Next Article in Journal
Effects of Laetiporus sulphureus-Fermented Wheat Bran on Growth Performance, Intestinal Microbiota and Digesta Characteristics in Broiler Chickens
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Rumen-Protected Choline on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Blood Lipid Metabolites of Feedlot Lambs
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Impact of Wildlife Shelter Management on the Genetic Diversity of Erinaceus europaeus and E. roumanicus in Their Contact Zone
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Feeding Increasing Levels of Yerba Mate on Lamb Meat Quality and Antioxidant Activity

by
Yuli A. Pena-Bermudez
1,*,
Richard R. Lobo
1,
Danny A. Rojas-Moreno
1,
Mirele D. Poleti
2,
Tamyres R. de Amorim
1,
Alessandra F. Rosa
2,
Angélica S. C. Pereira
3,
Rafael S. B. Pinheiro
4 and
Ives C. S. Bueno
1
1
Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo/FZEA, Pirassununga 13635-900, São Paulo, Brazil
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, São Paulo, Brazil
3
Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, São Paulo, Brazil
4
Department of Biology and Animal Science, Faculty of Engineering, State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Ilha Solteira 13635-900, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 July 2020 / Revised: 12 August 2020 / Accepted: 14 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Carcass Composition and Meat Quality of Small Ruminants)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The population’s growing concern for health and the increased consumption of natural products have led to the study of the use of bioactive compounds in animal feed, especially those containing antioxidants. An example of this is yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis), a plant highly consumed in South America due to its antioxidant properties, which benefit human health and can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. However, the effects of yerba mate on animal feed as well as the composition and preservation of meat products are unknown. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the effects of the inclusion level of yerba mate extract in the lamb’s diet on meat quality traits, antioxidant activity, and shelf-life. Our results showed that the use of the extract in lamb feed did not negatively affect the characteristics of lamb meat nor increase lipoperoxidation during a six-day storage period. The inclusion of 4% yerba mate extract (YME) resulted in a higher value in the yellow colour of the meat.

Abstract

The present study investigated the inclusion of yerba mate extract (YME) in the lamb’s diet on meat quality traits, antioxidant activity, and shelf-life. Thirty–six lambs were distributed according to a block design with the following groups: control group without YME (0%) and three treatment groups with 1, 2, and 4% YME inclusion in the dry matter. The animals were fed these diets for 53 days. Samples were collected from the Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle to analyze antioxidant activity and meat quality. Samples were placed on a counter display simulating a retail environment for 0, 3, and 6 days at 4 ± 2 °C. All data were analyzed using a MIXED model with orthogonal contrasts. Inclusion of 1 and 4% YME in the diet changed the yellow (b*) and the chroma (C*) of the meat (p ≤ 0.05). The pH, colour, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, and carbonyl values were influenced by the retail display time for all the evaluated treatments (p ≤ 0.03). However, neither diet nor the retail display time influenced the oxidation of proteins or the antioxidant enzyme activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione activity (GSH) in meat. Therefore, the inclusion of 4% YME showed positive results in the yellow and colour stability parameters of the meat without increasing the lipid peroxidation values or altering the normal meat quality parameters in lambs.

1. Introduction

Meat is considered a food with high nutritional quality and is of vital importance due to its functional characteristics and rich source of proteins, zinc, and B vitamins [1]. Accordingly, maintaining quality in animal production is of great importance to obtain a final product that satisfies the consumer’s demand for appearance and composition [2]. Because meat is strongly influenced during the storage process by microbiological deterioration and oxidation of its compounds, conservation of meat is important [3]. The final products of these reactions can lead to changes in composition, leading to market rejection and loss of profit or economic loss [4].
In the preservation of food products, antioxidant substances from a synthetic or natural origin are used to slow down the oxidative process by removing pro-oxidants, such as free fatty acids, metals, and oxidized compounds, and protecting food from light [5]. However, there is a crucial need for regulatory monitoring of synthetic antioxidants in animal feed, considering their potential toxicity in human health [6,7,8,9]. Due to the food safety concerns of consumers, research on the use of natural antioxidants, mainly active substances present in plants that include tannins, saponins, essential oils, and phenolic compounds, has increased [10,11]. These compounds can be used directly or in combination with other animal feed components, delaying the oxidative process and contributing to animal welfare and antioxidant status [12,13,14,15,16,17].
In this context, yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hilaire), a native plant grown in South American Countries and widely consumed in these regions [18], has been used for its antioxidant properties. This plant is composed mainly of polyphenolic compounds (chlorogenic acid) and xanthines (caffeine and theobromine) as well as purine alkaloids, flavonoids and saponins in smaller amounts [19,20]. The use of yerba mate for human health is beneficial, providing a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease and cancer due to the presence of phenolic compounds, mainly chlorogenic acids [10,21]. These phenolic compounds have the ability to scavenge free radicals, inhibiting lipid peroxidation when used in food preservation [19]. In animal production, previous studies showed that Yerba Mate improved lactation performance (increased milk fat, protein, and total solids content) of ewes and the growth rate of lambs [22,23]. Supplementation of yerba mate for large and small ruminants resulted in lower oxidative stress and also improved their productive and reproductive performance [24,25]. Finally, in meat quality in beef cattle and poultry, it was shown to be an additive that improves oxidative stability, nutritive value, and sensory quality [26,27,28].
To the best of our knowledge, limited information on yerba mate and its implication on meat quality is available [28,29,30], thus requiring more studies to better understand the mechanisms of action of yerba mate. We hypothesized that the inclusion of YME in the diet could positively alter the antioxidant status of the muscle during the retail display time and consequently, the meat quality parameters (color, oxidation of lipids, and proteins) of lamb. This study aimed to investigate the effect of inclusion levels of YME in the diet of lambs on meat quality traits, antioxidant activity, and shelf-life.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiments were performed in the Department of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil (21°57′02″ S, 47°27′50″ W). The Animal Use Ethics Commission (CEUA) of FZEA/USP, (Protocol number CEUA 3497040618) approved all procedures using animals.

2.1. Diets, Experimental Design, and Animal Management

Thirty-six male uncastrated industrial crossbred lambs [(Texel × Santa Inês) × Dorper] with an average initial weight of 23.90 ± 3.67 kg and approximately 90 days of age were used. All animals were treated for internal and external parasites using a commercial drug with levamisole hydrochloride as the active ingredient, following the manufacturer’s dose recommendations. The experiment was carried out in a shed (width = 5 m, length = 12 m and height = 4 m) in which the lambs were housed in individual pens (1 m 2) with a raised plastic floor (50 cm), allowing the passage of feces and urine to the concrete floor; each pen had individual access to water and feeder.
The animals were divided into nine blocks, and each block had four animals with similar initial weight. The four animals in each block were randomly assigned into one of the four treatments, following a randomized block design where each treatment had nine animals. Dietary treatments included no inclusion of YME (0%) and three treatments with 1, 2, and 4% YME of inclusion on a dry matter basis (DM), using food-grade kaolin as an inert ingredient. All animals received a control diet for three days, and on the fourth day, the animals were fed the predetermined diets for a 50-day growth trial.
The feed was formulated based on the National Research Council’s [31] requirements. The forage:concentrate ratio was 40:60 with corn silage (Zea mays) and grain concentrate, which included ground corn, soybean meal, and a mineral mixture for sheep (Table 1). The diet was offered twice a day at 08:00 h and 16:00 h, and water was offered ad libitum. The feed provided and orts were weighed daily to determine the daily DM intake, allowing 10% orts. The animal performance was described in a companion paper [32].

2.2. Chemical Analysis

Diet ingredients were analyzed by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [33] methods for dry matter (DM, method 934.01), ash (ASH, method 923.03), ether extract (EE, method 920.85), and crude fiber (CF, method 978.10). Crude protein (CP, method 920.87) was analyzed by the Kjeldahl method. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was analyzed according to Mertens [34] using the amylase enzyme method, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin (LN) were measured according to method 973.18 by Van Soest et al. (1991). Gross energy (GE) was measured with a calorimetric pump (C200 System, IKA, Staufen, Germany). Organic matter (OM) was calculated by subtracting the ASH content from 100. These values are shown in Table 1.
The YME was produced by Centro Flora (Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil) from fresh leaves of Ilex paraguariensis via water:ethanol 75:25 v/v extraction at 90 °C, and the total phenolic concentration was 21.7 eq–g gallic acid/100 g extract and 6% caffeine (w/w). The extract given to the animals in this research was the same product previously used by Zawadzki et al. [28]. In this extract, a complete characterization of phenolic compounds was reported using an ionization mass spectrometry analysis by electrospray ultra-performance liquid chromatography, within most relevant phenolic compounds in the YME chemical composition, which were as follows (expressed in mg g−1): chlorogenic acid, 12.30 ± 0.01; 1,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 6.01 ± 0.01; caffeic acid, 813 ± 0.002; ferulic acid, 0.0545 ± 0.0008; gallic acid, 0.018 ± 0.004. The extract was mixed with the concentrate, and the concentrate was mixed into the silage at feeding time. The chemical composition of the experimental diets and YME were presented and discussed in a companion paper [32].

2.3. Slaughter Procedures and Meat Sampling

The lambs were kept in confinement for 53 days and slaughtered with an approximate body weight of 40 kg [32] in the slaughterhouse at the, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP) after solid fasting for 16 h and receiving only water ad libitum. The slaughtering procedures were performed according to the regulation of the industrial and sanitary inspection of animal products of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply [35]. Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle samples (12 g) were collected 45 min after slaughter using a biopsy punch, packed in aluminum foil and frozen in liquid nitrogen for the analysis of antioxidant enzymes including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and reduced glutathione (GSH). The average hot carcass weight was 17 kg [32]. The carcasses were chilled at 2 °C for 24 h, after which they were divided longitudinally, and the right LT muscle (between 10 and 12 ribs) was extracted for meat quality analysis. More detail about carcass metrics and yield were described in a companion paper [32]

2.4. Meat Analysis

After removing the LT from the carcass, it was divided into 6 slices. Three slices were used for the analysis of lipid oxidation (each 1.5 cm thickness) and the other three were used to assess protein oxidation (1.5 cm thickness). The slices were packed in polystyrene trays and after covered with plastic wrap. Then they placed in a commercial display refrigerator (Auden Model Vega 125 Lx C) with lighting (Philips TL-D 58 W/33-640 1SL/25) on the side columns for a 0, 3 and 6-day shelf-life study at 4 ± 2 °C simulating retail display conditions, the trays were not rotated during the evaluation. pH, instrumental colour, lipid, and protein oxidation of meat was conducted for all three-time periods across all treatments (i.e., 0, 1, 2, and 4% YME). On sampling days, the slices were unpacked, subjected to the analysis of the pH and colour, subsequently wrapped in aluminum foil, and stored at −20 °C for further analysis.

2.4.1. pH Measurement and Meat Colour Determination

Sample pH was determined using a portable pH meter with a penetration probe (Model HI 99163, Hanna® Mark). Measurements were performed on samples immediately after slices were removed from packages after exposure for 0, 3, and 6 days.
Instrumental surface coluor analysis was performed using a colorimeter (Miniscan EZ, Hunter Lab brand) with a D65 light source, a 10° observation angle, and a cell opening measuring 30 mm. The CIELAB system was used to determine the following colour components: L* (brightness, 0 = black, 100 = white), a* (green (−100) to red (+100)) and b* (blue (−100) to yellow (+100)) [36]. The slope angle (H°, expressed in degrees) and chroma (C*) levels were also calculated as
H ° = tan 1 ( b * / a * ) ×   ( 180 / π )
and
C * = a 2 + b 2
respectively. Colour measurements were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 days of display.

2.4.2. Analysis of Lipid and Protein Oxidation

The analysis of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was performed following the methodology proposed by Sorensen and Jørgensen [37]. Approximately 5 g of each sample of LT muscle was homogenized in a Turratec homogenizer (Model T10 basic, IKA brand) using 15 mL of TCA solution (7.5% trichloroacetic acid, 0.1% EDTA disodium salt, and 0.1% n-propylgalate). Absorbance readings for samples and blanks were performed on a spectrophotometer (Multiskan Go, Thermo Scientific Brand) at 530 nm and 600 nm. A standard curve with 5 points was prepared using a solution of tetraethoxypropane of known concentration. The malonaldehyde (MDA) concentration of the samples was obtained with the equation provided by the standard curve. The analyses were performed in duplicate and expressed in mg of MDA per kg of meat.
Protein oxidation was determined using a carbonyl assay kit (code: DCAR-100; BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) and an improved method, in which 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) reacts with carbonyl groups to produce a coloured compound at 375 nm. The intensity of this coloured compound is directly proportional to the carbonyl content present in the sample, and the values are presented in nmol/mg of protein [38].

2.4.3. Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

Enzyme analyses were measured from meat and determined using kits from BioAssay Systems (Hayward, CA, USA) according to the methodology proposed in each extraction protocol. The absorbance readings for samples were performed on a spectrophotometer (Multiskan Go, Thermo Scientific Brand).
CAT activity was measured using a catalase assay kit (code: ECAT-100), the detection range of the kit was 0.2–5 U/L CAT. This assay directly measures the catalase degradation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) using a redox dye. The change in colour intensity at 570 nm or fluorescence intensity is directly proportional to the catalase activity in the sample. The activity of SOD was measured using the superoxide Dismutase Assay Kit (code: ECAT-100); the detection range of the kit was 0.05–3 U/mL SOD. In the assay, the xanthine oxidase (XO) catalyzed reaction provides superoxide (O2-). O2- reacts with a WST-1 dye to form a coloured product. SOD removes O2- hence less O2- is available for the chromogenic reaction. The colour intensity at 440 nm is used to determine the SOD activity in a sample. In relation, GPX was measured using Glutathione Peroxidase Assay Kit GPX (code: EGPX-100); the detection range of kit was 40 to 800 U/L GPX activity. The assay directly measured nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) consumption in the enzyme coupled reactions. The measured decrease in optical density at 340 nm was directly proportional to the enzyme activity in the sample. Finally, GSH was measured using the Glutathione Assay Kit (code: DIGT-250; the detection range of kit was 0.4–100 μM. This improved 5,5′-dithiobis 2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) method combines deproteination and detection (Reagent A) into one reagent. DTNB reacts with reduced glutathione to form a yellow product. The optical density, measured at 412 nm, is directly proportional to glutathione concentration in the sample.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were tested for normality using the UNIVARIATE procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA) with the normality of distributions determined by the Shapiro–Wilk (W) test. For the antioxidant enzyme variables, a completely randomized block design with nine replications per treatment was performed using the following model:
Y i j = μ + T i + B j + e i j
where Yij is the observed value; μ is the overall average; Ti is the fixed effect of the treatment; Bj is the random block effect (animal); eij is the random error associated with each observation.
For analyzing the pH, colour, lipid, and protein oxidation at a specific time, a split-plot design was used, employing the following model:
Y i j k = μ + T i + B j + D k   +   ( T i D k   )   + e i j k
where Yijk is the observed value; μ is the overall average; T i is the fixed effect of the treatment; Dk is the time in days;   ( T i   * D k ) is the interaction of the treatment and time; Bj is the random effect (animal); eijk is the random error associated with each observation. In addition, preslaughter live weight was used as a covariate. All data were evaluated using the MIXED procedure (version 9.4) from the statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2017). The level effect was evaluated using orthogonal polynomials, separating linear, quadratic, and cubic effects on physicochemical attributes and enzyme concentrations in meat. Because the intervals between treatments were not equidistant, the contrast coefficients were generated by the interactive matrix language (IML) procedure. Finally, the treatment averages were generated using the LSMEANS option (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and the averages were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. pH and Colour Determination

The pH values were significantly influenced by exposure time (p = 0.007) (Table 2). However, dietary treatment (p = 0.5576) and the diet × time interaction (p = 0.087) did not affect the pH value. All colour variables in meat were significantly influenced by exposure time (L*, a*, b*, C*, and H*).
The intensity of yellowness of meat was significantly affected by the diet for treatments with 1 and 4% YME (p = 0.0035), where the treatment with 4% YME had the highest mean values for the d storage times (Figure S1) between the treatments analyzed, as can be seen in Table 2 (Figure S1). This effect was associated with the linear increase in the exposure time (p = 0.0012). Therefore, the averages of each treatment were used to generate a linear trend graph represented by the following equations:
y = 0.16x + 14.24 (R2 = 0.75)
for the group with YME 1% and
y = 0.665x + 14.78 (R2 = 0.7949)
for the group with 4% YME. A linear increase in C* was also observed over time of exposure for the treatment with 4% YME (p = 0.008) represented by the following equation (Figure S2):
y = 0.1x + 22.63 (R2 = 0.0092)

3.2. Lipid and Protein Oxidation

The lipid oxidation values showed average values between 0.72 and 1.54 ± 0.09 mg of MDA per kg of meat, which increased linearly with increasing exposure time (p = 0.0001) (Figure S3). Moreover, dietary treatment (p = 0.3879) and the diet × time interaction (p = 0.9007) did not have a significant effect on this parameter (Table 2). For protein oxidation at retail display time (0, 3 and 6 days), there was no difference between treatments (p = 0.1027). However, the carbonyl values were affected by retail display time (p = 0.0256), which resulted in a linear effect (p = 0.0185) (Figure S4). Despite this effect, no significant variations were found in the diet × time interaction (p = 0.1498).

3.3. Antioxidant Enzymes

Table 3 shows the results obtained in the quantification of antioxidant enzymes in the meat of lambs fed diets with the inclusion of YME. There were no statistically significant differences for the enzymatic activity of CAT, GSH, GPX, and SOD between the treatments analyzed (p ≤ 0.7891). The concentration GPX enzyme linearly increased (p = 0.0316) with the inclusion of YME.

4. Discussion

4.1. pH and Colour Determination

The observed values were within the normal range (5.50 to 5.80) for sheep meat as previously reported [39,40,41,42], indicating adequate acidification of the meat for all the evaluated groups. These values were also similar to those found by Nieto et al. [15] and Yagoubi et al. [41], who used rosemary leaves as sheep feed and rosemary distillation residues in lamb diets, respectively.
The exposure time was expected to affect both the pH and colour of the meat. As the display time increases, the meat becomes more susceptible to oxidation and changes colour [43]. No significant differences in meat colour were found with the inclusion of YME in the diets, and the L* and a* values were within the normal ranges.
The lightness values, obtained for the evaluated groups, showed values that ranged between 41.61 and 45.41. Higher L* values result in lighter meat colour [44,45]. Regardless of the YME inclusion level, the meat of the animals used in this experiment was light.
The b* parameter indicates the amount of carotenoid pigments of intra and intermuscular fat tissue [46]. Moreover, lipid concentration and the intake of carotenoid pigments contained in the green roughage can influence the yellow intensity of the meat and, consequently, the b* parameter [47]. The b* values in the evaluated treatments can be explained by the type of diet that the animals received because animals fed with diets containing grains and silage have low pH, which correlates negatively with the b* values [48,49]. In turn, the presence of secondary compounds in the extract may also have influenced the values in the 4% YME treatment, but no studies have reported the correlation of yerba mate supplementation with high values of yellow. Therefore, the observed increase in b* values may have been associated with oxidative processes, which produce Schiff pigments (lipofuscin) from lipid and protein complexes [50]. These pigments are positively related to the sensory appreciation of degradation of colour [51].

4.2. Lipid and Protein Oxidation

Lipid oxidation is related to meat discoloration [52], and the accumulation of carbonyl compounds caused by oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids and phospholipids in meat, which, in turn, is correlated with the oxidation of myoglobin in meat [53].
According to the study by Greene and Cumuze [54], who determined the relationship between TBARS values and inexperienced assessments of oxidized lipid taste in beef, a MDA range of 0.6–2.0 was necessary for panelists to detect oxidized flavors in the meat. In contrast, Campo et al. [55] reported that a MDA level of only 2.0 mg/kg tissue was required for consumers to be able to detect rancidity.
Ripoll, Joy, and Muñoz [56] stated that the acceptability threshold for oxidized meat varies according to the animal and the study, and an acceptability limit of 1 mg MDA/kg meat is more appropriate for lamb than the higher limits considered for beef. The results obtained in this study were low and within normal ranges, presenting values lower than or similar to those of other studies by Chikwanha et al. [57], Parvar et al. [58], and Salami et al. [59], who evaluated the use of natural products containing polyphenols.
The lack of effect of the YME treatment may be associated with the low pH values found in the present study. This translates into greater stability detected in the red colour parameter (a*) in all treatments at the three storage times, which is related to a delay in the oxidative process, generating less production of methemoglobin [15], as reflected in the TBARS content. Low TBARS values have also been positively associated with an increase in total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (both n6 and n3) in the meat of lambs fed products rich in phenolic compounds [60].
Chemical modifications in the oxidative process include a loss of sulfhydryl groups, ketone formation, aldehyde formation, and amino acid oxidation, which depend largely on their position within the chain [61]. Certain amino acids, particularly cysteine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, histidine, proline, arginine, lysine, and methionine, quickly convert to carbonyl derivatives as they are relatively susceptible to reactive oxygen species [62]. In the exposure of amino acids to oxidation, carbonyl formation is considered a useful general indicator for assessing the level of protein oxidation in meat [63,64].
The observed values of carbonyls were considered high compared to those obtained by Chikwanha et al. [60], who evaluated different inclusion levels of grape pomace in lamb feed, and Santé-Lhoutellier et al. [64], who evaluated the effect of concentrate or pasture diet on the storage and oxidation of myofibrillar proteins.
Oxidative reactions can be easily transferred from lipids to proteins, showing a strong interaction between them [65]. Oxidizing lipids may react with proteins through free radicals and initiate protein oxidation [66]. This phenomenon may help explain the values obtained for the carbonyl and TBARS contents in the present study, showing a positive relationship between them.
As indicated by Estévez [65], measuring the carbonyl content does not allow for the evaluation of oxidative damage as a whole. Therefore, Mercier et al. [67] proposed the hypothesis that only certain amino acids produce carbonyl groups and that others, such as tyrosine and tryptophan, can be oxidized without producing carbonyl forms, demonstrating that the content of carbonyl compounds does not represent the full extent of the oxidation process.
However, more specific methods have been proposed. These methods are based on the detection of carbonyl proteins using Western blots, and γ-glutaminic semialdehyde (GGS) allows for the identification of individual oxidized proteins [68]. Carbonyl proteins are also considered adequate indicators of protein oxidation because they represent up to 60% of the total carbonyl compounds in food systems [69].
To date, threshold values for the carbonyl content in meat have not been established [60]. This area of study deserves further research because protein oxidation not only has negative effects on color and texture but also causes nutrient loss, including that of essential amino acids, and decreases digestibility [70].

4.3. Antioxidant Enzymes

Analysis of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, GPX, GSH and SOD are important because they constitute an endogenous intracellular barrier against free radicals, whose activity is modulated by various factors, such as stress, cell injury, or slaughter [71]. These enzymes act to transform reactive species into non-radical and non-toxic products [72].
Berté et al. [73], who evaluated the antioxidant activity of yerba mate, found that yerba mate has catalase-like activity, which is related to the total polyphenol content, but that the extract does not have superoxide dismutase activity. Therefore, catalase was expected to exhibit differences with various dietary YME inclusion levels in the present study. SOD and CAT are paired enzymes. SOD inactivates hydrogen peroxide, which is then converted by CAT into water and oxygen [67,74]. Thus, SOD and CAT should have similar values in their activity, but this was observed for only the control treatment. In the 1% YME treatment, the concentration of SOD increased as the value of CAT activity increased.
GPX decomposes both hydrogen peroxide and lipoperoxides formed during lipid oxidation [75]. Consequently, the concentration would be expected to be associated with the oxidative process in meat. Considering that GPX is a selenodependent enzyme, which uses glutathione as a cofactor, the decrease in its concentration may be associated with the depletion of its cofactors, or the oxidation of proteins and lipids during retail display time, in turn, may indicate a deterioration in red and yellow in meat. According to the previous information, the increase in GPX activity in this research is related to the low TBARS values and greater stability registered in the colour of the lamb meat.
The lack of differences in enzyme activity with the use of YME may be explained by the fact that all cells enter anoxia and deplete their nutrients after the animals are euthanized and bled [71]. Under these conditions, enzyme activity can be considered representative only at the beginning of cell death. Research on antioxidant activity in meat shows different results [71]; in addition, the activity of some enzymes may differ from one species to another. Therefore, variations in enzyme activity between different genetic types can lead to differences in oxidative stabilization in meat [76]. However, these extracts exhibited antioxidant activity in vivo, which agreed with the study by Lobo et al. [32], who added yerba mate to lambs diets, reporting an improvement in antioxidant status.

5. Conclusions

Based on current findings, YME can be adopted as a food ingredient in 4% of lamb diets as a strategy to improve the visual appearance of meat, which is a factor that significantly influences consumer acceptance. Levels of up to 4% YME did not show negative effects on the quality traits in the meat, nor in the lipoperoxidation values during a retail display time of 6 days, maintaining the oxidative stability of the meat. In future studies, they should continue to evaluate the potential use of YME as an antioxidant in the quality traits of the resulting meat products, as there is little scientific information on this topic.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-2615/10/9/1458/s1, Figure S1: Effect of YME inclusion on parameter b* during retail display time. a,b Means with distinct letters among treatments within each retail display time indicate significant differences in diet (p ≤ 0.05). x,y,z Means with distinct letters among the retail display times show significant differences (p ≤ 0.05); Figure S2: Effect of YME inclusion on values C* during retail display time. a,b Means with distinct letters among treatments within each retail display time indicate significant differences in diet (p ≤ 0.05). x,y,z Means with distinct letters among the retail display times indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05); Figure S3: Effect of YME inclusion on the lipid oxidation values of Longissimus thoracis muscle at different retail display time expressed in mg malonaldehyde (MDA)/kg. x,y,z Distinct letters among the exposure times indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05); Figure S4: Effect of YME inclusion on the protein oxidation values of Longissimus thoracis muscle at different retail display times expressed in carbonyl (nmol/mg of protein). x,y,z Distinct letters among the exposure times indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.A.P.-B., I.C.S.B., and A.S.C.P.; methodology, Y.A.P.-B., T.R.d.A., M.D.P., A.F.R., and R.S.B.P.; validation, Y.A.P.-B. and I.C.S.B.; formal analysis, Y.A.P.-B., R.R.L., D.A.R.-M., T.R.d.A., and M.D.P.; investigation, Y.A.P.-B., D.A.R.-M., and R.R.L.; resources, I.C.S.B.; data curation, Y.A.P.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A.P.-B.; writing—review and editing, Y.A.P.-B., R.R.L., D.A.R.-M., T.R.d.A., M.D.P., A.S.C.P. and R.S.B.P.; visualization, Y.A.P.-B., M.D.P., and R.S.B.P.; supervision, I.C.S.B.; project administration, I.C.S.B.; funding acquisition, I.C.S.B., and R.R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the financial support for research (process no 2018/10308-6) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Acknowledgments

We also acknowledge Daniel Rodriguez Aguilar of the National University of Colombia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bender, A. Meat and meat products in human nutrition in developing countries. FAO Food Nutr. Pap. 1992, 53, 1–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Montossi, F.; Font-i-Furnols, M.; del Campo, M.; San Julián, R.; Brito, G.; Sañudo, C. Sustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends: Compatibilities, contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 772–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gray, J.I.; Gomaa, E.A.; Buckley, D.J. Oxidative quality and shelf life of meats. Meat Sci. 1996, 43, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Q.; Lanari, M.C.; Schaefer, D.M. A review of dietary vitamin E supplementation for improvement of beef quality. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 3131–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choe, E.; Min, D.B. Mechanisms of Antioxidants in the Oxidation of Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gülçin, I. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 345–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Köksal, E.; Gülçin, İ. Antioxidant Activity of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.): Discovery Service for Allameh Tabatabai University. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2008, 32, 65–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zahid, M.A.; Choi, J.Y.; Seo, J.K.; Parvin, R.; Ko, J.; Yang, H.S. Effects of clove extract on oxidative stability and sensory attributes in cooked beef patties at refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2020, 161, 107972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Błaszczyk, A.; Augustyniak, A.; Skolimowski, J. Ethoxyquin: An antioxidant used in animal feed. Int. J. Food Sci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bracesco, N.; Sanchez, A.G.; Contreras, V.; Menini, T.; Gugliucci, A. Recent advances on Ilex paraguariensis research: Minireview. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mu, C.; Yang, W.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J.; Hao, X.; Zhang, J. Effects of high-concentrate diet supplemented with grape seed proanthocyanidins on growth performance, liver function, meat quality, and antioxidant activity in finishing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 266, 114518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bañón, S.; Méndez, L.; Almela, E. Effects of dietary rosemary extract on lamb spoilage under retail display conditions. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hajji, H.; Joy, M.; Ripoll, G.; Smeti, S.; Mekki, I.; Gahete, F.M.; Mahouachi, M.; Atti, N. Meat physicochemical properties, fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and sensory characteristics from three North African lamb breeds, as influenced by concentrate or pasture finishing diets. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 48, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Inserra, L.; Priolo, A.; Biondi, L.; Lanza, M.; Bognanno, M.; Gravador, R.; Luciano, G. Dietary citrus pulp reduces lipid oxidation in lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1489–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nieto, G.; Díaz, P.; Bañón, S.; Garrido, M.D. Effect on lamb meat quality of including thyme (Thymus zygis ssp. gracilis) leaves in ewes’ diet. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. North, M.K.; Dalle Zotte, A.; Hoffman, L.C. The use of dietary flavonoids in meat production: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 257, 114291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Z.; He, Z.; Gan, X.; Li, H. Interrelationship among ferrous myoglobin, lipid and protein oxidations in rabbit meat during refrigerated and superchilled storage. Meat Sci. 2018, 146, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Burris, K.P.; Harte, F.M.; Michael Davidson, P.; Neal Stewart, C., Jr.; Zivanovic, S. Composition and Bioactive Properties of Yerba Mate (llex paraguariensis A. St.-Hil.): A Review. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 72, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bastos, D.H.M.; Saldanha, L.A.; Catharino, R.R.; Sawaya, A.C.H.F.; Cunha, I.B.S.; Carvalho, P.O.; Eberlin, M.N. Phenolic antioxidants identified by ESI-MS from yerba maté (Ilex paraguariensis) and green tea (Camelia sinensis) extracts. Molecules 2007, 12, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jaiswal, R.; Sovdat, T.; Vivan, F.; Kuhnert, N. Profiling and characterization by LC-MSnof the chlorogenic acids and hydroxycinnamoylshikimate esters in maté (Ilex paraguariensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 5471–5484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lucivânia, A.; Monte, D.S.; Rannielle, H.; Gonsalves, D.O.; Bernardo, A.; Villarroel, S.; Damaceno, M.N. Qualidade da carne de caprinos e ovinos: Uma revisão. ACSA—Agropecuária Científica no Semi-Árido 2012, 8, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Po, E.; Xu, Z.; Celi, P. The Effect of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguarensis) Supplementation on the Productive Performance of Dorper Ewes and Their Progeny. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 945–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Po, E.; Horsburgh, K.; Raadsma, H.W.; Celi, P. Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguarensis) as a novel feed supplement for growing lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 106, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barbato, O.; Holmes, B.; Filipescu, I.-E.; Celi, P. Dietary Supplementation of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) during the Dry Period Improves Redox Balance in Lactating Dairy Cows. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Mazur, M.; Zwyrzykowska-Wodzinska, A.; Wojtas, E.; Zachwieja, A.; Salejda, A.M. Effect of yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis A. St.-Hil.) supplementation on oxidative stress in ruminants. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 79, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Garcia, R.G.; Burbarelli, M.F.D.C.; Naas, I.D.A.; Sgavioli, S.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Belintani, R.; Caldara, F.R. Dietary yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) influences lipid profile of broiler meat. Rev. Bras. Saúde Produção Anim. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Racanicci, A.M.C.; Menten, J.F.M.; Alencar, S.M.; Buissa, R.S.; Skibsted, L.H. Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) as dietary additive for broilers: Performance and oxidative stability of meat. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2011, 232, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zawadzki, A.; Arrivetti, L.O.R.; Vidal, M.P.; Catai, J.R.; Nassu, R.T.; Tullio, R.R.; Berndt, A.; Oliveira, C.R.; Ferreira, A.G.; Neves-Junior, L.F.; et al. Mate extract as feed additive for improvement of beef quality. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ceribeli, C.; De Zawadzki, A.; Racanicci, A.M.C.; Colnago, L.A.; Skibsted, L.H.; Cardoso, D.R. Mate as dietary supplement for broiler chickens: Effect on the metabolic profle and redox chemistry of meat. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2018, 29, 2266–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vidal, M.P.; Nassu, R.T.; Tullio, R.R.; Berndt, A.; Cardoso, D.R. Meat quality of beef from Nellore stdietseers fed yerba mate supplemented diets. In Proceedings of the 60th International Congress of Meat Science and Tecnology, Punta Del Este, Uruguay, 17–22 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. NRC National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lobo, R.R.; Vincenzi, R.; Moreno, D.A.R.; Lobo, A.A.G.; Silva, C.M.; Junior, V.B.; Ghussn, L.R.; Mufalo, V.C.; Berndt, A.; Gallo, S.B.; et al. Inclusion of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) Extract in the Diet of Growing Lambs: Effects on Blood Parameters, Animal Performance, and Carcass Traits. Animals 2020, 10, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC, 14th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mertens, D.R. Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 1217–1240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Brasil Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Decreto no 9.013, 29 março 2017. Regulam. da Inspeção Ind. e Sanitária Prod. Origem Anim. (RIISPOA) 1997, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Houben, J.H.; Van Dijk, A.; Eikelenboom, G.; Hoving-Bolink, A.H. Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation, fat level and packaging on colour stability and lipid oxidation in minced beef. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sorensen, G.; Storgaard Jørgensen, S. A critical examination of some experimental variables in the 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test for lipid oxidation in meat products. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1996, 202, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Weber, D.; Davies, M.; Weber, D.; Davies, M.J.; Grune, T. Determination of protein carbonyls in plasma, cell extracts, tissue homogenates, isolated proteins: Focus on sample preparation and derivatization conditions. Redox Biol. 2015, 5, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pinheiro, R.S.B.; Silva Sobrinho, A.G.D.; Souza, H.B.A.D.; Yamamoto, S.M. Qualidade de carnes provenientes de cortes da carcaça de cordeiros e de ovinos adultos. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2009, 38, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sañudo, C.A.; Delfa, R.; Casas, M. Influencia del genótipo en la calidad de la carne del ternasco de Aragón. Jorn. Científicas Soc. Espãnola Ovinotecnia Y Caprinotecnia 1992, 88, 473–479. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yagoubi, Y.; Joy, M.; Ripoll, G.; Mahouachi, M.; Bertolín, J.R.; Atti, N. Rosemary distillation residues reduce lipid oxidation, increase alpha-tocopherol content and improve fatty acid profile of lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2018, 136, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zeola, N.M.B.; Silva Sobrinho, A.; Gonzaga Neto, S.; Silva, A.M.D.A. Influência de diferentes níveis de concentrado sobre a qualidade da carne de cordeiros Morada Nova. Rev. Port. Ciências Veterinárias 2002, 97, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  43. Young, O.A.; Priolo, A.; Simmons, N.J.; West, J. Effects of rigor attainment temperature on meat blooming and colour on display. Meat Sci. 1999, 52, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costa, R.G.; Batista, A.S.M.; Madruga, M.S.; Neto, S.G.; de Cássia Ramos do Egypto Queiroga, R.; de Araújo Filho, J.T.; Villarroel, A.S. Physical and chemical characterization of lamb meat from different genotypes submitted to diet with different fibre contents. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 81, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johnson, P.L.; Purchas, R.W.; McEwan, J.C.; Blair, H.T. Carcass composition and meat quality differences between pasture-reared ewe and ram lambs. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Costa, R.G.; Dos Santos, N.M.; De Sousa, W.H.; de Cássia Ramos Do Egypto, Q.R.; Sérgio De Azevedo, P.; Cartaxo, F.Q. Qualidade física e sensorial da carne de cordeiros de três genótipos alimentados com rações formuladas com duas relações volumoso: Concentrado. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Fernandes, A.R.M.; Sampaio, A.A.M.; Henrique, W.; Oliveira, E.A.; Tullio, R.R.; Perecin, D. Características da carcaça e da carne de bovinos sob diferentes dietas, em confinamento. Arq. Bras. Med. Veterinária e Zootec. 2008, 60, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Vestergaard, M.; Therkildsen, M.; Henckel, P.; Jensen, L.R.; Andersen, H.R.; Sejrsen, K. Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness. Meat Sci. 2000, 54, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Muchenje, V.; Dzama, K.; Chimonyo, M.; Strydom, P.E.; Hugo, A.; Raats, J.G. Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: A review. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chelh, I.; Gatellier, P.; Santé-Lhoutellier, V. Characterisation of fluorescent Schiff bases formed during oxidation of pig myofibrils. Meat Sci. 2007, 76, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Insausti, K.; Beriain, M.J.; Lizaso, G.; Carr, T.R.; Purroy, A. Multivariate study of different beef quality traits from local Spanish cattle breeds. Animal 2008, 2, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Faustman, C.; Cassens, R.G.; Schaefer, D.M.; Buege, D.R.; Williams, S.N.; Scheller, K.K. Improvement of Pigment and Lipid Stability in Holstein Steer Beef by Dietary Supplementation with Vitamin E. J. Food Sci. 1989, 54, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rodas-González, A.; Narváez-Bravo, C.; Brashears, M.M.; Rogers, H.B.; Tedford, J.L.; Clark, G.O.; Brooks, J.C.; Johnson, B.J.; Rathmann, R.J.; Miller, M.F. Evaluation of the storage life of vacuum packaged Australian beef. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Greene, B.E.; Cumuze, T.H. Relationship Between TBA Numbers and Inexperienced Panelists’Assessments of Oxidized Flavor in Cooked Beef. J. Food Sci. 1981, 47, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Campo, M.M.; Nute, G.R.; Hughes, S.I.; Enser, M.; Wood, J.D.; Richardson, R.I. Flavour perception of oxidation in beef. Meat Sci. 2006, 72, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ripoll, G.; Joy, M.; Muñoz, F. Use of dietary vitamin E and selenium (Se) to increase the shelf life of modified atmosphere packaged light lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2011, 87, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chikwanha, O.C.; Muchenje, V.; Nolte, J.E.; Dugan, M.E.R.; Mapiye, C. Grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinotage) supplementation in lamb diets: Effects on growth performance, carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2019, 147, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Parvar, R.; Ghoorchi, T.; Kashfi, H.; Parvar, K. Effect of Ferulago angulata (Chavil) essential oil supplementation on lamb growth performance and meat quality characteristics. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 167, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salami, S.A.; Valenti, B.; O’Grady, M.N.; Kerry, J.P.; Mattioli, S.; Licitra, G.; Luciano, G.; Priolo, A. Influence of dietary cardoon meal on growth performance and selected meat quality parameters of lambs, and the antioxidant potential of cardoon extract in ovine muscle homogenates. Meat Sci. 2019, 153, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chikwanha, O.C.; Moelich, E.; Gouws, P.; Muchenje, V.; Nolte, J.V.E.; Dugan, M.E.R.; Mapiye, C. Effects of feeding increasing levels of grape (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinotage) pomace on lamb shelf-life and eating quality. Meat Sci. 2019, 157, 107887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suzuki, Y.J.; Carini, M.; Butterfield, D.A. Protein carbonylation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 323–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fu, Q.Q.; Liu, R.; Zhang, W.G.; Li, Y.P.; Wang, J.; Zhou, G.H. Effects of Different Packaging Systems on Beef Tenderness Through Protein Modifications. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 8, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lund, M.N.; Heinonen, M.; Baron, C.P.; Estévez, M. Protein oxidation in muscle foods: A review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Santé-Lhoutellier, V.; Engel, E.; Aubry, L.; Gatellier, P. Effect of animal (lamb) diet and meat storage on myofibrillar protein oxidation and in vitro digestibility. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Estévez, M. Protein carbonyls in meat systems: A review. Meat Sci. 2011, 89, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Utrera, M.; Morcuende, D.; Estévez, M. Temperature of frozen storage affects the nature and consequences of protein oxidation in beef patties. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1250–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mercier, Y.; Gatellier, P.; Renerre, M. Lipid and protein oxidation in vitro, and antioxidant potential in meat from Charolais cows finished on pasture or mixed diet. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Grossi, A.; Bolumar, T.; Søltoft-Jensen, J.; Orlien, V. High pressure treatment of brine enhanced pork semitendinosus: Effect on microbial stability, drip loss, lipid and protein oxidation, and sensory properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2014, 22, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Utrera, M.; Estevez, M. Impact of trolox, quercetin, genistein and gallic acid on the oxidative damage to myofibrillar proteins: The carbonylation pathway. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 4000–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Guyon, C.; Meynier, A.; de Lamballerie, M. Protein and lipid oxidation in meat: A review with emphasis on high-pressure treatments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Descalzo, A.M.; Sancho, A.M. A review of natural antioxidants and their effects on oxidative status, odor and quality of fresh beef produced in Argentina. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Surai, P. Silymarin as a Natural Antioxidant: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Perspectives. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 204–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Berté, K.A.S.; Beux, M.R.; Spada, P.K.W.D.S.; Salvador, M.; Hoffmann-Ribani, R. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of yerba-mate (Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hil., Aquifoliaceae) extract as obtained by spray drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5523–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Insani, E.M.; Eyherabide, A.; Grigioni, G.; Sancho, A.M.; Pensel, N.A.; Descalzo, A.M. Oxidative stability and its relationship with natural antioxidants during refrigerated retail display of beef produced in Argentina. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gatellier, P.; Mercier, Y.; Renerre, M. Effect of diet finishing mode (pasture or mixed diet) on antioxidant status of Charolais bovine meat. Meat Sci. 2004, 67, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hernández, P.; Zomeño, L.; Ariño, B.; Blasco, A. Antioxidant, lipolytic and proteolytic enzyme activities in pork meat from different genotypes. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets.
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets.
ComponentTreatments
0%1%2%4%
Ingredients, % DM
Corn silage40.0040.0040.0040.00
Ground corn33.0033.0033.0033.00
Soybean meal20.5020.5020.5020.50
Salt0.150.150.150.15
Dicalcium phosphate0.150.150.150.15
Mineral Mix 12.202.202.202.20
YME0.001.002.004.00
Kaolin 24.003.002.000.00
Chemical composition
Dry matter (DM), % as-fed68.8968.8368.7768.64
Organic matter % DM89.5690.4391.3093.04
Crude protein % DM21.4621.5621.6621.87
Ether extract % DM2.092.092.092.09
Ash % DM13.7710.858.477.16
Non-fiber carbohydrate % DM51.9052.6953.4955.07
Crude fiber % DM13.8713.8813.8813.88
ADF % DM18.1918.2018.2018.22
NDF % DM34.5334.5434.5434.56
Lignin % DM4.484.484.484.48
Gross energy (kcal/kg)4.194.234.274.35
1 Mineral Mix: GuabiPhos®, which has the following guaranteed levels per kilogram of product: calcium (maximum), 150 g; calcium (minimum), 130 g; phosphorus (minimum), 65 g; sodium (minimum), 130 g; fluorine (maximum), 650 mg; sulfur (minimum), 12 g; magnesium (minimum), 10 g; iron (minimum), 5000 mg; iodine (minimum), 60 mg; selenium (minimum), 10 mg; vitamin A (minimum), 50,000 international unit (IU); vitamin E (minimum), 312 IU. 2 Kaolin (also called the osp vehicle): kaolin is inert and has no nutritional value and is used to complete the ration.
Table 2. Effect of dietary treatment with yerba mate extract and retail display time (0, 3, and 6 days) on the physical and oxidative stability of lipids and proteins in the Longissimus thoracis muscle of lambs.
Table 2. Effect of dietary treatment with yerba mate extract and retail display time (0, 3, and 6 days) on the physical and oxidative stability of lipids and proteins in the Longissimus thoracis muscle of lambs.
Item 1Time 0Time 3Time 6SEM 2p-Value
0%1%2%4%0%1%2%4%0%1%2%4%DietaTempoD × TLineal
pH5.575.665.405.605.665.665.675.85.665.635.685.620.060.5576<0.00700.08730.6360
L*42.7741.6142.4243.2045.1643.2044.3045.4142.6943.0942.0544.550.860.1605<0.00210.72040.1529
a*16.8017.2916.9217.3014.7514.2014.6014.8015.0315.3916.2416.250.500.5747<0.00010.66140.1757
H*40.3639.7240.7642.2047.0445.0047.2046.7745.6544.9344.3046.250.920.3150<0.00010.62660.2329
b*14.26 a14.40 a14.57 a15.60 b15.77 a14.40 b15.70 a15.72 a15.31 a15.36 a15.75 a16.97 b0.370.0035<0.00010.09970.0012
C*22.05 a22.50 a22.34 a23.30 b21.62 a20.23 b21.50 a21.63 a21.50 a21.76 a22.69 a23.53 b0.520.0398<0.00050.30690.0080
TBARS0.800.790.740.721.020.940.860.931.431.541.351.340.090.3879<0.00010.90070.1807
Carbonyl22.3623.1828.2217.2022.9629.6139.9766.2224.9820.9933.3833.298.900.10270.02560.14980.0185
1 L*: Lightness; a*: redness; b*: yellowness; C*: chroma; H*: angle hue; TBARS: mg malonaldehyde (MDA/kg); Carbonyls: nmol/mg protein. 2 SEM: standard error of the mean. a,b Means followed by distinct letters among treatments of each exposure time indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of yerba mate extract (YME) supplementation on the antioxidant status of lambs.
Table 3. Effect of yerba mate extract (YME) supplementation on the antioxidant status of lambs.
Variables 1Inclusion Level of YMESEM 2p-Value 3
0%1%2%4%DietLinear
CAT (U/L)4.895.194.496.270.920.56430.3177
GPx (U/L)103.68146.44193.78341.8483.880.17060.0316
GSH (μM)60.5867.0566.4460.916.000.76360.8741
SOD (U/mL)0.060.070.060.050.010.78910.6573
1 CAT: Catalase, GPX: glutathione peroxidase, GSH: activity glutathione, SOD: superoxide dismutase. 2 SEM: standard error of the mean. 3 p-value: values from treatment (diet) and orthogonal contrast (linear) are significantly different if p ≤ 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pena-Bermudez, Y.A.; Lobo, R.R.; Rojas-Moreno, D.A.; Poleti, M.D.; Amorim, T.R.d.; Rosa, A.F.; Pereira, A.S.C.; Pinheiro, R.S.B.; Bueno, I.C.S. Effects of Feeding Increasing Levels of Yerba Mate on Lamb Meat Quality and Antioxidant Activity. Animals 2020, 10, 1458. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani10091458

AMA Style

Pena-Bermudez YA, Lobo RR, Rojas-Moreno DA, Poleti MD, Amorim TRd, Rosa AF, Pereira ASC, Pinheiro RSB, Bueno ICS. Effects of Feeding Increasing Levels of Yerba Mate on Lamb Meat Quality and Antioxidant Activity. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1458. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani10091458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pena-Bermudez, Yuli A., Richard R. Lobo, Danny A. Rojas-Moreno, Mirele D. Poleti, Tamyres R. de Amorim, Alessandra F. Rosa, Angélica S. C. Pereira, Rafael S. B. Pinheiro, and Ives C. S. Bueno. 2020. "Effects of Feeding Increasing Levels of Yerba Mate on Lamb Meat Quality and Antioxidant Activity" Animals 10, no. 9: 1458. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani10091458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop