Like the body's skeleton, the cytoskeleton gives shape and structure to the inside of a cell. Yet, unlike a skeleton, the cytoskeleton is ever changing. The cytoskeleton consists of many fibers each made from chains of protein molecules. One of these proteins is called vimentin and it forms intermediate filaments in the cytoskeleton. Many different types of cells contain vimentin and a lot of it is found in cancer cells that have spread beyond their original location to other sites in the body.

Cells use chemical modifications to regulate cytoskeleton proteins. For example, through a process called glycosylation, cells can reversibly attach a sugar modification called O-GlcNAc to vimentin. O-GlcNAc can be attached to several different parts of vimentin and each location may have a different effect. It is not currently clear how cells control their vimentin filaments or what role O-GlcNAc plays in this process.

Using genetic engineering, Tarbet et al. produced human cells in the laboratory with modified vimentin proteins. These altered proteins lacked some of the sites for O-GlcNAc attachment. The goal was to see whether the loss of O-GlcNAc at a specific location would affect fiber formation and cell behavior. The results showed one site where vimentin needs O-GlcNAc to form fibers. Without O-GlcNAc at this site, cells could not migrate towards chemical signals. In addition, in normal human cells, Chlamydia bacteria hijack vimentin and rearrange the filaments to form a cage around themselves for protection. However, the cells lacking O-GlcNAc on vimentin were resistant to infection by Chlamydia bacteria.

These findings highlight the importance of O-GlcNAc on vimentin in healthy cells and during infection. Vimentin’s contribution to cell migration may also help to explain its role in the spread of cancer. The importance of O-GlcNAc suggests it could be a new target for therapies. Yet, it also highlights the need for caution due to the delicate balance between the activity of vimentin in healthy and diseased cells. In addition, human cells produce about 70 other vimentin-like proteins and further work will examine if they are also affected by O-GlcNAc.

Intermediate filaments (IF) are a major component of the metazoan cytoskeleton, distinct from the actin and microtubule systems (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Köster et al., 2015; Leduc and Etienne-Manneville, 2015). Humans express over 70 IF proteins, including both cytoplasmic (e.g., vimentin, keratins, neurofilaments) and nuclear (lamins) members, many with tissue-specific functions (Szeverenyi et al., 2008). All IF proteins comprise a central, conserved α-helical rod domain, as well as amino-terminal head and carboxy-terminal tail domains of varying lengths (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Köster et al., 2015; Leduc and Etienne-Manneville, 2015). IF proteins homo- or heterodimerize through the parallel association of their rod domains into coiled coils, forming an elongated dimer of ~45–48 nm for cytoplasmic IFs and ~50–52 nm for nuclear lamins (Quinlan et al., 1986; Aebi et al., 1986). These dimers laterally associate in antiparallel fashion to form tetramers, which in turn assemble into ~65 nm unit-length filaments (ULFs) composed of eight tetramers (Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Herrmann et al., 1996). Finally, ULFs associate end-to-end to assemble mature IFs, measuring ~10 nm across (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015).

Unlike actin- or microtubule-based structures, IFs are nonpolar and do not serve as tracks for molecular motors. Instead, IFs contribute to the mechanical integrity of the cell through their unique viscoelastic properties (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Köster et al., 2015; Leduc and Etienne-Manneville, 2015). In general, the IF network is flexible under low strain but stiffens and resists breakage under an applied force (Janmey et al., 1991; Fudge et al., 2003; Guzmán et al., 2006; Kreplak et al., 2005). Remarkably, individual IFs can be stretched up to 3.6-fold before rupture, demonstrating their elastic nature, as compared to actin cables or microtubules (Kreplak et al., 2005). The IF network is also highly dynamic in vivo, with IF subunits (likely tetramers) exchanging rapidly at many points along mature filaments (Mendez et al., 2010; Goldman et al., 2012; Miller et al., 1991; Vikstrom et al., 1989; Ho et al., 1998; Martys et al., 1999; Vikstrom et al., 1992; Nöding et al., 2014). Similarly, the IF cytoskeleton quickly reorganizes in response to numerous physiological cues, including cell cycle progression, migration, spreading, and growth factor stimulation (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Köster et al., 2015; Leduc and Etienne-Manneville, 2015; Yoon et al., 1998; Helfand et al., 2003).

IFs participate in many cellular processes, including maintenance of cell shape, organelle anchoring, cell motility, and signal transduction (Helfand et al., 2011; Ben-Ze'ev, 1984). For example, vimentin, among the most widely studied IF proteins, is required for mesenchymal cell adhesion, migration, chemotaxis, and wound healing in both cell culture and animal models (Ivaska et al., 2007; Yamaguchi et al., 2005; Eckes et al., 2000; Rogel et al., 2011; Menko et al., 2014). Vimentin IFs also contribute to the mechanical properties of the cytoplasm, and stabilize and localize mitochondria (Nekrasova et al., 2011; Buehler, 2013; Guo et al., 2013; Eckes et al., 1998). Importantly, genetic lesions that dysregulate the IF cytoskeleton cause a wide range of human diseases, including skin and nail disorders (keratins), cardiomyopathies (desmin), lipodystrophy, muscular dystrophy and progeria (lamins), giant axonal neuropathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (neurofilaments), and cataracts (vimentin) (Omary, 2009; Omary et al., 2004). In addition, the ectopic expression of wild type (WT) vimentin is a hallmark of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and is widely observed in human metastatic cancers (Satelli and Li, 2011; Nieto, 2011; De Craene and Berx, 2013). IFs are likely functionally important in this context, because vimentin expression levels correlate with the invasive phenotypes of breast, prostate, and other epithelial cancers (Satelli and Li, 2011; Wei et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2011; Vuoriluoto et al., 2011). Finally, the IF cytoskeleton is also intimately involved in host-microbe interactions (Geisler and Leube, 2016; Mak and Brüggemann, 2016). For example, changes in vimentin IFs are implicated in the adhesion, invasion, and replication of a wide range of bacteria, including such important pathogens as Chlamydia trachomatis (Kumar and Valdivia, 2008; Jorgensen et al., 2011; Snavely et al., 2014; Bednar et al., 2011), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Garg et al., 2006; Mahesh et al., 2016), Streptococcus pyogenes (Bryant et al., 2006; Icenogle et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2015) and Salmonella enterica (Murli et al., 2001; Guignot and Servin, 2008).

Despite this broad pathophysiological significance, the regulation of IF cytoskeleton morphology, dynamics, and signaling functions remains incompletely understood. Several recent lines of evidence indicate that post-translational modifications (PTMs) are an important mode of IF regulation, and indeed all IFs are subject to extensive PTMs, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, acetylation, farnesylation, and glycosylation (Snider and Omary, 2014). However, in most cases, the functional impact of these PTMs on IF structure and function is poorly characterized.

To better understand the dynamic regulation of the IF cytoskeleton, we focused on O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc), an intracellular form of protein glycosylation that reversibly decorates serine and threonine residues on thousands of nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitochondrial proteins. In mammals, O-GlcNAc is added by O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and removed by O-GlcNAcase (OGA) (Figure 1A) (Hanover et al., 2010; Hart et al., 2011; Hart, 2014). O-GlcNAc cycling controls many processes, including nutrient sensing, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis (Hanover et al., 2010; Hart et al., 2011), and is essential, as genetic ablation of OGT or OGA is lethal in mice (Shafi et al., 2000; Keembiyehetty et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2012). In addition, aberrant O-GlcNAc cycling is implicated in numerous human diseases, including cancer (Hart et al., 2011; Ma and Vosseller, 2013; Yi et al., 2012; Singh et al., 2015), diabetes (Vaidyanathan and Wells, 2014; Hardivillé and Hart, 2014; Ma and Hart, 2013), cardiac dysfunction (Erickson et al., 2013; Erickson, 2014; Dassanayaka and Jones, 2014; Darley-Usmar et al., 2012), and neurodegeneration (Yuzwa et al., 2012; Vaidyanathan et al., 2014; Yuzwa and Vocadlo, 2014; Zhu et al., 2014).

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1—source data 1

Proteomic analysis of vimentin GlcNDAz crosslinks.

Full proteomics results are available for download as a Scaffold (.sf3) file on the eLife web site. Free software to view Scaffold files is available at http://www.proteomesoftware.com/products/scaffold/download/.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31807.007

Download elife-31807-fig1-data1-v2.sf3

Interestingly, numerous IF proteins are O-GlcNAcylated (King and Hounsell, 1989; Chou et al., 1992). For example, keratin-18 glycosylation is required for the recruitment and activation of the pro-survival kinase Akt, and mice expressing an unglycosylatable keratin-18 mutant are sensitized to chemical injury of the liver and pancreas (Ku et al., 2010; Ku et al., 1996). Several neurofilament proteins are also glycosylated, especially in axons, and neurofilament-M O-GlcNAcylation is reduced in both human Alzheimer’s disease patients and a rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, suggesting a potential role for dysregulated IF glycosylation in neurodegeneration (Dong et al., 1996; Dong et al., 1993; Lüdemann et al., 2005; Deng et al., 2008; Cheung and Hart, 2008). Finally, vimentin is O-GlcNAcylated on several sites, primarily in its head domain (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007). Changes in vimentin glycosylation have been observed in models of differentiating adipocytes (Ishihara et al., 2010) and neurons (Farach and Galileo, 2008), and a recent study observed a correlation between vimentin O-GlcNAcylation and the invasive potential of cholangiocarcinoma (Phoomak et al., 2017), implicating glycosylation changes in both the physiological and pathological functions of vimentin. These studies suggest that O-GlcNAcylation is a prominent mode of IF regulation in homeostasis and disease alike. Nevertheless, the mechanistic and functional impacts of O-GlcNAcylation on IF proteins remain largely unexplored.

Here, we report that vimentin O-GlcNAcylation is required for the structure and function of IFs in human cells. We demonstrate that site-specific glycosylation of vimentin mediates its self-association, and is required in human cells for both IF morphology and its facilitating role in cell migration. In addition, we provide evidence that vimentin glycosylation is co-opted by an intracellular bacterial pathogen to produce a replicative niche, revealing a new connection between IF O-GlcNAcylation and microbial pathogenesis. Our results provide new insight into the physiological role of vimentin glycosylation in particular, and may have broad implications for our understanding of the dynamic regulation of the IF cytoskeleton in general.

Vimentin is O-GlcNAcylated at multiple sites in its head domain (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007), but the functional consequences of this modification are poorly understood. Like other intracellular PTMs, O-GlcNAc can exert a wide range of biochemical effects on its substrates, including conformational change, relocalization or destruction (Hanover et al., 2010; Hart et al., 2011; Shafi et al., 2000; Keembiyehetty et al., 2015; Mondoux et al., 2011; Bond and Hanover, 2013). Because IF proteins self-associate into homo-oligomeric complexes, we hypothesized that vimentin O-GlcNAcylation might influence its protein-protein interactions. Indeed, O-GlcNAc regulates protein-protein interactions in other contexts, including chromatin remodeling, nutrient sensing, and the interaction between keratins and Akt (Ku et al., 2010; Fujiki et al., 2011; Tarbet et al., 2018; Dentin et al., 2008). However, physiological O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions are often low-affinity, sub-stoichiometric, and transient, presenting a technical barrier to studying them (Hanover et al., 2010; Hart et al., 2011; Shafi et al., 2000; Keembiyehetty et al., 2015; Mondoux et al., 2011; Bond and Hanover, 2013; Tarbet et al., 2018).

To address these challenges, we used a chemical biology method to capture and characterize O-GlcNAc-mediated protein-protein interactions in living cells (Yu et al., 2012). In this strategy, cells are metabolically labeled with a GlcNAc analog bearing a diazirine photocrosslinking moiety, termed ‘GlcNDAz' (Yu et al., 2012). GlcNDAz is accepted by the GlcNAc salvage pathway, converted to the nucleotide-sugar UDP-GlcNDAz, and used by OGT to decorate its native substrates (Yu et al., 2012). Brief treatment of GlcNDAz-labeled live cells with UV light triggers the covalent crosslinking of O-GlcNDAz moieties to any binding partner proteins within ~2–4 Å of the sugar (Yu et al., 2012). Because of this short radius, GlcNDAz crosslinking occurs exclusively at sites where the glycan contributes to the interaction interface, without crosslinking to distant or nonspecific proteins (Yu et al., 2012). Therefore, GlcNDAz is a powerful tool for identifying direct, glycosylation-mediated interactions between endogenous proteins in live cells (Yu et al., 2012).

To determine whether vimentin engages in O-GlcNAc-mediated protein-protein interactions, we treated human cells with GlcNDAz and UV, and analyzed lysates by immunoblot (IB). Endogenous vimentin crosslinked into distinct, high molecular weight bands that were diazirine- and UV-dependent (Figure 1B), indicating that O-GlcNAc mediates protein-protein interactions between vimentin and one or more binding partners. Overexpression of OGT caused an increase in vimentin crosslinks (Figure 1C), whereas overexpression of OGA (Figure 1C) or treatment with a small molecule inhibitor of OGT, abbreviated 5SGlcNAc (Gloster et al., 2011) (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), reduced crosslinking, confirming that this assay reports on authentic O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions, and not a nonspecific action of the GlcNDAz probe.

We next sought to identify the O-GlcNAc-mediated binding partner(s) of vimentin detected in our crosslinking assay. We created a myc-6xHis-tagged human vimentin construct and confirmed that it crosslinked via GlcNDAz similarly to endogenous vimentin (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Then, we purified preparative amounts of vimentin crosslinks from transfected cells via tandem immunoprecipitation (IP) and immobilized metal affinity chromatography, and analyzed the crosslinks by mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 2D,E and Figure 1—source data 1). We obtained 80% tryptic peptide coverage of vimentin in these samples, without significant enrichment of other proteins, beyond common contaminants (Figure 1—figure supplement 2 and Figure 1—source data 1). This result suggested that the vimentin GlcNDAz crosslinks represent homotypic, O-GlcNAc-mediated vimentin-vimentin interactions.

In vivo, vimentin exists in a range of assembly states, from soluble tetramers and ULFs, to relatively insoluble mature IFs (Lowery et al., 2015; Herrmann and Aebi, 2016; Chernyatina et al., 2015; Köster et al., 2015; Leduc and Etienne-Manneville, 2015). To determine the assembly state of the crosslinked vimentin species, we performed a well-established differential extraction procedure (Ridge et al., 2016) on GlcNDAz-crosslinked cells. The GlcNDAz crosslinks of endogenous vimentin extracted into a denaturing buffer but not low or high ionic strength non-denaturing buffers, indicating that the crosslinks occur within the highly assembled filament population (Figure 1D) (Ridge et al., 2016). Importantly, extracted crosslinks remained soluble when exchanged from denaturing into non-denaturing buffers, demonstrating that GlcNDAz crosslinking per se does not reduce vimentin solubility (Figure 1—figure supplement 2F). To further confirm that crosslinks occur within assembled IFs, we treated cells with β,β’-iminodipropionitrile (IDPN), which blocks vimentin assembly beyond the ULF state (Durham, 1986). Consistent with previous reports, IDPN treatment abrogated vimentin IFs and caused the accumulation of vimentin aggregates (Figure 1—figure supplement 2G) (Durham, 1986). In the crosslinking assay, IDPN also suppressed the formation of GlcNDAz-dependent adducts, indicating that the crosslinks occur in assembly states beyond ULFs (Figure 1E). Using quantitative IBs, we detected ~10% of endogenous vimentin crosslinked into GlcNDAz-dependent adducts (Figure 1—figure supplement 2H), though this measurement likely significantly underestimates the fraction of vimentin that engages in O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions, since several steps in the GlcNDAz crosslinking protocol are less than 100% efficient (Yu et al., 2012; Rodriguez et al., 2015). Based on these results, we concluded that O-GlcNAc-mediated vimentin-vimentin interactions are prevalent in cells, and occur primarily within assembled IFs, but not in soluble pools of lower-order assembly states.

The Hart lab previously mapped several glycosylation sites on vimentin’s flexible head domain (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007). We used these results to identify vimentin O-GlcNAc sites that contribute to its homotypic, glycosylation-mediated interactions. We mutated each reported O-GlcNAcylation site to alanine and screened these constructs in the GlcNDAz crosslinking assay (Figure 2). Mutation of several individual residues, including T33, S34, and S39, reduced vimentin crosslinking, while mutation of S49 abolished all detectable crosslinks. Because of the dramatic reduction of crosslinking in the S49A mutant, we measured the fraction of total vimentin glycosylation occurring at S49. We transfected cells with vector, WT or S49A vimentin and then labeled them with GalNAz, an azide-bearing unnatural monosaccharide that we have described previously as a metabolic reporter of O-GlcNAcylation (Boyce et al., 2011; Palaniappan et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2017). S49A mutant vimentin exhibited ~80% the GalNAz signal of WT (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), suggesting that approximately one-fifth of vimentin glycosylation occurs on S49 under these conditions. Together, these results suggest that robust and site-specific O-GlcNAcylation in the vimentin head domain mediates homotypic protein-protein interactions within IFs.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We next tested whether O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions influence vimentin IF structure or function in live human cells. We used CRISPR/Cas9 methods to delete endogenous vimentin from two different human cell lines, selected single cell-derived clones, and confirmed the absence of vimentin mRNA and protein (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A,B). Then, we stably reconstituted individual vimentin^−/− clones with WT or unglycosylatable point-mutant versions of a well-characterized vimentin-mEmerald fusion protein (Mendez et al., 2010; Yoon et al., 1998; Helfand et al., 2011; Hookway et al., 2015) to permit live-cell visualization of IFs. We verified that vimentin-mEmerald was expressed at uniform levels comparable to endogenous vimentin (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C,D), and that the mEmerald signal precisely coincided with anti-vimentin immunofluorescence in cells expressing both endogenous vimentin and vimentin-mEmerald (Figure 3—figure supplement 2E). These results confirmed that the vimentin-mEmerald construct is a faithful proxy for the untagged protein in this system. In our panels of vimentin-mEmerald-reconstituted cells, we included Y117L, a point-mutation in the rod domain that blocks vimentin assembly beyond the ULF stage (Meier et al., 2009), as a positive control for IF disruption. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting, IB and fluorescence microscopy to ensure equal expression of the various WT and mutant vimentin-mEmerald transgenes across reconstituted vimentin^−/− cell lines (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplements 1D,3A).

Figure 3 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Cells reconstituted with WT vimentin-mEmerald exhibited canonical IF morphology, whereas the Y117L-expressing cells lacked assembled filaments and instead displayed punctate structures consistent with ULFs (Figure 3A,B, Figure 3—figure supplement 3A,B). These results indicate that our reconstituted cell systems recapitulate the previously reported characteristics of WT and Y117L vimentin (Meier et al., 2009; Helfand et al., 2011; Robert et al., 2014). We also observed dramatic alterations in vimentin IF organization in several unglycosylatable point-mutants. For example, the S34A mutant, which had an intermediate phenotype in our crosslinking assay (Figure 2), displayed a partial defect in IF formation, with both punctate and filamentous fluorescence detected (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 3A). Interestingly, the S49A mutant, which lacked detectable O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions in the GlcNDAz assay (Figure 2), exhibited a significant reduction of assembled IFs in live cells, displaying a higher proportion of punctate vimentin fluorescence as compared to WT (Figure 3A,B, Figure 3—figure supplement 3A,B). Importantly, the S49A mutation had no impact on vimentin stability (Figure 3—figure supplement 2), further ruling out an effect of vimentin expression level in this system.

These results suggested that O-GlcNAc on specific residues of vimentin, particularly S49, may be required for its homotypic assembly into mature IFs in live cells. However, S/T→A mutations eliminate all O-linked PTMs at the mutated site, including both O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation. Therefore, phenotypes arising from S/T→A mutations may be due to loss of phosphorylation, glycosylation, or both. Vimentin S49 is a known glycosylation site (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007) but not a reported phosphorylation site, suggesting that the phenotypes we observed in the S49A mutant (Figures 2 and 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 3) are due to the loss of O-GlcNAc, and not the loss of phosphorylation. To further test this hypothesis, we reconstituted vimentin^−/− cells with a phosphomimetic S49E mutant. Vimentin-S49E-expressing cells displayed a loss of filament morphology and a proportion of puncta indistinguishable from the S49A mutant (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 3). These results suggest that the abnormal vimentin IF structures observed with the S49A mutant in live cells are due to the loss of glycosylation, not loss of phosphorylation, at S49.

We next investigated whether vimentin O-GlcNAcylation is required for known functions of IFs. The IF cytoskeleton facilitates cell migration, and vimentin^−/− cells and tissues exhibit migration defects (Ivaska et al., 2007; Yamaguchi et al., 2005; Eckes et al., 2000; Rogel et al., 2011; Menko et al., 2014). We used a well-characterized Transwell assay (Justus et al., 2014) to measure cell migration by vimentin-reconstituted cell lines across a collagen matrix. Consistent with prior reports in other systems (Ivaska et al., 2007; Yamaguchi et al., 2005; Eckes et al., 2000; Rogel et al., 2011; Menko et al., 2014), vimentin^−/− cells stably transduced with empty vector or the Y117L mutant construct were impaired in serum-stimulated migration, relative to cells expressing WT vimentin (Figure 4, Figure 4—source data 1). Interestingly, vimentin-S49A-expressing cells also exhibited migration defects compared to WT (Figure 4, Figure 4—source data 1). This result suggested that O-GlcNAc on vimentin may be required for optimal cell migration. To further confirm this hypothesis, we assayed the serum-induced migration of vimentin-reconstituted cells upon treatment with 5SGlcNAc or Thiamet-G, a specific small molecule inhibitor of OGA (Yuzwa et al., 2008) (Figure 4, Figure 4—source data 1). 5SGlcNAc or Thiamet-G treatment each significantly inhibited the serum-induced migration of cells expressing WT vimentin, but not cells lacking vimentin or expressing the S49A mutant (Figure 4, Figure 4—source data 1). Taken together, these results indicate that O-GlcNAcylation of vimentin, especially on S49, is required for optimal serum-stimulated cell migration.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

Full statistical analyses of cell migration data.

(A) Migration data were first compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using JMP software. The results of the ANOVA, as well as the effect test, are displayed. (B) Pairwise t-tests for all combinations of data points were performed. Level and –Level indicate the sample and the sample it is being compared to, respectively. The calculated difference, standard error, and upper and lower confidence levels (CL) are shown, as well as the p value for each t-test. (C) Comprehensive comparison of all samples and conditions. Any two samples that do not share a letter in column two are statistically significantly different from each other.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31807.016

Download elife-31807-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx

Several intracellular pathogens co-opt the IF cytoskeleton to stabilize the large membrane-bound vacuoles in which they replicate, presumably by providing structural scaffolds (Geisler and Leube, 2016; Mak and Brüggemann, 2016). For example, we previously showed that the obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis recruits a meshwork of vimentin IFs to its vacuolar ‘inclusion’ compartment, stabilizing its replicative niche and shielding bacterial components from the host’s cytoplasmic innate immune surveillance machinery (Kumar and Valdivia, 2008; Jorgensen et al., 2011; Snavely et al., 2014; Bednar et al., 2011). The molecular mechanisms of Chlamydia-induced vimentin recruitment and reorganization are incompletely understood. To examine the potential role of vimentin O-GlcNAcylation in these processes, we treated HeLa cells reconstituted with WT vimentin-mEmerald with vehicle control, 5SGlcNAc or Thiamet-G, infected them with Chlamydia, and visualized pathogen-containing inclusions and vimentin IFs by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 5A, Figure 5—figure supplement 1). We found that 5SGlcNAc treatment inhibited the formation of a vimentin meshwork around the inclusion, consistent with a requirement for vimentin glycosylation in IF remodeling during Chlamydia infection (Figure 5A). 5SGlcNAc treatment reduced the average size of the inclusions in infected cells and increased the number of extra-inclusion bacteria (Figure 5B), demonstrating that OGT activity is required for inclusion expansion and integrity. Thiamet-G treatment had little effect in these assays, likely because basal levels of O-GlcNAcylation are already sufficient for optimal Chlamydia replication (Figure 5, Figure 5—figure supplement 1).

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We next tested whether O-GlcNAcylation of vimentin itself is required for inclusion integrity. We infected vimentin-reconstituted HeLa cell lines with Chlamydia and visualized vimentin IFs and bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Compared to WT vimentin-expressing cells, cells expressing either the S49A or Y117L mutant vimentin displayed reduced IF recruitment to the inclusions, smaller average inclusion size, and larger numbers of bacteria escaping into the cytoplasm (Figure 5C,D). These data suggest that the site-specific glycosylation of vimentin itself is required for IF remodeling during Chlamydia infection. To further test this hypothesis, we infected empty vector-reconstituted vimentin^−/− cells with Chlamydia in the presence or absence of 5SGlcNAc. In contrast to our observations with cells expressing WT vimentin (Figure 5A,B), 5SGlcNAc had no impact on Chlamydia inclusion size or extra-inclusion bacteria in cells lacking vimentin, indicating that vimentin, but not other host- or pathogen-encoded targets, is required for the effects of 5SGlcNAc in this context (Figure 5E). We concluded that both OGT activity and vimentin glycosylation sites are required for IF reorganization during Chlamydia infection, and are co-opted by this pathogen to promote inclusion integrity and growth.

The IF cytoskeleton plays critical roles in both physiological and pathological processes, but how cells regulate IF structure and function remains poorly understood. We provide evidence that site-specific glycosylation of the vimentin head domain regulates its homotypic association in human cells, and is required for both IF morphology and cell migration (Figure 6). In addition, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of vimentin is exploited by an intracellular pathogen to promote its own replication, underlining the importance of IF dynamics in disease states. Because many IF proteins are O-GlcNAc-modified (King and Hounsell, 1989; Chou et al., 1992; Ku et al., 2010; Dong et al., 1996; Dong et al., 1993; Lüdemann et al., 2005; Deng et al., 2008; Cheung and Hart, 2008; Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007; Srikanth et al., 2010; Kakade et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2006), our results may provide new insight into the regulation of both vimentin in particular and the IF cytoskeleton in general.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Early evidence for vimentin glycosylation was reported nearly twenty-five years ago (Shikhman et al., 1993) and confirmed with sophisticated MS methods thirteen years later (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007). However, the biochemical and cellular effects of this modification have remained largely uncharacterized. Through GlcNDAz crosslinking (Figure 2) and live-cell imaging (Figure 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 3), we determined that the vimentin glycosylation sites S34, S39 and especially S49 are required for normal homotypic vimentin-vimentin interactions and for IF morphology in live human cells. These O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions likely occur within assembled IFs and not smaller oligomeric states (Figure 1D,E). It is well established that portions of the vimentin head domain are required for filament assembly (Eriksson et al., 2004), and that head domain PTMs (especially phosphorylation) govern IF dynamics in vivo (Helfand et al., 2011; Eriksson et al., 2004; Chou et al., 1990; Eriksson et al., 1992; Sihag et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2002; Chan et al., 2002). Our results are consistent with this general model of regulated filament assembly/disassembly through head domain PTMs (Figure 6). Interestingly, however, internal deletion mutations within the head domain demonstrate that S49 itself is not required for vimentin filament formation in vitro or in vivo (Shoeman et al., 2002). Therefore, we propose that the phenotypes observed in the S49A vimentin mutant are caused by a loss of PTM regulation, rather than simply a requirement for serine at that site.

Given the very short crosslinking radius of the GlcNDAz reagent (~2–4 Å) (Yu et al., 2012) and our MS proteomics analysis of the crosslinked complexes (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C and Figure 1—figure supplement 2D,E), the O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions we observe are likely homotypic dimeric or trimeric vimentin adducts. The precise molecular nature of these crosslinks, and why we observe multiple discrete crosslinked complexes, remain uncertain. The high MS proteomic coverage we obtained of vimentin and the lack of other proteins in the crosslinks (Figure 1—figure supplement 2 and Figure 1—source data 1) suggest that the complexes do not contain other binding partner proteins or known protein-based PTMs of vimentin, such as SUMO (Kaminsky et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010). Because vimentin is multiply phosphorylated (Helfand et al., 2011; Eriksson et al., 2004; Chou et al., 1990; Eriksson et al., 1992; Sihag et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2002; Chan et al., 2002), the crosslinks of distinct molecular weight (Figures 1B and 2) could in principle represent different phospho-forms of vimentin. However, several commercially available anti-phospho-vimentin antibodies failed to recognize the crosslinked complexes by IB (not shown), and phosphatase treatment of crosslinked adducts had no effect on their SDS-PAGE migration (Figure 1—figure supplement 3), arguing against differential phosphorylation as an explanation.

Instead, we postulate that the discrete bands in the GlcNDAz-induced vimentin complexes represent different crosslinking geometries of vimentin multimers. Because the O-GlcNAc-mediated interactions we detect occur primarily in assembled IFs (Figure 1D,E), an individual glycan on the vimentin head domain (e.g., at residue S49) may contact the head domain of its dimeric partner, and/or the rod domain of a vimentin molecule in an adjacent dimer, and/or another vimentin molecule within the same ULF. These different crosslinking geometries might produce migration differences in our GlcNDAz/SDS-PAGE assay (Figure 1B).

Irrespective of the molecular identities of the individual adducts, the fact that we observe a highly reproducible crosslinking pattern suggests that O-GlcNAc mediates specific contacts among vimentin molecules, and not a large variety of nonspecific interactions, which would produce variable or smeared crosslinking (Yu et al., 2012). This evidence of specific contacts is perhaps surprising, given the widely accepted model that the head domain of vimentin is intrinsically disordered (Guharoy et al., 2013). It is possible that, in vivo, O-GlcNAcylation mediates site-specific contacts between glycans on one vimentin molecule and discrete glycan recognition sites or domains on adjacent vimentin molecules within assembled filaments. Interestingly, several prior reports identified a GlcNAc-binding property of vimentin on the cell surface (Ise et al., 2010; Ise et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Komura et al., 2012). Although the physiological relevance of extracellular vimentin is controversial, these biochemical observations are reminiscent of our own, in that vimentin is reported to bind to GlcNAc residues in both cases. However, two mutations in vimentin that abolish extracellular GlcNAc binding, E382A and E396A (Komura et al., 2012), do not reduce intracellular GlcNDAz crosslinking (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Therefore, our observations are distinct from the reported glycan-binding property of cell surface vimentin (Ise et al., 2010; Ise et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2012; Komura et al., 2012). The vimentin site(s) that bind O-GlcNAc moieties are not readily discernible from our MS studies, due to the unpredictable masses and fragmentation spectra of crosslinked adducts. However, the identification of these sites will be an important priority for future studies, because this information may elucidate the biophysical regulation of IF assembly and dynamics by O-GlcNAc.

At the cellular level, specific glycosylation sites of vimentin, including S34, S39 and especially S49, are essential for IF morphology and for facilitating serum-stimulated migration (Figures 3 and 4, Figure 3—figure supplement 3). We propose that O-GlcNAcylation at one or more of these sites influences the assembly and/or disassembly of vimentin filaments, as has been described for other PTMs. Indeed, phosphorylation of several residues in the vimentin head domain promotes IF disassembly in response to multiple stimuli (Helfand et al., 2011; Eriksson et al., 2004; Chou et al., 1990; Eriksson et al., 1992; Sihag et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2002; Chan et al., 2002). O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation often compete for nearby or identical residues on specific protein substrates, giving rise to a complex functional interplay between these PTMs (Hart et al., 2011; Butkinaree et al., 2010). Moreover, specific O-GlcNAc sites required for in vivo IF assembly in our work, such as S34 and S39 (Figure 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 3), can also be phosphorylated (Helfand et al., 2011; Eriksson et al., 2004; Chou et al., 1990; Eriksson et al., 1992; Sihag et al., 2007; Goto et al., 2002; Chan et al., 2002). Therefore, reciprocal PTMs at certain sites may have antagonistic effects, with glycosylation of S34 or S39 promoting IF assembly, while phosphorylation at those sites induces disassembly.

In contrast, vimentin S49 is required for normal IF assembly in human cells (Figures 2 and 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 3) and is a known glycosylation site (Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007) but is not a reported phosphorylation site. These observations suggest a functional role for O-GlcNAc, but not O-phosphate, at this residue. In support of this hypothesis, a phosphomimetic S49E mutant phenocopies an S49A mutant in IF morphology (Figure 3), and an OGT inhibitor impacts on cell migration and Chlamydia inclusion size only in the presence of WT vimentin, but not in cells expressing S49A mutant vimentin or lacking vimentin (Figures 4 and 5E). Taken together, these results strongly indicate that (de)glycosylation of S49 is required for WT levels of cell migration and pathogen-induced IF remodeling. Although we cannot strictly rule out the possibility that S49 is phosphorylated under as-yet untested conditions, we suggest that S49 O-GlcNAcylation is required for homotypic vimentin-vimentin interactions (Figure 2), filament assembly (Figure 3), and downstream behaviors of the vimentin IF cytoskeleton in normal and pathological contexts (Figures 4 and 5).

Finally, our results indicate that O-GlcNAc-mediated vimentin IF assembly is required for Chlamydia inclusion expansion and integrity, because we observed smaller inclusions and more cytoplasmic bacteria in Chlamydia-infected cells expressing Y117L or S49A mutants of vimentin (Figure 5C,D). Chlamydia remodels the IF cytoskeleton to stabilize the inclusion during its replication phase, and deploys the CPAF protease to dismantle the IF cytoskeleton and promote bacterial release at late stages of infection (Kumar and Valdivia, 2008; Jorgensen et al., 2011; Snavely et al., 2014; Bednar et al., 2011). Our current data extend these results by demonstrating that vimentin filament remodeling by Chlamydia depends on both OGT activity (Figure 5A,B) and on the site-specific glycosylation of vimentin itself (Figure 5C–E). We detected WT levels of CPAF-mediated vimentin cleavage with the S49A and Y117L mutants (Figure 5—figure supplement 2), indicating that the phenotypes we observe are not due to differential vimentin cleavage during infection. The molecular mechanisms by which Chlamydia co-opts OGT activity and vimentin glycosylation sites (e.g., S49) to reshape the IF cytoskeleton remain to be determined, and will be an interesting focus of future studies.

In conclusion, we have shown that site-specific glycosylation of vimentin mediates its homotypic protein-protein interactions, and is required in human cells for IF morphology and cell migration. In addition, Chlamydia relies on OGT activity and particular vimentin glycosylation sites to remodel the IF cytoskeleton and promote inclusion expansion and integrity. Our results provide new insight into the biochemical and cell biological functions of vimentin O-GlcNAcylation. In addition, our work may have broad implications for other IF proteins. Numerous IF proteins are dynamically glycosylated in vivo (King and Hounsell, 1989; Chou et al., 1992; Ku et al., 2010; Dong et al., 1996; Dong et al., 1993; Lüdemann et al., 2005; Deng et al., 2008; Cheung and Hart, 2008; Slawson et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2007; Srikanth et al., 2010; Kakade et al., 2016; Tao et al., 2006), and the S49 residue of vimentin is conserved both among vertebrate vimentin orthologs and in human desmin, another type III IF protein (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Therefore, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation may be a general mode of regulating IF dynamics and function. In the future, pharmacological modulation of O-GlcNAcylation may provide a way to manipulate filament form and function for therapeutic benefit in diseases of dysregulated IFs, ranging from neurodegeneration and cardiomyopathy to cancer.

1. 1. Aebi U
   2. Cohn J
   3. Buhle L
   4. Gerace L

   (1986) The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments

   Nature 323:560–564.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/323560a0

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bednar MM
   2. Jorgensen I
   3. Valdivia RH
   4. McCafferty DG

   (2011) Chlamydia protease-like activity factor (CPAF): characterization of proteolysis activity in vitro and development of a nanomolar affinity CPAF zymogen-derived inhibitor

   Biochemistry 50:7441–7443.

   https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201098r

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Ben-Ze'ev A

   (1984) Differential control of cytokeratins and vimentin synthesis by cell-cell contact and cell spreading in cultured epithelial cells

   The Journal of Cell Biology 99:1424–1433.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.99.4.1424

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Blainey P
   2. Krzywinski M
   3. Altman N

   (2014) Points of significance: replication

   Nature Methods 11:879–880.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3091

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bond MR
   2. Hanover JA

   (2013) O-GlcNAc cycling: a link between metabolism and chronic disease

   Annual Review of Nutrition 33:205–229.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071812-161240

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Boyce M
   2. Carrico IS
   3. Ganguli AS
   4. Yu SH
   5. Hangauer MJ
   6. Hubbard SC
   7. Kohler JJ
   8. Bertozzi CR

   (2011) Metabolic cross-talk allows labeling of O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine-modified proteins via the N-acetylgalactosamine salvage pathway

   PNAS 108:3141–3146.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010045108

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bryant AE
   2. Bayer CR
   3. Huntington JD
   4. Stevens DL

   (2006) Group A streptococcal myonecrosis: increased vimentin expression after skeletal-muscle injury mediates the binding of Streptococcus pyogenes

   The Journal of Infectious Diseases 193:1685–1692.

   https://doi.org/10.1086/504261

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Buehler MJ

   (2013) Mechanical players-The role of intermediate filaments in cell mechanics and organization

   Biophysical Journal 105:1733–1734.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.050

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Butkinaree C
   2. Park K
   3. Hart GW

   (2010) O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc): Extensive crosstalk with phosphorylation to regulate signaling and transcription in response to nutrients and stress

   Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 1800:96–106.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.018

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chan W
    2. Kozma R
    3. Yasui Y
    4. Inagaki M
    5. Leung T
    6. Manser E
    7. Lim L

    (2002) Vimentin intermediate filament reorganization by Cdc42: involvement of PAK and p70 S6 kinase

    European Journal of Cell Biology 81:692–701.

    https://doi.org/10.1078/0171-9335-00281

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chen PH
    2. Smith TJ
    3. Wu J
    4. Siesser PF
    5. Bisnett BJ
    6. Khan F
    7. Hogue M
    8. Soderblom E
    9. Tang F
    10. Marks JR
    11. Major MB
    12. Swarts BM
    13. Boyce M
    14. Chi JT

    (2017) Glycosylation of KEAP1 links nutrient sensing to redox stress signaling

    The EMBO Journal 36:2233–2250.

    https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201696113

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chernyatina AA
    2. Guzenko D
    3. Strelkov SV

    (2015) Intermediate filament structure: the bottom-up approach

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 32:65–72.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Cheung WD
    2. Hart GW

    (2008) AMP-activated protein kinase and p38 MAPK activate O-GlcNAcylation of neuronal proteins during glucose deprivation

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:13009–13020.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801222200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Chou YH
    2. Bischoff JR
    3. Beach D
    4. Goldman RD

    (1990) Intermediate filament reorganization during mitosis is mediated by p34cdc2 phosphorylation of vimentin

    Cell 62:1063–1071.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90384-Q

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Chou CF
    2. Smith AJ
    3. Omary MB

    (1992)

    Characterization and dynamics of O-linked glycosylation of human cytokeratin 8 and 18

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 267:3901–3906.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Darley-Usmar VM
    2. Ball LE
    3. Chatham JC

    (2012) Protein O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine: a novel effector of cardiomyocyte metabolism and function

    Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 52:538–549.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.08.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Dassanayaka S
    2. Jones SP

    (2014) O-GlcNAc and the cardiovascular system

    Pharmacology & Therapeutics 142:62–71.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.11.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. De Craene B
    2. Berx G

    (2013) Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression

    Nature Reviews Cancer 13:97–110.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3447

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Deng Y
    2. Li B
    3. Liu F
    4. Iqbal K
    5. Grundke-Iqbal I
    6. Brandt R
    7. Gong CX

    (2008) Regulation between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation of neurofilament-M and their dysregulation in Alzheimer disease

    The FASEB Journal 22:138–145.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-8309com

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Dentin R
    2. Hedrick S
    3. Xie J
    4. Yates J
    5. Montminy M

    (2008) Hepatic glucose sensing via the CREB coactivator CRTC2

    Science 319:1402–1405.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151363

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Dong DL
    2. Xu ZS
    3. Chevrier MR
    4. Cotter RJ
    5. Cleveland DW
    6. Hart GW

    (1993)

    Glycosylation of mammalian neurofilaments. Localization of multiple O-linked N-acetylglucosamine moieties on neurofilament polypeptides L and M

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 268:16679–16687.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Dong DL
    2. Xu ZS
    3. Hart GW
    4. Cleveland DW

    (1996) Cytoplasmic O-GlcNAc modification of the head domain and the KSP repeat motif of the neurofilament protein neurofilament-H

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 271:20845–20852.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.34.20845

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Durham HD

    (1986) The effect of beta,beta'-iminodipropionitrile (IDPN) on cytoskeletal organization in cultured human skin fibroblasts

    Cell Biology International Reports 10:599–610.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1651(86)90137-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Eckes B
    2. Dogic D
    3. Colucci-Guyon E
    4. Wang N
    5. Maniotis A
    6. Ingber D
    7. Merckling A
    8. Langa F
    9. Aumailley M
    10. Delouvée A
    11. Koteliansky V
    12. Babinet C
    13. Krieg T

    (1998)

    Impaired mechanical stability, migration and contractile capacity in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts

    Journal of Cell Science 111 (Pt 13):1897–1907.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Eckes B
    2. Colucci-Guyon E
    3. Smola H
    4. Nodder S
    5. Babinet C
    6. Krieg T
    7. Martin P

    (2000)

    Impaired wound healing in embryonic and adult mice lacking vimentin

    Journal of Cell Science 113 (Pt 13):2455–2462.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Erickson JR
    2. Pereira L
    3. Wang L
    4. Han G
    5. Ferguson A
    6. Dao K
    7. Copeland RJ
    8. Despa F
    9. Hart GW
    10. Ripplinger CM
    11. Bers DM

    (2013) Diabetic hyperglycaemia activates CaMKII and arrhythmias by O-linked glycosylation

    Nature 502:372–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12537

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Erickson JR

    (2014) Mechanisms of CaMKII activation in the heart

    Frontiers in Pharmacology 5:59.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00059

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Eriksson JE
    2. Brautigan DL
    3. Vallee R
    4. Olmsted J
    5. Fujiki H
    6. Goldman RD

    (1992) Cytoskeletal integrity in interphase cells requires protein phosphatase activity

    PNAS 89:11093–11097.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.22.11093

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Eriksson JE
    2. He T
    3. Trejo-Skalli AV
    4. Härmälä-Braskén AS
    5. Hellman J
    6. Chou YH
    7. Goldman RD

    (2004) Specific in vivo phosphorylation sites determine the assembly dynamics of vimentin intermediate filaments

    Journal of Cell Science 117:919–932.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00906

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Farach AM
    2. Galileo DS

    (2008) O-GlcNAc modification of radial glial vimentin filaments in the developing chick brain

    Brain Cell Biology 36:191–202.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11068-008-9036-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Fudge DS
    2. Gardner KH
    3. Forsyth VT
    4. Riekel C
    5. Gosline JM

    (2003) The mechanical properties of hydrated intermediate filaments: insights from hagfish slime threads

    Biophysical Journal 85:2015–2027.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74629-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Fujiki R
    2. Hashiba W
    3. Sekine H
    4. Yokoyama A
    5. Chikanishi T
    6. Ito S
    7. Imai Y
    8. Kim J
    9. He HH
    10. Igarashi K
    11. Kanno J
    12. Ohtake F
    13. Kitagawa H
    14. Roeder RG
    15. Brown M
    16. Kato S

    (2011) GlcNAcylation of histone H2B facilitates its monoubiquitination

    Nature 480:557–560.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10656

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Garg A
    2. Barnes PF
    3. Porgador A
    4. Roy S
    5. Wu S
    6. Nanda JS
    7. Griffith DE
    8. Girard WM
    9. Rawal N
    10. Shetty S
    11. Vankayalapati R

    (2006) Vimentin expressed on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected human monocytes is involved in binding to the NKp46 receptor

    The Journal of Immunology 177:6192–6198.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6192

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Geisler F
    2. Leube RE

    (2016) Epithelial intermediate filaments: Guardians against microbial infection?

    Cells 5:29.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/cells5030029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Gloster TM
    2. Zandberg WF
    3. Heinonen JE
    4. Shen DL
    5. Deng L
    6. Vocadlo DJ

    (2011) Hijacking a biosynthetic pathway yields a glycosyltransferase inhibitor within cells

    Nature Chemical Biology 7:174–181.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.520

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Goldman RD
    2. Cleland MM
    3. Murthy SN
    4. Mahammad S
    5. Kuczmarski ER

    (2012) Inroads into the structure and function of intermediate filament networks

    Journal of Structural Biology 177:14–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Goto H
    2. Tanabe K
    3. Manser E
    4. Lim L
    5. Yasui Y
    6. Inagaki M

    (2002) Phosphorylation and reorganization of vimentin by p21-activated kinase (PAK)

    Genes to Cells 7:91–97.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1356-9597.2001.00504.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Guharoy M
    2. Szabo B
    3. Contreras Martos S
    4. Kosol S
    5. Tompa P

    (2013) Intrinsic structural disorder in cytoskeletal proteins

    Cytoskeleton 70:550–571.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21118

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Guignot J
    2. Servin AL

    (2008) Maintenance of the Salmonella-containing vacuole in the juxtanuclear area: a role for intermediate filaments

    Microbial Pathogenesis 45:415–422.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2008.09.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Guo M
    2. Ehrlicher AJ
    3. Mahammad S
    4. Fabich H
    5. Jensen MH
    6. Moore JR
    7. Fredberg JJ
    8. Goldman RD
    9. Weitz DA

    (2013) The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in cortical and cytoplasmic mechanics

    Biophysical Journal 105:1562–1568.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Guzmán C
    2. Jeney S
    3. Kreplak L
    4. Kasas S
    5. Kulik AJ
    6. Aebi U
    7. Forró L

    (2006) Exploring the mechanical properties of single vimentin intermediate filaments by atomic force microscopy

    Journal of Molecular Biology 360:623–630.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Hanover JA
    2. Krause MW
    3. Love DC

    (2010) The hexosamine signaling pathway: O-GlcNAc cycling in feast or famine

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 1800:80–95.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Hardivillé S
    2. Hart GW

    (2014) Nutrient regulation of signaling, transcription, and cell physiology by O-GlcNAcylation

    Cell Metabolism 20:208–213.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Hart GW
    2. Slawson C
    3. Ramirez-Correa G
    4. Lagerlof O

    (2011) Cross talk between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: roles in signaling, transcription, and chronic disease

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 80:825–858.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060608-102511

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Hart GW

    (2014) Three decades of research on O-GlcNAcylation - A major nutrient sensor that regulates signaling, transcription and cellular metabolism

    Frontiers in Endocrinology 5:183.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00183

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Helfand BT
    2. Chang L
    3. Goldman RD

    (2003) The dynamic and motile properties of intermediate filaments

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 19:445–467.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.092306

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Helfand BT
    2. Mendez MG
    3. Murthy SN
    4. Shumaker DK
    5. Grin B
    6. Mahammad S
    7. Aebi U
    8. Wedig T
    9. Wu YI
    10. Hahn KM
    11. Inagaki M
    12. Herrmann H
    13. Goldman RD

    (2011) Vimentin organization modulates the formation of lamellipodia

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 22:1274–1289.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0699

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Herrmann H
    2. Häner M
    3. Brettel M
    4. Müller SA
    5. Goldie KN
    6. Fedtke B
    7. Lustig A
    8. Franke WW
    9. Aebi U

    (1996) Structure and assembly properties of the intermediate filament protein vimentin: the role of its head, rod and tail domains

    Journal of Molecular Biology 264:933–953.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0688

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Herrmann H
    2. Kreplak L
    3. Aebi U

    (2004) Isolation, characterization, and in vitro assembly of intermediate filaments

    Methods in Cell Biology 78:3–24.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(04)78001-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Herrmann H
    2. Aebi U

    (2016) Intermediate filaments: structure and assembly

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 8:a018242.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018242

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Ho CL
    2. Martys JL
    3. Mikhailov A
    4. Gundersen GG
    5. Liem RK

    (1998)

    Novel features of intermediate filament dynamics revealed by green fluorescent protein chimeras

    Journal of Cell Science 111 (Pt 13):1767–1778.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Hookway C
    2. Ding L
    3. Davidson MW
    4. Rappoport JZ
    5. Danuser G
    6. Gelfand VI

    (2015) Microtubule-dependent transport and dynamics of vimentin intermediate filaments

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 26:1675–1686.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-09-1398

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Icenogle LM
    2. Hengel SM
    3. Coye LH
    4. Streifel A
    5. Collins CM
    6. Goodlett DR
    7. Moseley SL

    (2012) Molecular and biological characterization of Streptococcal SpyA-mediated ADP-ribosylation of intermediate filament protein vimentin

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:21481–21491.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.370791

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Ise H
    2. Kobayashi S
    3. Goto M
    4. Sato T
    5. Kawakubo M
    6. Takahashi M
    7. Ikeda U
    8. Akaike T

    (2010) Vimentin and desmin possess GlcNAc-binding lectin-like properties on cell surfaces

    Glycobiology 20:843–864.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwq039

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Ise M
    2. Ise H
    3. Shiba Y
    4. Kobayashi S
    5. Goto M
    6. Takahashi M
    7. Akaike T
    8. Ikeda U

    (2011) Targeting N-acetylglucosamine-bearing polymer-coated liposomes to vascular smooth muscle cells

    Journal of Artificial Organs 14:301–309.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-011-0595-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Ishihara K
    2. Takahashi I
    3. Tsuchiya Y
    4. Hasegawa M
    5. Kamemura K

    (2010) Characteristic increase in nucleocytoplasmic protein glycosylation by O-GlcNAc in 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 398:489–494.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Ivaska J
    2. Pallari HM
    3. Nevo J
    4. Eriksson JE

    (2007) Novel functions of vimentin in cell adhesion, migration, and signaling

    Experimental Cell Research 313:2050–2062.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Janmey PA
    2. Euteneuer U
    3. Traub P
    4. Schliwa M

    (1991) Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks

    The Journal of Cell Biology 113:155–160.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.113.1.155

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Jorgensen I
    2. Bednar MM
    3. Amin V
    4. Davis BK
    5. Ting JP
    6. McCafferty DG
    7. Valdivia RH

    (2011) The Chlamydia protease CPAF regulates host and bacterial proteins to maintain pathogen vacuole integrity and promote virulence

    Cell Host & Microbe 10:21–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2011.06.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Justus CR
    2. Leffler N
    3. Ruiz-Echevarria M
    4. Yang LV

    (2014) In vitro cell migration and invasion assays

    Journal of Visualized Experiments.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/51046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Kakade PS
    2. Budnar S
    3. Kalraiya RD
    4. Vaidya MM

    (2016) Functional Implications of O-GlcNAcylation-dependent Phosphorylation at a Proximal Site on Keratin 18

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 291:12003–12013.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.728717

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Kaminsky R
    2. Denison C
    3. Bening-Abu-Shach U
    4. Chisholm AD
    5. Gygi SP
    6. Broday L

    (2009) SUMO regulates the assembly and function of a cytoplasmic intermediate filament protein in C. elegans

    Developmental Cell 17:724–735.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.10.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Keembiyehetty C
    2. Love DC
    3. Harwood KR
    4. Gavrilova O
    5. Comly ME
    6. Hanover JA

    (2015) Conditional knock-out reveals a requirement for O-linked N-Acetylglucosaminase (O-GlcNAcase) in metabolic homeostasis

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:7097–7113.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.617779

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Kim SJ
    2. Ise H
    3. Goto M
    4. Akaike T

    (2012) Interactions of vimentin- or desmin-expressing liver cells with N-acetylglucosamine-bearing polymers

    Biomaterials 33:2154–2164.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.084

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. King IA
    2. Hounsell EF

    (1989)

    Cytokeratin 13 contains O-glycosidically linked N-acetylglucosamine residues

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:14022–14028.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Komura K
    2. Ise H
    3. Akaike T

    (2012) Dynamic behaviors of vimentin induced by interaction with GlcNAc molecules

    Glycobiology 22:1741–1759.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cws118

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Kreplak L
    2. Bär H
    3. Leterrier JF
    4. Herrmann H
    5. Aebi U

    (2005) Exploring the mechanical behavior of single intermediate filaments

    Journal of Molecular Biology 354:569–577.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.092

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Ku NO
    2. Michie SA
    3. Soetikno RM
    4. Resurreccion EZ
    5. Broome RL
    6. Oshima RG
    7. Omary MB

    (1996) Susceptibility to hepatotoxicity in transgenic mice that express a dominant-negative human keratin 18 mutant

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 98:1034–1046.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118864

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Ku NO
    2. Toivola DM
    3. Strnad P
    4. Omary MB

    (2010) Cytoskeletal keratin glycosylation protects epithelial tissue from injury

    Nature Cell Biology 12:876–885.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2091

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Kumar Y
    2. Valdivia RH

    (2008) Actin and intermediate filaments stabilize the Chlamydia trachomatis vacuole by forming dynamic structural scaffolds

    Cell Host & Microbe 4:159–169.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Köster S
    2. Weitz DA
    3. Goldman RD
    4. Aebi U
    5. Herrmann H

    (2015) Intermediate filament mechanics in vitro and in the cell: from coiled coils to filaments, fibers and networks

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 32:82–91.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2015.01.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Leduc C
    2. Etienne-Manneville S

    (2015) Intermediate filaments in cell migration and invasion: the unusual suspects

    Current Opinion in Cell Biology 32:102–112.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2015.01.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Lin AE
    2. Beasley FC
    3. Keller N
    4. Hollands A
    5. Urbano R
    6. Troemel ER
    7. Hoffman HM
    8. Nizet V

    (2015) A group A Streptococcus ADP-ribosyltransferase toxin stimulates a protective interleukin 1β-dependent macrophage immune response

    mBio 6:e00133.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00133-15

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Lowery J
    2. Kuczmarski ER
    3. Herrmann H
    4. Goldman RD

    (2015) Intermediate Filaments Play a Pivotal Role in Regulating Cell Architecture and Function

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:17145–17153.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.640359

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Lüdemann N
    2. Clement A
    3. Hans VH
    4. Leschik J
    5. Behl C
    6. Brandt R

    (2005) O-glycosylation of the tail domain of neurofilament protein M in human neurons and in spinal cord tissue of a rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:31648–31658.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504395200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Ma Z
    2. Vosseller K

    (2013) O-GlcNAc in cancer biology

    Amino Acids 45:719–733.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1543-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Ma J
    2. Hart GW

    (2013) Protein O-GlcNAcylation in diabetes and diabetic complications

    Expert Review of Proteomics 10:365–380.

    https://doi.org/10.1586/14789450.2013.820536

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Mahesh PP
    2. Retnakumar RJ
    3. Mundayoor S

    (2016) Downregulation of vimentin in macrophages infected with live Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by Reactive Oxygen Species

    Scientific Reports 6:21526.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21526

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Mak T
    2. Brüggemann H

    (2016) Vimentin in Bacterial Infections

    Cells 5:18.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/cells5020018

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Martys JL
    2. Ho CL
    3. Liem RK
    4. Gundersen GG

    (1999) Intermediate filaments in motion: observations of intermediate filaments in cells using green fluorescent protein-vimentin

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 10:1289–1295.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.5.1289

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Meier M
    2. Padilla GP
    3. Herrmann H
    4. Wedig T
    5. Hergt M
    6. Patel TR
    7. Stetefeld J
    8. Aebi U
    9. Burkhard P

    (2009) Vimentin coil 1A-A molecular switch involved in the initiation of filament elongation

    Journal of Molecular Biology 390:245–261.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Mendez MG
    2. Kojima S
    3. Goldman RD

    (2010) Vimentin induces changes in cell shape, motility, and adhesion during the epithelial to mesenchymal transition

    The FASEB Journal 24:1838–1851.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.09-151639

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Menko AS
    2. Bleaken BM
    3. Libowitz AA
    4. Zhang L
    5. Stepp MA
    6. Walker JL

    (2014) A central role for vimentin in regulating repair function during healing of the lens epithelium

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:776–790.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0900

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Miller RK
    2. Vikstrom K
    3. Goldman RD

    (1991) Keratin incorporation into intermediate filament networks is a rapid process

    The Journal of Cell Biology 113:843–855.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.113.4.843

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Mondoux MA
    2. Love DC
    3. Ghosh SK
    4. Fukushige T
    5. Bond M
    6. Weerasinghe GR
    7. Hanover JA
    8. Krause MW

    (2011) O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine cycling and insulin signaling are required for the glucose stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Genetics 188:369–382.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.126490

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Murli S
    2. Watson RO
    3. Galán JE

    (2001) Role of tyrosine kinases and the tyrosine phosphatase SptP in the interaction of Salmonella with host cells

    Cellular Microbiology 3:795–810.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00158.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Nekrasova OE
    2. Mendez MG
    3. Chernoivanenko IS
    4. Tyurin-Kuzmin PA
    5. Kuczmarski ER
    6. Gelfand VI
    7. Goldman RD
    8. Minin AA

    (2011) Vimentin intermediate filaments modulate the motility of mitochondria

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 22:2282–2289.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-09-0766

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Nieto MA

    (2011) The ins and outs of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in health and disease

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 27:347–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Nöding B
    2. Herrmann H
    3. Köster S

    (2014) Direct observation of subunit exchange along mature vimentin intermediate filaments

    Biophysical Journal 107:2923–2931.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.050

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Omary MB
    2. Coulombe PA
    3. McLean WH

    (2004) Intermediate filament proteins and their associated diseases

    New England Journal of Medicine 351:2087–2100.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040319

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Omary MB

    (2009) "IF-pathies": a broad spectrum of intermediate filament-associated diseases

    Journal of Clinical Investigation 119:1756–1762.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI39894

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Palaniappan KK
    2. Hangauer MJ
    3. Smith TJ
    4. Smart BP
    5. Pitcher AA
    6. Cheng EH
    7. Bertozzi CR
    8. Boyce M

    (2013) A chemical glycoproteomics platform reveals O-GlcNAcylation of mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel 2

    Cell Reports 5:546–552.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Phoomak C
    2. Vaeteewoottacharn K
    3. Silsirivanit A
    4. Saengboonmee C
    5. Seubwai W
    6. Sawanyawisuth K
    7. Wongkham C
    8. Wongkham S

    (2017) High glucose levels boost the aggressiveness of highly metastatic cholangiocarcinoma cells via O-GlcNAcylation

    Scientific Reports 7:43842.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43842

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Quinlan RA
    2. Hatzfeld M
    3. Franke WW
    4. Lustig A
    5. Schulthess T
    6. Engel J

    (1986) Characterization of dimer subunits of intermediate filament proteins

    Journal of Molecular Biology 192:337–349.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(86)90369-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Ran FA
    2. Hsu PD
    3. Wright J
    4. Agarwala V
    5. Scott DA
    6. Zhang F

    (2013) Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system

    Nature Protocols 8:2281–2308.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.143

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Ridge KM
    2. Shumaker D
    3. Robert A
    4. Hookway C
    5. Gelfand VI
    6. Janmey PA
    7. Lowery J
    8. Guo M
    9. Weitz DA
    10. Kuczmarski E
    11. Goldman RD

    (2016) Methods for determining the cellular functions of Vimentin intermediate filaments

    Methods in Enzymology 568:389–426.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2015.09.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Robert A
    2. Herrmann H
    3. Davidson MW
    4. Gelfand VI

    (2014) Microtubule-dependent transport of vimentin filament precursors is regulated by actin and by the concerted action of Rho- and p21-activated kinases

    The FASEB Journal 28:2879–2890.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-250019

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Rodriguez AC
    2. Yu SH
    3. Li B
    4. Zegzouti H
    5. Kohler JJ

    (2015) Enhanced transfer of a photocross-linking N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) analog by an O-GlcNAc transferase mutant with converted substrate specificity

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 290:22638–22648.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.667006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Rogel MR
    2. Soni PN
    3. Troken JR
    4. Sitikov A
    5. Trejo HE
    6. Ridge KM

    (2011) Vimentin is sufficient and required for wound repair and remodeling in alveolar epithelial cells

    The FASEB Journal 25:3873–3883.

    https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-170795

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Sadelain M
     2. Papapetrou EP
     3. Bushman FD

     (2011) Safe harbours for the integration of new DNA in the human genome

     Nature Reviews Cancer 12:51–58.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3179

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Satelli A
     2. Li S

     (2011) Vimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapy

     Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68:3033–3046.

     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0735-1

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Shafi R
     2. Iyer SP
     3. Ellies LG
     4. O'Donnell N
     5. Marek KW
     6. Chui D
     7. Hart GW
     8. Marth JD

     (2000) The O-GlcNAc transferase gene resides on the X chromosome and is essential for embryonic stem cell viability and mouse ontogeny

     PNAS 97:5735–5739.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100471497

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Shikhman AR
     2. Greenspan NS
     3. Cunningham MW

     (1993)

     A subset of mouse monoclonal antibodies cross-reactive with cytoskeletal proteins and group A streptococcal M proteins recognizes N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine

     Journal of Immunology 151:3902–3913.

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Shoeman RL
     2. Hartig R
     3. Berthel M
     4. Traub P

     (2002) Deletion mutagenesis of the amino-terminal head domain of vimentin reveals dispensability of large internal regions for intermediate filament assembly and stability

     Experimental Cell Research 279:344–353.

     https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.2002.5618

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Sihag RK
     2. Inagaki M
     3. Yamaguchi T
     4. Shea TB
     5. Pant HC

     (2007) Role of phosphorylation on the structural dynamics and function of types III and IV intermediate filaments

     Experimental Cell Research 313:2098–2109.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.04.010

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Singh JP
     2. Zhang K
     3. Wu J
     4. Yang X

     (2015) O-GlcNAc signaling in cancer metabolism and epigenetics

     Cancer Letters 356:244–250.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.04.014

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Slawson C
     2. Lakshmanan T
     3. Knapp S
     4. Hart GW

     (2008) A mitotic GlcNAcylation/phosphorylation signaling complex alters the posttranslational state of the cytoskeletal protein vimentin

     Molecular Biology of the Cell 19:4130–4140.

     https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1146

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Snavely EA
     2. Kokes M
     3. Dunn JD
     4. Saka HA
     5. Nguyen BD
     6. Bastidas RJ
     7. McCafferty DG
     8. Valdivia RH

     (2014) Reassessing the role of the secreted protease CPAF in Chlamydia trachomatis infection through genetic approaches

     Pathogens and Disease 71:336–351.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12179

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Snider NT
     2. Omary MB

     (2014) Post-translational modifications of intermediate filament proteins: mechanisms and functions

     Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 15:163–177.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3753

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Srikanth B
     2. Vaidya MM
     3. Kalraiya RD

     (2010) O-GlcNAcylation determines the solubility, filament organization, and stability of keratins 8 and 18

     Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:34062–34071.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.098996

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Szeverenyi I
     2. Cassidy AJ
     3. Chung CW
     4. Lee BT
     5. Common JE
     6. Ogg SC
     7. Chen H
     8. Sim SY
     9. Goh WL
     10. Ng KW
     11. Simpson JA
     12. Chee LL
     13. Eng GH
     14. Li B
     15. Lunny DP
     16. Chuon D
     17. Venkatesh A
     18. Khoo KH
     19. McLean WH
     20. Lim YP
     21. Lane EB

     (2008) The Human Intermediate Filament Database: comprehensive information on a gene family involved in many human diseases

     Human Mutation 29:351–360.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20652

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Tao GZ
     2. Kirby C
     3. Whelan SA
     4. Rossi F
     5. Bi X
     6. MacLaren M
     7. Gentalen E
     8. O'Neill RA
     9. Hart GW
     10. Omary MB

     (2006) Reciprocal keratin 18 Ser48 O-GlcNAcylation and Ser52 phosphorylation using peptide analysis

     Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 351:708–712.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.092

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. Tarbet HJ
     2. Toleman CA
     3. Boyce M

     (2018) A Sweet Embrace: Control of Protein-Protein Interactions by O-Linked β-N-Acetylglucosamine

     Biochemistry 57:.

     https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00871

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Vaidyanathan K
     2. Wells L

     (2014) Multiple tissue-specific roles for the O-GlcNAc post-translational modification in the induction of and complications arising from type II diabetes

     Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:34466–34471.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.591560

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Vaidyanathan K
     2. Durning S
     3. Wells L

     (2014) Functional O-GlcNAc modifications: implications in molecular regulation and pathophysiology

     Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 49:140–163.

     https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2014.884535

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Vikstrom KL
     2. Borisy GG
     3. Goldman RD

     (1989) Dynamic aspects of intermediate filament networks in BHK-21 cells

     PNAS 86:549–553.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.2.549

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Vikstrom KL
     2. Lim SS
     3. Goldman RD
     4. Borisy GG

     (1992) Steady state dynamics of intermediate filament networks

     The Journal of Cell Biology 118:121–129.

     https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.118.1.121

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
118. 1. Vuoriluoto K
     2. Haugen H
     3. Kiviluoto S
     4. Mpindi JP
     5. Nevo J
     6. Gjerdrum C
     7. Tiron C
     8. Lorens JB
     9. Ivaska J

     (2011) Vimentin regulates EMT induction by Slug and oncogenic H-Ras and migration by governing Axl expression in breast cancer

     Oncogene 30:1436–1448.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.509

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
119. 1. Wang Z
     2. Pandey A
     3. Hart GW

     (2007) Dynamic interplay between O-linked N-acetylglucosaminylation and glycogen synthase kinase-3-dependent phosphorylation

     Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 6:1365–1379.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M600453-MCP200

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
120. 1. Wang L
     2. Zhang J
     3. Banerjee S
     4. Barnes L
     5. Barnes L
     6. Sajja V
     7. Liu Y
     8. Guo B
     9. Du Y
     10. Agarwal MK
     11. Wald DN
     12. Wang Q
     13. Yang J

     (2010) Sumoylation of vimentin354 is associated with PIAS3 inhibition of glioma cell migration

     Oncotarget 1:620–627.

     https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.101101

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
121. 1. Wei J
     2. Xu G
     3. Wu M
     4. Zhang Y
     5. Li Q
     6. Liu P
     7. Zhu T
     8. Song A
     9. Zhao L
     10. Han Z
     11. Chen G
     12. Wang S
     13. Meng L
     14. Zhou J
     15. Lu Y
     16. Wang S
     17. Ma D

     (2008)

     Overexpression of vimentin contributes to prostate cancer invasion and metastasis via src regulation

     Anticancer Research 28:327–334.

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
122. 1. Yamaguchi T
     2. Goto H
     3. Yokoyama T
     4. Silljé H
     5. Hanisch A
     6. Uldschmid A
     7. Takai Y
     8. Oguri T
     9. Nigg EA
     10. Inagaki M

     (2005) Phosphorylation by Cdk1 induces Plk1-mediated vimentin phosphorylation during mitosis

     The Journal of Cell Biology 171:431–436.

     https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200504091

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
123. 1. Yang YR
     2. Song M
     3. Lee H
     4. Jeon Y
     5. Choi EJ
     6. Jang HJ
     7. Moon HY
     8. Byun HY
     9. Kim EK
     10. Kim DH
     11. Lee MN
     12. Koh A
     13. Ghim J
     14. Choi JH
     15. Lee-Kwon W
     16. Kim KT
     17. Ryu SH
     18. Suh PG

     (2012) O-GlcNAcase is essential for embryonic development and maintenance of genomic stability

     Aging Cell 11:439–448.

     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00801.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
124. 1. Yi W
     2. Clark PM
     3. Mason DE
     4. Keenan MC
     5. Hill C
     6. Goddard WA
     7. Peters EC
     8. Driggers EM
     9. Hsieh-Wilson LC

     (2012) Phosphofructokinase 1 glycosylation regulates cell growth and metabolism

     Science 337:975–980.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222278

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
125. 1. Yoon M
     2. Moir RD
     3. Prahlad V
     4. Goldman RD

     (1998) Motile properties of vimentin intermediate filament networks in living cells

     The Journal of Cell Biology 143:147–157.

     https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.1.147

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
126. 1. Yu SH
     2. Boyce M
     3. Wands AM
     4. Bond MR
     5. Bertozzi CR
     6. Kohler JJ

     (2012) Metabolic labeling enables selective photocrosslinking of O-GlcNAc-modified proteins to their binding partners

     PNAS 109:4834–4839.

     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114356109

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
127. 1. Yuzwa SA
     2. Macauley MS
     3. Heinonen JE
     4. Shan X
     5. Dennis RJ
     6. He Y
     7. Whitworth GE
     8. Stubbs KA
     9. McEachern EJ
     10. Davies GJ
     11. Vocadlo DJ

     (2008) A potent mechanism-inspired O-GlcNAcase inhibitor that blocks phosphorylation of tau in vivo

     Nature Chemical Biology 4:483–490.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.96

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
128. 1. Yuzwa SA
     2. Shan X
     3. Macauley MS
     4. Clark T
     5. Skorobogatko Y
     6. Vosseller K
     7. Vocadlo DJ

     (2012) Increasing O-GlcNAc slows neurodegeneration and stabilizes tau against aggregation

     Nature Chemical Biology 8:393–399.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.797

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
129. 1. Yuzwa SA
     2. Vocadlo DJ

     (2014) O-GlcNAc and neurodegeneration: biochemical mechanisms and potential roles in Alzheimer's disease and beyond

     Chem. Soc. Rev. 43:6839–6858.

     https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00038B

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
130. 1. Zhu QS
     2. Rosenblatt K
     3. Huang KL
     4. Lahat G
     5. Brobey R
     6. Bolshakov S
     7. Nguyen T
     8. Ding Z
     9. Belousov R
     10. Bill K
     11. Luo X
     12. Lazar A
     13. Dicker A
     14. Mills GB
     15. Hung MC
     16. Lev D

     (2011) Vimentin is a novel AKT1 target mediating motility and invasion

     Oncogene 30:457–470.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.421

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
131. 1. Zhu Y
     2. Shan X
     3. Yuzwa SA
     4. Vocadlo DJ

     (2014) The emerging link between O-GlcNAc and Alzheimer disease

     Journal of Biological Chemistry 289:34472–34481.

     https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.601351

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Heather J Tarbet

   Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Lee Dolat

   1. Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
   2. Center for Host-Microbial Interactions, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Timothy J Smith

   Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Brett M Condon

   Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. E Timothy O'Brien III

   1. Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
   2. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States

   Contribution

   Software, Formal analysis, Validation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Raphael H Valdivia

   1. Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
   2. Center for Host-Microbial Interactions, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Resources, Software, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Michael Boyce

   1. Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
   2. Center for Host-Microbial Interactions, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   michael.boyce@duke.edu

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2729-4876

• 3,428

  views

• 437

  downloads

• 54

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.