Defining the Structurally Compatible Uses of Ancient Vaults: A Comparison between Traditional and Modern Modelling Approaches

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Conservation of Historical Architectural Heritage Cannot Be Limited only to a Series of Isolated Interventions on Materials and Structures, but must Include Also the Maintenance or Insertion of Compatible Uses, which can Guarantee a Continuous Upkeep. the Exploitation of Heritage, nevertheless, is a Wedge Issue, as it Involves New Loads, more Wear, Different Environmental Conditions, which can Induce Changes in their Behaviour which are Hard to Foresee.This Contribution Aims to Analyse in Particular the Structural Issues Involved in the Use Changes or in the Adaptation of a Pre-Existing Use to New Functional or Normative Requirements. Indeed, for a Correct Management of the Built Heritage, the Choice of the Structurally Compatible Uses Cannot Disregard a Specific Analysis Aimed at the Identification of the Structure Bearing Capacity and Focusing on the Indications to Combine Functional and Structural Needs.The Proposed Case Study, on which the Approach is Applied, Regards the Pilotta National Museum, in Parma, that is Undergoing a Reorganization of the Visit Paths and a Reconsideration on the Uses Allocated to some Spaces. more Specifically, a Vaulted Room over a Long Barrel Vault is Asked to Host New Functions and Carry New Loads, Whose Compatibility with the Preservation of the Monumental Structure must Be Assessed.For the Assessment of the Structural Compatibility Levels, Different Modelling Approaches Have been Tested, in Order to Compare their Results and to Analyze their Pros and Cons in this Type of Evaluation. on One Side, Traditional Methods were Chosen: the Graphic Méry Method and the Heyman Limit Analysis Have been Applied to a System of 2D Arches Composing the Vault. on the other Side, the Edge Cutting Chronoengine Distinct Element Model Have been Also Tested, under the same Conditions. in all Cases, Calculations Have been Made Changing both Values and Positions of the Loads, Depending on the Requests for the New Use of the Vault.The Results are Compared both in Terms of Stresses inside the Masonry and in Terms of Deformation of the Structural Elements, Evaluating the Types of Information and Detail that the Different Approaches can Supply. the Results of the Numerical Method Allow to Assess the Validity of the Traditional Approaches. on the other Side, the Possible Contribution of the Traditional Methods to the Calibration of the Parameters for the Numerical Models is Also Discussed.The Results, at Last, will Be Adopted to Propose Limitations to the Possible Uses and to Give Specific Indications about the Setting up of the Museum Exhibitions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

267-274

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Fornari Schianchi. Il Palazzo della Pilotta a Parma: dai servizi della corte alle moderne istituzioni culturali, FMR, Milano, 1996 (in Italian).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Tralli, C. Alessandri & G. Milani. Computational methods for masonry vaults: a review of recent results. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 8-1(2014) 272-287.

DOI: 10.2174/1874149501408010272

Google Scholar

[3] P. Roca. Considerations on the significance of history for the structural analysis of ancient constructions. In: Lourenço, P., Modena, C., Roca, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of IV Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Balkema, Amsterdam, 1996, pp.63-73.

DOI: 10.1201/9781482288377

Google Scholar

[4] E. Méry, Mémoire sur l'équilibre des voutes en berçeau, Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, s.1, 1e trim., t. XIX (1840) 50-70.

Google Scholar

[5] Circolare 21 gennaio 2019, n. 7 C.S.LL.PP. Istruzioni per l'applicazione dell'«Aggiornamento delle "Norme tecniche per le costruzioni,» di cui al decreto ministeriale 17 gennaio 2018. (19A00855) (GU Serie Generale n.35 del 11-02-2019 - Suppl. Ordinario n. 5) (in Italian).

DOI: 10.3280/qt2010-039014

Google Scholar

[6] P. Gelfi, Role of horizontal backfill passive pressure on the stability of masonry vaults. International Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments 8-6 (2002) 573-590.

DOI: 10.1515/rbm-2002-5708

Google Scholar

[7] Arco,, URL: http://gelfi.unibs.it/arco.htm Accessed March (2019).

Google Scholar

[8] Project Chrono,, URL: https://projectchrono.org Accessed March (2019).

Google Scholar

[9] H. Mazhar, T. Heyn, A. Pazouki, D. Melanz, A. Seidl, A. Bartholomew, A. Tasora, D. Negrut, Chrono: a parallel multi-physics library for rigid-body, flexible-body, and fluid dynamics, Mechanical Sciences, 4-1 (2013) 49-64.

DOI: 10.5194/ms-4-49-2013

Google Scholar

[10] E. Coïsson, L. Ferrari, D. Ferretti, M. Rozzi, Non-smooth dynamic analysis of local seismic damage mechanisms of the San Felice fortress in Northern Italy, Procedia Engineering, 161 (2016) 451-457.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.589

Google Scholar

[11] V. Beatini, G. Royer-Carfagni, A. Tasora. A regularized non-smooth contact dynamics approach for architectural masonry structures, Computers & Structures, 187 (2017) 88-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.02.002

Google Scholar

[12] D. Ferretti, E. Coïsson & M. Rozzi, A new numerical approach to the structural analysis of masonry vaults, Key Engineering Materials, 747(2017) 52-59.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.747.52

Google Scholar

[13] C. Boni, D. Ferretti, E. Lenticchia, A. Tasora, DEM modelling of masonry vaults: influence of brick pattern and infill on stability during supports displacements. Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2019 – Structural Membranes 2019, Form and Force (2019).

Google Scholar

[14] A.T. Vermeltfoort, Analysis and experiments of masonry arches, in Historical Constructions, Guimarães, Lisbon, (2001) 7-9.

Google Scholar

[15] D. Ferretti, Z.P. Bažant. Stability of ancient masonry towers: Stress redistribution due to drying, carbonation, and creep. Cement and Concrete Research, 36-7(2006) 1389-1398.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.014

Google Scholar