[1]
M. F. Silva, J. A. T. Machado, and A. M. Lopes, Performance analysis of multi-legged system, in Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, May 2002, pp.2234-2239.
Google Scholar
[2]
Y. Zhao, L. Lu, T. Zhao, Y. Du, and Z. Huang, Dynamic performance analysis of six-legged walking machines, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2000, 35: 155-163.
DOI: 10.1016/s0094-114x(98)00069-x
Google Scholar
[3]
Multon, F, Cani-Gascuel, M., and Debunne, G. Computer animation of walking: A survey. J. Visualization Comp. Animation 1999, 10(1): 39–54.
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1778(199901/03)10:1<39::aid-vis195>3.0.co;2-2
Google Scholar
[4]
Reichler, J., and Delcomyn, F. A simulation test-bed for biologically inspired robots and their controllers. Proc. of the 12th European Simulation Multi-conference, 1998, 437-442.
Google Scholar
[5]
Brutzman, D. P., T. Healey, D. Marco, and B. McGhee. The Phoenix autonomous underwater vehicle. AI-Based Mobile Robots, Kortenkamp, David, Peter and Murphy, Robin, editors, MITIAAAI Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, (1997).
Google Scholar
[6]
Pollini L.; Innocenti, M. A synthetic Environment for Dynamic Systems Control and Distributed Simulation, IEEE Control SystemsMagazine, April, (2000).
Google Scholar
[7]
Gracanin, D., K.P. Valavanis, M. Matijasevic. Virtual environment testbed for autonomous underwater vehicles. Control Engineering Practice, 1998, 5(6): 653-660.
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(98)00059-8
Google Scholar
[8]
Caccia M., Bono R., Bruzzone G., Veruggio G. Variable configuration UUVs for marine science applications. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 1999, 6: 22-32.
DOI: 10.1109/100.774925
Google Scholar
[9]
Kuroda Y., K. Aramaki, T. Fuji, T. Ura . A Hybrid Environment for the Development of Underwater Mechatronic Systems. Proc. Of the 1995 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, Nov. (1995).
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.1995.483353
Google Scholar
[10]
Giacomo Marani, Song K. Choi, Junku Yuh. Underwater autonomous manipulation for intervention missions AUVs, Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36: 15-23.
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.007
Google Scholar
[11]
Choi, S.K., Menor, S.A., and Yuh, J. Distributed virtual environment collaborative simulator for underwater robots, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2000(2): 861 -866.
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2000.893127
Google Scholar
[12]
Leonard, J. J., S. T. Tuohy, J. G. Bellingham, B. A. Moran, J. H. L m , H. Schmidt, N. M. Patrikalakis and C. Chryssostomidis. Virtual Environments for AUV Development and Ocean Exploration. Proc. Int. Symp. on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, 1995: 436-443.
Google Scholar
[13]
Christina Georgiades, Meyer Nahon, Martin Buehler. Simulation of an underwater hexapod robot. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36: 39-47.
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.10.005
Google Scholar
[14]
Bae DS, Haug EJ. A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics: Part II, Closed loop systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 1987; 15(4): 481–506.
DOI: 10.1080/08905458708905130
Google Scholar
[15]
Rosenthal DE. An order-n formulation for robotic systems. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 1990; 38(4): 511–29.
Google Scholar
[16]
Anderson KS. An order-n formulation for the motion simulation of general constrained multi-rigid-body systems. Computers and Structures 1992; 43(3): 565–79.
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(92)90289-c
Google Scholar
[17]
Pradhan S, Modi VJ. Order-n formulation for flexible multi-body systems in tree topology: Lagrangian approach. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 1997; 20(4): 665–72.
DOI: 10.2514/2.4129
Google Scholar
[18]
Banerjee AK. Order-n formulation of extrusion of a beam with large bending and rotation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 1992; 15(1): 121–7.
DOI: 10.2514/3.20809
Google Scholar
[19]
Banerjee AK, Nagarajan S. Efficient simulation of large overall motion of beams undergoing large deflection. Multi-body System Dynamics 1997; 1(1): 113–26.
Google Scholar
[20]
Tasora A. An optimized Lagrangian-multiplier approach for interactive multibody simulation in kinematic and dynamical digital prototyping. In: International symposium on computer simulation in biomechanics, Politecnico diMilano, Italy, 2001. p.125.
Google Scholar
[21]
The Free Body Diagram / Kinetic Diagram, http: /laser. phys. ualberta. ca/~freeman/enph131/fbd. htm.
Google Scholar
[22]
Free-Body Diagram, http: /hyperphysics. phy-astr. gsu. edu/hbase/freeb. html.
Google Scholar
[23]
Y. Kim and S. Desa, The definition, determination, and characterization of acceleration sets for spatial manipulators, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, 12(6): 572-587.
DOI: 10.1177/027836499301200605
Google Scholar
[24]
J. Yuh, Modeling and Control of Underwater Robotic Vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1990, 20: 1475-1483.
DOI: 10.1109/21.61218
Google Scholar
[25]
K. Ioi and K. Itoh, Modelling and Simulation of an Underwater Manipulator, Advanced Robotics, 1990, 4(4): 303-317.
DOI: 10.1163/156855390x00152
Google Scholar
[26]
S. McMillan, D. E. Orin, and R. B. McGhee, Efficient Dynamic Simulation of an Underwater Vehicle with a Robotic Manipulator, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1995, 25: 1194-1206.
DOI: 10.1109/21.398681
Google Scholar