Next Article in Journal
Nitrate-Induced MtCLE34 Gene Lacks the Ability to Reduce Symbiotic Nodule Number and Carries Nonsense Mutation in a Few Accessions of Medicago truncatula
Previous Article in Journal
A Two-Year Field Experiment for the Integrated Management of Bread and Durum Wheat Fungal Diseases and of Deoxynivalenol Accumulation in the Grain in Central Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Can Cold Plasma Be Used for Boosting Plant Growth and Plant Protection in Sustainable Plant Production?

1
Department of Biology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 7 Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 7 Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
3
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
4
Department of Trade and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
5
Laboratory of Vegetables and Ornamental Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 6 Bernardyńska St., 85-225 Bydgoszcz, Poland
6
Plant Breeding Company Grunwald Ltd., Group IHAR, Mielno 163, 14-107 Mielno, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 15 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022

Abstract

:
Sustainable agriculture with low inputs of chemicals and fertilizers has been recently attracting more attention from producers and researchers in the EU. The main reason for such attention is The European Green Deal—the EU’s latest growth strategy concerning environmental degradation and climate change. One of its main components is the Farm to Fork strategy, which especially features the reduction in pesticide and mineral fertilizer application and also supports the development of organic farming. At the same time, food demand is rising. These ambitious challenges require extensive research, development and innovation. Therefore, new non-chemical techniques for improving plant growth and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses must be explored for their potential in this field. One of the most promising is the use of non-thermal plasma for such purposes. As this physical factor is a complex mixture of ions, atoms, electrons, radicals and molecules, its effect on plants and pathogens is also complex. This review presents different aspects of the effect of non-thermal plasma on seed germination, development of seedlings, plants and pathogens. The literature was explored to provide evidence for the possible use of non-thermal plasma for boosting plant growth and plant protection.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a rising environmental awareness amongst Europeans, which demonstrates our care for the natural environment. Its devastation, loss of biodiversity and climate change have been a concern of the European Community for years. These issues, especially climate change, are considered to be an existential threat to Europe and the world. In order to overcome these challenges, the European Green Deal was presented in December 2019 [1]. It is the most recent growth strategy and action plan, which will transform the EU into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, ensuring no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050. Moreover, it will turn the EU into the first climate-neutral continent (with a reduction in emissions by at least 55% by 2030, relative to 1990). The European Green Deal is an action plan aimed at turning the listed challenges into new opportunities for environment and climate-friendly, sustainable development. As nature is the most important ally in our efforts to reverse climate change and ensure healthier and sustainable EU food systems, two cornerstone strategies of the European Green Deal were launched in May 2020: Farm to Fork and Biodiversity [1]. They constitute elements for the sustainable development of agricultural and rural areas in the EU according to the common agricultural policy. These strategies are essential as half of the global GDP (Gross Domestic Product), EUR 40 trillion, depends on nature. Both strategies are intended to prevent biodiversity loss, as the global population of wild species decreased by 60% over the last 40 years and 1 million species are at risk of extinction, to reduce pollution levels, and to improve food quality. In 2017, over 950,000 deaths were attributed to unhealthy diets (one out of five) [2,3]. Therefore, the following, ambitious goals were set out by the EU within the Farm to Fork strategy: a reduction in the use of chemical plant protection products and dangerous pesticides by 50% by 2030, a reduction in nutrient loss by 50% while preserving soil fertility, a reduction in mineral fertilizer use by a minimum of 20% by 2030, as well as supporting the development of organic farming to achieve 25% of total farmland in the EU [2]. Despite the serious challenge that they pose, they are also an opportunity for dynamic and sustainable development as well as increasing competitiveness for the EU on the global market. However, a literal reduction in agricultural means of production or a simple increase in organic production would inevitably lead to failure. In order to fulfil the set goals, it is important to consider other background facts:
(a)
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the human population will increase to nearly 10 billion by 2050, which makes food security one of the greatest challenges and a concern for the EU (food production must increase to about 70%) [4]. However, this issue cannot be solved entirely by the EU policies and actions relating to the reduction in food waste (the commission will propose legally binding targets to reduce food waste across the EU by 2023 by halving per capita food waste at retail and consumer levels by 2030) [2].
(b)
On the other hand, the creation of a healthy food environment, which makes a healthy and sustainable choice the easy choice, as well as food labeling to empower consumers to choose healthy and sustainable diets, will raise consumers’ demand for healthy food free of chemicals in favor of plants and environmentally friendly means of plant production and protection (the commission will propose mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labeling and develop a sustainable food labeling framework that covers nutritional, climate, environmental and social aspects of food products) [2].
(c)
In general, plant pathogens are responsible for economic losses that usually amount to 20–30% on average, e.g., wheat 21.5%, rice 30.0% and maize 22.5% %, but sometimes reaching above 40% (e.g., maize 41.1%) if not correctly controlled [5] with their numbers increasing over the last 100 years [6]. Moreover, globalization is conducive to the faster spreading of pathogens (e.g., the rising issue of quarantine disease occurrence). The number of resistant pathogens is continuously increasing [7] and, at the same time, the number of available pesticides is decreasing. These facts, together with climate warming and the occurrence of more favorable conditions for pathogens, will result in a higher rate of disease incidence and this may in turn lead to producers using more chemicals, the outcome being a higher percentage of pesticide residues found in food products [8].
(d)
The climate crisis has become increasingly more evident in recent years, with frequent droughts and irregular rainfall distribution, and the last decade being witnessed as the warmest decade ever [9]. This global climate change makes plant production and disease control more difficult and complicated. The elevation in CO2 concentration and temperature can lead to the emergence of new diseases due to possible changes in plant susceptibility to infection by specific pathogens [10].
Considering the above mentioned facts, the demand for safer non-chemical-based, effective and sustainable systems for intensive agricultural production is continuously and quickly rising. Therefore, innovative and modern solutions that can pose an alternative to those currently used can guarantee the success of the European Green Deal strategies and meet consumers’ expectations. As a result, the search for new non-chemical techniques in accelerating seed germination, improving plant growth and development as well as resistance against abiotic and biotic stress factors has recently reached high importance. Promising results for the use of physical methods such as non-thermal plasma [11], electromagnetic fields [12] and ultrasounds [13,14] for improvement of seed germination and seedlings growth have been more widely reported in the literature.
This paper presents different aspects in which cold plasma affects seeds and plants, as well as its possible applications in non-chemical plant protection and boosting. The literature was reviewed to provide evidence for how cold plasma might be used to achieve the goals of the European Green Deal strategy in accordance with the principles of sustainable agriculture.

2. Plasma Basics and Its Potential in Agriculture

Plasma is the fundamental state of matter in the Universe. Interstellar matter, stars and other elements are in the plasma state of matter. It is estimated that over 99% of the entire Universe mass is in this state [15,16]. Natural plasma is relatively rare on Earth. The gaseous layer of the atmosphere absorbs a large part of the ionizing radiation. However, our planet has an outer plasma layer called the ionosphere. The main, natural source of plasma formation in terrestrial conditions is lightning or the aurora light (polar lights). In general, plasma is referred to as a fourth state of matter. It is an ionized gas characterized by unique properties. Plasma is comprised of excited atomic, molecular, ionic and radical species coexisting with numerous species, such as electrons, free radicals, positive and negative ions, gas atoms and molecules in the fundamental or excited state, e.g., reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) together with electromagnetic radiation (UV photons and visible light) [16]. It is considered a “quasi-neutral” medium with a zero net electrical charge. However, it is electrically conductive as it contains free charge carriers and exhibits properties distinguishing plasma from neutral gasses and liquids [16,17].
Plasma is usually created by the application of energy to a neutral gas, which in turn generates ions. The process can be supplied with thermal energy, electromagnetic radiation, or electric current [18]. Depending on the conditions of generation, plasma can be divided into equilibrium (thermal) and non-equilibrium (low temperature/cold) plasma. The latter can be further divided into quasi-equilibrium plasma (temperature around 100–150 °C) and non-equilibrium plasma (temperature less than 60 °C). The second group is especially interesting for biologists due to the lack of thermal damages of living material. The cold, non-thermal plasma is usually generated by an electric discharge with direct (DC) or alternating current (AC). However, it can also be produced with a radio frequency discharge (100 kHz–100 MHz) or a microwave discharge (above 100 MHz) [16,19]. The most frequently used types of DC discharges are a corona discharge (the current range is 10−7–10−5 A), a glow discharge (current range 10−5–1 A) and an arc discharge (current above 1 A) [20]. The best known and the most common type of AC discharge is a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD). The most characteristic feature of this discharge is two electrodes insulated by a dielectric barrier [21]. The greatest advantage of DBD is the possibility to operate in ambient air and in normal atmospheric pressure. The most common cold plasma generators include a dielectric barrier discharge, a plasma jet, a plasma torch, microplasma arrays, a gliding arc and high voltage nanosecond pulsed plasma [22,23,24,25,26,27]; the first two are the most frequently used devices. Figure 1 shows an example of DBD generators used by the authors in their research on cold plasma and ozone produced in the process of plasma generation and their effectiveness in decontamination of seeds and loose organic materials (e.g., grounded dry spices) [28]. Depending on the characteristics of the treated material, the construction of the discharge chamber and the electrodes may differ, as shown in Figure 2 [28,29].
The construction of plasma generators is closely related to their intended purpose. In our first prototype, the discharge chamber used a sliding electrode and was designated for the treatment of smaller sample particles to allow us to carry out laboratory scale research. The second prototype was equipped with rotating electrodes, a reverse transport of ozone and a belt conveyor, which was built for testing larger amounts of plant material in a production scale for that of small to medium sized companies [28,29]. Crucial for consideration in the final result of cold plasma treatments and its characteristics is the type and pressure of the gas being used. Numerous gases can be used for such purposes. Due to ease of use and low cost, the ambient air usually acts as the carrier gas for applications in agriculture [30]. There are also other gases used, such as argon, helium, nitrogen, oxygen and mixtures with oxygen [31]. Depending on these factors, cold plasma properties, such as volume, electron density, gas temperature, production rate of hydrogen peroxide and energy yield, can vary widely. The results of Wang et al. [32] showed that helium plasma had a lower electron density and gas temperature, but a larger volume compared to argon plasma in a nanosecond pulsed plasma discharge generated in a water-film plasma reactor. They also proved that it had production rates and energy yields of hydrogen peroxide slightly higher and more diffusive compared to argon plasma. However, helium plasma had a much lower electron density. The composition and properties of the cold plasma generated are specific to its intended purpose. Lou et al. [33] found that the antimicrobial efficiency for a cold atmospheric plasma jet (CAPJ) against Escherichia coli was highly dependent on the application voltage, CAPJ sample distance and treatment time, as well as the flow rate of argon gas. The most influential parameter was treatment time. Optimal bactericidal activity was achieved with an application voltage of 8.5 kV, CAPJ-sample distance of 10 mm, a treatment time of 300 s and an argon flow rate of 500 sccm (standard cubic centimeter per min). There was also an observed positive correlation intensity of hydroxyl radicals to CAPJ antibacterial activity. This would suggest that optimized experimental conditions can ensure high antimicrobial effectiveness of cold plasma.
Cold plasma has wide range of uses, including surface modification of plastics [34,35], ozone generation [36,37], toxic and harmful gas and sewage decomposition [38,39,40], as well as sterilization of soil and wounds [41,42,43]. Plasma complexity with its wide range of chemically active species also have a pronounced antimicrobial effect and can be used for surface decontamination [29,44,45,46], and for reducing the detrimental effect of microorganisms in the food processing industry [47,48] and agriculture [19,49,50]. Cold plasma technology is widely used in food preservation due to its ability to rapidly decontaminate microorganisms in ambient temperatures and normal atmospheric pressure conditions. Moreover, this technology ensures effectiveness without causing perceivable changes in food quality followed by reasonable costs when using ambient air as the working gas. The attractiveness of cold plasma technology is also due to a wide range of target microorganisms, including fungi (yeasts and molds), which have attracted special attention from the food industry as they are a large group of food spoilage microorganisms [51], viruses [52], prions [53], Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria [54,55] and biofilm forming bacteria [56]. There is also evidence that plasma has assisted the degradation of mycotoxins produced by some fungi [57,58,59,60].
Cold plasma technology also possesses many advantages desirable in agriculture, such as low operating temperatures, relatively short processing time as well as safeness to seeds, crops, humans and especially to the environment. Those highly reactive species that constitute cold plasma affect seed germination, plant growth, the quality of agricultural produce and cause changes in the density of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, pH, oxidation–reduction potential and electrical conductivity. Recently, the contribution of cold plasma technologies in agriculture has included the decontamination of seeds or crops intended for sowing or storage, the boosting of seed germination and growth, the reduction in pathogen contamination, the production of nitrogen-based fertilizers, soil remediation, the disinfection of processing surfaces and tools, the removal of ethylene from air to lower the aging rate [61,62] and the activation of plant growth-promoting bacteria [63]. As well as using cold plasma directly, plasma can be applied indirectly through the use of plasma-activated water (PAW) [64,65,66,67]. In general, water treatment by exposure to a plasma discharge, such as cold plasma jet, increases its beneficial properties for plants. PAW can significantly affect seed germination, seedling growth [11,68,69,70,71] and it can also increase crop yields when used for irrigation during the vegetation period [19,72,73]. The main mechanism is the activation of the synthesis of plant hormones such as auxin and cytokinin, which induce physiochemical changes resulting in the boosting of seed germination and plant growth. Cold atmospheric plasma-assisted nitrogen fixation is also considered a significant source of nitrogen for plants due to the presence of nitric oxide, nitrite, nitrate, dinitrogen trioxide, dinitrogen pentoxide and ammonia [74,75,76]. These forms of nitrogen are mobile and soluble in soil, which makes them easy for plant uptake [77,78]. Therefore, they can be used as fertilizers [79]. The undeniable benefits for the use of cold plasma in nitrogen fixation are low-energy consumption (high-energy demand of present artificial nitrogen fixation) and low cost, sustainable production (atmospheric conditions) [80,81], non-emission of greenhouse gases [82,83] and lastly, a relatively easy setup for on-site mass production [84]. However, nitrogen-fixed water is acidic (pH 2–3) due to dissolved nitrogen oxides and hydrogen peroxide, which can be harmful for some crops [69,85,86]. An alternative method for neutralization is the immersing of Mg, Al or Zn in water, as proven by Lamichhane et al. [67]. Authors found that the addition of metal ions is very effective in the neutralization of PAW. They observed a high increase in corn germination and plant growth after the treatment with metal ion-enriched PAW. Plants contained more chlorophyll (especially in Mg–PAW) and proteins. Such neutralized, metal ion-enriched and nitrogen-fixed PAW can be used directly for crop irrigation and therefore exhibits a great potential in large-scale sustainable agriculture for both soil-based and hydroponic production [87]. Moreover, some limitations for the present production of nitrogen fertilizers (environmental, establishment, production and transportation [88,89,90]) can be addressed. However, there is still a need to provide other macro and micronutrients essential for plant growth.

3. Effect of Cold Plasma on Seed Fungal Pathogens

It is scientific knowledge that pathogen-infected seeds are the primary source of plant disease in many types of food crops. A huge number of fungal pathogens, such as Alternaria, Aspergillus, Bipolaris, Botrytis, Colletotrichum, Fusarium or the Sclerotinia genera, are transmitted when the seeds are sown and emerge. The pathogens limit the germination and the development of both seedlings and plants, such as soybean [91], cereals [92], oilseed rape [93], vegetables [94,95,96] and herbs [97], thus negatively affecting the yield and food safety [98,99].
Traditionally, in order to control seed-borne pathogens, fungicides have been widely used [44,100]. As shown in numerous studies, the use of cold plasma is an innovative, efficient, and eco-friendly method for reducing pathogens without the use of pesticides, which are harmful to both the environment and consumer [94,101,102].
Plant pathogens occur mainly in the seed coat [103]. Low-temperature plasma, in addition to causing changes in the external structure of seeds, prevents the possibility of pathogen development [45]. Cold plasma has a direct impact on pathogens, which makes it a useful tool for sterilization of the seed surface. The application of cold plasma meets the criteria for the advanced seed treatment method, for ease of application, effectiveness against a wide range of pathogens and non-toxicity to humans and animals [102,104]. It has been found that a mixture of free radicals, ions, electrons, stable reaction products, reactive oxygen species and molecules, or ultraviolet (UV) radiation which are generated by cold plasma, induce fungicidal effects. Different reactive agents play a role, either independently or in synergistically, in the inactivation of microorganisms. The mechanism of sterilization has not yet been fully elucidated. In general, plasma disrupts the cell exterior and causes cell permeability. The device model and operating parameters, such as gas composition, flow rate, temperature, humidity, voltage, and frequency, also affect the efficacy of cold plasma [73,105,106,107].
Hydroxyl radicals (OH) have a direct effect on the cell membranes of microorganisms through the ability to readily destroy membrane proteins [107]. Moreover, the contact of biological material with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can lead to serious biological cell damage (oxidative stress). As a result of the oxidation of lipids and membrane proteins, the proper function of the cell membrane is impaired and, eventually, destroyed [108,109].
According to studies conducted on microorganisms, including filamentous fungi, the effect of UV radiation on the inactivation is relatively minor [110]. ROS are much more effective, as demonstrated in the case of inactivation of Penicillium digitatum spores [111,112]. Among the reactive oxygen species, ozone is a strong oxidant, second only to the hydroxyl radical [113].
A preliminary study carried out by the authors of this manuscript also proved a high inhibition effect of dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBD) on growth of some pathogenic fungi contaminated caraway seeds (Carum carvi L.). They were settled by the fungi from Alternaria, Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, Fusarium, Penicillium genera and some bacteria. Cold plasma (DBD) treatment of seeds with 400 W power and 15 s of exposure time was very effective. The weakest result was noted for Aspergillus ochraceus (Figure 3).
Fusarium spp., commonly occurring on seeds, is considered to be one of the most sensitive fungi to cold plasma, for example, the seed treatment of common buckwheat conducted in a low-pressure radiofrequency (RF) system with the use of oxygen, which resulted in a reduction in fungal growth, including Fusarium species [114]. Plasma treatment using the diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge (DCSBD) at atmospheric pressure in ambient air also strongly affected fungi on maize seeds. The fungi of genus Alternaria proved to be the most resistant to cold plasma. The reduction of 3.22 log (CFU/g) in A. alternata was observed after a 300 s plasma treatment with an input power of 400 W, while for F. culmorum, just 60 s was sufficient for its a total elimination [30]. Filamentous fungi inhabiting wheat grains also showed a varied response to cold plasma. The efficiency in the treatment of seeds artificially inoculated with fungal isolates decreased in the following order: F. nivale, F. culmorum, Trichothecium roseum, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus clavatus [115]. High antimicrobial activity of non-thermal plasma generated by an air dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) was also noted for Gibberella fujikuroi (Fusarium fujikuroi) pathogenic to rice, where treatments at atmospheric pressure effectively reduced the general number of colonies on seed surface [102]. A negligible effect of extended plasma treatment on the number of F. culmorum on wheat grains was noted by Kordas et al. [116]. In addition, Hoppanová et. al. [101] observed the possibility of decontamination in wheat and barley seed surfaces from this pathogen, which proves plasma to be an effective tool in the successful treatment of cereal seeds against disease. Treatment in the range of 120–300 s significantly inhibited the growth of F. culmorum on seed surface.
Cold plasma has also been shown to be effective in decontamination and enhancement of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seed quality. Inhibition of mycelium growth and spore germination of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, one of the most destructive plant pathogens [117], was observed [94] in this study where the emulated plasma-like condition was generated by exposing the solution of H2O2 with UV-C irradiation to obtain EPAS-H2O2. Results indicated that EPAS-5% H2O2 treatment completely inhibited the growth of mycelium and spore germination. Fungal mycelium was more resistant to the treatments than spores.
Cold plasma (DCSBD at atmospheric pressure in ambient air) has been shown to successfully reduce Didymella licopersici spores from pepper seeds. The elimination of Cladosporium cucumerinum and Didymella bryoniae spores from cucumber seed was found to require a slightly longer plasma treatment. In the same experiment, no effect of plasma treatment on the presence of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) and watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) on cucumber was found [118]. Nishioka et al. [119] observed the effect of inactivation of Rhizoctonia solani on brassicaceous seeds, where 10-min-long treatment with cold atmospheric plasma at low pressure reduced the fungal survival rate from 100% and 83%, respectively, to less than 2%. Plasma also exhibited antifungal activity on ginseng seeds. The number of fungal colonies from genera Coniochaeta, Pyrenochaeta and Fusarium was significantly lower for seeds treated with argon-generated plasma (argon used as feed gas for the DBD plasma generator) than for the untreated controls Lee at al. [120].
Numerous studies show the suppression of Aspergillus spp. growth by cold plasma. A reduction in A. flavus was noted on maize seeds [30]. Successful elimination of A. niger as well as A. westerdijikiae, A. steynii and A. versicolor was observed on coffee treated by cold plasma with helium at 1.5 L min−1 flow, which reduced the content of ochratoxin A in roasted coffee [121]. However, in the case of the dark pigmented species of Aspergillus spp., melanins, that proved to be involved in their resistance to environmental stress, can limit the cold plasma effectiveness. Such effect was observed for Aspergillus fumigatus where melanin increased conidia resistance to ROS [122,123]. It may be suspected that the presence of melanins resulted in a weaker plasma effect on A. flavus compared to Fusarium species [115]. Melanins are also present in the primary cell walls and the septa of multicellular conidia of Alternaria spp. [124], which may explain its previously mentioned resistance to cold plasma action.
The research results mainly show the effectiveness of cold plasma on pathogens inhabiting the seed surface. However, this eco-friendly technology may show efficiency in controlling seed-borne pathogenic fungi developing within the seeds, an example of which is the reduction in species from the Diaporthe/Phomopsis complex, which occurred on soybean seeds [125]. In these studies, the effectiveness was demonstrated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), which is consistent with the considerations of Ambrico et al. [126], who questioned the effectiveness of UV radiation in such cases, which when used directly against genetic material, destroyed its DNA [127]. The sterilization effect through the use of UV radiation cannot be achieved for microbial cells or spores that are stacked or covered with plant tissues, due to the minimal depth in penetration of UV photons Ambrico et al. [126].
The antifungal impact of cold plasma application against seed-transmitted fungi is documented in many research papers. However, the fungicidal effect of plasma is usually weaker than in the case of bacteria. This is mainly caused by differences in the structure of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells [126]. Due to the composition of chitin, α and β-linked glucans, glycoproteins, it is relatively difficult to force and destroy fungal cells by external factors. Melanins protect the fungi from damaging agents, such as UV, ionizing, extreme temperatures, the action of hydrolytic enzymes, antifungal substances and free oxygen radicals [128,129,130].

4. Effect of Cold Plasma on Bacteria Contaminated Seed

The most commonly found bacterial plant pathogens contain representatives of the genera that can be transmitted with seeds, such as Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Dickeya and Ralstonia solanacearum species [131]. Although plant pathogenic bacteria cause a smaller number of diseases and less economic damage than that of fungi, they have a negative impact on the condition of many plants and, consequently, on the quality and quantity of the crop. For this reason, the cold plasma application on bacteria has been relatively less studied [50]. Plasma is often more effective against bacteria. However, Lee et al. [120] found that plasma treatment disinfects the surface of the ginseng seeds from fungi to a greater extent compared to bacteria. They observed a weaker bactericidal effect, for example, in the case of genus Pseudomonas, which exhibited survival rates of 93.8% and 90.4% having used a plasma treatment with argon and Ar/O2 mixture as feed gases, respectively, while non-pathogenic Azospirillum was drastically inhibited.
However, the studies show that, as for fungi, successful elimination of bacteria can be achieved with the use of generated RONS, which probably led to the damage and dysfunction of DNA, proteins and ribosomes, as observed with mung bean seeds artificially inoculated with Dickeya and Pectobacterium spp. [132]. There are groups of bacteria transmitted with seeds that are of significant importance in agriculture that show sensitivity to plasma. An example is Xanthomonas campestris (Gram-negative), which causes black rot, the most important disease in vegetable brassica crops worldwide [133]. Regarding bacterial pathogens, Nishioka et al. [134] eradicated them from cruciferous seeds by cold plasma working under an Argon atmosphere. After plasma treatment of cabbage seeds contaminated artificially by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, a simultaneous elimination of molds and rot was observed in the seedlings [135].
Irradiation of infected rice seeds with atmospheric-pressure plasma has shown a suppressive effect on Burkholderia plantarii, a causal agent of bacterial seedling blight [136]. A beneficial effect observed in the use of cold plasma seed treatment was an increase in young plant resistance to tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Observation of some parameters suggests that plasma influences the regulation of plant growth, the concentration of H2O2 and the activity of enzymes in tomato plants, which results in improved resistance to this pathogen [137].
Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are sensitive to plasma treatment, as exemplified by its effect on Staphylococcus aureus (G +) and Escherichia coli (G −). Plasma directly affects the bacteria that cause a decrease in membrane integrity [138]. However, the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is usually more sensitive to the physical effects of plasma-generated species [139].
The presence of non-plant pathogenic bacteria is problematic in the case of seeds grown for their sprouts, which should be free from microorganisms harmful to humans. Raw sprouts can carry a risk of foodborne illness if they are contaminated [140]. Seeds infected with microorganisms are the primary cause of most contaminations in sprouts, although pathogens could possibly be introduced at various stages of production [141,142].
Salmonella strains, including S. enterica, E. coli and Bacillus cereus, can be found on the surfaces of plant seeds intended for sprouting purposes [143,144]. Exposure of broccoli seeds to corona discharge plasma jet has shown a species-specific variation of susceptibility among bacteria. Aerobic bacteria and E. coli were shown to reduce more strongly than B. cereus, Salmonella spp. as well as molds and yeasts [144]. It was noted that by applying a corona discharge plasma jet for 3 min, these three groups of bacteria were reduced in the range of 1.3–2.1 log CFU/g [145].
The research on the reduction in native microorganisms or artificially applied E. coli on sprout seeds of onion, radish, cress and alfalfa has shown more effective inactivation of E. coli compared to the native microbiota composed of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [146].
A positive effect of the reduction in E. coli on mung bean sprouting seeds has also been observed after the application of plasma-activated water (PAW) [147].

5. Potential of Cold Plasma for Boosting of Seed Germination and Plant Growth

In the previous chapters, we demonstrated the use of cold plasma for seed decontamination from microorganisms. However, cold plasma is also a useful tool for the enhancement of seed germination and improvement of their viability. In addition to modifying the seed surface morphology, the penetration of active plasma species through the pores affects their physiological response and results in the modification of some metabolic, biosynthetic and signaling pathways [88,115,148,149,150]. The application of this non-toxic and low-energy consumption method, favoring of long-time storage and supporting seed development, presents cold plasma as a promising tool for the improvement of plant survival [151].
There are a number of factors controlling seed germination and dormancy, including plant hormones, temperature, water uptake and availability of food stores, as well as morphological and physiological alterations [152]. The reactive forms of oxygen and nitrogen (RONS) and nitric oxide produced during plasma discharges eliminate seed dormancy and increase germination probability and biomass. These compounds penetrate into the seeds and may modify the water uptake rate, increasing the wettability, which in turn increases the germination rate [87,153]. As Švubová et al. [154] found for soybean seeds, water intake and thus seed weight increased linearly with increasing plasma dose. Changes in wetting properties of seeds are caused by oxidation of their surface that leads to faster germination and better yield. This was found for wheat and oats [88] and lentils, beans and wheat [155]. According to Park et al. [156], growth enhancement after seed germination observed for barley may be initiated by breakage of the seed coat and stimulation of the growth cycle. Analysis showed that cold plasma induced significant changes on the seed surface [157]. However, morphological changes, such as significant degradation or damage on the seed surface, were not observed. Zahoranová et al. [30], who based their research on maize, concluded that the active plasma species caused a decrease in the lipid group and an increase in polar groups containing oxygen and nitrogen on the seed surface.
Studies suggest the effect of seed treatment with cold plasma on the presence and synthesis of plant hormones in seeds and seedlings as they regulate seed dormancy, germination and plants’ vegetative growth [156,157,158,159,160,161]. Cold plasma treatment acts as an oxidative boost leading to disturbance of the redox equilibrium in plants. RONS can crosstalk with plant hormones, metabolic reactions and signaling cascades that alter physiological and biochemical processes in plants [162]. The main role is played by two antagonistic hormones: abscisic acid (ABA), an inhibitor of germination, and gibberellins (GAs), stimulators of germination. They activate the signaling cascades and enzymes, e.g., amylases that decompose seed reserves and initiate germination [49]. However, the key factor is not only the concentration of a specific hormone, but mainly their ratio, an integrated relationship. Other hormones, such as auxin IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) (negative regulator of germination), ethylene, citokinins, brasinosteroids and strigolactones (stimulate germination by various modes), salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonate (stress hormones) (stimulate or inhibit germination depending on the conditions) affect germination by modulating the effects of ABA/GA balance [163]. Mildažienė et al. [159] reported a noticeable change in the auxin/cytokinin ratio and production of other hormones in sunflower seeds treated with cold plasma and a radio-frequency electromagnetic field. However, there was no direct relationship between changes in the amount of phytohormone and germination kinetics. Ji et al. [23] showed a higher concentration of gibberellin acid (GA3) in wheat seeds after cold plasma treatment, as well as an increased activity of hydrolytic enzymes. Stolárik et al. [157] noted changes in auxin and cytokinins in peas after plasma treatment. They found an increase in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), (oxidizing IAA) oxIAA and zeatin and a correlation with increased growth parameters. Unclear data suggest a high complexity of phytohormones and their functions involving mutual regulation or functional crosstalk [164]. Therefore, an integrated analysis of plant hormones under cold plasma influence would require further research to provide a better understanding of the exact mechanisms involved.
The increased concentration of plant hormones after low-temperature plasma treatment may also affect the expression of certain genes or modify key gene products [165]. Wang et al. [166] reported that increased auxin levels may result in increased lateral root growth in tobacco under drought stress. Guo et al. [160] noted increased abscisic acid (ABA) content in wheat seedlings treated with cold plasma prior to imbibition. ABA is considered the major signaling factor in regulating the water status of plants and in the process of inducing genes involved in dehydration resistance.
Numerous studies have shown that plasma-treated seeds germinate faster than untreated ones. The result of the improved seed germination is the boosting of seedling and plant growth promotion, and increased yields for numerous crops [148,157,158,167]. Such effect was observed for tomatoes, where plasma enhanced the germination rate. Seedling length and weight were significantly higher than those of untreated seeds [168]. Green onion seeds also responded with an increase in both germination potential and germination rate to cold plasma treatment [169]. Enhancement of seedling vigor (shoot and root lengths) has been observed in the case of maize [30]. Guo et al. [170] found that germination potential, germination index and vigor index significantly increased along with shoot length, root length, dry weight, and fresh weight. Jiang et al. [161] observed that, after seed treatment, wheat plants were significantly taller with longer roots and contained more chlorophyll and nitrogen. In the case of peanuts, apart from the growth of germination potential, germination rate and the growth of dry matter of seedlings, leaf area and thickness, nitrogen concentration in leaves, chlorophyll content, plant height, stem diameter as well as dry root mass of plants in the final stages of vegetation were all found to be significantly increased by cold plasma treatment in another study [171]. Treatment of brown rice seeds have been found to increase the germination percentage, seedling length, and water uptake [172]. De Groot et al. [173] reported an increase in water absorption by seeds after air plasma treatment that improved germination activity, which remained for several months.
Cold plasma may have a positive effect under abiotic stresses. In drought conditions, seed germination improvement and better seedling growth of wheat have been observed [160]. In the case of alfalfa [174] and oilseed rape [175], a significant increase in seedling root and shoot lengths, seedling height and weight as well as lateral root number have been noted.
Problems with seed germination are often caused by microbiological contamination of their surface [176,177]. Therefore, in addition to its direct effect on seeds, cold plasma may also contribute to the boosting of the germination rate indirectly through their sterilization.

6. Cold Plasma Technology for Sustainable Plant Production

The European Green Deal has outlined the need for non-chemical, alternative and environmentally friendly production methods. This has driven scientists in cooperation with agriculture supplying companies and producers to look for new alternative tools for plant production and protection. This process is exceptionally difficult to achieve the goals as the above mentioned background situation imposes serious limitations on agricultural producers. Under such conditions, EU agriculture needs to develop the existing system as well as implement new cutting-edge solutions supporting sustainable agricultural production in line with the formulated requirements as soon as possible [178,179]. The above referenced literature and research findings conducted by the authors prove a significant potential for cold atmospheric plasma in this area. This is also evident in numerous scientific articles on the subject in the last decade, which show a positive effect of cold atmospheric plasma on plant growth and development. Cold plasma-enhanced antioxidant activity, the production of growth hormones and metabolites ensure earlier seed germination, higher germination percentage, improved growth of shoots and roots, and as a result, a yield increase. However, the positive effect of cold plasma treatment on the physicochemical and physiological parameters (e.g., protein and sugar content, seeds wettability plant growth and harvest time) depends on the plant species and cultivars, the type of treated seeds and the environmental conditions. Moreover, the positive direction of the germination and plant growth processes depend to a high extent on plasma gas composition, applied power and the time of seed treatment [180]. The power of plasma generator and the time of exposure are the most important and studied plasma parameters, crucial for the achievement of a desirable effect. These parameters may vary significantly (5 s–30 min) depending on the type and construction of the plasma generator and the plant species. In most of the conducted experiments, shorter exposure time significantly improved the seed and plant growth parameters, while longer treatments often had an inhibitory effect on seed germination percentage. Along with longer exposure time and an increase in plasma power, higher antimicrobial efficiency can be achieved. However, a lower percentage of germination may be also observed [87,157,180,181,182,183,184]. Following the above mentioned observations, it should be stated that in most research cases, a specially dedicated device for cold plasma generation must be constructed. Special attention must be also paid to health and safety measures when operating the cold plasma devices.
The evidence from the literature suggests that cold plasma can provide a reliable method to meet the requirements associated with global climate change in agriculture. Despite the achieved progress in cold plasma research, the available results indicate its use for seed treatment and plant growth boosting mainly based on laboratory experiments. Few studies have been performed in field conditions. Therefore, more detailed research is still required for commercialization purposes [58]. In order to support such needs, dedicated financial resources are allocated at the EU level (e.g., Horizon Europe). This need was perfectly realized by Stella Kyriakides, the EU’s Commissioner for Health and Food Safety—”We know that investment will be necessary to encourage innovation and create sustainable food systems. We have made EUR 10 billion available for research and innovation, to support and accelerate this transition, to develop biological pesticides, natural resources as well as the use of digital and nature-based solutions for food production” [178].

7. Conclusions

In order to meet the above listed expectations and to achieve the goals quickly and effectively, it needs to be emphasized that combined efforts of scientists from different, interdisciplinary areas of expertise, producers and agriculture supplying companies must cooperate in order to promptly transfer the new innovative solutions into real practice. The described achievements of cold plasma technology, especially from the last decade, allow us to look optimistically forward to the next decade, which, in view of the aims of the European Green Deal, will bring an important transformation for EU’s agriculture. Having outlined the above, we need to raise the question as to whether the European Green Deal can provide an opportunity for non-thermal atmospheric plasma use in agriculture. The worldwide research conducted so far, especially in the past decade, indicates that it should do so.
In conclusion, cold plasma technology has considerable potential for seed treatment, boosting their germination rate and providing support in later stages of seedling and plant development, especially during difficult growth periods. It proves itself as an innovative, efficient and eco-friendly plant protection method. Cold plasma use will reduce the application of fertilizers (in its use to strengthen diseased plants, for their recovery and plasma-assisted atmospheric nitrogen fixation due to available extra resources in PAW) and pesticides (due to antimicrobial activity, e.g., used for seed disinfection) in plant production, providing a more sustainable management, which fits within the scope of the European Green Deal. It is expected that cold plasma will find numerous applications for the agricultural sector in years to come.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P., M.J., A.B.-C. and A.Ł.; methodology, D.P. and A.B.-C.; validation, D.P., M.M., K.M. (Kamil Maitah), K.M. (Karel Malec), P.P. and J.d.D.M.; formal analysis, D.P., M.M., K.M. (Kamil Maitah), K.M. (Karel Malec), and K.S.; resources, D.P., M.M., K.M. (Kamil Maitah), K.M. (Karel Malec) and J.d.D.M.; data curation, D.P., M.J., A.Ł., J.d.D.M., P.P. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P., A.B.-C., A.Ł. and D.R.; writing—review and editing, D.P., A.B.-C., M.J., A.Ł. and D.R.; visualization, M.J., A.B.-C. and A.Ł.; supervision, D.P.; project administration, D.P. and M.J.; funding acquisition, P.P., K.S. and D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was partially founded by the Ministry of Education and Science “Doktorat Wdrożeniowy” program (Project No. DWD/5/0267/2021). The construction of devices for decontamination of loose organic material (Figure 1, Mućko et al. [29]) was financed by the UTP (PBŚ at present) and UKW Universities consortium under the "Inkubator Innowacyjności Plus” project (Application no. 17/02/2018/UTP). Other presented research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission. A European Green Deal. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  2. European Commission. Farm to Fork Strategy. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  3. European Commission. Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  4. FAO. How to Feed the World in 2050. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  5. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Wu, B.; Hussain, M.; Zhang, W.; Stadler, M.; Liu, X.; Xiang, M. Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi. Mycology 2019, 10, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. FRAC—Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. Pathogen Risk List. Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/pathogen-risk/frac-pathogen-list-2019.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  8. EFSA—European Food Safety Authority. The 2019 European Union Report on Pesticide Residues in Food. Available online: https://0-efsa-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6491 (accessed on 28 January 2022).
  9. Spinoni, J.; Vogt, J.V.; Naumann, G.; Barbosa, P.; Dosio, A. Will drought events become more frequent and severe in Europe? Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 38, 1718–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Elad, Y.; Pertot, I. Climate change impact on plant pathogens and plant diseases. J. Crop Improv. 2014, 28, 99–139. [Google Scholar]
  11. Attri, P.; Ishikawa, K.; Okumura, T.; Koga, K.; Shiratani, M. Plasma Agriculture from Laboratory to Farm: A Review. Processes 2020, 8, 1002. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tkalec, M.; Malarič, K.; Pavlica, M.; Pevalek-Kozlina, B.; Vidakovič-Cifrek, Ž. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on seed germination and root meristematic cells of Allium cepa L. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2009, 672, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
  13. López-Ribera, I.; Vicient, C.M. Use of ultrasonication to increase germination rates of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant. Methods 2017, 13, 31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pournavab, R.F.; Mejía, E.B.; Mendoza, A.B.; Salas Cruz, L.R.; Heya, M.N. Ultraviolet radiation effect on seed germination and seedling growth of common species from Northeastern Mexico. Agronomy 2019, 9, 269. [Google Scholar]
  15. Celiński, Z. Plazma; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 1980; p. 582. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tendero, C.; Tixier, C.; Tristant, P.; Desmaison, J.; Leprince, P. Atmospheric pressure plasmas: A review. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 2006, 61, 2–30. [Google Scholar]
  17. Piel, A. Plasma Physics: An Introduction to Laboratory, Space, and Fusion Plasmas; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; ISBN 97885-78110796. [Google Scholar]
  18. Conrads, H.; Schmidt, M. Plasma generation and plasma sources. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2000, 9, 441–454. [Google Scholar]
  19. Misra, N.N.; Schluter, O.; Cullen, P.J. Cold Plasma in Food and Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; ISBN 9780128013656. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wong, C.S.; Mongkolnavin, R. Elements of Plasma Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2016; ISBN 978-981-10-0115-4. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bogaerts, A.; Neyts, E.; Gijbels, R.; van der Mullen, J. Gas discharge plasmas and their applications. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 2002, 57, 609–658. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayashi, N.; Ono, R.; Shiratani, M.; Yonesu, A. Antioxidative activity and growth regulation of Brassicaceae induced by oxygen radical irradiation. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 06GD01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ji, S.H.; Choi, K.H.; Pengkit, A.; Im, J.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, Y.; Hong, E.J.; Jung, S.K.; Choi, E.H.; et al. Effects of high voltage nanosecond pulsed plasma and micro DBD plasma on seed germination, growth development and physiological activities in spinach. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 605, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Koga, K.; Thapanut, S.; Amano, T.; Seo, H.; Itagaki, N.; Hayashi, N.; Shiratani, M. Simple method of improving harvest by nonthermal air plasma irradiation of seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.). Appl. Phys. Express 2016, 9, 016201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nishime, T.M.C.; Wannicke, N.; Horn, S.; Weltmann, K.-D.; Brust, H. A coaxial dielectric barrier discharge reactor for treatment of winter wheat seeds. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7133. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pawlat, J.; Starek, A.; Sujak, A.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Terebun, P.; Budzeń, M. Effects of atmospheric pressure plasma generated in GlidArc reactor on Lavatera thuringiaca L. seeds’ germination. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1700064. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhuang, J.; Yang, S.; Bazaka, K.; Ostrikov, K. Effects of atmospheric-pressure N2, He, Air, and O2 microplasmas on mung bean seed germination and seedling growth. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32603. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mućko, J.; Dobosz, R.; Strzelecki, R. Dielectric Barrier Discharge Systems with HV Generators and Discharge Chambers for Surface Treatment and Decontamination of Organic Products. Energies 2020, 13, 5181. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mućko, J.; Panka, D.; Domanowski, P.; Bujnowski, S. Non-Thermal Plasma Reactor of Barrier Discharge for Disinfection and/or Sterilization of Organic Products. European Patent Application No. 20460005.0-1211, 29 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zahoranová, A.; Hoppanová, L.; Šimončicová, J.; Tučeková, Z.; Medvecká, V.; Hudecová, D.; Kaliňáková, B.; Kováčik, D.; Černák, M. Effect of cold atmospheric pressure plasma on maize seeds: Enhancement of seedlings growth and surface microorganisms inactivation. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2018, 38, 969–988. [Google Scholar]
  31. Okazaki, S.; Kogoma, M.; Uehara, M.; Kimura, Y. Appearance of stable glow discharge in air, argon, oxygen and nitrogen at atmospheric pressure using a 50 Hz source. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1993, 26, 889. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, H.; Wandell, R.J.; Locke, B.R. The influence of carrier gas on plasma properties and hydrogen peroxide production in a nanosecond pulsed plasma discharge generated in a water-film plasma reactor. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 94002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lou, B.-S.; Lai, C.-H.; Chu, T.-P.; Hsieh, J.-H.; Chen, C.-M.; Su, Y.-M.; Hou, C.-W.; Chou, P.-Y.; Lee, J.-W. Parameters Affecting the Antimicrobial Properties of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Jet. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pinson, J.; Thiry, D. Surface Modification of Polymers; WILEY-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-3-527-34541-0. [Google Scholar]
  35. Baneesh, N.S. Plasma Modification of Polyolefins: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  36. Alabduly, A.; Christensen, P.; Harvey, A. The characterization of a packed bed plasma reactor for ozone generation. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 035002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hafeez, A.; Javed, F.; Fazal, T.; Shezad, N.; Amjad, U.-E.-S.; Rehman, M.S.U.; Rehman, F. Intensification of ozone generation and degradation of azo dye in nonthermal hybrid corona-DBD plasma micro-reactor. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2021, 159, 108205. [Google Scholar]
  38. Du, Z.; Lin, X. Research progress in application of low temperature plasma technology forwastewater treatment. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, Hangzhou, China, 17–19 April 2020; p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yoshida, K. After treatment of carbon particles emitted by diesel engine using a combination of corona and dielectric barrier discharge. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 5261–5268. [Google Scholar]
  40. Svarnas, P.; Giannakopoulos, E.; Kalavrouziotis, I.; Krontiras, C.; Georga, S.; Pasolari, R.S.; Papadopoulos, P.K.; Apostolou, I.; Chrysochoou, D. Sanitary effect of FE-DBD cold plasma in ambient air on sewage biosolids. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 705, 135940. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lazra, Y.; Dubrovin, I.; Multanen, V.; Bormashenko, E.; Bormashenko, Y.; Cahan, R. Effects of atmospheric plasma corona discharges on soil bacteria viability. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 704. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lou, B.-S.; Hsieh, J.-H.; Chen, C.-M.; Hou, C.-W.; Wu, H.-Y.; Chou, P.-Y.; Lai, C.-H.; Lee, J.-W. Helium/Argon-Generated Cold Atmospheric Plasma Facilitates CutaneousWound Healing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 683. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shi, X.M.; Xu, G.M.; Zhang, G.J.; Liu, J.R.; Wu, Y.M.; Gao, L.G.; Yang, Y.; Chang, Z.S.; Yao, C.W. Low-temperature plasma promotes fibroblast proliferation in wound healing by ros-activated nf-kappab signaling pathway. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  44. Addrah, M.E.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Chen, W.; Zhao, J. Fungicide treatments to control seed-borne fungi of sunflower seeds. Pathogens 2019, 9, 29. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rusu, B.G.; Postolache, V.; Cara, I.G.; Pohoata, V.; Mihaila, I.; Topala, I.; Jitareanu, G. Method of fungal wheat seeds disease inhibition using direct exposure to air cold plasma. Rom. J. Phys. 2018, 63, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  46. Grabowski, M.; Dąbrowski, W.; Balcerek, M.; Marcin, H.; Kalisiak, A.; Jakubowski, T.; Chyla, M. Reaktor Plazmy Nietermicznej do Sterylizacji Produktów Pochodzenia Organicznego. (Non-Thermal Plasma Reactor for Sterilizing Products of Organic Origin). Patent No. PL230798B1, 22 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fernández-Gómez, P.; Muro-Fraguas, I.; Múgica-Vidal, R.; Sainz-García, A.; Sainz-García, E.; González-Raurich, M.; Álvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Prieto, M.; López, M.; López, M.; et al. Development and characterization of anti-biofilm coatings applied by Non-Equilibrium Atmospheric Plasma on stainless steel. Food Res. Int. 2020, 109891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Múgica-Vidal, R.; Sainz-García, E.; Álvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Prieto, M.; González-Raurich, M.; López, M.; López, M.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Sáenz, Y.; Alba-Elías, F. Production of antibacterial coatings through atmospheric pressure plasma: A promising alternative for combatting biofilms in the food industry. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019, 12, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adhikari, B.; Adhikari, M.; Park, G. The Effects of Plasma on Plant Growth, Development, and Sustainability. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adhikari, B.; Pangomm, K.; Veerana, M.; Mitra, S.; Park, G. Plant disease control by non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasma. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frías, E.; Iglesias, Y.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Prieto, M.; González-Raurich, M.; López, M. Evaluation of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma (CAPP) and plasma-activated water (PAW) as alternative non-thermal decontamination technologies for tofu: Impact on microbiological, sensorial and functional quality attributes. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Puligundla, P.; Mok, C. Non-thermal plasmas (NTPs) for inactivation of viruses in abiotic environment. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 11, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  53. Julák, J.; Janoušková, O.; Scholtz, V.; Holada, K. Inactivation of prions using electrical DC discharges at atmospheric pressure and ambient temperature. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Laroussi, M. Nonthermal decontamination of biological media by atmospheric-pressure plasmas: Review, analysis, and prospects. Trans. Plasma Sci. 2003, 30, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sysolyatina, E.; Mukhachev, A.; Yurova, M.; Grushin, M.; Karalnik, V.; Petryakov, A.; Trushkin, N.; Ermolaeva, S.; Akishev, Y. Role of the charged particles in bacteria inactivation by plasma of a positive and negative corona in ambient air. Plasma Process. Polym. 2014, 11, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Puligundla, P.; Mok, C. Potential applications of nonthermal plasmas against biofilm-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1134–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Hojnik, N.; Cvelbar, U.; Tavcar-Kalcher, G.; Walsh, J.L.; Krizaj, I. Mycotoxin decontamination of food: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma versus “Classic” decontamination. Toxins 2017, 9, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Misra, N.; Yadav, B.; Roopesh, M.; Jo, C. Cold Plasma for Effective Fungal and Mycotoxin Control in Foods: Mechanisms, Inactivation Effects, and Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Pankaj, S.K.; Shi, H.; Keener, K.M. A review of novel physical and chemical decontamination technologies for aflatoxin in food. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2018, 71, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schmidt, M.; Zannini, E.; Lynch, K.M.; Arendt, E.K. Novel approaches for chemical and microbiological shelf life extension of cereal crops. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3395–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Filimonova, E.A.; Amirov, R.K. Simulation of ethylene conversion initiated by a streamer corona in an air flow. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2001, 27, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ito, T.; Kawamura, T.; Nakagawa, A.; Yamazaki, S.; Syuto, B.; Takaki, K. Preservation of fresh food using AC electric field. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2014, 17, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ji, S.-H.; Kim, J.-S.; Lee, C.-H.; Seo, H.-S.; Chun, S.-C.; Oh, J.; Choi, E.-H.; Park, G. Enhancement of vitality and activity of a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) by atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Attri, P.; Han, J.; Choi, S.; Choi, E.H.; Bogaerts, A.; Lee, W. CAP modifies the structure of a model protein from thermophilic bacteria: Mechanisms of CAP-mediated inactivation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Park, J.H.; Kumar, N.; Park, D.H.; Yusupov, M.; Neyts, E.C.; Verlackt, C.C.W.; Bogaerts, A.; Kang, M.H.; Uhm, H.S.; Choi, E.H.; et al. A comparative study for the inactivation of multidrug resistance bacteria using dielectric barrier discharge and nano-second pulsed plasma. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Shaw, P.; Kumar, N.; Kwak, H.S.; Park, J.H.; Uhm, H.S.; Bogaerts, A.; Choi, E.H.; Attri, P. Bacterial inactivation by plasma treated water enhanced by reactive nitrogen species. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Lamichhane, P.; Veerana, M.; Lim, J.S.; Mumtaz, S.; Shrestha, B.; Kaushik, N.K.; Park, G.; Choi, E.H. Low-Temperature Plasma-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation for Corn Plant Growth and Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Adhikari, B.; Adhikari, M.; Ghimire, B.; Park, G.; Choi, E.H. Cold atmospheric plasma-activated water irrigation induces defense hormone and gene expression in tomato seedlings. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Adhikari, B.; Adhikari, M.; Ghimire, B.; Adhikari, B.C.; Park, G.; Choi, E.H. Cold plasma seed priming modulates growth, redox homeostasis and stress response by inducing reactive species in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 156, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bradu, C.; Kutasi, K.; Magureanu, M.; Pua’c, N.; Živkovi’c, S. Reactive nitrogen species in plasma-activated water: Generation, chemistry and application in agriculture. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 223001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ito, M.; Oh, J.S.; Ohta, T.; Shiratani, M.; Hori, M. Current status and future prospects of agricultural applications using atmospheric-pressure plasma technologies. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1700073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Puač, N.; Gherardi, M.; Shiratani, M. Plasma agriculture: A rapidly emerging field. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1700174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Thirumdas, R.; Kothakota, A.; Annapure, U.; Siliveru, K.; Blundell, R.; Gatt, R.; Valdramidis, V.P. Plasma activated water (PAW): Chemistry, physico-chemical properties, applications in food and agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ghimire, B.; Szili, E.J.; Lamichhane, P.; Short, R.D.; Lim, J.S.; Attri, P.; Masur, K.; Weltmann, K.D.; Hong, S.H.; Choi, E.H. The role of UV photolysis and molecular transport in the generation of reactive species in a tissue model with a cold atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 093701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Mumtaz, S.; Bhartiya, P.; Kaushik, N.; Adhikari, M.; Lamichhane, P.; Lee, S.J.; Kaushik, N.K.; Choi, E.H. Pulsed high-power microwaves do not impair the functions of skin normal and cancer cells in vitro: A short-term biological evaluation. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 22, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Peng, P.; Chen, P.; Addy, M.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Anderson, E.; Zhou, N.; Schiappacasse, C.; Hatzenbeller, R.; Fan, L.; et al. In situ plasma-assisted atmospheric nitrogen fixation using water and spray-type jet plasma. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2886–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pajares, S.; Bohannan, B.J. Ecology of nitrogen fixing, nitrifying, and denitrifying microorganisms in tropical forest soils. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1045. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Shiozaki, T.; Ijichi, M.; Isobe, K.; Hashihama, F.; Nakamura, K.I.; Ehama, M.; Hayashizaki, K.I.; Takahashi, K.; Hamasaki, K.; Furuya, K. Nitrification and its influence on biogeochemical cycles from the equatorial Pacific to the Arctic Ocean. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2184–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Van Alphen, S.; Jardali, F.; Creel, J.; Trenchev, G.; Snyders, R.; Bogaerts, A. Sustainable gas conversion by gliding arc plasmas: A new modelling approach for reactor design improvement. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2021, 5, 1786–1800. [Google Scholar]
  80. Barjasteh, A.; Dehghani, Z.; Lamichhane, P.; Kaushik, N.; Choi, E.H.; Kaushik, N.K. Recent progress in applications of non-thermal plasma for water purification, Bio-Sterilization, and Decontamination. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sharma, R.K.; Patel, H.; Mushtaq, U.; Kyriakou, V.; Zafeiropoulos, G.; Peeters, F.; Welzel, S.; van de Sanden, M.C.; Tsampas, M.N. Plasma activated electrochemical ammonia synthesis from Nitrogen and water. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 6, 313–319. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kumari, S.; Pishgar, S.; Schwarting, M.E.; Paxton, W.F.; Spurgeon, J.M. Synergistic plasma-assisted electrochemical reduction of nitrogen to ammonia. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13347–13350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, W.; Patil, B.; Heijkers, S.; Hessel, V.; Bogaerts, A. Nitrogen fixation by gliding arc plasma: Better insight by chemical kinetics modelling. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2145–2157. [Google Scholar]
  84. Lamichhane, P.; Adhikari, B.C.; Nguyen, L.N.; Paneru, R.; Ghimire, B.; Mumtaz, S.; Lim, J.S.; Hong, Y.J.; Choi, E.H. Sustainable nitrogen fixation from synergistic effect of photo-electrochemical water splitting and atmospheric pressure N2 plasma. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 045026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Judée, F.; Simon, S.; Bailly, C.; Dufour, T. Plasma-activation of tap water using DBD for agronomy applications: Identification and quantification of long lifetime chemical species and production/consumption mechanisms. Water Res. 2018, 133, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Sivachandiran, L.; Khacef, A. Enhanced seed germination and plant growth by atmospheric pressure cold air plasma: Combined effect of seed and water treatment. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Sera, B.; Spatenka, P.; Sery, M.; Vrchotova, N.; Hruskova, I. Influence of plasma treatment on wheat and oat germination and early growth. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2010, 38, 2963–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cherkasov, N.; Ibhadon, A.; Fitzpatrick, P. A review of the existing and alternative methods for greener nitrogen fixation. Chem. Eng. Process 2015, 90, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Erisman, J.W.; Sutton, M.A.; Galloway, J.; Klimont, Z.; Winiwarter, W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat. Geosci. 2008, 1, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hawtof, R.; Ghosh, S.; Guarr, E.; Xu, C.; Sankaran, R.M.; Renner, J.N. Catalyst-free, highly selective synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen and water by a plasma electrolytic system. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaat5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Chang, X.; Li, H.; Naeem, M.; Wu, X.; Yong, T.; Song, C.; Liu, T.; Chen, W.; Yang, W. Diversity of the seedborne fungi and pathogenicity of Fusarium species associated with intercropped soybean. Pathogens 2020, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Al-Sadi, A.M. Bipolaris sorokiniana-induced black point, common root rot, and spot blotch diseases of wheat: A review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 584899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sharma, P.; Meena, P.D.; Verma, P.R.; Saharan, G.S.; Mehta, N.; Singh, D.; Kumar, A. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary causing Sclerotinia rot in oilseed Brassicas: A review. J. Oilseed Brassica 2016, 6, 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ahmad, A.; Sripong, K.; Uthairatanakij, A.; Photchanachai, S.; Pankasemsuk, T.; Jitareerat, P. Decontamination of seed borne disease in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seed and the enhancement of seed quality by the emulated plasma technology. Sci Hortic. 2022, 291, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gullino, M.L.; Gilardi, G.; Garibaldi, A. Seed-borne fungal pathogens of leafy vegetable crops. In Global Perspectives on the Health of Seeds and Plant Propagation Material; Gullino, M.L., Munkvold, G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sowley, E.N.K.; Dewey, F.M.; Shaw, M.W. Persistent, symptomless, systemic, and seed-borne infection of lettuce by Botrytis cinerea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 126, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Mangwende, E.; Kritzinger, Q.; Truter, M.; Aveling, T.A.S. Alternaria alternata: A new seed-transmitted disease of coriander in South Africa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 152, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Amza, J. Seed borne fungi; food spoilage, negative impact and their management: A review. Food Sci. Qual. Manag. 2018, 81, 70–79. [Google Scholar]
  99. Silva, J.J.; Bertoldo, R.; Fungaro, M.H.P.; Massi, F.P.; Taniwaki, M.H.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Iamanaka, B.T. Black aspergilli in Brazilian onions: From field to market. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 337, 108958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Saranya, R.; Anadani, V.B.; Akbari, L.F.; Vanthana, M. Management of black mold of onion [Aspergillus niger (Van Teigh)] by using various fungicides. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017, 6, 1621–1627. [Google Scholar]
  101. Hoppanová, L.; Medvecká, V.; Dyblíková, J.; Hudecova, D.; Kaliňáková, B.; Kryštofová, S.; Zahoranová, A. Low-temperature plasma applications in chemical fungicide treatment reduction. Acta Chim. Slovaca 2020, 13, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jo, Y.K.; Cho, J.; Tsai, T.C.; Staack, D.; Kang, M.H.; Roh, J.H.; Shin, D.B.; Cromwell, W.; Gross, D. A non-thermal plasma seed treatment method for management of a seedborne fungal pathogen on rice seed. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tsedaley, B. Review on seed health tests and detection methods of seedborne diseases. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2015, 5, 176–184. [Google Scholar]
  104. Akishev, Y.; Grushin, M.; Karalnik, V.; Trushkin, N.; Kholodenko, V.; Chugunov, V.; Kobzev, E.; Zhirkova, N.; Irkhina, I.; Kireev, G. Atmospheric-pressure, nonthermal plasma sterilization of microorganisms in liquids and on surfaces. Pure Appl. Chem. 2008, 80, 1953–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bourke, P.; Ziuzina, D.; Han, L.; Cullen, P.J.; Gilmore, B.F. Microbiological interactions with cold plasma. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 308–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Kvam, E.; Davis, B.; Mondello, F.; Garner, A.L. Nonthermal atmospheric plasma rapidly disinfects multidrug-resistant microbes by inducing cell surface damage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Kolb, J.F.; Mattson, A.M.; Edelblute, C.M.; Hao, X.L.; Malik, M.A.; Heller, L.C. Cold DC-operated air plasma jet for the inactivation of infectious microorganisms. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2012, 40, 3007–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Afshari, R.; Hosseini, H. Non-thermal plasma as a new food preservation method, its present and future prospect. J. Paramed. Sci. 2014, 5, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  109. Imlay, J.A. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: Lessons from a model bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Misra, N.N.; Tiwari, B.K.; Raghavarao, K.S.M.S.; Cullen, P.J. Nonthermal plasma inactivation of food-borne pathogens. Food Eng. Rev. 2011, 3, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Hashizume, H.; Ohta, T.; Fengdong, J.; Takeda, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Hori, M.; Ito, M. Inactivation effects of neutral reactive-oxygen species on Penicillium digitatum spores using non-equilibrium atmospheric-pressure oxygen radical source. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 153708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ito, M.; Ohta, T.; Hori, M. Plasma Agriculture. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2012, 60, 937–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Segat, A.; Misra, N.N.; Fabbro, A.; Federica Buchini, F.; Lippe, G.; Cullen, P.J.; Innocente, N. Effects of ozone processing on chemical, structural and functional properties of whey protein isolate. Food Res. Int. 2014, 66, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mravlje, J.; Regvar, M.; Stari’c, P.; Mozeti’c, M.; Vogel-Mikuš, K. Cold plasma affects germination and fungal community structure of buckwheat seeds. Plants 2021, 10, 851. [Google Scholar]
  115. Zahoranová, A.; Henselová, M.; Hudecová, D.; Kaliňáková, B.; Kováčik, D.; Medvecká, V.; Černák, M. Effect of cold atmospheric pressure plasma on the wheat seedlings vigor and on the inactivation of microorganisms on the seeds surface. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2016, 36, 397–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kordas, L.; Pusz, W.; Czapka, T.; Kacprzyk, R. The effect of low-temperature plasma on fungus colonization of winter wheat grain and seed quality. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2015, 24, 433–438. [Google Scholar]
  117. Rampersad, S.N.; Teelucksingh, L.D. Differential Responses of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. truncatum isolates from different hosts to multiple fungicides based on two assays. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 1526–1536. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Štepánová, V.; Slavíček, P.; Kelar, J.; Prášil, J.; Smékal, M.; Stupavská, M.; Jurmanová, J.; Černák, M. Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of agricultural seeds of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) with effect on reduction of diseases and germination improvement. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1700076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nishioka, T.; Takai, Y.; Kawaradani, M.; Okada, K.; Tanimoto, H.; Misawa, T.; Kusakari, S. Seed disinfection effect of atmospheric pressure plasma and low-pressure plasma on Rhizoctonia solani. Biocont. Sci. 2014, 19, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Lee, Y.; Lee, Y.Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Balaraju, K.; Mok, Y.S.; Yoo, S.J.; Jeon, Y. Enhancement of seed germination and microbial disinfection on ginseng by cold plasma treatment. J. Gin-seng Res. 2021, 45, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Casas-Junco, P.P.; Solís-Pacheco, J.R.; Ragazzo-Sánchez, J.A.; Aguilar-Uscanga, B.R.; Bautista-Rosales, P.U.; Calderón-Santoyo, M. Cold plasma treatment as an alternative for ochratoxin a detoxification and inhibition of mycotoxigenic fungi in roasted coffee. Toxins 2019, 11, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Perez-Cuesta, U.; Aparicio-Fernandez, L.; Guruceaga, X.; Martin-Souto, L.; Abad-Diaz-de-Cerio, A.; Antoran, A.; Buldain, I.; Hernando, F.L.; Ramirez-Garcia, A.; Rementeria, A. Melanin and pyomelanin in Aspergillus fumigatus: From its genetics to host interaction. Int. Microbiol. 2020, 23, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tsai, H.F.; Chang, Y.C.; Washburn, R.G.; Wheeler, M.H.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. The developmentally regulated alb1 gene of Aspergillus fumigatus: Its role in modulation of conidial morphology and virulence. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 3031–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Carzaniga, R.; Fiocco, D.; Bowyer, P.; O’Connell, R.J. Localization of melanin in conidia of Alternaria alternata using phage display antibodies. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Pizá, M.C.P.; Prevosto, L.; Zili, C.; Cejas, E.; Kelly, H.; Baleastrasse, K. Effects of non–thermal plasmas on seed-borne Diaporthe/Phomopsis complex and germination parameters of soybean seeds. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 49, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ambrico, P.F.; Šimek, M.; Rotolo, C.; Morano, M.; Minafra, A.; Ambrico, M.; Polastro, S.; Gerin, D.; Faretra, F.; Angelin, R.M.D.M. Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge plasma: A suitable measure against fungal plant pathogens. Nature 2020, 10, 3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Lerouge, S.; Wertheimer, M.R.; Yahia, L.H. Plasma Sterilization: A review of parameters, mechanisms, and limitations. Plasma Polym. 2001, 6, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Belozerskaya, T.A.; Gessler, N.N.; Averyanov, A.A. Melanin pigments of fungi. In Fungal Metabolites; Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Merillon, J.M., Ramawat, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  129. Latgé, J.P.; Beauvais, A. Functional duality of the cell wall. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 20, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Rodrigues, E.G.; Travassos, L.R. The multitude of targets for the immune system and drug therapy in the fungal cell wall. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Mansfield, J.; Genin, S.; Magori, S.; Citovsky, V.; Sriariyanum, M.; Ronald, P.; Dow, M.; Verdier, V.; Beer, S.V.; Machado, M.A.; et al. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 614–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Motyka-Pomagruk, A.; Dzimitrowicz, A.; Orlowski, J.; Babinska, W.; Terefinko, D.; Rychlowski, M.; Prusinski, M.; Pohl, P.; Lojkowska, E.; Jamroz, P.; et al. Implementation of a non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma for eradication of plant pathogens from a surface of economically important seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vicente, J.G.; Holub, E.B. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nishioka, T.; Takai, Y.; Mishima, T.; Kawaradani, M.; Tanimoto, H.; Okada, K.; Misawa, T.; Kusakari, S. Low-pressure plasma application for the inactivation of the seed-borne pathogen Xanthomonas campestris. Biocontrol Sci. 2016, 21, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Ono, R.; Uchida, S.; Hayashi, N.; Kosaka, R.; Soeda, Y. Inactivation of bacteria on plant seed surface by low-pressure rf plasma using a vibrating stirring device. Vacuum 2017, 136, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ochi, A.; Konishi, H.; Ando, S.; Sato, K.; Yokoyama, K.; Tsushima, S.; Yoshida, S.; Morikawa, T.; Kaneko, T.; Takahashi, H. Management of bakanae and bacterial seedling blight diseases in nurseries by irradiating rice seeds with atmospheric plasma. Plant Pathol. 2016, 66, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Jiang, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Li, L.; He, X.; Shao, H.; Dong, Y. Effect of seed treatment by cold plasma on the resistance of tomato to Ralstonia solanacearum (Bacterial Wilt). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Xu, Z.; Cheng, C.; Shen, J.; Lan, Y.; Hu, S.; Han, W.; Chu, P.K. In vitro antimicrobial effects and mechanisms of direct current air-liquid discharge plasma on planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in liquids. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 121, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Montie, T.C.; Kelly-Wintenberg, K.; Reece Roth, J. An overview of research using the one atmosphere uniform glow discharge plasma (OAUGDP) for sterilization of surfaces and materials. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2000, 28, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Miyahira, R.F.; Antunes, A.E.C. Bacteriological safety of sprouts: A brief review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 352, 109266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. NACMCF (National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Food). Microbiological safety evaluations and recommendations on sprouted seeds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 52, 123–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mitra, A.; Li, Y.F.; Klämpfl, T.G.; Shimizu, T.; Jeon, J.; Morfill, G.E.; Zimmermann, J.L. Inactivation of surface-borne microorganisms and increased germination of seed specimen by cold atmospheric plasma. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Cui, Y.; Walcott, R.; Chena, J. Differential attachment of Salmonella enterica and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to alfalfa, fenugreek, lettuce, and tomato seeds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Kim, J.W.; Puligundla, P.; Mok, C. Effect of corona discharge plasma jet on sur-face-borne microorganisms and sprouting of broccoli seeds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Puligundla, P.; Kim, J.-W.; Mok, C. Effect of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on seed decontamination and sprouting of pak choi (Brassica rapa L. subsp. chinensis (L.) Hanelt). Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2018, 45, 2679–2690. [Google Scholar]
  146. Butscher, D.; Van Loon, H.; Waskow, A.; Rudolf von Rohr, P.; Schuppler, M. Plasma inactivation of microorganisms on sprout seeds in a dielectric barrier discharge. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 238, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Darmanin, M.; Fröhling, A.; Bußler, S.; Durek, J.; Neugart, S.; Schreiner, M.; Blundell, R.; Gatt, R.; Schlüter, O.; Valdramidis, V.P. Aqueous and gaseous plasma applications for the treatment of mung bean seeds. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Meng, Y.; Qu, G.; Wang, T.; Sun, Q.; Liang, D.; Hu, S. Enhancement of Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat Seed Using Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma with Various Gas Sources. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2017, 37, 1105–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Velichko, I.; Gordeev, I.; Shelemin, A.; Nikitin, D.; Brinar, J.; Pleskunov, P.; Choukourov, A.; Pazderů, K.; Pulkrábek, J. Plasma jet and dielectric barrier discharge treatment of wheat seeds. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2019, 39, 913–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Vashisth, A.; Nagarajan, S. Exposure of seeds to static magnetic field enhances germination and early growth characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Randeniya, L.K.; de Groot, G.J.J.B. Non-Thermal plasma treatment of agricultural seeds for stimulation of germination, removal of surface contamination and other benefits: A Review. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 608–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Miransari, M.; Smith, D.L. Plant hormones and seed germination. Env. Exp. Botany 2014, 99, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Arc, E.; Galland, M.; Godin, B.; Cueff, G.; Rajjou, L. Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Švubová, R.; Slováková, L’.; Holubová, L’.; Rovnanová, D.; Gálová, E.; Tomeková, J. Evaluation of the impact of cold atmospheric pressure plasma on soybean seed germination. Plants 2021, 10, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Bormashenko, E.; Grynyov, R.; Bormashenko, Y.; Drori, E. Cold radiofrequency plasma treatment modifies wettability and germination speed of plant seeds. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Park, Y.; Oh, K.S.; Oh, J.; Seok, D.C.; Kim, S.B.; Yoo, S.J.; Lee, M.J. The biological effects of surface dielectric barrier discharge on seed germination and plant growth with barley. Plasma Process. Polym. 2016, 15, 1600056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Stolárik, T.; Henselová, M.; Martinka, M.; Novák, O.; Zahoranová, A.; Černák, M. Effect of Low-Temperature Plasma on the structure of seeds, growth and metabolism of endogenous phytohormones in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2015, 35, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Meng, Y.; Qu, G.; Sun, Q.; Liang, D.; Hu, S. Air Atmospheric Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma induced germination and growth enhancement of wheat seed. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2017, 37, 1621–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Mildažienė, V.; Aleknavičiūtė, V.; Žūkienė, R.; Paužaitė, G.; Naučienė, Z.; Filatova, I.; Lyushkevich, V.; Haimi, P.; Tamošiūnė, I.; Baniulis, D. Treatment of Common sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) seeds with radio-frequency electromagnetic field and cold plasma induces changes in seed phytohormone balance, seedling development and leaf protein expression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Guo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qu, G.; Wanling, T.; Sun, Q.; Liang, D. Alleviation of adverse effects of drought stress on wheat seed germination using atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  161. Jiang, J.; He, X.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Shao, H.; Xu, Q.; Ye, R.; Dong, Y. Effect of cold plasma treatment on seed germination and growth of wheat. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2014, 16, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Su, L.; Lan, Q.; Pritchard, H.W.; Xue, H.; Wang, X. Reactive oxygen species induced by cold stratification. Promote germination of Hedysarum scoparium seeds. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2016, 109, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Shu, K.; Liu, X.D.; Xie, Q.; He, Z.H. Two faces of one seed: Hormonal regulation of dormancy and germination. Mol. Plant. 2016, 9, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Qureshi, M.I.; Qadir, S.; Zolla, L. Proteomics-based dissection of stress-responsive pathways in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 1239–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Liu, W.; Hildebrand, D.F.; Grayburm, W.S.; Phillips, G.C.; Collins, G.B. Effects of exogenous auxins on expression of lipoxygenases in cultured soybean embryos. Plant Physiol. 1991, 97, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Gu, P.; Zou, F.; Meng, L.; Song, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Auxin is Involved in Lateral Root Formation Induced by Drought Stress in Tobacco Seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regulat. 2018, 37, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Rahman, M.M.; Sajib, S.A.; Rahi, M.S.; Tahura, S.; Roy, N.C.; Parvez, S.; Reza, M.A.; Talukder, M.R.; Kabir, A.H. Mechanisms and signalling associated with LPDBD plasma mediated growth improvement in wheat. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Măgureanu, M.; Sîrbu, R.; Dobrin, D.; Gîdea, M. Stimulation of the germination and early growth of tomato seeds by non-thermal plasma. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2018, 38, 989–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Shao, C.Y.; Fang, X.F.; Tang, X.; Zhao, L.J.; Zhang, L.L.; Wang, D.C. Effects of low-temperature plasma on seed germination characteristics of green onion. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2013, 44, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  170. Guo, Q.; Meng, Y.; Qu, G.; Wang, T.; Yang, F.; Liang, D.; Hu, S. Improvement of wheat seed vitality by dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment. Bioelectromagnetics 2018, 39, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Li, L.; Li, J.; Shen, M.; Hou, J.; Shao, H.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, J. Improving seed germination and peanut yields by cold plasma treatment. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Chen, H.H.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, Y.K.; Hung, C.L.; Lin, S.Y.; Chen, Y.S. An improved process for high nutrition of germinated brown rice production: Low-pressure plasma. Food Chem. 2016, 191, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. De Groot, G.J.J.B.; Hundt, A.; Murphy, A.B.; Bange, M.P.; Mai-Prochnow, A. Cold plasma treatment for cotton seed germination improvement. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Feng, J.; Wang, D.; Shao, C.; Zhang, L.; Tang, X. Effects of cold plasma treatment on alfalfa seed growth under simulated drought stress. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2018, 20, 035505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Ling, L.; Jiangang, L.; Minchong, S.; Chunlei, Z.; Yuanhua, D. Cold plasma treatment enhances oilseed rape seed germination under drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hassani, F.; Zare, L.; Khaledi, N. Evaluation of germination and vigor indices associated with Fusarium-infected seeds in pre-basic seeds wheat fields. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2019, 59, 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  177. Dutta, B.; Gitaitis, R.; Smith, S.; Langston, D., Jr. Interactions of seed-borne bacterial pathogens with host and non-host plants in relation to seed infestation and seedling transmission. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Kyriakides, S. The food chain: Paving the way to formulating a more sustainable, healthy and quality food policy. In Farm to Fork: Towards a Sustainable and Resilient Food System in Europe; Ulmann, L., Mai Thanh, C., Eds.; The European Files/Les Dossiers Europeenes: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 64, p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  179. Wojciechowski, J. Towards a sustainable and resilient food system in Europe—The key role of the Common Agricultural Policy. In Farm to Fork: Towards a Sustainable and Resilient Food System in Europe; Ulmann, L., Mai Thanh, C., Eds.; The European Files/Les Dossiers Europeenes: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Volume 64, p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  180. Bourke, P.; Ziuzina, D.; Boehm, D.; Cullen, P.J.; Keener, K. The Potential of Cold Plasma for Safe and Sustainable Food Production. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 615–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  181. Filatova, I.; Azharonok, V.; Lushkevich, V.; Zhukovsky, A.; Gadzhieva, G.; Spasi, K. Plasma seeds treatment as a promising technique for seed germination improvement. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Granada, Spain, 14–19 July 2013; pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  182. Henselová, M.; Slováková, L’.; Martinka, M.; Zahoranová, A. Growth, anatomy and enzyme activity changes in maize roots induced by treatment of seeds with low-temperature plasma. Biologia 2012, 67, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Šerá, B.; Gajdová, I.; Černák, M.; Gavril, B.; Hnatiuc, E.; Kováčik, D.; Kříha, V.; Slama, J.; Šerý, M.; Špatenka, P. How Various Plasma Sources May Affect Seed Germination and Growth. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), Brasov, Romania, 24–26 May 2012; Clotea, L.R., Gerigan, C., Cernat, M., Eds.; IEEE: Brasov, Romania, 2012; pp. 1365–1370. [Google Scholar]
  184. Šerá, B.; Šerý, M.; Gavril, B.; Gajdová, I. Seed germination and early growth responses to seed pre-treatment by non-thermal plasma in hemp cultivars (Cannabis sativa L.). Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2017, 37, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. View of devices for decontamination of loose organic materials using DBD discharges tested by the authors: (a) device with a sliding electrode; (b) device with rotating electrodes; 1—discharge chamber, 2—electrodes assembly, 3—transport trolley, 4—operator panel, 5—electrodes gap adjustment knob, 6—ozone chamber and 7—belt conveyor (adapted from Mućko et al. [28]).
Figure 1. View of devices for decontamination of loose organic materials using DBD discharges tested by the authors: (a) device with a sliding electrode; (b) device with rotating electrodes; 1—discharge chamber, 2—electrodes assembly, 3—transport trolley, 4—operator panel, 5—electrodes gap adjustment knob, 6—ozone chamber and 7—belt conveyor (adapted from Mućko et al. [28]).
Agronomy 12 00841 g001
Figure 2. Construction of the devices for decontamination of loose organic material using DBD discharges: (a) discharge chamber with a sliding electrode; (b) discharge chamber with rotating electrodes; 1—discharge chamber, 2—electrodes assembly, 3—suction hole, 4—insulating support, 5—electrodes gap adjustment knob, 6—transport trolley, 7—belt conveyor, 8—processed material and 9—sweeper conveyor (adapted from Mućko et al. [28], Mućko et al. [29]).
Figure 2. Construction of the devices for decontamination of loose organic material using DBD discharges: (a) discharge chamber with a sliding electrode; (b) discharge chamber with rotating electrodes; 1—discharge chamber, 2—electrodes assembly, 3—suction hole, 4—insulating support, 5—electrodes gap adjustment knob, 6—transport trolley, 7—belt conveyor, 8—processed material and 9—sweeper conveyor (adapted from Mućko et al. [28], Mućko et al. [29]).
Agronomy 12 00841 g002
Figure 3. Control (untreated) (a) and treatment (b) by dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBD) seeds of caraway (Carum carvi L.) cultivated on PDA medium. Clear growth inhibition of some pathogenic fungi and bacteria after treatment.
Figure 3. Control (untreated) (a) and treatment (b) by dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBD) seeds of caraway (Carum carvi L.) cultivated on PDA medium. Clear growth inhibition of some pathogenic fungi and bacteria after treatment.
Agronomy 12 00841 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pańka, D.; Jeske, M.; Łukanowski, A.; Baturo-Cieśniewska, A.; Prus, P.; Maitah, M.; Maitah, K.; Malec, K.; Rymarz, D.; Muhire, J.d.D.; et al. Can Cold Plasma Be Used for Boosting Plant Growth and Plant Protection in Sustainable Plant Production? Agronomy 2022, 12, 841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12040841

AMA Style

Pańka D, Jeske M, Łukanowski A, Baturo-Cieśniewska A, Prus P, Maitah M, Maitah K, Malec K, Rymarz D, Muhire JdD, et al. Can Cold Plasma Be Used for Boosting Plant Growth and Plant Protection in Sustainable Plant Production? Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12040841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pańka, Dariusz, Małgorzata Jeske, Aleksander Łukanowski, Anna Baturo-Cieśniewska, Piotr Prus, Mansoor Maitah, Kamil Maitah, Karel Malec, Dominika Rymarz, Jean de Dieu Muhire, and et al. 2022. "Can Cold Plasma Be Used for Boosting Plant Growth and Plant Protection in Sustainable Plant Production?" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy12040841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop