Culture in Nepal: An Exploration of the Legacy and its Way Forward
Corresponding Author(s) : Mamta Siwakoti
Kathmandu School of Law Review,
Volume 6, Issue 2, November 2018
Abstract
“I do not think we would conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation.” - Thomas Babington Macaulay.
This paper quotes the ever-controversial Thomas Babington Macaulay at the outset because it seems we have long forgotten the gravity our roots hold. It is, now, imperative that we, the Nepali people realize the gold mine we are sitting on, our unique identity and the heritage associated with it. We have already lost a lot; some in the name of development and some in the crevices of time. Our languages, education system, music, food, buildings, settlements, the uniqueness and practices which are associated with our civilization are the ones that set us apart from the world. While the researchers wholeheartedly agree that certain practices such as Sati, Chaupadi, Deuki, Jhuma were indeed violations of inherent human rights in the name of customs, culture and practices and had to be eradicated, we also equally raise voices for those aspects of our culture that we can celebrate, namely our cultural heritage. Now maybe the right time to decide what we want in the form of development? Another copy of a Western City or a Nepal that is unique in all its rights, a Nepal where road expansion is not synonyms to development, where speaking English is not the yardstick for assessing education and where we make our own rules for development. This paper aims to raise questions regarding the said issues. This paper is based on the doctrines related to cultural heritage in Nepal. The researchers carried out on-site surveillance but owing to the lack of technical expertise in the field, the researchers have based their conclusions and recommendations mainly on the reports of Department of Archaeology, experts in the field of cultural heritage in Nepal and government documents depicting the scenario of heritage in Nepal, pre and post the 2015 earthquake.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
Joanna Turnbull et al, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 8th ed., Oxford University Press, London, 2010, p. 370.
Blaškić AC, The Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić, Appeal Judgement, 2004, IT-95-14-T, ICTY, para. 124.
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, 1037 UNTS 151, adopted on 16 November 1972, entered into force 17 December 1975.
Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, 2368 UNTS 1, adopted on 17 October 2003, entered into force 20 April 2004.
Carl Pruscha et al., Kathmandu Valley: The Preservation of Physical Environment and Cultural Heritage: A Protective Inventory, Anton Schroll & Co. Publishers, Vienna, vol. 1, 1975, p. 10; See generally Micheal Hutt et al., A Guide to the Art and Architecture of the Kathmandu Valley, Adroit Publishers, New Delhi, 2010.
Space Nepal, ‘Religious architecture of Kathmandu valley- a result of Lichhavi period pluralist culture’, 3 January 2016, Architecture, Historic Preservation, Research Project, available at https://spacesnepalblog.wordpress.com/2016/01/03/religious-architecture-of-kathmandu-valley-a-result-of-lichhavi-period-pluralist-culture/, accessed on 20 September 2018.
.R. Regmi, Ancient Nepal, Firma K. L. Mukhopadhyay, Calcutta, 1969, p. 8.
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts (Protocol II) [AP II], 1125 UNTS 609, adopted on 8 June 1977, art 16; Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts (Protocol I) [AP I], 1125 UNTS 3, adopted on 8 June 1977, art 53; Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court [Rome Statute], 2187 UNTS 3, adopted on 17 July 1998, art 8(2)(e)(iv).
Ibid.
Al Faqi TC, Situation in the Republic of Mali in the case of The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, Judgment and Sentence, Trial Chamber VIII, 2016, ICC-01/12-01/15, ICC, para 43; Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković et al, Trial Judgment, 2013, IT-04-74-T, ICTY, para 1282.
Pruscha (n 5), p. 20.
Ibid, p. 23.
UNESCO, ‘Tentative Lists’, UNESCO Official Website available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/?action=listtentative&pattern=&state=np&theme=&criteria_restrication=&date_start=&date_end=&order=, accessed on 1 September 2018.
Pruscha (n 5), p. 42.
Ibid.
S.J. Chung, ‘East Asian Values in Historic Conservation’, vol. 11, no. 1, Journal of Architectural Conservation, 2005, p. 16.
See generally D. Bajracharya, Lichchavi kal ka abhilekh, Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies, Kathmandu, 1978.
Neelam Pradhananga, Krishna K. Shrestha & John Dee, ‘Sustaining Indigenous Heritage: Learning from the Guthi System in Nepal’, 17 November 2009, p. 9.
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo, Project for Investigation of Damage Situation of Cultural Heritage in Nepal, Japan Centre for International Cooperation in Conservation, Tokyo, 2016, p. 37.
Ibid.
Wolfgang Korn, ‘The Traditional Architecture of the Kathmandu Valley’, Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathmandu, 2007, pp. 148-151.
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties (n 19), p. 44.
Nippon Institute of Technology, ‘Research Mission for the Study of Old Royal Palaces of the Kingdom of Nepal’, The Royal Buildings in Nepal: A Report on the Old Royal Palaces of the Kingdom of Nepal, Chuo Koron Bjutsu Shuppan, Tokyo, 1981, pp. 107-111.
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties (n 19), pp. 44-45.
Government of Nepal, Kathmandu Valley World Heritage Site, 42 COM 7 B. Kathmandu Valley (Nepal) C 121, 2017, p. 6.
Ibid, p. 8.
Ibid, p. 6.
Ibid, p. 10.
World Heritage Centre, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention on the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris, 2005, paras 79-80.
Ibid, paras 87-88.
Ibid, para 49.
Government of Nepal 2017 (n 25), p 7.
Government of Nepal, Kathmandu Valley World Heritage Site- Integrated Management Framework, KAT/2007/PI/H/3, 2007, pp 4-8.
Ibid, p. 19.
Ibid, p. 42.
Government of Nepal 2017 (n 25), p. 8.
Ibid, p. 10.
See Generally, G. Toffin, ‘From kin to caste: The role of guthis in Newar society and culture’, 2005; Ulrike Müller-Böker, ‘Spatial Organization of a Caste Society: The Example of the Newar in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal’, vol. 8, no. 1, Mountain Research and Development, 1988, pp. 23-31.
Ancient Monument Preservation Act, 1956 (Pracheen Smarak Samrakshan Ain 2013).
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (n 3).
Ancient Monument Preservation Act, 1956 (Pracheen Smarak Samrakshan Ain 2013), ss 3-3G.
Ibid, s 13.
Established under the Government of Nepal in 1953, Department of Archaeology is a major branch under Ministry of Culture. The department oversees all the archaeological activities to the protection of the cultural heritage in the country. It also functions as a core implementation mechanisms body as per the provision of the ‘Ancient Monument Preservation Act, 2013’ (A.D. 1956). Ramshahapath, Kathmandu, Nepal available at http://www.doa.gov.np/, accessed on accessed on 1 September 2018.
Ancient Monument Preservation Act, 1956 (Pracheen Smarak Samrakshan Ain 2013), s 3.
Local Self-Governance Act, 1999, (Sthaaniya Prashaashan Ain 2028), ss 43, 96, 189, 195.
Sir Seretse Khama, ‘A nation without a past is a lost nation, and people without a past are people without a soul’; Marcus Garvey, ‘A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots’.
World Heritage Convention, ‘Brief History’, UNESCO available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/convention/, accessed on 3 September 2018.
See generally Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (n 3).
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Belgium v. Spain, Second Phase, 1970, ICJ Rep. p. 3.
Sebastián Green Martínez, ‘Locus Standi Before the International Court of Justice for Violations of the World Heritage Convention’, vol. 5, Transnational Dispute Management, 2013 available at https://ssrn.com/abstra ct=2356102 accessed on 5 September 2018; O’Keefe, Roger, ‘World Cultural Heritage: Obligations to the International Community as a Whole?’, vol. 53, no. 1, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, pp. 189–209 available at www.jstor.org/stable/366314, accessed on 5 September 2018.
Operational Guidelines (n 29), para 49.
UNSC, Resolution 2347 (2017) S/RES/2347 (2017), 24 March 2017 [UNSC Res 2347], para 13.
Pruscha (n 5 ), p. 10.
Ancient Monument Preservation Act, Nepal, 1956 (Pracheen Smarak Samrakshan Ain 2013), s 3; Ancient Monuments Preservation Rules, Nepal, 1989(Pracheen Smarak Samrakshan Niyamaawali 2046), rule 4.1.
Communication from DoA to Kathmandu Metropolitan, 2073/01/20; Communication from DoA to Kathmandu Metropolitan, 2074/07/08.
Damodar Neupane, Bagburbar, k Cha, K Chaina? available at https://www.kantipurdaily.com/news/2017/11/01/201711 01162920.html, accessed on 3 September 2018 ; Dr. Sudharshan Raj Tiwari, Heritage conservationist to protest against Baghdurbar demolition plan, available at http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2018-07-19/heritage-conservationist-to-protest-against-baghdurbar-demolition-plan.html, accessed on 3 September 2018.
Purshottam Shumsher, Ranakalin Pramukh Aitihasik Durbar Haru Amar Singh Thapa Dwara Nirmit Baghdurbar, pp 7-9.
'Tokyo Bon 2020', 19 November 2017, Youtube available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhGnuWwpNxI, accessed on 5 September 2018.
National Research Institute for Cultural Properties (n 19), p. 27.