J Vet Sci. 2012 Sep;13(3):287-292. English.
Published online Sep 20, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
Original Article

Protective effects of recombinant Brucella abortus Omp28 against infection with a virulent strain of Brucella abortus 544 in mice

Jeong Ju Lim,1 Dong Hyeok Kim,1 Jin Ju Lee,1 Dae Geun Kim,1 Wongi Min,1 Hu Jang Lee,1 Man Hee Rhee,3 and Suk Kim1,2
    • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.
    • 2Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.
    • 3College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea.
Received September 05, 2011; Revised October 15, 2011; Accepted March 21, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Brucella (B.) abortus have been extensively studied, but their immunogenicity and protective ability against B. abortus infection are still unclear. In the present study, B. abortus Omp28, a group 3 antigen, was amplified by PCR and cloned into a maltose fusion protein expression system. Recombinant Omp28 (rOmp28) was expressed in Escherichia coli and was then purified. Immunogenicity of rOmp28 was confirmed by Western blot analysis with Brucella-positive mouse serum. Furthermore, humoral- or cell-mediated immune responses measured by the production of IgG1 or IgG2a in rOmp28-immunized mice and the ability of rOmp28 immunization to protect against B. abortus infection were evaluated in a mouse model. In the immunogenicity analysis, the mean titers of IgG1 and IgG2a produced by rOmp28-immunized mice were 20-fold higher than those of PBS-treated mice throughout the entire experimental period. Furthermore, spleen proliferation and bacterial burden in the spleen of rOmp28-immunized mice were approximately 1.5-fold lower than those of PBS-treated mice when challenged with virulent B. abortus. These findings suggest that rOmp28 from B. abortus is a good candidate for manufacturing an effective subunit vaccine against B. abortus infection in animals.

Keywords
Brucella abortus; immunization; rOmp28; vaccine

Introduction

Brucella spp. are facultative intracellular Gram-negative bacteria and an important etiological agent that causes zoonotic disease. Brucella spp. are able to evade the host bactericidal phagocyte functions and proliferate within macrophages, thereby leading to the establishment of chronic infection [9, 10]. Brucella spp. may occur as either smooth or rough, expressing smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) or rough LPS (R-LPS) as major surface antigen (Ag). S-LPS expressed by Brucella is the strongest Ag compared to other antigenic molecules that are involved in the immune response against brucellosis [16]. Currently, Brucella (B.) abortus S19 is used to immunize cattle whereas B. melitensis Rev 1 is used to immunize goats and sheep [28]. In general, the use of live attenuated organisms as vaccines is associated with safety concerns during vaccine production, and attenuated Brucella vaccines have many specific disadvantages, including abortion in animals administered during pregnancy [26, 28]. For these reasons, different strategies are being sought for the production of safe, non-replicating vaccines that are easy to reproduce with consistent quality [20].

Recently, outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Brucella have been evaluated as a non-LPS group of immunogens and vaccine [6, 8, 16]. Brucella OMP Ag are categorized according to their molecular weight into three groups: group 1, 2, and 3. Group 1, 2, and 3 Ags have approximate molecular masses of 94, 41 to 43, and 25 to 30 kDa, respectively [31]. All Brucella OMPs Ags, especially those in group 3, are also known as important factors that affect Brucella virulence [22]. These OMPs are major components of the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-insoluble cell wall fraction, and confer important vaccinal properties against Brucella infection [13, 14]. The role of the two major members of OMPs, Omp25/Omp31 family, in protective immunity against Brucella infection is being studied by several groups [4, 12, 31]. Although Brucella OMPs Ags have important roles in immunogenicity and virulence, vaccines using OMPs Ags have not been fully evaluated.

We performed the present study to develop a subunit vaccine against Brucella infection in a mouse model. The gene encoding B. abortus Omp28 was cloned and expressed using a maltose fusion protein (pMAL) expression system. The ability of this recombinant protein (rOmp28) to protect against challenge with virulent B. abortus was evaluated along with the mouse response to immunization.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth condition

A smooth virulent B. abortus biovar 1 strain of B. abortus 544 was kindly provided by Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency in Korea and Escherichia (E.) coli DH5α cells was purchased from Invitrogen (USA). B. abortus was routinely cultured overnight in Brucella broth (BD Biosciences, USA) at 37℃ in a gyratory shaker (Waver Digital Platform; VWR International, USA) at 10 × g. When needed, solid medium was made by supplementing Brucella or Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Becton Dickinson, USA) with 1.5% (w/v) agar (Takara, Japan). E. coli DH5α cells were used for producing the necessary plasmid constructs. E. coli cultures were routinely grown at 37℃ in LB broth or agar supplemented with 100 µg/mL of ampicillin (Sigma, USA).

rOMP expression

Total genomic DNA was prepared from B. abortus. Briefly, B. abortus cells were cultured at 37℃ overnight in Brucella broth with shaking. Next, 5 mL of the culture were collected and genomic DNA from the cells was recovered with a bacteria genomic DNA purification kit (iNtRON, Korea). The B. abortus Omp28 gene was amplified by PCR with the following primer pair: 5'-GATC GGA TCC AAC ACT CGT GCT AGC AAT TTT-3' (BamHI site underlined) and 5'-GATC AAG CTT TTA CTT GAT TTC AAA AAC GAC-3' (HindIII site underlined). The amplified DNA was digested with appropriate restriction enzymes (BamHI and HindIII; Takara, Japan) and ligated into a pMAL vector (New England Biolabs, USA). The recombinant plasmid was then used to transform the E. coli DH5α host cells. An exponential-phase culture of a rOmp28 clone confirmed in ampicillin-containing media was spread onto LB agar plates containing isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (1 mM; Amresco, USA) and ampicillin (100 g/mL).

Purification of rOMP protein

One liter of LB broth supplemented with 100 µg/mL of ampicillin was inoculated with 10 mL of an overnight culture of bacteria expressing the fusion plasmid. IPTG was then added at a final concentration of 0.3 mM and the culture was further incubated at 37℃ for 2 h. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2,560 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 50 mL column buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, 200 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). The sample was frozen at -70℃ and thawed in cold water three times. The cells were then was sonicated (Bandelin electronic, Germany) at 10,000 Hz in an ice-water bath and centrifuged at 5,200 × g for 30 min to collect the supernatant. The supernatant was diluted with column buffer (1 : 5) and loaded into maltose resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified protein was stored at -20℃.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE was performed according to previously described methods [11]. The purified rOmp28 was boiled for 10 min at 100℃ and diluted in 2× Laemmli sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.004% bromophenol blue and 0.125 M Tris HCl, pH 6.8). After electrophoresis, the separated proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Milipore, USA) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol) with a constant current of 2 mA/cm2 for 30 min using a semi-dry electroblot assembly (Bio-Rad, USA). The membrane was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, USA) for 1 h at 4℃, washed three times with 0.05% PBS-Tween 20, and incubated with Brucella-positive mouse sera (produced from mouse immunized by virulent B. abortus, 1 : 1,000 dilution) in blocking buffer at 4℃ for 2 h. The membrane was then washed with 0.05% PBS-Tween 20 and incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1 : 10,000 dilution; Sigma, USA) in blocking buffer for 1 h at 4℃, and finally washed with 0.05% PBS-Tween 20. The proteins were detected with a luminol-coumaric acid-H2O2 detection solution (iNtRON, Korea) and exposure to X-ray film (Fuji, Japan).

Immunization and bacterial challenge in mice

Six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Japan SLC, Japan), two groups of five BALB/c mice each were immunized intraperitoneally with rOmp28 (100 µg/mL) or PBS in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) (Sigma, USA) on days 0, 14, and 35. Serum samples were obtained from all animals 14, 35, and 49 days after the first immunization via retro orbital bleeding. Serum titers of immunoglobulin G1 and IgG2a isotypes specific for rOmp28 were determined with an ELISA (BioTek, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cutoff value for the assay was calculated as the mean specific optical density for samples from nonimmunized mice diluted 1 : 100 as previously described [27].

To test the protective effects of rOmp28, mice were challenged with approximately 104 colony forming unit (CFU) of B. abortus 14 days after the last immunization. Ten days post-infection, all mice were scarified and the spleens were removed, weighed, and homogenized (Wisd homogenizer; Witeg, Germany) in saline. The homogenates were serially diluted (1 : 100~1,000) with PBS and plated on Brucella agar and then incubated for 3 days at 37℃. The number of CFUs for each spleen sample was determined to assess the virulence of the bacteria in each group of animals.

Statistical analysis

The results for each of experiment are expressed as the mean ± SD. Student's t-test was used to compare the groups. p-values < 0.05 were considered significantly different.

Results

PCR amplification and immunoreactivity of rOmp28

A specific band (753 bp) corresponding to B. abortus Omp28 was amplified by PCR. The PCR-amplified gene fragment encoding Omp28 was integrated into the pMAL expression vector and used to transform competent E. coli cells. The cloned product sequence was confirmed and found to completely match that of the reported Omp28 gene sequence for B. abortus (Genbank accession No. NC_007618.1). E. coli harboring the Omp28 plasmid were grown in LB medium, and 1 mM IPTG was used to induce Omp28 protein expression.

The protein product of the cloned Omp28 gene in the pMAL expression system was purified and was approximately 28 kDa (Fig. 1A). To evaluate rOmp28 protein immunoreactivity, Western blotting was performed (Fig. 1B). Our results showed that the purified rOmp28 strongly reacted with Brucella-positive mouse serum (1 : 1,000 dilution).

Fig. 1
Expression of recombinant Brucella (B.) abortus Omp28 (rOmp28) via a maltose fusion protein (pMAL) expression system. Total bacterial cell lysate proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (A). The proteins were then transferred to a membrane and incubated with Brucella-positive mouse serum (B). pMAL (arrowheads) and rOmp28 (arrows) are indicated. M: marker, Lane 1: pMAL, Lane 2: rOmp28.

IgG1 and IgG2a responses to rOmp28 immunization

To test the protective effect of rOmp28, two groups of mice were immunized with purified rOmp28 protein or PBS with IFA on days 0, 14, and 35. Blood was collected from both groups 14, 35, and 49 days after the first immunization, and the IgG1 and IgG2a titers were determined. Throughout the entire experiment, the mean log titers of both IgG1 and IgG2a were significantly higher for the rOmp28-immunized mice compared to the animals injected with PBS (Figs. 2A and B). Our results clearly indicated that administration of rOmp28 increased both humoral and cell mediated immune response by inducing IgG1 and IgG2a production.

Fig. 2
Kinetics of the immune response elicited by immunization with rOmp28. The IgG1 (A) and IgG2a (B) log titers were determined by ELISA. Significant differences between the rOmp28-immunized and control (PBS-treated) mice are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001).

Protection of rOmp28 against B. abortus challenge

To analyze the ability of rOmp28 to protect against infection with virulent B. abortus, an in vivo protection study was performed in BALB/c mice (two groups with five mice each). In this experiment, protection was defined as a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the mice receiving the vaccine when compared to animals injected with PBS. Mice treated with PBS developed splenomegaly that was enlarged 2~3 times its normal size as a consequence of the host inflammatory response, but this was not observed in the rOmp28-immunized group (Fig. 3). Vaccine efficacy was calculated by comparing the log units of bacterial burden in the spleens of the PBS-treated or rOmp28-immunized mice after B. abortus challenge. The mean log titers were 5.49 ± 0.49 for the PBS-treated animals and 2.89 ± 0.17 for the rOmp28-immunized (Fig. 4). These finding showed that immunization with rOmp28 conferred protection against challenge with virulent B. abortus.

Fig. 3
Spleen weight of mice treated with PBS or immunized with rOmp28 and infected intraperitoneally with B. abortus. Spleen weights of the mice 10 days post-infection are shown. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5 per group). Spleen weight differed significantly between the rOmp28-immunized group and control (PBS-treated) animals as indicated by asterisks (**p < 0.01).

Fig. 4
Bacterial proliferation in the spleen of mice treated with PBS or immunized with rOmp28 and infected intraperitoneally with B. abortus. The numbers of viable bacteria recovered from spleens of the mice 10 days post-infections are shown. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 5 per group). Bacteria proliferation differed significantly between the rOmp28-immunized group and control (PBS-treated) animals as indicated by asterisks (**p < 0.01).

Discussion

In a previous study, groups of Brucella OMPs were originally grouped according to their molecular weights and presences in outer membrane preparations [30]. OMPs play a vital role in maintaining the integrity and selective permeability of membranes [24]. In addition, expression of these proteins is often regulated by environmental signals; this characteristic is important for bacterial pathogenesis by enhancing adaptability to various environmental conditions [4, 21].

Live attenuated Brucella vaccines interfere with serologic diagnosis of brucellosis because these vaccines induce a high-titer antibody response against the LPS O-polysaccharide. Antibody response is also limited to animals that develop an active case of brucellosis which is often delayed compared to a response against smooth LPS [19]. Accordingly, identification of Brucella protein components that can elicit an antibody response in the majority of infected animals would improve serological diagnostic methods and vaccinal strategies for treating brucellosis.

Development of a safe and effective vaccine against brucellosis has proven to be difficult. Indeed, numerous cell surface and intracellular components were examined as potential factors that could protect against Brucella infection. However, only low or intermediate levels of protection were achieved [1, 5, 29]. Regardless of the vaccine composition, a successful vaccination strategy would probably need to evoke a vigorous broad-based immune response. OMPs of Brucella spp. were characterized as immunogenic and protective Ags. Yet previous studies [4, 7, 12] were focused on the major OMPs (Omp25 and Omp31), and investigations on the protective capacity of minor OMPs were rarely performed. A previous report demonstrated that inoculation with B. abortus rOmp18 induces a Th1 response in vitro and the production of rOmp18-specific antibodies in BALB/c mice [30]. However, rOmp18 preparations were found to not protect against challenge with a virulent B. abortus strain [30]. Since Brucella species are facultative intracellular pathogens that reside mainly in macrophages, cellular immune responses are considered central for immunization [30].

Host immunity against B. abortus infection involves both Th1- and Th2-specific immune responses. Th1 responses are characterized by cellular immunity and the production of IgG2a antibodies. Th2 responses are characterized by humoral immunity, specifically the production of IgG1 [23]. The present study demonstrated that immunization with purified rOmp28 elicits protection against B. abortus infection in mice. Injection with rOmp28 produced in vivo Th1 and Th2 immune responses in the BALB/c mice (as shown by the production of IgG1 and IgG2a), and conferred a significant level of protection against challenge with virulent B. abortus 544. Because rOmp28 provided protection against B. abortus infection, this recombinant protein may be an important candidate for producing a vaccine against Brucella.

B. abortus infection results in a Th1 cellular immune response that promotes bacterial clearance [2]. Th1-isotype antibodies, such as IgG2a, are preferentially generated in humoral immune response by B cells against intracellular microorganisms, and may also opsonize the pathogen to facilitate phagocytosis [18]. During the course of infection, B. abortus is mainly cell-associated. However, this pathogen can be accessed through other mechanisms for clearance, such as ones mediated by IgG2a antibodies [15]. Presumably, these antibodies may have a greater ability than other isotypes to recognize microbial Ags on the surface of infected cells. The current study demonstrated that IgG2a and IgG1 responses were robust in B. abortus-infected mice vaccinated with rOmp28. It has been demonstrated that rOmp28 of B. melitensis can also protect against B. abortus infection [17]. In addition, rOmp28 of B. melitensis induced a humoral immune response in humans infected with both B. abortus and B. melitensis [22]. According to gene sequence data (Genbank accession no. NC_007618.1), the Omp28 homology between B. melitensis and B. abortus is almost 99% (NC_010742.1). These findings suggest that Omp28 is highly conserved among B. melitensis and B. abortus, and rOmp28 of both B. melitensis and B. abortus offers significant protection against virulent B. abortus infection.

The development of subcellular protein-based vaccines to prevent brucellosis has several advantages. One major advantage is the possible ability to differentiate vaccinated animals from infected animals. The current live attenuated vaccines against brucellosis for animals induce the high-titer production of antibodies against the O-polysaccharide of LPS, which interferes with ability to serologically diagnose the disease [3]. It has been reported that the B. abortus strain RB51, which is used for a general live attenuated vaccine, expresses the LPS O-side chain. Some cattle vaccinated with this strain were found to produce positive results for the card or buffered acid plate agglutination tests as well as the standard tube agglutination test [25].

In summary, the results from our study suggested that rOmp28 of B. abortus is a good vaccine candidate for protecting against B. abortus infection. However, the protective effects of rOmp28 in mice and the role of Omp28 in B. abortus virulence are still unclear. Consequently, further characterization of group 3 OMP genes of B. abortus including Omp28 will be required to understand the immunological and pathological aspects of brucellosis.

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by iPET (Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (112012-3), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Korea.

References

    1. Al-Mariri A, Tibor A, Mertens P, De Bolle X, Michel P, Godefroid J, Walravens K, Letesson JJ. Protection of BALB/c mice against Brucella abortus 544 challenge by vaccination with bacterioferritin or P39 recombinant proteins with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as adjuvant. Infect Immun 2001;69:4816–4822.
    1. Baldwin CL, Parent M. Fundamentals of host immune response against Brucella abortus: what the mouse model has revealed about control of infection. Vet Microbiol 2002;90:367–382.
    1. Blasco JM, Marín CM, Barberán M, Moriyón I, Díaz R. Immunization with Brucella melitensis Rev 1 against Brucella ovis infection of rams. Vet Microbiol 1987;14:381–392.
    1. Caro-Hernández P, Fernández-Lago L, de Miguel MJ, Martín-Martín AI, Cloeckaert A, Grilló MJ, Vizcaíno N. Role of the Omp25/Omp31 family in outer membrane properties and virulence of Brucella ovis. Infect Immun 2007;75:4050–4061.
    1. Cespedes S, Andrews E, Folch H, Oñate A. Identification and partial characterisation of a new protective antigen of Brucella abortus. J Med Microbiol 2000;49:165–170.
    1. Cloeckaert A, Jacques I, Bosseray N, Limet JN, Bowden R, Dubray G, Plommet M. Protection conferred on mice by monoclonal antibodies directed against outer-membrane-protein antigens of Brucella. J Med Microbiol 1991;34:175–180.
    1. Cloeckaert A, Vizcaíno N, Paquet JY, Bowden RA, Elzer PH. Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp.: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol 2002;90:229–247.
    1. de Wergifosse P, Lintermans P, Limet JN, Cloeckaert A. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene coding for the major 25-kilodalton outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus. J Bacteriol 1995;177:1911–1914.
    1. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF. Entry and intracellular localization of Brucella spp. in Vero cells: fluorescence and electron microscopy. Vet Pathol 1990;27:317–328.
    1. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF. Penetration and intracellular growth of Brucella abortus in nonphagocytic cells in vitro. Infect Immun 1990;58:2320–2328.
    1. Dubray G, Bézard G. Isolation of three Brucella abortus cell-wall antigens protective in murine experimental brucellosis. Ann Rech Vet 1980;11:367–373.
    1. Edmonds MD, Cloeckaert A, Booth NJ, Fulton WT, Hagius SD, Walker JV, Elzer PH. Attenuation of a Brucella abortus mutant lacking a major 25 kDa outer membrane protein in cattle. Am J Vet Res 2001;62:1461–1466.
    1. Edmonds MD, Cloeckaert A, Hagius SD, Samartino LE, Fulton WT, Walker JV, Enright FM, Booth NJ, Elzer PH. Pathogenicity and protective activity in pregnant goats of a Brucella melitensis Δomp25 deletion mutant. Res Vet Sci 2002;72:235–239.
    1. Erdenebaatar J, Bayarsaikhan B, Watarai M, Makino S, Shirahata T. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:710–714.
    1. Golding B, Scott DE, Scharf O, Huang LY, Zaitseva M, Lapham C, Eller N, Golding H. Immunity and protection against Brucella abortus. Microbes Infect 2001;3:43–48.
    1. Jiménez de Bagüés MP, Marín CM, Blasco JM, Moriyón I, Gamazo C. An ELISA with Brucella lipopolysaccharide antigen for the diagnosis of B. melitensis infection in sheep and for the evaluation of serological responses following subcutaneous or conjunctival B. melitensis strain Rev 1 vaccination. Vet Microbiol 1992;30:233–241.
    1. Kaushik P, Singh DK, Kumar SV, Tiwari AK, Shukla G, Dayal S, Chaudhuri P. Protection of mice against Brucella abortus 544 challenge by vaccination with recombinant OMP28 adjuvanted with CpG oligonucleotides. Vet Res Commun 2010;34:119–132.
    1. Ko J, Splitter GA. Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003;16:65–78.
    1. Letesson JJ, Tibor A, van Eynde G, Wansard V, Weynants V, Denoel P, Saman E. Humoral immune responses of Brucella-infected cattle, sheep, and goats to eight purified recombinant Brucella proteins in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1997;4:556–564.
    1. Liljeqvist S, Ståhl S. Production of recombinant subunit vaccines: protein immunogens, live delivery systems and nucleic acid vaccines. J Biotechnol 1999;73:1–33.
    1. Lin J, Huang S, Zhang Q. Outer membrane proteins: key players for bacterial adaptation in host niches. Microbes Infect 2002;4:325–331.
    1. Lindler LE, Hadfield TL, Tall BD, Snellings NJ, Rubin FA, Van De Verg LL, Hoover D, Warren RL. Cloning of a Brucella melitensis group 3 antigen gene encoding Omp28, a protein recognized by the humoral immune response during human brucellosis. Infect Immun 1996;64:2490–2499.
    1. Maecker HT, Do MS, Levy S. CD81 on B cells promotes interleukin 4 secretion and antibody production during T helper type 2 immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:2458–2462.
    1. Moriyón I, López-Goñi I. Structure and properties of the outer membranes of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. Int Microbiol 1998;1:19–26.
    1. Olsen SC, Evans D, Hennager SG, Cheville NF, Stevens MG. Serologic responses of Brucella abortus strain 19 calfhood-vaccinated cattle following adult vaccination with strain RB51. J Vet Diagn Invest 1996;8:451–454.
    1. Olsen SC, Stoffregen WS. Essential role of vaccines in brucellosis control and eradication programs for livestock. Expert Rev Vaccines 2005;4:915–928.
    1. Pasquevich KA, Estein SM, García Samartino C, Zwerdling A, Coria LM, Barrionuevo P, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH, Cassataro J. Immunization with recombinant Brucella species outer membrane protein Omp16 or Omp19 in adjuvant induces specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as systemic and oral protection against Brucella abortus infection. Infect Immun 2009;77:436–445.
    1. Schurig GG, Sriranganathan N, Corbel MJ. Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol 2002;90:479–496.
    1. Velikovsky CA, Goldbaum FA, Cassataro J, Estein S, Bowden RA, Bruno L, Fossati CA, Giambartolomei GH. Brucella lumazine synthase elicits a mixed Th1-Th2 immune response and reduces infection in mice challenged with Brucella abortus 544 independently of the adjuvant formulation used. Infect Immun 2003;71:5750–5755.
    1. Vemulapalli R, Cravero S, Calvert CL, Toth TE, Sriranganathan N, Boyle SM, Rossetti OL, Schurig GG. Characterization of specific immune responses of mice inoculated with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing an 18-kilodalton outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000;7:114–118.
    1. Verstreate DR, Creasy MT, Caveney NT, Baldwin CL, Blab MW, Winter AJ. Outer membrane proteins of Brucella abortus: isolation and characterization. Infect Immun 1982;35:979–989.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 4

PERMALINK