Study of Fly Ash (FA) and Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) Geopolymer Mortar Resistance in Acidic Peat Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Peat is superficial deposit or soil with high organic content. The soil is highly compressible and acidic. The organic acidic water in swampy peat soil consists humic acid that is potentially corrosive to concrete and metal structures. Geopolymer is a material using waste from agro-industry such as fly ash (FA) and palm oil fuel ash (POFA) that is activated with alkaline solution. In this research, the acid resistance of geopolymer mortars from fly ash and palm oil fuel ash was measured by change in compressive strength and porosity. The samples were subjected to distilled water and acidic peat water. The OPC mortars showed a considerable decrease in compressive strength after subjected in peat water for up to 180 days. There was a fluctuated trend of geopolymer FA and a high decrease in compressive strength of geopolymer POFA after subjected to the peat water. The porosity of the geopolymer specimens was higher than the control mortars. However, it was observed that the geopolymer FA is more resistant to the acidic peat water than the geopolymer POFA due to stable aluminosilicate bonding.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

126-132

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Bakharev: Cement and Concrete Research Vol 35 (2005): p.658.

Google Scholar

[2] S.E. Wallah, D. Hardjito, D.M.J. Sumajouw and B.V. Rangan: Australian Structural Engineering Conference (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] M.A.M. Ariffin, M.A.R. Bhutta, M.W. Hussin, M.M. Tahir, and N. Aziah: Construction and Building Materials Vol 43 (2013): p.80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.018

Google Scholar

[4] Y.Y. Kim, B-J. Lee, V. Saraswathy, and S-J. Kwon: The Scientific World Journal Vol 2014 (2014).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Allahverdi and F. Skvara: Ceramics-Silikaty Vol 50(2006): p.1.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Fernandez-Jimenez, I. Garcia-Lodeiro, and A. Palomo: Journal Materials Science Vol 42 (2007): p.3055.

Google Scholar

[7] M.O. Yusuf, M.A.M. Johari, Z.A. Ahmad, and M. Maslehuddin. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (2015).

Google Scholar

[8] R.R. Llyod, J.L. Provis, and J.S.J. van Deventer: Materials and Structures Vol 45 (2012): p.1.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Agus, and I.G.M. Subiksa: Lahan Gambut: Potensi untuk Pertanian dan Aspek Lingkungan. (Balai Penelitian Tanah Badan Penelitian dan World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor 2008).

DOI: 10.21776/ub.jtsl.2019.006.1.2

Google Scholar

[10] P.J. Spedding: Fuel Vol 67 (1988): p.883.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Duraisamy, B.B.K. Huat, and A.A. Aziz: American Journal of Environmental Sciences Vol 3 (2007): p.259.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Kazemian, A. Prasad, B.B.K. Huat, J.B. Bazaz, T.A. Mohammed, and F.N. Aziz: Journal of Central South University of Technology Vol 18 (2011): p.840.

Google Scholar

[13] V. Zivica, 2006. Construction and Building Materials Vol 20 (2006): p.634.

Google Scholar

[14] D.E. Shirley: Impurities in concreting aggregates. (Cement and Concrete Association, Slough 1981).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Olivia, U.A. Hutapea., I.R. Sitompul., L Darmayanti., A. Kamaldi., and Z. Djauhari, in: The 6th International Conference of Asian Concrete Federation (2014). 2014, Seoul, Korea.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Chen, and Q. Wang: Bulletin of Engineering Geology Environmental Vol 65 (2006): p.445.

Google Scholar