Effects of the Processing Parameters on the Forming Quality of Stainless Steel Parts by Selective Laser Melting

Article Preview

Abstract:

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) can produce high-performance metal parts with complex structures. However, it’s difficult to control the processing parameters, because many factors involves. From the perspective of the molten pool, the study focuses on the effects of processing parameters, including scanning speed, laser power, scanning space, layer thickness, and scanning strategies, on the surface quality, the balling effect, the density of SLM parts, by conducting experiments of single track, single layer and block forming. The results show that the quality of the molten pool is affected by laser power and scanning speed. Scanning drove in the strategy of “jumping and turning”,a smooth surface and a less balling effect will be obtained. The thicker the powder layer is, the lower density will be obtained. The optimal parameters from series of experiments are: laser power of 98W; scanning speed of 90mm/s; scanning space of 0.07mm; layer thickness of 0.1mm; and scanning strategy of “jumping and turning”.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 189-193)

Pages:

3668-3671

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Santos E. C, Shiomi M, Osakada K,et al: Int J Mach Tool Manu Vol. 46 (2006), pp.1459-1468.

Google Scholar

[2] Lin C. Y, Wirtz T, et al : J Biomed Mater Res Part A Vol. 83 (2007), p.272. -279.

Google Scholar

[3] Rehme O and Emmelmann C : Proc. Of SPIE Vol. 6107 (2006), p. K1070.

Google Scholar

[4] Adam T. C, Paul R. C, Sean D, : Int J Mech Mater Des Vol. 4 (2008), pp.181-187.

Google Scholar

[5] Mumtaz K and Hopkinson N : Rapid Prototyping J Vol. 5 (2009), pp.96-103.

Google Scholar

[6] Meier H and Haberland Ch : Mat. -wiss. u. Werkstofftech Vol. 39 (2008), pp.665-670.

Google Scholar

[7] Vandenbroucke B and Kruth J. P : Rapid Prototyping J Vol. 13 (2007), pp.196-203.

Google Scholar

[8] Kruth J. P, Froyenb L, Vaerenbergha J, et al: J Mater Process Tech Vol. 149 (2004), pp.616-622.

Google Scholar

[9] Badrossamay M and Childs T.H. C: Int J Mach Tool Manu Vol. 47 (2007), pp.779-784.

Google Scholar

[10] Tang Y, Loh H. Y, Wong Y. S, et al : J Mater Process Tech, Vol. 140 (2003), pp.368-372.

Google Scholar

[11] Weihui Wu and Yongqiang Yang : Journal of Mechanical Engineering In Chinese Vol. 43 (2007), pp.175-180.

Google Scholar