Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2005; 11(15): 2313-2318
Published online Apr 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i15.2313
Impact of comorbid anxiety and depression on quality of life and cellular immunity changes in patients with digestive tract cancers
Fu-Ling Zhou, Wang-Gang Zhang, Kang-Ling Xu, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Second Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China
Yong-Chang Wei, Xu-Sheng Wang, Department of Medical Oncology, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Ling-Yun Hui, Research Center of Medical Laboratory, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Ming-Zhong Li, Department of Radical Oncology, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Wang-Gang Zhang, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Second Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China. tcdj1971@eyou.com
Telephone: +86-29-87679457 Fax: +86-29-87678599
Received: June 24, 2004
Revised: June 25, 2004
Accepted: August 30, 2004
Published online: April 21, 2005

Abstract

AIM: A study was performed to investigate the impact of comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD) on quality of life (QOL) and cellular immunity changes in patients with digestive tract cancers.

METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six cases of both sexes with cancers of the digestive tract admitted between March 2001 and February 2004 in the Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University were randomly enrolled in the study. Depressive and anxiety disorder diagnoses were assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. All adult patients were evaluated with the Hamilton depressive scale (HAMD, the 24-item version), the Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA, a modified 14-item version), quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30), social support rating scale (SSRS), simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ), and other questionnaires, respectively. In terms of HAMD ≥ 20 and HAMA ≥ 14, the patients were categorized, including CAD (n = 31) in group A, anxiety disorder (n = 23) in group B, depressive disorder (n = 37) in group C, and non-disorder (n = 65) in group D. Immunological parameters such as T-lymphocyte subsets and natural killer (NK) cell activities in peripheral blood were determined and compared among the four groups.

RESULTS: The incidence of CAD was 21.15% in patients with digestive tract cancers. The average scores of social support was 43.67±7.05 for 156 cases, active coping 20.34±7.33, and passive coping 9.55±5.51. Compared with group D, subjective support was enhanced slightly in group A, but social support, objective support, and utilization of support reduced, especially utilization of support with significance (6.16 vs 7.80, P<0.05); total scores of active coping decreased, while passive coping reversed; granulocytes proliferated, monocytes declined, and lymphocytes declined significantly (32.87 vs 34.00, P<0.05); moreover, the percentage of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 in T lymphocyte subsets was in lower level, respectively, and CD56 showed a significant decline in group A (26.02 vs 32.20, P<0.05), however, CD4/CD8 ratio increased. Physical function, role function, fatigue, sleeplessness and constipation had significant changes among different groups by one-way ANOVA, and group A was in poor QOL. It revealed that global health-related quality of life (QL) were positively correlated with active coping and CD56; CAD was negatively correlated with QL, active coping and CD56. Furthermore, the step-wise regression analysis suggested that utilization of support, CD56, active coping, fatigue, sleeplessness and depression were significant factors contributing to QOL.

CONCLUSION: CAD, which can impair QOL and cellular immunity, occurs with a higher incidence in patients with digestive tract cancers. Hence, it is essential to improve mental health for them with specifically tailored interventions.

Key Words: Comorbid anxiety and depression, Quality of life, Digestive tract cancers, T lymphocyte subsets, Natural killer cell



INTRODUCTION

Comorbid anxiety and depression (CAD) occurs at a high rate in primary care, and is costly to both the individual and society. CAD is significantly associated with special conditions, such as severe symptom, chronic course, social functional lesion, suicidal ideation, bad prognosis, and so on. When severe enough, it may cause negative effects on the antitumor therapy, immunological function, as well as the quality of life[1-4]. Distress, social support, and coping style are the most important psychosocial factors in this approach. As a psychotic or neurotic condition, doctors and mental-health professionals have increasingly recognized the effects of CAD, however, to date, few studies have systematically examined the clinical correlates of CAD or its effect on patients with digestive tract cancers. Cancers of the digestive tract pose complicated public health problems worldwide[5-7]. These cancers are associated with high morbidity and mortality[8-11], in which esophageal, gastric, colorectal and liver cancers are among the top 10 malignant tumors in China and account for 63% of total cancer mortality[12-14]. In this study, we therefore tested the data on the changes of QOL aspects and immunological parameters in patients with digestive tract cancer suffering from CAD. The Hamilton rating scales and other questionnaires, as well as the immunological parameters were investigated in an attempt to provide guidelines for the means of psychological therapy in the clinical practice and for the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of CAD in the primary care setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

One hundred and fifty-six patients, 69 women and 87 men, with newly diagnosed cancers of the digestive tract, were registered to the protocol between March 2001 and February 2004 in the Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Eligibility criteria required that the patients be of age over 18 years and speak Chinese. Patients with known confusion or judged too ill to participate were excluded from the investigation. None of the patients had central nervous system disease, uncontrolled infections, or other malignancies. All cases were finally verified by the histopathologic examination, including 39 esophageal, 45 gastric, 9 liver, 5 duodenal, 5 gall bladder, 4 pancreatic, 42 colonic and 7 rectal cancer cases. The medical records for these patients were reviewed by investigators and abstracted for the case’s characteristics such as obvious symptoms. The average age was 58±9 years with education background of 21 graduated from primary school, 58 from junior high school and 77 from senior high school or above. Their performance status (PS) was defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and social information such as marital and employment status were obtained in the interview. Depressive and anxiety disorder diagnoses were assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. All adult patients were categorized into four groups in terms of the Hamilton scales.

Psychological measurements

Hamilton depressive scale (HAMD) The 24-item HAMD[15-17], a commonly used clinician-rated depression symptom rating scale, includes 24 items rated on a scale of 0-2, 0-3, or 0-4 (total score range: 0-75). The HAMD was administered by experienced clinical raters certified to have a high rate of interrate reliability and level of procedural integrity. HAMD index, equal to or above 20, suggested the presence of depression. It was not meant for HAMD index to offer a strict diagnostic guideline but rather to denote levels of depression in symptomatology that may be of clinical significance.

Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) A modified 14-item version[18], just like the HAMD system, includes 14 items rated on a scale of 0-2, 0-3, or 0-4 (total score range: 0-56). The cases were categorized into two levels of psychological conditions. Level 1, the HAMA index below 14, was considered as no significant psychopathology; level 2, the HAMA Index equal to or above 14, suggested the presence of anxiety.

Quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30) The European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0), the most frequently used health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, consists of 30 items that list the functioning and symptoms of cancer patients[19,20]. One is global health-related quality of life (QL), and the other six multi-item function scales are scored: physical function (PF), role function (RF), cognitive functioning (CF), emotional function (EF), and social function (SF). Furthermore, nine single-item symptom scales are assessed: fatigue (FA), pain (PA), nausea and vomiting (NV), dyspnea (DY), sleeplessness (SL), loss of appetite (AP), constipation (CO), diarrhea (DI), and financial difficulties (FI). The scales are linearly transformed according to the EORTC guidelines - all scales range from 0 to 100, in which a higher scale score represents a higher level of functioning. With respect to the single-item scales, a higher score indicates more symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ C-30 is a cancer-specific questionnaire translated into various languages and validated in several European countries. In this rearrangement of the EORTC, the Cronbach’s reliability coefficients are high[21].

Social support rating scale (SSRS) Social support was assessed by the patients’ perception of support from their family or social members. The SSRS has ten selective items, which was employed to evaluate total social support, the levels of objective and subjective as well as the utility of this support[22].

Simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) There are some relationships between coping and psychosocial adjustment of patients[23,24]. The SCSQ contains 20 items on a two-point scale (active versus passive coping). Overall, the SCSQ active coping index was shown to be relatively valid with a high internal consistency that was exhibited by an alpha coefficient of 0.89, while the SCSQ passive coping index was shown to be relatively valid with a high internal consistency that was exhibited by an alpha coefficient of 0.78.

Study protocols

The study protocol was in accordance with the guidelines for clinical research and was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethical Review Committee of the hospital cancer center. Informed consent was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki after all subjects had been fully informed of its purpose. In order to make the patients understand and complete the questionnaires correctly, each item for the psychological measurements was explained by the specialist doctors in a quiet environment before the investigation.

On the day of the experiment, 3.5 mL of peripheral blood was drawn from each patient and anticoagulated by ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA), in which 50 μL of blood was quantified with Sysmes KX-21 blood counter (Japan) for the measurement of lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes. The other 3.0 mL of blood sample was used to determine natural killer (NK) cells (CD56) and T lymphocyte subsets with EPICS ELITE flow cytometer (USA) by individuals blinded to the clinical data for the patients in our immunology laboratory.

Statistical analysis

An individual patient was regarded as a unit. Data were expressed as mean±SD of the mean. Demographic variables were analyzed by descriptive statistics to evaluate the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the studied samples. Comparisons between experimental groups were performed by One-Way ANOVA. Pearson correlations were adopted to note the correlation among CAD and other variables. Moreover, contributing factors of QOL were assessed by linear regression. For all statistical evaluations, P values of 0.05 or less were considered to indicate significance. All data analyses were conducted using SPSS 11.5 for Windows statistical software.

RESULTS
Incidence of CAD in cancer patients

One hundred and fifty-six individuals were categorized into four groups in terms of HAMD and HAMA index scores according to DSM-IV criteria. The patients with CAD (n = 31) in group A, anxiety disorder (n = 23) in group B, depressive disorder (n = 37) in group C, and no disorder (n = 65) in group D. The incidence of CAD was 21.15% in patients with digestive tract cancers. Furthermore, the differences of index scores listed in Table 1 were significant among four groups.

Table 1 Changes of HAMD and HAMA scores in different group.
GroupCase (%)DSM-IV
156HAMDHAMA
A33 (21.15)31.92±9.06b21.75±7.96d
B23 (14.74)18.92±9.1417.75±5.94d
C35 (22.44)25.92±8.17b11.92±6.10
D65 (41.67)16.33±6.258.19±3.70
F39. 7835.25
P0.000
The comparison of social support, coping style and cellular immunity

The total scores of social support was from 26 to 55 in the 156 cases, active coping from 6 to 35, and passive coping from 1 to 20. Meanwhile, the average of social support was 43.67±7.05 for 156 cases, active coping 20.34±7.33, and passive coping 9.55±5.51. Compared with group D, subjective support was enhanced slightly in group A, but social support, objective support, and utilization of support reduced, especially utilization of support with significance (6.16 vs 7.80, P<0.05); total scores of active coping decreased, while passive coping reversed. As for the parameter changes of cell-mediated immunology in peripheral blood, granulocytes proliferated, monocytes declined, and lymphocytes declined significantly (32.87 vs 34.00, P<0.05); moreover, the percentage of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 in T lymphocyte subsets was in lower level, respectively, and CD56 showed a significant decline in group A (26.02 vs 32.20, P<0.05). The changes of social support, coping style and cellular immunity findings were summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of social support, coping style and cellular immunity in group A, B and C with group D.
ItemStandard scores
P
ABCDP1P2P3
Social support43.1442.2544.0044.300.620.820.86
Subjective support25.0026.0025.1723.500.500.350.48
Objective support11.5012.2512.0012.000.540.901
Utilization of supportac6.165.756.837.800.040.030.37
Active coping20.7120.2519.521.600.620.530.37
Passive coping11.439.757.179.100.120.720.76
Lymphocytea(%)32.8729.2037.2034.000.010.330.39
Granulocyte (%)62.7068.3058.7556.900.110.190.81
Monocyte (%)4.072.504.146.080.490.180.33
CD3f (%)52.0052.6042.5059.570.210.250.00
CD4d (%)25.1037.3022.8525.550.880.000.24
CD8de (%)31.3019.3034.1038.120.240.000.03
CD56a (%)26.0223.2030.6532.200.020.110.42
QOL in patients with digestive tract cancer

The average of global QL were 41.67, 56.67, 35.00, 66.67, respectively, for patients in group A, B, C and D. It indicated that group A was in poor QOL, and the changes of physical function, role function, fatigue, sleeplessness and constipation were significant among different groups by one-way ANOVA (Table 3).

Table 3 Analysis of QOL in patients with digestive tract cancer.
Standard scores
P
ABCDP1P2P3
Global QL41.6756.6735.0066.670.200.710.12
Function
PFa61.4368.3369.3374.670.040.520.12
RFa67.6270.8370.0076.670.020.440.15
EF75.0047.9293.3390.000.110.240.25
CF66.6750.0073.3386.670.360.690.16
SF47.6254.1763.3356.670.790.500.65
Symptom
FA50.7916.6724.4425.560.100.170.12
NV21.4333.3310.0020.000.570.560.93
PA25.6729.1723.0316.670.430.260.52
Single item
DY23.3316.6723.006.000.100.120.10
SLbc41.0036.0018.3313.330.000.040.36
AP61.0041.6733.3323.330.400.230.05
COad55.6716.6750.0010.000.040.760.00
DI22.3316.6715.3212.150.050.170.14
FI83.3366.6741.6746.670.290.550.26
Correlation analysis of CAD patients

Pearson correlation analysis was performed among multiple variables in group A (Table 4). It revealed that QL were positively correlated with active coping and CD56 (P<0.05); depression was negatively correlated with lymphocyte (P<0.05); passive coping was negatively correlated with CD56 (P<0.05); CAD was negatively correlated with QL, active coping and CD56.

Table 4 Pearson correlation analysis among multiple variables in group A.
VariableQLSocial supportDepressionAnxietyActive copingPassive coping
QL1.000.180.280.070.42a0.02
Social support0.181.000.060.130.170.05
Depression0.280.061.000.310.070.15
Anxiety0.070.130.311.000.290.05
Active coping0.42a0.170.070.291.000.28
Passive coping0.020.050.150.050.281.00
Age (yr)0.100.280.090.020.0010.12
Lymphocyte0.080.070.66a0.210.360.37
Granulocyte0.220.180.080.060.440.39
Monocyte0.410.350.140.280.370.23
CD30.180.150.320.170.090.34
CD40.040.220.070.310.240.03
CD80.180.030.210.050.080.06
CD560.67a0.240.360.190.430.82b
Factors contributing to QOL

In clinical trials, there were many issues related to QOL, such as social support, active coping, fatigue, depression, monocyte, CD3, CD56, and so on. However, the step-wise regression analysis suggested that utilization of support, CD56, active coping, fatigue, sleeplessness and depression were the significant factors contributing to QOL (Table 5).

Table 5 Multivariate analysis of contributing factors of QOL with step-wise regression in patients with digestive tract cancer.
ModelUnstandardized coefficients (B)Standardized coefficients (β)tP
Utilization of support1.051.323 245.610.000
CD560.160.692 860.220.001
Active coping0.790.771 288.730.011
FA0.160.13148.030.010
SL0.040.02144.740.014
Depression0.0010.00516.670.038
DISCUSSION

Increasing evidence suggests that psychosocial factors such as stress and depression may have a harmful impact on the course of many diseases, such as cardiovascular disease[25,26], functional disorder and cancer[27-30], and may heighten susceptibility to infectious diseases[31,32]. As psychosocial stress has been suspected as a risk factor for cancer, an association between mental disorders and cancer has been reported in many clinical studies within patients. In this research, we have used data gathered in a 3-year consecutive study to examine the comorbidity in adult patients. The findings both confirm and extend the previous results.

Cancer of the gastrointestinal tract is a major health problem in China, especially for the elderly. Results indicated that Chinese patients newly diagnosed with gastrointestinal tract cancer experienced a range of symptoms associated with cancer and its treatment that resulted in varying degrees of symptom distress, anxiety and depression[33,34]. More than 20% of the cancer patients have elevated scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscales depression and anxiety in Harter’s report[35]. In the present cohort, there were clear and consistent trends that the average age was 58±9 years and the rates of CAD are 21.15% in patients with digestive tract cancers.

High level of social support appears to play a protective role in psychological adjustment of cancer patients[36]. Social networks, including marital/partner status; number of children, relatives, and friends; and the frequency of religious and community participation, may have an important relation with HRQOL-particularly, mental health-among female long-term colorectal cancer survivors[37]. Indeed, social support in the form of marriage, frequent daily contact with others, and the presence of a confidante may all have protective values against cancer progression. The current study showed that utilization of support went down significantly in group A, but the total scores of social support were close in four groups. It is considered that the family pay attention to patients in need and highlight their problems.

Coping with cancer is multidimensional scaling. There is a significant association between patients who scored highly on the HADS and dissatisfaction with the information provided. Young patients, women, patients with advanced tumors and those who had been treated with both surgery and radiotherapy reported worse function. The worse the functional domain, the more likely it was to be associated with anxiety, depression and ineffective coping style[38]. Use of a logistic regression model showed that those patients most likely to be suffering from severe psychological distress had a worse coping style, measured by the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (MACS)[39]. In this study, patients’ passive coping of their disease remained relatively stable, whereas their use of active coping strategies decreased remarkably.

Psychosocial factors influence disease-resistance capabilities via the neuroimmune connection. Some immunological parameters such as T lymphocyte subsets and NK cells are thought to play a central role in antitumour immunity[40-42]. For instance, the growth of malignancies was observed to be inhibited by the activated tumor-specific T cells and the depressed activity of NK cells was probably related to the tumor enlargement and dissemination[43,44]. Suppressive effects of CAD on immune function were well documented in our study, providing further evidence for the specificity of immune changes in psychiatric disorders. Granulocytes proliferated, monocytes declined, and lymphocytes declined significantly; moreover, the percentage of CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD56 in T lymphocyte subsets was in lower level. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that CAD may contribute to impairing immunity, and thereby delay the recovery of immune mechanisms that may be important for cancer resistance.

In the last decade of clinical research, there has been increasing interest in the evaluation of quality of life. Accurate assessment of the QOL of patients can provide important clinical information to physicians, especially in the area of oncology[45-47]. Changes in QOL are important indicators of the impact of a new cytotoxic therapy, which can affect a patient’s willingness to continue treatment, and may aid in defining response in the absence of quantifiable endpoints such as tumor regression[48-51]. The results obtained from the validated QLQ-C30 were used to evaluate the physical role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status as well as energy and sleep[52]. Then, it revealed that QL were positively correlated with active coping and CD56; CAD was negatively correlated with QL, active coping and CD56. Furthermore, use of a step-wise regression model suggested that utilization of support, CD56, active coping, fatigue, sleeplessness and depression were significant factors contributing to QOL. Our findings were consistent with the reports that patients who showed high levels of anxiety or depression had more health problems[53-56].

Quality of life, symptom management, and social support are the traditional foci for the practise of psychosocial oncology. The current paradigm for research in this area primarily assesses patient responses to cancer-related CAD and illuminates the necessity of ameliorating the negative aspects of those responses. Findings from this research provides insight into the importance of ongoing QOL assessment, symptom management, and intervention to improve QOL of Chinese cancer patients. In brief, CAD, which can impair QOL and cellular immunity, occurs with a higher incidence in patients with digestive tract cancers. Hence, it is essential to improve mental health for them with specifically tailored interventions.

Footnotes

Co-first-authors: Fu-Ling Zhou and Wang-Gang Zhang

Science Editor Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References
1.  Stein MB, Barrett-Connor E. Quality of life in older adults receiving medications for anxiety, depression, or insomnia: findings from a community-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10:568-574.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Sekula LK, DeSantis J, Gianetti V. Considerations in the management of the patient with comorbid depression and anxiety. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2003;15:23-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pop-Jordanova N, Pop-Jordanov J. Psychophysiological comorbidity and computerized biofeedback. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25:429-433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Schüssler G, Schubert C. The influence of psychosocial factors on the immune system (psychoneuroimmunology) and their role for the incidence and progression of cancer. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2001;47:6-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Shibuya K, Mathers CD, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. Results for the global burden of disease 2000. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 282]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 303]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Mitry E, Benhamiche AM, Couillault C, Roy P, Faivre-Finn C, Clinard F, Faivre J. Effect of age, period of diagnosis and birth cohort on large bowel cancer incidence in a well-defined French population, 1976-1995. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11:529-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ogimoto I, Shibata A, Fukuda K. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research 1997 recommendations: applicability to digestive tract cancer in Japan. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11:9-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Mohandas KM, Jagannath P. Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India. VI. Projected burden in the new millennium and the need for primary prevention. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2000;19:74-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Le Vu B, de Vathaire F, de Vathaire CC, Paofaite J, Roda L, Soubiran G, Lhoumeau F, Laudon F. Cancer incidence in French Polynesia 1985-95. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5:722-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Adanja B, Gledovic Z, Pekmezovic T, Vlajinac H, Jarebinski M, Zivaljevic V, Pavlovic M. Mortality trends of malignant tumours of digestive organs in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1975-1997. Dig Liver Dis. 2000;32:386-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Time-trends in cancer incidence and mortality in Japan. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001;28:137-141.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Ke L. Mortality and incidence trends from esophagus cancer in selected geographic areas of China circa 1970-90. Int J Cancer. 2002;102:271-274.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 137]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 139]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Sun X, Mu R, Zhou Y, Dai X, Qiao Y, Zhang S, Huangfu X, Sun J, Li L, Lu F. 1990-1992 mortality of stomach cancer in China. Zhonghua ZhongLiu ZaZhi. 2002;24:4-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Pan Y, Wang J, Liang H. 116 multiple primary cancers in the digestive system. Zhonghua ZhongLiu ZaZhi. 2002;24:191-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21041]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21651]  [Article Influence: 338.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6:278-296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5785]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5596]  [Article Influence: 98.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Miller IW, Bishop S, Norman WH, Maddever H. The Modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: reliability and validity. Psychiatry Res. 1985;14:131-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 291]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 297]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. 1988;14:61-68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 476]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 512]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Kemmler G, Holzner B, Kopp M, Dünser M, Greil R, Hahn E, Sperner-Unterweger B. Multidimensional scaling as a tool for analysing quality of life data. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:223-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Efficace F, Bottomley A, Vanvoorden V, Blazeby JM. Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:187-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Chie WC, Yang CH, Hsu C, Yang PC. Quality of life of lung cancer patients: validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:257-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Nan KJ, Wei YC, Zhou FL, Li CL, Sui CG, Hui LY, Gao CG. Effects of depression on parameters of cell-mediated immunity in patients with digestive tract cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:268-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Montgomery C, Pocock M, Titley K, Lloyd K. Predicting psychological distress in patients with leukaemia and lymphoma. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:289-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Yuet LM, Alexander M, Chun CJ. Coping and adjustment in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:383-395.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Barefoot JC, Burg MM, Carney RM, Cornell CE, Czajkowski SM, Freedland KE, Hosking JD, Khatri P, Pitula CR, Sheps D. Aspects of social support associated with depression at hospitalization and follow-up assessment among cardiac patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23:404-412.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Schulz R, Beach SR, Ives DG, Martire LM, Ariyo AA, Kop WJ. Association between depression and mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1761-1768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 425]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 405]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Faller H, Bülzebruck H, Drings P, Lang H. Coping, distress, and survival among patients with lung cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:756-762.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 141]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Yang EV, Glaser R. Stress-induced immunomodulation and the implications for health. Int Immunopharmacol. 2002;2:315-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Emmanuel AV, Mason HJ, Kamm MA. Relationship between psychological state and level of activity of extrinsic gut innervation in patients with a functional gut disorder. Gut. 2001;49:209-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Devanand DP, Adorno E, Cheng J, Burt T, Pelton GH, Roose SP, Sackeim HA. Late onset dysthymic disorder and major depression differ from early onset dysthymic disorder and major depression in elderly outpatients. J Affect Disord. 2004;78:259-267.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Dunlop SP, Jenkins D, Neal KR, Spiller RC. Relative importance of enterochromaffin cell hyperplasia, anxiety, and depression in postinfectious IBS. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1651-1659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 418]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 445]  [Article Influence: 21.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Selwyn PA, Rivard M, Kappell D, Goeren B, LaFosse H, Schwartz C, Caraballo R, Luciano D, Post LF. Palliative care for AIDS at a large urban teaching hospital: program description and preliminary outcomes. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:461-474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Lissoni P, Cangemi P, Pirato D, Roselli MG, Rovelli F, Brivio F, Malugani F, Maestroni GJ, Conti A, Laudon M. A review on cancer--psychospiritual status interactions. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2001;22:175-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Yan H, Sellick K. Quality of life of Chinese patients newly diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:309-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Härter M, Reuter K, Schretzmann B, Hasenburg A, Aschenbrenner A, Weis J. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in cancer patients in acute inpatient treatment and medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2000;39:317-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Barrera M, Fleming CF, Khan FS. The role of emotional social support in the psychological adjustment of siblings of children with cancer. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30:103-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Sapp AL, Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Hampton JM, Moinpour CM, Remington PL. Social networks and quality of life among female long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer. 2003;98:1749-1758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 98]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 101]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Hassanein KA, Musgrove BT, Bradbury E. Functional status of patients with oral cancer and its relation to style of coping, social support and psychological status. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;39:340-345.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Montgomery C, Pocock M, Titley K, Lloyd K. Predicting psychological distress in patients with leukaemia and lymphoma. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:289-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Luczynsk W, Stasiak-Barmuta A, Muszynska-Roslan K, Kasprzycka E. T-lymphocyte and monocyte activation in the course of infection in children with neoplastic disease. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2002;6:31-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Norris S, Doherty DG, Curry M, McEntee G, Traynor O, Hegarty JE, O'Farrelly C. Selective reduction of natural killer cells and T cells expressing inhibitory receptors for MHC class I in the livers of patients with hepatic malignancy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003;52:53-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Pardoll D. T cells take aim at cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15840-15842.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry R, Restifo NP, Hubicki AM. Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science. 2002;298:850-854.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2258]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2055]  [Article Influence: 93.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Takeuchi H, Maehara Y, Tokunaga E, Koga T, Kakeji Y, Sugimachi K. Prognostic significance of natural killer cell activity in patients with gastric carcinoma: a multivariate analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:574-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Knobel H, Loge JH, Brenne E, Fayers P, Hjermstad MJ, Kaasa S. The validity of EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue scale in advanced cancer patients and cancer survivors. Palliat Med. 2003;17:664-672.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Sherif T, Jehani T, Saadani M, Andejani AW. Adult oncology and chronically ill patients: comparison of depression, anxiety and caregivers' quality of life. East Mediterr Health J. 2001;7:502-509.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Lutgendorf SK, Anderson B, Ullrich P, Johnsen EL, Buller RE, Sood AK, Sorosky JI, Ritchie J. Quality of life and mood in women with gynecologic cancer: a one year prospective study. Cancer. 2002;94:131-140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Hammerlid E, Fayers P, Sezer O, Koller M, Arraras J, Bottomley A, Vickery CW, Etienne PL. Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1384-1394.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 273]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 287]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Nowak AK, Stockler MR, Byrne MJ. Assessing quality of life during chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma: feasibility, validity, and results of using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Lung Cancer Module. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3172-3180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Wu CW, Lo SS, Shen KH, Hsieh MC, Lui WY, P'eng FK. Surgical mortality, survival, and quality of life after resection for gastric cancer in the elderly. World J Surg. 2000;24:465-472.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sugawara Y, Nakano T, Shima Y, Uchitomi Y. Suicidality in terminally ill Japanese patients with cancer. Cancer. 2004;100:183-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Skarstein J, Aass N, Fosså SD, Skovlund E, Dahl AA. Anxiety and depression in cancer patients: relation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2000;49:27-34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 201]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 204]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Sarna L, Evangelista L, Tashkin D, Padilla G, Holmes C, Brecht ML, Grannis F. Impact of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function on quality of life of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2004;125:439-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 144]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 158]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Ciaramella A, Poli P. Assessment of depression among cancer patients: the role of pain, cancer type and treatment. Psychooncology. 2001;10:156-165.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 151]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 153]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Larsson G, von Essen L, Sjödén PO. Health-related quality of life in patients with endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Acta Oncol. 1999;38:481-490.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Okamoto T, Shimozuma K, Katsumata N, Koike M, Hisashige A, Tanaka K, Ohsumi S, Saito M, Shikama N, Mitsumori M. Measuring quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review of reliable and valid instruments available in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:204-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]