Next Article in Journal
Pediatric Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum after a Push-Up Exercise: An Uncommon Complication of a Common Exercise
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Pediatric Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis
Previous Article in Journal
What Solutions Exist for Developmental Delays Facing Indigenous Children Globally? A Co-Designed Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Children’s Interstitial and Diffuse Lung Diseases (ChILD) in 2020
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/children7120286
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Difficult and Severe Asthma in Children

by
Federica Porcaro
*,
Nicola Ullmann
,
Annalisa Allegorico
,
Antonio Di Marco
and
Renato Cutrera
Pediatric Pulmonology & Respiratory Intermediate Care Unit, Sleep and Long-Term Ventilation Unit, Academic Department of Pediatrics, and Genetic Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2020, 7(12), 286; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children7120286
Submission received: 19 November 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 10 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Asthma is the most frequent chronic inflammatory disease of the lower airways affecting children, and it can still be considered a challenge for pediatricians. Although most asthmatic patients are symptom-free with standard treatments, a small percentage of them suffer from uncontrolled persistent asthma. In these children, a multidisciplinary systematic assessment, including comorbidities, treatment-related issues, environmental exposures, and psychosocial factors is needed. The identification of modifiable factors is important to differentiate children with difficult asthma from those with true severe therapy-resistant asthma. Early intervention on modifiable factors for children with difficult asthma allows for better control of asthma without the need for invasive investigation and further escalation of treatment. Otherwise, addressing a correct diagnosis of true severe therapy-resistant asthma avoids diagnostic and therapeutic delays, allowing patients to benefit from using new and advanced biological therapies.

1. Introduction

Asthma is the most frequent chronic inflammatory disease of the lower airways that affects 4.4% of preschoolers and 6.4% of primary school children [1] and is responsible for significant social and economic burdens [2].
Good control of symptoms is usually achieved with low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and only a small proportion of asthmatics need high doses of ICS, long-acting β2-agonists (LABA), and leukotriene antagonists to achieve symptom control [3]. In 2008, the concept of “problematic severe asthma” was suggested to indicate children not responding to high doses of asthma medications [4]. Ten years later, this concept was revised as it was considered reductive, being based solely on prescribed treatment levels [5]. Indeed, there might be multiple reasons for poor control of asthma symptoms in children, such as (1) incorrect diagnosis; (2) asthma associated with other comorbidities; (3) difficult asthma, and (4) severe asthma [5].
As the management of children with poor control of asthma symptoms still represents a clinical challenge to pediatricians, we carried out a literature review to provide an overview of the definition of difficult and severe asthma and their respective strategies of treatment.

2. Is It Asthma?

In patients with a history of therapy-resistant asthma, the first step is to go back to the basics and confirm the initial diagnosis. We need to recollect a detailed clinical history, perform a complete physical examination, and respiratory functional tests [6].
First of all, the diagnosis of asthma is supported by the presence of (1) chronic airway inflammation triggered by exposure to respiratory viruses or specific allergens in sensitized children, and (2) airflow limitation that is completely or partially reversible following the administration of inhaler short-acting β-2-agonists (SABA) [7,8].
Parentally reported symptoms raising the suspicion of asthma include episodes of shortness of breath, wheezing, chest tightness, and periodic nocturnal dry cough. However, a symptom-based approach diagnosis can be misleading, resulting in over and under-diagnosis of asthma [9,10,11], and consequently in unnecessary treatment, increased disease burden, and significant impact on the patients’ quality of life.
The detection of wheezing on clinical examination reinforces the suspicion of asthma, even though a negative physical examination cannot exclude it. Based on reported symptoms, physicians should consider performing diagnostic tests, such as spirometry with or without reversibility testing, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability over 2–4 weeks to confirm the diagnosis of asthma [12].
Spirometry with bronchoreversibility is the first line objective test recommended in most pediatric asthma guidelines for school-age children. Reversible airflow obstruction characterized by FEV1 improvement of ≥ 12% is the hallmark of asthma [13].
FeNO measurement is suggested to support the diagnosis of asthma, as well as to define disease severity and adherence to prescribed therapy [12]. In children, a FeNO level ≥35 ppb should be interpreted as an index of bronchial inflammation [12].
PEF measurement is the maximum airflow (L/min) during a forced expiration beginning with fully inflated lungs. Variations of 20% of PEF over 2–4 weeks observation period, with twice-daily measurements, are suggestive of asthma [14].
Unfortunately, the diagnosis of asthma in preschool children is often based on history and treatment response because of the inability to perform the above-mentioned lung function tests. Although plethysmography, interrupter technique (Rint), and forced oscillation technique (FOT) can be performed to measure respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) in children aged >2 years, its use is limited in routine clinical practice because these techniques are performed in a few specialized centers [15]. Rrs measures the degree of obstruction of the main central airways, while small airways (<2 mm in diameter) account for only 10% of total airway resistance. Xrs measures the elastic recoil forces of the respiratory system and determines the effective ventilation of the lung’s peripheral areas. Although the scientific literature is conflicting, these parameters appear to be an important tool for the assessment of bronchial asthma in children [16].

3. Is It a Real Therapy-Resistant Asthma?

The typical and most frequently reported symptoms of asthma, dry cough, shortness of breath, wheezing, dyspnea on exertion, and chest tightness are shared with many other disorders that can be confused with asthma or which may complicate asthma. Therefore, patients with asthma symptoms that are refractory to traditional asthma treatment should be evaluated for alternative conditions that can mimic asthma. A symptoms-guided diagnostic workup should be considered in patients with an unclear history of asthma and/or suboptimal response to standard asthma treatment.
For instance, the presence of stridor at rest or stridor on exertion, wet cough, barky cough, failure to thrive, heartburn, and drumstick fingers require a careful evaluation for additional investigation (Table 1) [17,18].

4. Difficult Asthma

Difficult asthma is asthma that is uncontrolled despite GINA step 4 and 5 (medium or high dose ICS with a second controller; maintenance of oral corticosteroids), or that requires such treatment to maintain good symptoms control and reduce the risk of exacerbations. In this case, the lack of symptom control is linked to the presence of comorbidities or poor adherence to medical prescriptions. Accordingly, once a diagnosis has been confirmed, all possible risk factors or comorbidities need to be considered in patients with persistent symptoms despite standard treatment [19,20].
Periodical and careful assessments carried out by the specialist and by the family pediatrician can help identify potentially modifiable factors responsible for poorly controlled asthma. Indeed, poor symptom control is a consequence of modifiable factors that need to be carefully assessed, such as (1) nonadherence to medication or inadequate inhalation technique, (2) persistent environmental exposures, (3) comorbidities, and (4) psychosocial factors.

4.1. Adherence to Medication

Good adherence is most commonly defined as taking between 70–80% of prescribed treatment [21]. Suboptimal adherence to ICS leads to poor asthma control, severe asthma attacks, and frequent use of healthcare resources [22]. Although it is known that half of difficult-to-treat patients have poor adherence to prescribed medication or improperly use the suggested devices [23,24], clinicians are not used to always check adherence and inhaler technique at the time of patient’s evaluation [25]. Explaining and showing the spacer’s correct use is the most effective model to improve the inhaler technique and asthma control [26,27].
Several measurement tools, both subjective and objective, have been developed to assess adherence in adults and children with asthma [28] (Table 2). Unfortunately, each of these measures has limitations, such as the unavailability of self-report adherence questionnaires validated for the pediatric population, the often poor availability of electronic monitoring devices (EMD), the high production costs, the ability of patient/parent to manipulate the data, and the ability of EMD to measure inhalation and inhaler technique [28].

4.2. Environmental Exposures

4.2.1. Tobacco Smoke

It is known that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke increases pediatric asthma severity [29] and, in particular, increases resistance to steroids [30]. Therefore, the assessment of passive and/or active smoke exposure is mandatory for all children with difficult asthma. As parents and patients (especially if teenagers) can deny the exposure to tobacco smoke, levels of salivary or urinary cotinine can be used to determine actual exposure [31].

4.2.2. Air Pollution

There is increasing evidence of the association between air pollution and asthma exacerbations as well as new onset of asthma in children. Air pollution is a mixture of particles and gases emitted from several sources or generated in the atmosphere through chemical reactions (fine particles < 2.5 µm in diameter, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone). All these elements can cause oxidative stress into the airways, leading to inflammation and remodeling, especially in asthmatic children [32].

4.2.3. Allergen Exposure

Children with poor asthma control despite proper treatment should be investigated for allergy sensitization [33]. Several studies reported the increased risk of asthma in children with a family history of atopy, early-onset atopic dermatitis, sensitization to egg or milk in the first years of life [34]. In addition, the poor control of asthma symptoms is directly correlated with both specific IgE levels and the number of sensitizations [33]. Consequently, it is essential that allergen exposure is minimized in all patients with difficult asthma before any drug escalation.

4.3. Comorbidities

Co-morbidities are important in the management of difficult and severe asthma [18], as they may contribute to poor disease control, as well as mimicking asthma symptoms (Table 3). Researching and optimizing the management of these conditions also through a multidisciplinary team is mandatory in all asthmatic patients with poor symptom control [35].

4.4. Psychosocial Factors

Although the literature on psychiatric and behavioral disorders among children with asthma is conflicting, most research reported that children with asthma display more emotional and behavioral problems than their healthy peers [36].
Anxiety, depression, and symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and oppositional behaviors are often reported by patients and their parents. Children with asthma and internalizing disorders are at risk of having worse asthma control, increased use of rescue medications, more access to healthcare facilities for attacks, poorer pulmonary outcomes, and more missed school days [37,38,39]. Moreover, the caregivers of children with asthma can suffer too from chronicity, developing emotional difficulties that can interfere with the management of the young patient.
Questionnaires assessing the quality of life for both the child and family (Pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire; PAQLQ) [40] as well as symptom control (Asthma control test; ACT) [41] are useful tools to estimate the severity and the impact of the disease on patient’s life. Consequently, psychosocial interventions, including educational programs, behavioral support, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and family interventions can be considered to reduce the psychological impact of the disease and to better control asthma symptoms.

4.5. Socioeconomic Factors

In addition, we must not forget that low socioeconomic status (low income, educational level, parents’ occupation) is often associated with poor asthma control (need for rescue therapy for asthma exacerbation, need for emergency health service visits, need for hospitalization for asthma exacerbation and fatal outcome) [42]. In these cases, the role of the family pediatrician becomes fundamental in identifying children vulnerable to asthma with a worse prognosis.

5. Severe Asthma

Severe therapy-resistant asthma is defined by the need for high dose ICS (Table 4 and Table 5), plus a second controller (long-acting β2-agonist or a leukotriene antagonist) for the previous year or systemic corticosteroids for at least 50% of the previous year, to prevent asthma from becoming “uncontrolled” or remaining “uncontrolled” despite this therapy [43]. These criteria must be met in patients in which comorbidities or modifiable factors have been correctly managed.
Patients affected by severe asthma experience frequent exacerbations and might suffer from iatrogenic damage related to corticosteroids use (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, depression) [44]. All these conditions impact a patient’s quality of life and interfere with family and social life [45]. Since only a small percentage of asthmatic patients is affected by severe asthma (up to 5% of all children with asthma) [46], this clinical entity is still poorly known and, therefore, represents still a challenge for physicians.
All children meeting the criteria for severe asthma should be referred to a tertiary pediatric respiratory center for a full multidisciplinary assessment that includes several investigations defining the clinical phenotype and inflammatory endotype in order to better optimize the management [47].
Asthma phenotype can be classified according to the age of symptoms onset, allergen sensitization, identified triggers, airflow limitation, the role of comorbidities, symptom severity, response to treatment, and inflammatory biomarkers [47,48,49]. Although this classification appears useful, it doesn’t help to predict response to advanced therapies, such as biologics. Therefore, a better understanding of physio-pathological mechanisms underlying asthma could help to develop a personalized treatment, especially for severe asthma patterns [47].
Currently, two types of asthma endotype are recognized: (1) type-2 endotype and (2) non-type 2 endotype. Type 2 asthma is typical of atopic patients and is characterized by high sputum (>2%) and blood eosinophil counts (>300/µL), and high FeNO levels (>20 ppb) [47]. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (often produced after allergen exposure) and IL-33 [50], IL-25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (produced after the activation of the innate immune system by viruses and bacteria) [47] are involved in the inflammatory response.
Conversely, non-type 2 asthma is defined by neutrophilic and paucigranulocytic airway inflammatory patterns and a poor corticosteroid response [47]. Some studies support the hypothesis that elevated levels of circulating IL-17, IL-6, IL-23, bacterial infection, and obesity are all involved in the pathogenesis of the non-type 2 asthma [51].

5.1. Type 2 Asthma

Type 2 asthma covers more than 50% of asthma endotypes [52]. Type 2 asthma includes allergic (non)-eosinophilic, non-allergic eosinophilic, non-allergic non-eosinophilic, and mixed granulocytic phenotypes that often configure clinical pictures of difficult and severe asthma, for which monoclonal antibodies targeting type-2 inflammation appear to be the most promising emerging therapeutic strategies.
There are currently five monoclonal antibody therapies approved for severe asthma by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, and reslizumab [53], but only four of them are available for patients aged over 6 years [54] (Table 6).
Several considerations, including the patient’s age, degree of eosinophilia, IgE levels, presence of comorbidities, frequency, and route of administration, and delivery methods by the health system, must be considered when choosing a biologic treatment.
Benralizumab is a humanized Mab that binds to the α subunit of the IL-5 receptor (IL-5Rα), blocking the binding of IL-5 to its receptor and resulting in inhibition of eosinophil differentiation and maturation in the bone marrow. Furthermore, it promotes the apoptosis of both circulating and tissue-resident eosinophils. Its use has been approved as add-on maintenance treatment for adults and children (≥12 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma (baseline blood eosinophil cell counts >300 cells/μL or > 150 cells/μL for oral corticosteroids-dependent patients) despite proper treatment (high-dosage ICS + LABA). Studies report a good efficacy profile as a reduction in annual asthma exacerbations, significant improvement in prebronchodilator FEV1, and steroid-sparing effect [55,56,57,58,59]. Adverse events like worsening of asthma and recurrent upper and lower respiratory tract infections are reported [60], but further short and long-term safety studies are to be implemented.
Dupilumab is a human IgG4 Mab that targets the IL-4 receptor alpha chain (IL-4Rα), blocking the production of IL-4 and IL-13 and the activation of eosinophilic inflammation [61,62]. Its efficacy is described in several atopic diseases like atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis [63,64]. Its use has been approved as an add-on maintenance treatment for adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma, defined by raised blood eosinophils (>150 cells/μL) and/or raised FeNO (>20 ppb), and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps that are uncontrolled despite optimal treatment (medium-/high-dose ICS, plus up to 2 additional controllers including oral corticosteroid) [65]. It has been shown to reduce severe exacerbation, the use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) and rescue medication, to improve FEV1 and asthma control, and to suppress T2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with or without evidence of allergies [66]. The significant improvement of FEV1 from baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks is registered in the adult subgroup with blood eosinophils >300 cells/μL or with FeNO levels >50 ppb [65,67,68].
Although short-term safety data are reassuring, more accurate reports of adverse events are needed, in combination with long-term safety evaluation.
Mepolizumab is a humanized Mab (IgG1 kappa) directed against the IL-5 ligand that consequently can not interact with the IL-5 receptor, reducing the production and survival of eosinophils [69]. Its use has been approved for adults and children (≥6 years) affected by severe asthma and peripheral eosinophilia (blood eosinophil level of either 300 cells or more per μL in the past 12 months or 150 cells or more per μL at initiation). The recorded effects include the reduction of circulating eosinophils, exacerbations necessitating rescue medications, emergency room visits and hospitalizations, and OCS use, other than the improvement in asthma symptom scores and FEV1 from baseline [70,71,72,73,74,75]. Mild systemic symptoms (headaches, fatigue, arthralgia) and local injection-site reactions are the most common adverse events. As no drug-related anaphylaxis or fatal adverse events are reported, mepolizumab’s safety profile can be considered favorable [76,77,78,79].
Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal anti-IgE antibody that down-regulates the IgE high-affinity receptor (FcεRI) expression on basophils, mast cells, and dendritic cells (DCs), decreasing T2 cytokine production and inhibiting the eosinophilic inflammation. Its use is recommended in adults and children (≥6 years) with moderate-to-severe chronic allergic asthma, increase total IgE levels (total IgE level of 30–700 IU/mL considered in US; total IgE level of 30–1500 IU/mL considered in EU), and allergic sensitization to at least one perennial allergen [53]. Patients with higher levels of peripheral eosinophil count, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and serum periostin are more likely to respond to omalizumab [80,81]. Omalizumab provides clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate, lung function, and circulating eosinophil counts in children, adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma [82,83]. Mild systemic (pyrexia, headache, abdominal pain) and local (swelling, erythema, pain, pruritus in the injection side) adverse reactions are reported [84]. Based on recent literature, both skin and systemic adverse reactions are due to immune complexes formed between omalizumab and IgE [85]. As life-threatening systemic reactions such as anaphylaxis are rarely reported [86], the FDA added a black box warning, so that physicians administering omalizumab should be able to manage anaphylaxis, and patients should be monitored in a safe setting after administration.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal treatment in allergic asthma, but it is exclusively suggested in mild-moderate asthma. As it can induce asthma exacerbation, it cannot be prescribed in patients with uncontrolled or severe asthma [33].

5.2. Non-Type 2 Asthma

For patients with neutrophilic asthma, only a few strategies are available and include long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, theophylline, and macrolides.
Tiotropium is a long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator approved by the FDA for ages 6 years and older. It appears useful in patients with severe asthma at risk of β2-receptor downregulation due to overuse of short-acting β2-agonists [87,88].
Theophylline is a molecule with bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects [89,90] able to improve steroid sensitivity [90]. As it promotes neutrophil apoptosis, it could be beneficial to patients with neutrophilic asthma. The side effects (nausea, vomiting, headache, irritability, insomnia, tremors) and the need for frequent drug level monitoring limits its use in routine practice. However, its administration is associated to a reduction in daily oral corticosteroid use and improvement in FEV1 [90].
Macrolides are not currently recommended in severe pediatric asthma, but the prescription of low-dose macrolide as add-on therapy may be considered in children with refractory disease, oral corticosteroid dependence, eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic inflammation, and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections [88].

6. Conclusions

Asthma is a common disease in childhood, with a minority of affected children suffering from severe asthma. Uncontrolled severe asthma represents a challenge for physicians; therefore, a multidisciplinary systematic assessment is warranted. Early identification of modifiable factors for children with difficult-to-treat asthma allows establishing better control of asthma without the need for further invasive investigations and treatment escalation. Otherwise, addressing a correct diagnosis of true severe therapy-resistant asthma avoids diagnostic and therapeutic delays. Once the patient with severe asthma has been identified, the definition of clinical phenotype and endotype could help the clinician to resort to a “personalized medicine”, which recently also includes new biological drugs. Unfortunately, these novel therapies are not available in preschool age, hence, the control of modifiable factors and the empowerment of parents and caregivers remain crucial for the management of patients belonging to this age group.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing original draft preparation, F.P.; writing review and editing, N.U.; visualization review and editing, A.A.; visualization review and editing, A.D.M.; supervision review, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have nothing to declare.

Ethical Statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Abbreviations

ACT, asthma control test; ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; BMI, body mass index; CF, cystic fibrosis; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; CS, corticosteroids; CT, computed tomography; DCs, dendritic cells; DPI, dry powder inhaler; EMD, electronic monitoring devices; EU, Europe; FDA, the Food and Drug Administration; FeNO, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FOT, forced oscillation technique; GINA, global initiative for asthma; HFA, hydrofluoroalkane propellant; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; IL, interleukin; LABA, long-acting β2-agonists; Mab, monoclonal antibody; NO, nitric oxide; OCS, oral corticosteroids; PAQLQ, pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire; PEF, peak expiratory flow; pMDI, pressurized metered-dose inhaler; PPI, proton pump inhibitors; Rint, interrupter technique; Rrs, respiratory resistance; SABA, short-acting β2-agonists; US, United States; Xrs, reactance.

References

  1. Papi, A.; Brightling, C.; Pedersen, S.E.; Reddel, H.K. Asthma. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2018, 391, 783–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, D.H.; Malone, D.C.; Lawson, K.A.; Okamoto, L.J.; Battista, C.; Saunders, W.B. A National Estimate of the Economic Costs of Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 156, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hedlin, G.; Bush, A.; Lødrup Carlsen, K.; Wennergren, G.; De Benedictis, F.M.; Melén, E.; Paton, J.; Wilson, N.; Carlsen, K.-H. Problematic severe asthma in children, not one problem but many: A GA2LEN initiative. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bush, A.; Hedlin, G.; Carlsen, K.-H.; de Benedictis, F.; Lodrup-Carlsen, K.; Wilson, N. Severe childhood asthma: A common international approach? Lancet Lond. Engl. 2008, 372, 1019–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bush, A.; Fleming, L.; Saglani, S. Severe asthma in children. Respirol. Carlton. Vic. 2017, 22, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danvers, L.; Lo, D.K.H.; Gaillard, E.A. The role of objective tests to support a diagnosis of asthma in children. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2020, 33, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hargreave, F.E.; Nair, P. The definition and diagnosis of asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 39, 1652–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bush, A.; Fleming, L. Diagnosis and management of asthma in children. BMJ 2015, 350, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, C.L.; Simons, E.; Foty, R.G.; Subbarao, P.; To, T.; Dell, S.D. Misdiagnosis of asthma in schoolchildren. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2017, 52, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Looijmans-van den Akker, I.; van Luijn, K.; Verheij, T. Overdiagnosis of asthma in children in primary care: A retrospective analysis. Br. J. Gen. Pract. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract. 2016, 66, e152–e157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Aaron, S.D.; Boulet, L.P.; Reddel, H.K.; Gershon, A.S. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). Asthma: Diagnosis and Monitoring of Asthma in Adults, Children and Young People [Internet]; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: London, UK, 2017. Available online: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK469773/12/9/2020 (accessed on 19 October 2020).
  13. Pellegrino, R.; Viegi, G.; Brusasco, V.; Crapo, R.O.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Van Der Grinten, C.P.M.; Gustafsson, P.; Hankinson, J.; et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 948–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brouwer, A.F.J.; Visser, C.A.N.; Duiverman, E.J.; Roorda, R.J.; Brand, P.L.P. Is home spirometry useful in diagnosing asthma in children with nonspecific respiratory symptoms? Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2010, 45, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fainardi, V.; Lombardi, E. Lung function tests to monitor respiratory disease in preschool children. Acta Bio. Med. Atenei Parm. 2018, 89, 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  16. Starczewska-Dymek, L.; Bozek, A.; Jakalski, M. The Usefulness of the Forced Oscillation Technique in the Diagnosis of Bronchial Asthma in Children. Can. Respir. J. 2018, 2018, 7519592. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC6081498/12/09/2020 (accessed on 2 December 2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Barsky, E.; Giancola, L.M.; Baxi, S.N.; Gaffin, J.M. A Practical Approach to Severe Asthma in Children. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ullmann, N.; Mirra, V.; Di Marco, A.; Pavone, M.; Porcaro, F.; Negro, V.; Onofri, A.; Cutrera, R. Asthma: Differential Diagnosis and Comorbidities. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adams, A.; Saglani, S. Difficult-to-Treat Asthma in Childhood. Pediatr. Drugs 2013, 15, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Licari, A.; Brambilla, I.; Marseglia, A.; De Filippo, M.; Paganelli, V.; Marseglia, G.L. Difficult vs. Severe Asthma: Definition and Limits of Asthma Control in the Pediatric Population. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jochmann, A.; Artusio, L.; Jamalzadeh, A.; Nagakumar, P.; Delgado-Eckert, E.; Saglani, S.; Bush, A.; Frey, U.; Fleming, L. Electronic monitoring of adherence to inhaled corticosteroids: An essential tool in identifying severe asthma in children. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 50, 1700910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Williams, L.K.; Peterson, E.L.; Wells, K.; Ahmedani, B.K.; Kumar, R.; Burchard, E.G.; Chowdhry, V.K.; Favro, D.; Lanfear, D.E.; Pladevall, M. Quantifying the proportion of severe asthma exacerbations attributable to inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 1185–1191 e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lee, J.W.; Tay, T.R.; Radhakrishna, N.; Hore-Lacy, F.; Mackay, A.; Hoy, R.; Dabscheck, E.; O’Hehir, R.; Hew, M. Nonadherence in the era of severe asthma biologics and thermoplasty. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1701836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bracken, M.; Fleming, L.; Hall, P.; Van Stiphout, N.; Bossley, C.; Biggart, E.; Wilson, N.M.; Bush, A. The importance of nurse-led home visits in the assessment of children with problematic asthma. Arch. Dis. Child. 2009, 94, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Von Bülow, A.; Backer, V.; Bodtger, U.; Søes-Petersen, N.U.; Assing, K.D.; Skjold, T.; Porsbjerg, C. The level of diagnostic assessment in severe asthma: A nationwide real-life study. Respir. Med. 2017, 124, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hoch, H.E.; Kattan, M.; Szefler, S.J. Challenges in managing difficult-to-treat asthma in children: Stop, look, and listen. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2019, 55, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hew, M.; Menzies-Gow, A.; Hull, J.H.; Fleming, L.; Porsbjerg, C.; Brinke, A.T.; Allen, D.; Gore, R.; Tay, T.R. Systematic Assessment of Difficult-to-Treat Asthma: Principles and Perspectives. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2020, 8, 2222–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pearce, C.J.; Fleming, L. Adherence to medication in children and adolescents with asthma: Methods for monitoring and intervention. Exp. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hatoun, J.; Davis-Plourde, K.; Penti, B.; Cabral, H.J.; Kazis, L. Tobacco Control Laws and Pediatric Asthma. Pediatrics 2018, 141, S130–S136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kobayashi, Y.; Bossley, C.; Gupta, A.; Akashi, K.; Tsartsali, L.; Mercado, N.; Mercado, N.; Barnes, P.J.; Bush, A.; Ito, K. Passive smoking impairs histone deacetylase-2 in children with severe asthma. Chest 2014, 145, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Oddoze, C.; Dubus, J.C.; Badier, M.; Thirion, X.; Pauli, A.M.; Pastor, J.; Bruguerolle, B. Urinary cotinine and exposure to parental smoking in a population of children with asthma. Clin Chem. 1999, 45, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Vardoulakis, S.; Osborne, N. Air pollution and asthma. Arch. Dis. Child. 2018, 103, 813–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Arasi, S.; Porcaro, F.; Cutrera, R.; Fiocchi, A.G. Severe Asthma and Allergy: A Pediatric Perspective. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Amat, F.; Soria, A.; Tallon, P.; Bourgoin-Heck, M.; Lambert, N.; Deschildre, A.; Just, J. New insights into the phenotypes of atopic dermatitis linked with allergies and asthma in children: An overview. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Porsbjerg, C.; Menzies-Gow, A. Co-morbidities in severe asthma: Clinical impact and management. Respirology 2017, 22, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Booster, G.D.; Oland, A.A.; Bender, B.G. Psychosocial Factors in Severe Pediatric Asthma. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 2016, 36, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Richardson, L.P.; Lozano, P.; Russo, J.; McCauley, E.; Bush, T.; Katon, W. Asthma Symptom Burden: Relationship to Asthma Severity and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bender, B.G.; Zhang, L. Negative affect, medication adherence, and asthma control in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feldman, J.M.; Steinberg, D.; Kutner, H.; Eisenberg, N.; Hottinger, K.; Sidora-Arcoleo, K.; Warman, K.; Serebrisky, D. Perception of Pulmonary Function and Asthma Control: The Differential Role of Child Versus Caregiver Anxiety and Depression. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2013, 38, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Juniper, E.F.; Guyatt, G.H.; Feeny, D.H.; Ferrie, P.J.; Griffith, L.E.; Townsend, M. Measuring quality of life in children with asthma. Qual. Life Res. 1996, 5, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Juniper, E.F.; Gruffydd-Jones, K.; Ward, S.; Svensson, K. Asthma Control Questionnaire in children: Validation, measurement properties, interpretation. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cope, S.F.; Ungar, W.J.; Glazier, R.H. Socioeconomic factors and asthma control in children. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2008, 43, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Chung, K.F.; Wenzel, S.E.; Brozek, J.L.; Bush, A.; Castro, M.; Sterk, P.J.; Adcock, I.M.; Bateman, E.D.; Bel, E.H.; Bleecker, E.R.; et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 343–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Dalal, A.A.; Duh, M.S.; Gozalo, L.; Robitaille, M.-N.; Albers, F.; Yancey, S.; Ortega, H.G.; Forshag, M.; Lin, X.; Lefebvre, P. Dose-Response Relationship Between Long-Term Systemic Corticosteroid Use and Related Complications in Patients with Severe Asthma. J. Manag. Care Spéc. Pharm. 2016, 22, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eassey, D.; Reddel, H.K.; Foster, J.M.; Kirkpatrick, S.; Locock, L.; Ryan, K.; Smith, L. I’ve said I wish I was dead, you’d be better off without me’: A systematic review of people’s experiences of living with severe asthma. J. Asthma 2019, 56, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferrante, G.; La Grutta, S. The Burden of Pediatric Asthma. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Cevhertas, L.; Ogulur, I.; Maurer, D.J.; Burla, D.; Ding, M.; Jansen, K.; Koch, J.; Liu, C.; Ma, S.; Mitamura, Y.; et al. Advances and recent developments in asthma in 2020. Allergy 2020, 75, 3124–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Teague, W.G.; Phillips, B.R.; Fahy, J.V.; Wenzel, S.E.; Fitzpatrick, A.M.; Moore, W.C.; Hastie, A.T.; Bleecker, E.R.; Meyers, D.A.; Peters, S.P.; et al. Baseline Features of the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP III) Cohort: Differences with Age. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2018, 6, 545–554.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fleming, L.; Murray, C.; Bansal, A.T.; Hashimoto, S.; Bisgaard, H.; Bush, A.; Frey, U.; Hedlin, G.; Singer, F.; van Aalderen, W.M.; et al. The burden of severe asthma in childhood and adolescence: Results from the paediatric U-BIOPRED cohorts. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 1322–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Saglani, S.; Lui, S.; Ullmann, N.; Campbell, G.; Sherburn, R.; Mathie, S.; Denney, L.; Bossley, C.J.; Oates, T.; Walker, S.A.; et al. Interleukin-33 promotes airway remodelling in paediatric severe steroid resistant asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 676–685.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sze, E.; Bhalla, A.; Nair, P. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for non-T2 asthma. Allergy 2020, 75, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Diamant, Z.; Vijverberg, S.; Alving, K.; Bakirtas, A.; Bjermer, L.; Custovic, A.; Dahlen, S.; Gaga, M.; Van Wijk, R.G.; Del Giacco, S.; et al. Toward clinically applicable biomarkers for asthma: An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2019, 74, 1835–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Agache, I.; Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M.; Canonica, G.W.; Casale, T.B.; Chivato, T.; Corren, J.; Chu, D.K.; Del Giacco, S.; Eiwegger, T.; et al. EAACI Biologicals Guidelines—Recommendations for severe asthma. Allergy 2020, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Porcaro, F.; Cutrera, R.; Pajno, G.B. Options of immunotherapeutic treatments for children with asthma. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2019, 13, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bleecker, E.R.; FitzGerald, J.M.; Chanez, P.; Papi, A.; Weinstein, S.F.; Barker, P.; Sproule, S.; Gilmartin, G.; Aurivillius, M.; Werkstrom, V.; et al. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (SIROCCO): A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2016, 388, 2115–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fitzgerald, J.M.; Bleecker, E.R.; Menzies-Gow, A.; Zangrilli, J.G.; Hirsch, I.; Metcalfe, P.; Newbold, P.; Goldman, M. Predictors of enhanced response with benralizumab for patients with severe asthma: Pooled analysis of the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018, 6, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nair, P.; Wenzel, S.; Rabe, K.F.; Bourdin, A.; Lugogo, N.L.; Kuna, P.; Barker, P.; Sproule, S.; Ponnarambil, S.; Goldman, M. Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Benralizumab in Severe Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2448–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ohta, K.; Adachi, M.; Tohda, Y.; Kamei, T.; Kato, M.; Fitzgerald, J.M.; Takanuma, M.; Kakuno, T.; Imai, N.; Wu, Y.; et al. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in Japanese patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. Allergol. Int. 2018, 67, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chipps, B.E.; Newbold, P.; Hirsch, I.; Trudo, F.; Goldman, M. Benralizumab efficacy by atopy status and serum immunoglobulin E for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018, 120, 504–511.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Busse, W.W.; Bleecker, E.R.; Fitzgerald, J.M.; Ferguson, G.T.; Barker, P.; Sproule, S.; Olsson, R.F.; Martin, U.J.; Goldman, M.; Yañez, A.; et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: 1-year results from the BORA phase 3 extension trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Le Floch-Ramondou, A.; Nagashima, K.; Scott, G.; Birchard, D.; Asrat, S.; Bai, Y.; Lim, W.K.; Murphy, A.; Sleeman, M.; Orengo, J. Dual blockade of IL-4 and IL-13 with dupilumab, an IL-4Rα antibody, is required to broadly inhibit type 2 inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, AB158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Harb, H.; Chatila, T.A. Mechanisms of Dupilumab. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2020, 50, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Matsunaga, K.; Katoh, N.; Fujieda, S.; Izuhara, K.; Oishi, K. Dupilumab: Basic aspects and applications to allergic diseases. Allergol. Int. 2020, 69, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Licari, A.; Castagnoli, R.; Marseglia, A.; Olivero, F.; Votto, M.; Ciprandi, G.; Marseglia, G.L. Dupilumab to Treat Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases in Children and Adolescents. Pediatr. Drugs 2020, 22, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wenzel, S.E.; Castro, M.; Corren, J.; Maspero, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; Pirozzi, G.; Sutherland, E.R.; Evans, R.R.; Joish, V.N.; et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose-ranging trial. Lancet 2016, 388, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Agache, I.; Song, Y.; Rocha, C.; Beltran, J.; Posso, M.; Steiner, C.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M.; Canonica, G.W.; et al. Efficacy and safety of treatment with dupilumab for severe asthma: A systematic review of the EAACI guidelines—Recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma. Allergy 2020, 75, 1058–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Castro, M.; Corren, J.; Pavord, I.D.; Maspero, J.; Wenzel, S.; Rabe, K.F.; Busse, W.W.; Ford, L.; Sher, L.; FitzGerald, J.M.; et al. Dupilumab Efficacy and Safety in Moderate-to-Severe Uncontrolled Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2486–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rabe, K.F.; Nair, P.; Brusselle, G.; Maspero, J.F.; Castro, M.; Sher, L.; Zhu, H.; Hamilton, J.D.; Swanson, B.N.; Khan, A.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Glucocorticoid-Dependent Severe Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2475–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Emma, R.; Morjaria, J.B.; Fuochi, V.; Polosa, R.; Caruso, M. Mepolizumab in the management of severe eosinophilic asthma in adults: Current evidence and practical experience. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2018, 12, 1753466618808490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Crimi, C.; Campisi, R.; Cacopardo, G.; Intravaia, R.; Nolasco, S.; Porto, M.; Pelaia, C.; Crimi, N. Real-life effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma and multiple comorbidities. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pavord, I.; Bleecker, E.R.; Buhl, R.; Chanez, P.; Bel, E.H.; Howarth, P.; Bratton, D.J.; Albers, F.C.; Yancey, S. Response to mepolizumab treatment is sustained across 4-weekly dosing periods. ERJ Open Res. 2020, 6, 00068-2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Renner, A.; Marth, K.; Patocka, K.; Idzko, M.; Pohl, W. Effectiveness of mepolizumab therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: Austrian real-life data. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 64, 101946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Harrison, T.; Canonica, G.W.; Chupp, G.; Lee, J.; Schleich, F.; Welte, T.; Valero, A.; Gemzoe, K.; Maxwell, A.; Joksaite, S.; et al. Real-world mepolizumab in the prospective severe asthma REALITI-A study–initial analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2000151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sposato, B.; Camiciottoli, G.; Bacci, E.; Scalese, M.; Carpagnano, G.E.; Pelaia, C.; Santus, P.; Maniscalco, M.; Masieri, S.; Corsico, A.; et al. Mepolizumab effectiveness on small airway obstruction, corticosteroid sparing and maintenance therapy step-down in real life. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 61, 101899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yancey, S.W.; Ortega, H.; Keene, O.N.; Bradford, E.S. Efficacy of add-on mepolizumab in adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Van Toor, J.J.; van der Mark, S.C.; Kappen, J.H.; In’t Veen, J.C.C.M.; Braunstahl, G.J. Mepolizumab add-on therapy in a real world cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: Response rate, effectiveness, and safety. J. Asthma 2020, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bagnasco, D.; Caminati, M.; Menzella, F.; Milanese, M.; Rolla, G.; Lombardi, C.; Bucca, C.; Heffler, E.; Paoletti, G.; Testino, E.; et al. One year of mepolizumab. Efficacy and safety in real-life in Italy. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 58, 101836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Khurana, S.; Brusselle, G.G.; Bel, E.H.; Fitzgerald, J.M.; Masoli, M.; Korn, S.; Kato, M.; Albers, F.C.; Bradford, E.S.; Gilson, M.J.; et al. Long-term Safety and Clinical Benefit of Mepolizumab in Patients With the Most Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: The COSMEX Study. Clin. Ther. 2019, 41, 2041–2056.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Gupta, A.; Ikeda, M.; Geng, B.; Azmi, J.; Price, R.G.; Bradford, E.S.; Yancey, S.W.; Steinfeld, J. Long-term safety and pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab in children with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 1336–1342.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Lanier, B.; Bridges, T.; Kulus, M.; Taylor, A.F.; Berhane, I.; Vidaurre, C.F. Omalizumab for the treatment of exacerbations in children with inadequately controlled allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Silkoff, P.E.; Romero, F.A.; Gupta, N.; Townley, R.G.; Milgrom, H. Exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma receiving Xolair (omalizumab), a monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody. Pediatrics 2004, 113, e308–e312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Henriksen, D.P.; Bodtger, U.; Sidenius, K.; Maltbaek, N.; Pedersen, L.; Madsen, H.; Andersson, E.A.; Norgaard, O.; Madsen, L.K.; Chawes, B.L. Efficacy of omalizumab in children, adolescents, and adults with severe allergic asthma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and call for new trials using current guidelines for assessment of severe asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2020, 16, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Busse, W.W.; Humbert, M.; Haselkorn, T.; Ortiz, B.; Trzaskoma, B.L.; Stephenson, P.; Conde, L.G.; Kianifard, F.; Holgate, S.T. Effect of omalizumab on lung function and eosinophil levels in adolescents with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020, 124, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Chipps, B.E.; Lanier, B.; Milgrom, H.; Deschildre, A.; Hedlin, G.; Szefler, S.J.; Kattan, M.; Kianifard, F.; Ortiz, B.; Haselkorn, T.; et al. Omalizumab in children with uncontrolled allergic asthma: Review of clinical trial and real-world experience. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1431–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Balbino, B.; Herviou, P.; Godon, O.; Stackowicz, J.; Richard-Le Goff, O.; Iannascoli, B.; Sterlin, D.; Brule, S.; Millot, G.A.; Harris, F.M.; et al. The anti-IgE mAb omalizumab induces adverse reactions by engaging Fcγ receptors. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3177011112/09/2020/ (accessed on 7 November 2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Cox, L.; Platts-Mills, T.A.; Finegold, I.; Schwartz, L.B.; Simons, F.E.R.; Wallace, D.V. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force Report on omalizumab-associated anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 1373–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. McIvor, E.R.; McIvor, R.A. The evolving role of tiotropium in asthma. J. Asthma Allergy 2017, 10, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Holguin, F.; Cardet, J.C.; Chung, K.F.; Diver, S.; Ferreira, D.S.; Fitzpatrick, A.; Gaga, M.; Kellermeyer, L.; Khurana, S.; Knight, S.; et al. Management of severe asthma: A European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55. Available online: https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/55/1/1900588/12/09/2020 (accessed on 5 November 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Bush, A.; Saglani, S. Management of severe asthma in children. Lancet 2010, 376, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Jilani, T.N.; Preuss, C.V.; Sharma, S. Theophylline. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. Available online: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK519024/12/09/2020 (accessed on 5 November 2020).
Table
Table 1. From symptoms to diagnosis: alternative diagnosis mimicking asthma.
Table 1. From symptoms to diagnosis: alternative diagnosis mimicking asthma.
SymptomsDiseasesInvestigations
Stridor at rest
Stridor on exertion
Dyspnea on exertion		Congenital/acquired subglottic stenosis
Vocal cord dysfunction		Functional respiratory test
Flexible fibreoptic rhino-laryngoscopy
Productive cough
Recurrent wheezing
Failure to thrive		Cystic fibrosis
Non-CF bronchiectasis
Churg Strauss syndrome
Tracheo-esophageal fistula
Aspiration		Sweat test
Serum eosinophils count
ANCA
Exhaled nasal NO
Nasal brushing
Chest CT scan
Flexible bronchoscopy
Lipid laden alveolar macrophage on BAL
Dry cough/noisy breathing
Unresponsive to SABA
Dyspnea on exertion		Tracheo-bronchomalacia
Vascular ring		Functional respiratory tests
Flexible bronchoscopy
Chest CT scan with contrast enhancement and dynamic study
Symptoms onset from birth
Drumstick fingers		Congenital lung disease
Heart diseases		Oximetry
Chest X-ray
Chest CT scan
Heart ultrasound
Heartburn
Chest pain		Gastroesophageal refluxpH-impedance
Table
Table 2. Tools for monitoring the adherence to prescribed treatment.
Table 2. Tools for monitoring the adherence to prescribed treatment.
Measurement Tools of Treatment Adherence
SubjectivePhysician assessment of adherence
Self-report questionnaires
  • Morisky scale
  • Medication adherence report scale
ObjectiveDrug levels
Exhaled nitric oxide
Prescription data
Weighing inhaler canisters
Dose counters
Directly observed therapy
Nurse home visits
Electronic monitoring devices
Integrating digital technologies
Table
Table 3. Asthma comorbidities.
Table 3. Asthma comorbidities.
ComorbidityDiagnosisTreatment
Rhinosinusitis/nasal polyposisENT evaluation
Sinus CT		Topic CS
Surgery
Allergic rhinoconjuctivitisAnamnestic data
SPT test
Specific IgEs		Allergen avoidance
Topic CS
Antihistamines
Antileukotriene
Dysfunctional breathingAnamnestic data
Nijmegen questionnaire		Breathing rehabilitation
Vocal cord dysfunctionENT evaluation
Laryngoscopy		Speech retraining
Obesity BMIDiet
Obstructive sleep apneaAnamnestic data
Polisomnography		Weight loss
Nocturnal CPAP
Gastroesophageal refluxPPI trial
pH-impedance		PPI
Lifestyle changes
BronchiectasisChest CT scanHypertonic solutions
Physiotherapy
Macrolide
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosisTotal IgE
IgE for Aspergillus Fumigatus IgG for Aspergillus Fumigatus
Chest CT scan		Prednisone
Voriconazole
Table
Table 4. High-dose ICD dosages for children (6–11 years), adolescents, and adults (mcg/d) according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2020) guidelines.
Table 4. High-dose ICD dosages for children (6–11 years), adolescents, and adults (mcg/d) according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2020) guidelines.
Adults and Adolescents (12 Years and Older)
Inhaled CorticosteroidTotal Daily ICS Dose (mcg)
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)>1000
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, extrafine particle, HFA)>400
Budesonide (DPI)>800
Cilesonide (pMDI, extrafine particle, HFA)>320
Fluticasone furoate (DPI)200
Fluticasone propionate (DPI)>500
Fluticasone propionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)>500
Mometasone furoate (DPI)400
Mometasone furoate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)>400
Children 6–11 Years
Inhaled CorticosteroidTotal Daily ICS Dose (mcg)
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)>400
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, extrafine particle, HFA)>200
Budesonide (DPI)>400
Budesonide (nebules)>1000
Cilesonide (pMDI, extrafine particle, HFA)>160
Fluticasone furoate (DPI)n.a.
Fluticasone propionate (DPI)>200
Fluticasone propionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)>200
Mometasone furoate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)200
pMDI, pressurized metered-dose inhaler; HFA, hydrofluoroalkane propellant; DPI, dry powder inhaler; n.a, not available.
Table
Table 5. Low total daily dose (mcg) of ICS for children 5 years and younger, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2020) guidelines.
Table 5. Low total daily dose (mcg) of ICS for children 5 years and younger, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2020) guidelines.
Inhaled CorticosteroidLow Total Daily Dose (mcg)
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)100
Beclomethasone dipropionate (pMDI, extra-fine particle, HFA)50
Budesonide (nebules)500
Fluticasone propionate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)50
Mometasone furoate (pMDI, standard particle, HFA)100
pMDI, pressurized metered-dose inhaler; HFA, hydrofluoroalkane propellant; DPI, dry powder inhaler.
Table
Table 6. FDA and EMA approved biologic drugs for severe pediatric asthma.
Table 6. FDA and EMA approved biologic drugs for severe pediatric asthma.
BiologicsMechanism of ActionIndicationsDosing Route
BenralizumabAnti-IL5 (binds to IL5 receptor; causes apoptosis of eosinophils and basophils)≥2 ys old
Add-on maintenance treatment for adults and children with severe eosinophilic asthma (baseline blood eosinophil cell counts >300 cells/μL or >150 cells/μL for OCS-dependent patients) despite high-dosage ICS + LABA		30 mg s.c. every 4 wk for 3 doses; then every 8 wk
DupilumabAnti-IL4 (binds to IL4 receptor; blocks activation of IL4 and IL13 mediated inflammation)≥12 ys old
Add-on maintenance treatment for adults and adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma (blood eosinophils > 150 cells/μL and/or raised FeNO >20 ppb) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps which are uncontrolled despite medium-/high-dose ICS plus up to 2 additional controllers including OCS		200 or 300 mg s.c. every 2 wk
MepolizumabAnti-IL5 (binds to IL5 ligand; prevents IL5 from binding to receptor)≥6 ys old
Treatment for adults and children affected with severe asthma and peripheral eosinophilia (blood eosinophil level of either 300 cells or more per μL in the past 12 months or 150 cells or more per μL at initiation)		100 mg s.c. every 4 wk
OmalizumabAnti-IgE (prevents IgE from binding to receptor)≥6 ys old
Treatment for adults and children with moderate-to-severe chronic allergic asthma, increase total IgE levels (total IgE level of 30–700 IU/mL considered in US; total IgE level of 30–1500 IU/mL considered in EU) and allergic sensitization to at least one perennial allergen		30–1500 IU/mL s.c. every 2–4 wk
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Porcaro, F.; Ullmann, N.; Allegorico, A.; Di Marco, A.; Cutrera, R. Difficult and Severe Asthma in Children. Children 2020, 7, 286. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children7120286

AMA Style

Porcaro F, Ullmann N, Allegorico A, Di Marco A, Cutrera R. Difficult and Severe Asthma in Children. Children. 2020; 7(12):286. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children7120286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Porcaro, Federica, Nicola Ullmann, Annalisa Allegorico, Antonio Di Marco, and Renato Cutrera. 2020. "Difficult and Severe Asthma in Children" Children 7, no. 12: 286. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children7120286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop