Next Article in Journal
Luteolin: A Phytochemical to Mitigate S. Typhimurium Flagellin-Induced Inflammation in a Chicken In Vitro Hepatic Model
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Small Rodent Assemblages after a 20 Year Interval in the Alps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Colistin Resistance Genes in Broiler Chickens in Tunisia

1
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell’Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy
2
Institute of Veterinary Research of Tunisia, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1006, Tunisia
3
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 February 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal System and Management)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The extensive use of colistin in livestock is recognized as the main cause of the emergence of colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. This phenomenon represents a public health concern, as colistin is one of the last-resort antibiotics against multidrug-resistant deadly infections in human medicine. In the present survey, DNA extracted from cloacal swabs from 195 broiler chickens in Tunisia was tested by PCR for the ten mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes known so far. Of the 195 animals tested, 81 (41.5%) were mcr-1 positive. These results confirm the urgent nature of antimicrobial resistance in the Tunisian poultry sector and suggest the need for cautious use of colistin in the veterinary field.

Abstract

Colistin is a polymyxin antibiotic that has been used in veterinary medicine for decades, as a treatment for enterobacterial digestive infections as well as a prophylactic treatment and growth promoter in livestock animals, leading to the emergence and spread of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and to a great public health concern, considering that colistin is one of the last-resort antibiotics against multidrug-resistant deadly infections in clinical practice. Previous studies performed on livestock animals in Tunisia using culture-dependent methods highlighted the presence of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In the present survey, DNA extracted from cloacal swabs from 195 broiler chickens from six farms in Tunisia was tested via molecular methods for the ten mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes known so far. Of the 195 animals tested, 81 (41.5%) were mcr-1 positive. All the farms tested were positive, with a prevalence ranging from 13% to 93%. These results confirm the spread of colistin resistance in livestock animals in Tunisia and suggest that the investigation of antibiotic resistance genes by culture-independent methods could be a useful means of conducting epidemiological studies on the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

1. Introduction

Colistin (polymyxin E) is a polymyxin antibiotic commonly used in animal health, mainly orally, for the treatment of enterobacterial digestive infections in pigs, poultry and cattle [1]. In human medicine, since its first introduction in 1952 [2], colistin has mainly been used to treat Gram-negative infections, especially pseudomonal infections. In the early 1980s, the use of colistin was restricted in clinical settings in most parts of the world, because of the risk of neuro- and nephro-toxicity [3]. In recent years, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria as well as the lack of development of new antimicrobial agents has led to the re-evaluation of the use of colistin in clinical practice as one of the last-resort antibiotics against multidrug-resistant deadly infections, in particular by strains resistant to carbapenems [4,5].
The widespread and excessive use of colistin has led to the emergence and spread of colistin resistance among Gram-negative bacteria. The livestock industry has been pointed out as the main source responsible for this phenomenon, considering the limited use of colistin in human medicine for two decades vs its extensive use in livestock production for the treatment of enterobacterial digestive infections as well as for prophylactic treatment and as a growth promoter [6,7]. Polymyxins, including colistin, are positively charged polypeptides that interact with the negatively charged phosphate group of lipid A of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, destabilizing the membrane to cause cell lysis [8]. One of the defence strategies most used by Gram-negative bacteria against polymyxins is the modification of the target LPS, which reduces its negative charge and attenuates its affinity for positively charged polymyxins [9]. Chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms corresponding to mutations or deletions in genes involved in the biosynthesis of LPS have been known for some time [10]. Chromosomally encoded colistin resistance is of limited interest, as it is a rare, self-limiting mechanism, that is not transmissible within the population [11]. Of greater significance was the discovery in 2015 in China [12] of a mobilized colistin-resistance (mcr) gene, named mcr-1, which encodes an enzyme that catalyses the addition of phosphoethanolamine to the phosphate groups in lipid A, thus abolishing the negative charges to which cationic polymyxins have affinity. The emergence of mcr-1 has raised great concern, as it is located on a plasmid and is therefore potentially horizontally transferable between bacterial strains and species. Further, carriage of mcr-1 is often associated with co-carriage of other drug resistance genes, including those for carbapenemases and extended-spectrum β-lactamases [13]. To date, several mcr gene types, primarily mcr-1 and, less commonly, mcr-2 to mcr-10, and numerous variants [1], have been described worldwide in animals, food samples and humans [14]. All the mcr genes have been associated with conjugative plasmids, except mcr-6 which was found to be chromosomally located [15]. Among food-producing animals, a remarkable prevalence of colistin resistance has been highlighted in the poultry sector [16,17].
The aim of this study was to investigate, by PCR, the presence of mcr genes in broiler chickens in Tunisia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

In this study we retrospectively examined DNA extracted from cloacal swabs collected in 2019 from 195 apparently healthy broiler chickens at two slaughterhouses in the governorate of Ben Arous (Grand Tunis, Tunisia). The chickens belonged to 13 lots from different poultry sheds on six farms (A–F), located in five governorates (Ben Arous, Bizerte, Béja, Zaghouan and Nabeul), inside a perimeter of 60 km. Each lot consisted of 15 randomly selected animals. All the farms were industrial, except for one rural chicken farm (Farm E/Lot 7).
Total DNA was extracted from each cloacal swab using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the supplier’s recommendations. One extraction control, consisting of kit reagents only, was included.

2.2. Molecular Analysis

DNA Amplification and Sequencing

DNA samples were investigated by PCR targeting the genes mcr-1 to mcr-10. Each gene was amplified by an individual PCR, using primers described in Table 1.
The following PCR protocols were carried out: 5 min of initial denaturation at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 51.3 °C (mcr-8 and mcr-9), 53 °C (mcr-1), 56 °C (mcr-7), 57 °C (mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4, mcr-6 and mcr-10), or 62 °C (mcr-5) for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension step of 10 min at 72 °C completed the reaction. The DNA extracted from Escherichia coli field strains, containing colistin resistance plasmids, was used as a positive control. The extraction control and a distilled water negative control were also included.
The PCR products were analysed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis; the DNA bands were stained with Midori Green Advance (Nippon Genetics Europe GmbH, Düren, Germany) and then visualized using ultraviolet (UV) trans illumination. The amplicons were purified using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and both DNA strands were sequenced (Bio-Fab Research, Rome, Italy). The sequences obtained were compared with the public sequences available using the BLAST server in GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2023).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The Fisher exact test and Chi-Square test were used to compare the positivity rate within and between farms (p-value < 0.05 was considered significant).

3. Results

The results are shown in Table 2.
Positive results were highlighted for the mcr-1 gene only (Figure 1).
Of the 195 animals tested, 81 (41.5%) were mcr-1 positive. All six farms showed positivity for mcr-1, with a different prevalence for each lot. The highest prevalence was highlighted on farm A (lot 1: 87%, 13/15; lot 2: 47%, 7/15), farm C (lot 4: 93%, 14/15; lot 6: 87%, 13/15) and farm F (lot 9: 73%, 11/15; lot 11: 87%, 13/15), in which both lots tested were positive. Farms B and D showed only one mcr-1 positive lot each, with a prevalence of 13% (lot 13: 2/15) and 33% (lot 10: 5/15), respectively. For farm E, the only lot sampled showed a prevalence of 20% (3/15). No statistical difference emerged among lots from the same farm (p-value > 0.05), whereas there was a significant difference between the mcr-1 positivity rate observed in farms A, C, and F and that highlighted in the other farms investigated (p-value < 0.05). The identity of the amplicons was confirmed by comparison between the sequences obtained and the corresponding sequences available in the GenBank database, showing 99–100% nucleotide similarity. A representative mcr-1 sequence was deposited in the GenBank database under accession number OQ439918.

4. Discussion

A global dispersion of mcr genes has been demonstrated, especially along the food chain [15,17], in both developed and developing countries, which are currently interconnected due to globalization of the trade of food animals and foodstuffs [22]. In recent years, the non-therapeutic use of colistin has been banned in several countries [23]. In Africa, except for South Africa, colistin is an over-the-counter medication sold and dispensed without a veterinarian’s supervision [22]. Based on the bibliographic data, colistin resistance genes have been detected in Northern (Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco), Southern (South Africa), Central (Congo), Eastern (Tanzania, Sudan, Kenya) and Western (Nigeria) Africa, in humans, food animals and their products, wastewaters and terrestrial and aquatic wildlife, suggesting the dissemination of colistin resistance to all ecological niches [22]. Seven mcr variants—mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4, mcr-5, mcr-8 and mcr-9—were detected, with mcr-1 being dominant [22].
As far as North Africa is concerned, previous studies detected the highest prevalence of colistin resistance in Tunisia [7] where the presence of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has been well documented in clinical specimens [24], animals such as chickens [25], bovids [26], camels [27] and wild boars [28], retail meat [16], and wastewater [29]. Only the mcr-1 variant has been highlighted so far. The largest number of studies concerned the poultry industry where colistin has been widely used to prevent and treat Enterobacteriaceae infections [30]. Colistin resistance has been detected in Escherichia coli isolates from both apparently healthy chickens or poultry meat [16,25,31,32,33] and chickens that died due to colibacillosis [34], as well as in Salmonella spp. isolates in broiler flocks [35].
In this study we examined DNA extracted from cloacal swabs from 195 broiler chickens from six farms in Tunisia. Samples were analysed for the ten mcr genes known so far, highlighting mcr-1 positivity in 81 (41.5%) of 195 samples tested. All the farms sampled showed positivity for mcr-1, with prevalence ranging from 13% to 93%. A significantly higher mcr-1 prevalence rate was observed in farms A, C and F, when compared with the other farms tested, probably caused by increased or more frequent use of colistin and/or widespread circulation of selected colistin resistant bacterial strains. The results were concordant with the previous investigations cited above concerning the spread of colistin resistance in the Tunisian poultry sector, as well as detection of the mcr-1 gene, which is the only mcr gene type highlighted so far in all contexts examined in Tunisia.
In our opinion, this study shows two peculiarities, relating to the study approach and the number of mcr genes tested.
The phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is traditionally investigated using culture-dependent methods based on bacteriological culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolated microorganisms. This approach is highly specific, but it could cause an underestimation of AMR occurrence due to a consistent non-culturable fraction of microorganisms or those that require a long period of growth. Recent studies introduced a molecular approach based on amplification of antimicrobial resistance target genes from environmental or biological samples [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. This approach is more expensive than traditional cultivation and does not allow determination of the bacterial sources of resistance genes. However, it is a rapid method that avoids possible underestimation of the occurrence of AMR [44], as it is able to detect non-culturable or labile bacteria and provides more extensive information on the resistance patterns harboured by all bacteria present in the tested samples and not only those highlighted in selected colonies [45].
To our knowledge this study is the first investigation conducted in Tunisia in which all the mcr gene types known so far have been examined. In this regard, previous studies have shown a mismatch between phenotypic colistin resistance and the detection of mcr genes in some bacterial isolates [16,35]. The lack of evidence of mcr genes in DNA from colistin resistant isolates could be attributed to classic chromosomal mutations as well as the presence of untested mcr variants.
The samples examined in this study had previously been tested for 14 tetracycline resistance (tet) genes, showing a high frequency and diversity of tet genes [46]. The coexistence of mcr and tet genes is not surprising considering that both colistin and tetracycline have been widely used or abused in veterinary medicine [17].
Our results confirm the spread of colistin resistance in the Tunisian poultry sector. Given that the livestock industry has been pointed out as the main source responsible for the emergence and dissemination of colistin resistance, suggesting that animals may be an important source of transmission of colistin resistance to humans, continuous colistin resistance surveillance studies in the veterinary field, as well as a responsible use of the drug on farms, are needed, and farmers should be made aware of the potential dangers of self-medication. However, the reduction in the use of colistin must not lead to an increase in the use of other classes of critically important antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolones, third and fourth generation cephalosporins and macrolides, but must be achieved through the application of fundamental principles of good governance in animal health and good husbandry practices, e.g., taking care of animal welfare and applying strict biosecurity measures.

5. Conclusions

The emergence of colistin resistance from animal sources is a public health concern, as this antibiotic is considered to be the last line therapeutic option for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. As colistin is still widely used in veterinary medicine, especially in certain countries, continuous monitoring of mobile colistin resistance determinants in the veterinary field would be appropriate, to trace the dissemination of mcr genes and provide a more precise assessment of the risk of food-borne antimicrobial resistance [23].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D.F., D.S., S.S., S.B.Y., E.C. and A.T.; methodology, A.D.F. and D.S.; software, A.D.F.; validation, A.D.F. and D.S.; formal analysis, A.D.F.; investigation, D.S., F.B., S.B.Y. and S.S.; resources, A.D.F., F.B. and E.C.; data curation, A.D.F., F.B. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.F.; writing—review and editing, A.D.F., S.S., F.B., E.C. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because it was retrospectively performed on DNA previously extracted from slaughtered animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence generated in this study is available in GenBank under Accession number OQ439918.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Valiakos, G.; Kapna, I. Colistin resistant mcr genes prevalence in livestock animals (swine, bovine, poultry) from a multinational perspective. A systematic review. Vet Sci. 2021, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Biswas, S.; Brunel, J.M.; Dubus, J.C.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Rolain, J.M. Colistin: An update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev. Ant-Infect. Ther. 2012, 10, 917–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Koch-Weser, J.; Sidel, V.W.; Federman, E.B.; Kanarek, P.; Finer, D.C.; Eaton, A.E. Adverse effects of sodium colistimethate. Manifestations and specific reaction rates during 317 courses of therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 1970, 72, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Falagas, M.E.; Kasiakou, S.K. Colistin: The revival of polymyxins for the management of multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Rev. Anti-infect. Agents 2005, 40, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nasnas, R.; Saliba, G.; Hallak, P. The revival of colistin: An old antibiotic for the 21st century. Pathol. Biol. 2009, 57, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Nwobi, O.C. Occurrence and characteristics of mobile colistin resistance (mcr) gene-containing isolates from the environment: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dziri, O.; Dziri, R.; El Salabi, A.A.; Alawami, A.A.; Ksouri, R.; Chouchani, C. Polymyxin E-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in Tunisia and neighboring countries: Are there commonalities? Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 4821–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P. Polymyxins: Antibacterial activity, susceptibility testing, and resistance mechanisms encoded by plasmids or chromosomes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 557–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gogry, F.A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Sultan, I.; Haq, Q.M.R. Current update on intrinsic and acquired colistin resistance mechanisms in bacteria. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 677720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kieffer, N.; Royer, G.; Decousser, J.-W.; Bourrel, A.-S.; Palmieri, M.; De La Rosa, J.-M.O.; Jacquier, H.; Denamur, E.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L. mcr-9, an inducible gene encoding an acquired phosphoethanolamine transferase in Escherichia coli, and its origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e00965-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carretto, E.; Brovarone, F.; Russello, G.; Nardini, P.; El-Bouseary, M.M.; Aboklaish, A.F.; Walsh, T.R.; Tyrrell, J.M. Clinical validation of SensiTest Colistin, a broth microdilution-based method to evaluate colistin MICs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01523-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.-X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Forde, B.M.; Zowawi, H.M.; Harris, P.N.A.; Roberts, L.; Ibrahim, E.; Shaikh, N.; Deshmukh, A.; Sid Ahmed, M.A.; Al Maslamani, M.; Cottrell, K.; et al. Discovery of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance in a highly virulent Escherichia coli lineage. mSphere 2018, 3, e00486-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luo, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y. Prevalence and transmission of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) gene in bacteria common to animals and humans. Biosaf. Health 2020, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ling, Z.; Yin, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3087–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hassen, B.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ruiz-Ripa, L.; Mama, O.M.; Hassen, A.; Torres, C.; Hammami, S. High prevalence of mcr-1 encoding colistin resistance and first identification of blaCTX-M-55 in ESBL/CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli isolated from chicken faeces and retail meat in Tunisia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 318, 108478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bastidas-Caldes, C.; de Waard, J.H.; Salgado, M.S.; Villacís, M.J.; Coral-Almeida, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Calvopiña, M. Worldwide prevalence of mcr-mediated colistin-resistance Escherichia coli in isolates of clinical samples, healthy humans, and livestock—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Butaye, P.; Huang, K.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, X.; Gong, W.; Wang, C. Molecular detection of colistin resistance genes (mcr-1 to mcr-5) in human vaginal swabs. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Yin, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Shen, J.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gorecki, A.; Musialowski, M.; Wolacewicz, M.; Decewicz, P.; Ferreira, C.; Vejmelkova, D.; Grzesiuk, M.; Manaia, C.M.; Bartacek, J.; Dziewit, L. Development and validation of novel PCR primers for identification of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr) genes in various environmental settings. J. Hazard Mater. 2022, 425, 127936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lei, C.W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Wang, H.N. Detection of mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10.1 in a conjugative plasmid from Enterobacter roggenkampii of chicken origin in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01191-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anyanwu, M.U.; Jaja, I.F.; Oguttu, J.W.; Jaja, C.J.; Chah, K.; Shodeinde Shoyinka, V. Is Africa ready for mobile colistin resistance threat? Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2021, 11, 1962781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shen, Y.; Zhang, R.; Schwarz, S.; Wu, C.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R.; Wang, Y. Farm animals and aquaculture: Significant reservoirs of mobile colistin resistance genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2469–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ferjani, S.; Maamar, E.; Ferjani, A.; Meftah, K.; Battikh, H.; Mnif, B.; Hamdoun, M.; Chebbi, Y.; Kanzari, L.; Achour, W.; et al. Tunisian multicenter study on the prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Gram negative bacilli: Emergence of Escherichia coli harbouring the mcr-1 gene. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Grami, R.; Mansour, W.; Mehri, W.; Bouallègue, O.; Boujaâfar, N.; Madec, J.-Y.; Haenni, M. Impact of food animal trade on the spread of mcr-1-mediated colistin resistance, Tunisia, July 2015. Eurosurveillance 2016, 21, 30144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hassen, B.; Saloua, B.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ruiz-Ripa, L.; Mama, O.M.; Hassen, A.; Hammami, S.; Torres, C. mcr-1 encoding colistin resistance in CTX-M-1/CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli isolates of bovine and caprine origins in Tunisia. First report of CTX-M-15-ST394/D E. coli from goats. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 67, 101366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saidani, M.; Messadi, L.; Mefteh, J.; Chaouechi, A.; Soudani, A.; Selmi, R.; Dâaloul-Jedidi, M.; Ben Chehida, F.; Mamlouk, A.; Jemli, M.H.; et al. Various Inc-type plasmids and lineages of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae spreading blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-1 and mcr-1 genes in camels in Tunisia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 19, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Selmi, R.; Tayh, G.; Srairi, S.; Mamlouk, A.; Ben Chehida, F.; Lahmar, S.; Bouslama, M.; Daaloul-Jedidi, M.; Messadi, L. Prevalence, risk factors and emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing-, carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Enterobacteriales isolated from wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Tunisia. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 163, 105385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hassen, B.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ruiz-Ripa, L.; Mama, O.M.; Ibrahim, C.; Benlabidi, S.; Hassen, A.; Torres, C.; Hammami, S. Genetic characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from a biological industrial wastewater treatment plant in Tunisia with detection of the colistin-resistance mcr-1 gene. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2021, 97, fiaa231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pishnian, Z.; Haeili, M.; Feizi, A. Prevalence and molecular determinants of colistin resistance among commensal Enterobacteriaceae isolated from poultry in northwest of Iran. Gut Pathog. 2019, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soufi, L.; Abbassi, M.S.; Sáenz, Y.; Vinué, L.; Somalo, S.; Zarazaga, M.; Abbas, A.; Dbaya, R.; Khanfir, L.; As-sia Ben Hassen, A.; et al. Prevalence and diversity of integrons and associated resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry meat in Tunisia. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Maamar, E.; Alonso, C.A.; Hamzaoui, Z.; Dakhli, N.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ferjani, S.; Saidani, M.; Boubaker, I.B.B.; Torres, C. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance in CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli of lineage ST2197 in a Tunisian poultry farm. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 269, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saidani, M.; Messadi, L.; Chaouechi, A.; Tabib, I.; Saras, E.; Soudani, A.; Daaloul-Jedidi, M.; Mamlouk, A.; Ben Chehida, F.; Chakroun, C.; et al. High genetic diversity of Enterobacteriaceae clones and plasmids disseminating resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and colistin in healthy chicken in Tunisia. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1507–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dhaouadi, S.; Soufi, L.; Hamza, A.; Fedida, D.; Zied, C.; Awadhi, E.; Mtibaa, M.; Hassen, B.; Cherif, A.; Torres, C.; et al. Co-occurrence of mcr-1 mediated colistin resistance and β-lactamase-encoding genes in multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli from broiler chickens with colibacillosis in Tunisia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oueslati, W.; Rjeibi, M.R.; Benyedem, H.; Mamlouk, A.; Souissi, F.; Selmi, R.; Ettriqui, A. Prevalence, risk factors, antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella in Northeast Tunisia broiler flocks. Vet. Sci. 2021, 30, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guardabassi, L.; Agerso, Y. Genes homologous o glycopeptide resistance vanA are widespread in soil microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 259, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seyfried, E.E.; Newton, R.J.; Rubert, K.F.; Pedersen, J.A.; McMahon, K.D. Occurrence of tetracycline resistance genes in aquaculture facilities with varying use of oxytetracycline. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 59, 799–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Blanco-Peña, K.; Esperón, F.; Torres-Mejía, A.M.; de la Torre, A.; de la Cruz, E.; Jiménez-Soto, M. Antimicrobial resistance genes in pigeons from public parks in Costa Rica. Zoonoses Public Health 2017, 64, e23–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Di Francesco, A.; Renzi, M.; Borel, N.; Marti, H.; Salvatore, D. Detection of tetracycline resistance genes in European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and crested porcupines (Hystrix cristata). J. Wildl. Dis. 2020, 56, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smoglica, C.; Di Francesco, C.E.; Angelucci, S.; Antonucci, A.; Marsilio, F. Occurrence of the tetracycline resistance gene tetA(P) in Apennine wolves (Canis lupus italicus) from different human–wildlife interfaces. J. Global Antimicrob. Res. 2020, 23, 184–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Di Francesco, C.; Smoglica, C.; Profeta, F.; Farooq, M.; Di Giannatale, E.; Toscani, T.; Marsilio, F. Research Note: Detection of antibiotic-resistance genes in commercial poultry and turkey flocks from Italy. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Luo, Y.; Tan, L.; Zhang, H.; Bi, W.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X.; Lu, X.; Xu, X.; Sun, R.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Characteristics of wild bird resistomes and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in interconnected bird-habitat systems revealed by similarity of blaTEM polymorphic sequences. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 15084–15095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Di Francesco, A.; Salvatore, D.; Bertelloni, F.; Ebani, V.V. Tetracycline resistance genes in wild birds from a wildlife recovery centre in Central Italy. Animals 2022, 13, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Galhano, B.S.P.; Ferrari, R.G.; Panzenhagen, P.; de Jesus, A.C.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Antimicrobial resistance gene detection methods for bacteria in animal-based foods: A brief review of highlights and advantages. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Farooq, M.; Smoglica, C.; Ruffini, F.; Soldati, L.; Marsilio, F.; Di Francesco, C.E. Antibiotic resistance genes occurrence in conventional and antibiotic-free poultry farming, Italy. Animals 2022, 12, 2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Di Francesco, A.; Salvatore, D.; Sakhria, S.; Catelli, E.; Lupini, C.; Abbassi, M.S.; Bessoussa, G.; Ben Yahia, S.; Ben Chehida, N. High frequency and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in the microbiota of broiler chickens in Tunisia. Animals 2021, 11, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PCR amplicons. Lane 1, 308 bp mcr-1 gene fragment; lane 2, positive control; lane 3, distilled water negative control; lane M, MassRuler Low Range DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania).
Figure 1. PCR amplicons. Lane 1, 308 bp mcr-1 gene fragment; lane 2, positive control; lane 3, distilled water negative control; lane M, MassRuler Low Range DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania).
Animals 13 01409 g001
Table 1. PCR primers used in this study.
Table 1. PCR primers used in this study.
Primer NamePCR Primer
Sequence 5′-3′
Amplicon Size (bp)Target GeneReference
MCR1-F
MCR1-R
5′-CGGTCAGTCCGTTTGTTC-3′
5′-CTTGGTCGGTCTGTAGGG-3′
308mcr-1[12]
MCR2-F
MCR2-R
5′-CTGTTGCTTGTGCCGATTGGACTA-3′
5′-ACGGCCATAGCCATTGAACTGC-3′
282mcr-2[18]
MCR3-F
MCR3-R
5′-CGCTTATGTTCTTTTTGGCACTGTATT -3′
5′-TGAGCAATTTCACTATCGAGGTCTTG-3′
1063mcr-3[18]
MCR4-F
MCR4-R
5′-AATTGTCGTGGGAAAAGCCGC-3′
5′-CTGCTGACTGGGCTATTACCG-3′
1062mcr-4[18]
MCR5-F
MCR5-R
5′-GTGAAACAGGTGATCGTGACTTACCG-3′
5′-CGTGCTTTACACCGATCATGTGCT-3′
271mcr-5[18]
MCR6-F
MCR6-R
5′-GTCCGGTCAATCCCTATCTGT-3′
5′-ATCACGGGATTGACATAGCTAC-3′
556mcr-6[19]
MCR7-F
MCR7-R
5′-TGCTCAAGCCCTTCTTTTCGT-3′
5′-TTCATCTGCGCCACCTCGT-3′
892mcr-7[19]
MCR8-F
MCR8-R
5′-TTGTCGTCGTGGGCGAAAC-3′
5′-CTGTCGCAAGTTGGGCTAAAG3′
514mcr-8[20]
MCR9-F
MCR9-R
5′-CGGCGAACTACGCTTACAG-3′
5′-CGCACAGTTTCGGGTTATCAC-3′
465mcr-9[20]
MCR10-F
MCR10-R
5′-GGACCGACCTATTACCAGCG-3′
5′-GGCATTATGCTGCAGACACG-3′
365mcr-10[21]
Table 2. Number of cloacal swabs PCR positive for colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-10. (Each lot consisted of 15 animals).
Table 2. Number of cloacal swabs PCR positive for colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-10. (Each lot consisted of 15 animals).
Farm/Lotmcr-1mcr-2mcr-3mcr-4mcr-5mcr-6mcr-7mcr-8mcr-9mcr-10
A/113000000000
A/27000000000
B/30000000000
B/132000000000
C/414000000000
C/613000000000
D/50000000000
D/80000000000
D/105000000000
D/120000000000
E/73000000000
F/911000000000
F/1113000000000
Total81000000000
N (%)(41.5%)0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Francesco, A.; Salvatore, D.; Sakhria, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Catelli, E.; Ben Yahia, S.; Tlatli, A. Colistin Resistance Genes in Broiler Chickens in Tunisia. Animals 2023, 13, 1409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13081409

AMA Style

Di Francesco A, Salvatore D, Sakhria S, Bertelloni F, Catelli E, Ben Yahia S, Tlatli A. Colistin Resistance Genes in Broiler Chickens in Tunisia. Animals. 2023; 13(8):1409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13081409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Francesco, Antonietta, Daniela Salvatore, Sonia Sakhria, Fabrizio Bertelloni, Elena Catelli, Salma Ben Yahia, and Aida Tlatli. 2023. "Colistin Resistance Genes in Broiler Chickens in Tunisia" Animals 13, no. 8: 1409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13081409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop