Next Article in Journal
Autophagy-Related Gene WD Repeat Domain 45B Promotes Tumor Proliferation and Migration of Hepatocellular Carcinoma through the Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Handgrip Strength, Skinfold Thickness, and Trunk Strength among University Students
Previous Article in Special Issue
RT-LAMP Multicenter Study for SARS-CoV-2 Genome Molecular Detection in Brazilian Swab and Saliva Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prognosis of Laryngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Literature Review

1
Department of Sense Organs DOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Roma, Italy
2
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, El-Geish Street, Kafrelsheikh 33155, Egypt
3
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC), National Research Council (CNR), Department of Sense Organs DOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Roma, Italy
4
Department of Radiology, Oncology, and Anatomopathological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
5
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ospedale San Camillo de Lellis, ASL Rieti-Sapienza University, Viale Kennedy, 02100 Rieti, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 10 February 2023 / Revised: 21 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023

Abstract

:
Laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (LACC) is a sporadic neoplasm, especially if supraglottic. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened the presenting stage of many cancers and impacted their prognosis negatively. Here, a case of a patient with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) with delayed diagnosis and a rapid deterioration with distant metastasis due to the COVID-19 pandemic is illustrated. Next, we present a literature review of this rare glottic ACC. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened the stage of presentation of many cancers and adversely affected their prognosis. The present case had a rapidly lethal course, undoubtedly due to the diagnosis delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted the prognosis of this rare glottic ACC. Strict follow-up is recommended for any suspicious clinical findings, as an early diagnosis will improve the disease prognosis, and to consider the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially on the timing of common diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for oncological diseases. In the post-COVID-19 era, it is important to generate new diagnostic scenarios to achieve an increasingly rapid diagnosis of oncological diseases, especially the rare ones, through screening or similar procedures.

Figure 1. Endoscopic view of the larynx showing the lesion. The adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) arises from the minor salivary glands. It accounts for 1–5% of all head and neck malignancies. Since the minor salivary glands are present in small amounts throughout the larynx, the laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma is sporadic, representing less than 1% of all laryngeal malignancies [1]. Regarding the onset of laryngeal ACC (LACC), the prevalent age ranges from 50 to 60 years. However, younger generations can be affected, and both sexes are equally affected, with a slight male predominance and a male-to-female ratio of 1,5:1. There is no evidence connecting LACC etiology with smoking. An early perineural and hematological spread make this kind of carcinoma liable for local recurrence and distant metastasis, especially to the lung. Therefore, is important to increase the frequency of controls during follow-up [2]. Laryngeal ACC can originate from any part of the larynx. The most common origin is the subglottic area (64%), followed by the supraglottic area (25%), the glottic area (5%), and the trans-glottic area (6%) [3,4]. The clinical presentation is usually variable and related to the lesion location [5,6,7]. In November 2021, a 70-year-old no-smoker female patient presented to our hospital’s emergency department with stridor, severe dyspnea at rest, and hoarseness of voice. The O2 saturation level was 87% on air without cyanosis. An endoscopic laryngeal examination revealed bilateral vocal cord paralysis in adduction. Firstly, the patient underwent an urgent tracheostomy under general anesthesia. The procedure also included a laryngeal examination (micro-laryngeal surgery) under general anesthesia with tumor mapping, which revealed a bilateral mucosal thickening of the anterior thirds and anterior commissures of both vocal folds and a right vocal fold submucosal thickening (Figure 1). Multiple biopsies from different laryngeal areas were taken for histopathological examination. The pathological tissue revealed the presence of an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the solid type associated with the immunophenotype CK AE1 AE3 +, CD117+, CK7+/−, p63 +/−, p40+/−, Vimentin +/−, SMA+/−, S100+/−. Then, the patient underwent a CT scan of the neck chest and brain with a contrast medium and an abdominal ultrasound examination. The first chest, brain, and abdominal radiological evaluations did not show metastatic lesions. The neck CT scan revealed the presence of small submucosal bilateral glottic masses, associated with increased cervical lymph nodes volume, without subglottic and extra-laryngeal extensions (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Endoscopic view of the larynx showing the lesion. The adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) arises from the minor salivary glands. It accounts for 1–5% of all head and neck malignancies. Since the minor salivary glands are present in small amounts throughout the larynx, the laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma is sporadic, representing less than 1% of all laryngeal malignancies [1]. Regarding the onset of laryngeal ACC (LACC), the prevalent age ranges from 50 to 60 years. However, younger generations can be affected, and both sexes are equally affected, with a slight male predominance and a male-to-female ratio of 1,5:1. There is no evidence connecting LACC etiology with smoking. An early perineural and hematological spread make this kind of carcinoma liable for local recurrence and distant metastasis, especially to the lung. Therefore, is important to increase the frequency of controls during follow-up [2]. Laryngeal ACC can originate from any part of the larynx. The most common origin is the subglottic area (64%), followed by the supraglottic area (25%), the glottic area (5%), and the trans-glottic area (6%) [3,4]. The clinical presentation is usually variable and related to the lesion location [5,6,7]. In November 2021, a 70-year-old no-smoker female patient presented to our hospital’s emergency department with stridor, severe dyspnea at rest, and hoarseness of voice. The O2 saturation level was 87% on air without cyanosis. An endoscopic laryngeal examination revealed bilateral vocal cord paralysis in adduction. Firstly, the patient underwent an urgent tracheostomy under general anesthesia. The procedure also included a laryngeal examination (micro-laryngeal surgery) under general anesthesia with tumor mapping, which revealed a bilateral mucosal thickening of the anterior thirds and anterior commissures of both vocal folds and a right vocal fold submucosal thickening (Figure 1). Multiple biopsies from different laryngeal areas were taken for histopathological examination. The pathological tissue revealed the presence of an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the solid type associated with the immunophenotype CK AE1 AE3 +, CD117+, CK7+/−, p63 +/−, p40+/−, Vimentin +/−, SMA+/−, S100+/−. Then, the patient underwent a CT scan of the neck chest and brain with a contrast medium and an abdominal ultrasound examination. The first chest, brain, and abdominal radiological evaluations did not show metastatic lesions. The neck CT scan revealed the presence of small submucosal bilateral glottic masses, associated with increased cervical lymph nodes volume, without subglottic and extra-laryngeal extensions (Figure 2).
Diagnostics 13 00905 g001
Figure 2. CT scan showing (during hospitalization) pneumonia by Cytomegalovirus. At the lateral-basal segment of the right inferior lobe, in the subpleural level, the gross intraparenchymal collection with hydro-aerial content is compatible with the pneumatocele. In the lung window, multiple areas of parenchymal thickening are visible in the right basal location. (On the left, coronal section parenchymal window, on the right, axial section lung window). Partial laryngectomy (OPHL II B) with bilateral selective neck dissection (cervical nodal Robbins levels II–IV) and postoperative radiotherapy were planned to manage this case. Unfortunately, this planned surgical intervention was impossible because of the patient’s poor general conditions. Moreover, one of the follow-up CT scans of the chest (three months after the initial one) revealed the presence of bilateral diffuse multiple micronodules, which were considered early distant metastasis from the laryngeal adenoid cystic cancer (Figure 3).
Figure 2. CT scan showing (during hospitalization) pneumonia by Cytomegalovirus. At the lateral-basal segment of the right inferior lobe, in the subpleural level, the gross intraparenchymal collection with hydro-aerial content is compatible with the pneumatocele. In the lung window, multiple areas of parenchymal thickening are visible in the right basal location. (On the left, coronal section parenchymal window, on the right, axial section lung window). Partial laryngectomy (OPHL II B) with bilateral selective neck dissection (cervical nodal Robbins levels II–IV) and postoperative radiotherapy were planned to manage this case. Unfortunately, this planned surgical intervention was impossible because of the patient’s poor general conditions. Moreover, one of the follow-up CT scans of the chest (three months after the initial one) revealed the presence of bilateral diffuse multiple micronodules, which were considered early distant metastasis from the laryngeal adenoid cystic cancer (Figure 3).
Diagnostics 13 00905 g002
Figure 3. CT scan windows showing metastasis and inflammatory phenomena on both sides of the lung. (On the left, axial parenchymal lung section. On the right, axial lung window). During hospitalization, bacterial pneumonia began, worsened by secondary viral (Cytomegalovirus) and fungal pneumonia. The patient received a triple antibiotics course with an antiviral, an antifungal, and systemic and local inhalational corticosteroids. However, despite the medical therapy, the chest condition deteriorated progressively (Figure 4).
Figure 3. CT scan windows showing metastasis and inflammatory phenomena on both sides of the lung. (On the left, axial parenchymal lung section. On the right, axial lung window). During hospitalization, bacterial pneumonia began, worsened by secondary viral (Cytomegalovirus) and fungal pneumonia. The patient received a triple antibiotics course with an antiviral, an antifungal, and systemic and local inhalational corticosteroids. However, despite the medical therapy, the chest condition deteriorated progressively (Figure 4).
Diagnostics 13 00905 g003
Figure 4. CT scan on the left. The neck scan revealed the presence of small submucosal bilateral glottic masses, associated with increased cervical lymph node volume, without subglottic and extra laryngeal extensions. (A) Axial section basal CT scan on the left. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced CT on the right. Lung window showing a small scar at the level of the right lower lobe from previous pneumonia reported by the patient; (C) coronal and (D) axial lung window). Due to the worsening conditions, the patient was mechanically ventilated because of acute respiratory failure. Despite the therapy and mechanical ventilation, the pulmonary functions deteriorated progressively, resulting in the patient’s death. The patient was not diabetic, hypertensive, or cardiopathic and was not a smoker. By anamnestic clinical history, we discovered that two years before this event (October 2019), the subject presented mild hoarseness of voice. At the time, an endoscopic laryngeal examination revealed bilateral mobile vocal folds without apparent abnormalities. For further confirmation, the subject underwent a laryngeal exam under general anesthesia, which showed the absence of any macroscopic lesion, and the histopathological results of the biopsies were negative. The physicians scheduled a follow-up after three months, but unfortunately, the lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the fear of viral infection prevented her to attend the recommended follow-up visits. The patient was COVID-19-negative throughout the whole illness (Table 1). We performed a literature analysis by searching the PubMed database for ‘laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma’. We did not limit the search to article types because of the rarity of the disease and the little number of papers about it. We choose only papers published in English within the past five years. The articles in the database whose full text could not be found were also excluded. The title and abstracts of the identified manuscripts were initially screened and selected by all authors independently (IF, AC, PGM, HE, RA, MF, MR, DM, AG, MdV, CB, and AM) based on their relevance to the review topic. The following set of shared chosen inclusion criteria was applied individually to the selected articles in their full-text version: primary laryngeal affection of adenoid cystic carcinoma and therapy consensus of LACC. The literature search yielded 48 papers. Subsequently, 28 studies were excluded because they did not meet the objective of our review, and 20 studies were included and discussed (Figure 5 and Table 2).
Figure 4. CT scan on the left. The neck scan revealed the presence of small submucosal bilateral glottic masses, associated with increased cervical lymph node volume, without subglottic and extra laryngeal extensions. (A) Axial section basal CT scan on the left. (B) Axial contrast-enhanced CT on the right. Lung window showing a small scar at the level of the right lower lobe from previous pneumonia reported by the patient; (C) coronal and (D) axial lung window). Due to the worsening conditions, the patient was mechanically ventilated because of acute respiratory failure. Despite the therapy and mechanical ventilation, the pulmonary functions deteriorated progressively, resulting in the patient’s death. The patient was not diabetic, hypertensive, or cardiopathic and was not a smoker. By anamnestic clinical history, we discovered that two years before this event (October 2019), the subject presented mild hoarseness of voice. At the time, an endoscopic laryngeal examination revealed bilateral mobile vocal folds without apparent abnormalities. For further confirmation, the subject underwent a laryngeal exam under general anesthesia, which showed the absence of any macroscopic lesion, and the histopathological results of the biopsies were negative. The physicians scheduled a follow-up after three months, but unfortunately, the lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the fear of viral infection prevented her to attend the recommended follow-up visits. The patient was COVID-19-negative throughout the whole illness (Table 1). We performed a literature analysis by searching the PubMed database for ‘laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma’. We did not limit the search to article types because of the rarity of the disease and the little number of papers about it. We choose only papers published in English within the past five years. The articles in the database whose full text could not be found were also excluded. The title and abstracts of the identified manuscripts were initially screened and selected by all authors independently (IF, AC, PGM, HE, RA, MF, MR, DM, AG, MdV, CB, and AM) based on their relevance to the review topic. The following set of shared chosen inclusion criteria was applied individually to the selected articles in their full-text version: primary laryngeal affection of adenoid cystic carcinoma and therapy consensus of LACC. The literature search yielded 48 papers. Subsequently, 28 studies were excluded because they did not meet the objective of our review, and 20 studies were included and discussed (Figure 5 and Table 2).
Diagnostics 13 00905 g004
Table 1. Clinical synopsis of the laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Table 1. Clinical synopsis of the laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Clinical timeline
  • Hoarseness without laryngeal mucosal abnormalities in 2019.
  • Admission to the emergency room in 2021.
  • Tracheostomy.
Clinical staging
  • Laryngeal biopsies and diagnosis of ACC.
  • CT scan with contrast.
  • Partial laryngectomy with bilateral selective neck dissection planning.
  • Clinical worsening.
  • Death.
Figure 5. Articles selection on laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Primitive LACC is a rare head and neck carcinoma with slow growth but a high rate of malignancy due to its frequent perineural invasion. A high percentage of distant metastasis has been reported both at first diagnosis and during follow-up. The main distant metastasis site for LACC is the lung, but metastasis can develop in many sites. Iype et al. even described a case of an isolated scapular metastasis [8]. Although the first evaluation of neoplastic disease usually involves TNM staging according to AJCC, which is considered to have a significant prognostic value, Taha M. et al. observed that this is not true for LACC [9]. The histologic grade seems to be a more significant prognostic factor for survival in the presence of LACC, although this finding was established in a small sample of patients [10,11,12,13]. Radiation therapy is not considered a primary curative treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma, whatever its location, but it has been widely used as an adjuvant treatment. Benefits in terms of local control and survival with adjuvant radiotherapy have been reported in many papers [13].
Figure 5. Articles selection on laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Primitive LACC is a rare head and neck carcinoma with slow growth but a high rate of malignancy due to its frequent perineural invasion. A high percentage of distant metastasis has been reported both at first diagnosis and during follow-up. The main distant metastasis site for LACC is the lung, but metastasis can develop in many sites. Iype et al. even described a case of an isolated scapular metastasis [8]. Although the first evaluation of neoplastic disease usually involves TNM staging according to AJCC, which is considered to have a significant prognostic value, Taha M. et al. observed that this is not true for LACC [9]. The histologic grade seems to be a more significant prognostic factor for survival in the presence of LACC, although this finding was established in a small sample of patients [10,11,12,13]. Radiation therapy is not considered a primary curative treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma, whatever its location, but it has been widely used as an adjuvant treatment. Benefits in terms of local control and survival with adjuvant radiotherapy have been reported in many papers [13].
Diagnostics 13 00905 g005
Tan et al. [14] tried to create an overview of rare tumors of the larynx and of therapeutic protocols approved for laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. It seems that there are no international guidelines for their treatment, but only recommendations, as reported in Lionello’s work [15]. The recommended treatment for LACC is extensive surgical resection combined with postoperative radiotherapy. However, there is no agreement regarding the treatments for LACC. According to the AJCC criteria, surgery seems to be the best therapeutical choice, with a good disease-free survival rate in the following 5 years; however, the outcomes are not satisfactory [14,15,16]. Total laryngectomy was the most used surgical procedure [1,12,17,18]. However, nowadays the best surgical treatment is chosen based on the staging of the disease, thus considering surgical approaches aimed at preserving the morphology and function of the larynx [19]. The main goal is to free patients from cancer and at the same time guarantee them the best quality of life. Iandelli et al. reported only two cases of laryngeal non-SCC and argued that conservative surgery is possible without affecting the patients’ survival [20]. As the conservative approach is the best choice, Kozhanov et al. reported a case of endolaryngeal resection of ACC in a T1N0M0 R0 [21]. Partial laryngectomy could be a valid alternative to radical surgery according to disease staging [22]. For example, Wang et al. reported a partial laryngectomy for LACC, and the patient had no evidence of disease recurrence or metastasis during the follow-up period [23]. To improve the outcome, adjuvant therapy is to be considered in case of adverse features such as close or positive margins, T3-4, neural and perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases. Some authors proposed concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, such as Vardaxi et al. [24]. No studies compared these different therapeutic protocols. Even though LACC is relatively radioresistant, Akbaba et al. stressed the role of RT as an alternative to total laryngectomy [25]. The same group reported eight cases of LACC who underwent radiotherapy with carbon ions (C12) at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). The small number of enrolled patients does not allow us to come to conclusions [26]. Adjuvant radiotherapy is the best choice after surgical treatment and should be used in each case of perineural invasion, as also Marchiano et al. observed in 2016 [27]. Cui et al. reported, in 2019, that radiant therapy after surgery is more recommended, but there are many cases of recurrent LACC with or without distant metastasis in the lung some years after treatment [1]. The adenoid cystic carcinoma represents a rare tumor originating from the salivary glands that can affect the upper aero-digestive tract, including the larynx. It manifests with a slow growth pattern, often with macroscopic submucosal characteristics, such that it does not manifest symptomatically until advanced stages. Based on the laryngeal subsite involved, there are different clinical manifestations. In each case, the severity of the pathology is assessed according to both clinical and radiological analyses, but a definitive histological staging is usually necessary. Therefore, to determine its local extension, the histological pattern should always be identified, with particular attention to perineural invasion that characterizes high-risk cancers. After a careful evaluation of the literature about LACC, we can state that the first choice of treatment should be the most radical surgery as possible, considering conservative procedures such as partial laryngectomies among the options. The recommendation for adjuvant treatment is required on a case-by-case basis depending on the histology, extent, and stage of the pathology. A considerable number of distant metastases was found during follow-up. It should be emphasized that there is no direct correlation between the degree of pathology severity and the incidence of distant metastasis. Considering our clinical case, when the patient came to our clinic for the first time two years earlier, she had a recent onset of mild voice hoarseness. Although the endoscopy examination revealed no lesions, with bilateral mobile vocal folds without apparent mucosal abnormalities or neck involvement, we tried to confirm the exclusion of any malignant lesion by a complete laryngeal examination under general anesthesia. The negative clinical, radiological, and histopathological results denied the proposal of a suspicious malignancy. This negativity during the pathology’s starting period was most likely due to the inert submucosal nature of LACC lesions, which may take years to be noticeable. However, for additional confirmation, we asked the patient to follow a restricted follow-up protocol and to undergo an endoscopic office laryngeal examination every three months for the early detection of any developing lesion. Unfortunately, the patient did not follow this protocol and two years later developed a sudden onset of stridor which necessitated tracheostomy due to a T3 glottic LACC lesion. This follow-up delay was mainly due to the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. After diagnosing the glottic T3 N0 M0 ACC lesion, we decided on a therapeutic plan in the form of partial laryngectomy (OPHL II B) surgery with neck dissection, with adjuvant radiotherapy. We decided on a partial laryngectomy to preserve the voice function and reserved total laryngectomy for recurrence. ACC is conventionally thought to be radioresistant. However, some studies have shown prolonged patient survival and decreased recurrence following radiotherapy, suggesting that ACCs are radiosensitive [28]. Moreover, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy may help confirm negative free margins after surgery, as this tumor has a high liability for local growth because of perineural and hematological spread. This therapeutic plan was canceled because of a pulmonary infection and the bad general conditions of the patient. In addition, the presence of a cancer lesion decreased her immune function, resulting in refractory pneumonia. Moreover, this effect was worsened by the following uprising of lung metastasis from the laryngeal ACC lesion [28]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, all medical services were shortened, and most outpatient clinics and services were canceled. The medical services were mainly directed to manage COVID-19 cases and control the pandemic. In addition, the main priorities were the emergency cases and the oncological surgeries. All these circumstances were associated with a public fear of seeking medical services to avoid COVID-19 infection, which was associated with high mortality rates [29,30,31]. This worsened the presenting stage of many cancers and impacted their prognosis badly. According to the research of Stevens et al., head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma patients presented with more advanced clinical nodal disease during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, despite no change in the symptoms [32]. Moreover, Tevetoğlu et al. concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic caused delays in diagnosing and treating many diseases, such as head and neck cancers. Admissions with advanced-stage disease and the need for more complex reconstructive procedures increased [33]. The disease-specific survival rates of LACC are 69% and 49% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, after a primary treatment [15]. In contrast, the presenting case had a rapidly progressive disease course and died without receiving oncological management. Many factors were responsible for this bad prognosis, such as the delay in the diagnosis, the advanced stage at presentation, the bad general conditions, and the presence of distant metastasis to the lung. This case report shows that the COVID-19 pandemic worsened the stage of presentation of many cancers and adversely affected their prognosis [34]. The management of cancer patients was deeply modified, and oncology departments’ staff reorganized their protocols and priorities to counteract the COVID-19 impact. The presence of a COVID-19 infection in cancer patients increased the complexity of cancer treatment and the risk of complications [35]. In most patients, elective cancer treatments were postponed, with the aim of finding a balance between a potential COVID-19 infection and cancer treatment protocols in the cancer population [35]. The present case of LACC had a rapidly lethal course, undoubtedly due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected the prognosis of this rare glottic ACC. We recommend rigorous follow-up for any suspicious laryngeal clinical findings. However, it is not yet established that early intervention can improve the prognosis of laryngeal lesions. Overall, the purpose of our work is to recommend to strictly apply the already-known diagnostic–therapeutic algorithms and to alert patients about their clinical conditions. It would also be desirable to try to think of screening algorithms to speed up the time of early diagnosis and ensure a better post-treatment outcome, in the case of diseases that are rare but have a prognostically inauspicious course if misrecognized until an advanced stage. It is hoped that the pandemic, which has now been efficiently controlled by public health services, and post-COVID-19 studies and research may help define a new route of approaching patients, especially oncology patients, for the purpose to improve the outcomes of some malignancies, such as the laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Table 2. LACC diagnosis and treatment protocol.
Table 2. LACC diagnosis and treatment protocol.
FindingsReferences
DiagnosisStaging and histopathological assessmentIt is necessary to perform an accurate histopathological analysis because histological grading seems to have a greater prognostic impact than TNM staging.[11,12,13]
TreatmentSurgeryIt is recommended to perform extensive surgical resection of the cancer. Total laryngectomy is the most used technique, partial laryngectomy can be used in selected cases.[1,2,4,12,14,15,16,17,18,23]
Adjuvant therapyAdjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy improves local control and survival. There is no direct comparison between protocols. Adjuvant therapy is particularly recommended in case of adverse features.[1,13,16,24]
Patients not eligible for surgeryCurative radiotherapy with radiotherapy with carbon ions (C12) has been used in few patients, with encouraging results. Further studies are needed.[25,26]
Follow-upFrequent follow-upFrequent follow-up with whole-body evaluation is necessary, considering that cases of metastases have been reported in districts unusual for laryngeal carcinoma.[8]

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.V., A.G. and A.M.; methodology, I.F., A.C., P.G.M., R.A. and H.E.; validation, M.R. and D.M.; investigation, I.F., A.C., P.G.M., R.A., H.E., M.R. and D.M.; resources, I.F., A.C. and P.G.M.; data curation, I.F., A.C. and P.G.M.; writing-original draft preparation, I.F. and P.G.M.; writing—review and editing, C.B. and A.M.; visualization, I.F., M.F., M.d.V., A.G. and A.M.; project administration C.B. and A.M.; funding acquisition, A.M.; All co-authors provided a valuable interpretation of the data. They have ensured that all aspects of the work are accurate and have been appropriately investigated and interpreted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grant ‘Progetto Medio Ateneo’ Univ. Sapienza, Prot. N. RM11916B88DF74E7 to A.M.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and followed the Institutional Review Board standards from the Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank IBBC-CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cui, Y.; Bi, L.; Sun, L.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Z. Laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: Three case reports. Medicine 2019, 98, e18177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, W.; Chen, X. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the larynx: A report of six cases with review of the literature. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015, 135, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saraydaroglu, O.; Coskun, H.; Kasap, M. Unique presentation of adenoid cystic carcinoma in post cricoid region: A case report and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2011, 5, 413–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bertolin, A.; Lionello, M.; Baldovin, M.; Ghirardo, G.; Rizzotto, G. The glottic-subglottic laryngectomy: Surgical technique, oncological, and functional outcomes. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 125, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ikawa, H.; Koto, M.; Takagi, R.; Ebner, D.K.; Hasegawa, A.; Naganawa, K.; Takenouchi, T.; Nagao, T.; Nomura, T.; Shibahara, T.; et al. Prognostic factors of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck in carbon-ion radiotherapy: The Impact of histological subtypes. Radiother. Oncol. 2017, 123, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Van Weert, S.; Reinhard, R.; Bloemena, E.; Buter, J.; Witte, B.I.; Vergeer, M.R.; Leemans, C.R. Differences in patterns of survival in metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2017, 39, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Testa, D.; Guerra, G.; Conzo, G.; Nunziata, M.; D’Errico, G.; Siano, M.; Ilardi, G.; Vitale, M.; Riccitiello, F.; Motta, G. Glottic-Subglottic adenoid cystic carcinoma. A case report and review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2013, 13 (Suppl. 2), S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Iype, E.M.; Abdulla, F.A.; Thomas, S. An Unusual Metastasis from a Rare Histology at an Atypical Location-Isolated Metachronous Scapular Metastasis from Laryngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma-a Case Report. Indian J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 11, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taha, M.S.; Amir, M.; Hassan, O.; Sabra, R.; Taha, T.; Riad, M. Pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient mapping: Differentiation of benign from malignant laryngeal lesions. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2015, 129, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zanoni, D.K.; Patel, S.G.; Shah, J.P. Changes in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging of Head and Neck Cancer: Rationale and Implications. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 21, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mur, T.; Jaleel, Z.; Agarwal, P.; Edwards, H.A. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Larynx: A SEER Database Review. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022, 101, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ricciardiello, F.; Addeo, R.; Di Lullo, A.M.; Abate, T.; Mazzone, S.; Oliva, F.; Motta, G.; Caraglia, M.; Mesolella, M. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the larynx in a 70-year-old patient: A case report. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 2783–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hay, A.J.; Ma, J.M.; Zanoni, D.K.; Ma, M.M.; Patel, S.; Ganly, I. Minor salivary gland tumors of the head and neck-Memorial Sloan Kettering experience: Incidence and outcomes by site and histological type. Cancer 2019, 125, 3354–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tan, E.; Mody, M.D.; Saba, N.F. Systemic therapy in non-conventional cancers of the larynx. Oral Oncol. 2018, 82, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lionello, M.; Canal, F.; Presotto, F.; Palumbo, R.; Rizzotto, G.; Bertolin, A. Laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: Radical or conservative surgery? Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2021, 42, 102974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moretz-Sohn, P.F.; Dias, F.L.; de Carvalho Marques, C.M. Minor Salivary Gland Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Review of Epidemiologic Aspects, Prognostic Factors, and Outcomes. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2023, 25, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Eslami Aliabadi, H.; Dabiri, S.; Motamed, S. Laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: A rare case report. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2022, 15, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  18. Naim, A.; Hajjij, A.; Abbad, F.; Rami, A.; Essaadi, M. Rare location of head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2019, 34, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pacheco-Ojeda, L.; Ríos-Deidán, C., Sr.; Cañizares, S.; Pontón-Villalba, P.; Moya-Paredes, E. Cricotracheal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: Insights Into the Diagnosis and Management of an Uncommon Anatomic Variant. Cureus 2022, 14, e30686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iandelli, A.; Missale, F.; Laborai, A.; Filauro, M.; Marchi, F.; Del Bon, F.; Perotti, P.; Parrinello, G.; Piazza, C.; Peretti, G. Surgical management and oncological outcome of non-squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: A bicentric study. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2022, 279, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tang, D.; Tao, L.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, M.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Xie, M.; Cheng, L. Retrospective analysis of 659 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with open laryngeal function-preserving operations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018, 138, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tirelli, G.; Bertolin, A.; Guida, F.; Zucchini, S.; Tofanelli, M.; Rizzotto, G.; Boscolo-Rizzo, P.; Danesi, G.; Gardenal, N. Post-operative outcomes of different surgical approaches to oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: A case-matched study. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2021, 135, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Q.; Yu, X.S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H. Adenoid cystic carcinoma in ventricle of larynx: An interesting case. Medicine 2018, 97, e13622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vardaxi, C.; Skalias, A.; Karamitsou, P.; Forozidou, E.; Poutoglidis, A. Four Years of Disease-Free Survival After Conservative Treatment of Subglottic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Cureus 2022, 14, e28377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Akbaba, S.; Lang, K.; Bulut, O.C.; Held, T.; Rieken, S.; Plinkert, P.; Jensen, A.; Herfarth, K.; Debus, J.; Adeberg, S. The role of organ- and function-preserving radiotherapy in the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the larynx. Head Neck 2019, 41, 2208–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Akbaba, S.; Lang, K.; Held, T.; Bulut, O.C.; Mattke, M.; Uhl, M.; Jensen, A.; Plinkert, P.; Rieken, S.; Herfarth, K.; et al. Accelerated Hypofractionated Active Raster-Scanned Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT) for Laryngeal Malignancies: Feasibility and Safety. Cancers 2018, 10, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Marchiano, E.; Chin, O.Y.; Fang, C.H.; Park, R.C.; Baredes, S.; Eloy, J.A. Laryngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma: A systematic review. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 154, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, A.M.; Bucci, M.K.; Weinberg, V.; Garcia, J.; Quivey, J.M.; Schechter, N.R.; Phillips, T.L.; Fu, K.K.; Eisele, D.W. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck treated by surgery with or without postoperative radiation therapy: Prognostic features of recurrence. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2006, 66, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ralli, M.; Candelori, F.; Cambria, F.; Greco, A.; Angeletti, D.; Lambiase, A.; Campo, F.; Minni, A.; Polimeni, A.; De Vincentiis, M. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngology, ophthalmology and dental clinical activity and future perspectives. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 9705–9711. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Barbato, C.; Di Certo, M.G.; Gabanella, F.; Petrella, C.; Fiore, M.; Passananti, C.; Colizza, A.; Cavalcanti, L.; Ralli, M.; Greco, A.; et al. Staying tuned for post-COVID-19 syndrome: Looking for new research to sniff out. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 5318–5321. [Google Scholar]
  31. De Joode, K.; Dumoulin, D.W.; Engelen, V.; de Joode, K.; Dumoulin, D.W.; Engelen, V.; Bloemendal, H.J.; Verheij, M.; Van Laarhoven, H.W.M.; Dingemans, I.H.; et al. impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on cancer treatment: The patient’s perspective. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 136, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stevens, M.N.; Patro, A.; Rahman, B.; Gao, Y.; Liu, D.; Cmelak, A.; Wiggleton, J.; Kim, Y.J.; Langerman, A.; Mannion, K.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on presentation, staging, and treatment of head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2022, 43, 103263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tevetoğlu, F.; Kara, S.; Aliyeva, C.; Yıldırım, R.; Yener, H.M. Delayed presentation of head and neck cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2021, 278, 5081–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, W. The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 3809–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Teglia, F.; Angelini, M.; Casolari, G.; Astolfi, L.; Boffetta, P. Global Association of COVID-19 Pandemic Measures with Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2022, 14, 5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fatuzzo, I.; Colizza, A.; Meliante, P.G.; Elfarargy, H.; Altomari, R.; Fiore, M.; Ralli, M.; Messineo, D.; Greco, A.; de Vincentiis, M.; et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prognosis of Laryngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Literature Review. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 905. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13050905

AMA Style

Fatuzzo I, Colizza A, Meliante PG, Elfarargy H, Altomari R, Fiore M, Ralli M, Messineo D, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prognosis of Laryngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(5):905. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13050905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fatuzzo, Irene, Andrea Colizza, Piero Giuseppe Meliante, Haitham Elfarargy, Roger Altomari, Marco Fiore, Massimo Ralli, Daniela Messineo, Antonio Greco, Marco de Vincentiis, and et al. 2023. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Prognosis of Laryngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and a Literature Review" Diagnostics 13, no. 5: 905. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13050905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop