A Visual Method for Detailed Analysis of Building Life Cycle Assessment Results

[1] F. Pomponi, A. Moncaster, A Method for Visualising Embodied and Whole Life Carbon of Buildings, in: M. Dastbaz, C. Gorse, A. Moncaster (Eds.), Building Information Modelling, Building Performance, Design and Smart Construction, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, 2017, pp.185-189.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50346-2_13

Google Scholar

[2] S. Lasvaux, J. Gantner, B. Wittstock, M. Bazzana, N. Schiopu, T. Saunders, C. Gazulla, J. A. Mundy, C. Sjöström, P. Fullana-i Palmer, T. Barrow-Williams, A. Braune, J. Anderson, K. Lenz, Z. Takacs, J. Hans, and J. Chevalier, Achieving consistency in life cycle assessment practice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19 (2014) pp.1783-1793.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0786-2

Google Scholar

[3] European Commission, Resource efficiency opportunities in the building sector (2014) p.10.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Roux, P. Schalbart, E. Assoumou, and B. Peuportier, Integrating climate change and energy mix scenarios in LCA of buildings and districts, Applied Energy 184 (2016) pp.619-629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.043

Google Scholar

[5] S. Lasvaux, G. Habert, B. Peuportier, and J. Chevalier, Comparison of generic and productspecific Life Cycle Assessment databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20 (2015) pp.1473-1490.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0938-z

Google Scholar

[6] M. Buyle, J. Braet, A. Audenaert, and W. Debacker, Strategies for optimizing the environmental profile of dwellings in a Belgian context: A consequential versus an attributional approach, Journal of Cleaner Production (2015) pp.1-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.114

Google Scholar

[7] One Click LCA Software, Bionova Ltd, Helsinki (2017), available at: http://www.oneclicklca.com/[8] A. Hollberg, J. Ruth, LCA in architectural design-a parametric approach, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 21 (2016) 943-960.

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1065-1

Google Scholar

[9] X. Oregi Isasi, J. A. Tenorio, C. Gazulla, I. Zabalza, D. Cambra, S. O. Leao, L. Mabe, S. Otero, and J. Raigosa, SOFIAS - Software for life-cycle assessment and environmental rating of buildings, Informes de la Construcción 68 (2016), p. e151.

DOI: 10.3989/ic.15.055

Google Scholar

[10] A. Hollberg, N. Klüber, S. Schneider, J. Ruth, and D. Donath, A Method for Evaluating the Environmental Life Cycle Potential of Building Geometry, Sustainable Built Environment (SBE) regional conference, (2016).

DOI: 10.3218/3774-6_96

Google Scholar

[11] Tally Software Version 2016.05.08.01, KT Innovations, Philadelphia (2017), available at: http://choosetally.com.

Google Scholar

[12] Ecoinvent data v1.3 and final reports ecoinvent 2000, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] GaBi Databases, Thinkstep, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, (2017).

Google Scholar

[14] Ökobau.dat 2016-I (18.05.2016) Database, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, Bonn, (2016).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Hegger, M. Fuchs, T. Stark, M. Zeumer, Energie Atlas. Nachhaltige Architektur, Birkhäuser, Berlin, Basel, (2012).

DOI: 10.11129/detail.9783034614498

Google Scholar

[16] B. Kiss and Zs. Szalay, The Impact of Decisions Made in Various Architectural Design Stages on Life Cycle Assessment Results, Applied Mechanics and Materials 861 (2016) pp.593-600.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.861.593

Google Scholar

[17] ISO 14040 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (2006).

Google Scholar

[18] ISO 14044 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (2006).

Google Scholar

[19] EN 15978 Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2011).

Google Scholar

[20] ISO 15686 Buildings and constructed assets - Service life planning, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (2008).

Google Scholar

[21] A tárca nélküli miniszter 7/2006. (V.24.) TNM rendelete az épületek energetikai jellemzőinek meghatározásáról, Magyar Közlöny 62 (2006) 5134-5175.

Google Scholar

[22] A. Takano, S. K. Pal, M. Kuittinen, K. Alanne, M. Hughes, and S. Winter, The effect of material selection on life cycle energy balance: A case study on a hypothetical building model in Finland, Building and Environment 89 (2015) pp.192-202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.001

Google Scholar

[23] Rhinoceros Software Version 5 SR12, Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle (2017), available at: https://www.rhino3d.com.

Google Scholar

[24] Grasshopper 3D Software Version August-27 2014, Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle (2017), available at: http://www.grasshopper3d.com.

Google Scholar

[25] M. S. Roudsari, M. Pak, Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design, in: Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Conference, Lyon (2013) pp.3128-3135.

DOI: 10.26868/25222708.2013.2499

Google Scholar