and cancer cells of the stomach. As summarized in Table 1, the positive rates of maspin expression were 79.8% (145/182), 75.4% (52/69), and 50.4% (57/113) in normal mucosa, dysplasia and cancer of gastric cancer, respectively. Normal mucosa and dysplasia more frequently expressed maspin than cancer (P < 0.05).
Table 1 Maspin expression in normal mucosa, dysplasia, and primary cancer of the stomach.
Figure 1 A: Localization of maspin in cytoplasms, and strong expression in gastric epithelial cells (SABC, ×400), B: Strong immunoreactivity of gastric dysplastic cells to maspin (SABC, ×400), C: Strong immunostaining of maspin in gastric papil-lary adenocarcinoma cells (SABC, ×400), D: Negative expres-sion of maspin in poorly-differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma cells (SABC, ×400).
Relationship between maspin expression and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer
Table 2 shows that maspin expression had a significantly negative association with invasive depth, metastasis, Lauren’s and histological classifications (P < 0.05), but not with tumor size, Borrmann’s classification, growth pattern or TNM staging (P > 0.05).
Table 2 Relationship between maspin expression and clinico-pathological features of gastric cancer.
Clinicopathological features
n
Maspin expression
-
+
++
+++
%
rs
P value
Tumor size
0.000
0.999
< 4 cm
47
22
13
7
5
53.2
≥ 4 cm
66
34
11
15
6
48.5
Borrmann’s classification
0.014
0.896
I, II
28
12
9
5
2
57.1
III, IV
59
30
10
13
6
49.2
Invasive depth
0.280
0.03
Above submucosa
26
10
4
6
6
61.5
Muscularis propria
34
12
11
7
4
64.7
Below subserosa
53
34
9
9
1
35.8
Metastasis
0.208
0.027
-
75
31
18
19
7
58.7
+
38
25
6
3
4
34.2
TNM staging
0.004
0.967
O, I
46
22
11
10
3
52.2
II, III, IV
67
34
13
12
8
49.3
Growth pattern
0.032
0.767
Mass
23
13
4
5
1
43.5
Nest
30
11
6
8
5
63.63
Diffuse
34
18
9
5
2
47.1
Lauren’s classification
0.228
0.015
Intestinal
36
12
8
11
5
66.7
Diffuse
57
33
12
8
4
42.1
Mixed
20
11
4
3
2
45.0
Nakamura’s classification
0.212
0.024
Differentiated
53
20
14
12
7
62.3
Undifferentiated
60
30
10
1
4
10.0
Caspase-3 expression
0.246
0.09
-
78
44
17
12
5
56.4
+~+++
35
12
7
10
6
65.7
Relationship between maspin and Caspsae-3 expression, MVD in gastric cancer
The positive rate of Caspase-3 expression was lower in gastric cancer than in normal gastric mucosa (P < 0.05, 32.7% vs 50.4%). It was noticeable that maspin expression was positively correlated with Caspase-3 expression, but negatively with MVD in gastric cancer (P < 0.05) (Table 2 and Table 3, Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Figure 2 Negatively immunostaining of Caspase-3 in poorly-differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma cells and positive expres-sion in infiltrating lymphocytes (SABC, ×400).
Table 3 Relationship between maspin expression and MVD in primary gastric cancer.
Figure 3 Localization of CD34 antigens in cell membranes and cytoplasms of vascular endothelial cells (SABC, ×400).
DISCUSSION
Carcinogenesis and progression of malignancies are a complicated multistage process that requires the coordination of multiple genes, including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Genomic instability is one of the driving forces for tumor development. Among all genetic alterations, inactivation of metastasis suppressor genes has been found to be an important factor because of their contribution to malignant change of normal cells and metastasis of tumor cells[20,21].
It is known that maspin is highly expressed in various kinds of normal cells and lowly expressed in cancer cells. Our data showed that maspin expression was gradually reduced from normal mucosa, through dysplasia to cancer of the stomach. The positive rate of maspin expression was lower in gastric cancer than in normal gastric mucosa and gastric dysplasia with no significant difference in the latter two. These results suggested that reduced maspin expression contributed to malignant change of gastric epithelial cells. The down-regulated expression of maspin could be considered as a late molecular event of gastric carcinogenesis. Previous reports indicated that DNA methylation, histone deacetylation or LOH was partially responsible for the silencing of maspin gene expression[22-24]. Decreased expression of maspin might be attributable to these genetic alterations in gastric carcinogenesis as mentioned above.
Our study showed that maspin expression was negatively associated with invasion and metastasis of tumors, suggesting its inhibitory effects on progression of gastric cancer. Biliran et al[25] found that maspin could specifically inhibit cell surface-associated urokinase-type plasminogen activator and fibrinogen-bound tissue-type plasminogen activator, which was correlated with significantly decreased cell invasion potential and motility in vitro. Blacque et al[26] reported that interaction between recombinant maspin and some collagens might contribute to cell adhesion, cell migration and angiogenesis. Seftor et al[27] demonstrated that maspin was able to regulate integrin expression, indicating that maspin could reduce the invasive phenotype of cancer cells by altering their integrin profile. These findings suggested that maspin expression could inhibit tumor progression in vivo, likely through a combination of increased cell adhesion, decreased angiogenesis, and inhibition of tumor cell migration.
Additionally, it was found that undifferentiated gastric carcinomas had a lower expression of maspin as compared with the differentiated ones,suggesting that down-regulated expression of maspin was closely associated with the differentiation of gastric cancer. Diffuse-type gastric cancers had less expression of maspin as compared with the intestinal-type ones. It supported that there were different tumorigenetic pathways between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric carcinomas. Diffuse-type gastric cancer, the main part of which was undifferentiated carcinoma, displayed a diffusely invasive growth pattern. It is possible that down-regulation of maspin expression could influence mobility and adhesion of cancer cells.
Our study also showed a negative correlation between maspin expression and MVD in gastric cancer. Song et al[28] found that maspin-positive colonic adenocarcinomas showed less MVD than maspin-negative ones. Zhang et al[8] reported that maspin might act directly on vascular endothelial cells to stop their migration towards basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor and to limit mitogenesis and tube formation, which could dramatically reduce tumor-associated MVD. These in vivo and in vitro data suggest that the tumor suppressor activity of maspin may depend in large part on its ability to inhibit angiogenesis and raise the possibility that maspin and similar serpins may be excellent targets for the development of drugs that modulate angiogenesis.
Furthermore, it was found that Caspase-3 expression was increased in gastric cancer with maspin positively expressed. Jiang et al[29] reported that endogenous maspin expression could enhance staurosporine-induced apoptosis of carcinoma cells as judged by the increased fragmentation of DNA, increased proteolytic inactivation of poly-[ADP-ribose]-polymerase, as well as the increased activation of Caspase-8 and Caspase-3. Li et al[30] showed that apoptosis induced by manganese-containing superoxide dismutase was associated with elevated maspin expression level. These results indicated that it was possible that maspin expression might inhibit progression of gastric cancer by inducing apoptosis.
In summary, down-regulated maspin expression is a late molecular event in gastric carcinogenesis. Reduced expression of maspin can contribute to progression of gastric cancer by inhibiting cell adhesion, enhancing cell mobility, decreasing cell apoptosis and facilitating angiogenesis. Additionally altered expression of maspin underlies the molecular mechanism of differentiation of gastric cancer and supports the different histogenetic pathways of intestinal and diffuse gastric cancers. Maspin expression can be considered as an effective marker to reveal biological behaviors of gastric cancer.
Zou Z, Zhang W, Young D, Gleave MG, Rennie P, Connell T, Connelly R, Moul J, Srivastava S, Sesterhenn I. Maspin expression profile in human prostate cancer (CaP) and in vitro induction of Maspin expression by androgen ablation.Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1172-1177.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Yin T, Ji XL, Shen MS. Relationship between lymph node sinuses with blood and lymphatic metastasis of gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:40-43.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Yang L, Kuang LG, Zheng HC, Li JY, Wu DY, Zhang SM, Xin Y. PTEN encoding product: a marker for tumorigenesis and progression of gastric carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:35-39.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Jiang YA, Zhang YY, Luo HS, Xing SF. Mast cell density and the context of clinicopathological parameters and expression of p185, estrogen receptor, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in gastric carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:1005-1008.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Zhang H, Wu J, Meng L, Shou CC. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors KDR and Flt-1 in gastric cancer cells.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:994-998.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Zhou YN, Xu CP, Han B, Li M, Qiao L, Fang DC, Yang JM. Expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in gastric carcinoma and its correlation with the clinicopathological features and patient survival.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:987-993.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Fang DC, Luo YH, Yang SM, Li XA, Ling XL, Fang L. Mutation analysis of APC gene in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:787-791.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Song ZJ, Gong P, Wu YE. Relationship between the expression of iNOS,VEGF,tumor angiogenesis and gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:591-595.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Yao XX, Yin L, Sun ZC. The expression of hTERT mRNA and cellular immunity in gastric cancer and precancerosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:586-590.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Niu WX, Qin XY, Liu H, Wang CP. Clinicopathological analysis of patients with gastric cancer in 1200 cases.World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:281-284.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Xin Y, Li XL, Wang YP, Zhang SM, Zheng HC, Wu DY, Zhang YC. Relationship between phenotypes of cell-function differentiation and pathobiological behavior of gastric carcinomas.World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:53-59.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Domann FE, Rice JC, Hendrix MJ, Futscher BW. Epigenetic silencing of maspin gene expression in human breast cancers.Int J Cancer. 2000;85:805-810.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Biliran H, Sheng S. Pleiotrophic inhibition of pericellular urokinase-type plasminogen activator system by endogenous tumor suppressive maspin.Cancer Res. 2001;61:8676-8682.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Seftor RE, Seftor EA, Sheng S, Pemberton PA, Sager R, Hendrix MJ. maspin suppresses the invasive phenotype of human breast carcinoma.Cancer Res. 1998;58:5681-5685.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Song SY, Lee SK, Kim DH, Son HJ, Kim HJ, Lim YJ, Lee WY, Chun HK, Rhee JC. Expression of maspin in colon cancers: its relationship with p53 expression and microvessel density.Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:1831-1835.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
