Next Article in Journal
The Refined USSR Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Database for Borovoye Geophysical Observatory
Previous Article in Journal
DiiS: A Biomedical Data Access Framework for Aiding Data Driven Research Supporting FAIR Principles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

Fuel Properties of Torrefied Biomass from Pruning of Oxytree

by
Kacper Świechowski
1,
Marek Liszewski
2,
Przemysław Bąbelewski
3,
Jacek A. Koziel
4 and
Andrzej Białowiec
1,*
1
Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 37/41 Chełmońskiego Str., 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
2
Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 24A Grunwaldzki Sq., 53-363 Wrocław, Poland
3
Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Department of Horticulture, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 24A Grunwaldzki Sq., 53-363 Wrocław, Poland
4
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 31 March 2019 / Revised: 19 April 2019 / Accepted: 21 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019

Abstract

:
The very fast growing Oxytree (Paulownia Clon in Vitro 112) is marketed as a promising new energy crop. The tree has characteristically large leaves, thrives in warmer climates, and requires initial pruning for enhanced biomass production in later years. We explored valorizing the waste biomass of initial (first year) pruning via thermal treatment. Specifically, we used torrefaction (‘roasting’) to produce biochar with improved fuel properties. Here for the first time, we examined and summarized the fuel properties data of raw biomass of Oxytree pruning and biochars generated via torrefaction. The effects of torrefaction temperature (200~300 °C), process time (20~60 min), soil type, and agro-technical cultivation practices (geotextile and drip irrigation) on fuel properties of the resulting biochars were summarized. The dataset contains results of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) as well as proximate and ultimate analyses of Oxytree biomass and generated biochars. The presented data are useful in determining Oxytree torrefaction reaction kinetics and further techno-economical modeling of the feasibility of Oxytree valorization via torrefaction. Oxytree torrefaction could be exploited as part of valorization resulting from a synergy between a high yield crop with the efficient production of high-quality renewable fuel.
Dataset: This dataset is available in the supplementary files.
Dataset License: CC-BY

1. Summary

The global energy consumption increased by ~80% between 1980 and 2010. It is predicted that energy demand will increase by another 50% by 2025. New solutions for energy production and diversifying sources in addition to conventional fossil fuels are needed [1,2]. The environmental impact of fuel combustion (e.g., air pollution) and the sequestration of CO2 need to be considered [2,3]. One approach is to replace conventional fuel with biofuel as a means to limit overall CO2 emissions [2,3]. For example, mixing gasoline with bioethanol [3] and co-combustion coal with biomass [4] are used. Growing energy crops that sequester CO2 can also be considered as an alternative to conventional fuels. Paulownia trees could be a basis for cleaner technology development.
One species of the genus Paulownia is Clon in Vitro 112 (also known as Oxytree), a new type of energy crop gaining popularity in Europe. The genus Paulownia originates from southeastern China and Japan. Paulownia species have been introduced to the United States [5]. In recent years, these trees have become more popular for timber purposes in warmer climates [6], and are cultivated in southern Europe [7]. Oxytree is a hybrid of Paulownia elongata and Paulownia fortunei, grown in vitro. The Clon 112 was added to the Plant Variety Office register (EU) in 2011 [8]. In Poland, the first experimental plantations were established in 2016. Since then, 600 ha of plantations have been created. Oxytree is a very fast-growing plant with the C4 photosynthesis pathway [9].
The distinguishing feature of Oxytree compared to other energy crops is the ability to produce high-quality wood. This wood can be used for industrial purposes, such as the production of particleboard. Oxytree wood has a high strength-to-mass ratio [7]. The modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity are 29 MPa and 3970 MPa, respectively [10]. However, Paulownia species have a very soft wood (10–25 MPa on Janka’s scale) [11].
The density of Paulownia plantings determines the utilization of biomass. In the case of wood for industrial harvest, planting should not exceed 600 tree·ha‒1. However, it could reach 3000 tree·ha‒1 for energetic purposes [12]. The higher heating value (HHV) for biomass in the Paulownia genus differs slightly depending on the variety and ranges from 19.2~19.6 MJ·kg‒1 [10]. The HHV of Paulownia tomentosa is 19.7 MJ·kg‒1 [13] and is comparable with willow and poplar biomass HHV, ranging from 18.5~19.9 and from 19.6~19.8 MJ·kg‒1, respectively [14]. Short-rotation woody crop (SRWC) plantations are developed in Europe and they include poplar, black locust, willow [15], and Paulownia trees. Wood from these plantations may be utilized for the production of heat and electricity, as well as the production of bioethanol [16]. Torrefaction is considered a novel approach for biomass valorization [16]. Thus, we are pioneering the potential use of Paulownia valorization via torrefaction.
Torrefaction is the thermochemical process (similar to ‘roasting’)—typically at temperatures between 200 °C and 300 °C—occurring in the absence of oxygen, resulting in biochars [17]. Torrefaction allows the conversion of raw biomass into solid fuel with energy properties similar to bitumen and lignite coal [18], depending on the initial properties of the feedstock. In addition, the torrefied biomass storage and transportation conditions are improved. Produced biochars are hydrophobic and have increased energy density due to volume reduction. Torrefaction can convert food waste, sewage sludge, a combustible fraction of municipal solid waste (also known as refuse-derived fuel, RDF) [19,20,21], high moisture herbaceous residues [22], and forest residues [23,24] into fuel.
To date, the torrefaction of Oxytree has not been attempted yet. This dataset includes the pioneering work results covering thermogravimetric analyses (TGA), proximate and ultimate properties of Oxytree, and generated biochars. Oxytrees were grown on two types of soils in Poland with the application of four types of cultivation. Plants were pruned after the first year of vegetation. Pruned biomass created an early opportunity to investigate the fuel properties of Oxytree. The presented data are useful in determining the Oxytree torrefaction reaction kinetics and the techno-economical modeling of the feasibility of Oxytree valorization via torrefaction, including a comparison with other torrefied energy crops.

2. Data Description

2.1. The Origin of Biomass

The samples of pruned biomass (as presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2) of Paulownia Clon in Vitro 112 originated from two experimental plantations with different soils. The plantation in Pawłowice (Wrocław, Poland) was established on sandy soil, classified as V soil class belonging to brunic arenosols, and the plantation in Psary (Wrocław, Poland) was established on clay soil classified as Phaeozems. Classes of soils refer to the world reference database of soil resources [25].
In vitro shoots propagated to ~20–40 cm were planted with 4 m × 4 m (16 m2 per tree) spacing on 19 May 2016. The trees subjected to analysis were pruned on 27 September 2016, as is presented in Figure 2. Analyzed trees represent biomass after 1 year of vegetation. Normal agro-technical care treatment takes place 12 months after planting in May. This agro-technical care treatment involves trimming 0.05 m above the pitch to derive one main shoot, which would become the main trunk of the tree.
At both plantations, the mineral fertilization was applied as follows: pre-sowing fertilization with a dose of 70 kg K2O·ha‒1 (in the form of 60% potassium salt), 40 kg P2O4·ha‒1 (in the form of 46% triple superphosphate), and 40 kg·ha‒1 of nitrogen (in the form of 46% urea). Additionally, nitrogen with doses of 20 kg·ha‒1 (in the form of ammonium nitrate) was supplied monthly.
At the initial stage of the plants’ development, 1 month after planting, all plants were irrigated (50 dm3·tree‒1 per month, irrigated twice a week). Management of weeds included mechanical operations. Weeds in the inter-row were removed mechanically with a weeder and an active harrow. Weeds were removed mechanically every 2 months. Weeds between the plants in a row were removed manually using a hook. The schematic of planting on each plantation is presented in Figure 3.
The experiment differed on the applied cultivation method. The first differentiating factor was the application of a geotextile. Geotextile is a kind of material used to cover the ground under plants. It is used to provide protection against weeds. Geotextile also decreases water evaporation from the ground and increases the temperature of the ground [26]. A black geotextile was used (Wigolen S.A., model TA 94, Częstochowa, Poland). The second differentiating factor was the application of additional irrigation. Five trees in the plot were supplied with water by drip irrigation without compensation. Each plot was irrigated for 2 h twice a week with a hydraulic loading rate of 312.5 dm3·h‒1. The area of each irrigated plot was ~80 m2. The matrix of the experiment is given in Table 1. The temperature conditions during the growing season from May to October were 15.3 °C, 18.6 °C, 19.5 °C, 17.9 °C, 16.4 °C, and 8.5 °C, respectively. However, precipitation was somewhat abnormal, i.e., 5 mm in May (typically 54 mm), 114 mm in July (typically 78 mm), 27 mm in August (typically 65 mm), and 84 mm in October (typically 34 mm).
The biomass samples were collected at the end of the first vegetation season on 27 September 2016. The fresh mass yield of biomass was ~0.49 Mg·ha‒1 (assuming 625 trees per hectare). Detailed information about mass yield is given in the Supplementary Material file “Oxytree torrefaction data.xlsx” in the spreadsheet “Oxytree biomass yield”. The (mass-based) content of leaves and shoots in the biomass samples was about 71% and 29% of the total fresh mass, respectively. In dry mass, the content of leaves was about 66% and that of shoots was about 34%. Oxytree biomass samples were marked according to symbols used in Table 1.

2.2. Properties of Raw and Torrefied Biomass

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the torrefaction process was conducted with each kind of Oxytree biomass according to the protocol described elsewhere [27]. In brief, torrefied Oxytree biomass (biochar) was produced from each Oxytree biomass cultivation variant. The biochars were generated under a temperature of 200~300 °C (with 20 °C intervals) and retention times of 20~60 min (with 20 min intervals). The obtained data are presented in the Supplementary Material file “Oxytree torrefaction data.xlsx” in five sheets:
  • Read me (guide);
  • Oxytree biomass yield;
  • Oxytree torrefaction TGA ;
  • Proximate analyses of Oxytree biomass and biochars;
  • Ultimate analyses of Oxytree biomass and biochars.
The first “Read me” sheet is a guide on how to read the data with short information about each type of treatment. The second spreadsheet (“Oxytree biomass yield”) contains data on the Oxytree biomass yield, energy densification ratio, mass, and energy yield of biochars. The third spreadsheet (“Oxytree torrefaction TGA”) contains raw data from TGA tests. The fourth spreadsheet (“Proximate analyses”) contains data on moisture content, organic matter content, lost on ignition content, and ash content in raw and torrefied Oxytree biomass. The fifth spreadsheet (“Ultimate analyses”) presents the elemental composition, H:C and O:C ratios of raw Oxytree biomass and biochars, high heating value (HHV), low heating value (LHV), and HHV without ash.

3. Methods

Collected Oxytree biomass samples were dried for 24 h in a WAMED laboratory dryer, model KBC-65W (Warsaw, Poland), under the temperature of 105 °C. Then, dry biomass samples were ground through a 1 mm screen. For biomass grinding, the laboratory knife mill TESTCHEM, model LMN-100 (Pszów, Poland), was used.

3.1. Torrefaction Process

The torrefaction was carried out in a muffle furnace (Snol 8.1/1100, Utena, Lithuania). CO2 was used as an inert gas with a flow of 10 dm3·h‒1. The process was carried out under the setpoint temperatures of 200 °C to 300 °C with intervals of 20 °C. For each temperature, torrefaction was carried out in 20, 40, and 60 min. The samples were heated from 20 °C to the torrefaction setpoint temperature with a heating rate of 50 °C·min‒1. The dry mass of the sample used for the tests was 10 g (± 0.5 g). The biochars were removed from the muffle furnace when the interior temperature was lower than 200 °C. The approximate times of cooling from 300 °C, 280 °C, 260 °C, 240 °C, and 220 °C to 200 °C were 38, 33, 29, 23, and 13.5 min, respectively. The approximate cooling time from 300 °C to room temperature (~20 °C) was around 6 h. Analyses of one replicate were carried out. The TGA analysis was conducted in three replicates. The analyzer is described elsewhere [23].
Mass yield, energy densification ratio, and energy yield were calculated based on Equations (1)–(3) [28].
M a s s   y i e l d = M a s s   o f   d r y   b i o c h a r   M a s s   o f   d r i e d   r a w   m a t e r i a l · 100
E n e r g y   d e n s i f i c a t i o n   r a t i o = H H V   o f   b i o c h a r   H H V   o f   r a w   m a t e r i a l
E n e r g y   y i e l d = m a s s   y i e l d · e n e r g y   d e n s i f i c a t i o n   r a t i o
where:
  • Mass of dry biochar—mass of (dry) biochar after the process of torrefaction, g;
  • Mass of dried raw material—dried mass of biomass used in the process of torrefaction, g;
  • 100—conversion to percent;
  • HHV of biochar—high heating value of biochar after the process of torrefaction, J∙g‒1;
  • HHV of raw material—high heating value of dried biomass (raw material) used for torrefaction, J∙g‒1.

3.2. Proximate Analysis

Raw and torrefied biomass samples were tested in three replicates for:
  • Moisture content, determined in accordance with [29], by means of the laboratory dryer (WAMED, model KBC-65W, Warsaw, Poland).
  • Organic matter, determined in accordance with [30], by means of the SNOL 8.1/1100 muffle furnace (Utena, Lithuania). The dried sample was heated at 550 °C for at least 1 h (1 g and 3 h in this study) in the muffle furnace. After that, a sample was cooled down in a desiccator to room temperature. Next, the mass values before and after the process (measured with an accuracy fo ±1 mg) were used to calculate the loss on ignition. Organic matter content was estimated as the initial mass of the dry sample minus loss of ignition.
  • Combustibles and ash content, determined in accordance with [31], by means of the SNOL 8.1/1100 muffle furnace (Utena, Lithuania). This method consists of incinerating the sample and then calcining it to a constant mass at a temperature of 815 ± 10 °C for 2 h. The last step is a calculation in percent of the content of the combustibles and ash content.
  • High heating value (HHV) and low heating value (LHV), determined in accordance with [32], by means of the IKA C2000 Basic calorimeter. HHV was determined by the calorimeter and the mass of dry samples was 0.3 g. Based on HHV, moisture content, and the ultimate analysis, the LHV from Equation (4) was determined.
Q i = Q s r · ( W + 8.94 · H )
where:
  • Qi—low heating value, J·g‒1;
  • Qs—high heating value, J·g‒1;
  • R—the heat of water evaporation, 22.42 J·g‒1, for 1% of the water in fuel;
  • W—moisture content, %;
  • H—hydrogen content, %;
  • 8.94—hydrogen to water conversion, -.
  • HHVdaf (on dry and on ash-free bases) was calculated according to Equation (5) [33]:
    H H V d a f = H H V M f M a s h
    where:
    • HHVdaf—high heating value on dry and ash-free bases, J·g‒1;
    • HHV—high heating value (on dry basis), J·g‒1;
    • Mf—fuel mass (on dry basis), mass, g;
    • Mash—mass of ash in fuel, g.

3.3. Ultimate Analysis

Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen contents were determined by means of the elemental CHNS analyzer CE Instruments Ltd (Manchester, UK). Sulfur was determined by the atomic emission spectrometry method with excitation in inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) after microwave mineralization, Thermo Fisher Scientific, iCAP 7400 ICP-OES (Waltham, USA). One replicate was carried out.
The oxygen was determined by the calculation method according to Equation (6):
O = 100 % C H N S A s h
where:
  • O—oxygen content, %;
  • C—carbon content, %;
  • H—hydrogen content, %;
  • N—nitrogen content, %;
  • S—sulfur content, %;
  • Ash—ash content, %.
  • Atomic ratios for H:C and O:C were determined using Equations (7) and (8) [34]:
H : C = H 1 C 12
O : C = O 16 C 12
where:
  • H:C—atomic ratio of H to C, -;
  • O:C—atomic ratio of O to C, -;
  • 1—atomic mass of H, u;
  • 12—atomic mass of C, u;
  • 16—atomic mass of O, u.

4. User Notes

The given dataset presents pioneering work on the Oxytree biomass torrefaction. The dataset consists of results of biomass yield, energy densification ratio, mass, and energy yield of biochars in relation to the cultivation regime and soil type. The torrefaction TGA analyses results were given for pruned Oxytree biomass. The fuel characterization of raw Oxytree biomass and produced biochars were shown. These data can be used for calculating Oxytree torrefaction kinetics and activation energy, and can also be used to propose mathematical models describing the influence of torrefaction, temperature, and residence time on fuel properties. The presented data may serve as reference values for comparative analyses with other types of energy crops biomass such as poplar, willow, eucalyptus, Robinia, and birch.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2306-5729/4/2/55/s1, File S1: Oxytree torrefaction data.xlsx.zip.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.; methodology, A.B., M.L. and P.B.; software, K.Ś.; validation, K.Ś., A.B. and J.A.K.; formal analysis, K.Ś.; investigation, K.Ś., M.L. and P.B.; resources, K.Ś., M.L, P.B., A.B. and J.A.K.; data curation, K.Ś.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Ś.; writing—review and editing, K.Ś., A.B. and J.A.K.; visualization, K.Ś.; supervision, A.B. and J.A.K.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, K.Ś., A.B. and J.A.K.

Funding

“The PROM Programme—International scholarship exchange of Ph.D. candidates and academic staff” is co-financed by the European Social Fund under the Knowledge Education Development Operational Programme PPI/PRO/2018/1/00004/U/001. The authors would like to thank the Fulbright Foundation for funding the project titled “Research on pollutants emission from Carbonized Refuse-Derived Fuel into the environment,” completed at the Iowa State University. In addition, this paper preparation was partially supported by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project no. IOW05556 (Future Challenges in Animal Production Systems: Seeking Solutions through Focused Facilitation) sponsored by Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pleguezuelo, C.R.R.; Zuazo, V.H.D.; Bielders, C.; Bocanegra, J.A.J.; Torres, F.P.; Martínez, J.R.F. Bioenergy farming using woody crops. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 95–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iodice, P.; Senatore, A.; Langella, G.; Amoresano, A. Advantages of ethanol–gasoline blends as fuel substitute for last generation Si engines. Environ. Prog. Sustain. 2017, 36, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iodice, P.; Senatore, A. Industrial and Urban Sources in Campania, Italy: The Air Pollution Emission Inventory. Energy Environ. 2015, 26, 1305–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sahu, S.G.; Chakraborty, N.; Sarkar, P. Coal–biomass co-combustion: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalaycioglu, H.; Deniz, I.; Hiziroglu, S. Some of the properties of particleboard made from paulownia. J. Wood Sci. 2005, 51, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nelis, P.A.; Henke, O.; Mai, C. Comparison of blockboards with core layers made of kiri (Paulownia spp.) and of spruce (Picea abies) regarding mechanical properties. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jakubowski, M.; Tomczak, A.; Jelonek, T. The use of wood and the possibility of growing trees from the Paulownia type. Acta Sci. Pol. Silv. Colendar. Ratio Ind. Lignar. 2018, 17, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Foch, M. Annual Report 2011 Annex; Community Plant Variety Office: Angers, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Oxytree.pl. Available online: http://Oxytree.pl/ (accessed on 20 March 2019).
  10. Zhang, C.Z.; Hui, T.C.; Hun, A.T.; Seng, W.Y.; Fong, W.K.; San, H.P.; Long, L.K.; Lin, F.S. Anatomical Features, Fiber Morphological, Physical and Mechanical Properties of Three Years Old New Hybrid Paulownia: Green Paulownia. Res. J. For. 2016, 10, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lisiecka, B.; Bokůvka, O.; Tańśki, T.; Krzemiński, Ł.; Jambor, M. Obtaining of biomorphic composites based on carbon materials. Prod. Eng. Arch. 2018, 19, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paulownia Bulletin ≠ 3 Advices and Instructions Paulownia for Biomass Production. Available online: http://paulowniatrees.eu/products/paulownia-planting-material/ (accessed on 20 March 2019).
  13. Zachar, M.; Lieskovský, M.; Majlingová, A.; Mitterová, I. Comparison of thermal properties of the fast-growing tree species and energy crop species to be used as a renewable and energy-efficient resource. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 134, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yavorov, N.; Petrin, S.; Valchev, I.; Nenkova, S. Potential of fast growing poplar, willow and paulownia for bioenergy production. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2015, 47, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stolarski, M.J.; Krzyzaniak, M. Short-Rotation Woody Crops for Energy. Encycl. Sustain. Technol. 2017, 3, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Domínguez, E.; Romaní, A.; Domingues, L.; Garrote, G. Evaluation of strategies for second generation bioethanol production from fast growing biomass Paulownia within a biorefinery scheme. Appl. Energy 2017, 187, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ribeiro, J.; Godina, R.; Matias, J.; Nunes, L. Future Perspectives of Biomass Torrefaction: Review of the Current State-Of-The-Art and Research Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Talero, G.; Rincón, S.; Gómez, A. Biomass torrefaction in a standard retort: A study on oil palm solid residues. Fuel 2019, 244, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Białowiec, A.; Micuda, M.; Szumny, A.; Łyczko, J.; Koziel, J.A. Waste to Carbon: Influence of Structural Modification on VOC Emission Kinetics from Stored Carbonized Refuse-Derived Fuel. Sustainability 2019, 11, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Poudel, J.; Ohm, T.I.; Lee, S.H.; Oh, S.C. A study on torrefaction of sewage sludge to enhance solid fuel qualities. Waste Manag. 2015, 40, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pahla, G.; Ntuli, F.; Muzenda, E. Torrefaction of landfill food waste for possible application in biomass co-firing. Waste Manag. 2018, 71, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stępień, P.; Białowiec, A. Kinetic Parameters of Torrefaction Process of Alternative Fuel Produced From Municipal Solid Waste and Characteristic of Carbonized Refuse Derived Fuel. Detritus 2018, 3, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xin, S.; Mi, T.; Liu, X.; Huang, F. Effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis characteristics of high moisture herbaceous residues. Energy 2018, 152, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grimm, A. Torrefaction of agricultural and forest residues Torrefaction of agricultural and forest residues. In Proceedings of the Cubasular 2004, Guantánamo, Cuba, 12–16 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
  25. FAO World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. Update 2015. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2019).
  26. Hsieh, C.W. 23-Geotextiles in agriculture and aquaculture. In Geotextiles; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pulka, J.; Manczarski, P.; Koziel, J.A. Torrefaction of Sewage Sludge: Kinetics and Fuel Properties of Biochars. Energies 2019, 12, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, B.; Heidari, M.; Regmi, B.; Salaudeen, S.; Arku, P.; Thimmannagari, M.; Dutta, A. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Fruit Wastes: A Promising Technique for Generating Hydrochar. Energies 2018, 11, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Polish Committee for Standardization. PN-EN 14346:2011 Standard. Waste characteristics. Calculation of Dry Mass on the Basis of Dry Residue or Water Content. Available online: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-au/Standards/PN-EN-14346-2011-932471_SAIG_PKN_PKN_2197939/ (accessed on 24 April 2019).
  30. Polish Committee for Standardization. PN-EN 15169:2011 Standard. Waste characteristics. Determination of Organic Matter Content for Waste, Slurry and Sludge. Available online: http://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-15169-2011p.html (accessed on 24 April 2019).
  31. Polish Committee for Standardization. PN-Z-15008-04:1993 Standard. Municipal solid waste. Analysis of combustible and non-combustible content. Available online: http://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-z-15008-04-1993p.html (accessed on 24 April 2019).
  32. Polish Committee for Standardization. PN-G-04513:1981 Standard. Solid fuels. Determination of the higher heating value and the lower heating value. Available online: http://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-g-04513-1981p.html (accessed on 24 April 2019).
  33. Basu, P. Biomass Characteristics. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 49–91. ISBN 978-0-12-396488-5. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stępień, P.; Pulka, J.; Serowik, M.; Białowiec, A. Thermogravimetric and Calorimetric Characteristics of Alternative Fuel in Terms of Its Use in Low-Temperature Pyrolysis. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Paulownia tree before pruning. Planted on 16 May 2016. Image (a) was photographed on 13 June. Image (b) was photographed on 27 September 2016; the Oxytree was approximately 0.9 m tall. Geotextile is visible in the front row (as one of the treatments) in image (b). Oxytrees in the background row were cultivated without geotextile.
Figure 1. Paulownia tree before pruning. Planted on 16 May 2016. Image (a) was photographed on 13 June. Image (b) was photographed on 27 September 2016; the Oxytree was approximately 0.9 m tall. Geotextile is visible in the front row (as one of the treatments) in image (b). Oxytrees in the background row were cultivated without geotextile.
Data 04 00055 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of Oxytree biomass pruning was on 27 September 2016, i.e., approximately 5 months after planting. Pruned biomass was torrefied and analyzed for fuel properties.
Figure 2. Schematic of Oxytree biomass pruning was on 27 September 2016, i.e., approximately 5 months after planting. Pruned biomass was torrefied and analyzed for fuel properties.
Data 04 00055 g002
Figure 3. Aboveground schematic of Oxytree planting and experimental design. The same design was used on two experimental plantations, one with clay and and one with sandy soils.
Figure 3. Aboveground schematic of Oxytree planting and experimental design. The same design was used on two experimental plantations, one with clay and and one with sandy soils.
Data 04 00055 g003
Table 1. The matrix of the experiment involving the effects of geotextile, drip irrigation, and the soil type of Oxytree pruned biomass properties.
Table 1. The matrix of the experiment involving the effects of geotextile, drip irrigation, and the soil type of Oxytree pruned biomass properties.
Cultivation Type SymbolApplication of GeotextileApplication of IrrigationSoil Type
S(G-)(I-)--S—sandy soil, classified as V soil class belonging to brunic arenosols [21]
S(G+)(I-)+-
S(G-)(I+)-+
S(G+)(I+)++
C(G+)(I-)+-C—clay soil classified as Phaeozems [21]
C(G-)(I-)--
C(G+)(I+)++
C(G-)(I+)-+

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Świechowski, K.; Liszewski, M.; Bąbelewski, P.; Koziel, J.A.; Białowiec, A. Fuel Properties of Torrefied Biomass from Pruning of Oxytree. Data 2019, 4, 55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/data4020055

AMA Style

Świechowski K, Liszewski M, Bąbelewski P, Koziel JA, Białowiec A. Fuel Properties of Torrefied Biomass from Pruning of Oxytree. Data. 2019; 4(2):55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/data4020055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Świechowski, Kacper, Marek Liszewski, Przemysław Bąbelewski, Jacek A. Koziel, and Andrzej Białowiec. 2019. "Fuel Properties of Torrefied Biomass from Pruning of Oxytree" Data 4, no. 2: 55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/data4020055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop