Palabras clave
manejo forestal
cambio climático
valor actual neto
captura de carbono
Cómo citar
Resumen
En la actualidad, la determinación de las edades óptimas de corte, incluyendo diversos valores de ecosistemas forestales junto con la producción de madera, es extremadamente importante en la silvicultura. Este estudio presenta las edades óptimas de corte en Populus x euramericana (Dode) Guinier cv. I-214, incluyendo la producción de madera y los valores de captura de carbono en Turquía. También se evalúan los efectos de las tasas de descuento y precios del carbono en las edades óptimas de corte, utilizando el método del valor actual neto. Las curvas de crecimiento y rendimiento y los factores de conversión de carbono/biomasa con costos de plantación forestales se utilizaron para determinar las edades óptimas de corte. Los resultados del estudio de caso mostraron que la integración de los beneficios de captura de carbono con los beneficios de la madera incrementó las edades óptimas de corte de los bosques de álamo híbrido. Las edades óptimas de corte descendieron de 19 a 14 años, dependiendo del aumento en las tasas de descuento. Cuando los precios de carbono aumentaron, las edades óptimas de corte también aumentaron de 17 a 20 años. En presencia de los beneficios de captura de carbono, el aumento de las edades óptimas de corte produjo beneficios económicos netos de 374 a 1,654 USD·ha-1. Los valores actuales netos totales, obtenidos de la producción de madera y beneficios de captura de carbono, aumentaron entre 6 y 26 %, dependiendo del aumento de los precios del carbono (de 0 a 40 USD·t -1 carbono).
Citas
Asante, P., & Armstrong, G. W. (2012). Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis. Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 145-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.002
Başkent, E. Z., Keleş, S., & Yolasığmaz, H. A. (2008). Comparing multi-purpose forest management with timber management in incorporating timber, carbon and oxygen values: A case study. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23(2), 105-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701803536
Başkent, E. Z., Keleş, S., & Kadıoğulları, A. İ. & Bingöl, O. (2011). Quantifying the effects of forest management strategies on the production of forest values: timber, carbon, oxygen, water, and soil. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 16, 145-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-010-9238-y
Başkent, E. Z., Keleş, S., & Kadıoğulları, A. İ. (2014). Challenges in developing and implementing a decision support systems (ETÇAP) in forest management planning: A case study in Honaz and İbradı, Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(sup1), 121-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.822543
Birler, A. S. (2009). Industrial forest plantations. Turkey: Düzce University, Faculty of Forestry.
Cacho, O. J., Hean, R. L., & Wise, R. M. (2003). Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(2), 153-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00208
Demirci, U., & Öztürk, A. (2015). Carbon markets as a financial instrument in the forestry sector in Turkey. International Forestry Review, 17(2), 141-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815815500606
Diaz-Balteiro, L., Martell, D. L., Romero, C., & Weintraub, A. (2014). The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: A multi-criteria approach. Natural Hazards, 72(2), 375-387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1013-3
Diaz-Balteiro, L., & Rodriguez, L. C. E. (2006). Optimal rotations on Eucalyptus plantations including carbon sequestration- A comparison of results in Brazil and Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 229, 247-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.005
Kadıoğulları, A.İ., & Karahalil, U. (2013). Spatiotemporal change of carbon storage in forest biomass: A case study in Köprülü Canyon National Park. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 1-14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265683339_Spatiotemporal_Change_of_Carbon_Storage_in_Forest_Biomass_A_case_Study_in_Koprulu_Canyon_National_Park
Keleş, S. (2010). Forest optimization models including timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 17(6), 468- 474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2010.519574
Keleş, S. (2015). Comparison of alternative approaches of estimating above-ground tree biomass in a forest ecosystem of Turkey. International Journal of Global Warming, 9(3), 397–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2016.075449
Keleş, S., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Modeling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16(3), 473-479. http://www.pjoes.com/pdf/16.3/473-479.pdf
Keleş, S., Kadıoğulları, A. İ., & Başkent, E. Z. (2012). The effects of land-use and land-cover changes on carbon storage in forest timber biomass: A case study in Torul, Turkey. Journal of Land Use Science, 7(3), 125-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2010.537789
Kula, E., & Gunalay, Y. (2012). Carbon sequestration, optimum forest rotation and their environmental impact. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 37, 18-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.007
Labrecque, S., Fournier, R. A., Luther, J. E., & Piercey, D. (2006). A comparison of four methods to map biomass from Landsat-TM and inventory data in western Newfoundland. Forest Ecology and Management, 226(1- 3), 129–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.030
Olschewski, R., & Benitez, P. C. (2010). Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects. Journal of Forest Economics, 16(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2009.03.002
Nepal, P., Grala, R. K., & Grebner, D. L. (2012). Financial feasibility of increasing carbon sequestration in harvested wood products in Mississippi. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 99-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.005
Nijnik, M., Pajot, G., Moffat, A. J., & Slee, B. (2013). An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change. Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 34-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.002
Romero, C., Rios, V., & Diaz-Balteiro, L. (1998). Optimal forest rotation age when carbon captured is considered: theory and applications. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(2), 121-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3009978
Sanquetta, C. R., Corte, A., & da Silva, F. (2011). Biomass expansion factor and root-to-shoot ratio for Pinus in Brazil. Carbon Balance and Management, 6(6), 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-6
Sivrikaya, F., Keleş, S., & Çakır, G. (2007). Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132(1-3), 429- 438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9545-6
Sohngen, B., & Brown, S. (2008). Extending timber rotations: Carbon and cost implications. Climate Policy, 8(5), 435- 451. doi: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0396
Tolunay, D. (2011). Total carbon stock and carbon accumulation in living tree biomass in forest ecosystems of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35(3), 265-279. doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0909-369
Torres, I. L., Perez, S. O., Fernandez, A. M., & Belda, C. F. (2010). Estimating the optimal rotation age of Pinus nigra in the Spanish Iberian System applying discrete optimal control. Forest Systems, 19(3), 306-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2010193-8560
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2016 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente