[1]
D. M. Dohan Ehrenfest, P.G. Coelho, B. S. Kang, Y. T. Sul, T. Albrektsson, Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography, Trends Biotechnol. 28 (2010) 198-206.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003
Google Scholar
[2]
Y. Li, S. Zou, D. Wang, G. Feng, C. Bao, J. Hu, The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on titanium implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats, Biomaterials 31 (2010) 3266-3273.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.028
Google Scholar
[3]
F. Schwarz, M. Sager, I. Kadelka, D. Ferrari, J. Becker, Influence of titanium implant surface characteristics on bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects: an experimental study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 37 (2010) 466-473.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01533.x
Google Scholar
[4]
C.M. Stanford, Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 11 (2010) 354-369.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms11010354
Google Scholar
[5]
B. Gottenbos, D.W. Grijpma, H.C. Van der Mei, J. Feijen, H.J. Busscher, Antimicrobial effect of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48 (2001) 7-13.
DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.1.7
Google Scholar
[6]
H.J. Busscher, R. Ros, H.C. Van der Mei, Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of a biofilm adhesion, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 128 (1995) 229-234.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07529.x
Google Scholar
[7]
B. Del Curto, M.F. Brunella, C. Giordano, M.P. Pedeferri, V. Valtulina, L. Visai, A. Cigada, Decreased bacterial adhesion to surface-treated titanium, Int. J. Artif. Organs 28 (2005) 718-730.
DOI: 10.1177/039139880502800711
Google Scholar
[8]
L. Visai, L. De Nardo, C. Punta, L. Melone, A. Cigada, M. Imbriani, C. R. Arciola, Titanium dioxide antibacterial surfaces in biomedical devices. Int. J. Artif. Organs 34 (2011) 929-946.
DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000050
Google Scholar
[9]
K. Anselme, Ostebolast adhesion on biomaterials, Biomaterials 21 (2000) 667-681.
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00242-2
Google Scholar
[10]
P. Roach, D. Eglin, K. Rohde, C.C. Perry, Modern biomaterials: a review—bulk properties and implications of surface modifications, J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18 (2007) 1263–1277.
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0064-3
Google Scholar
[11]
T. Kokubo, H. Takadama, How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 2907-2915.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017
Google Scholar
[12]
T. Kasuga, H. Kondo, M. Nogami, Apatite formation on TiO2 in simulated body fluid, J. Cryst. Growth 235 (2002) 235-240.
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(01)01782-1
Google Scholar
[13]
T. Kokubo, H.M. Kim, M. Kawashita, H. Takadama, T. Miyazaki, M. Uchida, T. Nakamura, Nucleation and growth of apatite an amorphous phases in simulated body fluid, Glass Sci. Technol. 73 (2000) 247-254.
Google Scholar
[14]
E.G. Nordstrom, O.L.S. Munoz, Physics of bone bonding mechanism of different surface bioactive ceramic materials in vitro and in vivo, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 11 (2001) 221-231.
Google Scholar
[15]
H. Cao, X. Liu, Activating titanium oxide coatings for orthopedic implants, Surf. Coat. Tech. 233 (2013) 57-64.
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.043
Google Scholar
[16]
A. Reinis, M. Pilmane, A. Stunda, J. Vetra, J. Kroica, D. Rostoka, G. Salms, A. Vostroilovs, A. Dons, L. Berziņa-Cimdina, In vitro and in vivo Study of S. epidermidis and Ps. aeruginosa Adhesion and Colonisation Intensity on Originally Synthesised Biomaterials with Different Chemical Composition and Modified Surfaces and its Effect on TNF-α, β-defensin-2 and Il-10 Expression in Tissues, Medicina 47 (10) (2011).
DOI: 10.3390/medicina47100080
Google Scholar
[17]
T.J. Webster, C. Ergun, R.H. Doremus, R.W. Siegel, R. Bizios, Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 1327-1333.
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00285-4
Google Scholar
[18]
C. Drouet, Apatite formation: Why it may not work as planned, and how to conclusively identify apatite compounds, Biomed. Res. Int. 2013 (2013) 1-12, doi. org/10. 1155/2013/490946.
DOI: 10.1155/2013/490946
Google Scholar