Next Article in Journal
Automatic Generation of N-Bar Planar Linkages Containing Sliders
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Salicylaldehyde for Fungal and Pre- and Post-Emergent Weed Control
Previous Article in Journal
Deep ConvLSTM Network with Dataset Resampling for Upper Body Activity Recognition Using Minimal Number of IMU Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicorbial Potency of Major Functional Foods’ Essential Oils in Liquid and Vapor Phases: A Short Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/app11083539
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Allelopathic Interactions between Seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and Crop Species

by
Sakineh Rashidi
1,
Ali Reza Yousefi
1,*,
Nieves Goicoechea
2,
Majid Pouryousef
1,
Parviz Moradi
3,
Sara Vitalini
4,5,6,* and
Marcello Iriti
4,5,6,7
1
Department of Plant Production & Genetics, University of Zanjan, P.O. Box 4537138791, Zanjan 45195, Iran
2
Department of Environmental Biology, Plant Stress Physiology Group, Associated to CSIC (EEAD, Zaragoza, ICVV, Logroño), Schools of Sciences and Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
3
Research Division of Natural Resources, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Centre, AREEO, Zanjan 45195, Iran
4
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
5
Phytochem Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
6
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), 50121 Firenze, Italy
7
BAT Center—Interuniversity Center for Studies on Bioispired Agro-Environmental Technology, University of Napoli “Federico II”, Portici, 80055 Napoli, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(8), 3539; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11083539
Submission received: 3 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products in Crop Protection, Post-harvest Disease Control and Food Contamination)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Allelopathy is described as the interference to plant growth resulting from chemical interactions among plants and other organisms mediated through the release of bioactive secondary metabolites. Since only a few studies have been reported about the role of seed allelopathy, an experiment was designed to evaluate the interactions among seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and the crop species common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), broad bean (Vicia faba L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) on seed and seedling growth parameters. The results indicated that P. oleracea seeds had a negative effect on the germination of P. vulgaris and A. cepa. Conversely, germination of P. oleracea in the presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris seeds was strongly reduced with a higher inhibitory effect found for the seeds of A. cepa. The highest negative effect on root and shoot length was observed in P. vulgaris. Seedling vigor of all crop species decreased in the presence of P. oleracea. Our results suggest that seeds of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris exhibited high allelopathic effects against seeds of P. oleracea and can be used as potential bio-herbicides in future screening programs.

1. Introduction

Weeds are a threat in all cropping systems. These undesirable plants decrease input efficiency, interfere with agricultural practices, impair the quality of plant products, deplete resources such as soil nutrients, moisture, and space allocated to crop plants, and ultimately cause heavy losses in plant production [1]. It has been estimated that the economic damage of weeds is more than 100 billion dollars worldwide [2]. Therefore, eradicating or decreasing the harmful effects of weeds on crop plants is the main target of weed management.
Allelopathy is a natural process that can be considered as a tool for biological weed control in agriculture [3,4]. According to the International Allelopathy Society, allelopathy is defined as any process in which the secondary metabolites produced by plants affect the growth and development of biological systems [5]. Approximately 100,000 secondary metabolites have been identified to date in plants [6]. A smaller number of these are described as bioactive allelochemicals and are generally classified as members of specific chemical families that include phenolics, terpenoids, glycosteroids, and alkaloids [7]. These compounds are present in various concentrations in many plant parts, including leaves, stems, roots, flowers, seeds, rhizomes, pollen, bark, and buds [8], and are released through root exudates, leaching, volatilization, and decomposition of plant residues [9,10].
Several researchers have reported that some plant growth inhibitors from allelopathic plants can inhibit weed growth [11]. Consequently, allelopathic plants and allelochemicals can also be applied in the biological and non-synthetic chemical control of weeds; thus, introducing a new generation of environmentally friendly weed inhibitors and reducing the costs of crop productivity [12,13].
Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) is a summer annual C4 weed from the Portulacaceae family and is a very troublesome weed worldwide. This weed has been ranked as the 9th worst weed in the world, recorded in 45 crops in 81 countries [14]. It can severely decrease the yield of plants such as wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), and other vegetables [14]. This weed species has been identified as an allelopathic plant containing terpenes [15], tannins [16], saponins [17], alkaloids [18], phenolic acids, and flavonoids [19,20]. Silva et al. [21] indicated that leaves and roots of P. oleracea had detrimental effects on the germination and growth of Allium cepa L., Brassica oleracea L., Raphanus oleracea L., and S. lycopersicum. In addition, leaf and root aqueous extracts of P. oleracea adversely affected the activities of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthetic pigments of Cucurbita pepo L. So far, no study has reported the allelopathic effect of P. oleracea seeds on seed germination and seedling growth of other species. For this reason, the aim of the present study was to investigate the allelopathic effect of P. oleracea on seed germination and growth of Phaseous vulgaris L., A. cepa, Beta vulgaris L., Vicia faba L., and Pisum sativum L.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

In addition to P. oleracea seeds, common bean (P. vulgaris L. cv. Nassau), onion (A. cepa L. cv. Blanca de Pompei), beet (B. vulgaris cv. conditiva), broad bean (V. faba cv. Muchamiel.), and pea (P. sativum cv. Dulce de Provenza) seeds (Semillas Battle, Molins de Rei, Barcelona, Spain) were surface sterilized with hypochlorite (10%) and then soaked eight times with distilled water.
We collected matured seeds of P. oleracea from natural communities in Zanjan, Iran (36°41′ N and 48°23′ E; altitude 1634 m), which were stored at room temperatures (15–19 °C, 20–35% humidity) until the start of the experiment. Each replicate consisted of a Petri dish (11 cm diameter) with 25 seeds (only weed or only crop) or 50 seeds (weed + crop) on two layers of filter paper moistened with 3 mL of distilled water. Four replicates were established for each treatment combination and the Petri dishes were placed randomly within a climate-controlled room at 25 °C for 14 days with 12 h light per day. The crop seeds were placed at regular intervals between the weed seeds. Petri dishes with only weed or crop seeds were used as controls. The number of germinated seeds was recorded daily up to 14 days, and each seed was considered germinated when the protrusion of the radicle was visible [22].
Germination percentage was estimated by using the following equation:
GP = 100∗(NG/NT),
where NG is germinated seeds and NT is total seeds [23].
The root and shoot length of all germinated seeds were measured using a metric ruler.
Seedling vigor index was evaluated with equation:
SVI = (s + r)G,
where s and r are the shoot and root length (in cm), respectively; G is the percentage of germination [24].
Coefficient of allometry (CA) = radicle length/plumule length [25].
Inhibition (−) or stimulation (+) = GST − GSC/GSC∗100,
where GST is germination of seeds in treatments (seed close to seed); GSC is germination of seeds in control.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple-range tests (p ≤ 0.05). The Software SAS (Version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to conduct all the statistical analysis. Excel software was used to obtain figures.

3. Results

3.1. The Effect of P. oleracea on the Germination and Seedling Growth of Crop Species

The presence of P. oleracea caused differential responses in the germination percentage of crop species. The results revealed that the germination percentage of P. vulgaris and A. cepa seeds was reduced by the presence of P. oleracea seeds. In contrast, B. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum were not affected (Figure 1). The germination rates of P. vulgaris and A. cepa decreased marginally with the presence of P. oleracea, while B. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum were not influenced (Figure S1).
The proximity of P. oleracea strongly affected the root length of P. vulgaris, V. faba, and P. sativum. The root length of these plants was reduced by 77%, 39%, and 34% in comparison with their respective controls. This weed species had the highest inhibitory effect on the root length of P. vulgaris. In contrast, variation of the root length of A. cepa and B. vulgaris was not influenced by the presence of P. oleracea (Figure 2).
Shoot length of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and V. faba was decreased by P. oleracea seeds. Among these crop species, P. oleracea had less effect on reducing the shoot length of A. cepa (Figure 3). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the shoot length of B. vulgaris and P. sativum grown with P. oleracea.
Seedling vigor of all crop species decreased in the presence of P. oleracea. This weed showed the highest inhibitory effect on seedling vigor of P. vulgaris (<60%), but the seedling vigor of A. cepa and B. vulgaris were also reduced in the presence of P. oleracea (Figure 4).
The coefficient of allometry of crop species was also affected by the presence of P. oleracea. The coefficient of allometry of P. vulgaris and P. sativum was negatively affected by the proximity of P. oleracea, but A. cepa and V. faba showed a comparably higher coefficient of allometry in the presence of P. oleracea, and the strongest increase was observed in V. faba (Figure 5).

3.2. The Effect of Crop Species on the Germination and Seedling Growth of P. oleracea

The seeds of A. cepa, B. vulgaris, and P. vulgaris exerted inhibitory influences on the germination percent of P. oleracea. In particular, A. cepa had the highest effect on P. oleracea germination of −13.5%. In contrast, the presence of P. sativum and V. faba had no effect on the germination of this weed (Figure 6). Additionally, the germination rate of P. oleracea was reduced by P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris (Figure S2). As a consequence, the proximity of P. vulgaris and A. cepa with P. oleracea exhibited a mutual inhibition (Figure S3).
The root length of P. oleracea decreased when grown in close proximity to all the crop species. The highest reduction was recorded in the presence of B. vulgaris (Figure 7).
The shoot length of P. oleracea, which was not affected by the presence of V. faba and P. vulgaris, was lower when grown near B. vulgaris and P. sativum. Additionally, the shoot length of P. oleracea was stimulated by the association with A. cepa (>29% compared to mono (Figure 8).
Similar to the root length results, the proximity of all crop seeds had a severe impact on the seedling vigor of P. oleracea. Among crop plants, the highest effect on seedling vigor of P. oleracea was observed by B. vulgaris (Figure 9) and the seedling vigor of P. oleracea had a small, but significant decrease grown in close proximity to P. sativum.
The presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, B. vulgaris, and V. faba strongly decreased the coefficient of allometry of P. oleracea. In contrast, the coefficient of allometry for P. oleracea did not differ from the control when this weed was grown with P. sativum (Figure 10).

4. Discussion

Reduced germination in A. cepa and P. vulgaris as a result of the allelopathic potential of P. oleracea indicated that this weed species probably possess allelochemicals which exhibited phytoinhibitory effects on these crops. Alkaloids from seeds of P. oleracea such as dopa, dopamine and noradrenaline [26], and monoterpenes are widely known to modify seed germination and seedling growth [27]. Furthermore, inhibition of seed germination may be attributed to the presence of inhibitory allelochemicals. The latter can exert inhibitory effects by affecting cell division and cell elongation [28], and mobilization of stored compounds [29]. Therefore, the cultivation of A. cepa and P. vulgaris is not recommended on the farms with P. oleracea. Among crop species, the germination of P. sativum, V. faba, and B. vulgaris in the presence of P. oleracea was not affected, because these plants were not influenced by P. oleracea. In contrast, the germination of P. oleracea decreased in the presence of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris. The basic approach used in allelopathic research for agricultural crops has been to screen both crop plants and natural vegetation for their capacity to suppress weeds. As a result, the allelopathic potential of these plants can be used to suppress P. oleracea. There are some phytochemical constituents in the seeds of P. vulgaris, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids, and saponins, which alter mitochondrial structure and function, leading to the inability of the cells to use the storage materials [30]. Dadkhah [31] reported that foliar aqueous extracts of B. vulgaris had significant herbicidal effects on seedling and plant growth of P. oleracea, and similar results were observed by El-Shora et al. [32]. According to our results, the presence of P. oleracea also strongly decreased the root length of crop plants. Since roots are sensitive to any chemical changes in their surroundings, they may respond more quickly. Reduced length in roots and shoots might be due to reduced cell division and abnormalities in growth hormones [18]. Alkaloids are among major allelopathic compounds in P. oleracea. Alkaloids have been observed to inhibit plant growth by several mechanisms, including interference with DNA, enzyme activity, protein biosynthesis, and membrane integrity in developing plants [33]. Flavonoids also affect the breakdown of auxin by IAA oxidases and peroxidases [34,35,36] and impact polar auxin transport [35,37,38], thereby affecting the root growth of target species. For example, flavonols identified from lettuce function as allelopathic inhibitors of seedling growth [39].
Seedling vigor was evaluated as a component of vegetative performance or fitness of a plant species. Seedling vigor of all crop species and P. oleracea significantly decreased in the presence of each other. These results are in agreement with those of Kiran et al. [40], who found that the aqueous extract of Psoralea corylifolia L. seeds decreased the seedling vigor of maize (Zea mays L.). Dhungana et al. [41] evaluated the allelopathic potential of soybean (Glycine max L.) root extract and maize on beggarticks (Bidens spp.) and goosegrass (Eleusine spp.), reporting that seedling vigor and weed germination were decreased.
The coefficient of allometry of P. oleracea decreased in the presence of crop species. Seeds of V. faba and P. vulgaris contain a high amount of phenolic compounds [42,43], potent inhibitors of cell division, able to decrease radicle and seedling growth [44], thus reducing the coefficient of allometry. Our results confirmed that the studied crop species can be categorized into two groups according to their sensitivity to the inhibitory potential of P. oleracea. The first group include P. vulgaris, B. vulgaris, and A. cepa, with a higher inhibitory activity on P. oleracea seed germination, and the second group represented by P. sativum and V. faba with no inhibitory effect on seed germination of the weed.

5. Conclusions

The allelopathic potential of P. oleracea was demonstrated against P. vulgaris and A. cepa plants. Since seed germination is a pivotal stage in the lifecycle of higher plants, the release of inhibitory substances from seeds of P. oleracea may impact the competitive ability of the neighboring plant or crop species during the establishment stage. On the other hand, seeds of P. vulgaris, A. cepa, and B. vulgaris exerted a higher reduction in the germination of P. oleracea. Therefore, aqueous extracts or selected allelochemicals of P. olearacea can be developed as bio-herbicides for controlling weeds, as well as some crop species with allelopathic potential can be used to suppress weeds, thereby decreasing synthetic herbicide dependency in conventional weed management [45].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/app11083539/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I.; methodology, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; formal analysis, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; investigation, S.R., M.P., and S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., S.V., and M.I.; supervision, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I.; funding acquisition, A.R.Y., N.G., P.M., and M.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Zanjan, Iran and the University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zimdahl, R.L. Fundamentals of Weed Science; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Le Tourneau, D.; Failes, G.D.; Heggeness, H.G. The effect of aqueous extracts of plant tissue on germination of seeds and growth of seedlings. Weeds 1956, 4, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheema, Z.; Khaliq, A. Use of sorghum allelopathic properties to control weeds in irrigated wheat in a semi arid region of Punjab. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 79, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Heidarzade, A.; Pirdashti, H.; Esmaeili, M. Esmaeili, Quantification of allelopathic substances and inhibitory potential in root exudates of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L.). Plant Omics 2010, 3, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gholami, P.; Ghorbani, J.; Ghaderi, S. Allelopathic effects of Artemisia aucheri on seed germination and Dactylis glomerata properties of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Plant Ecophysiol. 2011, 9, 42–52, (In Persian with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  6. Afendi, F.M.; Okada, T.; Yamazaki, M.; Hirai-Morita, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Ikeda, S.; Takahashi, H.; Altaf-Ul-Amin, M.; Darusman, L.K.; et al. KNApSAcK family databases: Integrated metabolite—Plant species databases for multifaceted plant research. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ahuja, I.; Kissen, R.; Bones, A.M. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weston, L.A.; Duke, S.O. Weed and crop allelopathy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22, 367–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jabran, K.; Mahajan, G.; Sardana, V.; Chauhan, B.S. Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. Crop Prot. 2015, 72, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Muzell Trezzi, M.; Vidal, R.A.; Balbinot Junior, A.A.; von Hertwig Bittencourt, H.; da Silva Souza Filho, A.P. Allelopathy: Driving mechanisms governing its activity in agriculture. J. Plant Interact. 2016, 11, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ogata, T.; Hamachi, M.; Nishi, K. Organic Herbicide for Paddy Field. Japan Patent No. JP2008050329A, 6 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorbanli, M.L.; Bakhshi, K.G.R.; Shojaei, A.A. Examination of the effects of Allelopathy of Artemisia sieberi Besser Subsp. sieberi on seed germination and Avena lodoviciana and Amaranthus retroflexus seedlings growth. Pajouhesh-Va-Sazandegi 2008, 21, 129–134, (In Persian with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  13. Scrivanti, L.R.; Anton, A.M.; Zygadlo, J.A. Allelopathic potential of South American Bothriochloa species (Poaceae: Andropogoneae). Allelopath. J. 2011, 28, 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holm, L.G.; Plucknett, D.L.; Pancho, J.V.; Herberger, J.P. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology; University Press of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xin, H.L.; Xu, Y.F.; Hou, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.N.; Yue, X.Q.; Lu, J.C.; Ling, C.Q. Two novel triterpenoids from Portulaca oleracea L. Helv. Chim. Acta 2008, 91, 2075–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Keys, J.D. Chinese Herbs: Their Botany, Chemistry, and Pharmacodynamics; Charles, E., Ed.; Tuttle Company, Inc.: Rutland, VT, USA; Tokyo, Japan, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  17. Iwu, M. Handbook of African Medicinal Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 183–184. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xiang, L.; Xing, D.; Wang, W.; Wang, R.; Ding, Y.; Du, L. Alkaloids from Portulaca oleracea L. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2595–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Erkan, N. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of fractions from Portulaca oleracea L. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Tang, T. Analysis of flavonoids in Portulaca oleracea L. by UV–vis spectrophotometry with comparative study on different extraction technologies. Food Anal. Methods 2010, 3, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, M.; Magrico, S.; Dias, A.S.; Dias, L.S. Allelopathic plants. 20. Portulaca oleracea L. Allelopathy J. 2007, 19, 275–286. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Xiao, H.; Du, D. Response of Leaf Functional Traits of Cerasus yedoensis (Mats.) Yü Li to Serious Insect Attack. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Agrawal, R. Seed Technology; Oxford IBH Publishing: Oxford, UK, 1991; 658p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kulkarni, M.G.; Sparg, S.G.; Van Staden, J. Germination and post-germination response of Acacia seeds to smoke-water and butenolide, a smoke-derived compound. J. Arid Environ. 2007, 69, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saxena, A.; Singh, D.V.; Joshi, N.L. Autotoxic effects of pearl millet aqueous extracts on seed germination and seedling growth. J. Arid Environ. 1996, 33, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yue, M.E.; Jiang, T.F.; Shi, Y.P. Simultaneous determination of noradrenaline and dopamine in Portulaca oleracea L. by capillary zone electrophoresis. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haig, T. Allelochemicals in plants. In Allelopathy in Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 63–104. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaletha, M.S.; Bhatt, B.P.; Todaria, N.P. Tree-crop interactions in traditional agroforestry systems of Garhwal Himalaya. 1. Phytotoxic effects of farm trees on food crops. Allelopath. J. 1996, 3, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mishra, A. Allelopathic properties of Lantana camara: A review article. Int. J. Innov. Res. Rev. 2014, 2, 32–52. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharma, S.B.; Nasir, A.; Prabhu, K.M.; Murthy, P.S.; Dev, G. Hypoglycaemic and hypolipidemic effect of ethanolic extract of seeds of Eugenia jambolana in alloxan-induced diabetic rabbits. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 85, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dadkhah, A. Allelopathic effect of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) on seed germination and growth of Portulaca oleracea. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2013, 39, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Shora, H.M.; Abd El-Gawad, A.M. Physiological and biochemical responses of Cucurbita pepo L. mediated by Portulaca oleracea L. allelopathy. Fresenius Environ. Bull. J. 2015, 24, 386–393. [Google Scholar]
  33. Galindo, J.C.; Molinillo, J.M.; Macias, F.A. Allelopathy: Chemistry and Mode of Action of Allelochemicals; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Furuya, M.; Galston, A.W.; Stowe, B.B. Isolation from peas of co-factors and inhibitors of indolyl-3-acetic acid oxidase. Nature 1962, 193, 456–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stenlid, G. The effects of flavonoid compounds on oxidative phosphorylation and on the enzymatic destruction of indoleacetic acid. Physiol. Plant. 1963, 16, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mathesius, U. Flavonoids induced in cells undergoing nodule organogenesis in white clover are regulators of auxin breakdown by peroxidase. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jacobs, M.; Rubery, P.H. Naturally occurring auxin transport regulators. Science 1988, 241, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Peer, W.A.; Brown, D.E.; Tague, B.W.; Muday, G.K.; Taiz, L.; Murphy, A.S. Flavonoid accumulation patterns of transparent testa mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 536–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Levizou, E.; Karageorgou, P.; Petropoulou, Y.; Grammatikopoulos, G.; Manetas, Y. Induction of ageotropic response in lettuce radicle growth by epicuticular flavonoid aglycons of Dittrichia viscosa. Biol. Plant. 2004, 48, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kiran, B.; Lalitha, V.; Raveesha, K.A. In vitro evaluation of aqueous seed extract of Psoralea corylifolia L. on seed germination and seedling vigour of maize. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 1, 128–130. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dhungana, S.K.; Kim, I.D.; Adhikari, B.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, D.H. Reduced Germination and Seedling Vigor of Weeds with Root Extracts of Maize and Soybean, and the Mechanism Defined as Allelopathic. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pasricha, V.; Satpathy, G.; Gupta, R.K. Phytochemical & Antioxidant activity of underutilized legume Vicia faba seeds and formulation of its fortified biscuits. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2014, 3, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  43. Geil, P.B.; Anderson, J.W. Nutrition and health implications of dry beans: A review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1994, 13, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mao, J.; Yang, L.; Shi, Y.; Hu, J.; Piao, Z.; Mei, L.; Yin, S. Crude extract of Astragalus mongholicus root inhibits crop seed germination and soil nitrifying activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Farooq, M.; Jabran, K.; Cheema, Z.A.; Wahid, A.; Siddique, K.H. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 03539 g001 550
Figure 1. Germination percent of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 1. Germination percent of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g001
Applsci 11 03539 g002 550
Figure 2. Root length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 2. Root length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g002
Applsci 11 03539 g003 550
Figure 3. Shoot length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant differences between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 3. Shoot length of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant differences between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g003
Applsci 11 03539 g004 550
Figure 4. Seedling vigor of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 4. Seedling vigor of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g004
Applsci 11 03539 g005 550
Figure 5. Coefficient of allometry of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 5. Coefficient of allometry of crop species grown together with P. oleracea seeds (mono = only crop plant; mix = crop grown together with P. oleracea). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g005
Applsci 11 03539 g006 550
Figure 6. Percent germination of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 6. Percent germination of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g006
Applsci 11 03539 g007 550
Figure 7. Root length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 7. Root length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g007
Applsci 11 03539 g008 550
Figure 8. Shoot length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 8. Shoot length of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g008
Applsci 11 03539 g009 550
Figure 9. Seedling vigor of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 9. Seedling vigor of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown together with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g009
Applsci 11 03539 g010 550
Figure 10. Coefficient of allelometry of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown toghether with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 10. Coefficient of allelometry of P. oleracea grown with crop seeds (mono = weed alone; mix = weed grown toghether with crop). Bars represent the means of 4 replicates ± SE. Bars topped by the same letter indicate no significant difference between treatments at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Applsci 11 03539 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rashidi, S.; Reza Yousefi, A.; Goicoechea, N.; Pouryousef, M.; Moradi, P.; Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M. Allelopathic Interactions between Seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and Crop Species. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3539. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11083539

AMA Style

Rashidi S, Reza Yousefi A, Goicoechea N, Pouryousef M, Moradi P, Vitalini S, Iriti M. Allelopathic Interactions between Seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and Crop Species. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(8):3539. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11083539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rashidi, Sakineh, Ali Reza Yousefi, Nieves Goicoechea, Majid Pouryousef, Parviz Moradi, Sara Vitalini, and Marcello Iriti. 2021. "Allelopathic Interactions between Seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and Crop Species" Applied Sciences 11, no. 8: 3539. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11083539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop