Mixed leaf litter decomposition and N, P release with a focus on Phyllostachys edulis (Carrière) J. Houz. forest in subtropical southeastern China

Lei Shi, Shaohui Fan, Zehui Jiang, Lianghua Qi, Guanglu Liu

Abstract


As an important non-wood forest product and wood substitute, Moso bamboo grows extremely rapidly and hence acquires large quantities of nutrients from the soil. With regard to litter decomposition, N and P release in Moso bamboo forests is undoubtedly important; however, to date, no comprehensive analysis has been conducted. Here, we chose two dominant species (i.e., Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei), in addition to Moso bamboo, which are widely distributed in subtropical southeastern China, and created five leaf litter mixtures (PE100, PE80PB20, PE80CL20, PE50PB50 and PE50CL50) to investigate species effects on leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release (N and P) via the litterbag method. Over a one-year incubation experiment, mass loss varied significantly with litter type (P < 0.05). The litter mixtures containing the higher proportions (≥80%) of Moso bamboo decomposed faster; the remaining litter compositions followed Olson’s decay mode well (R2 > 0.94, P < 0.001). N and P had different patterns of release; overall, N showed great temporal variation, while P was released from the litter continually. The mixture of Moso bamboo and Phoebe bournei (PE80PB20 and PE50PB50) showed significantly faster P release compared to the other three types, but there was no significant difference in N release. Litter decomposition and P release were related to initial litter C/N ratio, C/P ratio, and/or C content, while no significant relationship between N release and initial stoichiometric ratios was found. The Moso bamboo–Phoebe bournei (i.e., bamboo–broadleaved) mixture appeared to be the best choice for nutrient return and thus productivity and maintenance of Moso bamboo in this region.

Keywords


litterbag; litter decomposition; litter mixture; mixed mode; Moso bamboo; nutrient return; N release; P release

Full Text:

PDF

References


McLaren JR, Turkington R. Plant identity influences decomposition through more than one mechanism. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023702

Purahong W, Kapturska D, Pecyna MJ, Schulz E, Schloter M, Buscot F, et al. Influence of different forest system management practices on leaf litter decomposition rates, nutrient dynamics and the activity of ligninolytic enzymes: a case study from Central European forests. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093700

Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD. Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science. 2004;305(5683):509–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1098778

Zhou G, Guan L, Wei X, Tang X, Liu S, Liu J, et al. Factors influencing leaf litter decomposition: an intersite decomposition experiment across China. Plant Soil. 2008;311(1–2):61–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9658-5

Aerts R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos. 1997;739:439–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546886

Heneghan L, Coleman DC, Zou X, Crossley DA, Haines BL. Soil microarthropod community structure and litter decomposition dynamics: a study of tropical and temperate sites. Appl Soil Ecol. 1998;9(1–3):33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00050-X

Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, et al. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science. 2007;315(5810):361–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853

Osono T, Azuma J, Hirose D. Plant species effect on the decomposition and chemical changes of leaf litter in grassland and pine and oak forest soils. Plant Soil. 2014;376(1–2):411–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1993-5

Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett. 2008;11(10):1065–1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x

Zhang D, Hui D, Luo Y, Zhou G. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J Plant Ecol. 2008;1(2):85–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtn002

Swan CM, Gluth MA, Horne CL. Leaf litter species evenness influences nonadditive breakdown in a headwater stream. Ecology. 2009;90(6):1650–1658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/08-0329.1

Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(25):13730–13734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730

Muller RN. Nutrient relations of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystems. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, editors. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 15–37.

Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology. 1982;63(3):621–626. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936780

Hobbie SE. Contrasting effects of substrate and fertilizer nitrogen on the early stages of litter decomposition. Ecosystems. 2005;8(6):644–656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0110-7

Zhao L, Hu Y, Lin G, Gao Y, Fang Y, Zeng D. Mixing effects of understory plant litter on decomposition and nutrient release of tree litter in two plantations in Northeast China. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076334

Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos. 2004;104(2):230–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12738.x

Song X, Zhou G, Jiang H, Yu S, Fu J, Li W, et al. Carbon sequestration by Chinese bamboo forests and their ecological benefits: assessment of potential, problems, and future challenges. Environ Rev. 2011;19:418–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/a11-015

Fu M, Fang M, Xie J, Chen Y, Wang H. Nutrient cycling in bamboo stands 1. leaf litter and its decomposition in pure Phyllostachys pubescens stands. For Res. 1989;2(3):207–213.

Soil Survey Staff. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA); 1999.

Jones JB. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001.

Bocock KL, Gilbert OJW. The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant Soil. 1957;9(2):179–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/a11-015

Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon,and organic matter. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; 1982. p. 539–579.

Bremner JM. Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, et al., editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; 1996. p. 1085–1122.

Watanabe FS, Olsen SR. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1965;291(6):677–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900060025x

Hanlon EA. Elemental determination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. In: Kalra YP, editor. Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998. p. 157–164.

Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology. 1963;44(2):322–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1932179

SPSS Incorporation. SPSS 13.0 for the Windows. Chicago, IL.: SPSS Incorporation; 2004.

Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM. Variation in the chemical composition of green leaves and leaf litters from three deciduous tree species growing on different soil types. For Ecol Manage. 2005;210(1–3):303–319.

Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM. Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35(3):391–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00290-0

Hilli S, Stark S, Derome J. Litter decomposition rates in relation to litter stocks in boreal coniferous forests along climatic and soil fertility gradients. Appl Soil Ecol. 2010;46(2):200–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.08.012

Aponte C, García LV, Maranon T. Tree species effect on litter decomposition and nutrient release in mediterranean oak forests changes over time. Ecosystems. 2012;15(7):1204–1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9577-4

Guendehou GHS, Liski J, Tuomi M, Moudachirou M, Sinsin B, Makipaa R. Decomposition and changes in chemical composition of leaf litter of five dominant tree species in a West African tropical forest. Trop Ecol. 2014;55(2):207–220.

Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, et al. Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett. 2005;8(8):811–818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x

Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Ogdahl M, Zytkowiak R, Hale C, et al. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology. 2006;87(9):2288–2297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2288:TSEODA]2.0.CO;2

Semwal RL, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, Sen KK, Saxena KG. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns of six multipurpose tree species of central Himalaya, India. Biomass Bioenergy. 2003;24(1):3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00087-9

Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Prescott CE, Fyles J, Titus BD. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems. 2006;9(1):46–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-004-0026-x

Blair JM, Crossley DA. Litter decomposition, nitrogen dynamics and litter microarthropods in a Southern Appalachian hardwood forest 8 years following clearcutting. J Appl Ecol. 1988;25(2):683–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2403854

Fang Y, Yoh M, Koba K, Zhu W, Takebayashi Y, Xiao Y, et al. Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17(2):872–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x

Fang Y, Gundersen P, Vogt RD, Koba K, Chen F, Chen XY, et al. Atmospheric deposition and leaching of nitrogen in Chinese forest ecosystems. J For Res. 2011;16(5):341–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10310-011-0267-4

Lü C, Tian H. Spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen deposition in China: synthesis of observational data. J Geophys Res. 2007;112(D22). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007990

Manzoni S, Jackson RB, Trofymow JA, Porporato A. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science. 2008;321(5889):684–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1159792

Blair JM. Nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing deciduous leaf litter in the Southern Appalachians. Soil Biol Biochem. 1988;20(5):693–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90154-X

Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A. Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr. 2010;80(1):89–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/09-0179.1

Cortina J, Romanya J, Vallejo VR. Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching from the forest floor of a mature Pinus radiata stand. Geoderma. 1995;66(3–4):321–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(95)00006-A

Duffy PD, Schreiber JD, McDowell LL. Leaching of nitrogen, phosphorus, and total organic-carbon from loblolly pine litter by simulated rainfall. For Sci. 1985;31(3):750–759.

Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Schnecker J, Wild B, Leitner S, Hofhansl F, et al. Stoichiometric controls of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in decomposing beech leaf litter. Ecology. 2012;93(4):770–782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/11-0721.1

Perry DA, Choquette C, Schroeder P. Nitrogen dynamics in conifer-dominated forests with and without hardwoods. Can J For Res. 1987;17(11):1434–1441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x87-221

Waring RH, Schlesinger WH. Forest ecosystems: concepts and management, New York, NY: Academic Press; 1985.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2015.019

Journal ISSN:
  • 2083-9480 (online)
  • 0001-6977 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society